NOTE 6. Fair Value

Fair Value Measurement

The Company follows FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed as follows:

Level 1 Inputs

·	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Generally, this includes debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market (i.e. New York Stock Exchange), as well as certain U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government and sponsored entity agency mortgage-backed securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2 Inputs

·	Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.

·	Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

·	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the term of the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds or volatilities) or “market corroborated inputs.”

·	Generally, this includes U.S. Government and sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts.

Level 3 Inputs

·	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity) and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

·	These assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Securities Available for Sale

The fair value of available for sale ("AFS") securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices provided by recognized broker dealers (Level 1). If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon quoted market prices for similar or identical assets or other observable inputs (Level 2) or externally developed models that use unobservable inputs due to limited or no market activity of the instrument (Level 3).

As of September 30, 2013, the fair value of the Company's AFS securities portfolio was $80.9 million. Approximately 54 percent of the portfolio was made up of residential mortgage-backed securities, which had a fair value of $43.7 million at September 30, 2013. Approximately $42.4 million of the residential mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"). The underlying loans for these securities are residential mortgages that are geographically dispersed throughout the United States.

All of the Company’s AFS securities, excluding commercial mortgage-backed securities, were classified as Level 2 assets at September 30, 2013. The valuation of AFS securities using Level 2 inputs was primarily determined using the market approach, which uses quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and all other relevant information. It includes model pricing, defined as valuing securities based upon their relationship with other benchmark securities.

For Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities, the inputs used by either dealer market participants or an independent pricing service, may be derived from unobservable market information (Level 3 inputs). In these instances, management evaluates the appropriateness and quality of the assumptions and the resulting prices. In addition, management reviews the volume and level of activity for all AFS securities and attempts to identify transactions which may not be orderly or reflective of a significant level of activity and volume. For securities meeting these criteria, the quoted prices received from either market participants or an independent pricing service may be adjusted, as necessary, to estimate fair value and this results in fair values based on Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes unobservable inputs which reflect its own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing each security. In developing its assertion of market participant assumptions, the Company utilizes the best information that is both reasonable and available without undue cost and effort.

In calculating the fair value for AFS securities under Level 3, management prepared present value cash flow models for certain private label commercial mortgage-backed securities. Private label commercial mortgage-backed securities owned by the Bank are A1 and A2 tranche sequential structures and are currently paying principal. The cash flows for the commercial mortgage-backed securities incorporated the expected cash flow of each security adjusted for default rates, loss severities and prepayments of the individual loans collateralizing the security. The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 inputs used to measure the fair value of commercial mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2013:


September 30, 2013
Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range		Weighted Average
Discounted Cash Flow	Prepayment rate	8 through 15	%	10.0	%
	Default rate	10 through 15	%	12.5	%
	Loss severity	10 through 25	%	18.0	%

Significant increases or decreases in any of the unobservable inputs in the table above in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement of the securities. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the default rate is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

For the Level 3 available for sale private label commercial mortgage-backed securities, cash flow assumptions incorporate independent third party market participant data based on vintage year for each security. The discount rate utilized in determining the present value of cash flows for the commercial mortgage-backed securities was arrived at by combining the yield on orderly transactions for similar maturity government sponsored mortgage-backed securities with (i) the historical average risk premium of similar structured private label securities, (ii) a risk premium reflecting current market conditions, including liquidity risk and (iii) if applicable, a forecasted loss premium derived from the expected cash flows of each security. The estimated cash flows for each private label commercial mortgage-backed security are then discounted at the aforementioned effective rate to determine the fair value. The quoted prices received from either market participants or independent pricing services are weighted with the internal price estimate to determine the fair value of each instrument.

There were no changes in the inputs or methodologies used to determine fair value during the period ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the periods ended December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012.

The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	September 30, 2013
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	-	$	6,379	$	-	$	6,379
State and political subdivisions		-		16,614		-		16,614
Residential mortgage-backed securities		-		43,669		-		43,669
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		-		-		1,308		1,308
Corporate and other securities		-		12,956		-		12,956
Total securities available for sale	$	-	$	79,618	$	1,308	$	80,926


	December 31, 2012
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	-	$	2,568	$	-	$	2,568
State and political subdivisions		-		15,303		-		15,303
Residential mortgage-backed securities		-		45,545		-		45,545
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		-		-		4,463		4,463
Corporate and other securities		-		21,659		-		21,659
Total securities available for sale	$	-	$	85,075	$	4,463	$	89,538

The following table summarizes changes in Level 3 assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, consisting of commercial mortgage-backed available for sale securities, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:


	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,594	$	-	$	4,463	$	-
Payoffs		(75)		-		(815)		-
Principal paydowns		(219)		-		(2,301)		-
Total net losses included in:
Other comprehensive income		8		-		(39)		-
Balance, end of period	$	1,308	$	-	$	1,308	$	-

There were no gains or losses (realized or unrealized) on Level 3 securities included in earnings for assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2013 or 2012.

Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

Appraisal Policy

All appraisals must be performed in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"). Appraisals are certified to the Company and performed by appraisers on the Company’s approved list of appraisers. Evaluations are completed by a person independent of Company management. The content of the appraisal depends on the complexity of the property. Appraisals are completed on a “retail value” and an “as is value”.

The Company requires current real estate appraisals on all loans that become OREO or in-substance foreclosure, loans that are classified substandard, doubtful or loss, or loans that are over $100,000 and nonperforming. Prior to each balance sheet date, the Company values impaired collateral-dependent loans and OREO based upon a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, drive by appraisal, automated valuation model, updated market evaluation, or a combination of these methods. The amount is discounted for the decline in market real estate values (for original appraisals), for any known damage or repair costs, and for selling and closing costs. The amount of the discount ranges from 10 to 25 percent and is dependent upon the method used to determine the original value. The original appraisal is generally used when a loan is first determined to be impaired. When applying the discount, the Company takes into consideration when the appraisal was performed, the collateral’s location, the type of collateral, any known damage to the property and the type of business. Subsequent to entering impaired status and the Company determining that there is a collateral shortfall, the Company will generally, depending on the type of collateral, order a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, automated valuation model or updated market evaluation. Subsequent to receiving the third party results, the Company will discount the value 8 to 10 percent for selling and closing costs.

Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO")

The fair value of OREO is determined using appraisals, which may be discounted based on management’s review and changes in market conditions (Level 3 Inputs).

Impaired Collateral-Dependent Loans

The fair value of impaired collateral-dependent loans is derived in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.” Fair value is determined based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral. Partially charged-off loans are measured for impairment based upon an appraisal for collateral-dependant loans. When an updated appraisal is received for a nonperforming loan, the value on the appraisal is discounted in the manner discussed above. If there is a deficiency in the value after the Company applies these discounts, management applies a specific reserve and the loan remains in nonaccrual status. The receipt of an updated appraisal would not qualify as a reason to put a loan back into accruing status. The Company removes loans from nonaccrual status when the borrower makes nine months of contractual payments and demonstrates the ability to service the debt going forward. Charge-offs are determined based upon the loss that management believes the Company will incur after evaluating collateral for impairment based upon the valuation methods described above and the ability of the borrower to pay any deficiency.

The valuation allowance for impaired loans is included in the allowance for loan losses in the consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2013, the valuation allowance for impaired loans was $1.4 million, a decrease of $554 thousand from $2.0 million at December 31, 2012.

The following tables present the assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level within the hierarchy (as described above) as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 and the fair value gains (losses) recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:


	Fair value at September 30, 2013								Gains (losses) from fair value changes for the		Gains (losses) from fair value changes for the
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		three months ended September 30, 2013		nine months ended September 30, 2013
Financial assets:
OREO	$	-	$	-	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	(390)	$	(459)
Impaired collateral-dependent loans		-		-		8,782		8,782		286		554

	Fair value at September 30, 2012								Gains (losses) from fair value changes for the		Gains (losses) from fair value changes for the
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		three months ended September 30, 2012		nine months ended September 30, 2012
Financial assets:
OREO	$	-	$	-	$	281	$	281	$	(362)	$	(1,502)
Impaired collateral-dependent loans		-		-		12,162		12,162		1,320		2,067

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including those financial instruments for which the Company did not elect the fair value option. These estimated fair values as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of alternative market assumptions and estimation methodologies could have had a material effect on these estimates of fair value. The methodology for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed above. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For these short-term instruments, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities Held to Maturity

The fair value of held to maturity ("HTM") securities is based upon quoted market prices for similar or identical assets or other observable inputs (Level 2) or externally developed models that use unobservable inputs due to limited or no market activity of the instrument (Level 3).

SBA Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of SBA loans held for sale is estimated by using a market approach that includes significant other observable inputs.

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates that reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the loan, except for previously discussed impaired loans.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is carried at cost. Carrying value approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the issues.

SBA Servicing Assets

SBA servicing assets do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. The Company estimates the fair value of SBA servicing assets using discounted cash flow models incorporating numerous assumptions from the perspective of a market participant including market discount rates and prepayment speeds.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. carrying value). The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates.

Borrowed Funds and Subordinated Debentures

The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting the projected future cash flows using current market rates.

Standby Letters of Credit

At September 30, 2013, the Bank had standby letters of credit outstanding of $1.6 million, consistent with December 31, 2012. The fair value of these commitments is nominal.

The table below presents the carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not previously presented as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


			September 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
(In thousands)	Fair value level		Carrying amount		Estimated fair value		Carrying amount		Estimated fair value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		Level 1	$	74,726	$	74,726	$	94,192	$	94,192
Securities held to maturity (1)		Level 2		25,980		25,261		21,515		22,741
SBA loans held for sale		Level 2		5,893		6,376		6,937		7,582
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses (2)		Level 2		641,174		631,628		565,341		564,528
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		Level 2		3,952		3,952		3,989		3,989
SBA servicing assets		Level 3		383		383		396		396
Accrued interest receivable		Level 2		3,131		3,131		3,298		3,298
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		Level 2		727,112		727,374		648,760		650,668
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures		Level 2		90,465		98,490		90,465		100,257
Accrued interest payable		Level 2		430		430		434		434

(1)	Includes held to maturity commercial mortgage-backed securities that are considered Level 3. These securities had book values of $6.8 million and $2.7 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and market values of $6.5 million and $3.2 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(2)	Includes collateral-dependent impaired loans that are considered Level 3 and reported separately in the tables under the “Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis” heading. Collateral-dependent impaired loans, net of specific reserves totaled $8.8 million and $8.2 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.