XML 15 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Basis of Presentation
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Basis of Presentation [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting [Text Block]
BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, included in Heartland Financial USA, Inc.'s ("Heartland") Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2012. Accordingly, footnote disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted.

The financial information of Heartland included herein has been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of the interim period ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Heartland evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is determined using net income available to common stockholders and weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares and assumed incremental common shares issued. Amounts used in the determination of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, are shown in the table below:
 
Three Months Ended
(Dollars and number of shares in thousands, except per share data)
March 31, 2012
 
March 31, 2011
Net income attributable to Heartland
$
12,841

 
$
4,237

Preferred dividends and discount
(1,021
)
 
(1,336
)
Net income available to common stockholders
$
11,820

 
$
2,901

Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
16,490

 
16,408

Assumed incremental common shares issued upon exercise of stock options
240

 
149

Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share
16,730

 
16,557

Earnings per common share — basic
$
0.72

 
$
0.18

Earnings per common share — diluted
$
0.71

 
$
0.18

Number of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation
509

 
562


Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to 2009, options were typically granted annually with an expiration date ten years after the date of grant. Vesting was generally over a five-year service period with portions of a grant becoming exercisable at three years, four years and five years after the date of grant. A summary of the status of the stock options as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, follows:
 
2012
 
2011
 
Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
 
Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1
570,762

 
$
21.06

 
672,721

 
$
20.27

Granted

 

 

 

Exercised
(12,500
)
 
9.89

 
(30,250
)
 
10.03

Forfeited
(5,250
)
 
20.62

 

 

Outstanding at March 31
553,012

 
$
21.32

 
642,471

 
$
20.76

Options exercisable at March 31
505,295

 
$
21.58

 
499,370

 
$
20.44


At March 31, 2012, the vested options totaled 505,295 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $21.58 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.73 years. The intrinsic value for the vested options as of March 31, 2012, was $240 thousand. The intrinsic value for the total of all options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $93 thousand. The total fair value of shares under stock options and awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $759 thousand. At March 31, 2012, shares available for issuance under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan totaled 168,263.

No options were granted during the first three months of 2012 and 2011. Cash received from options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $124 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $23 thousand. Cash received from options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $303 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $66 thousand.

Under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, stock awards may be granted as determined by the Heartland Compensation Committee. On January 17, 2012, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) totaling 94,001 were granted to key policy-making employees. On January 18, 2011, RSUs totaling 101,150 were granted to key policy-making employees. The RSUs were granted at no cost to the employee. The RSUs granted in 2012 represent the right to receive shares of Heartland common stock at a specified date in the future based on specific vesting conditions; vest over five years in three equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date; will be settled in common stock upon vesting; will not be entitled to dividends until vested; will terminate upon termination of employment, but will continue to vest after retirement if retirement occurs after the second anniversary of the grant date and the employee has attained age 62 and provided five years of service to Heartland. The RSUs granted in 2011 contain the same terms as the RSUs granted in 2012 except that vesting after retirement is conditioned on ten years of service to Heartland.

In addition to the RSUs referenced in the preceding paragraph, performance-based RSUs totaling 49,801 were granted to key policy-making employees on January 17, 2012, and 21,200 on October 11, 2011. These RSUs were granted at no cost to the employee and represent the right to receive shares of Heartland common stock at a specified date in the future based first on performance measures tied to Heartland's earnings and assets on December 31 of the grant year, and then on time-based vesting conditions. For the grants in 2011, vesting occurs on December 31, 2013, and for the grants in 2012, vesting occurs on December 31, 2014. The performance-based RSUs will be settled in common stock upon vesting; will not be entitled to dividends until vested; will terminate upon termination of employment, but will continue to vest after retirement if the employee has attained age 62 and has provided ten years of service to Heartland for those granted in 2011 and five years of service for those granted in 2012.

Total compensation costs recorded for stock options, RSUs and restricted stock awards were $759 thousand and $312 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, there were $4.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan for stock options, RSUs and restricted stock awards which are expected to be recognized through 2016.

Effect of New Financial Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, "Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements," which removes the collateral maintenance provision that is currently required when determining whether a transfer of a financial instrument is accounted for as a sale or a secured borrowing. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 860. Heartland adopted this standard on January 1, 2012, and the adoption did not have an impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS," which is a joint effort between the FASB and IASB to converge fair value measurement and disclosure guidance. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820. This standard permits measuring financial assets and liabilities on a net credit risk basis, if certain criteria are met. This standard also increases disclosure surrounding company-determined market prices (Level 3) financial instruments and requires the fair value hierarchy disclosure of financial assets and liabilities that are not recognized at fair value in the statement of financial position for which fair values are disclosed. Heartland adopted this standard on January 1, 2012, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. See Note 8 for the fair value of financial instruments disclosure.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income," which requires companies to report total net income, each component of comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income on the face of the income statement, or as two consecutive statements. This statement was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 220. The components of comprehensive income were not changed, nor did the standard affect how earnings per share is calculated or reported. The adoption of this standard was required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q, and did not have an impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill For Impairment," which allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine if it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. ASU 2011-08 also expands upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Heartland adopted this standard on January 1, 2012, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.