10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For transition period __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 0-24724

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

42-1405748

(I.R.S. employer identification number)

1398 Central Avenue, Dubuque, Iowa  52001

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(563) 589-2000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes x No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.

	Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated Filer	x
	Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes oNo x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the classes of Registrant's common stock as of the latest practicable date:  As of November 7, 2011, the Registrant had outstanding 16,460,088 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC.

Form 10-Q Quarterly Report

Part I
Item 1.	Financial Statements
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
Part II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.	Risk Factors
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Issuer Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4.	[Reserved]
Item 5.	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits
	31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101 Financial statements formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
	Form 10-Q Signature Page

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	September 30, 2011
	(Unaudited)			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	79,879		$	58,960
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments	1,726			3,612
Cash and cash equivalents	81,605			62,572
Securities:
Trading, at fair value	458			244
Available for sale, at fair value (cost of $1,232,287 at September 30, 2011, and $1,188,807 at December 31, 2010)	1,264,569			1,204,699
Held to maturity, at cost (fair value of $57,545 at September 30, 2011, and $58,610 at December 31, 2010)	58,437			59,621
Loans held for sale	36,529			23,904
Loans and leases receivable:
Held to maturity	2,374,186			2,343,987
Loans covered by loss share agreements	14,766			20,800
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(44,195		)	(42,693		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	2,344,757			2,322,094
Premises, furniture and equipment, net	110,127			121,012
Other real estate, net	39,188			32,002
Goodwill, net	25,909			25,909
Other intangible assets, net	12,601			13,466
Cash surrender value on life insurance	66,654			62,508
FDIC indemnification asset	992			2,294
Other assets	70,853			69,130
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,112,679		$	3,999,455
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Demand	$	692,893		$	580,589
Savings	1,654,417			1,558,998
Time	826,304			894,461
Total deposits	3,173,614			3,034,048
Short-term borrowings	173,199			235,864
Other borrowings	375,976			362,527
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	36,667			35,232
TOTAL LIABILITIES	3,759,456			3,667,671
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock (par value $1 per share; authorized 20,604 at September 30, 2011, and 102,302 shares at December 31, 2010; none issued or outstanding)	—			—
Series A Junior Participating preferred stock (par value $1 per share; authorized 16,000 shares; none issued or outstanding)	—			—
Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual preferred stock (par value $1 per share; liquidation value none at September 30, 2011, and $81.7 million at December 31, 2010; authorized 81,698 shares; issued and outstanding none at September 30, 2011, and 81,698 shares at December 31, 2010)	—			78,483
Series C Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual preferred stock (par value $1 per share; liquidation value $81.7 million at September 30, 2011, and none at December 31, 2010; authorized, issued and outstanding 81,698 shares at September 30, 2011, and none at December 31, 2010)	81,698			—
Common stock (par value $1 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 16,611,671 shares)	16,612			16,612
Capital surplus	43,151			44,628
Retained earnings	194,780			184,525
Accumulated other comprehensive income	16,561			8,517
Treasury stock at cost (152,333 shares at September 30, 2011, and 186,616 shares at December 31, 2010)	(2,285		)	(3,674		)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	350,517			329,091
Noncontrolling interest	2,706			2,693
TOTAL EQUITY	353,223			331,784
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	4,112,679		$	3,999,455
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2011			Sept. 30, 2010			Sept. 30, 2011			Sept. 30, 2010
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$	37,393		$	38,756		$	111,839		$	114,354
Interest on securities:
Taxable	6,826			8,225			21,820			26,618
Nontaxable	3,370			3,282			10,452			9,178
Interest on federal funds sold	2			—			3			1
Interest on interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions	—			1			1			13
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME	47,591			50,264			144,115			150,164
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on deposits	7,028			9,033			22,729			29,748
Interest on short-term borrowings	205			305			689			830
Interest on other borrowings	4,123			4,213			12,140			12,380
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE	11,356			13,551			35,558			42,958
NET INTEREST INCOME	36,235			36,713			108,557			107,206
Provision for loan and lease losses	7,727			4,799			21,581			23,648
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES	28,508			31,914			86,976			83,558
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges and fees	3,657			3,665			10,617			10,363
Loan servicing income	1,081			1,862			3,928			4,909
Trust fees	2,384			2,267			7,519			6,778
Brokerage and insurance commissions	918			739			2,622			2,236
Securities gains, net	2,085			2,158			8,930			4,664
Gain (loss) on trading account securities	(83		)	18			214			(198		)
Gains on sale of loans	3,183			2,394			5,893			4,275
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights	—			(1,239		)	—			(1,239		)
Income on bank owned life insurance	208			396			942			1,003
Other noninterest income	(171		)	349			(126		)	1,245
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME	13,262			12,609			40,539			34,036
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits	17,736			15,502			53,402			46,499
Occupancy	2,396			2,287			6,995			6,782
Furniture and equipment	1,392			1,515			4,161			4,561
Professional fees	3,110			2,621			9,182			7,381
FDIC insurance assessments	798			1,331			2,929			4,135
Advertising	1,191			906			3,154			2,772
Intangible assets amortization	141			149			431			445
Goodwill impairment charge	—			1,639			—			1,639
Net loss on repossessed assets	1,409			4,219			5,552			7,919
Other noninterest expenses	3,690			3,277			11,287			9,789
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES	31,863			33,446			97,093			91,922
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	9,907			11,077			30,422			25,672
Income taxes	2,549			4,187			8,631			8,382
NET INCOME	7,358			6,890			21,791			17,290
Net income available to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(20		)	30			5			80
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HEARTLAND	7,338			6,920			21,796			17,370
Preferred dividends and discount	(3,947		)	(1,336		)	(6,619		)	(4,008		)
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	3,391		$	5,584		$	15,177		$	13,362
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$	0.21		$	0.34		$	0.92		$	0.82
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED	$	0.20		$	0.34		$	0.92		$	0.81
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.10		$	0.10		$	0.30		$	0.30
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	21,791		$	17,290
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,712			6,302
Provision for loan and lease losses	21,581			23,648
Net amortization of premium on securities	10,555			4,767
Securities gains, net	(8,930		)	(4,664		)
(Increase) decrease in trading account securities	(214		)	553
Stock based compensation	929			783
Loans originated for sale	(232,173		)	(357,416		)
Proceeds on sales of loans	250,691			385,428
Net gains on sales of loans	(5,893		)	(4,275		)
Increase in accrued interest receivable	(488		)	(1,523		)
Decrease in prepaid expenses	2,368			845
Decrease in accrued interest payable	(1,392		)	(1,306		)
Goodwill impairment charge	—			1,639
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights	—			1,239
Other, net	5,386			(489		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	69,923			72,821
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale	412,609			304,482
Proceeds from the maturity of and principal paydowns on securities available for sale	224,404			214,932
Proceeds from the maturity of and principal paydowns on securities held to maturity	1,256			1,676
Purchase of securities available for sale	(682,190		)	(512,457		)
Purchase of securities held to maturity	—			(22,331		)
Net increase in loans and leases	(96,939		)	(110,561		)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance policies	(3,140		)	(5,676		)
Capital expenditures	(4,634		)	(8,553		)
Proceeds on sale of OREO and other repossessed assets	16,737			12,779
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(131,897		)	(125,709		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts	207,723			139,845
Net decrease in time deposit accounts	(68,157		)	(116,591		)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings	(62,665		)	34,184
Proceeds from other borrowings	18,549			518
Repayments of other borrowings	(5,100		)	(38,499		)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	81,698			—
Redemption of preferred stock	(81,698		)	—
Redemption of warrant	(1,800		)	—
Purchase of treasury stock	(305		)	(201		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	1,003			848
Excess tax benefits on exercised stock options	85			28
Dividends paid	(8,326		)	(7,952		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	81,007			12,180
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	19,033			(40,708		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	62,572			182,410
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	81,605		$	141,702
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for income/franchise taxes	$	3,298		$	10,296
Cash paid for interest	$	36,950		$	44,264
Loans transferred to OREO	$	27,445		$	20,201
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC. CONSOLATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Heartland Financial USA, Inc. Stockholders' Equity
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock		Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Non-controlling Interest			Total Equity
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	77,224		$	16,612	$	44,284		$	172,487		$	7,107		$	(5,433	)	$	2,776		$	315,057
Net income									17,370									(80		)	17,290
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale arising during the period												27,702									27,702
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives arising during the period												(7,169		)							(7,169		)
Reclassification adjustment for net security (gains)/losses realized in net income												(4,664		)							(4,664		)
Reclassification adjustment for net derivatives (gains)/losses realized in net income												729									729
Income taxes												(6,157		)							(6,157		)
Comprehensive income																					27,731
Sale of noncontrolling interest																		32			32
Cumulative preferred dividends accrued and discount accretion	944								(944		)										—
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred, $37.50 per share									(3,064		)										(3,064		)
Common, $0.30 per share									(4,888		)										(4,888		)
Purchase of 13,789 shares of common stock															(201		)				(201		)
Issuance of 59,518 shares of common stock						(317		)							1,193						876
Commitments to issue common stock						783															783
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	78,168		$	16,612	$	44,750		$	180,961		$	17,548		$	(4,441	)	$	2,728		$	336,326
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	78,483		$	16,612	$	44,628		$	184,525		$	8,517		$	(3,674	)	$	2,693		$	331,784
Net income									21,796									(5		)	21,791
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale arising during the period												25,320									25,320
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives arising during the period												(3,487		)							(3,487		)
Reclassification adjustment for net security (gains)/losses realized in net income												(8,930		)							(8,930		)
Reclassification adjustment for net derivatives (gains)/losses realized in net income												5									5
Income taxes												(4,864		)							(4,864		)
Comprehensive income																					29,835
Sale of noncontrolling interest																		18			18
Cumulative preferred dividends accrued and discount accretion	3,215								(3,215		)										—
Repurchase of Series B preferred stock and warrant	(81,698		)			(1,800		)													(83,498		)
Issuance of Series C preferred stock	81,698																				81,698
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred, $37.50 per share									(3,404		)										(3,404		)
Common, $0.30 per share									(4,922		)										(4,922		)
Purchase of 49,298 shares of common stock															(305		)				(305		)
Issuance of 74,581 shares of common stock						(606		)							1,694						1,088
Commitments to issue common stock						929															929
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	81,698		$	16,612	$	43,151		$	194,780		$	16,561		$	(2,285	)	$	2,706		$	353,223
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, included in Heartland Financial USA, Inc.'s ("Heartland") Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011. Accordingly, footnote disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted.

The financial information of Heartland included herein has been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of the interim period endedSeptember 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Heartland evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is determined using net income available to common stockholders and weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares and assumed incremental common shares issued. Amounts used in the determination of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, are shown in the table below:

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars and number of shares in thousands, except per share data)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Net income attributable to Heartland	$	7,338		$	6,920
Preferred dividends and discount	(3,947		)	(1,336		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	3,391		$	5,584
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share	16,444			16,377
Assumed incremental common shares issued upon exercise of stock options	141			89
Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share	16,585			16,466
Earnings per common share — basic	$	0.21		$	0.34
Earnings per common share — diluted	$	0.20		$	0.34
Number of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation	522			567

	Nine Months Ended
(Dollars and number of shares in thousands, except per share data)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Net income attributable to Heartland	$	21,796		$	17,370
Preferred dividends and discount	(6,619		)	(4,008		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	15,177		$	13,362
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share	16,428			16,364
Assumed incremental common shares issued upon exercise of stock options	141			90
Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share	16,569			16,454
Earnings per common share — basic	$	0.92		$	0.82
Earnings per common share — diluted	$	0.92		$	0.81
Number of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation	522			567

Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to 2009, options were typically granted annually with an expiration date ten years after the date of grant. Vesting was generally over a five-year service period with portions of a grant becoming exercisable at three years, four years and five years after the date of grant. A summary of the status of the stock options as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, follows:

	2011				2010
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1	672,721		$	20.27	704,471		$	20.02
Granted	—		—		—		—
Exercised	(44,375	)	9.82		(20,500	)	10.68
Forfeited	(39,834	)	22.92		(6,750	)	22.19
Outstanding at September 30	588,512		$	20.88	677,221		$	20.28
Options exercisable at September 30	452,495		$	20.63	399,987		$	18.81

At September 30, 2011, the vested options totaled 452,495 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $20.63 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.73 years. The intrinsic value for the vested options as of September 30, 2011, was $207 thousand. The intrinsic value for the total of all options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $193 thousand. The total fair value of shares under stock options and awards that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $929 thousand. At September 30, 2011, shares available for issuance under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan totaled 316,344.

No options were granted during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010. Cash received from options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $436 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $85 thousand. Cash received from options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $219 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $28 thousand.

Under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, stock awards may be granted as determined by the Heartland Compensation Committee. On January 18, 2011, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) totaling 101,150 were granted to key policy-making employees. On January 19, 2010, RSUs totaling 98,200 were granted to key policy-making employees. These RSUs were granted at no cost to the employee. These RSUs represent the right to receive shares of Heartland common stock at a specified date in the future based on specific vesting conditions; vest over five years in three equal installments on the 3rd, 4th and 5th anniversaries of the grant date; will be settled in common stock upon vesting; will not be entitled to dividends until vested; will terminate upon termination of employment, but will continue to vest after retirement if retirement occurs after the employee attains age 62 and has provided ten years of service to Heartland; and will continue to vest after retirement if retirement occurs after the second anniversary of the grant date.

Total compensation costs recorded for stock options, RSUs and shares to be issued under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan were $929 thousand and $783 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, there were $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan for stock options, RSUs and restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized through 2015.

Effect of New Financial Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires (i) fair value disclosures by each class of assets and liabilities (generally a subset within a line item as presented in the statement of financial position) rather than major category, (ii) for items measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the amounts of significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2, and transfers into and out of Level 3, and the reasons for those transfers, including separate discussion related to the transfers into each level apart from transfers out of each level, and (iii) gross presentation of the amounts of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 recurring measurement reconciliation. Additionally, the standard clarifies that a description of the valuation techniques(s) and inputs used to measure fair values is required for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Also, if a valuation technique has changed, entities should disclose that change and the reason for the changes. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, "Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements."  Disclosures other than the gross presentation changes in the Level 3 reconciliation were effective for the first reported period beginning after December 31, 2009. Heartland adopted this accounting standard at the beginning of 2010, except for the detailed Level 3 disclosures, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the presentment of detailed Level 3 disclosures during the first quarter of 2011 with no material impact on

the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, "Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses," which requires significant new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding credit losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this statement, the activity in the allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in financing receivables are to be disclosed by portfolio segment, while credit quality information, impaired financing receivables and nonaccrual status are to be presented by class of financing receivable. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial impact and segment information of troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") is also required. The disclosures are to be presented at the level of disaggregation that management uses when assessing and monitoring the portfolio's risk and performance. Heartland adopted this accounting standard as of December 31, 2010, except for the activity-related disclosures, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the activity-related disclosures during the first quarter of 2011 with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the disclosure requirements related to the TDRs effective July 1, 2011, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. See Note 4 for additional disclosures regarding this accounting standard.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, "A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring," which modifies guidance for identifying restructurings of receivables that constitute a TDR. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 310. This standard requires retrospective application to all restructurings occurring during 2011, along with disclosure of certain additional information. Heartland adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2011, with no significant impact to the restructurings that are considered TDRs and the related provision for loan losses required for these loans.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, "Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements," which removes the collateral maintenance provision that is currently required when determining whether a transfer of a financial instrument is accounted for as a sale or a secured borrowing. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 860. The adoption of this accounting standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS," which is a joint effort between the FASB and IASB to converge fair value measurement and disclosure guidance. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820. This standard permits measuring financial assets and liabilities on a net credit risk basis, if certain criteria are met. This standard also increases disclosure surrounding company-determined market prices (Level 3) financial instruments and requires the fair value hierarchy disclosure of financial assets and liabilities that are not recognized at fair value in the statement of financial position for which fair values are disclosed. The adoption of this accounting standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q, and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income," which requires companies to report total net income, each component of comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income on the face of the income statement, or as two consecutive statements. This statement was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 220. The components of comprehensive income will not be changed, nor does the standard affect how earnings per share is calculated or reported. These amendments will be reported retrospectively upon adoption. The adoption of this standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q, and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles-Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment," which allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine if it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. ASU 2011-08 also expands upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Heartland anticipates that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

NOTE 2: ACQUISITIONS

On July 9, 2009, through its subsidiary Galena State Bank & Trust Co., Heartland acquired substantially all of the assets of The Elizabeth State Bank in an FDIC assisted transition for which the FDIC provided loss share coverage. The carrying amount of loans covered under these loss share agreements with the FDIC consisted of impaired and nonimpaired purchased loans and are summarized in the following table, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Impaired Purchased Loans		Nonimpaired Purchased Loans		Total Covered Loans		Impaired Purchased Loans		Nonimpaired Purchased Loans		Total Covered Loans
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	2,568	$	4,220	$	6,788	$	4,256	$	5,800	$	10,056
Residential real estate	—		4,410		4,410		—		5,792		5,792
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	379		1,760		2,139		379		2,344		2,723
Consumer loans	523		906		1,429		690		1,539		2,229
Total Covered Loans	$	3,470	$	11,296	$	14,766	$	5,325	$	15,475	$	20,800

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for all loans with evidence of credit deterioration since origination acquired in the acquisition was $13.8 million and the estimated fair value of the loans was $9.0 million. At September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, a majority of these loans were valued based upon the liquidation value of the underlying collateral, because the expected cash flows are primarily based on the liquidation of underlying collateral and the timing and amount of the cash flows could not be reasonably estimated. There was no allowance for loan and lease losses related to these ASC 310-30 loans at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for all nonimpaired loans acquired in the acquisition was $28.9 million and the estimated fair value of the loans was $28.7 million.

NOTE 3: SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values of securities available for sale as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are summarized in the table below, in thousands:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
September 30, 2011
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	164,039	$	5,596	$	(233	)	$	169,402
Mortgage-backed securities	756,652		17,298		(4,754		)	769,196
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	261,968		15,597		(866		)	276,699
Corporate debt securities	26,261		—		(801		)	25,460
Total debt securities	1,208,920		38,491		(6,654		)	1,240,757
Equity securities	23,367		445		—			23,812
Total	$	1,232,287	$	38,936	$	(6,654	)	$	1,264,569
December 31, 2010
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	316,758	$	4,392	$	(1,143	)	$	320,007
Mortgage-backed securities	586,796		17,455		(4,211		)	600,040
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	244,368		4,235		(4,140		)	244,463
Corporate debt securities	16,142		—		(1,168		)	14,974
Total debt securities	1,164,064		26,082		(10,662		)	1,179,484
Equity securities	24,743		472		—			25,215
Total	$	1,188,807	$	26,554	$	(10,662	)	$	1,204,699

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values of held to maturity securities as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are summarized in the table below, in thousands:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
September 30, 2011
Securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	9,307	$	119	$	(1,179	)	$	8,247
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	49,130		181		(13		)	49,298
Total	$	58,437	$	300	$	(1,192	)	$	57,545
December 31, 2010
Securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	9,825	$	145	$	(993	)	$	8,977
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	49,796		—		(163		)	49,633
Total	$	59,621	$	145	$	(1,156	)	$	58,610

Nearly 82% of Heartland's mortgage-backed securities are issuances of government-sponsored enterprises.

The following table summarizes, in thousands, the amount of unrealized losses, defined as the amount by which cost or amortized cost exceeds fair value, and the related fair value of investments with unrealized losses in Heartland's securities portfolio as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The investments were segregated into two categories: those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months. The reference point for determining how long an investment was in an unrealized loss position was September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.

	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2011
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	50,231	$	(233	)	$	—	$	—		$	50,231	$	(233	)
Mortgage-backed securities	168,537		(2,617		)	49,460		(2,137		)	217,997		(4,754		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	5,171		(162		)	4,094		(704		)	9,265		(866		)
Corporate debt securities	14,562		(445		)	10,897		(356		)	25,459		(801		)
Total debt securities	238,501		(3,457		)	64,451		(3,197		)	302,952		(6,654		)
Equity securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	238,501	$	(3,457	)	$	64,451	$	(3,197	)	$	302,952	$	(6,654	)
December 31, 2010
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	107,583	$	(1,143	)	$	—	$	—		$	107,583	$	(1,143	)
Mortgage-backed securities	104,724		(2,765		)	11,984		(1,446		)	116,708		(4,211		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	109,387		(3,995		)	763		(145		)	110,150		(4,140		)
Corporate debt securities	14,974		(1,168		)	—		—			14,974		(1,168		)
Total debt securities	336,668		(9,071		)	12,747		(1,591		)	349,415		(10,662		)
Equity securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	336,668	$	(9,071	)	$	12,747	$	(1,591	)	$	349,415	$	(10,662	)

Unrealized losses on Heartland's mortgage-backed securities are the result of changes in market interest rates or widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities and not related to concerns regarding the underlying credit of the issuers or the underlying collateral. It is expected that the securities will not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or widening market spreads and not credit quality, and because Heartland has the intent and ability to hold these investments until a market price recovery or to maturity and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Unrealized losses on Heartland's obligations of states and political subdivisions are the result of changes in market interest rates or widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities. Management monitors the published credit ratings of these securities and has noted credit rating reductions in a number of these securities, primarily due to the downgrade in the credit ratings of the insurance companies providing credit enhancement to that of the issuing municipalities. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or widening market spreads due to insurance company downgrades and not underlying credit quality, and because Heartland has the intent and ability to hold these investments until a market price recovery or to maturity and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

NOTE 4: LOANS AND LEASES

Loans and leases as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Loans and leases receivable held to maturity:
Commercial	$	561,063		$	558,031
Commercial real estate	1,164,523			1,160,962
Residential real estate	179,628			163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	256,857			250,943
Consumer	217,007			214,515
Gross loans receivable held to maturity	2,379,078			2,348,177
Net direct financing leases held to maturity	604			981
Gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,379,682			2,349,158
Unearned discount	(2,466		)	(2,581		)
Deferred loan fees	(3,030		)	(2,590		)
Total net loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,374,186			2,343,987
Loans covered under loss share agreements:
Commercial and commercial real estate	6,788			10,056
Residential real estate	4,410			5,792
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	2,139			2,723
Consumer	1,429			2,229
Total loans covered under loss share agreements	14,766			20,800
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(44,195		)	(42,693		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	$	2,344,757		$	2,322,094

Heartland has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to provide for an acceptable level of credit risk. The board of directors reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management and the board with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing loans and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is also a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

The commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolio includes a wide range of business loans, including lines of credit for working capital and operational purposes and term loans for the acquisition of equipment and real estate. Although most loans are made on a secured basis, loans may be made on an unsecured basis where warranted by the overall financial condition of the borrower. Terms of commercial business loans generally range from one to five years. Commercial loans and leases are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The collateral for most of these loans and leases is based upon a discount from its market value. The primary

repayment risks of commercial loans and leases are that the cash flow of the borrowers may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Heartland seeks to minimize these risks in a variety of ways. The underwriting analysis includes credit verification, analysis of global cash flows, appraisals and a review of the financial condition of the borrower. Personal guarantees are frequently required as a tertiary form of repayment. In addition, when underwriting loans for commercial real estate, careful consideration is given to the property's operating history, future operating projections, current and projected occupancy, location and physical condition. Heartland also utilizes government guaranteed lending through the U.S. Small Business Administration and the USDA Rural Development Business and Industry Program to assist customers with longer-term funding and to reduce risk.

Agricultural loans, many of which are secured by crops, machinery and real estate, are provided to finance capital improvements and farm operations as well as acquisitions of livestock and machinery. Agricultural loans present unique credit risks relating to adverse weather conditions, loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products and the impact of government regulations. The ultimate repayment of agricultural loans is dependent upon the profitable operation or management of the agricultural entity. In underwriting agricultural loans, lending personnel work closely with their customers to review budgets and cash flow projections for the ensuing crop year. These budgets and cash flow projections are monitored closely during the year and reviewed with the customers at least annually. Lending personnel also work closely with governmental agencies to help agricultural customers obtain credit enhancement products such as loan guarantees or interest assistance.

Heartland originates first-lien, adjustable-rate and fixed-rate, one-to-four-family residential real estate loans for the construction, purchase or refinancing of a single family residential property. These loans are principally collateralized by owner-occupied properties and are amortized over 10 to 30 years. Heartland typically sells longer-term low rate, residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with servicing rights retained. This practice allows Heartland to better manage interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Heartland bank subsidiaries participate in lending programs sponsored by U.S. government agencies such as Veterans Administration and Federal Home Administration when justified by market conditions.

Consumer lending includes motor vehicle, home improvement, home equity and small personal credit lines. Consumer loans typically have shorter terms, lower balances, higher yields and higher risks of default than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and are therefore more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Risk is reduced through underwriting criteria, which include credit verification, appraisals, a review of the borrower's financial condition, and personal cash flows. A security interest, with title insurance when necessary, is taken in the underlying real estate.

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Heartland’s policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest income on any loan or lease when, in the opinion of management, there is a reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of the interest and principal, normally when a loan or lease is 90 days past due. When interest accruals are deemed uncollectible, interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and interest accrued in prior years is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Nonaccrual loans and leases are returned to an accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates that there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely payment of interest and principal.

Under Heartland’s credit policies, all nonaccrual and troubled debt restructured loans meeting the criteria of a troubled debt restructuring are defined as impaired loans. Loan impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except where more practical, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The following table shows the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, and the related loan balances, disaggregated on the basis of impairment methodology, in thousands. Loans evaluated under ASC 310-10-35 include loans on nonaccrual status, which are individually evaluated for impairment, and other impaired loans deemed to have similar risk characteristics. All other loans are collectively evaluated for impairment under ASC 450-20. Heartland has made no changes to the accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses policy during 2011.

	Allowance For Loan and Lease Losses						Gross Loans and Leases Receivable Held to Maturity
	Ending Balance Under ASC 310-10-35		Ending Balance Under ASC 450-20		Total		Ending Balance Evaluated for Impairment Under ASC 310-10-35		Ending Balance Evaluated for Impairment Under ASC 450-20		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	1,724	$	8,105	$	9,829	$	8,670	$	552,393	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	10,244		12,575		22,819		87,812		1,076,711		1,164,523
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	5		1,688		1,693		19,440		237,417		256,857
Residential real estate	493		2,261		2,754		6,041		173,587		179,628
Consumer	1,612		5,482		7,094		4,381		212,626		217,007
Lease financing	—		6		6		—		604		604
Unallocated	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	14,078	$	30,117	$	44,195	$	126,344	$	2,253,338	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	2,837	$	7,688	$	10,525	$	16,598	$	541,433	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	7,127		13,189		20,316		105,341		1,055,621		1,160,962
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	512		1,635		2,147		16,255		234,688		250,943
Residential real estate	659		1,722		2,381		5,450		158,276		163,726
Consumer	1,026		5,289		6,315		3,540		210,975		214,515
Lease financing	—		9		9		—		981		981
Unallocated	—		1,000		1,000		—		—		—
Total	$	12,161	$	30,532	$	42,693	$	147,184	$	2,201,974	$	2,349,158

The following table presents nonaccrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and troubled debt restructured loans not covered under loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands. There were no nonaccrual leases, accruing leases past due 90 days or more or restructured leases at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Nonaccrual loans	$	60,088	$	77,875
Nonaccrual troubled debt restructured loans	12,541		12,637
Total nonaccrual loans	$	72,629	$	90,512
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	—		85
Performing troubled debt restructured loans	$	24,853	$	23,719

Heartland had $37.4 million of troubled debt restructured loans at September 30, 2011, of which $12.5 million were classified as nonaccrual and $24.9 million were accruing according to the restructured terms. Heartland had $36.4 million of troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2010, of which $12.7 million were classified as nonaccrual and $23.7 million were accruing according to the restructured terms.

The following table provides information on troubled debt restructured loans that were modified during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended Sept. 30, 2011					Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2011
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial	1	$	298	$	298	4	$	424	$	424
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		21	13,383		13,383
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1	298		298		25	13,807		13,807
Residential real estate	4	342		342		8	1,165		1,165
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	7	3,014		3,014		7	3,014		3,014
Consumer	1	41		41		1	41		41
Total	13	$	3,695	$	3,695	41	$	18,027	$	18,027

The pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment represents amounts as of the date of loan modification. Since the modifications on these loans have been only interest rate concessions and term extensions, not principal reductions, the pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment amounts are the same.

The following table provides information on troubled debt restructured loans for which there was a payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, that had been modified during the 12-month period prior to the default:

(Dollars in thousands)	With Payment Defaults During the Following Periods
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Number of Loans	Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Recorded Investment
Commercial	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial real estate	1	6,605		1	6,605
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1	6,605		1	6,605
Residential real estate	—	—		3	295
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	—	—		—	—
Consumer	—	—		—	—
Total	1	$	6,605	4	$	6,900

The following table presents nonaccrual loans not covered by loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	1,808	$	9,114
Commercial real estate	58,307		65,534
Total commercial and commercial real estate	60,115		74,648
Residential real estate	5,974		9,510
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	1,957		1,670
Consumer	4,583		4,684
Total nonaccrual loans held to maturity	$	72,629	$	90,512

Heartland's internal rating system is a series of grades reflecting management's risk assessment, based on its analysis of the borrower's financial condition. The "pass" category consists of a range of loan grades that reflect increasing, though still acceptable, risk. Movement of risk through the various grade levels in the pass category is monitored for early identification of credit deterioration. The "nonpass" category consists of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss loans. The "special

mention" rating is attached to loans where the borrower exhibits negative financial trends due to borrower specific or systemic conditions that, if left uncorrected, threaten its capacity to meet its debt obligations. The borrower is believed to have sufficient financial flexibility to react to and resolve its negative financial situation. These credits are closely monitored for improvement or deterioration. The "substandard" rating is assigned to loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the borrower and may be further at risk due to deterioration in the value of collateral pledged. Well-defined weaknesses jeopardize liquidation of the debt. These loans are still considered collectible, however, a distinct possibility exists that Heartland will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans may exhibit some or all of the following weaknesses: deteriorating trends, lack of earnings, inadequate debt service capacity, excessive debt and/or lack of liquidity. The "doubtful" rating is assigned to loans where identified weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. These borrowers are usually in default, lack liquidity and capital, as well as, resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Specific pending events, such as capital injections, liquidations or perfection of liens on additional collateral, may strengthen the credit, thus deferring classification of the loan as loss until exact status can be determined. The "loss" rating is assigned to loans considered uncollectible. As of September 30, 2011, Heartland had no loans classified as doubtful or loss. Loans are placed on "nonaccrual" when management does not expect to collect payments of principal and interest in full or when principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.

The following table presents loans and leases not covered by loss share agreements by credit quality indicator at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	Pass		Nonpass		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	509,323	$	51,740	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	964,964		199,559		1,164,523
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1,474,287		251,299		1,725,586
Residential real estate	163,138		16,490		179,628
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	215,797		41,060		256,857
Consumer	207,244		9,763		217,007
Lease financing	604		—		604
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	2,061,070	$	318,612	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	504,207	$	53,824	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	912,897		248,065		1,160,962
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1,417,104		301,889		1,718,993
Residential real estate	146,392		17,334		163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	220,096		30,847		250,943
Consumer	202,533		11,982		214,515
Lease financing	981		—		981
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	1,987,106	$	362,052	$	2,349,158

The nonpass category in the table above is comprised of approximately 41% special mention and 59% substandard as of September 30, 2011. The percent of nonpass loans on nonaccrual status as of September 30, 2011, was 23%. As of December 31, 2010, the nonpass category in the table above was comprised of approximately 37% special mention and 63% substandard. The percent of nonpass loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2010, was 25%. Changes in credit risk are monitored on a continuous basis and changes in risk ratings are made when identified. All impaired loans are reviewed at least annually.

The following table sets forth information regarding Heartland's accruing and nonaccrual loans and leases not covered by loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	Accruing Loans and Leases
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual		Total Loans and Leases
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	1,097	$	54	$	—	$	1,151	$	558,104	$	1,808	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	5,107		1,253		—		6,360		1,099,856		58,307		1,164,523
Total commercial and commercial real estate	6,204		1,307		—		7,511		1,657,960		60,115		1,725,586
Residential real estate	1,204		—		—		1,204		172,450		5,974		179,628
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	169		655		—		824		254,076		1,957		256,857
Consumer	2,046		1,256		—		3,302		209,122		4,583		217,007
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		604		—		604
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	9,623	$	3,218	$	—	$	12,841	$	2,294,212	$	72,629	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	895	$	282	$	—	$	1,177	$	547,740	$	9,114	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	5,328		2,940		85		8,353		1,087,075		65,534		1,160,962
Total commercial and commercial real estate	6,223		3,222		85		9,530		1,634,815		74,648		1,718,993
Residential real estate	2,482		—		—		2,482		151,734		9,510		163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	283		292		—		575		248,698		1,670		250,943
Consumer	2,369		628		—		2,997		206,834		4,684		214,515
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		981		—		981
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	11,357	$	4,142	$	85	$	15,584	$	2,243,062	$	90,512	$	2,349,158

The majority of Heartland's impaired loans are those that are nonaccrual, are past due 90 days or more and still accruing or have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. The following table presents data on impaired loans not covered by loss share agreements as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Impaired loans for which a valuation allowance has been provided	$	47,933	$	58,975
Impaired loans for which no valuation allowance has been provided	78,411		88,209
Total loans determined to be impaired	$	126,344	$	147,184
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans	$	14,078	$	12,161

The following tables present, for impaired loans not covered by loss share agreements and by category of loan, the unpaid balance that was contractually due at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the outstanding loan balance recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, any related allowance recorded for those loans as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the average outstanding loan balance recorded on the balance sheet during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and year ended December 31, 2010, and the interest income recognized on the impaired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and year ended December 31, 2010, in thousands:

September 30, 2011	Unpaid Contractual Balance		Loan Balance		Related Allowance Recorded		Year-to-Date Avg. Loan Balance		Year-to-Date Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a related allowance
Commercial	$	7,783	$	7,745	$	1,724	$	9,838	$	281
Commercial real estate	35,623		34,862		10,244		34,267		706
Total commercial and commercial real estate	43,406		42,607		11,968		44,105		987
Residential real estate	1,999		1,999		493		1,883		41
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	10		1		5		3,630		—
Consumer	3,326		3,326		1,612		2,524		31
Total loans held to maturity	$	48,741	$	47,933	$	14,078	$	52,142	$	1,059
Impaired loans without a related allowance
Commercial	$	1,436	$	925	$	—	$	2,635	$	3
Commercial real estate	73,748		52,950		—		55,260		396
Total commercial and commercial real estate	75,184		53,875		—		57,895		399
Residential real estate	4,564		4,042		—		4,330		38
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	19,555		19,439		—		13,119		629
Consumer	1,363		1,055		—		1,483		2
Total loans held to maturity	$	100,666	$	78,411	$	—	$	76,827	$	1,068
Total impaired loans held to maturity
Commercial	$	9,219	$	8,670	$	1,724	$	12,473	$	284
Commercial real estate	109,371		87,812		10,244		89,527		1,102
Total commercial and commercial real estate	118,590		96,482		11,968		102,000		1,386
Residential real estate	6,563		6,041		493		6,213		80
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	19,565		19,440		5		16,749		629
Consumer	4,689		4,381		1,612		4,007		33
Total impaired loans held to maturity	$	149,407	$	126,344	$	14,078	$	128,969	$	2,128

December 31, 2010	Unpaid Contractual Balance		Loan Balance		Related Allowance Recorded		Year-to-Date Avg. Loan Balance		Year-to-Date Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a related allowance
Commercial	$	14,936	$	14,936	$	2,837	$	15,471	$	481
Commercial real estate	35,365		35,282		7,127		36,545		1,394
Total commercial and commercial real estate	50,301		50,218		9,964		52,016		1,875
Residential real estate	2,577		2,415		659		1,390		7
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	3,911		3,911		512		3,707		181
Consumer	2,445		2,431		1,026		1,740		70
Total loans held to maturity	$	59,234	$	58,975	$	12,161	$	58,853	$	2,133
Impaired loans without a related allowance
Commercial	$	4,378	$	1,662	$	—	$	1,722	$	1
Commercial real estate	92,979		70,059		—		72,567		1,026
Total commercial and commercial real estate	97,357		71,721		—		74,289		1,027
Residential real estate	3,515		3,035		—		1,748		47
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	12,401		12,344		—		11,701		391
Consumer	1,458		1,109		—		793		2
Total loans held to maturity	$	114,731	$	88,209	$	—	$	88,531	$	1,467
Total impaired loans held to maturity
Commercial	$	19,314	$	16,598	$	2,837	$	17,193	$	482
Commercial real estate	128,344		105,341		7,127		109,112		2,420
Total commercial and commercial real estate	147,658		121,939		9,964		126,305		2,902
Residential real estate	6,092		5,450		659		3,138		54
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	16,312		16,255		512		15,408		572
Consumer	3,903		3,540		1,026		2,533		72
Total impaired loans held to maturity	$	173,965	$	147,184	$	12,161	$	147,384	$	3,600

NOTE 5: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, were as follows, in thousands:

	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Leases			Unallocated		Total
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	10,097		$	19,362		$	1,982		$	2,508		$	6,646		$	7		$	—	$	40,602
Charge-offs	(487		)	(4,038		)	—			(248		)	(1,380		)	—			—		(6,153		)
Recoveries	581			1,213			—			12			213			—			—		2,019
Provision	(362		)	6,282			(289		)	482			1,615			(1		)	—		7,727
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	9,829		$	22,819		$	1,693		$	2,754		$	7,094		$	6		$	—	$	44,195

	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Leases			Unallocated			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	10,525		$	20,316		$	2,147		$	2,381		$	6,315		$	9		$	1,000		$	42,693
Charge-offs	(2,491		)	(16,622		)	(167		)	(1,477		)	(3,602		)	—			—			(24,359		)
Recoveries	974			2,742			—			37			527			—			—			4,280
Provision	821			16,383			(287		)	1,813			3,854			(3		)	(1,000		)	21,581
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	9,829		$	22,819		$	1,693		$	2,754		$	7,094		$	6		$	—		$	44,195

NOTE 6: GOODWILL, CORE DEPOSIT PREMIUM AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Heartland had goodwill of $25.9 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The gross carrying amount of intangible assets and the associated accumulated amortization at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are presented in the table below, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortizing intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles	$	9,957	$	8,700	$	9,957	$	8,345
Mortgage servicing rights	16,456		5,680		15,297		4,087
Customer relationship intangible	1,177		609		1,177		533
Total	$	27,590	$	14,989	$	26,431	$	12,965
Unamortized intangible assets			$	12,601			$	13,466

Projections of amortization expense for mortgage servicing rights are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest rate environment as of September 30, 2011. Heartland's actual experience may be significantly different depending upon changes in mortgage interest rates and market conditions. There was no valuation allowance on mortgage servicing rights at September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010. The fair value of Heartland's mortgage servicing rights was estimated at $12.0 million and $12.3 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets, in thousands:

	Core Deposit Intangibles		Mortgage Servicing Rights		Customer Relationship Intangible		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2011	$	115	$	1,273	$	23	$	1,411
Year ending December 31,
2012	441		3,801		55		4,297
2013	423		2,851		45		3,319
2014	184		1,901		43		2,128
2015	15		950		42		1,007
2016	14		—		41		55
Thereafter	65		—		319		384

The following table summarizes, in thousands, the changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights:

	2011			2010
Balance at January 1	$	11,210		$	9,533
Originations	2,341			3,444
Amortization	(2,775		)	(2,630		)
Valuation adjustment	$	—		$	(1,239	)
Balance at September 30	$	10,776		$	9,108

NOTE 7: BORROWINGS

On March 11, 2011, Heartland issued an additional $3.0 million of its senior notes to one additional accredited investor. The total senior notes outstanding was $27.5 million as of September 30, 2011, and $24.5 million as of December 31, 2010. Prior to April 2011, Heartland maintained credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, one of which provided borrowing authority for $15.0 million and one of which provided borrowing authority for $5.0 million. On April 20, 2011, Heartland entered into a debt arrangement with one of these banks to convert the $15.0 million revolving line of credit into a $15.0 million amortizing term loan with a maturity date of April 20, 2016, and to add $5.0 million in borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving line of credit with a maturity date of April 20, 2013. At the same time, Heartland entered into an interest rate swap transaction, designated as a cash flow hedge, with the bank to fix the rate on the term loan at 5.14 percent for the full 5-year term. Accordingly, after this debt arrangement, Heartland continues to have credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, both with revolving borrowing capacity of $5.0 million, and one with an additional $15.0 million amortizing term loan. At September 30, 2011, Heartland had no outstanding balance on either credit line.

NOTE 8: DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On occasion, Heartland uses derivative financial instruments as part of its interest rate risk management, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors and collars. Heartland’s objectives in using derivatives are to add stability to its net interest margin and to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates.

Heartland executed an interest rate swap transaction on April 5, 2011, with an effective date of April 20, 2011, and an expiration date of April 20, 2016, to effectively convert $15.0 million of its newly issued variable rate amortizing debt to fixed rate debt. For accounting purposes, this swap transaction is designated as a cash flow hedge of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in one-month LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, associated with the interest payments made on an amount of Heartland's debt principal equal to the then-outstanding swap notional amount. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the swap. Under this contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.14% and receive a variable rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% based upon $14.5 million of indebtedness. Payments under this interest rate swap contract are made monthly. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $733 thousand at September 30, 2011.

To reduce the potentially negative impact a downward movement in interest rates would have on its interest income, Heartland

entered into the following transaction. On September 19, 2005, Heartland entered into a five-year interest rate collar transaction on a notional amount of $50.0 million. This collar transaction was effective on September 21, 2005, and matured on September 21, 2010. Heartland was the payer on prime at a cap strike rate of 9.00% and the counterparty was the payer on prime at a floor strike rate of 6.00%.

For accounting purposes, the collar transaction described above was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Heartland's prime-based loans that reset whenever prime changes. The hedged loan transactions for the hedging relationship was designated as the first prime-based interest payments received by Heartland each calendar month during the term of the collar that, in aggregate for each period, are interest payments on principal from specified portfolios equal to the notional amount of the collar.

Prepayments in the hedged loan portfolios were treated in a manner consistent with the guidance in ASC 815-20-25, “Cash Flow Hedges: Using the First-Payments-Received Technique in Hedging the Variable Interest Payments on a Group of Non-Benchmark-Rate-Based Loans,” which allows the designated forecasted transactions to be the variable, prime-rate-based interest payments on a rolling portfolio of prepayable interest-bearing loans using the first-payments-received technique, thereby allowing interest payments from loans that prepay to be replaced with interest payments from new loan originations. Based on Heartland's assessments, both at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship, it was probable that sufficient prime-based interest receipts existed through the maturity dates of the collars.

To reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income, Heartland entered into the following two cap transactions. For accounting purposes, these two cap transactions were originally designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, above the cap strike rate associated with the interest payments made on $40.0 million of Heartland's subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV and V) that reset quarterly on a specified reset date. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the caps.

The first transaction executed on January 15, 2008, was a fifty-five month interest rate cap transaction on a notional amount of $20.0 million to reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income. The cap has an effective date of January 15, 2008, and a maturity date of September 1, 2012. Should 3-month LIBOR exceed 5.12% on a reset date, the counterparty will pay Heartland the amount of interest that exceeds the amount owed on the debt at the cap LIBOR rate of 5.12%. The floating-rate subordinated debentures contain an interest rate deferral feature that is mirrored in the cap transaction. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the fair market value of this cap transaction was recorded as an asset of $0 and $5 thousand, respectively. Upon the execution of the second swap transaction discussed below, hedge accounting was discontinued and this cap transaction was converted to an economic hedge. During the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this cap transaction was recorded as a loss of $5 thousand and $73 thousand, respectively.

The second transaction executed on March 27, 2008, was a twenty-eight month interest rate cap transaction on a notional amount of $20.0 million to reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income. The cap has an effective date of January 7, 2009, and a maturity date of April 7, 2011. Should 3-month LIBOR exceed 5.5% on a reset date, the counterparty will pay Heartland the amount of interest that exceeds the amount owed on the debt at the cap LIBOR rate of 5.5%. The floating-rate subordinated debentures contain an interest rate deferral feature that is mirrored in the cap transaction. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, this cap transaction had no fair market value. Upon the execution of the third swap transaction discussed below, hedge accounting was discontinued and this cap transaction was converted to an economic hedge. During the first nine months of 2011, there was no mark to market adjustment for this cap transaction. During the nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment for this cap transaction was recorded as a loss of $3 thousand.

In addition to the two cap transactions, Heartland entered into the following three forward-starting interest rate swap transactions to effectively convert $65.0 million of its variable interest rate subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV, V and VII) to fixed interest rate debt. For accounting purposes, these three swap transactions are designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, associated with the interest payments made on $65.0 million of Heartland's subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV, V and VII) that reset quarterly on a specified reset date. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the swaps.

The first swap transaction was executed on January 28, 2009, on a notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of March 17, 2010, and an expiration date of March 17, 2014. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 2.58% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $1.2 million at September 30, 2011, and as a liability of $972 thousand at December 31, 2010.

The second swap transaction was executed on February 4, 2009, on a notional amount of $20.0 million with an effective date of January 7, 2010, and an expiration date of January 7, 2020. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 3.35% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $2.4 million at September 30, 2011, and a liability of $333 thousand at December 31, 2010.

The third swap transaction was executed on February 4, 2009, on a notional amount of $20.0 million with an effective date of March 1, 2010, and an expiration date of March 1, 2017. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 3.22% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $2.0 million at September 30, 2011, and as a liability of $823 thousand at December 31, 2010.

For the collar, cap and swap transactions described above, the effective portion of changes in the fair values of the derivatives is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings (interest income on loans or interest expense on borrowings) when the hedged transactions affect earnings. Ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship, if any, is recorded as a gain or loss in earnings as part of noninterest income. Heartland uses the “Hypothetical Derivative Method” described in ASC 815-20-25, “Cash Flow Hedges: Assessing and Measuring the Effectiveness of a Purchased Option Used in a Cash Flow Hedge,” for its quarterly prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness, as well as for measurements of hedge ineffectiveness. All components of the derivative instruments' change in fair value were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Except as discussed below, no ineffectiveness was recognized for the cash flow hedge transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

At the inception of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction, Heartland designated separate proportions of the $50.0 million collar in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships. Designation of a proportion of a derivative instrument is discussed in ASC 815, which states that “Either all or a proportion of a derivative may be designated as the hedging instrument. The proportion must be expressed as a percentage of the entire derivative so that the profile of risk exposures in the hedging portion of the derivative is the same as that in the entire derivative.” Consistent with that guidance, Heartland identified four different proportions of the $50.0 million collar and documented four separate hedging relationships based on those proportions. Although only one collar was executed with an external party, Heartland established four distinct hedging relationships for various proportions of the collar and designated them against hedged transactions specifically identified at each of four different subsidiary banks. Because each proportion of the collar was designated against hedged transactions specified at different subsidiary banks, the hedging relationship for one proportion of the collar could fail hedge accounting (or have hedge ineffectiveness), without affecting the separate hedging relationships established for other proportions of the collar that were designated against hedged transactions at other subsidiary banks. Effectiveness of each hedging relationship is assessed and measured independently of the other hedging relationships.

A portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at March 31, 2008. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Dubuque Bank and Trust Company's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $9.6 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this portion of the collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $293 thousand.

A portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction also did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at June 30, 2007. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Rocky Mountain Bank's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by the sale of its Broadus branch, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $7.5 million. On August 17, 2007, the $14.3 million portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction was redesignated and met the requirements for hedge accounting treatment. The fair value of this portion of the collar transaction was zero on the redesignation date. The redesignated collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at December 31, 2008. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure of the redesignated hedge was caused by paydowns, which reduced the redesignated loan pool from $14.3 million to $10.4 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market

adjustment on this portion of the collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $290 thousand.

An additional portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at March 31, 2009. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of New Mexico Bank & Trust's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $11.6 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $290 thousand.

The final portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at June 30, 2009. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $7.2 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Wisconsin Community Bank's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $7.2 million to $4.8 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $148 thousand.

Net unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges arising during the first nine months of 2011 and separately disclosed in the statement of changes in stockholders' equity totaled $3.5 million, before income taxes of $1.3 million. Net unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges arising during the first nine months of 2010 and separately disclosed in the statement of changes in shareholders' equity totaled $7.2 million, before income taxes of $2.7 million.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest income or expense as interest payments are received or made on Heartland's variable-rate assets and liabilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the change in net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges reflects cash payments and reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income or interest expense totaling $1.4 million. For the next twelve months, Heartland estimates that cash payments and reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income or interest expense will total $1.8 million.

Cash payments received on the collar transactions totaled $695 thousand during the first nine months of 2010.

By using derivatives, Heartland is exposed to credit risk if counterparties to derivative instruments do not perform as expected. Heartland minimizes this risk by entering into derivative contracts with large, stable financial institutions and Heartland has not experienced any losses from counterparty nonperformance on derivative instruments. Furthermore, Heartland also periodically monitors counterparty credit risk in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815.

NOTE 9: FAIR VALUE

Heartland utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for sale, trading securities and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, Heartland may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis such as loans held for sale, loans held to maturity and certain other assets including, but not limited to, mortgage servicing rights and other real estate owned. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under ASC 820, assets and liabilities are grouped at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar

techniques.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimation of fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value.

Assets

Securities Available for Sale

Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include agency mortgage-backed securities and private collateralized mortgage obligations, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. The Level 3 securities consist primarily of Z tranche mortgage-backed securities.

Trading Assets

Trading assets are recorded at fair value and consist of securities held for trading purposes. The valuation method for trading securities is the same as the methodology used for securities classified as available for sale.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, Heartland classifies loans held for sale subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans Held to Maturity

Heartland does not record loans held to maturity at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” Loan impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except where more practical, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At September 30, 2011, all impaired loans were measured based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. Heartland classifies impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Currently, Heartland uses interest rate caps, floors, collars and swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fell below (rise above) the strike rate of the floors (caps). The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the floor (cap) are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, Heartland incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Heartland has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although Heartland has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, Heartland has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, Heartland has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned ("OREO") represents property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower of the principal amount of the loan outstanding at the time of acquisition, plus any acquisition costs, or the estimated fair value of the property, less disposal costs. Heartland considers third party appraisals, as well as independent fair value assessments from realtors or persons involved in selling OREO, in determining the fair value of particular properties. Accordingly, the valuation of OREO is subject to significant external and internal judgment. Heartland also periodically reviews OREO to determine if the fair value of the property, less disposal costs, has declined below its recorded book value and records any adjustments accordingly. OREO is classified as nonrecurring Level 3.

The table below presents Heartland's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:

	Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
September 30, 2011
Trading securities	$	458	$	458	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale	1,264,569		169,402		1,091,601		3,566
Total assets at fair value	$	1,265,027	$	169,860	$	1,091,601	$	3,566
Derivative liabilities	$	5,609	$	—	$	5,609	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	5,609	$	—	$	5,609	$	—
December 31, 2010
Trading securities	$	244	$	244	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale	1,204,699		320,008		880,015		4,676
Total assets at fair value	$	1,204,943	$	320,252	$	880,015	$	4,676
Derivative liabilities	$	2,122	$	—	$	2,122	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	2,122	$	—	$	2,122	$	—

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, or the year ended December 31, 2010.

The changes in Level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following table, in thousands:

	For the Nine Months			For the Year
	Ended			Ended
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Fair Value			Fair Value
Balance at January 1,	$	4,676		$	1,535
Redemptions	(1,397		)	(45		)
Market value appreciation	287			3,186
Balance at period end,	$	3,566		$	4,676

The tables below present Heartland's assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, in thousands:

	Carrying Value at								Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011								September 30, 2011
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans	$	78,386	$	—	$	—	$	78,386	$	19,280
OREO	39,188		—		—		39,188		3,824

(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value at								Year Ended
	December 31, 2010								December 31, 2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans	$	110,422	$	—	$	—	$	110,422	$	27,492
OREO	32,002		—		—		32,002		11,711

The table below is a summary of the estimated fair value of Heartland's financial instruments as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, as defined by ASC 825, in thousands. The carrying amounts in the following table are recorded in the balance sheet under the indicated captions. In accordance with ASC 825, the assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments are not included in the disclosure, such as the value of the mortgage servicing rights, premises, furniture and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles and other liabilities.

Heartland does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative of the earnings power or value of Heartland. The following analysis, which is inherently limited in depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with either existing customer relationships or the ability of Heartland to create value through loan origination, deposit gathering or fee generating activities. Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information and assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair value estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the disclosed fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually realized or paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be significantly different.

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	81,605	$	81,605	$	62,572	$	62,572
Trading securities	458		458		244		244
Securities available for sale	1,264,569		1,264,569		1,204,699		1,204,699
Securities held to maturity	58,437		57,545		59,621		58,610
Loans and leases, net of unearned	2,425,481		2,411,197		2,388,691		2,394,837
Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	692,893	$	692,893	$	580,589	$	580,589
Savings deposits	1,654,417		1,654,417		1,558,998		1,558,998
Time deposits	826,304		826,304		894,461		894,461
Short-term borrowings	173,199		173,199		235,864		235,864
Other borrowings	375,976		362,923		362,527		347,749
Derivatives	5,609		5,609		2,122		2,122

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Securities —For securities either held to maturity, available for sale or trading, fair value equals quoted market price if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Loans and Leases—The fair value of loans is estimated using a historical or replacement cost basis concept (i.e., an entrance price concept).The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar

loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated using quoted market prices.

Derivatives — The fair value of all derivatives is estimated based on the amount that Heartland would pay or would be paid to terminate the contract or agreement, using current rates and, when appropriate, the current creditworthiness of the counter-party.

Deposits — The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.

Short-term and Other Borrowings—Rates currently available to Heartland for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Unused Lines of Credit and Standby Letters of Credit — Based upon management's analysis of the off balance sheet financial instruments, there are no significant unrealized gains or losses associated with these financial instruments based upon review of the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.

NOTE 10: CAPITAL ISSUANCE AND REDEMPTION

On September 15, 2011, Heartland entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with the Secretary of the Treasury ("Treasury"), pursuant to which Heartland issued and sold to Treasury 81,698 shares of its Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C ("Series C Preferred Stock"), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share ("Liquidation Amount"), for aggregate proceeds of $81.7 million. The issuance was made pursuant to the Small Business Lending Fund ("SBLF"), a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.

The Series C Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital for Heartland. Non-cumulative dividends are payable quarterly on the Series C Preferred Stock, beginning October 1, 2011. The dividend rate is calculated as a percentage of the aggregate Liquidation Amount of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock and is based on changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending or “QSBL” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). Based upon Heartland's level of QSBL compared to the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period, which is from the date of issuance through September 30, 2011, has been set at 5%. For the 2nd through 10th calendar quarters, the annual dividend rate may be adjusted to between 1% and 5%, to reflect the amount of change in Heartland's level of QSBL. For the 11th calendar quarter through 4.5 years after issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between 1% and 7% based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After 4.5 years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9% (including a quarterly lending incentive fee of 0.5%).

The Series C Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that Heartland misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the Series C Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on Heartland's Board of Directors. In the event that Heartland misses six dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, and if the then outstanding aggregate Liquidation Amount of the Series C Preferred Stock is at least $25.0 million, then the holder of the Series C Preferred Stock will have the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors of Heartland. Heartland may redeem the shares of Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the sum of the Liquidation Amount per share and the per share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period, subject to any required prior approval by Heartland's primary federal banking regulator.

The terms of the Series C Preferred Stock impose limits on Heartland's ability to pay dividends on and repurchase shares of its common stock and other securities. In general, Heartland may declare and pay dividends on its common stock or any other stock junior to the Series C Preferred Stock, or repurchase shares of any such stock, only if after payment of such dividends or repurchase of such shares Heartland's Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Signing Date Tier 1 Capital (as defined and set forth in the Certificate of Designation), excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series C Preferred Stock (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the 2nd anniversary and ending on the 10th anniversary of issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, by 10% for each one percent increase in Heartland's QSBL over the baseline level. If, however Heartland fails to declare and pay dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock in a given quarter, then during such quarter and for the next three quarters following such missed dividend payment Heartland may not pay dividends on or repurchase any common stock or any other securities that are junior to (or in parity with) the Series C Preferred Stock, except in very limited circumstances. If any Series C Preferred Stock remains outstanding on the 10th anniversary of issuance, Heartland may not pay any further dividends on its common stock or any other junior stock until the Series C Preferred Stock is redeemed in full.

On September 15, 2011, Heartland entered into a letter agreement (“Repurchase Document”) with Treasury, pursuant to which, Heartland redeemed from Treasury, in part using the proceeds from the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, all 81,698 outstanding shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B ("Series B Preferred Stock"), for a redemption price of $82.0 million, including accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption. As a result of its redemption of the Series B Preferred Stock, Heartland is no longer subject to the limits provided for under the TARP Capital Purchase Program with respect to future executive compensation decisions and other matters. When the Series B Preferred Stock was issued, $6.3 million of the $81.7 million purchase price was assigned to the associated warrant and the remaining $75.4 million was assigned to the carrying value of the Series B Preferred Stock. The $6.3 million discount was being amortized over five years, the anticipated life of the Series B Preferred Stock. Upon redemption of the Series B Preferred Stock, $2.6 millionof the remaining unamortized discount was recognized.

On September 28, 2011, Heartland repurchased from Treasury a warrant to purchase 609,687 shares of Heartland common stock, $1.00 par value per share, at an exercise price of $20.10 per share (“Warrant”), issued to Treasury on December 19, 2008, in connection with participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Heartland paid an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 million for the repurchase of the Warrant, which has been cancelled.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of Heartland and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Heartland. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of Heartland's management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "plan", "intend", "estimate", "may", "will", "would", "could", "should" or other similar expressions. Although Heartland has made these statements based on management's experience and best estimate of future events, there may be events or factors that management has not anticipated, and the accuracy and achievement of such forward-looking statements and estimates are subject to a number of risks, including those identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and Heartland undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. These estimates are based upon historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The estimates and judgments that management believes have the most effect on Heartland's reported financial position and results of operations are described in Heartland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant changes in the critical accounting policies or the assumptions and judgments utilized in applying these policies since the year ended December 31, 2010.

OVERVIEW

Heartland's results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest earning assets and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities. Noninterest income, which includes service charges and fees, loan servicing income, trust income, brokerage and insurance commissions, securities gains and gains on sale of loans, also affects Heartland's results of operations. Heartland's principal operating expenses, aside from interest expense, consist of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment costs, professional fees, FDIC insurance premiums and the provision for loan and lease losses. During the most recent years, Heartland's operating expenses have also been significantly impacted by net losses on repossessed assets.

Net income was $7.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $6.9 million for the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $468 thousand or 7 percent. Net income available to common stockholders was $3.4 million, or $0.20 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $5.6 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of 2010. Return on average common equity was 4.97 percent and return on average assets was 0.33 percent for the third quarter of 2011, compared to 8.76 percent and 0.55 percent, respectively, for the same quarter in 2010.

Net income for the third quarter of 2011 remained higher than net income for the third quarter of 2010 despite a $2.9 million or 61 percent increase in provision for loan losses, which resulted primarily from weaknesses recently identified in one significant loan relationship. Earnings for the third quarter of 2011 in comparison to the third quarter of 2010 were positively affected by increased gains on sale of loans, decreased losses on repossessed assets and a smaller provision for income taxes. Net income available to common stockholders decreased significantly during the third quarter of 2011 primarily due to the recognition of $2.6 million in remaining unamortized discount on preferred stock. On September 15, 2011, Heartland joined the Small Business Lending Fund ("SBLF"). Simultaneous with receipt of the SBLF funds, Heartland redeemed the $81.7 million of preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008 under the Capital Purchase Program, a part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program ("TARP"). Exclusive of this one-time event, net income available to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2011 would have been $6.0 million or $0.36 per diluted common share. Heartland's net interest margin was 4.14 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to 4.18 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Net income recorded for the first nine months of 2011 was $21.8 million, compared to $17.3 million recorded during the first nine months of 2010, an increase of $4.5 million or 26 percent. Net income available to common stockholders was $15.2

million, or $0.92 per diluted common share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $13.4 million, or $0.81 per diluted common share, earned during the first nine months of 2010. Return on average common equity was 7.77 percent and return on average assets was 0.50 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 7.32 percent and 0.45 percent, respectively, for the same period in 2010.

Earnings for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010 were positively affected by increased securities gains, gains on sale of loans and net interest income, combined with reductions in net losses on repossessed assets, FDIC insurance assessments and provision for loan and lease losses. The effect of these improvements was partially offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits, professional fees and other noninterest expenses. Heartland's net interest margin was 4.18 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 4.14 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

At September 30, 2011, total assets were $4.11 billion, an increase of $113.2 million or 3 percent, over total assets of $4.00 billion at December 31, 2010. Securities represented 32 percent of total assets at both September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

Total loans and leases, exclusive of those covered by loss share agreements, were $2.37 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $2.34 billion at year-end 2010, an increase of $30.2 million or 2 percent annualized. Commercial and commercial real estate loans increased $6.6 million or 1 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Residential mortgage loans increased $15.9 million or 13 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Agricultural and agricultural real estate loans increased $5.9 million or 3 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Consumer loans increased $2.5 million or 1 percent annualized since year-end 2010.

Total deposits were $3.17 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $3.03 billion at year-end 2010, an increase of $139.6 million or 6 percent annualized. The composition of Heartland's deposits continued to shift from higher cost certificates of deposit to no cost demand deposits during the third quarter of 2011, as demand deposits increased $112.3 million or 26 percent annualized since year-end 2010. The increase in demand deposits was effectively matched with a corresponding decrease in time deposits. The result is an improving mix of total deposits, with demand deposits representing 22 percent, savings representing 52 percent and time deposits representing 26 percent.

On June 10, 2011, Heartland completed the charter consolidation of its First Community Bank subsidiary located in Keokuk, Iowa, with its flagship subsidiary bank, Dubuque Bank and Trust Company, located in Dubuque, Iowa. Through this charter consolidation, Heartland hopes to realize efficiencies in operating costs, audit fees, regulatory examinations and insurance premiums.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income

Net interest margin, expressed as a percentage of average earning assets, was 4.14 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to 4.18 percent for the third quarter of 2010. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, net interest margin was 4.18 percent during 2011 and 4.14 percent during 2010. The continuation of a net interest margin above 4.00 percent has been a direct result of Heartland's price discipline, the effect of which would have been more significant had it not been for the amount of foregone interest on nonaccrual loans not covered by loss share agreements, which had balances of $72.6 million or 3.06 percent of total loans and leases at September 30, 2011, and $85.2 million or 3.61 percent of total loans and leases at September 30, 2010. Heartland's net interest margin has been relatively stable throughout 2011 with a slight decline during the third quarter from 4.23 percent realized during the second quarter and 4.19 percent realized during the first quarter. Because deposit rates have been set at close to the bottom of their manageable range, and because the reinvestment rates on maturing securities have fallen dramatically and loan rates are presently impacted by competition for new loans, management anticipates that it will be increasingly difficult to maintain net interest margin above 4.00 percent during the coming year.

Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis totaled $37.8 million during the third quarter of 2011, a decrease of $194 thousand or 1 percent from $38.0 million recorded during the third quarter of 2010. For the first nine months of 2011, net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $112.8 million, an increase of $1.9 million or 2 percent from $110.9 million recorded during the first nine months of 2010.

On a tax-equivalent basis, interest income in the third quarter of 2011 was $49.1 million compared to $51.5 million in the third quarter of 2010, a decrease of $2.4 million or 5 percent. The $21.6 million or 1 percent growth in average earning assets during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was not enough to compensate for the decrease in the average

interest rate earned on these assets which was 5.38 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to 5.67 percent during the third quarter of 2010. A majority of the reduction in the average interest rate earned was in the securities portfolio which earned 3.56 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to 4.05 percent during the third quarter of 2010. Additionally, average total securities as a percent of total earning assets was 35 percent for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 34 percent during the third quarter of 2010. For the first nine months of 2011, interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $148.4 million compared to $153.8 million during the same period in 2010, a decrease of $5.4 million or 4 percent. The $25.7 million or 1 percent growth in average earning assets during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was offset by the impact of a decrease in the average interest rate earned on these assets which was 5.50 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to 5.74 percent during the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to the decrease in the average interest rate earned on total securities which was 3.79 percent in 2011 compared to 4.28 percent in 2010.

Interest expense for the third quarter of 2011 was $11.4 million, a decrease of $2.2 million or 16 percent from $13.6 million in the third quarter of 2010. On a nine-month comparative basis, interest expense decreased $7.4 million or 17 percent. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $81.9 million or 3 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the same quarter in 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, average interest bearing liabilities decreased $128.1 million or 4 percent as compared to the first nine months of 2010. These decreases resulted primarily from an outflow of higher cost certificates of deposit and a reduction in other borrowings. The average interest rates paid on Heartland's interest bearing deposits and borrowings declined 24 basis points to 1.50 percent in the third quarter of 2011 from 1.74 percent in the third quarter of 2010. On a nine-month comparative basis, the average interest rate paid on Heartland's deposits and borrowings declined 25 basis points to 1.58 percent in 2011 from 1.83 percent in 2010. The amount of certificates of deposit maturing over the next six months is $253.2 million, or 31 percent of total certificates of deposit, at a weighted average interest rate of 1.36 percent. For the next twelve months, the amount of certificates of deposit maturing is $385.4 million, or 47 percent of total certificates of deposit, at a weighted average interest rate of 1.46 percent. The weighted average interest rate for the renewal term on certificates of deposit maturing during the month of September 2011 was 0.53 percent. Additionally, Heartland believes that the rates currently paid on its non-maturity deposits are effectively approaching a floor and that it will have less flexibility to pay lower rates on these deposits in the future.

Heartland attempts to manage its balance sheet to minimize the effect that a change in interest rates has on its net interest margin. Heartland plans to continue to work toward improving both its earning assets and funding mix through targeted organic growth strategies, which management believes will result in additional net interest income. Heartland believes its net interest income simulations reflect a well-balanced and manageable interest rate posture. Management supports a pricing discipline in which the focus is less on price and more on the unique value provided to business and retail clients. Approximately 40 percent of Heartland's commercial and agricultural loan portfolios consist of floating rate loans that reprice immediately upon a change in the national prime interest rate. Since a large portion of these floating rate loans have interest rate floors that are currently in effect, an upward movement in the national prime interest rate would not have an immediate positive effect on Heartland's interest income. Item 3 of this Form 10-Q contains additional information about the results of Heartland's most recent net interest income simulations. Note 8 to the quarterly financial statements contains a detailed discussion of the derivative instruments Heartland has utilized to manage its interest rate risk.

The tables below set forth certain information relating to Heartland's average consolidated balance sheets and reflects the yield on average earning assets and the cost of average interest bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities derives such yields and costs. Average balances are derived from daily balances. Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale are included in each respective loan category.

ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE BALANCES, TAX EQUIVALENT YIELDS AND RATES(1) For the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Dollars in thousands)
	2011							2010
	Average Balance			Interest		Rate		Average Balance			Interest		Rate
EARNING ASSETS
Securities:
Taxable	$	971,156		$	6,826	2.79	%	$	945,261		$	8,225	3.45	%
Nontaxable(1)	293,585			4,525		6.11		274,819			4,228		6.10
Total securities	1,264,741			11,351		3.56		1,220,080			12,453		4.05
Interest bearing deposits	1,896			2		0.42		3,584			1		0.11
Federal funds sold	217			—		—		960			—		—
Loans and leases:
Commercial and commercial real estate(1)	1,727,100			24,980		5.74		1,733,120			26,195		6.00
Residential mortgage	195,847			2,649		5.37		209,400			2,777		5.26
Agricultural and agricultural real estate(1)	257,934			3,821		5.88		261,640			4,022		6.10
Consumer	217,534			5,325		9.71		221,661			5,051		9.04
Direct financing leases, net	632			8		5.02		1,320			19		5.71
Fees on loans	—			1,009				—			1,016		—
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses	(41,342		)	—		—		(48,812		)	—		—
Net loans and leases	2,357,705			37,792		6.36		2,378,329			39,080		6.52
Total earning assets	3,624,559			$	49,145	5.38	%	3,602,953			$	51,534	5.67	%
NONEARNING ASSETS	438,768							409,154
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,063,327						$	4,012,107
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Savings	$	1,588,958		$	2,165	0.54	%	$	1,546,129		$	3,041	0.78	%
Time, $100,000 and over	269,069			1,436		2.12		282,587			1,808		2.54
Other time deposits	585,589			3,427		2.32		637,516			4,184		2.60
Short-term borrowings	181,794			205		0.45		195,298			305		0.62
Other borrowings	377,458			4,123		4.33		423,212			4,213		3.95
Total interest bearing liabilities	3,002,868			11,356		1.50	%	3,084,742			13,551		1.74	%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Noninterest bearing deposits	667,362							552,696
Accrued interest and other liabilities	40,094							41,323
Total noninterest bearing liabilities	707,456							594,019
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	353,003							333,346
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	4,063,327						$	4,012,107
Net interest income(1)				$	37,789						$	37,983
Net interest spread(1)						3.88	%						3.93	%
Net interest income to total earning assets(1)						4.14	%						4.18	%
Interest bearing liabilities to earning assets	82.85		%					85.62		%
(1)Tax equivalent basis is calculated using an effective tax rate of 35%.

ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE BALANCES, TAX EQUIVALENT YIELDS AND RATES(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Dollars in thousands)
	2011							2010
	Average Balance			Interest		Rate		Average Balance			Interest		Rate
EARNING ASSETS
Securities:
Taxable	$	949,952		$	21,820	3.07	%	$	950,772		$	26,618	3.74	%
Nontaxable(1)	297,141			13,519		6.08		256,544			12,033		6.27
Total securities	1,247,093			35,339		3.79		1,207,316			38,651		4.28
Interest bearing deposits	3,559			3		0.11		3,662			13		0.47
Federal funds sold	551			1		0.24		642			1		0.21
Loans and leases:
Commercial and commercial real estate(1)	1,736,296			75,159		5.79		1,726,399			76,853		5.95
Residential mortgage	189,310			7,542		5.33		201,410			7,994		5.31
Agricultural and agricultural real estate(1)	256,284			11,720		6.11		260,237			12,104		6.22
Consumer	215,908			15,179		9.40		226,555			15,054		8.88
Direct financing leases, net	763			31		5.43		1,729			76		5.88
Fees on loans	—			3,379				—			3,084		—
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses	(42,416		)	—		—		(46,275		)	—		—
Net loans and leases	2,356,145			113,010		6.41		2,370,055			115,165		6.50
Total earning assets	3,607,348			$	148,353	5.50	%	3,581,675			$	153,830	5.74	%
NONEARNING ASSETS	426,867							428,409
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,034,215						$	4,010,084
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Savings	$	1,567,209		$	7,118	0.61	%	$	1,557,363		$	10,930	0.94	%
Time, $100,000 and over	268,849			4,592		2.28		302,643			5,790		2.56
Other time deposits	602,574			11,019		2.44		657,019			13,028		0.27
Short-term borrowings	197,691			689		0.47		192,357			830		0.58
Other borrowings	373,518			12,140		4.35		428,540			12,380		3.86
Total interest bearing liabilities	3,009,841			35,558		1.58	%	3,137,922			42,958		1.83	%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Noninterest bearing deposits	644,916							511,148
Accrued interest and other liabilities	36,410							36,520
Total noninterest bearing liabilities	681,326							547,668
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	343,048							324,494
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	4,034,215						$	4,010,084
Net interest income(1)				$	112,795						$	110,872
Net interest spread(1)						3.92	%						3.91	%
Net interest income to total earning assets(1)						4.18	%						4.14	%
Interest bearing liabilities to earning assets	83.44		%					87.61		%
(1)Tax equivalent basis is calculated using an effective tax rate of 35%.

Provision For Loan And Lease Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses is established through a provision charged to expense to provide, in Heartland management's opinion, an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses. The provision for loan losses was $7.7 million for the third quarter of 2011 compared to $4.8 million for the third quarter of 2010, a $2.9 million or 61 percent increase. A majority of the increase in provision for loan losses during the third quarter of 2011 was due to the establishment of an impairment reserve against a credit relationship in the Midwest due to concerns regarding continued repayment ability. While payments have remained current, future cash flows to service all debt under this relationship are beginning to come into question. For the first nine months of 2011, provision for loan losses was $21.6 million compared to $23.6 million for the first nine months of 2010. Additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses continued during 2011 because of the prolonged depressed economic conditions that impact individual credits and the impact those conditions have on the appraised values of collateral. When updated appraisals have been obtained, many reflect a decline in property values due primarily to a lack of recent comparable sales and an extension of absorption periods.

The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is determined by management using factors that include the overall composition of the loan portfolio, general economic conditions, types of loans, loan collateral values, past loss experience, loan delinquencies, substandard credits, and doubtful credits. For additional details on the specific factors considered, refer to the critical accounting policies and allowance for loan and lease losses sections of this report. Heartland believes the allowance for loan and lease losses as of September 30, 2011, was at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions should become more unfavorable, certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require further increases in the provision for loan and lease losses.

Noninterest Income

The tables below show Heartland's noninterest income for the quarters and nine months indicated.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			Change			% Change
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges and fees, net	$	3,657		$	3,665		$	(8	)	—	%
Loan servicing income	1,081			1,862			(781		)	(42	)
Trust fees	2,384			2,267			117			5
Brokerage and insurance commissions	918			739			179			24
Securities gains, net	2,085			2,158			(73		)	(3	)
Gain (loss) on trading account securities, net	(83		)	18			(101		)	(561	)
Gains on sale of loans	3,183			2,394			789			33
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights	—			(1,239		)	1,239			100
Income on bank owned life insurance	208			396			(188		)	(47	)
Other noninterest income	(171		)	349			(520		)	(149	)
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME	$	13,262		$	12,609		$	653		5	%

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			Change			% Change
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges and fees, net	$	10,617		$	10,363		$	254		2	%
Loan servicing income	3,928			4,909			(981		)	(20	)
Trust fees	7,519			6,778			741			11
Brokerage and insurance commissions	2,622			2,236			386			17
Securities gains, net	8,930			4,664			4,266			91
Gain (loss) on trading account securities, net	214			(198		)	412			208
Gains on sale of loans	5,893			4,275			1,618			38
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights	—			(1,239		)	1,239			100
Income on bank owned life insurance	942			1,003			(61		)	(6	)
Other noninterest income	(126		)	1,245			(1,371		)	(110	)
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME	$	40,539		$	34,036		$	6,503		19	%

Noninterest income was $13.3 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $12.6 million during the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $653,000 or 5 percent. Included in noninterest income for the third quarter of 2010 was a $1.2 million valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights that did not recur in 2011. The category contributing most significantly to this improvement was gains on sale of loans. The improvement in gains on sale of loans was offset by reduced loan servicing income and a decrease in other noninterest income, primarily attributable to payment to the FDIC for recoveries on loans covered under loss share agreements. For the nine-month period ended September 30, noninterest income was $40.5 million in 2011 compared to $34.0 million in 2010, an increase of $6.5 million or 19 percent. Securities gains totaled $8.9 million for the first nine months of 2011 compared to $4.7 million for the first nine months of 2010. Other categories contributing to the increase for the nine-month comparative period were gains on sale of loans, service charges and fees, trust fees and brokerage and insurance commissions.

Service charges and fees remained relatively flat at $3.7 million during the quarters under comparison. During the nine-month periods under comparison, service charges and fees increased $254 thousand or 2 percent. Service charges on checking and savings accounts recorded during the third quarter of 2011 were $781 thousand compared to $711 thousand during the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $71 thousand or 10 percent. For the nine months ended September 30, service charges on checking and savings accounts totaled $2.4 million during 2011 compared to $2.1 million during 2010, an increase of $284 thousand or 13 percent. These fees were affected by increased service charges on commercial checking accounts as the earnings credit rate applied to the balances maintained in these accounts continued at historically low levels and the resultant earnings credit was not sufficient to cover activity charges on these accounts. Overdraft fees were $1.4 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $1.6 million during the third quarter of 2010, a decrease of $227 thousand or 14 percent. For the nine months ended September 30, overdraft fees totaled $4.0 million during 2011 compared to $4.6 million during 2010, a decrease of $528 thousand or 12 percent. The decreases in overdraft fees during both comparative periods were due primarily to the implementation of the revisions to Regulation E effective August 15, 2010, and the impact of changes initiated to comply with FDIC guidance related to overdraft privilege programs. Interchange revenue from activity on bank debit cards, along with surcharges on ATM activity, resulted in service charges and fees of $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $1.2 million during the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $146 thousand or 13 percent. These same fees were $3.7 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $3.3 million during the first nine months of 2010, an increase of $454 thousand or 14 percent.

Loan servicing income decreased $781 thousand or 42 percent for the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and $981 thousand or 20 percent for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. Two components of loan servicing income, mortgage servicing rights and amortization of mortgage servicing rights, are dependent upon the level of loans Heartland originates and sells into the secondary market, which in turn is highly influenced by market interest rates for home mortgage loans. Mortgage servicing rights income was $743 thousand during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $1.8 million during the third quarter of 2010 and amortization of mortgage servicing rights was $1.1 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2010. Loan servicing income also includes the fees collected for the servicing of mortgage loans for others, which is dependent upon the aggregate outstanding balance of these loans, rather than quarterly production and sale of mortgage loans. Fees collected for the servicing of mortgage loans for others were $908 thousand during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $778 thousand during the third quarter of 2010. The portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others by Heartland totaled $1.47 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $1.29 billion at September 30, 2010.

Trust fees increased $117 thousand or 5 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same quarter in 2010 and $741 thousand or 11 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same nine months in 2010. A large portion of trust fees are based upon the market value of the trust assets, which was $2.20 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $1.88 billion at September 30, 2010. The total number of trust accounts was 2,052 at September 30, 2011, compared to 2,073 at September 30, 2010.

Brokerage and insurance commissions increased $179 thousand or 24 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same quarter in 2010 and $386 thousand or 17 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same nine months in 2010. During 2011, Heartland's customers continued to seek the higher rates offered in fixed income products and also overcame some of their reluctance to invest in equity securities.

Securities gains totaled $2.1 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $2.2 million during the third quarter of 2010. For the nine-month comparative period, securities gains totaled $8.9 million during 2011 compared to $4.7 million during 2010. Volatility in the bond market provided opportunities in 2011 to swap securities from one sector of the portfolio to another without significantly changing the duration of the portfolio. One such strategy was the sale of taxable municipal bonds and the reinvestment into tax-exempt municipal bonds. Another strategy initiated in the second quarter of 2011 shifted a portion of the securities portfolio from agencies to treasuries and shorter-term mortgage-backed securities. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2011, a private label Z tranche security with a book value of $10 thousand was sold at a gain of $1.4 million. Seven of these Z tranche securities remain in Heartland's securities available for sale portfolio at a book value of $145 thousand and a market value of $3.5 million at September 30, 2011. Management has not determined when any future sales of these securities will occur.

Trading securities contributed a net loss of $83 thousand during the third quarter of 2011 compared to a net gain of $18 thousand during the third quarter of 2010. For the nine-month period ended September 30, trading securities experienced a net gain of $214 thousand during 2011 compared to a net loss of $198 thousand during 2010. These changes were driven by overall market conditions.

Gains on sale of loans totaled $3.2 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $2.4 million during the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $789 thousand or 33 percent. For the first nine months of 2011, gains on sale of loans totaled $5.9 million compared to $4.3 million during the first nine months of 2010. Even though the origination of 15- and 30-year, fixed-rate residential mortgage loans was slower during the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010, the gains on sale of loans increased as a result of better pricing received on the sale of these loans into the secondary market. Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, Heartland began selling a majority of these loans under a bulk delivery method instead of on an individual delivery method. Refinancing activity increased during the third quarter of 2011 as long-term mortgage loan rates fell to all-time lows, combined with the recent opening of loan production offices, operating under the National Residential Mortgage name, in Reno, Nevada; Austin, Texas; and San Diego, California. New residential mortgage loans are originated under the Heartland subsidiary bank brands in current banking markets or under the National Residential Mortgage brand in non-footprint locations. National Residential and its team of mortgage banking professionals were acquired by Heartland in late 2010. This unit has implemented a highly efficient loan origination process at all Heartland locations. As this unit expands both within and outside the Heartland footprint, management expects to see continued increases in mortgage loan originations from both new purchases and refinancing activity.

Income on bank owned life insurance decreased $188 thousand or 47 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same quarter of 2010 and $61 thousand or 6 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. A large portion of Heartland's bank owned life insurance is held in a separate account product that experienced lower yields during 2011.

Other noninterest income was a loss of $171 thousand during the third quarter of 2011 compared to income of $349 thousand during the third quarter of 2010. Affecting other noninterest income were payments due to or from the FDIC under loss share agreements associated with The Elizabeth State Bank acquisition completed on July 2, 2009. For the third quarter of 2011, payments due to the FDIC under loss share agreements totaled $390 thousand while payments due from the FDIC under loss share agreements totaled $64 thousand for the third quarter of 2010. Payments due to the FDIC for the first nine months of 2011 totaled $952 thousand whereas payments due from the FDIC for the first nine months of 2010 totaled $316 thousand. For the nine-month period ended on September 30, other noninterest income totaled a loss of $126 thousand during 2011 compared to income of $1.2 million during 2010.

Noninterest Expenses

The tables below show Heartland's noninterest expense for the quarters and nine months indicated.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		Change			% Change
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	17,736	$	15,502	$	2,234		14	%
Occupancy	2,396		2,287		109			5
Furniture and equipment	1,392		1,515		(123		)	(8	)
Professional fees	3,110		2,621		489			19
FDIC insurance assessments	798		1,331		(533		)	(40	)
Advertising	1,191		906		285			31
Intangible assets amortization	141		149		(8		)	(5	)
Goodwill impairment charge	—		1,639		(1,639		)	(100	)
Net loss on repossessed assets	1,409		4,219		(2,810		)	(67	)
Other noninterest expenses	3,690		3,277		413			13
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES	$	31,863	$	33,446	$	(1,583	)	(5	)%

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		Change			% Change
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	53,402	$	46,499	$	6,903		15	%
Occupancy	6,995		6,782		213			3
Furniture and equipment	4,161		4,561		(400		)	(9	)
Professional fees	9,182		7,381		1,801			24
FDIC insurance assessments	2,929		4,135		(1,206		)	(29	)
Advertising	3,154		2,772		382			14
Intangible assets amortization	431		445		(14		)	(3	)
Goodwill impairment charge	—		1,639		(1,639		)	(100	)
Net loss on repossessed assets	5,552		7,919		(2,367		)	(30	)
Other noninterest expenses	11,287		9,789		1,498			15
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES	$	97,093	$	91,922	$	5,171		6	%

For the third quarter of 2011, noninterest expense totaled $31.9 million, a decrease of $1.6 million or 5 percent from the same quarter of 2010. Included in noninterest expense during the third quarter of 2010 was a $1.6 million goodwill impairment charge. The effect of reductions in FDIC insurance assessments and net losses on repossessed assets was partially offset by an increase in salaries and employee benefits. For the nine-month period ended September 30, noninterest expense totaled $97.1 million in 2011 compared to $91.9 million in 2010, a $5.2 million or 6 percent increase. Contributing to this increase was an increase in salaries and employee benefits, additional professional fees and an increase in other noninterest expenses. The effect of these increases was mitigated by a reduction in FDIC insurance assessments and a decrease in net losses on repossessed assets.

The largest component of noninterest expense, salaries and employee benefits, increased $2.2 million or 14 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and $6.9 million or 15 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. These increases were primarily a result of the expansion of residential loan origination and the addition of personnel in the Heartland Mortgage and National Residential Mortgage units. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 1,105 on September 30, 2011, compared to 1,027 on September 30, 2010.

Professional fees increased $489 thousand or 19 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and $1.8 million or 24 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same nine months in 2010. These increases were primarily associated with the workout and disposition of nonperforming assets and the services provided to Heartland by third-party consultants.

FDIC assessments decreased $533 thousand or 40 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and $1.2 million or 29 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same nine months in 2010, primarily associated with a change in the FDIC assessment rates that became effective April 1, 2011. These new rates are based upon total assets minus tangible equity of the insured bank instead of total deposits.

Net losses on repossessed assets totaled $1.4 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $4.2 million during the third quarter of 2010. For the nine-month period ended on September 30, net losses on repossessed assets totaled $5.6 million during 2011 compared to $7.9 million during 2010. A majority of these losses resulted from valuation adjustments due to reductions in real estate values.

Other noninterest expenses increased $413 thousand or 13 percent during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and $1.5 million or 15 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. During the first quarter of 2011, a $403 thousand writedown on land in Phoenix, Arizona, which had originally been purchased for branch expansion but has now been listed for sale, was recorded.

Income Taxes

Heartland's effective tax rate was 28.37 percent for the first nine months of 2011 compared to 32.65 percent for the first nine months of 2010. Excluding the non-deductible goodwill impairment charge, Heartland's effective tax rate was 30.69 percent for the first nine months of 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, Heartland's income taxes included a $404 thousand refund for state taxes attributable to the 2007 and 2008 tax years. Federal low-income housing tax credits included in Heartland's effective tax rate totaled $599 thousand during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $163 thousand during the first nine months of 2010. Heartland's effective tax rate is also affected by the level of tax-exempt interest income which, as a percentage of pre-tax income, was 25.87 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to 26.44 percent during the first nine months of 2010. The tax-equivalent adjustment for this tax-exempt interest income was $4.2 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $3.7 million during the first nine months of 2010.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

At September 30, 2011, total assets were $4.11 billion, an increase of $113.2 million or 3 percent, over total assets of $4.00 billion at December 31, 2010.

Lending Activities

Total loans and leases, exclusive of those covered by loss share agreements, were $2.37 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $2.34 billion at year-end 2010, an increase of $30.2 million or 2 percent annualized. Commercial and commercial real estate loans, which totaled $1.73 billion at September 30, 2011, increased $6.6 million or 1 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Residential mortgage loans, which totaled $179.6 million at September 30, 2011, increased $15.9 million or 13 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Agricultural and agricultural real estate loans, which totaled $256.9 million at September 30, 2011, increased $5.9 million or 3 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Consumer loans, which totaled $217.0 million at September 30, 2011, increased $2.5 million or 1 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Loan growth has been difficult to achieve during the first nine months of 2011, although management has begun to see pipeline improvement in some of Heartland's markets.

The table below presents the composition of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010:

LOAN PORTFOLIO (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Amount			Percent		Amount			Percent
Loans and leases receivable held to maturity:
Commercial	$	561,063		23.57	%	$	558,031		23.75	%
Commercial real estate	1,164,523			48.94		1,160,962			49.43
Residential mortgage	179,628			7.55		163,726			6.97
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	256,857			10.79		250,943			10.68
Consumer	217,007			9.12		214,515			9.13
Lease financing, net	604			0.03		981			0.04
Gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,379,682			100.00	%	2,349,158			100.00	%
Unearned discount	(2,466		)			(2,581		)
Deferred loan fees	(3,030		)			(2,590		)
Total net loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,374,186					2,343,987
Loans covered under loss share agreements:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	6,788		45.97	%	$	10,056		48.34	%
Residential mortgage	4,410			29.86		5,792			27.85
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	2,139			14.49		2,723			13.09
Consumer	1,429			9.68		2,229			10.72
Total loans covered under loss share agreements	14,766			100.00	%	20,800			100.00	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(44,195		)			(42,693		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	$	2,344,757				$	2,322,094

Loans and leases secured by real estate, either fully or partially, totaled $1.71 billion or 72 percent of total loans and leases at September 30, 2011. Of the non-farm, nonresidential loans, 60 percent are owner occupied. The largest categories within Heartland's real estate secured loans at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are listed below:

LOANS SECURED BY REAL ESTATE (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Residential real estate, excluding residential construction and residential lot loans	$	407,030	$	389,790
Agriculture	199,388		201,750
Industrial, manufacturing, business and commercial	186,121		186,558
Land development and lots	141,003		152,658
Retail	158,190		168,916
Office	148,097		124,041
Hotel, resort and hospitality	94,335		97,442
Warehousing	60,763		65,196
Multi-family	65,784		62,886
Food and beverage	71,172		68,550
Residential construction	40,595		42,564
All other	139,553		137,216
Total loans secured by real estate	$	1,712,031	$	1,697,567

The process utilized by Heartland to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is considered a critical accounting practice for Heartland. The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management's estimate of identified and unidentified probable losses in the existing loan portfolio. For additional details on the specific factors considered, refer to the

critical accounting policies section of this report.

The allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30, 2011, was 1.86 percent of loans and leases and 60.85 percent of nonperforming loans compared to 1.82 percent of loans and leases and 47.12 percent of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010, and 1.89 percent of loans and leases and 52.51 percent of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2010. Additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses continued during 2011 because of the continued depressed economic conditions that impact individual credits and the impact those conditions have on the appraised values of collateral. When updated appraisals have been obtained, many reflect a decline in property values due primarily to a lack of recent comparable sales and an extension of absorption periods.

Nonperforming loans, exclusive of those covered under the loss sharing agreements, were $72.6 million or 3.06 percent of total loans and leases at September 30, 2011, compared to $90.6 million or 3.87 percent of total loans and leases at December 31, 2010, and $85.2 million or 3.61 percent of total loans and leases at September 30, 2010. Approximately 62 percent, or $44.8 million, of Heartland's nonperforming loans have individual loan balances exceeding $1.0 million. These nonperforming loans, to an aggregate of 18 borrowers, are primarily concentrated in Heartland's banks serving the Western states, with $12.1 million originated by Summit Bank & Trust, $10.2 million originated by Arizona Bank & Trust, $9.5 million originated by Rocky Mountain Bank, $5.1 million originated by Wisconsin Community Bank, $4.9 million originated by New Mexico Bank & Trust and $3.0 million originated by Galena State Bank and Trust Company. The portion of Heartland's nonperforming loans covered by government guarantees was $3.1 million at September 30, 2011. The industry breakdown for nonperforming loans with individual balances exceeding $1.0 million, as identified using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), was $16.5 million for lot and land development, $11.5 million to lessors of real estate, $3.4 million for other activities related to real estate and $2.3 million for construction and development. The remaining $11.1 million was distributed among six other industries.

Other real estate owned was $39.2 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $32.0 million at December 31, 2010, and $32.4 million at September 30, 2010. Liquidation strategies have been identified for all the assets held in other real estate owned. Management continues to market these properties through an orderly liquidation process instead of a quick liquidation process in order to avoid discounts greater than the projected carrying costs. During the first nine months of 2011, $16.4 million of other real estate owned was sold, $6.2 million during the third quarter, $4.9 million during the second quarter and $5.3 million during the first quarter.

Net charge-offs on loans during the third quarter of 2011 were $4.1 million compared to $8.4 million during the third quarter of 2010. A large portion of the net charge-offs in both years was related to nonfarm nonresidential real estate and construction, land development and other land loans.

Delinquencies in each of the loan portfolios continue to be well-managed and no significant adverse trends have been identified. Loans delinquent 30 to 89 days as a percent of total loans were 0.54 percent at September 30, 2011, compared to 0.60 percent at June 30, 2011, 0.61 percent at March 31, 2011, 0.67 percent at December 31, 2010, and 1.65 percent at September 30, 2010.

The table below presents the changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods indicated:

ANALYSIS OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES (Dollars in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	42,693		$	41,848
Provision for loan and lease losses	21,581			23,648
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	4,280			1,708
Charge-offs on loans and leases not covered by loss share agreements	(23,846		)	(22,119		)
Charge-offs on loans and leases covered by loss share agreements	(513		)	(353		)
Balance at end of period	$	44,195		$	44,732
Annualized ratio of net charge offs to average loans and leases	1.12		%	1.15		%

The table below presents the amounts of nonperforming loans and leases and other nonperforming assets on the dates indicated:

NONPERFORMING ASSETS (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009
Not covered under loss share agreements:
Nonaccrual loans and leases	$	72,629		$	85,190		$	90,512		$	78,118
Loan and leases contractually past due 90 days or more	—			—			85			17
Total nonperforming loans and leases	72,629			85,190			90,597			78,135
Other real estate	38,640			32,129			31,731			30,205
Other repossessed assets	398			492			302			501
Total nonperforming assets not covered under loss share agreements	$	111,667		$	117,811		$	122,630		$	108,841
Covered under loss share agreements:
Nonaccrual loans and leases	$	3,886		$	5,330		$	4,901		4,170
Loan and leases contractually past due 90 days or more	—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming loans and leases	3,886			5,330			4,901			4,170
Other real estate	548			279			271			363
Other repossessed assets	—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming assets covered under loss share agreements	$	4,434		$	5,609		$	5,172		4,533
Performing troubled debt restructured loans (1)	$	24,853		$	29,244		$	23,719		$	21,637
Nonperforming loans and leases not covered under loss share agreements to total loans and leases	3.06		%	3.61		%	3.86		%	3.35		%
Nonperforming assets not covered under loss share agreements to total loans and leases plus repossessed property	4.63		%	4.92		%	5.16		%	4.61		%
Nonperforming assets not covered under loss share agreements to total assets	2.72		%	2.90		%	3.07		%	2.71		%
(1) Represents accruing troubled debt restructured loans performing according to their restructured terms.

The schedules below summarize the changes in Heartland's nonperforming assets, including those covered by loss share agreements, during the third quarter of 2011 and the first nine months of 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)	Nonperforming Loans			Other Real Estate Owned			Other Repossessed Assets			Total Nonperforming Assets
June 30, 2011	$	72,590		$	39,075		$	188		$	111,853
Loan foreclosures	(7,505		)	7,326			179			—
Net loan charge offs	(4,134		)	—			—			(4,134		)
New nonperforming loans	19,122			—			—			19,122
Reduction of nonperforming loans(1)	(3,558		)	—			—			(3,558		)
OREO/Repossessed sales proceeds	—			(6,459		)	(25		)	(6,484		)
OREO/Repossessed assets writedowns, net	—			(754		)	(32		)	(786		)
Net activity at Citizens Finance Co.	—			—			88			88
September 30, 2011	$	76,515		$	39,188		$	398		$	116,101
(1) Includes principal reductions and transfers to performing status.

(Dollars in thousands)	Nonperforming Loans			Other Real Estate Owned			Other Repossessed Assets			Total Nonperforming Assets
December 31, 2010	$	95,498		$	32,002		$	302		$	127,802
Loan foreclosures	(27,445		)	27,200			245			—
Net loan charge offs	(20,079		)	—			—			(20,079		)
New nonperforming loans	54,042			—			—			54,042
Reduction of nonperforming loans(1)	(25,501		)	—			—			(25,501		)
OREO/Repossessed sales proceeds	—			(16,089		)	(170		)	(16,259		)
OREO/Repossessed assets writedowns, net	—			(3,925		)	(32		)	(3,957		)
Net activity at Citizens Finance Co.	—			—			53			53
September 30, 2011	$	76,515		$	39,188		$	398		$	116,101
(1) Includes principal reductions and transfers to performing status.

Securities

The composition of Heartland's securities portfolio is managed to maximize the return on the portfolio while considering the impact it has on Heartland's asset/liability position and liquidity needs. Securities represented 32 percent of total assets at both September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Total available for sale securities as of September 30, 2011, were $1.26 billion, an increase of $59.9 million or 7 percent annualized from $1.20 billion at December 31, 2010.

The composition of the securities portfolio shifted from an emphasis in U.S. government corporations and agencies to mortgage-backed securities as the spread on mortgage-backed securities widened in comparison to government agency securities. The percentage of mortgage-backed securities was 59 percent at September 30, 2011, compared to 48 percent at year-end 2010. A portion of the new mortgage-backed securities was in reverse mortgage products. Nearly 82 percent of Heartland's mortgage-backed securities are issuances of government-sponsored enterprises as of September 30, 2011.

The table below presents the composition of the securities portfolio, by major category, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010: 

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	169,402	12.80	%	$	320,007	25.30	%
Mortgage-backed securities	778,503		58.82		609,865		48.23
Obligation of states and political subdivisions	325,829		24.62		294,259		23.27
Other securities	49,730		3.76		40,433		3.20
Total securities	$	1,323,464	100.00	%	$	1,264,564	100.00	%

Deposits And Borrowed Funds

Total deposits were $3.17 billion at September 30, 2011, compared to $3.03 billion at year-end 2010, an increase of $139.6 million or 6 percent annualized. The composition of Heartland's deposits continued to shift from higher cost certificates of deposit to no cost demand deposits during the third quarter of 2011, as demand deposits increased $112.3 million or 26 percent annualized since year-end 2010. Time deposits, exclusive of brokered deposits, experienced a decrease of $75.1 million or 12 percent annualized since year-end 2010. The increase in demand deposits was effectively matched with a corresponding decrease in time deposits. The result is an improving mix of total deposits, with demand deposits representing 22 percent, savings representing 52 percent and time deposits representing 26 percent. At year-end 2010, demand deposits represented 19 percent of total deposits, savings represented 51 percent and time deposits represented 30 percent.

Short-term borrowings generally include federal funds purchased, treasury tax and loan note options, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, short-term FHLB advances and discount window borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank. These funding alternatives are utilized in varying degrees depending on their pricing and availability. As of September 30, 2011, the amount of short-term borrowings was $173.2 million compared to $235.9 million at year-end 2010, a decrease of $62.7 million

or 27 percent, primarily due to activity in retail repurchase agreements. All of the bank subsidiaries provide retail repurchase agreements to their customers as a cash management tool, sweeping excess funds from demand deposit accounts into these agreements. This source of funding does not increase the bank's reserve requirements. Although the aggregate balance of these retail repurchase agreements is subject to variation, the account relationships represented by these balances are principally local. These balances were $154.9 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $212.7 million at December 31, 2010.

Also included in short-term borrowings are the revolving credit lines Heartland has with two unaffiliated banks, primarily to provide working capital to Heartland. These credit lines may also be used to fund the operations of Heartland Community Development Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heartland formed to hold and manage certain nonperforming loans and assets and to allow the liquidation of those assets at a time that is more economically advantageous. Under these unsecured revolving credit lines, Heartland may borrow up to $10.0 million at any one time. There was no balance outstanding on these revolving credit lines at September 30, 2011, compared to a balance of $5.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2010.

Other borrowings include all debt arrangements Heartland and its subsidiaries have entered into with original maturities that extend beyond one year. As of September 30, 2011, the amount of other borrowings was $376.0 million, an increase of $13.4 million or 4 percent since year-end 2010. On March 11, 2011, Heartland issued an additional $3.0 million of its senior notes to one additional accredited investor taking the total amount of senior notes outstanding at September 30, 2011, to $27.5 million. Prior to April 2011, Heartland maintained credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, one of which provided borrowing authority for $15.0 million and one of which provided borrowing authority for $5.0 million. On April 20, 2011, Heartland entered into a debt arrangement with one of these banks to convert the $15.0 million revolving line of credit into a $15.0 million amortizing term loan with a maturity date of April 20, 2016, and to add $5.0 million in borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving line of credit with a maturity date of April 20, 2013. At the same time, Heartland entered into an interest rate swap transaction, designated as a cash flow hedge, with the unaffiliated bank to fix the rate on the term loan at 5.14 percent for the full 5-year term. Accordingly, after this debt arrangement, Heartland continues to have credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, both with a revolving borrowing capacity of $5.0 million, and a $15.0 million amortizing term loan with one of these banks. At September 30, 2011, Heartland had no outstanding balance on either credit line.

Other borrowings include structured wholesale repurchase agreements, which totaled $85.0 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The balances outstanding on trust preferred capital securities issued by Heartland are also included in other borrowings. A schedule of Heartland's trust preferred offerings outstanding as of September 30, 2011, is as follows: 

(Dollars in thousands)
Amount Issued		Issuance Date	Interest Rate	Interest Rate as of Sept. 30, 2011(1)	Maturity Date	Callable Date
$	5,000	8/7/2000	10.60%	10.60%	9/7/2030	12/7/2011
20,000		10/10/2003	8.25%	8.25%	10/10/2033	12/30/2011
25,000		3/17/2004	2.75% over Libor	3.06%(2)	3/17/2034	12/17/2011
20,000		1/31/2006	1.33% over Libor	1.58%(3)	4/7/2036	10/7/2011
20,000		6/21/2007	6.75%	6.75%	9/15/2037	6/15/2012
20,000		6/26/2007	1.48% over Libor	1.81%(4)	9/1/2037	9/1/2012
$	110,000

(1)	Effective weighted average interest rate as of September 30, 2011, was 6.13% due to interest rate swap transactions on the variable rate securities as discussed in Note 8 to Heartland's consolidated financial statements.
(2)	Effective interest rate as of September 30, 2011, was 5.33% due to an interest rate swap transaction as discussed in Note 8 to Heartland's consolidated financial statements.
(3)	Effective interest rate as of September 30, 2011, was 4.69% due to an interest rate swap transaction as discussed in Note 8 to Heartland's consolidated financial statements.
(4)	Effective interest rate as of September 30, 2011, was 4.70% due to an interest rate swap transaction as discussed in Note 8 to Heartland's consolidated financial statements.

Also in other borrowings are the bank subsidiaries' borrowings from the FHLB. All of the bank subsidiaries, except for Heartland's most recent de novo bank, Minnesota Bank & Trust, own FHLB stock in either Chicago, Dallas, Des Moines, Seattle, San Francisco or Topeka, enabling them to borrow funds from their respective FHLB for short- or long-term purposes under a variety of programs. FHLB borrowings totaled $132.4 million at September 30, 2011, and $135.7 million at December 31, 2010. Total FHLB borrowings at September 30, 2011, had an average rate of 3.24 percent and an average maturity of 3.29

years. When considering the earliest possible call date on these advances, the average maturity is shortened to 3.08 years.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Heartland banks evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Heartland banks upon extension of credit, is based upon management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties. Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by the Heartland banks to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. At September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit aggregated $734.0 million and $623.2 million, and standby letters of credit aggregated $49.3 million and $48.7 million, respectively.

Contractual obligations and other commitments were presented in Heartland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes in Heartland's contractual obligations and other commitments since that report was filed.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Bank regulatory agencies have adopted capital standards by which all bank holding companies will be evaluated. Under the risk-based method of measurement, the resulting ratio is dependent upon not only the level of capital and assets, but also the composition of assets and capital and the amount of off-balance sheet commitments. Heartland and its bank subsidiaries have been, and will continue to be, managed so they meet the well-capitalized requirements under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework, bank holding companies and banks must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10 percent, 6 percent and 4 percent, respectively. The most recent notification from the FDIC categorized Heartland and each of its bank subsidiaries as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed each institution's category.

Heartland's capital ratios were as follows for the dates indicated:

CAPITAL RATIOS (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Risk-Based Capital Ratios (1)
Tier 1 capital	$	422,234	14.35	%	$	403,357	14.06	%
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement	117,713		4.00	%	114,760		4.00	%
Excess	$	304,521	10.35	%	$	288,597	10.06	%
Total capital	$	483,401	16.43	%	$	465,666	16.23	%
Total capital minimum requirement	235,427		8.00	%	229,521		8.00	%
Excess	$	247,974	8.43	%	$	236,145	8.23	%
Total risk-adjusted assets	$	2,942,832			$	2,869,010
Leverage Capital Ratios (2)
Tier 1 capital	$	422,234	10.46	%	$	403,357	9.92	%
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement (3)	161,503		4.00	%	162,580		4.00	%
Excess	$	260,731	6.46	%	$	240,777	5.92	%
Average adjusted assets (less goodwill and other intangible assets)	$	4,037,581			$	4,064,508

(1)	Based on the risk-based capital guidelines of the Federal Reserve, a bank holding company is required to maintain a Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 4.00% and total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 8.00%.
(2)	The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average adjusted assets.
(3)	Management of Heartland has established a minimum target leverage ratio of 4.00%. Based on Federal Reserve guidelines, a bank holding company generally is required to maintain a leverage ratio of 3.00% plus additional capital of at least 100 basis points.

On September 15, 2011, Heartland joined the SBLF with an issuance of $81.7 million of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury. Simultaneous with receipt of the SBLF funds, Heartland redeemed the $81.7 million of preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008 under the Capital Purchase Program. On September 28, 2011, Heartland repurchased a warrant to purchase 609,687 shares of Heartland common stock from the U.S. Treasury at a purchase price of $1.8 million. The warrant had been issued in connection with participation in the Capital Purchase Program. Note 10 to the quarterly financial statements contains a detailed discussion about of the capital issuance and redemptions.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity refers to Heartland's ability to maintain a cash flow that is adequate to meet maturing obligations and existing commitments, to withstand fluctuations in deposit levels, to fund operations and to provide for customers' credit needs. The liquidity of Heartland principally depends on cash flows from operating activities, investment in and maturity of assets, changes in balances of deposits and borrowings and its ability to borrow funds in the money or capital markets.

Total cash provided by operating activities was $69.9 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $72.8 million during the first nine months of 2010.

Investing activities used cash of $131.9 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to using cash of $125.7 million during the first nine months of 2010. The proceeds from securities sales, paydowns and maturities was $638.3 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $521.1 million during the first nine months of 2010. Purchases of securities used cash of $682.2 million during the first nine months of 2011 while $534.8 million was used for securities purchases during the first nine months of 2010. A net increase in loans and leases used cash of $96.9 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $110.6 million during the first nine months of 2010.

Financing activities provided cash of $81.0 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $12.2 million during the first nine months of 2010. A net increase in deposit accounts provided cash of $139.6 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to providing cash of $23.3 million during the same nine months of 2010. Activity in short-term borrowings used cash of $62.7 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to providing cash of $34.2 million during the first

nine months of 2010. Cash proceeds from other borrowings were $18.5 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $518 thousand during the first nine months of 2010. Repayment of other borrowings used cash of $5.1 million during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $38.5 million during the first nine months of 2010.

Management of investing and financing activities, and market conditions, determine the level and the stability of net interest cash flows. Management attempts to mitigate the impact of changes in market interest rates to the extent possible, so that balance sheet growth is the principal determinant of growth in net interest cash flows.

In the event of short-term liquidity needs, the bank subsidiaries may purchase federal funds from each other or from correspondent banks and may also borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank. Additionally, the subsidiary banks' FHLB memberships give them the ability to borrow funds for short- and long-term purposes under a variety of programs.

At September 30, 2011, Heartland's revolving credit agreements with two unaffiliated banks provided a maximum borrowing capacity of $10.0 million, of which nothing had been borrowed. These credit agreements contain specific covenants, with which Heartland was in compliance on September 30, 2011.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates. Heartland's market risk is comprised primarily of interest rate risk resulting from its core banking activities of lending and deposit gathering. Interest rate risk measures the impact on earnings from changes in interest rates and the effect on current fair market values of Heartland's assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The objective is to measure this risk and manage the balance sheet to avoid unacceptable potential for economic loss.

Management continually develops and applies strategies to mitigate market risk. Exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the asset/liability committees of the banks and, on a consolidated basis, by Heartland's executive management and board of directors. Darling Consulting Group, Inc. has been engaged to provide asset/liability management position assessment and strategy formulation services to Heartland and its bank subsidiaries. At least quarterly, a detailed review of the balance sheet risk profile is performed for Heartland and each of its bank subsidiaries. Included in these reviews are interest rate sensitivity analyses, which simulate changes in net interest income in response to various interest rate scenarios. This analysis considers current portfolio rates, existing maturities, repricing opportunities and market interest rates, in addition to prepayments and growth under different interest rate assumptions. Selected strategies are modeled prior to implementation to determine their effect on Heartland's interest rate risk profile and net interest income. Management does not believe that Heartland's primary market risk exposures have changed significantly in the first nine months of 2011.

The core interest rate risk analysis utilized by Heartland examines the balance sheet under increasing and decreasing interest scenarios that are neither too modest nor too extreme. All rate changes are ramped over a 12-month horizon based upon a parallel shift in the yield curve and then maintained at those levels over the remainder of the simulation horizon. Using this approach, management is able to see the effect that both a gradual change of rates (year 1) and a rate shock (year 2 and beyond) could have on Heartland's net interest income. Starting balances in the model reflect actual balances on the “as of” date, adjusted for material and significant transactions. Pro-forma balances remain static. This enables interest rate risk embedded within the existing balance sheet structure to be isolated from the interest rate risk often caused by growth in assets and liabilities. Due to the low interest rate environment, the simulations under a decreasing interest rate scenario were prepared using a 100 basis point shift in rates. The most recent reviews at September 30, 2011, and 2010, provided the following results:

	2011				2010
	Net Interest Margin (in thousands)		% Change From Base		Net Interest Margin (in thousands)		% Change From Base
Year 1
Down 100 Basis Points	$	137,826	0.15	%	$	136,246	0.43	%
Base	$	137,613			$	135,669
Up 200 Basis Points	$	134,704	(2.11	)%	$	131,866	(2.80	)%
Year 2
Down 100 Basis Points	$	129,052	(6.22	)%	$	131,894	(2.78	)%
Base	$	132,622	(3.63	)%	$	134,526	(0.84	)%
Up 200 Basis Points	$	136,239	(1.00	)%	$	133,993	(1.24	)%

Heartland uses derivative financial instruments to manage the impact of changes in interest rates on its future interest income or interest expense. Heartland is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to these derivative instruments, but believes it has minimized the risk of these losses by entering into the contracts with large, stable financial institutions. The estimated fair market values of these derivative instruments are presented in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

Heartland enters into financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Heartland to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stated amount and with specified terms and conditions. These commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are not recorded on the balance sheet until the instrument is exercised.

Heartland holds a securities trading portfolio that would also be subject to elements of market risk. These securities are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. These securities had a carrying value of $458 thousand at September 30, 2011, and $244 thousand at December 31, 2010, and in both cases were less than 1 percent of total assets.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Heartland's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Heartland's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Heartland's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) were effective as of September 30, 2011, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by Heartland in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no significant changes to Heartland's disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting during the first nine months of 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Heartland's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which Heartland or its subsidiaries are a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses. While the ultimate outcome of current legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of these legal actions should not have a material effect on Heartland's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in the risk factors applicable to Heartland from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, in Heartland's 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Please refer to that section of Heartland's Form 10-K for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to Heartland's business.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF ISSUER SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. [RESERVED]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits

3.1	Certificate of Designation of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011).
4.1	Form of Stock Certificate for Fixed Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011).
10.1	Promissory Note between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and Bankers Trust Company dated as of April 20, 2011, including Loan Commitment Letter dated April 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2011).
10.2	ISDA Confirmation Letter between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and Bankers Trust Company dated April 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2011).
10.3	Promissory Note between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and Bankers Trust Company dated April 20, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2011).
10.4	Securities Purchase Agreement between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and the Secretary of the Treasury dated September 15, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011).
10.5	Repurchase Document between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and the United States Department of the Treasury dated September 15, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011).
10.6	Warrant Letter Agreement between Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and the United States Department of the Treasury dated September 28, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2011).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101	Financial statement formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned there unto duly authorized.

HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC.

(Registrant)

Principal Executive Officer

/s/ Lynn B. Fuller

By: Lynn B. Fuller

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

/s/ John K. Schmidt

John K. Schmidt

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 9, 2011

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

I, Lynn B. Fuller, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heartland Financial USA, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting, and;
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 9, 2011
/s/ Lynn B. Fuller
Lynn B. Fuller
Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

I, John K. Schmidt, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heartland Financial USA, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting, and;
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 9, 2011
/s/ John K. Schmidt
John K. Schmidt
Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Financial USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), I, Lynn B. Fuller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lynn B. Fuller
Lynn B. Fuller
Chief Executive Officer
Date:	November 9, 2011

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Financial USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), I, John K. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John K. Schmidt
John K. Schmidt
Chief Financial Officer
Date:	November 9, 2011

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Cost of available for sale securities	$ 1,232,287,000	$ 1,188,807,000
Fair value of held to maturity securities	57,545,000	58,610,000
Common stock, par value	$ 1.00	$ 1.00
Common stock, shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	16,611,671	16,611,671
Treasury stock shares	152,333	186,616
Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1.00	$ 1.00
Preferred stock, shares authorized	20,604	102,302
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1.00	$ 1.00
Preferred stock, shares authorized	16,000	16,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1.00	$ 1.00
Preferred stock, shares authorized	81,698	81,698
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	81,698
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	81,698
Preferred stock, liquidation value	0	81,698,000
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1	$ 0
Preferred stock, shares authorized	81,698	0
Preferred stock, shares issued	81,698	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	81,698	0
Preferred stock, liquidation value	$ 81,698,000	$ 0

XML

Consolidated Statements of Income (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$ 37,393	$ 38,756	$ 111,839	$ 114,354
Interest on securities:
Taxable	6,826	8,225	21,820	26,618
Nontaxable	3,370	3,282	10,452	9,178
Interest on federal funds sold	2	0	3	1
Interest on interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions	0	1	1	13
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME	47,591	50,264	144,115	150,164
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on deposits	7,028	9,033	22,729	29,748
Interest on short-term borrowings	205	305	689	830
Interest on other borrowings	4,123	4,213	12,140	12,380
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE	11,356	13,551	35,558	42,958
NET INTEREST INCOME	36,235	36,713	108,557	107,206
Provision for loan and lease losses	7,727	4,799	21,581	23,648
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES	28,508	31,914	86,976	83,558
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges and fees	3,657	3,665	10,617	10,363
Loan servicing income	1,081	1,862	3,928	4,909
Trust fees	2,384	2,267	7,519	6,778
Brokerage and insurance commissions	918	739	2,622	2,236
Securities gains, net	2,085	2,158	8,930	4,664
Gain (loss) on trading account securities	(83)	18	214	(198)
Gains on sale of loans	3,183	2,394	5,893	4,275
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights		(1,239)	0	(1,239)
Income on bank owned life insurance	208	396	942	1,003
Other noninterest income	(171)	349	(126)	1,245
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME	13,262	12,609	40,539	34,036
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits	17,736	15,502	53,402	46,499
Occupancy	2,396	2,287	6,995	6,782
Furniture and equipment	1,392	1,515	4,161	4,561
Professional fees	3,110	2,621	9,182	7,381
FDIC insurance assessments	798	1,331	2,929	4,135
Advertising	1,191	906	3,154	2,772
Intangible assets amortization	141	149	431	445
Goodwill impairment charge		1,639	0	1,639
Net loss on repossessed assets	1,409	4,219	5,552	7,919
Other noninterest expenses	3,690	3,277	11,287	9,789
NONINTEREST EXPENSES	31,863	33,446	97,093	91,922
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	9,907	11,077	30,422	25,672
Income taxes	2,549	4,187	8,631	8,382
NET INCOME	7,358	6,890	21,791	17,290
Net income available to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(20)	30	5	80
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HEARTLAND	7,338	6,920	21,796	17,370
Preferred dividends and discount	(3,947)	(1,336)	(6,619)	(4,008)
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$ 3,391	$ 5,584	$ 15,177	$ 13,362
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$ 0.21	$ 0.34	$ 0.92	$ 0.82
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED	$ 0.20	$ 0.34	$ 0.92	$ 0.81
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.30	$ 0.30

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Nov. 07, 2011
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	Heartland Financial USA Inc
Entity Central Index Key	0000920112
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		16,460,088

XML

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses [Abstract]

Allowance for Credit Losses [Text Block]

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, were as follows, in thousands:

	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Leases			Unallocated		Total
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	10,097		$	19,362		$	1,982		$	2,508		$	6,646		$	7		$	—	$	40,602
Charge-offs	(487		)	(4,038		)	—			(248		)	(1,380		)	—			—		(6,153		)
Recoveries	581			1,213			—			12			213			—			—		2,019
Provision	(362		)	6,282			(289		)	482			1,615			(1		)	—		7,727
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	9,829		$	22,819		$	1,693		$	2,754		$	7,094		$	6		$	—	$	44,195

	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Leases			Unallocated			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	10,525		$	20,316		$	2,147		$	2,381		$	6,315		$	9		$	1,000		$	42,693
Charge-offs	(2,491		)	(16,622		)	(167		)	(1,477		)	(3,602		)	—			—			(24,359		)
Recoveries	974			2,742			—			37			527			—			—			4,280
Provision	821			16,383			(287		)	1,813			3,854			(3		)	(1,000		)	21,581
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	9,829		$	22,819		$	1,693		$	2,754		$	7,094		$	6		$	—		$	44,195

XML

Capital Issuance and Redemption

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Capital Issuance and Redemption [Abstract]

Preferred Stock [Text Block]

On September 15, 2011, Heartland entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with the Secretary of the Treasury ("Treasury"), pursuant to which Heartland issued and sold to Treasury 81,698 shares of its Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C ("Series C Preferred Stock"), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share ("Liquidation Amount"), for aggregate proceeds of $81.7 million. The issuance was made pursuant to the Small Business Lending Fund ("SBLF"), a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.

The Series C Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital for Heartland. Non-cumulative dividends are payable quarterly on the Series C Preferred Stock, beginning October 1, 2011. The dividend rate is calculated as a percentage of the aggregate Liquidation Amount of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock and is based on changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending or “QSBL” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). Based upon Heartland's level of QSBL compared to the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period, which is from the date of issuance through September 30, 2011, has been set at 5%. For the 2nd through 10th calendar quarters, the annual dividend rate may be adjusted to between 1% and 5%, to reflect the amount of change in Heartland's level of QSBL. For the 11th calendar quarter through 4.5 years after issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between 1% and 7% based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After 4.5 years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9% (including a quarterly lending incentive fee of 0.5%).

The Series C Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that Heartland misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the Series C Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on Heartland's Board of Directors. In the event that Heartland misses six dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, and if the then outstanding aggregate Liquidation Amount of the Series C Preferred Stock is at least $25.0 million, then the holder of the Series C Preferred Stock will have the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors of Heartland. Heartland may redeem the shares of Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the sum of the Liquidation Amount per share and the per share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period, subject to any required prior approval by Heartland's primary federal banking regulator.

The terms of the Series C Preferred Stock impose limits on Heartland's ability to pay dividends on and repurchase shares of its common stock and other securities. In general, Heartland may declare and pay dividends on its common stock or any other stock junior to the Series C Preferred Stock, or repurchase shares of any such stock, only if after payment of such dividends or repurchase of such shares Heartland's Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Signing Date Tier 1 Capital (as defined and set forth in the Certificate of Designation), excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series C Preferred Stock (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the 2nd anniversary and ending on the 10th anniversary of issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, by 10% for each one percent increase in Heartland's QSBL over the baseline level. If, however Heartland fails to declare and pay dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock in a given quarter, then during such quarter and for the next three quarters following such missed dividend payment Heartland may not pay dividends on or repurchase any common stock or any other securities that are junior to (or in parity with) the Series C Preferred Stock, except in very limited circumstances. If any Series C Preferred Stock remains outstanding on the 10th anniversary of issuance, Heartland may not pay any further dividends on its common stock or any other junior stock until the Series C Preferred Stock is redeemed in full.

On September 15, 2011, Heartland entered into a letter agreement (“Repurchase Document”) with Treasury, pursuant to which, Heartland redeemed from Treasury, in part using the proceeds from the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, all 81,698 outstanding shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B ("Series B Preferred Stock"), for a redemption price of $82.0 million, including accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption. As a result of its redemption of the Series B Preferred Stock, Heartland is no longer subject to the limits provided for under the TARP Capital Purchase Program with respect to future executive compensation decisions and other matters. When the Series B Preferred Stock was issued, $6.3 million of the $81.7 million purchase price was assigned to the associated warrant and the remaining $75.4 million was assigned to the carrying value of the Series B Preferred Stock. The $6.3 million discount was being amortized over five years, the anticipated life of the Series B Preferred Stock. Upon redemption of the Series B Preferred Stock, $2.6 millionof the remaining unamortized discount was recognized.

On September 28, 2011, Heartland repurchased from Treasury a warrant to purchase 609,687 shares of Heartland common stock, $1.00 par value per share, at an exercise price of $20.10 per share (“Warrant”), issued to Treasury on December 19, 2008, in connection with participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Heartland paid an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 million for the repurchase of the Warrant, which has been cancelled.

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting [Text Block]

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, included in Heartland Financial USA, Inc.'s ("Heartland") Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011. Accordingly, footnote disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted.

The financial information of Heartland included herein has been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of the interim period endedSeptember 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Heartland evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is determined using net income available to common stockholders and weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares and assumed incremental common shares issued. Amounts used in the determination of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, are shown in the table below:

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars and number of shares in thousands, except per share data)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Net income attributable to Heartland	$	7,338		$	6,920
Preferred dividends and discount	(3,947		)	(1,336		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	3,391		$	5,584
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share	16,444			16,377
Assumed incremental common shares issued upon exercise of stock options	141			89
Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share	16,585			16,466
Earnings per common share — basic	$	0.21		$	0.34
Earnings per common share — diluted	$	0.20		$	0.34
Number of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation	522			567

	Nine Months Ended
(Dollars and number of shares in thousands, except per share data)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Net income attributable to Heartland	$	21,796		$	17,370
Preferred dividends and discount	(6,619		)	(4,008		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	15,177		$	13,362
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share	16,428			16,364
Assumed incremental common shares issued upon exercise of stock options	141			90
Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share	16,569			16,454
Earnings per common share — basic	$	0.92		$	0.82
Earnings per common share — diluted	$	0.92		$	0.81
Number of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation	522			567

Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to 2009, options were typically granted annually with an expiration date ten years after the date of grant. Vesting was generally over a five-year service period with portions of a grant becoming exercisable at three years, four years and five years after the date of grant. A summary of the status of the stock options as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, follows:

	2011				2010
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1	672,721		$	20.27	704,471		$	20.02
Granted	—		—		—		—
Exercised	(44,375	)	9.82		(20,500	)	10.68
Forfeited	(39,834	)	22.92		(6,750	)	22.19
Outstanding at September 30	588,512		$	20.88	677,221		$	20.28
Options exercisable at September 30	452,495		$	20.63	399,987		$	18.81

At September 30, 2011, the vested options totaled 452,495 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $20.63 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.73 years. The intrinsic value for the vested options as of September 30, 2011, was $207 thousand. The intrinsic value for the total of all options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $193 thousand. The total fair value of shares under stock options and awards that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $929 thousand. At September 30, 2011, shares available for issuance under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan totaled 316,344.

No options were granted during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010. Cash received from options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $436 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $85 thousand. Cash received from options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $219 thousand, with a related tax benefit of $28 thousand.

Under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, stock awards may be granted as determined by the Heartland Compensation Committee. On January 18, 2011, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) totaling 101,150 were granted to key policy-making employees. On January 19, 2010, RSUs totaling 98,200 were granted to key policy-making employees. These RSUs were granted at no cost to the employee. These RSUs represent the right to receive shares of Heartland common stock at a specified date in the future based on specific vesting conditions; vest over five years in three equal installments on the 3rd, 4th and 5th anniversaries of the grant date; will be settled in common stock upon vesting; will not be entitled to dividends until vested; will terminate upon termination of employment, but will continue to vest after retirement if retirement occurs after the employee attains age 62 and has provided ten years of service to Heartland; and will continue to vest after retirement if retirement occurs after the second anniversary of the grant date.

Total compensation costs recorded for stock options, RSUs and shares to be issued under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan were $929 thousand and $783 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, there were $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan for stock options, RSUs and restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized through 2015.

Effect of New Financial Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires (i) fair value disclosures by each class of assets and liabilities (generally a subset within a line item as presented in the statement of financial position) rather than major category, (ii) for items measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the amounts of significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2, and transfers into and out of Level 3, and the reasons for those transfers, including separate discussion related to the transfers into each level apart from transfers out of each level, and (iii) gross presentation of the amounts of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 recurring measurement reconciliation. Additionally, the standard clarifies that a description of the valuation techniques(s) and inputs used to measure fair values is required for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Also, if a valuation technique has changed, entities should disclose that change and the reason for the changes. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, "Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements."  Disclosures other than the gross presentation changes in the Level 3 reconciliation were effective for the first reported period beginning after December 31, 2009. Heartland adopted this accounting standard at the beginning of 2010, except for the detailed Level 3 disclosures, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the presentment of detailed Level 3 disclosures during the first quarter of 2011 with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, "Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses," which requires significant new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding credit losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this statement, the activity in the allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in financing receivables are to be disclosed by portfolio segment, while credit quality information, impaired financing receivables and nonaccrual status are to be presented by class of financing receivable. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial impact and segment information of troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") is also required. The disclosures are to be presented at the level of disaggregation that management uses when assessing and monitoring the portfolio's risk and performance. Heartland adopted this accounting standard as of December 31, 2010, except for the activity-related disclosures, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the activity-related disclosures during the first quarter of 2011 with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Heartland adopted the disclosure requirements related to the TDRs effective July 1, 2011, with no material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity. See Note 4 for additional disclosures regarding this accounting standard.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, "A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring," which modifies guidance for identifying restructurings of receivables that constitute a TDR. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 310. This standard requires retrospective application to all restructurings occurring during 2011, along with disclosure of certain additional information. Heartland adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2011, with no significant impact to the restructurings that are considered TDRs and the related provision for loan losses required for these loans.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, "Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements," which removes the collateral maintenance provision that is currently required when determining whether a transfer of a financial instrument is accounted for as a sale or a secured borrowing. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 860. The adoption of this accounting standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS," which is a joint effort between the FASB and IASB to converge fair value measurement and disclosure guidance. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820. This standard permits measuring financial assets and liabilities on a net credit risk basis, if certain criteria are met. This standard also increases disclosure surrounding company-determined market prices (Level 3) financial instruments and requires the fair value hierarchy disclosure of financial assets and liabilities that are not recognized at fair value in the statement of financial position for which fair values are disclosed. The adoption of this accounting standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q, and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income," which requires companies to report total net income, each component of comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income on the face of the income statement, or as two consecutive statements. This statement was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 220. The components of comprehensive income will not be changed, nor does the standard affect how earnings per share is calculated or reported. These amendments will be reported retrospectively upon adoption. The adoption of this standard will be required for Heartland's first quarter 2012 Form 10-Q, and is not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles-Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment," which allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine if it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. ASU 2011-08 also expands upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Heartland anticipates that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

XML

Borrowings

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Disclosures - Debt [Abstract]

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

BORROWINGS

On March 11, 2011, Heartland issued an additional $3.0 million of its senior notes to one additional accredited investor. The total senior notes outstanding was $27.5 million as of September 30, 2011, and $24.5 million as of December 31, 2010. Prior to April 2011, Heartland maintained credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, one of which provided borrowing authority for $15.0 million and one of which provided borrowing authority for $5.0 million. On April 20, 2011, Heartland entered into a debt arrangement with one of these banks to convert the $15.0 million revolving line of credit into a $15.0 million amortizing term loan with a maturity date of April 20, 2016, and to add $5.0 million in borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving line of credit with a maturity date of April 20, 2013. At the same time, Heartland entered into an interest rate swap transaction, designated as a cash flow hedge, with the bank to fix the rate on the term loan at 5.14 percent for the full 5-year term. Accordingly, after this debt arrangement, Heartland continues to have credit lines with two unaffiliated banks, both with revolving borrowing capacity of $5.0 million, and one with an additional $15.0 million amortizing term loan. At September 30, 2011, Heartland had no outstanding balance on either credit line.

XML

Derivates Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Disclosure: Derivative Concepts and Hedging Activities [Abstract]

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On occasion, Heartland uses derivative financial instruments as part of its interest rate risk management, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors and collars. Heartland’s objectives in using derivatives are to add stability to its net interest margin and to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates.

Heartland executed an interest rate swap transaction on April 5, 2011, with an effective date of April 20, 2011, and an expiration date of April 20, 2016, to effectively convert $15.0 million of its newly issued variable rate amortizing debt to fixed rate debt. For accounting purposes, this swap transaction is designated as a cash flow hedge of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in one-month LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, associated with the interest payments made on an amount of Heartland's debt principal equal to the then-outstanding swap notional amount. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the swap. Under this contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.14% and receive a variable rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% based upon $14.5 million of indebtedness. Payments under this interest rate swap contract are made monthly. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $733 thousand at September 30, 2011.

To reduce the potentially negative impact a downward movement in interest rates would have on its interest income, Heartland entered into the following transaction. On September 19, 2005, Heartland entered into a five-year interest rate collar transaction on a notional amount of $50.0 million. This collar transaction was effective on September 21, 2005, and matured on September 21, 2010. Heartland was the payer on prime at a cap strike rate of 9.00% and the counterparty was the payer on prime at a floor strike rate of 6.00%.

For accounting purposes, the collar transaction described above was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Heartland's prime-based loans that reset whenever prime changes. The hedged loan transactions for the hedging relationship was designated as the first prime-based interest payments received by Heartland each calendar month during the term of the collar that, in aggregate for each period, are interest payments on principal from specified portfolios equal to the notional amount of the collar.

Prepayments in the hedged loan portfolios were treated in a manner consistent with the guidance in ASC 815-20-25, “Cash Flow Hedges: Using the First-Payments-Received Technique in Hedging the Variable Interest Payments on a Group of Non-Benchmark-Rate-Based Loans,” which allows the designated forecasted transactions to be the variable, prime-rate-based interest payments on a rolling portfolio of prepayable interest-bearing loans using the first-payments-received technique, thereby allowing interest payments from loans that prepay to be replaced with interest payments from new loan originations. Based on Heartland's assessments, both at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship, it was probable that sufficient prime-based interest receipts existed through the maturity dates of the collars.

To reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income, Heartland entered into the following two cap transactions. For accounting purposes, these two cap transactions were originally designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, above the cap strike rate associated with the interest payments made on $40.0 million of Heartland's subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV and V) that reset quarterly on a specified reset date. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the caps.

The first transaction executed on January 15, 2008, was a fifty-five month interest rate cap transaction on a notional amount of $20.0 million to reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income. The cap has an effective date of January 15, 2008, and a maturity date of September 1, 2012. Should 3-month LIBOR exceed 5.12% on a reset date, the counterparty will pay Heartland the amount of interest that exceeds the amount owed on the debt at the cap LIBOR rate of 5.12%. The floating-rate subordinated debentures contain an interest rate deferral feature that is mirrored in the cap transaction. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the fair market value of this cap transaction was recorded as an asset of $0 and $5 thousand, respectively. Upon the execution of the second swap transaction discussed below, hedge accounting was discontinued and this cap transaction was converted to an economic hedge. During the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this cap transaction was recorded as a loss of $5 thousand and $73 thousand, respectively.

The second transaction executed on March 27, 2008, was a twenty-eight month interest rate cap transaction on a notional amount of $20.0 million to reduce the potentially negative impact an upward movement in interest rates would have on its net interest income. The cap has an effective date of January 7, 2009, and a maturity date of April 7, 2011. Should 3-month LIBOR exceed 5.5% on a reset date, the counterparty will pay Heartland the amount of interest that exceeds the amount owed on the debt at the cap LIBOR rate of 5.5%. The floating-rate subordinated debentures contain an interest rate deferral feature that is mirrored in the cap transaction. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, this cap transaction had no fair market value. Upon the execution of the third swap transaction discussed below, hedge accounting was discontinued and this cap transaction was converted to an economic hedge. During the first nine months of 2011, there was no mark to market adjustment for this cap transaction. During the nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment for this cap transaction was recorded as a loss of $3 thousand.

In addition to the two cap transactions, Heartland entered into the following three forward-starting interest rate swap transactions to effectively convert $65.0 million of its variable interest rate subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV, V and VII) to fixed interest rate debt. For accounting purposes, these three swap transactions are designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in cash flows attributable to changes in LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate being hedged, associated with the interest payments made on $65.0 million of Heartland's subordinated debentures (issued in connection with the trust preferred securities of Heartland Financial Statutory Trust IV, V and VII) that reset quarterly on a specified reset date. At inception, Heartland asserted that the underlying principal balance would remain outstanding throughout the hedge transaction making it probable that sufficient LIBOR-based interest payments would exist through the maturity date of the swaps.

The first swap transaction was executed on January 28, 2009, on a notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of March 17, 2010, and an expiration date of March 17, 2014. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 2.58% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $1.2 million at September 30, 2011, and as a liability of $972 thousand at December 31, 2010.

The second swap transaction was executed on February 4, 2009, on a notional amount of $20.0 million with an effective date of January 7, 2010, and an expiration date of January 7, 2020. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 3.35% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $2.4 million at September 30, 2011, and a liability of $333 thousand at December 31, 2010.

The third swap transaction was executed on February 4, 2009, on a notional amount of $20.0 million with an effective date of March 1, 2010, and an expiration date of March 1, 2017. Under this interest rate swap contract, Heartland will pay a fixed interest rate of 3.22% and receive a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR. The fair value of this swap transaction was recorded as a liability of $2.0 million at September 30, 2011, and as a liability of $823 thousand at December 31, 2010.

For the collar, cap and swap transactions described above, the effective portion of changes in the fair values of the derivatives is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings (interest income on loans or interest expense on borrowings) when the hedged transactions affect earnings. Ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship, if any, is recorded as a gain or loss in earnings as part of noninterest income. Heartland uses the “Hypothetical Derivative Method” described in ASC 815-20-25, “Cash Flow Hedges: Assessing and Measuring the Effectiveness of a Purchased Option Used in a Cash Flow Hedge,” for its quarterly prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness, as well as for measurements of hedge ineffectiveness. All components of the derivative instruments' change in fair value were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Except as discussed below, no ineffectiveness was recognized for the cash flow hedge transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

At the inception of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction, Heartland designated separate proportions of the $50.0 million collar in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships. Designation of a proportion of a derivative instrument is discussed in ASC 815, which states that “Either all or a proportion of a derivative may be designated as the hedging instrument. The proportion must be expressed as a percentage of the entire derivative so that the profile of risk exposures in the hedging portion of the derivative is the same as that in the entire derivative.” Consistent with that guidance, Heartland identified four different proportions of the $50.0 million collar and documented four separate hedging relationships based on those proportions. Although only one collar was executed with an external party, Heartland established four distinct hedging relationships for various proportions of the collar and designated them against hedged transactions specifically identified at each of four different subsidiary banks. Because each proportion of the collar was designated against hedged transactions specified at different subsidiary banks, the hedging relationship for one proportion of the collar could fail hedge accounting (or have hedge ineffectiveness), without affecting the separate hedging relationships established for other proportions of the collar that were designated against hedged transactions at other subsidiary banks. Effectiveness of each hedging relationship is assessed and measured independently of the other hedging relationships.

A portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at March 31, 2008. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Dubuque Bank and Trust Company's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $9.6 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this portion of the collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $293 thousand.

A portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction also did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at June 30, 2007. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Rocky Mountain Bank's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by the sale of its Broadus branch, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $7.5 million. On August 17, 2007, the $14.3 million portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction was redesignated and met the requirements for hedge accounting treatment. The fair value of this portion of the collar transaction was zero on the redesignation date. The redesignated collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at December 31, 2008. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure of the redesignated hedge was caused by paydowns, which reduced the redesignated loan pool from $14.3 million to $10.4 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this portion of the collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $290 thousand.

An additional portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at March 31, 2009. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $14.3 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of New Mexico Bank & Trust's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $14.3 million to $11.6 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $290 thousand.

The final portion of the September 19, 2005, collar transaction did not meet the retrospective hedge effectiveness test at June 30, 2009. Accordingly, hedge accounting ceased as of the last day the hedging relationship was highly effective. The failure was on a portion of the $50.0 million notional amount. That portion, $7.2 million, was designated as a cash flow hedge of the overall changes in the cash flows above and below the collar strike rates associated with interest payments on certain of Wisconsin Community Bank's prime-based loans. The failure of this hedge relationship was caused by paydowns, which reduced the designated loan pool from $7.2 million to $4.8 million. During the first nine months of 2010, the mark to market adjustment on this collar transaction was recorded as a loss of $148 thousand.

Net unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges arising during the first nine months of 2011 and separately disclosed in the statement of changes in stockholders' equity totaled $3.5 million, before income taxes of $1.3 million. Net unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges arising during the first nine months of 2010 and separately disclosed in the statement of changes in shareholders' equity totaled $7.2 million, before income taxes of $2.7 million.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest income or expense as interest payments are received or made on Heartland's variable-rate assets and liabilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the change in net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges reflects cash payments and reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income or interest expense totaling $1.4 million. For the next twelve months, Heartland estimates that cash payments and reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income or interest expense will total $1.8 million.

Cash payments received on the collar transactions totaled $695 thousand during the first nine months of 2010.

By using derivatives, Heartland is exposed to credit risk if counterparties to derivative instruments do not perform as expected. Heartland minimizes this risk by entering into derivative contracts with large, stable financial institutions and Heartland has not experienced any losses from counterparty nonperformance on derivative instruments. Furthermore, Heartland also periodically monitors counterparty credit risk in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815.

XML

Goodwill, Core Deposit Premium and Other Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Goodwill, Core Deposit Premium and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

GOODWILL, CORE DEPOSIT PREMIUM AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Heartland had goodwill of $25.9 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The gross carrying amount of intangible assets and the associated accumulated amortization at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are presented in the table below, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortizing intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles	$	9,957	$	8,700	$	9,957	$	8,345
Mortgage servicing rights	16,456		5,680		15,297		4,087
Customer relationship intangible	1,177		609		1,177		533
Total	$	27,590	$	14,989	$	26,431	$	12,965
Unamortized intangible assets			$	12,601			$	13,466

Projections of amortization expense for mortgage servicing rights are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest rate environment as of September 30, 2011. Heartland's actual experience may be significantly different depending upon changes in mortgage interest rates and market conditions. There was no valuation allowance on mortgage servicing rights at September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010. The fair value of Heartland's mortgage servicing rights was estimated at $12.0 million and $12.3 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets, in thousands:

	Core Deposit Intangibles		Mortgage Servicing Rights		Customer Relationship Intangible		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2011	$	115	$	1,273	$	23	$	1,411
Year ending December 31,
2012	441		3,801		55		4,297
2013	423		2,851		45		3,319
2014	184		1,901		43		2,128
2015	15		950		42		1,007
2016	14		—		41		55
Thereafter	65		—		319		384

The following table summarizes, in thousands, the changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights:

	2011			2010
Balance at January 1	$	11,210		$	9,533
Originations	2,341			3,444
Amortization	(2,775		)	(2,630		)
Valuation adjustment	$	—		$	(1,239	)
Balance at September 30	$	10,776		$	9,108

XML

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Thousands	Total	Preferred Stock [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Noncontrolling Interest [Member]
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest at Period Start at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 315,057	$ 77,224	$ 16,612	$ 44,284	$ 172,487	$ 7,107	$ (5,433)	$ 2,776
Net income	17,290				17,370			(80)
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale arising during the period	27,702					27,702
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives arising during the period	(7,169)					(7,169)
Reclassification adjustment for net security (gains)/losses realized in net income	(4,664)					(4,664)
Reclassification adjustment for net derivatives (gains)/losses realized in net income	729					729
Income taxes	(6,157)					(6,157)
Comprehensive income	27,731
Sale of noncontrolling interest	32							32
Cumulative preferred dividends accrued and discount accretion	0	944			(944)
Issuance of Series C preferred stock	0
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred, $37.50 per share	(3,064)				(3,064)
Common, $0.30 per share	(4,888)				(4,888)
Purchase of shares of common stock	(201)						(201)
Issuance of shares of common stock	876			(317)			1,193
Commitments to issue common stock	783			783
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest at Period End at Sep. 30, 2010	336,326	78,168	16,612	44,750	180,961	17,548	(4,441)	2,728
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest at Period Start at Dec. 31, 2010	331,784	78,483	16,612	44,628	184,525	8,517	(3,674)	2,693
Net income	21,791				21,796			(5)
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale arising during the period	25,320					25,320
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives arising during the period	(3,487)					(3,487)
Reclassification adjustment for net security (gains)/losses realized in net income	(8,930)					(8,930)
Reclassification adjustment for net derivatives (gains)/losses realized in net income	5					5
Income taxes	(4,864)					(4,864)
Comprehensive income	29,835
Cumulative preferred dividends accrued and discount accretion	0	3,215			(3,215)
Repurchase of Series B preferred stock and warrants	83,498	81,698		1,800
Issuance of Series C preferred stock	81,698	81,698
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred, $37.50 per share	(3,404)				(3,404)
Common, $0.30 per share	(4,922)				(4,922)
Purchase of shares of common stock	(305)						(305)
Issuance of shares of common stock	1,088			(606)			1,694
Commitments to issue common stock	929			929
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest at Period End at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 353,223	$ 81,698	$ 16,612	$ 43,151	$ 194,780	$ 16,561	$ (2,285)	$ 2,706

XML

Acquisitions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Mergers, Acquisitions and Dispositions Disclosures [Text Block]

ACQUISITIONS

On July 9, 2009, through its subsidiary Galena State Bank & Trust Co., Heartland acquired substantially all of the assets of The Elizabeth State Bank in an FDIC assisted transition for which the FDIC provided loss share coverage. The carrying amount of loans covered under these loss share agreements with the FDIC consisted of impaired and nonimpaired purchased loans and are summarized in the following table, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Impaired Purchased Loans		Nonimpaired Purchased Loans		Total Covered Loans		Impaired Purchased Loans		Nonimpaired Purchased Loans		Total Covered Loans
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	2,568	$	4,220	$	6,788	$	4,256	$	5,800	$	10,056
Residential real estate	—		4,410		4,410		—		5,792		5,792
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	379		1,760		2,139		379		2,344		2,723
Consumer loans	523		906		1,429		690		1,539		2,229
Total Covered Loans	$	3,470	$	11,296	$	14,766	$	5,325	$	15,475	$	20,800

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for all loans with evidence of credit deterioration since origination acquired in the acquisition was $13.8 million and the estimated fair value of the loans was $9.0 million. At September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, a majority of these loans were valued based upon the liquidation value of the underlying collateral, because the expected cash flows are primarily based on the liquidation of underlying collateral and the timing and amount of the cash flows could not be reasonably estimated. There was no allowance for loan and lease losses related to these ASC 310-30 loans at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for all nonimpaired loans acquired in the acquisition was $28.9 million and the estimated fair value of the loans was $28.7 million.

XML

Securities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Securities [Abstract]

Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values of securities available for sale as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are summarized in the table below, in thousands:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
September 30, 2011
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	164,039	$	5,596	$	(233	)	$	169,402
Mortgage-backed securities	756,652		17,298		(4,754		)	769,196
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	261,968		15,597		(866		)	276,699
Corporate debt securities	26,261		—		(801		)	25,460
Total debt securities	1,208,920		38,491		(6,654		)	1,240,757
Equity securities	23,367		445		—			23,812
Total	$	1,232,287	$	38,936	$	(6,654	)	$	1,264,569
December 31, 2010
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	316,758	$	4,392	$	(1,143	)	$	320,007
Mortgage-backed securities	586,796		17,455		(4,211		)	600,040
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	244,368		4,235		(4,140		)	244,463
Corporate debt securities	16,142		—		(1,168		)	14,974
Total debt securities	1,164,064		26,082		(10,662		)	1,179,484
Equity securities	24,743		472		—			25,215
Total	$	1,188,807	$	26,554	$	(10,662	)	$	1,204,699

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values of held to maturity securities as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are summarized in the table below, in thousands:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
September 30, 2011
Securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	9,307	$	119	$	(1,179	)	$	8,247
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	49,130		181		(13		)	49,298
Total	$	58,437	$	300	$	(1,192	)	$	57,545
December 31, 2010
Securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	9,825	$	145	$	(993	)	$	8,977
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	49,796		—		(163		)	49,633
Total	$	59,621	$	145	$	(1,156	)	$	58,610

Nearly 82% of Heartland's mortgage-backed securities are issuances of government-sponsored enterprises.

The following table summarizes, in thousands, the amount of unrealized losses, defined as the amount by which cost or amortized cost exceeds fair value, and the related fair value of investments with unrealized losses in Heartland's securities portfolio as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The investments were segregated into two categories: those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months. The reference point for determining how long an investment was in an unrealized loss position was September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.

	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2011
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	50,231	$	(233	)	$	—	$	—		$	50,231	$	(233	)
Mortgage-backed securities	168,537		(2,617		)	49,460		(2,137		)	217,997		(4,754		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	5,171		(162		)	4,094		(704		)	9,265		(866		)
Corporate debt securities	14,562		(445		)	10,897		(356		)	25,459		(801		)
Total debt securities	238,501		(3,457		)	64,451		(3,197		)	302,952		(6,654		)
Equity securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	238,501	$	(3,457	)	$	64,451	$	(3,197	)	$	302,952	$	(6,654	)
December 31, 2010
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	107,583	$	(1,143	)	$	—	$	—		$	107,583	$	(1,143	)
Mortgage-backed securities	104,724		(2,765		)	11,984		(1,446		)	116,708		(4,211		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	109,387		(3,995		)	763		(145		)	110,150		(4,140		)
Corporate debt securities	14,974		(1,168		)	—		—			14,974		(1,168		)
Total debt securities	336,668		(9,071		)	12,747		(1,591		)	349,415		(10,662		)
Equity securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	336,668	$	(9,071	)	$	12,747	$	(1,591	)	$	349,415	$	(10,662	)

Unrealized losses on Heartland's mortgage-backed securities are the result of changes in market interest rates or widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities and not related to concerns regarding the underlying credit of the issuers or the underlying collateral. It is expected that the securities will not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or widening market spreads and not credit quality, and because Heartland has the intent and ability to hold these investments until a market price recovery or to maturity and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Unrealized losses on Heartland's obligations of states and political subdivisions are the result of changes in market interest rates or widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities. Management monitors the published credit ratings of these securities and has noted credit rating reductions in a number of these securities, primarily due to the downgrade in the credit ratings of the insurance companies providing credit enhancement to that of the issuing municipalities. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or widening market spreads due to insurance company downgrades and not underlying credit quality, and because Heartland has the intent and ability to hold these investments until a market price recovery or to maturity and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

XML

Loans and Leases

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Disclosure - Receivables, Loans, Notes Receivable and Others [Abstract]

Loans, Notes, Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure [Text Block]

LOANS AND LEASES

Loans and leases as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Loans and leases receivable held to maturity:
Commercial	$	561,063		$	558,031
Commercial real estate	1,164,523			1,160,962
Residential real estate	179,628			163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	256,857			250,943
Consumer	217,007			214,515
Gross loans receivable held to maturity	2,379,078			2,348,177
Net direct financing leases held to maturity	604			981
Gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,379,682			2,349,158
Unearned discount	(2,466		)	(2,581		)
Deferred loan fees	(3,030		)	(2,590		)
Total net loans and leases receivable held to maturity	2,374,186			2,343,987
Loans covered under loss share agreements:
Commercial and commercial real estate	6,788			10,056
Residential real estate	4,410			5,792
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	2,139			2,723
Consumer	1,429			2,229
Total loans covered under loss share agreements	14,766			20,800
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(44,195		)	(42,693		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	$	2,344,757		$	2,322,094

Heartland has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to provide for an acceptable level of credit risk. The board of directors reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management and the board with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing loans and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is also a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

The commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolio includes a wide range of business loans, including lines of credit for working capital and operational purposes and term loans for the acquisition of equipment and real estate. Although most loans are made on a secured basis, loans may be made on an unsecured basis where warranted by the overall financial condition of the borrower. Terms of commercial business loans generally range from one to five years. Commercial loans and leases are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The collateral for most of these loans and leases is based upon a discount from its market value. The primary repayment risks of commercial loans and leases are that the cash flow of the borrowers may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Heartland seeks to minimize these risks in a variety of ways. The underwriting analysis includes credit verification, analysis of global cash flows, appraisals and a review of the financial condition of the borrower. Personal guarantees are frequently required as a tertiary form of repayment. In addition, when underwriting loans for commercial real estate, careful consideration is given to the property's operating history, future operating projections, current and projected occupancy, location and physical condition. Heartland also utilizes government guaranteed lending through the U.S. Small Business Administration and the USDA Rural Development Business and Industry Program to assist customers with longer-term funding and to reduce risk.

Agricultural loans, many of which are secured by crops, machinery and real estate, are provided to finance capital improvements and farm operations as well as acquisitions of livestock and machinery. Agricultural loans present unique credit risks relating to adverse weather conditions, loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products and the impact of government regulations. The ultimate repayment of agricultural loans is dependent upon the profitable operation or management of the agricultural entity. In underwriting agricultural loans, lending personnel work closely with their customers to review budgets and cash flow projections for the ensuing crop year. These budgets and cash flow projections are monitored closely during the year and reviewed with the customers at least annually. Lending personnel also work closely with governmental agencies to help agricultural customers obtain credit enhancement products such as loan guarantees or interest assistance.

Heartland originates first-lien, adjustable-rate and fixed-rate, one-to-four-family residential real estate loans for the construction, purchase or refinancing of a single family residential property. These loans are principally collateralized by owner-occupied properties and are amortized over 10 to 30 years. Heartland typically sells longer-term low rate, residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with servicing rights retained. This practice allows Heartland to better manage interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Heartland bank subsidiaries participate in lending programs sponsored by U.S. government agencies such as Veterans Administration and Federal Home Administration when justified by market conditions.

Consumer lending includes motor vehicle, home improvement, home equity and small personal credit lines. Consumer loans typically have shorter terms, lower balances, higher yields and higher risks of default than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and are therefore more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Risk is reduced through underwriting criteria, which include credit verification, appraisals, a review of the borrower's financial condition, and personal cash flows. A security interest, with title insurance when necessary, is taken in the underlying real estate.

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Heartland’s policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest income on any loan or lease when, in the opinion of management, there is a reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of the interest and principal, normally when a loan or lease is 90 days past due. When interest accruals are deemed uncollectible, interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and interest accrued in prior years is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Nonaccrual loans and leases are returned to an accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates that there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely payment of interest and principal.

Under Heartland’s credit policies, all nonaccrual and troubled debt restructured loans meeting the criteria of a troubled debt restructuring are defined as impaired loans. Loan impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except where more practical, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The following table shows the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, and the related loan balances, disaggregated on the basis of impairment methodology, in thousands. Loans evaluated under ASC 310-10-35 include loans on nonaccrual status, which are individually evaluated for impairment, and other impaired loans deemed to have similar risk characteristics. All other loans are collectively evaluated for impairment under ASC 450-20. Heartland has made no changes to the accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses policy during 2011.

	Allowance For Loan and Lease Losses						Gross Loans and Leases Receivable Held to Maturity
	Ending Balance Under ASC 310-10-35		Ending Balance Under ASC 450-20		Total		Ending Balance Evaluated for Impairment Under ASC 310-10-35		Ending Balance Evaluated for Impairment Under ASC 450-20		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	1,724	$	8,105	$	9,829	$	8,670	$	552,393	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	10,244		12,575		22,819		87,812		1,076,711		1,164,523
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	5		1,688		1,693		19,440		237,417		256,857
Residential real estate	493		2,261		2,754		6,041		173,587		179,628
Consumer	1,612		5,482		7,094		4,381		212,626		217,007
Lease financing	—		6		6		—		604		604
Unallocated	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	14,078	$	30,117	$	44,195	$	126,344	$	2,253,338	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	2,837	$	7,688	$	10,525	$	16,598	$	541,433	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	7,127		13,189		20,316		105,341		1,055,621		1,160,962
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	512		1,635		2,147		16,255		234,688		250,943
Residential real estate	659		1,722		2,381		5,450		158,276		163,726
Consumer	1,026		5,289		6,315		3,540		210,975		214,515
Lease financing	—		9		9		—		981		981
Unallocated	—		1,000		1,000		—		—		—
Total	$	12,161	$	30,532	$	42,693	$	147,184	$	2,201,974	$	2,349,158

The following table presents nonaccrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and troubled debt restructured loans not covered under loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands. There were no nonaccrual leases, accruing leases past due 90 days or more or restructured leases at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Nonaccrual loans	$	60,088	$	77,875
Nonaccrual troubled debt restructured loans	12,541		12,637
Total nonaccrual loans	$	72,629	$	90,512
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	—		85
Performing troubled debt restructured loans	$	24,853	$	23,719

Heartland had $37.4 million of troubled debt restructured loans at September 30, 2011, of which $12.5 million were classified as nonaccrual and $24.9 million were accruing according to the restructured terms. Heartland had $36.4 million of troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2010, of which $12.7 million were classified as nonaccrual and $23.7 million were accruing according to the restructured terms.

The following table provides information on troubled debt restructured loans that were modified during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended Sept. 30, 2011					Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2011
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial	1	$	298	$	298	4	$	424	$	424
Commercial real estate	—	—		—		21	13,383		13,383
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1	298		298		25	13,807		13,807
Residential real estate	4	342		342		8	1,165		1,165
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	7	3,014		3,014		7	3,014		3,014
Consumer	1	41		41		1	41		41
Total	13	$	3,695	$	3,695	41	$	18,027	$	18,027

The pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment represents amounts as of the date of loan modification. Since the modifications on these loans have been only interest rate concessions and term extensions, not principal reductions, the pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment amounts are the same.

The following table provides information on troubled debt restructured loans for which there was a payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, that had been modified during the 12-month period prior to the default:

(Dollars in thousands)	With Payment Defaults During the Following Periods
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Number of Loans	Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Recorded Investment
Commercial	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial real estate	1	6,605		1	6,605
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1	6,605		1	6,605
Residential real estate	—	—		3	295
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	—	—		—	—
Consumer	—	—		—	—
Total	1	$	6,605	4	$	6,900

The following table presents nonaccrual loans not covered by loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	1,808	$	9,114
Commercial real estate	58,307		65,534
Total commercial and commercial real estate	60,115		74,648
Residential real estate	5,974		9,510
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	1,957		1,670
Consumer	4,583		4,684
Total nonaccrual loans held to maturity	$	72,629	$	90,512

Heartland's internal rating system is a series of grades reflecting management's risk assessment, based on its analysis of the borrower's financial condition. The "pass" category consists of a range of loan grades that reflect increasing, though still acceptable, risk. Movement of risk through the various grade levels in the pass category is monitored for early identification of credit deterioration. The "nonpass" category consists of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss loans. The "special mention" rating is attached to loans where the borrower exhibits negative financial trends due to borrower specific or systemic conditions that, if left uncorrected, threaten its capacity to meet its debt obligations. The borrower is believed to have sufficient financial flexibility to react to and resolve its negative financial situation. These credits are closely monitored for improvement or deterioration. The "substandard" rating is assigned to loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the borrower and may be further at risk due to deterioration in the value of collateral pledged. Well-defined weaknesses jeopardize liquidation of the debt. These loans are still considered collectible, however, a distinct possibility exists that Heartland will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans may exhibit some or all of the following weaknesses: deteriorating trends, lack of earnings, inadequate debt service capacity, excessive debt and/or lack of liquidity. The "doubtful" rating is assigned to loans where identified weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. These borrowers are usually in default, lack liquidity and capital, as well as, resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Specific pending events, such as capital injections, liquidations or perfection of liens on additional collateral, may strengthen the credit, thus deferring classification of the loan as loss until exact status can be determined. The "loss" rating is assigned to loans considered uncollectible. As of September 30, 2011, Heartland had no loans classified as doubtful or loss. Loans are placed on "nonaccrual" when management does not expect to collect payments of principal and interest in full or when principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.

The following table presents loans and leases not covered by loss share agreements by credit quality indicator at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	Pass		Nonpass		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	509,323	$	51,740	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	964,964		199,559		1,164,523
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1,474,287		251,299		1,725,586
Residential real estate	163,138		16,490		179,628
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	215,797		41,060		256,857
Consumer	207,244		9,763		217,007
Lease financing	604		—		604
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	2,061,070	$	318,612	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	504,207	$	53,824	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	912,897		248,065		1,160,962
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1,417,104		301,889		1,718,993
Residential real estate	146,392		17,334		163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	220,096		30,847		250,943
Consumer	202,533		11,982		214,515
Lease financing	981		—		981
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	1,987,106	$	362,052	$	2,349,158

The nonpass category in the table above is comprised of approximately 41% special mention and 59% substandard as of September 30, 2011. The percent of nonpass loans on nonaccrual status as of September 30, 2011, was 23%. As of December 31, 2010, the nonpass category in the table above was comprised of approximately 37% special mention and 63% substandard. The percent of nonpass loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2010, was 25%. Changes in credit risk are monitored on a continuous basis and changes in risk ratings are made when identified. All impaired loans are reviewed at least annually.

The following table sets forth information regarding Heartland's accruing and nonaccrual loans and leases not covered by loss share agreements at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	Accruing Loans and Leases
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual		Total Loans and Leases
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	1,097	$	54	$	—	$	1,151	$	558,104	$	1,808	$	561,063
Commercial real estate	5,107		1,253		—		6,360		1,099,856		58,307		1,164,523
Total commercial and commercial real estate	6,204		1,307		—		7,511		1,657,960		60,115		1,725,586
Residential real estate	1,204		—		—		1,204		172,450		5,974		179,628
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	169		655		—		824		254,076		1,957		256,857
Consumer	2,046		1,256		—		3,302		209,122		4,583		217,007
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		604		—		604
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	9,623	$	3,218	$	—	$	12,841	$	2,294,212	$	72,629	$	2,379,682
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	895	$	282	$	—	$	1,177	$	547,740	$	9,114	$	558,031
Commercial real estate	5,328		2,940		85		8,353		1,087,075		65,534		1,160,962
Total commercial and commercial real estate	6,223		3,222		85		9,530		1,634,815		74,648		1,718,993
Residential real estate	2,482		—		—		2,482		151,734		9,510		163,726
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	283		292		—		575		248,698		1,670		250,943
Consumer	2,369		628		—		2,997		206,834		4,684		214,515
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		981		—		981
Total gross loans and leases receivable held to maturity	$	11,357	$	4,142	$	85	$	15,584	$	2,243,062	$	90,512	$	2,349,158

The majority of Heartland's impaired loans are those that are nonaccrual, are past due 90 days or more and still accruing or have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. The following table presents data on impaired loans not covered by loss share agreements as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Impaired loans for which a valuation allowance has been provided	$	47,933	$	58,975
Impaired loans for which no valuation allowance has been provided	78,411		88,209
Total loans determined to be impaired	$	126,344	$	147,184
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans	$	14,078	$	12,161

The following tables present, for impaired loans not covered by loss share agreements and by category of loan, the unpaid balance that was contractually due at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the outstanding loan balance recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, any related allowance recorded for those loans as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the average outstanding loan balance recorded on the balance sheet during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and year ended December 31, 2010, and the interest income recognized on the impaired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and year ended December 31, 2010, in thousands:

September 30, 2011	Unpaid Contractual Balance		Loan Balance		Related Allowance Recorded		Year-to-Date Avg. Loan Balance		Year-to-Date Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a related allowance
Commercial	$	7,783	$	7,745	$	1,724	$	9,838	$	281
Commercial real estate	35,623		34,862		10,244		34,267		706
Total commercial and commercial real estate	43,406		42,607		11,968		44,105		987
Residential real estate	1,999		1,999		493		1,883		41
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	10		1		5		3,630		—
Consumer	3,326		3,326		1,612		2,524		31
Total loans held to maturity	$	48,741	$	47,933	$	14,078	$	52,142	$	1,059
Impaired loans without a related allowance
Commercial	$	1,436	$	925	$	—	$	2,635	$	3
Commercial real estate	73,748		52,950		—		55,260		396
Total commercial and commercial real estate	75,184		53,875		—		57,895		399
Residential real estate	4,564		4,042		—		4,330		38
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	19,555		19,439		—		13,119		629
Consumer	1,363		1,055		—		1,483		2
Total loans held to maturity	$	100,666	$	78,411	$	—	$	76,827	$	1,068
Total impaired loans held to maturity
Commercial	$	9,219	$	8,670	$	1,724	$	12,473	$	284
Commercial real estate	109,371		87,812		10,244		89,527		1,102
Total commercial and commercial real estate	118,590		96,482		11,968		102,000		1,386
Residential real estate	6,563		6,041		493		6,213		80
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	19,565		19,440		5		16,749		629
Consumer	4,689		4,381		1,612		4,007		33
Total impaired loans held to maturity	$	149,407	$	126,344	$	14,078	$	128,969	$	2,128

December 31, 2010	Unpaid Contractual Balance		Loan Balance		Related Allowance Recorded		Year-to-Date Avg. Loan Balance		Year-to-Date Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a related allowance
Commercial	$	14,936	$	14,936	$	2,837	$	15,471	$	481
Commercial real estate	35,365		35,282		7,127		36,545		1,394
Total commercial and commercial real estate	50,301		50,218		9,964		52,016		1,875
Residential real estate	2,577		2,415		659		1,390		7
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	3,911		3,911		512		3,707		181
Consumer	2,445		2,431		1,026		1,740		70
Total loans held to maturity	$	59,234	$	58,975	$	12,161	$	58,853	$	2,133
Impaired loans without a related allowance
Commercial	$	4,378	$	1,662	$	—	$	1,722	$	1
Commercial real estate	92,979		70,059		—		72,567		1,026
Total commercial and commercial real estate	97,357		71,721		—		74,289		1,027
Residential real estate	3,515		3,035		—		1,748		47
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	12,401		12,344		—		11,701		391
Consumer	1,458		1,109		—		793		2
Total loans held to maturity	$	114,731	$	88,209	$	—	$	88,531	$	1,467
Total impaired loans held to maturity
Commercial	$	19,314	$	16,598	$	2,837	$	17,193	$	482
Commercial real estate	128,344		105,341		7,127		109,112		2,420
Total commercial and commercial real estate	147,658		121,939		9,964		126,305		2,902
Residential real estate	6,092		5,450		659		3,138		54
Agricultural and agricultural real estate	16,312		16,255		512		15,408		572
Consumer	3,903		3,540		1,026		2,533		72
Total impaired loans held to maturity	$	173,965	$	147,184	$	12,161	$	147,384	$	3,600

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$ 21,791	$ 17,290
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,712	6,302
Provision for loan and lease losses	21,581	23,648
Net amortization of premium on securities	10,555	4,767
Securities gains, net	(8,930)	(4,664)
(Increase) decrease in trading account securities	(214)	553
Stock based compensation	929	783
Loans originated for sale	(232,173)	(357,416)
Proceeds on sales of loans	250,691	385,428
Net gains on sales of loans	(5,893)	(4,275)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable	(488)	(1,523)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses	2,368	845
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable	(1,392)	(1,306)
Goodwill impairment charge	0	1,639
Valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights	0	1,239
Other, net	5,386	(489)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	69,923	72,821
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale	412,609	304,482
Proceeds from the maturity of and principal paydowns on securities available for sale	224,404	214,932
Proceeds from the maturity of and principal paydowns on securities held to maturity	1,256	1,676
Purchase of securities available for sale	(682,190)	(512,457)
Purchase of securities held to maturity	0	(22,331)
Net increase in loans and leases	(96,939)	(110,561)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance policies	(3,140)	(5,676)
Capital expenditures	(4,634)	(8,553)
Proceeds on sale of OREO and other repossessed assets	16,737	12,779
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(131,897)	(125,709)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts	207,723	139,845
Net decrease in time deposit accounts	(68,157)	(116,591)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings	(62,665)	34,184
Proceeds from other borrowings	18,549	518
Repayments of other borrowings	(5,100)	(38,499)
Issuance of Series C preferred stock	81,698	0
Redemption of preferred stock	(81,698)	0
Redemption of warrant	(1,800)	0
Purchase of treasury stock	(305)	(201)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	1,003	848
Excess tax benefits on exercised stock options	85	28
Dividends paid	(8,326)	(7,952)
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	81,007	12,180
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	19,033	(40,708)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	62,572	182,410
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	81,605	141,702
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for income/franchise taxes	3,298	10,296
Cash paid for interest	36,950	44,264
Loans transferred to OREO	$ 27,445	$ 20,201

XML

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Parentheticals) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Cash dividends per share preferred stock	$ 37.50	$ 37.50
Cash dividends per share common stock	$ 0.30	$ 0.30
Shares of common stock purchased	49,298	13,789
Shares of common stock issued	74,581	59,518

XML

Fair Value

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Disclosure - Fair Value Measures and Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

FAIR VALUE

Heartland utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for sale, trading securities and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, Heartland may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis such as loans held for sale, loans held to maturity and certain other assets including, but not limited to, mortgage servicing rights and other real estate owned. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under ASC 820, assets and liabilities are grouped at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimation of fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value.

Assets

Securities Available for Sale

Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include agency mortgage-backed securities and private collateralized mortgage obligations, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. The Level 3 securities consist primarily of Z tranche mortgage-backed securities.

Trading Assets

Trading assets are recorded at fair value and consist of securities held for trading purposes. The valuation method for trading securities is the same as the methodology used for securities classified as available for sale.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, Heartland classifies loans held for sale subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans Held to Maturity

Heartland does not record loans held to maturity at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” Loan impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except where more practical, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At September 30, 2011, all impaired loans were measured based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. Heartland classifies impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Currently, Heartland uses interest rate caps, floors, collars and swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fell below (rise above) the strike rate of the floors (caps). The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the floor (cap) are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, Heartland incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Heartland has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although Heartland has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, Heartland has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, Heartland has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned ("OREO") represents property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower of the principal amount of the loan outstanding at the time of acquisition, plus any acquisition costs, or the estimated fair value of the property, less disposal costs. Heartland considers third party appraisals, as well as independent fair value assessments from realtors or persons involved in selling OREO, in determining the fair value of particular properties. Accordingly, the valuation of OREO is subject to significant external and internal judgment. Heartland also periodically reviews OREO to determine if the fair value of the property, less disposal costs, has declined below its recorded book value and records any adjustments accordingly. OREO is classified as nonrecurring Level 3.

The table below presents Heartland's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, in thousands, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:

	Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
September 30, 2011
Trading securities	$	458	$	458	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale	1,264,569		169,402		1,091,601		3,566
Total assets at fair value	$	1,265,027	$	169,860	$	1,091,601	$	3,566
Derivative liabilities	$	5,609	$	—	$	5,609	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	5,609	$	—	$	5,609	$	—
December 31, 2010
Trading securities	$	244	$	244	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale	1,204,699		320,008		880,015		4,676
Total assets at fair value	$	1,204,943	$	320,252	$	880,015	$	4,676
Derivative liabilities	$	2,122	$	—	$	2,122	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	2,122	$	—	$	2,122	$	—

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, or the year ended December 31, 2010.

The changes in Level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following table, in thousands:

	For the Nine Months			For the Year
	Ended			Ended
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Fair Value			Fair Value
Balance at January 1,	$	4,676		$	1,535
Redemptions	(1,397		)	(45		)
Market value appreciation	287			3,186
Balance at period end,	$	3,566		$	4,676

The tables below present Heartland's assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, in thousands:

	Carrying Value at								Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011								September 30, 2011
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans	$	78,386	$	—	$	—	$	78,386	$	19,280
OREO	39,188		—		—		39,188		3,824

(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value at								Year Ended
	December 31, 2010								December 31, 2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans	$	110,422	$	—	$	—	$	110,422	$	27,492
OREO	32,002		—		—		32,002		11,711

The table below is a summary of the estimated fair value of Heartland's financial instruments as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, as defined by ASC 825, in thousands. The carrying amounts in the following table are recorded in the balance sheet under the indicated captions. In accordance with ASC 825, the assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments are not included in the disclosure, such as the value of the mortgage servicing rights, premises, furniture and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles and other liabilities.

Heartland does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative of the earnings power or value of Heartland. The following analysis, which is inherently limited in depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with either existing customer relationships or the ability of Heartland to create value through loan origination, deposit gathering or fee generating activities. Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information and assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair value estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the disclosed fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually realized or paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be significantly different.

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	81,605	$	81,605	$	62,572	$	62,572
Trading securities	458		458		244		244
Securities available for sale	1,264,569		1,264,569		1,204,699		1,204,699
Securities held to maturity	58,437		57,545		59,621		58,610
Loans and leases, net of unearned	2,425,481		2,411,197		2,388,691		2,394,837
Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	692,893	$	692,893	$	580,589	$	580,589
Savings deposits	1,654,417		1,654,417		1,558,998		1,558,998
Time deposits	826,304		826,304		894,461		894,461
Short-term borrowings	173,199		173,199		235,864		235,864
Other borrowings	375,976		362,923		362,527		347,749
Derivatives	5,609		5,609		2,122		2,122

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Securities —For securities either held to maturity, available for sale or trading, fair value equals quoted market price if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Loans and Leases—The fair value of loans is estimated using a historical or replacement cost basis concept (i.e., an entrance price concept).The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated using quoted market prices.

Derivatives — The fair value of all derivatives is estimated based on the amount that Heartland would pay or would be paid to terminate the contract or agreement, using current rates and, when appropriate, the current creditworthiness of the counter-party.

Deposits — The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.

Short-term and Other Borrowings—Rates currently available to Heartland for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Unused Lines of Credit and Standby Letters of Credit — Based upon management's analysis of the off balance sheet financial instruments, there are no significant unrealized gains or losses associated with these financial instruments based upon review of the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$ 79,879	$ 58,960
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments	1,726	3,612
Cash and cash equivalents	81,605	62,572
Trading, at fair value	458	244
Available for sale, at fair value (cost of $1,232,287 at September 30, 2011, and $1,188,807 at December 31, 2010)	1,264,569	1,204,699
Held to maturity, at cost (fair value of $57,545 at September 30, 2011, and $58,610 at December 31, 2010)	58,437	59,621
Loans held for sale	36,529	23,904
Loans and leases receivable:
Loans held to maturity	2,374,186	2,343,987
Loans covered by loss share agreements	14,766	20,800
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(44,195)	(42,693)
Loans and leases receivable, net	2,344,757	2,322,094
Premises, furniture and equipment, net	110,127	121,012
Other real estate, net	39,188	32,002
Goodwill, net	25,909	25,909
Other intangible assets, net	12,601	13,466
Cash surrender value on life insurance	66,654	62,508
FDIC indemnification asset	992	2,294
Other assets	70,853	69,130
TOTAL ASSETS	4,112,679	3,999,455
Deposits:
Demand	692,893	580,589
Savings	1,654,417	1,558,998
Time	826,304	894,461
Total deposits	3,173,614	3,034,048
Short-term borrowings	173,199	235,864
Other borrowings	375,976	362,527
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	36,667	35,232
TOTAL LIABILITIES	3,759,456	3,667,671
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock		0
Common stock (par value $1 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 16,611,671 shares)	16,612	16,612
Capital surplus	43,151	44,628
Retained earnings	194,780	184,525
Accumulated other comprehensive income	16,561	8,517
Treasury stock at cost (152,333 shares at September 30, 2011, and 186,616 shares at December 31, 2010)	(2,285)	(3,674)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	350,517	329,091
Noncontrolling interest	2,706	2,693
TOTAL EQUITY	353,223	331,784
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	4,112,679	3,999,455
Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock	0	0
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock	0	0
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock	0	78,483
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock	$ 81,698