Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
Feb. 01, 2014
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: On September 9, 2008, the Company and Robert N. Wildrick, Chairman of the Board, entered into a Consulting Agreement (as amended, the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company retained Mr. Wildrick to consult on matters of strategic planning and initiatives for a consulting period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2012 at a fee of $0.8 million per year. Pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated November 30, 2010, the consulting period was extended through January 26, 2014. Pursuant to that certain Second Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated April 2, 2013, the consulting period was extended through January 30, 2016. Pursuant to that certain Third Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated December 18, 2013, the Company agreed to indemnify Mr. Wildrick in his capacity as a consultant and to obtain reasonable insurance in connection therewith. In accordance with the Company's policy regarding related party transactions described below, the First Amendment and Third Amendment were approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors and the Second Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee. The Consulting Agreement includes an agreement by Mr. Wildrick not to compete with the Company or to solicit its customers or employees during its term. The Consulting Agreement also provides for the acceleration of payments due thereunder to Mr. Wildrick in connection with certain termination events. If Mr. Wildrick's services are terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined below), the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Wildrick the balance of amounts due under the Consulting Agreement for its remaining term as and when such payments would otherwise be due. If Mr. Wildrick's services are terminated by the Company with “cause,” the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Wildrick the unpaid, prorated amount of the consulting fees payable through the date of termination. Without limiting the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, the term “cause,” as used therein, generally means: (a) the conviction of Mr. Wildrick of a felony involving money or other property of the Company or any other felony or offense involving moral turpitude; or (b) the willful commission of any act of fraud or misrepresentation related to the business of the Company which would materially and negatively impact the Company. If within ninety (90) days following a change of control of the Company (as defined below), Mr. Wildrick exercises his right to terminate the Consulting Agreement or the Company terminates the Consulting Agreement based on a default thereunder by Mr. Wildrick, the Company will pay Mr. Wildrick a lump sum equal to the balance of amounts due under the Consulting Agreement for its remaining term. Without limiting the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, the term “change of control,” as used therein, generally means (a) the acquisition by any “person” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of beneficial ownership of 51% or more of the stock of the Company; (b) the acquisition by any such “person” of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the stock of the Company and a change in the majority of the Board; or (c) the merger, consolidation or liquidation of the Company or the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Merger will constitute a change of control under the Consulting Agreement. As a result of the Merger Agreement, the Company, Men’s Wearhouse and Mr. Wildrick entered into a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with respect to the compensation of Mr. Wildrick and the obligations of the Company under the Consulting Agreement, and certain other agreements of Mr. Wildrick, the Company and Men's Wearhouse. The Term Sheet generally provides that (i) pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Wildrick will be paid $1,800,000 in respect of consulting services he has provided through March 8, 2014 in excess of those required under the Consulting Agreement, (ii) the amount of such additional fees Mr. Wildrick may earn between March 11, 2014 and the consummation of the Merger Transactions is limited to $500,000 and (iii) Mr. Wildrick will be subject to a non-competition covenant for the two year period following the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (for which covenant Mr. Wildrick will receive a payment of $3,500,000, of which $1,000,000 is payable upon the closing of the Merger and the remainder is payable in equal installments over the term of the covenant). The Company's policy regarding related party transactions is set forth in the Audit Committee's charter and in the Company's Corporate Governance Standards (both of which are available on our website at www.josbank.com). As used herein and therein, “related party transactions” are transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 404(a) generally requires disclosure of transactions in which the Company is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person (such as an executive officer, director, director nominee, or 5% stockholder of the Company or any family member of the foregoing) has a direct or indirect material interest. Except as otherwise set forth below, the Audit Committee shall review each related party transaction to determine whether it is fair and reasonable to the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of the Committee so doing, the determination of whether a related party transaction is fair and reasonable to the Company may be made by the members of the Board who are independent directors. The Company will enter into or ratify a related party transaction only if the Committee or the independent directors, as the case may be, determines that it is fair and reasonable to the Company. In the event a related party transaction is entered into without prior approval as set forth in the Company's related party transaction policy and, after review by the Committee or the independent directors, as the case may be, such transaction is not determined to be fair and reasonable to the Company, the Company will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul such transaction.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

On September 9, 2008, the Company and Robert N. Wildrick, Chairman of the Board, entered into a Consulting Agreement (as amended, the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company retained Mr. Wildrick to consult on matters of strategic planning and initiatives for a consulting period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2012 at a fee of $0.8 million per year. Pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated November 30, 2010, the consulting period was extended through January 26, 2014. Pursuant to that certain Second Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated April 2, 2013, the consulting period was extended through January 30, 2016. Pursuant to that certain Third Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated December 18, 2013, the Company agreed to indemnify Mr. Wildrick in his capacity as a consultant and to obtain reasonable insurance in connection therewith. In accordance with the Company's policy regarding related party transactions described below, the First Amendment and Third Amendment were approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors and the Second Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee.

The Consulting Agreement includes an agreement by Mr. Wildrick not to compete with the Company or to solicit its customers or employees during its term. The Consulting Agreement also provides for the acceleration of payments due thereunder to Mr. Wildrick in connection with certain termination events.

If Mr. Wildrick's services are terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined below), the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Wildrick the balance of amounts due under the Consulting Agreement for its remaining term as and when such payments would otherwise be due. If Mr. Wildrick's services are terminated by the Company with “cause,” the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Wildrick the unpaid, prorated amount of the consulting fees payable through the date of termination. Without limiting the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, the term “cause,” as used therein, generally means: (a) the conviction of Mr. Wildrick of a felony involving money or other property of the Company or any other felony or offense involving moral turpitude; or (b) the willful commission of any act of fraud or misrepresentation related to the business of the Company which would materially and negatively impact the Company.

If within ninety (90) days following a change of control of the Company (as defined below), Mr. Wildrick exercises his right to terminate the Consulting Agreement or the Company terminates the Consulting Agreement based on a default thereunder by Mr. Wildrick, the Company will pay Mr. Wildrick a lump sum equal to the balance of amounts due under the Consulting Agreement for its remaining term. Without limiting the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, the term “change of control,” as used therein, generally means (a) the acquisition by any “person” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of beneficial ownership of 51% or more of the stock of the Company; (b) the acquisition by any such “person” of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the stock of the Company and a change in the majority of the Board; or (c) the merger, consolidation or liquidation of the Company or the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Merger will constitute a change of control under the Consulting Agreement.

As a result of the Merger Agreement, the Company, Men’s Wearhouse and Mr. Wildrick entered into a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with respect to the compensation of Mr. Wildrick and the obligations of the Company under the Consulting Agreement, and certain other agreements of Mr. Wildrick, the Company and Men's Wearhouse. The Term Sheet generally provides that (i) pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Wildrick will be paid $1,800,000 in respect of consulting services he has provided through March 8, 2014 in excess of those required under the Consulting Agreement, (ii) the amount of such additional fees Mr. Wildrick may earn between March 11, 2014 and the consummation of the Merger Transactions is limited to $500,000 and (iii) Mr. Wildrick will be subject to a non-competition covenant for the two year period following the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (for which covenant Mr. Wildrick will receive a payment of $3,500,000, of which $1,000,000 is payable upon the closing of the Merger and the remainder is payable in equal installments over the term of the covenant).

The Company's policy regarding related party transactions is set forth in the Audit Committee's charter and in the Company's Corporate Governance Standards (both of which are available on our website at www.josbank.com). As used herein and therein, “related party transactions” are transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 404(a) generally requires disclosure of transactions in which the Company is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person (such as an executive officer, director, director nominee, or 5% stockholder of the Company or any family member of the foregoing) has a direct or indirect material interest. Except as otherwise set forth below, the Audit Committee shall review each related party transaction to determine whether it is fair and reasonable to the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of the Committee so doing, the determination of whether a related party transaction is fair and reasonable to the Company may be made by the members of the Board who are independent directors. The Company will enter into or ratify a related party transaction only if the Committee or the independent directors, as the case may be, determines that it is fair and reasonable to the Company. In the event a related party transaction is entered into without prior approval as set forth in the Company's related party transaction policy and, after review by the Committee or the independent directors, as the case may be, such transaction is not determined to be fair and reasonable to the Company, the Company will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul such transaction.