XML 38 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Policies)
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting
The interim consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management of the Company, the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2019, and the results of operations, and changes in shareholders' deficit for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, and cash flows for the nine month period ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The Company’s balance sheet information at December 31, 2018, was derived from its audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2018.
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as discussed in Notes 3 and 6 to the interim consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted the requirements of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), as discussed in Notes 3 and 4 to the interim consolidated financial statements. All amounts and disclosures set forth in this Form 10-Q have been updated to comply with the new standards.
The results of operations for the periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for a full year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with ASC 205, the Company's discontinued operating results have been reclassified on the face of the financial statements and footnotes for all periods presented to reflect the discontinued status of these operations.
Recent Accounting Standards Adopted and Not Adopted by the Company
Recent Accounting Standards Adopted by the Company
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard establishes a right-of-use ("ROU") model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For short-term leases (those with a term of 12 months or less and that do not include a lessee purchase option that is reasonably certain to be exercised), a lessee is permitted to make (and the Company chose to utilize) an accounting policy election by asset class not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities, which would generally result in lease expense for these short term leases being recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases - Targeted Improvements, which allows lessees and lessors to recognize and measure existing leases at the beginning of the period of adoption without modifying the comparative period financial statements (which therefore will remain under prior GAAP, Topic 840, Leases). The Company elected to use the optional expedient to reflect adoption in the period of adoption (January 1, 2019) rather than the earliest period presented. The Company also elected the package of practical expedients upon transition, which includes retaining the lease classification for any leases that exist prior to adoption of the standard. The adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of net lease assets and lease liabilities of $384,187 and $389,403, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net earnings and had no impact on cash flows. See Note 6, "Leases" for a discussion regarding leases under the new standard.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which is intended to simplify and amend the application of hedge accounting to more clearly portray the economics of an entity’s risk management strategies in its financial statements. The new guidance will make more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. The new guidance also changes how companies assess effectiveness and amends the presentation and disclosure requirements. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument will be required to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The new guidance also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The new guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 805): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") Overnight Index Swap ("OIS") Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. The ASU amends ASC 815 to add the OIS rate based on the SOFR as a fifth US benchmark interest rate. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement- Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The new guidance allows entities the option to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) to retained earnings. The new guidance allows the option to apply the guidance retrospectively or in the period of adoption. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvement to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to nonemployees to largely align it with the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which outlines a single comprehensive model for recognizing revenue and supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance, including guidance specific to the healthcare industry. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the requirements of this standard effective January 1, 2018. The Company elected to apply the modified retrospective approach with the cumulative transition effect recognized in beginning retained earnings as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASC 606 represents a change in accounting principle that more closely aligns revenue recognition with the delivery of the Company's services. The cumulative effect of applying the new guidance to all contracts with customers as of January 1, 2018 was not material to the interim consolidated financial statements. See Note 4, "Revenue Recognition" for a discussion regarding revenue recognition under the new standard.
Accounting Standards Recently Issued But Not Yet Adopted by the Company
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The new guidance intends to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other such commitments. This update requires that financial statement assets measured at an amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. This standard is effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the impact from the adoption of this new standard on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework- Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements of fair value measurements under Topic 820. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASC 606 represents a change in accounting principle that more closely aligns revenue recognition with the delivery of the Company's services. The cumulative effect of applying the new guidance to all contracts with customers as of January 1, 2018 was not material to the interim consolidated financial statements. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these services.
Performance obligations are promises made in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company has concluded that the contracts with patients and residents represent a bundle of distinct services that are substantially the same, with the same pattern of transfer to the customer. Accordingly, the promise to provide quality care is accounted for as a single performance obligation.
The Company performed analyses using the application of the portfolio approach as a practical expedient to group patient contracts with similar characteristics, such that revenue for a given portfolio would not be materially different than if it were evaluated on a contract-by-contract basis. These analyses incorporated consideration of reimbursements at varying rates from Medicaid, Medicare, Managed Care, Private Pay, Assisted Living, Hospice, and Veterans for services provided in each corresponding state. It was determined that the contracts are not materially different for the following groups: Medicaid, Medicare, Managed Care and Private Pay and other (Assisted Living, Hospice and Veterans).
In order to determine the transaction price, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration at the beginning of the contract using the expected value method. The estimates consider (i) payor type, (ii) historical payment trends, (iii) the maturity of the portfolio, and (iv) geographic payment trends throughout a class of similar payors. The Company typically enters into agreements with third-party payors that provide for payments at amounts different from the established charges. These arrangement terms provide for subsequent settlement and cash flows that may occur well after the service is provided. The Company constrains (reduces) the estimates of variable consideration such that it is probable that a significant reversal of previously recognized revenue will not occur throughout the life of the contract. Changes in the Company's expectation of the amount it will receive from the patient or third-party payors will be recorded in revenue unless there is a specific event that suggests the patient or third-party payor no longer has the ability and intent to pay the amount due and, therefore, the changes in its estimate of variable consideration better represent an impairment, or bad debt. These estimates are re-assessed each reporting period, and any amounts allocated to a satisfied performance obligation are recognized as revenue or a reduction of revenue in the period in which the transaction price changes.
The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing quality of care services to its patients and residents on a daily basis until termination of the contract. The performance obligation is recognized on a time elapsed basis, by day, for which the services are provided. For these contracts, the Company has the right to consideration from the customer in an amount that directly corresponds with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue based on the amount billable to the customer in accordance with the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-55-18. Additionally, because the Company applied ASC 606 using certain practical expedients, the Company elected not to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price for unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, performance obligations for all contracts with an original expected length of one year or less.
The Company incurs costs related to patient/resident contracts, such as legal and advertising expenses. The contract costs are expensed as incurred. They are not expected to be recovered and are not chargeable to the patient/resident regardless of whether the contract is executed.