XML 97 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments
The Company is committed under long-term operating leases with various expiration dates and varying renewal options. Minimum annual rentals, including renewal option periods (exclusive of taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs) under these leases beginning January 1, 2014, are as follows:
2014
$
26,165,000

2015
27,077,000

2016
27,825,000

2017
28,521,000

2018
29,459,000

Thereafter
467,387,000

 
$
606,434,000



Under lease agreements with Omega and others, the Company's lease payments are subject to periodic annual escalations as described below and in Note 2. Total lease expense for continuing operations was $21,542,000, $19,050,000 and $18,064,000 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The accrued liability related to straight line rent was $10,759,000 and $11,389,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in “Other noncurrent liabilities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Omega Leases
General Terms
The Company leases 25 nursing centers from Omega under a Master Lease. On October 20, 2006, the Company and Omega entered into a Third Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Master Lease (“Lease Amendment”) to extend the term of its facilities leased from Omega. The Lease amendment extended the term to September 30, 2018 and provided a renewal option of an additional twelve years. Consistent with prior terms, the lease provides for annual increases in lease payments equal to the lesser of two times the increase in the consumer price index or 3 percent. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the Company is required to report these scheduled rent increases on a straight line basis over the term of the lease including the 12 year term of the renewal period. These scheduled increases had no effect on cash rent payments at the start of the lease term and only result in additional cash outlay as the annual increases take effect each year.
As previously mentioned in Note 4, the Company entered into an agreement with Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. ("Omega") to terminate its lease with respect to eleven nursing centers located in Arkansas and concurrently entered into operation transfer agreements to transfer the operations of each of those eleven centers to an operator selected by Omega. In connection with the closing of this transaction, the Company and Omega entered into the Thirteenth Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Master Lease ("Master Lease") most recently amended on January 22, 2013. This amendment effectively modifies the terms of the Master Lease to terminate the terms surrounding the eleven nursing centers in Arkansas, and only as to those eleven centers, and effectively reduces the annual rent payable under the Master Lease by $5,000,000.
The Master Lease requires the Company to fund annual capital expenditures related to the leased facilities at an amount currently equal to $427 per licensed bed. These amounts are subject to adjustment for increases in the Consumer Price Index. The Company is in compliance with the capital expenditure requirements. Total required capital expenditures during the remaining lease term and renewal options are $7,336,000. These capital expenditures are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset life or the appropriate lease term.
Upon expiration of the Master Lease or in the event of a default under the Master Lease, the Company is required to transfer all of the leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures of the leased facilities to Omega. The assets to be transferred to Omega are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or estimated useful life, and will be fully depreciated upon the expiration of the lease. All of the equipment, inventory and other related assets of the facilities leased pursuant to the Master Lease have been pledged as security under the Master Lease. In addition, the Company has a letter of credit of $4,551,000 as a security deposit for the Company's leases with Omega, as described in Note 7.

Brentwood Terrace
In August 2009, the Company completed the construction of a 119-bed skilled nursing facility, Brentwood Terrace, located in Paris, Texas, replacing an existing 102-bed facility leased from Omega. The new facility was financed with funding from Omega and is leased from Omega under a long-term operating lease with renewal options through 2035. Annual rent was $789,000 initially, equal to 10.25% of $7,702,000, the total cost of the replacement facility, and is subject to the annual escalation provisions described above.

Texas Leased Nursing Centers
Effective August 11, 2007, the Company acquired the leases and leasehold interests of seven facilities which are leased from a subsidiary of Omega. In connection with this acquisition, the Company amended the Master Lease to include these seven facilities. The substantive terms of the lease of these centers, including payment provisions and lease period including renewal options were not changed by the amendment. The lease terms for the seven facilities provide for an initial term and renewal periods at the Company's option through May 31, 2035. The lease provides for annual increases in lease payments equal to the increase in the consumer price index, not to exceed 2.5%.

Renovation Funding
In January 2013, we entered into an amendment to the Master lease with Omega under which Omega agreed to provide an additional $5,000,000 to fund renovations to two nursing centers located in Texas that are leased from Omega. The annual base rent related to these facilities will be increased to reflect the amount of capital improvements to the respective facilities as the related expenditures are made. The increase is based on a rate of 10.25% per year of the amount financed under this amendment. This arrangement is similar to amendments entered into in previous years that provided financing totaling $20,000,000 that was used to fund renovations at fourteen nursing centers leased from Omega.
The Company completed an expansion to one of its facilities by making use of fifteen licensed beds it acquired in 2005. This expansion project was funded by Omega with the renovation funding previously described. This project increased capacity and footprint compared to the Company's previous lessor-funded facility projects which included renovations of existing facilities, but did not increase capacity. Accordingly, the costs incurred to expand the facility are recorded as a leasehold improvement asset with the amounts reimbursed by Omega for this project included as a long-term liability and amortized to rent expense over the remaining term of the lease. The capitalized leasehold improvements and lessor reimbursed costs are being amortized over the initial lease term ending in September 2018. The leasehold improvement asset and accumulated amortization are as follows:
 
December 31
 
2013
 
2012
Leasehold improvement
$
921,000

 
$
921,000

Accumulated Amortization
(421,000
)
 
(316,000
)
Net Intangible
$
500,000

 
$
605,000




Insurance Matters
Professional Liability and Other Liability Insurance
The Company has professional liability insurance coverage for its nursing centers that, based on historical claims experience, is likely to be substantially less than the claims that are expected to be incurred. Effective July 1, 2013, the Company established a wholly-owned, offshore limited purpose insurance subsidiary, SHC Risk Carriers, Inc. (“SHC”), to replace some of the expiring commercial policies. SHC covers losses up to specified limits per occurrence. All of the Company's nursing centers in Florida, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia are now covered under the captive insurance policies along with most of the nursing centers in Alabama, Kentucky, and Texas. The insurance coverage provided for these centers under the SHC policy includes coverage limits of at least $500,000 per medical incident with a sublimit per center of $1,000,000 and total annual aggregate policy limits of $5,000,000. All other centers within the Company’s portfolio are covered through various commercial insurance policies which provide similar coverage limits per medical incident, per location, and on an aggregate basis for covered centers. 

Reserve for Estimated Self-Insured Professional Liability Claims
Because the Company’s actual liability for existing and anticipated professional liability and general liability claims will exceed the Company’s limited insurance coverage, the Company has recorded total liabilities for reported and estimated future claims of $27,067,000 as of December 31, 2013. This accrual includes estimates of liability for incurred but not reported claims, estimates of liability for reported but unresolved claims, actual liabilities related to settlements, including settlements to be paid over time, and estimates of legal costs related to these claims. All losses are projected on an undiscounted basis and are presented without regard to any potential insurance recoveries. Amounts are added to the accrual for estimates of anticipated liability for claims incurred during each period, and amounts are deducted from the accrual for settlements paid on existing claims during each period.
The Company evaluates the adequacy of this liability on a quarterly basis. Semi-annually, the Company retains a third-party actuarial firm to assist in the evaluation of this reserve. Since May 2012, Merlinos & Associates, Inc. (“Merlinos”) has assisted management in the preparation of the appropriate accrual for incurred but not reported general and professional liability claims based on data furnished as of November 30. Merlinos primarily utilizes historical data regarding the frequency and cost of the Company’s past claims over a multi-year period, industry data and information regarding the number of occupied beds to develop its estimates of the Company’s ultimate professional liability cost for current periods. The Actuarial Division of Willis of Tennessee, Inc. assisted the Company with all estimates prior to May 2012.
On a quarterly basis, the Company obtains reports of asserted claims and lawsuits incurred. These reports, which are provided by the Company’s insurers and a third party claims administrator, contain information relevant to the actual expense already incurred with each claim as well as the third-party administrator’s estimate of the anticipated total cost of the claim. This information is reviewed by the Company quarterly and provided to the actuary semi-annually. Based on the Company’s evaluation of the actual claim information obtained, the semi-annual estimates received from the third-party actuary, the amounts paid and committed for settlements of claims and on estimates regarding the number and cost of additional claims anticipated in the future, the reserve estimate for a particular period may be revised upward or downward on a quarterly basis. Any increase in the accrual decreases results of operations in the period and any reduction in the accrual increases results of operations during the period.
The Company’s cash expenditures for self-insured professional liability costs from continuing operations were $5,367,000, $2,682,000, and $3,811,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company follows the FASB Accounting Standards Update, “Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries,” that clarifies that a health care entity should not net insurance recoveries against a related professional liability claim and that the amount of the claim liability should be determined without consideration of insurance recoveries. Accordingly, the Company has assets and equal liabilities of $440,000 at December 31, 2013 and $1,238,000 at December 31, 2012, respectively.
Although the Company adjusts its accrual for professional and general liability claims on a quarterly basis and retains a third-party actuarial firm semi-annually to assist management in estimating the appropriate accrual, professional and general liability claims are inherently uncertain, and the liability associated with anticipated claims is very difficult to estimate. Professional liability cases have a long cycle from the date of an incident to the date a case is resolved, and final determination of the Company’s actual liability for claims incurred in any given period is a process that takes years. As a result, the Company’s actual liabilities may vary significantly from the accrual, and the amount of the accrual has and may continue to fluctuate by a material amount in any given period. Each change in the amount of this accrual will directly affect the Company’s reported earnings and financial position for the period in which the change in accrual is made.
Other Insurance
With respect to workers’ compensation insurance, substantially all of the Company’s employees became covered under either an indemnity insurance plan or state-sponsored programs in May 1997. The Company is completely self-insured for workers’ compensation exposures prior to May 1997. The Company has been and remains a non-subscriber to the Texas workers’ compensation system and is, therefore, completely self-insured for employee injuries with respect to its Texas operations. From June 30, 2003 until June 30, 2007, the Company’s workers’ compensation insurance programs provided coverage for claims incurred with premium adjustments depending on incurred losses. For the period from July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2013, the Company is covered by a prefunded deductible policy. Under this policy, the Company is self-insured for the first $500,000 per claim, subject to an aggregate maximum of $3,000,000. The Company funds a loss fund account with the insurer to pay for claims below the deductible. The Company accounts for premium expense under this policy based on its estimate of the level of claims subject to the policy deductibles expected to be incurred. The liability for workers’ compensation claims is $176,000 at December 31, 2013. The Company has a non-current receivable for workers’ compensation policies covering previous years of $833,000 as of December 31, 2013. The non-current receivable is a function of payments paid to the Company’s insurance carrier in excess of the estimated level of claims expected to be incurred.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company is self-insured for health insurance benefits for certain employees and dependents for amounts up to $175,000 per individual annually. The Company provides reserves for the settlement of outstanding self-insured health claims at amounts believed to be adequate. The liability for reported claims and estimates for incurred but unreported claims is $843,000 at December 31, 2013. The differences between actual settlements and reserves are included in expense in the period finalized.

Employment Agreements

Current Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of management that provide for the payment to these members of amounts up to 2.0 times their annual salary in the event of a termination without cause, a constructive discharge (as defined in each employee agreement), or upon a change in control of the Company (as defined in each employee agreement). The maximum contingent liability under these agreements is $1,260,000 as of December 31, 2013. The terms of such agreements are from 1 to 3 years and automatically renew for 1 year if not terminated by the employee or the Company. In addition, upon the occurrence of any triggering event, these certain members of management may elect to require the Company to purchase equity awards granted to them for a purchase price equal to the difference in the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of termination versus the stated equity award exercise price. Based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 2013, there is no contingent liability for the repurchase of the equity grants. No amounts have been accrued for these contingent liabilities for members of management the Company currently employs.

Changes in Executive Officers
On August 13, 2012, the Company appointed James R. McKnight, Jr. as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In connection with the appointment of Mr. McKnight, the Company entered into an employment agreement which provides for an initial base salary of $225,000.
On January 2, 2013, the Company announced the appointment of Leslie Campbell as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. In connection with the appointment of Ms. Campbell, the Company entered into an employment agreement which provides for an initial base salary of $275,000.

Health Care Industry and Legal Proceedings
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and regulations of federal, state and local governments. These laws and regulations include, but are not necessarily limited to, matters such as licensure, accreditation, government health care program participation requirements, reimbursement for patient services, quality of resident care and Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. Over the last several years, government activity has increased with respect to investigations and allegations concerning possible violations by health care providers of fraud and abuse statutes and regulations as well as laws and regulations governing quality of care issues in the skilled nursing profession in general. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in exclusion from government health care programs together with the imposition of significant fines and penalties, as well as significant repayments for patient services previously billed. Compliance with such laws and regulations is subject to ongoing government review and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions which may be unknown or unasserted at this time. The Company is involved in regulatory actions of this type from time to time.
All of the Company's nursing centers must be licensed by the state in which they are located in order to accept patients, regardless of payor source. In most states, nursing homes are subject to certificate of need laws, which require the Company to obtain government approval for the construction of new nursing homes or the addition of new licensed beds to existing homes. The Company's nursing centers must comply with detailed statutory and regulatory requirements on an ongoing basis in order to qualify for licensure, as well as for certification as a provider eligible to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Generally, the requirements for licensure and Medicare/Medicaid certification are similar and relate to quality and adequacy of personnel, quality of medical care, record keeping, dietary services, resident rights, and the physical condition of the facility and the adequacy of the equipment used therein. Each facility is subject to periodic inspections, known as “surveys” by health care regulators, to determine compliance with all applicable licensure and certification standards. Such requirements are both subjective and subject to change. If the survey concludes that there are deficiencies in compliance, the facility is subject to various sanctions, including but not limited to monetary fines and penalties, increased staffing requirements, suspension of new admissions, non-payment for new admissions and loss of licensure or certification. Generally, however, once a facility receives written notice of any compliance deficiencies, it may submit a written plan of correction and is given a reasonable opportunity to take mutually agreeable measures to correct the deficiencies. There can be no assurance that, in the future, the Company will be able to maintain such licenses and certifications for its facilities or that the Company will not be required to expend significant sums in order to comply with regulatory requirements. Recently, the Company has experienced an increase in the severity of survey citations and the size of monetary penalties, consistent with industry trends.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company is engaged in 54 professional liability lawsuits. Five lawsuits are currently scheduled for trial or mediation during the next year, and it is expected that additional cases will be set for trial. The ultimate results of any of the Company's professional liability claims and disputes cannot be predicted. The Company has limited, and sometimes no, professional liability insurance with regard to most of these claims. A significant judgment entered against the Company in one or more of these legal actions could have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position and cash flows.
On May 16, 2012, a purported stockholder class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, against the Company's Board of Directors. This action alleges that the Board of Directors breached its fiduciary duties to stockholders related to its response to certain expressions of interest in a potential strategic transaction from Covington Investments, LLC (“Covington”). The complaint asserts that the Board failed to negotiate or otherwise appropriately consider Covington's proposals. In November, 2012, the lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The action was refiled in the Chancery Court for Williamson County, Tennessee (21st Judicial District) on November 30, 2012. The lawsuit remains in its early stages and has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. We intend to defend the matter vigorously.
In June 2012, a collective action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas against us and certain of our subsidiaries.  The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and seeks unpaid overtime wages as well as liquidated damages.  The Court conditionally certified a nationwide class of all of the Company's hourly employees.  The Company will defend the lawsuit vigorously.
In January 2009, a purported class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Garland County, Arkansas against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and Garland Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (the “Facility”). The complaint alleges that the defendants breached their statutory and contractual obligations to the patients of the Facility over the past five years. The lawsuit remains in its early stages and has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. The Company intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
We cannot currently predict with certainty the ultimate impact of any of the above cases on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. Our reserve for professional liability expenses does not include any amounts for the collective actions, the purported class action against the Facility or the lawsuit filed against our directors. An unfavorable outcome in any of these lawsuits or any of our professional liability actions, any regulatory action, any investigation or lawsuit alleging violations of fraud and abuse laws or of elderly abuse laws or any state or Federal False Claims Act case could subject us to fines, penalties and damages, including exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs, and could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
 
Reimbursement
The Company is unable to predict what, if any, reform proposals or reimbursement limitations will be implemented in the future, or the effect such changes would have on its operations. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company derived 27.3% and 53.5% of its total patient and resident revenues related to continuing operations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, respectively.
The Company will attempt to increase revenues from non-governmental sources to the extent capital is available to do so, if at all. However, private payors, including Managed Care payors, are increasingly demanding that providers accept discounted fees or assume all or a portion of the financial risk for the delivery of health care services. Such measures may include capitated payments, which can result in significant losses to health care providers if patients require expensive treatment not adequately covered by the capitated rate.