XML 30 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Abstract]  
INCOME TAXES

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

The provision (benefit) for income taxes reflected in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

 

                 
(000s omitted)   2011     2010  

Current expense (benefit) of continuing operations

  $ 295     $ 132  

Deferred expense (benefit) of continuing operations

    (243     (339
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net tax from continuing operations

    52       (207

Net tax expense (benefit) of discontinued operations

    280       5  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 332     $ (202
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit) for continuing operations was less than the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The reasons for the difference are as follows:

 

                 
(000s omitted)   2011     2010  

Income tax at statutory rate

  $ (663   $ (1,890

Valuation allowance

    321       1,650  

IRS audit settlement

    193       0  

Tax exempt income

    (77     (124

Other

    278       157  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 52     $ (207
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The net deferred tax asset recorded includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

 

                 
(000s omitted)   2011     2010  

Deferred tax assets

               

Allowance for loan losses

  $ 2,775     $ 4,614  

Alternative minimum tax credit

    214       563  

Compensation

    299       443  

Net operating loss

    2,334       1,216  

Non-accrual interest

    98       248  

Capital loss

    1,149       1,393  

ORE write downs

    628       556  

Other

    281       256  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      7,778       9,289  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     

Deferred tax liabilities

               

Depreciation

    (575     (512

Purchase accounting adjustments

    0       (220

Unrealized loss on securities available for sale

    (23     (31

Other

    (51     (83
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      (649     (846
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     

Valuation allowance

    (7,129     (8,443
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred taxes

  $ 0     $ 0  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets may not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Corporation’s evaluation of taxable events, losses in recent years and the continuing deterioration of the Michigan economy led management to conclude that it was more likely than not that the benefit would not be realized. As a result, the Corporation maintained a full valuation allowance at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6,865,000 will expire beginning in 2030 if not previously utilized.

An income tax expense associated with continuing operations in the amount of $52,000 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2011. The expense recorded considers the results of current period adjustments to other comprehensive income and discontinued operations. Generally, the calculation for income tax expense (benefit) does not consider the tax effect of changes in other comprehensive income or loss, which is a component of shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet. However, an exception is provided in certain circumstances when there is a pre-tax loss from continuing operations and income from other categories such as other comprehensive income or discontinued operations. In such case, pre-tax income from other categories is included in the tax expense (benefit) calculation for the current period.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into certain transactions that have uncertain tax consequences. From time to time, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) questions and/or challenges the tax position taken by the Corporation with respect to those transactions. The Corporation believes that its tax returns were filed based upon applicable statutes, regulations and case law in effect at the time of the transactions. The IRS, an administrative authority of a court, if presented with the transactions, could disagree with the Corporation’s interpretation of the tax law. After evaluating the risks and opportunities, the best outcome may result in a settlement. The ultimate outcome for each position is not known.

At December 31, 2011, amounts payable to the IRS for the settlement of certain tax positions examined by the agency were $193,000. There were no unrecognized or recognized tax benefits recorded in any previously reported periods presented. The increase of $193,000 in amounts recorded for tax positions previously taken from December 31, 2010 was the result of the Corporation’s IRS examination and ultimate settlement. Accrued interest and penalties were not considered to be significant. The Corporation continues to engage in discussions with the IRS related to its ongoing examination for the 2008 and 2009 tax years and based upon current knowledge the Corporation does not believe that it is more likely that not that other positions taken will not be sustained upon ultimate resolution and/or appeal. The Corporation does not expect the total amount of unrecognized or recognized tax benefits to significantly change within the next twelve months. The aforementioned other positions taken would not be expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s effective tax rate in any one reporting period if and when recognized.

Based on current knowledge and probability of assessment of various potential outcomes, the Corporation believes that accrued tax liabilities and the valuation allowance are adequate to absorb the effect, if any, relating to the ultimate resolution of the uncertain tax position in the matter outlined above.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S federal income taxes as well as income tax of the state of Michigan. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2008.