e10vqza

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

[Amendment No. 1]


(Mark One)

x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

		For the quarterly period ended August 9, 2004

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

		For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 1-11313

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		33-0602639
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

6307 Carpinteria Avenue, Ste. A, Carpinteria, CA		93013
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 745-7500

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

As of September 8, 2004, 57,707,543 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Explanatory Note

The purpose of this amendment on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CKE Restaurants, Inc. for the quarterly period ended August 9, 2004 is to restate our consolidated financial statements for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, and as of January 31, 2004, and related disclosures, as described in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information about the decision to restate these financial statements can be found in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 23, 2004.

Generally, no attempt has been made in this Form 10-Q/A to modify or update other disclosures presented in the original report on Form 10-Q, except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement. The Form 10-Q/A generally does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-Q or modify or update those disclosures, including the exhibits to the Form 10-Q affected by subsequent events. Information not affected by the restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing of the Form 10-Q on September 13, 2004. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the original Form 10-Q, including any amendments to those filings. The following items have been amended as a result of the restatement:

• Part I—Item 1—Financial Information

• Part I—Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In previous reports, we have presented in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations a detailed, tabular sensitivity analysis to illustrate our critical accounting policy discussed under the heading “Impairment of Property and Equipment and Other Amortizable Long-Lived Assets Held and Used, Held for Sale or to be Disposed of Other than by Sale.” In this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q, we have decided to omit the detailed tabular sensitivity analysis in favor of a more general discussion of this accounting policy, because the financial information being restated in this amendment is such that the tabular presentation would have to be entirely recalculated to reflect the restated results. Because the tabular presentation serves only to illustrate the general point, management decided our resources would be better directed towards other activities required in connection with the restatement.

In previous reports, we have also presented in our note under the heading “Facility Action Charges, Net” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Note 6 in this amendment) a table summarizing average annual sales per restaurant and total operating losses related to restaurants we decided to close. In this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q, management decided its resources would be better directed towards other activities required in connection with the restatement, and we have decided to omit the detailed tabular analysis of closed restaurant operating data in favor of a more general discussion.

• Part I—Item 4—Controls and Procedures

We have included in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q substantially the same discussion of our controls and procedures as we have included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2004, which is being filed concurrently herewith. While the discussion consequently speaks as of a date later than August 9, 2004, the end of our second quarter of the 2005 fiscal year that is the subject of this amendment, we concluded that an updated disclosure is appropriate under the circumstances of the restatement reflected in this amendment.

• Part II—Item 6—Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

terms. As a result, we concluded that our rent expense, net, had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $2,103. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, rent expense, net, had been understated by $60, $138, $232 and $543, respectively. As a result, our deferred rent liability as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, had been understated by $2,241 and $2,103, respectively. We have corrected these errors through restatement of our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, after identifying this error, we commenced an extensive internal review of our consolidated financial statements (the “November Review”) in order to identify any other potential accounting errors. Through the November Review, we identified the following additional accounting errors:

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

We are party to a substantial number of real property leases and have significant investments in related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets. In fiscal 1998, we extended the depreciable life we applied to our owned buildings to the new expected economic life of the assets. In addition, in certain cases the longer depreciable life exceeded the duration of the applicable underlying land lease, including option periods, resulting in an understatement of depreciation expense beginning in fiscal 1999.

In determining whether each of our real property leases is an operating lease or a capital lease and in calculating our straight-line rent expense, we generally utilize the initial term of the lease, excluding option periods. Capitalized lease assets and liabilities are generally recorded and amortized based upon the corresponding initial lease term. Historically, we depreciated or amortized our investment in the related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets over a period that included both the initial term of the lease and all option periods provided for in the lease (or the useful life of the asset if shorter than the lease term plus option periods).

During the November Review, we evaluated the propriety of the above accounting treatment, and determined that we should use one consistent definition of lease term, typically the initial lease term, for purposes of determining lease classification, straight-line rent expense, and the depreciation or amortization period for the related asset. As a result, we concluded that our depreciation and amortization expense had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $30,222. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, depreciation and amortization expense had been understated by $1,383, $3,223, $1,342 and $3,138, respectively. As a result, our property and equipment, net, and certain intangible assets as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, were overstated by $33,445 and $30,222, respectively, with respect to this matter. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

Our historical practices for determining depreciable life and amortization periods also resulted in errors in the timing and classification of expense recognition for fixed assets subjected to facility action charges in prior fiscal periods. Generally, restaurants subject to facility action charges were over-impaired in the fiscal year of the facility action charge to the extent that such assets had been under-depreciated or under-amortized leading up to the impairment date. Through fiscal 2004, these errors resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $1,014. This was comprised of a cumulative understatement of depreciation and amortization expense of $17,300, partially offset by a cumulative overstatement of facility action charges of $16,286. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we overstated facility action charges by $182, $803, $421 and $696, respectively, and understated depreciation and amortization expense by $22, $52, $98 and $229, respectively. As a result, in the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, these errors resulted in a net overstatement of expenses by $160, $751, $323 and $467, respectively. Also as a result, our property and equipment, net, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, was overstated by $263 and $1,014, respectively, with respect to this matter. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

We identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

During fiscal 2001, we sold many company-operated restaurants to franchisees. In one of these transactions, we sold 19 restaurant properties, of which eight were fee-owned properties and eleven were leased properties. We sold the eight fee-owned properties and subleased the eleven leased properties to the buyer. In recording the transaction, we did not retire the net book value of the eight fee-owned properties. Through fiscal 2004, this error resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $5,333. As a result of this error, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we overstated depreciation expense by $31, $72, $34 and $79, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our property and equipment was overstated by approximately $5,261 and $5,333, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

We also identified $1,315 of other property and equipment that was not timely retired when the assets were removed from service, primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of general and administrative expenses, net of subsequent over-depreciation, of $1,175. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we understated general and administrative expenses by $99 and $83 and overstated general and administrative expenses by $9 and $20, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our property and equipment was overstated by $1,258 and $1,175, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

Additionally, the we did not timely retire certain software development expenditures when the software applications were taken out of service. We also did not properly expense certain software development costs when incurred, in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. These accounting errors occurred primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of expenses of $2,267. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we overstated depreciation expense by $148, $311, $140 and $50, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our property and equipment was overstated by $1,956 and $2,267, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

We determined that we had misstated its property tax expense and accrued property taxes in prior fiscal periods. These errors resulted from imprecise metrics used to calculate our property tax accrual. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative overstatement of property tax expenses of $1,198. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we understated property tax expenses by $108 and $250 and overstated property tax expenses by $142 and $333, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, accrued property taxes were overstated by $948 and $1,198, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

In September 2004, we determined that, when we adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, at the beginning of fiscal 2003, as a result of temporary differences relating to the treatment of goodwill relating to our Carl’s Jr. brand, we should have recorded income tax expense to increase our deferred tax valuation allowance, which would have resulted in a deferred tax liability. We had not previously recorded this deferred tax liability. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of income tax expense of $1,413. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, our income tax expense was understated by $62, $144, $144 and $288, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our deferred tax liability was understated by $1,557 and $1,413, respectively. We determined in September 2004 that the error was immaterial and did not record an adjustment. In

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except par values)
(Unaudited)


	August 9, 2004			January 31, 2004
	(as restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	36,578		$	54,355
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,592 as of August 9, 2004 and $5,580 as of January 31, 2004		24,241			26,562
Related party trade receivables		7,100			7,991
Inventories		19,199			17,972
Prepaid expenses		10,849			16,053
Assets held for sale		17,000			18,760
Advertising fund assets, restricted		21,448			—
Other current assets		1,739			1,656

Total current assets		138,154			143,349
Notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,126 as of August 9, 2004 and $6,186 as of January 31, 2004		3,086			2,317
Property and equipment, net		466,413			479,660
Property under capital leases, net		39,872			44,895
Goodwill		22,649			22,649
Other assets		35,419			37,433

Total assets	$	705,593		$	730,303

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of bank indebtedness and other long-term debt	$	2,551		$	26,843
Current portion of capital lease obligations		5,416			7,028
Accounts payable		53,957			47,592
Advertising fund liabilities		21,448			—
Other current liabilities		104,405			105,419

Total current liabilities		187,777			186,882
Bank indebtedness and other long-term debt, less current portion		200,433			22,428
Senior subordinated notes		—			200,000
Convertible subordinated notes due 2023		105,000			105,000
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		53,259			56,877
Other long-term liabilities		57,723			56,077

Total liabilities		604,192			627,264

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 59,587,000 shares issued and 57,683,000 shares outstanding at August 9, 2004; 59,216,000 shares issued and 57,631,000 shares outstanding at January 31, 2004		596			592
Additional paid-in capital		466,632			464,689
Officer and non-employee director notes receivable		(576	)		(2,530	)
Accumulated deficit		(351,491	)		(349,306	)
Treasury stock at cost, 1,904,000 and 1,585,000 shares at August 9, 2004 and January 31, 2004, respectively		(13,760	)		(10,406	)

Total stockholders’ equity		101,401			103,039

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	705,593		$	730,303

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Revenue:
Company-operated restaurants	$	281,802		$	271,168		$	647,674		$	610,210
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		71,932			62,547			161,372			143,058

Total revenue		353,734			333,715			809,046			753,268

Operating costs and expenses:
Restaurant operations:
Food and packaging		83,897			80,852			189,621			180,949
Payroll and other employee benefit expenses		89,213			84,909			201,808			197,544
Occupancy and other operating expenses		62,503			63,140			143,758			143,859

		235,613			228,901			535,187			522,352
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		52,564			48,514			119,556			113,435
Advertising expenses		17,410			16,571			39,674			37,584
General and administrative expenses		39,153			24,846			76,810			56,455
Facility action charges, net		1,883			410			8,699			1,197

Total operating costs and expenses		346,623			319,242			779,926			731,023

Operating income		7,111			14,473			29,120			22,245
Interest expense		(11,963	)		(9,017	)		(23,683	)		(21,186	)
Other income (expense), net		(7,289	)		76			(6,560	)		(753	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		(12,141	)		5,532			(1,123	)		306
Income tax expense		244			355			595			718

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(12,385	)		5,177			(1,718	)		(412	)
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued segment (net of income tax expense (benefit) of $0, $(25), $0 and $(26) for the twelve-week periods ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, and the twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, respectively)		(304	)		46			(467	)		(2,067	)

Net income (loss)	$	(12,689	)	$	5,223		$	(2,185	)	$	(2,479	)

Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.21	)	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		—			(0.01	)		(0.03	)

Net income (loss)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.09		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)

Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.21	)	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		—			(0.01	)		(0.03	)

Net income (loss)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.09		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		57,575			57,567			57,590			57,474
Dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and convertible notes		—			1,105			—			—

Diluted		57,575			58,672			57,590			57,474

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
	Common Stock						Officer and						Treasury Stock
	Number of				Additional		Non-Employee												Total
	Shares				Paid-In		Director Notes			Accumulated			Number of						Stockholders’
	Issued		Amount		Capital		Receivable			Deficit			Shares			Amount			Equity
Balance at January 31, 2004 (as previously reported)		59,216	$	592	$	464,689	$	(2,530	)	$	(306,113	)		(1,585	)	$	(10,406	)	$	146,232
Restatement adjustments		—		—		—		—			(43,193	)		—			—			(43,193	)

Balance at January 31, 2004 (as restated)		59,216		592		464,689		(2,530	)		(349,306	)		(1,585	)		(10,406	)		103,039
Exercise of stock options		371		4		1,943		—			—			—			—			1,947
Collections on officer and non-employee director notes receivable		—		—		—		1,954			—			—			—			1,954
Repurchase of common stock		—		—		—		—			—			(319	)		(3,354	)		(3,354	)
Net loss (as restated)		—		—		—		—			(2,185	)		—			—			(2,185	)

Balance at August 9, 2004 (as restated)		59,587	$	596	$	466,632	$	(576	)	$	(351,491	)		(1,904	)	$	(13,760	)	$	101,401

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,185	)	$	(2,479	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		36,818			36,920
Amortization of loan fees		1,994			2,536
(Recovery of) provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable		(1,792	)		2,192
Loss on sale of property and equipment, capital leases and extinguishment of debts		6,316			78
Facility action charges, net		8,699			1,197
Other non-cash credits		(483	)		(167	)
Deferred income taxes		144			288
Net change in refundable income taxes		(421	)		639
Change in estimated liability for closing restaurants and estimated liability for self-insurance		(3,298	)		(4,956	)
Net change in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,670			6,030
Net change in accounts payable and other current and long-term liabilities		14,926			346
Loss from operations of discontinued segment		467			2,067
Net cash provided to discontinued segment		(252	)		(216	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		67,603			44,475

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(28,727	)		(22,897	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		7,722			9,243
Collections on notes receivable		1,968			1,203
Increase in cash upon consolidation of variable interest entity		100			—
Net change in other assets		(192	)		939

Net cash used in investing activities		(19,129	)		(11,512	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Net change in bank overdraft		(9,293	)		(8,661	)
Repayments of borrowings under credit facility		(54,588	)		(166,000	)
Long-term borrowings		230,000			149,500
(Repayments of) borrowings under long-term debt		(222,466	)		605
Repayments of capital lease obligations		(4,451	)		(5,470	)
Collections on officer and non-employee director notes receivable		1,954			—
Payment of deferred loan fees		(6,000	)		(42	)
Repurchase of common stock		(3,354	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,947			1,061

Net cash used in financing activities		(66,251	)		(29,007	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(17,777	)		3,956
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		54,355			18,440

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	36,578		$	22,396

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	(22,336	)	$	(17,973	)

Income taxes, net of refunds received	$	(402	)	$	(282	)

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Gain recognized on sale and leaseback transactions	$	187		$	189

Consolidation of advertising funds assets and liabilities	$	21,448		$	—

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE (1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

CKE Restaurants, Inc. (“CKE” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns, operates, franchises and licenses the Carl’s Jr.®, Hardee’s®, The Green Burrito® (“Green Burrito”) and La Salsa Fresh Mexican Grill® (“La Salsa”) concepts. Carl’s Jr. restaurants are primarily located in the Western United States. Hardee’s restaurants are located throughout the Southeastern and Midwestern United States. Green Burrito restaurants are located in California, primarily in dual-brand Carl’s Jr. restaurants. La Salsa restaurants are primarily located in California. As of August 9, 2004, the Company’s system-wide restaurant portfolio consisted of:


	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s		La Salsa		Other		Total
Company-operated		429		690		62		3		1,184
Franchised and licensed		587		1,377		43		15		2,022

Total		1,016		2,067		105		18		3,206

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CKE and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the instructions to Form 10-Q, and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2004. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future period.

For clarity of presentation, the Company generally labels all fiscal year ends as fiscal year ended January 31.

Prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has various stock-based compensation plans that provide options for certain employees and outside directors to purchase common shares of the Company. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure (“SFAS 148”). SFAS 148 amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Disclosures required by this standard are included in the notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

For purposes of the following pro forma disclosures required by SFAS 148 and SFAS 123, the fair value of each option has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the value of an estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The assumptions used for grants in the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, are as follows:


	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
Annual dividends	$	—		$	—
Expected volatility		72.6	%		55.2	%
Risk-free interest rate (matched to the expected term of the outstanding option)		3.45	%		3.88	%
Expected life of all options outstanding (years)		5.43			5.46
Weighted-average fair value of each option granted	$	7.19		$	3.07

The assumptions used to determine the fair value of each option granted are highly subjective. Changes in the assumptions used would affect the fair value of the options granted as follows:


	Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value of Options Granted
	Twelve Weeks Ended			Twelve Weeks Ended
Change in Assumption	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
10% increase in expected volatility	$	0.63		$	0.37
1% increase in risk-free interest rate		0.11			0.08
1 year increase in expected life of all options outstanding		0.48			0.24
10% decrease in expected volatility		(0.70	)		(0.40	)
1% decrease in risk-free interest rate		(0.12	)		(0.08	)
1 year decrease in expected life of all options outstanding		(0.57	)		(0.27	)

The following tables reconcile reported net income (loss) to pro forma net income (loss) assuming compensation expense for stock-based compensation had been recognized in accordance with SFAS 123:


	Twelve Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(12,689	)	$	5,223
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss)		—			—
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects		(1,096	)		(598	)

Net income (loss) — pro forma	$	(13,785	)	$	4,625

Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic — as reported	$	(0.22	)	$	0.09
Basic — pro forma		(0.24	)		0.08
Diluted — as reported		(0.22	)		0.09
Diluted — pro forma		(0.24	)		0.08


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Net loss, as reported	$	(2,185	)	$	(2,479	)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss		—			—
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects		(2,208	)		(1,232	)

Net loss — pro forma	$	(4,393	)	$	(3,711	)

Net loss per common share:
Basic — as reported	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)
Basic — pro forma		(0.08	)		(0.06	)
Diluted — as reported		(0.04	)		(0.04	)
Diluted — pro forma		(0.08	)		(0.06	)

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE (2) – RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This Note should be read in conjunction with Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2004.

In October 2004, the Company identified accounting errors that occurred in fiscal 2000 and 1999 which had resulted in an understatement of its deferred rent liability related to operating leases with fixed rent escalations over the lease terms. As a result, CKE concluded that its rent expense, net, had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $2,103. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, rent expense, net, had been understated by $60, $138, $232 and $543, respectively. As a result, the Company’s deferred rent liability as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, had been understated by $2,241 and $2,103, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through restatement of its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, after identifying this error, the Company commenced an extensive internal review of its consolidated financial statements (the “November Review”) in order to identify any other potential accounting errors. Through the November Review, the Company identified the following additional accounting errors:

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

The Company is party to a substantial number of real property leases and has significant investments in related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets. In fiscal 1998, the Company extended the depreciable life it applied to its owned buildings to the new expected economic life of the assets. In addition, in certain cases the longer depreciable life exceeded the duration of the applicable underlying land lease, including option periods, resulting in an understatement of depreciation expense beginning in fiscal 1999.

In determining whether each of its real property leases is an operating lease or a capital lease and in calculating its straight-line rent expense, the Company generally utilizes the initial term of the lease, excluding option periods. Capitalized lease assets and liabilities are generally recorded and amortized based upon the corresponding initial lease term. Historically, the Company depreciated or amortized its investment in the related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets over a period that included both the initial term of the lease and all option periods provided for in the lease (or the useful life of the asset if shorter than the lease term plus option periods).

During the November Review, the Company evaluated the propriety of the above accounting treatment, and determined that it should use one consistent definition of lease term, typically the initial lease term, for purposes of determining lease classification, straight-line rent expense, and the depreciation or amortization period for the related asset. As a result, CKE concluded that its depreciation and amortization expense had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $30,222. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, depreciation and amortization expense had been understated by $1,383, $3,223, $1,342 and $3,138, respectively. As a result, the Company’s property and equipment, net, and certain intangible assets as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, were overstated by $33,445 and $30,222, respectively, with respect to this matter. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

The Company’s historical practices for determining depreciable life and amortization periods also resulted in errors in the timing and classification of expense recognition for fixed assets subjected to facility action charges in prior fiscal periods. Generally, restaurants subject to facility action charges were over-impaired in the fiscal year of the facility action charge to the extent that such assets had been under-depreciated or under-amortized leading up to the impairment date. Through fiscal 2004, these errors resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $1,014. This was comprised of a cumulative understatement of depreciation and amortization expense of $17,300, partially offset by a cumulative overstatement of facility action charges of $16,286. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company overstated facility action charges by $182, $803, $421 and $696, respectively, and understated depreciation and amortization expense by $22,

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

$52, $98 and $229, respectively. As a result, in the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, these errors resulted in a net overstatement of expenses by $160, $751, $323 and $467, respectively. Also as a result, the Company’s property and equipment, net, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, was overstated by $263 and $1,014, respectively, with respect to this matter. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

The Company identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

During fiscal 2001, the Company sold many company-operated restaurants to franchisees. In one of these transactions, the Company sold 19 restaurant properties, of which eight were fee-owned properties and eleven were leased properties. The Company sold the eight fee-owned properties and subleased the eleven leased properties to the buyer. In recording the transaction, the Company did not retire the net book value of the eight fee-owned properties. Through fiscal 2004, this error resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $5,333. As a result of this error, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company overstated depreciation expense by $31, $72, $34 and $79, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by approximately $5,261 and $5,333, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

The Company also identified $1,315 of other property and equipment that was not timely retired when the assets were removed from service, primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of general and administrative expenses, net of subsequent over-depreciation, of $1,175. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company understated general and administrative expenses by $99 and $83 and overstated general and administrative expenses by $9 and $20, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by $1,258 and $1,175, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

Additionally, the Company did not timely retire certain software development expenditures when the software applications were taken out of service. The Company also did not properly expense certain software development costs when incurred, in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. These accounting errors occurred primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of expenses of $2,267. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company overstated depreciation expense by $148, $311, $140 and $50, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by $1,956 and $2,267, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

The Company determined that it had misstated its property tax expense and accrued property taxes in prior fiscal periods. These errors resulted from imprecise metrics used to calculate the Company’s property tax accrual. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative overstatement of property tax expenses of $1,198. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company understated property tax expenses by $108 and $250 and overstated property tax expenses by $142 and $333, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, accrued property taxes were overstated by $948 and $1,198, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

In September 2004, the Company determined that, when it adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, at the beginning of fiscal 2003, as a result of temporary differences relating to the treatment of goodwill relating to its Carl’s Jr. brand, the Company should have recorded income tax expense to increase its deferred tax valuation allowance, which would have resulted in a deferred tax liability. The Company had not previously recorded this deferred tax liability. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of income tax expense of $1,413. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, the Company’s income tax expense was understated by $62, $144, $144 and $288, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s deferred tax liability was understated by $1,557 and $1,413, respectively. The Company determined in September 2004 that the error was immaterial and did not record an adjustment. In light of the conclusion to restate the Company’s financial statements for the other matters discussed herein, the Company determined it was appropriate to also include this adjustment in the restatement.

(v) Other Items

The Company identified several other items that it has corrected through its restatement. For the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, these additional items aggregate to reduction to expense upon restatement of $117, $274, $38 and $102, respectively. Also as a result, prior to the restatement, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s accumulated deficit had been understated by $591 and $865, respectively, with respect to these items.

The impacts of these restatements on the condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized below:


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
August 9, 2004
Balance Sheet Data
Accounts receivable, net	$	24,408		$	(167	)	$	24,241
Inventories		19,719			(520	)		19,199
Prepaid expenses		10,346			503			10,849
Total current assets		138,338			(184	)		138,154
Property and equipment, net		507,678			(41,265	)		466,413
Property under capital leases, net		41,352			(1,480	)		39,872
Other assets		37,383			(1,964	)		35,419
Total assets		750,486			(44,893	)		705,593
Current portion of capital lease obligations		5,430			(14	)		5,416
Other current liabilities		106,175			(1,770	)		104,405
Total current liabilities		189,561			(1,784	)		187,777

Capital lease obligations, less current portion		53,485			(226	)		53,259
Other long-term liabilities		54,983			2,740			57,723
Total liabilities		603,462			730			604,192
Accumulated deficit		(305,868	)		(45,623	)		(351,491	)
Total stockholders’ equity		147,024			(45,623	)		101,401
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		750,486			(44,893	)		705,593


	Previously
	Reported		Adjustments			As Restated
Twelve Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	71,938	$	(6	)	$	71,932
Total revenue		353,740		(6	)		353,734
Occupancy and other operating expenses		61,034		1,469			62,503
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		52,557		7			52,564
General and administrative expenses		39,273		(120	)		39,153
Facility action charges, net		1,955		(72	)		1,883
Total operating costs and expenses		345,339		1,284			346,623

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


Operating income	8,401		(1,290	)	7,111
Interest expense	(11,971	)	8		(11,963	)
Other expense, net	(7,377	)	88		(7,289	)
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations	(10,947	)	(1,194	)	(12,141	)
Income tax expense	182		62		244
Loss from continuing operations	(11,129	)	(1,256	)	(12,385	)
Net loss	(11,433	)	(1,256	)	(12,689	)
Basic loss per common share:
Continuing operations	(0.19	)	(0.02	)	(0.21	)
Net loss	(0.20	)	(0.02	)	(0.22	)
Diluted loss per common share:
Continuing operations	(0.19	)	(0.02	)	(0.21	)
Net loss	(0.20	)	(0.02	)	(0.22	)


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Twelve Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	62,551		$	(4	)	$	62,547
Total revenue		333,719			(4	)		333,715
Occupancy and other operating expenses		61,870			1,270			63,140
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		48,507			7			48,514
General and administrative expenses		24,963			(117	)		24,846
Facility action charges, net		831			(421	)		410
Total operating costs and expenses		318,503			739			319,242
Operating income		15,216			(743	)		14,473
Interest expense		(9,024	)		7			(9,017	)
Other income, net		228			(152	)		76
Income before income taxes and discontinued operations		6,420			(888	)		5,532
Income tax expense		211			144			355
Income from continuing operations		6,209			(1,032	)		5,177
Net income		6,255			(1,032	)		5,223
Basic income per common share:
Continuing operations		0.11			(0.02	)		0.09
Net income		0.11			(0.02	)		0.09
Diluted income per common share:
Continuing operations		0.11			(0.02	)		0.09
Net income		0.11			(0.02	)		0.09


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	161,386		$	(14	)	$	161,372
Total revenue		809,060			(14	)		809,046
Occupancy and other operating expenses		140,337			3,421			143,758
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		119,544			12			119,556
General and administrative expenses		77,058			(248	)		76,810
Facility action charges, net		9,392			(693	)		8,699
Total operating costs and expenses		777,434			2,492			779,926
Operating income		31,626			(2,506	)		29,120
Interest expense		(23,699	)		16			(23,683	)
Other expense, net		(6,764	)		204			(6,560	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		1,163			(2,286	)		(1,123	)
Income tax expense		451			144			595
Income (loss) from continuing operations		712			(2,430	)		(1,718	)

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


Net income (loss)	245		(2,430	)	(2,185	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	0.01		(0.04	)	(0.03	)
Net income (loss)	0.00		(0.04	)	(0.04	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	0.01		(0.04	)	(0.03	)
Net income (loss)	0.00		(0.04	)	(0.04	)
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities	67,611		(8	)	67,603
Net cash used in investing activities	(19,129	)	—		(19,129	)
Net cash used in financing activities	(66,259	)	8		(66,251	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(17,777	)	—		(17,777	)


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	143,067		$	(9	)	$	143,058
Total revenue		753,277			(9	)		753,268
Occupancy and other operating expenses		140,891			2,968			143,859
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		113,416			19			113,435
General and administrative expenses		56,455			—			56,455
Facility action charges, net		1,893			(696	)		1,197
Total operating costs and expenses		728,732			2,291			731,023
Operating income		24,545			(2,300	)		22,245
Interest expense		(21,202	)		16			(21,186	)
Other expense, net		(407	)		(346	)		(753	)
Income before income taxes and discontinued operations		2,936			(2,630	)		306
Income tax expense		430			288			718
Income (loss) from continuing operations		2,506			(2,918	)		(412	)
Net income (loss)		439			(2,918	)		(2,479	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		0.04			(0.05	)		(0.01	)
Net income (loss)		0.01			(0.05	)		(0.04	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		0.04			(0.05	)		(0.01	)
Net income (loss)		0.01			(0.05	)		(0.04	)
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities		44,742			(267	)		44,475
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,772	)		260			(11,512	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(29,014	)		7			(29,007	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		3,956			—			3,956

Certain amounts in Notes 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8 have been restated to reflect the restatement adjustments described above.

NOTE (3) ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

On May 17, 2004, the Company completed adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 (“FIN 46”).

The FASB issued FIN 46 in January 2003. This interpretation is intended to clarify the application of the majority voting interest requirement of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

requires the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (“VIEs”), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities, entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns, or both. FIN 46 may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date on which it is first applied or by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated. FIN 46 was applicable immediately to variable interests in a VIE created after January 31, 2003.

During the course of 2003, the FASB proposed modifications to FIN 46 and issued FASB Staff Positions (“FSPs”) that changed and clarified FIN 46. These modifications and FSPs were subsequently incorporated into FIN 46 (revised) (“FIN 46R”), which was issued on December 23, 2003, and replaced FIN 46. FIN 46R excludes operating businesses, as defined, from its scope subject to four conditions, and states the provisions of FIN 46R need not be applied to interests in VIEs created or obtained prior to December 31, 2003, if a company is unable, subject to making and continuing to make an exhaustive effort, to obtain the information necessary to determine whether the entity is a VIE, determine whether the company is the VIE’s primary beneficiary or perform the accounting required to consolidate the VIE.

The principal entities in which the Company possesses a variable interest include franchise entities, which operate its franchised restaurants. The Company does not possess any ownership interests in its franchisees. Additionally, the Company generally does not provide financial support to its franchisees in a typical franchise relationship. Also, the Company’s franchise agreements do not require its franchisees to provide the timely financial information necessary to apply the provisions of FIN 46R to its franchisees.

Upon the final adoption of FIN 46R on May 17, 2004, the Company consolidated one franchise entity that operates six Hardee’s restaurants. The Company subleases to this franchise entity all of its six operating locations and substantially all of its operating equipment, and this franchise entity received no equity contribution from its principals upon its inception. Because the principals did not invest a significant amount of equity, the legal entity within which this franchise operates is considered to be inadequately capitalized and, as a result, is a VIE. Because of the relatively significant financial support it provides to this franchise, the Company determined it is the primary beneficiary of this VIE. The assets and liabilities of this entity included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 9, 2004, are as follows:


ASSETS:
Cash	$	134
Inventories		46
Property and equipment, net		5
Other assets		30

	$	215

LIABILITIES:
Other current liabilities	$	159
Other long-term debt		33
Other long-term liabilities		23

	$	215

The operating results of this franchise entity are included within the Company’s accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and are not significant. The minority interest in the income of this franchise entity is classified in Other Expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and in Other Long-Term Liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 9, 2004, and also is not significant.

Although this franchise entity has been included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, the Company has no rights to the assets, nor

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

does it have any obligation with respect to the liabilities, of this franchise entity. None of the Company’s assets serve as collateral for the creditors of this franchisee or any of the Company’s other franchisees.

There is also a portion of franchised restaurants that are VIEs for which the Company holds a significant variable interest, but for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The Company’s significant exposures related to these VIEs and other franchisees relate to the collection of amounts due the Company, which are collected weekly or monthly, guarantees of franchisee debt provided to third party lenders by the Company (see Note 10) and primary lease obligations or fee property ownership underlying sublease and lease arrangements the Company has with several of its franchisees, as more fully described in Note 10 herein and in Note 9 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004.

The Company utilizes various advertising funds to administer its advertising programs. The Carl’s Jr. National Advertising Fund (“CJNAF”) is Carl’s Jr.’s sole cooperative advertising program. The Company has historically consolidated CJNAF into its financial statements on a net basis, whereby contributions from franchisees are recorded as offsets to the Company’s reported advertising expenses.

The Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds consist of the Hardee’s National Advertising Fund (“HNAF”) and many local advertising cooperative funds (“Co-op Funds”). Each of these funds is a separate non-profit association with all proceeds segregated and managed by a third-party accounting service company. Upon final adoption of FIN 46R, the Company consolidated all of the Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds. The Company has included $21,448 of Advertising Fund Assets, Restricted, and Advertising Fund Liabilities in its accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 9, 2004. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds have been reported in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations on a net basis, whereby contributions from franchisees have been recorded as offsets to the Company’s reported advertising expenses. The Company elected to apply FIN 46R prospectively and, upon final adoption thereof, had no cumulative-effect adjustment.

Advertising Fund Assets, Restricted, and Advertising Fund Liabilities as of June 30, 2004, the most recent date through which financial statements are available, are included in the Company’s accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 9, 2004, and consisted of the following:


ADVERTISING FUND ASSETS, RESTRICTED:
Cash	$	15,105
Accounts and notes receivable, net		5,705
Other assets		638

	$	21,448

ADVERTISING FUND LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	8,145
Deferred obligations		13,303

	$	21,448

NOTE (4) INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The table below presents identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004:


	August 9, 2004							January 31, 2004
	Gross					Net		Gross					Net
	Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying
Intangible	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount
Asset	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)
Trademarks	$	17,159	$	(2,078	)	$	15,081	$	17,159	$	(1,616	)	$	15,543
Franchise agreements		1,780		(217	)		1,563		1,780		(169	)		1,611
Favorable lease agreements		9,006		(5,661	)		3,345		16,149		(12,004	)		4,145

	$	27,945	$	(7,956	)	$	19,989	$	35,088	$	(13,789	)	$	21,299

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Amortization expense related to identifiable definite-lived intangible assets was $744 and $1,492 for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004, and $533 and $1,165 for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 11, 2003, respectively. These intangible assets are amortized over periods of six to 20 years and are included in Other Assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE (5) INDEBTEDNESS AND INTEREST EXPENSE

On June 2, 2004, the Company amended and restated its senior credit facility (“the Facility”) to provide for a $380,000 senior secured credit facility consisting of a $150,000 revolving credit facility and a $230,000 term loan. The revolving credit facility matures on May 1, 2007, and includes an $85,000 letter of credit sub-facility. The principal amount of the term loan is scheduled to be repaid in quarterly installments, with a balloon payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity on July 2, 2008. The Facility also requires term loan prepayments based upon an annual excess cash flow formula, as defined therein. Subject to certain conditions as defined in the Facility, the maturity of the term loan may be extended to May 1, 2010. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to repay the $10,137 remaining balance of the prior Facility term loan. On July 2, 2004, the Company used additional proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to redeem $200,000 of its 9.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (“Senior Notes”) and pay the related optional redemption premium of $9,126 (which was recorded in other income (expense) during the second quarter of fiscal 2005) and accrued interest. The Company also incurred a charge of approximately $3,400 during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 to write-off unamortized loan fees primarily associated with the Senior Notes and the Facility, which was recorded in Interest Expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, the Company voluntarily prepaid $30,000 of the $230,000 term loan in addition to the $525 regularly scheduled payment. As of August 9, 2004, the Company had cash borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the Facility of $199,475, outstanding letters of credit under the revolving portion of the Facility of $64,697 and availability under the revolving portion of the Facility of $85,303. Subsequent to quarter-end, the Company voluntarily prepaid an additional $34,500 of the term loan, reducing the term loan balance to $164,975.

The terms of the Facility include certain restrictive covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict the Company’s ability to incur debt, incur liens on its assets, make any significant change in its corporate structure or the nature of its business, dispose of assets in the collateral pool securing the Facility, prepay certain debt, engage in a change of control transaction without the member banks’ consents, pay dividends and make investments or acquisitions. The Facility is collateralized by a lien on all of the Company’s personal property assets and by certain restaurant property deeds of trust. As of August 9, 2004, the applicable interest rate on the term loan was LIBOR plus 3.0%, or 4.56% per annum, and the applicable interest rate on the revolving loan portion of the Facility was LIBOR plus 2.75%. The Company also incurs fees on outstanding letters of credit under the Facility at a rate equal to the applicable margin for revolving loans, which is currently 2.75% per annum.

The Facility also required the Company to enter into interest rate protection agreements in an aggregate notional amount of at least $70,000 for a term of at least three years. Pursuant to this requirement, on July 26, 2004, the Company entered into two interest rate cap agreements in an aggregate notional amount of $70,000. Under the terms of each agreement, if LIBOR exceeds 5.375% on the measurement date for any quarterly period, the Company will receive payments equal to the amount LIBOR exceeds 5.375% multiplied by (i) the notional amount of the agreement and (ii) the fraction of a year represented by the quarterly period. The agreements expire on July 28, 2007. The agreements were not designated as cash flow hedges under the terms of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, the change in the fair value of the $371 of interest rate cap premiums will be recognized quarterly in Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, the Company recorded $49 of interest expense to reduce the carrying value of the interest rate cap premium to its fair value of $322. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivative instruments unless there is an underlying exposure.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Subject to the terms of the Facility, the Company may make capital expenditures in the amount of $50,000, plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined) in excess of $110,000 during the current fiscal year and $45,000, plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined) in excess of $110,000 during each subsequent fiscal year. In fiscal 2005 and thereafter, the Company may carry forward any unused capital expenditure amounts to the following year. The Facility also permits the Company to repurchase its common stock in the amount of $27,000 plus a portion of excess cash flow and certain net asset sale proceeds (as defined) during the term of the Facility. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

The Facility contains financial performance covenants, which include a minimum EBITDA requirement, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and maximum leverage ratios and capital expenditures, and precludes the Company from paying dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of August 9, 2004.

On September 29, 2003, the Company completed an offering of $105,000 of its 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 (“2023 Convertible Notes’), and used nearly all of the net proceeds of the offering to repurchase $100,000 of its then-outstanding 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 (the “2004 Convertible Notes”). The 2023 Convertible Notes bear interest at 4.0% annually, are payable in semiannual installments due April 1 and October 1 each year, and are unsecured general obligations of the Company, contractually subordinate in right of payment to certain other Company obligations including the Facility. On October 1 of 2008, 2013 and 2018, the holders of the 2023 Convertible Notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at 100% of the face value plus accrued interest. On October 1, 2008 and thereafter, the Company has the right to call all or a portion of the notes at 100% of the face value plus accrued interest. Under the terms of the 2023 Convertible Notes, such notes become convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 112.4859 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes at any time after the Company’s common stock has a closing sale price of at least $9.78 per share, which is 110% of the conversion price per share, for at least 20 days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter. As a result of the daily closing sales price levels on the Company’s common stock during the second calendar quarter of 2004, the 2023 Convertible Notes became convertible into the Company’s common stock effective July 1, 2004, and will remain convertible throughout the remainder of their term.

Interest expense consisted of the following:


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004		August 11, 2003		August 9, 2004		August 11, 2003
	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Facility	$	1,936	$	233	$	2,362	$	715
Senior subordinated notes due 2009		2,240		4,212		7,855		9,827
Capital lease obligations		1,595		1,805		3,798		4,212
2004 Convertible Notes		—		1,200		73		2,800
2023 Convertible Notes		969		—		2,262		—
Amortization of loan fees		903		1,091		1,945		2,504
Write-off of unamortized loan fees		3,817		—		4,210		—
Letter of credit fees and other		503		476		1,178		1,128

	$	11,963	$	9,017	$	23,683	$	21,186

NOTE (6) FACILITY ACTION CHARGES, NET

The following transactions have been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations as facility action charges, net:

(i) impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants the Company closes;

(ii) impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants with net asset values in excess of estimated fair values;

(iii) restaurant closure costs (primarily reflecting the estimated liability to terminate leases);

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(iv) gains (losses) on the sale of restaurants and surplus properties; and

(v) amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants.

Quarterly, the Company evaluates the adequacy of its estimated liability for closing restaurants and subsidizing restaurant lease payments for franchisees, and modifies the assumptions used based on actual results from selling surplus properties and terminating leases. The Company also assesses the carrying value of closed restaurant properties each quarter based on estimated property values obtained from a related party real estate broker. The Company closed two Hardee’s, one Carl’s Jr. and one La Salsa company-operated restaurants during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004. The Company closed 32 Hardee’s, one Carl’s Jr. and one La Salsa company-operated restaurants during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004. During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, the Company identified four Hardee’s, four Carl’s Jr. and three La Salsa company-operated restaurants that are still in operation, but whose estimated fair values did not support the related net asset values and, accordingly, an impairment charge was recorded. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, the Company identified ten Hardee’s, seven Carl’s Jr. and six La Salsa company-operated restaurants that are still in operation, but whose estimated fair values did not support the related net asset values and, accordingly, an impairment charge was recorded.

The components of facility action charges (gains), net are as follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Hardee’s
New decisions regarding closing restaurants	$	227		$	266		$	4,305		$	435
Favorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(576	)		(1,418	)		(422	)		(2,479	)
Impairment of assets to be disposed of		366			1,966			427			3,126
Impairment of assets to be held and used		935			690			1,705			805
Gain on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(169	)		(1,076	)		(1,203	)		(931	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		259			548			595			1,279

		1,042			976			5,407			2,235

Carl’s Jr.
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		7			—			7			14
Favorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(130	)		(245	)		(155	)		(245	)
Impairment of assets to be disposed of		4			—			4			—
Impairment of assets to be held and used		198			—			1,624			503
(Gain) loss on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		123			(565	)		(193	)		(952	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		67			73			182			195

		269			(737	)		1,469			(485	)

La Salsa and Other
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		—			—			800			—
(Favorable)/unfavorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(15	)		(191	)		25			(846	)
Impairment of assets to be held and used		588			429			992			429
(Gain) loss on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(2	)		(67	)		3			(136	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		1			—			3			—

		572			171			1,823			(553	)

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Total
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		234			266			5,112			449
Favorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(721	)		(1,854	)		(552	)		(3,570	)
Impairment of assets to be disposed of		370			1,966			431			3,126
Impairment of assets to be held and used		1,721			1,119			4,321			1,737
Gain on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(48	)		(1,708	)		(1,393	)		(2,019	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		327			621			780			1,474

	$	1,883		$	410		$	8,699		$	1,197

Facility action charges for new decisions regarding closing restaurants during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, include (i) $2,628 of provisions associated with 28 Hardee’s restaurants the Company closed during the first fiscal quarter, for which the Company had made the decision to close during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004; and (ii) $1,043 recorded during the first fiscal quarter for six lease obligations, for which the Company remained liable, associated with the bankruptcy filing of a Hardee’s franchisee during December 2003.

The following table summarizes the activity in the estimated liability for closing restaurants:


Balance at January 31, 2004	$	22,325
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		5,112
Usage		(6,317	)
Favorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(552	)
Amortization of discount		780

Balance at August 9, 2004		21,348
Less current portion, included in Other Current Liabilities		8,487

Long-term portion, included in Other Long-Term Liabilities	$	12,861

NOTE (7) INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company presents “basic” and “diluted” income (loss) per share. Basic income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by weighted-average shares outstanding, including all potentially dilutive securities and excluding all potentially anti-dilutive securities.

The dilutive effect of stock options and warrants is determined using the “treasury stock” method, whereby exercise is assumed at the beginning of the reporting period and proceeds from such exercise, including tax benefits therefrom, are assumed to be used to purchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price during the period. The dilutive effect of convertible debt is determined using the “if-converted” method, whereby interest charges, net of taxes, applicable to the convertible debt are added back to income and the convertible debt is assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the reporting period, with the resulting common shares being included in weighted-average shares.

The following table presents the number of potentially dilutive shares, in thousands, of the Company’s common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004		August 11, 2003		August 9, 2004		August 11, 2003
					(as restated)		(as restated)
2004 Convertible Notes		N/A		2,791		125		2,791
2023 Convertible Notes		11,811		—		11,811		—
Stock Options		5,017		4,870		5,425		5,843
Warrants		982		982		982		982

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE (8) SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company is principally engaged in developing, operating and franchising its Carl’s Jr., Hardee’s and La Salsa quick-service restaurants, each of which is considered an operating segment that is managed and evaluated separately. Management evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is segment operating income or loss. General and administrative expenses are allocated to each segment based on management’s analysis of the resources applied to each segment. Interest expense related to the Facility, Senior Notes, 2004 Convertible Notes and 2023 Convertible Notes has been allocated to Hardee’s based on the use of funds. Certain amounts that the Company does not believe would be proper to allocate to the operating segments are included in Other (i.e., gains or losses on sales of long-term investments and the operating results of consolidated variable interest entities). The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004).


	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Twelve Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
Revenue	$	181,340	$	158,611		$	11,898		$	1,885		$	353,734
Operating income (loss)		6,516		2,535			(1,973	)		33			7,111
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		5,753		(16,389	)		(2,002	)		497			(12,141	)
Goodwill (as of August 9, 2004)		22,649		—			—			—			22,649
Twelve Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
Revenue	$	168,296	$	154,199		$	10,832		$	388		$	333,715
Operating income (loss)		15,210		(679	)		(25	)		(33	)		14,473
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		14,139		(8,717	)		(19	)		129			5,532
Goodwill (as of August 11, 2003)		22,649		—			34,059			—			56,708


	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other		Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)		(as restated)
Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
Revenue	$	418,425	$	361,532		$	26,657		$	2,432	$	809,046
Operating income (loss)		27,565		5,829			(4,463	)		189		29,120
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		25,598		(22,877	)		(4,533	)		689		(1,123	)
Goodwill (as of August 9, 2004)		22,649		—			—			—		22,649
Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
Revenue	$	387,013	$	341,337		$	23,971		$	947	$	753,268
Operating income (loss)		32,968		(10,781	)		(433	)		491		22,245
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		30,639		(30,584	)		(431	)		682		306
Goodwill (as of August 11, 2003)		22,649		—			34,059			—		56,708

NOTE (9) NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

In conjunction with the acquisition of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. (“SBRG”) in fiscal 2003, the Company made the decision to divest Timber Lodge as the concept does not fit with the Company’s core concepts of quick-service and fast-casual restaurants. The sale of Timber Lodge was completed on September 3, 2004, during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, as discussed below.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Assets held for sale as of August 9, 2004, consisted of the following:


Assets held for sale:
Total assets of Timber Lodge	$	15,708
Other surplus property		1,292

	$	17,000

Net assets of Timber Lodge as of August 9, 2004, consisted of the following:


ASSETS:
Current assets	$	934
Property and equipment, net		8,378
Other assets		6,396

Total assets		15,708

LIABILITIES:
Current liabilities		5,259
Other long-term liabilities		1,735

Total liabilities		6,994

NET ASSETS	$	8,714

Total liabilities of Timber Lodge are included in Other Current Liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The results of Timber Lodge included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, are as follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
Revenue	$	8,061		$	9,059		$	21,429		$	23,297

Operating income (loss)		(387	)		15			(545	)		(2,343	)
Interest expense		4			12			10			24
Other income, net		87			18			88			274
Income tax benefit		—			(25	)		—			(26	)

Net income (loss)	$	(304	)	$	46		$	(467	)	$	(2,067	)

The operating income (loss) for Timber Lodge for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, include impairment charges of $281, $898, $0 and $1,566, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of Timber Lodge to fair value.

On September 3, 2004, the Company sold Timber Lodge to T-Lodge Acquisition Corp. for $8,816. The Company received $6,954 in cash and accepted two secured notes aggregating approximately $1,862 from the buyer. The two secured notes are comprised of a $1,000 note maturing on January 1, 2008, and bearing interest of 8.0%, and an $862 note maturing on September 3, 2005, and bearing interest of 9.0%. T-Lodge Acquisition Corp. is a privately-held corporation whose owners include certain members of the management team of Timber Lodge and other investors.

NOTE (10) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Pursuant to the Facility, a letter of credit sub-facility in the amount of $85,000 was established (see Note 5). Several standby letters of credit are outstanding under this sub-facility, which secure the Company’s potential workers’ compensation obligations and general and health liability obligations. The Company is required to provide letters of credit each year, or set aside a comparable amount of cash or investment securities in a trust account, based on its

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

existing claims experience. As of August 9, 2004, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of $64,697 under the revolving portion of the Facility.

As of August 9, 2004, the Company had recorded an accrued liability for contingencies related to litigation in the amount of $11,755, which includes $9,000 pertaining to the Carl’s Jr. purported class action matter discussed below in this Note 10. Certain of the matters for which the Company maintains an accrued liability for litigation pose risk of loss significantly above the accrued amounts. In addition, as of August 9, 2004, the Company estimated the liability for those losses related to other litigation claims that, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, are not accrued, but that the Company believes are reasonably possible to result in an adverse outcome, to be in the range of $535 to $895.

For several years, the Company offered a program whereby it guaranteed the loan obligations of certain franchisees to independent lending institutions. Franchisees have used the proceeds from such loans to acquire certain equipment and pay the costs of remodeling Carl’s Jr. restaurants. In the event a franchisee defaults under the terms of a program loan, the Company is obligated, within 15 days following written demand by the lending institution, to purchase such loan or assume the franchisee’s obligation thereunder by executing an assumption agreement and seeking a replacement franchisee for the franchisee in default. By purchasing such loan, the Company may seek recovery against the defaulting franchisee. As of August 9, 2004, the principal outstanding under program loans guaranteed by the Company totaled approximately $2.0 million, with maturity dates ranging from 2004 through 2009. As of August 9, 2004, the Company had no accrued liability for expected losses under this program and was not aware of any outstanding loans being in default.

The Company also guarantees a $214 obligation of a former subsidiary to a related party lending institution associated with an equipment leasing transaction. The Company maintains an accrual equal to 50% of this obligation based upon its estimated loss under the guarantee.

As of August 9, 2004, the Company had unconditional purchase obligations in the amount of $58,335, which include contracts for goods and services primarily related to restaurant operations.

In prior years, as part of its refranchising program, the Company sold restaurants to franchisees. In some cases, these restaurants were on leased sites. The Company entered into agreements with these franchisees but remained principally liable for the lease obligations. The Company accounts for the sublease payments received as franchising rental income and the payments on the leases as rental expense in franchising expense. As of August 9, 2004, the present value of the lease obligations under the remaining master leases’ primary terms is $128,548. Franchisees may, from time to time, experience financial hardship and may cease payment on the sublease obligation to the Company. The present value of the exposure to the Company from franchisees characterized as under financial hardship is $22,232.

The Company is, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially adversely affect the Company and its restaurants, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether the Company is liable. The Company is also, at times, the subject of complaints or allegations from employees, former employees and franchisees. On October 3, 2001, an action was filed by Adam Huizar and Michael Bolden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, seeking class action status and alleging violations of California wage and hour laws. Similar actions were filed by Mary Jane Amberson and James Bolin, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, on April 5, 2002 and November 26, 2002, respectively. The complaints allege that salaried restaurant management personnel at the Company’s Carl’s Jr. restaurants in California were improperly classified as exempt from California overtime laws, thereby depriving them of overtime pay. The complaints seek damages in an unspecified amount, injunctive relief, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, the Company announced that it had reached a preliminary agreement to settle these three lawsuits and fully resolve all complaints contained therein, under which the Company will make a cash payment of up to $9,000 to cover claims by eligible class members,

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction and Safe Harbor Disclosure

CKE Restaurants, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) is comprised of the operations of Carl’s Jr., Hardee’s, La Salsa, and Green Burrito, which is primarily operated as a dual-brand concept with Carl’s Jr. quick-service restaurants. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004. All Note references herein refer to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Matters discussed in this Form 10-Q/A contain forward-looking statements relating to future plans and developments, financial goals, and operating performance that are based on our current beliefs and assumptions. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those described include, but are not limited to, whether or not restaurants will be closed and the number of restaurant closures, consumers’ concerns or adverse publicity regarding our products, the effectiveness of operating initiatives and advertising and promotional efforts (particularly at the Hardee’s brand), changes in economic conditions or prevailing interest rates, changes in the price or availability of commodities, availability and cost of energy, workers’ compensation and general liability premiums and claims experience, changes in our suppliers’ ability to provide quality and timely products, delays in opening new restaurants or completing remodels, severe weather conditions, the operational and financial success of our franchisees, our franchisees’ willingness to participate in our strategy, the availability of financing for us and our franchisees, unfavorable outcomes in litigation, changes in accounting policies and practices, new legislation or government regulation (including environmental laws), the availability of suitable locations and terms for the sites designed for development, and other factors as discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

In October 2004, we identified accounting errors that occurred in fiscal 2000 and 1999 which had resulted in an understatement of our deferred rent liability related to operating leases with fixed rent escalations over the lease terms. As a result, we concluded that our rent expense, net, had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $2,103. In the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, rent expense, net, had been understated by $60, $138, $232 and $543, respectively. As a result, our deferred rent liability as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, had been understated by $2,241 and $2,103, respectively. We have corrected these errors through restatement of our consolidated financial statements.

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

lease assets and liabilities are generally recorded and amortized based upon the corresponding initial lease term. Historically, we depreciated or amortized our investment in the related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets over a period that included both the initial term of the lease and all option periods provided for in the lease (or the useful life of the asset if shorter than the lease term plus option periods).

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

We identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

We determined that we had misstated our property tax expense and accrued property taxes in prior fiscal periods. These errors resulted from imprecise metrics used to calculate our property tax accrual. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative overstatement of property tax expenses of $1,198. As a result of these errors, for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, we understated property tax expenses by $108 and $250 and overstated property tax expenses by $142 and $333, respectively. Also as a result, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, accrued property taxes were overstated by $948 and $1,198, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

(v) Other Items

We identified several other items that we have corrected through our restatement. For the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, these additional items aggregate to reduction to expense upon restatement of $117, $274, $38 and $102, respectively. Also as a result, prior to the restatement, as of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our accumulated deficit had been understated by $591 and $865, respectively, with respect to these items.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our reported results are impacted by the application of certain accounting policies that require us to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact our quarterly or annual results of operations and financial condition. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Our most significant accounting policies require:

• estimation of future cash flows used to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets, including goodwill, and establish the estimated liability for closing restaurants and subsidizing lease payments of franchisees;

• estimation, using actuarially determined methods, of our self-insured claim losses under our workers’ compensation, property and general liability insurance programs;

• determination of appropriate estimated liabilities for loss contingencies related to litigation;

• determination of the appropriate allowances associated with franchise and license receivables and estimated liabilities for franchise subleases;

• determination of the appropriate assumptions to use to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation for purposes of disclosures of pro forma net income or loss; and

• estimation of our net deferred income tax asset valuation allowance.

Descriptions of these critical accounting policies follow.

Impairment of Property and Equipment and Other Amortizable Long-Lived Assets Held and Used, Held for Sale or to be Disposed of Other than by Sale (as restated)

Each quarter we evaluate the carrying value of individual restaurants when the operating results have reasonably progressed to a point to adequately evaluate the probability of continuing operating losses or a current expectation that a restaurant will be sold or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. We generally estimate the useful life of land and owned buildings to be 20 to 35 years and estimate the remaining useful life of restaurants subject to leases to range from the end of the lease term then in effect to the end of such lease including all option periods. In making these judgments, we consider the period of time since the restaurant was opened or remodeled and the trend of operations and expectations for future sales growth. For restaurants selected for review, we estimate the future estimated cash flows from operating the restaurant over its estimated useful life. We make judgments about future same-store sales and the operating expenses and estimated useful life that we would expect with such level of same-store sales. We employ a probability-weighted approach wherein we estimate the effectiveness of future sales and marketing efforts on same-store sales and related estimated useful life. In general, in expected same-store sales scenarios where sales are not expected to increase, we generally assume a shorter than previously estimated useful life.

Quarterly, we update our model for estimating future cash flows based upon experience gained, current intentions about refranchising restaurants and closures, expected sales trends, internal plans and other relevant information. As the operations of restaurants opened or remodeled in recent years progress to the point that their profitability and future prospects can adequately be evaluated, additional restaurants will become subject to review and the possibility that impairments exist.

Same-store sales are the key indicator used to estimate future cash flow for evaluating recoverability. For each of our restaurant concepts, to evaluate recoverability of restaurant assets we estimate same-store sales will increase at an annual average rate of approximately 3.0% over the remaining useful life of the restaurant. The inflation rate assumed in making this calculation generally is 2.0%. If our same-store sales do not perform at or above our forecasted level, or cost inflation exceeds our forecast and we are unable to recover such costs through price increases, the carrying value of certain of our restaurants may prove to be unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Additionally, typically restaurants are operated for three years before we test them for impairment. Also, restaurants typically are not tested for either two or three years following a major remodel (contingent upon the extent of the remodel). We believe this provides the restaurant sufficient time to establish its presence in the market and build a customer base. If we were to test all restaurants for impairment without regard to the amount of time the restaurants were operating, the total asset impairment would increase substantially. In addition, if recently opened or remodeled restaurants do not eventually establish stronger market presence and build a customer base, the carrying value of certain of these restaurants may prove to be unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Impairment of Goodwill

At the reporting unit level, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually during the first quarter of our fiscal year, and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not impairment may have occurred. We consider the reporting unit level to be the brand level since the components (e.g., restaurants) within each brand have similar economic characteristics, including products and services, production processes, types or classes of customers and distribution methods. The impairment, if any, is measured based on the estimated fair value of the brand. Fair value can be determined based on discounted cash flows, comparable sales or valuations of other restaurant brands. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value.

The most significant assumptions we use in this analysis are those made in estimating future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we use the assumptions in our strategic plan for items such as same-store sales, store count growth rates, and the discount rate we consider to be the market discount rate for acquisitions of restaurant companies and brands.

If our assumptions used in performing the impairment test prove inaccurate, the fair value of the brands may ultimately prove to be significantly lower, thereby causing the carrying value to exceed the fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we performed a valuation of the Carl’s Jr. brand. We concluded that the fair value of the net assets of Carl’s Jr. exceeded the carrying value, and thus no impairment charge was required. As of August 9, 2004, we had $22,649 in goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, all of which relates to Carl’s Jr.

Estimated Liability for Closing Restaurants

We make decisions to close restaurants based on prospects for estimated future profitability, and sometimes we are forced to close restaurants due to circumstances beyond our control (e.g., a landlord’s refusal to negotiate a new lease). Our restaurant operators evaluate each restaurant’s performance every quarter. When restaurants continue to perform poorly, we consider the demographics of the location, as well as the likelihood of being able to improve an unprofitable restaurant. Based on the operator’s judgment, we estimate the future cash flows. If we determine that the restaurant will not, within a reasonable period of time, operate at break-even cash flow or be profitable, and we are not contractually obligated to continue operating the restaurant, we may close the restaurant. Additionally, franchisees may close restaurants for which we are the primary lessee. If the franchisee cannot make payments on the lease, we continue making the lease payments and establish an estimated liability for the closed restaurant if we decide not to operate it as a company-operated restaurant.

The estimated liability for closing restaurants on properties vacated is generally based on the term of the lease and the lease termination fee we expect to pay, as well as estimated maintenance costs until the lease has been abated. The amount of the estimated liability established is generally the present value of these estimated future payments. The interest rate used to calculate the present value of these liabilities is based on our incremental borrowing rate at the time the liability is established. The related discount is amortized and shown in Facility Action Charges, Net, in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

A significant assumption used in determining the amount of the estimated liability for closing restaurants is the amount of the estimated liability for future lease payments on vacant restaurants, which we determine based on our broker’s (a related party) assessment of its ability to successfully negotiate early terminations of our lease agreements with the lessors or sublease the property. Additionally, we estimate the cost to maintain leased and owned vacant properties until the lease has been abated or the owned property has been sold. If the costs to maintain properties increase, or it takes longer than anticipated to sell properties or sublease or terminate leases, we may need to record additional estimated liabilities. If the leases on the vacant restaurants are not terminated or subleased on the terms we used to estimate the liabilities, we may be required to record losses in future periods. Conversely, if the leases on the vacant restaurants are terminated or subleased on more favorable terms than we used to estimate the liabilities, we reverse previously established estimated liabilities, resulting in an increase in operating income. The present value of our operating lease payment obligations on all closed restaurants is approximately $35,514, which represents the discounted amount we would be required to pay if we are unable to terminate the leases prior to the terms required in the lease agreements or enter into sublease agreements. However, it is our experience that we can often terminate those leases for less than that amount, or sublease the property and, accordingly, we have recorded an estimated liability for operating lease obligations of $16,489 as of August 9, 2004.

Estimated Liability for Self-Insurance

We are self-insured for a portion of our current and prior years’ losses related to workers’ compensation, property and general liability insurance programs. We have obtained stop loss insurance for individual workers’ compensation, property and general liability claims over $500. Insurance liabilities and reserves are accounted for based on the present value of actuarial estimates of the amount of incurred and unpaid losses, based approximately on a risk-free interest rate. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we adjusted the rate to 4.5% due to prolonged changes in the interest rate environment. These estimates rely on actuarial observations of historical claim loss development. The actuary, in determining the estimated liability, bases the assumptions on the average historical losses on claims we have incurred. The actual loss development may be better or worse than the development we estimated in conjunction with the actuary. In that event, we will modify the reserve. As such, if we experience a higher than expected number of claims or the costs of claims rise more than expected, then we may, in conjunction with the actuary, adjust the expected losses upward and our future self-insurance expenses will rise. As a result mainly of increases in actuarial estimates of claims costs for prior periods, during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 we recorded additional expense of approximately $2,700 to increase our insurance reserves. Consistent with trends the restaurant industry has experienced in recent years, particularly in California where claim cost trends are among the highest in the country, workers’ compensation liability premiums and claim costs continue to increase. Additionally, after several years of increases, our property and general liability insurance premiums have leveled.

Loss Contingencies

We maintain accrued liabilities for contingencies related to litigation. We account for contingent obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (“SFAS 5”),which requires that we assess each contingency to determine estimates of the degree of probability and range of possible settlement. Those contingencies that are deemed to be probable and where the amount of such settlement is reasonably estimable are accrued in our consolidated financial statements. If only a range of loss can be determined, we accrue to the low end of the range. In accordance with SFAS 5, as of August 9, 2004, we have recorded an accrued liability for contingencies related to litigation in the amount of $11,755 (see note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein for further information). The assessment of contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. Contingencies are reviewed at least quarterly to determine the adequacy of the accruals and related consolidated financial statement disclosure. The ultimate settlement of contingencies may differ materially from amounts we have accrued in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In addition, as of August 9, 2004, we estimated the liability for those losses related to other litigation claims that we believe are reasonably possible to result in an adverse outcome, to be in the range of $535 to $895. In accordance with SFAS 5, we have not recorded a liability for those losses.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Franchised and Licensed Operations (as restated)

We monitor the financial condition of certain franchisees and record provisions for estimated losses on receivables when we believe that our franchisees are unable to make their required payments to us. Each quarter we perform an analysis to develop estimated bad debts for each franchisee. We then compare the aggregate result of that analysis to the amount recorded in our consolidated financial statements as the allowance for doubtful accounts and adjust the allowance as appropriate. Additionally, we cease accruing royalties and rent income from franchisees that are materially delinquent in paying or in default for other reasons and reverse any royalties and rent income accrued during the last 90 days. Over time our assessment of individual franchisees may change. For instance, we have had some franchisees who, in the past, we had determined required an estimated loss equal to the total amount of the receivable, who have paid us in full or established a consistent record of payments (generally one year) such that we determined an allowance was no longer required.

Depending on the facts and circumstances, there are a number of different actions we and/or our franchisees may take to resolve franchise collections issues. These actions may include the purchase of franchise restaurants by us or by other franchisees, a modification to the franchise agreement, which may include a provision to defer certain royalty payments or reduce royalty rates in the future (if royalty rates are not sufficient to cover our costs of service over the life of the franchise agreement, we record an estimated loss at the time we modify the agreements), a restructuring of the franchisee’s business and/or finances (including the restructuring of leases for which we are the primary obligee — see further discussion below) or, if necessary, the termination of the franchise agreement. The allowance established is based on our assessment of the most probable course of action that will occur.

Many of the restaurants that we sold to Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees as part of our refranchising program were on leased sites. Generally, we remain principally liable for the lease and have entered into a sublease with the franchisee on the same terms as the primary lease. We account for the sublease payments received as franchising income. Our payments on the leases are included within franchised and licensed restaurants and other expense in our consolidated statements of operations. As of August 9, 2004, the present value of our total obligation on such lease arrangements with Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees was $37,569 and $90,979, respectively. We do not expect Carl’s Jr. franchisees to experience the same level of financial difficulties as Hardee’s franchisees have encountered in the past or may encounter in the future. However, we can provide no assurance that this will not occur.

In addition to the sublease arrangements with franchisees described above, we also lease land and buildings to franchisees. As of August 9, 2004, the net book value of property under lease to Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees was $20,118 and $9,557, respectively. Troubled franchisees are those with whom we have entered into workout agreements and who may have liquidity problems in the future. In the event that a troubled franchisee closes a restaurant for which we own the property, our options are to operate the restaurant as a company-owned restaurant, lease the property to another tenant or sell the property. These circumstances would cause us to consider whether the carrying value of the land and building was impaired. If we determined the property value was impaired, we would record a charge to operations for the amount the carrying value of the property exceeds its fair value. As of August 9, 2004, the net book value of land and buildings under lease to Hardee’s franchisees that are considered to be troubled franchisees was approximately $17,746 and is included in the amount above. During fiscal 2005 or thereafter, some of these franchisees may close restaurants and, accordingly, we may record an impairment loss in connection with some of these closures.

In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”), which we adopted on January 1, 2003, an estimated liability for future lease obligations on restaurants operated by franchisees for which we are the primary obligee is established on the date the franchisee closes the restaurant. Also, we record an estimated liability for subsidized lease payments when we sign a sublease agreement committing us to the subsidy.

The amount of the estimated liability is established using the methodology described in Estimated Liability for Closing Restaurants above. Consistent with SFAS 146, we have not established an additional estimated liability for potential losses not yet incurred. The present value of the lease obligations for which we remain principally liable

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

and have entered into subleases with troubled franchisees was approximately $22,232 as of August 9, 2004 (five troubled franchisees represent all of this amount). If sales trends/economic conditions worsen for our franchisees, their financial health may worsen, our collection rates may decline and we may be required to assume the responsibility for additional lease payments on franchised restaurants. Entering into restructured franchise agreements may result in reduced franchise royalty rates in the future (see discussion above). The likelihood of needing to increase the estimated liability for future lease obligations is related to the success of our Hardee’s concept (i.e., if our Hardee’s concept results continue to improve from the execution of our comprehensive plan, we would reasonably expect that the financial performance of our franchisees would improve).

Stock-Based Compensation

As discussed in Notes 1 and 24 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, we have various stock-based compensation plans that provide options for certain employees and outside directors to purchase common shares of stock. We have elected to account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which utilizes the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based compensation, as opposed to using the fair-value method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”). Because of this election, we are required to make certain disclosures of pro forma net income or loss assuming we had adopted SFAS 123. We determine the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the historical stock price volatility, expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate. A change in one or more of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may result in a material change to the estimated fair value of the stock-based compensation (see Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for analysis of the effect of certain changes in assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock-based compensation).

Valuation Allowance for Net Deferred Tax Assets (as restated)

As disclosed in Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets of $188,689. The valuation allowance provides a 100% allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities that may be offset by the Company’s deferred tax assets for income tax accounting purposes. If our business turnaround is successful, and we have been profitable for a number of years, and our prospects for the realization of our deferred tax assets are more likely than not, we would reverse our valuation allowance and credit income tax expense. In assessing the prospects for future profitability, many of the assessments of same-store sales and cash flows mentioned above become relevant. When circumstances warrant, we assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized from future taxable income.

As of August 9, 2004, and January 31, 2004, we have a net deferred tax liability of $1,557 and $1,413, respectively, that arose from a financial versus tax reporting difference in accounting for goodwill. With goodwill no longer amortized for financial reporting purposes, while such amortization continues for income tax reporting purposes, the reversal timing of the associated deferred tax liability has become indeterminable. Accordingly, such deferred tax liability may not be offset by the Company’s deferred tax assets, which all have determinable reversal timing for purposes of reducing the Company’s deferred tax valuation allowance.

Significant Known Events, Trends, or Uncertainties Expected to Impact Fiscal 2005 Comparisons with Fiscal 2004(as restated)

The factors discussed below impact comparability of operating performance for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, to the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, or could impact comparisons for the remainder of fiscal 2005.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Divestiture of Timber Lodge

As discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Timber Lodge is accounted for as a discontinued operation, and we completed the sale of Timber Lodge on September 3, 2004. The results of Timber Lodge included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as discontinued operations for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, are as follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
Revenue	$	8,061		$	9,059		$	21,429		$	23,297

Operating income (loss)		(387	)		15			(545	)		(2,343	)
Interest expense		4			12			10			24
Other income, net		87			18			88			274
Income tax benefit		—			(25	)		—			(26	)

Net income (loss)	$	(304	)	$	46		$	(467	)	$	(2,067	)

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

We operate on a retail accounting calendar. Our fiscal year has 13 four-week accounting periods and ends the last Monday in January. The first quarter of our fiscal year has four periods, or 16 weeks. All other quarters have three periods, or 12 weeks. Fiscal 2005 will be a 53-week fiscal year. The fourth quarter of this fiscal year will have two accounting periods of four weeks and one accounting period of five weeks.

Our restaurant sales, and therefore our profitability, are subject to seasonal fluctuations and are traditionally higher during the spring and summer months because of factors such as increased travel upon school vacations and improved weather conditions, which affect the public’s dining habits.

Business Strategy

We remain focused on vigorously pursuing a comprehensive business strategy. The main components of our strategy are as follows:

• remain focused on restaurant fundamentals — quality, service and cleanliness;

• offer premium products that compete on quality and taste — not price;

• build on the strength of the Carl’s Jr. brand, including dual branding opportunities with Green Burrito;

• continue to execute and refine the Hardee’s Revolution;

• continue to control costs while increasing revenues;

• leverage our infrastructure and marketing presence to build out existing core markets; and

• strengthen our franchise system and pursue further franchising opportunities.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Hardee’s Revolution

We completed a comprehensive plan to revitalize Hardee’s involving a repositioning of the brand as a premium burger restaurant (the “Hardee’s Revolution”) during fiscal 2004. The plan included menu adjustments and associated advertising and media strategies. This menu, featuring Angus beef Thickburgers,™ along with related media, seeks to distinguish Hardee’s as a premium burger specialist.

Franchise Operations

Like others in the quick-service restaurant industry, some of our franchise operators experience financial difficulties from time to time with respect to their operations. Our approach to dealing with financial and operational issues that arise from these situations is described under Critical Accounting Policies above, under the heading Franchised and Licensed Operations. Some franchise operators in the Hardee’s system have experienced significant financial problems and, as discussed above, there are a number of potential resolutions of these financial issues.

We continue to work with franchisees in an attempt to maximize our future franchising income. Our franchising income is dependent on both the number of restaurants operated by franchisees and their operational and financial success, such that they can make their royalty and lease payments to us. Although we quarterly review the allowance for doubtful accounts and the estimated liability for closed franchise restaurants (see discussion under Critical Accounting Policies — Franchised and Licensed Operations), there can be no assurance that the number of franchisees or franchised restaurants experiencing financial difficulties will not increase from our current assessments, nor can there be any assurance that we will be successful in resolving financial issues relating to any specific franchisee. As of August 9, 2004, our consolidated provision for doubtful accounts of notes receivable was 68% of the gross balance of notes receivable and our consolidated provision for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable was 5% of the gross balance of accounts receivable. During fiscal 2004, we accepted several notes receivable pursuant to completing workout agreements with several troubled franchisees. Also, as of August 9, 2004, we have not recognized $4,312 in accounts receivable and $6,422 in notes receivable pertaining to royalty and rent revenue due from franchisees that are in default under the terms of their franchise agreements. We still experience specific problems with troubled franchisees (see Critical Accounting Policies — Franchise and Licensed Operations) and may be required to increase the amount of our provisions for doubtful accounts and/or increase the amount of our estimated liability for future lease obligations. The result of increasing the allowances for doubtful accounts is an effective royalty rate lower than our standard contractual royalty rate.

The effective royalty rate reflects royalties deemed collectible as a percent of franchise-generated revenue for all franchisees for which we are recognizing revenue. For the trailing thirteen periods ended August 9, 2004, the effective royalty rates for domestic Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s franchised and licensed restaurants were 3.8% and 3.7%, respectively. For the trailing thirteen periods ended August 11, 2003, the effective royalty rates for domestic Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s franchised and licensed restaurants were 3.7% and 3.6%, respectively.

Financial Comparison

The table below is a condensed presentation of certain changes in the components of net income (loss), and is designed to facilitate the discussion of results in this Form 10-Q/A.


	(All amounts are approximate and in millions)
	Second Fiscal Quarter			Year-To-Date
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Current Year:
Net loss	$	(12.7	)	$	(2.2	)
Prior Year:
Net income (loss)	$	5.2		$	(2.5	)

(Decrease) increase in net income or loss	$	(17.9	)	$	0.3

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	(All amounts are approximate and in millions)
	Second Quarter			Year-To-Date
	Fiscal Year 2005 vs.			Fiscal Year 2005 vs.
	Second Quarter			Year-To-Date
	Fiscal Year 2004			Fiscal Year 2004
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Items causing net income/loss to decrease from the prior year to the current year:
Approximate store margin improvement in Hardee’s restaurants	$	4.5		$	20.9
Approximate store margin improvement in Carl’s Jr. restaurants		0.4			5.2
Increase in net franchising income, excluding provisions for doubtful accounts		3.7			8.2
Increase in provision for litigation settlements		(8.4	)		(8.2	)
Provision for disposal of interest in corporate aircraft		(1.5	)		(1.5	)
Increase in corporate overhead		(4.2	)		(10.7	)
Increase in facility action charges		(1.5	)		(7.5	)
(Increase) decrease in loss from discontinued operations		(0.4	)		1.6
Decrease in provisions for doubtful accounts		1.7			4.0
Increase in advertising expense, excluding La Salsa and Green Burrito		(0.6	)		(1.8	)
Decrease in interest expense, excluding write-off of unamortized loan fees		0.9			1.7
Increase in operating losses of La Salsa and Green Burrito, excluding facility action charges and provisions for doubtful accounts		(1.4	)		(1.4	)
Increase in write-off of unamortized loan fees		(3.8	)		(4.2	)
Premium paid upon redemption of Senior Notes		(9.1	)		(9.1	)
Increase in other income, net, excluding premium paid upon redemption of Senior Notes		1.8			3.3
All other, net		0.0			(0.2	)

(Decrease) increase in net income or loss	$	(17.9	)	$	0.3

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Operating Review

The following tables are presented to facilitate Management’s Discussion and Analysis and are presented in the same format in which we present segment information (see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).


	Twelve Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)		Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)					(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	129,412		$	140,569		$	11,498		$	323	$	281,802
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		25,195			17,089			15,257
Company-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,255			838			736
Franchise-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,120			887			798
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.92			4.68			9.76
Company-operated same-store sales increase (C)		8.1	%		6.2	%		4.6	%
Company-operated same-store transactions increase (decrease) (D)		1.6	%		(0.7	)%		0.8	%
Franchise-operated same-store sales increase (C)		7.6	%		4.8	%		3.2	%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		29.5	%		30.2	%		27.0	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.9	%		33.7	%		37.2	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		21.2	%		22.1	%		34.2	%
Restaurant level margin		20.4	%		14.0	%		1.6	%
Advertising as a percentage of company-operated revenue		6.8	%		5.9	%		2.7	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	5,764		$	10,833		$	400		$	79	$	17,076
Distribution centers		41,129			4,416			—			—		45,545
Rent		4,818			2,640			—			—		7,458
Retail sales of variable interest entity		—			—			—			1,483		1,483
Other		217			153			—			—		370

Total franchising revenue		51,928			18,042			400			1,562		71,932

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		644			418			202			—		1,264
Distribution centers		39,778			4,318			—			—		44,096
Rent and other occupancy		4,147			1,594			—			—		5,741
Operating costs of variable interest entity		—			—			—			1,463		1,463

Total franchising expense		44,569			6,330			202			1,463		52,564

Net franchising income	$	7,359		$	11,712		$	198		$	99	$	19,368

Facility action charges, net	$	269		$	1,042		$	567		$	5	$	1,883
Operating income (loss)	$	6,516		$	2,535		$	(1,973	)	$	33	$	7,111

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	Twelve Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)			Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	121,792		$	138,611		$	10,439		$	326		$	271,168
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		22,940			15,838			14,944
Company-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,158			758			726
Franchise-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,060			808			640
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.55			4.38			9.20
Company-operated same-store sales increase (decrease) (C)		2.3	%		1.0	%		(2.0	)%
Company-operated same-store transactions decrease (D)		(1.0	)%		(7.0	)%		(3.0	)%
Franchise-operated same-store sales increase (decrease) (C)		(1.3	)%		(1.8	)%		4.5	%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		28.5	%		31.3	%		25.9	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.5	%		33.8	%		30.2	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		21.6	%		23.9	%		33.6	%
Restaurant level margin		21.4	%		11.0	%		10.3	%
Advertising as a percentage of company-operated revenue		6.4	%		6.2	%		1.0	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	5,078		$	9,192		$	358		$	62		$	14,690
Distribution centers		36,342			4,209			—			—			40,551
Rent		4,922			2,081			—			—			7,003
Other		162			106			35			—			303

Total franchising revenue		46,504			15,588			393			62			62,547

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		977			1,511			128			—			2,616
Distribution centers		35,341			3,891			—			—			39,232
Rent and other occupancy		4,911			1,755			—			—			6,666

Total franchising expense		41,229			7,157			128			—			48,514

Net franchising income	$	5,275		$	8,431		$	265		$	62		$	14,033

Facility action charges (gains), net	$	(737	)	$	976		$	192		$	(21	)	$	410
Operating income (loss)	$	15,210		$	(679	)	$	(25	)	$	(33	)	$	14,473

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)		Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)					(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	299,621		$	321,587		$	25,700		$	766	$	647,674
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		25,033			16,625			14,803
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.85			4.62			9.62
Company-operated same-store sales increase (C)		9.0	%		9.3	%		5.3	%
Company-operated same-store transactions increase (D)		1.7	%		0.6	%		1.8	%
Franchise-operated same-store sales increase (C)		8.0	%		7.7	%		3.8	%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		28.9	%		29.7	%		27.4	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.4	%		33.4	%		35.0	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		21.5	%		22.0	%		34.0	%
Restaurant level margin		21.2	%		14.9	%		3.6	%
Advertising as a percentage of company- operated revenue		6.6	%		5.9	%		2.8	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	13,345		$	24,171		$	924		$	183	$	38,623
Distribution centers		93,386			9,653			—			—		103,039
Rent		11,491			5,852			—			—		17,343
Retail sales of variable interest entity		—			—			—			1,483		1,483
Other		582			269			33			—		884

Total franchising revenue		118,804			39,945			957			1,666		161,372

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		1,996			1,701			653			—		4,350
Distribution centers		90,765			9,728			—			—		100,493
Rent and other occupancy		9,482			3,768			—			—		13,250
Operating costs of variable interest entity		—			—			—			1,463		1,463

Total franchising expense		102,243			15,197			653			1,463		119,556

Net franchising income	$	16,561		$	24,748		$	304		$	203	$	41,816

Facility action charges, net	$	1,469		$	5,407		$	1,766		$	57	$	8,699
Operating income (loss)	$	27,565		$	5,829		$	(4,463	)	$	189	$	29,120

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)			Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	280,076		$	306,224		$	23,135		$	775		$	610,210
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		22,618			14,980			14,341
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.44			4.25			9.10
Company-operated same-store sales increase (decrease) (C)		0.8	%		(1.7	)%		(2.0	)%
Company-operated same-store transactions decrease (D)		(1.7	)%		(8.7	)%		(4.2	)%
Franchise-operated same-store sales increase (decrease) (C)		(1.5	)%		(4.1	)%		1.9	%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		28.4	%		31.1	%		26.1	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.8	%		35.8	%		30.9	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		21.9	%		24.3	%		32.7	%
Restaurant level margin		20.9	%		8.8	%		10.3	%
Advertising as a percentage of company-operated revenue		6.4	%		6.3	%		2.1	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	11,647		$	19,665		$	771		$	172		$	32,255
Distribution centers		82,921			11,067			—			—			93,988
Rent		12,012			4,201			—			—			16,213
Other		357			180			65			—			602

Total franchising revenue		106,937			35,113			836			172			143,058

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		2,334			3,066			264			—			5,664
Distribution centers		80,770			11,257			—			—			92,027
Rent and other occupancy		11,723			4,021			—			—			15,744

Total franchising expense		94,827			18,344			264			—			113,435

Net franchising income	$	12,110		$	16,769		$	572		$	172		$	29,623

Facility action charges (gains), net	$	(485	)	$	2,235		$	192		$	(745	)	$	1,197
Operating income (loss)	$	32,968		$	(10,781	)	$	(433	)	$	491		$	22,245

(A) Other consists of a few Green Burrito stores that are not dual-branded and a consolidated variable interest Hardee’s franchise entity over which we do not exercise decision-making authority. Additionally, amounts that we do not believe would be proper to allocate to the operating segments are included in Other.

(B) Average check represents total restaurant sales divided by total transactions for any given period. The average check is viewed in conjunction with same-store sales and same-store transactions, as defined below. This indicator, when viewed with other measures, may illustrate revenue growth or decline resulting from a change in menu or price offering. When we introduce menu items or pricing initiatives with higher or lower price points than the existing menu base, the average check may reflect the benefit or impact from these new items or pricing on the average price paid by the consumer.

(C) Same-store sales is a widely used performance indicator in our industry. This indicator is a measure of revenue growth on the existing comparable store base of a multi-unit chain company such as ours and is measured as a percentage variance over the same fiscal period in the prior year. Same-store sales can help illustrate how competitive forces and external economic conditions benefit or impact us, as well as any benefit from the diverse value propositions and marketing initiatives undertaken by us. However, same-store sales must be viewed in light of numerous factors which may have occurred in either the prior or current fiscal period and can make same-store sales comparisons less indicative of actual performance. Such factors can include, among other things, weather

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

conditions, successful or unsuccessful promotions, successful or unsuccessful advertising campaigns, new product introductions, competitive activity, and/or holiday alignments. In calculating same-store sales, we include restaurants open for 14 full accounting periods, which allows for a year-over-year comparison.

(D) Same-store transactions represent the number of individual sales recorded at each of our restaurants but are not a measure of the number of customers or products sold at any such restaurants as any given transaction may involve one or more individuals or products. Same-store transactions is viewed on the same basis as same-store sales above and is another widely used performance indicator in our industry. This indicator is a measure of the number of sales recorded in the existing comparable store base and is measured as a percentage variance over the same fiscal period in the prior year. Same-store transactions is another measure of the effects of competitive forces and economic conditions on consumer behavior and resulting benefit, or impact, to us. Same-store transactions also reflect any benefit or detriment from the diverse value propositions and marketing initiatives undertaken by us. However, same-store transactions also must be viewed in light of numerous factors which may have occurred in either the prior or current fiscal period and can make same-store transaction comparisons less indicative of actual performance. Such factors can include, among other things, weather conditions, successful or unsuccessful promotions, successful or unsuccessful advertising campaigns, new product introductions, competitive activity, and/or holiday alignments. Premium product pricing may also have a negative impact on transactions while positively impacting sales and/or profits. Conversely, value product pricing or discounting may have a negative impact on profits but a positive impact on transactions.

Presentation of Non-GAAP Measures

EBITDA

EBITDA is a typical non-GAAP measure (i.e., a measure calculated and presented on the basis of methodologies other than in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “GAAP”) for companies that issue public debt and a measure used by the lenders under our bank credit facility. We believe EBITDA is useful to our investors as an indicator of earnings available to service debt. EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to income from operations, an indicator of cash flow from operations or a measure of liquidity. We calculate EBITDA as earnings before cumulative effect of accounting changes, operations of discontinued segment, interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, facility action charges, premiums on early redemption of debt, impairment of goodwill and impairment of assets held for sale. Because not all companies calculate EBITDA identically, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Additionally, we believe EBITDA is a more meaningful indicator of earnings available to service debt when certain charges, such as impairment of goodwill and facility action charges, are excluded from income (loss) from continuing operations. EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest expense, income taxes and debt service payments and cash costs arising from facility actions.


	Twelve Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other		Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)		(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	5,648	$	(16,403	)	$	(2,002	)	$	68	$	(12,689	)
Loss from operations of discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—		—			—			23		23
Interest expense (income)		1,094		10,857			(2	)		14		11,963
Income tax expense		106		14			—			124		244
Depreciation and amortization		5,691		9,052			988			41		15,772
Facility action charges, net		269		1,042			567			5		1,883
Premium on early redemption of Senior Notes		—		9,126			—			—		9,126
Impairment of Timber Lodge		—		—			—			281		281

EBITDA	$	12,808	$	13,688		$	(449	)	$	556	$	26,603

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	Twelve Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	13,993		$	(8,744	)	$	(19	)	$	(7	)	$	5,223
Income from operations of discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—			—			—			(46	)		(46	)
Interest expense (income)		1,338			7,726			(32	)		(15	)		9,017
Income tax expense		146			27			—			182			355
Depreciation and amortization		6,230			9,053			916			42			16,241
Facility action charges (gains), net		(737	)		976			192			(21	)		410

EBITDA	$	20,970		$	9,038		$	1,057		$	135		$	31,200


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 9, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	25,351	$	(22,916	)	$	(4,534	)	$	(86	)	$	(2,185	)
Income from operations of discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—		—			—			(431	)		(431	)
Interest expense (income)		2,767		20,927			(25	)		14			23,683
Income tax expense		247		39			1			308			595
Depreciation and amortization		13,121		21,269			2,333			95			36,818
Facility action charges, net		1,469		5,407			1,766			57			8,699
Premium on early redemption of Senior Notes		—		9,126			—			—			9,126
Impairment of Timber Lodge		—		—			—			898			898

EBITDA	$	42,955	$	33,852		$	(459	)	$	855		$	77,203


	Twenty-eight Weeks Ended August 11, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	30,294		$	(30,645	)	$	(431	)	$	(1,697	)	$	(2,479	)
Loss from operations of discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—			—			—			501			501
Interest expense (income)		2,864			18,357			(27	)		(8	)		21,186
Income tax expense		345			61			—			312			718
Depreciation and amortization		14,331			20,453			2,038			98			36,920
Facility action charges (gains), net		(485	)		2,235			192			(745	)		1,197
Impairment of Timber Lodge		—			—			—			1,566			1,566

EBITDA	$	47,349		$	10,461		$	1,772		$	27		$	59,609

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

The following table reconciles EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) to cash flow provided by operating activities (a GAAP measure):


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-eight Weeks Ended
	August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003			August 9, 2004			August 11, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	20,162		$	26,311		$	67,603		$	44,475
Interest expense		11,963			9,017			23,683			21,186
Income tax expense		244			355			595			718
Premium on early redemption of Senior Notes		9,126			—			9,126			—
Amortization of loan fees		(952	)		(1,123	)		(1,994	)		(2,536	)
Recovery of (provision for) losses on accounts and notes receivable		1,550			(128	)		1,792			(2,192	)
Loss on sales of property and equipment, capital leases and extinguishment of debts		(5,031	)		(309	)		(6,316	)		(78	)
Deferred income taxes		(62	)		(144	)		(144	)		(288	)
Other non-cash credits		(183	)		149			483			167
Net change in refundable income taxes		425			(497	)		421			(639	)
Change in estimated liability for closing restaurants and estimated liability for self-insurance		(210	)		1,720			3,298			4,956
Net change in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,321			5,147			(6,670	)		(6,030	)
Net change in accounts payable and other current and long term liabilities		(14,030	)		(9,349	)		(14,926	)		(346	)
EBITDA from operations of discontinued segment		(19	)		32			441			(503	)
Net cash provided to discontinued segment		280			51			252			216

EBITDA, including operations of discontinued segment		26,584			31,232			77,644			59,106
Less: EBITDA from operations of discontinued segment		19			(32	)		(441	)		503

EBITDA	$	26,603		$	31,200		$	77,203		$	59,609

Carl’s Jr.

During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, we opened two Carl’s Jr. restaurants. Carl’s Jr. franchisees and licensees opened four restaurants. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, we opened four Carl’s Jr. restaurants. Carl’s Jr. franchisees and licensees opened nine restaurants. The following tables show the change in the Carl’s Jr. restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue for the current quarter and year-to-date:


	Restaurant Portfolio							Revenue
	Second Fiscal Quarter							Second Fiscal Quarter						Year-To-Date
	2005		2004		Change			2005		2004		Change		2005		2004		Change
								(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Company		429		442		(13	)	$	129,412	$	121,792	$	7,620	$	299,621	$	280,076	$	19,545
Franchised and licensed^(a)		587		558		29			51,928		46,504		5,424		118,804		106,937		11,867

Total		1,016		1,000		16		$	181,340	$	168,296	$	13,044	$	418,425	$	387,013	$	31,412

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

(a) Includes $41,129, $36,342, $93,386 and $82,921 of revenues from distribution of food, packaging and supplies to franchised and licensed restaurants during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, and the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, respectively.

Company-Operated Restaurants

Revenue from company-operated Carl’s Jr. restaurants increased $7,620, or 6.3%, to $129,412 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. This increase resulted primarily from an 8.1% increase in same-store sales, partially offset by the impact of selling 15 company stores located in Arizona to a franchisee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. During the twenty-eight week period ended August 9, 2004, revenue from company-operated Carl’s Jr. restaurants increased $19,545, or 7.0%, to $299,621. We believe the launch of several new products during the current fiscal year, including The Low Carb Six Dollar Burger™, the Low Carb Breakfast Bowl™, the Low Carb Charbroiled Chicken Club™ and two new entrée salads, as well as conversion to 100 percent Angus beef in The Six Dollar Burger ™, contributed to the growth in same-store sales. Promotional item sales also increased $1,375 during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the prior year comparable period, primarily due to a current year bobblehead promotion featuring members of the National Basketball Association’s (“NBA”) Los Angeles Lakers, which was broader than a similar promotion featuring members of the NBA’s Sacramento Kings in the prior year.

The changes in the restaurant-level margin are explained as follows:


	Twelve			Twenty-eight
	Weeks			Weeks
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Restaurant-level margin for the period ended August 11, 2003		21.4	%		20.9	%
Increase in food and packaging costs		(1.0	)		(0.5	)
Increase in workers’ compensation expense		(0.9	)		(0.4	)
Decrease in labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation		0.5			0.7
Increase in general liability insurance expense		(0.4	)		—
Decrease in utilities expense		0.3			0.2
Decrease in depreciation, rent, property taxes and licenses		0.2			0.1
Decrease in repair and maintenance expense		0.2			0.2
Increase in cost of promotional items		—			(0.3	)
Other, net		0.1			0.3

Restaurant-level margin for the period ended August 9, 2004		20.4	%		21.2	%

Food and packaging costs as a percent of sales increased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the prior year periods, due primarily to increases in the cost of several commodities, primarily beef, during the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

Workers’ compensation expense as a percent of sales increased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the prior year periods, mainly as a result of an approximate $1,100 charge recorded in the current year second fiscal quarter to reflect an increase in the actuarial estimate of claims losses in prior policy periods.

Labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation, as a percent of sales decreased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, due mainly to benefits of sales leverage.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

General liability insurance expense increased during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, from the comparable prior year period, primarily due to an approximate $500 credit recorded in the prior year as a result of actuarial analysis of our general liability insurance accrual. The current year actuarial analysis yielded an insignificant change. Since the beginning of fiscal 2004, loss development on general liability claims for recent fiscal years has been less than previously estimated.

Utilities expense as a percent of sales decreased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the prior year, due mainly to benefits of sales leverage, partially offset by recording a decrease to estimated utility costs in the prior year first fiscal quarter upon finalizing contract terms with a new fixed-rate energy provider.

Depreciation, rent, property taxes and licenses expenses, as well as repair and maintenance expense, as percents of sales, decreased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, from the comparable prior year period, due mainly to sales leverage.

Promotional items costs as a percent of sales increased during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, due to the promotional items sales increase noted above.

On October 5, 2003, the Governor of California signed Senate Bill 2, known as the “Health Insurance Act of 2003” (“SB2”), which will require certain California businesses either to pay at least 80% of the premiums for a basic individual health insurance package for its employees who work over 100 hours per month and their dependents, or to pay a fee into a state pool for the purchase of health insurance for uninsured, low-income workers. California businesses that employ 200 or more employees must comply with the new law beginning on January 1, 2006. We currently do not offer health insurance benefits to our hourly employees. SB2 is currently being challenged on several fronts. In particular, Proposition 72, a measure that will be included in the State of California election ballot on November 2, 2004, will allow a majority of California voters to halt the implementation of SB2. If SB2 is halted by Proposition 72, employers would be allowed to continue to choose whether to provide health insurance for their employees and dependents. We continue to evaluate the status and impact of this legislation, which could be material to our results of operations.

Franchised and Licensed Restaurants

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $5,424, or 11.7%, to $51,928 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. The increase is comprised mainly of an increase of $4,787, or 13.2%, in food, paper and supplies sales to franchisees, resulting from the increase in the franchise store base over the comparable prior year period, overall commodity cost increases passed through to franchisees and the food purchasing volume impact of the 7.6% increase in franchise same-store sales. For similar reasons, franchise royalties also grew $686, or 13.5%, during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003.

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $11,867, or 11.1%, to $118,804 during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. The increase is comprised mainly of an increase of $10,465, or 12.6%, in food, paper and supplies sales to franchisees and an increase of $1,698, or 14.6%, in franchise royalties, both for reasons similar to those noted in the second fiscal quarter discussion above.

Net franchising income increased $2,084, or 39.5%, during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003, and increased $4,451, or 36.8%, during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. These increases are primarily due to increased profits from subleasing facilities to franchisees and the increase in franchise royalties.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Although not required to do so, approximately 89% of Carl’s Jr. franchised and licensed restaurants purchase food, paper and other supplies from us.

Hardee’s

During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, we closed two Hardee’s restaurants. During the same period, Hardee’s franchisees and licensees opened one restaurant and closed 17 restaurants. For the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, we closed 32 Hardee’s restaurants and opened one restaurant. During the same period, Hardee’s franchisees and licensees opened three restaurants and closed 32 restaurants. The following table shows the change in the Hardee’s restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue for the current quarter and year-to-date:


	Restaurant Portfolio							Revenue
	Second Fiscal Quarter							Second Fiscal Quarter						Year-To-Date
	2005		2004		Change			2005		2004		Change		2005		2004		Change
										(as restated)		(as restated)				(as restated)		(as restated)
Company		690		729		(39	)	$	140,569	$	138,611	$	1,958	$	321,587	$	306,224	$	15,363
Franchised and licensed		1,377		1,425		(48	)		18,042		15,588		2,454		39,945		35,113		4,832

Total		2,067		2,154		(87	)	$	158,611	$	154,199	$	4,412	$	361,532	$	341,337	$	20,195

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we introduced a new menu at Hardee’s pursuant to our “Hardee’s Revolution” strategy. We determined that significant management and staff training would be required to properly execute the new menu. We also invested in additional labor in the restaurants to ensure outstanding customer service during the training stage of the Hardee’s Revolution. These investments significantly impacted our financial results during the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 11, 2003. In addition, the deletion of up to 40 menu items pursuant to the Hardee’s Revolution strategy negatively affected sales at both company-operated and franchised Hardee’s restaurants through the first half of fiscal 2004. As the training, implementation and introduction of the Hardee’s Revolution were completed in early fiscal 2004, we have adjusted our staffing levels. We have also experienced significant sales trend improvements since the completion of Hardee’s Revolution rollout, including same-store sales growth at company-operated restaurants for 14 consecutive four-week reporting periods through August 9, 2004.

Company-Operated Restaurants

Same-store sales for company-operated Hardee’s restaurants increased 6.2% during the twelve weeks and 9.3% during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004. We believe this increase reflects positive consumer reception of the Hardee’s Revolution menu changes. A 4% price increase implemented at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 to address cost pressures, particularly the cost of beef, may have also contributed to our same-store sales growth.

Revenue from company-operated Hardee’s restaurants increased $1,958, or 1.4%, during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. This increase is due to the increase in same-store sales discussed above, partially offset by the closure of 30 restaurants during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 that did not adequately respond to the Hardee’s Revolution strategy and other minor store closure activity. The average check during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004 was $4.68, as compared to $4.38 during the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. The increase in average check is primarily due to our shift to premium products, reductions in couponing and discounted menu items, and the price increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

Revenue from company-operated Hardee’s restaurants increased $15,363, or 5.0%, during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. This increase is also due to the increase in same-store sales discussed above, partially offset by the restaurant closures. Consistent with the

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

second quarter of fiscal 2005, the average check during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 increased to $4.62, as compared to $4.25 during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003.

The changes in restaurant-level margins are explained as follows:


	Twelve			Twenty-eight
	Weeks			Weeks
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Restaurant-level margin for the period ended August 11, 2003		11.0	%		8.8	%
Decrease in labor and incentive costs, excluding workers’ compensation		1.1			3.0
Decrease in food and packaging costs		1.1			1.4
Increase in workers’ compensation insurance expense		(1.0	)		(0.4	)
Decrease in general liability insurance expense		0.8			0.6
Increase in asset retirement expense		(0.5	)		(0.3	)
Decrease in repair and maintenance expenses		0.4			0.3
Decrease in cost of promotional items		0.3			0.2
Decrease in utilities expense		0.2			0.6
Decrease in rent, depreciation, property taxes and licenses		0.3			0.4
Decrease in restaurant opening costs		—			0.2
Other, net		0.3			0.1

Restaurant-level margin for the period ended August 9, 2004		14.0	%		14.9	%

Labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation, decreased significantly as a percent of sales during the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004, from the comparable prior year period. This decrease resulted mainly from adjusting staffing levels after completing the Hardee’s Revolution rollout, the benefits of sales leverage, and certain labor cost management improvements commencing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, slightly offset by increased restaurant manager bonuses due to improved financial performance.

Food and packaging costs as a percent of sales decreased from the comparable prior year periods primarily due to lower discounting during the current year versus the prior year while we were still transitioning to the Hardee’s Revolution menu, as well as the price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 discussed above, partially offset by higher prices for beef and other commodities.

Workers’ compensation expense as a percent of sales increased during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the prior year, mainly as a result of an approximate $1,200 charge recorded in the current year second fiscal quarter to reflect an increase in the actuarial estimate of claims losses in prior policy periods, primarily the policy year ended January 31, 2004. General liability insurance expense decreased as a percent of sales from the prior year comparable periods, primarily due to an approximate $600 charge recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 versus an approximate $400 credit recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 as a result of actuarial analyses of our general liability insurance accrual. Based on current actuarial estimates of insurance costs for fiscal 2005, Hardee’s combined workers’ compensation and general liability insurance expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were approximately 50 basis points higher, as a percent of sales, than the anticipated run rate for the remainder of fiscal 2005. However, actual loss incurrence and development may be better or worse than that estimated in conjunction with our actuary.

Asset retirement expenses are dependent upon restaurant actions that may only occur from time to time. During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, we retired a minor amount of obsolete restaurant cooking equipment assets based on the results of store physical inventory counts at approximately half of our Hardee’s restaurants, whereas we had no significant asset retirement activity in the prior year comparable period.

Repair and maintenance expenses and utilities expense decreased as percents of sales from the prior year comparable periods due mainly to the benefits of sales leverage.

The decrease in rent, depreciation, property taxes and licenses as a percent of sales from the comparable prior year periods primarily resulted from an adjustment to deferred rents based on current lease terms (no impact in the twelve

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

weeks ended August 9, 2004, and 0.2% margin impact in the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004) and benefits of sales leverage, partially offset by increased depreciation expense on point-of-sale equipment under capital lease which, in late fiscal 2004, we determined we will replace earlier than originally planned (0.3% margin impact in both the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004). We do not anticipate similar deferred rent adjustments in future periods. We expect accelerated amortization of point-of-sale equipment to continue into the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

Restaurant opening costs are dependent upon restaurant actions that occur only from time to time. During the twelve week periods ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003, we did not open any Hardee’s restaurants. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, we opened one Hardee’s restaurant, while in the prior year comparable period we opened three Hardee’s restaurants. In addition, we applied certain new uniform and training costs pursuant to the Hardee’s Revolution conversion to opening costs in the prior year first fiscal quarter.

During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, a major lease for a significant number of Hardee’s locations expired. The lease was renegotiated at significantly improved terms, resulting in an estimated annual savings of $1,652 beginning in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.

Franchised and Licensed Restaurants

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $2,454, or 15.7%, to $18,042 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. During the same period franchise royalties grew $1,641, or 17.9%, primarily due to improved financial health of certain franchisees, which allowed them to resume royalty payments to us, and the 4.8% increase in franchise same-store sales, partially offset by the decrease in the number of franchised restaurants. Similarly, rent revenues increased $559 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as the improved financial health of certain franchisees has allowed them to resume making lease or sublease payments to the Company.

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $4,832, or 13.8%, to $39,945 during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. During the same period franchise royalties grew $4,506, or 22.9%, both for reasons similar to those noted in the second fiscal quarter discussion above.

Distribution revenues increased slightly by $207, or 4.9%, to $4,416 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004 from the prior year comparable period. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, distribution revenues decreased $1,414, or 12.8%, to $9,653. Equipment sales have slowed after franchisees made significant investments in fiscal 2003 and early fiscal 2004 pursuant to the Star Hardee’s remodel program.

Net franchising income increased $3,281, or 38.9%, during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004 and increased $7,979, or 47.6%, during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 as compared to the same periods in the prior year. These increases are primarily due to the increases in franchise royalties and rents noted above. The increases are also due to approximately $1,100 in collections of franchise receivables that were previously fully reserved and reductions in reserves for franchise bad debts due to continued improvements in the health of certain franchisees that took place in the second fiscal quarter.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

La Salsa

During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, we closed one La Salsa restaurant. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, we opened two La Salsa restaurants and closed one restaurant. During the same period, La Salsa franchisees and licensees opened two restaurants. The following table shows the change in the La Salsa restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue at La Salsa for the current quarter and year-to-date:


							Revenue
	Restaurant Portfolio Second Fiscal Quarter						Second Fiscal Quarter						Year-To-Date
	2005		2004		Change		2005		2004		Change		2005		2004		Change
Company		62		60		2	$	11,498	$	10,439	$	1,059	$	25,700	$	23,135	$	2,565
Franchised and licensed		43		40		3		400		393		7		957		836		121

Total		105		100		5	$	11,898	$	10,832	$	1,066	$	26,657	$	23,971	$	2,686

Same-store sales for company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased 4.6% during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004. Revenue from company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased $1,059, or 10.1%, when compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003, primarily due to the net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants and the increase in same-store sales. For the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, same-store sales for company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased 5.3% and revenue from company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased $2,565, or 11.1%, when compared to the same period in the prior year, also primarily due to the company-operated restaurant count and same-store sales growth.

Restaurant-level margins were 1.6% and 10.3% as a percent of company-operated restaurant revenues for the twelve-week periods ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, respectively. Margins were negatively impacted by approximately 110 basis points due to an increase in food and packaging costs as a percent of sales, resulting primarily from higher produce and dairy costs. Margins were also negatively impacted by approximately 700 basis points due to an increase in payroll and employee benefit costs, primarily as a result of an approximate $570 charge recorded in the current year to reflect an increase in the actuarial estimate of workers’ compensation claims losses in prior policy years and, to a lesser extent, the first half of fiscal 2005. Payroll and employee benefit costs were also affected by increased hourly labor related to higher costs associated with new restaurant openings and the fixed nature of labor on lower sales at more labor-intensive full service locations. Occupancy and other expenses negatively impacted margins by approximately 60 basis points, due mainly to amortization of intangible assets (approximately 200 basis points), which had been classified as general and administrative expenses in the prior year comparable period, and increased rent expense (approximately 190 basis points) due mainly to an adjustment to deferred rents based on current lease terms, partially offset by a decrease in restaurant opening costs (approximately 140 basis points).

Restaurant-level margins were 3.6% and 10.3% as a percent of company-operated restaurant revenues for the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, respectively. Margins were negatively impacted by approximately 130 basis points due to an increase in food and packaging costs as a percent of sales, resulting primarily from higher produce and dairy costs. Margins were also negatively impacted by approximately 410 basis points due to an increase in payroll and employee benefit costs for the same reasons noted in the second fiscal quarter discussion above. Occupancy and other expenses negatively impacted margins by approximately 120 basis points, due mainly to amortization of intangible assets (approximately 210 basis points), which had been classified as general and administrative expenses in the prior year comparable period, and increased rent expense (approximately 100 basis points) due mainly to an adjustment to deferred rents based on current lease terms, partially offset by a decrease in restaurant opening costs (approximately 90 basis points).

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

We consolidate the results of one variable interest entity (VIE), a franchise that operates six Hardee’s restaurants, and a group of Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds. We do not possess any ownership interest in the VIE franchise. Retail sales and operating expenses of the VIE franchise are included within Franchise and Licensed

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Restaurants and Other and the resulting minority interest in the income of the VIE franchisee is included in Other Income (Expense), Net, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004. (See Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the VIE franchise.) The Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds consist of the Hardee’s National Advertising Fund and many local advertising cooperative funds. Each of these funds is a separate non-profit association with all the proceeds segregated and managed by a third-party accounting service company. The group of funds has been reported in the Company’s accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 9, 2004, on a net basis, and is included within Advertising Fund Assets, Restricted, and Advertising Fund Liabilities within current assets and current liabilities, respectively. The funds are reported as of the latest practicable date, which is June 30, 2004. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the group of funds has been reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations on a net basis, whereby contributions from franchisees have been recorded as offsets to our reported advertising expenses. (See Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds.)

Consolidated Advertising Expense

Advertising expenses increased $839, or 5.1%, to $17,410 during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. Advertising expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue increased marginally from 6.1% to 6.2% during the same period, due mainly to the management decision to slightly increase advertising spending at the Carl’s Jr. brand.

Advertising expenses increased $2,090, or 5.6%, to $39,674 during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. Advertising expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue decreased marginally from 6.2% to 6.1% during the same period, due to higher advertising in the prior year first fiscal quarter during the Hardee’s Revolution rollout at the Hardee’s brand, partially offset by the management decision to slightly increase advertising spending at the Carl’s Jr. brand.

Consolidated General and Administrative Expense (as restated)

General and administrative expenses were 11.1% of total revenue during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to 7.4% during the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003. For the same period, general and administrative expenses increased $14,307, or 57.6%, to $39,153 as compared to the prior year period. This increase, in both dollar and percentage terms, is primarily due to charges of $7,000 and $1,250 in the current year to increase the litigation accrual for a pending matter to its estimated settlement amount (see Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein) and to increase the accrual for certain other litigation contingencies, increased corporate and regional management incentive compensation expense as a result of our improved financial performance, a charge of approximately $1,500 for losses incurred upon disposal of a partial interest in a corporate jet in which we shared ownership interest with a related party, increased legal and consulting expenses pursuant to payroll services outsourcing and compliance work associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (and new corporate governance requirements imposed by the New York Stock Exchange), and increased legal fees with respect to ongoing litigation, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense with respect to information systems software.

General and administrative expenses were 9.5% of total revenue during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, as compared to 7.5% during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003. For the same period, general and administrative expenses increased $20,355, or 36.1%, to $76,810 as compared to the prior year period. This increase, in both dollar and percentage terms, is primarily due to the charges incurred during the current year fiscal second quarter, as discussed above, along with the fiscal first half impact of increased incentive compensation expense as a result of our improved financial performance, increased legal and consulting expenses pursuant to payroll services outsourcing and compliance work associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (and new corporate governance requirements imposed by the New York Stock Exchange), and increased legal fees with respect to ongoing litigation, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense with respect to information systems software.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Consolidated Interest Expense (as restated)

During the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, interest expense increased $2,946, or 32.7%, to $11,963, as compared to the twelve weeks ended August 11, 2003, primarily as a result of $3,817 of deferred financing cost write-offs pursuant to our refinancing and debt prepayment activity during the current year quarter (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein), partially offset by lower average borrowings, lower interest rates upon refinancing our Senior Notes with a lower cost bank term loan and further amortization of our capital lease obligations since the prior year comparable period. During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, interest expense increased $2,497, or 11.8%, to $23,683, as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended August 11, 2003, primarily as a result of the same factors noted above.

Consolidated Other Income (Expense), Net (as restated)

Other income (expense), net, typically consists of lease and sublease income from non-franchisee tenants, provisions for bad debts on certain notes receivable from franchisees, and other non-operating charges. Other expense, net increased by $7,365, to $7,289, during the twelve weeks ended August 9, 2004, over the comparable prior year period due mainly to a $9,126 premium paid upon early redemption of our Senior Notes in the current year quarter, partially offset by receipt of a $515 lease termination make-whole payment and approximately $300 of interest income upon collection of officer and non-employee director notes receivable. For the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, other expense, net increased by $5,807, to $6,560, mainly due to the same factors noted above.

Consolidated Income Tax Expense (as restated)

We recorded income tax expense of $244 and $355 for the twelve week periods ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, respectively. For the twenty-eight week periods ended August 9, 2004, and August 11, 2003, we recorded income tax expense of $595 and $718, respectively. These amounts for both periods were comprised of foreign income taxes and deferred taxes associated with a difference in amortization of goodwill for financial reporting versus income tax reporting purposes. We believe that our net operating loss carryforward is such that we will not be required to pay federal or state income taxes on this fiscal year’s taxable earnings, if any, and have only provided for foreign income taxes.

At January 31, 2004, we had federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $91,970, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2010 through 2024, and state NOL carryforwards totaling approximately $335,948, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2006 through 2024. We have federal NOL carryforwards for alternative minimum tax purposes of approximately $72,210 and an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward of approximately $10,691. We have also generated general business credit carryforwards of approximately $10,952, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2020 through 2024, and foreign tax credits in the amount of $2,829, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2008 and 2009.

We have recorded a 100% valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities that may be offset by our deferred tax assets for income tax accounting purposes. If our business turnaround continues to result in sustained profitability and our prospects for the realization of our deferred tax assets are more likely than not, we would then reverse our valuation allowance and record an income tax benefit. As circumstances warrant, we continue to assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized. As of January 31, 2004, we maintained a deferred tax liability of $1,413, which results from our net deferred tax assets and tax valuation allowance of approximately $187,276 and $188,689, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources (as restated)

We have historically financed our business through cash flow from operations, borrowings under our credit facility and the sale of restaurants. Our most significant cash uses during the next 12 months will be for capital expenditures. We amended and restated our senior credit facility (“Facility”) on June 2, 2004 (see below). We anticipate that existing cash balances, availability under the Facility and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to service

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

existing debt and to meet our operating and capital requirements for the next 12 months. Additionally, we are able to sell restaurants as a source of liquidity, although we have no intention to do so significantly at this time. We have no potential mandatory payments of principal on our $105,000 of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 until October 1, 2008. On July 2, 2004, we redeemed our $200,000 of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with proceeds from the Facility.

We, and the restaurant industry in general, maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories, and vendors grant trade credit for purchases such as food and supplies. We also continually invest in our business through the addition of new sites and the refurbishment of existing sites, which are reflected as long-term assets and not as part of working capital. As a result, we typically maintain current liabilities in excess of current assets, resulting in a working capital deficit. As of August 9, 2004, our current ratio was 0.74 to 1.

The Facility provides for a $380,000 senior secured credit facility consisting of a $150,000 revolving credit facility and a $230,000 term loan. The revolving credit facility matures on May 1, 2007, and includes an $85,000 letter of credit sub-facility. The principal amount of the term loan is scheduled to be repaid in quarterly installments, with a balloon payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity on July 2, 2008. The Facility also requires term loan prepayments based upon an annual excess cash flow formula, as defined therein. Subject to certain conditions as defined in the Facility, the maturity of the term loan may be extended to May 1, 2010. We used a portion of the proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to repay the $10,137 remaining balance of the prior Facility term loan. On July 2, 2004, we used additional proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to redeem our $200,000 of 9.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (“Senior Notes”) and pay the related optional redemption premium of $9,126 and accrued interest. We also incurred a charge of approximately $3,400 during our second quarter of fiscal 2005 to write-off unamortized debt issuance costs primarily associated with the Senior Notes and the Facility.

During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, we voluntarily prepaid $30,000 of the $230,000 term loan in addition to the $525 regularly scheduled payment. As of August 9, 2004, we had cash borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the Facility of $199,475, outstanding letters of credit under the revolving portion of the Facility of $64,697 and availability under the revolving portion of the Facility of $85,303. Subsequent to quarter-end, we voluntarily prepaid an additional $34,500 of the term loan, reducing the term loan balance to $164,975.

The terms of the Facility include certain restrictive covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict our ability to incur debt, incur liens on our assets, make any significant change in our corporate structure or the nature of our business, dispose of assets in the collateral pool securing the Facility, prepay certain debt, engage in a change of control transaction without the member banks’ consents, pay dividends and make investments or acquisitions. The Facility is collateralized by a lien on all of our personal property assets and certain restaurant property deeds of trust. As of August 9, 2004, the applicable interest rate on the term loan was LIBOR plus 3.0%, or 4.56% per annum, and the applicable interest rate on the revolving loan portion of the Facility was LIBOR plus 2.75%. We also incur fees on outstanding letters of credit under the Facility at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, which is currently 2.75% per annum.

The Facility also required us to enter into interest rate protection agreements in an aggregate notional amount of at least $70,000 for a term of at least three years. Pursuant to this requirement, on July 26, 2004, we entered into two interest rate cap agreements in an aggregate notional amount of $70,000. Under the terms of each agreement, if LIBOR exceeds 5.375% on the measurement date for any quarterly period, we will receive payments equal to the amount LIBOR exceeds 5.375% multiplied by (i) the notional amount of the agreement and (ii) the fraction of a year represented by the quarterly period. The agreements expire on July 28, 2007. The agreements were not designated as cash flow hedges under the terms of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”). Accordingly, the change in the fair value of the $371 of interest rate cap premiums will be recognized quarterly in interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, we recorded $49 of interest expense to reduce the carrying value of the interest rate cap premium to its fair value of $322. As a matter of policy, we do not use derivative instruments unless there is an underlying exposure.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Subject to the terms of the Facility, we may make capital expenditures in the amount of $50,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined) in excess of $110,000 during the current fiscal year and $45,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined) in excess of $110,000 during each subsequent fiscal year. In fiscal 2005 and thereafter, we may carry forward any unused capital expenditure amounts to the following year. The Facility also permits us to repurchase our common stock in the amount of $27,000 plus a portion of excess cash flow and certain net asset sale proceeds (as defined) during the term of the Facility.

The Facility contains financial performance covenants, which include a minimum EBITDA requirement, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratios and capital expenditures, and precludes us from paying dividends.

The full text of the contractual requirements imposed by this financing is set forth in the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2004, which we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the ancillary loan documents described therein. We were in compliance with the requirements of the Facility as of August 9, 2004. Subject to cure periods in certain instances, the lenders under our Facility may demand repayment of borrowings prior to stated maturity upon certain events, including if we breach the terms of the agreement, suffer a material adverse change, engage in a change of control transaction, suffer certain adverse legal judgments, in the event of specified events of insolvency or if we default other significant obligations. In the event the Facility is declared accelerated by the lenders (which can occur only if we are in default under the Facility), our 2023 Convertible Notes (described below) may also become accelerated under certain circumstances and after all cure periods have expired.

On September 29, 2003, we completed an offering of $105,000 of our 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 (“2023 Convertible Notes’), and used nearly all of the net proceeds of the offering to repurchase $100,000 of our then-outstanding 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 (“the 2004 Convertible Notes”). The 2023 Convertible Notes bear interest at 4.0% annually, are payable in semiannual installments due April 1 and October 1 each year, are unsecured general obligations of the Company, contractually subordinate in right of payment to certain other Company obligations including the Facility. On October 1 of 2008, 2013 and 2018, the holders of the 2023 Convertible Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at 100% of the face value plus accrued interest. On October 1, 2008 and thereafter, we have the right to call all or a portion of the notes at 100% of the face value plus accrued interest. Under the terms of the 2023 Convertible Notes, such notes become convertible into our common stock at a conversion rate of 112.4859 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes at any time after our common stock has a closing sale price or at least $9.78 per share, which is 110% of the conversion price per share, for at least 20 days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter. As a result of the daily closing sales price levels on our common stock during the second calendar quarter of 2004, the 2023 Convertible Notes became convertible into our common stock effective July 1, 2004, and will remain convertible throughout the remainder of their term.

The terms of the Facility are not dependent on any change in our credit rating. The 2023 Convertible Notes contain a convertibility trigger based on the credit ratings of the notes; however, such trigger is no longer applicable since the notes are now convertible through the remainder of their term, as discussed above. We believe the key company-specific factors affecting our ability to maintain our existing debt financing relationships and to access such capital in the future are our present and expected levels of profitability and cash flow from operations, asset collateral bases and the level of our equity capital relative to our debt obligations. In addition, as noted above, our existing debt agreements include significant restrictions on future financings including, among others, limits on the amount of indebtedness we may incur or which may be secured by any of our assets.

During the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, cash provided by operating activities was $67,603, an increase of $23,128 over the prior year comparable period. The increase resulted mainly from a trend change in the accounts payable balance fluctuation in the current year first half as compared to the prior year first half. Such trend can vary significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon the timing of large vendor payments. In addition, while net loss during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 is slightly lower ($294) than net loss for the

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

comparable prior year period, the current year period includes significantly more non-cash charges, including a significant portion of our facility action charges and the deferred financing cost write-offs noted above.

Cash used in investing activities during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, totaled $19,129, which principally consisted of purchases of property and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment and collections on notes receivable.

Cash used in financing activities during the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004, totaled $66,251, which principally consisted of redemption of $200,000 of our Senior Notes due 2009 and $22,319 of our 2004 Convertible Notes, repayment of $44,451 of the term loans under our bank credit facilities (of which $43,515 represented voluntary prepayment thereof), repayment of the $10,137 remaining balance of our then-existing Facility term loan, $6,000 of financing costs incurred in connection with our refinancing activity during the second fiscal quarter and a $9,293 decrease in our bank overdraft position (which is generally not a significant source or use of cash over the long term), partially offset by the $230,000 of proceeds from the term loan component of our Facility.

Capital expenditures for the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 were:


New restaurants (including restaurants under development)
Carl’s Jr.	$	4,679
Hardee’s		2,075
La Salsa		710
Remodels/Dual-branding (including construction in process)
Carl’s Jr.		324
Hardee’s		3,387
Other restaurant additions
Carl’s Jr.		5,686
Hardee’s		8,192
La Salsa		1,160
Corporate/other		2,514

Total	$	28,727

As of August 9, 2004, we had remodeled 81% of the Hardee’s company-operated restaurants to the Star Hardee’s format.

Contractual Obligations

We enter into purchasing contracts and pricing arrangements to control costs for commodities and other items that are subject to price volatility. These arrangements in addition to any unearned supplier funding and distributor inventory obligations result in unconditional purchase obligations (see further discussion regarding these obligations in Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk), which totaled $58,335 as of August 9, 2004.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Our principal exposure to financial market risks relates to the impact that interest rate changes could have on our Facility. As of August 9, 2004, we had $199,475 of borrowings and $64,697 of letters of credit outstanding under the Facility. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in short-term interest rates would result in a reduction in the Company’s annual pre-tax earnings of $1,995. The estimated reduction is based upon the outstanding balance of the borrowings under the Facility and the weighted-average interest rate for the quarter and assumes no change in the volume, index or composition of debt as in effect on August 9, 2004. Substantially all of our business is transacted in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, foreign exchange rate fluctuations have not had a significant impact on us and are not expected to in the foreseeable future.

Commodity Price Risk

We purchase certain products which are affected by commodity prices and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions and other factors which are not considered predictable or within our control. Although many of the products purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, certain purchasing contracts or pricing arrangements contain risk management techniques designed to minimize price volatility. The purchasing contracts and pricing arrangements we use may result in unconditional purchase obligations, which are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. Typically, we use these types of purchasing techniques to control costs as an alternative to directly managing financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address material commodity cost increases by adjusting our menu pricing or changing our product delivery strategy. However, increases in commodity prices, without adjustments to our menu prices, could result in lower restaurant-level operating margins for our restaurant concepts.

Derivative Financial Instruments

On July 26, 2004, we entered into two interest rate cap agreements in an aggregate notional amount of $70,000. Under the terms of each agreement, if LIBOR exceeds 5.375% on the measurement date for any quarterly period, we will receive payments equal to the amount LIBOR exceeds 5.375% multiplied by (i) the notional amount of the agreement and (ii) the fraction of a year represented by the quarterly period. The agreements expire on July 28, 2007. The agreements were not designated as cash flow hedges under the terms of SFAS 133. Accordingly, the change in the fair value of the $371 of interest rate cap premiums will be recognized quarterly in interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. During the quarter ended August 9, 2004, we recorded $49 of interest expense to reduce the carrying value of the interest rate cap premium to its fair value of $322. As a matter of policy, we do not use derivative instruments unless there is an underlying exposure.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-Q/A, is reported in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the preparation of the Form 10-Q as of August 9, 2004, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Form 10-Q report, were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings.

Beginning with the Company’s fiscal year ending January 31, 2005, in addition to reporting on disclosure controls and procedures, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require the Company’s senior management to provide an annual report on internal controls over financial reporting. This report must contain (i) a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for the Company, (ii) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, (iii) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective, and (iv) a statement that the Company’s independent auditors have issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting. Pursuant to this requirement, in early fiscal 2005 management established an internal control steering committee and project team, engaged outside consultants and adopted a detailed project work plan to document and assess the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting, remediate any control weaknesses that may be identified, validate through testing that the controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal controls over financial reporting.

In October and November of 2004, through an extensive internal review of its consolidated financial statements, the Company’s management identified several accounting matters that led to a conclusion by the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors that previously filed financial statements of the Company should be restated. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included within this Form 10-Q/A for further detailed discussion and quantification of the accounting errors identified.

In December 2004, management determined that the accounting errors identified in its internal review resulted collectively from material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting in the associated accounting areas. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, concurred with the Company that the matters identified in the Company’s internal review collectively resulted from a material weakness (as such term is defined under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Based on the information obtained during its internal review and Section 404 compliance work subsequent to August 9, 2004, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded in December 2004 that, because of the material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting described above, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q/A report, were not effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings.

Except as described below, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended August 9, 2004, or thereafter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company has addressed several deficiencies identified during its internal review and Section 404 compliance work. Such efforts have resulted in changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. These efforts have resulted in the following:

• Revisions to the Company’s accounting policies to eliminate inconsistencies in its definition of lease term, strengthening of accounting practices whereby applicable lease terms are reviewed and appropriately considered by the Fixed Asset Accounting Department when establishing the depreciable lives for fixed and intangible assets that are subject to leases, and establishment of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

• Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among the Company’s Real Estate, Fixed Assets and General Accounting Departments to ensure timely and complete accounting for and financial reporting of facility actions such as restaurant sales, closures and lease/sublease modifications, or changes in the Company’s intention to sell or close restaurants or modify lease or sublease arrangements.

• Increases to lease accounting staffing levels, additional training of General Accounting Department personnel with respect to all facets of lease accounting applicable to the Company, and implementation of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

• Formalization and improvement of existing documentation practices to ensure communication of asset dispositions to the Company’s Accounting Department.

• Implementation of annual fixed asset physical inventories in restaurant operations and annual fixed asset listing reviews by Facilities Department and Information Technology Department personnel.

• Training of Information Technology Department and General Accounting Department personnel, and establishment of communication mechanisms between these two departments with respect to accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use.

• Development and implementation of an enhanced Delegation of Authority policy to ensure that Company expenditures and contractual commitments are approved in accordance with the Company’s management plan.

• Additional training of the Company’s Accounts Payable Department personnel to ensure they review invoices, before making payment, to ensure approval compliance in accordance with the Delegation of Authority.

• Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among General Accounting and other Corporate Departments throughout the Company to ensure timely and complete accrual for incurred but unbilled legal, information technology and other professional services.

• Enhancement of property tax accrual preparation and management review within the Company’s Corporate Tax Department.

• Additional training of individuals in the Company’s Corporate Tax Department regarding the appropriate accounting for deferred income taxes arising from financial versus tax reporting differences with respect to goodwill.

• Segregation of development and production support duties within the Company’s Information Technology Department with respect to its key accounting and financial reporting systems.

• Formalization of documentation of management reviews that occur during the periodic accounting close process.

• Segregation of wire transfer and other electronic payment initiation and approval duties within the Company’s Treasury Department.

• Enhancement of revenue recognition cut-off procedures in the Company’s equipment distribution business to ensure proper revenue recognition within each fiscal quarter.

The Company continues to implement remedial measures in response to specific accounting and reporting issues related to the restatement and its ongoing Section 404 compliance work. These remedial measures will include

additional personnel and organizational changes to improve supervision and increased training for finance and accounting personnel. The Company will also continue to develop new policies and procedures and educate and train its employees on its existing policies and procedures in an effort to constantly improve its internal controls over financial reporting and other disclosure controls and procedures. Furthermore, the Section 404 compliance work may identify additional weaknesses in the Company’s system of internal controls that may require additional remedial measures. Management will consider the status of these remedial measures when assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and other disclosure controls and procedures as of January 31, 2005.

Part II. Other Information.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Information regarding legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part 1 of this report.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

The following table provides information as of August 9, 2004, with respect to shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company during the fiscal quarter then ended (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Maximum

Number (or

Approximate

Dollar

Value) of

Total

Shares (or

Number of Shares

Units) that

Average

(or Units)

May Yet Be

Total

Price

Purchased as Part

Purchased

Number of Shares

Paid per

of Publicly

Under the

(or Units)

Share

Announced Plans

Plans or

Period

Purchased

(or Unit)

or Programs

Programs

May 18, 2004 – June 14, 2004

—

16,646

June 15, 2004 – July 12, 2004

—

16,646

July 13, 2004 – August 9, 2004

—

16,646

Total

—

16,646

In April 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to allow us to repurchase up to $20,000 of our Common Stock through April 2005. Pursuant to this authorization, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we repurchased 319,000 shares of our Common Stock at an average price of $10.49 per share, for a total cost, including trading commissions, of $3,354. We have not repurchased any additional shares in the twelve-week period ending August 9, 2004.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 28, 2004, for the purpose of electing certain members of the Board of Directors. Management’s nominees for directors, whose term expired as of the date of the Annual Meeting, were elected by the following vote:


	Shares Voted For		Authority to Vote Withheld
Byron Allumbaugh		50,248,323		1,405,499
Douglas K. Ammerman		50,191,488		1,462,334
Frank P. Willey		50,394,060		1,259,762
Janet E. Kerr		50,342,496		1,311,326
Carl L. Karcher		50,401,549		1,252,273

The following individuals also continue to serve on the Board of Directors:

Peter Churm, William P. Foley, II, Daniel D. (Ron) Lane, Ronald B. Maggard, Sr., Daniel E. Ponder, Jr. and Andrew F. Puzder.

At the annual meeting, the stockholders also voted upon and approved the following matter:

Ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the year ending January 31, 2005.


For	Against		Abstain
50,912,679		442,682		298,461

Item 6. Exhibits.


Exhibit #		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


	Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 9, 2004 and January 31, 2004		7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve weeks and twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003		8
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004		9
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-eight weeks ended August 9, 2004 and August 11, 2003		10
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		11
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		28
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		57
Item 4 Controls and Procedures		57
Part II. Other Information
Item 1 Legal Proceedings		60
Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		60
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		61
Item 6 Exhibits		61
Signatures		62
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

(i)		impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants the Company closes;

(ii)		impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants with net asset values in excess of estimated fair values;

(iii)		restaurant closure costs (primarily reflecting the estimated liability to terminate leases);

(iv)		gains (losses) on the sale of restaurants and surplus properties; and

(v)		amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants.


		CKE RESTAURANTS, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date: December 17, 2004		/s/ Theodore Abajian

		Theodore Abajian
		Executive Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer