CKE Restaurants, Inc.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

[Amendment No. 1]

(Mark One)


x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

		For the quarterly period ended May 17, 2004

		OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

		For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 1-11313

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		33-0602639
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

6307 Carpinteria Avenue, Ste. A, Carpinteria, CA		93013
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 745-7500

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

As of June 16, 2004, 57,509,524 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Explanatory Note

The purpose of this amendment on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CKE Restaurants, Inc. for the quarterly period ended May 17, 2004 is to restate our consolidated financial statements for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003, and as of January 31, 2004, and related disclosures, as described in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information about the decision to restate these financial statements can be found in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 23, 2004.

Generally, no attempt has been made in this Form 10-Q/A to modify or update other disclosures presented in the original report on Form 10-Q, except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement. The Form 10-Q/A generally does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-Q or modify or update those disclosures, including the exhibits to the Form 10-Q affected by subsequent events. Information not affected by the restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing of the Form 10-Q on June 22, 2004. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the original Form 10-Q, including any amendments to those filings. The following items have been amended as a result of the restatement:

• Part I—Item 1—Financial Information

• Part I—Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In previous reports, we have presented in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations a detailed, tabular sensitivity analysis to illustrate our critical accounting policy discussed under the heading “Impairment of Property and Equipment and Other Amortizable Long-Lived Assets Held and Used, Held for Sale or to be Disposed of Other than by Sale.” In this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q, we have decided to omit the detailed tabular sensitivity analysis in favor of a more general discussion of this accounting policy, because the financial information being restated in this amendment is such that the tabular presentation would have to be entirely recalculated to reflect the restated results. Because the tabular presentation serves only to illustrate the general point, management decided our resources would be better directed towards other activities required in connection with the restatement.

In previous reports, we have also presented in our note under the heading “Facility Action Charges, Net” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Note 6 in this amendment) a table summarizing average annual sales per restaurant and total operating losses related to restaurants we decided to close. In this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q, management decided its resources would be better directed towards other activities required in connection with the restatement, and we have decided to omit the detailed tabular analysis of closed restaurant operating data in favor of a more general discussion.

• Part I—Item 4—Controls and Procedures

We have included in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q substantially the same discussion of our controls and procedures as we have included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2004, which is being filed concurrently herewith. While the discussion consequently speaks as of a date later than May 17, 2004, the end of our first quarter of the 2005 fiscal year that is the subject of this amendment, we concluded that an updated disclosure is appropriate under the circumstances of the restatement reflected in this amendment.

• Part II—Item 6—Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

In October 2004, we identified accounting errors that occurred in fiscal 2000 and 1999 which had resulted in an understatement of our deferred rent liability related to operating leases with fixed rent escalations over the lease terms. As a result, we concluded that our rent expense, net, had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $2,103. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, rent expense, net, had been understated by $78 and $311, respectively. As a result, our deferred rent liability as of May 17, 2004, and

January 31, 2004, had been understated by $2,181 and $2,103, respectively. We have corrected these errors through restatement of our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, after identifying this error, we commenced an extensive internal review of our consolidated financial statements (the “November Review”) in order to identify any other potential accounting errors. Through the November Review, we identified the following additional accounting errors:

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

We are party to a substantial number of real property leases and have significant investments in related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets. In fiscal 1998, we extended the depreciable life we applied to our owned buildings to the new expected economic life of the assets. In addition, in certain cases the longer depreciable life exceeded the duration of the applicable underlying land lease, including option periods, resulting in an understatement of depreciation expense beginning in fiscal 1999.

In determining whether each of our real property leases is an operating lease or a capital lease and in calculating our straight-line rent expense, we generally utilize the initial term of the lease, excluding option periods. Capitalized lease assets and liabilities are generally recorded and amortized based upon the corresponding initial lease term. Historically, we depreciated or amortized our investment in the related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets over a period that included both the initial term of the lease and all option periods provided for in the lease (or the useful life of the asset if shorter than the lease term plus option periods).

During the November Review, we evaluated the propriety of the above accounting treatment, and determined that we should use one consistent definition of lease term, typically the initial lease term, for purposes of determining lease classification, straight-line rent expense, and the depreciation or amortization period for the related asset. As a result, we concluded that our depreciation and amortization expense had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $30,222. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, depreciation and amortization expense had been understated by $1,840 and $1,796, respectively. As a result, the our property and equipment, net, and certain intangible assets as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, were overstated by $32,062 and $30,222, respectively, with respect to this matter. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

Our historical practices for determining depreciable life and amortization periods also resulted in errors in the timing and classification of expense recognition for fixed assets subjected to facility action charges in prior fiscal periods. Generally, restaurants subject to facility action charges were over-impaired in the fiscal year of the facility action charge to the extent that such assets had been under-depreciated or under-amortized leading up to the impairment date. Through fiscal 2004, these errors resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $1,014. This was comprised of a cumulative understatement of depreciation and amortization expense of $17,300, partially offset by a cumulative overstatement of facility action charges of $16,286. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, we overstated facility action charges by $621 and $275, respectively, and understated depreciation and amortization expense by $30 and $131, respectively. As a result, in the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, these errors resulted in an understatement of net income and overstatement of net loss by $591 and $144, respectively. Also as a result, our property and equipment, net, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, was overstated by $423 and $1,014, respectively, with respect to this matter. We has corrected these errors through our restatement.

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

We identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

During fiscal 2001, we sold many company-operated restaurants to franchisees. In one of these transactions, we sold 19 restaurant properties, of which eight were fee-owned properties and eleven were leased properties. We sold the eight fee-owned properties and subleased the eleven leased properties to the buyer. In recording the transaction, we did not retire the net book value of the eight fee-owned properties. Through fiscal 2004, this error resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $5,333. As a result of this error, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, we overstated depreciation expense by $41 and $45, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17,

2004, and January 31, 2004,our property and equipment was overstated by approximately $5,292 and $5,333, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

We also identified $1,315 of other property and equipment that was not timely retired when the assets were removed from service, primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of general and administrative expenses, net of subsequent over-depreciation, of $1,175. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, we overstated general and administrative expenses by $16 and $11, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our property and equipment was overstated by $1,159 and $1,175, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

Additionally, we did not timely retire certain software development expenditures when the software applications were taken out of service. We also did not properly expense certain software development costs when incurred, in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. These accounting errors occurred primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of expenses of $2,267. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, we overstated depreciation expense by $163 and understated general and administrative expenses, net of overstated depreciation expense, by $90, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our property and equipment was overstated by $2,104 and $2,267, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

We determined that we had misstated our property tax expense and accrued property taxes in prior fiscal periods. These errors resulted from imprecise metrics used to calculate our property tax accrual. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative overstatement of property tax expenses of $1,198. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, we understated property tax expenses by $142 and overstated property tax expenses by $191, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, accrued property taxes were overstated by $1,056 and $1,198, respectively. We have corrected these errors through our restatement.

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

In September 2004, we determined that, when we adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, at the beginning of fiscal 2003, as a result of temporary differences relating to the treatment of goodwill relating to our Carl’s Jr. brand, we should have recorded income tax expense to increase our deferred tax valuation allowance, which would have resulted in a deferred tax liability. We had not previously recorded this deferred tax liability. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of income tax expense of $1,413. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, our income tax expense was understated by $82 and $144, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our deferred tax liability was understated by $1,495 and $1,413, respectively. We determined in September 2004 that the error was immaterial and did not record an adjustment. In light of the conclusion to restate our financial statements for the other matters discussed herein, we determined it was appropriate to also include this adjustment in the restatement.

(v) Other Items

We identified several other items that we have corrected through our restatement. For the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, these additional items aggregate to reduction to expense upon restatement of $157 and $64, respectively. Also as a result, prior to the restatement, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, our accumulated deficit had been understated by $708 and $865, respectively, with respect to these items.

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except par values)
(Unaudited)


	May 17, 2004			January 31, 2004
	(as restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	42,740		$	54,355
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,196 as of May 17, 2004 and $5,580 as of January 31, 2004		22,010			26,562
Related party trade receivables		6,960			7,991
Inventories		18,461			17,972
Prepaid expenses		10,335			16,053
Assets held for sale		18,020			18,760
Advertising fund assets, restricted		19,438			—
Other current assets		1,626			1,656

Total current assets		139,590			143,349
Notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,135 as of May 17, 2004 and $6,186 as of January 31, 2004		2,792			2,317
Property and equipment, net		470,512			479,660
Property under capital leases, net		41,814			44,895
Goodwill		22,649			22,649
Other assets		34,755			37,433

Total assets	$	712,112		$	730,303

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of bank indebtedness and other long-term debt	$	2,383		$	26,843
Current portion of capital lease obligations		5,993			7,028
Accounts payable		54,284			47,592
Advertising fund liabilities		19,438			—
Other current liabilities		91,333			105,419

Total current liabilities		173,431			186,882
Bank indebtedness and other long-term debt, less current portion		10,555			22,428
Senior subordinated notes		200,000			200,000
Convertible subordinated notes due 2023		105,000			105,000
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		54,572			56,877
Other long-term liabilities		57,570			56,077

Total liabilities		601,128			627,264

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 59,368,000 shares issued and 57,464,000 shares outstanding at May 17, 2004; 59,216,000 shares issued and 57,631,000 shares outstanding at January 31, 2004		593			592
Additional paid-in capital		465,444			464,689
Officer and non-employee director notes receivable		(2,491	)		(2,530	)
Accumulated deficit		(338,802	)		(349,306	)
Treasury stock at cost, 1,904,000 and 1,585,000 shares at May 17, 2004 and January 31, 2004, respectively		(13,760	)		(10,406	)

Total stockholders’ equity		110,984			103,039

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	712,112		$	730,303

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Revenue:
Company-operated restaurants	$	365,871		$	339,042
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		89,440			80,511

Total revenue		455,311			419,553

Operating costs and expenses:
Restaurant operations:
Food and packaging		105,724			100,097
Payroll and other employee benefit expenses		112,595			112,635
Occupancy and other operating expenses		81,255			80,719

		299,574			293,451
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		66,991			64,921
Advertising expenses		22,264			21,013
General and administrative expenses		37,656			31,609
Facility action charges, net		6,817			787

Total operating costs and expenses		433,302			411,781

Operating income		22,009			7,772
Interest expense		(11,720	)		(12,167	)
Other income (expense), net		729			(830	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		11,018			(5,225	)
Income tax expense		351			363

Income (loss) from continuing operations		10,667			(5,588	)
Loss from operations of discontinued segment (net of income tax benefit of $0 and $1 for the sixteen-week periods ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003, respectively)		(163	)		(2,114	)

Net income (loss)	$	10,504		$	(7,702	)

Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	$	0.18		$	(0.09	)
Discontinued operations		(0.00	)		(0.04	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.18		$	(0.13	)

Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations	$	0.18		$	(0.09	)
Discontinued operations		(0.00	)		(0.04	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.18		$	(0.13	)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		57,605			57,395
Dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and convertible notes		1,770			—

Diluted		59,375			57,395

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004
	Common Stock												Treasury Stock
							Officer and
	Number of				Additional		Non-Employee												Total
	Shares				Paid-In		Director Notes			Accumulated			Number of						Stockholders’
	Issued		Amount		Capital		Receivable			Deficit			Shares			Amount			Equity
Balance at January 31, 2004 (as previously reported)		59,216	$	592	$	464,689	$	(2,530	)	$	(306,113	)		(1,585	)	$	(10,406	)	$	146,232
Restatement adjustments		—		—		—		—			(43,193	)		—			—			(43,193	)

Balance at January 31, 2004 (as restated)		59,216		592		464,689		(2,530	)		(349,306	)		(1,585	)		(10,406	)		103,039
Exercise of stock options		152		1		755		—			—			—			—			756
Collections on officer and non-employee director notes receivable		—		—		—		39			—			—			—			39
Repurchase of common stock		—		—		—		—			—			(319	)		(3,354	)		(3,354	)
Net income (as restated)		—		—		—		—			10,504			—			—			10,504

Balance at May 17, 2004 (as restated)		59,368	$	593	$	465,444	$	(2,491	)	$	(338,802	)		(1,904	)	$	(13,760	)	$	110,984

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	10,504		$	(7,702	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		21,046			20,679
Amortization of loan fees		1,042			1,413
(Recovery of) provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable		(242	)		2,064
Loss (gain) on investments, sale of property and equipment, capital leases and extinguishment of debts		1,284			(232	)
Facility action charges, net		6,817			787
Deferred income taxes		82			144
Other non-cash credits		(666	)		(18	)
Net change in refundable income taxes		4			142
Change in estimated liability for closing restaurants and estimated liability for self-insurance		(3,508	)		(3,236	)
Net change in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,991			11,177
Net change in accounts payable and other current liabilities		896			(9,003	)
Loss from operations of discontinued segment		163			2,114
Net cash received from (provided to) discontinued segment		28			(165	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		47,441			18,164

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(16,384	)		(14,827	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		6,624			3,172
Collections on notes receivable and net change in related party receivables		702			630
Increase in cash upon consolidation of variable interest entity		100			—
Net change in other assets		111			172

Net cash used in investing activities		(8,847	)		(10,853	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Net change in bank overdraft		(8,744	)		(15,225	)
Borrowings under credit facility		—			106,000
Repayments of borrowings under credit facility		(13,926	)		(95,000	)
(Repayments of) borrowings under long-term debt		(22,407	)		445
Repayments of capital lease obligations		(2,561	)		(3,125	)
Collections on officer and non-employee director notes receivable		39			—
Payment of deferred loan fees		(12	)		(5	)
Repurchase of common stock		(3,354	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		756			930

Net cash used in financing activities		(50,209	)		(5,980	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(11,615	)		1,331
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		54,355			18,440

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	42,740		$	19,771

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	(14,949	)	$	(14,964	)

Income taxes	$	(2,963	)	$	(190	)

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Gain recognized on sale and leaseback transactions	$	107		$	108

Consolidation of advertising funds	$	19,438		$	—

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts

NOTE (1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

CKE Restaurants, Inc. (“CKE” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns, operates, franchises and licenses the Carl’s Jr.®, Hardee’s®, The Green Burrito® (“Green Burrito”) and La Salsa Fresh Mexican Grill® (“La Salsa”) concepts. Carl’s Jr. restaurants are primarily located in the Western United States. Hardee’s restaurants are located throughout the Southeastern and Midwestern United States. Green Burrito restaurants are located in California, primarily in dual-brand Carl’s Jr. restaurants. La Salsa restaurants are primarily located in California. As of May 17, 2004, the Company’s system-wide restaurant portfolio consisted of:


	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s		La Salsa		Other		Total
Company-operated		428		692		63		4		1,187
Franchised and licensed		588		1,389		43		15		2,035

Total		1,016		2,081		106		19		3,222

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of CKE and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the instructions to Form 10-Q, and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2004. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future period.

For clarity of presentation, the Company generally labels all fiscal year ends as fiscal year ended January 31.

Prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has various stock-based compensation plans that provide options for certain employees and outside directors to purchase common shares of the Company. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure (“SFAS 148”). SFAS 148 amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Disclosures required by this standard are included in the notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

For purposes of the following pro forma disclosures required by SFAS 148 and SFAS 123, the fair value of each option has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the value of an estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

The assumptions used for grants in the sixteen week periods ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, are as follows:


	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
Annual dividends	$	—		$	—
Expected volatility		73.2	%		56.4	%
Risk-free interest rate (matched to the expected term of the outstanding option)		3.83	%		4.25	%
Expected life of all options outstanding (years)		5.5			6.7
Weighted-average fair value of each option granted	$	5.65		$	2.63

The assumptions used to determine the fair value of each option granted are highly subjective. Changes in the assumptions used would affect the fair value of the options granted as follows:


	Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value of Options Granted
	Sixteen Weeks Ended			Sixteen Weeks Ended
Change in Assumption	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
10% increase in expected volatility	$	0.48		$	0.28
1% increase in risk-free interest rate		0.09			0.06
1 year increase in expected life of all options outstanding		0.37			0.16
10% decrease in expected volatility		(0.53	)		(0.31	)
1% decrease in risk-free interest rate		(0.09	)		(0.07	)
1 year decrease in expected life of all options outstanding		(0.44	)		(0.18	)

The following tables reconcile reported net income (loss) to pro forma net income (loss) assuming compensation expense for stock-based compensation had been recognized in accordance with SFAS 123:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	10,504		$	(7,702	)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss)		—			—
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects		(1,114	)		(670	)

Net income (loss) — pro forma	$	9,390		$	(8,372	)

Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic — as reported	$	0.18		$	(0.13	)
Basic — pro forma		0.16			(0.15	)
Diluted — as reported		0.18			(0.13	)
Diluted — pro forma		0.16			(0.15	)

NOTE (2) – RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This Note should be read in conjunction with Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2004.

In October 2004, the Company identified accounting errors that occurred in fiscal 2000 and 1999 which had resulted in an understatement of its deferred rent liability related to operating leases with fixed rent escalations over the lease terms. As a result, CKE concluded that its rent expense, net, had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $2,103. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, rent expense, net, had been understated by $78 and $311, respectively. As a result, the Company’s deferred rent liability as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, had been understated by $2,181 and $2,103, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through restatement of its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, after identifying this error, the Company commenced an extensive internal review of its consolidated financial statements (the “November Review”) in order to identify any other potential accounting errors. Through the November Review, the Company identified the following additional accounting errors:

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

The Company is party to a substantial number of real property leases and has significant investments in related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets. In fiscal 1998, the Company extended the depreciable life it applied to its owned buildings to the new expected economic life of the assets. In addition, in certain cases the longer depreciable life exceeded the duration of the applicable underlying land lease, including option periods, resulting in an understatement of depreciation expense beginning in fiscal 1999.

In determining whether each of its real property leases is an operating lease or a capital lease and in calculating its straight-line rent expense, the Company generally utilizes the initial term of the lease, excluding option periods. Capitalized lease assets and liabilities are generally recorded and amortized based upon the corresponding initial lease term. Historically, the Company depreciated or amortized its investment in the related buildings, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets over a period that included both the initial term of the lease and all option periods provided for in the lease (or the useful life of the asset if shorter than the lease term plus option periods).

During the November Review, the Company evaluated the propriety of the above accounting treatment, and determined that it should use one consistent definition of lease term, typically the initial lease term, for purposes of determining lease classification, straight-line rent expense, and the depreciation or amortization period for the related asset. As a result, CKE concluded that its depreciation and amortization expense had been understated through fiscal 2004 in the cumulative amount of $30,222. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, depreciation and amortization expense had been understated by $1,840 and $1,796, respectively. As a result, the Company’s property and equipment, net, and certain intangible assets as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, were overstated by $32,062 and $30,222, respectively, with respect to this matter. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

The Company’s historical practices for determining depreciable life and amortization periods also resulted in errors in the timing and classification of expense recognition for fixed assets subjected to facility action charges in prior fiscal periods. Generally, restaurants subject to facility action charges were over-impaired in the fiscal year of the facility action charge to the extent that such assets had been under-depreciated or under-amortized leading up to the impairment date. Through fiscal 2004, these errors resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $1,014. This was comprised of a cumulative understatement of depreciation and amortization expense of $17,300, partially offset by a cumulative overstatement of facility action charges of $16,286. In the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company overstated facility action charges by $621 and $275, respectively, and understated depreciation and amortization expense by $30 and $131, respectively. As a result, in the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, these errors resulted in an understatement of net income and overstatement of net loss by $591 and $144, respectively. Also as a result, the Company’s property and equipment, net, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, was overstated by $423 and $1,014, respectively, with respect to this matter. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

The Company identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

During fiscal 2001, the Company sold many company-operated restaurants to franchisees. In one of these transactions, the Company sold 19 restaurant properties, of which eight were fee-owned properties and eleven were leased properties. The Company sold the eight fee-owned properties and subleased the eleven leased properties to the buyer. In recording the transaction, the Company did not retire the net book value of the eight fee-owned properties. Through fiscal 2004, this error resulted in a cumulative net understated expense of $5,333. As a result of this error, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company overstated depreciation expense by $41 and $45, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by approximately $5,292 and $5,333, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

The Company also identified $1,315 of other property and equipment that was not timely retired when the assets were removed from service, primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of general and administrative expenses, net of subsequent over-depreciation, of $1,175. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company overstated general and administrative expenses by $16 and $11, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by $1,159 and $1,175, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

Additionally, the Company did not timely retire certain software development expenditures when the software applications were taken out of service. The Company also did not properly expense certain software development costs when incurred, in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. These accounting errors occurred primarily in fiscal 2001 and 2003. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of expenses of $2,267. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company overstated depreciation expense by $163 and understated general and administrative expenses, net of overstated depreciation expense, by $90, respectively. Also as a result of these errors, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s property and equipment was overstated by $2,104 and $2,267, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

The Company determined that it had misstated its property tax expense and accrued property taxes in prior fiscal periods. These errors resulted from imprecise metrics used to calculate the Company’s property tax accrual. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative overstatement of property tax expenses of $1,198. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company understated property tax expenses by $142 and overstated property tax expenses by $191, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, accrued property taxes were overstated by $1,056 and $1,198, respectively. The Company has corrected these errors through its restatement.

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

In September 2004, the Company determined that, when it adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, at the beginning of fiscal 2003, as a result of temporary differences relating to the treatment of goodwill relating to its Carl’s Jr. brand, the Company should have recorded income tax expense to increase its deferred tax valuation allowance, which would have resulted in a deferred tax liability. The Company had not previously recorded this deferred tax liability. Through fiscal 2004, this resulted in a cumulative understatement of income tax expense of $1,413. As a result of these errors, for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, the Company’s income tax expense was understated by $82 and $144, respectively. Also as a result, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s deferred tax liability was understated by $1,495 and $1,413, respectively. The Company determined in September 2004 that the error was immaterial and did not record an adjustment. In light of the conclusion to restate the Company’s financial statements for the other matters discussed herein, the Company determined it was appropriate to also include this adjustment in the restatement.

(v) Other Items

The Company identified several other items that it has corrected through its restatement. For the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, these additional items aggregate to reduction to expense upon restatement of $157 and $64, respectively. Also as a result, prior to the restatement, as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, the Company’s accumulated deficit had been understated by $708 and $865, respectively, with respect to these items.

The impacts of these restatements on the condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized below:


	Previously
	Reported		Adjustments			As Restated
May 17, 2004
Balance Sheet Data
Accounts receivable, net	$	22,177	$	(167	)	$	22,010
Inventories		18,981		(520	)		18,461
Prepaid expenses		9,847		488			10,335
Total current assets		139,789		(199	)		139,590
Property and equipment, net		510,688		(40,176	)		470,512
Property under capital leases, net		43,297		(1,483	)		41,814
Other assets		36,772		(2,017	)		34,755
Total assets		755,987		(43,875	)		712,112


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Current portion of capital lease obligations		6,007			(14	)		5,993
Other current liabilities		93,211			(1,878	)		91,333
Total current liabilities		175,323			(1,892	)		173,431
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		54,801			(229	)		54,572
Other long-term liabilities		54,957			2,613			57,570
Total liabilities		600,636			492			601,128
Accumulated deficit		(294,435	)		(44,367	)		(338,802	)
Total stockholders’ equity		155,351			(44,367	)		110,984
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		755,987			(43,875	)		712,112


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
January 31, 2004
Balance Sheet Data
Accounts receivable, net	$	26,729		$	(167	)	$	26,562
Inventories		18,492			(520	)		17,972
Prepaid expenses		15,589			464			16,053
Total current assets		143,572			(223	)		143,349
Property and equipment, net		518,881			(39,221	)		479,660
Property under capital leases, net		46,382			(1,487	)		44,895
Other assets		39,522			(2,089	)		37,433
Total assets		773,323			(43,020	)		730,303
Current portion of capital lease obligations		7,042			(14	)		7,028
Other current liabilities		107,439			(2,020	)		105,419
Total current liabilities		188,916			(2,034	)		186,882
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		57,111			(234	)		56,877
Other long-term liabilities		53,636			2,441			56,077
Total liabilities		627,091			173			627,264
Accumulated deficit		(306,113	)		(43,193	)		(349,306	)
Total stockholders’ equity		146,232			(43,193	)		103,039
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		773,323			(43,020	)		730,303


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	89,448		$	(8	)	$	89,440
Total revenue		455,319			(8	)		455,311
Occupancy and other operating expenses		79,303			1,952			81,255
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		66,986			5			66,991
General and administrative expenses		37,784			(128	)		37,656
Facility action charges, net		7,438			(621	)		6,817
Total operating costs and expenses		432,094			1,208			433,302
Operating income		23,225			(1,216	)		22,009
Interest expense		(11,335	)		(385	)		(11,720	)
Other income, net		220			509			729
Income before income taxes and discontinued operations		12,110			(1,092	)		11,018
Income tax expense		269			82			351
Income from continuing operations		11,841			(1,174	)		10,667
Net income		11,678			(1,174	)		10,504
Basic income per common share:
Continuing operations		0.21			(0.03	)		0.18

Net income		0.20			0.02			0.18
Diluted income per common share:
Continuing operations		0.20			(0.02	)		0.18

Net income		0.20			(0.02	)		0.18


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities		47,439			2			47,441
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,847	)		—			(8,847	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(50,207	)		(2	)		(50,209	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(11,615	)		—			(11,615	)


	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003
Statement of Operations Data
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other revenue	$	80,516		$	(5	)	$	80,511
Total revenue		419,558			(5	)		419,553
Occupancy and other operating expenses		79,021			1,698			80,719
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other expenses		64,909			12			64,921
General and administrative expenses		31,492			117			31,609
Facility action charges, net		1,062			(275	)		787
Total operating costs and expenses		410,229			1,552			411,781
Operating income		9,329			(1,557	)		7,772
Interest expense		(12,176	)		9			(12,167	)
Other expense, net		(636	)		(194	)		(830	)
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations		(3,483	)		(1,742	)		(5,225	)
Income tax expense		219			144			363
Loss from continuing operations		(3,702	)		(1,886	)		(5,588	)
Net loss		(5,816	)		(1,886	)		(7,702	)
Basic loss per common share:
Continuing operations		(0.06	)		(0.03	)		(0.09	)

Net loss		(0.10	)		(0.03	)		(0.13	)
Diluted loss per common share:
Continuing operations		(0.06	)		(0.03	)		(0.09	)

Net loss		(0.10	)		(0.03	)		(0.13	)
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities		18,341			(177	)		18,164
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,113	)		260			(10,853	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(5,897	)		(83	)		(5,980	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,331			—			1,331

Certain amounts in Notes 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 have been restated to reflect the restatement adjustments described above.

NOTE (3) ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

On May 17, 2004, the Company completed adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 (“FIN 46”).

The FASB issued FIN 46 in January 2003. This Interpretation is intended to clarify the application of the majority voting interest requirement of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (“VIEs”), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities, entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns, or both. FIN 46 may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date on which it is first applied or by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated. FIN 46 was applicable immediately to variable interests in a variable interest entity created after January 31, 2003.

During the course of 2003, the FASB proposed modifications to FIN 46 and issued FASB Staff Positions (“FSPs”) that changed and clarified FIN 46. These modifications and FSPs were subsequently incorporated into FIN 46 (revised) (“FIN 46R”), which was issued on December 23, 2003, and replaced FIN 46. FIN 46R excludes operating businesses, as defined, from its scope subject to four conditions, and states the provisions of FIN 46R need not be applied to interests in VIEs created or obtained prior to December 31, 2003, if a company is unable, subject to making and continuing to make an exhaustive effort, to obtain the information necessary to determine whether the entity is a VIE, determine whether the company is the VIE’s primary beneficiary or perform the accounting required to consolidate the VIE.

The principal entities in which the Company possesses a variable interest include franchise entities, which operate its franchised restaurants. The Company does not possess any ownership interests in its franchisees. Additionally, the Company generally does not provide financial support to its franchisees in a typical franchise relationship. Also, the Company’s franchise agreements currently do not require its franchisees to provide the timely financial information necessary to apply the provisions of FIN 46R to its franchisees.

Upon the adoption of FIN 46R, the Company consolidated one franchise entity that operates six Hardee’s restaurants. The Company subleases to this franchise entity all of its six operating locations and substantially all of its operating equipment, and this franchise entity received no equity contribution from its principals upon its inception. Because the principals did not invest a significant amount of equity, the legal entity within which this franchise operates is considered to not be adequately capitalized and, as a result, is a VIE. Because of the relatively significant financial support it provides to this franchise, the Company determined it is the primary beneficiary of this VIE. The assets and liabilities of this entity included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 17, 2004, are as follows:


ASSETS
Cash	$	100
Inventories		43
Property and equipment, net		3
Other assets		15

	$	161

LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities	$	125
Other long-term liabilities		36

	$	161

Although this franchise entity has been included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 17, 2004, the Company has no rights to the assets, nor does it have any obligation with respect to the liabilities, of this franchise entity. None of the Company’s assets serve as collateral for the creditors of this franchisee or any of the Company’s other franchisees.

There is also a portion of franchised restaurants that are VIEs for which the Company holds a significant variable interest, but for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The Company’s significant exposures related to these VIEs and other franchisees relate to the collection of amounts due the Company, which are collected weekly or monthly, guarantees of franchisee debt provided to third party lenders by the Company (see Note 11) and primary lease obligations or fee property ownership underlying sublease and lease arrangements the Company has with several of its franchisees, as more fully described in Note 11 herein and in Note 9 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2004.

The Company utilizes various advertising funds (“Funds”) to administer its advertising programs. The Carl’s Jr. National Advertising Fund (“CJNAF”) is Carl’s Jr.’s sole cooperative advertising program. The Company has historically consolidated CJNAF into its financial statements on a net basis, whereby contributions from franchisees are recorded as offsets to the Company’s reported advertising expenses.

The Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds consist of the Hardee’s National Advertising Fund (“HNAF”) and many local advertising cooperative funds (“Co-op Funds”). Each of these funds is a separate non-profit association with all

proceeds segregated and managed by a third-party accounting service company. Upon final adoption of FIN 46R on May 17, 2004, the Company consolidated all of the Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds, resulting in the inclusion of $19,438 of “Advertising Fund Assets, Restricted” and “Advertising Fund Liabilities” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 17, 2004. In future periods, the Hardee’s cooperative advertising funds will be reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations on a net basis, whereby contributions from franchisees will be recorded as offsets to the Company’s reported advertising expenses. The Company elected to apply FIN 46R prospectively and, upon final adoption thereof, had no cumulative-effect adjustment.

Advertising Fund Assets, Restricted, and Advertising Fund Liabilities as of March 31, 2004, the most recent date through which financial statements are available, are included in the Company’s accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 17, 2004, and consisted of the following:


ADVERTISING FUND ASSETS, RESTRICTED
Cash	$	14,880
Accounts and notes receivable, net		4,322
Other assets		236

	$	19,438

ADVERTISING FUND LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	9,420
Deferred obligations		10,018

	$	19,438

NOTE (4) INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The table below presents identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets as of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004:


	May 17, 2004							January 31, 2004
	Gross					Net		Gross					Net
Intangible	Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying
Asset	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)
Trademarks	$	17,159	$	(1,881	)	$	15,278	$	17,159	$	(1,616	)	$	15,543
Franchise agreements		1,780		(196	)		1,584		1,780		(169	)		1,611
Favorable lease agreements		9,530		(5,714	)		3,816		16,149		(12,004	)		4,145

	$	28,469	$	(7,791	)	$	20,678	$	35,088	$	(13,789	)	$	21,299

Amortization expense related to identifiable definite-lived intangible assets was $733 and $629 for the sixteen week periods ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, respectively. These intangible assets are amortized over periods of six to 20 years and are included in Other Assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE (5) INDEBTEDNESS AND INTEREST EXPENSE

As of May 17, 2004, the Company had outstanding $200,000 aggregate principal amount of 9 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (“Senior Notes”). The indenture relating to the Senior Notes limits the Company’s ability (and the ability of its subsidiaries) to incur indebtedness to an amount not greater than the senior debt outstanding when the Company issued the Senior Notes, less any contractually required permanent reductions. The indenture also imposes certain restrictions on the Company’s ability (and the ability of its subsidiaries) to pay dividends on, redeem or repurchase capital stock, make restricted payments (as defined in the agreement) over a specified amount, make investments, incur liens on assets, sell assets other than in the ordinary course of business, or enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The Senior Notes represent unsecured general obligations subordinate in right of payment to the Company’s senior indebtedness, including its senior credit facility. All active subsidiaries of the Company are guarantors of the Senior Notes.

As of May 17, 2004, the Company’s senior credit facility (“Facility”) consisted of a $150,000 revolving credit facility and a $25,000 term loan. The $150,000 revolving credit facility included an $80,000 letter of credit sub-facility and was scheduled to mature November 15, 2006. As of May 17, 2004, the Company had cash borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the Facility of $10,137, outstanding letters of credit under the revolving

portion of the Facility of $63,697 and availability under the revolving portion of the Facility of $86,303. The principal amount of the term loan portion of the Facility was scheduled to be repaid in quarterly installments maturing on April 1, 2008. The proceeds from the $25,000 term loan were used to repay and retire the Company’s 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 (“2004 Convertible Notes”) during March 2004.

On April 1, 2004, the Company amended the Facility to allow it to repurchase up to $20,000 of its outstanding common stock. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company repurchased 319,000 shares of its common stock for $3,354 (market value, plus trading commissions) at various prices ranging from $9.93 to $11.00 per share.

The Facility contained financial performance covenants, which included a minimum EBITDA requirement, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum consolidated net worth requirements, maximum leverage ratios and capital expenditures and precluded the Company from paying dividends. Based upon the financial results originally reported by the Company (i.e., prior to the restatement of previously issued financial statements, as discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company was in compliance with the requirements of the Facility as of May 17, 2004. However, had the Company reported its “as-restated” financial results instead of its originally reported results, and had the Company been unable to obtain an amendment to or waiver of the applicable sections of the Facility, the Company would have been in violation of certain of the financial performance covenants under the Facility as of May 17, 2004. On June 2, 2004, the Company refinanced the Facility with a new credit facility. Based on the terms of the new credit facility, the Company continues to classify the Facility as long-term as of May 17, 2004, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On June 2, 2004, subsequent to the quarter end, the Company amended and restated the Facility to provide for a $380,000 senior secured credit facility consisting of a $150,000 revolving credit facility and a $230,000 term loan (“Amended Facility”). The revolving credit facility matures on May 1, 2007, and includes an $85,000 letter of credit sub-facility. The principal amount of the term loan will be repaid in quarterly installments, with a balloon payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity on July 2, 2008. The Amended Facility also requires term loan prepayments based upon an annual excess cash flow formula, as defined therein. Subject to certain conditions as defined in the Amended Facility, the maturity of the term loan may be extended to May 1, 2010. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to repay the balance of the existing Facility term loan. On June 2, 2004, the Company deposited $212,168 with the trustee for its Senior Notes, constituting all funds necessary to retire the Senior Notes obligations, and gave notice of redemption of the Senior Notes to occur on July 2, 2004. On July 2, 2004, the trustee will apply the depository amount to redeem the entire principal of $200,000 under the Senior Notes, and pay the Company’s optional redemption premium of $9,126 and accrued interest. The Company will also incur a charge of approximately $3,100 during its second fiscal quarter to write-off unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the Senior Notes.

The agreement underlying the Amended Facility includes certain restrictive covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict the Company’s ability to incur debt, incur liens on its assets, make any significant change in its corporate structure or the nature of its business, dispose of assets in the collateral pool securing the Amended Facility, prepay certain debt, engage in a change of control transaction without the member banks’ consents, pay dividends and make investments or acquisitions. The Amended Facility is collateralized by certain restaurant property deeds of trust. Currently, the applicable interest rate on the term loan is LIBOR plus 3.00%. The applicable interest rate on the revolving loan portion of the Amended Facility is LIBOR plus 2.75%. The Company also incurs fees on outstanding letters of credit under the Amended Facility at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, which is currently 3.00% per annum.

Subject to the terms of the Amended Facility, the Company may make capital expenditures in the amount of $50,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined in the Amended Facility) in excess of $110,000 during the current fiscal year and $45,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined in the Amended Facility) in excess of $110,000 during each subsequent fiscal year. Additionally, in fiscal 2005 and thereafter, the Company may carry forward any unused capital expenditure amounts to the following year. The Amended Facility also permits the Company to repurchase its common stock in the amount of $27,000 plus a portion of excess cash flow and certain net asset sale proceeds (as defined in the Amended Facility) during the term of the Amended Facility.

Consistent with previous amendments and restatements, the Amended Facility contains financial performance covenants, which include a minimum EBITDA requirement, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, maximum leverage ratios and capital expenditures and precludes the Company from paying dividends.

The Company was in compliance with the covenant requirements under its Senior Notes as of May 17, 2004. However, the incurrence of additional senior indebtedness under the Amended Facility on June 2, 2004, breached the limitation on additional indebtedness in the Senior Note indenture. The indenture allows the Company 30 days to cure this breach before the breach becomes a default. Upon repayment of the entire outstanding balance and the related optional redemption premium and accrued interest under the Senior Notes at the end of the notice period on July 2, 2004, the breached covenant will terminate within the 30-day cure period.

On September 29, 2003, the Company completed an offering of $105,000 of its 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 (“2023 Convertible Notes’), and used nearly all of the net proceeds of the offering to repurchase $100,000 of the 2004 Convertible Notes. The 2023 Convertible Notes bear interest at 4.0% annually, are payable in semiannual installments due April 1 and October 1 each year, and are unsecured general obligations of the Company, contractually subordinate in right of payment to certain other Company obligations including the Facility (and the Amended Facility) and the Senior Notes. On October 1 of 2008, 2013 and 2018, the holders of the 2023 Convertible Notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at 100% of the face value plus accrued interest. The 2023 Convertible Notes are convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 112.4859 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes as follows: 1) at any time after the Company’s common stock has a closing sale price of more than 110% of the conversion price per share ($9.78 per share as of May 17, 2004) for at least 20 days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter; 2) in each of the five business days after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price, as defined in the agreement, per $1,000 principal amount was less than 98% of the product of a) the average closing sale price of the common stock over the same ten day period and b) the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the 2023 Convertible Notes; or 3) during any period in which the 2023 Convertible Notes are a) rated below CCC by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Caa1 by Moody’s Investor Services, b) no longer rated by either one of the aforementioned ratings services, or c) withdrawn or suspended from rating by one of the aforementioned services. The 2023 Convertible Notes were not convertible during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004.

Interest expense consisted of the following:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004		May 19, 2003
	(as restated)		(as restated)
Facility	$	426	$	482
Senior subordinated notes due 2009.		5,615		5,615
Capital lease obligations		2,204		2,407
2004 Convertible subordinated notes		73		1,600
2023 Convertible subordinated notes		1,292		—
Amortization of loan fees		1,042		1,413
Write-off of unamortized loan fees.		393		—
Letter of credit fees and other		675		650

	$	11,720	$	12,167

NOTE (6) FACILITY ACTION CHARGES, NET

In late fiscal 2000, the Company embarked on a refranchising initiative to reduce outstanding debt, increase the number of franchise-operated restaurants and close under-performing restaurants. The following transactions pertaining to these efforts have been recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as facility action charges, net:

(i) impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants the Company closes;

(ii) impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants with net asset values in excess of estimated fair values;

(iii) restaurant closure costs (primarily reflecting the estimated liability to terminate leases);

(iv) gains (losses) on the sale of restaurants and surplus properties; and

(v) amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants.

Quarterly, the Company evaluates the adequacy of its estimated liability for closing restaurants and subsidizing restaurant lease payments for franchisees and modifies the assumptions used based on actual results from selling surplus properties and terminating leases. The Company also assesses the carrying value of closed restaurant properties each quarter based on estimated property values obtained from a related party real estate broker. The Company closed 30 Hardee’s, no Carl’s Jr. and no La Salsa company-operated restaurants during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004. The Company closed three Hardee’s, no Carl’s Jr. and two La Salsa company-operated restaurants during the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, the Company identified six Hardee’s, three Carl’s Jr. and three La Salsa company-operated restaurants that are still in operation, but whose estimated fair values did not support the related net asset values and, accordingly, an impairment charge was recorded.

The components of facility action charges (gains), net are as follows:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Hardee’s
New decisions regarding closing restaurants	$	4,078		$	169
(Favorable)/unfavorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		154			(1,061	)
Impairment of assets to be disposed of		61			1,160
Impairment of assets to be held and used		770			115
(Gain) loss on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(1,035	)		145
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		336			731

		4,364			1,259

Carl’s Jr.
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		—			14
Favorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		(24	)		—
Impairment of assets to be held and used		1,426			503
Gain on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(315	)		(387	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		115			122

		1,202			252

La Salsa and Other
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		800			—
(Favorable)/unfavorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		39			(655	)
Impairment of assets to be held and used		405			—
(Gain) loss on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		6			(69	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		1			—

		1,251			(724	)

Total
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		4,878			183
(Favorable)/unfavorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		169			(1,716	)
Impairment of assets to be disposed of		61			1,160
Impairment of assets to be held and used		2,601			618
Gain on sales of restaurants and surplus properties, net		(1,344	)		(311	)
Amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants		452			853

	$	6,817		$	787

Facility action charges for new decisions regarding closing restaurants include (i) $2,628 of provisions associated with 28 Hardee’s restaurants the Company closed during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, for which the Company had made the decision to close during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004; and (ii) $1,043 for six lease obligations, for which the Company remained liable, associated with the bankruptcy filing of a Hardee’s franchisee during December 2003.

The following table summarizes the activity in the estimated liability for closing restaurants:


Balance at January 31, 2004	$	22,325
New decisions regarding closing restaurants		4,878
Usage		(3,523	)
Unfavorable dispositions of leased and fee surplus properties, net		169
Amortization of discount		452

Balance at May 17, 2004		24,301
Less current portion, included in Other Current Liabilities		8,551

Long-term portion, included in Other Long-Term Liabilities	$	15,750

NOTE (7) INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company presents “basic” and “diluted” income (loss) per share. Basic income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by weighted-average shares outstanding, including all potentially dilutive securities and excluding all potentially anti-dilutive securities.

The dilutive effect of stock options and warrants is determined using the “treasury stock” method, whereby exercise is assumed at the beginning of the reporting period and proceeds from such exercise are assumed to be used to purchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price during the period. The dilutive effect of convertible debt is determined using the “if-converted” method, whereby interest charges, net of taxes, applicable to the convertible debt are added back to income and the convertible debt is assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the reporting period, with the resulting common shares being included in weighted-average shares.

The following table presents the number of potentially dilutive shares, in thousands, of the Company’s common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004		May 19, 2003
2004 Convertible Notes		—		2,791
2023 Convertible Notes		11,811		—
Stock Options		3,654		5,776
Warrants		982		982

Potentially dilutive shares related to the 2004 Convertible Notes for the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003 were excluded as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive shares related to the 2023 Convertible Notes were excluded because the notes were not convertible during the period (see Note 5). Potentially dilutive stock options and warrants were excluded as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE (8) SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company principally is engaged in developing, operating and franchising its Carl’s Jr., Hardee’s and La Salsa quick-service restaurants, each of which is considered an operating segment that is managed and evaluated separately. Management evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is segment operating income or loss. General and administrative expenses are allocated to each segment based on management’s analysis of the resources applied to each segment. Interest expense related to the Facility, Senior Notes, 2004 Convertible Notes and 2023 Convertible Notes is allocated to Hardee’s based on the use of funds. Certain amounts that the Company does not believe would be proper to allocate to the operating segments are included in “Other” (i.e., gains or losses on sales of long-term investments). The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004).


	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa					Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)			Other		(as restated)
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004
Revenue	$	237,085	$	202,920		$	14,759		$	547	$	455,311
Operating income (loss)		21,049		3,295			(2,491	)		156		22,009
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		19,845		(6,489	)		(2,531	)		193		11,018
Goodwill (as of May 17, 2004)		22,649		—			—			—		22,649
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003
Revenue	$	218,717	$	187,138		$	13,139		$	559	$	419,553
Operating income (loss)		17,759		(10,101	)		(409	)		523		7,772
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		16,642		(21,868	)		(414	)		415		(5,225	)
Goodwill (as of May 19, 2003)		22,649		—			34,059			—		56,708

NOTE (9) NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

In conjunction with the acquisition of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. (“SBRG”) in fiscal 2003, the Company made the decision to divest Timber Lodge as the concept does not fit with the Company’s core concepts of quick-service and fast-casual restaurants. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company received a letter of intent for the sale of Timber Lodge and expects the sale to be completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

Assets held for sale as of May 17, 2004, consisted of the following:


Assets held for sale:
Total assets of Timber Lodge	$	16,490
Other surplus property		1,530

	$	18,020

Net assets of Timber Lodge as of May 17, 2004, consisted of the following:


ASSETS
Current assets	$	1,582
Property and equipment, net		8,508
Other assets		6,400

Total assets		16,490

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities		6,323
Other long-term liabilities		1,674

Total liabilities		7,997

NET ASSETS	$	8,493

Total liabilities of Timber Lodge are included in Other Current Liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The results of Timber Lodge included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as discontinued operations for the sixteen week periods ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, are as follows:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17,			May 19,
	2004			2003
Revenue	$	13,369		$	14,237

Operating loss		(157	)		(2,102	)
Interest expense		6			13
Income tax benefit		—			(1	)

Net loss	$	(163	)	$	(2,114	)

The operating losses for Timber Lodge for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003, include impairment charges of $617 and $1,566, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of Timber Lodge to fair value.

NOTE (10) SUBSIDIARIES’ GUARANTY OF INDEBTEDNESS

CKE is the issuer and all active subsidiaries of CKE are guarantors of the Company’s Senior Notes. Separate financial statements for each guarantor subsidiary are not included in this filing because each guarantor subsidiary is wholly-owned and fully, unconditionally, jointly and severally liable for the Senior Notes. There were no significant restrictions on the ability of CKE or any guarantor subsidiary to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.

The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of (i) CKE, as parent, as if it accounted for its subsidiaries on the equity method; (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries; and (iii) the non-guarantor VIEs (included prospectively upon the adoption of FIN 46R on May 17, 2004 as discussed in Note 1). CKE’s independent operations are primarily comprised of the Carl’s Jr. food and packaging distribution business.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
May 17, 2004


						Non-
				Guarantor		Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries		VIEs		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(as restated)			(as restated)				(as restated)			(as restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	442		$	42,198	$	100	$	—		$	42,740
Accounts receivable, net		9,602			12,408		—		—			22,010
Related party trade receivables		6,043			917		—		—			6,960
Inventories		6,663			11,755		43		—			18,461
Assets held for sale		—			18,020		—		—			18,020
Prepaid and other current assets		1,401			10,560		—		—			11,961
Advertising fund assets, restricted		—			—		19,438		—			19,438

Total current assets		24,151			95,858		19,581		—			139,590
Property and equipment, net		21,276			449,233		3		—			470,512
Property under capital leases, net		—			41,814		—		—			41,814
Goodwill		—			22,649		—		—			22,649
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries		251,241			—		—		(251,241	)		—
Other assets		10,701			26,831		15		—			37,547

Total assets	$	307,369		$	636,385	$	19,599	$	(251,241	)	$	712,112

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt, including capital lease obligations	$	2,131		$	6,245	$	—	$	—		$	8,376
Accounts payable		22,797			31,487		—		—			54,284
Advertising fund liabilities		—			—		19,438		—			19,438
Other current liabilities		12,823			78,385		125		—			91,333

Total current liabilities		37,751			116,117		19,563		—			173,431
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current portion		313,219			56,908		—		—			370,127
Other long-term liabilities		1,245			56,289		36		—			57,570

Total liabilities		352,215			229,314		19,599		—			601,128
Stockholders’ equity (deficiency)		(44,846	)		407,071		—		(251,241	)		110,984

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	307,369		$	636,385	$	19,599	$	(251,241	)	$	712,112

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
January 31, 2004


						Non-
				Guarantor		Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries		VIEs		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(as restated)			(as restated)				(as restated)			(as restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,297		$	29,058	$	—	$	—		$	54,355
Accounts receivable, net		9,750			16,812		—		—			26,562
Related party trade receivables		6,333			1,658		—		—			7,991
Inventories		6,616			11,356		—		—			17,972
Assets held for sale		—			18,760		—		—			18,760
Prepaid and other current assets		1,375			16,334		—		—			17,709

Total current assets		49,371			93,978		—		—			143,349
Property and equipment, net		22,095			457,565		—		—			479,660
Property under capital leases, net		—			44,895		—		—			44,895
Goodwill		—			22,649		—		—			22,649
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries		241,319			—		—		(241,319	)		—
Other assets		12,517			27,233		—		—			39,750

Total assets	$	325,302		$	646,320	$	—	$	(241,319	)	$	730,303

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt, including capital lease obligations	$	26,595		$	7,276	$	—	$	—		$	33,871
Accounts payable		15,973			31,619		—		—			47,592
Other current liabilities		19,068			86,351		—		—			105,419

Total current liabilities		61,636			125,246		—		—			186,882
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current portion		325,000			59,305		—		—			384,305
Other long-term liabilities		1,216			54,861		—		—			56,077

Total liabilities		387,852			239,412		—		—			627,264
Stockholders’ equity (deficiency)		(62,550	)		406,908		—		(241,319	)		103,039

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	325,302		$	646,320	$	—	$	(241,319	)	$	730,303

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004


							Non-
				Guarantor			Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			VIEs		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(as restated)			(as restated)					(as restated)			(as restated)
Revenue:
Company-operated restaurants	$	—		$	365,871		$	—	$	—		$	365,871
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		52,257			37,183			—		—			89,440

Total revenue		52,257			403,054			—		—			455,311

Operating costs and expenses:
Restaurant operations:
Food and packaging		—			105,724			—		—			105,724
Payroll and other employee benefit expenses		—			112,595			—		—			112,595
Occupancy and other operating expenses		—			81,255			—		—			81,255

		—			299,574			—		—			299,574
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		50,987			16,004			—		—			66,991
Advertising expenses		—			22,264			—		—			22,264
General and administrative expenses		462			37,194			—		—			37,656
Facility action charges, net		53			6,764			—		—			6,817

Total operating costs and expenses		51,502			381,800			—		—			433,302

Operating income		755			21,254			—		—			22,009
Interest expense		(7,625	)		(4,095	)		—		—			(11,720	)
Allocated interest expense		7,625			(7,625	)		—		—			—
Other income, net		23			706			—		—			729

Income before income taxes and discontinued operations		778			10,240			—		—			11,018
Income tax expense		185			166			—		—			351

Income from continuing operations		593			10,074			—		—			10,667
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(163	)		—		—			(163	)

Income before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		593			9,911			—		—			10,504
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries.		9,911						—		(9,911	)		—

Net income	$	10,504		$	9,911		$	—	$	(9,911	)	$	10,504

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003


							Non-
				Guarantor			Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			VIEs		Eliminations		Consolidated
	(as restated)			(as restated)					(as restated)		(as restated)
Revenue:
Company-operated restaurants	$	—		$	339,042		$	—	$	—	$	339,042
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		46,579			33,932			—		—		80,511

Total revenue		46,579			372,974			—		—		419,553

Operating costs and expenses:
Restaurant operations:
Food and packaging		—			100,097			—		—		100,097
Payroll and other employee benefit expenses		—			112,635			—		—		112,635
Occupancy and other operating expenses		—			80,719			—		—		80,719

		—			293,451			—		—		293,451
Franchised and licensed restaurants and other		45,429			19,492			—		—		64,921
Advertising expenses		—			21,013			—		—		21,013
General and administrative expenses		546			31,063			—		—		31,609
Facility action charges, net		—			787			—		—		787

Total operating costs and expenses		45,975			365,806			—		—		411,781

Operating income		604			7,168			—		—		7,772
Interest expense		(7,769	)		(4,398	)		—		—		(12,167	)
Allocated interest expense		7,769			(7,769	)		—		—		—
Other income (expense), net		16			(846	)		—		—		(830	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		620			(5,845	)		—		—		(5,225	)
Income tax expense		131			232			—		—		363

Income (loss) from continuing operations		489			(6,077	)		—		—		(5,588	)
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(2,114	)		—		—		(2,114	)

Income (loss) before equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries		489			(8,191	)		—		—		(7,702	)
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries		(8,191	)		—			—		8,191		—

Net loss	$	(7,702	)	$	(8,191	)	$	—	$	8,191	$	(7,702	)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004


							Non-
				Guarantor			Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			VIEs		Eliminations		Consolidated
				(as restated)							(as restated)
Net cash provided by operating activities.	$	3,078		$	44,363		$	—	$	—	$	47,441

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(998	)		(15,386	)		—		—		(16,384	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			6,624			—		—		6,624
Other		9,618			(8,805	)		100		—		913

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		8,620			(17,567	)		100		—		(8,847	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt, including capital lease obligations		(22,319	)		(2,649	)		—		—		(24,968	)
Repayments of borrowings under credit facility		(13,926	)		—			—		—		(13,926	)
Other		(308	)		(11,007	)		—		—		(11,315	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(36,553	)		(13,656	)		—		—		(50,209	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(24,855	)		13,140			100		—		(11,615	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		25,297			29,058			—		—		54,355

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	442		$	42,198		$	100	$	—	$	42,740

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003


							Non-
				Guarantor			Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			VIEs		Eliminations		Consolidated
	(as restated)			(as restated)							(as restated)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	2,983		$	15,181		$	—	$	—	$	18,164

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,021	)		(13,806	)		—		—		(14,827	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			3,172			—		—		3,172
Other		(9,498	)		10,300			—		—		802

Net cash used in investing activities		(10,519	)		(334	)		—		—		(10,853	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt, including capital lease obligations		(95,000	)		(3,125	)		—		—		(98,125	)
Borrowings under credit facility		106,000			—			—		—		106,000
Other		(2,701	)		(11,154	)		—		—		(13,855	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		8,299			(14,279	)		—		—		(5,980	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		763			568			—		—		1,331
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		87			18,353			—		—		18,440

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	850		$	18,921		$	—	$	—	$	19,771

NOTE (11) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

In conjunction with the Amended Facility, a letter of credit sub-facility in the amount of $85,000 was established (see Note 5). Several standby letters of credit are outstanding under this facility, which secure the Company’s potential workers’ compensation claims and general and health liability claims. The Company is required to provide letters of credit each year based on its existing claims experience, or set aside a comparable amount of cash or investment securities in a trust account. As of May 17, 2004, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under the revolving portion of the Facility of $63,697.

As of May 17, 2004, the Company has recorded an accrued liability for contingencies related to litigation in the amount of $3,750. Certain of the matters for which the Company maintains an accrued liability for litigation pose risk of loss significantly above the accrued amounts. In addition, as of May 17, 2004, the Company estimates the liability for those losses related to other litigation claims that, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies are not accrued, but that it believes are reasonably possible to result in an adverse outcome, to be in the range of $335 to $645.

For several years, the Company has maintained a program whereby it guarantees the loan obligations of certain franchisees with an independent lending institution. Franchisees have used the proceeds from such loans to acquire certain equipment and pay the costs of remodeling Carl’s Jr. restaurants. In the event a franchisee defaults under the terms of a program loan, the Company is obligated, within 15 days following written demand by the lending institution, to purchase such loan or assume the franchisee’s obligation thereunder by executing an assumption agreement and seeking a replacement franchisee for the franchisee in default. By purchasing such loan, the Company may seek recovery against the defaulting franchisee. As of May 17, 2004, the principal outstanding under program loans guaranteed by the Company totaled approximately $2.1 million, with maturity dates ranging from 2004 through 2009. Additional loans may be granted under this program in the future. The Company’s remaining loss exposure under this program, based on a formula in the program agreement and including the existing loans outstanding, is approximately $4.5 million. As of May 17, 2004, the Company had no accrued liability for expected losses under this program and was not aware of any outstanding loans being in default.

The Company also guarantees a $214 obligation of a former subsidiary to a related party lending institution associated with an equipment leasing transaction. The Company maintains an accrual equal to 50% of this obligation based upon its estimated loss under the guarantee.

As of May 17, 2004, the Company had unconditional purchase obligations in the amount of $57,470, which include contracts for goods and services primarily related to restaurant operations.

In prior years, as part of its refranchising program, the Company sold restaurants to franchisees. In some cases, these restaurants were on leased sites. The Company entered into agreements with these franchisees but remained principally liable for the lease obligations. The Company accounts for the sublease payments received as franchising rental income and the payments on the leases as rental expense in franchising expense. The present value of the lease obligations under the master leases’ primary terms remaining is $130,475. Franchisees may, from time to time, experience financial hardship and may cease payment on the sublease obligation to the Company. The present value of the exposure to the Company from franchisees characterized under financial hardship is $20,066.

The Company is, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially adversely affect the Company and its restaurants, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether the Company is liable. The Company is also, at times, the subject of complaints or allegations from employees, former employees and franchisees. On October 3, 2001, an action was filed by Adam Huizar and Michael Bolden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, seeking class action status and alleging violations of California wage and hour laws. Similar actions were filed by Mary Jane Amberson and James Bolin, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, on April 5, 2002 and November 26, 2002, respectively. The complaints allege that salaried restaurant management personnel at the Company’s Carl’s Jr. restaurants in California were improperly classified as exempt from California overtime laws, thereby depriving them of overtime pay. The complaints seek damages in an unspecified amount, injunctive relief, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes its employee classifications are appropriate, that it complies with state and federal wage and hour laws and plans to vigorously defend these actions.

NOTE (12) SUBSEQUENT EVENT

As a result of the daily closing sales price levels on the Company’s common stock through June 18, 2004, the 2023 Convertible Notes (see Note 5) will be convertible into the Company’s common stock effective July 1, 2004. Had the dilutive effect of the 2023 Convertible Notes been included in the calculation of diluted income per share for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, the Company’s weighted average diluted common shares outstanding would have increased from the reported amount of 59,375,000 shares to 71,186,000 shares, and diluted income per share would have decreased from the reported amount of $0.18 per diluted share (as restated) to $0.17 per diluted share. For this calculation, the dilutive effect is determined using the “if-converted” method, whereby the interest expense ($1,292) and amortization of loan fees ($250) incurred for the 2023 Convertible Notes during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, are added back to income.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction and Safe Harbor Disclosure

CKE Restaurants, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) is comprised of the operations of Carl’s Jr., Hardee’s, La Salsa, and Green Burrito, which is primarily operated as a dual-brand concept with Carl’s Jr. quick-service restaurants. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004. All Note references herein refer to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Matters discussed in this Form 10-Q/A contain forward-looking statements relating to future plans and developments, financial goals, and operating performance that are based on our current beliefs and assumptions. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those described include, but are not limited to, whether or not restaurants will be closed and the number of restaurant closures, consumers’ concerns or adverse publicity regarding our products, the effectiveness of operating initiatives and advertising and promotional efforts (particularly at the Hardee’s brand), changes in economic conditions or prevailing interest rates, changes in the price or availability of commodities, availability and cost of energy, workers’ compensation and general liability premiums and claims experience, changes in our suppliers’ ability to provide quality and timely products, delays in opening new restaurants or completing remodels, severe weather conditions, the operational and financial success of our franchisees, our franchisees’ willingness to participate in our strategy, the availability of financing for us and our franchisees, unfavorable outcomes in litigation, changes in accounting policies and practices, new legislation or government regulation (including environmental laws), the availability of suitable locations and terms for the sites designed for development, and other factors as discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

(i) Understated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

(ii) Unretired Property and Equipment

We identified instances in which property and equipment was not retired in a timely manner or in which certain expenditures were incorrectly capitalized.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

(iii) Overstated Property Tax Expense

(iv) Understated Deferred Tax Liability

(v) Other Items

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our reported results are impacted by the application of certain accounting policies that require us to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact our quarterly or annual results of operations and financial condition. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.

For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Our most significant accounting policies require:

• estimation of future cash flows used to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets, including goodwill, and establishing the estimated liability for closing restaurants and subsidizing lease payments of franchisees;

• estimation, using actuarially determined methods, of our self-insured claim losses under our workers’ compensation, property and general liability insurance programs;

• determination of appropriate estimated liabilities for litigation;

• determination of the appropriate allowances associated with franchise and license receivables and estimated liabilities for franchise subleases;

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

• determination of the appropriate assumptions to use to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation for purposes of disclosures of pro forma net income; and

• estimation of our net deferred income tax asset valuation allowance.

Descriptions of these critical accounting policies follow.

Impairment of Property and Equipment and Other Amortizable Long-Lived Assets Held and Used, Held for Sale or to be Disposed of Other than by Sale (as restated)

Each quarter we evaluate the carrying value of individual restaurants when the operating results have reasonably progressed to a point to adequately evaluate the probability of continuing operating losses or a current expectation that a restaurant will be sold or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. We generally estimate the useful life of land and owned buildings to be 20 to 35 years and estimate the remaining useful life of restaurants subject to leases to range from the end of the lease term then in effect to the end of such lease including all option periods. In making these judgments, we consider the period of time since the restaurant was opened or remodeled and the trend of operations and expectations for future sales growth. For restaurants selected for review, we estimate the future estimated cash flows from operating the restaurant over its estimated useful life. We make judgments about future same-store sales and the operating expenses and estimated useful life that we would expect with such level of same-store sales. We employ a probability-weighted approach wherein we estimate the effectiveness of future sales and marketing efforts on same-store sales and related estimated useful life. In general, in expected same-store sales scenarios where sales are not expected to increase, we generally assume a shorter than previously estimated useful life.

Quarterly, we update our model for estimating future cash flows based upon experience gained, current intentions about refranchising restaurants and closures, expected sales trends, internal plans and other relevant information. As the operations of restaurants opened or remodeled in recent years progress to the point that their profitability and future prospects can adequately be evaluated, additional restaurants will become subject to review and the possibility that impairments exist.

Same-store sales are the key indicator used to estimate future cash flow for evaluating recoverability. For each of our restaurant concepts, to evaluate recoverability of restaurant assets we estimate same-store sales will increase at an annual average rate of approximately 3.0% over the remaining useful life of the restaurant. The inflation rate assumed in making this calculation generally is 2.0%. If our same-store sales do not perform at or above our forecasted level, or cost inflation exceeds our forecast and we are unable to recover such costs through price increases, the carrying value of certain of our restaurants may prove to be unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Additionally, typically restaurants are operated for three years before we test them for impairment. Also, restaurants typically are not tested for either two or three years following a major remodel (contingent upon the extent of the remodel). We believe this provides the restaurant sufficient time to establish its presence in the market and build a customer base. If we were to test all restaurants for impairment without regard to the amount of time the restaurants were operating, the total asset impairment would increase substantially. In addition, if recently opened or remodeled restaurants do not eventually establish stronger market presence and build a customer base, the carrying value of certain of these restaurants may prove to be unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Impairment of Goodwill

At the reporting unit level, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually during the first quarter of our fiscal year, and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not impairment may have occurred. We consider the reporting unit level to be the brand level since the components (e.g., restaurants) within each brand have similar economic characteristics, including products and services, production processes, types or classes of customers and distribution methods. The impairment, if any, is measured based on the estimated fair value of the brand. Fair value can be determined based on discounted cash flows, comparable sales or valuations of other restaurant brands. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

The most significant assumptions we use in this analysis are those made in estimating future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we use the assumptions in our strategic plan for items such as same-store sales, store count growth rates, and the discount rate we consider to be the market discount rate for acquisitions of restaurant companies and brands.

If our assumptions used in performing the impairment test prove inaccurate, the fair value of the brands may ultimately prove to be significantly lower, thereby causing the carrying value to exceed the fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we performed a valuation of the Carl’s Jr. brand. We concluded that the fair value of the net assets of Carl’s Jr. exceeded the carrying value, and thus no impairment charge was required. As of May 17, 2004, we had $22,649 in goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, all of which relates to Carl’s Jr.

Estimated Liability for Closing Restaurants

We make decisions to close restaurants based on prospects for estimated future profitability, and sometimes we are forced to close restaurants due to circumstances beyond our control (e.g., a landlord’s refusal to negotiate a new lease). Our restaurant operators evaluate each restaurant’s performance every quarter. When restaurants continue to perform poorly, we consider the demographics of the location, as well as the likelihood of being able to improve an unprofitable restaurant. Based on the operator’s judgment, we estimate the future cash flows. If we determine that the restaurant will not, within a reasonable period of time, operate at break-even cash flow or be profitable, and we are not contractually obligated to continue operating the restaurant, we may close the restaurant. Additionally, franchisees may close restaurants for which we are the primary lessee. If the franchisee cannot make payments on the lease, we continue making the lease payments and establish an estimated liability for the closed restaurant if we decide not to operate it as a company-operated restaurant.

The estimated liability for closing restaurants on properties vacated is generally based on the term of the lease and the lease termination fee we expect to pay, as well as estimated maintenance costs until the lease has been abated. The amount of the estimated liability established is generally the present value of these estimated future payments. The interest rate used to calculate the present value of these liabilities is based on our incremental borrowing rate at the time the liability is established. The related discount is amortized and shown in Facility Action Charges, Net, in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A significant assumption used in determining the amount of the estimated liability for closing restaurants is the amount of the estimated liability for future lease payments on vacant restaurants, which we determine based on our broker’s (a related party) assessment of its ability to successfully negotiate early terminations of our lease agreements with the lessors or sublease the property. Additionally, we estimate the cost to maintain leased and owned vacant properties until the lease has been abated. If the costs to maintain properties increase, or it takes longer than anticipated to sell properties or sublease or terminate leases, we may need to record additional estimated liabilities. If the leases on the vacant restaurants are not terminated or subleased on the terms we used to estimate the liabilities, we may be required to record losses in future periods. Conversely, if the leases on the vacant restaurants are terminated or subleased on more favorable terms than we used to estimate the liabilities, we reverse previously established estimated liabilities, resulting in an increase in operating income. The present value of our operating lease payment obligations on all closed restaurants is approximately $40,145, which represents the discounted amount we would be required to pay if we are unable to terminate the leases prior to the terms required in the lease agreements or enter into sublease agreements. However, it is our experience that we can terminate those leases for less than that amount or sublease the property and, accordingly, we have recorded an estimated liability for operating lease obligations of $18,556 as of May 17, 2004.

Estimated Liability for Self-Insurance

We are self-insured for a portion of our current and prior years’ losses related to workers’ compensation, property and general liability insurance programs. We have obtained stop loss insurance for individual workers’ compensation, property and general liability claims over $500. Insurance liabilities and reserves are accounted for based on the present value of actuarial estimates of the amount of incurred and unpaid losses, based approximately

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

on a risk-free interest rate. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we adjusted the rate to 4.5% due to prolonged changes in the interest rate environment. These estimates rely on actuarial observations of historical claim loss development. The actuary, in determining the estimated liability, bases the assumptions on the average historical losses on claims we have incurred. The actual loss development may be better or worse than the development we estimated in conjunction with the actuary. In that event, we will modify the reserve. As such, if we experience a higher than expected number of claims or the costs of claims rise more than expected, then we may, in conjunction with the actuary, adjust the expected losses upward and our future self-insurance expenses will rise. Consistent with trends the restaurant industry has experienced in recent years, particularly in California where claim cost trends are among the highest in the country, workers’ compensation liability premiums and claim costs continue to increase. Additionally, after several years of increases, our property and general liability insurance premiums have leveled.

Loss Contingencies

We maintain accrued liabilities for contingencies related to litigation. We account for contingent obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (“SFAS 5”),which requires that we assess each contingency to determine estimates of the degree of probability and range of possible settlement. Those contingencies that are deemed to be probable and where the amount of such settlement is reasonably estimable are accrued in our condensed consolidated financial statements. If only a range of loss can be determined, we accrue to the low end of the range. In accordance with SFAS 5, as of May 17, 2004, we have recorded an accrued liability for contingencies related to litigation in the amount of $3,750. The assessment of contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. Contingencies are reviewed at least quarterly to determine the adequacy of the accruals and related condensed consolidated financial statement disclosure. The ultimate settlement of contingencies may differ materially from amounts we have accrued in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In addition, we estimate the liability for those losses related to other litigation claims that, in accordance with SFAS 5, are not accrued, but that we believe are reasonably possible to result in an adverse outcome, to be in the range of $335 to $645. In accordance with SFAS 5, we have not recorded a liability for those losses.

Franchised and Licensed Operations (as restated)

We monitor the financial condition of certain franchisees and record provisions for estimated losses on receivables when we believe that our franchisees are unable to make their required payments to us. Each quarter we perform an analysis to develop estimated bad debts for each franchisee. We then compare the aggregate result of that analysis to the amount recorded in our consolidated financial statements as the allowance for doubtful accounts and adjust the allowance as appropriate. Additionally, we cease accruing royalties and rent income from franchisees that are materially delinquent in paying or in default for other reasons and reverse any royalties and rent income accrued during the last 90 days. Over time our assessment of individual franchisees may change. For instance, we have had some franchisees who, in the past, we had determined required an estimated loss equal to the total amount of the receivable, who have paid us in full or established a consistent record of payments (generally one year) such that we determined an allowance was no longer required.

Depending on the facts and circumstances, there are a number of different actions we and/or our franchisees may take to resolve franchise collections issues. These actions may include the purchase of franchise restaurants by us or by other franchisees, a modification to the franchise agreement, which may include a provision to defer certain royalty payments or reduce royalty rates in the future (if royalty rates are not sufficient to cover our costs of service over the life of the franchise agreement, we record an estimated loss at the time we modify the agreements), a restructuring of the franchisee’s business and/or finances (including the restructuring of leases for which we are the primary obligee — see further discussion below) or, if necessary, the termination of the franchise agreement. The allowance established is based on our assessment of the most probable course of action that will occur. Many of the restaurants that we sold to Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees as part of our refranchising program were on leased sites. Generally, we remain principally liable for the lease and have entered into a sublease with the franchisee on the same terms as the primary lease. We account for the sublease payments received as franchising rental income. Our payments on the leases are accounted for as rental expense in franchised and licensed restaurants and other expense in our consolidated statements of operations. As of May 17, 2004, the present value of our total obligation on such lease arrangements with Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees was $39,487 and $90,989, respectively. We do not expect Carl’s Jr. franchisees to experience the same level of financial difficulties as Hardee’s franchisees have encountered in the past or may encounter in the future. However, we can provide no assurance that this will not occur.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

In addition to the sublease arrangements with franchisees described above, we also lease land and buildings to franchisees. As of May 17, 2004, the net book value of property under lease to Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. franchisees was $21,211 and $9,739, respectively. Troubled franchisees are those with whom we have entered into workout agreements and who may have liquidity problems in the future. In the event that a troubled franchisee closes a restaurant for which we own the property, our options are to operate the restaurant as a company-owned restaurant, lease the property to another tenant or sell the property. These circumstances would cause us to consider whether the carrying value of the land and building was impaired. If we determined the property value was impaired, we would record a charge to operations for the amount the carrying value of the property exceeds its fair value. As of May 17, 2004, the net book value of land and buildings under lease to Hardee’s franchisees that are considered to be troubled franchisees was approximately $18,851 and is included in the amount above. During fiscal 2005 or thereafter, some of these franchisees may close restaurants and, accordingly, we may record an impairment loss in connection with some of these closures.

In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”), which we adopted on January 1, 2003, an estimated liability for future lease obligations on restaurants operated by franchisees for which we are the primary obligee is established on the date the franchisee closes the restaurant. Also, we record an estimated liability for subsidized lease payments when we sign a sublease agreement committing us to the subsidy.

The amount of the estimated liability is established using the methodology described in “Estimated Liability for Closing Restaurants” above. Consistent with SFAS 146, we have not established an additional estimated liability for potential losses not yet incurred. The present value of the lease obligations for which we remain principally liable and have entered into subleases to troubled franchisees is approximately $20,066 (six troubled franchisees represent all of this amount). If sales trends/economic conditions worsen for our franchisees, their financial health may worsen, our collection rates may decline and we may be required to assume the responsibility for additional lease payments on franchised restaurants. Entering into restructured franchise agreements may result in reduced franchise royalty rates in the future (see discussion above). The likelihood of needing to increase the estimated liability for future lease obligations is related to the success of our Hardee’s concept (i.e., if our Hardee’s concept results improve from the execution of our comprehensive plan, we would reasonably expect that the financial performance of our franchisees would improve).

Stock-Based Compensation

As discussed in Notes 1 and 24 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, we have various stock-based compensation plans that provide options for certain employees and outside directors to purchase common shares of stock. We have elected to account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which utilizes the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based compensation, as opposed to using the fair-value method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”). Because of this election, we are required to make certain disclosures of pro forma net income assuming we had adopted SFAS 123. We determine the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the historical stock price volatility, expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate. A change in one or more of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may result in a material change to the estimated fair value of the stock-based compensation (see Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for analysis of the effect of certain changes in assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock-based compensation).

Valuation Allowance for Net Deferred Tax Assets (as restated)

As disclosed in Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets of $188,689. The valuation allowance provides a 100% allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities that may be offset by the Company’s deferred tax assets for income tax accounting purposes.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

If our business turnaround is successful, and we have been profitable for a number of years, and our prospects for the realization of our deferred tax assets are more likely than not, we would reverse our valuation allowance and credit income tax expense. In assessing the prospects for future profitability, many of the assessments of same-store sales and cash flows mentioned above become relevant. When circumstances warrant, we assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized from future taxable income. As of January 31, 2004, we maintained a deferred tax liability of $ 1,413, which results from our net deferred tax assets and tax valuation allowance of approximately $187,276 and $188,689 respectively.

As of May 17, 2004, and January 31, 2004, we have a net deferred tax liability of $1,495 and $1,413, respectively, that arose from a financial versus tax reporting difference in accounting for goodwill. With goodwill no longer amortized for financial reporting purposes, while such amortization continues for income tax reporting purposes, the reversal timing of the associated deferred tax liability has become indeterminable. Accordingly, such deferred tax liability may not be offset by the Company’s deferred tax assets, which all have determinable reversal timing for purposes of reducing the Company’s deferred tax valuation allowance.

Significant Known Events, Trends, or Uncertainties Expected to Impact Fiscal 2005 Comparisons with Fiscal 2004(as restated)

The factors discussed below impact comparability of operating performance for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, or could impact comparisons for the remainder of fiscal 2005.

Divestiture of Timber Lodge

As discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Timber Lodge is accounted for as a discontinued operation. The results of Timber Lodge included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as discontinued operations for the sixteen week periods ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003, are as follows:


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
Revenue	$	13,369		$	14,237

Operating loss		(157	)		(2,102	)
Interest expense		6			13
Income tax benefit		—			(1	)

Net loss	$	(163	)	$	(2,114	)

The operating losses for Timber Lodge for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, include impairment charges of $617 and $1,566, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of Timber Lodge to fair value. We have a letter of intent for the sale of Timber Lodge and expect the sale to be completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

We operate on a retail accounting calendar. Our fiscal year has 13 four-week accounting periods and ends the last Monday in January. The first quarter of our fiscal year has four periods, or 16 weeks. All other quarters have three periods, or 12 weeks. Fiscal 2005 will be a 53-week fiscal year. The fourth quarter of this fiscal year will have two accounting periods of four weeks and one accounting period of five weeks.

Our restaurant sales, and therefore our profitability, are subject to seasonal fluctuations and are traditionally higher during the spring and summer months because of factors such as increased travel upon school vacations and improved weather conditions, which affect the public’s dining habits.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Business Strategy

We remain focused on pursuing vigorously a comprehensive business strategy. The main components of our strategy are as follows:

• remain focused on restaurant fundamentals — quality, service and cleanliness;

• offer premium products that compete on quality and taste — not price;

• build on the strength of the Carl’s Jr. brand, including dual branding opportunities with Green Burrito;

• continue to execute and refine the Hardee’s Revolution;

• continue to control costs while increasing revenues;

• leverage our infrastructure and marketing presence to build out existing core markets; and

• strengthen our franchise system and pursue further franchising opportunities.

We believe a key factor in operating Hardee’s profitably is increasing sales. For the trailing thirteen periods ended May 17, 2004, the average unit volume (“AUV”) at our company-operated Hardee’s restaurants was approximately $823, while franchise-operated AUV was $874. If we are unable to grow sales at Hardee’s to the level at which we estimate the brand would operate profitably and improve operating margins, it will affect our ability to access both the amount and terms of financing available to us in the future (see Liquidity and Capital Resources section below).

Hardee’s Revolution

We completed a comprehensive plan to revitalize Hardee’s involving a repositioning of the brand as a premium burger restaurant (Hardee’s Revolution) during fiscal 2004. The plan included menu adjustments and associated advertising and media strategies. This menu, featuring Angus beef Thickburgers, along with related media, seeks to distinguish Hardee’s as a premium burger specialist.

Franchisees’ Operations

Like others in the quick-service restaurant industry, some of our franchise operators experience financial difficulties from time to time with respect to their operations. Our approach to dealing with financial and operational issues that arise from these situations is described under Critical Accounting Policies above, under the heading “Franchised and Licensed Operations.” Some franchise operators in the Hardee’s system have experienced significant financial problems and, as discussed above, there are a number of potential resolutions of these financial issues.

We continue to work with franchisees in an attempt to maximize our future franchising income. Our franchising income is dependent on both the number of restaurants operated by franchisees and their operational and financial success, such that they can make their royalty and lease payments to us. Although we quarterly review the allowance for doubtful accounts and the estimated liability for closed franchise restaurants (see discussion under Critical Accounting Policies — Franchised and Licensed Operations), there can be no assurance that the number of franchisees or franchised restaurants experiencing financial difficulties will not increase from our current assessments, nor can there be any assurance that we will be successful in resolving financial issues relating to any specific franchisee. As of May 17, 2004, our consolidated provision for doubtful accounts of notes receivable was 74% of the gross balance of notes receivable and our consolidated provision for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable was 7% of the gross balance of accounts receivable. During fiscal 2004, we received several notes receivable pursuant to completing workout agreements with several troubled franchisees. Also, as of May 17, 2004, we have not recognized $5,160 in accounts receivable and $6,292 in notes receivable pertaining to royalty and rent revenue due from franchisees that are in default under the terms of their franchise agreements. We still experience specific problems with troubled franchisees (see Critical Accounting Policies — Franchise and Licensed Operations) and may be required to increase the amount of our provisions for doubtful accounts and/or increase the amount of our estimated liability for future lease obligations. The result of increasing the allowances for doubtful accounts is an effective royalty rate lower than our standard contractual royalty rate.

Effective royalty rate reflects royalties deemed collectible as a percent of franchise-generated revenue for all franchisees for which we are recognizing revenue. For the trailing thirteen periods ended May 17, 2004, the effective royalty rates for domestic Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s were 3.8% and 3.6%, respectively.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Financial Comparison

Our results reflect the substantial changes we have made in executing our business turnaround including the sale and closure of under-performing restaurants, the disposal of non-core investments, the reduction of corporate overhead and our efforts to improve margins and repay debt. The table below is a condensed presentation of those activities, and other changes in the components of net income, designed to facilitate the discussion of results in this Form 10-Q/A.


	(All amounts are
	approximate and in
	millions)
	First Fiscal Quarter
	(as restated)
Current Year:
Net income	$	10.5
Prior Year:
Net loss	$	(7.7	)

Increase in net income	$	18.2


	First Quarter
	Fiscal Year 2005 vs.
	First Quarter
	Fiscal Year 2004
	(as restated)
Items causing net income to increase from the prior year to the current year:
Approximate store margin improvement in Hardee’s restaurants	$	16.5
Approximate store margin improvement in Carl’s Jr. restaurants		4.8
Increase in net franchising income, excluding provisions for doubtful accounts		6.1
Increase in corporate overhead		(6.4	)
Increase in facility action charges		(6.0	)
Decrease in loss from discontinued operations		2.0
Decrease in provisions for doubtful accounts		2.3
Increase in advertising expense, excluding La Salsa and Green Burrito		(1.2	)
Decrease in interest expense		0.8
Increase in operating loss of La Salsa and Green Burrito, excluding facility action charges and provisions for doubtful accounts		(0.6	)
All other, net		(0.1	)

Increase in net income	$	18.2

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Operating Review

The following tables are presented to facilitate Management’s Discussion and Analysis and are presented in the same format in which we present segment information (See Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).


	Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)		Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)					(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	170,209		$	181,017		$	14,202		$	443	$	365,871
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		24,912			16,279			14,462
Company-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,228			823			732
Franchise-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,109			874			759
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.80			4.57			9.51
Company-operated same-store sales increase (C)		9.8	%		11.9	%		6.0	%
Company-operated same-store transactions increase (D)		1.8	%		1.5	%		2.6	%
Franchise-operated same-store sales increase (C)		9.3	%		10.9	%		4.4	%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		28.4	%		29.4	%		27.8	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.0	%		33.1	%		33.3	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		21.7	%		21.7	%		33.7	%
Restaurant level margin		21.9	%		15.6	%		5.2	%
Advertising as a percentage of company-operated revenue		6.5	%		5.9	%		2.9	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	7,581		$	13,338		$	524		$	104	$	21,547
Distribution centers		52,257			5,237			—			—		57,494
Rent		6,672			3,212			—			—		9,884
Other		366			116			33			—		515

Total franchising revenue		66,876			21,903			557			104		89,440

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		1,352			1,282			451			—		3,085
Distribution centers		50,987			5,410			—			—		56,397
Rent and other occupancy		5,335			2,174			—			—		7,509

Total franchising expense		57,674			8,866			451			—		66,991

Net franchising income	$	9,202		$	13,037		$	106		$	104	$	22,449

Facility action charges, net	$	1,202		$	4,364		$	1,198		$	53	$	6,817
Operating income (loss)	$	21,049		$	3,295		$	(2,491	)	$	156	$	22,009

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)


	Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.			Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other (A)			Total
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Company-operated revenue	$	158,284		$	167,613		$	12,696		$	449		$	339,042
Company-operated average weekly unit volume (actual $- not in thousands)		22,376			14,337			13,888
Company-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,151			756			736
Franchise-operated average unit volume (trailing 13 periods)		1,058			805			635
Average check (actual $- not in thousands) (B)		5.36			4.15			9.10
Company-operated same-store sales decrease (C)		(0.4	)%		(3.8	)%		(1.9	)%
Company-operated same-store transactions decrease (D)		(2.1	)%		(10.0	)%		(5.1	)%
Franchise-operated same-store sales decrease (C)		(1.6	)%		(6.8	)%		(0.4	)%
Operating costs as a % of company-operated revenue:
Food and packaging		28.3	%		30.9	%		26.3	%
Payroll and employee benefits		28.9	%		37.4	%		31.5	%
Occupancy and other operating costs		22.3	%		24.6	%		31.9	%
Restaurant level margin		20.5	%		7.1	%		10.3	%
Advertising as a percentage of company-operated revenue		6.3	%		6.3	%		3.0	%
Franchising revenue:
Royalties	$	6,569		$	10,472		$	413		$	110		$	17,564
Distribution centers		46,579			6,858			—			—			53,437
Rent		7,090			2,120			—			—			9,210
Other		195			75			30			—			300

Total franchising revenue		60,433			19,525			443			110			80,511

Franchising expense:
Administrative expense (including provision for bad debts)		1,359			1,553			135			1			3,048
Distribution centers		45,429			7,367			—			—			52,796
Rent and other occupancy		6,811			2,266			—			—			9,077

Total franchising expense		53,599			11,186			135			1			64,921

Net franchising income	$	6,834		$	8,339		$	308		$	109		$	15,590

Facility action charges (gains), net	$	252		$	1,259		$	—		$	(724	)	$	787
Operating income (loss)	$	17,759		$	(10,101	)	$	(409	)	$	523		$	7,772

(A) “Other” consists of Green Burrito. Additionally, amounts that we do not believe would be proper to allocate to the operating segments are included in “Other.”

(B) Average check represents total restaurant sales divided by total transactions for any given period. The average check is viewed in conjunction with same-store sales and same-store transactions, as defined below. This indicator, when viewed with other measures, may illustrate revenue growth or decline resulting from a change in menu or price offering. When we introduce menu items or pricing initiatives with higher or lower price points than the existing menu base, the average check may reflect the benefit or impact from these new items or pricing on the average price paid by the consumer.

(C) Same-store sales is a key performance indicator in our industry. This indicator is a measure of revenue growth on the existing comparable store base of a multi-unit chain company such as ours and is measured as a percentage variance over the same fiscal period in the prior year. Same-store sales illustrate how competitive forces and external economic conditions benefit or impact us, as well as any benefit from the diverse value propositions and marketing initiatives undertaken by us. In calculating same-store sales, we include restaurants open for 14 full accounting periods, which allows for a year-over-year comparison.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

(D) Same-store transactions represent the number of consumer visits to our restaurants. Transactions are viewed on the same basis as same-store sales above and are another key performance indicator in our industry. This indicator is a measure of consumer frequency in the existing comparable store base and is measured as a percentage variance over the same fiscal period in the prior year. Same-store transactions are another measure of the effects of competitive forces and economic conditions on consumer behavior and resulting benefit, or impact, to us. Transactions also reflect any benefit from the diverse value propositions and marketing initiatives undertaken by us.

Presentation of Non-GAAP Measures

EBITDA

EBITDA is a typical non-GAAP measure (i.e. a measure calculated and presented on the basis of methodologies other than in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “GAAP”) for companies that issue public debt and a measure used by the lenders under our bank credit facility. We believe EBITDA is useful to our investors as an indicator of earnings available to service debt. EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to income from operations, an indicator of cash flow from operations or a measure of liquidity. We calculate EBITDA as earnings before cumulative effect of accounting changes, discontinued operations, interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, facility action charges, impairment of goodwill and impairment of assets held for sale. Because not all companies calculate EBITDA identically, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Additionally, we believe EBITDA is a more meaningful indicator of earnings available to service debt when certain charges, such as impairment of goodwill and facility action charges are excluded from income (loss) from continuing operations. EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest expense, income taxes and debt service payments and cash costs arising from facility actions.


	Sixteen Weeks Ended May 17, 2004
	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	19,704	$	(6,513	)	$	(2,532	)	$	(155	)	$	10,504
Income from discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—		—			—			(454	)		(454	)
Interest expense (income)		1,673		10,071			(24	)		—			11,720
Income tax expense		141		24			1			185			351
Depreciation and amortization		7,430		12,217			1,344			55			21,046
Facility action charges, net		1,202		4,364			1,198			53			6,817
Impairment of Timber Lodge		—		—			—			617			617

EBITDA	$	30,150	$	20,163		$	(13	)	$	301		$	50,601


	Sixteen Weeks Ended May 19, 2003
	Carl’s Jr.		Hardee’s			La Salsa			Other			Total
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)						(as restated)
Net income (loss)	$	16,299	$	(21,899	)	$	(414	)	$	(1,688	)	$	(7,702	)
Loss from discontinued segment, excluding impairment		—		—			—			548			548
Interest expense		1,526		10,631			3			7			12,167
Income tax expense (benefit)		343		31			—			(11	)		363
Depreciation and amortization		8,099		11,401			1,122			57			20,679
Facility action charges, net		252		1,259			—			(724	)		787
Impairment of Timber Lodge		—		—			—			1,566			1,566

EBITDA	$	26,519	$	1,423		$	711		$	(245	)	$	28,408

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

The following table reconciles EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) to cash flow provided by operating activities (a GAAP measure):


	Sixteen Weeks Ended
	May 17, 2004			May 19, 2003
	(as restated)			(as restated)
Cash flow provided by operating activities	$	47,441		$	18,164
Interest expense		11,720			12,167
Income tax expense		351			363
Amortization of loan fees		(1,042	)		(1,413	)
Recovery of (provision for) losses on accounts and notes receivable		242			(2,064	)
(Loss) gain on investments, sales of property and equipment, capital leases and extinguishment of debts		(1,284	)		232
Deferred income taxes		(82	)		(144	)
Other non-cash credits		666			18
Net change in refundable income taxes		(4	)		(142	)
Change in estimated liability for closing restaurants and estimated liability for self-insurance		3,508			3,236
Net change in receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets		(9,991	)		(11,177	)
Net change in accounts payable and other current liabilities		(896	)		9,003
EBITDA from discontinued operations		460			(536	)
Net cash (received from) provided to discontinued segment		(28	)		165

EBITDA, including discontinued segment		51,061			27,872
Less: EBITDA from discontinued segment		(460	)		536

EBITDA	$	50,601		$	28,408

Carl’s Jr.

During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we opened two Carl’s Jr. restaurants. Carl’s Jr. franchisees and licensees opened eight restaurants. The following table shows the change in the Carl’s Jr. restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue for the current quarter:


	Restaurant Portfolio							Revenue
	First Fiscal Quarter							First Fiscal Quarter
	2005		2004		Change			2005		2004		Change
								(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Company		428		443		(15	)	$	170,209	$	158,284	$	11,925
Franchised and licensed^(a)		588		553		35			66,876		60,433		6,443

Total		1,016		996		20		$	237,085	$	218,717	$	18,368

(a) Includes $52,257 and $46,579 of revenues from distribution of food, packaging and supplies to franchised and licensed restaurants during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, respectively.

Company-Operated Restaurants

Revenue from company-operated Carl’s Jr. restaurants increased $11,925, or 7.5%, to $170,209 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. This increase resulted primarily from a 9.8% increase in same-store sales, partially offset by the impact of selling 15 company stores located in Arizona to a franchisee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. We believe the launch of several new products during the fiscal quarter ended May 17, 2004, including The Low Carb Six Dollar Burger™ and the Low Carb Breakfast Bowl™, as well as conversion to 100 percent Angus beef in The Six Dollar Burger ™, contributed to the growth in same-store sales. Promotional item sales also increased $1,326 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the prior year comparable period, primarily due to a current year “bobblehead” promotion featuring members of the National Basketball Association’s (“NBA”) Los Angeles Lakers, which was broader than a similar promotion featuring members of the NBA’s Sacramento Kings in the prior year.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

The changes in the restaurant-level margin are explained as follows:


	(as restated)
Restaurant-level margin for the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003		20.5	%
Decrease in labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation		0.8
Decrease in general liability insurance expense		0.3
Increase in cost of promotional items		(0.5	)
Decrease in utilities expense		0.2
Decrease in repair and maintenance expense		0.2
Decrease in depreciation, rent, property taxes and licenses		0.1
Decrease in workers’ compensation expense		0.1
Increase in food and packaging costs		(0.1	)
Other, net		0.3

Restaurant-level margin for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004		21.9	%

Labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation, as a percent of sales decreased during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, due mainly to reduced restaurant manager salaries and hourly wages resulting from benefits of sales leverage, partially offset by an increase in restaurant manager bonuses due to improved financial performance. General liability insurance expense decreased during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, from the comparable prior year period, primarily as a result of lower estimated claims losses. Since the beginning of fiscal 2004, loss development on general liability claims for recent fiscal years has been less than previously estimated.

Promotional items costs as a percent of sales increased during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, due to the promotional items sales increase noted above.

Utilities expense as a percent of sales decreased during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the prior year, due mainly to benefits of sales leverage, partially offset by recording a decrease to estimated utility costs in the prior year upon finalizing contract terms with a new fixed-rate energy provider. Previously, we had a fixed-rate contract with Enron to supply energy to a majority of our California Carl’s Jr. restaurants. As part of its bankruptcy reorganization, Enron rejected that contract during the third quarter of fiscal 2003. In connection with Enron rejecting our fixed-rate contract, we have filed bankruptcy court claims totaling $14,204 against Enron. At this time, we cannot make a determination as to the potential recovery, if any, with respect to these claims and, accordingly, no recognition of this uncertainty has been recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

Repair and maintenance expense, as well as depreciation, rent, property taxes and licenses expenses as percents of sales decreased during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, from the comparable prior year period, due mainly to sales leverage.

Food and packaging costs as a percent of sales increased slightly during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, from the comparable prior year period, primarily due to an increase in beef and other commodity costs.

On October 5, 2003, the Governor of California signed Senate Bill 2, known as the “Health Insurance Act of 2003” (“SB2”), which will require certain California businesses either to pay at least 80% of the premiums for a basic individual health insurance package for its employees who work over 100 hours per month and their dependents, or to pay a fee into a state pool for the purchase of health insurance for uninsured, low-income workers. California businesses that employ 200 or more employees must comply with the new law beginning on January 1, 2006. We currently do not offer health insurance benefits to our hourly employees. SB2 is currently being challenged on several fronts. We continue to evaluate the status and impact of this legislation, which could be material to our results of operations.

Franchised and Licensed Restaurants

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $6,443, or 10.7%, to $66,876 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. The increase is comprised mainly of an increase of $5,678, or 12.2%, in food, paper and supplies sales to franchisees, resulting from the increase in the franchise store base over the comparable prior year period and the food purchasing volume impact of the 9.3% increase in franchise same-store sales. For similar reasons, franchise royalties also grew $1,012, or 15.4%, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Net franchising income increased $2,368, or 34.7%, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. The increase is primarily due to increased profits from subleasing facilities to franchisees and the increase in franchise royalties.

Although not required to do so, approximately 88% of Carl’s Jr. franchised and licensed restaurants purchase food, paper and other supplies from us.

Hardee’s

During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we closed 30 Hardee’s restaurants and opened one restaurant. During the same period, Hardee’s franchisees and licensees opened five restaurants and closed 16 restaurants. The following table shows the change in the Hardee’s restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue for the current quarter:


	Restaurant Portfolio							Revenue
	First Fiscal Quarter							First Fiscal Quarter
	2005		2004		Change			2005		2004		Change
										(as restated)		(as restated)
Company		692		730		(38	)	$	181,017	$	167,613	$	13,404
Franchised and licensed		1,389		1,451		(62	)		21,903		19,525		2,378

Total		2,081		2,181		(100	)	$	202,920	$	187,138	$	15,782

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we introduced a new menu at Hardee’s pursuant to our “Hardee’s Revolution” strategy. We determined that significant management and staff training would be required to properly execute the new menu. We also invested in additional labor in the restaurants to ensure outstanding customer service during the training stage of the Hardee’s Revolution. These investments significantly impacted our financial results during the sixteen week period ended May 19, 2003. In addition, the deletion of up to 40 menu items pursuant to the Hardee’s Revolution strategy negatively affected sales at both company-operated and franchised Hardee’s restaurants through the first half of fiscal 2004. As the training, implementation and introduction of the Hardee’s Revolution were completed in early fiscal 2004, we have returned to pre-Hardee’s Revolution staffing levels. We have also experienced significant sales trend improvements since the completion of Hardee’s Revolution rollout, including same-store sales growth at company-operated restaurants for 11 consecutive four-week reporting periods through May 17, 2004.

Company-Operated Restaurants

Same-store sales for company-operated Hardee’s restaurants increased 11.9% during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004. We believe this increase reflects positive consumer reception of the Hardee’s Revolution menu changes. A 4% price increase implemented at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 to address cost pressures, particularly the cost of beef, also contributed to our same-store sales growth. Revenue from company-operated Hardee’s restaurants increased $13,404, or 8.0%, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. This increase is due to the increase in same-store sales during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, partially offset by the closure of 30 restaurants that did not adequately respond to the Hardee’s Revolution strategy. The average check during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 was $4.57, as compared to $4.15 during the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, primarily due to our shift to premium products and the price increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

The changes in restaurant-level margins are explained as follows:


	(as restated)
Restaurant-level margin for the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003		7.1	%
Decrease in labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation		4.1
Decrease in food and packaging costs		1.5
Decrease in utilities expense		0.9
Decrease in general liability insurance expense		0.5
Decrease in rent, depreciation, property taxes and licenses		0.4
Decrease in restaurant opening costs		0.4
Decrease in workers’ compensation insurance expense		0.2
Decrease in repair and maintenance expenses		0.2
Decrease in incentive program costs		0.2
Increase in asset retirement expense		(0.2	)
Other, net		0.3

Restaurant-level margin for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004		15.6	%

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Labor costs, excluding workers’ compensation, decreased significantly as a percent of sales during the sixteen week period ended May 17, 2004, from the comparable prior year period. This decrease resulted mainly from the return to normal staffing levels after completing the Hardee’s Revolution rollout, the benefits of sales leverage, and certain labor cost management improvements commencing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, slightly offset by increased restaurant manager bonuses due to improved financial performance.

Food and packaging costs decreased from the prior year comparable period as a percent of sales primarily due to lower discounting during the current year versus the prior year while we were still transitioning to the Hardee’s Revolution menu, as well as the price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 discussed above. General liability insurance expense decreased from the prior year comparable period as well, primarily due to lower estimated claims losses and a decrease in insurance premiums as a result of recent loss trend improvements.

The decrease in rent, depreciation, property taxes and licenses as a percent of sales from the prior year comparable period primarily resulted from adjustment to deferred rents based on current lease terms (0.3% margin impact) and benefits of sales leverage, partially offset by increased depreciation expense on point-of-sale equipment under capital lease which, in late fiscal 2004, we determined we will replace earlier than originally planned (0.3% margin impact). We do not anticipate similar deferred rent adjustments in future periods. We expect accelerated amortization of point-of-sale equipment to continue into the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

Restaurant opening costs and asset retirement expenses are dependent upon restaurant actions that occur only from time to time. During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we opened one Hardee’s restaurant, while in the prior year comparable period we opened three Hardee’s restaurants. In addition, we applied certain new uniform and training costs pursuant to the Hardee’s Revolution conversion to opening costs in the prior year comparable period. During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we retired a minor amount of obsolete restaurant cooking equipment assets whereas we had no significant asset retirement activity in the prior year comparable period.

Workers’ compensation and repair and maintenance expenses decreased as percents of sales from the prior year comparable period due mainly to the benefits of sales leverage. Incentive costs decreased due to curtailment of a particular program.

Franchised and Licensed Restaurants

Franchised and licensed restaurant revenues increased $2,378, or 12.2%, to $21,903 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. Franchise royalties grew $2,866, or 27.4%, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, primarily due to improved financial health of certain franchisees, which allowed them to resume royalty payments to us, and the 10.9% increase in franchise same-store sales, partially offset by the decrease in the number of franchised restaurants. Similarly, rent revenues increased $1,093 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as the improved financial health of certain franchisees has allowed them to resume making lease or sublease payments to the Company.

Distribution revenues decreased $1,621, or 23.6%, to $5,237 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 from the prior year comparable period due to decreased equipment sales to franchisees. Equipment sales have slowed after franchisees made significant investments in fiscal 2003 and early fiscal 2004 pursuant to the Star Hardee’s remodel program.

Net franchising income increased $4,698, or 56.3%, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. The increase is primarily due to the increases in franchise royalties and rents noted above.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

La Salsa

During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we opened two La Salsa restaurants. During the same period, La Salsa franchisees and licensees opened two restaurants. The following table shows the change in the La Salsa restaurant portfolio, as well as the change in revenue at La Salsa for the current quarter:


	Restaurant Portfolio						Revenue
	First Fiscal Quarter						First Fiscal Quarter
	2005		2004		Change		2005		2004		Change
Company		63		57		6	$	14,202	$	12,696	$	1,506
Franchised and licensed		43		40		3		557		443		114

Total		106		97		9	$	14,759	$	13,139	$	1,620

Same-store sales for company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased 6.0% during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004. Revenue from company-operated La Salsa restaurants increased $1,506, or 11.9%, when compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, primarily due to the net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants and the increase in same-store sales.

Restaurant-level margins were 5.8% and 10.8% as a percent of company-operated restaurant revenues for the sixteen-week periods ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, respectively. Margins were negatively impacted by approximately 150 basis points due to an increase in food and packaging costs as a percent of sales, resulting primarily from higher produce and dairy costs. Margins were also negatively impacted by approximately 180 basis points primarily as a result of increased hourly labor related to higher costs associated with new restaurant openings and the fixed nature of labor on lower sales at more labor-intensive full service locations. Occupancy and other expenses negatively impacted margins by approximately 170 basis points, due mainly to amortization of intangible assets (approximately 210 basis points), which had been classified as general and administrative expenses in the prior year comparable period.

Consolidated Advertising Expense

Advertising expenses increased $1,251, or 6.0%, to $22,264 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004. Advertising expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue decreased marginally from 6.2% to 6.1% during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, due to higher advertising in the prior year during the Hardee’s Revolution rollout at the Hardee’s brand, partially offset by the management decision to slightly increase advertising spending at the Carl’s Jr. brand.

Consolidated General and Administrative Expense (as restated)

General and administrative expenses were 8.3% of total revenue during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to 7.5% during the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003. General and administrative expenses increased $6,047, or 19.1%, to $37,656 during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, as compared to the same period last year. This increase is primarily due to increased incentive compensation expense as a result of our improved financial performance, increased consulting expenses pursuant to payroll services outsourcing and compliance work associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (and new corporate governance requirements imposed by the New York Stock Exchange), and increased legal fees with respect to ongoing litigation, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense with respect to information systems software.

Consolidated Interest Expense (as restated)

During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, interest expense decreased $447, or 3.7%, to $11,720, as compared to the sixteen weeks ended May 19, 2003, primarily as a result of a decrease in deferred financing cost amortization expense, lower average borrowings under convertible debt financing and further amortization of our capital lease obligations since the prior year comparable period, partially offset by $393 of deferred financing cost write-offs during the current quarter upon prepayment of a portion of the Company’s term loan under its senior credit facility.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Consolidated Other Income (Expense), Net (as restated)

Other income (expense), net, primarily consists of lease and sublease income from non-franchisee tenants, provisions for bad debts on certain notes receivable from franchisees and other non-operating charges. Other income increased by $1,559, to $729, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, over the prior year comparable period due mainly to a $1,422 provision for bad debts for Hardee’s notes receivable in the prior year comparable period..

Consolidated Income Tax Expense (as restated)

We recorded income tax expense of $351 and $363 for the sixteen weeks periods ended May 17, 2004, and May 19, 2003, respectively. These amounts for both periods were comprised primarily of foreign income taxes and deferred taxes associated with a difference in amortization of goodwill for financial reporting versus income tax reporting purposes. We believe that our net operating loss carryforward is such that we will not be required to pay federal income taxes on this fiscal year’s taxable earnings, if any, and have only provided for foreign income taxes. At January 31, 2004, we had federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $91,970, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2010 through 2024, and state NOL carryforwards totaling approximately $335,948, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2006 through 2024. We have federal NOL carryforwards for alternative minimum tax purposes of approximately $72,210 and an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward of approximately $10,691. We have also generated general business credit carryforwards of approximately $10,952, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2020 through 2024, and foreign tax credits in the amount of $2,829, expiring in varying amounts in the years 2008 and 2009.

We have recorded a 100% valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities that may be offset by our deferred tax assets for income tax accounting purposes. If our business turnaround continues to result in sustained profitability and our prospects for the realization of our deferred tax assets are more likely than not, we would then reverse our valuation allowance and record an income tax benefit. As circumstances warrant, we continue to assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized. As of January 31, 2004, we maintained a deferred tax liability of $1,413, which results from our net deferred tax assets and tax valuation allowance of approximately $187,276 and $188,689, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources (as restated)

We have historically financed our business through cash flow from operations, borrowings under our credit facility and the sale of restaurants. Our most significant cash uses during the next 12 months will arise primarily from funding our capital expenditures. We amended and restated our senior credit facility (“Amended Facility”) on June 2, 2004 (see below). We anticipate that existing cash balances, availability under the Amended Facility and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to service existing debt and to meet our operating and capital requirements for the next 12 months. Additionally, we are able to sell restaurants as a source of liquidity, although we have no intention to do so significantly at this time. We have no potential mandatory payments of principal on our $105,000 of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 until October 1, 2008. On July 2, 2004, we will redeem our $200,000 of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with proceeds from the Amended Facility.

We, and the restaurant industry in general, maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories, and vendors grant trade credit for purchases such as food and supplies. We also continually invest in our business through the addition of new sites and the refurbishment of existing sites, which are reflected as long-term assets and not as part of working capital. As a result, we typically maintain current liabilities in excess of current assets, resulting in a working capital deficit. As of May 17, 2004, our current ratio was 0.80 to 1.

On June 2, 2004, we amended and restated our senior credit facility to provide for a $380,000 senior secured credit facility consisting of a $150,000 revolving credit facility and a $230,000 term loan. The revolving credit facility matures on May 1, 2007, and includes an $85,000 letter of credit sub-facility. The principal amount of the term loan will be repaid in quarterly installments, with a balloon payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity on July 2, 2008. The Amended Facility also requires term loan prepayments based upon an annual excess cash flow formula, as defined therein. Subject to certain conditions as defined in the Amended Facility, the maturity of the term loan may be extended to May 1, 2010. We used a portion of the proceeds from the $230,000 term loan to repay the balance of the existing Facility term loan of $10,137 and to pay approximately $5,800 in transaction fees.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

On June 2, 2004, we deposited $212,168 with the trustee for our Senior Notes, constituting all funds necessary to retire the Senior Notes obligations, and gave notice of redemption of the Senior Notes to occur on July 2, 2004. On July 2, 2004, the trustee will apply the depository amount to redeem the entire principal of $200,000, and pay our optional redemption premium of $9,126 and accrued interest, under our 9.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009. We will also incur a charge of approximately $3,100 during our second fiscal quarter to write-off unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the Senior Notes. We anticipate this redemption will result in annual interest savings of approximately $7,000 during the first year. We will use the remaining proceeds of the term loan for general corporate purposes.

We use the Amended Facility to fund letters of credit required for our self-insurance programs. Additionally, the Amended Facility provides working capital during those periods when seasonality affects our cash flow. As of May 17, 2004 (prior to amendment and restatement of the Facility), we had cash borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the Facility of $10,137, outstanding letters of credit under the revolving portion of the Facility of $63,697 and availability under the revolving portion of the Facility of $86,303. Upon the closing of the Amended Facility, we had $230,000 outstanding under the term loan, $63,697 of outstanding letters of credit and borrowing availability of $86,303. Borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR plus an applicable margin or the Prime Rate plus an applicable margin, with interest due monthly or quarterly depending on the interest period. Currently, the applicable interest rate on the term loan is LIBOR plus 3.00%. The applicable interest rate on the revolving loan portion of the Amended Facility is LIBOR plus 2.75%. We also incur fees on outstanding letters of credit under the Amended Facility at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, which is currently 3.00% per annum. Subsequent to May 17, 2004, we repaid $20,000 of the outstanding term loan balance under the Amended Facility in advance of the terms of the Amended Facility.

The agreement underlying the Amended Facility includes certain restrictive covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict our ability to incur debt, incur liens on our assets, make any significant change in our corporate structure or the nature of our business, dispose of assets in the collateral pool securing the Amended Facility, prepay certain debt, engage in a change of control transaction without the member banks’ consents, pay dividends and make investments or acquisitions.

Subject to the terms of the Amended Facility, we may make capital expenditures in the amount of $50,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined in the Facility) in excess of $110,000 during our current fiscal year and $45,000 plus 80% of the amount of actual EBITDA (as defined in the Facility) in excess of $110,000 during each subsequent fiscal year. Additionally, in fiscal 2005 and thereafter we may carry forward any unused capital expenditure amounts to the following year.

The Amended Facility also permits us to repurchase our common stock in the amount of $27,000 plus a portion of excess cash flow and certain net asset sale proceeds (as defined in the Amended Facility) during the term of the Amended Facility. On April 13, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to allow us to repurchase up to $20,000 of our common stock. Pursuant to this authorization, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we repurchased 319,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $10.49 per share, for a total cost, including trading commissions, of $3,354. We may make additional repurchases of our common stock if we believe it to be a good investment of our corporate funds and in the best interests of our stockholders.

The Amended Facility also requires that, by no later than August 31, 2004, we enter into an interest rate hedge agreement, for a period expiring no sooner than June 2, 2007, that effectively fixes or caps the interest expense on at least $70,000 of the term loan under the Facility.

The full text of the contractual requirements imposed by this financing is set forth in the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2004, which we are filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this report. Based upon the financial results we originally reported (i.e., prior to our restatement of previously issued financial statements, as discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), we were in compliance with the requirements of the Facility as of May 17, 2004. However, had we reported our “as-restated” financial results instead of our originally reported results, and had we been unable to obtain an amendment to or waiver of the applicable sections of the Facility, we would have been in violation of certain of the financial performance covenants under the Facility as of May 17, 2004. On June 2, 2004, were financed the Facility with a new credit facility. Based on the terms of the new credit facility, we continue to classify the Facility as long-term as of May 17, 2004, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Balance Sheets. Subject to cure periods in certain instances, the lenders under our Amended Facility may demand repayment of borrowings prior to stated maturity upon certain events, including if we breach the terms of the agreement, suffer a material adverse change, engage in a change of control transaction, suffer certain adverse legal judgments, in the event of specified events of insolvency or if we default other significant obligations. In the event the Amended Facility is declared accelerated by the lenders (which can occur only if we are in default under the Amended Facility), our 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2023 (“2023 Convertible Notes”) may also become accelerated under certain circumstances and after all cure periods have expired.

The 2023 Convertible Notes, which are our unsecured general obligations, are governed by an indenture. The indenture requires that we pay interest at a rate of 4.00% per annum in semiannual coupons due each April 1 and October 1, with all outstanding principal due and payable October 1, 2023. We have the right to prepay the notes after October 1, 2008 for an amount equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued interest, subject to a notice requirement. The full text of the contractual requirements imposed by this financing is set forth in the related indenture, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The indenture contains certain restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with the covenants of the 2023 Convertible Notes as of May 17, 2004. Subject in certain instances to cure periods, the holders of the 2023 Convertible Notes may demand repayment of these borrowings prior to stated maturity upon certain events, including if we breach the terms of the indenture, in the event of specified events of insolvency, or if other significant obligations are accelerated. On October 1 of 2008, 2013 and 2018, holders of the 2023 Convertible Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at prices specified in the related indenture. The notes are convertible into our common stock on the conditions set forth in the related indenture. The notes were not convertible during the period September 29, 2003 through May 17, 2004. The net proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay a portion of the 2004 Convertible Notes.

The Senior Notes, which are unsecured obligations but are guaranteed by our subsidiaries, are governed by an indenture. The indenture requires that we pay interest at a rate of 9.125% per annum in semi-annual coupons due on each May 1 and November 1, with all outstanding principal due and payable May 1, 2009. On May 1, 2004, we began to have the right to prepay the notes for an amount equal to principal, accrued interest and a premium, subject to a notice requirement. The premium from May 1, 2004 to May 1, 2005, is 4.56% of the principal amount redeemed. The full text of the contractual requirements imposed by this financing is set forth in the indenture, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We were in compliance with such requirements as of May 17, 2004. However, our incurrence of additional senior indebtedness under the Amended Facility on June 2, 2004, breached the limitation on additional indebtedness in the Senior Notes indenture. The indenture allows us 30 days to cure this breach before the breach becomes a default. As noted above, we will repay the entire outstanding balance and the related optional redemption premium and accrued interest under the Senior Notes at the end of the notice period on July 2, 2004, which will result in the termination of the breached covenant within the 30-day cure period.

On March 15, 2004, we repaid and retired the remaining outstanding principal balance of $22,319 on our 2004 Convertible Notes, using a portion of the proceeds of the $25,000 term loan issued under the Facility on November 12, 2003.

The terms of the Amended Facility are not dependent on any change in our credit rating. The 2023 Convertible Notes contain a convertibility trigger based on the credit ratings of the notes (see discussion in Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). We believe the key company-specific factors affecting our ability to maintain our existing debt financing relationships and to access such capital in the future are our present and expected levels of profitability and cash flow from operations, asset collateral bases and the level of our equity capital relative to our debt obligations. In addition, as noted above, our existing agreements include significant restrictions on future financings including, among others, limits on the amount of indebtedness we may incur or which may be secured by any of our assets.

During the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, cash provided by operating activities was $47,441, an increase of $29,277 over the prior year comparable period. The increase resulted mainly from the increase in net income over the prior year and a trend change in the accounts payable balance fluctuation in the current year first fiscal quarter as compared to the prior year first fiscal quarter. Such trend can be vary significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon the timing of large vendor payments.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands)

Cash used in investing activities during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, totaled $8,847, which principally consisted of purchases of property and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment and collections on notes receivable and related party receivables.

Cash used in financing activities during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, totaled $50,209, which principally consisted of redemption of $22,319 of our 2004 Convertible Notes, repayment of $13,926 of the term loan under our bank credit facility (of which $13,515 represented voluntary prepayment thereof) and a decrease in our bank overdraft position, which is generally not a significant source or use of cash over the long term.

Capital expenditures for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 were:


	(as restated)
New restaurants (including restaurants under development)
Carl’s Jr.	$	1,996
Hardee’s		1,324
La Salsa		202
Remodels/Dual-branding (including construction in process)
Carl’s Jr.		130
Hardee’s		1,734
Other restaurant additions
Carl’s Jr.		3,890
Hardee’s		5,288
La Salsa		718
Corporate/other		1,102

Total	$	16,384

As of May 17, 2004, we had remodeled 80% of the Hardee’s company-operated restaurants to the Star Hardee’s format.

Contractual Obligations

We enter into purchasing contracts and pricing arrangements to control costs for commodities and other items that are subject to price volatility. These arrangements in addition to any unearned supplier funding and distributor inventory obligations result in unconditional purchase obligations (see further discussion regarding these obligations in “Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”) which, as of May 17, 2004, totaled $57,470.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Our principal exposure to financial market risks relates to the impact that interest rate changes could have on our Facility. As of May 17, 2004, we had $10,137 of borrowings and $63,697 of letters of credit outstanding under the Facility. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in short-term interest rates would result in a reduction in the Company’s annual pre-tax earnings of $101. The estimated reduction is based upon the outstanding balance of the Facility (including outstanding letters of credit) and the weighted-average interest rate for the quarter and assumes no change in the volume, index or composition of debt as in effect May 17, 2004. Substantially all of our business is transacted in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, foreign exchange rate fluctuations have not had a significant impact on us and are not expected to in the foreseeable future.

Commodity Price Risk

We purchase certain products which are affected by commodity prices and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions and other factors which are not considered predictable or within our control. Although many of the products purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, certain purchasing contracts or pricing arrangements contain risk management techniques designed to minimize price volatility. The purchasing contracts and pricing arrangements we use may result in unconditional purchase obligations, which are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. Typically, we use these types of purchasing techniques to control costs as an alternative to directly managing financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address material commodity cost increases by adjusting our menu pricing or changing our product delivery strategy. However, increases in commodity prices, without adjustments to our menu prices, could result in lower restaurant-level operating margins for our restaurant concepts.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-Q/A, is reported in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the preparation of the Form 10-Q as of May 17, 2004, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Form 10-Q report, were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings.

Beginning with the Company’s fiscal year ending January 31, 2005, in addition to reporting on disclosure controls and procedures, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require the Company’s senior management to provide an annual report on internal controls over financial reporting. This report must contain (i) a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for the Company, (ii) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, (iii) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective, and (iv) a statement that the Company’s independent auditors have issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting. Pursuant to this requirement, in early fiscal 2005 management established an internal control steering committee and project team, engaged outside consultants and adopted a detailed project work plan to document and assess the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting, remediate any control weaknesses that may be identified, validate through testing that the controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal controls over financial reporting.

In October and November of 2004, through an extensive internal review of its consolidated financial statements, the Company’s management identified several accounting matters that led to a conclusion by the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors that previously filed financial statements of the Company should be restated. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included within this Form 10-Q/A for further detailed discussion and quantification of the accounting errors identified.

In December 2004, management determined that the accounting errors identified in its internal review resulted collectively from material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting in the associated accounting areas. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, concurred with the Company that the matters identified in the Company’s internal review collectively resulted from a material weakness (as such term is defined under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Based on the information obtained during its internal review and Section 404 compliance work subsequent to May 17, 2004, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded in December 2004 that, because of the material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting described above, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q/A report, were not effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the

Company’s periodic filings.

Except as described below, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended May 17, 2004, or thereafter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company has addressed several deficiencies identified during its internal review and Section 404 compliance work. These efforts have resulted in the following:

• Revisions to the Company’s accounting policies to eliminate inconsistencies in its definition of lease term, strengthening of accounting practices whereby applicable lease terms are reviewed and appropriately considered by the Fixed Asset Accounting Department when establishing the depreciable lives for fixed and intangible assets that are subject to leases, and establishment of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

• Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among the Company’s Real Estate, Fixed Assets and General Accounting Departments to ensure timely and complete accounting for and financial reporting of facility actions such as restaurant sales, closures and lease/sublease modifications, or changes in the Company’s intention to sell or close restaurants or modify lease or sublease arrangements.

• Increases to lease accounting staffing levels, additional training of General Accounting Department personnel with respect to all facets of lease accounting applicable to the Company, and implementation of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

• Formalization and improvement of existing documentation practices to ensure communication of asset dispositions to the Company’s Accounting Department.

• Implementation of annual fixed asset physical inventories in restaurant operations and annual fixed asset listing reviews by Facilities Department and Information Technology Department personnel.

• Training of Information Technology Department and General Accounting Department personnel, and establishment of communication mechanisms between these two departments with respect to accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use.

• Development and implementation of an enhanced Delegation of Authority policy to ensure that Company expenditures and contractual commitments are approved in accordance with the Company’s management plan.

• Additional training of the Company’s Accounts Payable Department personnel to ensure they review invoices, before making payment, to ensure approval compliance in accordance with the Delegation of Authority.

• Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among General Accounting and other Corporate Departments throughout the Company to ensure timely and complete accrual for incurred but unbilled legal, information technology and other professional services.

• Enhancement of property tax accrual preparation and management review within the Company’s Corporate Tax Department.

• Additional training of individuals in the Company’s Corporate Tax Department regarding the appropriate accounting for deferred income taxes arising from financial versus tax reporting differences with respect to goodwill.

• Segregation of development and production support duties within the Company’s Information Technology Department with respect to its key accounting and financial reporting systems.

• Formalization of documentation of management reviews that occur during the periodic accounting close process.

• Segregation of wire transfer and other electronic payment initiation and approval duties within the Company’s Treasury Department.

• Enhancement of revenue recognition cut-off procedures in the Company’s equipment distribution business to ensure proper revenue recognition within each fiscal quarter.

The Company continues to implement remedial measures in response to specific accounting and reporting issues related to the restatement and its ongoing Section 404 compliance work. These remedial measures will include additional personnel and organizational changes to improve supervision and increased training for finance and accounting personnel. The Company will also continue to develop new policies and procedures and educate and train its employees on its existing policies and procedures in an effort to constantly improve its internal controls over financial reporting and other disclosure controls and procedures. Furthermore, the Section 404 compliance work may identify additional weaknesses in the Company’s system of internal controls that may require additional remedial measures. Management will consider the status of these remedial measures when assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and other disclosure controls and procedures as of January 31, 2005.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
OTHER INFORMATION
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Part II. Other Information.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Information regarding legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Note 11 to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part 1 of this report.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

The following table provides information as of May 17, 2004, with respect to shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company during the fiscal quarter then ended (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Maximum

Number (or

Approximate

Dollar

Value) of

Total

Shares (or

Number of Shares

Units) that

Average

(or Units)

May Yet Be

Total

Price

Purchased as Part

Purchased

Number of Shares

Paid per

of Publicly

Under the

(or Units)

Share

Announced Plans

Plans or

Period

Purchased

(or Unit)

or Programs

Programs

January 27, 2004 –February 25, 2004

—

February 26, 2004 – March 25, 2004

—

March 26, 2004 – April 25, 2004

319

10.49

319

16,646

April 26, 2004 – May 17, 2004

—

Total

319

10.49

319

16,646

In April 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to allow us to repurchase up to $20,000 of our Common Stock through April 2005. Pursuant to this authorization, during the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004, we repurchased 319,000 shares of our Common Stock at an average price of $10.49 per share, for a total cost, including trading commissions, of $3,354.

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a) Exhibits:


Exhibit #		Description
10.57		Employment agreement, effective as of January 27, 2004, by and between the Company and Brad R. Haley.* †

10.58		Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2004, by and among the Company, the Lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas, a bank organized under the laws of France acting through its Chicago Branch (as successor in interest to Paribas), as Agent. †

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K.

† Previously filed.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 7, 2004, was filed during the first quarter of fiscal 2005, furnishing the Company’s financial results for the fourth quarter and Fiscal Year ended January 26, 2004.

Exhibit Index


Exhibit #		Description
10.57		Employment agreement, effective as of January 27, 2004, by and between the Company and Brad R. Haley.* †

10.58		Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2004, by and among the Company, the Lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas, a bank organized under the laws of France acting through its Chicago Branch (as successor in interest to Paribas), as Agent. †

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K.

† Previously filed.


		Page
	Part I. Financial Information
Item 1	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 17, 2004 and January 31, 2004		6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003		7
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004		8
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the sixteen weeks ended May 17, 2004 and May 19, 2003		9
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		10
Item 2	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		31
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		52
Item 4	Controls and Procedures		53
	Part II. Other Information
Item 1	Legal Proceedings		56
Item 2	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		56
Item 6	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		57
	Signatures		58
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

(i)		impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants the Company closes;

(ii)		impairment of long-lived assets for restaurants with net asset values in excess of estimated fair values;

(iii)		restaurant closure costs (primarily reflecting the estimated liability to terminate leases);

(iv)		gains (losses) on the sale of restaurants and surplus properties; and

(v)		amortization of discount related to estimated liability for closing restaurants.

	•		estimation of future cash flows used to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets, including goodwill, and establishing the estimated liability for closing restaurants and subsidizing lease payments of franchisees;

	•		estimation, using actuarially determined methods, of our self-insured claim losses under our workers’ compensation, property and general liability insurance programs;

	•		determination of appropriate estimated liabilities for litigation;

	•		determination of the appropriate allowances associated with franchise and license receivables and estimated liabilities for franchise subleases;

	•		determination of the appropriate assumptions to use to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation for purposes of disclosures of pro forma net income; and

	•		estimation of our net deferred income tax asset valuation allowance.

	•		remain focused on restaurant fundamentals — quality, service and cleanliness;

	•		offer premium products that compete on quality and taste — not price;

	•		build on the strength of the Carl’s Jr. brand, including dual branding opportunities with Green Burrito;

	•		continue to execute and refine the Hardee’s Revolution;

	•		continue to control costs while increasing revenues;

	•		leverage our infrastructure and marketing presence to build out existing core markets; and

	•		strengthen our franchise system and pursue further franchising opportunities.

(A)		“Other” consists of Green Burrito. Additionally, amounts that we do not believe would be proper to allocate to the operating segments are included in “Other.”

(B)		Average check represents total restaurant sales divided by total transactions for any given period. The average check is viewed in conjunction with same-store sales and same-store transactions, as defined below. This indicator, when viewed with other measures, may illustrate revenue growth or decline resulting from a change in menu or price offering. When we introduce menu items or pricing initiatives with higher or lower price points than the existing menu base, the average check may reflect the benefit or impact from these new items or pricing on the average price paid by the consumer.

(C)		Same-store sales is a key performance indicator in our industry. This indicator is a measure of revenue growth on the existing comparable store base of a multi-unit chain company such as ours and is measured as a percentage variance over the same fiscal period in the prior year. Same-store sales illustrate how competitive forces and external economic conditions benefit or impact us, as well as any benefit from the diverse value propositions and marketing initiatives undertaken by us. In calculating same-store sales, we include restaurants open for 14 full accounting periods, which allows for a year-over-year comparison.

	•		Revisions to the Company’s accounting policies to eliminate inconsistencies in its definition of lease term, strengthening of accounting practices whereby applicable lease terms are reviewed and appropriately considered by the Fixed Asset Accounting Department when establishing the depreciable lives for fixed and intangible assets that are subject to leases, and establishment of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

	•		Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among the Company’s Real Estate, Fixed Assets and General Accounting Departments to ensure timely and complete accounting for and financial reporting of facility actions such as restaurant sales, closures and lease/sublease modifications, or changes in the Company’s intention to sell or close restaurants or modify lease or sublease arrangements.

	•		Increases to lease accounting staffing levels, additional training of General Accounting Department personnel with respect to all facets of lease accounting applicable to the Company, and implementation of management review and approval procedures related thereto.

	•		Formalization and improvement of existing documentation practices to ensure communication of asset dispositions to the Company’s Accounting Department.

	•		Implementation of annual fixed asset physical inventories in restaurant operations and annual fixed asset listing reviews by Facilities Department and Information Technology Department personnel.

	•		Training of Information Technology Department and General Accounting Department personnel, and establishment of communication mechanisms between these two departments with respect to accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use.

	•		Development and implementation of an enhanced Delegation of Authority policy to ensure that Company expenditures and contractual commitments are approved in accordance with the Company’s management plan.

	•		Additional training of the Company’s Accounts Payable Department personnel to ensure they review invoices, before making payment, to ensure approval compliance in accordance with the Delegation of Authority.

	•		Formalization and improvement of existing communication practices among General Accounting and other Corporate Departments throughout the Company to ensure timely and complete accrual for incurred but unbilled legal, information technology and other professional services.

	•		Enhancement of property tax accrual preparation and management review within the Company’s Corporate Tax Department.

	•		Additional training of individuals in the Company’s Corporate Tax Department regarding the appropriate accounting for deferred income taxes arising from financial versus tax reporting differences with respect to goodwill.

	•		Segregation of development and production support duties within the Company’s Information Technology Department with respect to its key accounting and financial reporting systems.

	•		Formalization of documentation of management reviews that occur during the periodic accounting close process.

	•		Segregation of wire transfer and other electronic payment initiation and approval duties within the Company’s Treasury Department.

	•		Enhancement of revenue recognition cut-off procedures in the Company’s equipment distribution business to ensure proper revenue recognition within each fiscal quarter.

*		A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K.

†		Previously filed.


		CKE RESTAURANTS, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date: December 17, 2004		/s/ Theodore Abajian

		Theodore Abajian
		Executive Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer

1.		I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 17, 2004, of the Company;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

		a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

		b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

		c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

		d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.		The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

		b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: December 17, 2004	By:	/s/ Andrew F. Puzder

		Andrew F. Puzder
		Chief Executive Officer

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and

2.		The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.