XML 51 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Nov. 05, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents information on our financial instruments as of:

 
November 5, 2012
 
January 31, 2012
 
Carrying Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
139,723

 
$
139,723

 
$
64,555

 
$
64,555

Notes receivable

 
118

 
1,696

 
2,050

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank indebtedness and other long-term debt, including current portion
465,301

 
548,049

 
523,641

 
599,027



The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates its carrying amount due to its short maturity. The estimated fair value of notes receivable was determined by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans might be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. The estimated fair value of the Senior Secured Notes was determined by using estimated market prices of our outstanding Senior Secured Notes. For all other long-term debt, the estimated fair value was determined by discounting future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Our non-financial assets, which include long-lived assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, are reported at carrying value and are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, on a periodic basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable, we assess our long-lived assets for impairment. When impairment has occurred, such long‑lived assets are written down to fair value.

During the forty weeks ended November 5, 2012, we determined that the assets at two underperforming company-operated Carl's Jr. restaurants were impaired. As a result, property and equipment with a carrying value of $1,265 was written down to fair value, resulting in impairment charges of $1,195. Additionally, during the forty weeks ended November 5, 2012, we determined that a property leased to a Hardee's franchisee was impaired due to a highway project that will eliminate direct access to the property, rendering it unfit for retail purposes. As a result, property and equipment with a carrying value of $1,250 was written down to fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,204. We impaired each of the assets down to their respective fair values using measurements with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). These fair value estimates are based on the assumption of the highest and best use of the asset group, or individual asset, and generally include estimates of future cash flows, assumptions of future same-store sales, projected operating expenses, and/or broker estimates of value, when readily available or determinable. These impairment charges were recorded to facility action charges, net in our accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 10).