Fair Value Of Financial Instruments

6 Months Ended

Aug. 13, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Of Financial Instruments

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents information on our financial instruments as of:

	August 13, 2012				January 31, 2012
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	62,168	$	62,168	$	64,555	$	64,555
Cash and cash equivalents - restricted	31,073		31,073		—		—
Notes receivable	616		741		1,696		2,050
Financial liabilities:
Bank indebtedness and other long-term debt, including current portion	465,098		540,967		523,641		599,027

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents each approximate their respective carrying amounts due to the short maturity of the balances. The estimated fair value of notes receivable was determined by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans might be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. The estimated fair value of the Senior Secured Notes was determined by using estimated market prices of our outstanding Senior Secured Notes. For all other long-term debt, the estimated fair value was determined by discounting future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Our non-financial assets, which include long-lived assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, are reported at carrying value and are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, on a periodic basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable, we assess our long-lived assets for impairment. When impairment has occurred, such long‑lived assets are written down to fair value.

During the twelve weeks ended August 13, 2012, we determined that the assets at two underperforming company-operated Carl's Jr. restaurants were impaired. As a result, property and equipment with a carrying value of $1,265 was written down to fair value, resulting in impairment charges of $1,195. Additionally, during the twelve weeks ended August 13, 2012, we determined that a property leased to a Hardee's franchisee was impaired due to a highway project that will eliminate direct access to the property, rendering it unfit for retail purposes. As a result, property and equipment with a carrying value of $1,250 was written down to fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,204. We impaired each of the assets down to their respective fair values using measurements with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). These fair value estimates are based on the assumption of the highest and best use of the asset group, or individual asset, and generally include estimates of future cash flows, assumptions of future same-store sales, projected operating expenses, and/or broker estimates of value, when readily available or determinable. These impairment charges were recorded to facility action charges, net in our accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 9).