XML 64 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:

Certain SJI subsidiaries are involved in buying, selling, transporting and storing natural gas and buying and selling retail electricity for their own accounts as well as managing these activities for third parties. These subsidiaries are subject to market risk on expected future purchases and sales due to commodity price fluctuations. The Company uses a variety of derivative instruments to limit this exposure to market risk in accordance with strict corporate guidelines.  These derivative instruments include forward contracts, swap agreements, options contracts and futures contracts. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had outstanding derivative contracts intended to limit the exposure to market risk on 20.6 MMdts of expected future purchases of natural gas, 23.4 MMdts of expected future sales of natural gas, 1.2 MMmwh of expected future purchases of electricity and 1.2 MMmwh of expected future sales of electricity.  In addition to these derivative contracts, the Company had basis and index related purchase and sales contracts totaling 107.2 MMdts.  The value of these contracts are not significant as of December 31, 2012.  These contracts, which have not been designated as hedging instruments under GAAP, are measured at fair value and recorded in Derivatives — Energy Related Assets or Derivatives — Energy Related Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The net unrealized pre-tax gains and losses for these energy related commodity contracts are included with realized gains and losses in Operating Revenues – Nonutility.

SJI structured its subsidiaries so that SJG and SJE transact commodities on a physical basis and typically do not directly enter into positions that financially settle. SJRG performs this risk management function for these entities and enters into the types of financial transactions noted above. As part of its gas purchasing strategy, SJG uses financial contracts through SJRG to limit exposure to forward price risk. The costs or benefits of these short-term contracts are recoverable through SJG's BGSS clause, subject to BPU approval.

Management takes an active role in the risk management process and has developed policies and procedures that require specific administrative and business functions to assist in identifying, assessing and controlling various risks. Management reviews any open positions in accordance with strict policies to limit exposure to market risk.

SJI presents revenues and expenses related to its energy trading activities on a net basis in Operating Revenues - Nonutility in the consolidated statements of income consistent with GAAP. This net presentation has no effect on operating income or net income.

The Company has also entered into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to increasing interest rates and the impact of those rates on cash flows of variable-rate debt. These interest rate derivatives, some of which have been designated as hedging instruments under GAAP are measured at fair value and recorded in Derivatives - Other on the consolidated balance sheets. Beginning in July 2012, hedge accounting was discontinued for these derivatives. As a result, unrealized gains and losses on these derivatives, that were previously included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the consolidated balance sheets, will be reclassified into earnings over the remaining life of the derivative. These derivatives are expected to mature in 2026. As of December 31, 2012, SJI's active interest rate swaps were as follows:

Notional Amount
 
Fixed Interest Rate
 
Start Date
 
Maturity
 
Type of Debt
 
Obligor
$
3,900,000

 
4.795%
 
12/1/2004
 
12/1/2014
 
Taxable
 
Marina
$
8,000,000

 
4.775%
 
11/12/2004
 
11/12/2014
 
Taxable
 
Marina
$
14,500,000

 
3.905%
 
3/17/2006
 
1/15/2026
 
Tax-exempt
 
Marina
$
500,000

 
3.905%
 
3/17/2006
 
1/15/2026
 
Tax-exempt
 
Marina
$
330,000

 
3.905%
 
3/17/2006
 
1/15/2026
 
Tax-exempt
 
Marina
$
7,100,000

 
4.895%
 
2/1/2006
 
2/1/2016
 
Taxable
 
Marina
$
12,500,000

 
3.430%
 
12/1/2006
 
2/1/2036
 
Tax-exempt
 
SJG
$
12,500,000

 
3.430%
 
12/1/2006
 
2/1/2036
 
Tax-exempt
 
SJG


The unrealized gains and losses on interest rate derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges are included in Interest Charges. However, for selected interest rate derivatives at SJG, management believes that, subject to BPU approval, the market value upon termination can be recovered in rates and therefore these unrealized losses have been included in Other Regulatory Assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

    
The fair values of all derivative instruments, as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
Energy related commodity contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives – Energy Related – Current
 
$
24,242

 
$
23,828

 
$
37,461

 
$
38,738

Derivatives – Energy Related – Non-Current
 
12,297

 
5,403

 
8,135

 
7,367

Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Derivatives - Other
 

 
13,462

 

 
10,684

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP
 
36,539

 
42,693

 
45,596

 
56,789

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Derivatives - Other
 

 

 

 
3,362

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP
 

 

 

 
3,362

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Derivatives
 
$
36,539

 
$
42,693

 
$
45,596

 
$
60,151



The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Interest Rate Contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Losses recognized in OCI on effective portion
 
$
(752
)
 
$
(2,773
)
 
$
(1,063
)
Losses reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (a)
 
$
(594
)
 
$
(1,435
)
 
$
(1,486
)
Losses recognized in income on ineffective portion (a)
 

 

 


(a) Included in Interest Charges

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
(Losses) gains on energy related commodity contracts (a)
 
$
(193
)
 
$
5,377

 
$
(22,624
)
Gains (losses) on interest rate contracts (b)
 
660

 
(149
)
 
(641
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
467

 
$
5,228

 
$
(23,265
)

(a)  Included in Operating Revenues - Non Utility
(b)  Included in Interest Charges
    
    
Net realized losses associated with SJG’s energy related financial commodity contracts of $15.4 million, $12.9 million and $23.5 million for the years ended 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are not included in the above table. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, SJG had $1.9 million and $10.2 million of unrealized losses on energy related financial commodity contracts, respectively, included in its BGSS which are also not included in the above table. These contracts are part of SJG’s regulated risk management activities that serve to mitigate BGSS costs passed on to its customers. As these transactions are entered into pursuant to, and recoverable through, regulatory riders, any changes in the value of SJG’s energy related financial commodity contracts are deferred in Regulatory Assets or Liabilities and there is no impact to earnings.

Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments contain provisions that require immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions in the event of a material adverse change in the credit standing of the Company. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position on December 31, 2012, is $7.2 million.   If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements were triggered on December 31, 2012, the Company would have been required to settle the instruments immediately or post collateral to its counterparties of approximately $3.7 million after offsetting asset positions with the same counterparties under master netting arrangements.