XML 84 R80.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS, INCLUDING DERIVATIVES - SCEG
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS, INCLUDING DERIVATIVES

7.             FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS, INCLUDING DERIVATIVES

 

The Company values available for sale securities using quoted prices from a national stock exchange, such as the NASDAQ, where the securities are actively traded. For commodity derivative assets and liabilities, the Company uses unadjusted NYMEX prices to determine fair value, and considers such measures of fair value to be Level 1 for exchange traded instruments and Level 2 for over-the-counter instruments. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are valued using discounted cash flow models with independently sourced data. Fair value measurements, and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements fall, were as follows:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Millions of dollars

 

Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Assets-Available for sale securities

 

$

3

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

$

2

 

Commodity contracts

 

 

1

 

Energy management contracts

 

 

27

 

Liabilities-Interest rate contracts

 

 

158

 

Commodity contracts

 

1

 

13

 

Energy management contracts

 

 

26

 

As of December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Assets-Available for sale securities

 

$

3

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

$

8

 

Commodity contracts

 

2

 

2

 

Energy management contracts

 

 

9

 

Liabilities-Interest rate contracts

 

 

82

 

Commodity contracts

 

1

 

6

 

Energy management contracts

 

 

11

 

 

There were no fair value measurements based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for either period presented. In addition, there were no transfers of fair value amounts into or out of Levels 1 and 2 during any period presented.

 

Financial instruments for which the carrying amount may not equal estimated fair value at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

Millions of dollars

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Long-term debt

 

$

4,653.0

 

$

5,479.2

 

$

4,488.3

 

$

4,840.5

 

 

Fair values of long-term debt are based on quoted market prices of the instruments or similar instruments. For debt instruments for which no quoted market prices are available, fair values are based on net present value calculations. Carrying values reflect the fair values of interest rate swaps based on discounted cash flow models with independently sourced data. Early settlement of long-term debt may not be possible or may not be considered prudent.

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
 
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS, INCLUDING DERIVATIVES

7.                                      FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS, INCLUDING DERIVATIVES

 

SCE&G values commodity derivative assets and liabilities using unadjusted NYMEX prices to determine fair value, and considers such measure of fair value to be Level 1 for exchange traded instruments and Level 2 for over-the-counter instruments. Consolidated SCE&G’s interest rate swap agreements are valued using discounted cash flow models with independently sourced data. Fair value measurements, and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements fall, were as follows:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Millions of dollars

 

Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Assets-Interest rate contracts

 

 

$

1

 

Liabilities-Interest rate contracts

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Assets-Interest rate contracts

 

 

$

4

 

Commodity contracts

 

$

1

 

 

Liabilities-Interest rate contracts

 

 

35

 

 

There were no fair value measurements based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for either period presented. In addition, there were no transfers of fair value amounts into or out of Levels 1 and 2 during any period presented.

 

Financial instruments for which the carrying amount may not equal estimated fair value at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

Millions of dollars

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Long-term debt

 

$

3,241.5

 

$

3,920.3

 

$

3,059.7

 

$

3,321.8

 

 

Fair values of long-term debt are based on quoted market prices of the instruments or similar instruments. For debt instruments for which no quoted market prices are available, fair values are based on net present value calculations. Carrying values reflect the fair values of interest rate swaps based on discounted cash flow models with independently sourced data. Early settlement of long-term debt may not be possible or may not be considered prudent.

 

Potential taxes and other expenses that would be incurred in an actual sale or settlement have not been considered.