Litigation	9 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Litigation [Abstract]
Litigation	15. Litigation In May 2011, the Company purchased (i) all of the outstanding equity of Fenwick Automotive Products Limited (“FAPL”), (ii) all of the outstanding equity of Introcan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Introcan”), and (iii) 1% of the outstanding equity of Fapco S.A. de C.V., a Mexican variable capital company (“Fapco”) (collectively, “Fenco” and also referred to herein as the “discontinued subsidiaries”). Since FAPL owned 99% of Fapco prior to these acquisitions, the Company owned 100% of Fapco following these transactions. On June 10, 2013, each of FAPL, Introcan and Introcan’s subsidiaries, Flo-Pro Inc., LH Distribution Inc., Rafko Logistics Inc., Rafko Holdings Inc. and Rafko Enterprises Inc. (collectively, the “Fenco Entities”), filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On October 26, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement and general and specific release agreement with M&T Bank and the trustee in the bankruptcy cases relating to the discontinued subsidiaries, which resolved the litigation and released the claims made or threatened by those parties against the Company and its executives in exchange for a payment by the Company of $18,500,000, of which approximately half was paid by the Company’s insurers under applicable insurance policies. As a result, the Company recorded an accrual of $9,250,000 in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income, net of insurance recoveries, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and this amount was paid in full during the three months ended December 31, 2015. None of the parties admitted the allegations made by any other party, and the settlement was entered into for the purpose of avoiding the time, expense, inconvenience and delay incident to protracted litigation. The settlement agreement was subject to approval by the applicable courts and other customary conditions, which have now been obtained and satisfied. On December 8, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement that resolved the federal court litigation brought in California by the Company involving the purchase of FAPL and various of its subsidiaries, styled Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. v. FAPL Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-01153-GW-JEM (“MPA Action”). The agreement also resolved the pending Ontario, Canada, litigation by individual defendants in the MPA Action against the Company relating to their employment. The Company received a net payment of $5,800,000, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015. None of the parties admitted the allegations made by any other party. On December 16, 2015, the Ontario actions filed by the individual defendants against the Company were dismissed. The Company also is subject to various other lawsuits and claims. Management does not believe that the outcome of these other matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or future results of operations.

15. Litigation

In May 2011, the Company purchased (i) all of the outstanding equity of Fenwick Automotive Products Limited (“FAPL”), (ii) all of the outstanding equity of Introcan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Introcan”), and (iii) 1% of the outstanding equity of Fapco S.A. de C.V., a Mexican variable capital company (“Fapco”) (collectively, “Fenco” and also referred to herein as the “discontinued subsidiaries”). Since FAPL owned 99% of Fapco prior to these acquisitions, the Company owned 100% of Fapco following these transactions.

On June 10, 2013, each of FAPL, Introcan and Introcan’s subsidiaries, Flo-Pro Inc., LH Distribution Inc., Rafko Logistics Inc., Rafko Holdings Inc. and Rafko Enterprises Inc. (collectively, the “Fenco Entities”), filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

On October 26, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement and general and specific release agreement with M&T Bank and the trustee in the bankruptcy cases relating to the discontinued subsidiaries, which resolved the litigation and released the claims made or threatened by those parties against the Company and its executives in exchange for a payment by the Company of $18,500,000, of which approximately half was paid by the Company’s insurers under applicable insurance policies. As a result, the Company recorded an accrual of $9,250,000 in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income, net of insurance recoveries, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and this amount was paid in full during the three months ended December 31, 2015. None of the parties admitted the allegations made by any other party, and the settlement was entered into for the purpose of avoiding the time, expense, inconvenience and delay incident to protracted litigation. The settlement agreement was subject to approval by the applicable courts and other customary conditions, which have now been obtained and satisfied.

On December 8, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement that resolved the federal court litigation brought in California by the Company involving the purchase of FAPL and various of its subsidiaries, styled Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. v. FAPL Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-01153-GW-JEM (“MPA Action”). The agreement also resolved the pending Ontario, Canada, litigation by individual defendants in the MPA Action against the Company relating to their employment. The Company received a net payment of $5,800,000, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015. None of the parties admitted the allegations made by any other party. On December 16, 2015, the Ontario actions filed by the individual defendants against the Company were dismissed.

The Company also is subject to various other lawsuits and claims. Management does not believe that the outcome of these other matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or future results of operations.