10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2002 Commission File No. 0-23866

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter.)

Colorado	06-0679347
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer identification No.)

4895 Peoria Street
Denver, Colorado 80239

(Address of principal executive offices)

(303) 371-1560

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x                        No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o                        No x

     The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of February 12, 2003:

Class of Securities	Outstanding Securities
$0.01 par value	7,252,093 shares
Common shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Balance Sheets
		Statements of Operations
		Statements of Operations
		Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
		Statements of Cash Flows
		Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS
EX-10.1 Stipulation of Settlement

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

December 31, 2002

Index

Part I.			Financial Information
	Item 1.		Financial Statements:
		Balance Sheets, December 31, 2002 (unaudited) and June 30, 2002		2
		Statements of Operations, three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001      (unaudited)		3
		Statements of Operations, six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001      (unaudited)		4
		Statement of Stockholders' Equity, six months ended December 31, 2002      (unaudited)		5
		Statements of Cash Flows, six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001      (unaudited)		6
		Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		7
	Item 2.		Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
	Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	31
	Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	32
Part II.			Other Information
	Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	33
	Item 2.		Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	37
	Item 6.		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	38

1

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Balance Sheets

(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)

				December 31,			June 30,
Assets				2002			2002
				(unaudited)
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	138			553
	Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $55 and $132, respectively				2,192			2,589
	Inventories				2,432			2,491
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets				269			617
		Total current assets			5,031			6,250
Property and equipment:
	Machinery and equipment				12,116			12,263
	Furniture and fixtures				833			839
	Leasehold improvements				1,504			1,509
					14,453			14,611
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				8,979			8,211
		Net property and equipment			5,474			6,400
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization					410			744
		Total assets		$	10,915			13,394
			Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
	Trade accounts payable			$	1,738			1,392
	Accrued compensation				585			756
	Other accrued expenses				1,180			492
	Notes payable and current installments of long-term obligations				3,505			1,611
		Total current liabilities			7,008			4,251
Long-term obligations					—			55
Other liabilities					27			149
		Total liabilities			7,035			4,455
Settlement obligation to issue 2,000,000 shares of common stock					1,200			1,200
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
	Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 7,164,792 and 7,179,832 shares issued and outstanding, respectively				72			72
	Additional paid-in capital				36,941			36,945
	Unamortized stock compensation cost				(14	)		(31	)
	Accumulated deficit				(34,319	)		(29,247	)
		Total stockholders’ equity			2,680			7,739
Commitments and contingencies
		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	10,915			13,394

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

2

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Statements of Operations

(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)

			Three Months			Three Months
			Ended			Ended
			December 31,			December 31,
			2002			2001
			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net sales			$	4,309			5,607
Cost of goods sold				3,068			3,220
		Gross profit		1,241			2,387
Operating expenses:
	Selling			688			628
	General and administrative			1,461			1,501
	Research and development			751			701
	Expenses related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza			828			101
	Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries			(2	)		(51	)
		Total operating expenses		3,726			2,880
		Operating loss		(2,485	)		(493	)
Other income (expense):
	Interest income			1			11
	Interest expense			(263	)		(48	)
	Other, net			(4	)		2
		Total other income (expense)		(266	)		(35	)
		Net loss	$	(2,751	)		(528	)
Loss per share, basic and diluted			$	(0.38	)		(0.07	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted				7,244,357			7,128,503

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Statements of Operations

(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)

			Six Months			Six Months
			Ended			Ended
			December 31,			December 31,
			2002			2001
			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net sales			$	8,291			11,283
Cost of goods sold				6,128			6,750
		Gross profit		2,163			4,533
Operating expenses:
	Selling			1,360			1,282
	General and administrative			2,973			3,380
	Research and development			1,568			1,308
	Expenses related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza			876			101
	Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries			30			34
		Total operating expenses		6,807			6,105
		Operating loss		(4,644	)		(1,572	)
Other income (expense):
	Interest income			9			29
	Interest expense			(385	)		(98	)
	Other, net			(52	)		(7	)
		Total other income (expense)		(428	)		(76	)
		Net loss	$	(5,072	)		(1,648	)
Loss per share, basic and diluted			$	(0.70	)		(0.23	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted				7,252,008			7,125,980

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars, except share data)

										Unamortized
	Common stock						Additional			stock						Total
							paid-in			compensation			Accumulated			stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			capital			cost			deficit			equity
Balance June 30, 2002		7,179,832		$	72			36,945			(31	)		(29,247	)		7,739
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan		83,473			1			70			—			—			71
Common stock issued under stock award plan		1,800			*			1			—			—			1
Common stock surrendered and retired		(100,813	)		(1	)		(75	)		—			—			(76	)
Common stock exercised under stock option plan		500			—			*			—			—			—
Amortization of stock compensation cost		—			—			—			17			—			17
Net loss		—			—			—			—			(5,072	)		(5,072	)
Balance December 31, 2002		7,164,792		$	72			36,941			(14	)		(34,319	)		2,680

* amount is less than $1000.00

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands of dollars)

				Six Months			Six Months
				Ended			Ended
				December 31,			December 31,
				2002			2001
				(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net loss				$	(5,072	)		(1,648	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization				1,034			1,020
	Loss on disposal of assets				53			7
	Common stock issued under stock award plans				1			1
	Common stock surrendered and retired				(76	)		—
	Amortization of stock compensation				17			27
	Write-off of debt issue costs				59			—
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Trade accounts receivable, net			397			1,354
		Inventories, net			59			828
		Prepaid expenses and other current assets			348			133
		Trade accounts payable			346			(745	)
		Accrued compensation			(320	)		(564	)
		Other accrued expenses and liabilities			715			(167	)
			Total adjustments		2,633			1,894
			Cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(2,439	)		246
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchases of property and equipment				(127	)		(442	)
	Proceeds from sale of equipment				23			59
	Net proceeds (investment) from cash surrender value of whole life insurance				266			(17	)
	Decrease (increase) in other assets				(48	)		(18	)
			Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		114			(418	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from notes payable				3,869			6,899
	Payments of notes payable				(379	)		(7,374	)
	Proceeds from long-term obligations				—			308
	Payments of long-term obligations				(1,651	)		(142	)
	Proceeds from common stock issued under stock purchase plan				71			48
			Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,910			(261	)
			Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(415	)		(433	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					553			2,013
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	138			1,580
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
	Cash paid for interest			$	166			85
	Cash paid for income taxes			$	—			—

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

(1)	Basis of Presentation and Liquidity
	The accompanying financial statements of the Company have been prepared without audit (except for the balance sheet information as of June 30, 2002, which is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2002. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. Interim results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of operating results that can be expected for the full year.
	Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant assumptions inherent in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition and allowances for doubtful accounts, the provision for excess and obsolete inventories, and commitments and contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period’s presentation.
	Based upon the Company’s operating results for the three month period ended December 31, 2002, the Company is in default of the Net Operating Loss covenant of the Loan Facility with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. (“Sirenza”). The net operating loss covenant is defined as net operating loss excluding costs such as restructuring, severance benefits, extraordinary non-cash charges and legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with the proposed transaction with Sirenza. The covenant requires that the Company’s cumulative net operating loss not exceed a specified amount in any rolling three-month period; the maximum permitted operating loss for the three month period ended December 31, 2002 was $1,585,000. During the three month period ended December 31, 2002, the Company’s net operating loss for such period as defined in the Loan Facility was $1,656,000. Under the terms of the Loan Facility with Sirenza, the default interest rate increased 5 percentage points from 25% to 30% effective January 1, 2003. Furthermore, Sirenza has the right to declare all amounts due on the loan immediately due and payable. At this time Sirenza has not taken any action to accelerate the loan, but has reserved the right to do so.
	If Sirenza were to elect to declare the loan due and payable in full, the Company would most likely be required to file for bankruptcy protection and would be unable to consummate the asset sale to Sirenza contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 2, 2002. Filing for bankruptcy protection could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s relationships with its customers, suppliers and employees.
	As of February 12, 2003, the Company and Sirenza are continuing to work toward the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

7

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

(2)	Inventories
	Inventories consist of the following (in thousands of dollars):

	December 31,			June 30,
	2002			2002
Finished goods	$	1,070			1,083
Work-in-process		520			394
Raw materials		2,339			3,536
		3,929			5,013
Less allowances for excess and obsolete inventories		(1,497	)		(2,522	)
Net inventories	$	2,432			2,491

(3)	Notes Payable and Long-term Obligations
	Notes payable and long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands of dollars):

			December 31,		June 30,
			2002		2002
Notes payable under Wells Fargo Credit Facility
	Term Loan		$	—		1,498
Notes payable under Sirenza Loan Facility:
	Tranche A			1,354		—
	Tranche B			2,064		—
Promissory notes				72		139
Capital lease obligations				15		29
				3,505		1,666
Less current installments				3,505		1,611
		Long-term obligations	$	—		55

On October 7, 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Sirenza which provides for a $5.3 million senior secured loan facility (the “Loan Facility”). As a condition to the Loan Facility, the Company entered into an Exclusivity and Right of First Refusal Agreement (the “Exclusivity Agreement”) with Sirenza to evaluate a potential acquisition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Loan Facility matures on September 25, 2003, is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and has an annual interest rate of 25% on outstanding amounts. Additionally, the Loan Facility is subject to covenants that among other things impose limitations on capital expenditures and investments, restrict certain payments and

8

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

distributions and require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios based on a rolling three-month calculation.

Under the terms of the Loan Facility, Sirenza has provided for funding in two tranches. The first tranche (“Tranche A”) consists of an initial term loan of approximately $1.4 million which was used to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility at Wells Fargo on October 7, 2002. The second tranche (“Tranche B”) consists of additional term loans of up to approximately $3.9 million which may be drawn down in accordance with an agreed schedule. The Company expects to use the proceeds from any advances under Tranche B to fund its working capital requirements.

The Company’s ability to draw down amounts under Tranche B is conditioned upon, among other things, the absence of an event of default and its representations and warranties being true and correct at the time of such draw down request. Based upon the Company’s operating results for the three month period ended December 31, 2002, the Company is in default of the Net Operating Loss covenant of the Loan Facility with Sirenza. The net operating loss covenant is defined as net operating loss excluding costs such as restructuring, severance benefits, extraordinary non-cash charges and legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with the proposed transaction with Sirenza. The covenant requires that the Company’s cumulative net operating loss not exceed a specified amount in any rolling three-month period; the maximum permitted operating loss for the three month period ended December 31, 2002 was $1,585,000. During the three month period ended December 31, 2002, the Company’s net operating loss for such period as defined in the Loan Facility was $1,656,000. Under the terms of the Loan Facility, the default interest rate increased 5 percentage points from 25% to 30% effective January 1, 2003. Furthermore, Sirenza has the right to declare all amounts due on the loan immediately due and payable. At this time Sirenza has not taken any action to accelerate the loan, but has reserved the right to do so.

During January and February 2003, Sirenza advanced an additional $1.0 million under the Loan Facility. As of February 12, 2003, the Company had aggregate borrowings of $4.5 million under the Sirenza Loan Facility and $854,000 in borrowing availability. In the event the Company is unable to draw down future amounts under Tranche B, the Company may be required to seek additional capital through other sources; however, the Company’s ability is limited by the terms of the Exclusivity Agreement described below. There can be no assurance that the Company would be able to procure adequate funds in such an event. If such funds are not available, the Company may be forced to curtail or suspend its operations.

If Sirenza were to elect to declare the loan due and payable in full, the Company would most likely be required to file for bankruptcy protection and would be unable to consummate the asset sale to Sirenza contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 2, 2002. Filing for bankruptcy protection could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s relationships with its customers, suppliers and employees.

In the event of a change of control or execution of a definitive acquisition agreement with any party other than Sirenza, amounts outstanding under the Loan Facility are due in full within five business days. Additionally, the Company must pay a prepayment fee in the amount of $1,000,000 (the “Prepayment Fee”). The Company may voluntarily prepay the Tranche A and Tranche B loans provided that in the event of a change of control or

9

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

execution of a definitive acquisition agreement with any party other than Sirenza within 180 days of such prepayment, the Company must pay the Prepayment Fee.

Under the terms of the Loan Facility, at Sirenza’s option, the Tranche A loan is convertible into 19.9% of the Company’s Common Stock on a fully diluted basis at the following times:

• five business days prior to the maturity date of the Tranche A loan,

• the date Sirenza receives written notice of the Company’s intent to prepay the Tranche A loan,

• the date of the commencement of a tender offer by a party other than Sirenza, or

• the date the Company executes a definitive acquisition agreement with another party.

	The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Tranche A Note are subject to certain registration rights as set forth in the Resale Registration Rights Agreement between the parties. The Company has amended its Rights Agreement with American Securities Transfer, Inc. to make the rights thereunder inapplicable to certain transactions with Sirenza that are approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, including the conversion of the Tranche A Note.
	Pursuant to the terms of the Exclusivity Agreement, the Company has agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to solicit acquisition proposals from other parties or otherwise negotiate with such parties with respect to an acquisition proposal. Such exclusivity period terminates upon the earlier of March 31, 2003 or the occurrence of certain other events. Under the Exclusivity Agreement, the Company has granted Sirenza a right of first refusal in the event that the Company receives any future offer to acquire it or substantially all of its assets. Such right of first refusal terminates upon the earlier of: the date that Sirenza advises the Company in writing that they are terminating all negotiations with the Company or that they are no longer interested in pursuing a transaction with the Company; such time as the Loan Facility has terminated and no loans remain outstanding thereunder; or such time as they default on their obligations to make loans to the Company pursuant to the Loan Facility.
(4)	Income Taxes
	A valuation allowance was provided for the income tax benefit of the net operating losses incurred during the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.
(5)	Stockholders’ Equity
	On April 25, 2002, the Company filed a Tender Offer (the “Offer”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission which offered employees the right to exchange all outstanding options to purchase shares of Company common stock with an exercise price equal to $34.50 per share for replacement options to be granted no earlier than six months and one day from the expiration of the Offer at an exercise price equal to no less than the fair market value of the common stock on that date. Under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer, 180,579 options were surrendered by eligible employees and cancelled on May 23, 2002. On November 25, 2002, the Company issued replacement

10

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

	options to purchase an aggregate of up to 160,079 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share in exchange for the options surrendered pursuant to the Offer.
	As a result of the signing of the definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with Sirenza as described in Note 10 and in accordance with the Company’s Tandem Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the “Plan”), all options outstanding under the Plan became immediately exercisable on December 2, 2002.
	Pursuant to the Company Tandem Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, during the three months ended December 31, 2002, the Company had one employee exercise his right to purchase 500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share.
	As further discussed in Note 11, the Company signed a mutual general release with David Sherman, which among other things, releases the Company from all claims related to his employment and separation agreements and any rights he may have had regarding advancement or indemnification of attorney’s fees and other costs of defense. In consideration of the mutual release with Mr. Sherman, Mr. Sherman transferred 100,813 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company and the Company agreed to repay Mr. Sherman’s promissory note to Carolyn Kiser in the principal amount of $55,030. Mr. Sherman and Carolyn Kiser are former officers of the Company. On the date of execution of the mutual general release, the fair market value of the shares was approximately $76,000. On December 31, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the retirement of the transferred shares.
(6)	Expenses Related to Workforce Reductions and the Proposed Transaction with Sirenza
	As a result of the continuing weakness in the wireless industry and the impact it has had upon the Company’s revenues, the Company has had to reduce its workforce and incur severance expenses. Additionally, the Company has incurred certain transaction costs in connection with the proposed transaction with Sirenza as discussed in Note 10. Such costs are defined under the Loan Facility with Sirenza and include restructuring, severance benefits, legal and accounting fees and other related costs incurred. Expenses related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza for the six months ended December 31, 2002 were as follows:

		Six Months		Six Months
		Ended		Ended
		December 31,		December 31,
		2002		2001
Legal fees		$	413,000	$	—
Severance expense			393,000		101,000
Other related costs			70,000		—
	Total	$	876,000	$	101,000

11

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

	The Company will continue to incur costs related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza until the closing of the transaction with Sirenza which is expected to occur during the second quarter of calendar 2003. However, the closing of the transaction with Sirenza is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions contained in the asset purchase agreement, many of which are outside of the Company’s control. Such conditions include the court’s approval of the stipulation of settlement regarding the Company’s private securities class action lawsuit as described in Note 11. The settlement of the private securities class action lawsuit is subject to several conditions and uncertainties and the Company cannot predict the exact date upon which the court might approve the stipulation of settlement, if at all.
(7)	Expenses of Accounting Restatements, Shareholder Litigation and Related Matters
	In early 2000, management of the Company commenced efforts to restate its previously issued financial statements after being notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) that the Commission was investigating its accounting and reporting practices. Certain costs incurred in conjunction with these efforts have been separately classified in the Company’s Statements of Operations as “Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries.” Expenses included in this classification include the cost of external counsel for services provided in connection with shareholder lawsuits, the Commission’s investigation of the Company, legal fees and expenses of the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors, the costs incurred to settle the private securities action and the Company action against former officers (net of recoveries), the cost of certain consultants and temporary labor hired to assist in the accounting restatements, and reimbursements to current and former employees of the Company for their legal fees and expenses.
	The accounting restatements were completed in February 2001. Additionally, during October 2002 and December 2002, the Company, the individual defendants in the private securities class action, the Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, and the individual defendants in the action against former officers attended global settlement conferences. All parties involved reached an agreement in principle for the global settlement of all litigation as further described in Note 11. On January 22, 2003, the Company, the class action representatives and the individual defendants in the private securities class action executed and filed a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. On January 29, 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its order preliminarily approving the settlement of the private securities class action, certification of the class, and the provision of notice to members of the class (the “Preliminary Approval”) as described more fully in Note 11. While the Company believes that final approval of Stipulation and the dismissal of the actions are probable, there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions.

12

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries, for the six months ended December 31, 2002, were as follows:

		Six Months			Six Months
		Ended			Ended
		December 31,			December 31,
		2002			2001
Legal fees incurred in connection with the shareholder lawsuits, Special Litigation Committee and the global settlement		$	147,000		$	151,000
Adjustment of previously recorded estimates of $286,000 (representing legal fees incurred by former officers, the present value of post-employment health care obligations and a one time separation bonus payable to Mr Kiser) to $245,000 reflecting the settlement agreements			(41,000	)		—
Adjustment of previously recorded estimates of $117,000 (representing net employment obligations payable to Mr Sherman) to $0 reflecting termination of an agreement due to misappropriation of funds			—			(117,000	)
Mr. Sherman’s transfer of 100,813 shares of common stock to the Company. The shares were valued at the closing market price on the date in which Mr. Sherman and the Company executed a mutual general release			(76,000	)		—
	Total	$	30,000		$	34,000

(8)

Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and potential Common Stock equivalents outstanding during the period, if dilutive. Potential Common Stock equivalents include incremental shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options. The effects of potential common stock equivalents have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as their effect is anti-dilutive.

13

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss	$	(2,971	)	$	(528	)	$	(5,292	)	$	(1,648	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		7,244			7,129			7,252			7,126
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.23	)

(9)	Principal Executive Office Lease Amendment
	On November 12, 2002, the Company negotiated the right to terminate the lease for its principal executive office located in Denver, Colorado on June 30, 2003 (the “Termination Date”) for a payment of $594,000 and forfeiture of an existing security deposit of $81,000. The original termination date of the lease is August 31, 2013. In consideration of the option to terminate the lease early, the Company paid an additional security deposit of $50,000 to cover any damages associated with vacating the premises. In the event that the Company closes a sale of all or substantially all of its assets to Sirenza prior to the Termination Date, the Company would exercise its right to terminate the lease and pay the early termination fee within two business days of closing. The total costs to terminate the lease including leasehold improvements that would be written off should this event occur are $879,000.
(10)	Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.
	On December 2, 2002, the Company entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) to sell substantially all of its assets to Sirenza. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Sirenza will forgive $1.4 million in secured loans. Additionally, Sirenza will pay the Company approximately $13.6 million in cash and common stock consideration to be decreased by the amount of any indebtedness in excess of $1.4 million owed to Sirenza as of the closing date of the asset sale pursuant to the existing Sirenza Loan Facility as described in Note 3. The consideration to be received will be further increased or decreased by the amount of the net asset adjustment as described below. Forty-five percent of the net amount of consideration described above will be paid to the Company in cash and the remaining fifty-five percent will be paid in shares of Sirenza common stock, which will be valued for such purpose at $1.44 per share (the 15-day trailing average closing price of Sirenza’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as of the execution date of the Asset Purchase Agreement).
	Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company and Sirenza designated as either “included” or “excluded” each of the assets and liabilities of the Company as listed on its balance sheet at September 30, 2002, which is referred to as the reference balance sheet. By subtracting the total included liabilities on the reference balance sheet from the total

14

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

	included assets on the reference balance sheet, Sirenza and the Company agreed upon a beginning net asset balance of $8,447,000. Prior to the closing of the asset purchase, the Company will prepare a new balance sheet, which is referred to as the preliminary closing balance sheet, as of the month end immediately preceding the closing, on a basis consistent with that of the reference balance sheet. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet exceeds $8,447,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to the Company will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet is less than $8,447,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to the Company will be decreased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Within fifteen business days following the closing, the Company shall prepare another balance sheet as of the closing date, which shall be prepared on a basis consistent with that of the reference balance sheet, and which is referred to as the closing balance sheet. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the closing balance sheet exceeds the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet by at least $25,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to the Company will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the closing balance sheet is less than the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet by at least $25,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to the Company will be decreased on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
	As of February 12, 2003, the Company and Sirenza are continuing to work toward the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement.
(11)	Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies
	Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
	In December 1999, the Company learned that the SEC was conducting an investigation to determine whether there were violations of the federal securities laws by the Company or any of its officers, directors or employees. The SEC’s investigation was focused primarily on the Company’s financial reporting and accounting practices and procedures during the fiscal years 1996 through 1999.
	In September 2001, the Company agreed to a settlement with the SEC under which the Company, without admitting or denying that it violated any laws, consented to the entry of an injunction prohibiting future violations by the Company of certain periodic reporting, record keeping, internal controls, proxy solicitation and antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act. On November 9, 2001, the Company’s settlement with the SEC was approved by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado pursuant to its judgment order Final Judgment as to Vari-L, Civil Action No. 01-WM-1903, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vari-L, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark and Sarah E. Hume, United States District Court, District of Colorado.
	Private Securities Class Action
	A number of private shareholder class actions alleging violations of federal securities laws were filed against the Company and certain of its former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado beginning in June 2000. Those actions have since been consolidated and an amended consolidated complaint has been filed by the class representatives.

15

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

On November 21, 2001, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims against the Company in the consolidated private securities class action, Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 00-S-1181. The Company’s motion argued that the amended consolidated complaint alleges wrongdoing by former corporate employees in furtherance of their personal interests, as opposed to corporate interest, which does not state a claim for securities fraud against the Company. The class action representatives filed their response to the Company’s motion to dismiss and the Company filed a reply to that response but the court had not yet ruled on that motion.

On October 3, 2002, the Company and the class action representatives reached an agreement in principle for the settlement of the litigation and executed a memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”), subject to court approval. The MOU outlines the general terms of the proposed settlement and is intended to be used as a basis for drafting a stipulation of settlement (the “Stipulation”). The MOU contemplates that the Company will pay $250,000 in cash and issue 2.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares issuable pursuant to the MOU is subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments in the event the Company sells its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock below certain threshold prices. At June 30, 2002, the Company recorded a liability of $1.45 million representing the estimated cost to settle this litigation. Such liability reflects the cash portion of the settlement plus the estimated value of the common stock to be issued in the settlement based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date in which all substantive aspects with respect to the MOU were agreed upon.

Under the MOU, the Company is also required to transfer its claims against Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon C. Clark and Derek L. Bailey to the plaintiffs. However, the Company will retain the claims from the Company action against former officers described below. The Company will also assign to the plaintiffs any right it might have to proceeds or other damages from the Directors and Officers insurance policies with Reliance Insurance Company and Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company. As described below under global settlement of private securities class action and Company action against former officers, Messrs. Sherman and Clark have executed settlement agreements and/or mutual releases with the Company, the terms of which preclude them from asserting claims against the Company for advancement or indemnification of their attorneys fees and other costs of defense. Messrs. Kiser and Bailey have also executed similar agreements. However, if the court does not approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions with prejudice (or, in the case of Mr. Kiser, if he does not receive the consideration provided for in his settlement agreement), Messrs. Bailey and Kiser may assert claims against the Company for advancement or indemnification of their attorneys fees and other costs of defense, which claims may be material.

On January 22, 2003, the Company, the class action representatives and the individual defendants executed and filed the Stipulation with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The terms under the Stipulation are consistent with the terms under the MOU as described above. On January 29, 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its order preliminarily approving the settlement of the private securities class action, certification of the class, and the provision of notice to members of the class (the “Preliminary Approval”). The Preliminary Approval provides for a settlement hearing scheduled on March 28, 2003 to determine whether the proposed

16

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

settlement of the litigation on the terms and conditions provided forth in the Stipulation is fair, just and reasonable to the class. The Preliminary Approval provides for the mailing of notice of the proposed settlement to members of the class by February 4, 2003 and a publication of a summary notice of the proposed settlement in the Investor’s Business Daily on February 11, 2003.

The final settlement of the private securities class action is subject to several conditions and uncertainties, many of which are outside of the Company’s control. Such conditions include the issuance of an order by the court of a final judgment and order of dismissal of the actions with prejudice following the fairness hearing and the absence of or dismissal of any appeal to such final judgment. The Company anticipates that the 2.0 million shares to be issued under the Stipulation will be issued approximately two months after the issuance of a final judgment and order of dismissal of the actions with prejudice. The Company believes it is unlikely such shares will be issued prior to the closing of the asset sale as described above. While the Company believes that the approval of the Stipulation and dismissal of the actions with prejudice are probable, there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions with prejudice.

Shareholder Derivative Suit

On August 21, 2002, the District Court, City and County of Denver dismissed the shareholder derivative action filed, purportedly on behalf of the Company against Joseph Kiser, David Sherman, Jon Clark Derek Bailey, Sarah Booher, David Lisowski, Anthony Petrelli, Jae Shim and the Company. The derivative plaintiff appealed the Court’s ruling to the Colorado Court of Appeals. On November 12, 2002, the parties filed a stipulated voluntary dismissal of the appeal. On November 14, 2002, the Colorado Court of Appeals granted the stipulated dismissal and issued its mandate ordering that the appeal be dismissed.

Insurance Claims

Reliance Insurance Company is the issuer of the $5 million primary directors and officers’ liability insurance policy in effect for the period of time covered by the securities class action and the derivative action. In January 2002, the Reliance liquidator notified claimants concerning the procedures by which insureds and other claimants may file claims against the Reliance estate. The Company intends to file a claim against the Reliance estate; however, all rights under the claim have been assigned to the private securities class action plaintiffs pursuant to the Stipulation.

Declaratory Judgment Action by Excess Insurer

On June 5, 2001, Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“AESIC”), which had issued to the Company a $2.5 million excess directors and officers liability insurance policy for the period of time covered by the shareholder and class action litigation referenced above, filed suit in United States District Court for the District of Colorado asking the court to find that it is not obligated to provide coverage, or in the alternative, seeking permission to rescind its policy. In connection with the execution of the Stipulation, the Company executed a settlement agreement with AESIC in which the Company and AESIC executed mutual releases. The parties to this action have executed a stipulation of dismissal, which will dismiss the action with prejudice. The Company

17

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

anticipates that such stipulation of dismissal will be filed once the Stipulation has become a final order of the court hearing the private securities class action.

Company Action against Former Officers

On December 5, 2001, the Company formed a Special Litigation Committee (the “SLC”) of the Board of Directors. The SLC is comprised of two outside directors who joined the Company’s Board subsequent to the time of certain alleged wrongdoings as discussed below.

On December 20, 2001, the SLC retained independent counsel to advise the SLC in its investigation of the allegations of wrongdoing during prior periods by former employees, as well as current and former members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Additionally, the SLC suspended the advancement of certain legal fees and expenses being paid on behalf of former officers of the Company.

On March 19, 2002, the Company filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, against Mr. David Sherman, Mr. Joseph Kiser, individuals, and J.C. Enterprises, a Colorado general partnership. Mr. Sherman is the former President of the Company and Mr. Kiser is the former Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and Chief Scientific Officer. Additionally, Mr. Kiser is the General Partner of J.C. Enterprises. The Company subsequently amended the complaint to add Ms. Joan Sherman and the Kathryn Sherman Trust as defendants. In its lawsuit, the Company sought to rescind certain employment and consulting agreements between the Company and Messrs. Kiser and Sherman, and to rescind certain stock and stock option grants made to them, on the basis that such agreements were entered into, and such stock option grants were made, based upon mistaken or misrepresented information regarding the Company’s true financial performance. The Company also sought to recover the compensation and bonuses paid to them as a result of such mistaken or misrepresented information. In addition, the Company sought to recover excessive rent it paid pursuant to a lease agreement between the Company and J.C. Enterprises in reliance on misrepresented information provided by Messrs. Kiser and Sherman. The Company added Ms. Sherman and the Kathryn Sherman Trust to this action because they may have received assets from Mr. Sherman that the Company may have been entitled to recover.

On May 30, 2002, David Sherman filed a counter-claim against the Company alleging that the Company breached its obligation to him by suspending payment of consulting fees under the termination and consulting agreement between him and the Company.

On July 8, 2002, Joseph Kiser filed counter-claims against the Company, Charles R. Bland, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, Gil J. Van Lunsen and David M. Risley alleging a variety of claims. Mr. Bland is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Dutkiewicz is the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Messrs. Risley and Van Lunsen are on the Company’s Board of Directors and are members of the SLC.

Mr. Kiser’s employment contract required him to perform any directive of the Company’s Board of Directors. Subsequent to March 19, 2002, Mr. Kiser had not performed any services for the Company. Since March 19, 2002, the Company suspended all payments required by Mr. Kiser’s employment contract. The Company recorded approximately

18

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

$203,000 of estimated liabilities representing the present value of post-employment health care obligations and a one time separation bonus to be paid to Mr. Kiser upon termination of contract payments.

Had Mr. Kiser prevailed in requiring the Company to comply with the terms of the employment contract, the Company could have been obligated to total future payments of approximately $1,400,000 payable over ten years. If the Company had been successful in its claims against Mr. Kiser, it could have been awarded as much as $5,600,000 plus attorneys’ fees. Additionally, the Company would have reversed all previously recorded liabilities associated with this matter. Had Mr. Kiser prevailed on his breach of contract action related to the indemnification agreements he had with the Company, the Company could have been liable for attorney fees and costs incurred in the various actions as well as for future covered attorney’s fees, the present amount of which is unknown.

Under Mr. Sherman’s termination and consulting agreement, the Company agreed to engage Mr. Sherman as a consultant for the period August 1, 2000 through July 31, 2001. As a consultant he was to receive compensation of $195,000 as consulting fees along with certain other benefits. Due to his failure to submit certain documentation for travel expenses in which amounts were advanced, the Company’s audit committee suspended payment of the consulting fees in October 2000 and terminated his agreement due to misappropriation of funds. During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Company recognized a $145,000 benefit from an insurance recovery for Mr. Sherman’s undocumented travel advances. Had Mr. Sherman prevailed on his breach of contract action, the Company could have been liable for amounts under his termination and consulting agreement, attorney fees and costs incurred in the various actions as well as for future covered attorney’s fees, the present amount of which is unknown.

Global Settlement of Private Securities Class Action and Company Action against Former Officers

In connection with the private securities class action, the declaratory judgment action by excess insurer and the Company action against former officers, the Company, the individual defendants in the private securities class action, AESIC, and the individual defendants in the Company action against former officers attended global settlement conferences on October 11, 2002 and December 10, 2002. All parties involved reached an agreement in principle for the global settlement of all litigation.

As part of the global settlement that resulted in the Stipulation, the Company has executed settlement agreements and/or mutual releases with all parties to the Company action against the former officers. Under the terms of the settlement agreement with Mr. Kiser and J.C. Enterprises, the Company has agreed to pay $245,000 in total consideration; $230,000 to Mr. Kiser as well as $15,000 to his former attorneys to cover certain legal expenses. In return, Mr. Kiser agreed to a mutual general release including, but not limited to, releasing the Company, Messrs. Bland, Dutkiewicz, Risley and Van Lunsen from all claims related to his employment agreement and the advancement or indemnification of attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense, subject to the settlement of the private securities class action. Under the terms of this settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the current required rental amount under the existing lease with J.C. Enterprises, but the Company has the option to terminate the lease, after sufficient notice, in the event J.C. Enterprises contracts to sell the property during the remaining lease term.

19

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Additionally, the Company has signed a mutual general release with Mr. Sherman, which, among other things, releases the Company from all claims related to his employment and separation agreements and any rights he may have had regarding advancement or indemnification of attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense. In consideration of the mutual release with Mr. Sherman, Mr. Sherman transferred 100,813 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company and the Company agreed to repay Mr. Sherman’s promissory note to Carolyn Kiser in the principal amount of $55,030. The Company also executed mutual release relating to litigation with Joan Sherman and the Kaythern Sherman Trusts, which were signed on December 17, 2002.

The parties to the Company action against former officers have executed a stipulation of dismissal, which will dismiss the action with prejudice. The Company anticipates that the stipulation of dismissal will be filed by the Company’s counsel once the Stipulation has received final approval from the court hearing the private securities class action and the Company pays Mr. Kiser $230,000 as described above.

Additionally, the Company has signed mutual general releases with Messrs. Bailey and Clark, which, among other things, release the Company from all claims related to their employment and separation agreements and any rights they may have had regarding advancement or indemnification of attorney’s fees and other costs of defense. Mr. Bailey’s mutual release is conditioned upon the settlement of the private securities class action.

Patent Litigation

On August 8, 2002, Anaren Microwave, Inc. (“Anaren”) filed suit against the Company for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,821,007. On November 19, 2002, the Company was served with the complaint. Anaren has requested damages in an unspecified amount and attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. The Company and its counsel are investigating Anaren’s allegations. The Company believes that the outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Other

The Company is a party to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of these other matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

20

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains “forward looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions by us about the future, usually based on current conditions or on the broader expectations of others. These assumptions may or may not prove to be correct and, as a result, our own forward-looking statements may also be inaccurate. On the other hand, based on what we know today and what we expect in the future, we believe that the forward-looking statements we make in this report are reasonable. In most cases, when we use words like “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” or “predict” to describe something which has not yet occurred, we are making a forward-looking statement.

We cannot list here all of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future financial and operating results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections but we can identify many of them. For example, our future results could be affected by the overall market for various types of wireless communications products, the success of the specific products into which our products are integrated, governmental action relating to wireless communications, licensing and regulation, the accuracy of our internal projections as to the demand for certain types of technological innovation, competitors’ products and pricing, the success of new product development efforts, the timely release for production and the delivery of products under existing contracts, the ultimate outcome of pending and threatened litigation and regulatory action, our ability to access the Sirenza Loan Facility and the consummation of the asset sale with Sirenza as well as those factors discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002. It is also important to remember that forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when they are made and we do not promise that we will publicly update or revise those statements whenever conditions change or future events occur. Accordingly, we do not recommend that any person seeking to evaluate our company should place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation and commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

21

Revenue Recognition and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

Revenues are recognized at the time of shipment to, or acceptance by, the customer provided title and risk of loss is transferred to the customer.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on review of the overall condition of accounts receivable balances and review of significant past due accounts. Additionally, we maintain credit insurance on certain of our foreign accounts receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Inventory Valuation

We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market on a part-by-part basis. Additionally, we make estimates regarding the market value of our inventory, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventory. We determine excess and obsolete inventory based on an estimate of the future demand within a specified time horizon, generally twelve months. The estimates we use for demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchasing and are consistent with our revenue forecasts. If our actual forecast is less than our demand forecast, we may be required to take additional excess inventory charges, which will decrease gross margin and net operating results in the future.

Commitments and Contingencies

We are party to legal proceedings and claims, as well as various other commitments and contingencies. We have recorded a liability if it is (1) probable that an obligation has been incurred because of a transaction or event happening on or before the date of the financial statements and (2) the amount of the obligation can be reasonably estimated.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2001

Net Sales

Net sales for the three months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 23.1% to $4.3 million compared with $5.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. This decline is primarily due to approximately $1.0 million in price concessions granted to our more significant customers. In benchmarking our decline in revenue against that of our competitors and our significant customers, the percentage decline is consistent with that in the wireless telecommunications industry. Overall, we do not believe that our market share has deteriorated.

Revenue from commercial signal source products was $3.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a 25.0% decrease from $4.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. Revenue from all other products was $1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a 16.7% decrease from $1.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. Revenue from all other products for the three months ended December 31, 2001 included fees earned from a contract termination of approximately $96,000.

22

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 48.0% to $1,241,000, or 28.8% of net sales, compared with $2.4 million, or 42.6% of net sales, for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The gross profit percent in any period can be affected significantly by volume and price concessions. Fixed manufacturing overhead adversely affects gross profit at lower sales levels. Accordingly, reduced sales levels combined with fixed manufacturing overhead levels comparable to prior periods has the effect of lowering gross profit as a percentage of sales. Additionally, changes in market demand for our products, combined with changes in product design can result in excess inventory parts. On a quarterly basis, we review our inventory on hand and firm purchase commitments versus our sales forecast to determine the adequacy of the existing reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.

Included in cost of goods sold for the three months ended December 31, 2002 is a charge of $92,000 for excess and obsolete inventory. Included in cost of goods sold for the three months ended December 31, 2001 is a charge of $66,000 for excess and obsolete inventory. Additionally, for the three months ended December 31, 2001, we recognized a benefit of $268,000 of recoveries for previously written-off inventory.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2002 increased 9.6% to $688,000, or 16.0% of net sales, compared with $628,000, or 11.2% of net sales, for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar increase in selling expenses was primarily attributable to an increase of approximately $93,000 in salaries and benefits paid to certain new members of our sales management team offset by a decrease of $21,000 in lower commissions paid to manufacturer’s representatives as a result of reduced sales volume.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 2.7% to $1.5 million, or 33.9% of net sales, compared with $1.5 million, or 26.8% of net sales, for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $113,000 in salaries and benefits due to a decrease in personnel and reduced spending of $81,000 on independent contractors for accounting and information technology services. Offsetting these costs for the three months ended December 31, 2001 was a $145,000 benefit from an insurance recovery for undocumented travel advances to a former employee.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2002 increased 7.1% to $751,000, or 17.4% of net sales, compared with $701,000 or 12.5% of net sales, for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to $73,000 in higher salaries and benefits due to an increase in personnel.

Expenses Related to Workforce Reductions and the Proposed Transaction with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.

As a result of the continuing weakness in the wireless industry and the impact it has had upon our revenues, we have had to reduce our workforce and incur severance expenses. Additionally, we have incurred certain transaction costs in connection with the definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. (“Sirenza”) (the “transaction”) as described in Part I, Item II, “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Such costs are defined under the Loan Facility with Sirenza and include restructuring, severance benefits, legal and accounting fees and other related

23

costs incurred. Expenses related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza for the three months ended December 31, 2002 were as follows:

		Three Months		Three Months
		Ended		Ended
		December 31,		December 31,
		2002		2001
Legal fees		$	380,000	$	—
Severance expense			393,000		101,000
Other related costs			55,000		—
	Total	$	828,000	$	101,000

We will continue to incur costs related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza until the closing of the transaction with Sirenza which is expected to occur during the second quarter of calendar 2003. However, the closing of the transaction with Sirenza is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions contained in the asset purchase agreement, many of which are outside of our control. Such conditions include the court’s approval of the stipulation of settlement regarding the private securities class action lawsuit as described in Part II, Item I, “Legal Proceedings.” The settlement of the private securities class action lawsuit is subject to several conditions and uncertainties and we cannot predict the exact date upon which the court might approve the stipulation of settlement, if at all.

Expenses Relating to Accounting Restatements and Related Legal Matters, Net of Recoveries

In early 2000, management of the Company commenced efforts to restate its previously issued financial statements after being notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) that the Commission was investigating its accounting and reporting practices. Certain costs incurred in conjunction with these efforts have been separately classified in the Company’s Statements of Operations as “Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries.” Expenses included in this classification include the cost of external counsel for services provided in connection with shareholder lawsuits, the Commission’s investigation of the Company, legal fees and expenses of the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors, the costs incurred to settle the private securities action and the Company action against former officers (net of recoveries), the cost of certain consultants and temporary labor hired to assist in the accounting restatements, and reimbursements to current and former employees of the Company for their legal fees and expenses.

The accounting restatements were completed in February 2001. Additionally, during October 2002 and December 2002, the Company, the individual defendants in the private securities class action, the Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, and the individual defendants in the action against former officers attended global settlement conferences. All parties involved reached an agreement in principle for the global settlement of all litigation as further described in Part II, Item I, “Legal Proceedings.” On January 22, 2003, the Company, the class action representatives and the individual defendants in the private securities class action executed and filed a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. On January 29, 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its order preliminarily approving the settlement of the private securities class action, certification of the class, and the provision of notice to members of the class (the “Preliminary Approval”). While we believe that final approval of Stipulation and the dismissal of the actions are probable, there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions.

24

Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries, for the three months ended December 31, 2002, were as follows:

		Three Months			Three Months
		Ended			Ended
		December 31,			December 31,
		2002			2001
Legal fees incurred in connection with the shareholder lawsuits, Special Litigation Committee and the global settlement		$	74,000		$	66,000
Adjustment of previously recorded estimates of $117,000 (representing net employment obligations payable to Mr Sherman) to $0 reflecting termination of an agreement due to misappropriation of funds			—			(117,000	)
Mr. Sherman’s transfer of 100,813 shares of common stock to the Company. The shares were valued at the closing market price on the date in which Mr Sherman and the Company executed a mutual general release			(76,000	)		—
	Total	$	(2,000	)	$	(51,000	)

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense), net, increased 660.0% to expense of $266,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared with expense of $35,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in interest expense of $215,000 due to a larger balance of debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 as compared to December 31, 2001 at significantly higher interest rates as a result of our new loan facility with Sirenza as discussed in Part I, Item II, “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to the Six Months Ended December 31, 2001

Net Sales

Net sales for the six months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 26.5% to $8.3 million compared with $11.3 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001. This decline is primarily due to approximately $2.0 million in price concessions granted to our more significant customers and to a lesser extent, a decrease in demand for the quantity of commercial signal source products. In benchmarking our decline in revenue against that of our competitors and our significant customers, the percentage decline is consistent with that in the wireless telecommunications industry. Overall, we do not believe that our market share has deteriorated.

Revenue from commercial signal source products was $6.3 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a 27.6% decrease from $8.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001. Revenue from all other products was $2.0 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a 23.1% decrease from $2.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001. Revenue from all other products for the six months ended December 31, 2001 included fees earned from contract termination of approximately $257,000.

25

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the six months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 52.5% to $2.2 million, or 26.1% of net sales, compared with $4.5 million, or 40.2% of net sales, for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The gross profit percent in any period can be affected significantly by volume and price concessions. Fixed manufacturing overhead adversely affects gross profit at lower sales levels. Accordingly, reduced sales levels combined with fixed manufacturing overhead levels comparable to prior periods has the effect of lowering gross profit as a percentage of sales. Additionally, changes in market demand for our products, combined with changes in product design can result in excess inventory parts. On a quarterly basis, we review our inventory on hand and firm purchase commitments versus our sales forecast to determine the adequacy of the existing reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.

Included in cost of goods sold for the six months ended December 31, 2002 is a charge of $215,000 for excess and obsolete inventory. Included in cost of goods sold for the six months ended December 31, 2001 is a charge of $122,000 for excess and obsolete inventory. Additionally, for the six months ended December 31, 2001, we recognized a benefit of $268,000 of recoveries for previously written-off inventory.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2002 increased 6.1% to $1.4 million, or 16.4% of net sales, compared with $1.3 million, or 11.4% of net sales, for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar increase in selling expenses was primarily attributable to an increase of $181,000 in salaries paid to certain new members of our sales management team offset by a decrease of $107,000 in commissions paid to manufacturer’s representatives as a result of reduced sales volume.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2002 decreased 12.0% to $3.0 million, or 35.9% of net sales, compared with $3.4 million, or 30.0% of net sales, for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $185,000 in salaries and benefits due to a decrease in personnel and reduced spending of $319,000 on independent contractors for accounting and information technology services. Offsetting these costs for the six months ended December 31, 2001 was a $145,000 benefit from an insurance recovery for undocumented travel advances to a former employee.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2002 increased 19.9% to $1.6 million, or 18.9% of net sales, compared with $1.3 million or 11.6% of net sales, for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to $274,000 in salaries and benefits due to an increase in personnel.

Expenses Related to Workforce Reductions and the Proposed Transaction with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.

As a result of the continuing weakness in the wireless industry and the impact it has had upon our revenues, we have had to reduce our workforce and incur severance expenses. Additionally, we have incurred certain transaction costs in connection with the definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. (“Sirenza”) (the “transaction”) as described in Part I, Item II, “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Such costs are defined under the Loan Facility with Sirenza and include restructuring, severance benefits, legal and accounting fees and other related

26

costs incurred. Expenses related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza for the six months ended December 31, 2002 were as follows:

		Six Months		Six Months
		Ended		Ended
		December 31,		December 31,
		2002		2001
Legal fees		$	413,000	$	—
Severance expense			393,000		101,000
Other related costs			70,000		—
	Total	$	876,000	$	101,000

We will continue to incur costs related to workforce reductions and the proposed transaction with Sirenza until the closing of the transaction with Sirenza which is expected to occur during the second quarter of calendar 2003. However, the closing of the transaction with Sirenza is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions contained in the asset purchase agreement, many of which are outside of our control. Such conditions include the court’s approval of the stipulation of settlement regarding the private securities class action lawsuit as described in Part II, Item I, “Legal Proceedings.” The settlement of the private securities class action lawsuit is subject to several conditions and uncertainties and we cannot predict the exact date upon which the court might approve the stipulation of settlement, if at all.

Expenses Relating to Accounting Restatements and Related Legal Matters, Net of Recoveries

In early 2000, management of the Company commenced efforts to restate its previously issued financial statements after being notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) that the Commission was investigating its accounting and reporting practices. Certain costs incurred in conjunction with these efforts have been separately classified in the Company’s Statements of Operations as “Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries.” Expenses included in this classification include the cost of external counsel for services provided in connection with shareholder lawsuits, the Commission’s investigation of the Company, legal fees and expenses of the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors, the costs incurred to settle the private securities action and the Company action against former officers (net of recoveries), the cost of certain consultants and temporary labor hired to assist in the accounting restatements, and reimbursements to current and former employees of the Company for their legal fees and expenses.

The accounting restatements were completed in February 2001. Additionally, during October 2002 and December 2002, the Company, the individual defendants in the private securities class action, the Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, and the individual defendants in the action against former officers attended global settlement conferences. All parties involved reached an agreement in principle for the global settlement of all litigation as further described in Part II, Item I, “Legal Proceedings.” On January 22, 2003, the Company, the class action representatives and the individual defendants in the private securities class action executed and filed a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. On January 29, 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its order preliminarily approving the settlement of the private securities class action, certification of the class, and the provision of notice to members of the class (the “Preliminary Approval”). While we believe that final approval of Stipulation and the dismissal of the actions are probable, there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions.

27

Expenses relating to accounting restatements and related legal matters, net of recoveries, for the six months ended December 31, 2002, were as follows:

		Six Months			Six Months
		Ended			Ended
		December 31,			December 31,
		2002			2001
Legal fees incurred in connection with the shareholder lawsuits, Special Litigation Committee and the global settlement		$	147,000		$	151,000
Adjustment of previously recorded estimates of $286,000 (representing legal fees incurred by former officers, the present value of post-employment health care obligations and a one time separation bonus payable to Mr Kiser) to $245,000 reflecting the settlement agreements			(41,000	)		—
Adjustment of previously recorded estimates of $117,000 (representing net employment obligations payable to Mr Sherman) to $0 reflecting termination of an agreement due to misappropriation of funds			—			(117,000	)
Mr. Sherman’s transfer of 100,813 +shares of common stock to the Company. The shares were valued at the closing market price on the date in which Mr. Sherman and the Company executed a mutual general release			(76,000	)		—
	Total	$	30,000		$	34,000

For the six months ended December 31, 2001, we recorded $151,000 of legal fees incurred in connection with shareholder lawsuits offset by a benefit of $117,000 resulting from an adjustment of an estimated liability recorded in a previous period.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense), net, increased 463.2% to expense of $428,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared with expense of $76,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in interest expense of $284,000 due to a larger balance of debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 as compared to December 31, 2001 at significantly higher interest rates as a result of our new loan facility with Sirenza as discussed in Part I, Item II, “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2002, our working capital deficit was $2.0 million including cash and cash equivalents of $138,000. Operations consumed $2.4 million of cash primarily attributable to the net loss incurred during the six months ended December 31, 2002 offset by the reduction of accounts receivable through collections and lower sales volumes and the timing of payments of accrued expenses and liabilities. Our net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2002 included charges of $876,000 for workforce reduction expenses and transaction costs incurred as a result of the definitive agreement with Sirenza as described below. Additionally, we are in default of the Net Operating Loss covenant of our loan agreement with Sirenza as described below.

28

Cash provided by investing activities was primarily attributable to net borrowings of $254,000 against certain whole life insurance policies owned by the Company offset by capital expenditures of $127,000. Our capital expenditures include purchasing new production equipment and implementing IT e-commerce initiatives.

Cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to borrowings of $3.9 million under our new loan facility with Sirenza and financing our Directors and Officers insurance premiums offset by $1.5 million to repay our outstanding obligations under our loan agreement with Wells Fargo.

Sirenza Loan Facility

On October 7, 2002, we entered into a loan agreement with Sirenza which provides for a $5.3 million senior secured loan facility (the “Loan Facility”). As a condition to the Loan Facility, we entered into an Exclusivity and Right of First Refusal Agreement (the “Exclusivity Agreement”) with Sirenza to evaluate a potential acquisition of all or substantially all of our assets.

The Loan Facility matures on September 25, 2003, is secured by substantially all of our assets and has an annual interest rate of 25% on outstanding amounts. Additionally, the Loan Facility is subject to covenants that among other things impose limitations on capital expenditures and investments, restrict certain payments and distributions and require us to maintain certain financial ratios based on a rolling three-month calculation.

Under the terms of the Loan Facility, Sirenza has provided for funding in two tranches. The first tranche (“Tranche A”) consists of an initial term loan of approximately $1.4 million which was used to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility at Wells Fargo on October 7, 2002. The second tranche (“Tranche B”) consists of additional term loans of up to approximately $3.9 million which may be drawn down in accordance with an agreed schedule. We expect to use the proceeds from any advances under Tranche B to fund our working capital requirements.

Our ability to draw down amounts under Tranche B is conditioned upon, among other things, the absence of an event of default and our representations and warranties being true and correct at the time of such draw down request. Based upon our operating results for the three month period ended December 31, 2002, we are in default of the Net Operating Loss covenant of the Loan Facility with Sirenza. The net operating loss covenant is defined as net operating loss excluding costs such as restructuring, severance benefits, extraordinary non-cash charges and legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with the proposed transaction with Sirenza. The covenant requires that our cumulative net operating loss not exceed a specified amount in any rolling three-month period; the maximum permitted operating loss for the three month period ended December 31, 2002 was $1,585,000. During the three month period ended December 31, 2002, our net operating loss for such period as defined in the Loan Facility was $1,656,000. Under the terms of the Loan Facility, the default interest rate increased 5 percentage points from 25% to 30% effective January 1, 2003. Furthermore, Sirenza has the right to declare all amounts due on the loan immediately due and payable. At this time Sirenza has not taken any action to accelerate the loan, but has reserved the right to do so.

During January and February 2003, Sirenza advanced an additional $1.0 million under the Loan Facility. As of February 12, 2003, we had aggregate borrowings of $4.5 million under the Sirenza Loan Facility and $854,000 in borrowing availability. In the event we are unable to draw down future amounts under Tranche B, we may be required to seek additional capital through other sources; however, our ability is limited by the terms of the Exclusivity Agreement described below. There can be no assurance that we would be able to procure adequate funds in

29

such an event. If such funds are not available, we may be forced to curtail or suspend our operations.

If Sirenza were to elect to declare the loan due and payable in full, we would most likely be required to file for bankruptcy protection and would be unable to consummate the asset sale to Sirenza contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 2, 2002. Filing for bankruptcy protection could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s relationships with its customers, suppliers and employees.

In the event of a change of control or execution of a definitive acquisition agreement with any party other than Sirenza, amounts outstanding under the Loan Facility are due in full within five business days. Additionally, we must pay a prepayment fee in the amount of $1,000,000 (the “Prepayment Fee”). Under the terms of the Loan Facility, we may voluntarily prepay the Tranche A and Tranche B loans provided that in the event of a change of control or execution of a definitive acquisition agreement with any party other than Sirenza within 180 days of such prepayment, we must pay the Prepayment Fee.

Additionally under the terms of the Loan Facility, at Sirenza’s option, the Tranche A loan is convertible into 19.9% of our Common Stock on a fully diluted basis at the following times:

• five business days prior to the maturity date of the Tranche A loan,

• the date Sirenza receives written notice of our intent to prepay the Tranche A loan,

• the date of the commencement of a tender offer by a party other than Sirenza, or

• the date we execute a definitive acquisition agreement with another party.

The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Tranche A Note are subject to certain registration rights as set forth in the Resale Registration Rights Agreement between the parties. We have amended our Rights Agreement with American Securities Transfer, Inc. to make the rights thereunder inapplicable to certain transactions with Sirenza that are approved by our Board of Directors, including the conversion of the Tranche A Note.

Pursuant to the terms of the Exclusivity Agreement, we have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to solicit acquisition proposals from other parties or otherwise negotiate with such parties with respect to an acquisition proposal. Such exclusivity period terminates upon the earlier of March 31, 2003 or the occurrence of certain other events. Under the Exclusivity Agreement, we have granted Sirenza a right of first refusal in the event that we receive any future offer to acquire us or substantially all of our assets. Such right of first refusal terminates upon the earlier of: the date that Sirenza advises us in writing that they are terminating all negotiations with us or that they are no longer interested in pursuing a transaction with us; such time as the Loan Facility has terminated and no loans remain outstanding thereunder; or such time as they default on their obligations to make loans to us pursuant to the Loan Facility.

Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with Sirenza

On December 2, 2002, we entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) to sell substantially all of our assets to Sirenza. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Sirenza will forgive $1.4 million in secured loans. Additionally, Sirenza will pay us approximately $13.6 million in cash and common stock consideration to be decreased by the amount of any indebtedness in excess of $1.4 million owed to Sirenza as of the closing date of the asset sale pursuant to the existing Sirenza Loan Facility as previously described. The consideration to be received will be further increased or decreased by the amount of the net asset adjustment as described below. Forty-five percent of the net amount of consideration described above will be paid to us in cash and the remaining fifty-five percent will be paid in shares of Sirenza common stock, which will be valued for such purpose at $1.44 per

30

share (the 15-day trailing average closing price of Sirenza’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as of the execution date of the Asset Purchase Agreement).

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, both parties designated as either “included” or “excluded” each of the assets and liabilities of the Company as listed on its balance sheet at September 30, 2002, which is referred to as the reference balance sheet. By subtracting the total included liabilities on the reference balance sheet from the total included assets on the reference balance sheet, both parties agreed upon a beginning net asset balance of $8,447,000. Prior to the closing of the asset purchase, we will prepare a new balance sheet, which is referred to as the preliminary closing balance sheet, as of the month end immediately preceding the closing, on a basis consistent with that of the reference balance sheet. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet exceeds $8,447,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to us will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet is less than $8,447,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to us will be decreased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Within fifteen business days following the closing, we shall prepare another balance sheet as of the closing date, which shall be prepared on a basis consistent with that of the reference balance sheet, and which is referred to as the closing balance sheet. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the closing balance sheet exceeds the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet by at least $25,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to us will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis. To the extent that the net asset balance listed on the closing balance sheet is less than the net asset balance listed on the preliminary closing balance sheet by at least $25,000, the proceeds of the asset sale to us will be decreased on a dollar-for-dollar basis.

As of February 12, 2003, the Company and Sirenza are continuing to work toward the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Principal Executive Office Lease Amendment

On November 12, 2002, the Company negotiated the right to terminate the lease for its principal executive office located in Denver, Colorado on June 30, 2003 (the “Termination Date”) for a payment of $594,000 and forfeiture of an existing security deposit of $81,000. The original termination date of the lease is August 31, 2013. In consideration of the option to terminate the lease early, the Company paid an additional security deposit of $50,000 to cover any damages associated with vacating the premises. In the event that the Company closes a sale of all or substantially all of its assets to Sirenza prior to the Termination Date, the Company would exercise its right to terminate the lease and pay the early termination fee within two business days of closing. The total costs to terminate the lease including leasehold improvements that would be written off should this event occur are $879,000.

Other

We own various term life and whole life insurance policies in which certain former officers are named as the insured. Under these policies, we are entitled to 100% of the net death benefits. As of December 31, 2002, the aggregate death benefits receivable under these policies was approximately $6.2 million. We have not recorded any gain contingency associated with the aggregate death benefits receivable, however in the event of death; the net death benefit could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks, including the effects of adverse changes in interest rates. Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowings with fixed interest rates at significantly greater than prevailing market rates. At the present time, we have no financial

31

instruments in place to manage the impact of changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2002, we have borrowed $1.4 million under the Tranche A Convertible Note and $2.1 million under the Tranche B Note at an annual interest rate of 25.0%. Effective January 1, 2003, the annual interest rate increased 5 percentage points to 30.0%. We estimate that a 1.0% upward movement in interest rates would have impacted our results of operations by less than $7,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2002.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including Charles R. Bland (the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer) and Richard P. Dutkiewicz (the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, Messrs. Bland and Dutkiewicz concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings. There have not been any significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

32

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The following should be read in conjunction with Note 11 to the financial statements.

Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation

In December 1999, the Company learned that the SEC was conducting an investigation to determine whether there were violations of the federal securities laws by the Company or any of its officers, directors or employees. The SEC’s investigation was focused primarily on the Company’s financial reporting and accounting practices and procedures during the fiscal years 1996 through 1999.

In September 2001, the Company agreed to a settlement with the SEC under which the Company, without admitting or denying that it violated any laws, consented to the entry of an injunction prohibiting future violations by the Company of certain periodic reporting, record keeping, internal controls, proxy solicitation and antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act. On November 9, 2001, the Company’s settlement with the SEC was approved by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado pursuant to its judgment order Final Judgment as to Vari-L, Civil Action No. 01-WM-1903, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vari-L, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark and Sarah E. Hume, United States District Court, District of Colorado.

Private Securities Class Action

A number of private shareholder class actions alleging violations of federal securities laws were filed against the Company and certain of its former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado beginning in June 2000. Those actions have since been consolidated and an amended consolidated complaint has been filed by the class representatives.

On November 21, 2001, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims against the Company in the consolidated private securities class action, Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 00-S-1181. The Company’s motion argued that the amended consolidated complaint alleges wrongdoing by former corporate employees in furtherance of their personal interests, as opposed to corporate interest, which does not state a claim for securities fraud against the Company. The class action representatives filed their response to the Company’s motion to dismiss and the Company filed a reply to that response but the court had not yet ruled on that motion.

On October 3, 2002, the Company and the class action representatives reached an agreement in principle for the settlement of the litigation and executed a memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”), subject to court approval. The MOU outlines the general terms of the proposed settlement and is intended to be used as a basis for drafting a stipulation of settlement (the “Stipulation”). The MOU contemplates that the Company will pay $250,000 in cash and issue 2.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares issuable pursuant to the MOU is subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments in the event the Company sells its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock below certain threshold prices. At June 30, 2002, the Company recorded a liability of $1.45 million representing the estimated cost to settle this litigation. Such liability reflects the cash portion of the settlement plus the estimated value of the common stock to be issued in the settlement based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date in which all substantive aspects with respect to the MOU were agreed upon.

33

Under the MOU, the Company is also required to transfer its claims against Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon C. Clark and Derek L. Bailey to the plaintiffs. However, the Company will retain the claims from the Company action against former officers as described below. The Company will also assign to the plaintiffs any right it might have to proceeds or other damages from the Directors and Officers insurance policies with Reliance Insurance Company and Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company. As described below under global settlement of private securities class action and Company action against former officers, Messrs. Sherman and Clark have executed settlement agreements and/or mutual releases with the Company, the terms of which preclude them from asserting claims against the Company for advancement or indemnification of their attorneys fees and other costs of defense. Messrs. Kiser and Bailey have also executed similar agreements. However, if the court does not approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions with prejudice (or, in the case of Mr. Kiser, if he does not receive the consideration provided for in his settlement agreement), Messrs. Bailey and Kiser may assert claims against the Company for advancement or indemnification of their attorneys fees and other costs of defense, which claims may be material.

On January 22, 2003, the Company, the class action representatives and the individual defendants executed and filed the Stipulation with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The terms under the Stipulation are consistent with the terms under the MOU as described above.

On January 29, 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its order preliminarily approving the settlement of the private securities class action, certification of the class, and the provision of notice to members of the class (the “Preliminary Approval”). The Preliminary Approval provides for a settlement hearing scheduled on March 28, 2003 to determine whether the proposed settlement of the litigation on the terms and conditions provided forth in the Stipulation is fair, just and reasonable to the class. The Preliminary Approval provides for the mailing of notice of the proposed settlement to members of the class by February 4, 2003 and a publication of a summary notice of the proposed settlement in the Investor’s Business Daily on February 11, 2003.

The final settlement of the private securities class action is subject to several conditions and uncertainties, many of which are outside of the Company’s control. Such conditions include the issuance of an order by the court of a final judgment and order of dismissal of the actions with prejudice following the fairness hearing and the absence of or dismissal of any appeal to such final judgment. The Company anticipates that the 2.0 million shares to be issued under the Stipulation will be issued approximately two months after the issuance of a final judgment and order of dismissal of the actions with prejudice. The Company believes it is unlikely such shares will be issued prior to the closing of the asset sale as described in Part II “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. While the Company believes that the approval of the Stipulation and dismissal of the actions with prejudice are probable, there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Stipulation and dismiss the actions with prejudice.

Shareholder Derivative Suit

On August 21, 2002, the District Court, City and County of Denver dismissed the shareholder derivative action filed, purportedly on behalf of the Company against Joseph Kiser, David Sherman, Jon Clark Derek Bailey, Sarah Booher, David Lisowski, Anthony Petrelli, Jae Shim and the Company. The derivative plaintiff appealed the Court’s ruling to the Colorado Court of Appeals. On November 12, 2002, the parties filed a stipulated voluntary dismissal of the appeal. On November 14, 2002, the Colorado Court of Appeals granted the stipulated dismissal and issued its mandate ordering that the appeal be dismissed.

34

Insurance Claims

Reliance Insurance Company is the issuer of the $5 million primary directors and officers’ liability insurance policy in effect for the period of time covered by the securities class action and the derivative action. In January 2002, the Reliance liquidator notified claimants concerning the procedures by which insureds and other claimants may file claims against the Reliance estate. The Company intends to file a claim against the Reliance estate; however, all rights under the claim have been assigned to the private securities class action plaintiffs pursuant to the Stipulation.

Declaratory Judgment Action by Excess Insurer

On June 5, 2001, Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“AESIC”), which had issued to the Company a $2.5 million excess directors and officers liability insurance policy for the period of time covered by the shareholder and class action litigation referenced above, filed suit in United States District Court for the District of Colorado asking the court to find that it is not obligated to provide coverage, or in the alternative, seeking permission to rescind its policy. In connection with the execution of the Stipulation, the Company executed a settlement agreement with AESIC in which the Company and AESIC executed mutual releases. The parties to this action have executed a stipulation of dismissal, which will dismiss the action with prejudice. The Company anticipates that such stipulation of dismissal will be filed once the Stipulation has become a final order of the court hearing the private securities class action.

Company Action against Former Officers

On December 5, 2001, the Company formed a Special Litigation Committee (the “SLC”) of the Board of Directors. The SLC is comprised of two outside directors who joined the Company’s Board subsequent to the time of certain alleged wrongdoings as discussed below.

On December 20, 2001, the SLC retained independent counsel to advise the SLC in its investigation of the allegations of wrongdoing during prior periods by former employees, as well as current and former members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Additionally, the SLC suspended the advancement of certain legal fees and expenses being paid on behalf of former officers of the Company.

On March 19, 2002, the Company filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, against Mr. David Sherman, Mr. Joseph Kiser, individuals, and J.C. Enterprises, a Colorado general partnership. Mr. Sherman is the former president of the Company and Mr. Kiser is the former Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and Chief Scientific Officer. Additionally, Mr. Kiser is the General Partner of J.C. Enterprises. The Company subsequently amended the complaint to add Ms. Joan Sherman and the Kathryn Sherman Trust as defendants. In its lawsuit, the Company sought to rescind certain employment and consulting agreements between the Company and Messrs. Kiser and Sherman, and to rescind certain stock and stock option grants made to them, on the basis that such agreements were entered into, and such stock option grants were made, based upon mistaken or misrepresented information regarding the Company’s true financial performance. The Company also sought to recover the compensation and bonuses paid to them as a result of such mistaken or misrepresented information. In addition, the Company sought to recover excessive rent it paid pursuant to a lease agreement between the Company and J.C. Enterprises in reliance on misrepresented information provided by Messrs. Kiser and Sherman. The Company added Ms. Sherman and the Kathryn Sherman Trust to this action because they may have received assets from Mr. Sherman that the Company may have been entitled to recover.

35

On May 30, 2002, David Sherman filed a counter-claim against the Company alleging that the Company breached its obligation to him by suspending payment of consulting fees under the termination and consulting agreement between him and the Company.

On July 8, 2002, Joseph Kiser filed counter-claims against the Company, Charles R. Bland, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, Gil J. Van Lunsen and David M. Risley alleging a variety of claims. Mr. Bland is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Dutkiewicz is the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Messrs. Risley and Van Lunsen are on the Company’s Board of Directors and are members of the SLC.

Mr. Kiser’s employment contract required him to perform any directive of the Company’s Board of Directors. Subsequent to March 19, 2002, Mr. Kiser had not performed any services for the Company. Since March 19, 2002, the Company suspended all payments required by Mr. Kiser’s employment contract. The Company recorded approximately $203,000 of estimated liabilities representing the present value of post-employment health care obligations and a one time separation bonus to be paid to Mr. Kiser upon termination of contract payments.

Had Mr. Kiser prevailed in requiring the Company to comply with the terms of the employment contract, the Company could have been obligated to total future payments of approximately $1,400,000 payable over ten years. If the Company had been successful in its claims against Mr. Kiser, it could have been awarded as much as $5,600,000 plus attorneys’ fees. Additionally, the Company would have reversed all previously recorded liabilities associated with this matter. Had Mr. Kiser prevailed on his breach of contract action related to the indemnification agreements he had with the Company, the Company could have been liable for attorney fees and costs incurred in the various actions as well as for future covered attorney’s fees, the present amount of which is unknown.

Under Mr. Sherman’s termination and consulting agreement, the Company agreed to engage Mr. Sherman as a consultant for the period August 1, 2000 through July 31, 2001. As a consultant he was to receive compensation of $195,000 as consulting fees along with certain other benefits. Due to his failure to submit certain documentation for travel expenses in which amounts were advanced, the Company’s audit committee suspended payment of the consulting fees in October 2000 and terminated the agreement due to misappropriation of funds. During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Company recognized a $145,000 benefit from an insurance recovery for Mr. Sherman’s undocumented travel advances. Had Mr. Sherman prevailed on his breach of contract action, the Company could have been liable for amounts under his termination and consulting agreement, attorney fees and costs incurred in the various actions as well as for future covered attorney’s fees, the present amount of which is unknown.

Global Settlement of Private Securities Class Action and Company Action against Former Officers

In connection with the private securities class action, the declaratory judgment action by excess insurer and the Company action against former officers, the Company, the individual defendants in the private securities class action, AESIC, and the individual defendants in the Company action against former officers attended global settlement conferences on October 11, 2002 and December 10, 2002. All parties involved reached an agreement in principle for the global settlement of all litigation.

As part of the global settlement that resulted in the Stipulation, the Company has executed settlement agreements and/or mutual releases with all parties against the former officers. Under the terms of the settlement agreement with Mr. Kiser and J.C. Enterprises, the Company has

36

agreed to pay $245,000 in total consideration; $230,000 to Mr. Kiser as well as $15,000 to his former attorneys to cover certain legal expenses. In return, Mr. Kiser agreed to a mutual general release including, but not limited to, releasing the Company, Messrs. Bland, Dutkiewicz, Risley and Van Lunsen from all claims related to his employment agreement and the advancement or indemnification of attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense, subject to the settlement of the private securities class action. Under the terms of this settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the current required rental amount under the existing lease with J.C. Enterprises, but the Company has the option to terminate the lease, after sufficient notice, in the event J.C. Enterprises contracts to sell the property during the remaining lease term.

Additionally, the Company has signed a mutual general release with Mr. Sherman, which, among other things, releases the Company from all claims related to his employment and separation agreements and any rights he may have had regarding advancement or indemnification of attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense. In consideration of the mutual release with Mr. Sherman, Mr. Sherman transferred 100,813 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company and the Company agreed to repay Mr. Sherman’s promissory note to Carolyn Kiser in the principal amount of $55,030. The Company also executed mutual release relating to litigation with Joan Sherman and the Kaythern Sherman Trusts, which were signed on December 17, 2002.

The parties to the Company action against former officers have executed a stipulation of dismissal, which will dismiss the action with prejudice. The Company anticipates that the stipulation of dismissal will be filed by the Company’s counsel once the Stipulation has received final approval from the court hearing the private securities class action and the Company pays Mr. Kiser $230,000 as described above.

Additionally, the Company has signed mutual general releases with Messrs. Bailey and Clark, which, among other things, release the Company from all claims related to their employment and separation agreements and any rights they may have had regarding advancement or indemnification of attorney’s fees and other costs of defense. Mr. Bailey’s mutual release is conditioned upon the settlement of the private securities class action.

Patent Litigation

On August 8, 2002, Anaren Microwave, Inc. (“Anaren”) filed suit against the Company for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,821,007. On November 19, 2002, the Company was served with the complaint. Anaren has requested damages in an unspecified amount and attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. The Company and its counsel are investigating Anaren’s allegations. The Company believes that the outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Other

The Company is a party to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of these other matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

Stock Grant Plan. During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, we issued 900 shares of our common stock with an aggregate fair market value of less than $1,000 to non-management members of our Board of Directors under our Stock Grant Plan. Although we have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares issuable under the Stock Grant Plan, due to the fact that certain of our financial statements for the periods prior to June 30, 2000 are unaudited as discussed

37

in Item 8 on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2002, we have issued such shares in reliance on Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Tandem Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan. During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, we sold 500 shares of our common stock to an employee at a price of $0.25 per share pursuant to such employee’s exercise of an option issued under our Tandem Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan. Although we have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares issuable under the Tandem Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, due to the fact that certain of our financial statements for the periods prior to June 30, 2000 are unaudited as discussed in Item 8 on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2002, we have issued such shares in reliance on Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)	Exhibits
	10.1	Stipulation of Settlement dated January 22, 2003 between Vari-L Company, Inc., Derek L. Bailey, Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark and the plaintiffs in Civil No. 00-S-1198 between plaintiffs Micheal Rasner, et al., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and defendants Vari-L Company, Inc., Derek L. Bailey, Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman and Jon L. Clark in the United State District Court, District of Colorado, by and through their respective attorneys, for settlement of litigation against Vari-L Company, Inc.
(b)	Reports on Form 8-K
	A report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2002 under Item 5 and 7 was filed with the Commission on October 2, 2002 and a report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2002 under Item 5 and 7 was filed with the Commission on December 6, 2002.

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	VARI-L COMPANY, INC
Date: February 12, 2003	By:	/s/ Charles R. Bland
		Charles R. Bland President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 12, 2003	By:	/s/ Richard P. Dutkiewicz
		Richard P. Dutkiewicz Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

39

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles R. Bland, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vari-L Company, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c.	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 12, 2003

/s/ CHARLES R. BLAND

Charles R. Bland, President and
Chief Executive Officer

40

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vari-L Company, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c.	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

d.	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
e.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 12, 2003

/s/ RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZ

Richard P. Dutkiewicz, Vice President
of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

41

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.1	Stipulation of Settlement dated January 22, 2003 between Vari-L Company, Inc., Derek L. Bailey, Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark and the plaintiffs in Civil No. 00-S-1198 between plaintiffs Micheal Rasner, et al., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and defendants Vari-L Company, Inc., Derek L. Bailey, Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman and Jon L. Clark in the United State District Court, District of Colorado, by and through their respective attorneys, for settlement of litigation against Vari-L Company, Inc.

EX-10.1 3 d03122exv10w1.txt EX-10.1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"), is made and entered into by and among the following Settling Parties (as defined further in Section IV hereof) to the above-entitled Litigation: (i) the Lead Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and each of the Settlement Class Members), by and through Co-Lead Counsel of record in the Litigation; and (ii) the Defendants, by and through their counsel of record in the Litigation. The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the Released Claims (as defined in Paragraph 1.17 hereof), upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof. I. THE LITIGATION On and after June 9, 2000, the following actions (collectively, the "Litigation") were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, as securities class actions on behalf of purchasers of Vari-L Company, Inc. ("Vari-L" or the "Company") stock between December 17, 1997 and July 6, 2000, brought against Vari-L and certain of its present and former officers and directors: Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1181 Furman v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-WY-1198 Pedersen v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1217 Rambo v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1238 Gonzalez v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1241 Paige v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1292 Bronner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1395 Crescente v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1401 -1- Farina v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1409 Betts v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1460 Hoos v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1465 Cody v. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1493 Bernstein v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1518 Schmidt v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1520 Rhodes v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1565 Striker v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1690 The operative complaint (the "Complaint") is the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, filed on October 9, 2001. The Complaint alleges claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On September 6, 2000, the Court granted the motion of Columbus Circle Investors, Steven D. Thomas and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, for appointment as lead plaintiffs under Section 21D(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act and approved Lead Plaintiffs' selection of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo as Co-Lead Counsel pursuant to Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange Act. II. DEFENDANTS' DENIAL OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY -2- Defendants deny and continue to deny each and all of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered damage, that the price of Vari-L common stock was artificially inflated by reasons of alleged misrepresentations, non-disclosures or otherwise, or that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class were harmed by the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Nothing in this Stipulation is intended, or should be construed, as an admission or concession of any of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. The Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial to them that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. III. CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through trial and through appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also have taken into account the uncertain outcome -3- and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Litigation, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof under and possible defenses to the claims asserted in the Litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs are also aware of the limited financial resources of the Defendants and of their inability to pay a large judgment. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Settlement Class. Based on their evaluation, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs have determined that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is in the best interests of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. IV. TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among each of the Lead Plaintiffs (for themselves and the Settlement Class Members) and the Defendants, by and through their respective counsel or attorneys of record, that, subject to the occurrence of the events and conditions set forth in Paragraph 7.1 below, the Litigation and the Released Claims (as hereinafter defined) shall be finally and fully compromised, settled and released, and the Litigation shall be dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation, as follows. 1. Definitions As used in this Stipulation the following terms have the meanings specified below: 1.1 "Authorized Claimant" means any Settlement Class Member whose claim for recovery has been allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. 1.2 "Claimant" means any Settlement Class Member who files a Proof of Claim in such form and manner, and within such time, as the Court shall prescribe. 1.3 "Claims Administrator" means the firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC. -4- 1.4 "Class Period" means the period commencing on December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive. 1.5 "Settlement Class Member" or "Member of the Settlement Class" mean a Person who falls within the definition of the Settlement Class as set forth in Paragraph 1.21 of the Stipulation. 1.6 "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc., Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark, and Derek L. Bailey. 1.7 "Effective Date" means the first date by which all of the events and conditions specified in Paragraph 7.1 of the Stipulation have been met and have occurred. 1.8 "Escrow Agent" means the law firm of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP. 1.9 "Final" means (a) the date of final affirmance on an appeal of the Judgment, the expiration of the time for a petition for or a denial of a writ of certiorari to review the Judgment and, if certiorari is granted, the date of final affirmance of the Judgment following review pursuant to that grant; or (b) the date of final dismissal of any appeal from the Judgment or the final dismissal of any proceeding on certiorari to review the Judgment; or (c) if no appeal is filed the expiration date of the time for the filing or noticing of any appeal from the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto; i.e., thirty (30) days after entry of the Judgment. Any proceeding or order, or any appeal or petition for a writ of certiorari pertaining solely to any Plan of Allocation and/or application for attorneys' fees or expenses, shall not in any way delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming final. 1.10 "Individual Defendants" mean Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark and Derek L. Bailey. 1.11 "Judgment" means the judgment to be rendered by the Court, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. -5- 1.12 "Lead Plaintiffs" mean Columbus Circle Investors, Steven D. Thomas and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, appointed pursuant to this Court's Order of September 6, 2000. 1.13 "Person" means an individual, natural person, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, association, joint stock company, joint venture, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity and their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, representatives, or assignees. 1.14 "Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel" means Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101, Telephone 619/231-1058; Michael Yarnoff, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, Telephone: 610/667-7706; and Norman Berman, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, LLP, One Liberty Square, Boston, MA 02109, Telephone: 617/542-8300. 1.15 "Plan of Allocation" means a plan or formula of allocation of the Settlement Fund whereby the Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants after payment of expenses of notice and administration of the settlement, Taxes and Tax Expenses and such attorneys' fees, expenses and interest as may be awarded by the Court. Any Plan of Allocation is not part of the Stipulation and Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility or liability with respect thereto. 1.16 "Related Parties" means each of a Defendant's past or present directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters, insurers (including but not limited to Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under Policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under Policy No. NDA0155834), co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, associates, -6- personal or legal representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest, any members of their immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family. 1.17 "Released Claims" shall collectively mean any and all claims (including Unknown Claims as defined in Paragraph 1.25 hereof), actions, demands, allegations, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever, including but not limited to, claims for negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, mismanagement, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that have been or could have been asserted against the Defendants and/or the Related Parties in the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to both the purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by any other Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation. 1.18 "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and the Related Parties. 1.19 "Representative Plaintiffs" means each plaintiff who has appeared in the Litigation. 1.20 "Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel" means counsel who have appeared for any of the Representative Plaintiffs in the Litigation. 1.21 "Settlement Class" means all Persons (except Defendants, present and former executive officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries, their heirs, successors, -7- assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants) who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the "Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action" to be sent to the class. 1.22 "Settlement Fund" means (a) the principal amount of Six Hundred Forty Four Thousand Dollars ($644,000) in cash (the "Cash Amount") to be paid to the Escrow Agent pursuant to Paragraph 2.1 of this Stipulation, plus all interest earned thereon; and (b) the Settlement Stock. 1.23 "Settling Parties" means, collectively, each of the Defendants and the Lead Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class Members. 1.24 "Settlement Stock" means Two Million (2,000,000) shares of Vari-L common stock, which shall be issued under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 exempt from registration, subject to the anti-dilution provisions set forth in Paragraph 2.4 hereof. 1.25 "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. -8- Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542. The Representative Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a material element of the settlement of which this release is a part. 2. THE SETTLEMENT a. THE SETTLEMENT FUND 2.1 The Cash Amount will be transferred to the Escrow Agent as follows: (a) Within fifteen (15) days of receiving an order granting preliminary approval of the settlement, the Individual Defendants shall pay or cause to be paid $394,000, in an allocation previously agreed upon by the Individual Defendants, in accordance with -9- instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed into an interest-bearing escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent. Of the $394,000, $115,000 shall be paid by AESIC and the remainder shall be paid or caused to be paid by the Individual Defendants without any recourse to AESIC under the Policy or otherwise, in the allocation previously agreed upon by the Individual Defendants. Each Individual Defendant is solely responsible for his agreed upon contribution. Defendants Kiser and Clark shall take all reasonable steps to request that the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pay the agreed-upon disgorgement funds to the Escrow Agent for the benefit of the Settlement Class. (b) Within fifteen (15) days of receiving an order granting preliminary approval of the settlement, Vari-L shall pay $100,000 in accordance with instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed in an interest-bearing escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent. (c) The remaining cash payment of $150,000, plus interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum to begin accruing on the date of the order granting preliminary approval of the settlement, shall be paid by Vari-L on or before thirty-five (35) days after entry of the Judgment, in accordance with instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed in an interest-bearing escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent. This payment shall be made regardless of whether any appeal is taken to any aspect of the Final Judgment and Order, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2.12 herein. 2.2 Vari-L shall deliver or cause to be delivered the Settlement Stock to Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in accordance with the instructions provided to the Vari-L transfer agent by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator, subject to the limitations contained in Paragraph 2.3. Each and all shares of Settlement Stock shall be exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, freely tradeable and free from any liens and encumbrances upon delivery to Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel. Upon entry of the Final Order and Judgment, Vari-L -10- shall take all steps reasonably necessary to prepare for the contribution of the Settlement Stock to the Settlement Fund, such that the shares will be available for distribution within thirty-five (35) days after the Effective Date. 2.3 Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Vari-L's transfer agent will be provided with a list identifying each Authorized Claimant and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to receive Settlement Stock and the number of shares of Settlement Stock to be issued to each such Person ("Distribution List"). No fractional shares of Settlement Stock will be issued, and thus, the calculation of the number of shares to be distributed will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole share. In addition, the Settlement Stock will be distributed to Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the Settlement Stock is exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the Settlement Stock is not exempt, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator to equalize the value of their distribution under the Plan of Allocation, however, said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any Defendants' contribution to the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's contribution of the Settlement Stock. Vari-L shall direct its transfer agent to distribute certificates for shares of Vari-L common stock within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of the Distribution List to the Persons and in the amounts shown on said Distribution List in a transaction exempt under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. All costs associated with the delivery of the Settlement Stock shall be borne by Vari-L. Nothing herein shall require Vari-L or its transfer agent to distribute said shares to Authorized Claimants or any other Person who, in the opinion of Vari-L's legal counsel, reside in states where the Settlement Stock is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. b. ANTI-DILUTION PROVISIONS OF THE SETTLEMENT STOCK -11- 2.4 With respect to any issuance of New Equity Securities (as defined below) at any time between January 22, 2003, and the later of December 31, 2003 or three (3) months after distribution of the Settlement Stock to the Settlement Class, the Settlement Class shall be entitled to receive an amount of Assessment Security (defined below) upon the terms and conditions set forth below: (a) Until the later of December 31, 2003, or the date that is three (3) months after the date of distribution of the Settlement Stock to the Settlement Class, Vari-L may sell equity securities, securities that are convertible at any time into one or more equity securities, and securities that provide for the purchase at any time of one or more equity securities (collectively "New Equity Securities") without being required to issue any Assessment Security (as defined below) to the Settlement Class if, and only if, one or more of the following conditions is satisfied: (i) the sale of such security is made as a rights offering to all holders of the Company's outstanding common stock; (ii) in the case of shares sold in a private financing or PIPES transaction, the sale of such security is made at a per-common-share price equal to or greater than the average closing price of Vari-L's common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days ending two (2) trading days before such transaction is priced; (iii) such security is sold at a price per share not less than the Deemed Value (as defined below) of the shares issued to the Settlement Class and the Company makes public disclosures of such sale; (iv) the holders of the Company's common stock approve of such issuance at a Meeting of Shareholders by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares represented at such meeting (excluding the shares of such Person or Persons participating in the issuance which is the subject matter of the vote); or -12- (v) the Company receives at the time of the sale of such security the signed opinion or report of a nationally-recognized investment banking firm that is independent of the Company and independent of all proposed purchasers of each such security to the effect that the price at which such security is being sold is fair to the Company and its shareholders from a financial point of view. The term New Equity Securities shall not include (1) any shares of common stock, or rights or options to purchase common stock, issued pursuant to the Company's existing stock option plan or employee stock purchase plan or any new plan approved by shareholders, or (2) shares issued in an underwritten public offering. The term "Deemed Value" shall be the average closing sale price of Vari-L's common stock for the ten (10) trading days preceding October 3, 2002, or $0.51. (b) Until the later of December 31, 2003, or the date that is three (3) months after the date of distribution of the Settlement Stock to the Settlement Class, any New Equity Securities that are sold without meeting one or more of the conditions in Paragraph 2.4(a) shall be designated as an "Assessment Security." (c) With respect to any Assessment Security, the Settlement Class shall be entitled to receive, without making payment, a number of shares of the Assessment Security being sold in an amount determined in accordance with the following formula: Where: A = Number of Assessment Security shares to be issued -- -- | NP + FD | A = S |1- [-------] | | ND + FD | -- -- S = Number of shares originally issued to the Settlement Class (2,000,000), as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, etc. N = Number of New Equity Securities issued P = Price (on a common equivalent basis) of the New Equity Securities F = Fully diluted shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to issuance of New Equity Securities D = Deemed Value of hares issued to the Settlement Class (based on market price of Vari-L's stock on October 3, 2002), as adjusted Upon any adjustments in accordance with the foregoing, D will be adjusted for the purpose of any future adjustments in accordance with the following, where DN represents the new -13- Deemed Value and DO is the Deemed Value immediately prior to the issuance of the Assessment Security. D(N) = D(O) x S --- S+A The total number of shares to be contributed to the Settlement Fund will be adjusted to reflect any changes due to stock splits, stock dividends or reverse stock splits. (d) Within ten (10) business days after any issuance of New Equity Securities that requires Vari-L to issue Assessment Securities hereunder (an "Eligible Transaction"), Vari-L shall provide the Claims Administrator with written notice of such issuance (an "Assessment Security Notice"). Such Assessment Security Notice shall include the number of shares sold in the Eligible Transaction, the effective price of such securities and the number of shares of Assessment Securities to which the Settlement Class is entitled. Within ten (10) business days after receipt of such Assessment Security Notice, the Claims Administrator will provide Vari-L with a list identifying each Authorized Claimant and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to receive Assessment Securities and the number of shares of Assessment Securities to be issued to each such Person ("Assessment Security Distribution List"). No fractional shares of Assessment Securities will be issued, and thus, the calculation of the number of shares to be distributed will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole share. In addition, Assessment Securities will be distributed to Authorized Claimants or other Persons who reside in states where the Assessment Securities are exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the Assessment Securities are not exempt, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator to equalize the value of their distribution under the Plan of Allocation however, said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any Defendants' contribution to the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's -14- contribution of the Settlement Stock. Vari-L shall direct its transfer agent to distribute certificates for shares of Vari-L common stock within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of the Assessment Security Distribution List, which in no event shall be less than thirty-five (35) days after the Effective Date, to the Persons and in the amounts shown on said Assessment Security Distribution List in a transaction exempt under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. All costs associated with the delivery of the Assessment Securities shall be borne by Vari-L. Nothing herein shall require Vari-L or its transfer agent to distribute said shares to Authorized Claimants or any other Person who, in the opinion of Vari-L's legal counsel, reside in states where the Assessment Securities are not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. c. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION FOR THE SETTLEMENT 2.5 As additional consideration for the settlement, Vari-L agrees to and does assign to the Settlement Class, to the extent they exist, any rights that Vari-L may have to proceeds or other damages under the following insurance policy: Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), Policy No. NDA0155834. Reliance is in liquidation and any recovery under the policy is uncertain. Vari-L shall use its best efforts to obtain the written consent or endorsement from an authorized representative of Reliance of the assignment of Vari-L's rights to the insurance proceeds, if any, to the Settlement Class. d. THE ESCROW AGENT 2.6 The Escrow Agent shall invest the Cash Amount of the Settlement Fund deposited pursuant to Paragraph 2.1 above in instruments backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government or fully insured by the United States Government or an agency thereof and shall reinvest the proceeds of these instruments as they mature in similar instruments at their then-current market rates. The Escrow Agent shall bear all risks related to investment of the Settlement Fund. -15- 2.7 The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Settlement Fund except as provided in the Stipulation, by an order of the Court, or with the written agreement of counsel for Defendants and Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel. 2.8 Subject to further order and/or directions as may be made by the Court, the Escrow Agent is authorized to execute such transactions on behalf of the Settlement Class Members as are consistent with the terms of the Stipulation. 2.9 All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court. 2.10 Within ten (10) days after payment of the Cash Amount of the Settlement Fund to the Escrow Agent set forth in Paragraph 2.1(b) hereof, the Escrow Agent may establish a "Class Notice and Administration Fund," and may deposit therein the $100,000 contributed by Vari-L to the Settlement Fund. The Class Notice and Administration Fund may be used by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel to pay costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in connection with providing notice to the class, locating class members, soliciting Settlement Class claims, assisting with the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any. The Class Notice and Administration Fund may also be invested and earn interest as provided for in Paragraph 2.6 of this Stipulation. Any unused portion of the Class Notice and Administration Fund shall be returned to the Settlement Fund. -16- e. TAXES 2.11 (a) The Settling Parties and the Escrow Agent agree to treat the Settlement Fund as being at all times a "qualified settlement fund" within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-1. In addition, the Escrow Agent shall timely make such elections as necessary or advisable to carry out the provisions of this Paragraph 2.11, including the "relation-back election" (as defined in Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-1) back to the earliest permitted date. Such elections shall be made in compliance with the procedures and requirements contained in such regulations. It shall be the responsibility of the Escrow Agent to timely and properly prepare and deliver the necessary documentation for signature by all necessary parties, and thereafter to cause the appropriate filing to occur. (b) For the purpose of Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the "administrator" shall be the Escrow Agent. The Escrow Agent shall timely and properly file all informational and other tax returns necessary or advisable with respect to the Settlement Fund (including, without limitation, the returns described in Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-2(k)). Such returns (as well as the election described in Paragraph 2.11(a) hereof) shall be consistent with this Paragraph 2.11 and in all events shall reflect that all Taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or penalties) on the income earned by the Settlement Fund shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund as provided in Paragraph 2.11(c) hereof. (c) All (i) Taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or penalties) arising with respect to the income earned by the Settlement Fund, including any Taxes or tax detriments that may be imposed upon the Defendants, the Related Parties or counsel for any of them with respect to any income earned by the Settlement Fund for any period during which the Settlement Fund does not qualify as a "qualified settlement fund" for federal or state income tax purposes ("Taxes"), and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in connection with the operation and implementation of this Paragraph 2.11 (including, without limitation, expenses of tax -17- attorneys and/or accountants and mailing and distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or failing to file) the returns described in this Paragraph 2.11) ("Tax Expenses"), shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund; in all events the Defendants, the Related Parties and counsel for each of them shall have no liability or responsibility for the Taxes or the Tax Expenses or the filing of any tax returns or other documents with the Internal Revenue Service or any other state or local taxing authority. The Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold each of the Defendants, the Related Parties and counsel for each of them harmless for Taxes and Tax Expenses (including, without limitation, Taxes payable by reason of any such indemnification). Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be treated as, and considered to be, a cost of administration of the Settlement Fund and shall be timely paid by the Escrow Agent out of the Settlement Fund without prior order from the Court and the Escrow Agent shall be obligated (notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary) to withhold from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds necessary to pay such amounts including the establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax Expenses (as well as any amounts that may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-2(l)(2)); neither the Defendants, the Related Parties nor counsel for any of them are responsible nor shall they have any liability therefor or for any reporting requirements that may relate thereto. The parties hereto agree to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each other, and their tax attorneys and accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Paragraph 2.11. (d) For the purpose of this Paragraph 2.11 and of Paragraph 2.12, references to the Settlement Fund shall include both the Settlement Fund and the Class Notice and Administration Fund and shall also include any earnings thereon. f. TERMINATION OF SETTLEMENT 2.12 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved, or is terminated, canceled, or fails to become effective for any reason, the Settlement Fund less expenses actually incurred -18- or due and owing pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 and Paragraph 2.11 shall be refunded to the Defendants and/or their insurers or other designees as described in Paragraph 7.5 below. 3. NOTICE ORDER AND SETTLEMENT HEARING 3.1 Promptly upon execution of the Stipulation, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall submit the Stipulation together with its Exhibits to the Court and shall apply for entry of an order (the "Notice Order"), substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, providing for, inter alia, the certification of a class for settlement purposes only, the preliminary approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and approval for the mailing of a settlement notice (the "Notice") and publication of a summary notice (the "Summary Notice"), substantially in the forms of Exhibits A-1 and A-3 hereto. The Notice shall include the general terms of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, the proposed Plan of Allocation, the general terms of the Fee and Expense Application as defined in Paragraph 6.1 hereof and the date of the Settlement Hearing as defined below. 3.2 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall request that after notice is given, the Court hold a hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") and finally approve the settlement of the Litigation as set forth herein. At or after the Settlement Hearing, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel also will request that the Court approve the proposed Plan of Allocation and the Fee and Expense Application. 4. RELEASES 4.1 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in Paragraph 1.7 hereof, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against each and all of the Released Persons, and otherwise in connection with the -19- defense or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims, whether or not such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release. 4.2 The Proof of Claim and Release to be executed by Settlement Class Members shall release all Released Claims against the Released Persons and shall be substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto. 4.3 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in Paragraph 1.7 hereof, each of the Defendants shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of the Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs from all claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 5. ADMINISTRATION AND CALCULATION OF CLAIMS, FINAL AWARDS AND SUPERVISION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT FUND 5.1 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, or their authorized agents, acting on behalf of the Settlement Class, and subject to such supervision and direction of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, shall administer and calculate the claims submitted by Settlement Class Members and shall oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (defined below) to Authorized Claimants. 5.2 The Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows: (a) to pay counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs attorneys' fees and expenses with interest thereon (the "Fee and Expense Award"), if and to the extent allowed by the Court; (b) to pay all the expenses reasonably and actually incurred in connection with providing notice, locating class members, soliciting Settlement Class claims, assisting with the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Net Settlement Fund -20- to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any; (c) to pay the Taxes and Tax Expenses described in Paragraph 2.11 hereof; and (d) to distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlement Fund") to Authorized Claimants as allowed by the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or the Court. 5.3 Upon the Effective Date and thereafter, and in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or such further approval and further order(s) of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants, subject to and in accordance with the following: (a) Within ninety (90) days after the mailing of the Notice or such other time as may be set by the Court, each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall be required to submit to the Claims Administrator a completed Proof of Claim and Release, substantially in the form of Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, signed under penalty of perjury and supported by such documents as are specified in the Proof of Claim and Release and as are reasonably available to the Authorized Claimant. (b) Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, all Settlement Class Members who fail to timely submit a Proof of Claim and Release within such period, or such other period as may be ordered by the Court, shall be forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to the Stipulation and the settlement set forth herein, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of this Stipulation, the releases contained herein, and the Judgment. (c) The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants substantially in accordance with a Plan of Allocation described in the Notice and approved by the Court. The proposed Plan of Allocation will not be part of the Stipulation. However, if there is any balance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after six (6) months -21- from the date of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of tax refunds, uncashed checks or otherwise) Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall reallocate such balance among Authorized Claimants in an equitable and economic fashion. Thereafter, any balance which still remains in the Net Settlement Fund shall be donated to an appropriate non-profit organization. 5.4 The Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility for, interest in (except as provided in Paragraph 2.1(c) hereof), or liability whatsoever with respect to the investment or distribution of the Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the determination, administration, or calculation of claims, the payment or withholding of Taxes, or any losses incurred in connection therewith. 5.5 No Person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or any claims administrator, or other agent designated by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, or Defendants or their counsel based on the distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the settlement contained herein, the Plan of Allocation, and further order(s) of the Court. 5.6 It is understood and agreed by the Settling Parties that any proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund including, but not limited to, any adjustments to an Authorized Claimant's claim set forth therein, is not a part of the Stipulation and is to be considered by the Court separately from the Court's consideration of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to the Plan of Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect the finality of the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein, or any other orders entered pursuant to the Stipulation. 6. REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S ATTORNEYS' FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES -22- 6.1 Representative Plaintiffs or their counsel may submit an application or applications (the "Fee and Expense Application") for distributions to them from the Settlement Fund for: (a) an award of attorneys' fees; plus (b) reimbursement of expenses, including the fees of any experts or consultants, incurred in connection with prosecuting the Litigation, plus any interest on such attorneys' fees and expenses at the same rate and for the same periods as earned by the Settlement Fund (until paid) as may be awarded by the Court. Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel reserve the right to make additional applications for fees and expenses incurred to be distributed from the Settlement Fund. None of the funds in the Settlement Fund attributable to disgorgement received from the SEC may be used to pay counsel or to calculate any award to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel. 6.2 The attorneys' fees and expenses, as awarded by the Court, shall be paid to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel from the Settlement Fund, as ordered, immediately after the Court executes an order awarding such fees and expenses. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall thereafter allocate the attorneys' fees amongst Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in a manner in which they in good faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the prosecution and settlement of the Litigation. In the event that the Effective Date does not occur, or the Judgment or the order making the Fee and Expense Award is reversed or modified, or the Stipulation is canceled or terminated for any other reason, and in the event that the Fee and Expense Award has been paid to any extent, then Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel shall within five (5) business days from receiving notice from Defendants' counsel or from a court of appropriate jurisdiction, refund to the Settlement Fund the fees and expenses previously paid to them from the Settlement Fund plus interest thereon at the same rate as earned on the Settlement Fund in an amount consistent with such reversal or modification. Each such Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel's law firm, as a condition of receiving such fees and expenses, on behalf of itself and each partner and/or shareholder of it, agrees (a) that the obligations, set forth in this Paragraph 6.2, of each such law firm shall be joint -23- and several, (b) that each such law firm and its partners and/or shareholders shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Paragraph 6.2, and (c) that the Court may, upon application of Defendants, summarily issue orders and take whatever other actions it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, issuing judgments and attachment orders and making appropriate findings of and/or sanctions for contempt, against such law firms should any such law firm fail timely to repay fees and expenses pursuant to this Paragraph 6.2. 6.3 The procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the Court of any applications by any of the counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs for attorneys' fees and expenses, including the fees of experts and consultants, to be paid out of the Settlement Fund, are not part of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and are to be considered by the Court separately from the Court's consideration of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceedings relating to the Fee and Expense Application, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment approving the Stipulation and the settlement of the Litigation set forth therein. 6.4 Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, any payment to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel from the Settlement Fund. 6.5 Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to the allocation among Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, and/or any other Person who may assert some claim thereto, of any Fee and Expense Award that the Court may make in the Litigation, and Defendants and the Related Parties take no position with respect to such matters. -24- 7. CONDITIONS OF SETTLEMENT, EFFECT OF DISAPPROVAL, CANCELLATION OR TERMINATION 7.1 The Effective Date of the Stipulation shall be conditioned on the following: (a) Defendants shall have timely made or caused to be made their contributions to the Settlement Fund as required by Paragraph 2.1(a)-(c) hereof and defendants Kiser and Clark shall have taken all reasonable steps to request that the SEC pay the agreed-upon disgorgement funds to the Escrow Agent for the benefit of the Settlement Class; (b) the Court shall have entered the Notice Order, as required by Paragraph 3.1 hereof; (c) the settlement shall not have been terminated in accordance with the procedures referenced in Paragraph 7.4 below relating to Requests for Exclusion (as defined in Paragraph 7.4); (d) the Court shall have entered the Judgment, or a judgment substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto; and (e) the Judgment shall have become Final, as defined in Paragraph 1.9 hereof. 7.2 Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in Paragraph 7.1 hereof, any and all remaining interest or right of the Defendants in or to the Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutely and forever extinguished. 7.3 If all of the conditions specified in Paragraph 7.1 hereof are not met, then the Stipulation shall be canceled and terminated subject to Paragraph 7.6 hereof unless Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel and counsel for the Defendants mutually agree in writing to proceed with the Stipulation. 7.4 If prior to the Settlement Hearing, Persons who otherwise would be Members of the Settlement Class have submitted timely requests for exclusion ("Requests for Exclusion") from the Settlement Class in accordance with the provisions of the Notice Order and the notice given pursuant thereto, and if the aggregate number of shares of Vari-L common stock purchased by such class members during the Class Period, equals or exceeds the sums specified in a separate supplemental agreement ("Supplemental Agreement") -25- between the parties, then the Defendants shall have, in their sole and absolute discretion, the option to terminate the Stipulation in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Supplemental Agreement. The Supplemental Agreement will not be filed with the Court unless and until a dispute among the parties concerning its interpretation or application arises. Copies of all Requests for Exclusion received and copies of all written revocations of Requests for Exclusion received shall be delivered to counsel for Defendants within five (5) business days of receipt by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or their agents but in no event later than seven (7) court days before the Settlement Hearing. 7.5 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, in the event the Stipulation shall be terminated or canceled or fails to become effective for any reason, within five (5) business days after written notification of such event is sent by counsel for the Defendants or Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel to the Escrow Agent, the Settlement Fund (including earnings thereon), plus any amount then remaining in the Class Notice and Administration Fund (including earnings thereon), less expenses described in Paragraph 2.10 hereof, shall be refunded by the Escrow Agent to the Defendants and/or their insurers or other designees pursuant to written instructions from counsel for the Defendants. In particular, all parties to this Stipulation agree that the Escrow Agent shall return the $115,000 portion of the Settlement Fund funded by AESIC to AESIC or its counsel in the event a refund becomes due as contemplated in this paragraph. Notwithstanding any other provision to this Stipulation to the contrary, all the parties hereto expressly consent to Defendants assigning to AESIC any and all rights they have or may have in the $115,000 portion of the Settlement Fund funded by AESIC in the event that a refund becomes due pursuant to this paragraph. At the request of counsel for the Defendants, the Escrow Agent or its designee shall apply for any tax refund owed to the Settlement Fund and pay the proceeds, after deduction of any fees or expenses reasonably incurred in connection with such application(s) for refund, pursuant to written instructions from counsel for the Defendants. -26- 7.6 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved by the Court or the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is terminated, canceled, or otherwise fails to become effective in accordance with its terms, the Settling Parties and the Related Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of October 3, 2002. In such event, the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of Paragraph Paragraph 2.12, 6.2, 7.3-7.7 and 8.4 hereof, shall have no further force and effect with respect to the Settling Parties or the Related Parties and shall not be used in this Litigation or in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro tunc. No order of the Court or modification or reversal on appeal of any order of the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation or the amount of any attorneys' fees, expenses and interest awarded by the Court to the Representative Plaintiffs or any of their counsel shall constitute grounds for cancellation or termination of the Stipulation. 7.7 If the Effective Date does not occur, or if the Stipulation is terminated, canceled, or otherwise fails to become effective pursuant to its terms, neither the Representative Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually and properly disbursed in accordance with Paragraph 2.10 from the Class Notice and Administration Fund. In addition, any expenses already incurred and properly chargeable to the Class Notice and Administration Fund pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 hereof at the time of such termination or cancellation but which have not been paid, shall be paid by the Escrow Agent in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation prior to the balance of the Class Notice and Administration Fund being refunded in accordance with Paragraph 7.5 hereof. 7.8 If a case is commenced in respect to any Defendant under Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankruptcy), or a trustee, receiver or conservator is appointed under any similar law, and in the event of the entry of a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction determining the transfer of the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, by or on behalf of -27- such Defendant to be a preference, voidable transfer, fraudulent transfer or similar transaction, then, as to such Defendant, the releases given and Judgment entered in favor of such Defendant pursuant to this Stipulation shall be null and void. 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 8.1 The Settling Parties (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to consummate this agreement; and (b) agree to cooperate to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and conditions of the Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the foregoing terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 8.2 Each of the parties warrants and represents that he or it is not "insolvent" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.Section 101(32) as of the time this Stipulation is executed and as of the time any payments are transferred or made as required by this Stipulation. 8.3 The parties intend this settlement to be a final and complete resolution of all disputes between them with respect to the Litigation. The settlement compromises claims which are contested and shall not be deemed an admission by any Settling Party as to the merits of any claim or defense. The Final Judgment also will contain a finding that during the course of the Litigation, the parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The Settling Parties agree that the amount paid to the Settlement Fund and the other terms of the settlement were negotiated in good faith by the Settling Parties, and reflect a settlement that was reached voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel. The Settling Parties reserve their right to rebut, in a manner that such party determines to be appropriate, any contention made in any public forum that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. 8.4 The Settling Parties agree that except at the election of the Defendants (including any assignee(s) or subrogee(s) of the Defendants) or any of them, neither the -28- Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document prepared pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the settlement contained therein: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Defendants; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal other than in such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce this Stipulation or the settlement provided for herein, or the Judgment. 8.5 All of the Exhibits to this Stipulation are material and integral parts hereof and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. 8.6 The Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by or on behalf of all Settling Parties or their respective successors-in-interest. 8.7 This Stipulation and the Exhibits attached hereto and the Supplemental Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto and no representations, warranties or inducements have been made to any party concerning the Stipulation or its Exhibits other than the representations, warranties and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall bear its own costs. 8.8 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, on behalf of the Settlement Class, are expressly authorized by the Representative Plaintiffs to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be taken by the Settlement Class pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms and also are expressly authorized to enter into any modifications or amendments to the Stipulation on behalf of the Settlement Class which they deem appropriate. 8.9 Each counsel or other Person executing this Stipulation or any of its Exhibits on behalf of any party hereto hereby warrants that such Person has the full authority to do so. -29- 8.10 The Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A complete set of original executed counterparts shall be filed with the Court. 8.11 This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 8.12 The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to implementation and enforcement of the terms of this Stipulation, and all parties hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of implementing and enforcing the settlement embodied in this Stipulation. 8.13 This Stipulation and the Exhibits hereto shall be considered to have been negotiated, executed and delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the State of Colorado, and the rights and obligations of the parties to the Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the internal, substantive laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to that State's choice-of-law principles. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Stipulation to be executed, by their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of January 22, 2003. LILLEY & GARCIA LLP CHARLES W. LILLEY /s/ CHARLES W. LILLEY ----------------------------------------- 1600 Stout Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303/293-9800 Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs -30- MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP WILLIAM S. LERACH SPENCER A. BURKHOLZ HENRY ROSEN ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART /s/ ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART ----------------------------------------- ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP DAVID KESSLER MICHAEL K. YARNOFF /s/ MICHAEL K. YARNOFF ----------------------------------------- MICHAEL K. YARNOFF Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Telephone: 610/667-7706 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO BURT & PUCILLO NORMAN BERMAN JEFFREY C. BLOCK MICHAEL M. SULLIVAN /s/ NORMAN BERMAN ----------------------------------------- NORMAN BERMAN One Liberty Square Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: 617/542-8300 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs COOLEY GODWARD, LLP PETER A. GERGELY /s/ PETER A. GERGELY ----------------------------------------- PETER A. GERGELY 380 Interlocken Crescent Suite 900 Broomfield, CO 80021-8023 Telephone: 720/566-4000 Attorneys for Defendant Vari-L Company, Inc. -31- SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC KENNETH B. SIEGEL /s/ KENNETH B. SIEGEL ----------------------------------------- KENNETH B. SIEGEL 633 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303/299-8408 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP DAVID W. STARK /s/ DAVID W. STARK ----------------------------------------- DAVID W. STARK 370 17th Street, Suite 4700 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303/629-3400 ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP FREDERICK J. BAUMANN /s/ FREDERICK J. BAUMANN ----------------------------------------- FREDERICK J. BAUMANN 1200 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303/623-9000 BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C. CARLA B. MINCKLEY /s/ CARLA B. MINCKLEY ----------------------------------------- CARLA B. MINCKLEY 1700 Broadway, Suite 1501 Denver, CO 80209 Telephone: 303/860-1700 Attorneys for Individual Defendants -32- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE EXHIBIT A - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending before the Court entitled Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (the "Litigation"); WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"), that has been entered into by the Representative Plaintiffs and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and its attached Exhibits; and WHEREAS, the parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Litigation, in accordance with the Stipulation which, together with the Exhibits annexed thereto sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and the Court having read and considered the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; and WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby certifies, for purposes of effectuating this settlement, a class consisting of all Persons (except Defendants, present and former executive officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries, their heirs, successors, assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants) who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the "Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action" to be sent to the class. -1- 2. With respect to the class, this Court finds and concludes that: (a) the members of the class are so numerous that joinder of all class members in the Litigation is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the class which predominate over any individual questions; (c) the claims of the Representative Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the class; (d) the Representative Plaintiffs and their counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interests of all of the class members; and (e) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy, considering: (i) the interests of the members of the class in individually controlling the prosecution of the separate actions, (ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by members of the class, (iii) the desirability or undesirability of continuing the litigation of these claims in this particular forum, and (iv) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of the class action 3. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below. 4. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") shall be held before this Court on March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to determine whether the proposed settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class and should be approved by the Court; and whether a Judgment as provided in P. 1.11 of the Stipulation should be entered herein. At that time, or at any other time thereafter that the Court may order, the Court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved; and to determine the amount of fees and expenses that should be awarded to Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to members of the class. 5. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice"), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of Claim"), and Summary Notice for publication annexed as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 hereto and -2- finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in P. P. 6-7 of this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto. 6. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel are hereby authorized to retain the firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC ("Claims Administrator") to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims as more fully set forth below: (a) Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall make reasonable efforts to identify all Persons who are members of the class, and not later than February 4, 2003 (the "Notice Date"), Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 hereto, to be mailed by first class mail to all class members who can be identified with reasonable effort; (b) Not later than February 11, 2003, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investor's Business Daily; and (c) At least seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall cause to be served on Defendants' counsel and filed with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing and publishing. 7. Nominees who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period beginning December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, shall send the Notice and the Proof of Claim to all beneficial owners of such Vari-L stock within ten (10) days after receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator within ten (10) days of receipt thereof, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses or other nominees solely for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing notice to beneficial owners who are class members out of the Settlement Fund, -3- which expenses would not have been incurred except for the sending of such notice, subject to further order of this Court with respect to any dispute concerning such compensation. 8. All members of the class shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Litigation concerning the settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the class. 9. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement shall complete and submit Proof of Claim forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms must be submitted no later than ninety (90) days from the Notice Date. Any class member who does not timely submit a Proof of Claim within the time provided for, shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 10. Any member of the class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at their own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. If they do not enter an appearance, they will be represented by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel. 11. Any Person falling within the definition of the class may, upon request, be excluded from the class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion ("Request for Exclusion"), postmarked no later than March 10, 2003. A Request for Exclusion must state: (a) the name, address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b) each of the Person's purchases and sales of Vari-L common stock made during the Class Period, including the dates of purchase or sale, the number of shares purchased and/or sold, and the price paid or received per share for each such purchase or sale; and (c) that the Person wishes to be excluded from the class. All Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Stipulation or the Judgment entered in the Litigation. 12. Any member of the class may appear and show cause, if he, she or it has any, why the proposed settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair, just, reasonable and -4- adequate, why a judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan of Allocation should or should not be approved, or why attorneys' fees and expenses should or should not be awarded to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs; provided, however, that no class member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon approving the same, or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the attorneys' fees and expenses to be awarded to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs, unless that Person has delivered by hand or sent by first class mail written objections and copies of any papers and briefs such that they are received on or before March 10, 2003, by Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, California 92101; and Cooley Godward, LLP, Peter A. Gergely, 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900, Broomfield, Colorado 80021-8023, and filed said objections, papers and briefs with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, on or before March 10, 2003. Any member of the class who does not make his, her or its objection in the manner provided shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness or adequacy of the proposed settlement as set forth in the Stipulation, to the Plan of Allocation, or to the award of attorneys' fees and expenses to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 13. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court. 14. All papers in support of the settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and any application by counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be filed and served seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 15. Neither Defendants and their Related Parties nor Defendants' counsel shall have any responsibility for the Plan of Allocation or any application for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of -5- expenses submitted by Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, and such matters will be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement. 16. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Plan of Allocation proposed by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, and any application for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be approved. 17. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying class members, as well as administering the Settlement Fund, shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. In the event the settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Representative Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually and properly disbursed from the Class Notice and Administration Fund. 18. Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by Defendants of the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind. 19. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing without further notice to the members of the class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the class. DATED: --------------------- ---------------------------------- THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. BLACKBURN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -6- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION EXHIBIT A-1 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED VARI-L COMPANY, INC. ("VARI-L") COMMON STOCK DURING THE PERIOD BEGINNING DECEMBER 17, 1997 THROUGH JULY 6, 2000, INCLUSIVE PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SHARE IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE SETTLEMENT DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE. TO CLAIM YOUR SHARE OF THIS FUND, YOU MUST SUBMIT A VALID PROOF OF CLAIM POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2003. This Notice has been sent to you pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (the "Court"). The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the pendency and proposed settlement of this class action litigation and of the hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the settlement. This Notice is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an expression of any opinion by the Court with respect to the truth of the allegations in the Litigation or the merits of the claims or defenses asserted. This Notice describes the rights you may have in connection with the settlement and what steps you may take in relation to the settlement and this class action litigation. The proposed settlement creates a fund in the amount of $644,000 in cash (the "Cash Amount") and two million shares of Vari-L common stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement Stock") (collectively, the "Settlement Fund") and will include interest that accrues on the cash portion of the Settlement Fund prior to distribution. Your recovery from this fund will depend on a number of variables, including the number of shares of Vari-L common stock you purchased during the period December 17, 1997 to July 6, 2000, and the timing of your purchases and any sales. Depending on the number of eligible shares purchased by Settlement Class Members who elect to participate in the settlement and when -1- those shares were purchased and sold, the estimated average recovery per share will be approximately $0.32 before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. Representative Plaintiffs and Defendants do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if the Representative Plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim alleged. The issues on which the parties disagree include: (1) the appropriate economic model for determining the amount by which Vari-L common stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (2) the amount by which Vari-L common stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (3) the effect of various market forces influencing the trading price of Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; (4) the extent to which external factors, such as general market and industry conditions, influenced the trading price of Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; (5) the extent to which the various matters that Representative Plaintiffs alleged were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading price of Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; (6) the extent to which the various allegedly adverse material facts that Representative Plaintiffs alleged were omitted influenced (if at all) the trading price of Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; and (7) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were material, false, misleading or otherwise actionable under the securities laws. The Representative Plaintiffs believe that the proposed settlement is a good recovery under the circumstances and is in the best interests of the Settlement Class. Because of the risks associated with continuing to litigate and proceeding to trial, there was a danger that plaintiffs would not have prevailed on any of their claims, in which case the Settlement Class would receive nothing. The amount of damages recoverable by the Settlement Class was and is challenged by Defendants. Recoverable damages in this case are limited to losses caused by conduct actionable under applicable law and, had the litigation gone to trial, Defendants would have asserted that all or most of the losses of Settlement Class Members were caused by non-actionable market, industry or general economic factors. Defendants would also assert that throughout the Class Period the uncertainties and risks -2- associated with the purchase of Vari-L common stock were fully and adequately disclosed. Moreover, given Vari-L's financial condition, any recovery by the Settlement Class was in substantial doubt. Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have not received any payment for their services in conducting this Litigation since 2000 on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and the Members of the Class, nor have they been reimbursed for their substantial out-of-pocket expenditures. If the settlement is approved by the Court, counsel for the plaintiffs will apply to the Court for attorneys' fees of 25% of the portion of the Settlement Fund not attributable to disgorgement received from the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $250,000 to be paid from the Settlement Fund. If the amount requested is approved by the Court, the average cost per share will be $0.128. For further information regarding this settlement you may contact: Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101, Telephone: 619/231-1058; Michael Yarnoff, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, Telephone: 610/667-7706; or Norman Berman, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, LLP, One Liberty Square, Boston, MA 02109, Telephone: 617/542-8300. I. NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT A settlement hearing will be held on March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Court Judge, at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, District of Colorado, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado (the "Settlement Hearing"). The purpose of the Settlement Hearing will be to determine: whether the settlement consisting of $644,000 in cash and $2,000,000 shares of Vari-L common stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement should be approved as fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settling Parties; and whether a Judgment as provided in Paragraph 1.11 of the Stipulation -3- should be entered. At that time, or at any other time thereafter that the Court may order, the Court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the proposed plan to distribute the settlement proceeds (the "Plan of Allocation") is fair, just, reasonable, and adequate; and whether the application by Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses should be approved. The Court may adjourn or continue the Settlement Hearing without further notice to the class. II. DEFINITIONS USED IN THIS NOTICE 1. "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc. and the Individual Defendants. 2. "Individual Defendants" means Joseph H. Kiser, Jon L. Clark, Derek L. Bailey and David G. Sherman. 3. "Related Parties" means each of a Defendant's past or present directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters, insurers (including, but not limited to, Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under Policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under Policy No. NDA0155834), co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, associates, personal or legal representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest, any members of their immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family. 4. "Released Claims" shall collectively mean any and all claims (including "Unknown Claims" as defined below), actions, demands, allegations, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever, including but not limited to, claims for negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, mismanagement, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that have been -4- or could have been asserted against the Defendants and/or the Related Parties in the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to both the purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by any other Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation. 5. "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and the Related Parties. 6. "Settlement Class" means all Persons (except Defendants, present and former executive officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries, their heirs, successors, assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants) who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 and July 6, 2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to this Notice. 7. "Settlement Fund" means (a) the principal amount of Six Hundred Forty Four Thousand Dollars ($644,000) in cash (the "Cash Amount"), plus all interest earned thereon; and (b) the Settlement Stock. 8. "Settlement Stock" means Two Million (2,000,000) shares of Vari-L common stock, which shall be issued under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 exempt from registration, subject to the anti-dilution provisions set forth in paragraph 2.4 of the Stipulation. 9. "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the -5- Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542. The Representative Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a material element of the settlement of which this release is a part. III. THE LITIGATION On and after June 9, 2000, the following actions (collectively, the "Litigation") were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, as securities class actions on behalf of -6- purchasers of Vari-L Company, Inc. stock between December 17, 1997 and July 6, 2000 (the "Class Period"), brought against Vari-L and certain of its present and former officers and directors: Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1181 Furman v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-WY-1198 Pedersen v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1217 Rambo v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1238 Gonzalez v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1241 Paige v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1292 Bronner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1395 Crescente v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1401 Farina v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1409 Betts v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1460 Hoos v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1465 Cody v. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1493 Bernstein v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1518 Schmidt v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1520 Rhodes v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1565 Striker v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-S-1690 -7- The operative complaint (the "Complaint") is the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, filed on October 9, 2001. The Complaint alleges claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. More specifically, the Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants reported materially false financial results and made false and misleading statements about Vari-L's financial condition, causing Vari-L's stock to trade at artificially inflated levels. The Complaint alleges that Vari-L's reported revenues and earnings for 1997, 1998, 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, were grossly overstated. The Complaint further alleges that Vari-L's financial controls were so inadequate that it is impossible to reconstruct or restate any financials prior to 1999. On September 6, 2000, the Court granted the motion of Columbus Circle Investors, Steven D. Thomas and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, for appointment as lead plaintiffs under Section 21D(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act and approved Lead Plaintiffs' selection of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo as Co-Lead Counsel pursuant to Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange Act. IV. CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through trial and through appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Litigation, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof under and possible defenses to the claims asserted in the Litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs is also -8- aware of the limited financial resources of the Defendants and of their inability to pay a large judgment. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Settlement Class. Based on their evaluation, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs have determined that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is in the best interests of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. V. DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT AND DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY Defendants deny and continue to deny each and all of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered damage, that the price of Vari-L common stock was artificially inflated by reasons of alleged misrepresentations, non-disclosures or otherwise, or that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class were harmed by the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Nothing in the Stipulation is intended, or should be construed, as an admission or concession of any of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. The Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial to them that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. -9- VI. TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT The Defendants will pay or cause to be paid into an escrow account, pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"), cash in the amount of $644,000, a portion of which is attributable to disgorgement from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will continue to earn interest for the benefit of the Settlement Class. Vari-L is obligated to deliver or cause to be delivered the Settlement Stock to Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in accordance with the instructions provided to the Vari-L transfer agent by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator. Each and all shares of Settlement Stock shall be exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), freely tradeable and free from any liens and encumbrances upon delivery to Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel. Vari-L's transfer agent will be provided with a list identifying each Authorized Claimant and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to receive Settlement Stock and the number of shares of Settlement Stock to be issued to each such Person ("Distribution List"). No fractional shares of Settlement Stock will be issued, and thus, the calculation of the number of shares to be distributed will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole share. In addition, the Settlement Stock will be distributed to Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the Settlement Stock is exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the Settlement Stock is not exempt, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator to equalize the value of their distribution under the Plan of Allocation however, said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any Defendants' contribution to the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's contribution of the Settlement Stock . Vari-L shall direct its transfer agent to distribute certificates for shares of Vari-L common stock within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of the Distribution List to the Persons and in the amounts shown on the Distribution List in a transaction exempt under -10- Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act. All costs associated with the delivery of the Settlement Stock shall be borne by Vari-L. A portion of the settlement proceeds will be used for certain administrative expenses, including costs of printing and mailing this Notice, the cost of publishing a newspaper notice, payment of any taxes assessed against the Settlement Fund and costs associated with the processing of claims submitted. In addition, as explained below, a portion of the Settlement Fund may be awarded by the Court to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs as attorneys' fees and for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. The balance of the Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlement Fund") will be distributed according to the Plan of Allocation described below to Settlement Class Members who submit valid and timely Proof of Claim forms. VII. THE RIGHTS OF CLASS MEMBERS If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may receive the benefit of and you will be bound by the terms of the proposed settlement described in Section VI of this Notice, upon approval of it by the Court. If you are a Settlement Class Member, you have the following options: 1. You may file a Proof of Claim as described below. If you choose this option, you will remain a Settlement Class Member, you will share in the proceeds of the proposed settlement if your claim is timely and valid and if the proposed settlement is finally approved by the Court, and you will be bound by the Judgment and release described below. 2. If you do not wish to be included in the Settlement Class and you do not wish to participate in the proposed settlement described in this Notice, you may request to be excluded. To do so, you must so state in writing, postmarked no later than March 10, 2003. You must set forth: (a) your name, address and telephone number; (b) the number of shares of Vari-L common stock purchased and the number of shares sold during the Class Period and the dates and prices of such -11- purchase(s) and/or sale(s); and (c) that you wish to be excluded from the Settlement Class. The exclusion request should be addressed as follows: Vari-L Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 8040 San Rafael, CA 94912-8040 NO REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION WILL BE CONSIDERED VALID UNLESS ALL OF THE INFORMATION DESCRIBED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN ANY SUCH REQUEST. If you validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class (a) you will be excluded from the Settlement Class, (b) you will not share in the proceeds of the settlement described herein, (c) you will not be bound by any judgment entered in the Litigation, and (d) you will not be precluded, by reason of your decision to request exclusion from the Settlement Class, from otherwise prosecuting an individual claim, if timely, against Defendants based on the matters complained of in the Litigation. 3. If you do not request in writing to be excluded from the Settlement Class as set forth in Paragraph 2 above, you will be bound by any and all determinations or judgments in the Litigation in connection with the settlement entered into or approved by the Court, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Settlement Class, and you shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have fully released all of the Released Claims against the Released Persons, whether or not you submit a valid Proof of Claim. 4. You may object to the settlement and/or the application of Plaintiffs' Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses in the manner set forth below. The filing of a Proof of Claim by a Settlement Class Member does not preclude a Settlement Class Member from objecting to the settlement. However, if your objection is rejected you will be bound by the settlement and the Judgment just as if you had not objected. 5. You may do nothing at all. If you choose this option, you will not share in the proceeds of the settlement, but you will be bound by any judgment entered by the Court, and you -12- shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have fully released all of the Released Claims against the Released Persons. If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may, but are not required to, enter an appearance through counsel of your own choosing at your own expense. If you do not do so, you will be represented by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel: Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101; Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Michael Yarnoff, Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, LLP, Norman Berman, One Liberty Square, Boston, MA 02109. VIII. PLAN OF ALLOCATION The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to Settlement Class Members who submit valid, timely Proof of Claim forms ("Authorized Claimants") under the Plan of Allocation described below. The Plan of Allocation provides that you will be eligible to participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund only if you have a net loss on all transactions in Vari-L common stock during the Class Period. For purposes of determining the amount an Authorized Claimant may recover under the Plan of Allocation, Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have consulted with their damage consultants and the Plan of Allocation reflects an assessment of the damages that they believe could have been recovered had plaintiffs prevailed at trial. To the extent there are sufficient funds in the Net Settlement Fund, each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to the Authorized Claimant's claim, as defined below. If, however, the amount in the Net Settlement Fund is not sufficient to permit payment of the total claim of each Authorized Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage of the Net Settlement Fund that each Authorized Claimant's claim bears to the total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. Payment in this manner shall be deemed conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. -13- 1. A claim will be calculated as follows: For shares of Vari-L common stock purchased on December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, and (a) sold from December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, the claim per share is the difference between the price paid for the shares of Vari-L common stock and the amount realized from the sale of any such shares; (b) retained at the end of July 6, 2000, the claim per share is the difference between the price paid for the shares of Vari-L common stock and $6.00 per share (September 8, 2000 closing price on date stock resumed trading). 2. The date of purchase or sale is the "contract" or "trade" date as distinguished from the "settlement" date. 3. For Settlement Class Members who held shares at the beginning of the Class Period or made multiple purchases or sales during the Class Period, the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method will be applied to such holdings, purchases and sales for purposes of calculating a claim. Under the FIFO method, sales of shares during the Class Period will be matched, in chronological order, first against shares held at the beginning of the Class Period. The remaining sales of shares during the Class Period will then be matched, in chronological order, against shares purchased during the Class Period. 4. A Class Member will be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund only if a Class Member had a net loss, after all profits from transactions in Vari-L common stock during the Class Period are subtracted from all losses. However, the proceeds from sales of stock which have been matched against stock held at the beginning of the Class Period will not be used in the calculation of such net loss. The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the claim of any Settlement Class Member on equitable grounds. -14- Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation set forth above shall be conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No Person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or any claims administrator or Defendants or other agent designated by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or Defendants or Defendants' counsel based on distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further orders of the Court. All Settlement Class Members who fail to complete and file a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund (unless otherwise ordered by the Court), but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation, including the terms of any judgment entered and the releases given. IX. PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT If you fall within the definition of the Settlement Class, you will be bound by any judgment entered with respect to the settlement in the Litigation whether or not you file a Proof of Claim. If you choose, you may enter an appearance individually or through your own counsel at your own expense. TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND, YOU MUST TIMELY COMPLETE AND RETURN THE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM THAT ACCOMPANIES THIS NOTICE. The Proof of Claim and Release must be postmarked on or before May 1, 2003, and delivered to the Claims Administrator at the address below. Unless the Court orders otherwise, if you do not timely submit a valid Proof of Claim, you will be barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement Fund, but will in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and the Judgment. X. DISMISSAL AND RELEASES If the proposed settlement is approved, the Court will enter a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice ("Judgment"). The Judgment will dismiss the Released Claims with prejudice as to all Defendants. The Judgment will provide that all Settlement Class Members shall -15- be deemed to have released and forever discharged all Released Claims (to the extent Members of the Settlement Class have such claims) against all Released Persons and that the Released Persons shall be deemed to have released and discharged all Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs from all claims arising out of the prosecution and settlement of the Litigation or the Released Claims. XI. APPLICATION FOR FEES AND EXPENSES At the Settlement Hearing, counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs will request the Court to award attorneys' fees of 25% of that portion of the Settlement Fund which is not attributable to disgorgement received from the SEC, plus reimbursement of their expenses, not to exceed $250,000 which were advanced in connection with the Litigation, plus interest thereon. Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses. To date, Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have not received any payment for their services in conducting this Litigation on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and Members of the Settlement Class, nor have counsel been reimbursed for their substantial out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested by Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel will compensate counsel for their efforts in achieving the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Settlement Class, and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. The fee requested is well within the range of fees awarded to plaintiffs' counsel under similar circumstances in other litigation of this type. XII. CONDITIONS FOR SETTLEMENT The settlement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events described in the Stipulation. Those events include, among other things: (1) entry of the Judgment by the Court, as provided for in the Stipulation; and (2) expiration of the time to appeal from or alter or amend the Judgment. If, for any reason, any one of the conditions described in the Stipulation is not met, the -16- Stipulation might be terminated and, if terminated, will become null and void, and the parties to the Stipulation will be restored to their respective positions as of October 3, 2002. XIII. THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING Any Settlement Class Member who objects to any aspect of the settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the application for attorneys' fees and expenses, may appear and be heard at the Settlement Hearing. Any such Person must submit a written notice of objection, such that it is received on or before March 10, 2003, by each of the following: CLERK OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO 901 19th Street Denver, CO 80294 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs: MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP MICHAEL K. YARNOFF Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO BURT & PUCILLO NORMAN BERMAN One Liberty Square Boston, MA 02109 Counsel for Defendant Vari-L: COOLEY GODWARD, LLP PETER A. GERGELY 380 Interlocken Crescent Suite 900 Broomfield, CO 80021-8023 -17- Counsel for Individual Defendants: SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC KENNETH B. SIEGEL 633 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP DAVID W. STARK 370 17th Street, Suite 4700 Denver, CO 80202 ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP FREDERICK J. BAUMANN 1200 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C. CARLA B. MINCKLEY 1700 Broadway, Suite 1501 Denver, CO 80209 The notice of objection must demonstrate the objecting Person's membership in the Settlement Class, including the number of Vari-L shares purchased and sold during the Class Period, and contain a statement of the reasons for objection. Only Members of the Settlement Class who have submitted written notices of objection in this manner will be entitled to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, unless the Court orders otherwise. XIV. SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you hold any Vari-L common stock purchased during the Class Period as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, you must either: (1) send a copy of this Notice and the Proof of Claim by first class mail to all such Persons; or (2) provide a list of the names and addresses of such Persons to the Claims Administrator: Vari-L Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 8040 San Rafael, CA 94912-8040 -18- If you choose to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim yourself, you may obtain from the Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or advancement of reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and Proof of Claim and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice and Proof of Claim, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Claims Administrator. XV. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS This Notice is a summary and does not describe all of the details of the Stipulation. For full details of the matters discussed in this Notice, you may review the Stipulation filed with the Court, which may be inspected during business hours, at the office of the Clerk of the Court, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, District of Colorado, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. If you have any questions about the settlement of the Litigation, you may contact Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel by writing: MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP RICK NELSON 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP MICHAEL K. YARNOFF Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO BURT & PUCILLO NORMAN BERMAN One Liberty Square Boston, MA 02109 -19- DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. DATED: __________________, 2003 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO -20- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE EXHIBIT A-2 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To recover as a Member of the Settlement Class based on your claims in the action entitled Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (the "Litigation"), you must complete and, on page ___ hereof, sign this Proof of Claim and Release. If you fail to file a properly addressed (as set forth in paragraph 3 below) Proof of Claim and Release, your claim may be rejected and you may be precluded from any recovery from the Net Settlement Fund created in connection with the proposed settlement of the Litigation. 2. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release, however, does not assure that you will share in the proceeds of settlement in the Litigation. 3. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2003, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: Vari-L Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 8040 San Rafael, CA 94912-8040 If you are NOT a Member of the Settlement Class (as defined in the "Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action") DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim and Release form. 4. If you are a Member of the Settlement Class, you are bound by the terms of any judgment entered in the Litigation, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. II. DEFINITIONS 1. "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc. ("Vari-L") and the Individual Defendants. 2. "Individual Defendants" means Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon L. Clark, and Derek L. Bailey. 3. "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and their Related Parties. -1- III. CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION 1. If you purchased Vari-L common stock and held the certificate(s) in your name, you are the beneficial purchaser as well as the record purchaser. If, however, the certificate(s) were registered in the name of a third party, such as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial purchaser and the third party is the record purchaser. 2. Use Part I of this form entitled "Claimant Identification" to identify each purchaser of record ("nominee"), if different from the beneficial purchaser of Vari-L common stock which forms the basis of this claim. THIS CLAIM MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL BENEFICIAL PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OR THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OF THE VARI-L COMMON STOCK UPON WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED. 3. All joint purchasers must sign this claim. Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees must complete and sign this claim on behalf of Persons represented by them and their authority must accompany this claim and their titles or capacities must be stated. The Social Security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the beneficial owner may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the foregoing information could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of the claim. IV. CLAIM FORM 1. Use Part II of this form entitled "Schedule of Transactions in Vari-L Common Stock" to supply all required details of your transaction(s) in Vari-L common stock. If you need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same form. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet. 2. On the schedules, provide all of the requested information with respect to ALL of your purchases and ALL of your sales of Vari-L common stock which took place at any time between December 17, 1997 and July 6, 2000, inclusive (the "Class Period"), whether such transactions -2- resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may result in the rejection of your claim. 3. List each transaction in the Class Period separately and in chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day and year of each transaction you list. 4. The date of covering a "short sale" is deemed to be the date of purchase of Vari-L stock. The date of a "short sale" is deemed to be the date of sale of Vari-L stock. 5. Broker confirmations or other documentation of your transactions in Vari-L stock should be attached to your claim. Failure to provide this documentation could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of your claim. -3- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) PROOF OF CLAIM Must be Postmarked No Later Than: May 1, 2003 Please Type or Print PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beneficial Owner's Name (First, Middle, Last) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Street Address - ------------------------------------- City State Zip Code ------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------- Foreign Province Foreign Country ------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------- Individual Social Security Number or ----- Taxpayer Identification Number Corporation/Other ----- ------------------------------------- Area Code Telephone Number (work) ------------------------------------- Area Code Telephone Number (home) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Record Owner's Name (if different from beneficial owner listed above) -4- PART II: SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN VARI-L COMMON STOCK A. Number of shares of Vari-L common stock held at the beginning of trading on December 17, 1997: B. Purchases (December 17, 1997 - July 6, 2000, inclusive):

Trade Date Mo. Day Year Number of Shares Purchased Total Purchase Price 1. 1. 1. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ 2. 2. 2. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ 3. 3. 3. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------

IMPORTANT: Identify by number listed above all purchases in which you covered a "short sale":_____________________ C. Sales (December 17, 1997 - July 6, 2000, inclusive):

Trade Date Mo. Day Year Number of Shares Sold Total Sales Price 1. 1. 1. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ 2. 2. 2. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ 3. 3. 3. ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------

D. Number of shares of Vari-L common stock held at close of trading on July 6, 2000: ____________ If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and print your name on each additional page. YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE __________. -5- V. SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement described in the Notice. I also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, with respect to my claim as a Settlement Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein. I further acknowledge that I am bound by and subject to the terms of any judgment that may be entered in the Litigation. I agree to furnish additional information to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel to support this claim (including transactions in other Vari-L securities such as options) if required to do so. I have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases or sales of Vari-L common stock during the Class Period and know of no other person having done so on my behalf. VI. RELEASE 1. I hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully, finally and forever settle, release and discharge from the Released Claims each and all of the Defendants and each and all of their "Related Parties," defined as each of a Defendant's past or present directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters, insurers, (including but not limited to Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under policy No. NDA0155834), co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, associates, personal or legal representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest, any members of their immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family. 2. "Released Claims" shall collectively mean all claims (including "Unknown Claims" as defined below), actions, demands, allegations, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every -6- nature and description whatsoever, including, but not limited to, claims for negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, mismanagement, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that have been or could have been asserted, against the Defendants and/or the Related Parties in the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or any Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to both the purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by any other Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation. 3. "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent -7- to California Civil Code Section 1542. The Representative Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a material element of the settlement of which this release is a part. 4. This release shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court approves the Stipulation of Settlement and the Stipulation becomes effective on the Effective Date (as defined in the Stipulation). 5. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any matter released pursuant to this release or any other part or portion thereof. 6. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included information about all of my (our) transactions in Vari-L common stock which occurred during the Class Period as well as the number of shares of Vari-L common stock held by me (us) at the opening of trading on December 17, 1997, and at the close of trading on July 6, 2000. -8- SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 Request for Taxpayer Identification Number ("TIN") and Certification PART I NAME: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check appropriate box: [ ] Individual/Sole Proprietor [ ] Pension Plan [ ] Corporation [ ] Partnership [ ] Trust [ ] IRA [ ] Other Enter TIN on appropriate line. o For individuals, this is your social security number ("SSN"). o For sole proprietors, you must show your individual name, but you may also enter your business or "doing business as" name. You may enter either your SSN or your Employer Identification Number ("EIN"). o For other entities, it is your EIN. _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ or _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Social Security Number Employer Identification Number PART II For Payees Exempt from Backup Withholding If you are exempt from backup withholding, enter your correct TIN in Part I and write "exempt" on the following line: _________________________. PART III Certification UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, I (WE) CERTIFY THAT: 1.) The number shown on this form is my correct TIN; and 2.) I (We) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406 (a)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code because: (a) I am (we are) exempt from backup withholding; or (b) I (we) have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that I am (we are) subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or -9- dividends; or (c) the Internal Revenue Service has notified me (us) that I am (we are) no longer subject to backup withholding. NOTE: If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject to backup withholding, you must cross out Item 2 above. SEE ENCLOSED FORM W-9 INSTRUCTIONS The Internal Revenue Service does not require your consent to any provision of this document other than the certification required to avoid backup withholding. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct. Executed this _________ day of ___________________, (Month / Year) in _____________________, ______________________________. (City) (State / Country) ------------------------------------- (Sign your name here) ------------------------------------- (Type or print your name here) ------------------------------------- (Capacity of person(s) signing, e.g., Beneficial Purchaser, Executor or Administrator) ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. Reminder Checklist: 1. Please sign the above release and declaration. 2. Remember to attach supporting documentation, if available. 3. Do not send original or copies of stock certificates. 4. Keep a copy of your claim form for your records. -10- 5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form, please send it Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 6. If you move, please send us your new address. -11- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. SUMMARY NOTICE EXHIBIT A-3 TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED VARI-L COMPANY, INC. ("VARI-L") COMMON STOCK DURING THE PERIOD BEGINNING DECEMBER 17, 1997 THROUGH JULY 6, 2000, INCLUSIVE YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, that a hearing will be held on March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, for the purpose of determining (1) whether the proposed settlement of the claims in the Litigation for the sum of $644,000 in cash plus 2,000,000 shares of Vari-L common stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 ("Stipulation") should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable and adequate; (2) whether, thereafter, this Litigation should be dismissed with prejudice as set forth in the Stipulation; (3) whether the Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable and adequate and therefore should be approved; and (4) whether the application of Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel for the payment of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection in this Litigation should be approved. If you purchased Vari-L common stock during the period beginning December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, your rights may be affected by the settlement of this Litigation. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action ("Notice") and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release, you may obtain copies by writing to Vari-L Securities Litigation, c/o Gilardi & Co., LLC, P.O. Box 8040, San Rafael, CA 94912-8040. If you are a Settlement Class Member, in order to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and Release no later than May 1, 2003, establishing that you are entitled to recovery. If you desire to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you must file a Request for Exclusion by March 10, 2003, in the manner and form explained in the detailed Notice referred to above. All Members of the Settlement Class who have not requested exclusion from the Settlement Class will be bound by any judgment entered in the Litigation pursuant to the Stipulation. -1- Any objection to the settlement must be mailed or delivered such that it is received by each of the following no later than March 10, 2003: CLERK OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO 901 19th Street Denver, CO 80294 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs: MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP MICHAEL K. YARNOFF Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO BURT & PUCILLO NORMAN BERMAN One Liberty Square Boston, MA 02109 Counsel for Defendant Vari-L: COOLEY GODWARD, LLP PETER A. GERGELY 380 Interlocken Crescent Suite 900 Broomfield, CO 80021-8023 Counsel for Individual Defendants: SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC KENNETH B. SIEGEL 633 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP DAVID W. STARK 370 17th Street, Suite 4700 Denver, CO 80202 -2- ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP FREDERICK J. BAUMANN 1200 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C. CARLA B. MINCKLEY 1700 Broadway, Suite 1501 Denver, CO 80209 PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING THIS NOTICE. If you have any questions about the settlement, you may contact plaintiffs' counsel at the addresses listed above. DATED: ________________, 2003 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO -3- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198) MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. VARI-L COMPANY, INC., DEREK L. BAILEY, JOSEPH H. KISER, DAVID G. SHERMAN and JON L. CLARK, Defendants. [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EXHIBIT B This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to an Order of this Court, dated ________, 2003, on the application of the Settling Parties for approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having been given of the settlement as required in said Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Settlement Class. 3. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons (identified in Exhibit 1 hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Settlement Class, the Litigation as well as all of the Released Claims are dismissed with prejudice as to the Representative Plaintiffs and the other Members of the Settlement Class, and as against the Defendants. The parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, this Court hereby approves the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to, and is in the best interests of, the Lead Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class and each of the Settlement Class Members. This Court further finds the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is the result of arm's-length negotiations between experienced counsel representing the interests of the Lead Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members and the Defendants. Accordingly, the settlement embodied in the Stipulation is hereby approved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with its terms and provisions. The Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform the terms of the Stipulation, including the issuance of the Settlement Stock (and any Assessment Securities). -1- 5. Pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), the Court finds that the issuance of the Settlement Stock (and any Assessment Securities) as part of the Settlement Fund for distribution to the Settlement Class and to Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel for attorneys' fees shall be without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance upon the exemption under Section 3(a)(10) thereto. 6. Upon the Effective Date hereof, the Lead Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Persons, whether or not such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers a Proof of Claim and Release. 7. All Settlement Class Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined from prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons. 8. Upon the Effective Date hereof, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of the Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Lead Plaintiffs from all claims (including Unknown Claims), arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 9. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action given to the Settlement Class was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to all Members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable effort. Said Notice provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of those proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed settlement set forth in the Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said Notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the requirements of due process. 10. Any plan of allocation submitted by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or any order entered regarding the attorneys' fees and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall be considered separate from this Final Judgment. -2- 11. Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Defendants; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal. Defendants may file the Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 12. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over (a) implementation of this settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining applications for attorneys' fees and expenses in the Litigation; and (d) all parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing and administering the Stipulation. 13. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 14. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Defendants, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in -3- accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ------------------------- ----------------------------------- THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. BLACKBURN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -4- -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----

EX-10.1

                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)


MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------






         This Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 (the
"Stipulation"), is made and entered into by and among the following Settling
Parties (as defined further in Section IV hereof) to the above-entitled
Litigation: (i) the Lead Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and each of the
Settlement Class Members), by and through Co-Lead Counsel of record in the
Litigation; and (ii) the Defendants, by and through their counsel of record in
the Litigation. The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully,
finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the Released Claims (as
defined in Paragraph 1.17 hereof), upon and subject to the terms and conditions
hereof.

I.       THE LITIGATION


         On and after June 9, 2000, the following actions (collectively, the
"Litigation") were filed in the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado, as securities class actions on behalf of purchasers of Vari-L Company,
Inc. ("Vari-L" or the "Company") stock between December 17, 1997 and July 6,
2000, brought against Vari-L and certain of its present and former officers and
directors:

         Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1181

         Furman v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-WY-1198

         Pedersen v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1217

         Rambo v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1238

         Gonzalez v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1241

         Paige v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1292

         Bronner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1395

         Crescente v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1401


                                      -1-



         Farina v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1409

         Betts v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1460

         Hoos v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1465

         Cody v. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1493

         Bernstein v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1518

         Schmidt v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1520

         Rhodes v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1565

         Striker v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1690

The operative complaint (the "Complaint") is the Consolidated Amended Class
Action Complaint, filed on October 9, 2001. The Complaint alleges claims for
violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

         On September 6, 2000, the Court granted the motion of Columbus Circle
Investors, Steven D. Thomas and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, for
appointment as lead plaintiffs under Section 21D(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act
and approved Lead Plaintiffs' selection of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
LLP, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt &
Pucillo as Co-Lead Counsel pursuant to Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange
Act.

II.      DEFENDANTS' DENIAL OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY


                                      -2-



         Defendants deny and continue to deny each and all of the claims and
contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants
expressly have denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or
liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or
omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The
Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations
that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered damage, that the
price of Vari-L common stock was artificially inflated by reasons of alleged
misrepresentations, non-disclosures or otherwise, or that the Lead Plaintiffs or
the Settlement Class were harmed by the conduct alleged in the Complaint.
Nothing in this Stipulation is intended, or should be construed, as an admission
or concession of any of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead
Plaintiffs in the Litigation.

         Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the
Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the
Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and
conditions set forth in this Stipulation. The Defendants also have taken into
account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in
complex cases like this Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined
that it is desirable and beneficial to them that the Litigation be settled in
the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation.

III.     CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT

         The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation
have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However,
counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length
of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the
Defendants through trial and through appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs
also have taken into account the uncertain outcome


                                      -3-



and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as this
Litigation, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation.
Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also are mindful of the inherent problems of
proof under and possible defenses to the claims asserted in the Litigation.
Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs are also aware of the limited financial
resources of the Defendants and of their inability to pay a large judgment.
Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the settlement set forth in the
Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Settlement Class. Based on
their evaluation, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs have determined that the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation is in the best interests of the Lead
Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class.


IV.      TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among each of
the Lead Plaintiffs (for themselves and the Settlement Class Members) and the
Defendants, by and through their respective counsel or attorneys of record,
that, subject to the occurrence of the events and conditions set forth in
Paragraph 7.1 below, the Litigation and the Released Claims (as hereinafter
defined) shall be finally and fully compromised, settled and released, and the
Litigation shall be dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the terms and
conditions of the Stipulation, as follows.

         1. Definitions

         As used in this Stipulation the following terms have the meanings
         specified below:

         1.1 "Authorized Claimant" means any Settlement Class Member whose claim
for recovery has been allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation.

         1.2 "Claimant" means any Settlement Class Member who files a Proof of
Claim in such form and manner, and within such time, as the Court shall
prescribe.

         1.3 "Claims Administrator" means the firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC.


                                      -4-



         1.4 "Class Period" means the period commencing on December 17, 1997
through July 6, 2000, inclusive.

         1.5 "Settlement Class Member" or "Member of the Settlement Class" mean
a Person who falls within the definition of the Settlement Class as set forth in
Paragraph 1.21 of the Stipulation.

         1.6 "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc., Joseph H. Kiser, David G.
Sherman, Jon L. Clark, and Derek L. Bailey.

         1.7 "Effective Date" means the first date by which all of the events
and conditions specified in Paragraph 7.1 of the Stipulation have been met and
have occurred.

         1.8 "Escrow Agent" means the law firm of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
Lerach LLP.

         1.9 "Final" means (a) the date of final affirmance on an appeal of the
Judgment, the expiration of the time for a petition for or a denial of a writ of
certiorari to review the Judgment and, if certiorari is granted, the date of
final affirmance of the Judgment following review pursuant to that grant; or (b)
the date of final dismissal of any appeal from the Judgment or the final
dismissal of any proceeding on certiorari to review the Judgment; or (c) if no
appeal is filed the expiration date of the time for the filing or noticing of
any appeal from the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation substantially in
the form of Exhibit B attached hereto; i.e., thirty (30) days after entry of the
Judgment. Any proceeding or order, or any appeal or petition for a writ of
certiorari pertaining solely to any Plan of Allocation and/or application for
attorneys' fees or expenses, shall not in any way delay or preclude the Judgment
from becoming final.

         1.10 "Individual Defendants" mean Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman,
Jon L. Clark and Derek L. Bailey.

         1.11 "Judgment" means the judgment to be rendered by the Court,
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B.


                                      -5-



         1.12 "Lead Plaintiffs" mean Columbus Circle Investors, Steven D. Thomas
and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, appointed pursuant to this Court's
Order of September 6, 2000.

         1.13 "Person" means an individual, natural person, corporation,
partnership, limited partnership, association, joint stock company, joint
venture, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association,
government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or
legal entity and their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors,
representatives, or assignees.

         1.14 "Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel" means Ellen Gusikoff Stewart,
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego,
CA 92101, Telephone 619/231-1058; Michael Yarnoff, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP,
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, Telephone:
610/667-7706; and Norman Berman, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo,
LLP, One Liberty Square, Boston, MA 02109, Telephone: 617/542-8300.

         1.15 "Plan of Allocation" means a plan or formula of allocation of the
Settlement Fund whereby the Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized
Claimants after payment of expenses of notice and administration of the
settlement, Taxes and Tax Expenses and such attorneys' fees, expenses and
interest as may be awarded by the Court. Any Plan of Allocation is not part of
the Stipulation and Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no
responsibility or liability with respect thereto.

         1.16 "Related Parties" means each of a Defendant's past or present
directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents,
underwriters, insurers (including but not limited to Agricultural Excess and
Surplus Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under Policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but
excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under Policy No. NDA0155834),
co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or
auditors, banks or investment banks, associates,


                                      -6-



personal or legal representatives, predecessors, successors, parents,
subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or
affiliated entities, any entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest,
any members of their immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is
the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his
family.

         1.17 "Released Claims" shall collectively mean any and all claims
(including Unknown Claims as defined in Paragraph 1.25 hereof), actions,
demands, allegations, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature
and description whatsoever, including but not limited to, claims for negligence,
gross negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of
loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, mismanagement,
breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or
regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that have
been or could have been asserted against the Defendants and/or the Related
Parties in the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs
and/or Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to both
the purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by any
other Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts,
transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or
failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation.

         1.18 "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and the
Related Parties.

         1.19 "Representative Plaintiffs" means each plaintiff who has appeared
in the Litigation.

         1.20 "Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel" means counsel who have
appeared for any of the Representative Plaintiffs in the Litigation.

         1.21 "Settlement Class" means all Persons (except Defendants, present
and former executive officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries,
their heirs, successors,


                                      -7-



assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants) who purchased
Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 through July 6,
2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request
exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the "Notice of Pendency and
Proposed Settlement of Class Action" to be sent to the class.

         1.22 "Settlement Fund" means (a) the principal amount of Six Hundred
Forty Four Thousand Dollars ($644,000) in cash (the "Cash Amount") to be paid to
the Escrow Agent pursuant to Paragraph 2.1 of this Stipulation, plus all
interest earned thereon; and (b) the Settlement Stock.

         1.23 "Settling Parties" means, collectively, each of the Defendants and
the Lead Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class Members.

         1.24 "Settlement Stock" means Two Million (2,000,000) shares of Vari-L
common stock, which shall be issued under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act
of 1933 exempt from registration, subject to the anti-dilution provisions set
forth in Paragraph 2.4 hereof.

         1.25 "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the
Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect
to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released
Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its
settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his,
her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and
all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the
Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly, and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of
California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides:

                  A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor
         does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing
         the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his
         settlement with the debtor.


                                      -8-



Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and
benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or
principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar,
comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542. The
Representative Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover
facts in addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or
believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims,
but the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class
Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any
and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent
or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or
heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming
into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is
negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or
rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different
or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class
Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that
the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a material element of
the settlement of which this release is a part.

         2.  THE SETTLEMENT

             a. THE SETTLEMENT FUND

         2.1 The Cash Amount will be transferred to the Escrow Agent as follows:

             (a) Within fifteen (15) days of receiving an order granting
preliminary approval of the settlement, the Individual Defendants shall pay or
cause to be paid $394,000, in an allocation previously agreed upon by the
Individual Defendants, in accordance with


                                      -9-



instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed into an interest-bearing
escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent. Of the $394,000, $115,000
shall be paid by AESIC and the remainder shall be paid or caused to be paid by
the Individual Defendants without any recourse to AESIC under the Policy or
otherwise, in the allocation previously agreed upon by the Individual
Defendants. Each Individual Defendant is solely responsible for his agreed upon
contribution. Defendants Kiser and Clark shall take all reasonable steps to
request that the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pay the agreed-upon
disgorgement funds to the Escrow Agent for the benefit of the Settlement Class.

         (b) Within fifteen (15) days of receiving an order granting preliminary
approval of the settlement, Vari-L shall pay $100,000 in accordance with
instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed in an interest-bearing
escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent.

         (c) The remaining cash payment of $150,000, plus interest at a rate of
five percent (5%) per annum to begin accruing on the date of the order granting
preliminary approval of the settlement, shall be paid by Vari-L on or before
thirty-five (35) days after entry of the Judgment, in accordance with
instructions provided by the Escrow Agent to be placed in an interest-bearing
escrow account to be maintained by the Escrow Agent. This payment shall be made
regardless of whether any appeal is taken to any aspect of the Final Judgment
and Order, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2.12 herein.

         2.2 Vari-L shall deliver or cause to be delivered the Settlement Stock
to Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in accordance
with the instructions provided to the Vari-L transfer agent by Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator, subject to the limitations
contained in Paragraph 2.3. Each and all shares of Settlement Stock shall be
exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933,
freely tradeable and free from any liens and encumbrances upon delivery to
Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel. Upon entry of the
Final Order and Judgment, Vari-L


                                      -10-



shall take all steps reasonably necessary to prepare for the contribution of the
Settlement Stock to the Settlement Fund, such that the shares will be available
for distribution within thirty-five (35) days after the Effective Date.

         2.3 Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Vari-L's transfer agent
will be provided with a list identifying each Authorized Claimant and
Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to receive Settlement Stock
and the number of shares of Settlement Stock to be issued to each such Person
("Distribution List"). No fractional shares of Settlement Stock will be issued,
and thus, the calculation of the number of shares to be distributed will be
rounded up or down to the nearest whole share. In addition, the Settlement Stock
will be distributed to Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the
Settlement Stock is exempt from registration or qualification under applicable
"Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who reside in states where the
Settlement Stock is not exempt, appropriate adjustments will be made by the
Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator to
equalize the value of their distribution under the Plan of Allocation, however,
said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any Defendants' contribution to
the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's contribution of the Settlement Stock. Vari-L
shall direct its transfer agent to distribute certificates for shares of Vari-L
common stock within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of the Distribution List to
the Persons and in the amounts shown on said Distribution List in a transaction
exempt under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. All costs
associated with the delivery of the Settlement Stock shall be borne by Vari-L.
Nothing herein shall require Vari-L or its transfer agent to distribute said
shares to Authorized Claimants or any other Person who, in the opinion of
Vari-L's legal counsel, reside in states where the Settlement Stock is not
exempt from registration or qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws.

             b. ANTI-DILUTION PROVISIONS OF THE SETTLEMENT STOCK


                                      -11-



         2.4 With respect to any issuance of New Equity Securities (as defined
below) at any time between January 22, 2003, and the later of December 31, 2003
or three (3) months after distribution of the Settlement Stock to the Settlement
Class, the Settlement Class shall be entitled to receive an amount of Assessment
Security (defined below) upon the terms and conditions set forth below:

             (a) Until the later of December 31, 2003, or the date that is three
(3) months after the date of distribution of the Settlement Stock to the
Settlement Class, Vari-L may sell equity securities, securities that are
convertible at any time into one or more equity securities, and securities that
provide for the purchase at any time of one or more equity securities
(collectively "New Equity Securities") without being required to issue any
Assessment Security (as defined below) to the Settlement Class if, and only if,
one or more of the following conditions is satisfied:

                 (i) the sale of such security is made as a rights offering to
all holders of the Company's outstanding common stock;

                 (ii) in the case of shares sold in a private financing or PIPES
transaction, the sale of such security is made at a per-common-share price equal
to or greater than the average closing price of Vari-L's common stock for the
ten (10) consecutive trading days ending two (2) trading days before such
transaction is priced;

                 (iii) such security is sold at a price per share not less than
the Deemed Value (as defined below) of the shares issued to the Settlement Class
and the Company makes public disclosures of such sale;

                 (iv) the holders of the Company's common stock approve of such
issuance at a Meeting of Shareholders by the affirmative vote of a majority of
shares represented at such meeting (excluding the shares of such Person or
Persons participating in the issuance which is the subject matter of the vote);
or


                                      -12-



                 (v) the Company receives at the time of the sale of such
security the signed opinion or report of a nationally-recognized investment
banking firm that is independent of the Company and independent of all proposed
purchasers of each such security to the effect that the price at which such
security is being sold is fair to the Company and its shareholders from a
financial point of view. The term New Equity Securities shall not include (1)
any shares of common stock, or rights or options to purchase common stock,
issued pursuant to the Company's existing stock option plan or employee stock
purchase plan or any new plan approved by shareholders, or (2) shares issued in
an underwritten public offering. The term "Deemed Value" shall be the average
closing sale price of Vari-L's common stock for the ten (10) trading days
preceding October 3, 2002, or $0.51.

             (b) Until the later of December 31, 2003, or the date that is three
(3) months after the date of distribution of the Settlement Stock to the
Settlement Class, any New Equity Securities that are sold without meeting one or
more of the conditions in Paragraph 2.4(a) shall be designated as an "Assessment
Security."

             (c) With respect to any Assessment Security, the Settlement Class
shall be entitled to receive, without making payment, a number of shares of the
Assessment Security being sold in an amount determined in accordance with the
following formula:

Where:       A = Number of Assessment Security shares to be issued

                   --           --
                   |    NP + FD  |
             A = S |1- [-------] |
                   |    ND + FD  |
                   --           --

             S = Number of shares originally issued to the Settlement Class
                 (2,000,000), as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends,
                 etc.

             N = Number of New Equity Securities issued

             P = Price (on a common equivalent basis) of the New Equity
                 Securities

             F = Fully diluted shares of common stock outstanding immediately
                 prior to issuance of New Equity Securities

             D = Deemed Value of hares issued to the Settlement Class (based on
                 market price of Vari-L's stock on October 3, 2002), as adjusted

Upon any adjustments in accordance with the foregoing, D will be adjusted for
the purpose of any future adjustments in accordance with the following, where DN
represents the new


                                      -13-



Deemed Value and DO is the Deemed Value immediately prior to the issuance of the
Assessment Security.

                  D(N) = D(O) x  S
                                ---
                                S+A

The total number of shares to be contributed to the Settlement Fund will be
adjusted to reflect any changes due to stock splits, stock dividends or reverse
stock splits.

             (d) Within ten (10) business days after any issuance of New Equity
Securities that requires Vari-L to issue Assessment Securities hereunder (an
"Eligible Transaction"), Vari-L shall provide the Claims Administrator with
written notice of such issuance (an "Assessment Security Notice"). Such
Assessment Security Notice shall include the number of shares sold in the
Eligible Transaction, the effective price of such securities and the number of
shares of Assessment Securities to which the Settlement Class is entitled.
Within ten (10) business days after receipt of such Assessment Security Notice,
the Claims Administrator will provide Vari-L with a list identifying each
Authorized Claimant and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to
receive Assessment Securities and the number of shares of Assessment Securities
to be issued to each such Person ("Assessment Security Distribution List"). No
fractional shares of Assessment Securities will be issued, and thus, the
calculation of the number of shares to be distributed will be rounded up or down
to the nearest whole share. In addition, Assessment Securities will be
distributed to Authorized Claimants or other Persons who reside in states where
the Assessment Securities are exempt from registration or qualification under
applicable "Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who reside in states where
the Assessment Securities are not exempt, appropriate adjustments will be made
by the Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or the Claims Administrator
to equalize the value of their distribution under the Plan of Allocation
however, said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any Defendants'
contribution to the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's


                                      -14-



contribution of the Settlement Stock. Vari-L shall direct its transfer agent to
distribute certificates for shares of Vari-L common stock within thirty-five
(35) days of receipt of the Assessment Security Distribution List, which in no
event shall be less than thirty-five (35) days after the Effective Date, to the
Persons and in the amounts shown on said Assessment Security Distribution List
in a transaction exempt under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.
All costs associated with the delivery of the Assessment Securities shall be
borne by Vari-L. Nothing herein shall require Vari-L or its transfer agent to
distribute said shares to Authorized Claimants or any other Person who, in the
opinion of Vari-L's legal counsel, reside in states where the Assessment
Securities are not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable
"Blue Sky" laws.

             c. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION FOR THE SETTLEMENT

         2.5 As additional consideration for the settlement, Vari-L agrees to
and does assign to the Settlement Class, to the extent they exist, any rights
that Vari-L may have to proceeds or other damages under the following insurance
policy: Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), Policy No. NDA0155834. Reliance
is in liquidation and any recovery under the policy is uncertain. Vari-L shall
use its best efforts to obtain the written consent or endorsement from an
authorized representative of Reliance of the assignment of Vari-L's rights to
the insurance proceeds, if any, to the Settlement Class.

             d. THE ESCROW AGENT

         2.6 The Escrow Agent shall invest the Cash Amount of the Settlement
Fund deposited pursuant to Paragraph 2.1 above in instruments backed by the full
faith and credit of the United States Government or fully insured by the United
States Government or an agency thereof and shall reinvest the proceeds of these
instruments as they mature in similar instruments at their then-current market
rates. The Escrow Agent shall bear all risks related to investment of the
Settlement Fund.


                                      -15-



         2.7 The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Settlement Fund except as
provided in the Stipulation, by an order of the Court, or with the written
agreement of counsel for Defendants and Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel.

         2.8 Subject to further order and/or directions as may be made by the
Court, the Escrow Agent is authorized to execute such transactions on behalf of
the Settlement Class Members as are consistent with the terms of the
Stipulation.

         2.9 All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered
to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the
jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed
pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court.

         2.10 Within ten (10) days after payment of the Cash Amount of the
Settlement Fund to the Escrow Agent set forth in Paragraph 2.1(b) hereof, the
Escrow Agent may establish a "Class Notice and Administration Fund," and may
deposit therein the $100,000 contributed by Vari-L to the Settlement Fund. The
Class Notice and Administration Fund may be used by Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel to pay costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in connection
with providing notice to the class, locating class members, soliciting
Settlement Class claims, assisting with the filing of claims, administering and
distributing the Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of
Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any. The Class
Notice and Administration Fund may also be invested and earn interest as
provided for in Paragraph 2.6 of this Stipulation. Any unused portion of the
Class Notice and Administration Fund shall be returned to the Settlement Fund.


                                      -16-



             e. TAXES

         2.11 (a) The Settling Parties and the Escrow Agent agree to treat the
Settlement Fund as being at all times a "qualified settlement fund" within the
meaning of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-1. In addition, the Escrow Agent shall timely
make such elections as necessary or advisable to carry out the provisions of
this Paragraph 2.11, including the "relation-back election" (as defined in
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-1) back to the earliest permitted date. Such elections
shall be made in compliance with the procedures and requirements contained in
such regulations. It shall be the responsibility of the Escrow Agent to timely
and properly prepare and deliver the necessary documentation for signature by
all necessary parties, and thereafter to cause the appropriate filing to occur.

             (b) For the purpose of Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the
"administrator" shall be the Escrow Agent. The Escrow Agent shall timely and
properly file all informational and other tax returns necessary or advisable
with respect to the Settlement Fund (including, without limitation, the returns
described in Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.468B-2(k)). Such returns (as well as the
election described in Paragraph 2.11(a) hereof) shall be consistent with this
Paragraph 2.11 and in all events shall reflect that all Taxes (including any
estimated Taxes, interest or penalties) on the income earned by the Settlement
Fund shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund as provided in Paragraph 2.11(c)
hereof.

             (c) All (i) Taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or
penalties) arising with respect to the income earned by the Settlement Fund,
including any Taxes or tax detriments that may be imposed upon the Defendants,
the Related Parties or counsel for any of them with respect to any income earned
by the Settlement Fund for any period during which the Settlement Fund does not
qualify as a "qualified settlement fund" for federal or state income tax
purposes ("Taxes"), and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in connection with the
operation and implementation of this Paragraph 2.11 (including, without
limitation, expenses of tax


                                      -17-



attorneys and/or accountants and mailing and distribution costs and expenses
relating to filing (or failing to file) the returns described in this Paragraph
2.11) ("Tax Expenses"), shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund; in all events
the Defendants, the Related Parties and counsel for each of them shall have no
liability or responsibility for the Taxes or the Tax Expenses or the filing of
any tax returns or other documents with the Internal Revenue Service or any
other state or local taxing authority. The Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold
each of the Defendants, the Related Parties and counsel for each of them
harmless for Taxes and Tax Expenses (including, without limitation, Taxes
payable by reason of any such indemnification). Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses
shall be treated as, and considered to be, a cost of administration of the
Settlement Fund and shall be timely paid by the Escrow Agent out of the
Settlement Fund without prior order from the Court and the Escrow Agent shall be
obligated (notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary) to withhold from
distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds necessary to pay such amounts
including the establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax Expenses
(as well as any amounts that may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg.
Sec. 1.468B-2(l)(2)); neither the Defendants, the Related Parties nor counsel
for any of them are responsible nor shall they have any liability therefor or
for any reporting requirements that may relate thereto. The parties hereto agree
to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each other, and their tax attorneys and
accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of
this Paragraph 2.11.

             (d) For the purpose of this Paragraph 2.11 and of Paragraph 2.12,
references to the Settlement Fund shall include both the Settlement Fund and the
Class Notice and Administration Fund and shall also include any earnings
thereon.

             f. TERMINATION OF SETTLEMENT

         2.12 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved, or is
terminated, canceled, or fails to become effective for any reason, the
Settlement Fund less expenses actually incurred


                                      -18-



or due and owing pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 and Paragraph 2.11 shall be refunded
to the Defendants and/or their insurers or other designees as described in
Paragraph 7.5 below.

         3. NOTICE ORDER AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

         3.1 Promptly upon execution of the Stipulation, Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel shall submit the Stipulation together with its Exhibits to the Court and
shall apply for entry of an order (the "Notice Order"), substantially in the
form of Exhibit A attached hereto, providing for, inter alia, the certification
of a class for settlement purposes only, the preliminary approval of the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and approval for the mailing of a
settlement notice (the "Notice") and publication of a summary notice (the
"Summary Notice"), substantially in the forms of Exhibits A-1 and A-3 hereto.
The Notice shall include the general terms of the settlement set forth in the
Stipulation, the proposed Plan of Allocation, the general terms of the Fee and
Expense Application as defined in Paragraph 6.1 hereof and the date of the
Settlement Hearing as defined below.

         3.2 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall request that after notice is
given, the Court hold a hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") and finally approve
the settlement of the Litigation as set forth herein. At or after the Settlement
Hearing, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel also will request that the Court approve
the proposed Plan of Allocation and the Fee and Expense Application.

         4. RELEASES

         4.1 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in Paragraph 1.7 hereof, the
Representative Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members and counsel
to the Representative Plaintiffs shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and
discharged all Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against each and all
of the Released Persons, and otherwise in connection with the


                                      -19-



defense or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims, whether or not
such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and
Release.

         4.2 The Proof of Claim and Release to be executed by Settlement Class
Members shall release all Released Claims against the Released Persons and shall
be substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto.

         4.3 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in Paragraph 1.7 hereof, each
of the Defendants shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment
shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged
each and all of the Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Representative
Plaintiffs from all claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating
to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or
resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims.

         5.       ADMINISTRATION AND CALCULATION OF CLAIMS, FINAL AWARDS AND
                  SUPERVISION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT FUND

         5.1 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, or their authorized agents, acting
on behalf of the Settlement Class, and subject to such supervision and direction
of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, shall
administer and calculate the claims submitted by Settlement Class Members and
shall oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (defined below) to
Authorized Claimants.

         5.2 The Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows:

             (a) to pay counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs attorneys' fees
and expenses with interest thereon (the "Fee and Expense Award"), if and to the
extent allowed by the Court;

             (b) to pay all the expenses reasonably and actually incurred in
connection with providing notice, locating class members, soliciting Settlement
Class claims, assisting with the filing of claims, administering and
distributing the Net Settlement Fund


                                      -20-



to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying
escrow fees and costs, if any;

             (c) to pay the Taxes and Tax Expenses described in Paragraph 2.11
hereof; and

             (d) to distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the "Net
Settlement Fund") to Authorized Claimants as allowed by the Stipulation, the
Plan of Allocation, or the Court.

         5.3 Upon the Effective Date and thereafter, and in accordance with the
terms of the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or such further approval and
further order(s) of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may
require, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants,
subject to and in accordance with the following:

             (a) Within ninety (90) days after the mailing of the Notice or such
other time as may be set by the Court, each Person claiming to be an Authorized
Claimant shall be required to submit to the Claims Administrator a completed
Proof of Claim and Release, substantially in the form of Exhibit A-2 attached
hereto, signed under penalty of perjury and supported by such documents as are
specified in the Proof of Claim and Release and as are reasonably available to
the Authorized Claimant.

             (b) Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, all Settlement Class
Members who fail to timely submit a Proof of Claim and Release within such
period, or such other period as may be ordered by the Court, shall be forever
barred from receiving any payments pursuant to the Stipulation and the
settlement set forth herein, but will in all other respects be subject to and
bound by the provisions of this Stipulation, the releases contained herein, and
the Judgment.

             (c) The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized
Claimants substantially in accordance with a Plan of Allocation described in the
Notice and approved by the Court. The proposed Plan of Allocation will not be
part of the Stipulation. However, if there is any balance remaining in the Net
Settlement Fund after six (6) months


                                      -21-



from the date of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of
tax refunds, uncashed checks or otherwise) Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall
reallocate such balance among Authorized Claimants in an equitable and economic
fashion. Thereafter, any balance which still remains in the Net Settlement Fund
shall be donated to an appropriate non-profit organization.

         5.4 The Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility
for, interest in (except as provided in Paragraph 2.1(c) hereof), or liability
whatsoever with respect to the investment or distribution of the Settlement
Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the determination, administration, or calculation
of claims, the payment or withholding of Taxes, or any losses incurred in
connection therewith.

         5.5 No Person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel or any claims administrator, or other agent designated by Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel, or Defendants or their counsel based on the distributions
made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the settlement
contained herein, the Plan of Allocation, and further order(s) of the Court.

         5.6 It is understood and agreed by the Settling Parties that any
proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund including, but not
limited to, any adjustments to an Authorized Claimant's claim set forth therein,
is not a part of the Stipulation and is to be considered by the Court separately
from the Court's consideration of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of
the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding
relating to the Plan of Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the
Stipulation or affect the finality of the Court's Judgment approving the
Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein, or any other orders entered
pursuant to the Stipulation.

         6.       REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S ATTORNEYS' FEES AND
                  REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES


                                      -22-



         6.1 Representative Plaintiffs or their counsel may submit an
application or applications (the "Fee and Expense Application") for
distributions to them from the Settlement Fund for: (a) an award of attorneys'
fees; plus (b) reimbursement of expenses, including the fees of any experts or
consultants, incurred in connection with prosecuting the Litigation, plus any
interest on such attorneys' fees and expenses at the same rate and for the same
periods as earned by the Settlement Fund (until paid) as may be awarded by the
Court. Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel reserve the right to make additional
applications for fees and expenses incurred to be distributed from the
Settlement Fund. None of the funds in the Settlement Fund attributable to
disgorgement received from the SEC may be used to pay counsel or to calculate
any award to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel.

         6.2 The attorneys' fees and expenses, as awarded by the Court, shall be
paid to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel from the Settlement Fund, as ordered,
immediately after the Court executes an order awarding such fees and expenses.
Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall thereafter allocate the attorneys' fees
amongst Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in a manner in which they in good
faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the prosecution and
settlement of the Litigation. In the event that the Effective Date does not
occur, or the Judgment or the order making the Fee and Expense Award is reversed
or modified, or the Stipulation is canceled or terminated for any other reason,
and in the event that the Fee and Expense Award has been paid to any extent,
then Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel shall within five (5) business days from
receiving notice from Defendants' counsel or from a court of appropriate
jurisdiction, refund to the Settlement Fund the fees and expenses previously
paid to them from the Settlement Fund plus interest thereon at the same rate as
earned on the Settlement Fund in an amount consistent with such reversal or
modification. Each such Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel's law firm, as a
condition of receiving such fees and expenses, on behalf of itself and each
partner and/or shareholder of it, agrees (a) that the obligations, set forth in
this Paragraph 6.2, of each such law firm shall be joint


                                      -23-



and several, (b) that each such law firm and its partners and/or shareholders
shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of enforcing
the provisions of this Paragraph 6.2, and (c) that the Court may, upon
application of Defendants, summarily issue orders and take whatever other
actions it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, issuing judgments
and attachment orders and making appropriate findings of and/or sanctions for
contempt, against such law firms should any such law firm fail timely to repay
fees and expenses pursuant to this Paragraph 6.2.

         6.3 The procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the Court of
any applications by any of the counsel to the Representative Plaintiffs for
attorneys' fees and expenses, including the fees of experts and consultants, to
be paid out of the Settlement Fund, are not part of the settlement set forth in
the Stipulation, and are to be considered by the Court separately from the
Court's consideration of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceedings relating
to the Fee and Expense Application, or any appeal from any order relating
thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or
cancel the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment
approving the Stipulation and the settlement of the Litigation set forth
therein.

         6.4 Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility
for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, any payment to Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel from the Settlement Fund.

         6.5 Defendants and the Related Parties shall have no responsibility
for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to the allocation among
Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, and/or any other Person who may assert some
claim thereto, of any Fee and Expense Award that the Court may make in the
Litigation, and Defendants and the Related Parties take no position with respect
to such matters.


                                      -24-



         7.  CONDITIONS OF SETTLEMENT, EFFECT OF DISAPPROVAL, CANCELLATION OR
             TERMINATION

         7.1 The Effective Date of the Stipulation shall be conditioned on the
following:

             (a) Defendants shall have timely made or caused to be made their
contributions to the Settlement Fund as required by Paragraph 2.1(a)-(c) hereof
and defendants Kiser and Clark shall have taken all reasonable steps to request
that the SEC pay the agreed-upon disgorgement funds to the Escrow Agent for the
benefit of the Settlement Class;

             (b) the Court shall have entered the Notice Order, as required by
Paragraph 3.1 hereof;

             (c) the settlement shall not have been terminated in accordance
with the procedures referenced in Paragraph 7.4 below relating to Requests for
Exclusion (as defined in Paragraph 7.4);

             (d) the Court shall have entered the Judgment, or a judgment
substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto; and

             (e) the Judgment shall have become Final, as defined in Paragraph
1.9 hereof.

         7.2 Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in Paragraph
7.1 hereof, any and all remaining interest or right of the Defendants in or to
the Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutely and forever extinguished.

         7.3 If all of the conditions specified in Paragraph 7.1 hereof are not
met, then the Stipulation shall be canceled and terminated subject to Paragraph
7.6 hereof unless Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel and counsel for the Defendants
mutually agree in writing to proceed with the Stipulation.

         7.4 If prior to the Settlement Hearing, Persons who otherwise would be
Members of the Settlement Class have submitted timely requests for exclusion
("Requests for Exclusion") from the Settlement Class in accordance with the
provisions of the Notice Order and the notice given pursuant thereto, and if the
aggregate number of shares of Vari-L common stock purchased by such class
members during the Class Period, equals or exceeds the sums specified in a
separate supplemental agreement ("Supplemental Agreement")


                                      -25-



between the parties, then the Defendants shall have, in their sole and absolute
discretion, the option to terminate the Stipulation in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the Supplemental Agreement. The Supplemental Agreement
will not be filed with the Court unless and until a dispute among the parties
concerning its interpretation or application arises. Copies of all Requests for
Exclusion received and copies of all written revocations of Requests for
Exclusion received shall be delivered to counsel for Defendants within five (5)
business days of receipt by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or their agents but
in no event later than seven (7) court days before the Settlement Hearing.

         7.5 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, in the event the Stipulation
shall be terminated or canceled or fails to become effective for any reason,
within five (5) business days after written notification of such event is sent
by counsel for the Defendants or Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel to the Escrow
Agent, the Settlement Fund (including earnings thereon), plus any amount then
remaining in the Class Notice and Administration Fund (including earnings
thereon), less expenses described in Paragraph 2.10 hereof, shall be refunded by
the Escrow Agent to the Defendants and/or their insurers or other designees
pursuant to written instructions from counsel for the Defendants. In particular,
all parties to this Stipulation agree that the Escrow Agent shall return the
$115,000 portion of the Settlement Fund funded by AESIC to AESIC or its counsel
in the event a refund becomes due as contemplated in this paragraph.
Notwithstanding any other provision to this Stipulation to the contrary, all the
parties hereto expressly consent to Defendants assigning to AESIC any and all
rights they have or may have in the $115,000 portion of the Settlement Fund
funded by AESIC in the event that a refund becomes due pursuant to this
paragraph. At the request of counsel for the Defendants, the Escrow Agent or its
designee shall apply for any tax refund owed to the Settlement Fund and pay the
proceeds, after deduction of any fees or expenses reasonably incurred in
connection with such application(s) for refund, pursuant to written instructions
from counsel for the Defendants.


                                      -26-



         7.6 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved by the Court or
the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is terminated, canceled, or
otherwise fails to become effective in accordance with its terms, the Settling
Parties and the Related Parties shall be restored to their respective positions
in the Litigation as of October 3, 2002. In such event, the terms and provisions
of the Stipulation, with the exception of Paragraph Paragraph 2.12, 6.2, 7.3-7.7
and 8.4 hereof, shall have no further force and effect with respect to the
Settling Parties or the Related Parties and shall not be used in this Litigation
or in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by
the Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as
vacated, nunc pro tunc. No order of the Court or modification or reversal on
appeal of any order of the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation or the amount
of any attorneys' fees, expenses and interest awarded by the Court to the
Representative Plaintiffs or any of their counsel shall constitute grounds for
cancellation or termination of the Stipulation.

         7.7 If the Effective Date does not occur, or if the Stipulation is
terminated, canceled, or otherwise fails to become effective pursuant to its
terms, neither the Representative Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have
any obligation to repay any amounts actually and properly disbursed in
accordance with Paragraph 2.10 from the Class Notice and Administration Fund. In
addition, any expenses already incurred and properly chargeable to the Class
Notice and Administration Fund pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 hereof at the time of
such termination or cancellation but which have not been paid, shall be paid by
the Escrow Agent in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation prior to the
balance of the Class Notice and Administration Fund being refunded in accordance
with Paragraph 7.5 hereof.

         7.8 If a case is commenced in respect to any Defendant under Title 11
of the United States Code (Bankruptcy), or a trustee, receiver or conservator is
appointed under any similar law, and in the event of the entry of a final order
of a court of competent jurisdiction determining the transfer of the Settlement
Fund, or any portion thereof, by or on behalf of


                                      -27-



such Defendant to be a preference, voidable transfer, fraudulent transfer or
similar transaction, then, as to such Defendant, the releases given and Judgment
entered in favor of such Defendant pursuant to this Stipulation shall be null
and void.

         8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

         8.1 The Settling Parties (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to
consummate this agreement; and (b) agree to cooperate to the extent reasonably
necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and conditions of the
Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the foregoing terms
and conditions of the Stipulation.

         8.2 Each of the parties warrants and represents that he or it is not
"insolvent" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.Section 101(32) as of the time this
Stipulation is executed and as of the time any payments are transferred or made
as required by this Stipulation.

         8.3 The parties intend this settlement to be a final and complete
resolution of all disputes between them with respect to the Litigation. The
settlement compromises claims which are contested and shall not be deemed an
admission by any Settling Party as to the merits of any claim or defense. The
Final Judgment also will contain a finding that during the course of the
Litigation, the parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with
the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The Settling Parties
agree that the amount paid to the Settlement Fund and the other terms of the
settlement were negotiated in good faith by the Settling Parties, and reflect a
settlement that was reached voluntarily after consultation with competent legal
counsel. The Settling Parties reserve their right to rebut, in a manner that
such party determines to be appropriate, any contention made in any public forum
that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable
basis.

         8.4 The Settling Parties agree that except at the election of the
Defendants (including any assignee(s) or subrogee(s) of the Defendants) or any
of them, neither the


                                      -28-



Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or
document prepared pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the
settlement contained therein: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an
admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any
wrongdoing or liability of the Defendants; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or
may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of
the Defendants in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court,
administrative agency or other tribunal other than in such proceedings as may be
necessary to consummate or enforce this Stipulation or the settlement provided
for herein, or the Judgment.

         8.5 All of the Exhibits to this Stipulation are material and integral
parts hereof and are fully incorporated herein by this reference.

         8.6 The Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written
instrument signed by or on behalf of all Settling Parties or their respective
successors-in-interest.

         8.7 This Stipulation and the Exhibits attached hereto and the
Supplemental Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto
and no representations, warranties or inducements have been made to any party
concerning the Stipulation or its Exhibits other than the representations,
warranties and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. Except as
otherwise provided herein, each party shall bear its own costs.

         8.8 Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, on behalf of the Settlement Class,
are expressly authorized by the Representative Plaintiffs to take all
appropriate action required or permitted to be taken by the Settlement Class
pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms and also are expressly
authorized to enter into any modifications or amendments to the Stipulation on
behalf of the Settlement Class which they deem appropriate.

         8.9 Each counsel or other Person executing this Stipulation or any of
its Exhibits on behalf of any party hereto hereby warrants that such Person has
the full authority to do so.


                                      -29-



         8.10 The Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts. All
executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same
instrument. A complete set of original executed counterparts shall be filed with
the Court.

         8.11 This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit
of, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

         8.12 The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to implementation
and enforcement of the terms of this Stipulation, and all parties hereto submit
to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of implementing and enforcing the
settlement embodied in this Stipulation.

         8.13 This Stipulation and the Exhibits hereto shall be considered to
have been negotiated, executed and delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the
State of Colorado, and the rights and obligations of the parties to the
Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by,
the internal, substantive laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to
that State's choice-of-law principles.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Stipulation to
be executed, by their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of January 22, 2003.



                                       LILLEY & GARCIA LLP
                                       CHARLES W. LILLEY

                                       /s/ CHARLES W. LILLEY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       1600 Stout Street, Suite 1100
                                       Denver, CO  80202
                                       Telephone:  303/293-9800

                                       Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs



                                      -30-

                                       MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
                                         HYNES & LERACH LLP
                                       WILLIAM S. LERACH
                                       SPENCER A. BURKHOLZ
                                       HENRY ROSEN
                                       ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART


                                       /s/ ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                            ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART

                                       401 B Street, Suite 1700
                                       San Diego, CA  92101
                                       Telephone:  619/231-1058

                                       SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP
                                       DAVID KESSLER
                                       MICHAEL K. YARNOFF


                                       /s/ MICHAEL K. YARNOFF
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                MICHAEL K. YARNOFF

                                       Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
                                       Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004
                                       Telephone:  610/667-7706

                                       BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO
                                         BURT & PUCILLO
                                       NORMAN BERMAN
                                       JEFFREY C. BLOCK
                                       MICHAEL M. SULLIVAN


                                       /s/ NORMAN BERMAN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                 NORMAN BERMAN

                                       One Liberty Square
                                       Boston, MA  02109
                                       Telephone:  617/542-8300

                                       Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
                                       COOLEY GODWARD, LLP
                                       PETER A. GERGELY


                                       /s/ PETER A. GERGELY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                 PETER A. GERGELY

                                       380 Interlocken Crescent
                                       Suite 900
                                       Broomfield, CO  80021-8023

                                       Telephone:  720/566-4000

                                       Attorneys for Defendant Vari-L Company,
                                       Inc.


                                      -31-

                                       SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC
                                       KENNETH B. SIEGEL


                                       /s/ KENNETH B. SIEGEL
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                 KENNETH B. SIEGEL

                                       633 17th Street, Suite 3000
                                       Denver, CO  80202
                                       Telephone:  303/299-8408

                                       DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
                                       DAVID W. STARK


                                       /s/ DAVID W. STARK
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                  DAVID W. STARK

                                       370 17th Street, Suite 4700
                                       Denver, CO  80202
                                       Telephone:  303/629-3400

                                       ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP
                                       FREDERICK J. BAUMANN


                                       /s/ FREDERICK J. BAUMANN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                FREDERICK J. BAUMANN

                                       1200 17th Street, Suite 3000
                                       Denver, CO  80202
                                       Telephone:  303/623-9000

                                       BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C.
                                       CARLA B. MINCKLEY


                                       /s/ CARLA B. MINCKLEY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                 CARLA B. MINCKLEY

                                       1700 Broadway, Suite 1501
                                       Denver, CO  80209
                                       Telephone:  303/860-1700

                                       Attorneys for Individual Defendants


                                      -32-





                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)


MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
                       SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

                                    EXHIBIT A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------






         WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending before the Court
entitled Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.
00-RB-1181(CBS) (the "Litigation");

         WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated as
of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"), that has been entered into by the
Representative Plaintiffs and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the
Stipulation and its attached Exhibits; and

         WHEREAS, the parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of
this Litigation, in accordance with the Stipulation which, together with the
Exhibits annexed thereto sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed
settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice
upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and the Court having read and
considered the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; and

         WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same
meanings as set forth in the Stipulation;

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

         1. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
Court hereby certifies, for purposes of effectuating this settlement, a class
consisting of all Persons (except Defendants, present and former executive
officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries, their heirs,
successors, assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants) who
purchased Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 through
July 6, 2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request
exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the "Notice of Pendency and
Proposed Settlement of Class Action" to be sent to the class.



                                      -1-





         2. With respect to the class, this Court finds and concludes that: (a)
the members of the class are so numerous that joinder of all class members in
the Litigation is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common
to the class which predominate over any individual questions; (c) the claims of
the Representative Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the class; (d) the
Representative Plaintiffs and their counsel have fairly and adequately
represented and protected the interests of all of the class members; and (e) a
class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient
adjudication of the controversy, considering: (i) the interests of the members
of the class in individually controlling the prosecution of the separate
actions, (ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy
already commenced by members of the class, (iii) the desirability or
undesirability of continuing the litigation of these claims in this particular
forum, and (iv) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of
the class action

         3. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the
settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement
Hearing described below.

         4. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") shall be held before this Court
on March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., at the Alfred A. Arraj United States
Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to determine whether the proposed
settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in the
Stipulation is fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class and
should be approved by the Court; and whether a Judgment as provided in P. 1.11
of the Stipulation should be entered herein. At that time, or at any other time
thereafter that the Court may order, the Court shall hold a hearing to determine
whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved; and to determine the
amount of fees and expenses that should be awarded to Representative Plaintiffs'
Counsel. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to
members of the class.

         5. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency
and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice"), the Proof of Claim and
Release form (the "Proof of Claim"), and Summary Notice for publication annexed
as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 hereto and



                                      -2-


finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the
Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in P. P. 6-7 of
this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due
process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall
constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.

         6. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel are hereby authorized to retain the
firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC ("Claims Administrator") to supervise and administer
the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims as more fully set forth
below:

                  (a) Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall make reasonable
efforts to identify all Persons who are members of the class, and not later than
February 4, 2003 (the "Notice Date"), Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall cause
a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed
as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 hereto, to be mailed by first class mail to all class
members who can be identified with reasonable effort;

                  (b) Not later than February 11, 2003, Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investor's
Business Daily; and

                  (c) At least seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement
Hearing, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel shall cause to be served on Defendants'
counsel and filed with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such
mailing and publishing.

         7. Nominees who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period
beginning December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, shall send the
Notice and the Proof of Claim to all beneficial owners of such Vari-L stock
within ten (10) days after receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and
addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator within ten (10)
days of receipt thereof, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly
mail the Notice and Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners. Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel shall, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses or
other nominees solely for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
providing notice to beneficial owners who are class members out of the
Settlement Fund,



                                      -3-


which expenses would not have been incurred except for the sending of such
notice, subject to further order of this Court with respect to any dispute
concerning such compensation.

         8. All members of the class shall be bound by all determinations and
judgments in the Litigation concerning the settlement, whether favorable or
unfavorable to the class.

         9. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement shall
complete and submit Proof of Claim forms in accordance with the instructions
contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms
must be submitted no later than ninety (90) days from the Notice Date. Any class
member who does not timely submit a Proof of Claim within the time provided for,
shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the
Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

         10. Any member of the class may enter an appearance in the Litigation,
at their own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. If
they do not enter an appearance, they will be represented by Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel.

         11. Any Person falling within the definition of the class may, upon
request, be excluded from the class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims
Administrator a request for exclusion ("Request for Exclusion"), postmarked no
later than March 10, 2003. A Request for Exclusion must state: (a) the name,
address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b) each of
the Person's purchases and sales of Vari-L common stock made during the Class
Period, including the dates of purchase or sale, the number of shares purchased
and/or sold, and the price paid or received per share for each such purchase or
sale; and (c) that the Person wishes to be excluded from the class. All Persons
who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in
this paragraph shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in
the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the
Stipulation or the Judgment entered in the Litigation.

         12. Any member of the class may appear and show cause, if he, she or it
has any, why the proposed settlement of the Litigation should or should not be
approved as fair, just, reasonable and



                                      -4-


adequate, why a judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan
of Allocation should or should not be approved, or why attorneys' fees and
expenses should or should not be awarded to counsel for the Representative
Plaintiffs; provided, however, that no class member or any other Person shall be
heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the
proposed settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon
approving the same, or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the
attorneys' fees and expenses to be awarded to counsel for the Representative
Plaintiffs, unless that Person has delivered by hand or sent by first class mail
written objections and copies of any papers and briefs such that they are
received on or before March 10, 2003, by Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
LLP, Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, California
92101; and Cooley Godward, LLP, Peter A. Gergely, 380 Interlocken Crescent,
Suite 900, Broomfield, Colorado 80021-8023, and filed said objections, papers
and briefs with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District
of Colorado, on or before March 10, 2003. Any member of the class who does not
make his, her or its objection in the manner provided shall be deemed to have
waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection
to the fairness or adequacy of the proposed settlement as set forth in the
Stipulation, to the Plan of Allocation, or to the award of attorneys' fees and
expenses to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs, unless otherwise ordered
by the Court.

         13. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered
to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the
jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed
pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court.

         14. All papers in support of the settlement, the Plan of Allocation,
and any application by counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs for attorneys'
fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be filed and served seven (7) calendar
days prior to the Settlement Hearing.

         15. Neither Defendants and their Related Parties nor Defendants'
counsel shall have any responsibility for the Plan of Allocation or any
application for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of


                                      -5-


expenses submitted by Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, and such matters will
be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the
settlement.

         16. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine
whether the Plan of Allocation proposed by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel, and
any application for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be
approved.

         17. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying class
members, as well as administering the Settlement Fund, shall be paid as set
forth in the Stipulation. In the event the settlement is not approved by the
Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Representative
Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have any obligation to repay any
amounts actually and properly disbursed from the Class Notice and Administration
Fund.

         18. Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor
any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as
an admission or concession by Defendants of the truth of any of the allegations
in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind.

         19. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement
Hearing without further notice to the members of the class, and retains
jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected
with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the settlement, with such
modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate,
without further notice to the class.

DATED:
       ---------------------                  ----------------------------------
                                              THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. BLACKBURN
                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE




                                      -6-


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)


MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED
                           SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

                                   EXHIBIT A-1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------






TO:      ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED VARI-L COMPANY, INC. ("VARI-L") COMMON STOCK
         DURING THE PERIOD BEGINNING DECEMBER 17, 1997 THROUGH JULY 6, 2000,
         INCLUSIVE

         PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY
BE AFFECTED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU ARE A
CLASS MEMBER, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SHARE IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE SETTLEMENT
DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE. TO CLAIM YOUR SHARE OF THIS FUND, YOU MUST SUBMIT A
VALID PROOF OF CLAIM POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2003.

         This Notice has been sent to you pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for
the District of Colorado (the "Court"). The purpose of this Notice is to inform
you of the pendency and proposed settlement of this class action litigation and
of the hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness,
and adequacy of the settlement. This Notice is not intended to be, and should
not be construed as, an expression of any opinion by the Court with respect to
the truth of the allegations in the Litigation or the merits of the claims or
defenses asserted. This Notice describes the rights you may have in connection
with the settlement and what steps you may take in relation to the settlement
and this class action litigation.

         The proposed settlement creates a fund in the amount of $644,000 in
cash (the "Cash Amount") and two million shares of Vari-L common stock subject
to certain anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the Stipulation of
Settlement (the "Settlement Stock") (collectively, the "Settlement Fund") and
will include interest that accrues on the cash portion of the Settlement Fund
prior to distribution. Your recovery from this fund will depend on a number of
variables, including the number of shares of Vari-L common stock you purchased
during the period December 17, 1997 to July 6, 2000, and the timing of your
purchases and any sales. Depending on the number of eligible shares purchased by
Settlement Class Members who elect to participate in the settlement and when



                                      -1-


those shares were purchased and sold, the estimated average recovery per share
will be approximately $0.32 before deduction of Court-approved fees and
expenses.

         Representative Plaintiffs and Defendants do not agree on the average
amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if the Representative
Plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim alleged. The issues on which the
parties disagree include: (1) the appropriate economic model for determining the
amount by which Vari-L common stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at
all) during the Class Period; (2) the amount by which Vari-L common stock was
allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (3) the
effect of various market forces influencing the trading price of Vari-L common
stock at various times during the Class Period; (4) the extent to which external
factors, such as general market and industry conditions, influenced the trading
price of Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; (5) the
extent to which the various matters that Representative Plaintiffs alleged were
materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading price of
Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; (6) the extent to
which the various allegedly adverse material facts that Representative
Plaintiffs alleged were omitted influenced (if at all) the trading price of
Vari-L common stock at various times during the Class Period; and (7) whether
the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were material, false, misleading
or otherwise actionable under the securities laws.

         The Representative Plaintiffs believe that the proposed settlement is a
good recovery under the circumstances and is in the best interests of the
Settlement Class. Because of the risks associated with continuing to litigate
and proceeding to trial, there was a danger that plaintiffs would not have
prevailed on any of their claims, in which case the Settlement Class would
receive nothing. The amount of damages recoverable by the Settlement Class was
and is challenged by Defendants. Recoverable damages in this case are limited to
losses caused by conduct actionable under applicable law and, had the litigation
gone to trial, Defendants would have asserted that all or most of the losses of
Settlement Class Members were caused by non-actionable market, industry or
general economic factors. Defendants would also assert that throughout the Class
Period the uncertainties and risks



                                      -2-


associated with the purchase of Vari-L common stock were fully and adequately
disclosed. Moreover, given Vari-L's financial condition, any recovery by the
Settlement Class was in substantial doubt.

         Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have not received any payment for
their services in conducting this Litigation since 2000 on behalf of the
Representative Plaintiffs and the Members of the Class, nor have they been
reimbursed for their substantial out-of-pocket expenditures. If the settlement
is approved by the Court, counsel for the plaintiffs will apply to the Court for
attorneys' fees of 25% of the portion of the Settlement Fund not attributable to
disgorgement received from the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $250,000 to be paid from
the Settlement Fund. If the amount requested is approved by the Court, the
average cost per share will be $0.128.

         For further information regarding this settlement you may contact:
Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, 401 B Street,
Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101, Telephone: 619/231-1058; Michael Yarnoff,
Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA
19004, Telephone: 610/667-7706; or Norman Berman, Berman DeValerio Pease
Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, LLP, One Liberty Square, Boston, MA 02109, Telephone:
617/542-8300.

I.       NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

         A settlement hearing will be held on March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m.,
before the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Court Judge, at
the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, District of Colorado, 901 19th
Street, Denver, Colorado (the "Settlement Hearing"). The purpose of the
Settlement Hearing will be to determine: whether the settlement consisting of
$644,000 in cash and $2,000,000 shares of Vari-L common stock subject to certain
anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement should
be approved as fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settling Parties; and
whether a Judgment as provided in Paragraph 1.11 of the Stipulation



                                      -3-


should be entered. At that time, or at any other time thereafter that the Court
may order, the Court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the proposed plan
to distribute the settlement proceeds (the "Plan of Allocation") is fair, just,
reasonable, and adequate; and whether the application by Representative
Plaintiffs' Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses should be
approved. The Court may adjourn or continue the Settlement Hearing without
further notice to the class.

II.      DEFINITIONS USED IN THIS NOTICE

         1. "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc. and the Individual
Defendants.

         2. "Individual Defendants" means Joseph H. Kiser, Jon L. Clark, Derek
L. Bailey and David G. Sherman.

         3. "Related Parties" means each of a Defendant's past or present
directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents,
underwriters, insurers (including, but not limited to, Agricultural Excess and
Surplus Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under Policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but
excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under Policy No. NDA0155834),
co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or
auditors, banks or investment banks, associates, personal or legal
representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions,
joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any
entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest, any members of their
immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which
is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family.

         4. "Released Claims" shall collectively mean any and all claims
(including "Unknown Claims" as defined below), actions, demands, allegations,
rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description
whatsoever, including but not limited to, claims for negligence, gross
negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of
loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, mismanagement,
breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or
regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that have
been



                                      -4-


or could have been asserted against the Defendants and/or the Related Parties in
the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and/or
Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to both the
purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by any other
Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts,
transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or
failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation.

         5. "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and the
Related Parties.

         6. "Settlement Class" means all Persons (except Defendants, present and
former executive officers and directors of Vari-L and/or its subsidiaries, their
heirs, successors, assigns and members of the immediate families of Defendants)
who purchased Vari-L common stock during the period from December 17, 1997 and
July 6, 2000, inclusive, excluding those Persons who timely and validly request
exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to this Notice.

         7. "Settlement Fund" means (a) the principal amount of Six Hundred
Forty Four Thousand Dollars ($644,000) in cash (the "Cash Amount"), plus all
interest earned thereon; and (b) the Settlement Stock.

         8. "Settlement Stock" means Two Million (2,000,000) shares of Vari-L
common stock, which shall be issued under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act
of 1933 exempt from registration, subject to the anti-dilution provisions set
forth in paragraph 2.4 of the Stipulation.

         9. "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the
Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect
to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released
Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its
settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his,
her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and
all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the
Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the


                                      -5-


Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of
California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides:

                  A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
         DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING
         THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS
         SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and
benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or
principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar,
comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542. The
Representative Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover
facts in addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or
believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims,
but the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class
Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any
and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent
or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or
heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming
into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is
negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or
rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different
or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class
Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that
the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a material element of
the settlement of which this release is a part.

III.     THE LITIGATION

         On and after June 9, 2000, the following actions (collectively, the
"Litigation") were filed in the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado, as securities class actions on behalf of



                                      -6-


purchasers of Vari-L Company, Inc. stock between December 17, 1997 and July 6,
2000 (the "Class Period"), brought against Vari-L and certain of its present and
former officers and directors:

         Rasner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1181

         Furman v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-WY-1198

         Pedersen v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1217

         Rambo v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1238

         Gonzalez v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1241

         Paige v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1292

         Bronner v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1395

         Crescente v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1401

         Farina v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1409

         Betts v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1460

         Hoos v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1465

         Cody v. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1493

         Bernstein v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1518

         Schmidt v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1520

         Rhodes v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1565

         Striker v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.,
         Civil Action No. 00-S-1690




                                      -7-




The operative complaint (the "Complaint") is the Consolidated Amended Class
Action Complaint, filed on October 9, 2001. The Complaint alleges claims for
violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. More specifically,
the Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants reported
materially false financial results and made false and misleading statements
about Vari-L's financial condition, causing Vari-L's stock to trade at
artificially inflated levels. The Complaint alleges that Vari-L's reported
revenues and earnings for 1997, 1998, 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, were
grossly overstated. The Complaint further alleges that Vari-L's financial
controls were so inadequate that it is impossible to reconstruct or restate any
financials prior to 1999.

         On September 6, 2000, the Court granted the motion of Columbus Circle
Investors, Steven D. Thomas and Susan E. Thomas, and Abraham Kadisha, for
appointment as lead plaintiffs under Section 21D(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act
and approved Lead Plaintiffs' selection of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
LLP, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt &
Pucillo as Co-Lead Counsel pursuant to Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange
Act.

IV.      CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT

         The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation
have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However,
counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length
of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the
Defendants through trial and through appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs
also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any
litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Litigation, as well as
the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Counsel for the Lead
Plaintiffs also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof under and possible
defenses to the claims asserted in the Litigation. Counsel for the Lead
Plaintiffs is also



                                      -8-


aware of the limited financial resources of the Defendants and of their
inability to pay a large judgment. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that
the settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon
the Settlement Class. Based on their evaluation, counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs
have determined that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is in the best
interests of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class.

V.       DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT AND DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY

         Defendants deny and continue to deny each and all of the claims and
contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants
expressly have denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or
liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or
omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The
Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations
that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered damage, that the
price of Vari-L common stock was artificially inflated by reasons of alleged
misrepresentations, non-disclosures or otherwise, or that the Lead Plaintiffs or
the Settlement Class were harmed by the conduct alleged in the Complaint.
Nothing in the Stipulation is intended, or should be construed, as an admission
or concession of any of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead
Plaintiffs in the Litigation.

         Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the
Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the
Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and
conditions set forth in the Stipulation. The Defendants also have taken into
account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in
complex cases like this Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined
that it is desirable and beneficial to them that the Litigation be settled in
the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation.



                                      -9-


VI.      TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

         The Defendants will pay or cause to be paid into an escrow account,
pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22,
2003 (the "Stipulation"), cash in the amount of $644,000, a portion of which is
attributable to disgorgement from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which
will continue to earn interest for the benefit of the Settlement Class. Vari-L
is obligated to deliver or cause to be delivered the Settlement Stock to
Authorized Claimants and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel in accordance with
the instructions provided to the Vari-L transfer agent by Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel or the Claims Administrator. Each and all shares of Settlement Stock
shall be exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act
of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), freely tradeable and free from any liens and
encumbrances upon delivery to Authorized Claimants and Representative
Plaintiffs' Counsel.

         Vari-L's transfer agent will be provided with a list identifying each
Authorized Claimant and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel who are entitled to
receive Settlement Stock and the number of shares of Settlement Stock to be
issued to each such Person ("Distribution List"). No fractional shares of
Settlement Stock will be issued, and thus, the calculation of the number of
shares to be distributed will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole share.
In addition, the Settlement Stock will be distributed to Authorized Claimants
who reside in states where the Settlement Stock is exempt from registration or
qualification under applicable "Blue Sky" laws. For Authorized Claimants who
reside in states where the Settlement Stock is not exempt, appropriate
adjustments will be made by the Escrow Agent, Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or
the Claims Administrator to equalize the value of their distribution under the
Plan of Allocation however, said appropriate adjustments shall not increase any
Defendants' contribution to the Settlement Fund or Vari-L's contribution of the
Settlement Stock . Vari-L shall direct its transfer agent to distribute
certificates for shares of Vari-L common stock within thirty-five (35) days of
receipt of the Distribution List to the Persons and in the amounts shown on the
Distribution List in a transaction exempt under



                                      -10-


Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act. All costs associated with the delivery of the
Settlement Stock shall be borne by Vari-L.

         A portion of the settlement proceeds will be used for certain
administrative expenses, including costs of printing and mailing this Notice,
the cost of publishing a newspaper notice, payment of any taxes assessed against
the Settlement Fund and costs associated with the processing of claims
submitted. In addition, as explained below, a portion of the Settlement Fund may
be awarded by the Court to counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs as
attorneys' fees and for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. The balance of
the Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlement Fund") will be distributed according to
the Plan of Allocation described below to Settlement Class Members who submit
valid and timely Proof of Claim forms.

VII.     THE RIGHTS OF CLASS MEMBERS

         If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may receive the benefit of
and you will be bound by the terms of the proposed settlement described in
Section VI of this Notice, upon approval of it by the Court.

         If you are a Settlement Class Member, you have the following options:

         1. You may file a Proof of Claim as described below. If you choose this
option, you will remain a Settlement Class Member, you will share in the
proceeds of the proposed settlement if your claim is timely and valid and if the
proposed settlement is finally approved by the Court, and you will be bound by
the Judgment and release described below.

         2. If you do not wish to be included in the Settlement Class and you do
not wish to participate in the proposed settlement described in this Notice, you
may request to be excluded. To do so, you must so state in writing, postmarked
no later than March 10, 2003. You must set forth: (a) your name, address and
telephone number; (b) the number of shares of Vari-L common stock purchased and
the number of shares sold during the Class Period and the dates and prices of
such



                                      -11-


purchase(s) and/or sale(s); and (c) that you wish to be excluded from the
Settlement Class. The exclusion request should be addressed as follows:

                           Vari-L Securities Litigation
                           Claims Administrator
                           c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC
                           P.O. Box 8040
                           San Rafael, CA 94912-8040

NO REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION WILL BE CONSIDERED VALID UNLESS ALL OF THE INFORMATION
DESCRIBED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN ANY SUCH REQUEST.

         If you validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class (a) you will
be excluded from the Settlement Class, (b) you will not share in the proceeds of
the settlement described herein, (c) you will not be bound by any judgment
entered in the Litigation, and (d) you will not be precluded, by reason of your
decision to request exclusion from the Settlement Class, from otherwise
prosecuting an individual claim, if timely, against Defendants based on the
matters complained of in the Litigation.

         3. If you do not request in writing to be excluded from the Settlement
Class as set forth in Paragraph 2 above, you will be bound by any and all
determinations or judgments in the Litigation in connection with the settlement
entered into or approved by the Court, whether favorable or unfavorable to the
Settlement Class, and you shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have fully released all of the Released Claims against the
Released Persons, whether or not you submit a valid Proof of Claim.

         4. You may object to the settlement and/or the application of
Plaintiffs' Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of
expenses in the manner set forth below. The filing of a Proof of Claim by a
Settlement Class Member does not preclude a Settlement Class Member from
objecting to the settlement. However, if your objection is rejected you will be
bound by the settlement and the Judgment just as if you had not objected.

         5. You may do nothing at all. If you choose this option, you will not
share in the proceeds of the settlement, but you will be bound by any judgment
entered by the Court, and you



                                      -12-


shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have fully
released all of the Released Claims against the Released Persons.

         If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may, but are not required to,
enter an appearance through counsel of your own choosing at your own expense. If
you do not do so, you will be represented by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel:
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Ellen Gusikoff Stewart, 401 B Street,
Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101; Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Michael Yarnoff,
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, and Berman DeValerio
Pease Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, LLP, Norman Berman, One Liberty Square, Boston,
MA 02109.

VIII.    PLAN OF ALLOCATION

         The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to Settlement Class Members
who submit valid, timely Proof of Claim forms ("Authorized Claimants") under the
Plan of Allocation described below. The Plan of Allocation provides that you
will be eligible to participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund
only if you have a net loss on all transactions in Vari-L common stock during
the Class Period.

         For purposes of determining the amount an Authorized Claimant may
recover under the Plan of Allocation, Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have
consulted with their damage consultants and the Plan of Allocation reflects an
assessment of the damages that they believe could have been recovered had
plaintiffs prevailed at trial.

         To the extent there are sufficient funds in the Net Settlement Fund,
each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to the Authorized
Claimant's claim, as defined below. If, however, the amount in the Net
Settlement Fund is not sufficient to permit payment of the total claim of each
Authorized Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage
of the Net Settlement Fund that each Authorized Claimant's claim bears to the
total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. Payment in this manner shall be
deemed conclusive against all Authorized Claimants.



                                      -13-


         1.       A claim will be calculated as follows:

                  For shares of Vari-L common stock purchased on December 17,
1997 through July 6, 2000, and

                  (a) sold from December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, the
claim per share is the difference between the price paid for the shares of
Vari-L common stock and the amount realized from the sale of any such shares;

                  (b) retained at the end of July 6, 2000, the claim per share
is the difference between the price paid for the shares of Vari-L common stock
and $6.00 per share (September 8, 2000 closing price on date stock resumed
trading).

         2. The date of purchase or sale is the "contract" or "trade" date as
distinguished from the "settlement" date.

         3. For Settlement Class Members who held shares at the beginning of the
Class Period or made multiple purchases or sales during the Class Period, the
first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method will be applied to such holdings, purchases
and sales for purposes of calculating a claim. Under the FIFO method, sales of
shares during the Class Period will be matched, in chronological order, first
against shares held at the beginning of the Class Period. The remaining sales of
shares during the Class Period will then be matched, in chronological order,
against shares purchased during the Class Period.

         4. A Class Member will be eligible to receive a distribution from the
Net Settlement Fund only if a Class Member had a net loss, after all profits
from transactions in Vari-L common stock during the Class Period are subtracted
from all losses. However, the proceeds from sales of stock which have been
matched against stock held at the beginning of the Class Period will not be used
in the calculation of such net loss.

         The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the
claim of any Settlement Class Member on equitable grounds.



                                      -14-


         Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation set forth above shall be
conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No Person shall have any claim
against Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or any claims administrator or Defendants
or other agent designated by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel or Defendants or
Defendants' counsel based on distributions made substantially in accordance with
the Stipulation and the settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or
further orders of the Court. All Settlement Class Members who fail to complete
and file a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release shall be barred from
participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund (unless otherwise
ordered by the Court), but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the
Stipulation, including the terms of any judgment entered and the releases given.

IX.      PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT

         If you fall within the definition of the Settlement Class, you will be
bound by any judgment entered with respect to the settlement in the Litigation
whether or not you file a Proof of Claim. If you choose, you may enter an
appearance individually or through your own counsel at your own expense.

         TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND, YOU MUST
TIMELY COMPLETE AND RETURN THE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM THAT ACCOMPANIES
THIS NOTICE. The Proof of Claim and Release must be postmarked on or before May
1, 2003, and delivered to the Claims Administrator at the address below. Unless
the Court orders otherwise, if you do not timely submit a valid Proof of Claim,
you will be barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement Fund, but
will in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and the
Judgment.

X.       DISMISSAL AND RELEASES

         If the proposed settlement is approved, the Court will enter a Final
Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice ("Judgment"). The Judgment will
dismiss the Released Claims with prejudice as to all Defendants. The Judgment
will provide that all Settlement Class Members shall



                                      -15-


be deemed to have released and forever discharged all Released Claims (to the
extent Members of the Settlement Class have such claims) against all Released
Persons and that the Released Persons shall be deemed to have released and
discharged all Settlement Class Members and counsel to the Representative
Plaintiffs from all claims arising out of the prosecution and settlement of the
Litigation or the Released Claims.

XI.      APPLICATION FOR FEES AND EXPENSES

         At the Settlement Hearing, counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs
will request the Court to award attorneys' fees of 25% of that portion of the
Settlement Fund which is not attributable to disgorgement received from the SEC,
plus reimbursement of their expenses, not to exceed $250,000 which were advanced
in connection with the Litigation, plus interest thereon. Such sums as may be
approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Settlement Class
Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses.

         To date, Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel have not received any
payment for their services in conducting this Litigation on behalf of the
Representative Plaintiffs and Members of the Settlement Class, nor have counsel
been reimbursed for their substantial out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested
by Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel will compensate counsel for their efforts
in achieving the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Settlement Class, and
for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis.
The fee requested is well within the range of fees awarded to plaintiffs'
counsel under similar circumstances in other litigation of this type.

XII.     CONDITIONS FOR SETTLEMENT

         The settlement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events
described in the Stipulation. Those events include, among other things: (1)
entry of the Judgment by the Court, as provided for in the Stipulation; and (2)
expiration of the time to appeal from or alter or amend the Judgment. If, for
any reason, any one of the conditions described in the Stipulation is not met,
the


                                      -16-

Stipulation might be terminated and, if terminated, will become null and void,
and the parties to the Stipulation will be restored to their respective
positions as of October 3, 2002.

XIII.    THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING

         Any Settlement Class Member who objects to any aspect of the
settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the application for attorneys' fees and
expenses, may appear and be heard at the Settlement Hearing. Any such Person
must submit a written notice of objection, such that it is received on or before
March 10, 2003, by each of the following:

                           CLERK OF THE COURT
                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                           901 19th Street
                           Denver, CO  80294

                           Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs:

                           MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
                             HYNES & LERACH LLP
                           ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART
                           401 B Street, Suite 1700
                           San Diego, CA 92101

                           SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP
                           MICHAEL K. YARNOFF
                           Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
                           Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004

                           BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO
                             BURT & PUCILLO
                           NORMAN BERMAN
                           One Liberty Square
                           Boston, MA  02109

                           Counsel for Defendant Vari-L:

                           COOLEY GODWARD, LLP
                           PETER A. GERGELY
                           380 Interlocken Crescent
                           Suite 900
                           Broomfield, CO  80021-8023



                                      -17-


                           Counsel for Individual Defendants:

                           SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC
                           KENNETH B. SIEGEL
                           633 17th Street, Suite 3000
                           Denver, CO  80202

                           DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
                           DAVID W. STARK
                           370 17th Street, Suite 4700
                           Denver, CO  80202

                           ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP
                           FREDERICK J. BAUMANN
                           1200 17th Street, Suite 3000
                           Denver, CO  80202

                           BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C.
                           CARLA B. MINCKLEY
                           1700 Broadway, Suite 1501
                           Denver, CO  80209


The notice of objection must demonstrate the objecting Person's membership in
the Settlement Class, including the number of Vari-L shares purchased and sold
during the Class Period, and contain a statement of the reasons for objection.
Only Members of the Settlement Class who have submitted written notices of
objection in this manner will be entitled to be heard at the Settlement Hearing,
unless the Court orders otherwise.

XIV.     SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES

         If you hold any Vari-L common stock purchased during the Class Period
as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive
this Notice, you must either: (1) send a copy of this Notice and the Proof of
Claim by first class mail to all such Persons; or (2) provide a list of the
names and addresses of such Persons to the Claims Administrator:

                           Vari-L Securities Litigation
                           Claims Administrator
                           c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC
                           P.O. Box 8040
                           San Rafael, CA 94912-8040



                                      -18-


         If you choose to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim yourself, you may
obtain from the Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional
copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing.

         Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or
elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or
advancement of reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to
be incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and Proof of Claim and
which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice
and Proof of Claim, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Claims
Administrator.

XV.      EXAMINATION OF PAPERS

         This Notice is a summary and does not describe all of the details of
the Stipulation. For full details of the matters discussed in this Notice, you
may review the Stipulation filed with the Court, which may be inspected during
business hours, at the office of the Clerk of the Court, Alfred A. Arraj United
States Courthouse, District of Colorado, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.

         If you have any questions about the settlement of the Litigation, you
may contact Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel by writing:

                           MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
                             HYNES & LERACH LLP
                           RICK NELSON
                           401 B Street, Suite 1700
                           San Diego, CA  92101

                           SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP
                           MICHAEL K. YARNOFF
                           Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
                           Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004

                           BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO
                             BURT & PUCILLO
                           NORMAN BERMAN
                           One Liberty Square
                           Boston, MA  02109



                                      -19-


         DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE.


DATED: __________________, 2003               BY ORDER OF THE COURT
                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO



                                      -20-


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)


MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.




- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

                                   EXHIBIT A-2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------









I.       GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

         1. To recover as a Member of the Settlement Class based on your claims
in the action entitled Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al., Civil
Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (the "Litigation"), you must complete and, on page
___ hereof, sign this Proof of Claim and Release. If you fail to file a properly
addressed (as set forth in paragraph 3 below) Proof of Claim and Release, your
claim may be rejected and you may be precluded from any recovery from the Net
Settlement Fund created in connection with the proposed settlement of the
Litigation.

         2. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release, however, does not
assure that you will share in the proceeds of settlement in the Litigation.

         3. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2003, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:

                           Vari-L Securities Litigation
                           Claims Administrator
                           c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC
                           P.O. Box 8040
                           San Rafael, CA 94912-8040

If you are NOT a Member of the Settlement Class (as defined in the "Notice of
Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action") DO NOT submit a Proof of
Claim and Release form.

         4. If you are a Member of the Settlement Class, you are bound by the
terms of any judgment entered in the Litigation, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A
PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE.

II.      DEFINITIONS

         1. "Defendants" means Vari-L Company, Inc. ("Vari-L") and the
Individual Defendants.

         2. "Individual Defendants" means Joseph H. Kiser, David G. Sherman, Jon
L. Clark, and Derek L. Bailey.

         3. "Released Persons" means each and all of the Defendants and their
Related Parties.



                                      -1-



III.     CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION

         1. If you purchased Vari-L common stock and held the certificate(s) in
your name, you are the beneficial purchaser as well as the record purchaser. If,
however, the certificate(s) were registered in the name of a third party, such
as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial purchaser and the third
party is the record purchaser.

         2. Use Part I of this form entitled "Claimant Identification" to
identify each purchaser of record ("nominee"), if different from the beneficial
purchaser of Vari-L common stock which forms the basis of this claim. THIS CLAIM
MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL BENEFICIAL PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OR THE LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OF THE VARI-L COMMON STOCK UPON
WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED.

         3. All joint purchasers must sign this claim. Executors,
administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees must complete and sign this
claim on behalf of Persons represented by them and their authority must
accompany this claim and their titles or capacities must be stated. The Social
Security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the
beneficial owner may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the
foregoing information could delay verification of your claim or result in
rejection of the claim.

IV.      CLAIM FORM

         1. Use Part II of this form entitled "Schedule of Transactions in
Vari-L Common Stock" to supply all required details of your transaction(s) in
Vari-L common stock. If you need more space or additional schedules, attach
separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same
form. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet.

         2. On the schedules, provide all of the requested information with
respect to ALL of your purchases and ALL of your sales of Vari-L common stock
which took place at any time between December 17, 1997 and July 6, 2000,
inclusive (the "Class Period"), whether such transactions





                                      -2-


resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may
result in the rejection of your claim.

         3. List each transaction in the Class Period separately and in
chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must
accurately provide the month, day and year of each transaction you list.

         4. The date of covering a "short sale" is deemed to be the date of
purchase of Vari-L stock. The date of a "short sale" is deemed to be the date of
sale of Vari-L stock.

         5. Broker confirmations or other documentation of your transactions in
Vari-L stock should be attached to your claim. Failure to provide this
documentation could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of
your claim.



                                      -3-



                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO

                 Rasner, et al. v. Vari-L Company, Inc., et al.

                        Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS)

                                 PROOF OF CLAIM

                        Must be Postmarked No Later Than:

                                   May 1, 2003

                              Please Type or Print

PART I:  CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beneficial Owner's Name (First, Middle, Last)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Street Address


- -------------------------------------
City                                      State             Zip Code
                                          -------------------------------------


- -------------------------------------
Foreign Province


                                          Foreign Country
                                          -------------------------------------


- -------------------------------------           Individual
Social Security Number or                 -----
Taxpayer Identification Number                  Corporation/Other
                                          -----






                      -------------------------------------
Area Code             Telephone Number          (work)


                      -------------------------------------
Area Code             Telephone Number          (home)



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Record Owner's Name (if different from beneficial owner listed above)



                                      -4-



PART II: SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN VARI-L COMMON STOCK

         A.       Number of shares of Vari-L common stock held at the beginning
                  of trading on December 17, 1997:

         B.       Purchases (December 17, 1997 - July 6, 2000, inclusive):



         Trade Date
         Mo.   Day   Year       Number of Shares Purchased      Total Purchase Price

                                                          
1.                              1.                              1.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------
2.                              2.                              2.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------
3.                              3.                              3.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------



IMPORTANT:        Identify by number listed above all purchases in which you
                  covered a "short sale":_____________________


         C.       Sales (December 17, 1997 - July 6, 2000, inclusive):




         Trade Date
         Mo.   Day   Year       Number of Shares Sold           Total Sales Price

                                                          
1.                              1.                              1.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------
2.                              2.                              2.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------
3.                              3.                              3.
   ------------------------        ------------------------        ------------------------





         D.       Number of shares of Vari-L common stock held at close of
                  trading on July 6, 2000: ____________


If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as
above. Sign and print your name on each additional page.


YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE __________.



                                      -5-



V.       SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

         I submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the
Stipulation of Settlement described in the Notice. I also submit to the
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado,
with respect to my claim as a Settlement Class Member and for purposes of
enforcing the release set forth herein. I further acknowledge that I am bound by
and subject to the terms of any judgment that may be entered in the Litigation.
I agree to furnish additional information to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel to
support this claim (including transactions in other Vari-L securities such as
options) if required to do so. I have not submitted any other claim covering the
same purchases or sales of Vari-L common stock during the Class Period and know
of no other person having done so on my behalf.

VI.      RELEASE

         1. I hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do
hereby fully, finally and forever settle, release and discharge from the
Released Claims each and all of the Defendants and each and all of their
"Related Parties," defined as each of a Defendant's past or present directors,
officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters,
insurers, (including but not limited to Agricultural Excess and Surplus
Insurance Company ("AESIC"), under policy No. NSX2422135 ("Policy"), but
excepting Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance"), under policy No. NDA0155834),
co-insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, accountants or
auditors, banks or investment banks, associates, personal or legal
representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions,
joint ventures, assigns, spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any
entity in which a Defendant has a controlling interest, any members of their
immediate families, or any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which
is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family.

         2. "Released Claims" shall collectively mean all claims (including
"Unknown Claims" as defined below), actions, demands, allegations, rights,
liabilities and causes of action of every






                                      -6-


nature and description whatsoever, including, but not limited to, claims for
negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, breach of duty of care and/or breach
of duty of loyalty, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation,
mismanagement, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes,
rules or regulations, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, that
have been or could have been asserted, against the Defendants and/or the Related
Parties in the Litigation by or on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs
and/or any Settlement Class Members arising out of, based upon or related to
both the purchase of Vari-L common stock by the Representative Plaintiffs or by
any other Settlement Class Member during the Class Period and any of the facts,
transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or
failures to act which were, could or might have been alleged in the Litigation.

         3. "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims which any of the
Representative Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect
to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released
Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its
settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his,
her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and
all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the
Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs shall expressly and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of
California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides:

                  A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
         DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING
         THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS
         SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and
benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or
principle of common law or international or foreign law, which is similar,
comparable or equivalent





                                      -7-


to California Civil Code Section 1542. The Representative Plaintiffs and
Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or
different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with
respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Representative
Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective
Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have,
fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims,
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent,
whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed,
upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the
future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional,
with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to
the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. The
Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed
by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was
separately bargained for and is a material element of the settlement of which
this release is a part.

         4. This release shall be of no force or effect unless and until the
Court approves the Stipulation of Settlement and the Stipulation becomes
effective on the Effective Date (as defined in the Stipulation).

         5. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or
transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily,
any matter released pursuant to this release or any other part or portion
thereof.

         6. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included
information about all of my (our) transactions in Vari-L common stock which
occurred during the Class Period as well as the number of shares of Vari-L
common stock held by me (us) at the opening of trading on December 17, 1997, and
at the close of trading on July 6, 2000.



                                      -8-


                               SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

      Request for Taxpayer Identification Number ("TIN") and Certification

                                     PART I

NAME:
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check appropriate box:

[ ]      Individual/Sole Proprietor                       [ ]      Pension Plan
[ ]      Corporation                [ ]     Partnership   [ ]      Trust
[ ]      IRA                        [ ]     Other

         Enter TIN on appropriate line.

         o        For individuals, this is your social security number ("SSN").

         o        For sole proprietors, you must show your individual name, but
                  you may also enter your business or "doing business as" name.
                  You may enter either your SSN or your Employer Identification
                  Number ("EIN").

         o        For other entities, it is your EIN.

_ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _       or      _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Social Security Number              Employer Identification Number


                                     PART II

                    For Payees Exempt from Backup Withholding

If you are exempt from backup withholding, enter your correct TIN in Part I and
write "exempt" on the following line: _________________________.


                                    PART III

                                  Certification

UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, I (WE) CERTIFY THAT:

         1.)      The number shown on this form is my correct TIN; and

         2.)      I (We) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup
                  withholding under the provisions of Section 3406 (a)(1)(C) of
                  the Internal Revenue Code because: (a) I am (we are) exempt
                  from backup withholding; or (b) I (we) have not been notified
                  by the Internal Revenue Service that I am (we are) subject to
                  backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all
                  interest or






                                      -9-


                  dividends; or (c) the Internal Revenue Service has notified me
                  (us) that I am (we are) no longer subject to backup
                  withholding.

NOTE:    If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are
         subject to backup withholding, you must cross out Item 2 above.

                       SEE ENCLOSED FORM W-9 INSTRUCTIONS

The Internal Revenue Service does not require your consent to any provision of
this document other than the certification required to avoid backup withholding.

         I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States
of America that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true
and correct.

         Executed this _________ day of ___________________,
                                           (Month / Year)

in _____________________, ______________________________.
         (City)                   (State / Country)


                                           -------------------------------------
                                           (Sign your name here)


                                           -------------------------------------
                                           (Type or print your name here)


                                           -------------------------------------
                                           (Capacity of person(s) signing, e.g.,
                                           Beneficial Purchaser, Executor or
                                           Administrator)

                       ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A
                           SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME.
                          THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

Reminder Checklist:

         1.       Please sign the above release and declaration.

         2.       Remember to attach supporting documentation, if available.

         3.       Do not send original or copies of stock certificates.

         4.       Keep a copy of your claim form for your records.


                                      -10-


         5.       If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form,
                  please send it Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested.

         6.       If you move, please send us your new address.







                                      -11-





                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)


MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.



                                 SUMMARY NOTICE

                                   EXHIBIT A-3







TO:      ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED VARI-L COMPANY, INC. ("VARI-L") COMMON STOCK
         DURING THE PERIOD BEGINNING DECEMBER 17, 1997 THROUGH JULY 6, 2000,
         INCLUSIVE

         YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States
District Court for the District of Colorado, that a hearing will be held on
March 28, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, at the
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, for
the purpose of determining (1) whether the proposed settlement of the claims in
the Litigation for the sum of $644,000 in cash plus 2,000,000 shares of Vari-L
common stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments as set forth in the
Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 22, 2003 ("Stipulation") should be
approved by the Court as fair, reasonable and adequate; (2) whether, thereafter,
this Litigation should be dismissed with prejudice as set forth in the
Stipulation; (3) whether the Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable and adequate
and therefore should be approved; and (4) whether the application of
Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel for the payment of attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection in this Litigation should be
approved.

         If you purchased Vari-L common stock during the period beginning
December 17, 1997 through July 6, 2000, inclusive, your rights may be affected
by the settlement of this Litigation. If you have not received a detailed Notice
of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action ("Notice") and a copy of the
Proof of Claim and Release, you may obtain copies by writing to Vari-L
Securities Litigation, c/o Gilardi & Co., LLC, P.O. Box 8040, San Rafael, CA
94912-8040. If you are a Settlement Class Member, in order to share in the
distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and
Release no later than May 1, 2003, establishing that you are entitled to
recovery.

         If you desire to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you must file a
Request for Exclusion by March 10, 2003, in the manner and form explained in the
detailed Notice referred to above. All Members of the Settlement Class who have
not requested exclusion from the Settlement Class will be bound by any judgment
entered in the Litigation pursuant to the Stipulation.




                                      -1-

         Any objection to the settlement must be mailed or delivered such that
it is received by each of the following no later than March 10, 2003:

                                    CLERK OF THE COURT
                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                    DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                                    901 19th Street
                                    Denver, CO 80294

                                    Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs:

                                    MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
                                      HYNES & LERACH LLP
                                    ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART
                                    401 B Street, Suite 1700
                                    San Diego, CA 92101

                                    SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP
                                    MICHAEL K. YARNOFF
                                    Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
                                    Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004

                                    BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO
                                      BURT & PUCILLO
                                    NORMAN BERMAN
                                    One Liberty Square
                                    Boston, MA  02109

                                    Counsel for Defendant Vari-L:

                                    COOLEY GODWARD, LLP
                                    PETER A. GERGELY
                                    380 Interlocken Crescent
                                    Suite 900
                                    Broomfield, CO  80021-8023

                                    Counsel for Individual Defendants:

                                    SHERMAN & HOWARD, LLC
                                    KENNETH B. SIEGEL
                                    633 17th Street, Suite 3000
                                    Denver, CO  80202

                                    DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
                                    DAVID W. STARK
                                    370 17th Street, Suite 4700
                                    Denver, CO  80202




                                      -2-


                                    ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS, LLP
                                    FREDERICK J. BAUMANN
                                    1200 17th Street, Suite 3000
                                    Denver, CO 80202

                                    BIRGE & MINCKLEY, P.C.
                                    CARLA B. MINCKLEY
                                    1700 Broadway, Suite 1501
                                    Denver, CO 80209

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING THIS NOTICE. If
you have any questions about the settlement, you may contact plaintiffs' counsel
at the addresses listed above.

DATED: ________________, 2003                BY ORDER OF THE COURT
                                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                             DISTRICT OF COLORADO




                                      -3-


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Civil Action No. 00-RB-1181(CBS) (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 00-RB-1198)

MICHAEL RASNER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VARI-L COMPANY, INC.,
DEREK L. BAILEY,
JOSEPH H. KISER,
DAVID G. SHERMAN and
JON L. CLARK,

Defendants.



                       [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
                           OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

                                    EXHIBIT B






         This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to an Order of
this Court, dated ________, 2003, on the application of the Settling Parties for
approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as
of January 22, 2003 (the "Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having been
given of the settlement as required in said Order, and the Court having
considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully
informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

         1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the
Stipulation, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth
in the Stipulation.

         2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the
Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the
Settlement Class.

         3. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons (identified in
Exhibit 1 hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the
Settlement Class, the Litigation as well as all of the Released Claims are
dismissed with prejudice as to the Representative Plaintiffs and the other
Members of the Settlement Class, and as against the Defendants. The parties are
to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation.

         4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, this Court hereby approves the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said settlement is, in
all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to, and is in the best interests of,
the Lead Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class and each of the Settlement Class
Members. This Court further finds the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is
the result of arm's-length negotiations between experienced counsel representing
the interests of the Lead Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members and the
Defendants. Accordingly, the settlement embodied in the Stipulation is hereby
approved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with its terms
and provisions. The Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform the terms of
the Stipulation, including the issuance of the Settlement Stock (and any
Assessment Securities).




                                      -1-

         5. Pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "1933 Act"), the Court finds that the issuance of the Settlement
Stock (and any Assessment Securities) as part of the Settlement Fund for
distribution to the Settlement Class and to Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel
for attorneys' fees shall be without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance
upon the exemption under Section 3(a)(10) thereto.

         6. Upon the Effective Date hereof, the Lead Plaintiffs and each of the
Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and
discharged all Released Claims against the Released Persons, whether or not such
Settlement Class Member executes and delivers a Proof of Claim and Release.

         7. All Settlement Class Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined
from prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons.

         8. Upon the Effective Date hereof, each of the Released Persons shall
be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally,
and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of the Settlement
Class Members and counsel to the Lead Plaintiffs from all claims (including
Unknown Claims), arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the
institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Litigation
or the Released Claims.

         9. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action given
to the Settlement Class was the best notice practicable under the circumstances,
including individual notice to all Members of the Class who could be identified
through reasonable effort. Said Notice provided the best notice practicable
under the circumstances of those proceedings and of the matters set forth
therein, including the proposed settlement set forth in the Stipulation, to all
Persons entitled to such notice, and said Notice fully satisfied the
requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the requirements of due
process.

         10. Any plan of allocation submitted by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel
or any order entered regarding the attorneys' fees and expense application shall
in no way disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall be considered separate
from this Final Judgment.



                                      -2-

         11. Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor
any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the
Stipulation or the settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as
an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any
wrongdoing or liability of the Defendants; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or
may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of
the Defendants in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court,
administrative agency or other tribunal. Defendants may file the Stipulation
and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to
support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata,
collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction
or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or
counterclaim.

         12. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this
Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over (a) implementation of this
settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including
interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and
determining applications for attorneys' fees and expenses in the Litigation; and
(d) all parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing and
administering the Stipulation.

         13. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the
Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the
requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.

         14. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in
accordance with the terms of the Stipulation or in the event that the Settlement
Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Defendants, then this Judgment
shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in




                                      -3-


accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all
orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and
void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:
       -------------------------             -----------------------------------
                                             THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. BLACKBURN
                                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE




                                      -4-