XML 66 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The table below shows our consolidated income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations (excluding noncontrolling interest) and our effective tax rates for the periods indicated (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Income tax expense (benefit)
$
15

 
$
(48
)
 
$
(4
)
 
$
(98
)
Effective tax rate
10
%
 
41
%
 
(3
)%
 
33
%

Our income tax rates do not bear a customary relationship to statutory income tax rates primarily as a result of the impact of our NOLs, changes in unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances. As a result, we generally do not record a provision for federal and state income taxes. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, our income tax expense (benefit) is largely comprised of discrete tax items and estimated state and foreign income taxes in jurisdictions where we do not have NOLs. See Note 10 in our 2013 Form 10-K for further information regarding our NOLs.   
Income Tax Audits — We remain subject to periodic audits and reviews by taxing authorities; however, we do not expect these audits will have a material effect on our tax provision. Any NOLs we claim in future years to reduce taxable income could be subject to IRS examination regardless of when the NOLs occurred. Due to significant NOLs, any adjustment of state returns or federal returns would likely result in a reduction of deferred tax assets rather than a cash payment of income taxes.
Canadian Tax Audits — In January 2013, we received an adjusted reassessment on one of two transfer pricing issues that we were disputing with the Canadian Revenue Authority (“CRA”). We proposed a settlement of the adjusted reassessment with the CRA and it has accepted our proposal. The adjustment to our transfer pricing increased taxable income and was offset by existing NOLs to which a valuation allowance had been applied and did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
On January 28, 2014, we received a letter from the CRA which informed us that they did not agree with our transfer price on the second issue and proposed an increase to taxable income for tax years 2006 and 2007. On June 6, 2014, we proposed a settlement, and on June 14, 2014, the CRA accepted our proposal. The adjustment to our transfer price increased taxable income for one of our Canadian affiliates and was offset by existing NOLs to which a valuation allowance had been applied. As part of the settlement, we agreed to pay some interest and withholding taxes which did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
Valuation Allowance — U.S. GAAP requires that we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, and tax planning strategies to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed to reduce the value of deferred tax assets. Future realization of the tax benefit of an existing deductible temporary difference or carryforward ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryback or carryforward periods available under the tax law. Due to our history of losses, we are unable to assume future profits; however, we are able to consider available tax planning strategies.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits — At June 30, 2014, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $67 million. If recognized, $16 million of our unrecognized tax benefits could impact the annual effective tax rate and $51 million, related to deferred tax assets, could be offset against the recorded valuation allowance resulting in no impact on our effective tax rate. We also had accrued interest and penalties of $13 million for income tax matters at June 30, 2014. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense (benefit) on our Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. We believe it is reasonably possible that a decrease within the range of nil and $9 million in unrecognized tax benefits could occur within the next 12 months primarily related to foreign tax issues.