UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 10, 2006

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

Commission File Number: 001-12079

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 77-0212977

50 West San Fernando Street

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 995-5115

(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)

Not applicable

(Former name or former address if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act

(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act

(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

ITEM 7.01 — REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

On August 10, 2006, Calpine Corporation (“Calpine” or the “Company”) and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed their unaudited consolidated Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended April 30, 2006 (the “Monthly Operating Statement”), with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “U.S. Bankruptcy Court”) in the matter of In re Calpine Corporation, et al., 05-60200 (BRL). Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K contains the unaudited consolidated Monthly Operating Statement as filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

The Monthly Operating Statement is limited in scope, covers a limited time period, and has been prepared solely for the purpose of complying with the monthly reporting requirements of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Certain of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary (the “Canadian Court”) under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (the “CCAA”). As a result, certain of the Company’s Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries were deconsolidated as of December 20, 2005. Financial information regarding such deconsolidated subsidiaries is not part of the consolidated group included in the Monthly Operating Statement. The financial information in the Monthly Operating Statement is preliminary and unaudited and does not purport to show the financial statements of any of the Debtors in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and therefore may exclude items required by GAAP, such as certain reclassifications, eliminations, accruals, valuations and disclosure items. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon the Monthly Operating Statement. There can be no assurance that such information is complete and the Monthly Operating Statement may be subject to revision. The Monthly Operating Statement is in a format required by the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and should not be used for investment purposes. The Monthly Operating Statement should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K and 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q.

These unaudited financial statements have been derived from the books and records of the Company. This information, however, has not been subject to procedures that would typically be applied to financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and, upon the application of such procedures, the Company believes that the financial information could be subject to changes, and these changes could be material. The information furnished in the Monthly Operating Statement includes primarily normal recurring adjustments but does not include all of the adjustments that would typically be made for quarterly financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.

Access to documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and other general information about the Company’s U.S. bankruptcy cases is available at www.kccllc.net/calpine. Certain information regarding the Company’s Canadian cases under the CCAA, including the reports of the monitor appointed by the Canadian Court, is available at the monitor’s website at www.ey.com/ca/calpinecanada. The content of the foregoing websites is not a part of this Report.

Limitation on Incorporation by Reference

The Monthly Operating Statement is being furnished for informational purposes only and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Registration statements or other documents filed with the SEC shall not incorporate the Monthly Operating Statement or any other information set forth in this Report by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing. This Report will not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information that is required to be disclosed solely by Regulation FD.

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company uses words such as “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “may,” “will” and similar expressions to

1

identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, among others, those concerning the Company’s expected financial performance and strategic and operational plans, as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions or beliefs about future events. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that a number of risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) the risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s U.S. and Canadian bankruptcy cases, including impact on operations; (ii) the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees and successfully implement new strategies; (iii) the Company’s ability to successfully reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy; (iv) the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers and counterparties; (v) the Company’s ability to implement its business plan; (vi) financial results that may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends; (vii) the Company’s ability to manage liquidity needs and comply with financing obligations; (viii) the direct or indirect effects on the Company’s business of its impaired credit including increased cash collateral requirements; (ix) the expiration or termination of the Company’s PPAs and the related results on revenues; (x) potential volatility in earnings and requirements for cash collateral associated with the use of commodity contracts; (xi) price and supply of natural gas; (xii) risks associated with power project development, acquisition and construction activities; (xiii) unscheduled outages of operating plants; (xiv) factors that impact the output of the Company’s geothermal resources and generation facilities, including unusual or unexpected steam field well and pipeline maintenance and variables associated with the waste water injection projects that supply added water to the steam reservoir; (xv) quarterly and seasonal fluctuations of the Company’s results; (xvi) competition; (xvii) risks associated with marketing and selling power from plants in the evolving energy markets; (xviii) present and possible future claims, litigation and enforcement actions; (xix) effects of the application of laws or regulations, including changes in laws or regulations or the interpretation thereof; and (xx) other risks identified in this report and in the Company’s annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. You should also carefully review other reports that the Company files with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

ITEM 9.01 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

(d) Exhibits

99.1  Calpine Corporation’s Unaudited Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended April 30, 2006.

2

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CALPINE CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ Charles B. Clark, Jr.
		Charles B. Clark, Jr.
		Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Date:  August 10, 2006

3

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
99.1	Calpine Corporation’s Unaudited Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended April 30, 2006.

4

EXHIBIT 99.1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
	x
In re:	:	Chapter 11
	:
CALPINE CORPORATION, et al.,	:	Case No. 05-60200 BRL
	:
Debtors.	:	(Jointly Administered)
	:
	x

MONTHLY OPERATING STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD

FROM APRIL 1, 2006, TO APRIL 30, 2006

DEBTORS’ ADDRESS:	50 West San Fernando Street, San Jose, California 95113
	MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS MADE BY CALPINE CORPORATION, ET AL. AND ITS DEBTOR SUBSIDIARIES (IN THOUSANDS):	$289,382
DEBTORS’ ATTORNEY:	Kirkland & Ellis LLP
	Richard M. Cieri (RC 6062)
	Marc Kieselstein admitted pro hac vice
	David R. Seligman admitted pro hac vice
	Edward O. Sassower (ES 5823)
	Citigroup Center
	153 East 53rd Street
	New York, NY 10022-4611
	MONTHLY OPERATING LOSS (IN THOUSANDS):	$274,224
REPORT PREPARER:	CALPINE CORPORATION, et al.

The undersigned, having reviewed the attached report and being familiar with the Debtors’ financial affairs, verifies under penalty of perjury, that the information contained therein is complete, accurate and truthful to the best of my knowledge.

	/s/ CHARLES B. CLARK, JR.
	Charles B. Clark, Jr.
	Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
DATE: August 10, 2006	Calpine Corporation

5

DEFINITIONS

The following abbreviations contained herein have the meanings set forth below. Additionally, the terms “the Company,” “Calpine,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Calpine Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. For clarification, such terms will not include the Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries that were deconsolidated as a result of the filings by the Canadian Debtors under the CCAA.

Abbreviation	Definition
2005 Form 10-K	Calpine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006
2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q	Calpine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on July 3, 2006
APB	Accounting Principles Board
Bankruptcy Code	United States Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy Courts	The U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Canadian Court
Calgary Energy Centre	Calgary Energy Centre Limited Partnership
Calpine Debtor(s)	The U.S. Debtors and the Canadian Debtors
Canadian Court	The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary
Canadian Debtor(s)	The subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that have been granted creditor protection under the CCAA in the Canadian Court
Cash Collateral Order	Second Amended Final Order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral and Granting Adequate Protection, dated February 24, 2006, as modified by the Order Granting U.S. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 105,361 and 105,363 modifying Order Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral and Granting Adequate Protection, dated June 21, 2006
CCAA	Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada)
CDWR	California Department of Water Resources
CES-Canada	Calpine Energy Services Canada Partnership
Chapter 11	Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
DIG	Derivatives Implementation Group
DIP	Debtor-in-possession

6

Abbreviation	Definition
DIP Facility	The Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, as amended on January 26, 2006, and as amended and restated by that certain Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2006, among Calpine Corporation, as borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as joint syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent for the First Priority Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Sub-Agent for the Revolving Lenders, Credit Suisse, as administrative agent for the Second Priority Term Lenders, Landesbank Hessen Thuringen Girozentrale, New York Branch, General Electric Capital Corporation and HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, as joint documentation agents for the first priority Lenders and Bayerische Landesbank, General Electric Capital Corporation and Union Bank of California, N.A., as joint documentation agents for the second priority Lenders, as amended thereafter from time to time
EITF	Emerging Issues Task Force
EPS	Earnings per share
Exchange Act	United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
First Priority Notes	Calpine Corporation’s 9 5/8% First Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2014
First Priority Trustee	Until February 2, 2006, Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, and from February 3, 2006, and thereafter, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, as successor trustee, under the Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2004, with respect to the First Priority Notes
GAAP	Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
GPC	Geysers Power Company, LLC
ISO	Independent System Operator
LSTC	Liabilities Subject to Compromise
MW	Megawatt(s)
NOL	Net operating loss
Non-Debtor(s)	The subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that are not Calpine Debtors
Non-U.S. Debtor(s)	The consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that are not U.S. Debtor(s)
PCF	Power Contract Financing, L.L.C.
PCF III	Power Contract Financing III, LLC
Petition Date	December 20, 2005

7

Abbreviation	Definition
PPA(s)	Power purchase agreement(s)
Rosetta	Rosetta Resources Inc.
SDNY Court	United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
SEC	United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Second Priority Debt	Calpine Corporation’s Second Priority Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2007, 8 1/2% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2010, 8 3/4% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2013, 9 7/8% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2011, and Senior Secured Term Loans Due 2007
Securities Act	United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended
SFAS	Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 123-R	FASB Statement No. 123-R (As Amended), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Share-Based Payment”
SOP	Statement of Position
The Geysers Assets	19 geothermal power plant assets located in Geyserville, California
ULC I	Calpine Canada Energy Finance ULC
ULC II	Calpine Canada Energy Finance II ULC
U.S.	United States of America
U.S. Bankruptcy Court	United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
U.S. Debtor(s)	Calpine Corporation and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, which matters are being jointly administered in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under the caption In re Calpine Corporation, et al., Case No. 05-60200 (BRL)

8

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Index to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and Schedules

				Page
Financial Statements as of and for the Month Ended April 30, 2006:
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations				10
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet				11
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements				13
	1.	Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11		13
	2.	Basis of Presentation		15
	3.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies		16
	4.	Recent Accounting Pronouncements		16
	5.	Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Margin Deposits		17
	6.	Rejected Contracts and Related Matters		18
	7.	Liabilities Subject to Compromise		20
	8.	DIP Facility		21
	9.	Reorganization Items		21
Schedules:
Schedule I			Schedule of Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2006	22
Schedule II			Schedule of Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations for the Month Ended April 30, 2006	24
Schedule III			Schedule of Payroll and Payroll Taxes	26
Schedule IV			Schedule of Federal, State and Local Taxes Collected, Received, Due or Withheld	27
Schedule V			Schedule of Total Disbursements by Debtor	28
Schedule VI			Insurance Statement	35

9

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

For the period from April 1, 2006, through April 30, 2006

Revenue:
Electricity and steam revenue	$	349,455
Transmission sales revenue		33
Sales of purchased power and gas for hedging and optimization		125,007
Mark-to-market activities, net		3,123
Other revenue		6,590
Total revenue		484,208
Cost of revenue:
Plant operating expense		54,455
Royalty expense		1,797
Transmission purchase expense		5,430
Purchased power and gas expense for hedging and optimization		105,265
Fuel expense		218,312
Depreciation and amortization expense		37,341
Operating lease expense		6,615
Other cost of revenue		5,100
Total cost of revenue		434,315
Gross profit		49,893
Project development expense		995
Research and development expense		1,087
Sales, general and administrative expense		12,685
Income (loss) from operations		35,126
Interest expense		102,891
Interest (income)		(9,095	)
Minority interest expense (income)		(139	)
Other (income) expense, net		(10,581	)
Loss before reorganization items and provision for income taxes		(47,950	)
Reorganization items		223,425
Loss before provision for income taxes		(271,375	)
Provision for income taxes		2,849
Net loss	$	(274,224	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

10

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

April 30, 2006

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,222,784
Accounts receivable, net		880,159
Margin deposits and other prepaid expense		337,107
Inventories		159,214
Restricted cash		762,475
Current derivative assets		295,818
Current assets held for sale		39,542
Other current assets		65,752
Total current assets		3,762,851
Restricted cash, net of current portion		196,309
Notes receivable, net of current portion		160,100
Project development costs		24,247
Investments		52,021
Deferred financing costs		194,280
Prepaid lease, net of current portion		352,917
Property, plant and equipment, net		14,437,693
Goodwill		45,160
Other intangible assets, net		52,874
Long-term derivative assets		615,603
Other assets		608,969
Total assets	$	20,503,024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

11

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET — (Continued)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	492,630
Accrued payroll and related expense		43,463
Accrued interest payable		145,042
Income taxes payable		99,073
Notes payable and other borrowings, current portion		187,135
Preferred interests, current portion		8,877
Capital lease obligations, current portion		284,932
CCFC financing, current portion		783,125
CalGen financing, current portion		2,508,997
Construction/project financing, current portion		2,194,220
Senior notes and term loans, current portion		641,819
DIP Facility, current portion		3,500
Current derivative liabilities		443,472
Other current liabilities		304,080
Total current liabilities		8,140,365
Notes payable and other borrowings, net of current portion		468,558
Preferred interests, net of current portion		579,519
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion		2,908
Construction/project financing, net of current portion		189,748
DIP Facility, net of current portion		995,625
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion		375,161
Deferred revenue		137,964
Long-term derivative liabilities		799,053
Other liabilities		138,267
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		11,827,168
Liabilities subject to compromise		14,738,734
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interests		273,934
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock		569
Additional paid-in capital		3,267,413
Additional paid-in capital, loaned shares		258,100
Additional paid-in capital, returnable shares		(258,100	)
Accumulated deficit		(9,476,826	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(127,968	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(6,336,812	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	20,503,024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

12

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the period from April 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006

1.Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11

On December 20, 2005 and December 21, 2005, Calpine and 254 of its wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and, in Canada, 12 of its Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief in the Canadian Court under the CCAA, which, like Chapter 11, allows for reorganization under the protection of the court system. On December 27 and 29, 2005, January 8 and 9, 2006, February 3, 2006, and May 2, 2006, 19 additional wholly owned subsidiaries of Calpine commenced Chapter 11 cases in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court has treated December 20, 2005 as the filing date for Calpine and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries that filed voluntary petitions at various dates in December 2005. Certain other subsidiaries could file in the U.S. or Canada in the future. The Chapter 11 cases of the U.S. Debtors are being jointly administered for procedural purposes only by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under the case captioned In re Calpine Corporation et al., Case No. 05-60200 (BRL).

The Calpine Debtors are continuing to operate their business as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Courts and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the CCAA and applicable court orders, as well as other applicable laws and rules. In general, as debtors-in-possession, each of the Calpine Debtors is authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the applicable Bankruptcy Court.

On December 20, 2005, the U.S. Debtors entered into the $2.0 billion DIP Facility. On December 21, 2005, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted interim approval of the DIP Facility, but initially limited access under the DIP Facility to $500 million under the revolving credit facility. On January 26, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered a final order approving the DIP Facility and removing the limitation on our ability to borrow thereunder. On February 23, 2006, the DIP Facility was amended and restated and the term loans were funded. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Credit Suisse were co-lead arrangers for the DIP Facility, which will remain in place until the earlier of an effective plan of reorganization or December 20, 2007. In connection with and as a condition to the closing, on February 3, 2006, we acquired ownership of The Geysers Assets, which had previously been leased pursuant to a leveraged lease. We used borrowings under the DIP Facility to pay a portion of the purchase price for The Geysers Assets. The DIP Facility is secured by first priority liens on all of the unencumbered assets of the U.S. Debtors, including The Geysers Assets, and junior liens on all of their encumbered assets. In addition, the DIP Facility was amended on May 3, 2006, to, among other things, provide us with extensions of time to provide certain financial information to the DIP Facility lenders, including financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, and for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. See Note 8 contained herein, Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the 2005 Form 10-K and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements contained in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for further details regarding the DIP Facility.

In addition, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved cash collateral and adequate assurance stipulations in connection with the approval of the DIP Facility, which has allowed our business activities to continue to function. We have also sought and obtained U.S. Bankruptcy Court approval through our “first day” and subsequent motions to continue to pay critical vendors, meet our pre-petition and post-petition payroll obligations, maintain our cash management systems, collateralize certain of our gas supply contracts, enter into and collateralize trading contracts, pay our taxes, continue to provide employee benefits, maintain our insurance programs and implement an employee severance program, which has allowed us to continue to operate the existing business in the ordinary course. In addition, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court has approved certain trading notification and transfer procedures designed to allow us to restrict trading in our common stock (and related securities) which could negatively impact our accrued NOLs and other tax attributes, and granted us extensions of time to file and seek approval of a plan of reorganization and to assume or reject real property leases.

13

Both the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Canadian Court have established August 1, 2006 as a bar date for filing proofs of claim against the U.S. Debtors’ estates and the Canadian Debtors’ estates, respectively (after the Canadian Court extended its original bar date of June 30, 2006, to August 1, 2006). Differences between amounts recorded by the Calpine Debtors and proofs of claim filed by the creditors will be investigated and resolved through the claims reconciliation process. Because of the number of creditors and claims, the claims reconciliation process may take considerable time to complete and the Company expects will continue after its emergence from bankruptcy. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known, nor can the ultimate recovery with respect to such allowed claims be presently determined. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have recognized certain charges related to expected allowed claims.

Under the Bankruptcy Code, we have the right to assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to the approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. Parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases rejected by a U.S. Debtor may file proofs of claim against that U.S. Debtor’s estate for damages and parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases that are assumed have an opportunity to assert cure amounts prior to such assumptions. Due to ongoing evaluation of contracts for assumption or rejection and the uncertain nature of many of the potential claims for damages, we cannot project the magnitude of these potential claims at this time. We had until July 18, 2006, to assume unexpired non-residential real property leases. Absent the consent of the applicable counterparty, such leases not assumed by that date are deemed rejected (except for U.S. Debtors filing after the Petition Date, which have a commensurately longer period of time). Accordingly, the Company entered into stipulations with counterparties extending the time to assume certain of such leases that the Company is still examining. All other non-assumed leases have been deemed rejected. Further, on July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to extend the time for the Company to assume leases between U.S. Debtor-lessees and any affiliated lessors until the confirmation of a plan of reorganization of the applicable U.S. Debtor-lessee. Without an extension of time to assume, leases between U.S. Debtors and their affiliates would also have been deemed rejected if not assumed by July 18, 2006. See Note 6 for further discussion of significant contracts and leases for which we have received or are seeking approval to reject.

On April 11, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted our application for an extension of the period during which we have the exclusive right to file a reorganization plan or plans from April 20, 2006, to December 31, 2006, and granted us the exclusive right until March 31, 2007, to solicit acceptances of such plan or plans. Also on April 11, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted our application for the repayment of a portion of a loan we had extended to CPN Insurance Corporation, our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. The repayment of this loan facilitates our ability to continue to provide a portion of our insurance needs through our subsidiary and thus provides us additional flexibility to be able to continue to implement a favorable property insurance program.

By order dated May 10, 2006 (as well as successive orders implementing the May 10 order), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved our motion to repay the outstanding principal amount of First Priority Notes at par ($646.1 million) plus accrued and unpaid interest. The repayment orders provided that such repayment was without prejudice to rights of the holders of the First Priority Notes to pursue their demand for payment of a “make whole” premium they alleged to be due as a result of our repayment of First Priority Notes prior to their stated maturity. Pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s repayment orders, we completed the repayment of the First Priority Notes in June 2006. The First Priority Trustee appealed each of the repayment orders to the SDNY Court, and in addition, on May 5, 2006, the First Priority Trustee filed an adversary proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on behalf of the holders of the First Priority Notes seeking a declaratory judgment on the merits of their demand for a “make whole” premium. On June 21, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving our request to extend the date by which we must answer or otherwise move with respect to the First Priority Trustee’s adversary proceeding until after the conclusion of the First Priority Trustee’s appeal to the SDNY Court of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s repayment orders. The First Priority Trustee then appealed the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s June 21, 2006, order to the SDNY Court as well, and both appeals are pending. The SDNY Court will schedule briefing and argument of the appeals.

At this time, it is not possible to accurately predict the effects of the reorganization process on the business of the Calpine Debtors or if and when some or all of the Calpine Debtors may emerge from bankruptcy. The prospects for future results depend on the timely and successful development, confirmation and implementation of a plan or plans of

14

reorganization. There can be no assurance that a successful plan or plans of reorganization will be proposed by the Calpine Debtors, supported by the Calpine Debtors’ creditors or confirmed by the Bankruptcy Courts, or that any such plan or plans will be consummated. The ultimate recovery, if any, that creditors and equity security holders receive will not be determined until confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the bankruptcy cases to the interests of each of the various creditor and equity or other security holder constituencies, and it is possible that the equity interests in or other securities issued by Calpine and the other Calpine Debtors will be restructured in a manner that will substantially reduce or eliminate any remaining value of such equity interests or other securities, or that certain creditors may ultimately receive little or no payment with respect to their claims. Whether or not a plan or plans of reorganization are approved, it is possible that the assets of any one or more of the Calpine Debtors may be liquidated.

As a result of our bankruptcy filings and the other matters described herein, including the uncertainties related to the fact that we have not yet had time to complete and have approved a plan of reorganization, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern, including our ability to meet our ongoing operational obligations, is dependent upon, among other things: (i) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand; (ii) our ability to generate cash from operations; (iii) the cost, duration and outcome of the restructuring process; (iv) our ability to comply with our DIP Facility agreement and the adequate assurance provisions of the Cash Collateral Order and (v) our ability to achieve profitability following a restructuring. These challenges are in addition to those operational and competitive challenges faced by us in connection with our business. In conjunction with our advisors, we are working to design and implement strategies to ensure that we maintain adequate liquidity and will be able to continue as a going concern. However, there can be no assurance as to the success of such efforts.

2.Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business, and in accordance with SOP 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” The consolidated condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be required should we be unable to continue to operate as a going concern. In accordance with SOP 90-7, all pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise have been segregated in the consolidated condensed balance sheets and classified as LSTC, at the estimated amount of allowed claims. Interest expense related to pre-petition LSTC has been reported only to the extent that it will be paid during the pendency of the bankruptcy cases or is expected to be an allowed claim. Liabilities not subject to compromise are separately classified as current or noncurrent. Expenses, provisions for losses resulting from reorganization and certain other items directly related to our bankruptcy cases are reported separately as reorganization expenses.

The Monthly Operating Statement is limited in scope, covers a limited time period, and has been prepared solely for the purpose of complying with the monthly reporting requirements of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Certain of our Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief by the Canadian Court under the CCAA. As a result, certain of our Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries were deconsolidated as of December 20, 2005. Financial information regarding such deconsolidated subsidiaries is not included with that of the consolidated group reported in the Monthly Operating Statement. The financial information in the Monthly Operating Statement is preliminary and unaudited and does not purport to show the financial statements of any of the U.S. Debtors in accordance with GAAP, and therefore may exclude items required by GAAP, such as certain reclassifications, eliminations, accruals, valuations and disclosure items. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon the Monthly Operating Statement. There can be no assurance that such information is complete and the Monthly Operating Statement may be subject to revision. The Monthly Operating Statement is in a format required by the Bankruptcy Code and should not be used for investment purposes. The Monthly Operating Statement should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2005 Form 10-K and the 2006 First Quarter 10-Q.

The unaudited financial statements contained in the Monthly Operating Statement have been derived from the books and records of the Company. This information, however, has not been subject to procedures that would typically be applied to financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and upon the application of such procedures, we believe that

15

the financial information could be subject to changes, and these changes could be material. The information furnished in this Monthly Operating Statement includes primarily normal recurring adjustments but does not include all of the adjustments that would typically be made for financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.

Mark-to-Market — Mark-to-market, net activity includes realized settlements of and unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on both power and gas derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges, including those held for trading purposes. Gains and losses due to ineffectiveness on hedging instruments are also included in unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses. Trading activity is presented net in accordance with EITF Issue No. 02-03. Of the total mark-to-market revenue of $3.1 million in April 2006, there was $13.6 million of unrealized gains (mostly from open gas contracts), and we had a realized loss of $10.5 million. The realized loss included a non-cash gain of approximately $1.8 million from amortization of various items.

Per agreement among the Company, the Office of the U.S. Trustee and the Committee of Unsecured Creditors, the Statements of Cash Flows will be excluded from Monthly Operating Statements except on a quarterly basis.

3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2005 Form 10-K and Note 1 “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for a summary of the accounting policies that we believe are significant to us.

4.Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SFAS No. 123-R

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123-R, which requires a public company to use the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2006, and applied the modified prospective transition method. The modified prospective approach applies to the unvested portion of all awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, and to all prospective awards. Prior financial statements are not restated under this method.

SFAS No. 123-R also requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits that occur from estimated tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized be presented as financing cash flows in the statement of cash flows. Prior to adopting this statement, we presented tax benefits from allowable deductions as operating cash flows in our Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows.

As we previously adopted the fair value method of accounting under SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 123”) on January 1, 2003, the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

SFAS No. 154

In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Adoption of this statement did not materially impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

16

FASB Interpretation No. 48

In June 2006, FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 addresses the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact this standard will have on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

5.Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Margin Deposits

Cash and Cash Equivalents — We have certain project finance facilities and lease agreements that establish segregated cash accounts. These accounts have been pledged as security in favor of the lenders to such project finance facilities, and the use of certain cash balances on deposit in such accounts with our project financed securities is limited to the operations of the respective projects. At April 30, 2006, $380.0 million of the cash and cash equivalents balance was subject to such project finance facilities and lease agreements.

Restricted Cash — We are required to maintain cash balances that are restricted by provisions of certain of our debt and lease agreements or by regulatory agencies. These amounts are held by depository banks in order to comply with the contractual provisions requiring reserves for payments such as for debt service, rent, major maintenance and debt repurchases. Funds that can be used to satisfy obligations due during the next twelve months are classified as current restricted cash, with the remainder classified as non-current restricted cash. Restricted cash is generally invested in accounts earning market rates; therefore the carrying value approximates fair value.

The table below represents the components of our consolidated restricted cash as of April 30, 2006, (in thousands):

	Current		Non-Current		Total
Debt service	$	103,651	$	120,973	$	224,624
Rent reserve		13,374		—		13,374
Construction/major maintenance		83,406		37,683		121,089
Proceeds from asset sales		410,906		—		410,906
Collateralized letters of credit and other credit support		125,216		—		125,216
Other		25,922		37,653		63,575
Total	$	762,475	$	196,309	$	958,784

As part of a prior business acquisition, which included certain facilities subject to a pre-existing operating lease, we acquired certain restricted cash balances comprised of a portfolio of debt securities. This portfolio is classified as held-to-maturity because we have the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. The securities are held in escrow accounts to support operating activities of the leased facilities and consist of a $17.0 million debt security maturing in 2015 and a $7.4 million debt security maturing in 2023. This portfolio is stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion discounts to maturity.

Of our restricted cash at April 30, 2006, $254.1 million relates to the assets of the following entities, each an entity with its existence separate from us and our other subsidiaries (in millions).

17

PCF	$	146.6
Gilroy Energy Center, LLC		39.2
Riverside Energy Center, LLC		29.8
Rocky Mountain Energy Center, LLC		26.8
Calpine Northbrook Energy Marketing, LLC		3.7
Calpine King City Cogen, LLC		5.6
Calpine Fox LLC		1.0
PCF III		1.4
	$	254.1

Margin Deposits — As of April 30, 2006, to support commodity transactions, we had margin deposits with third parties of $172.7 million, we made gas and power prepayments of $96.9 million, and had letters of credit outstanding of $5.6 million. Counterparties had deposited with us $18.2 million as margin deposits at April 30, 2006. We use margin deposits, prepayments and letters of credit as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices and also based on our credit ratings and general perception of creditworthiness in this market. While we believe that we have adequate liquidity to support our operations at this time, it is difficult to predict future developments and the amount of credit support that we may need to provide as part of our business operations.

6.Rejected Contracts and Related Matters

We continue to evaluate our executory contracts and those real property leases that are not subject to the July 18, 2006, assumption deadline (as described in Note 1) in order to determine which contracts will be assumed, assumed and assigned, or rejected. Once the evaluation is complete with respect to each particular contract or lease, the applicable U.S. Debtor will file the appropriate motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to assume, assume and assign, or reject the contract or lease. Pursuant to applicable orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, if a U.S. Debtor seeks to reject a contract or lease, the contract or lease counterparties then have an opportunity to file objections. If an objection has been filed, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court will conduct a hearing to determine any matters raised by the objection. As of the date of this filing, the U.S. Debtors have identified the following significant contracts and leases to be rejected:

• On December 21, 2005, we filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to reject eight PPAs and to enjoin FERC from asserting jurisdiction over the rejections. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court issued a temporary restraining order against FERC and set the matter for a hearing on January 5, 2006. Under most of the PPAs sought to be rejected, we are obligated to sell power at prices that are significantly lower than currently prevailing market prices. On December 29, 2005, certain counterparties to the various PPAs filed an action in the SDNY Court arguing that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court did not have jurisdiction over the dispute. On January 5, 2006, the SDNY Court entered an order that had the effect of transferring our motion seeking to reject the eight PPAs and our related request for an injunction against FERC to the SDNY Court from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Earlier, however, on December 19, 2005, CDWR, a counterparty to one of the eight PPAs, had filed a complaint with FERC seeking to obtain injunctive relief to prevent us from rejecting our PPA with CDWR and contending that FERC had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. On January 3, 2006, FERC determined that it did not have exclusive jurisdiction, and that the matter could be heard by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. However, despite the FERC ruling, on January 27, 2006, the SDNY Court determined that FERC had jurisdiction over whether the contracts could be rejected. We appealed the SDNY Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal was heard on April 10, 2006 and we have not yet received a decision. We can not determine at this time whether the SDNY Court, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court or FERC will ultimately determine whether we may reject any or all of the eight PPAs, or when such determination will be made. In the meantime, three of the PPAs have been terminated by the applicable counterparties, and two of the PPAs are the subject of negotiated settlements. We continue to perform under the three PPAs that remain in effect. We can not presently determine the ultimate outcome of the pending court cases nor the market factors that will need to be considered

18

in valuing the rejected contracts and therefore are unable to estimate the expected allowed claims related to these PPAs.

• On February 6, 2006, we filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, a notice of rejection of certain of our leases related to the Rumford Power Plant and the Tiverton Power Plant and noticed the proposed surrender of the two plants to their owner-lessor. The owner-lessor declined to take possession and control of the plants at that time and certain objections to the rejection notice and other opposing pleadings were filed by various interested parties. After negotiations with the indenture trustee related to the two leasehold properties, on May 18, 2006, we filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of the terms and conditions of a transition agreement to be entered into between us, the indenture trustee and a receiver for certain assets of the owner-lessor to be appointed on a motion filed with the SDNY Court by the indenture trustee. A receiver was appointed by the SDNY Court on June 6, 2006, and on June 9, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the transition agreement and the effective date of the rejection of the leases. On June 23, 2006, we closed the transaction contemplated in the transition agreement and the receiver now has possession and control of the Rumford and Tiverton power plants, as well as the ancillary assets related to the power plants transferred under the transition agreement. In connection with the lease rejections, we expect to record a non-cash charge of $234.6 million which includes our current estimate of the expected allowed claim related to the lease rejections, the write-off of prepaid lease expense and certain fees and expenses related to the transaction. The amount is expected to be reported as a reorganization item in the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and the portion representing the expected allowed claim is expected to be included in liabilities subject to compromise in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at June 30, 2006.

• In April 2006, we filed a notice of rejection relating to our office lease in Atlanta, Georgia. In May 2006, we filed a notice of rejection relating to our office lease in Dublin, California. The rejection of each of the foregoing leases has been approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. In June 2006, we filed notices of rejection relating to our office lease and office sublease in Boston, Massachusetts and the seventh floor lease relating to our office in San Jose, California. The rejection of these leases has been approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court with the exception of the Boston office sublease. The counterparty to the Boston office sublease objected to the rejection in order to address the recovery of an associated security deposit. We are in negotiation with the counterparty regarding the security deposit.

• On May 24, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court authorized the amendment and assumption of a steam agreement and related ground lease between Texas City Cogeneration, L.P. and Union Carbide Corporation and the amendment and assumption of a gas refinery agreement between Texas City and BP Products North America Inc.

• On June 5, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume geothermal leases related to The Geysers Assets steam field operations and the Glass Mountain area, and the associated executory contracts, surface use agreements and site leases that allow the geothermal leases to be utilized to harness geothermal energy and operate these facilities. The geothermal leases combined with the operations at these facilities make up the core collateral for the DIP facility.

• On June 21 and July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motions to assume more than 60 natural gas pipeline leases and related real property licenses that support the Company’s pipelines across the country, covering more than 350 miles of both gathering and transmission pipelines. Assumption of these leases and licenses is intended to allow us to continue to transport gas to our customers, including Calpine affiliates.

• On June 21 and July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume more than 20 leases related to the operation of the Company’s power plants (e.g., ground leases, facilities leases, operating leases, warehouse leases, etc.). Assumption of these leases was intended to allow the Company to continue to operate these facilities.

19

• On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved motions to assume (or assume and assign) office leases in Folsom, California; Houston, Texas; Pasadena, Texas; San Jose, California; Boca Raton, Florida; Jupiter, Florida and Washington, D.C.

• On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume approximately 130 oil and gas leases, to the extent that such leases are, in fact, leases of real property. Many of these oil and gas leases are the subject of an ongoing dispute with Rosetta stemming from the Company’s sale of domestic oil and gas assets to Rosetta in July 2005. By assuming these leases, we preserved our rights in the leases by avoiding the rejection of such leases on July 18, 2006.

In addition, during the course of the Chapter 11 cases the U.S. Debtors have determined that certain gas transportation contracts no longer provide any benefit to the U.S. Debtors or their estates. In certain instances, the U.S. Debtors have given notice to counterparties to these contracts that the U.S. Debtors will no longer accept or pay for service under such contracts. The Company believes that any claims resulting from the repudiation of these contracts will be treated as pre-petition general unsecured claims. Accordingly, the Company expects to record a non-cash charge of $308.8 million as its current estimate of the expected allowed claim related to the repudiation of these contracts. This charge is expected to be reported as a reorganization item in the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and is expected to be included in liabilities subject to compromise in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at June 30, 2006.

7.Liabilities Subject to Compromise

The claims bar dates—the dates by which claims against the Calpine Debtors must be filed with the applicable Bankruptcy Court—have been set for August 1, 2006 by each of the Bankruptcy Courts. Accordingly, not all potential claims would have been filed as of April 30, 2006, and we expect that additional claims will be filed against us prior to the claims bar dates.

The amounts of LSTC at April 30, 2006 consisted of the following (in millions):

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	412.6
Terminated derivative liabilities		295.7
Project financing		164.0
Convertible notes		1,823.5
Second priority senior secured notes(1)		3,671.9
Unsecured senior notes		1,880.0
Notes payable and other liabilities – related party		1,133.2
Provision for allowed claims(2)		5,357.8
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	14,738.7

__________

(1) We have not made, and currently do not propose to make, an affirmative determination whether our Second Priority Debt is fully secured or under-secured. We do, however, believe that there is uncertainty about whether the market value of the assets securing the obligations owing in respect of the Second Priority Debt is less than, equals or exceeds the amount of these obligations. Accordingly, we have classified the Second Priority Debt as “liabilities subject to compromise.”

(2) Consists primarily of estimated allowed claims related to guarantees by Calpine Corporation of repayment of unsecured senior notes (original principal amount of $2,597.2 million) for two wholly owned finance subsidiaries of the Company, ULC I and ULC II. The amounts outstanding to unrelated security holders had been reduced to $1,943.0 million at December 31, 2005, due to repurchases of such senior notes. However, some of the repurchased notes are held by certain of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries and are expected to give rise to allowed claims by these subsidiaries under the

20

above guarantees. Additionally, there is a guarantee by Calpine Corporation of the obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Quintana Canada Holdings, LLC, under certain subscription agreements with ULC I, under which claims may be asserted for the same amounts sought under the Calpine Corporation guarantees of the ULC I notes. Although the expected claims are redundant relative to the underlying exposure to unrelated security holders, the Company determined that these duplicative claims were probable of being allowed into the claim pool by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, although the U.S. Debtors fully reserve their rights in this regard.

8.DIP Facility

On December 20, 2005, Calpine Corporation, as borrower, entered into the DIP Facility with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and Credit Suisse, as joint syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as administrative agent for the first priority lenders and Credit Suisse as administrative agent for the second priority lenders. The DIP Facility is guaranteed by each of the other U.S. Debtors. On January 26, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted final approval of the DIP Facility, and on February 23, 2006, the DIP Facility was amended and restated and the term loans were funded. On May 3, 2006, the DIP Facility was further amended.

Pursuant to the DIP Facility, and applicable orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the lenders have made available to Calpine up to $2 billion comprising of a $1 billion revolving loan and letter of credit facility, a $400 million first priority term loan facility and a $600 million second priority term loan facility. The proceeds of borrowings and letters of credit issued under the DIP Facility will be used, among other things, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. A portion of the borrowings under the revolving loan facility in February 2006 were used to fund a portion of the costs in connection with the purchase of The Geysers Assets. In May 2006 and June 2006, a portion of the funds drawn under the term loan facilities, together with approximately $409 million of restricted cash, plus related interest thereon, were used to repay $646.1 million of the First Priority Notes. During the month of April 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving loan facility; however, approximately $3.0 million of letters of credit were issued against the revolving loan facility. Accordingly, at April 30, 2006, there was $999.1 million outstanding under the term loan facilities, nothing outstanding under the revolving loan facility and $3.0 million of letters of credit issued against the revolving loan facility. At June 30, 2006, there was $998.3 million outstanding under the term loan facilities as a result of the June repayment of $875,000 of the amounts outstanding under the first priority term loan, plus the related interest. Also at June 30, 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving loan facility; however, approximately $11.7 million of letters of credit had been issued against the revolving loan facility.

See Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2005 Form 10-K and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for further discussion of the DIP Facility.

9.Reorganization Items

Reorganization items represent the direct and incremental costs of being in bankruptcy, such as professional fees, pre-petition liability claim adjustments related to terminated contracts that are probable and can be estimated and charges related to expected allowed claims.

The table below lists the significant items recognized within this category for the month ended April 30, 2006 (in millions)

Provision for allowed claims	$	55.1
Loss on terminated contracts, net		158.7
Professional fees		9.6
Total reorganization items	$	223.4

See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2005 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Reorganization items.

21

Schedule I

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

April 30, 2006

	U.S. Debtors		Non-U.S. Debtors		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	972,913	$	249,871	$	—		$	1,222,784
Accounts receivable, net		723,307		156,852		—			880,159
Accounts receivable (payable) from affiliates, net		38,921,027		2,931,683		(41,852,710	)		—
Margin deposits and other prepaid expense		287,570		52,276		(2,739	)		337,107
Inventories		132,741		26,473		—			159,214
Restricted cash		611,225		151,250		—			762,475
Current derivative assets		206,024		89,794		—			295,818
Current assets held for sale		39,542		—		—			39,542
Other current assets		937,002		32,131		(903,381	)		65,752
Total current assets		42,831,351		3,690,330		(42,758,830	)		3,762,851
Restricted cash, net of current portion		54,907		141,402		—			196,309
Notes receivable, net of current portion		158,388		1,712		—			160,100
Notes receivable from affiliates, net of current portion		4,157,472		48,766		(4,206,238	)		—
Project development costs		24,247		—		—			24,247
Investments		11,997,919		9,243,502		(21,189,400	)		52,021
Deferred financing costs		61,662		132,618		—			194,280
Prepaid lease, net of current portion		352,320		597		—			352,917
Property, plant and equipment, net		8,162,344		6,276,228		(879	)		14,437,693
Goodwill		45,160		—		—			45,160
Other intangible assets, net		16,017		36,857		—			52,874
Long-term derivative assets		498,534		117,069		—			615,603
Other assets		268,546		352,851		(12,428	)		608,969
Intercompany		521,564		69,874		(591,438	)		—
Total assets	$	69,150,431	$	20,111,806	$	(68,759,213	)	$	20,503,024

22

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET — (Continued)

	U.S. Debtors			Non-U.S. Debtors			Eliminations			Consolidated
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	532,250		$	2,111,778		$	(2,151,398	)	$	492,630
Accrued payroll and related expense		42,052			1,411			—			43,463
Accrued interest payable		306,097			69,535			(230,590	)		145,042
Income taxes payable		99,073			—			—			99,073
Notes payable and other borrowings, current portion		743,788			178,193			(734,846	)		187,135
Preferred interests, current portion		—			8,877			—			8,877
Capital lease obligations, current portion		189,747			96,846			(1,661	)		284,932
CCFC financing, current portion		—			783,125			—			783,125
CalGen financing, current portion		2,508,997			—			—			2,508,997
Construction/project financing, current portion		386,638			1,807,582			—			2,194,220
Senior notes and term loans, current portion		641,819			—			—			641,819
DIP Facility, current portion		3,500			—			—			3,500
Current derivative liabilities		336,019			107,453			—			443,472
Other current liabilities		189,282			116,905			(2,107	)		304,080
Total current liabilities		5,979,262			5,281,705			(3,120,602	)		8,140,365
Notes payable and other borrowings, net of current portion		4,117,237			2,107,369			(5,756,048	)		468,558
Preferred interests, net of current portion		—			579,519			—			579,519
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion		318,199			2,448			(317,739	)		2,908
Construction/project financing, net of current portion		—			189,748			—			189,748
DIP Facility, net of current portion		995,625			—			—			995,625
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion		129,425			245,736			—			375,161
Deferred revenue		129,890			21,380			(13,306	)		137,964
Long-term derivative liabilities		642,231			156,822			—			799,053
Other liabilities		108,688			29,584			(5	)		138,267
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		12,420,557			8,614,311			(9,207,700	)		11,827,168
Liabilities subject to compromise		53,321,733			240			(38,583,239	)		14,738,734
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interests		273,934			—			—			273,934
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock		31,567			5,097			(36,095	)		569
Additional paid-in capital		25,731,547			10,787,658			(33,251,792	)		3,267,413
Accumulated deficit		(22,470,055	)		717,299			12,275,930			(9,476,826	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(158,852	)		(12,799	)		43,683			(127,968	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		3,134,207			11,497,255			(20,968,274	)		(6,336,812	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	69,150,431		$	20,111,806		$	(68,759,213	)	$	20,503,024

Calpine Corporation’s consolidated results are comprised of U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that have affiliated transactions with other U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that must be eliminated in consolidation. Amounts listed under the “Eliminations” heading are required to correctly eliminate transactions between any affiliated entities for consolidated financial statement presentation purposes.

23

Schedule II

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

For the Period from April 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006

	U.S. Debtors			Non-U.S. Debtors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenue:
Electricity and steam revenue	$	467,234		$	192,920		$	(310,699	)	$	349,455
Transmission sales revenue		33			—			—			33
Sales of purchased power and gas for hedging and optimization		376,398			10,318			(261,709	)		125,007
Mark-to-market activities, net		1,588			1,535			—			3,123
Other revenue from operations		42,686			1,127			(37,223	)		6,590
Total revenue		887,939			205,900			(609,631	)		484,208
Cost of revenue:
Plant operating expense		378,576			15,883			(340,004	)		54,455
Royalty expense		1,797			—			—			1,797
Transmission purchase expense		2,462			2,968			—			5,430
Purchased power and gas expense for hedging and optimization		72,884			39,332			(6,951	)		105,265
Fuel expense		404,145			76,865			(262,698	)		218,312
Depreciation and amortization expense		17,146			20,197			(2	)		37,341
Operating plant impairments		—			—			—			—
Operating lease expense		6,615			—			—			6,615
Other cost of revenue		2,861			2,239			—			5,100
Total cost of revenue		886,486			157,484			(609,655	)		434,315
Gross profit		1,453			48,416			24			49,893
(Income) from unconsolidated investments		939,410			9,095			(948,505	)		—
Project development expense		791			204			—			995
Research and development expense		1,087			—			—			1,087
Sales, general and administrative expense		9,657			3,028			—			12,685
Income (loss) from operations		(949,492	)		36,089			948,529			35,126
Interest expense		72,557			34,690			(4,356	)		102,891
Interest (income)		(10,981	)		(2,470	)		4,356			(9,095	)
Minority interest expense		(139	)		—			—			(139	)
Other (income) expense, net		(13,094	)		2,489			24			(10,581	)
Loss before reorganization items and provision (benefit) for income taxes		(997,835	)		1,380			948,505			(47,950	)

24

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS — (Continued)

	U.S. Debtors			Non-U.S. Debtors			Eliminations		Consolidated
Reorganization items	$	223,425		$	—		$	—	$	223,425
Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes		(1,221,260	)		1,380			948,505		(271,375	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		2,866			(17	)		—		2,849
Net loss	$	(1,224,126	)	$	1,397		$	948,505	$	(274,224	)

Calpine Corporation’s consolidated results are comprised of U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that have affiliated transactions with other U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that must be eliminated in consolidation. Amounts listed under the “Eliminations” heading are required to correctly eliminate transactions between any affiliated entities for consolidated financial statement presentation purposes.

25

Schedule III

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

SCHEDULE OF PAYROLL AND PAYROLL TAXES

(in thousands)

For the Period from April 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006

Gross Wages Paid**	Employee Payroll Taxes Withheld*	Employer Payroll Taxes Remitted*
$19,407	$5,056	$1,534

* Employee Payroll Taxes are withheld each pay period and remitted by the Company, together with the Employer Payroll Taxes, to the appropriate tax authorities.

** Gross Wages were paid by the Company on April 7, 2006, April 14, 2006, April 21, 2006, and April 28, 2006.

26

Schedule IV

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAXES

COLLECTED, RECEIVED, DUE OR WITHHELD

(in thousands)

For the Period from April 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006

	Amount Withheld/Accrued			Amount Paid
Federal and state income taxes	$	2,866		$	—
State and local taxes:
Property		11,601			7,555
Sales and use		(1,616	)		2,826
Franchise		221			221
Other		140			140
Total state and local taxes		10,346			10,742
Total taxes	$	13,212		$	10,742

27

Schedule V

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR

For the Month Ended April 30, 2006

(in dollars)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Amelia Energy Center, LP	05-60223-BRL	$	—
Anacapa Land Company, LLC	05-60226-BRL	62,800
Anderson Springs Energy Company	05-60232-BRL	26,701
Androscoggin Energy, Inc.	05-60239-BRL	—
Auburndale Peaker Energy Center, LLC	05-60244-BRL	54,469
Augusta Development Company, LLC	05-60248-BRL	—
Aviation Funding Corp.	05-60252-BRL	—
Baytown Energy Center, LP	05-60255-BRL	551,197
Baytown Power GP, LLC	05-60256-BRL	—
Baytown Power, LP	05-60258-BRL	—
Bellingham Cogen, Inc.	05-60224-BRL	—
Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC	05-60225-BRL	778,793
Bethpage Fuel Management Inc.	05-60228-BRL	—
Blue Heron Energy Center, LLC	05-60235-BRL	—
Blue Spruce Holdings, LLC	05-60238-BRL	—
Broad River Energy LLC	05-60242-BRL	419,518
Broad River Holdings, LLC	05-60245-BRL	—
CalGen Equipment Finance Company, LLC	05-60249-BRL	—
CalGen Equipment Finance Holdings, LLC	05-60251-BRL	—
CalGen Expansion Company, LLC	05-60253-BRL	—
CalGen Finance Corp.	05-60229-BRL	—
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company One, LLC	05-60236-BRL	—
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Three, LLC	05-60259-BRL	—
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Two, LLC	05-60262-BRL	—
Calpine Acadia Holdings, LLC	05-60265-BRL	934
Calpine Administrative Services Company, Inc.	05-60201-BRL	3,406,535
Calpine Agnews, Inc.	05-60268-BRL	—
Calpine Amelia Energy Center GP, LLC	05-60270-BRL	—
Calpine Amelia Energy Center LP, LLC	05-60272-BRL	—
Calpine Auburndale Holdings, LLC	05-60452-BRL	—
Calpine Baytown Energy Center GP, LLC	05-60453-BRL	—
Calpine Baytown Energy Center LP, LLC	05-60320-BRL	—
Calpine Bethpage 3 Pipeline Construction Company, Inc.	05-60330-BRL	—
Calpine Bethpage 3, LLC	05-60342-BRL	—
Calpine c*Power, Inc.	05-60250-BRL	—
Calpine CalGen Holdings, Inc.	05-60352-BRL	100
Calpine California Development Company, LLC	05-60355-BRL	—
Calpine California Energy Finance, LLC	05-60360-BRL	—
Calpine California Equipment Finance Company, LLC	05-60464-BRL	—

28

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Calpine Calistoga Holdings, LLC	05-60377-BRL	—
Calpine Capital Trust	05-60325-BRL	—
Calpine Capital Trust II	05-60379-BRL	—
Calpine Capital Trust III	05-60384-BRL	—
Calpine Capital Trust IV	05-60391-BRL	—
Calpine Capital Trust V	05-60221-BRL	—
Calpine Central Texas GP, Inc.	05-60329-BRL	—
Calpine Central, Inc.	05-60333-BRL	—
Calpine Central, L.P.	05-60351-BRL	986,507
Calpine Central-Texas, Inc.	05-60338-BRL	—
Calpine Channel Energy Center GP, LLC	05-60340-BRL	—
Calpine Channel Energy Center LP, LLC	05-60343-BRL	—
Calpine Clear Lake Energy GP, LLC	05-60345-BRL	—
Calpine Clear Lake Energy, LP	05-60349-BRL	—
Calpine Cogeneration Corporation	05-60233-BRL	5,250
Calpine Construction Management Company, Inc.	05-60260-BRL	1,581,744
Calpine Corporation	05-60200-BRL	65,640,821
Calpine Corpus Christi Energy GP, LLC	05-60247-BRL	—
Calpine Corpus Christi Energy, LP	05-60261-BRL	—
Calpine Decatur Pipeline, Inc.	05-60263-BRL	—
Calpine Decatur Pipeline, L.P.	05-60254-BRL	—
Calpine Dighton, Inc.	05-60264-BRL	—
Calpine East Fuels, Inc.	05-60257-BRL	—
Calpine Eastern Corporation	05-60266-BRL	174,636
Calpine Energy Holdings, Inc.	05-60207-BRL	—
Calpine Energy Services Holdings, Inc.	05-60208-BRL	—
Calpine Energy Services, L.P.	05-60222-BRL	139,030,855
Calpine Finance Company	05-60204-BRL	—
Calpine Freestone Energy GP, LLC	05-60227-BRL	—
Calpine Freestone Energy, LP	05-60230-BRL	—
Calpine Freestone, LLC	05-60231-BRL	—
Calpine Fuels Corporation	05-60203-BRL	—
Calpine Gas Holdings LLC	05-60234-BRL	—
Calpine Generating Company, LLC	05-60237-BRL	475,547
Calpine Gilroy 1, Inc.	05-60240-BRL	—
Calpine Gilroy 2, Inc.	05-60241-BRL	—
Calpine Gilroy Cogen, L.P.	05-60243-BRL	389,477
Calpine Global Services Company, Inc.	05-60246-BRL	465,373
Calpine Gordonsville GP Holdings, LLC	05-60281-BRL	—
Calpine Gordonsville LP Holdings, LLC	05-60282-BRL	—
Calpine Gordonsville, LLC	05-60283-BRL	—
Calpine Greenleaf Holdings, Inc.	05-60284-BRL	—
Calpine Greenleaf, Inc.	05-60285-BRL	—
Calpine Hidalgo Design, L.P.	06-10039-BRL	—

29

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Calpine Hidalgo Energy Center, L.P.	06-10029-BRL	457,320
Calpine Hidalgo Holdings, Inc.	06-10027-BRL	—
Calpine Hidalgo Power GP, LLC	06-10030-BRL	—
Calpine Hidalgo Power, LP	06-10028-BRL	—
Calpine Hidalgo, Inc.	06-10026-BRL	—
Calpine International Holdings, Inc.	05-60205-BRL	—
Calpine International, LLC	05-60288-BRL	8,651
Calpine Investment Holdings, LLC	05-60289-BRL	—
Calpine Kennedy Airport, Inc.	05-60294-BRL	—
Calpine Kennedy Operators Inc.	05-60199-BRL	—
Calpine KIA, Inc.	05-60465-BRL	—
Calpine Leasing Inc.	05-60297-BRL	—
Calpine Long Island, Inc.	05-60298-BRL	—
Calpine Lost Pines Operations, Inc.	05-60314-BRL	—
Calpine Louisiana Pipeline Company	05-60328-BRL	—
Calpine Magic Valley Pipeline, Inc.	05-60331-BRL	—
Calpine Monterey Cogeneration, Inc.	05-60341-BRL	—
Calpine MVP, Inc.	05-60348-BRL	—
Calpine NCTP GP, LLC	05-60359-BRL	—
Calpine NCTP, LP	05-60406-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Corporation of Maine, Inc.	05-60409-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Energy Holdings, LLC	05-60418-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Energy, LLC	05-60431-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Holdings Corporation	05-60286-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Investors, LLC	05-60291-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Project Holdings, LLC	05-60295-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Services, LLC	05-60299-BRL	—
Calpine Northbrook Southcoast Investors, LLC	05-60304-BRL	—
Calpine NTC, LP	05-60308-BRL	—
Calpine Oneta Power I, LLC	05-60311-BRL	—
Calpine Oneta Power II, LLC	05-60315-BRL	—
Calpine Oneta Power, L.P.	05-60318-BRL	681,440
Calpine Operating Services Company, Inc.	05-60322-BRL	23,366,230
Calpine Operations Management Company, Inc.	05-60206-BRL	2,550
Calpine Pastoria Holdings, LLC	05-60302-BRL	—
Calpine Philadelphia, Inc.	05-60305-BRL	42,333
Calpine Pittsburg, LLC	05-60307-BRL	78,384
Calpine Power Company	05-60202-BRL	—
Calpine Power Equipment LP	05-60310-BRL	—
Calpine Power Management, Inc.	05-60319-BRL	—
Calpine Power Management, LP	05-60466-BRL	—
Calpine Power Services, Inc.	05-60323-BRL	155,718
Calpine Power, Inc.	05-60316-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica, Inc.	05-60211-BRL	—

30

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Calpine PowerAmerica, LP	05-60212-BRL	926,461
Calpine PowerAmerica-CA, LLC	05-60213-BRL	296,785
Calpine PowerAmerica-CT, LLC	05-60214-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica-MA, LLC	05-60215-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica-ME, LLC	05-60216-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica-NH, LLC	06-10032-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica-NY, LLC	06-10031-BRL	—
Calpine PowerAmerica-OR, LLC	06-10034-BRL	—
Calpine Producer Services, L.P.	05-60217-BRL	8,199,389
Calpine Project Holdings, Inc.	05-60324-BRL	—
Calpine Pryor, Inc.	05-60326-BRL	—
Calpine Rumford I, Inc.	05-60327-BRL	—
Calpine Rumford, Inc.	05-60414-BRL	—
Calpine Schuylkill, Inc.	05-60416-BRL	—
Calpine Siskiyou Geothermal Partners, L.P.	05-60420-BRL	30,210
Calpine Sonoran Pipeline LLC	05-60423-BRL	—
Calpine Stony Brook Operators, Inc.	05-60424-BRL	—
Calpine Stony Brook Power Marketing, LLC	05-60425-BRL	—
Calpine Stony Brook, Inc.	05-60426-BRL	—
Calpine Sumas, Inc.	05-60427-BRL	—
Calpine TCCL Holdings, Inc.	05-60429-BRL	—
Calpine Texas Pipeline GP, Inc.	05-60433-BRL	—
Calpine Texas Pipeline LP, Inc.	05-60439-BRL	—
Calpine Texas Pipeline, L.P.	05-60447-BRL	7,808
Calpine Tiverton I, Inc.	05-60450-BRL	—
Calpine Tiverton, Inc.	05-60451-BRL	—
Calpine ULC I Holding, LLC	05-60454-BRL	—
Calpine University Power, Inc.	05-60455-BRL	—
Calpine Unrestricted Funding, LLC	05-60456-BRL	—
Calpine Unrestricted Holdings, LLC	05-60458-BRL	—
Calpine Vapor, Inc.	05-60459-BRL	—
Carville Energy LLC	05-60460-BRL	865,272
CCFC Development Company, LLC	05-60267-BRL	—
CCFC Equipment Finance Company, LLC	05-60269-BRL	—
CCFC Project Equipment Finance Company One, LLC	05-60271-BRL	—
Celtic Power Corporation	05-60273-BRL	—
CES GP, LLC	05-60218-BRL	—
CGC Dighton, LLC	05-60274-BRL	—
Channel Energy Center, LP	05-60275-BRL	657,023
Channel Power GP, LLC	05-60276-BRL	—
Channel Power, LP	05-60277-BRL	—
Clear Lake Cogeneration Limited Partnership	05-60278-BRL	442,776
CogenAmerica Asia Inc.	05-60372-BRL	—
CogenAmerica Parlin Supply Corp.	05-60383-BRL	—

31

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Columbia Energy LLC	05-60440-BRL	2,774,101
Corpus Christi Cogeneration L.P.	05-60441-BRL	452,849
CPN 3rd Turbine, Inc.	05-60443-BRL	—
CPN Acadia, Inc.	05-60444-BRL	—
CPN Berks Generation, Inc.	05-60445-BRL	—
CPN Berks, LLC	05-60446-BRL	—
CPN Bethpage 3rd Turbine, Inc.	05-60448-BRL	69,784
CPN Cascade, Inc.	05-60449-BRL	—
CPN Clear Lake, Inc.	05-60287-BRL	—
CPN Decatur Pipeline, Inc.	05-60290-BRL	—
CPN East Fuels, LLC	05-60476-BRL	—
CPN Energy Services GP, Inc.	05-60209-BRL	—
CPN Energy Services LP, Inc.	05-60210-BRL	—
CPN Freestone, LLC	05-60293-BRL	—
CPN Funding, Inc.	05-60296-BRL	25
CPN Morris, Inc.	05-60301-BRL	—
CPN Oxford, Inc.	05-60303-BRL	—
CPN Pipeline Company	05-60309-BRL	152,610
CPN Pleasant Hill Operating, LLC	05-60312-BRL	—
CPN Pleasant Hill, LLC	05-60317-BRL	—
CPN Power Services GP, LLC	05-60321-BRL	—
CPN Power Services, LP	05-60292-BRL	—
CPN Pryor Funding Corporation	05-60300-BRL	86,519
CPN Telephone Flat, Inc.	05-60306-BRL	20,626
Decatur Energy Center, LLC	05-60313-BRL	440,601
Deer Park Power GP, LLC	05-60363-BRL	—
Deer Park Power, LP	05-60370-BRL	—
Delta Energy Center, LLC	05-60375-BRL	506,554
Dighton Power Associates Limited Partnership	05-60382-BRL	280,120
East Altamont Energy Center, LLC	05-60386-BRL	—
Fond du Lac Energy Center, LLC	05-60412-BRL	1,468
Fontana Energy Center, LLC	05-60335-BRL	—
Freestone Power Generation LP	05-60339-BRL	774,625
GEC Bethpage Inc.	05-60347-BRL	—
Geothermal Energy Partners, LTD., a California limited partnership	05-60477-BRL	—
Geysers Power Company II, LLC	05-60358-BRL	—
Geysers Power Company, LLC	06-10197-BRL	6,105,875
Geysers Power I Company	05-60389-BRL	—
Goldendale Energy Center, LLC	05-60390-BRL	2,331,867
Hammond Energy LLC	05-60393-BRL	—
Hillabee Energy Center, LLC	05-60394-BRL	34,450
Idlewild Fuel Management Corp.	05-60397-BRL	—
JMC Bethpage, Inc.	05-60362-BRL	—
KIAC Partners	05-60366-BRL	4,077,240

32

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Lake Wales Energy Center, LLC	05-60369-BRL	—
Lawrence Energy Center, LLC	05-60371-BRL	—
Lone Oak Energy Center, LLC	05-60403-BRL	7,322
Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility, LLC	05-60404-BRL	376,577
Los Medanos Energy Center LLC	05-60405-BRL	265,145
Magic Valley Gas Pipeline GP, LLC	05-60407-BRL	—
Magic Valley Gas Pipeline, LP	05-60408-BRL	—
Magic Valley Pipeline, L.P.	05-60332-BRL	218
MEP Pleasant Hill, LLC	05-60334-BRL	458,797
Moapa Energy Center, LLC	05-60337-BRL	624
Mobile Energy L L C	05-60344-BRL	156,046
Modoc Power, Inc.	05-60346-BRL	—
Morgan Energy Center, LLC	05-60353-BRL	973,280
Mount Hoffman Geothermal Company, L.P.	05-60361-BRL	—
Mt. Vernon Energy LLC	05-60376-BRL	—
NewSouth Energy LLC	05-60381-BRL	11,273
Nissequogue Cogen Partners	05-60388-BRL	235,582
Northwest Cogeneration, Inc.	05-60336-BRL	—
NTC Five, Inc.	05-60463-BRL	—
NTC GP, LLC	05-60350-BRL	—
Nueces Bay Energy LLC	05-60356-BRL	—
O.L.S. Energy-Agnews, Inc.	05-60374-BRL	1,312,320
Odyssey Land Acquisition Company	05-60367-BRL	—
Pajaro Energy Center, LLC	05-60385-BRL	—
Pastoria Energy Center, LLC	05-60387-BRL	—
Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C.	05-60410-BRL	3,097,025
Philadelphia Biogas Supply, Inc.	05-60421-BRL	—
Phipps Bend Energy Center, LLC	05-60395-BRL	—
Pine Bluff Energy, LLC	05-60396-BRL	397,002
Power Investors, L.L.C.	05-60398-BRL	—
Power Systems MFG., LLC	05-60399-BRL	6,478,864
Quintana Canada Holdings, LLC	05-60400-BRL	—
RockGen Energy LLC	05-60401-BRL	267,071
Rumford Power Associates Limited Partnership	05-60467-BRL	1,071,209
Russell City Energy Center, LLC	05-60411-BRL	1,715
San Joaquin Valley Energy Center, LLC	05-60413-BRL	280
Silverado Geothermal Resources, Inc.	06-10198-BRL	280,500
Skipanon Natural Gas, LLC	05-60415-BRL	—
South Point Energy Center, LLC	05-60417-BRL	2,003,525
South Point Holdings, LLC	05-60419-BRL	—
Stony Brook Cogeneration, Inc.	05-60422-BRL	—
Stony Brook Fuel Management Corp.	05-60428-BRL	2,678,696
Sutter Dryers, Inc.	05-60430-BRL	—
TBG Cogen Partners	05-60432-BRL	91,912

33

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)

Legal Entity	Case Number	Disbursements
Texas City Cogeneration, L.P.	05-60434-BRL	334,303
Texas Cogeneration Company	05-60435-BRL	—
Texas Cogeneration Five, Inc.	05-60436-BRL	—
Texas Cogeneration One Company	05-60437-BRL	—
Thermal Power Company	05-60438-BRL	—
Thomassen Turbine Systems America, Inc.	05-60354-BRL	11,750
Tiverton Power Associates Limited Partnership	05-60357-BRL	199,195
Towantic Energy, L.L.C.	05-60364-BRL	—
VEC Holdings, LLC	05-60365-BRL	—
Venture Acquisition Company	05-60368-BRL	—
Vineyard Energy Center, LLC	05-60373-BRL	—
Wawayanda Energy Center, LLC	05-60378-BRL	2,554
Whatcom Cogeneration Partners, L.P.	05-60468-BRL	—
Zion Energy LLC	05-60380-BRL	290,766
TOTAL		$	289,382,472

34

SCHEDULE VI

CALPINE CORPORATION

(Debtor-in-Possession)

CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)

DEBTORS’ STATEMENT REGARDING INSURANCE POLICIES

For the Period from April 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006

All insurance policies are fully paid for the current period, including amounts owed for workers’ compensation and disability insurance.

35