Contingencies

Beazer Homes and certain of our subsidiaries have been and continue to be named as defendants in various construction defect claims, complaints and other legal actions. The Company is subject to the possibility of loss contingencies arising from its business. In determining loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss as well as the ability to reasonably estimate the amount of such loss or liability. An estimated loss is recorded when it is considered probable that a liability has been incurred and when the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Warranty Reserves. We currently provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) covering workmanship and materials per our defined performance quality standards. In addition, we provide a limited warranty (generally ranging from a minimum of five years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) covering only certain defined construction defects. We also provide a defined structural element warranty with single-family homes and townhomes in certain states.

Our homebuilding work is performed by subcontractors that typically must agree to indemnify us with regard to their work and provide us with certificates of insurance demonstrating that they have met our insurance requirements and that we are named as an additional insured under their policies. Therefore, many claims relating to workmanship and materials that result in warranty spending are the primary responsibility of these subcontractors. In addition, we maintain insurance coverage relating to our construction efforts that can result in recoveries of warranty and construction defect costs above certain specified limits.

Warranty reserves are included in other liabilities and the provision for warranty accruals is included in home construction expenses in our unaudited consolidated financial statements. We record reserves covering anticipated warranty expense for each home closed. Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and management’s estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly. Our review includes a quarterly analysis of the historical data and trends in warranty expense by operating segment. An analysis by operating segment allows us to consider market specific factors such as our warranty experience, the number of home closings, the prices of homes, product mix and other data in estimating our warranty reserves. In addition, our analysis also contemplates the existence of any non-recurring or community-specific warranty-related matters that might not be included in our historical data and trends. While we adjust our estimated warranty liabilities each reporting period to the extent required as a result of our quarterly analyses, historical data and trends may not accurately predict actual warranty costs which could lead to a significant change in the reserve.

Changes in our warranty reserves are as follows for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014			2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	27,227		$	11,911		$	16,084		$	11,663
Accruals for warranties issued ^(a)	1,630			1,047			3,155			2,170
Changes in liability related to warranties existing in prior periods ^(b)	6,524			1,480			20,754			3,223
Payments made	(6,587		)	(1,877		)	(11,199		)	(4,495		)
Balance at end of period	$	28,794		$	12,561		$	28,794		$	12,561

^(a) Accruals for warranties issued is a function of the number of home closings in the period, the average selling prices of the homes and the rates of accrual per home estimated as a percentage of the selling price of the home. The increase in the amount of accrual in the current three-month and six-month periods compared to the comparable prior-year periods is due to an increase in the average selling prices of homes closed in the respective periods, as well as increases in certain divisions' accrual rates.

^(b) Changes in liability related to warranties existing in prior periods increased in the current three-month and six-month periods primarily due to charges related to water intrusion issues in certain of our communities located in Florida. Refer to separate discussion of these issues below.

Florida and New Jersey Water Intrusion Issues

In the latter portion of fiscal 2014, we experienced an increase in calls from homeowners reporting stucco and water intrusion issues in certain of our communities in Florida and New Jersey. Through March 31, 2015, we have cumulatively recorded $22.8 million in charges related to these issues, of which $22.2 million related to communities in Florida and $0.6 million related to one community in New Jersey. Refer to discussion below for further detail of the charges by period.

Florida. The issues in Florida related to stucco installation in several communities ("the Florida stucco issues"). Through September 30, 2014, we had identified a total of 135 homes that we believed were likely to require more than minor repairs and recorded an associated warranty charge of $4.3 million. We had resolved repairs on 11 of those homes resulting in payments of $0.3 million. We consider warranty-related repairs for homes to be resolved when all repairs are complete and all repair costs are fully paid. As of September 30, 2014, our warranty liability included $4.0 million for the amount of estimated repair costs for the remaining 124 homes, as well as an estimate of repair costs for homes that were likely to be identified in the future. At that time, we believed the issues were isolated to a limited number of specific house plans in several specific communities.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, with many homeowners seeing an increased level of warranty-related activities occurring in their communities, the number of stucco and water-related warranty calls in Florida increased significantly. This led us to expand the scope of our inspections, including to homes and communities from which no warranty calls had been received. This enhanced review, together with our growing experience repairing homes previously identified, resulted in us determining that more homes and communities in Florida were likely to be adversely affected. Based on all of these activities and our resulting analysis, we recorded additional warranty expense of $13.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 related to the Florida stucco issues.

Through December 31, 2014, we had identified a total of 382 homes, with an average age of more than 8 years, in Florida with stucco installation issues that we believed were likely to require more than minor repairs, of which 42 were already fully repaired by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and numerous others were in various stages of repair. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we paid $1.4 million to repair such homes. As of December 31, 2014, our overall warranty liability included $16.2 million to complete repairs on the remaining 340 homes, as well as an estimated amount to cover repair costs for additional homes that we believed likely to be identified in the future.

During the current quarter, we continued to accumulate additional facts that have better allowed us to assess our risk for stucco installation issues and subsequent repairs. We determined that an additional warranty expense of $4.3 million was required during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 to cover additional homes identified as likely requiring more than minor repairs. As of March 31, 2015, 436 homes have been identified likely to require repairs, of which 65 homes have been repaired. We also have acquired additional data concerning the actual costs to repair each home at risk based on historical repair costs for each community. After considering repair costs already paid of $3.3 million in the current quarter, the remaining accrual to cover the potential repair costs for homes impacted by the Florida stucco issues is $17.2 million as of March 31, 2015, which is included in our overall warranty liability.

Our assessment of the Florida stucco issues is ongoing. As a result, we anticipate that our assessment as to the ultimate magnitude of our liability may change as additional information is obtained. We believe that we will recover a portion of our repair costs related to the Florida stucco issues from various sources, including the subcontractors involved with the construction of these homes and their insurers; however, no amounts related to subcontractor recoveries have been recorded in our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2015.

New Jersey. The water intrusion issues in New Jersey related to flashing and stone installation in one specific community. These homes had an average age of 8 years. No new homes were identified in New Jersey during the first six months of fiscal 2015. As of March 31, 2015, we believe the remaining warranty liability for New Jersey encompasses the probable cost of the repair effort remaining to resolve the issues in that community and is not material.

Insurance Recoveries

The Company has entered into contracts with a third-party insurance provider which allow for the recovery of certain warranty costs incurred by us above a specified threshold for each period covered. Due to the significant costs we have incurred related to the Florida stucco issues, as well as other warranty issues that have not been separately discussed, we have, in the current quarter, surpassed these thresholds for certain contract years. As such, we expect additional costs incurred in the future for further warranty work on homes within these contract years will be reimbursed by our insurer.

During the current quarter, warranty costs expensed beyond the threshold set in our insurance contracts were recorded related to homes impacted by the Florida stucco issues, as well as other various warranty issues, resulting in our recording of $5.7 million in insurance recoveries that we deem to be probable of receiving. Of this amount, $4.3 million is associated with the incremental current quarter expense from the Florida stucco issues, while the remainder relates to expenditures for other warranty issues that are also over our insurance thresholds. Amounts recorded for anticipated insurance recoveries are reflected within our unaudited consolidated statement of income as a reduction of our current quarter home construction expenses, and have been recorded on a gross basis as a receivable within accounts receivable on our unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015.

Amounts to be recovered under our insurance plans will vary based on whether additional warranty costs are incurred for periods for which our threshold has already been met. As a result, we anticipate the balance of our established receivable for insurance recoveries to fluctuate for potential future reimbursements, as well as the payments ultimately received from our insurer.

Litigation

In the normal course of business, we are subject to various lawsuits. We cannot predict or determine the timing or final outcome of these lawsuits or the effect that any adverse findings or determinations in pending lawsuits may have on us. In addition, an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, cannot presently be made with respect to certain of these pending matters. An unfavorable determination in any of the pending lawsuits could result in the payment by us of substantial monetary damages, which may not be fully covered by insurance. Further, the legal costs associated with the lawsuits and the amount of time required to be spent by management and the Board of Directors on these matters, even if we are ultimately successful, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Other Matters

On July 1, 2009, we entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement and associated Bill of Information (the “DPA”) with the United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina and a separate but related agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (the HUD Agreement) and the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice. We have satisfied our obligations under the DPA and in July 2014 the United States District Court for the Western Division of North Carolina dismissed the Bill of Information. However, under these agreements, we are obligated to make payments equal to 4% of “adjusted EBITDA,” as defined in the agreements, until the earlier of (a) September 30, 2016 or (b) the date that a cumulative $48.0 million has been paid pursuant to the DPA and the HUD Agreement. As of March 31, 2015, we have paid a cumulative $24.9 million and an additional $0.8 million has been recorded as a liability at March 31, 2015.

We and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, most relating to construction defects, moisture intrusion and product liability. Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered in whole or in part by insurance. In our opinion, based on our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters, excluding the Florida stucco issues previously discussed, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We have accrued $8.4 million and $13.4 million in other liabilities related to litigation and other matters, excluding warranty, as of March 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.

We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $42.6 million and $217.4 million, respectively, at March 31, 2015 related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments. We have no outstanding letters of credit relating to our land option contracts as of March 31, 2015.