XML 91 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Inventory
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Real Estate [Abstract]  
Inventory
Inventory
(In thousands)
September 30, 2012
 
September 30, 2011
Homes under construction
$
251,828

 
$
277,331

Development projects in progress
391,019

 
424,055

Land held for future development
367,102

 
384,761

Land held for sale
10,149

 
12,837

Capitalized interest
38,190

 
45,973

Model homes
40,844

 
47,423

Total owned inventory
$
1,099,132

 
$
1,192,380



Homes under construction includes homes finished and ready for delivery and homes in various stages of construction. We had 174 ($39.7 million) and 334 ($59.3 million) substantially completed homes that were not subject to a sales contract (spec homes) at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Development projects in progress consist principally of land and land improvement costs. Certain of the fully developed lots in this category are reserved by a deposit or sales contract. Land held for future development consists of communities for which construction and development activities are expected to occur in the future or have been idled and are stated at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. All applicable interest and real estate taxes on land held for future development are expensed as incurred. The decrease in land held for future development relates to our activation of a large mid-Atlantic project during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Land held for sale in Unallocated and Other as of September 30, 2012 included land held for sale in the markets we have decided to exit including Jacksonville, Florida and Charlotte, North Carolina. Total owned inventory, by reportable segment, is set forth in the table below. Inventory located in California, the state with our largest concentration of inventory, was $350.9 million and $367.8 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively
(In thousands)
Projects in
Progress
 
Held for Future
Development
 
Land Held
for Sale
 
Total Owned
Inventory
September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West Segment
$
261,239

 
$
318,351

 
$
2,553

 
$
582,143

East Segment
279,954

 
25,130

 
3,204

 
308,288

Southeast Segment
118,853

 
23,621

 
1,675

 
144,149

Unallocated & Other
61,835

 

 
2,717

 
64,552

Total
$
721,881

 
$
367,102

 
$
10,149

 
$
1,099,132

September 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West Segment
$
294,208

 
$
318,732

 
$
2,681

 
$
615,621

East Segment
304,648

 
41,993

 
5,056

 
351,697

Southeast Segment
122,126

 
24,036

 
75

 
146,237

Unallocated & Other
73,800

 

 
5,025

 
78,825

Total
$
794,782

 
$
384,761

 
$
12,837

 
$
1,192,380



Inventory Impairments. When conducting our community level review for the recoverability of our homebuilding inventories held for development, we establish a quarterly “watch list” of communities with more than 10 homes remaining that carry profit margins in backlog and in our forecast that are below a minimum threshold of profitability. Assets on the quarterly watch list are subject to substantial additional financial and operational analyses and review that consider the competitive environment and other factors contributing to profit margins below our watch list threshold. For communities where the current competitive and market dynamics indicate that these factors may be other than temporary, which may call into question the recoverability of our investment, a formal impairment analysis is performed. The formal impairment analysis consists of both qualitative competitive market analyses and a quantitative analysis reflecting market and asset specific information.
In our impairment analyses for the year ended September 30, 2012, we have assumed limited market improvements in some communities beginning in fiscal 2014 and continuing improvement in these communities in subsequent years. For any communities scheduled to close out in fiscal 2013, we did not assume any market improvements. The discount rate used may be different for each community and ranged from 11.2% to 17.0% for the communities analyzed in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 and 12.6% to 18.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The following tables represent the results, by reportable segment of our community level review of the recoverability of our inventory assets held for development as of September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010 ($ in thousands). We have elected to aggregate our disclosure at the reportable segment level because we believe this level of disclosure is most meaningful to the readers of our financial statements. The aggregate undiscounted cash flow fair value as a percentage of book value for the communities represented below is consistent with our expectations given our “watch list” methodology.
 
 
 
Undiscounted Cash Flow Analyses Prepared
Segment
# of
Communities
on Watch List
 
# of
Communities
 
Pre-analysis
Book Value
(BV)
 
Aggregate Undiscounted Cash Flow as a % of BV
Year Ended September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West
14

 
8

 
$
28,467

 
94.7
%
East
12

 
8

 
30,052

 
91.8
%
Southeast
5

 
3

 
9,247

 
116.5
%
Unallocated

 

 
5,193

 
100.0
%
Total
31

 
19

 
$
72,959

 
96.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended Ended September 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West
18

 
15

 
$
58,848

 
88.4
%
East
7

 
5

 
16,436

 
94.6
%
Southeast
4

 
3

 
11,017

 
60.3
%
Unallocated
1

 

 
9,707

 
100.0
%
Total
30

 
23

 
$
96,008

 
87.4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended September 30, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West
20

 
20

 
$
80,270

 
90.8
%
East
12

 
10

 
43,655

 
79.7
%
Southeast
6

 
5

 
16,394

 
80.8
%
Discontinued Operations
5

 
5

 
7,882

 
93.8
%
Unallocated

 

 
13,728

 
100.0
%
Total
43

 
40

 
$
161,929

 
87.7
%



The table below summarizes the results of our discounted cash flow analysis for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The impairment charges below include impairments taken as a result of these discounted cash flow analyses and also impairment charges recorded for individual homes sold and in backlog with net contribution margins below a minimum threshold of profitability in communities that were not otherwise impaired through our discounted cash flow analyses. The estimated fair value of the impaired inventory is determined immediately after a community’s impairment.
($ in thousands)
Results of Discounted Cash Flow Analyses Prepared
Segment
# of
Communities
Impaired
 
# of Lots
Impaired
 
Impairment
Charge
 
Estimated Fair
Value of
Impaired
Inventory at
Period End
Year Ended September 30, 2012
West
2

 
116

 
$
3,902

 
$
11,058

East
2

 
93

 
4,316

 
7,342

Southeast
1

 
37

 
796

 
2,457

Unallocated

 

 
473

 

Continuing Operations
5

 
246

 
9,487

 
20,857

Discontinued Operations

 

 
60

 

Total
5

 
246

 
$
9,547

 
$
20,857

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended Ended September 30, 2011
West
12

 
859

 
$
20,150

 
$
33,066

East
4

 
86

 
1,611

 
10,671

Southeast
3

 
278

 
5,182

 
6,022

Unallocated

 

 
2,362

 

Continuing Operations
19

 
1,223

 
29,305

 
49,759

Discontinued Operations

 

 
276

 

Total
19

 
1,223

 
$
29,581

 
$
49,759

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended September 30, 2010
 
 
 
West
14

 
618

 
$
18,056

 
$
38,830

East
6

 
847

 
18,703

 
17,020

Southeast
5

 
362

 
7,510

 
10,984

Unallocated

 

 
3,404

 

Continuing Operations
25

 
1,827

 
47,673

 
66,834

Discontinued Operations
4

 
68

 
1,244

 
5,972

Total
29

 
1,895

 
$
48,917

 
$
72,806


Our assumptions about future home sales prices and absorption rates require significant judgment because the residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. During these periods, for certain communities we determined that it was prudent to reduce sales prices or further increase sales incentives in response to factors including competitive market conditions in those specific submarkets for the product and locations of these communities. Because the projected cash flows used to evaluate the fair value of inventory are significantly impacted by changes in market conditions including decreased sales prices, the change in sales prices and changes in absorption estimates based on current market conditions and management’s assumptions relative to future results led to impairments in five communities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, discrete changes in our revenue and absorption estimates for certain communities due to pricing reductions in response to competitor actions and local market conditions led to impairments in 19 and 29 communities, respectively. Market deterioration that exceeds our estimates may lead us to incur additional impairment charges on previously impaired homebuilding assets in addition to homebuilding assets not currently impaired but for which indicators of impairment may arise if the market continues to deteriorate.
The year-to-date impairments on land held for sale below represent further write downs of these properties to net realizable value, less estimated costs to sell and are as a result of challenging market conditions and our review of recent comparable transactions. The negative impairments indicated below are due to adjustments to accruals for estimated selling costs related to either our strategic decision to develop a previously held-for-sale land position or revised estimates based on pending sales transactions. Our assumptions about land sales prices require significant judgment because the current market is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. We calculated the estimated fair values of land held for sale based on current market conditions and assumptions made by management, which may differ materially from actual results and may result in additional impairments if market conditions continue to deteriorate.
Also, we have determined the proper course of action with respect to a number of communities within each homebuilding segment was to abandon the remaining lots under option and to write-off the deposits securing the option takedowns, as well as pre-acquisition costs. In determining whether to abandon a lot option contract, we evaluate the lot option primarily based upon the expected cash flows from the property that is the subject of the option. If we intend to abandon or walk-away from a lot option contract, we record a charge to earnings in the period such decision is made for the deposit amount and any related capitalized costs associated with the lot option contract. We recorded lot option abandonment charges during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010 as indicated in the table below. The abandonment charges relate primarily to our decision to abandon certain option contracts that no longer fit in our long-term strategic plan.
The following table sets forth, by reportable homebuilding segment, the inventory impairments and lot option abandonment charges recorded for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010 (in thousands) :
 
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Development projects and homes in process (Held for Development)
 
 
 
 
 
West
$
3,902

 
$
20,150

 
18,056

East
4,316

 
1,611

 
18,703

Southeast
796

 
5,182

 
7,510

Unallocated
473

 
2,362

 
3,404

Subtotal
$
9,487

 
$
29,305

 
$
47,673

Land Held for Sale
 
 
 
 
 
West
$

 
$
(51
)
 
1,061

East
100

 
193

 

Southeast
208

 
169

 

Subtotal
$
308

 
$
311

 
$
1,061

Lot Option Abandonments
 
 
 
 
 
West
$
301

 
$
405

 
783

East
1,320

 
2,048

 
35

Southeast
792

 
390

 
14

Unallocated
2

 

 

Subtotal
$
2,415

 
$
2,843

 
$
832

Continuing Operations
$
12,210

 
$
32,459

 
$
49,566

Discontinued Operations
 
 
 
 
 
Held for Development
$
60

 
$
276

 
1,244

Land Held for Sale
503

 
78

 
1,003

Lot Option Abandonments
16

 
2,552

 
26

Subtotal
$
579

 
$
2,906

 
$
2,273

Total Company
$
12,789

 
$
35,365

 
$
51,839



Lot Option Agreements and Variable Interest Entities (VIE). As previously discussed, we also have access to land inventory through lot option contracts, which generally enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our lot option. A majority of our lot option contracts require a non-refundable cash deposit or irrevocable letter of credit based on a percentage of the purchase price of the land for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Under lot option contracts, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our liability under option contracts is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $24.9 million at September 30, 2012. The total remaining purchase price, net of cash deposits, committed under all options was $198.5 million as of September 30, 2012. We expect to exercise, subject to market conditions and seller satisfaction of contract terms, most of our remaining option contracts. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing of the completion of development activities, will have a significant impact on the timing of option exercises or whether lot options will be exercised.
For the VIEs in which we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we have consolidated the VIE and reflected such assets and liabilities as land not owned under option agreements in our balance sheets. For VIEs we were required to consolidate, we recorded the remaining contractual purchase price under the applicable lot option agreement to land not owned under option agreements with an offsetting increase to obligations related to land not owned under option agreements. Also, to reflect the purchase price of this inventory consolidated, we reclassified the related option deposits from land under development to land not owned under option agreement in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Consolidation of these VIEs has no impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.
The following provides a summary of our interests in lot option agreements as of September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
 
Deposits &
Non-refundable
Preacquisition
Costs Incurred
 
Remaining
Obligation
 
Land Not Owned -
Under Option
Agreements
As of September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated VIEs
$
7,203

 
$
3,346

 
$
10,549

Other consolidated lot option agreements (a)
430

 
1,441

 
$
1,871

Unconsolidated lot option agreements
17,290

 
193,711

 

Total lot option agreements
$
24,923

 
$
198,498

 
$
12,420

As of September 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated VIEs
$
6,201

 
$
1,214

 
$
7,415

Other consolidated lot option agreements (a)
164

 
4,175

 
4,338

Unconsolidated lot option agreements
13,732

 
219,841

 

Total lot option agreements
$
20,097

 
$
225,230

 
$
11,753


(a)
Represents lot option agreements with non-VIE entities that we have deemed to be “financing arrangements” pursuant to ASC 470-40, Product Financing Arrangements.