10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from               to               ..

Commission File No.:  0-25244

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada	13-3738518
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
545 Fifth Avenue, Suite 940 New York, NY	10017
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 983-3355

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock as of August 4, 2010 was 8,871,640.

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

INDEX

		Page
	PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows forthe Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)	4
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	11
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	18
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	18
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	20
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	20
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	20
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	20
	SIGNATURES	24

i

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

(in thousands, except for share data)

	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	3,477		$	2,582
Prepaid expenses	811			1,026
Notes receivable, current portion	326			225
Other current assets	434			1,897
Total current assets	5,048			5,730
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, less accumulated depreciation of $8,989 and $9,316, respectively	32,501			38,203
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill	5,738			6,577
Notes receivable, less current portion	1,039			1,309
Deposits and other assets	2,973			1,849
Total other assets	9,750			9,735
	$	47,299		$	53,668
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt, current maturities	$	3,314		$	3,521
Capital lease, current portion	38			50
Accounts payable	1,015			1,206
Interest payable	295			218
Czech tax accrual	3,494			4,459
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	1,023			1,659
Total current liabilities	9,179			11,113
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt, less current maturities	6,442			6,983
Capital lease, less current portion	53			57
Total long-term liabilities	6,495			7,040
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 4,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
Common stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 8,871,640 shares, issued and outstanding, respectively	9			9
Additional paid-in capital	51,842			51,710
Accumulated other comprehensive income	4,285			9,083
Accumulated deficit	(24,511		)	(25,287		)
Total stockholders’ equity	31,625			35,515
	$	47,299		$	53,668

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

1

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(in thousands, except for share data)

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
REVENUES	$	16,660		$	16,557		$	8,029		$	8,739
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of revenues	9,076			8,646			4,395			4,560
Depreciation and amortization	985			989			474			536
Selling, general and administrative	5,489			5,080			2,513			2,634
	15,550			14,715			7,382			7,730
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS	1,110			1,842			647			1,009
OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense, net	(334		)	(355		)	(158		)	(175		)
NET INCOME	776			1,487			489			834
Other comprehensive income (loss), foreign currency translation adjustments,	(4,798		)	833			(3,916		)	4,124
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	(4,022	)	$	2,320		$	(3,427	)	$	4,958
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic	8,871,640			8,868,862			8,871,640			8,871,640
Diluted	8,947,177			8,948,807			8,947,177			8,951,586
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic	$	0.09		$	0.17		$	0.06		$	0.09
Diluted	$	0.09		$	0.17		$	0.05		$	0.09

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

2

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	776		$	1,487
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	985			989
Stock-based compensation expense	127			85
Stock issued for services				35
Deferred compensation to be paid as stock	5			53
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,500			(175		)
Deposits and other assets	(1,243		)	(30		)
Accounts payable	(80		)	(86		)
Interest payable	76			(78		)
Czech tax accrual	(432		)	(44		)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(448		)	14
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	1,266			2,250
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment	(256		)	(167		)
Investment into Hotel Savannah and the Spa	(58		)	(2,368		)
Repayment on notes receivable	49
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(265		)	(2,535		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from loan	1,197
Payments on long-term debt	(765		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	432			—
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	(538		)	(392		)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH	895			(677		)
CASH:
Beginning of period	2,582			3,676
End of period	$	3,477		$	2,999
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	552		$	432
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Property and equipment acquired via accounts payable	$	—		$	141

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

3

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except for share data)

1.Basis of Presentation and Consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Trans World Corporation and Subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “TWC,” “we,” “our” or “us”) as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the six and three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature to fairly present the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial statements of all foreign subsidiaries consolidated herein have been converted in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP” or “GAAP”) for financial presentation purposes. All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company according to the instructions of Form 10-Q and pursuant to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) accounting and reporting requirements under Regulations S-X and S-K. Pursuant to these instructions, certain financial information and footnote disclosures normally included in such consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted.

In management’s opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company have been included. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may occur for the year ending December 31, 2010.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by US GAAP.  All monetary amounts set forth in these financial statements are in United States dollars (“USD” or “$”) unless otherwise stated herein.

2.Commitments and Contingencies.

Lease Obligations- The Company is obligated under several operating leases expiring through 2018.  Future aggregate minimum annual rental payments under all of these leases for the next five years are as follows:

Twelve Months Ending June 30,
2011	$	115
2012	$	112
2013	$	113
2014	$	115
2015	$	96

Rent expense under these operating leases was approximately $58 and $54 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company is also obligated under certain five-year, slot equipment operating leases, the projected costs of which are not included in the table above due to fluctuating inventory, expiring in 2011 and 2012, which provide for a monthly fixed rental fee per slot machine, and an option for replacement to a different/newer machine during the term of the lease.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company’s slot lease expenses were approximately $531 versus $528 in the comparable period in 2009, while for the first six months of 2010, they were $1,116 versus $1,023 for the comparable period in 2009.

Employment Agreements- The Company’s July 1, 2005 employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Mr. Rami S. Ramadan, absent the intervention of either party by September 30th of each year, will renew automatically for another calendar year, currently ending December 31, 2010. In addition to a perpetually renewable employment term of one year absent the intervention of either party, the agreement provides for annual compensation,

4

plus participation in the Company’s benefits programs and equity incentive plans. As of June 30, 2010, approximately $225 of annual compensation remains payable in 2010.

401 (k) and Profit Sharing Plan- The Company maintains a contributory 401(k) plan and a profit sharing plan.  These plans are for the benefit of all eligible corporate employees, who may have up to 16.5% of their salary withheld, not to exceed the maximum federally allowed amount.  The Company makes an employer-matching contribution of 60 cents for each employee dollar contributed.

Taxing Jurisdiction-The Czech Republic currently has a number of laws related to various taxes imposed by governmental authorities.  Applicable taxes include gaming tax, value-added tax or VAT, charity tax, and payroll (social) taxes.  Tax declarations, together with other legal compliance areas (as examples, customs and currency control matters) are subject to review and investigation by a number of governmental authorities, which are enabled by law to impose fines, penalties and interest charges, create tax risks in the Czech Republic.  Management believes that it has adequately provided for its Czech tax liabilities as of June 30, 2010.

Legal Proceedings-The Company is often subject to various contingencies, the resolutions of which, its management believes will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.  TWC was not involved in any material litigation during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, or through the date of this filing.

3.Liquidity.

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a working capital deficit of approximately $4,131, a reduction of $1,252 compared to a working capital deficit of $5,383 at December 31, 2009.  This decrease was primarily due to the positive cash flow generated by operations, short term nature of note receivables from the owners of the Grand Casino Lav, which represent a one year-equivalent of principal due on the replacement loan and to a reduction in Czech tax payable.  On July 8, 2010 TWC satisfactorily retired, pursuant to the terms of the Replacement Notes, the Company’s unsecured promissory notes aggregating a principal balance of $1,550 which had matured on June 26, 2010, along with a total payment of $295 in associated deferred and accrued interest.  In April 2010, the Company opted to utilize a payment schedule, ending September 2010, as permitted by the Czech Ministry of Finance to remit its 2009 gaming tax obligations of Czech Koruna (“CZK”) 31,000, or about $1,500.  The schedule of 2010 payments is as follows: (i) CZK 16,000, or approximately $800 on April 12th, which has been paid; and (ii) CZK 5,000, or approximately $250, due in three individual installments on July 25th, which has been paid, August 25th, and September 25th.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company had fully drawn down its full revolving credit facility of CZK 40,000, or approximately $1,900.  The Company was in full compliance with all of the credit facility’s financial covenants at June 30, 2010.

In December 2009, TWC agreed to a proposal from the owners of Grand Casino Lav to consolidate the owners’ three outstanding loans, which had been extended to them in connection with the Company’s securing of a 10-year casino management contract in 2007, plus accrued interest and penalties into a single, 3-year, 3.55% per annum interest, term loan (the “Replacement Loan”), to be effective January 1, 2010, excluding accrued management fees.  The Replacement Loan principal amount is approximately Euro (“EUR”) 875, or $1,100.  Monthly payments for the Replacement Loan commenced May 31, 2010 (after a four-month, interest-free grace period).  In addition to liens on gaming equipment, the Replacement Loan is secured by nine legally-binding receivable notes, which can be presented at any time upon default of the Replacement Loan to the owners’ bank for the satisfaction of the Replacement Loan.  In the event of a sale of the business, the Replacement Loan would be transferred to the new owner.  TWC management believes the loan is fully collectible.

The Company’s management believes that its cash resources at June 30, 2010, in addition to the anticipated cash to be provided by existing operations, will be sufficient to satisfy its accounts payable and other current obligations and fund its operating activities for the next twelve months.  However, should cash from operations be insufficient to cover the above objectives, the Company may seek to raise additional capital in order to fund its current liabilities, operations and growth strategies.  There is no guarantee that such funds will be available to TWC at favorable terms or at all, in which case the Company may decide to reduce its operations and/or its development plans.

5

4.Summary of Selected Significant Accounting Policies.

(a)Revenue recognition-The Company complies with requirements for revenue recognition in financial statements.  Casino revenue is defined as the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wagers and the amount paid out to patrons, and is recognized on the day it is earned. Revenues generated from ancillary services, including lodging, sales of food, beverage, cigarettes, and casino logo merchandise are recognized at the time the related services are performed and represent, on an individual basis, less than three percent of total revenues.

(b)Earnings per share- The Company complies with accounting and disclosure requirements regarding earnings per share. Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share incorporate the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents on an average basis during the period. The Company’s common stock equivalents currently include stock options, warrants and deferred compensation  stock. Thus, unexercised stock options to purchase up to 838,525 and 838,965 shares as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, were included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share, if such unexercised stock options were “in-the-money” and vested. Warrants to purchase up to 75,000 shares were also included, if they were “in-the-money” and vested. In addition, 47,234 and 43,813 issuable shares, as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan were also included in the computation.

A table illustrating the impact of dilution on earnings per share, based on the treasury stock method, is presented below:

	(UNAUDITED)
	For the Six Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended
(amounts in thousands, except for	June 30,				June 30,
share information)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Basic Earnings Per Share:
Net earnings	$	776	$	1,487	$	489	$	834
Weighted average common shares	8,871,640		8,868,862		8,871,640		8,871,640
Basic earnings per share	$	0.09	$	0.17	$	0.06	$	0.09
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Net earnings	$	776	$	1,487	$	489	$	834
Weighted average common shares	8,871,640		8,868,862		8,871,640		8,871,640
Addition due to the effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants (1)	28,303		36,132		28,303		36,133
Stock issuable under the Deferred Compensation Plan	47,234		43,813		47,234		43,813
Dilutive potential weighted average common shares	8,947,177		8,948,807		8,947,177		8,951,586
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.09	$	0.17	$	0.05	$	0.09

(1) per the treasury stock method.

(c)Goodwill- Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the Company’s Czech subsidiaries over the fair value of their net assets at the date of acquisition, which consisted of the Ceska and Rozvadov casinos and the land in Hate, which is currently, the Route 59 Casino. Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test. The Company has allocated the goodwill over two reporting units that are components of the operating segment “Czech subsidiaries” and are classified as the “German reporting unit” which consists of the Ceska and Rozvadov casinos, and the “Austrian reporting unit” which consists of the Route 55 and Route 59 casinos and the Hotel Savannah. The impairment assessment requires the Company to compare the fair value of its two reporting units to their respective carrying values to determine whether there is an indication that an impairment exists. The fair value of the two reporting units were determined through a combination of recent appraisals of the Company’s real property and a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), which was based on the Company’s experience and data from independent, third parties. As required, the Company performed its required annual fair-value based testing of the carrying value of goodwill related to its two reporting units at September 30, 2009, and determined that goodwill was not impaired. The Company will perform its required annual assessment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2010. There were no indicators of impairment present during the interim

6

periods following the annual testing date, therefore the Company determined that there was no impairment of goodwill at June 30, 2010.

(d)Property and Equipment- Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  TWC capitalizes the cost of improvements that extend the life of the asset and expenses maintenance and repair costs as incurred.  The Company provides for depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Asset	Estimated Useful Life
Building and improvements	5-50 years
Gaming equipment	4-12 years
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	4-12 years

At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, property and equipment consisted of the following:

	As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited)			As of December 31, 2009
Land	$	2,354		$	3,569
Building and improvements	26,835			32,307
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	12,301			11,643
	41,490			47,519
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(8,989		)	(9,316		)
	$	32,501		$	38,203

(e)Impairment for long-lived assets-The Company adheres to GAAP for the impairment on disposal of long-lived assets and periodically evaluates whether current facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its depreciable assets to be held and used may be recoverable. If such circumstances are determined to exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the long-lived assets, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the carrying value to determine whether an impairment exists. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset’s fair value and its carrying value. An estimate of the asset’s fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The Company reports an asset to be disposed of at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated net realizable market value. There were no impairment losses for long-lived assets recorded for the six months ending June 30, 2010.

(f)    Foreign currency translation - The Company complies with GAAP accounting and reporting requirements for foreign currency translation, where for foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local foreign currency, balance sheet accounts and cash flows are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period and resulting translation adjustments are included in “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” Statement of operations accounts are translated by applying the monthly averages of the daily exchange rates of one (1) USD dollar to one (1) CZK at the end of the respective month on the respective monthly local Czech statement of operations accounts for the period.

7

The impact of foreign currency translation on goodwill is presented below:

	Applicable	Goodwill
	Foreign Exchange	German		Austrian
As of June 30, 2010 (in thousands, except FX)	Rate ("FX") (2)	reporting unit		reporting unit		Total
Residual balance, as of January 1, 2003 (in USD) (1)		USD	3,042	USD	537	USD	3,579
USD residual balance (A), translated at June 30, 1998 (date of acquisition), at FX rate of:	33.8830	CZK	103,077	CZK	18,190	CZK	121,267
2003 CZK balance, translated to USD, at June 30, 2010 at FX of:	21.1340	USD	4,877	USD	861	USD	5,738
Net increase to Goodwill (adjustment made to Translation Adjustment in consolidation):		USD	1,835	USD	324	USD	2,159

(1)Goodwill was amortized over 15 years until the Company started to comply with GAAP requirements, as of January 1, 2002. This balance represents the remaining, unamortized goodwill, after an impairment charge taken prior to January 1, 2003.

(2)FX (interbank) rates taken from Oanda.com.

(g)Stock-based compensation- The Company complies with the GAAP accounting and reporting requirements for share-based payments which permit companies to adopt its requirements using either a “modified prospective” method, or a “modified retrospective” method. Under the “modified prospective” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of share-based payments for all share-based payments vested after that date, and based on these requirements for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of this pronouncement. Under the “modified retrospective” method, the requirements are the same as under the “modified prospective” method, but also permit entities to restate financial statements of previous periods, either for all prior periods presented or to the beginning of the fiscal year in which the statement is adopted, based on previous pro forma disclosures made in accordance with this pronouncement.  Accordingly, the Company has adopted the modified prospective method of recognition, and began applying the valuation and other criteria to stock options granted beginning January 1, 2006. The Company is recognizing expense for the unvested portion of previously issued grants based on the valuation and attribution methods used previously to calculate the pro forma disclosures. The Company did not recognize expense for employee stock options prior to January 1, 2006.

The Company currently utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to certain key employees. While this pronouncement permits entities to continue to use such a model, it also permits the use of a “lattice” model. The Company expects to continue using the Black-Scholes option pricing model in connection with its adoption of this pronouncement to measure the fair value of stock options granted.

(h)Comprehensive income (loss) — The Company complies with GAAP accounting and reporting requirements for reporting comprehensive income. Those requirements establish rules for reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.  Furthermore, they require the Company’s change in the foreign currency translation adjustments to be included in other comprehensive income (loss).

8

(i)Promotional allowances — Promotional allowances primarily consist of food and beverages and, to certain of its valuable players, hotel accommodations, all of which are furnished gratuitously.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues do not include the retail amount of food and beverages and hotel accommodations of $2,961 and $2,298, respectively, provided at no-charge to customers. The retail value of the food and beverages given away is determined by dividing the food and beverage costs charged to the gaming operation of $1,267 and $884, for the respective periods, by the average percentage of cost of food and beverages sold.  The cost of hotel accommodations is either the out-of-pocket expenses paid to other hotels or the retail charge of rooms at the Hotel Savannah. The promotional allowances are summarized below:

	(UNAUDITED)
	For the Six Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(amounts in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Cost of gratuitous food and beverages (A)	$	1,267		$	884		$	599		$	582
Average cost of food and beverages sold (B)	43.1		%	38.6		%	41.4		%	39.3		%
Retail value of food and beverages (A/B)	$	2,938		$	2,292		$	1,447		$	1,482
Cost of hotel accommodations	23			6			9			3
Total promotional allowances	$	2,961		$	2,298		$	1,456		$	1,485

(j)Czech taxes — The majority of TWC’s revenues are derived from gaming operations in the Czech Republic, which are subject to gaming taxes only, while its non-gaming revenues, which are not material, have correspondingly non-material corporate income tax liabilities under Czech law.  Gaming taxes are computed on gross gaming revenues, which is comprised of live (table) games and slot games revenues. For live game revenue, the applicable taxes and fees are: (i) a 10% administration tax; (ii) a 1% state supervision fee; and (iii) a charity contribution (tax) (herein referred to as a charity tax) according to a gross revenue formula specified by the Czech Ministry of Finance, net of the aforementioned taxes and fees. For slot game revenue, the applicable taxes and fees are: (i) an annual license fee of CZK 30,000, or $1,400, per slot machine, paid to the Ministry of Finance; (ii) an administration fee of CZK 4,000, or $200, per slot machine; and (iii) the charity tax, net of the applicable fees.  Therefore, for all gaming revenue, net of applicable taxes and fees, up to CZK 50,000 (or approximately $2,400 at the June 30, 2010 exchange rate), a 6% charity tax applies; up to CZK 100,000 (or approximately $4,700 at the same exchange rate), an 8% rate applies; up to CZK 500,000 (or approximately $23,700 at the same exchange rate), a 10% rate applies; and above the CZK 500,000 gaming revenue threshold, a 15% rate applies.  The charity tax is intended for publicly beneficial, cultural, sporting and welfare purposes, net of local (municipality) administration and slot state-licensing fees.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, TWC’s live game taxes were approximately $383 and $785, respectively, compared with $438 and $844 for the comparable periods of 2009.  Charity taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $627 and $1,306, respectively, versus $681 and $1,296 for the comparable periods in 2009.

Gaming taxes payable are due to the Czech Ministry of Finance annually, typically in April of the subsequent year, while charity taxes payable, although having no stated due dates, are paid as mutually agreed with the charities by May of the subsequent year. The Company may allocate this charity contribution to local schools, sports clubs, subsidized or volunteered organizations, or municipalities in which each of the Company’s casinos operate. The distribution is subject to the prior approval of the Czech Ministry of Finance.

On April 8, 2010, the Company opted to utilize a payment schedule, ending September 25, 2010, permitted by the Czech Ministry of Finance to remit its 2009 gaming tax obligations of approximately CZK 31,000, or approximately $1,500.  The schedule of 2010 payments is as follows: (i) CZK 16,000, or approximately $800 on April 12th, which has been paid; and (ii) CZK 5,000, or approximately $240, individual installments due on July 25th (which has been paid), August 25th, and September 25th.

In conformity with the European Union (“EU”) taxation legislation, when the Czech Republic joined the EU in 2004, its value added tax (“VAT”) increased from a range of 5% to 22%, beginning in January 2004, up to a range of 9% to 19%, by December 31, 2009 for all intra-EU generated purchases. All non-EU generated purchases were impacted by identical VAT increases, beginning in May 2004.  Beginning January 1, 2010, VAT rates increased to a range of 10% to 20% in the Czech Republic.  The Company pays its VAT directly to its vendors in connection with any purchases that are subject to this tax.  Unlike in other industries, VATs are

9

not recoverable for gaming operations.  As for the Company’s new hotel operation, Hotel Savannah, the recoverable VAT was non-material for the three and six month periods in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(k)Income taxes — The Company complies with GAAP accounting and reporting requirements with respect to accounting for income taxes, which require an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  In July 2006, the accounting recognition rules for uncertainty in income taxes created a single accounting and disclosure model for uncertain tax positions, provides guidance on the minimum threshold that a tax uncertainty is required to meet before it can be recognized in the financial statements and applies to all tax positions taken by a company, both those deemed to be routine as well as those for which there may be a high degree of uncertainty.  During the period ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized no adjustments for uncertain tax positions.

(l)Recently issued and adopted accounting standards:

In December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) — Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (“ASU No. 2009-17”). ASU No. 2009-17 requires a qualitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and replaces the quantitative evaluation previously set forth under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This approach is focused on identifying the reporting entity that has the ability to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly affects the entity’s economic performance and has the obligation to absorb the entity’s losses or has the right to receive benefits from the entity. ASU No. 2009-17, among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement in variable interest entities. The guidance under ASU No. 2009-17 became effective for the first annual period beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within that first annual period. The Company adopted the pronouncement on January 1, 2010 resulting in no impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of income and cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, which requires that an SEC filer, as defined, evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. The update also removed the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-16 which requires that an entity should not accrue a jackpot liability (or portions thereof) before the jackpot is won if the entity is not obligated to pay out that jackpot.  Jackpots should be accrued and charged to revenue when an entity has the obligation to pay the jackpot.  The guidance will become effective for the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2010 and the interim periods within that first annual period.  The Company is assessing what impact, if any, adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

10

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Note on Forward-Looking Information

This Form 10-Q contains certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use in those statements of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future.

Although we believe the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business at the time the statements are made, a number of factors outside of our control could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q. Any one or a combination of these factors, or other factors not now known, could materially affect our financial performance, business strategy, business operations, plans, goals and objectives. These factors include but are not limited to:

·the market’s acceptance of our gaming offerings;

·the effect of competition in our markets;

·the political, legislative, and regulatory climates and changes upon our business;

·the impact of fluctuations of currencies on revenue we receive or expenses we incur; and,

·other factors described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Forward-looking statements that we make or that are made by others on our behalf are based on a knowledge of our business and the environment in which we operate, but because of the factors listed above, actual results may differ significantly from those in forward-looking statements. Consequently, these cautionary statements qualify all of the forward-looking statements we make herein. The results or developments we anticipate may not be realized. Even if substantially realized, those results or developments may not result in the expected consequences for us or affect us, our business or our operations in the ways we expect. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q, which speak only as of their dates. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements.

Nature of Business and Competition

We are engaged in the acquisition, development and management of niche casino operations in Europe, which feature gaming tables and mechanized gaming devices, such as video slot machines, as well as the acquisition, development and the management of small to midsize hotels, which may include casino facilities.  Our expansion into the hotel industry was founded on management’s belief that hotels in the small to midsize boutique class are complementary to our casino brand; that opportunities in one of these two industries often lead to, or are tied to, opportunities in the other industry; and that a more diversified portfolio of assets will give us greater stability and make us more attractive to potential investors.  Further, several of our top management executives have extensive experience in the hotel industry.  In this pursuit, we have developed our first hotel, Hotel Savannah, a 77-room, European four-star deluxe hotel, adjoining our Route 59 Casino, which primarily draws customers from the Vienna, Austria, regional area.

Currently, we own and operate four casinos in the Czech Republic (“CZ”), and manage, under a 10-year management contract expiring in 2017, a casino and nightclub in Croatia.  With respect to our Czech casinos, two are located in the western part of the CZ, close to the border of Germany.  The larger of the two, located in Ceska Kubice (“Ceska”), currently has four competitors. The smaller one is located in the town of Rozvadov (“Rozvadov”), and currently has one competitor.  The other two Czech casinos are located in the southern part of the CZ, close to the Austrian border.  The larger of these two, “Route 55,” located in Dolni Dvoriste, has two competitors, and the other

11

casino, “Route 59,” which recently underwent a major building expansion and renovation, is located in Hate, near Znojmo, and currently has two competitors.  On April 16, 2009, we officially launched our newly constructed 77-room, European four-star hotel, Hotel Savannah.  The hotel is connected to our Route 59 casino with the joint facility’s main restaurant linking the two buildings.  Along with the hotel operation, we also launched a full-service spa operation, the Spa at Hotel Savannah (the “Spa”), which is attached to Hotel Savannah.  The Spa, which features Ayurvedic massage therapies and an indoor pool, opened on March 16, 2009.  The Croatian casino and adjoining nightclub (collectively known as the “Grand Casino Lav”), is located in the Grand Hotel Lav resort in the city of Podstrana, near Split, Croatia.  The Grand Casino Lav’s revenues and expenses are recognized on the owner’s books.  We derive only management fee income from the performance results of the Grand Casino Lav, which is recognized in our consolidated financial statements.  The Grand Casino Lav currently has two competitors.

Exchange Rates

Due to the fact that the Company’s operations are located in Europe and principally in the Czech Republic, TWC’s financial results are subject to the influence of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  The revenue generated by our Czech operations is generally denominated in EUR and the expenses incurred by these facilities are generally denominated in CZK.  As our primary reporting subsidiary, American Chance Casinos, the TWC subsidiary that operates TWC’s casinos (“ACC”), is a Czech entity, all revenues and expenses, regardless of sources of origin (e.g. Croatia), are recognized in the Czech currency and translated to USD for reporting purposes.  A substantial change in the value of any of these currencies in relation to the value of the USD would have an impact on the results from our operations when translated into USD.  We do not hedge our foreign currency holdings.

The actual 2010 and 2009 operating results in local currency for the Czech casino units were converted to USD using the average of the daily exchange rates of each month in the reporting periods.  As all of the Grand Casino Lav’s operating results, including revenues and expenses, are recognized on the owner’s books, the foreign currency exchange impact is limited to only our earned management fees income, which was not material for the periods reviewed.  The monthly average exchange rates for the CZK versus the USD and EUR, respectively, are presented in the following graphical chart.

The consolidated balance sheet totals of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were converted to USDs using the interbank exchange rates, as reported at www.oanda.com, which are depicted in the following table:

As of	USD	CZK
June 30, 2010	1.00	21.1340
December 31, 2009	1.00	18.4379

12

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements. These condensed financial statements have been prepared following the US GAAP and by Article 8 of Regulation S-X for interim periods and require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to potential impairment of goodwill and share-based compensation expense. As these are condensed consolidated financial statements, the reader should also review expanded information about our critical accounting policies and estimates provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Performance Measures and Indicators

In discussing the consolidated results of operations, we may use or refer to performance measures and indicators that are common to the gaming industry, such as: (i) total (live game) drop, the dollar value of gaming chips purchased in a given period; (ii) (live game) drop per head (“DpH”), the per guest average dollar value of gaming chips purchased; (iii) daily income per (slot) machine; (iv) net win, the difference between live game wagers and the amount paid out to patrons; (v) win percentage (“WP”), the ratio of net win over total drop; and (vi) occupancy rate, the number of rooms sold divided by the number of rooms available.  These measures are “non-GAAP financial measures.”

Review of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Results of the Company:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2010			2009			Variance $			Variance %
Total revenues	$	8,029		$	8,739		$	(710	)	-8.1	%
Total operating costs and expenses	7,382			7,730			(348		)	-4.5	%
Income from operations	647			1,009			(362		)	-35.9	%
Other expense	(158		)	(175		)	17			-9.7	%
Net Income	$	489		$	834		$	(345	)	-41.4	%
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.06		$	0.09
Diluted	$	0.05		$	0.09

For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, our total revenues declined to $8.0 million, from $8.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.  The decline was attributable in large part to the impact of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, which lasted from June 11, 2010 to July 11, 2010, which served to divert many of our players to other social venues, including their own homes, to watch the soccer matches.  Live game and slot game attendances fell 9.6% and 5.5%, respectively, thereby reducing the revenue potential for the quarter.   The revenue decline was partially offset by increases in food and beverage (“F&B”) revenues and by the addition of hotel room and spa revenues.  F&B, rooms and spa revenues aggregated approximately 4.6% of total revenue.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $348,000, or 4.5%, from approximately $7.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 to approximately $7.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, mainly due to reduced volume-based gaming taxes and payroll, lower expenses in property-related costs and to lower depreciation and amortization expenses for the comparable periods.

Consequently, income from operations fell $362,000, or 35.9%, from the second quarter in 2009, as a result of the above factors.

Other expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $17,000, or 9.7%, to $158,000 from $175,000 for the same quarter last year, and represents lower interest paid on the Company’s credit facility.

13

As a result of the above, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $345,000, or 41.4%, to $489,000, versus a net income of $834,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Costs and Expenses

Total costs and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below:

	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30,
(amounts in thousands)	2010		2009		Variance $			Variance %
Cost of revenues	$	4,395	$	4,560	$	(165	)	-3.6	%
Depreciation and amortization	474		536		(62		)	-11.6	%
Selling, general and administrative	2,513		2,634		(121		)	-4.6	%
Total operating costs and expenses	$	7,382	$	7,730	$	(348	)	-4.5	%

Cost of revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $165,000, or 3.6%, primarily due to lower volume-driven gaming taxes and payroll.  The complimentary food and beverage, cigarettes and cigars, and hotel accommodations costs were recognized in the gaming departmental expenses, which totaled approximately $631,000 or 8.0% of gaming revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $582,000 or 7.0% of gaming revenues for the comparable quarter last year.  General gifts and giveaways, excluding personal gifts, represented $108,000 or 1.4% of gaming revenues, versus $79,000 or 0.9% of gaming revenues in the same quarter of 2009.  These expenses were also recognized in the gaming departmental expenses and generally reflected the heightened focus of the Company on customer retention due to increasing competition.

The personal gifts, which are booked in the Marketing Department, totaled approximately $32,000 for the second quarter in 2010, compared with $13,000 for the same quarter in 2009.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $62,000, or 11.6%, partly due to the presence of fully depreciated assets.

Selling, general and administrative costs decreased by $121,000, or 4.6%, due largely to reduced repairs and maintenance costs and lower property insurance.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2010			2009			Variance $			Variance %
Total revenues	$	16,660		$	16,557		$	103		0.6	%
Total operating costs and expenses	15,550			14,715			835			5.7	%
Income from operations	1,110			1,842			(732		)	-39.7	%
Other expense	(334		)	(355		)	21			-5.9	%
Net Income	$	776		$	1,487		$	(711	)	-47.8	%
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.09		$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.09		$	0.17

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our total revenues rose $103,000, or 0.6%, to approximately $16.7 million, from approximately $16.6 million for the same period ended June 30, 2009, largely due to a 5.3% increase in slot revenues and 32.0% increase in rooms, spa and F&B revenues, which compensated for the lower live games revenues.

Live game and slot attendances declined 10.5% and 3.8%, respectively, when compared with the same period a year ago, largely due several factors, including the severe snowfalls and dangerous road conditions, which restricted travel for an average of 21 days in the first quarter of 2010 versus an average of 5 days for the comparable quarter last year, and the negative impact of the 2010 FIFA World Cup matches, which served to reduce overall attendance at our casinos.

14

Total revenues were supplemented by the addition of rooms, restaurant, banquet and spa revenues from Hotel Savannah and the Spa.  Combined hotel rooms, restaurant and banquet operations, and spa revenues totaled approximately 4.6% of the Company’s consolidated revenue.

Total operating costs and expenses increased by $835,000 or 5.7%, mainly due to the continuation of a players’ loyalty rewards program that was implemented in the last quarter of 2009, and intended to stimulate casino attendance and incentivize longer playtime.  Also, increased expenditures in promotional activities, gifts and giveaways and complimentary buffets and beverages, as detailed below, were used as a means to combat increasing competition.

As a result of the above costs and other lesser factors, income from operations fell 39.7% or $732,000 from the first six months of 2009.

Other expense was reduced by $21,000, as a result of lower interest rates applicable to our credit facility payments.

Consequently, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $711,000 or 47.8%, versus the same period a year ago.

Costs and Expenses

Total costs and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below:

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(amounts in thousands)	2010		2009		Variance $			Variance %
Cost of revenues	$	9,076	$	8,646	$	430		5.0	%
Depreciation and amortization	985		989		(4		)	-0.4	%
Selling, general and administrative	5,489		5,080		409			8.1	%
Total operating costs and expenses	$	15,550	$	14,715	$	835		5.7	%

Cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by about $430,000, or 5.0%, primarily due to increased player-related amenities.

Complimentary food and beverage, cigarettes and cigars, and hotel accommodations costs were recognized in gaming departmental expenses, which totaled $1.3 million or 8.1% of gaming revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010, versus approximately $1.2 million or 7.1% of gaming revenues for the comparable six-month period in 2009.  General gifts and giveaways, which were also recognized in gaming departmental expenses, but excluding personal gifts, represented $224,000 or 1.4% of gaming revenues for the same six months in 2010, compared with $142,000 or 0.9% of gaming revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

The VIP personal gifts, which are booked in the marketing department (selling, general and administrative costs), totaled approximately $33,000 for the first six months of 2010, versus $41,000 for the same period a year ago.  The reduction was in part a result of the Company’s focus on providing wider player benefits to its general customer base.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $4,000, or 0.4%, resulting from fully depreciated assets.

Selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $409,000 or 8.1% from the same period in 2009, principally due to higher marketing and promotional expenses related to the 2010 Miss Austria Pageant, hosted on March 27, 2010 by Route 59 and Hotel Savannah.  Higher promotional activities in an effort to combat greater competition also contributed to the increase.

Our Facilities:

Each of our casinos offers a restaurant and a full bar, and in the larger units, lounge areas and multiple bars.  All of our casinos operate under the registered ACC brand.

15

Ceska

Ceska Casino, which has a 1920’s Chicago Prohibition Period theme, currently has 15 gaming tables, including eight card tables and seven roulette tables, and 80 video slot machines.

Rozvadov

Rozvadov Casino, which has a South Pacific theme, currently operates eight gaming tables, including four card tables and four roulette tables, and 20 video slot machines.

Route 59

Route 59 Casino, which has a New Orleans in the 1920’s theme, currently includes 25 gaming tables, which consist of 16 card tables and nine roulette tables, and 114 video slot machines.

Route 55

Route 55 Casino, our largest casino, features a Miami Beach in the early 1950’s theme.  The two-story casino offers 23 tables, including 12 card tables, 10 roulette tables, a Slingshot multi-win roulette, and 124 video slot machines.  On the mezzanine level, the casino offers a full-service Italian restaurant, an open buffet area, a VIP lounge, and a VIP gaming room equipped with four gaming tables, which are included in the 23 table count.

Grand Casino Lav

The Grand Casino Lav currently has 18 gaming tables, including six roulette tables, 12 card tables, two of which are in the VIP dedicated area, 60 video slot machines, a mezzanine bar with a panoramic view overlooking the gaming floor, and a full-service nightclub.

Hotel Savannah and the Spa at Hotel Savannah

The hotel, which is connected to our Route 59 casino, features banquet halls for conference meetings and special events as well as a full-service restaurant and bar.  To complement our hotel, we also opened a full-service spa operation, the Spa, in April 2009, which is attached to our hotel. The Spa, which is operated by a independent contractor from which we receive revenue-based fees, features a large indoor pool and offers Ayurvedic massage therapies to all our hotel guests and outside visitors.

Sales and Marketing

We utilize a wide range of media marketing and promotional programs in an effort to secure and enhance our competitive position in the respective markets being served and to differentiate our product from our competitors.  With respect to our Czech casinos, we aggressively target key cities in our media campaigns, most notably Vienna and Linz in Austria, and Regensburg in Germany, as well as the areas surrounding these cities, all of which are within driving distance of our casinos.

For our Croatian operating unit, our marketing programs target hotel guests, as well as guests in surrounding hotels.  In addition, marketing efforts are focused on Split, the second largest city in Croatia, which is approximately five miles from the casino, as well as certain key foreign markets, such as Italy and other neighboring countries.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of June 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $4.1 million, a reduction of approximately $1.3 million compared to a working capital deficit of approximately $5.4 million at December 31, 2009.  This decrease was primarily due to the positive cash flow generated by operations, short term nature of note receivables from the owners of the Grand Casino Lav, which represent a one year-equivalent of principal due on the replacement loan and to a reduction in Czech tax payable.  On July 8, 2010, we satisfactorily retired, pursuant to the terms of the Replacement Notes, the Company’s unsecured promissory notes aggregating a principal balance of $1.55 million which had matured on June 26, 2010, along with a total payment of $295,000 in associated deferred and accrued interest.  In April 2010, we opted to utilize a

16

payment schedule, ending September 2010, as permitted by the Czech Ministry of Finance to remit our 2009 gaming tax obligations of CZK 31 million, or about $1.5 million.  The schedule of 2010 payments is as follows: (i) CZK 16 million, or approximately $800,000 on April 12th, which has been paid; and (ii) CZK 5.0 million, or approximately $250,000, due in three individual installments on July 25th, which has been paid, August 25th, and September 25th.  As of June 30, 2010, we had fully drawn down our full revolving credit facility of CZK 40 million, or approximately $1.9 million.  We were in full compliance with all of the credit facility’s financial covenants at June 30, 2010.

In December 2009, we agreed to a proposal from the owners of Grand Casino Lav to consolidate the owners’ three outstanding loans, which had been extended to them in connection with the Company’s securing of a 10-year casino management contract in 2007, plus accrued interest and penalties into a single, 3-year, 3.55% per annum interest, term loan (the “Replacement Loan”), to be effective January 1, 2010, excluding accrued management fees.  The Replacement Loan principal amount is approximately EUR 875,000, or $1.1 million.  Monthly payments for the Replacement Loan commenced May 31, 2010 (after a four-month, interest-free grace period).  In addition to liens on gaming equipment, the Replacement Loan is secured by nine legally-binding receivable notes, which can be presented at any time upon default of the Replacement Loan to the owners’ bank for the satisfaction of the Replacement Loan.  In the event of a sale of the business, the Replacement Loan would be transferred to the new owner.  We believe the loan is fully collectible.

The Company’s management believes that our cash resources at June 30, 2010, in addition to the anticipated cash to be provided by existing operations, will be sufficient to satisfy our accounts payable and other current obligations and fund our operating activities for the next twelve months.  However, should cash from operations be insufficient to cover the above objectives, we may seek to raise additional capital in order to fund our current liabilities, operations and growth strategies.  There is no guarantee that such funds will be available to TWC at favorable terms or at all, in which case we may decide to reduce our operations and/or our development plans.

We are obligated under various contractual commitments over the next five years.  We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.  The following is a five-year summary of our commitments as of June 30, 2010:

(in thousands)			Less than						More than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years
Long-term, unsecured debt, U.S.	$	1,550	$	1,550	$	—	$	—	$	—
Long-term, unsecured debt, foreign	1,166				1,166
Long-term, secured debt, foreign	7,040		1,764		5,276
Operating and capital leases	676		153		278		211		34
Employment agreements	225		225
Total contractual obligations	$	10,657	$	3,692	$	6,720	$	211	$	34

On July 8, 2010, we satisfactorily retired our U.S. long-term, unsecured debt, the Replacement Notes.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS

We intend to continue to develop and implement marketing and operational strategies that are designed to increase attendance and revenues at our existing locations in the Czech Republic, while striving to minimize costs, through cost-sharing alliances with non-competing businesses such as food and beverage vendors, where advantageous.  We endeavor to find synergy of operations between our Route 59 Casino and our newest operating unit, Hotel Savannah to enhance revenues, while reducing operational redundancies.  In cooperation with the adjacent hotel operation, we also plan to employ these strategies at the Grand Casino Lav, while building a solid customer base from the local and regional markets.  Further, we expect to place additional focus on developing marketing initiatives that specifically target the significant summer tourist market in that region.

Long Range Objective

Our operations are primarily in the gaming industry and we have recently entered the hotel business.  Consequently, our senior corporate management, several of whom have extensive experience in the hotel industry, are exploring ways to further expand the Company’s operations through the acquisition and/or development of new, complementary non-gaming business units, such as hotels, while continuing to grow the Company’s existing operations.

17

In this regard, we have made a first step, with our first internally developed hotel, Hotel Savannah.  We will also seek to manage or lease new business units that complement our existing operations, while acquisitions will be based on evaluations of the potential returns of projects that arise and, for certain projects, the availability of financing.

ITEM 3.                  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The information in this section should be read in conjunction with information related to changes in the exchange rates of foreign currency in Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations — Exchange Rates” above and in “Part II — Other Information, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Changes in foreign exchange rates could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and/or financial condition.

Due to the fact that the Company’s operations are all located overseas, the results of the Company are subject to the impact of fluctuations in certain foreign exchanges rates.  Our operations conduct business exclusively in EURs and CZKs for the Czech units and EURs and Croatian Kunas for the Croatian unit.  Payroll and most payable items are paid in the local currencies, while our revenues are largely and generally received in EURs.  As our primary reporting subsidiary, ACC, is a Czech entity, all revenues and expenses, regardless of sources of origin (e.g. Croatia), are recognized in the Czech currency and translated to USD for reporting purposes.

For the first six months of 2010, the CZK strengthened slightly against the EUR currency, thereby decreasing our revenues as converted to local currency, the CZK, while local costs remained essentially stable. This exchange rate movement resulted in tighter profitability margins for our Czech operations.  Furthermore, as the CZK also depreciated substantially against the USD, the reported consolidated results were negatively affected.

In summary, substantial fluctuations in the value of the CZK versus one or both of these currencies may have an adverse effect on our revenues and expenses, which will negatively impact our reported consolidated US results.  We do not currently hedge our exposure to fluctuations of these foreign currencies.

Interest Rate Risk

We maintain a loan facility and credit line (“credit facility”) from Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, pobočka Praha (“Commerzbank”). The credit facility is provided in two tranches: a 4- year term loan of CZK 125 million (or approximately $5.9 million at the June 30, 2010 exchange rate), with quarterly interest based on the three-month Prague Interbank Offered Rate (“PRIBOR”) plus 500 basis points, and a renewable two-year revolving credit line of CZK 40 million (or approximately $1.9 million at the same exchange rate) with interest based on, depending on each draw request, the one, two, three or six- month PRIBOR plus 400 basis points, with the Company’s option to renew the term for one-year. The revolving credit line will be reduced to CZK 35 million (or approximately $1.7 million at the same exchange rate) after 12 months from the signing date. The credit line was fully drawn down at June 30, 2010. The credit facility includes financial covenants, security and requirements, which notably include: (i) a mandatory annual prepayment that requires that 25% of the borrower’s excess cash above a certain annually-escalating bank balance at the end of each fiscal year be applied toward the term loan’s principal balance; (ii) the pledge of the Route 59 and Route 55 casinos and other guarantees as security; and (iii) the term loan to be repaid quarterly in equal principal installments, with the applicable interest based on the three-month PRIBOR rate plus the said basis points. The renewable credit line matures on November 11, 2011 and the term loan matures on November 4, 2013.

Because this credit facility bears interest at variable rates of interest which could change monthly, the Company bears the risk and the exposure to the possibility that the interest rates on the credit facility will increase, perhaps substantially, over the term of the credit facility. If interest rates on the credit facility increase, because of an increase in the PRIBOR, our debt service obligations on the credit facility will increase even though the principal amount of our borrowings remain the same or even decrease, which would result in a decrease of our net income. We do not hedge our interest rate risk.

ITEM 4.                  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), which is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act, is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Mr. Ramadan, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, Mr. Ramadan concluded that, as of the date of such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting him to information relating to the Company that is required to be included in our reports filed under the Exchange Act.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the first six months of 2010, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met.  In addition, the design of any

18

control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.  Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer, Mr. Ramadan, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

·Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

·Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The scope of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting includes all of our Company’s consolidated subsidiaries.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. In making this assessment, our management considered the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework.” Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of June 30, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was operating effectively.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.                  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are often subject to various contingencies, the resolutions of which, our management believes will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.  We were not involved in any material litigation during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, or through the date of this filing.

ITEM 1A.               RISK FACTORS

Other than the two risk factors discussed above in “Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” there have been no addition of risk factors from the information provided in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The risk factors highlighted in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 are not the only risks our Company is facing.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial at this time also may materially adversely impact our business, financial condition and operational results in the future.

19

ITEM 5.                  OTHER INFORMATION

The Company held its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 25, 2010 at the law offices of Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick LLP, 734 15th Street, NW, 11th Floor, Washington D.C. 20005.  There were a total of 8,871,640 shares of common stock of the Company which could be voted and 6,111,186 shares were represented at the meeting by the holders thereof in person and by proxy, which constituted a quorum.  The votes were as follows:

1.Election of Directors, for One-year Term expiring in 2011:

	For	Withheld	Not Voted
Geoffrey B. Baker	5,674,198	3,550	433,438
Timothy G. Ewing	5,675,318	2,430	433,438
Julio E. Heurtematte, Jr.	5,675,318	2,430	433,438
Rami S. Ramadan	5,675,318	2,430	433,438
Malcolm M.B. Sterrett	5,675,318	2,430	433,438

2.Ratification of the appointment of Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C. as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010:

For	Against	Abstain
6,108,579	607	2,000

As a result of such voting, all matters presented to the stockholders at the Annual Meeting were approved by the requisite vote.

ITEM 6.                  EXHIBITS

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index hereinafter contained.

20

TRANS WORLD CORPORATION
EXHIBIT INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

Item No	Item	Method of Filing
3.1(a)	Articles of Incorporation	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in the registration statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-85446-A).
3.1(b)	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 0-25244)
3.1 (c)	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 0-25244)
3.2	Bylaws	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 contained in the registration statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-85446-A).
4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 contained in the registration statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-85446-A).
4.2	Indenture dated March 31, 1998, as supplemented on October 29, 1998.  October 15, 1999 and September 10, 2001, among the registrant, TWC International U.S. Corporation, TWC Finance Corp. and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(1) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No.0-25244).
4.3	Indenture dated March 31, 1998, as supplemented on October 29, 1998, October 15, 1999 and September 10, 2001, between TWC International U.S. Corporation and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(III) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No. 0-25244).
4.4	Series A Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 31, 1998	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(VI) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No. 0-25244)
4.5	Series B Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 31, 1998	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(VII) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No. 0-25244)
4.6	Series C Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 31, 1998	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(II) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No. 0-25244)
4.7	Series G Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 31, 1999	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 contained in the Form 10-KSB filed on May 30, 2000 (File No. 0-25244)

21

4.8	Agreement to Amend Warrants dated March 31, 1998 among the Company and the named Holders	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(VIII) contained in the Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998 (File No. 0-25244)
10.1	1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 contained in the registration statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-85446-A).
10.2	Loan Agreement dated June 11, 1997 between the Company and Value Partners	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 contained in the Form 8-K filed on June 17, 1997 (File No. 0-25244)
10.3	Loan Agreement dated October 27, 1997, between Value Partners, and the Company	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1997, filed on November 12, 1997 (File No. 0-25244)
10.4	Employment Agreement between the Company and Rami S. Ramadan dated July 12, 1999	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 contained in the Form 8-K filed on July 13, 1999 (File No. 0-25244)
10.5	Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Rami S. Ramadan dated July 1, 2002	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.6	1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 contained in the Form 10-KSB filed on May 26, 2000 (File No. 0-25244)
10.7	1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 contained in the Form 10-KSB filed on May 26, 2000 (File No. 0-25244)
10.8	Form 12% Secured Senior Note due March 2005	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 contained in the Form 10-KSB filed on May 26, 2000 (File No. 0-25244)
10.9	English Restatement of the Spanish Agreement of Sale of Casino de Zaragoza	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 contained in the Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2002 (File No. 0-22544)
10.10	Form of Fourth Supplemental Trust Indenture by and among Trans World Corporation, TWG International U.S. Corp., TWG Finance Corp. and the Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. (as Trustee)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.11	Waiver and Forbearance of Covenant Violations (Interest) — Primary Indenture	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.12	Waiver and Forbearance of Covenant Violations (Interest) — Finance Indenture	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)

22

10.13	Indemnification Agreement by and between Value Partners, Ltd., Trans World Corporation and TWG International U.S. Corporation dated February 12, 2003	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.14	Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization dated June 25, 2003 between the Company and the named Holders	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.15	Form of  8% Rate Promissory Note due 2006	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.16	Form of Variable Rate Promissory Note due 2010	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4  (File No. 333-101028)
10.17	2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended	Incorporated by reference to Appendix E contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting, and from the discussion contained at page 12-14 of the proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, at page 14-15 of the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting, at page 14-15 of the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting, and at page 15 of the Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting (File No. 0-25244)
10.18	Renewal and Amendment of Employment Agreement between the Company and Rami S. Ramadan, Effective as of July 1, 2005	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 contained in the Form 10-KSB filed on March 17, 2006 (File No. 0-25244)
31.0	Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer	Filed herewith
32.0	Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer	Filed herewith

23

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	TRANS WORLD CORPORATION
Date:    August 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Rami S. Ramadan
		President, Chief Executive Officer and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

24

EX-31.0

EXHIBIT 31.0

RULE 13a-14a/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Rami S. Ramadan, the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of Trans World Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trans World Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this quarterly report any material changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s second fiscal quarter in the case of this quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   August 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Rami S. Ramadan
		Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer

1

EX-32.0

Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of Trans World Corporation (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: August 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Rami S. Ramadan
		Rami S. Ramadan
		President, Chief Executive Officer, and
		Chief Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Trans World Corporation and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1