10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2010

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission file number 1-5111

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio	34-0538550
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)

One Strawberry Lane
Orrville, Ohio	44667-0280
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (330) 682-3000

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller Reporting Company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The Company had 119,055,837 common shares outstanding on November 30, 2010.

The Exhibit Index is located at Page No. 32.

1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales	$	1,278,913		$	1,278,745		$	2,326,225		$	2,330,271
Cost of products sold		772,171			786,495			1,401,595			1,431,992
Cost of products sold — restructuring		12,072			0			21,525			0
Gross Profit		494,670			492,250			903,105			898,279
Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses		222,821			232,985			426,082			434,162
Amortization		18,501			18,312			36,998			36,689
Merger and integration costs		2,773			8,148			5,429			24,624
Other restructuring costs		8,345			0			26,449			0
Other operating expense — net		2,194			1,599			2,944			2,764
Operating Income		240,036			231,206			405,203			400,040
Interest income		572			686			1,005			2,057
Interest expense		(18,505	)		(17,473	)		(35,044	)		(36,424	)
Other (expense) income — net		(376	)		583			317			563
Income Before Income Taxes		221,727			215,002			371,481			366,236
Income taxes		72,001			75,012			118,874			128,183
Net Income	$	149,726		$	139,990		$	252,607		$	238,053
Earnings per common share:
Net Income	$	1.25		$	1.18		$	2.12		$	2.00
Net Income — Assuming Dilution	$	1.25		$	1.18		$	2.11		$	2.00
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.40		$	0.35		$	0.80		$	0.70

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

	October 31, 2010			April 30, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	487,463		$	283,570
Marketable securities		48,086			0
Trade receivables, less allowances		415,826			238,867
Inventories:
Finished products		518,809			413,269
Raw materials		303,805			241,670
		822,614			654,939
Prepaid income taxes		32,028			1,663
Other current assets		48,169			44,591
Total Current Assets		1,854,186			1,223,630
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Land and land improvements		63,532			62,982
Buildings and fixtures		312,069			308,358
Machinery and equipment		1,019,695			997,374
Construction in progress		57,960			31,426
		1,453,256			1,400,140
Accumulated depreciation		(612,161	)		(541,827	)
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment		841,095			858,313
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill		2,807,418			2,807,730
Other intangible assets, net		2,989,374			3,026,515
Other noncurrent assets		61,277			58,665
Total Other Noncurrent Assets		5,858,069			5,892,910
	$	8,553,350		$	7,974,853
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	194,194		$	179,509
Accrued trade marketing and merchandising		113,890			52,536
Income taxes payable		0			75,977
Current portion of long-term debt		0			10,000
Other current liabilities		168,835			160,875
Total Current Liabilities		476,919			478,897
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Long-term debt		1,300,000			900,000
Deferred income taxes		1,103,991			1,101,506
Other noncurrent liabilities		168,431			168,130
Total Noncurrent Liabilities		2,572,422			2,169,636
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common shares		29,882			29,780
Additional capital		4,592,720			4,575,127
Retained income		902,528			746,063
Amount due from ESOP Trust		(3,334	)		(4,069	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(17,787	)		(20,581	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		5,504,009			5,326,320
	$	8,553,350		$	7,974,853

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	252,607		$	238,053
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		56,646			51,148
Depreciation — restructuring		21,440			0
Amortization		36,998			36,689
Share-based compensation expense		12,268			13,098
Other noncash restructuring charges		5,367			0
Loss on sale of assets — net		1,027			1,621
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect from businesses acquired:
Trade receivables		(177,018	)		(142,686	)
Inventories		(167,945	)		(150,828	)
Accounts payable and accrued items		95,208			91,112
Defined benefit pension contributions		(12,312	)		(723	)
Income taxes		(105,166	)		25,693
Other — net		426			24,635
Net cash provided by operating activities		19,546			187,812
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property, plant, and equipment		(62,073	)		(89,433	)
Sale and maturities of marketable securities		9,000			13,519
Purchases of marketable securities		(57,037	)		0
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment		339			0
Other — net		11			(818	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(109,760	)		(76,732	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayments of long-term debt		(10,000	)		(75,000	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		400,000			0
Dividends paid		(95,333	)		(82,993	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(5,147	)		(5,225	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		2,100			1,672
Other — net		2,476			286
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		294,096			(161,260	)
Effect of exchange rate changes		11			3,195
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		203,893			(46,985	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		283,570			456,693
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	487,463		$	409,708

( ) Denotes use of cash

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Note A — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year classifications.

Note B — Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”), which requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of different levels of the fair value hierarchy and a higher level of disaggregation for different types of financial instruments. These disclosure requirements were effective in the current fiscal year for the Company. In addition, for the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, ASU 2010-06 requires information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements to be presented separately. These disclosure requirements will be effective in fiscal 2012 for the Company.

Note C — Restructuring

During fiscal 2010, the Company announced its plan to restructure certain operations as part of its ongoing efforts to enhance the long-term strength and profitability of its leading brands. The initiative is a long-term investment to optimize production capacity and lower the overall cost structure and includes capital investments for a new state-of-the-art food manufacturing facility in Orrville, Ohio, and consolidation of coffee production in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Company expects to incur restructuring costs of approximately $190.0 million related to this plan.

Subsequently, on September 27, 2010, the Company expanded its restructuring plan and committed to an initiative to improve the overall cost structure in its Canadian pickle and condiments operations by transitioning production to third-party manufacturers in the U.S. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs of approximately $45.0 million related to this initiative, consisting primarily of long-lived asset charges of $28.0 million and employee separation costs of $13.0 million.

Upon completion, the restructuring will result in a reduction of approximately 850 full-time positions and the closing of six of the Company’s facilities — Memphis, Tennessee; Ste. Marie, Quebec; Sherman, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Dunnville, Ontario; and Delhi Township, Ontario.

The Company expects to incur total restructuring costs of approximately $235.0 million, of which $53.7 million has been incurred through October 31, 2010. The balance of the costs is anticipated to be incurred over the next four fiscal years as the facilities are closed.

5

The following table summarizes the restructuring activity, including the reserves established and the total amount expected to be incurred.

							Site Preparation
	Long-Lived			Employee			and Equipment			Production
	Asset Charges			Separation			Relocation			Start-up			Other Costs			Total
Total expected restructuring charge	$	118,000		$	60,000		$	23,500		$	23,000		$	10,500		$	235,000
Balance at May 1, 2009	$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0
Fourth quarter charge to expense		3,870			1,139			407			16			279			5,711
Cash payments		0			(50	)		(407	)		(16	)		(279	)		(752	)
Noncash utilization		(3,870	)		0			0			0			0			(3,870	)
Balance at April 30, 2010	$	0		$	1,089		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	1,089
First quarter charge to expense		9,453			16,748			1,268			61			27			27,557
Second quarter charge to expense		11,987			5,363			2,228			684			155			20,417
Cash payments		0			(10,711	)		(3,496	)		(745	)		(182	)		(15,134	)
Noncash utilization		(21,440	)		(5,367	)		0			0			0			(26,807	)
Balance at October 31, 2010	$	0		$	7,122		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	7,122
Remaining expected restructuring charge	$	92,690		$	36,750		$	19,597		$	22,239		$	10,039		$	181,315

Approximately $12,072 of the total restructuring charges of $20,417 in the three months ended October 31, 2010, and $21,525 of the total restructuring charges of $47,974 in the six months ended October 31, 2010, were reported in cost of products sold in the accompanying Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income, while the remaining charges were reported in other restructuring costs. The restructuring costs classified as cost of products sold include primarily long-lived asset charges. Long-lived asset charges consist entirely of accelerated depreciation related to property, plant, and equipment that will be used at the affected production facilities until the facilities close or are sold.

Expected employee separation costs include severance, retention bonuses, and pension costs. Severance costs and retention bonuses are being recognized over the estimated future service period of the affected employees. The obligation related to employee separation costs is included in other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For information on the impact of the restructuring plan on defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, see Note I — Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.

Other costs include professional fees, costs related to closing the facilities, and miscellaneous expenditures associated with the Company’s restructuring initiative and are expensed as incurred.

Note D — Share-Based Payments

The Company provides for equity-based incentives to be awarded to key employees and nonemployee directors. These incentives are administered through various plans, and currently consist of restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred shares, deferred stock units, performance units, and stock options.

The following table summarizes amounts related to share-based payments.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	October 31,				October 31,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Compensation expense included in selling, distribution, and adminstrative expenses	$	5,968	$	5,268	$	10,308	$	9,821
Compensation expense included in merger and integration costs		973		1,418		1,960		3,277
Compensation expense included in other restructuring costs		109		0		174		0
Total compensation expense	$	7,050	$	6,686	$	12,442	$	13,098
Related income tax benefit	$	2,293	$	2,330	$	3,981	$	4,584

6

As of October 31, 2010, total compensation cost related to nonvested share-based awards not yet recognized was approximately $41,962. The weighted-average period over which this amount is expected to be recognized is approximately 3.1 years.

Note E — Common Shares

The following table sets forth common share information.

	October 31, 2010		April 30, 2010
Common shares authorized		150,000,000		150,000,000
Common shares outstanding		119,529,429		119,119,152
Treasury shares		9,074,736		9,485,013

Note F — Reportable Segments

The Company operates in one industry: the manufacturing and marketing of food products. The Company has four reportable segments: U.S. Retail Coffee Market, U.S. Retail Consumer Market, U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market, and Special Markets. The U.S. Retail Coffee Market segment represents the domestic sales of Folgers®, Dunkin’ Donuts®, and Millstone® branded coffee to retail customers; the U.S. Retail Consumer Market segment primarily includes domestic sales of Smucker’s®, Jif®, and Hungry Jack® branded products; the U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment includes domestic sales of Crisco®, Pillsbury®, Eagle Brand®, and Martha White® branded products; and the Special Markets segment is comprised of the Canada, foodservice, natural foods, and international strategic business areas. Special Markets segment products are distributed domestically and in foreign countries through retail channels, foodservice distributors and operators (e.g., restaurants, schools and universities, health care operations), and health and natural foods stores and distributors.

While the Company’s four reportable segments remain the same for 2011, the calculation of segment profit has been modified to include intangible asset amortization and impairment charges related to segment assets, along with certain other items in each of the segments. These items were previously considered corporate expenses and were not allocated to the segments. This change more accurately aligns the segment financial results with the responsibilities of segment management, most notably in the area of intangible assets. Fiscal 2010 segment profit has been presented to be consistent with the current methodology.

7

The following table sets forth reportable segment information.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net sales:
U.S. Retail Coffee Market	$	477,287		$	445,102		$	870,857		$	811,331
U.S. Retail Consumer Market		272,564			290,090			551,839			581,092
U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market		279,523			303,896			453,394			498,312
Special Markets		249,539			239,657			450,135			439,536
Total net sales	$	1,278,913		$	1,278,745		$	2,326,225		$	2,330,271
Segment profit:
U.S. Retail Coffee Market	$	149,099		$	131,850		$	260,981		$	243,017
U.S. Retail Consumer Market		74,287			70,512			145,704			136,635
U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market		40,854			45,398			63,441			71,078
Special Markets		49,406			40,003			84,278			66,697
Total segment profit	$	313,646		$	287,763		$	554,404		$	517,427
Interest income		572			686			1,005			2,057
Interest expense		(18,505	)		(17,473	)		(35,044	)		(36,424	)
Share-based compensation expense		(5,968	)		(5,268	)		(10,308	)		(9,821	)
Merger and integration costs		(2,773	)		(8,148	)		(5,429	)		(24,624	)
Cost of products sold — restructuring		(12,072	)		0			(21,525	)		0
Other restructuring costs		(8,345	)		0			(26,449	)		0
Corporate administrative expenses		(44,452	)		(43,141	)		(85,490	)		(82,942	)
Other (expense) income — net		(376	)		583			317			563
Income before income taxes	$	221,727		$	215,002		$	371,481		$	366,236

Note G — Debt and Financing Arrangements

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	October 31, 2010		April 30, 2010
7.94% Series C Senior Notes due September 1, 2010	$	0	$	10,000
4.78% Senior Notes due June 1, 2014		100,000		100,000
6.12% Senior Notes due November 1, 2015		24,000		24,000
6.63% Senior Notes due November 1, 2018		376,000		376,000
5.55% Senior Notes due April 1, 2022		400,000		400,000
4.50% Senior Notes due June 1, 2025		400,000		0
Total long-term debt	$	1,300,000	$	910,000
Current portion of long-term debt		0		10,000
Total long-term debt less current portion	$	1,300,000	$	900,000

On June 15, 2010, the Company issued $400.0 million of 4.50 percent Senior Notes with a final maturity on June 1, 2025. The Senior Notes have a 12-year average maturity. Proceeds from the Senior Notes issuance will be used for general corporate purposes. On September 1, 2010, the Company repaid the $10.0 million of 7.94 percent Series C Senior Notes utilizing cash on hand.

All of the Company’s Senior Notes are unsecured and interest is paid semiannually. Scheduled payments are required on the 5.55 percent Senior Notes, the first of which is $50.0 million on April 1, 2013, and on the 4.50 percent Senior Notes, the first of which is $100.0 million on June 1, 2020.

The Company has available an unsecured $400.0 million revolving credit facility with a group of five banks maturing on October 29, 2012. The Company’s $180.0 million revolving credit facility with a group of three

8

banks expires on January 31, 2011 and is not expected to be extended. Interest on the revolving credit facilities is based on prevailing U.S. Prime, Canadian Base Rate, London Interbank Offered Rate, or Canadian Dealer Offered Rate, as determined by the Company, and is payable either on a quarterly basis or at the end of the borrowing term. At October 31, 2010, the Company did not have a balance outstanding under either revolving credit facility.

The Company’s debt instruments contain certain financial covenant restrictions including consolidated net worth, leverage ratios, and an interest coverage ratio. The Company is in compliance with all covenants.

Note H — Earnings per Share

The following tables set forth the computation of net income per common share and net income per common share — assuming dilution.

	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Computation of net income per share:
Net income	$	149,726	$	139,990	$	252,607	$	238,053
Net income allocated to participating securities		1,501		1,257		2,478		2,082
Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	148,225	$	138,733	$	250,129	$	235,971
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		118,313,698		117,887,960		118,235,258		117,771,445
Net income per common share	$	1.25	$	1.18	$	2.12	$	2.00

	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Computation of net income per share — assuming dilution:
Net income	$	149,726	$	139,990	$	252,607	$	238,053
Net income allocated to participating securities		1,500		1,256		2,476		2,080
Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	148,226	$	138,734	$	250,131	$	235,973
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		118,313,698		117,887,960		118,235,258		117,771,445
Dilutive effect of stock options		130,397		144,249		134,980		112,920
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — assuming dilution		118,444,095		118,032,209		118,370,238		117,884,365
Net income per common share — assuming dilution	$	1.25	$	1.18	$	2.11	$	2.00

The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share disclosures to the total weighted-average shares outstanding.

	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		118,313,698		117,887,960		118,235,258		117,771,445
Weighted-average participating shares outstanding		1,198,303		1,068,221		1,171,207		1,038,972
Total weighted-average shares outstanding		119,512,001		118,956,181		119,406,465		118,810,417
Dilutive effect of stock options		130,397		144,249		134,980		112,920
Total weighted-average shares outstanding — assuming dilution		119,642,398		119,100,430		119,541,445		118,923,337

9

Note I — Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits

The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are shown below.

	Three Months Ended October 31,
	Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Other Postretirement Benefits
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	1,861		$	1,423		$	405		$	494
Interest cost		6,360			6,167			691			651
Expected return on plan assets		(6,674	)		(5,718	)		0			0
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)		2,198			1,574			(134	)		(260	)
Termination benefit cost		735			0			0			0
Curtailment		181			0			0			0
Other		289			310			(122	)		(122	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	4,950		$	3,756		$	840		$	763

	Six Months Ended October 31,
	Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Other Postretirement Benefits
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	3,719		$	2,833		$	810		$	988
Interest cost		12,706			12,264			1,381			1,294
Expected return on plan assets		(13,331	)		(11,359	)		0			0
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)		3,925			3,121			(268	)		(521	)
Termination benefit cost		8,197			0			2,413			0
Curtailment		4,091			0			0			0
Other		577			617			(244	)		(244	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	19,884		$	7,476		$	4,092		$	1,517

Upon completion of the restructuring plan discussed in Note C — Restructuring, approximately 850 full-time positions will be reduced. The Company has included the estimated impact of the planned reductions in measuring the net periodic benefit cost of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As a result, charges for termination benefits and curtailment were recognized for the three and six months ended October 31, 2010.

10

Note J — Comprehensive Income

The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income	$	149,726		$	139,990		$	252,607		$	238,053
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		2,542			(2,083	)		(1,066	)		23,668
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities		1,361			2,195			(36	)		2,760
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedging derivatives		(2,226	)		(626	)		6,742			(870	)
Unrealized loss on pension and other postretirement liabilities		0			0			(300	)		0
Income tax benefit (expense)		317			(568	)		(2,546	)		(666	)
Comprehensive income	$	151,720		$	138,908		$	255,401		$	262,945

Note K — Commitments and Contingencies

The Company, like other food manufacturers, is from time to time subject to various administrative, regulatory, and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is a defendant in a variety of legal proceedings, some of which involve claims for damages in unspecified amounts. The Company cannot predict with certainty the results of these proceedings or reasonably determine a range of potential loss. The Company’s policy is to accrue costs for contingent liabilities when such liabilities are probable and amounts can be reasonably estimated. Based on information known to date, the Company does not believe the final outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note L — Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to market risks, such as changes in commodity pricing and foreign currency exchange rates. To manage the volatility relating to these exposures, the Company enters into various derivative transactions. By policy, the Company historically has not entered into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes or for speculation.

Commodity Price Management. The Company enters into commodity futures and options contracts to manage the price volatility and reduce the variability of future cash flows related to anticipated inventory purchases of green coffee, edible oils, flour, milk, corn, and corn sweetener. The Company also enters into commodity futures and options to manage price risk for energy input costs, including natural gas and diesel fuel. The derivative instruments generally have maturities of less than one year.

Certain of the derivative instruments associated with the Company’s U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market and U.S. Retail Coffee Market segments meet the hedge criteria according to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The mark-to-market gains or losses on qualifying hedges are deferred and included as a component of other comprehensive income to the extent effective, and reclassified to cost of products sold in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. In order to qualify as a hedge of commodity price risk, it must be demonstrated that the changes in the fair value of the commodity’s futures contracts are highly effective in hedging price risks associated with the commodity purchased. Hedge effectiveness is assessed at inception and on a monthly basis.

The mark-to-market gains or losses on nonqualifying and ineffective portions of commodity hedges are recognized in cost of products sold immediately.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Hedging. The Company utilizes foreign currency forwards and options contracts to manage the effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations on future cash payments primarily related to purchases of certain raw materials, finished goods, and fixed assets. The contracts generally have

11

maturities of less than one year. At the inception of the contract, the derivative is evaluated and documented for hedge accounting treatment. If the contract qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, to the extent the hedge is deemed effective, the associated mark-to-market gains and losses are deferred and included as a component of other comprehensive income. These gains or losses are reclassified to earnings in the period the contract is executed. The ineffective portion of these contracts is immediately recognized in earnings. Instruments currently used to manage foreign currency exchange exposures do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment and the change in value of these instruments is immediately recognized in cost of products sold.

The following table sets forth the fair value of derivative instruments recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	October 31, 2010				April 30, 2010
	Other		Other		Other		Other
	Current Assets		Current Liabilities		Current Assets		Current Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	$	4,967	$	0	$	1,874	$	9
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	$	8,235	$	8,075	$	2,414	$	599
Foreign currency exchange contracts		0		383		0		830
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	$	8,235	$	8,458	$	2,414	$	1,429
Total derivative instruments	$	13,202	$	8,458	$	4,288	$	1,438

The Company has elected to not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments and its cash margin accounts executed with the same counterparty. The Company maintained cash margin accounts of $11,872 and $5,714 at October 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010, respectively, that are included in other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table presents information on gains recognized on derivatives designated as cash flow hedging relationships, all of which hedge commodity price risk.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Gains recognized in other comprehensive income (effective portion)	$	4,103		$	193		$	13,034	$	925
Gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to cost of products sold (effective portion)		6,329			819		$	6,292		1,795
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(2,226	)	$	(626	)	$	6,742	$	(870	)
Gains recognized in cost of products sold (ineffective portion)	$	203		$	560		$	374	$	603

Included as a component in accumulated other comprehensive loss at October 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010, were deferred pre-tax gains of $9,870 and $3,128, respectively. The related tax impact recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $3,585 and $1,134 at October 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010, respectively. The entire amount of the deferred gain included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at October 31, 2010, is expected to be recognized in earnings within one year as the related commodity is sold.

The following table presents the realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in cost of products sold on derivatives not designated as qualified hedging instruments.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Gains (losses) on commodity contracts	$	454		$	(2,226	)	$	4,847	$	(2,830	)
(Losses) gains on foreign currency exchange contracts		(207	)		25			270		(5,493	)
Total	$	247		$	(2,201	)	$	5,117	$	(8,323	)

12

The following table presents the gross contract notional value of outstanding derivative contracts at October 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010.

	October 31, 2010		April 30, 2010
Commodity contracts	$	524,580	$	323,351
Foreign currency exchange contracts		53,215		45,295

Note M — Other Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Financial instruments, other than derivatives, that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of marketable securities and trade receivables. The Company’s marketable securities are in debt securities. Under the Company’s investment policy, it may invest in securities deemed to be investment grade at the time of purchase. The Company determines the appropriate categorization of debt securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation at each balance sheet date.

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, other than certain of its fixed-rate long-term debt, approximates their carrying amounts. The following table provides information on the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.

	October 31, 2010				April 30, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Marketable securities	$	48,086	$	48,086	$	0	$	0
Other investments and securities		38,634		38,634		34,895		34,895
Derivatives financial instruments, net		4,744		4,744		2,850		2,850
Fixed-rate long-term debt		1,300,000		1,692,864		910,000		1,172,467

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions.

The following table is a summary of the fair values of the Company’s financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Quoted Prices in			Significant		Significant
	Active Markets for			Observable		Unobservable		Fair Value at
	Identical Assets			Inputs		Inputs		October 31,			Fair Value at
	(Level 1)			(Level 2)		(Level 3)		2010			April 30, 2010
Marketable securities (A)	$	0		$	48,086	$	0	$	48,086		$	0
Other investments: (B)
Equity mutual funds		13,392			0		0		13,392			11,626
Municipal obligations		0			17,984		0		17,984			16,753
Other investments		1,078			6,180		0		7,258			6,516
Derivatives: (C)
Commodity contracts, net		5,127			0		0		5,127			3,680
Foreign currency exchange contracts		(383	)		0		0		(383	)		(830	)
Total	$	19,214		$	72,250	$	0	$	91,464		$	37,745

^(A) The Company’s marketable securities consist of commercial paper valued by a third party using an evaluated pricing methodology.

13

(B)	The Company’s other investments consist of funds maintained for the payment of benefits associated with nonqualified retirement plans. The funds include equity securities listed in active markets and municipal obligations valued by a third party using an evaluated pricing methodology.
(C)	The Company’s derivatives are valued using quoted market prices. For additional information, see Note L — Derivative Financial Instruments.

Note N — Income Taxes

During the three-month and six-month periods ended October 31, 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate decreased to 32.5 and 32.0 percent, respectively, compared to 34.9 and 35.0 percent in the three-month and six-month periods ended October 31, 2009, reflecting the impact of increased benefits realized from the domestic manufacturing deduction and lower state income taxes. At October 31, 2010, the effective income tax rate varied from the U.S. statutory income tax rate primarily due to the domestic manufacturing deduction offset slightly by state income taxes.

Within the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that the Company could decrease its unrecognized tax benefits by an additional $3.0 million, primarily as a result of expiring statute of limitations periods.

14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This discussion and analysis deals with comparisons of material changes in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month and six-month periods ended October 31, 2010 and 2009.

The Company is the owner of all trademarks, except Pillsbury® is a trademark of The Pillsbury Company LLC, used under license; and Dunkin’ Donuts® is a registered trademark of DD IP Holder LLC, used under license.

Dunkin’ Donuts® brand is licensed to the Company for packaged coffee products sold in retail environments like grocery stores, mass merchandisers, club stores, and drug stores. Information in this document is not applicable to Dunkin’ Donuts® coffee or other products for sale in Dunkin’ Donuts® stores. K-Cup® and K-Cups® are trademarks of Keurig, Incorporated.

Results of Operations

	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Net sales	$	1,278.9		$	1,278.7		$	2,326.2		$	2,330.3
Operating income	$	240.0		$	231.2		$	405.2		$	400.0
% of net sales		18.8	%		18.1	%		17.4	%		17.2	%
Net income:
Net income	$	149.7		$	140.0		$	252.6		$	238.1
Net income per common share — assuming dilution	$	1.25		$	1.18		$	2.11		$	2.00
Operating income before restructuring and merger and integration costs (1)	$	263.2		$	239.4		$	458.6		$	424.7
% of net sales		20.6%			18.7%			19.7%			18.2%
Income before restructuring and merger and integration costs: (2)
Income	$	165.3		$	145.3		$	288.9		$	254.1
Income per common share — assuming dilution	$	1.38		$	1.22		$	2.42		$	2.14
(1) Reconciliation to operating income:
Operating income	$	240.0		$	231.2		$	405.2		$	400.0
Merger and integration costs		2.8			8.1			5.4			24.6
Cost of products sold — restructuring		12.1			—			21.5			—
Other restructuring costs		8.3			—			26.4			—
Operating income before restructuring and merger and integration costs	$	263.2		$	239.4		$	458.6		$	424.7
(2) Reconciliation to net income:
Income before income taxes	$	221.7		$	215.0		$	371.5		$	366.2
Merger and integration costs		2.8			8.1			5.4			24.6
Cost of products sold — restructuring		12.1			—			21.5			—
Other restructuring costs		8.3			—			26.4			—
Income before income taxes, restructuring, and merger and integration costs		244.9			223.2			424.9			390.9
Income taxes		79.6			77.8			136.0			136.8
Income before restructuring and merger and integration costs	$	165.3		$	145.3		$	288.9		$	254.1

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

Net sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2011 were flat compared to the same periods in 2010, as the impact of pricing, sales mix, and exchange rate offset overall volume declines and the impact of potato products divested in March 2010. Operating income increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, as increased restructuring and merger and integration costs (“special project costs”)

15

and overall higher raw material costs were more than offset by the net effect of pricing. Excluding special project costs, operating income increased 10 percent and eight percent for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010.

The Company’s net income per diluted share was $1.25 and $1.18 for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, and $2.11 and $2.00 for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, an increase of six percent in both periods. The Company’s income per diluted share, excluding special project costs, was $1.38 and $1.22 for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, and $2.42 and $2.14 for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, an increase of 13 percent in both periods, as 2011 periods benefited from operating income improvements and the impact of a lower effective tax rate compared to 2010.

Net Sales

	Three Months Ended October 31,												Six Months Ended October 31,
							Increase												Increase
	2010			2009			(Decrease)			%			2010			2009			(Decrease)			%
	(Dollars in millions)
Net sales	$	1,278.9		$	1,278.7		$	0.2			0	%	$	2,326.2		$	2,330.3		$	(4.1	)		(0	%)
Adjust for noncomparable items:
Divestiture		—			(12.1	)		12.1			1	%		—			(22.0	)		22.0			1	%
Foreign currency exchange		(4.9	)		—			(4.9	)		(0	%)		(11.6	)		—			(11.6	)		(1	%)
Net sales without divestiture and foreign currency exchange	$	1,274.0		$	1,266.6		$	7.4			1	%	$	2,314.6		$	2,308.3		$	6.3			0	%

Net sales of $1,278.9 million in the second quarter of 2011 were flat compared to the second quarter of 2010, and increased one percent, excluding the impact of the potato products divestiture and foreign exchange. Overall volume declined four percent, over the same time period, driven by the Company’s U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment brands and Folgers® coffee in the U.S. Retail Coffee Market segment. Volume gains were most significant across the Special Markets segment, while gains were also realized in Dunkin’ Donuts® packaged coffee, Smucker’s® fruit spreads, and Jif® peanut butter. The net impact of pricing contributed approximately three percent to net sales and the overall impact of sales mix was favorable.

Net sales for the first six months of 2011 were flat compared to the first six months of 2010 and the net impact of the potato products divestiture and foreign exchange was not significant. Volume declined four percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010. The net impact of pricing contributed approximately two percent to net sales and the overall impact of sales mix was favorable.

Operating Income

The following table presents components of operating income as a percentage of net sales.

	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Gross profit		38.7	%		38.5	%		38.8	%		38.5	%
Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses:
Marketing		5.8	%		6.9	%		6.2	%		6.8	%
Selling		3.2	%		3.2	%		3.3	%		3.2	%
Distribution		3.2	%		3.2	%		3.3	%		3.3	%
General and administrative		5.2	%		4.9	%		5.5	%		5.3	%
Total selling, distribution, and administrative expenses		17.4	%		18.2	%		18.3	%		18.6	%
Amortization		1.4	%		1.4	%		1.6	%		1.6	%
Other restructuring and merger and integration costs		0.9	%		0.6	%		1.4	%		1.1	%
Other operating expense — net		0.2	%		0.2	%		0.1	%		0.0	%
Operating income		18.8	%		18.1	%		17.4	%		17.2	%

16

Gross profit increased $2.4 million to 38.7 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2011, from 38.5 percent in the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter of 2011 includes the impact of $12.1 million of restructuring charges in cost of products sold and $5.9 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses on derivative contracts. The impact of raw material and manufacturing costs on gross profit was mixed. Green coffee costs were significantly higher in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010. Pricing actions taken earlier in the year, relative to the recognition of higher green coffee costs, contributed to gross profit in the second quarter of 2011. The Company expects to recognize steadily higher green coffee costs during the remainder of the year. Higher costs were also realized for milk, sugar, and soybean oil while lower costs were recognized for peanuts and flour. The second quarter of 2010 had benefited from volume-related plant efficiencies.

Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses decreased four percent for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010, and decreased as a percentage of net sales from 18.2 percent to 17.4 percent. Compared to the second quarter of 2010, that included higher levels of investment spending in brand equity initiatives and new advertising, marketing expenses decreased 15 percent for the second quarter of 2011. A portion of the marketing expense decrease was reallocated to support promotional programs, primarily in the U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment. Selling and distribution expenses in the second quarter of 2011 remained relatively even with 2010. General and administrative expenses were up five percent over the same period primarily due to higher depreciation charges.

Operating income increased $8.8 million, or four percent, in the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010, despite an increase in special project costs of approximately $15.0 million. Excluding the impact of special project costs in both periods, operating income increased $23.9 million, or 10 percent, and improved from 18.7 percent of net sales in 2010, to 20.6 percent in 2011.

For the first six months of 2011, gross profit increased $4.8 million to 38.8 percent of net sales, compared to 38.5 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2010. The first six months of 2011 includes the impact of $21.5 million of restructuring charges in cost of products sold. Gross profit for the first six months of 2011 included higher costs for green coffee, milk, sugar, and soybean oil while costs for peanuts and flour were lower, compared to the first six months of 2010. The first six months of 2010 had benefited from volume-related plant efficiencies.

Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses decreased two percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, and decreased as a percentage of net sales from 18.6 percent to 18.3 percent. Marketing expenses decreased nine percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010. Selling and distribution expenses in the first six months of 2011 were flat compared to 2010. General and administrative expenses were up five percent over the same period due primarily to higher depreciation charges and digital marketing initiatives.

Operating income increased $5.2 million, or one percent, in the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, despite an increase in special project costs of approximately $28.8 million. Excluding the impact of special project costs in both periods, operating income increased $33.9 million, or eight percent, and improved from 18.2 percent of net sales in 2010, to 19.7 percent in 2011.

Other

Despite an increase in the average cash and investment balance in 2011, compared to 2010, interest income was essentially flat during the second quarter and decreased $1.1 million during the first six months, due to a lower overall investment yield. Interest expense increased $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010, as lower average debt outstanding was more than offset by modestly higher interest rates. Interest expense decreased $1.4 million during the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, as lower average debt outstanding offset modestly higher interest rates. Debt repayments made during fiscal 2010 totaled $625.0 million and were offset somewhat by the issuance of $400.0 million in Senior Notes on June 15, 2010.

17

Income tax expense decreased $3.0 million and $9.3 million during the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, compared to 2010. The effective tax rates decreased to 32.5 and 32.0 percent in the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, compared to 34.9 and 35.0 percent in the second quarter and first six months of 2010. The lower effective tax rates in 2011 primarily reflect benefits realized from an increased deduction related to U.S. manufacturing activities, compared to 2010, together with lower state income taxes.

Restructuring

In fiscal 2010, the Company announced its plan to restructure certain coffee and fruit spreads operations as part of its ongoing efforts to enhance the long-term strength and profitability of its leading brands. The initiative is a long-term investment to optimize production capacity and lower the overall cost structure and includes capital investments for a new state-of-the-art food manufacturing facility in Orrville, Ohio, and consolidation of coffee production in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Subsequently, on September 27, 2010, the Company expanded its restructuring plan to include an initiative to improve the overall cost structure in its Canadian pickle and condiments operations by transitioning production to third-party manufacturers in the U.S.

The restructuring plan calls for the future closing of six of the Company’s facilities — Memphis, Tennessee; Ste. Marie, Quebec; Sherman, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Dunnville, Ontario; and Delhi Township, Ontario. Upon completion, the restructuring will result in the reduction of approximately 850 full-time positions.

The Company expects to incur restructuring costs of approximately $235.0 million, of which $53.7 million has been incurred through October 31, 2010 including $20.4 million and $48.0 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively. The balance of the costs is anticipated to be incurred over the next four fiscal years as the facilities are closed.

Segment Results

	Three Months Ended October 31,									Six Months Ended October 31,
							%									%
							Increase									Increase
	2010			2009			(Decrease)			2010			2009			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in millions)
Net sales:
U.S. Retail Coffee Market	$	477.3		$	445.1			7	%	$	870.9		$	811.3			7	%
U.S. Retail Consumer Market		272.6			290.1			(6	%)		551.8			581.1			(5	%)
U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market		279.5			303.9			(8	%)		453.4			498.3			(9	%)
Special Markets		249.5			239.7			4	%		450.1			439.5			2	%
Segment profit:
U.S. Retail Coffee Market	$	149.1		$	131.9			13	%	$	261.0		$	243.0			7	%
U.S. Retail Consumer Market		74.3			70.5			5	%		145.7			136.6			7	%
U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market		40.9			45.4			(10	%)		63.4			71.1			(11	%)
Special Markets		49.4			40.0			24	%		84.3			66.7			26	%
Segment profit margin:
U.S. Retail Coffee Market		31.2	%		29.6	%					30.0	%		30.0	%
U.S. Retail Consumer Market		27.3	%		24.3	%					26.4	%		23.5	%
U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market		14.6	%		14.9	%					14.0	%		14.3	%
Special Markets		19.8	%		16.7	%					18.7	%		15.2	%

While the Company’s four reportable segments remain the same for 2011, the calculation of segment profit has been modified to include intangible asset amortization and impairment charges related to segment assets,

18

along with certain other items in each of the segments. These items were previously considered corporate expenses and were not allocated to the segments. This change more accurately aligns the segment financial results with the responsibilities of segment management, most notably in the area of intangible assets. Fiscal 2010 segment profit has been presented to be consistent with the current methodology.

U.S. Retail Coffee Market

The U.S. Retail Coffee Market segment net sales increased seven percent in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter in 2010. Price increases totaling 13 percent were taken in 2011 to cover rising green coffee costs, but were partially offset by a seven percent overall volume decline and additional promotional spending. Volume decreased in the Folgers® brand while Dunkin’ Donuts® packaged coffee continued its double-digit growth. The introduction of Folgers Gourmet Selections® and Millstone® K-Cups® offerings during the quarter contributed approximately two percent to U.S. Retail Coffee Market segment net sales.

Green coffee costs were significantly higher in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010. Pricing actions taken earlier in the year, relative to higher green coffee costs realized during the second quarter, contributed to segment profit. The Company expects the impact of rising green coffee costs to accelerate during the remainder of the year. Marketing expenses decreased in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010 which included significant long-term investments in brand equity initiatives and new advertising. U.S. Retail Coffee Market segment profit increased 13 percent in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010 that included the benefit of volume-related plant efficiencies. Segment profit margin was 31.2 percent in 2011, compared to 29.6 percent in 2010.

For the first six months of 2011, net sales for the U.S. Retail Coffee Market increased seven percent, compared to the first six months of 2010. Price increases taken during the first six months of the year, offset slightly by a one percent volume decline, contributed to the net sales increase. Segment profit increased seven percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, and segment profit margin was 30.0 percent in both periods.

U.S. Retail Consumer Market

The U.S. Retail Consumer Market segment net sales declined approximately two percent while volume increased one percent, excluding potato products divested in the fourth quarter of 2010. Net sales include the impact of a peanut butter price reduction of five percent taken earlier in the fiscal year. Volume gains were realized in Smucker’s® fruit spreads, Jif® peanut butter, and Smucker’s® Snack’n Waffles® brand waffles, offsetting volume declines in Smucker’s Uncrustables® sandwiches and toppings. Reported segment net sales and volume decreased six percent and three percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010, reflecting the divested potato products.

The U.S. Retail Consumer Market segment profit increased five percent for the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter in 2010, due to lower supply chain and raw material costs, primarily peanuts and corn sweetener, and a favorable sales mix which more than offset increased marketing costs. Segment profit margin for the quarter improved significantly from 24.3 percent in the second quarter of 2010, to 27.3 percent in 2011.

Net sales for the U.S. Retail Consumer Market decreased one percent in the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, and volume was flat over the same period, excluding potato products. On a reported basis, net sales and volume decreased five and three percent, respectively. Segment profit increased seven percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, and segment profit margin improved from 23.5 percent to 26.4 percent.

19

U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market

Net sales and volume in the U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment were down eight percent and 10 percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010. Pillsbury® flour and baking mixes volume was down double digits due to a combination of planned reductions in lower-margin products, and a continued competitive and promotional environment. Following a price decline earlier in the year, Crisco® oils volume showed modest improvement from earlier in the year, but was down three percent for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010.

The U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment profit decreased 10 percent for the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010. The impact of pricing, along with increases in milk, sugar, and soybean oil costs, and unrealized mark-to-market adjustments on commodity contracts caused segment profit margin to decrease from 14.9 percent in the second quarter of 2010, to 14.6 percent in 2011.

U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market net sales and volume decreased nine percent and 11 percent in the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010. Segment profit decreased 11 percent for the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, and segment profit margin declined from 14.3 percent to 14.0 percent.

Special Markets

Net sales in the Special Markets segment increased four percent in the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010. Excluding foreign exchange, net sales increased two percent over the same time period. Volume increased four percent in the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010, driven by gains in the natural foods, baking, and coffee categories. The impact of volume gains was partially offset by higher promotional spending.

Special Markets segment profit increased 24 percent for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 2010, and profit margin increased to 19.8 percent from 16.7 percent during the same time period, primarily due to coffee price increases taken earlier in the year, lower flour costs, and the favorable impact of sales mix associated with higher natural foods and coffee sales.

Net sales and volume in the Special Markets segment both increased two percent in the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010. Excluding foreign exchange, net sales were essentially flat compared to the same period last year. Special Markets segment profit increased 26 percent and improved to 18.7 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2011, from 15.2 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2010.

Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

	Six Months Ended October 31,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	19.5		$	187.8
Net cash used for investing activities		(109.8	)		(76.7	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		294.1			(161.3	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	19.5		$	187.8
Additions to property, plant, and equipment		(62.1	)		(89.4	)
Free cash flow	$	(42.5	)	$	98.4

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

20

On an annual basis, the Company’s principal source of funds is cash generated from operations, supplemented by borrowings against the Company’s revolving credit facilities. Total cash and cash equivalents at October 31, 2010, were $487.5 million compared to $283.6 million at April 30, 2010.

Cash provided for operating activities in the first six months of 2011 was $19.5 million compared to $187.8 million in 2010. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2011, compared to 2010, was primarily related to an increase in cash used for income tax payments of $130.9 million. Approximately $82.0 million of the increase in income tax payments represents a change in the timing of the payments. Increases in trade receivables and inventory balances, primarily related to higher commodity costs and related price increases, also contributed to the decrease in cash provided by operating activities.

The Company expects a significant use of cash during the first half of each fiscal year, primarily due to the buildup of inventories to support the Fall Bake and Holiday period, and the additional increase of coffee inventory in advance of the Atlantic hurricane season. The Company expects cash provided by operations in the second half of the fiscal year to exceed the first half of the year, upon completion of the Company’s key promotional periods.

Cash used for investing activities was $109.8 million in the first six months of 2011, compared to $76.7 million in the same period of 2010. The increased cash used for investing activities in 2011, compared to 2010, was primarily the purchase of $57.0 million of marketable securities in 2011. Cash used for capital expenditures was $62.1 million in the first six months of 2011, compared to $89.4 million in 2010. The Company expects capital expenditures to increase throughout the remainder of 2011, and total approximately $200 million for the full fiscal year, as expenditures for the coffee and fruit spreads restructuring project accelerate.

Cash provided by financing activities during the first six months of 2011 was approximately $294.1 million, consisting primarily of the issuance of $400.0 million in Senior Notes, offset by quarterly dividend payments of $95.3 million, and repayments of long-term debt of $10.0 million. During the first six months of 2010, total cash of $161.3 million was used for financing purposes consisting primarily of $75.0 million in debt repayments and $83.0 million in quarterly dividend payments. The increased dividend payments in 2011, compared to 2010, resulted primarily from an increase in the quarterly dividend rate from $0.35 to $0.40 per common share during the period.

Capital Resources

The following table presents the Company’s capital structure:

	October 31, 2010		April 30, 2010
	(Dollars in millions)
Current portion of long-term debt	$	0.0	$	10.0
Long-term debt		1,300.0		900.0
Total debt	$	1,300.0	$	910.0
Shareholders’ equity		5,504.0		5,326.3
Total capital	$	6,804.0	$	6,236.3

The Company has available a $400.0 million revolving credit facility with a group of five banks that expires in October 2012. The Company’s $180.0 million revolving credit facility with a group of three banks expires in January 2011 and is not expected to be extended. No amounts were outstanding under either revolving credit facility at October 31, 2010.

On June 15, 2010, the Company issued $400.0 million of 4.50 percent Senior Notes with a final maturity on June 1, 2025. The Senior Notes have a 12-year average maturity with required prepayments starting on June 1, 2020. Proceeds from the Senior Notes issuance will be used for general corporate purposes. On

21

September 1, 2010, the Company repaid the $10.0 million of 7.94 percent Series C Senior Notes utilizing cash on hand.

The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase an established number of common shares at its discretion with no established expiration date. However, under the transaction agreement relating to the Folgers merger and related ancillary agreements, the Company could repurchase common shares only under specific conditions for two years following the closing of the merger. As a result, the Company did not repurchase shares under the buyback program during that period. On November 6, 2010, the Company’s two-year restriction on share repurchases expired. On November 22, 2010, the Company entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan (the “Plan”) to facilitate the potential repurchase of approximately 3.7 million common shares remaining under its Board of Directors’ share repurchase authorization. The share repurchase period commenced on November 22, 2010 and expires on April 30, 2011. Purchases will be transacted by a broker based upon the guidelines and parameters of the Plan. There is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be repurchased under the Plan. From November 22, 2010 to November 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 577,462 common shares for approximately $36.2 million.

Absent any material acquisitions or other significant investments, the Company believes that cash on hand, combined with cash provided by operations and borrowings available under credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet cash requirements for the next twelve months, including capital expenditures, the payment of quarterly dividends, principal and interest on debt outstanding, and share repurchases.

Non-GAAP Measures

The Company uses non-GAAP measures including net sales, excluding divestitures and foreign currency exchange rate impact; operating income, income, and income per diluted share, excluding restructuring and merger and integration costs; and free cash flow as key measures for purposes of evaluating performance internally. The non-GAAP measures are not intended to replace the presentation of financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Rather, the presentation of these non-GAAP measures supplements other metrics used by management to internally evaluate its businesses, and facilitate the comparison of past and present operations. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies and may exclude certain nondiscretionary expenses and cash payments.

22

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices.

Interest Rate Risk. The fair value of the Company’s cash and short-term investment portfolio at October 31, 2010, approximates carrying value. Exposure to interest rate risk on the Company’s long-term debt is mitigated since it is at a fixed rate until maturity. Based on the Company’s overall interest rate exposure as of and during the three-month and six-month periods ended October 31, 2010, including derivative and other instruments sensitive to interest rates, a hypothetical 10 percent movement in interest rates would not materially affect the Company’s results of operations. Interest rate risk can also be measured by estimating the net amount by which the fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities would change as a result of movements in interest rates. Based on a hypothetical, immediate one-percentage point decrease in interest rates at October 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt would increase by approximately $59 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. The Company has operations outside the U.S. with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily denominated in Canadian currency. Because the Company has foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, financial exposure may result, primarily from the timing of transactions and the movement of exchange rates. The foreign currency balance sheet exposures as of October 31, 2010, are not expected to result in a significant impact on future earnings or cash flows.

The Company utilizes foreign currency exchange forwards and options contracts to manage the price volatility of foreign currency exchange fluctuations on future cash transactions. The contracts generally have maturities of less than one year. The mark-to-market gains and losses on qualifying hedges are included as a component of other comprehensive income, and reclassified to earnings in the period the contract is executed. The ineffective portion of these contracts is immediately recognized in earnings. Instruments currently used to manage foreign currency exchange exposures do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment and the change in value of these instruments is immediately recognized in cost of products sold. Based on the Company’s hedged foreign currency positions as of October 31, 2010, a hypothetical 10 percent change in exchange rates would result in a loss of fair value of approximately $5.5 million.

Revenues from customers outside the U.S. represented approximately 10 percent of net sales during the three-month and six-month periods ended October 31, 2010. Thus, certain revenues and expenses have been, and are expected to be, subject to the effect of foreign currency fluctuations and these fluctuations may have an impact on operating results.

Commodity Price Risk. Raw materials and other commodities used by the Company are subject to price volatility caused by supply and demand conditions, political and economic variables, weather, investor speculation, and other unpredictable factors. To manage the volatility related to anticipated commodity purchases, the Company uses futures and options with maturities generally less than one year. Certain of these instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. The mark-to-market gains or losses on qualifying hedges are included in other comprehensive income to the extent effective, and reclassified into cost of products sold in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The mark-to-market gains or losses on nonqualifying, excluded, and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in cost of products sold immediately.

The following sensitivity analysis presents the Company’s potential loss of fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent change in market prices.

23

	October 31, 2010		April 30, 2010
	(Dollars in millions)
Raw material commodities:
High	$	21.8	$	21.2
Low		3.2		2.3
Average		12.2		11.6

Fair value was determined using quoted market prices and was based on the Company’s net derivative position by commodity for the previous four quarters. The calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that the Company expects to incur. In practice, as markets move, the Company actively manages its risk and adjusts hedging, derivative, and purchasing strategies as appropriate. The commodities hedged have a high inverse correlation to price changes of the derivative commodity instrument; thus, the Company would expect that any gain or loss in the fair value of its derivatives would generally be offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposures.

24

Certain Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. The forward-looking statements may include statements concerning the Company’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions, and beliefs concerning future events, conditions, plans, and strategies that are not historical fact. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “plans,” and similar phrases.

Federal securities laws provide a safe harbor for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information. The Company is providing this cautionary statement in connection with the safe harbor provisions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as such statements are by nature subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control and could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from the Company’s historical results and experience. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

• volatility of commodity markets from which raw materials, particularly green coffee beans, wheat, soybean oil, milk, and peanuts, are procured and the related impact on costs;

• risks associated with hedging, derivative, and purchasing strategies employed by the Company to manage commodity pricing risks, including the risk that such strategies could result in significant losses and adversely impact the Company’s liquidity;

• crude oil price trends and their impact on transportation, energy, and packaging costs;

• the ability to successfully implement price changes;

• the success and cost of introducing new products and the competitive response;

• the success and cost of marketing and sales programs and strategies intended to promote growth in the Company’s businesses;

• general competitive activity in the market, including competitors’ pricing practices and promotional spending levels;

• the successful completion of the Company’s restructuring programs, and the ability to realize anticipated savings and other potential benefits within the time frames currently contemplated;

• the impact of food safety concerns involving either the Company or its competitors’ products;

• the impact of accidents and natural disasters, including crop failures and storm damage;

• the concentration of certain of the Company’s businesses with key customers and suppliers and the ability to manage and maintain key relationships;

• the loss of significant customers or a substantial reduction in orders from such customers or the bankruptcy of any such customer;

• changes in consumer coffee preferences, and other factors affecting the coffee business, which represents a substantial portion of the Company’s business;

• the ability of the Company to obtain any required financing;

• the timing and amount of the Company’s capital expenditures, share repurchases, and restructuring costs;

• impairments in the carrying value of goodwill, other intangible assets, or other long-lived assets or changes in useful lives of other intangible assets;

• the impact of new or changes to existing governmental laws and regulations or their application;

• the impact of future legal, regulatory, or market measures regarding climate change;

• the outcome of current and future tax examinations, changes in tax laws and other tax matters, and their related impact on the Company’s tax positions;

• foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations;

• political or economic disruption;

• other factors affecting share prices and capital markets generally; and

• the other factors described under “Risk Factors” in registration statements filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the other reports and statements filed by the

25

Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy materials.

Readers are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, when evaluating the information presented in this Quarterly Report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances.

26

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

     Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officers and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of October 31, 2010 (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the chief executive officers and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company’s business, operations, and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The risk factors described in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010, as revised below and in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, should be carefully considered, together with the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with evaluating the Company, its business, and the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial also may affect the Company. The occurrence of any of these known or unknown risks could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The risk factor described below updates the risk factors disclosed in “Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010.

• The Company’s business could be harmed by strikes or work stoppages.

As of October 31, 2010, approximately 32 percent of the Company’s employees, located at 10 facilities, are covered by union contracts. These contracts vary in term depending on location. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to negotiate these collective bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, without production interruptions caused by labor stoppages. In particular, the collective bargaining agreement for the Company’s facility in Toledo, Ohio, expired on May 1, 2010, and the Company is currently negotiating the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement. If a strike or work stoppage were to occur in connection with negotiations of new collective bargaining agreements, including the new agreement currently being negotiated for the Company’s facility in Toledo, Ohio, or as a result of disputes under collective bargaining agreements with labor unions, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

28

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

	(a)		(b)		(c)		(d)
							Maximum Number (or
					Total Number of		Approximate Dollar
					Shares Purchased		Value) of Shares That
	Total Number of				as Part of Publicly		May Yet Be Purchased
	Shares		Average Price		Announced Plans		Under the Plans or
Period	Purchased		Paid Per Share		or Programs		Programs
August 1, 2010 - August 31, 2010		902	$	46.97		—		3,744,222
September 1, 2010 - September 30, 2010		1,995		60.08		—		3,744,222
October 1, 2010 - October 31, 2010		958		51.21		—		3,744,222
Total		3,855	$	54.81		—		3,744,222

Information set forth in the table above represents activity in the Company’s second fiscal quarter.

(a) Shares in this column include shares repurchased as part of publicly announced plans as well as shares repurchased from stock plan recipients in lieu of cash payments.

(d) The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase an established number of common shares at its discretion with no established expiration date. However, under the transaction agreement relating to the Folgers transaction and related ancillary agreements, the Company could repurchase common shares only under specific conditions for two years following the closing of the merger. As a result, the Company did not repurchase shares under the buyback program during that period.

On November 6, 2010, the Company’s two-year restriction on share repurchases expired. On November 22, 2010, the Company entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan to facilitate the potential repurchase of the 3,744,222 common shares remaining under its Board of Directors’ share repurchase authorization. From November 22, 2010 to November 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 577,462 common shares for approximately $36.2 million.

29

Item 6. Exhibits.

See the Index of Exhibits that appears on Page No. 32 of this report.

30

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

December 10, 2010	THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
	/s/ Timothy P. Smucker
	BY TIMOTHY P. SMUCKER
	Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ Richard K. Smucker
	BY RICHARD K. SMUCKER
	Executive Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ Mark R. Belgya
	BY MARK R. BELGYA
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

31

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit
No.	Description
10.1	The J. M. Smucker Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111). *
10.2	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Commission File No. 001-5111). *
10.3	Form of Deferred Stock Units Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111). *
31.1	Certifications of Timothy P. Smucker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2	Certifications of Richard K. Smucker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.3	Certifications of Mark R. Belgya pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

* Management contract or compensatory plan or agreement.

32

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

     WHEREAS, __________ (the “Grantee”) is an employee of The J. M. Smucker Company, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), or one of its Subsidiaries; and

     WHEREAS, the execution of an agreement in the form hereof (this “Agreement”) has been authorized by a resolution of the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board, pursuant to The J. M. Smucker Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), as of __________ (the “Date of Grant”);

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby grants to the Grantee __________ shares of Restricted Stock (the “Restricted Stock”), effective as of the Date of Grant, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the following additional terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions.

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS

     All terms used herein with initial capital letters and not otherwise defined herein that are defined in the Plan shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.

ARTICLE II

CERTAIN TERMS OF THE RESTRICTED STOCK

     1. Issuance of Restricted Stock. The Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall be issued to the Grantee effective upon the Date of Grant. The Restricted Stock shall be registered in the Grantee’s name and shall be fully paid and nonassessable. Any certificates or evidence of award shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the restrictions hereinafter set forth.

     2. Restrictions on Transfer of Shares. The Restricted Stock may not be sold, exchanged, assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of by the Grantee, except to the Company, unless the Restricted Stock has become nonforfeitable as provided in Article II, Section 3 hereof; provided, however, that the Grantee’s rights with respect to such Restricted Stock may be transferred by will or pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution. Any purported transfer or encumbrance in violation of the provisions of this Article II, Section 2 shall be void, and the other party to any such purported transaction shall not obtain any rights to or interest in such Restricted Stock. The Committee in its sole discretion, when and as permitted by the Plan, may waive the restrictions on transferability with respect to all or a portion of the Restricted Stock.

     3. Vesting of Restricted Stock.

          (a) All of the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall become nonforfeitable on the fourth anniversary of the Date of Grant, which such date will be __________, if the Grantee shall have remained in the continuous employ of the Company or a Subsidiary during that four-year period.

          (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article II, Section 3(a), all of the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall immediately become nonforfeitable if (i) the Grantee dies or becomes permanently disabled while in the employ of the Company or a Subsidiary during the four-year period from the Date of Grant, (ii) [at any time during the four-year period from the Date of Grant, the Grantee is age 60 with at least ten years of service with the Company,]¹ or (iii) a Change in Control occurs during the four-year period from the Date of Grant while the Grantee is employed by the Company or a Subsidiary.

          (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article II, Section 3(a), if the Grantee leaves the employ of the Company or a Subsidiary within four years from the Date of Grant under circumstances determined by the Committee to be for the convenience of the Company, the Committee may, when and as permitted by the Plan, determine that all of the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall become nonforfeitable.

     4. Forfeiture of Shares. The Restricted Stock shall be forfeited, except as otherwise provided in Article II, Section 3 above, if the Grantee ceases to be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary prior to the fourth anniversary of the Date of Grant or in the event the Committee determines the Grantee has engaged in Detrimental Activity as such term is defined in the Plan. In the event of a forfeiture, any certificate(s) representing the Restricted Stock or any evidence of direct registration of the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall be cancelled.

     5. Dividend, Voting and Other Rights. (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, from and after the Date of Grant, the Grantee shall have all of the rights of a shareholder with respect to the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement, including the right to vote such Restricted Stock and receive any dividends that may be paid thereon; provided, however, that any additional Common Shares or other securities that the Grantee may become entitled to receive pursuant to a stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, separation, or reorganization or any other change in the capital structure of the Company shall be subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement.

          (b) Cash dividends on the Restricted Stock covered by this Agreement shall be paid to the Grantee pursuant to the Company’s then-current articles of incorporation and reported on the Grantee’s annual wage and tax statement (Form W-2) as compensation.

¹ For employees of the Folgers business, use: [at any time during the four-year period from the Date of Grant, theGrantee has either (A) reached the age of 60 with at least ten years of combined service with the Folgers business and the Company or (B) reached the age of 57¹/2 years of age and has at least 20 years of combined service with the Folgers business and the Company, provided, further, that the Grantee was at least 48 years of age as of November 19, 2008,]

-2-

     6. Retention of Restricted Stock in Book Entry Form. The Restricted Stock will be held at the Company’s transfer agent in book entry form with appropriate restrictions relating to the transfer of such Restricted Stock until all restrictions thereon will have lapsed.

ARTICLE III

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     1. Compliance with Law. The Company shall make reasonable efforts to comply with all applicable federal and state securities laws; provided, however, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be obligated to issue any Common Shares pursuant to this Agreement if the issuance thereof would result in a violation of any such law.

     2. Withholding Taxes. To the extent that the Company or any Subsidiary is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with the Restricted Stock or any delivery of Common Shares pursuant to this Agreement, and the amounts available to the Company or such Subsidiary for such withholding are insufficient, it will be a condition to the receipt of Restricted Stock or such delivery that the Grantee make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of the balance of such taxes required to be withheld. The Grantee hereby elects to satisfy this withholding obligation by having withheld, from the Common Shares otherwise deliverable to the Grantee, Common Shares having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld (except where the Grantee has made an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to the Common Shares subject to delivery). The Common Shares so retained shall be credited against such withholding requirement at the Market Value per Share on the date of such retention. In no event, however, shall the Company withhold Common Shares for payment of taxes in excess of the minimum amount of taxes required to be withheld.

     3. Continuous Employment. For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employment of the Grantee with the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be deemed to have been interrupted, and the Grantee shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or Subsidiary, by reason of the (a) transfer of his employment among the Company and its Subsidiaries or (b) a leave of absence approved by a duly constituted officer of the Company or a Subsidiary.

     4. Right to Terminate Employment. No provision of this Agreement shall limit in any way whatsoever any right that the Company or a Subsidiary may otherwise have to terminate the employment of the Grantee at any time. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a contract or a right to employment with respect to the Grantee.

     5. Relation to Other Benefits. Any economic or other benefit to the Grantee under this Agreement or the Plan shall not be taken into account in determining any benefits to which the Grantee may be entitled under any profit-sharing, retirement, or other benefit or compensation plan maintained by the Company or a Subsidiary and shall not affect the amount of any life insurance coverage available to any beneficiary under any life insurance plan covering employees of the Company or a Subsidiary.

-3-

     6. Amendments. Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however, that no amendment shall impair the rights of the Grantee under this Agreement without the Grantee’s consent; further provided, however, that the Grantee’s consent shall not be required to an amendment that is deemed necessary by the Company to ensure compliance with (or exemption from) Section 409A of the Code or the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any regulations promulgated thereunder.

     7. Severability. In the event that one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be invalidated for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, any provision so invalidated shall be deemed to be separable from the other provisions hereof, and the remaining provisions hereof shall continue to be valid and fully enforceable.

     8. Relation to Plan. This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the Plan, the Plan shall govern. The Committee acting pursuant to the Plan, as constituted from time to time, shall, except as expressly provided otherwise herein, have the right to determine any questions which arise in connection with the grant of the Restricted Stock.

     9. Electronic Delivery. The Company may, in its sole discretion, deliver any documents related to the Restricted Stock and the Grantee’s participation in the Plan, or future awards that may be granted under the Plan, by electronic means or to request the Grantee’s consent to participate in the Plan by electronic means. The Grantee consents to receive such documents by electronic delivery and, if requested, agrees to participate in the Plan through an on-line or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.

     10. Governing Law. This Agreement is made under, and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal substantive laws of the State of Ohio.

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

-4-

     This Agreement is executed by the Company as of the _____ day of _________.

THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
By:
	Title:

     The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of an executed original of this Agreement, together with a copy of the prospectus for the Plan, dated __________, summarizing key provisions of the Plan, and accepts the award of Restricted Stock granted hereunder on the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.

Date:
	Grantee:

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Timothy P. Smucker, Co-Chief Executive Officer of The J. M. Smucker Company, certify that:

(1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The J. M. Smucker Company;
(2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4)	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 10, 2010

/s/ Timothy P. Smucker
Name:	Timothy P. Smucker
Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard K. Smucker, Co-Chief Executive Officer of The J. M. Smucker Company, certify that:

(1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The J. M. Smucker Company;
(2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4)	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 10, 2010

/s/ Richard K. Smucker
Name:	Richard K. Smucker
Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.3

Exhibit 31.3

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark R. Belgya, Chief Financial Officer of The J. M. Smucker Company, certify that:

(1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The J. M. Smucker Company;
(2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4)	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 10, 2010

/s/ Mark R. Belgya
Name:	Mark R. Belgya
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The J. M. Smucker Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

/s/ Timothy P. Smucker
Name:	Timothy P. Smucker
Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Richard K. Smucker
Name:	Richard K. Smucker
Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Mark R. Belgya
Name:	Mark R. Belgya
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 10, 2010

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.