UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
|
For the fiscal year ended
or
|
For the transition period from ________to__________ |
Commission file number
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
| ||
(State of Incorporation) |
| (I.R.S. Employer ID No.) |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, $.01 par value | PRKR | OTCQB |
Common Stock Rights |
| OTCQB |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ( ) No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Yes ( ) No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
Large accelerated filer ( ) | Accelerated filer ( ) |
Smaller | |
| Emerging |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit reports.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
As of June 30, 2021, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $
As of March 15, 2022,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), “we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company” mean ParkerVision, Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH.
Forward-Looking Statements
We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our shareholders and to the public. This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements about our future plans, objectives, and expectations under the headings “Item 1. Business” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. When used in this Annual Report and in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the words or phrases “will likely result”, “management expects”, “we expect”, “will continue”, “is anticipated”, “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify such “forward-looking statements.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results and those presently anticipated or projected, including the risks and uncertainties set forth in this Annual Report under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in our other periodic reports. Examples of such risks and uncertainties include general economic and business conditions, the outcome of litigation, unexpected changes in technologies and technological advances, reliance on our intellectual property, and the ability to obtain adequate financing in the future. We have no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
We are in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies and products. We have designed and developed proprietary radio frequency (“RF”) technologies and integrated circuits for use in wireless communication products.
We have expended significant financial and other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for those technologies in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others and therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement litigation and licensing efforts.
We currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against mobile handset providers and providers of smart televisions and other WiFi products and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the infringement of several of our RF patents. We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.
We spent the majority of 2021 supporting our current patent enforcement actions. We have two patent enforcement cases pending against Qualcomm in the Middle District of Florida. Both cases experienced trial delays in 2020 and 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We are currently awaiting a trial
date in the first of these cases, which is expected to be scheduled in 2022 pending the court’s rulings on a few outstanding pre-trial motions. The second case which is pending against Qualcomm and Apple has been stayed pending the outcome of the first case.
In 2021, we entered into two patent settlement and licensing agreements as a result of patent enforcement actions initiated in the Western District of Texas in 2020. We have additional enforcement actions ongoing in Texas including against Intel Corporation (“Intel”) which is scheduled for trial in 2022. See “Legal Proceedings” in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a detailed description of our various patent enforcement actions.
A significant portion of our litigation costs have been funded under a secured contingent payment arrangement with Brickell Key Investments, LP (“Brickell”), contingent arrangements with legal counsel, and various debt and equity financings. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” included in Item 7 for a full discussion of our litigation funding arrangements and our equity and debt financings.
Products and Licenses
During 2021, we did not offer any products for sale, but rather focused exclusively on our patent enforcement and licensing efforts. This resulted in two licensees of our technologies in 2021 including Buffalo, Inc. (“Buffalo”) and Zyxel Communications Corporation (“Zyxel”). Each of these licenses resulted from a settlement and patent license agreement following initiation of patent enforcement actions by us. See “Revenue” in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional details.
RF Technologies
Our RF technologies enable highly accurate transmission and reception of RF carriers at low power, thereby enabling extended battery life, and certain size, cost, performance, and packaging advantages.
We believe the most significant hurdle to the licensing and/or sale of our technologies and related products is the widespread use of certain of our technologies in infringing products produced by companies with significantly greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing resources. We believe we can secure licensing agreements with unauthorized current users of one or more of our technologies, and therefore compete, based on a solid and defensible patent portfolio and the advantages enabled by our unique patent-protected technologies.
Patents and Trademarks
We consider our intellectual property, including patents, patent applications, trademarks, and trade secrets to be significant to our business plan. We have a program to file applications for and obtain patents, copyrights, and trademarks in the U.S. and in selected foreign countries where we believe filing for such protection is appropriate to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our technology and products. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 81 active U.S. and foreign patents related to our RF technologies. In addition, we have a number of recently expired patents that we believe continue to have significant economic value as a result of our ability to assert past damages in our patent enforcement actions. We estimate the economic lives of our patents to be the shorter of fifteen years from issuance or twenty years from the earliest application date. Our current portfolio of issued patents have expirations ranging from 2022 to 2036.
Employees
As of December 31, 2021, we had seven full-time employees and one part-time employee. We also outsource certain specialty services, such as information technology, and utilize contract staff and third-party consultants from time to time to supplement our workforce. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining agreements and we consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.
We have taken measures to protect our workforce in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including optional remote worksites for all of our employees beginning in April 2020. Our management, with the oversight of our board of directors, monitors the hiring, retention and management of our employees.
Available Information and Access to Reports
We file annual reports on Forms 10-K, quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q, proxy statements and other reports, including any amendments thereto, electronically with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) where these reports may be obtained at no charge. We also make copies of these reports available, free of charge through our website (http://www.parkervision.com) via the link “SEC filings” as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing such materials with the SEC.
Corporate Website
We announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business, financial performance and related matters, SEC filings, notices of investor events, and our press and earnings releases, in the investor relations section of our website (http://ir.parkervision.com). Additionally, if applicable, we webcast our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or host with members of the investment community in the investor relations section of our website. Investors and others can receive notifications of new information posted in the investor relations section in real time by signing up for email alerts and/or RSS feeds. Further corporate governance information, including our governance guidelines, Board committee charters, and code of conduct, is also available in the investor relations section of our website under the heading “Corporate Governance.” The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
Financial and Operating Risks
Our financial condition raises substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
We have had significant losses and negative cash flows in every year since inception, and continue to have an accumulated deficit which, at December 31, 2021, was approximately $433.4 million. Our net losses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were approximately $12.3 million and $19.6 million, respectively. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included in their audit opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, a
statement with respect to substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 includes a discussion regarding our liquidity and our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. If we become unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our consolidated financial statements. The substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern may adversely affect our ability to negotiate reasonable terms with our vendors and may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the future.
We have had a history of losses which may ultimately compromise our ability to implement our business plan and continue in operation.
To date, our technologies and products have not produced revenues sufficient to cover our operating costs. We will continue to make expenditures on patent protection and enforcement and general operations in order to continue our current patent enforcement and licensing efforts. Those efforts may not produce a successful financial outcome in 2022, or at all. Without a successful financial outcome from one or more of our patent enforcement and licensing efforts, we will not achieve profitability. Furthermore, our current capital resources are not sufficient to sustain our operations through 2022. If we are not able to generate sufficient revenues or obtain sufficient capital resources, we may not be able to implement our business plan or meet our current obligations due within the twelve months after the issuance date of our consolidated financial statements and investors will suffer a loss in their investment. This may also result in a change in our business strategies.
We will need to raise substantial additional capital in the future to fund our operations. Failure to raise such additional capital may prevent us from implementing our business plan as currently formulated.
Because we have had net losses and, to date, have not generated positive cash flow from operations, we have funded our operating losses primarily from the sale of debt and equity securities, including our secured and unsecured contingent debt obligations. Our capital resources include cash and cash equivalents of $1.0 million at December 31, 2021. Our business plan will continue to require expenditures for patent protection and enforcement and general operations. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used $7.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively in cash for operations which was funded primarily through the sale of convertible debt and equity securities. Our current capital resources will not be sufficient to meet our working capital needs for the twelve months after the issuance of our consolidated financial statements and we will require additional capital to fund our operations. Additional capital may be in the form of debt securities, the sale of equity securities, including common or preferred stock, additional litigation funding, or a combination thereof. Failure to raise additional capital may have a material adverse impact on our ability to achieve our business objectives.
Raising additional capital by issuing debt securities or additional equity securities may result in dilution and/or impose covenants or restrictions that create operational limitations or other obligations.
We will require additional capital to fund our operations and meet our current obligations due within the twelve months after the issuance date of our consolidated financial statements. Financing, if any, may be in the form of debt or sales of equity securities, including common or preferred stock. Debt instruments or the sale of preferred stock may result in the imposition of operational limitations and other covenants and payment obligations, any of which may be burdensome to us and may have a material adverse impact
on our ability to implement our business plan as currently formulated. The sale of equity securities, including common or preferred stock, may result in dilution to the current stockholders’ ownership and may be limited by the number of shares we have authorized and available for issuance.
We may be obligated to repay outstanding notes at a premium upon the occurrence of an event of default.
We have $2.9 million in outstanding principal under convertible notes at December 31, 2021. If we fail to comply with the various covenants set forth in each of the notes, including failure to pay principal or interest when due or, under certain notes, consummating a change in control, we could be in default thereunder. Upon an event of default under each of the notes, the interest rate of the notes will increase to 12% per annum and the outstanding principal balance of the notes plus all accrued unpaid interest may be declared immediately payable by the holders. We may not have sufficient available funds to repay the notes upon an event of default, and we cannot provide assurances that we will be able to obtain other financing at terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Our ability to utilize our tax benefits could be substantially limited if we fail to generate sufficient income or if we experience an “ownership change.”
We have cumulative net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) totaling approximately $313.2 million at December 31, 2021, of which $276.6 million is subject to expiration in varying amounts from 2022 to 2037. Our ability to fully recognize the benefits from those NOLs is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient income prior to their expiration. In addition, our NOL carryforwards may be limited if we experience an ownership change as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”). In general, an ownership change under Section 382 occurs if 5% shareholders increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of our outstanding shares by more than 50 percentage points over a relevant lookback period. We have sold a significant number of equity securities over the relevant lookback period which increases the risk of triggering an ownership change under Section 382 from the future sale of additional equity securities. An ownership change under Section 382 will significantly limit our ability to utilize our tax benefits.
Our litigation funding arrangements may impair our ability to obtain future financing and/or generate sufficient cash flows to support our future operations.
We have funded much of our cost of litigation through contingent financing arrangements with Brickell Key Investments LP (“Brickell”) and others and contingent fee arrangements with legal counsel. The repayment obligation to Brickell is secured by the majority of our assets until such time that we have repaid a specified minimum return. Furthermore, our contingent arrangements will result in reductions in the amount of net proceeds retained by us from litigation, licensing and other patent-related activities. The contingent fees payable to legal counsel, Brickell and others will consume all of our initial future proceeds up to specified limits and could exceed half of our proceeds thereafter depending on size and timing of proceeds, among other factors. The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon our ability to secure sufficient financing to support our business, and our ability to generate revenues and/or patent related proceeds sufficient to offset expenses and meet our contingent payment obligations. Failure to generate revenue or other patent-related proceeds sufficient to repay our contingent obligations may impede our ability to obtain additional financing which will have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our long-term business objectives.
Our litigation can be time-consuming, costly and we cannot anticipate the results.
Since 2011, we have spent a significant amount of our financial and management resources to pursue patent infringement litigation against third parties. We believe this litigation, and other litigation matters that we may in the future determine to pursue, will continue to consume management and financial resources for long periods of time. There can be no assurance that our current or future litigation matters will ultimately result in a favorable outcome for us or that our financial resources will not be exhausted before achieving a favorable outcome. In addition, even if we obtain favorable interim rulings or verdicts in particular litigation matters, they may not be predictive of the ultimate resolution of the matter. Unfavorable outcomes could result in exhaustion of our financial resources and could hinder our ability to pursue licensing and/or product opportunities for our technologies in the future. Failure to achieve favorable outcomes from one or more of our patent enforcement actions will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and business prospects.
If our patents and intellectual property rights do not provide us with the anticipated market protections, our competitive position, business, and prospects will be impaired.
We rely on our intellectual property rights, including patents and patent applications, to provide competitive advantage and protect us from theft of our intellectual property. We believe that our patents are for entirely new technologies and that our patents are valid, enforceable and valuable. However, third parties have made claims of invalidity with respect to certain of our patents and other similar claims may be brought in the future. For example, in 2019, the Federal Patent Court in Munich invalidated one of our patents that was the subject of infringement cases against LG and Apple in Germany following a nullity action filed by Qualcomm. If our patents are shown not to be as broad as currently believed or are otherwise challenged such that some or all of the protection is lost, we will suffer adverse effects from the loss of competitive advantage and our ability to offer unique products and technologies. As a result, there would be an adverse impact on our financial condition and business prospects. Furthermore, defending against challenges to our patents may give rise to material costs for defense and divert resources away from our other activities.
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be impacted by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.
The global spread of COVID-19 has created significant volatility and uncertainty in financial markets. If such volatility and uncertainty persist, we may be unable to raise additional capital on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Additionally, in response to the pandemic, governments and the private sector have taken a number of drastic measures to contain the spread of COVID-19. While our employees currently have the ability and are encouraged to work remotely, such measures may have a substantial impact on employee attendance or productivity, which, along with the possibility of employees’ illness, may adversely affect our operations.
In addition, COVID-19 has negatively impacted the timing of our current patent infringement actions as a result of office closures, travel restrictions and court closures. For example, our patent infringement trial in Orlando, Florida has been delayed twice due to the impact of COVID-19. It is possible that further delays in our cases could occur.
Although COVID-19 is currently not material to our results of operations, there is significant uncertainty relating to the potential impact of COVID-19 on our business. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our ongoing patent enforcement actions and our ability to obtain financing, as well as our results of operations and financial condition, generally, will depend on future developments which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity
of COVID-19 and the actions taken by governments and private businesses to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 continue for an extensive period of time, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
We are subject to outside influences beyond our control, including new legislation that could adversely affect our licensing and enforcement activities and have an adverse impact on the execution of our business plan.
Our licensing and enforcement activities are subject to numerous risks from outside influences, including new legislation, regulations and rules related to obtaining or enforcing patents. For instance, the U.S. has enacted sweeping changes to the U.S. patent system including changes that transition the U.S. from a “first-to-invent” to a “first-to-file” system and that alter the processes for challenging issued patents. To the extent that we are unable to secure patent protection for our future technologies and/or our current patents are challenged such that some or all of our protection is lost, we will suffer adverse effects to our ability to offer unique products and technologies. As a result, there would be an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and our ability to execute our business plan.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological changes which if we are unable to match or surpass, will result in a loss of competitive advantage and market opportunity.
Because of the rapid technological development that regularly occurs in the wireless technology industry, along with shifting user needs and the introduction of competing products and services, we have historically devoted substantial resources to developing and improving our technology and introducing new product offerings. As a result of our limited financial resources, we have ceased our research and development activities which could result in a loss of future market opportunity which could adversely affect our future revenue potential.
We are highly dependent on Mr. Jeffrey Parker as our chief executive officer. If his services were lost, it would have an adverse impact on the execution of our business plan.
Because of Mr. Parker’s leadership position in the Company, the relationships he has garnered in both the industry in which we operate and the investment community and the key role he plays in our patent litigation strategies, the loss of his services might be seen as an impediment to the execution of our business plan. If Mr. Parker was no longer available to the Company, investors might experience an adverse impact on their investment. We maintain $5 million in key-employee life insurance for our benefit for Mr. Parker.
If we are unable to retain key highly skilled employees, we will not be able to execute our current business plans.
Our business is dependent on having skilled and specialized key employees to conduct our business activities. The inability to retain these key employees would have an adverse impact on the technical support activities and the financial reporting and regulatory compliance activities that our business requires. These activities are instrumental to the successful execution of our business plan.
Any disruptions to our information technology systems or breaches of our network security could interrupt our operations, compromise our reputation, and expose us to litigation, government enforcement actions, and costly response measures and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on information technology systems, including third-party hosted servers and cloud-based servers, to keep business, financial, and corporate records, communicate internally and externally, and operate other critical functions. If any of our internal systems or the systems of our third-party providers are compromised due to computer virus, unauthorized access, malware, and the like, then sensitive documents could be exposed or deleted, and our ability to conduct business could be impaired. Cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents can include, but are not limited to, unauthorized access to our systems, computer viruses or other malicious code, denial of service attacks, malware, ransomware, phishing, SQL injection attacks, human error, or other events that result in security breaches or give rise to the manipulation or loss of sensitive information or assets. Cyber incidents can be caused by various persons or groups, including disgruntled employees and vendors, activists, organized crime groups, and state-sponsored and individual hackers. Cyber incidents can also be caused or aggravated by natural events, such as earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, and telecommunications failures. The risk of cybersecurity breach has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks from around the world has increased. While we have cyber security procedures in place, given the evolving nature of these threats, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses in the future due to cyber-attacks.
To date, we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks, computer viruses or other systems failures. Although we have taken steps to protect the security of data maintained in our information systems, it is possible that our security measures will not be able to prevent the systems’ improper functioning or the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information, such as in the event of cyber-attacks. In addition to operational and business consequences, if our cybersecurity is breached, we could be held liable to our customers or other parties in regulatory or other actions, and we may be exposed to reputation damages and loss of trust and business. This could result in costly investigations and litigation, civil or criminal penalties, fines and negative publicity.
Risks Relating to our Common Stock
Our outstanding options and warrants may affect the market price and liquidity of the common stock.
At December 31, 2021, we had 77.0 million shares of common stock outstanding and had outstanding options and warrants for the purchase of up to 33.6 million additional shares of common stock, of which approximately 27.0 million were exercisable as of December 31, 2021. In addition, as described more fully below, holders of convertible notes may elect to receive a substantial number of shares of common stock upon conversion of the notes and we may elect to pay accrued interest on the notes in shares of our common stock. All of the shares of common stock underlying these securities are currently registered for sale to the holder or for public resale by the holder. The amount of common stock reserved for issuance may have an adverse impact on our ability to raise capital and may affect the price and liquidity of our common stock in the public market. In addition, the issuance of these shares of common stock will have a dilutive effect on current stockholders’ ownership.
The conversion of outstanding convertible notes into shares of common stock, and the issuance of common stock by us as payment of accrued interest upon the convertible notes, could materially dilute our current stockholders.
We have an aggregate principal amount of $2.9 million in convertible notes outstanding at December 31, 2021. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices, which may be less than the market price of our common stock at the time of conversion. If the entire principal were converted into shares of common stock, we would be required to issue an aggregate of up to 20.2 million shares of common stock. If we issue all of these shares, the ownership of our current stockholders will be diluted.
Further, we may elect to pay interest on the notes, at our option, in shares of common stock, at a price equal to the then-market price for our common stock. As of December 31, 2021, we have issued approximately 2.7 million shares of common stock as in-kind interest payments on our convertible notes. We currently do not believe that we will have the financial ability to make payments on the notes in cash when due. Accordingly, we currently intend to make such payments in shares of our common stock to the greatest extent possible. Such interest payments could further dilute our current stockholders.
The price of our common stock may be subject to substantial volatility.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. Between January 1, 2020 and March 15, 2022, the reported high and low sales prices for our common stock ranged between $0.15 and $1.91 per share. The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile as a result of a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, developments in outstanding litigation, our performance and prospects, general conditions of the markets in which we compete, economic and financial conditions, and the impact of COVID-19 on global financial markets. Such volatility could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock in future periods.
Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB, an over-the-counter market. There can be no assurance that our common stock will continue to trade on the OTCQB or on another over-the-counter market or securities exchange.
Our common stock began trading on the OTCQB, an over-the-counter market, in August 2018 immediately following delisting from Nasdaq, under the symbol “PRKR”. The over-the-counter market is a significantly more limited market than a nationally-recognized securities exchange such as Nasdaq, and the quotation of our common stock on the over-the-counter market has resulted in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade shares of our common stock. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market generally have less liquidity due to factors such as the reduced number of investors that will consider investing in the securities, the reduced number of market makers in the securities, and the reduced number of securities analysts that follow such securities. As a result, holders of shares of our common stock may find it difficult to resell their shares at prices quoted in the market or at all. We are also subject to additional compliance requirements under applicable state laws relating to the issuance of our securities. This could have a long-term adverse effect on our ability to raise capital, which ultimately could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We cannot provide any assurances as to if or when we will be in a position to relist our common stock on a nationally-recognized securities exchange.
Our common stock is classified as a “penny stock” under SEC rules, which means broker-dealers who make a market in our stock will be subject to additional compliance requirements.
Our common stock is deemed to be a "penny stock" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Penny stocks are stocks (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a recognized national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on an automated quotation system sponsored by a recognized national securities association; or (iv) whose issuer has net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years); or $5,000,000 (if continuous operations for less than three years); or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years. The Exchange Act requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be “penny stock.” Further, the Exchange Act requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. These procedures require the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his, her or its financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor, and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the public market. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.
We do not currently pay dividends on our common stock and thus stockholders must look to appreciation of our common stock to realize a gain on their investments.
We do not currently pay dividends on our common stock and intend to retain our cash and future earnings, if any, to fund our business plan. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including our business, financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements. We therefore cannot offer any assurance that our board of directors will determine to pay special or regular dividends in the future. Accordingly, unless our board of directors determines to pay dividends, stockholders will be required to look to appreciation of our common stock to realize a gain on their investment. There can be no assurance that this appreciation will occur.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws could have effects that conflict with the interest of shareholders.
Some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. For example, our board of directors is divided into three classes with directors having staggered terms of office, our board of directors has the ability to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval, and there are advance notification provisions for director nominations and submissions of proposals from shareholders to a vote by all the shareholders under the by-laws. Florida law also has anti-takeover provisions in its corporate statute.
We have a shareholder protection rights plan that may delay or discourage someone from making an offer to purchase the Company without prior consultation with the board of directors and management, which may conflict with the interests of some of the shareholders.
On November 17, 2005, as amended on November 20, 2015 and November 20, 2020, our board of directors adopted a shareholder protection rights plan which called for the issuance, on November 29, 2005, as a dividend, of rights to acquire fractional shares of preferred stock. The rights are attached to the shares of common stock and transfer with them. In the future, the rights may become exchangeable for shares of preferred stock with various provisions that may discourage a takeover bid. Additionally, the rights have what are known as “flip-in” and “flip-over” provisions that could make any acquisition of the Company more costly. The principal objective of the plan is to cause someone interested in acquiring the Company to negotiate with the board of directors rather than launch an unsolicited bid. This plan may limit, prevent, or discourage a takeover offer that some shareholders may find more advantageous than a negotiated transaction. A negotiated transaction may not be in the best interests of the shareholders.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties.
Until the expiration of our lease in October 2020, our headquarters were located in a 3,000 square foot leased facility in Jacksonville, Florida. Beginning in November 2020, we reverted to remote worksites for all of our employees in light of the pandemic. We believe a remote work environment is currently suitable for the conduct of our business. We have an additional 7,000 square foot leased facility in Lake Mary, Florida that was primarily for engineering design activities. We have ceased use of the Lake Mary facility and secured a sublease tenant in 2021 for the duration of the lease term through November 2022. Refer to Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding our outstanding lease obligations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are a party to a number of patent enforcement actions initiated by us against others for the infringement of our technologies, as well as proceedings brought by others against us in an attempt to invalidate certain of our patent claims. These patent-related proceedings are more fully described in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our Common Stock is listed on the OTCQB, an over-the-counter market, under the ticker symbol “PRKR”. Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Holders
As of March 15, 2022, we had approximately 83 holders of record and we believe there are approximately 7,200 beneficial holders of our common stock.
Dividends
We do not currently pay dividends on our common stock and intend to retain our cash and future earnings, if any, to fund our business plan. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenue and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition. The payment of any dividends will be within the discretion of our board of directors.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
No purchases of our equity securities have been made by us or affiliated purchasers within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Item 6. [Reserved].
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Executive Overview
We are in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies and products. We have designed and developed proprietary RF technologies and integrated circuits based on those technologies, and we license our technologies to others for use in wireless communication products. We have expended significant financial and other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for those technologies in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others and therefore our business plan primarily consists of enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against providers of mobile handsets, smart televisions and other WiFi products and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the infringement of a number of our RF patents. We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.
We continue to aggressively pursue licensing opportunities with wireless communications companies that make, use or sell chipsets and/or products that incorporate RF. We believe there are a number of wireless communications companies that can benefit from the use of the RF technologies we have developed, whether through a license or, in certain cases, a joint product venture that may include licensing rights. Our licensing efforts to date have required litigation in order to enforce and/or defend our intellectual property rights. Since 2011, we have been involved in patent infringement litigation against Qualcomm and others for the unauthorized use of our technology. Refer to Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion of our legal proceedings. We have expended significant resources since 2011 and incurred significant debt for the enforcement and defense of our intellectual property rights.
Recent Developments
On March 22, 2022, the United States District Court in the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division) issued an order granting Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm does not infringe the three patents that are the subject of our infringement case against them. This ruling, which is a final determination of the district court, follows a March 9, 2022 order granting a Qualcomm motion to strike and exclude the opinions of our experts regarding the alleged infringement and validity issues. We intend to appeal both of these decisions. Refer to ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida) included in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion of these legal proceedings.
In February 2022, our two patent infringement cases against Intel in the Western District of Texas were reconfigured whereby the first case would assert an aggregate of six patents against Intel cellular products and the second case would assert the same six patents along with a seventh patent against Intel WiFi and Bluetooth products. As a result of the restructuring of the cases, the trial date for the first Intel case was moved from June 2022 to October 24, 2022. In March 2022, as a result of discovery delays, the trial date was moved to a start date of December 5, 2022. The second case against Intel is currently scheduled for trial commencing in May 2023, however that date may change in lieu of the revised schedule in the first Intel case. Refer to ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of Texas) and ParkerVision v. Intel II (Western District of Texas) included in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion of these legal proceedings.
In January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued its final decisions on two Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) filed by Intel against two of the patents asserted in the ParkerVision v. Intel infringement cases. The PTAB ruled in our favor with respect to the seven challenged claims of one of the two patents and ruled in Intel’s favor with respect to the one challenged claim of the second patent. We have one additional IPR filed by Intel against a patent asserted in our second case, and the PTAB is expected to issue its final decision in July 2022. Refer to Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) included in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion of these IPR proceedings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have incurred significant losses from operations and negative cash flows in every year since inception, largely as a result of our significant investments in developing and protecting our intellectual property, and have utilized the proceeds from sales of debt and equity securities and contingent funding arrangements with third-parties to fund our operations, including the cost of litigation.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred a net loss of approximately $12.3 million and negative cash flows from operations of approximately $7.7 million. At December 31, 2021, we had cash
and cash equivalents of approximately $1.0 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $433.4 million. Additionally, a significant amount of future proceeds that we may receive from our patent enforcement and licensing programs will first be utilized to repay borrowings, legal fees and litigation expenses under our contingent funding arrangements. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included in their audit report an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of our liquidity and our ability to continue as a going concern.
We used cash for operations of approximately $7.7 million and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in cash used for operations from 2020 to 2021 is primarily due to the use of approximately $3.9 million in cash for the reduction of accounts payable and accrued expenses during the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $1.8 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses during the year ended December 31, 2020. Our accounts payable decreased $3.6 million from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021 primarily as result of a $3.0 million payment to a law firm in settlement of our outstanding fees and expenses and in exchange for an agreed-upon reduction in potential success fees payable to the firm from future patent-related proceeds. This increase in use of cash from 2020 to 2021 was somewhat offset by a reduction in cash-based operating costs from 2020 to 2021, largely as a result of decreased litigation fees and expenses. As a result of the decrease in our current liabilities from 2020 to 2021, our working capital improved by approximately $3.7 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we received aggregate net proceeds from the sale of debt and equity securities, including the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, of approximately $7.2 million compared to approximately $7.6 million in proceeds received for the year ended December 31, 2020. We repaid approximately $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively in debt obligations during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Our ability to meet our short-term liquidity needs, including our debt repayment obligations, is dependent upon one or more of (i) our ability to successfully negotiate licensing agreements and/or settlements relating to the use of our technologies by others in excess of our contingent payment obligations to Brickell and legal counsel; and/or (ii) our ability to raise additional capital from the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing arrangements.
Significant portions of our litigation costs to date have been funded by contingent payment arrangements with legal counsel. Fee discounts offered by legal counsel in exchange for contingent payments upon successful outcome in our litigation are not recognized in expense until such time that the related proceeds on which the contingent fees are payable are considered probable. Contingent fees vary based on each firm’s specific fee agreement. We currently have contingent fee arrangements in place for all of our active cases. In addition to our contingent fee agreements with legal counsel, we have secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations to litigation funders that have priority payments due from patent-related proceeds as discussed more fully under “Financial Condition-Contingent Payment Obligations” below.
Although current working capital will not be used to repay our contingent arrangements, based on our current outstanding legal proceedings, funding arrangements and contingent payment arrangements, we estimate that up to 100% of our initial future proceeds will be used to repay contingent payment arrangements until the minimum return under our secured contingent payment obligation has been met. After repayment of minimum returns on litigation financing, we estimate that 45% to 68% of remaining future proceeds from current actions could be payable to others, depending on the proceeding and the nature, amount and timing of proceeds, among other factors.
Patent enforcement litigation is costly and time-consuming and the outcome is difficult to predict. We expect to continue to invest in the support of our patent enforcement and licensing programs. We expect that revenue generated from patent enforcement actions and/or technology licenses in 2022, if any, after deduction of contingent payment obligations, may not be sufficient to cover our operating expenses. In the event we do not generate revenues, or other patent-related proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational costs and contingent repayment obligations, we will be required to raise additional working capital through the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing arrangements.
The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon our ability to secure sufficient financing to support our business, and our ability to generate revenues and/or patent-related proceeds sufficient to offset expenses and meet our contingent payment obligations and other long-term debt repayment obligations. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, and/or reduce operating costs could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our short and long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term business objectives.
Financial Condition
Intangible Assets
We consider our intellectual property, including patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets to be significant to our business. Our intangible assets are pledged as security for our secured contingent payment obligation with Brickell. The net book value of our intangible assets was approximately $1.8 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, generally fifteen to twenty years. The decrease in the carrying value of our intangible assets is primarily the result of $0.4 million in patent amortization expense recognized in 2021. Management evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets periodically and takes into account events or circumstances that may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that may indicate impairment exists. As part of our ongoing patent maintenance program, we may, from time to time, abandon a particular patent if we determine fees to maintain the patent exceed its expected recoverability. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred losses of approximately $0.03 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the write-off of specific patent assets. These losses are included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
Contingent Payment Obligations
We have secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $43.1 million and $38.3 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These repayment obligations are contingent upon receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and other patent monetization actions. As a result, we have elected to account for these contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair values which are subject to significant estimates and assumptions as discussed in “Critical Accounting Policies” below. Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of the fair value measurement of our contingent payment obligation.
Our secured contingent payment obligation is payable to Brickell as a result of $18 million in borrowings under a 2016 funding agreement, as amended from time to time. We have repaid Brickell an aggregate of $3.3 million to date under this agreement. The contingent payment obligation to Brickell is recorded at its estimated fair market value of $37.4 million at December 31, 2021, an increase of $4.3 million or 13% from the estimated fair market value at December 31, 2020. Brickell is entitled to a priority, prorated payment of up to 100% of proceeds received by us from funded patent-related actions up to a specified minimum return. Brickell’s minimum return is determined as a multiple of the outstanding funded amount that increases over time. The estimated aggregate minimum return due to Brickell if repaid in full
at December 31, 2021 is approximately $48.8 million, an increase of approximately $6.8 million, or 16%, from the minimum return that would have been due to Brickell as of December 31, 2020.
In addition, in 2020 and 2021, we incurred unsecured contingent payment obligations in connection with various funding arrangements. These contingent payment obligations are payable from our share of patent-related proceeds after satisfaction of our obligation to Brickell and payment of contingent fees to legal counsel. These unsecured contingent payment obligations are recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $5.7 million at December 31, 2021, representing an increase of $0.5 million from the estimated fair market value at December 31, 2020. This increase is primarily the result of $0.4 million in new unsecured contingent payment obligations incurred in 2021. The maximum payment obligation for our unsecured contingent payment obligations is $10.8 million at December 31, 2021.
See “Change in Fair Value of Contingent Obligations” included in “Results of Operations” below for a discussion of the increase in the estimated fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations.
Note Payable
As of December 31, 2021, we have a $0.7 million unsecured note payable to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox, PLLC (“SKGF”), a related party. We are obligated to make principal and interest payments totaling $0.12 million in 2022 under this note. The remaining outstanding balance of the note is subject to payment in full by April 30, 2023. Failure to comply with the payment terms of this note constitutes an event of default which, if uncured, will result in the entire unpaid principal balance of the note and any unpaid, accrued interest to become immediately due and payable. In addition, an event of default results in an increase in the interest rate under the notes to a default rate of 12% per annum. Notes payable are discussed more fully in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Convertible Notes
As of December 31, 2021, we have $2.9 million in notes that are convertible, at the holders’ option, into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.08 to $0.57 per share. These notes mature at varying dates from September 2023 to January 2025. The majority of the notes bear interest at a stated rate of 8%, payable quarterly. We have the option, subject to certain conditions, to pay the quarterly interest in-kind with shares of our common stock based on market price at the interest payment date. To date, all of the interest payments under these convertible notes have been paid in-kind and we anticipate that future payments of interest will also be paid in-kind. The notes provide for events of default that include failure to pay principal or interest when due, breach of any of the representations made by us, events of liquidation or bankruptcy, and a change in control. In the event of default, the interest rate increases to 12% per annum and the outstanding principal balance of the notes plus all accrued interest due may be declared immediately payable by the holders of a majority of the then-outstanding notes. Our convertible notes payable are more fully discussed in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Deferred Tax Assets and Related Valuation Allowance
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2021, we had net deferred tax assets of approximately $93 million, primarily related to our NOL carryforwards, which were fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty related to realization of these assets through future taxable income. In addition, our ability to benefit from our NOL
and other tax credit carryforwards could be limited under Section 382 as more fully discussed in “Risk Factors” and in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Results of Operations for Each of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Revenues and Gross Margins
Licensing revenue was $0.14 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. We reported no licensing revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020. We entered into patent licensing and settlement agreements with Buffalo and Zyxel in May 2021 and September 2021, respectively. We recognized revenue from these contracts during the year ended December 31, 2021 when the parties’ performance obligations were met. Cost of sales related to the licensing revenue consists of amortization expense related to the patents covered under the license agreements.
Our licensing proceeds were fully offset against out-of-pocket expenses recognized under our contingent fee agreement with counsel and therefore did not impact our cash flows. These out-of-pocket expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Although we do anticipate additional revenue to result from our licensing and patent enforcement actions, the amount and timing is highly unpredictable and there can be no assurance that we will achieve our anticipated results.
We reported no product revenue during the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive, director, technical support, and finance and administrative personnel costs, including share-based compensation, costs incurred for insurance, shareholder relations and outside legal and professional services, including litigation expenses, and amortization and maintenance expenses related to our patent assets.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to approximately $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, representing a decrease of approximately $2.6 million or 24%. This decrease results, in part, from a number of one-time, noncash charges in 2020 including $1.8 million associated with an amendment to a warrant agreement, $0.4 million from an amendment to our March 2020 equity transactions, and $0.2 million for impairment of the right-of-use asset associated with our Lake Mary lease. In addition, our litigation fees and expenses decreased by approximately $2.3 million as a result of the stay in the Qualcomm case in Jacksonville, Florida. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in share-based compensation attributed to nonqualified stock options awarded to executives, key employees, and nonemployee directors in January 2021 as more fully discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Payment Obligations
We have elected to measure our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations at fair value which is based on significant unobservable inputs. We estimated the fair value of our secured contingent payment obligations using a probability-weighted income approach based on the estimated present value of projected future cash outflows using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Increases or decreases in the significant unobservable inputs could result in significant increases or decreases in fair value.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded an increase in the fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations of approximately $4.4 million. The majority of the change in fair value is attributable to an increase in the estimated fair value of the secured contingent obligation with Brickell as a result of changes in estimated amounts and timing of projected future cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe that the following are critical accounting policies and estimates that significantly impact the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Contingent Payment Obligations
We have accounted for our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations as long-term debt. Our repayment obligations are contingent upon the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement or other patent monetization actions. We have elected to measure our contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair values based on the variable and contingent nature of the repayment provisions. We have determined that the fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations falls within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, which involves significant estimates and assumptions including projected future patent-related proceeds and the risk-adjusted rate for discounting future cash flows. Actual results could differ from the estimates made. Changes in fair value, including the component related to imputed interest, are included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss under the heading “Change in fair value of contingent payment obligations.” Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of the significant estimates and assumptions used in estimated the fair value of our contingent payment obligations.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
We calculate the fair value of share-based equity awards to employees, including restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), on the date of grant and recognize the calculated fair value as compensation expense over the requisite service periods of the related awards. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that requires the use of highly subjective assumptions and estimates including how long employees will retain their stock options before exercising them and the volatility of our common stock price over the expected life of the equity award. Changes in these subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of share-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized as expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-06, "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity" as of January 1, 2021. ASU 2020-06 simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for the exception. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. For smaller reporting companies, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The ASU provides for a modified retrospective method of adoption whereby the guidance is applied to transactions outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption with the cumulative effect of the change being recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Adoption of ASU 2020-06 resulted in an increase to our long-term debt of approximately $0.8 million, a decrease in
additional paid-in-capital of approximately $1.1 million and an adjustment to our beginning accumulated deficit of $0.3 million resulting from the elimination of the previously recognized beneficial conversion feature as a debt discount.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
As of December 31, 2021, we had outstanding warrants to purchase 10.3 million shares of our common stock. The estimated grant date fair value of these warrants of approximately $3.2 million is included in shareholders’ deficit in our consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2021. The outstanding warrants have an average exercise price of $0.75 per share and a weighted average remaining life of approximately 3 years.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements | ||
|
| Page |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020) (PCAOB ID: |
| 22 |
|
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: |
|
|
| 24 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss - for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 |
| 25 |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit - for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 |
| 26 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 |
| 27 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - December 31, 2021 and 2020 |
| 28 |
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA: |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
ParkerVision, Inc.
Jacksonville, Florida
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ParkerVision, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As a part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter Regarding Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Estimation of Fair Value of Contingent Payment Obligations
As disclosed in Note 1 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company accounts for their secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations as long-term debt. Their payment obligations are contingent upon the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent monetization actions. The Company has elected to measure their contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair values. The Company recorded the fair value of their contingent payment obligations at approximately $43,063,000 as of December 31, 2021.
Auditing management’s estimate of the fair value of their contingent payment obligations involved subjective evaluation and high degree of auditor judgement due to significant assumptions involved in estimating the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent monetization actions.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of internal controls that address the risks of material misstatement relating to recording the contingent payment obligations at fair value. We tested the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in calculating the fair value. We evaluated management’s ability to accurately estimate the assumptions used to develop the fair value of the contingent payment obligations. We also involved an independent legal firm to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions of future litigation outcomes used by the Company in estimating the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent monetization actions.
/s/
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
March 29, 2022
PARKERVISION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | |
| $ | |
Prepaid expenses |
| |
|
| |
Other current assets |
| |
|
| |
Total current assets |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
| |
|
| |
Intangible assets, net |
| |
|
| |
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
| |
|
| |
Other assets, net |
| |
|
| |
Total assets | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable | $ | |
| $ | |
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
| |
|
| |
Professional fees |
| |
|
| |
Statutory court costs |
|
|
|
| |
Other accrued expenses |
| |
|
| |
Related party note payable, current portion |
| |
|
| |
Secured note payable, current portion |
|
|
|
| |
Unsecured notes payable |
|
|
|
| |
Operating lease liabilities, current portion |
| |
|
| |
Total current liabilities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured contingent payment obligation |
| |
|
| |
Unsecured contingent payment obligations |
| |
|
| |
Convertible notes, net |
| |
|
| |
Related party note payable, net of current portion |
| |
|
| |
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion |
| |
|
| |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
| |
Total long-term liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Total liabilities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT: |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $ |
| |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital |
| |
|
| |
Accumulated deficit |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Total shareholders' deficit |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARKERVISION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
Licensing revenue | $ | |
| $ |
|
|
Cost of sales |
| ( |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
| |
|
| |
|
Total operating expenses |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
| |
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment obligations |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
Total interest and other |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARKERVISION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common Stock, Par Value |
|
| Additional Paid-in Capital |
| Accumulated |
| Total | |||
Balance as of December 31, 2019 |
| $ | |
|
| |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Issuance of common stock and warrants in public and private offerings, net of issuance costs and initial fair value of contingent payment rights |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock and warrants for services |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature |
|
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock upon conversion and payment of interest in kind on convertible debt |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of short-term loans and payables |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Share-based compensation, net of shares withheld for taxes |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Net loss for the year |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Balance as of December 31, 2020 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| |
|
| ( |
Issuance of common stock and warrants in public and private offerings, net of issuance costs and initial fair value of contingent payment rights |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock and warrants for services |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock upon conversion and payment of interest in kind on convertible debt |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Share-based compensation, net of shares withheld for taxes |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
Net loss for the year |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Balance as of December 31, 2021 |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARKERVISION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
|
| |
Share-based compensation |
| |
|
| |
Noncash lease expense |
| |
|
| |
Change in fair value of contingent payment obligations |
| |
|
| |
Loss on disposal/impairment of equipment and other assets |
| |
|
| |
Loan forgiveness |
| ( |
|
| - |
Noncash expense for amendment of equity-related agreements |
| - |
|
| |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
| ( |
|
| |
Operating lease liabilities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Total adjustments |
| |
|
| |
Net cash used in operating activities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
| - |
|
| |
Purchases of property and equipment |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net cash used in investing activities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, including contingent payment rights, in private offerings |
| |
|
| |
Net proceeds from exercise of options and warrants |
| |
|
| |
Net proceeds from debt financings |
| - |
|
| |
Debt repayments |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
| ( |
|
| |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year |
| |
|
| |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest | $ | |
| $ | |
Cash paid for income taxes | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARKERVISION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
ParkerVision, Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH (collectively “ParkerVision”, “we” or the “Company”) is in the business of innovating fundamental wireless hardware technologies and products. We have determined that our business currently operates under a operating and reportable segment.
We have designed and developed proprietary radio frequency (“RF”) technologies and integrated circuits based on those technologies, and we license our technologies to others for use in wireless communication products. We have expended significant financial and other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for those technologies in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others, and therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against providers of mobile handsets, smart televisions and other WiFi products and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the infringement of a number of our RF patents. We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ParkerVision, Inc. and our wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH, after elimination of all intercompany transactions and accounts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and office equipment | |
Leasehold improvements | Shorter of useful life or remaining life of lease |
Furniture and fixtures | |
Computer equipment and software |
We have accounted for our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations as long-term debt in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-10-25, “Sales of Future Revenues or Various other Measures of Income.” Our payment obligations are contingent upon the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent monetization actions. We have elected to measure our contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair values in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” based on the variable and contingent nature of the repayment provisions. We have determined that the fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations falls within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, which involves significant estimates, and assumptions including projected future patent-related proceeds and the risk-adjusted rate for discounting future cash flows (see Note 10). Actual results could differ from the estimates made. Changes in fair value, including the component related to imputed interest, are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive loss under the heading “Change in fair value of contingent payment obligations.”
We have accounted for our finance and operating leases in accordance with ASC 842, “Leases” which requires the recognition of lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets for finance and operating leases with initial lease terms of more than 12 months. At inception of a lease, we determine if an arrangement contains a lease and whether that lease meets the classification criteria of a finance or operating lease. Some of our lease arrangements contain lease components (e.g. minimum rent payments) and non-lease components (e.g. services). For certain
equipment leases, we account for lease and non-lease components separately based on a relative fair market value basis. For all other leases, we account for the lease and non-lease components (e.g. common area maintenance) on a combined basis.
For operating leases with terms greater than 12 months, we record the ROU asset and lease obligation at the present value of lease payments over the term using the implicit interest rate, when readily available, or our incremental borrowing rate for collateralized debt based on information available at the lease commencement date. Certain of our leases include rental escalation clauses, renewal options and/or termination options that are factored into our determination of lease payments when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. We do not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases with terms at inception of twelve months or less.
Finance leases are included in property and equipment and other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are recorded as an asset and an obligation at an amount equal to the present value of the minimum lease payments during the lease term. Amortization expense and interest expense associated with finance leases are included in selling, general, and administrative expense and interest expense, respectively, on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
We have issued debt that is convertible, at the holder’s option, into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices. Certain of the convertible notes were issued with conversion prices that were below market value of our common stock on the closing date resulting in a beneficial conversion feature which we recorded to equity with a corresponding discount to the debt that was amortized over the life of the notes as interest expense.
Effective January 1, 2021, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-06 "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity." This ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for the exception. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. For smaller reporting companies, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The ASU provides for a modified retrospective method of adoption whereby the guidance is applied to transactions outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption with the cumulative effect of the change being recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings.
We account for revenue under ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. This revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. These steps
include (1) identifying the contract with the customer, (2) identifying the performance obligations, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligation(s).
Our revenue is derived from patent licensing and settlement agreements. We have an active monitoring and enforcement program with respect to our intellectual property rights that includes seeking appropriate compensation from third parties that utilize or have utilized our intellectual property without a license. As a result, we may receive payments as part of a settlement or in the form of court-awarded damages for a patent infringement dispute. The timing and amount of revenue recognized from each licensee depend upon a variety of factors, including the specific terms of each agreement and the nature of the deliverables and obligations. Such agreements are often complex and may include multiple performance obligations. These agreements can include performance obligations related to the settlement of past patent infringement liabilities, royalties on future covered products sold by licensees, access to a portfolio of technology as it exists at a point in time, and/or promises to provide technology updates to the portfolio during the term of the license.
Refer to Note 3 for additional disclosures related to our revenue.
We have various share-based compensation programs which provide for equity awards including stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and restricted stock awards (“RSAs”). We calculate the fair value of share-based equity awards on the date of grant and recognize the calculated fair value as compensation expense over the requisite service periods of the related awards. We estimate the fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model requires the use of highly subjective assumptions and estimates including how long employees will retain their stock options before exercising them and the volatility of our common stock price over the expected life of the equity award. Such estimates, and the basis for our conclusions regarding such estimates, are outlined in detail in Note 14. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity awards. We account for forfeitures of share-based awards as they occur.
The provision for income taxes is based on loss before taxes as reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be realized. Our deferred tax assets exclude unrecognized tax benefits which do not meet a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
Basic loss per common share is determined based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share as all potential common shares are excluded from the calculation, as their effect is anti-dilutive.
The number of shares underlying outstanding options, warrants, unvested RSUs, and convertible notes at December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Options outstanding |
| |
|
| |
Warrants outstanding |
| |
|
| |
Unvested RSUs |
| - |
|
| |
Shares underlying convertible notes |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 were prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates that we will continue in operation and will be able to realize our assets and settle our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for a period of at least one year from the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that could result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
We have incurred significant losses from operations and negative cash flows in every year since inception and have utilized the proceeds from the sales of our equity and equity-linked securities and our contingent funding arrangements with third-parties to fund our operations, including our litigation costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred a net loss of approximately $
We had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $
Our business plan is currently focused solely on our patent enforcement and technology licensing objectives. The timing and amount of proceeds from our patent enforcement actions are difficult to predict and there can be no assurance we will receive any proceeds from these enforcement actions. Refer to Note 12 for a complete discussion of our patent enforcement proceedings.
Our ability to meet our liquidity needs for the twelve months after the issuance date of these financial statements is dependent upon one or more of (i) our ability to successfully negotiate licensing agreements and/or settlements relating to the use of our technologies by others in excess of our contingent payment
obligations and (ii) our ability to raise additional capital from the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing arrangements. We anticipate that we will continue to invest in patent protection, licensing, and enforcement of our wireless technologies. We expect that revenue generated from patent enforcement actions, and technology licenses over the twelve months after the issuance date of these financial statements, if any, after deduction of payment obligations to our third-party litigation funder and legal counsel, may not be sufficient to cover our operating expenses. In the event we do not generate revenues, or other patent-asset proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational costs and contingent repayment obligation, we will be required to raise additional working capital through the sale of equity securities or other financing arrangements.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $
We recognized
Prepaid expenses consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Prepaid services | $ | |
| $ | |
Prepaid bonds for German statutory costs |
| - |
|
| |
Prepaid insurance |
| |
|
| |
Prepaid licenses, software tools and support |
| |
|
| |
Other prepaid expenses |
| |
|
| |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Equipment and software | $ | |
| $ | |
Leasehold improvements |
| |
|
| |
Furniture and fixtures |
| - |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Less accumulated depreciation |
| ( |
|
| ( |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was approximately $
Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and copyrights | $ | |
| $ | |
Less accumulated amortization |
| ( |
|
| ( |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was approximately $
Future estimated amortization expense for intangible assets that have remaining unamortized amounts as of December 31, 2021 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 | $ | |
2023 |
| |
2024 |
| |
2025 |
| |
2026 |
| |
2027 and thereafter |
| |
Total | $ | |
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Advances | $ | |
| $ | |
Other accrued expenses |
| |
|
| |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances include amounts received from litigation counsel as advanced reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses expected to be incurred by us and, at December 31, 2020, includes approximately $
We lease our office and other facilities and certain office equipment under long-term, non-cancelable operating leases. No new finance or operating leases commenced during the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020 except with respect to a sublease agreement for our Lake Mary facility in 2021 as discussed more fully below.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized an impairment loss of approximately $
Lease expense for operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in operating expenses on the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. We recognized operating lease costs of $
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table summarizes the supplemental cash flow information related to leases (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year Ended |
| Year Ended | ||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from operating leases |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for amounts included in the measurement of sublease assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from operating subleases |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Information
The table below summarizes other supplemental information related to leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years): |
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
| |
| |
Operating subleases |
| |
| - |
Weighted average discount rate |
|
|
|
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted Cash Flows
The future maturities of lease liabilities and sublease receivables consist of the following as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating Leases |
| Operating Subleases | ||
2022 |
| $ | |
| $ | ( |
2023 |
|
| |
|
| - |
Thereafter |
|
| - |
|
| - |
Total undiscounted lease payments (receipts) |
|
| |
|
| ( |
Less: imputed interest |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
Present value of lease liabilities (receivables) |
|
| |
|
| ( |
Less: current portion |
|
| ( |
|
| |
Long-term lease obligations |
| $ | |
| $ | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable
Note Payable to a Related Party
We have an unsecured promissory note payable of $
Unsecured Notes Payable
Unsecured notes payable at December 31, 2020 represents the current portion of our Paycheck Protection Program loan. In May 2020, we received approximately $
Secured Note Payable
Our secured note payable as of December 31, 2020 represented default interest accrued related to a note payable to Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz”) for outstanding fees and expenses. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $
At December 31, 2021, the aggregate maturities of our notes payable are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 | $ | |
2023 |
| |
Total | $ | |
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our notes payable at December 31, 2021 is approximately $
Convertible Notes
Our convertible notes represent five-year promissory notes that are convertible, at the holders’ option, into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices. Interest payments are made on a quarterly basis and are payable, at our option and subject to certain equity conditions, in either cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof. The number of shares issued for interest is determined by dividing the interest payment amount by the closing price of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the scheduled interest payment date.
To date, all interest payments on the convertible notes have been made in shares of our common stock. We have recognized the convertible notes as debt in our consolidated financial statements. The fixed conversion prices of certain of the notes were below the market value of our common stock on the closing date resulting in the recognition of a beneficial conversion feature that was recorded as a discount on the convertible notes with a corresponding increase to additional paid in capital. Upon our adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2021, the previously recognized beneficial conversion feature was eliminated resulting in an increase in convertible notes of $
Convertible notes payable at December 31, 2021 and 2020, consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Conversion |
| Interest |
|
|
| December 31, | ||||
Description |
| Rate |
| Rate |
| Maturity Date |
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Convertible notes dated September 10, 2018 |
| $ |
|
| September 10, 2023 |
| $ | |
| $ | | |
Convertible notes dated September 19, 2018 |
| $ |
|
| September 19, 2023 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Convertible notes dated February/March 2019 |
| $ |
|
| February 28, 2024 to March 13, 2024 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Convertible notes dated June/July 2019 |
| $ |
|
| June 7, 2024 to July 15, 2024 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Convertible notes dated July 18, 2019 |
| $ |
|
| July 18, 2024 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Convertible notes dated September 13, 2019 |
| $ |
|
| September 13, 2024 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Convertible notes dated January 8, 2020 |
| $ |
|
| January 8, 2025 1 |
|
| |
|
| | |
Total principal balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Less unamortized discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The maturity date may be extended by one-year increments for up to an additional five years at the holder’s option at a reduced interest rate of
We have the option to prepay the majority of the notes any time following the one-year anniversary of the issuance of the notes, subject to a premium on the outstanding principal prepayment amount of
For the year ended December 31, 2021, convertible notes with a face value of $
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized interest expense of approximately $
All of the shares underlying our convertible notes, including shares reserved for future in-kind interest payments on the notes, have been registered for resale.
At December 31, 2021, we estimate our convertible notes have an aggregate fair value of approximately $
Secured Contingent Payment Obligation
The following table provides a reconciliation of our secured contingent payment obligation measured at estimated fair market value for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| 2021 |
|
| 2020 |
Secured contingent payment obligation, beginning of year |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Change in fair value |
|
| |
|
| |
Secured contingent payment obligation, end of year |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our secured contingent payment obligation represents the estimated fair value of our repayment obligation to Brickell Key Investments, LP (“Brickell”) under a February 2016 funding agreement, as amended from time to time (the “CPIA”). To date, we have received aggregate proceeds of $
Brickell is entitled to priority payment of
Brickell holds a senior security interest in the majority of our assets until such time as the specified minimum return is paid, in which case, the security interest will be released except with respect to the
patents and proceeds related to specific legal actions. The security interest is enforceable by Brickell in the event that we are in default under the agreement which would occur if (i) we fail, after notice, to pay proceeds to Brickell, (ii) we become insolvent or insolvency proceedings are commenced (and not subsequently discharged) with respect to us, (iii) our creditors commence actions against us (which are not subsequently discharged) that affect our material assets, (iv) we, without Brickell’s consent, incur indebtedness other than immaterial ordinary course indebtedness, or (v) there is an uncured non-compliance of our obligations or misrepresentations under the agreement. As of December 31, 2021, we are in compliance with our obligations under this agreement.
In addition, in the event of a change in control of the Company, Brickell has the right to be paid its return as defined under the CPIA based on the transaction price for the change in control event.
We have elected to measure our secured contingent payment obligation at its estimated fair value based on probability-weighted estimated cash outflows, discounted back to present value using a discount rate determined in accordance with accepted valuation methods (see Note 10). The secured contingent payment obligation is remeasured to fair value at each reporting period with changes recorded in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency is resolved.
Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations
The following table provides a reconciliation of our unsecured contingent payment obligations, measured at estimated fair market value, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Unsecured contingent payment obligations, beginning of period |
| $ | |
| $ |
|
Reclassification of other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of contingent payment rights |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in fair value |
|
| |
|
| |
Unsecured contingent payment obligations, end of period |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our unsecured contingent payment obligations represent amounts payable to others from future patent-related proceeds including (i) a termination fee due to a litigation funder (“Termination Fee”) and (ii) contingent payment rights (“CPRs”) issued to accredited investors primarily in connection with equity financings. We have elected to measure these unsecured contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair value based on probability-weighted estimated cash outflows, discounted back to present value using a discount rate determined in accordance with accepted valuation methods. The unsecured contingent payment obligations will be remeasured to fair value at each reporting period with changes recorded in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency is resolved (see Note 10).
The Termination Fee is a result of advances received under a letter agreement with a third-party funder of $
ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those described in Level 1
Level 3: Unobservable inputs
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, segregated by classification within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair Value Measurements | |||||||
| Total |
| Quoted Prices in |
| Significant Other |
| Significant | ||||
December 31, 2021: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured contingent payment obligation | $ | |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | |
Unsecured contingent payment obligations |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured contingent payment obligation |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unsecured contingent payment obligations |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, we had
The fair values of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations were estimated using a probability-weighted income approach based on various cash flow scenarios as to the outcome of patent-related actions both in terms of timing and amount, discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate. We used a risk-adjusted discount rate of
The following table provides quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the measurement of fair value for both the secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations at December 31, 2021, including the lowest and highest undiscounted payout scenarios as well as a weighted average payout scenario based on relative undiscounted fair value of each cash flow scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Secured Contingent Payment Obligation |
| Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations | ||||||||||||||
Unobservable Inputs |
| Low |
| Weighted Average |
| High |
| Low |
| Weighted Average |
| High | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated undiscounted cash outflows (in millions) |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Duration (in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Estimated probabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net losses before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are from domestic operations as well as losses from our wholly-owned German subsidiary. We elected to treat our German subsidiary as a disregarded entity for purposes of income taxes and accordingly, the losses from our German subsidiary have been included in our operating results.
A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax benefit using the federal statutory rate of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Tax benefit at statutory rate | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
State tax benefit |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Increase in valuation allowance |
| |
|
| |
Other |
| ( |
|
| |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the following sources and differences between financial accounting and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Gross deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forward | $ | |
| $ | |
Research and development credit carry-forward |
| |
|
| |
Stock compensation |
| |
|
| |
Patents and other |
| |
|
| |
Contingent payment obligations |
| |
|
| |
Fixed assets |
| |
|
| |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
| |
Lease liabilities |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Less valuation allowance |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Net deferred tax asset | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2021 (see “Convertible Notes” in Note 9), the difference between the financial accounting and tax bases, net of tax effect, of unrecognized tax benefit related to the beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt was eliminated.
At December 31, 2021, we had cumulative net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards for income tax purposes of $
Our ability to benefit from the tax credit carry-forwards could be limited under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code if there are ownership changes of more than 50%, as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Section 382”). Under Section 382, an ownership change may limit the amount of NOL, capital loss and R&D credit carry-forwards that can be used annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. We conduct a study annually of our ownership changes. Based on the results of our studies, we have determined that we do not have any ownership changes on or prior to December 31, 2021 which would result in limitations of our NOL, capital loss or R&D credit carry-forwards under Section 382.
Uncertain Tax Positions
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, and Germany. We have identified our Federal and Florida tax returns as our only major jurisdictions, as defined. The periods subject to examination for those returns are the
provides a reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits due to uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Unrecognized tax benefits – beginning of year | $ | |
| $ | |
Reduction as a result of lapse of statute of limitations |
| ( |
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits – end of year | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future changes in the unrecognized tax benefit will have no impact on the effective tax rate so long as we maintain a full valuation allowance.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings include patent enforcement actions initiated by us against others for the infringement of our technologies, as well as proceedings brought by others against us at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTAB”) and in the Federal Patent Court in Germany in an attempt to invalidate certain of our patent claims.
The majority of our litigation, including our PTAB proceedings, is being paid for through contingency fee arrangements with our litigation counsel as well as third-party litigation financing. In general, litigation counsel is entitled to recoup on a priority basis, from litigation proceeds, any out-of-pocket expenses incurred. Following reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, litigation counsel is generally entitled to a percentage of remaining proceeds based on the terms of the specific arrangement between us, counsel and our third-party litigation funder.
We were liable for costs assessed on infringement and validity cases in Germany in which we did not prevail. A portion of this liability was covered by bonds posted in Germany. As of December 31, 2021, our bonds have been fully released and all outstanding statutory court costs have been satisfied in full. We have no remaining litigation or related liabilities in Germany.
ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida)
We have a patent infringement complaint pending in the Middle District of Florida against Qualcomm and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. (collectively “Qualcomm”) seeking approximately $
Circuit upheld the PTAB’s decision with regard to the ‘940 Patent and, in January 2019, the court lifted the stay in this case. In July 2019, the court issued an order that granted our proposed selection of patent claims from
In April 2020, the court issued its claim construction order in which the court adopted our proposed construction for
In March 2021, the court further delayed the trial date citing backlog due to the pandemic, among other factors. A new trial date has not yet been set. Fact and expert discovery in this case are closed, expert reports have been submitted, and summary judgement and Daubert briefings have been completed by the parties. Joint pre-trial statements were submitted in May 2021. In March 2021, the court granted Qualcomm’s motion to strike certain of our 2020 infringement contentions. We filed a motion to clarify the court’s order and in July 2021, based on the court’s response to our motion to clarify, we filed a joint motion for entry of a judgement of non-infringement of our Patent No. 7,865,177 (“the ‘177 Patent”), subject to appeal. A number of outstanding motions are pending decisions by the court. In January 2022, the court held a hearing to allow the parties to present their respective positions on three outstanding motions. The court indicated that upon its ruling on these motions, a pre-trial conference will be scheduled and a trial date set. On March 9, 2022, the court ruled with respect to one of these motions granting Qualcomm’s motion to strike and exclude opinions regarding the alleged infringement and validity issues. This court order prevents the presentation of infringement and validity opinions by both of our experts at trial. In addition, on March 22, 2022, the court issued an order granting Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm does not infringe the remaining three patents in this case. This is a final judgment and the next step is an appeal of both the March 22, 2022 and the March 9, 2022 rulings (see Note 17). We are represented in this case on a full contingency fee basis.
ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida)
In December 2015, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the Middle District of Florida against Apple, LG, Samsung and Qualcomm alleging infringement of
ruled against the Qualcomm and Apple motions. The parties also filed a joint motion in March 2018 to eliminate
ParkerVision v. LG (District of New Jersey)
In July 2017, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the District of New Jersey against LG for the alleged infringement of the same patents previously asserted against LG in the Middle District of Florida (see ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm above). We elected to dismiss the case in the Middle District of Florida and re-file in New Jersey as a result of a Supreme Court ruling regarding proper venue. In March 2018, the court stayed this case pending a final decision in ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm in the Middle District of Florida. As part of this stay, LG has agreed to be bound by the final claim construction decision in that case.
ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of Texas)
In February 2020, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the Western District of Texas against Intel Corporation (“Intel”) alleging infringement of
The court issued its claim construction ruling in January 2021 in which the majority of the disputed claim terms were decided in our favor. The case was scheduled for trial beginning February 7, 2022. In April 2021, we filed an amended complaint to include additional Intel chips and products, including WiFi devices, to the complaint. The court suggested that, given the number of patents at issue, the case would be separated into two trials and, as a result of the added products, the first trial date was moved to June 2022.
In January 2022, the PTAB issued its ruling on the IPRs (see Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) below). In February 2022, the parties filed a joint motion with respect to both Intel cases whereby the first case would be narrowed to
ParkerVision v. Intel II (Western District of Texas)
In June 2020, to reduce the number of claims in ParkerVision v. Intel, we filed a second patent infringement complaint in the Western District of Texas against Intel that included a patent that we voluntarily dismissed from the original case. In July 2020, we amended our complaint adding
patents to the case. Intel responded to the complaint denying infringement and claiming invalidity of the patents.
In January 2021, Intel filed a petition for IPR against one of the patents in this case and in July 2021, the PTAB instituted proceedings with regard to this petition (see Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) below). We filed an amended complaint in 2021 adding Intel WiFi and Bluetooth products to the case. Two claim construction hearings were held in June 2021 and July 2021 and the court’s claim construction ruling was largely decided in our favor. The case was scheduled for trial in October 2022. In February 2022, the parties filed a joint motion which provided that the Intel II case would assert the same six patents from the first Intel case, provided none of the patents were invalidated in the first case, as well as one additional patent, depending on the outcome of the pending IPR proceeding. As a result of the restructuring of the cases, the trial date for this case is rescheduled for May 2023 although this date may change in lieu of the schedule changes in the first Intel case. We are represented in this case on a full contingency fee basis.
Additional Patent Infringement Cases – Western District of Texas
ParkerVision filed a number of additional patent cases in the Western District of Texas in September and October 2020 including cases against (i) TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd, a Chinese company, TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co., Ltd., TCL Moka Int’l Ltd. and TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. DE C.V. (collectively “TCL”), (ii) Hisense Co., Ltd. and Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd (collectively “Hisense”), a Chinese company, (iii) Buffalo Inc., a Japanese company (“Buffalo”) and (iv) Zyxel Communications Corporation, a Chinese multinational electronics company headquartered in Taiwan, (“Zyxel”). Each case alleges infringement of the same ten patents by products that incorporate modules containing certain WiFi chips manufactured by Realtek and/or MediaTek. Each of the defendants have filed responses denying infringement and claiming invalidity of the patents, among other defenses.
In May 2021, we filed a patent infringement case against LG Electronics (“LGE”), a South Korean company, in the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of the same ten patents. A second action was filed against Hisense in June 2021 in the Western District of Texas for infringement of
In May 2021, TCL and Hisense filed petitions for IPR against
The court held a combined Markman hearing on October 27, 2021 for the cases against Hisense and TCL. The court issued its claim construction recommendations on October 29, 2021, in which nearly all of the claim terms were decided in our favor. The Hisense and TCL cases currently have a trial date scheduled for December 12, 2022. The LGE case currently has a claim construction hearing scheduled for April 25, 2022 and a trial scheduled to commence on April 24, 2023. We are represented in each of these cases on a full contingency fee basis.
Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB)
Intel filed petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR) against U.S. patent 7,539,474 (“the ‘474 Patent”), and the ‘444 Patent which were both asserted in ParkerVision v. Intel. Intel also filed a petition for IPR against U.S. patent 8,190,108 (“the ‘108 patent”) which is asserted in ParkerVision v. Intel II. In January 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to institute IPR proceedings for the ‘444 Patent and the ‘474 Patent. An oral hearing was held on November 1, 2021 and final decisions from the PTAB on the ‘474 Patent and
the ‘444 Patent were issued in January 2022. The PTAB ruled against us with respect to the single challenged claim of the ‘444 Patent and ruled in our favor with respect to the seven challenged claims of the ‘474 Patent. The ‘444 Patent has subsequently been excluded from the narrowed claims asserted in ParkerVision v. Intel.
In July 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to institute IPR proceedings for the ‘108 Patent. We filed our response to this petition in October 2021 and an oral hearing is scheduled for April 2022. A final decision from the PTAB with respect to the ‘108 Patent is expected by July 2022. Depending on the PTAB’s ruling with respect to the ‘108 Patent, we have the option to include or exclude this patent from the patents being asserted in the Intel II case.
TCL, et. al. v. ParkerVision (PTAB)
In May 2021, TCL, along with Hisense, filed petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) against U.S. patent 7,292,835 (“the ‘835 Patent”) and the ‘444 Patent, both of which are asserted in the infringement cases against these parties in the Western District of Texas. In November 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to implement IPR proceedings for these
Preferred Stock
We have
Common Stock
We have
As of December 31, 2021, we have
Stock and Warrant Issuances – Equity Based Financings
The following table presents a summary of completed equity-based financing transactions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
The following table presents a summary of completed equity-based financing transactions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 (in thousands, except for per share amounts): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date | Transaction |
| # of Common Shares/ Units Sold |
| Average Price per Share/ Unit |
| # of Warrants Issued |
| Average Exercise Price per Warrant |
|
| Net Proceeds (1) |
January 2020 | Private placement of common stock |
| |
| $ |
| - |
| - |
| $ | |
February 2020 | Warrant amendment |
| - |
| - |
| |
| $ |
| $ | - |
March 2020 | Private placement of common stock, amended to add CPR |
| |
| $ |
| - |
| - |
| $ | |
April 2020 to December 2020 | Private placement of common stock with CPRs |
| |
| $ |
| - |
| - |
| $ | |
January 2021 | Private placement of common stock with CPRs |
| |
| $ |
| - |
| - |
| $ | |
March 2021 | Private placement of common stock with warrants |
| |
| $ |
| |
| $ |
| $ | |
December 2021 | Private placement of common stock with warrants |
| |
| $ |
| |
| $ |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)After deduction of applicable offering costs. Net proceeds are inclusive of the value of the CPRs that are classified as long-term debt (see Note 9).
Private Placements
In January 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of
In March 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of
From April to December 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of
In January 2021, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for the sale of an aggregate of
In March 2021, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for the sale of
In December 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor for the sale of
Warrant Amendment
On February 28, 2020, we entered into a warrant amendment agreement (the “Warrant Amendment Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC (“Aspire”), with respect to warrants issued in July and September 2018 (the “2018 Warrants”) that are exercisable, collectively, into
We recognized $
declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762). The shares underlying the 2018 Warrants are currently registered for resale pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-226738).
Upon execution of the Warrant Amendment Agreement, Aspire exercised
Stock and Warrant Issuances – Payment for Services
On February 10, 2020, we entered into a business consulting and retention agreement with Chelsea Investor Relations (“Chelsea”) to provide business advisory services to us. As consideration for services to be provided under the
On March 16, 2020, we entered into an agreement with Tailwinds Research Group LLC (“Tailwinds”) to provide digital marketing services to us. As consideration for services to be provided under the twelve-month term of the agreement, we issued warrants for the purchase up to
On May 22, 2020, we entered into an agreement with Intro-Act to provide research and shareholder relations services. As consideration for services under the agreement, we issued
On June 8, 2020, we entered into an agreement with a third party to provide media advisory services. As consideration for services provided under the term of the agreement, which extended through December 31, 2020, we issued
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a consulting services agreement with a third-party to provide shareholder relations services. As consideration for services provided under the twelve-month term of the agreement, we issued
In addition, from time to time, we issue restricted stock awards under our approved equity plans to third party consultants as share-based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued
Common Stock Warrants
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had outstanding warrants for the purchase of up to
Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement
On November 20, 2020, we adopted a second amendment to our Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (“Rights Agreement”) dated November 21, 2005, as amended. The amendment extends the expiration date of the Rights Agreement from November 20, 2020 to November 20, 2023 and decreases the exercise price of the rights from $
The Rights Agreement provided for the issuance, on November 29, 2005, as a dividend, rights to acquire fractional shares of Series E Preferred Stock. We did not assign any value to the dividend, as the value of these rights is not believed to be objectively determinable. The principal objective of the Rights Agreement is to cause someone interested in acquiring us to negotiate with our Board rather than launch an unsolicited or hostile bid. The Rights Agreement subjects a potential acquirer to substantial voting and economic dilution. Each share of common stock issued by ParkerVision will include an attached right.
The rights initially are not exercisable and trade with the common stock of ParkerVision. In the future, the rights may become exchangeable for shares of Series E Preferred Stock with various provisions that may discourage a takeover bid. Additionally, the rights have what are known as “flip-in” and “flip-over” provisions that could make any acquisition of us more costly to the potential acquirer. The rights may separate from the common stock following the acquisition of
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 we recognized share-based compensation expense of approximately $
As of December 31, 2021, there was $
Stock Incentive Plans
2019 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan
We adopted a long-term incentive equity plan in August 2019 that provides for the grant of stock-based awards to employees, officers, directors and consultants, not to exceed
2011 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan
We adopted a long-term incentive equity plan in September 2011 that, as amended in 2014, 2016 and 2017, provides for the grant of stock-based awards to employees, officers, directors and consultants, not to exceed
2008 Equity Incentive Plan
We adopted an equity incentive plan in August 2008 (the “2008 Plan”). The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of stock-based awards to employees (excluding named executives), directors and consultants, not to exceed
Restricted Stock Awards
RSAs are issued as executive and employee incentive compensation and as payment for services to others. The value of the award is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSAs are generally immediately vested.
Restricted Stock Units
RSUs are issued as incentive compensation to executives, employees, and non-employee directors. Each RSU represents a right to one share of our common stock, upon vesting. The RSUs are not entitled to voting rights or dividends, if any, until vested. RSUs generally vest over a to
RSAs and RSUs
The following table presents a summary of RSA and RSU activity under the 2008, 2011, and 2019 Plans (collectively, the “Stock Plans”) as of December 31, 2021 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-vested Shares | |||
| Shares |
| Weighted-Average | |
Non-vested at beginning of year | |
| $ | |
Granted | |
|
| |
Vested | ( |
|
| |
Forfeited | - |
|
| - |
Non-vested at end of year | - |
| $ | - |
|
|
|
|
|
The awards granted under the Stock Plans in 2021 were all RSAs awarded to non-employees as compensation in connection with consulting agreements.
The total fair value of RSAs and RSUs vested under the Stock Plans for the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $
Stock Options
Stock options are issued as incentive compensation to executives, employees and non-employee directors. Stock options are generally granted with exercise prices at or above fair market value of the underlying shares at the date of grant. The fair value of options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Generally, fair value is determined as of the grant date. Options for employees, including executives and non-employee directors, are generally granted under the Stock Plans.
The following table presents a summary of option activity under the Stock Plans for the year ended December 31, 2021 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares |
| Weighted- |
| Weighted-Average |
| Aggregate | |||
Outstanding at beginning of year | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised | ( |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Expired | ( |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year | |
|
| |
| years |
| $ | | |
Vested at end of year | |
| $ | |
| years |
| $ | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2021, the Board awarded
The weighted average per share fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $
The fair value of option grants under the Stock Plans for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year ended December 31, | ||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
Expected option term 1 |
| ||
Expected volatility factor 2 |
| ||
Risk-free interest rate 3 |
| ||
Expected annual dividend yield |
| ||
|
|
|
|
1 The expected term was generally determined based on historical activity for grants with similar terms and for similar groups of employees and represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. For employee options, groups of employees with similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes.
2 The stock volatility for each grant is measured using the weighted average of historical daily price changes of our common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option life of the grant.
3 The risk-free interest rate for periods equal to the expected term of the share option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the measurement date.
Options by Price Range
The options outstanding at December 31, 2021 under all plans have exercise price ranges, weighted average contractual lives, and weighted average exercise prices as follows (weighted average lives in years and shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Options Outstanding |
| Options Vested | ||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
| Number Outstanding at December 31, 2021 |
| Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price |
| Wtd. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life |
| Number Exercisable at December 31, 2021 |
| Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price |
| Wtd. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life | ||
$ |
| |
| $ | |
| |
| |
| $ | |
| |
$ |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
$ |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| $ | |
| |
| |
| $ | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We paid approximately $
In January 2020, we issued
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in bank accounts and overnight investments. At times our cash balances on deposit with banks may exceed the balance insured by the F.D.I.C.
On March 22, 2022, the United States District Court in the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division) issued an order granting Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm does not infringe the
In February 2022, our
In January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued its final decisions on
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, “disclosure controls and procedures” are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Under Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, “internal control over financial reporting’’ is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and our dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting; provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of the Company are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or the timely detection of the unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 using the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
In accordance with and satisfaction of the requirements of Form 8-K, we include the following disclosure:
On March 29, 2022, we issued a press release announcing our results of operations and financial condition for the year ended December 31, 2021. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The foregoing information, including the exhibit related thereto, is furnished in response to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any disclosure document of the Registrant, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such document.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevents Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors
Our Board is divided into three classes with only one class of directors typically being elected in each year and each class serving a three-year term. Our current directors, including their backgrounds and qualifications are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Age |
| Position with the Company |
Frank N. Newman |
| 79 |
| Class II Director, Audit Committee Member |
Jeffrey L. Parker |
| 65 |
| Class I Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Paul A. Rosenbaum |
| 79 |
| Class III Director, Audit Committee Chair |
Robert G. Sterne |
| 70 |
| Class III Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank N. Newman
Frank Newman has been a director of ours since December 2016 and a member of our audit committee since April 2020. Mr. Newman has been the chief executive officer and co-founder of PathGuard, Inc. (or its predecessors), a company offering hardware-based cybersecurity, since 2015. From 2011 until December 2018, Mr. Newman served as chairman of Promontory Financial Group China Ltd., an advisory group for financial institutions and corporations in China. From 2005 to 2010, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of Shenzhen Development Bank, a national bank in China. Prior to 2005, Mr. Newman served as chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Bankers Trust and chief financial officer of Bank of America and Wells Fargo Bank. Mr. Newman served as Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Treasury from 1994 to 1995 and as Under Secretary of Domestic Finance from 1993 to 1994. He has authored two books and several articles on economic matters, published in the U.S., mainland China, and Hong Kong. Mr. Newman has served as director of Aspirational Consumer Lifestyle Corp (NYSE: ASPL), a special purpose acquisition company, since September 2020. He also serves as audit committee chair and a member of the compensation committee for ASPL. Mr. Newman has previously served as a director for major public companies in the U.S., United Kingdom, and China, and as a member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall. He earned his BA, magna cum laude, in economics at Harvard. Mr. Newman brings a substantial knowledge of international banking and business relationships to the Board. His financial background adds an important expertise to the Board with regard to financing future business opportunities.
Jeffrey L. Parker
Jeffrey Parker has been the Chairman of our Board and our Chief Executive Officer since our inception in August 1989 and was our president from April 1993 to June 1998. From March 1983 to August 1989, Mr. Parker served as executive vice president for Parker Electronics, Inc., a joint venture partner with Carrier Corporation performing research, development, manufacturing, and sales and marketing for the heating, ventilation and air conditioning industry. Mr. Parker is a named inventor on 31 U.S. patents. Among other qualifications, as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Parker has relevant insight into our operations, our industry, and related risks as well as experience bringing disruptive technologies to market.
Paul A. Rosenbaum
Paul A. Rosenbaum has been a director of ours since December 2016 and a member of our audit committee since September 2018. Mr. Rosenbaum has extensive experience as a director and executive officer for both public and private companies in a number of industries. Since 1994, Mr. Rosenbaum has served as chief executive of SWR Corporation, a privately-held corporation that designs, sells, and markets specialty industrial chemicals. In September 2017, Mr. Rosenbaum was appointed to the Board
of Commissioners for the Oregon Liquor Control Commission and has served as chairman since March 2018. Since 2009, Mr. Rosenbaum has been a member of the Providence St. Vincent Medical Foundation Council of Trustees, and previously served as president of the Council. In addition, from September 2000 until June 2009, Mr. Rosenbaum served as chairman and chief executive officer of Rentrak Corporation (“Rentrak”), a Nasdaq publicly traded company that provides transactional media measurement and analytical services to the entertainment and media industry. From June 2009 until July 2011, Mr. Rosenbaum served in a non-executive capacity as chairman of Rentrack. From 2007 until 2016, Mr. Rosenbaum served on the Board of Commissioners for the Port of Portland, including as vice chairman from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Rosenbaum was chief partner in the Rosenbaum Law Center from 1978 to 2000 and served in the Michigan Legislature from 1972 to 1978, during which time he chaired the Michigan House Judiciary Committee, was legal counsel to the Speaker of the House of the state of Michigan and wrote and sponsored the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act. Additionally, Mr. Rosenbaum served on the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, as vice chairman of the Criminal Justice and Consumer Affairs Committee of the National Conference of State Legislatures, and on a committee of the Michigan Supreme Court responsible for reviewing local court rules. Among other qualifications, Mr. Rosenbaum has extensive experience as a director and executive officer of a publicly held corporation and has relevant insights into operations and our litigation strategies.
Robert G. Sterne
Robert Sterne has been a director of ours since September 2006 and also served as a director of ours from February 2000 to June 2003. Since 1978, Mr. Sterne has been a partner of the law firm of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, specializing in patent and other intellectual property law. Mr. Sterne provides legal services to us as one of our patent and intellectual property attorneys. Mr. Sterne has co-authored numerous publications related to patent litigation strategies. He has received multiple awards for contributions to intellectual property law including Law 360’s 2016 Top 25 Icons of IP and the Financial Times 2015 Top 10 Legal Innovators in North America. Among other qualifications, Mr. Sterne has an in-depth knowledge of our intellectual property portfolio and patent strategies and is considered a leader in best practices and board responsibilities concerning intellectual property.
Information About Our Executive Officers
Our current executive officers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Age |
| Position with the Company |
Jeffrey Parker |
| 65 |
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) |
Cynthia French |
| 55 |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (“CFO”) |
|
|
|
|
|
The background for Mr. Jeffrey Parker is included above under the heading “Directors”.
Cynthia French (formerly Poehlman)
Cynthia French has been our chief financial officer since June 2004 and our corporate secretary since August 2007. From March 1994 to June 2004, Ms. French was our controller and our chief accounting officer. Ms. French has been a certified public accountant in the state of Florida since 1989.
Former Executive Officers
Messrs. David Sorrells and Gregory Rawlins both served as our Chief Technology Officers (“CTO”) through March 2020, at which time, given our reduced scope of operations, in particular our research and development activities, our Board determined to eliminate the Chief Technology Officer role. Both Mr. Sorrells and Mr. Rawlins remain employed by us in technical support roles.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our officers or directors.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely upon a review of such forms and written representations received by the Company from certain reporting persons, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2021 all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with in a timely manner.
Code of Ethics
The Board has adopted a code of ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial and accounting officer, that is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports that we file or submit to the SEC and in our other public communications, compliance with applicable government laws, rules and regulations, prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person designated in the code and accountability for adherence to the code. A copy of the code of ethics may be found on our website at www.parkervision.com.
Shareholder Nominations
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board.
Audit Committee and Financial Expert
Messrs. Paul Rosenbaum and Frank Newman serve as the members of our audit committee. Our audit committee is governed by a Board-approved charter which, among other things, establishes the audit committee’s membership requirements and its powers and responsibilities. Our Board has determined that Mr. Rosenbaum and Mr. Newman are audit committee financial experts within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the total compensation of each of our “named executive officers” as defined in Item 402(m) of Regulation S-K (the “Executives”) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Given the complexity of disclosure requirements concerning executive compensation, and in particular with respect to the standards of financial accounting and reporting related to equity compensation, there is a difference between the compensation that is reported in this table versus that which is actually paid to and received by the Executives. The amounts in the Summary Compensation Table that reflect the full grant date fair value of an equity award, do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that has been realized or will be realized in the future with respect to these awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | (b) |
| (c) |
| (d) |
| (e) |
| (f) |
| (g) |
| (h) | ||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year |
| Salary |
| Bonus ($) |
| Stock Awards |
| Option Awards |
| All Other |
| Total | ||||||
Jeffrey Parker, CEO | 2021 |
| $ | 260,000 |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | 3,640,000 |
| $ | 24,000 | 3 | $ | 3,924,000 |
| 2020 |
|
| 270,000 | 1 |
| - |
|
| 99,000 |
|
| - |
|
| 24,923 | 3 |
| 393,923 |
Cynthia French, CFO | 2021 |
|
| 180,000 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 455,000 |
|
| - |
|
| 635,000 |
| 2020 |
|
| 186,923 | 1 |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 42,750 |
|
| - |
|
| 229,673 |
David Sorrells, Former CTO 4 | 2020 |
|
| 176,150 |
|
| - |
|
| 49,500 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 225,650 |
Gregory Rawlins, Former CTO Heathrow 4 | 2020 |
|
| 207,692 |
|
| - |
|
| 49,500 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 257,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.There were 27 biweekly pay periods in 2020 compared to 26 in 2021 resulting in an decrease in reported base salaries.
2.The amounts represented in columns (e) and (f) represents the full grant date fair value of equity awards in accordance with ASC 718. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 included in Item 8 for the assumptions made in the valuation of equity awards.
3.Represents an automobile allowance in the amount of $24,000, paid biweekly. The additional amount in 2020 is the result of 27 pay periods in 2020 compared to 26 in 2021.
4.The CTO roles were eliminated in March 2020 by our Board.
In February 2020, our Board approved equity awards under our 2019 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) including 300,000 RSUs to Mr. Parker, 150,000 RSUs to each of Messrs. Rawlins and Sorrells and 150,000 share options at an exercise price of $0.33 per share to Ms. French. These awards vest over five quarters through May 2021. These awards were, in part, in consideration of continuing voluntary salary reductions by our Executives.
In January 2021, the Board approved equity awards under the 2019 Plan including nonqualified stock options for the purchase of up to 8,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.54 per share to Mr. Parker and nonqualified stock options for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.54 to Ms. French. These options vest over eight equal quarterly increments commencing March 31, 2021 and expiring on January 11, 2026. These awards were awarded as long-term incentive to our executives and took into consideration the longevity of their tenure with us, the continuation of their base compensation at a 20% reduced pay rate since 2018 and in recognition of the key role each holds in the organization.
We do not have employment agreements with any of our Executives. We have non-compete arrangements in place with all of our employees, including our Executives, that impose post-termination
restrictions on (i) employment or consultation with competing companies or customers, (ii) recruiting or hiring employees for a competing company, and (iii) soliciting or accepting business from our customers. We also have a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan for all of our employees, including our Executives. We did not make any employer contributions to the 401(k) plan in 2021 or 2020.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table summarizes information concerning the outstanding equity awards, including unexercised options, unvested stock and equity incentive awards, as of December 31, 2021 for each of our Executives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Option Awards | |||||||
|
| Number of |
| Number of | Option |
| Option |
| |
Name |
| (a) |
| (b) | (c) |
| (d) |
| |
Jeffrey Parker |
| 20,000 | 1 | - |
| 1.98 |
| 8/15/2024 |
|
|
| 2,680,000 | 2, 5 | - |
| 0.17 |
| 8/7/2026 |
|
|
| 4,000,000 | 3 | 4,000,000 | 3 | 0.54 |
| 1/11/2026 |
|
Cynthia French |
| 20,000 | 1 | - |
| 1.98 |
| 8/15/2024 |
|
|
| 877,150 | 2 | - |
| 0.17 |
| 8/7/2026 |
|
|
| 150,000 | 4 | - |
| 0.33 |
| 2/9/2027 |
|
|
| 500,000 | 3 | 500,000 | 3 | 0.54 |
| 1/11/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Options vested over four equal quarterly periods from August 31, 2017 to May 31, 2018.
2Options vested over eight equal quarterly periods from September 1, 2019 to June 1, 2021.
3Options vest over eight equal quarterly periods beginning March 31, 2021
4Options vested 50% on grant date and the remaining 50% over four equal quarterly periods from May 9, 2020 to May 9, 2021
5Number of securities underlying exercisable options is net of 3.3 million share options gifted for no consideration by Mr. Parker in January 2021.
Director Compensation
Since September 2018, the Board compensation program has consisted exclusively of equity-based compensation, generally awarded annually, in the form of nonqualified stock options, RSUs, or a combination thereof. Unvested director equity compensation awards are forfeited if the director resigns or is removed from the Board for cause prior to the vesting date. Nonqualified stock options generally expire seven year from grant date.
In February 2020, our non-employee directors were awarded, at their option, either 150,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise price of $0.33 per share or an RSU for 150,000 shares. Messrs. Rosenbaum and Sterne opted to receive options, each with a grant-date fair value of approximately $43,000. Mr. Newman opted to receive a RSU with a grant date fair value of approximately $50,000. Each of the awards vest 50% upon grant with the remaining portion vesting in four equal quarterly installments from
May 2020 through February 2021.
In addition, in February 2020, Mr. Sterne was awarded an immediately vested nonqualified stock option for the purchase of 100,000 shares at $0.33 per share, with an estimated grant-date fair value of approximately $29,000, as partial payment of accrued and unpaid fees for board and committee service prior to 2019. Mr. Sterne waived approximately $70,000 in additional accrued and unpaid fees.
In January 2021, each of our non-employee directors were awarded 380,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise price of $0.54 per share. These options vest over eight equal quarterly increments commencing March 31, 2021 and expiring on January 11, 2026.
We reimburse our non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings where applicable and we encourage participation in relevant educational programs for which we reimburse all or a portion of the costs incurred for these purposes.
Directors who are also our employees are not compensated for serving on our Board. Information regarding compensation otherwise received by our directors who are also named executive officers is provided under “Executive Compensation.”
The following table summarizes the compensation of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Stock Awards($) |
| Option Awards($) 1 |
| Total | |||
(a) |
| (b) |
| (c) |
| (d) | |||
Frank Newman 2 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 172,900 |
| $ | 172,900 |
Paul Rosenbaum 3 |
|
| - |
|
| 172,900 |
|
| 172,900 |
Robert Sterne 4 |
|
| - |
|
| 172,900 |
|
| 172,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1.The amounts represented in columns (b) and (c) represent the full grant date fair value of share-based awards in accordance with ASC 718. Refer to Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for the assumptions made in the valuation of stock awards.
2.At December 31, 2021, Mr. Newman has an aggregate of 1,355,000 nonqualified stock options outstanding, of which 1,165,000 are exercisable.
3.At December 31, 2021, Mr. Rosenbaum has an aggregate of 1,505,000 nonqualified stock options outstanding, of which 1,315,000 are exercisable.
4.At December 31, 2021, Mr. Sterne has 1,651,735 nonqualified stock options outstanding, of which 1,461,735 are exercisable.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table gives information as of December 31, 2021 about shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under all of our equity compensation plans (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category | Number of securities to | Weighted-average | Number of securities |
| (a) | (b) | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,3 | 1,204 | $0.94 | 82 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2,3 | 22,011 | 0.39 | 1,898 |
Total | 23,215 |
| 1,980 |
|
|
|
|
1.Includes the 2008 Plan and the 2011 Plan.
2.Includes the 2019 Plan.
3.The types of awards that may be issued under each of these plans is discussed more fully in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 15, 2022 with respect to the stock ownership of (i) those persons or groups who beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our executive officers, and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group (based upon information furnished by those persons).
As of March 15, 2022, 77,766,448 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
| Amount and |
| Percent |
>5% HOLDERS (EXCLUDING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS) |
|
|
|
|
GEM Partners, LP |
| 8,156,616 | 2 | 9.99% |
Thomas Staz Revocable Trust |
| 4,017,169 | 3 | 5.17% |
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Parker 10 |
| 7,990,583 | 4 | 9.35% |
Cynthia French 10 |
| 1,690,743 | 5 | 2.13% |
Frank Newman 10 |
| 1,395,600 | 6 | 1.77% |
Paul Rosenbaum 10 |
| 2,039,884 | 7 | 2.57% |
Robert Sterne 10 |
| 1,557,500 | 8 | 1.96% |
All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons) |
| 14,674,310 | 9 | 16.05% |
|
|
|
|
|
1Percentage is calculated based on all outstanding shares of common stock plus, for each person or group, any shares of common stock that the person or the group has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other rights. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or group has sole voting and dispositive power over all such shares of common stock.
2GEM Investment Advisors, LLC (“GEM Advisors”) is the general partner of GEM Partners LP (“GEM”) and Flat Rock Partners LP (“FlatRock”). Mr. Daniel Lewis is the controlling person of GEM Advisors. GEM Advisors and Mr. Lewis have shared voting and dispositive power. Beneficial ownership includes (i) 4,899 shares held by FlatRock, (ii) 6,600 shares held by Mr. Lewis, (iii) 4,272,796 shares held by GEM, and (iv) 3,886,923 shares underlying convertible notes held by GEM. Excludes 5,440,000 shares underlying convertible notes held by GEM that are not convertible within 60 days due to exercise limitations. The principal business address of GEM Advisors, FlatRock, and Mr. Lewis is 100 State Street, Suite 2B, Teaneck, NJ 07666. Information derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed by GEM Advisors on March 9, 2021.
3Thomas Staz is the trustee of the Thomas Staz Revocable Trust. The principal business address of the Thomas Staz Revocable Trust is 1221 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2660, Miami, Florida 33131. Information derived from a Schedule 13D filed by Thomas Staz Revocable Trust on April 7, 2021.
4Includes 7,680,000 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options, 193,324 shares held by Mr. Parker directly, and 117,259 shares held by Jeffrey Parker and Deborah Parker Joint Tenants in Common, over which Mr. Parker has shared voting and dispositive power. Excludes 3,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future.
5Includes 1,665,550 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options and excludes 375,000 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future.
6Includes 1,212,500 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options and excludes 142,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future.
7Includes 1,362,500 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options and 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of convertible notes. Excludes 142,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future.
8Includes 1,509,235 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options and excludes 142,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future.
9Includes 13,429,785 shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options and 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of convertible notes held by directors and officers and excludes 3,802,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the future (see notes 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 above).
10The person’s address is 4446-1A Hendricks Avenue, Suite 354, Jacksonville, Florida 32207.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Related Party Transactions
We paid approximately $97,000 and $11,000 in 2021 and 2020, respectively for patent-related legal services to SKGF, of which Robert Sterne is a partner. In addition, we paid approximately $130,000 and $110,000 in 2021 and 2020, respectively, for principal and interest on an unsecured note payable to SKGF. The note was issued in 2016 to convert outstanding unpaid legal fees to an unsecured promissory note. The note has been amended multiple times to defer principal payments. The note, as amended, allows for interest at 4% per annum, monthly installments of $10,000 per month beginning January 2020, with a final balloon payment due on April 30, 2023. At December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of the note, including unpaid interest is approximately $703,000.
In January 2020, we issued 500,000 in unregistered shares of our common stock as an in-kind payment of approximately $0.08 million in outstanding amounts payable to Stacie Wilf, sister to Jeffrey Parker.
Director Independence
We follow the rules of Nasdaq in determining if a director is independent. The Board also consults with our counsel to ensure that the Board’s determination is consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors. The Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Newman, Rosenbaum, and Sterne are independent directors.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The firm of MSL, P.A. acts as our principal accountants. From April 2018 to September 2019, the firm of BDO USA, LLP acted as our principal accountants (“Prior Accountants”). The following is a summary of fees paid to the principal accountants and Prior Accountants for services rendered.
Audit Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of our financial statements included in our quarterly reports, and services provided in connection with regulatory filings were approximately $120,000 and $148,300, respectively. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2020, the aggregate fees billed by our Prior Accountants for professional services rendered in connection with services provided in connection with regulatory filings were approximately $70,000.
Audit Related Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no fees billed for professional services by our principal accountants or Prior Accountants for assurance and related services.
Tax Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning.
All Other Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no fees billed for other professional services by our principal accountants.
All the services discussed above were approved by our audit committee. The audit committee pre-approves the services to be provided by our principal accountants, including the scope of the annual audit and non-audit services to be performed by the principal accountants and the principal accountants’ audit and non-audit fees.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
(2) Financial statement schedules:
Not applicable.
(3) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
| Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
| |
3.2 |
| |
3.3 |
| |
3.4 |
| |
3.5 |
| |
3.6 |
| |
3.7 |
| |
3.8 |
| |
3.9 |
| |
3.10 |
|
4.1 |
| |
4.2 |
| |
4.3 |
| |
4.5 |
| |
4.6 |
| |
4.7 |
| |
10.1 |
| |
10.2 |
| |
10.3 |
| |
10.4 |
| |
10.5 |
| |
10.6 |
| |
10.7 |
| |
10.8 |
| |
10.9 |
| |
10.10 |
| |
10.11 |
| |
10.12 |
| |
10.13 |
| |
10.14 |
|
10.15 |
| |
10.16 |
| |
10.17 |
| |
10.18 |
| |
10.19 |
| |
10.20 |
| |
10.21 |
| |
10.22 |
| |
10.23 |
| |
10.24 |
| |
10.25 |
| |
10.26 |
| |
10.27 |
| |
10.28 |
| |
10.29 |
| |
10.30 |
| 2019 Long-term Incentive Plan dated August 9, 2019, as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.39 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2021) ** |
10.31 |
| |
10.32 |
| |
10.33 |
| |
10.34 |
| |
10.35 |
| |
10.36 |
|
10.37 |
| |
10.38 |
| |
10.39 |
| |
10.40 |
| |
10.41 |
| |
10.42 |
| |
10.43 |
| |
10.44 |
| |
10.45 |
| |
10.46 |
| |
10.47 |
| |
10.48 |
| |
10.49 |
| |
10.50 |
| |
10.51 |
| |
10.52 |
| |
10.53 |
| |
10.54 |
| |
10.55 |
|
10.56 |
| |
10.57 |
| |
10.58 |
| Form of Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Accredited Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.84 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2021) |
10.59 |
| Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Registrant and Accredited Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.85 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2021) |
10.60 |
| Form of Warrant Agreement between Registrant and Accredited Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.86 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2021) |
10.61 |
| List of Accredited Investors to March 29, 2021 Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.87 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2021)* |
10.62 |
| |
10.63 |
| |
10.64 |
| |
21.1 |
| |
23.1 |
| |
31.1 |
| |
31.2 |
| |
32.1 |
| Section 1350 Certification of Jeffrey L. Parker and Cynthia L. French * |
99.1 |
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
| XBRL Instance Document* |
101.SCH |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema* |
101.CAL |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase* |
101.DEF |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase* |
101.LAB |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase* |
101.PRE |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase* |
* Filed herewith
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Date: March 29, 2022 |
|
|
| PARKERVISION, INC. |
|
| By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Parker |
|
| Jeffrey L. Parker |
|
| Chief Executive Officer |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Signature | Title | Date |
|
|
|
By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Parker | Chief Executive Officer and | March 29, 2022 |
Jeffrey L. Parker | Chairman of the Board (Principal |
|
| Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Cynthia L. French | Chief Financial Officer (Principal | March 29, 2022 |
Cynthia L. French | Financial Officer and Principal |
|
| Accounting Officer) and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Frank N. Newman | Director | March 29, 2022 |
Frank N. Newman |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Paul A. Rosenbaum | Director | March 29, 2022 |
Paul A. Rosenbaum |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Robert G. Sterne | Director | March 29, 2022 |
Robert G. Sterne |
|
|