XML 43 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Loan Portfolio
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Loan Portfolio [Abstract]  
Loan Portfolio
Note 4.  Loan Portfolio

The Company segregates its loan portfolio into three primary loan segments: Real Estate Loans, Commercial Loans, and Consumer Loans. Real estate loans are further segregated into the following classes: construction loans, loans secured by farmland, loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate, and other real estate loans. Other real estate loans include commercial real estate loans. The consolidated loan portfolio was composed of the following on the dates indicated:
 
   
September 30, 2012
  
December 31, 2011
 
   
Outstanding
Balance
  
Percent of
Total Portfolio
  
Outstanding
Balance
  
Percent of
Total Portfolio
 
   
(In Thousands)
     
(In Thousands)
    
Real estate loans:
            
Construction
 $48,740   7.0% $42,208   6.3%
Secured by farmland
  9,438   1.4%  10,047   1.5%
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  254,079   36.7%  236,760   35.3%
Other real estate loans
  258,679   37.4%  275,428   41.0%
Commercial loans
  108,962   15.7%  94,427   14.1%
Consumer loans
  12,466   1.8%  12,523   1.8%
    692,364   100.0%  671,393   100.0%
Less allowance for loan losses
  13,941       14,623     
Net loans
 $678,423      $656,770     
 
Loans presented in the table above exclude loans held for sale. The Company had $92.5 million in mortgages held for sale at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The following table presents a contractual aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


   
September 30, 2012
        
(In thousands)
    
   
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
90 Days
Or Greater
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total
Loans
Real estate loans:
             
Construction
 $175  $  $3,142  $3,317  $45,423  $48,740 
Secured by farmland
              9,438   9,438 
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  4,838   208   2,817   7,863   246,216   254,079 
Other real estate loans
  855   253   6,794   7,902   250,777   258,679 
Commercial loans
  15   126   1,960   2,101   106,861   108,962 
Consumer loans
  61   22   33   116   12,350   12,466 
Total
 $5,944  $609  $14,746  $21,299  $671,065  $692,364 


   
December 31, 2011
        
(In thousands)
    
   
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
90 Days
Or Greater
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total
Loans
Real estate loans:
             
Construction
 $696  $  $3,285  $3,981  $38,227  $42,208 
Secured by farmland
  415         415   9,632   10,047 
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  2,036   1,721   7,639   11,396   225,364   236,760 
Other real estate loans
  6,079   1,736   1,466   9,281   266,147   275,428 
Commercial loans
  1,751   121   315   2,187   92,240   94,427 
Consumer loans
  23         23   12,500   12,523 
Total
 $11,000  $3,578  $12,705  $27,283  $644,110  $671,393 

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing by class of loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


   
September 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
   
Nonaccrual
  
Past due 90
days or more
and still accruing
 
Nonaccrual
 
Past due 90
days or more
and still accruing
   
(In Thousands)
Real estate loans:
         
Construction
 $2,943  $268  $3,804  $86 
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  8,653   399   11,839   1,097 
Other real estate loans
  8,881   130   7,567    
Commercial loans
  2,176   60   2,136   50 
Consumer loans
  30   3       
Total
 $22,683  $860  $25,346  $1,233 


If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such income would have approximated $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.
 
The Company utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of measuring and monitoring credit risk in the loan portfolio. Under the Company's classification system, problem and potential problem loans are classified as "Special Mention", "Substandard", "Doubtful" and "Loss".
 
Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt. Either the paying capacity of the borrower or the value of the collateral may be inadequate to protect the Company from potential losses.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have a very high possibility of loss. However, because of important and reasonably specific pending factors, classification as a loss is deferred until a more exact status can be determined.

Loss: Loans are classified as loss when they are deemed uncollectable and are charged off immediately.

The following tables present a summary of loan classifications by class of loan as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


 
September 30, 2012
  (In Thousands)
 
   
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Secured by
Farmland
  
Real Estate
Secured by 1-4
Family Residential
  
Other Real
Estate Loans
  
Commercial
  
Consumer
  
Total
 
Pass
 $27,342  $8,629  $230,963  $218,427  $102,620  $12,310  $600,291 
Special Mention
  15,810   199   4,235   23,155   3,442   60   46,901 
Substandard
  4,553   610   17,396   16,044   2,772   66   41,441 
Doubtful
  1,035      1,485   1,053   128   30   3,731 
Loss
                     
Ending Balance
 $48,740  $9,438  $254,079  $258,679  $108,962  $12,466  $692,364 

 
December 31, 2011
  (In thousands)
 
   
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Secured by
Farmland
  
Real Estate
Secured by 1-4
Family Residential
  
Other Real
Estate Loans
  
Commercial
  
Consumer
  
Total
 
Pass
 $22,250  $9,235  $207,332  $239,156  $87,731  $12,448  $578,152 
Special Mention
  5,764   199   10,773   23,434   4,127   61   44,358 
Substandard
  13,163   613   17,062   12,592   2,374   14   45,818 
Doubtful
  1,031      1,593   246   195      3,065 
Loss
                     
Ending Balance
 $42,208  $10,047  $236,760  $275,428  $94,427  $12,523  $671,393 
The following table presents loans identified as impaired by class of loan as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
 
   
September 30, 2012
   (In thousands)
   
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
           
Real estate loans:
           
Construction
 $1,629  $2,180  $  $2,071  $ 
Secured by farmland
               
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  3,136   3,554      3,360   36 
Other real estate loans
  3,814   3,857      4,438   91 
Commercial loans
  1,938   1,938      1,919    
Consumer loans
               
Total with no related allowance
  10,517   11,529      11,788   127 
                      
With an allowance recorded:
                    
Real estate loans:
                    
Construction
  1,314   2,539   198   1,913    
Secured by farmland
               
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  6,802   7,460   2,577   7,034   30 
Other real estate loans
  7,852   7,952   1,408   7,975   51 
Commercial loans
  471   492   361   467   13 
Consumer loans
  30   30   30   30    
Total with a related allowance
  16,469   18,473   4,574   17,419   94 
Total
 $26,986  $30,002  $4,574  $29,207  $221 
 
The following table presents loans identified as impaired by class of loan as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011:
 
  December 31, 2011 
  (In thousands) 
   
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
With no related allowance recorded:
               
Real estate loans:
               
Construction
 $2,992  $3,652  $  $3,948  $ 
Secured by farmland
                
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  3,978   4,656      4,424   7 
Other real estate loans
  4,732   4,775      5,729   95 
Commercial loans
  1,751   1,751      1,735    
Consumer loans
               
Total with no related allowance
  13,453   14,834      15,836   102 
                      
With an allowance recorded:
                    
Real estate loans:
                    
Construction
  812   842   328   812    
Secured by farmland
                
Secured by 1-4 family residential
  8,697   10,417   3,076   9,047   17 
Other real estate loans
  5,581   5,581   1,192   5,076   64 
Commercial loans
  656   678   502   662   14 
Consumer loans
               
Total with a related allowance
  15,746   17,518   5,098   15,597   95 
Total
 $29,199  $32,352  $5,098  $31,433  $197 

The "Recorded Investment" amounts in the tables above represent the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the tables plus any accrued interest receivable on such loans. The "Unpaid Principal Balance" represents the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the tables plus any amounts that have been charged off on each loan.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans table above are troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") that were classified as impaired. The total balance of TDRs at September 30, 2012 was $11.5 million of which $7.2 million were included in the Company's non-accrual loan totals at that date and $4.3 million represented loans performing as agreed according to the restructured terms. This compares with $11.2 million in total restructured loans at December 31, 2011, an increase of $0.3 million or 2.7%. The amount of the valuation allowance related to total TDRs was $2.0 million and $1.7 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively.

The $7.2 million in nonaccrual TDRs as of September 30, 2012 is comprised of $74,000 in real estate construction loans, $2.3 million in 1-4 family real estate loans, $4.7 million in other real estate loans, and $213,000 in consumer loans. The $4.3 million in TDRs which were performing as agreed under restructured terms as of September 30, 2012 is comprised of $1.3 million in 1-4 family real estate loans, $2.8 million in other real estate loans and $233,000 in commercial loans. The Company considers all loans classified as TDRs to be impaired.

The following table presents by class of loan, information related to loans modified in a TDR during the three months ended September 30, 2012:
 
 
Loans modified as TDR's
 
For the three months ended
 
September 30, 2012
Class of Loan
Number of Contracts
 
Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
        
Construction
 
$
   
$
 
Secured by farmland
 
   
 
Secured by 1-4 family residential
3
 
2,163
   
1,595
 
Other real estate loans
1
 
1,528
   
1,524
 
Total real estate loans
4
 
3,691
   
3,119
 
Commercial loans
 
   
 
Consumer loans
1
 
217
   
213
 
Total
5
 
$
3,908
   
$
3,332
 
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company modified five loans that were considered to be TDRs and are summarized in the above table. The interest rate was lowered on three of the loans and repayment terms were modified on the other two.
 
 
Loans modified as TDR's
 
For the nine months ended
 
September 30, 2012
Class of Loan
Number of Contracts
 
Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
        
Construction
 
$
   
$
 
Secured by farmland
 
   
 
Secured by 1-4 family residential
5
 
3,075
   
2,486
 
Other real estate loans
1
 
1,528
   
1,524
 
Total real estate loans
6
 
4,603
   
4,010
 
Commercial loans
 
   
 
Consumer loans
1
 
217
   
213
 
Total
7
 
$
4,820
   
$
4,223
 
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company modified seven loans that were considered to be TDRs and are summarized on the above table. The interest rate was lowered for five of the loans, term was extended for one loan, and repayment terms were modified for two loans.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company identified four loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $2.6 million as TDRs for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance methodology. Upon identifying these loans as TDRs, the Company evaluated them for impairment. On the basis of a current evaluation of loss for these loans, they required the establishment of an allowance for loan losses of approximately $536,000 at September 30, 2012.

As of September 30, 2012, four loans restructured as TDRs during the nine month period with an aggregate recorded investment of $3.3 million are included in the Company's non-accrual loans total. The remaining loans identified as TDRs during this period are included in the Company's non-performing assets that are performing as agreed under the restructured terms.

No loans modified as TDRs from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 subsequently defaulted (i.e., 90 days or more past due following a restructuring) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Management considers troubled debt restructurings and subsequent defaults in restructured loans in the determination of the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses. When identified as a TDR, a loan is evaluated for potential loss based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent. Loans identified as TDRs frequently are on non-accrual status at the time of the restructuring and, in some cases, partial charge-offs may have already been taken against the loan and a specific allowance may have already been established for the loan. As a result of any modification as a TDR, the specific reserve associated with the loan may be increased. Additionally, loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future defaults. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. As a result, any specific allowance may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the total allowance balance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.