XML 48 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Loan Portfolio
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Receivables [Abstract]  
Loan Portfolio
Loan Portfolio

The Company segregates its loan portfolio into three primary loan segments:  Real Estate Loans, Commercial Loans, and Consumer Loans.  Real estate loans are further segregated into the following classes: construction loans, loans secured by farmland, loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate, and other real estate loans.  Other real estate loans include commercial real estate loans.  The consolidated loan portfolio was composed of the following on the dates indicated:
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Outstanding
Balance
 
Percent of
Total Portfolio
 
Outstanding
Balance
 
Percent of
Total Portfolio
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$
37,155

 
5.2
%
 
$
50,218

 
7.1
%
Secured by farmland
11,504

 
1.6
%
 
11,876

 
1.7
%
Secured by 1-4 family residential
269,986

 
37.7
%
 
260,620

 
36.7
%
Other real estate loans
261,095

 
36.5
%
 
254,930

 
35.9
%
Commercial loans
123,285

 
17.2
%
 
118,573

 
16.8
%
Consumer loans
13,081

 
1.8
%
 
13,260

 
1.8
%
 
716,106

 
100.0
%
 
709,477

 
100.0
%
Less allowance for loan losses
13,382

 
 

 
14,311

 
 

Net loans
$
702,724

 
 

 
$
695,166

 
 



Loans presented in the table above exclude loans held for sale.  The Company had $41.9 million in mortgages held for sale at September 30, 2013 and $82.1 million at December 31, 2012.

The following table presents a contractual aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
30-59 Days
Past Due
 
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
90 Days
Or Greater
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total
Loans
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$
174

 
$

 
$
935

 
$
1,109

 
$
36,046

 
$
37,155

Secured by farmland

 

 

 

 
11,504

 
11,504

Secured by 1-4 family residential
940

 
396

 
1,604

 
2,940

 
267,046

 
269,986

Other real estate loans
576

 

 
4,068

 
4,644

 
256,451

 
261,095

Commercial loans
118

 

 
55

 
173

 
123,112

 
123,285

Consumer loans
7

 
9

 
38

 
54

 
13,027

 
13,081

Total
$
1,815

 
$
405

 
$
6,700

 
$
8,920

 
$
707,186

 
$
716,106


 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
30-59 Days
Past Due
 
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
90 Days
Or Greater
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total
Loans
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$

 
$
108

 
$
2,043

 
$
2,151

 
$
48,067

 
$
50,218

Secured by farmland
415

 

 

 
415

 
11,461

 
11,876

Secured by 1-4 family residential
1,625

 
568

 
1,910

 
4,103

 
256,517

 
260,620

Other real estate loans
197

 
361

 
6,112

 
6,670

 
248,260

 
254,930

Commercial loans

 
44

 
144

 
188

 
118,385

 
118,573

Consumer loans
27

 
10

 
32

 
69

 
13,191

 
13,260

Total
$
2,264

 
$
1,091

 
$
10,241

 
$
13,596

 
$
695,881

 
$
709,477


The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing by class of loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Non-accrual
 
Past due 90
days or more
and still accruing
 
Non-accrual
 
Past due 90
days or more
and still accruing
 
(In Thousands)
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$
2,629

 
$
400

 
$
2,861

 
$
780

Secured by 1-4 family residential
9,768

 
227

 
8,761

 
228

Other real estate loans
6,236

 

 
7,866

 

Commercial loans
1,862

 

 
2,146

 
34

Consumer loans
30

 
9

 
30

 
2

Total
$
20,525

 
$
636

 
$
21,664

 
$
1,044



If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such income would have approximated $839,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and $1.35 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The Company utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of measuring and monitoring credit risk in the loan portfolio.  Under the Company’s classification system, problem and potential problem loans are classified as “Special Mention”, “Substandard”, “Doubtful” and “Loss”.
 
Special Mention:  Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit.

Substandard:  Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt.  Either the paying capacity of the borrower or the value of the collateral may be inadequate to protect the Company from potential losses.

Doubtful:  Loans classified as doubtful have a very high possibility of loss.  However, because of important and reasonably specific pending factors, classification as a loss is deferred until a more exact status can be determined.

Loss: Loans are classified as loss when they are deemed uncollectible and are charged off immediately.

The following tables present a summary of loan classifications by class of loan as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
Construction
 
Real Estate
Secured by
Farmland
 
Real Estate
Secured by 1-4
Family Residential
 
Other Real
Estate Loans
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
Total
Pass
$
31,061

 
$
2,994

 
$
249,447

 
$
236,543

 
$
119,731

 
$
12,980

 
$
652,756

Special Mention
2,363

 
7,903

 
2,488

 
12,291

 
951

 
12

 
26,008

Substandard
3,171

 
607

 
16,053

 
12,261

 
2,489

 
59

 
34,640

Doubtful
560

 

 
1,998

 

 
114

 
30

 
2,702

Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending Balance
$
37,155

 
$
11,504

 
$
269,986

 
$
261,095

 
$
123,285

 
$
13,081

 
$
716,106

 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
Construction
 
Real Estate
Secured by
Farmland
 
Real Estate
Secured by 1-4
Family Residential
 
Other Real
Estate Loans
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
Total
Pass
$
29,741

 
$
11,068

 
$
237,121

 
$
228,052

 
$
112,298

 
$
13,134

 
$
631,414

Special Mention
15,540

 
199

 
3,767

 
12,949

 
3,332

 
47

 
35,834

Substandard
3,902

 
609

 
18,333

 
12,887

 
2,831

 
49

 
38,611

Doubtful
1,035

 

 
1,399

 
1,042

 
112

 
30

 
3,618

Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending Balance
$
50,218

 
$
11,876

 
$
260,620

 
$
254,930

 
$
118,573

 
$
13,260

 
$
709,477


The following table presents loans identified as impaired by class of loan as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$
1,910

 
$
2,187

 
$

 
$
1,927

 
$
13

Secured by farmland

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
4,363

 
4,840

 

 
4,664

 
6

Other real estate loans
4,347

 
4,581

 

 
4,421

 
111

Commercial loans
2,132

 
2,139

 

 
2,275

 
19

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

Total with no related allowance
12,752

 
13,747

 

 
13,287

 
149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
With an allowance recorded:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate loans:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Construction
987

 
1,037

 
508

 
1,016

 

Secured by farmland

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
6,477

 
6,707

 
2,904

 
6,644

 
51

Other real estate loans
4,995

 
5,288

 
830

 
5,077

 
71

Commercial loans
373

 
403

 
285

 
408

 
10

Consumer loans
30

 
30

 
30

 
30

 

Total with a related allowance
12,862

 
13,465

 
4,557

 
13,175

 
132

Total
$
25,614

 
$
27,212

 
$
4,557

 
$
26,462

 
$
281

 
The following table presents loans identified as impaired by class of loan as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012:
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
$
1,819

 
$
2,370

 
$

 
$
2,543

 
$

Secured by farmland

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
3,248

 
3,667

 

 
3,712

 
50

Other real estate loans
3,135

 
3,178

 

 
3,141

 
91

Commercial loans
1,947

 
1,947

 

 
1,924

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

Total with no related allowance
10,149

 
11,162

 

 
11,320

 
141

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
With an allowance recorded:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate loans:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Construction
1,150

 
2,250

 
166

 
1,685

 

Secured by farmland

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
7,544

 
8,203

 
2,724

 
7,842

 
65

Other real estate loans
7,505

 
7,605

 
1,045

 
7,691

 
73

Commercial loans
417

 
464

 
338

 
446

 
14

Consumer loans
30

 
30

 
30

 
30

 

Total with a related allowance
16,646

 
18,552

 
4,303

 
17,694

 
152

Total
$
26,795

 
$
29,714

 
$
4,303

 
$
29,014

 
$
293



The “Recorded Investment” amounts in the tables above represent the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the tables plus any accrued interest receivable on such loans.  The “Unpaid Principal Balance” represents the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the tables plus any amounts that have been charged off on each loan.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans table above are troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) that were classified as impaired.  The total balance of TDRs at September 30, 2013 was $15.8 million of which $11.0 million were included in the Company’s non-accrual loan totals at that date and $4.8 million represented loans performing as agreed according to the restructured terms. The total amount of TDRs at September 30, 2013 represents an increase of $3.8 million or 31.7% from the amount at December 31, 2012 of $12.0 million. The amount of the valuation allowance related to total TDRs was $2.6 million and $2.0 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 respectively.

The $11.0 million in nonaccrual TDRs as of September 30, 2013 is comprised of $651,000 in real estate construction loans, $5.4 million in 1-4 family real estate loans, $4.9 million in other real estate loans, and $80,000 in commercial loans.  The $4.8 million in TDRs which were performing as agreed under the restructured terms as of September 30, 2013 is comprised of $1.1 million in 1-4 family real estate loans, $3.1 million in other real estate loans and $642,000 in commercial loans.  The Company considers all loans classified as TDRs to be impaired.

The following tables present by class of loan, information related to loans modified in a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013:
 
Loans modified as TDR's
 
For the three months ended
 
September 30, 2013
Class of Loan
Number of Contracts
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
 
(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
Construction
1

 
$
45

 
$
41

Secured by farmland

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
6

 
2,300

 
1,986

Other real estate loans
3

 
701

 
676

Total real estate loans
10

 
3,046

 
2,703

Commercial loans
1

 
50

 
49

Consumer loans

 

 

Total
11

 
$
3,096

 
$
2,752

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans modified as TDR's
 
For the nine months ended
 
September 30, 2013
Class of Loan
Number of Contracts
 
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 
(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
 

 
 

 
 

Construction
2

 
$
557

 
$
514

Secured by farmland

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential
11

 
3,549

 
3,227

Other real estate loans
5

 
869

 
824

Total real estate loans
18

 
4,975

 
4,565

Commercial loans
2

 
517

 
515

Consumer loans

 

 

Total
20

 
$
5,492

 
$
5,080


 
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company modified eleven loans that were considered to be TDRs and are summarized in the above table.  The interest rates were reduced on ten of the loans and maturity dates were extended on nine of the loans.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company modified twenty loans that were considered to be TDRs and are summarized in the above table.  The interest rates were reduced on fifteen of the loans and maturity dates were extended on fifteen of the loans.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company identified ten loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $3.8 million as TDRs for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance methodology. Upon identifying these loans as TDRs, the Company evaluated them for impairment and determined, based on a current evaluation, that these loans required an allowance for loan losses balance of $1.1 million at September 30, 2013.

One loan modified as a TDR in the past twelve months subsequently defaulted (i.e., 90 days or more past due following a restructuring) during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The recorded investment of this loan was $712,000 as is classified as a 1-4 family residential loan.

Management considers troubled debt restructurings and subsequent defaults in restructured loans in the determination of the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.  When identified as a TDR, a loan is evaluated for potential loss based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent.  Loans identified as TDRs frequently are on non-accrual status at the time of the restructuring and, in some cases, partial charge-offs may have already been taken against the loan and a specific allowance may have already been established for the loan.  As a result of any modification as a TDR, the specific reserve associated with the loan may be increased.  Additionally, loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future defaults.  If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment.  As a result, any specific allowance may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the total allowance balance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.