XML 70 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets [Text Block]
GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The Company has goodwill of $14.0 million as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 and there were no changes in the carrying value during the fiscal years then ended.

In fiscal years 2012 and 2011, for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test, the Company determined there to be no reporting units below its operating segment; therefore, the annual goodwill impairment analysis was performed at the segment level in both of these years.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012, the Company identified qualitative factors that may affect the fair value of the reporting unit, including changes in the Company's industry, competitive environment, business strategy, and product mix; current and historical budgeted to actual performance; Company and peer market capitalization trends; macro-economic conditions and currency rate fluctuations. The Company also considered the results of its most recent fair value calculation and the amount by which the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, as well as the extent to which the inputs and assumptions in the fair value calculation would need to deteriorate in order for the reporting unit's fair value to fall below carrying value. Based on the assessment of the foregoing factors, the Company concluded there to be no indication of goodwill impairment.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company elected to use the fair value carry forward approach previously allowed under the Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Topic of the FASB ASC and determined each of the relevant criteria had been met. As a result of this determination, the Company concluded it was appropriate to carry forward the fair value from the valuation performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 and concluded there to be no indication of goodwill impairment.

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table presents the carrying value of purchased intangible assets with remaining net book values as of March 31, 2012 and 2011:

 
 
March 31, 2012
 
March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
 
Net
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
 
Net
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Amortization
 
Amount
 
Amount
 
Amortization
 
Amount
 
Useful Life
Technology
 
$
3,000

 
$
(3,000
)
 
$

 
$
3,000

 
$
(2,812
)
 
$
188

 
6

years
Customer relationships
 
1,705

 
(1,322
)
 
383

 
1,705

 
(1,044
)
 
661

 
8

years
OEM relationships
 
27

 
(27
)
 

 
27

 
(20
)
 
7

 
7

years
Total
 
$
4,732

 
$
(4,349
)
 
$
383

 
$
4,732

 
$
(3,876
)
 
$
856

 
 
 


Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was immaterial for fiscal year 2012, and for fiscal year 2011 and 2010 was $2.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

The Company tests its indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value.  If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the difference.  As of March 31, 2012, the Company had no indefinite lived intangible assets other than goodwill; however, the Company had previously reported indefinite lived intangible assets for which impairment or accelerated amortization charges were recorded in prior years presented in the Consolidated statements of operations and these are discussed below.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company finalized a long-term product development strategy and in doing so, evaluated the extent to which acquired technology would be used in future products. As part of this analysis, the Company elected to abandon certain of its acquired technology and therefore, recorded $1.4 million in accelerated amortization expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 to reflect the revised estimate of the asset's useful life.

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, management entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell Altec Lansing, the Company’s AEG segment.  The Company concluded that this triggered an interim impairment review as it was now more likely than not that the segment would be sold; however, as the Company’s Board of Directors had not yet approved the sale of the segment, the assets did not qualify for “held for sale” accounting under the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC.  The Company tests its indefinite lived assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value.  If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the difference.  The Company used the proposed purchase price of the AEG segment net assets per the non-binding letter of intent signed during the quarter as the fair value of the segment’s net assets.  This resulted in a full impairment of the Altec Lansing trademark and trade name; therefore, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and recognized a deferred tax benefit of $7.1 million associated with this impairment charge, which is included in discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.

As a result of the proposed purchase price of the net assets of the AEG segment, the Company also evaluated the long-lived assets within the reporting unit.  The fair value of the long-lived assets, which included purchased intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, was determined for each individual asset and compared to the asset’s relative carrying value.  This resulted in a full impairment of the AEG intangibles and a partial impairment of its property, plant and equipment; therefore, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company recognized non-cash impairment charges of $6.6 million and $3.8 million related to purchased intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, respectively.   The Company recognized a deferred tax benefit of $2.5 million associated with these impairment charges.  The impairment charges and tax benefit are recorded in discontinued operations for the year ended March 31, 2010.