Commitments and Contingencies (Notes)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 28, 2014

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company is from time to time involved in litigation, certain other claims and arbitration matters arising in the ordinary course of its business. In addition, since the public announcement of the proposed business combination with RF Micro Devices, Inc. (“RFMD”) on February 24, 2014, five putative stockholder class action lawsuits have been filed against the Company, its directors, RFMD, and others in connection with the proposed mergers. Two of the five actions were filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court in the State of Oregon: (1) Roberts vs. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. et al., Case No. 1402-02441, filed on February 28, 2014; and (2) Lam v. Steven J. Sharp et al., Case No. 1403-02757, filed on March 6, 2014. The other three actions were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) Philemon v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. et al., Case No. 9415-VCN, filed on March 5, 2014; (2) Schmitz v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. et al., Case No. 9427-VCN, filed on March 7, 2014; and (3) Wallace v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. et al., Case No. 9429-VCN, filed on March 10, 2014. Each of these lawsuits was filed on behalf of a putative class of the Company’s stockholders against the Company, the individual members of the Company’s board of directors, RFMD, Rocky Holding, Inc., and/or the to-be-formed subsidiaries of Rocky Holding, Inc. that will be used to effect the mergers. The plaintiffs in each of these lawsuits generally seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief concerning alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, injunctive relief prohibiting completion of the mergers, rescission of the mergers if they are completed, an accounting by defendants, rescissionary damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief. TriQuint moved to dismiss the Roberts and Lam actions filed in Oregon. Those motions to dismiss have been fully briefed and argued and are under advisement with the court. On April 29, 2014, the court orally granted the plaintiffs’ motions to consolidate the Oregon actions. On April 29, 2014, the Delaware Court of Chancery consolidated the actions filed in Delaware under the caption In re TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 9415-VCN. On May 1, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint in the consolidated action and on May 12, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion for expedited proceedings and a motion for preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin defendants from taking any action to complete the proposed mergers. TriQuint opposed the motion for expedited proceedings, and the court denied the motion for expedited proceedings on June 13, 2014.

The Company believes the lawsuits to be without merit and intends to defend the lawsuits vigorously. The Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of any such pending proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.