-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, IEG/oyyYfNlL/IS4SsooQEfj3jetacrQ2AzHYwq/kpnATIiPVbeEOpWFL/tWTCbX 7w1+o18IbDJXqKb8+qsZ0g== 0000912057-97-025711.txt : 19970801 0000912057-97-025711.hdr.sgml : 19970801 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000912057-97-025711 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19970628 FILED AS OF DATE: 19970731 SROS: NASD FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000913885 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES [3674] IRS NUMBER: 953654013 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22660 FILM NUMBER: 97649437 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2300 NE BROOKWOOD PARKWAY CITY: HILLSBOROR STATE: OR ZIP: 97124 BUSINESS PHONE: 5036159186 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2300 NE BROOKWOOD PARKWAY CITY: HILLSBORO STATE: OR ZIP: 97124 10-Q 1 FORM 10-Q - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ------------------------ FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-22660 ------------------------ TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. (REGISTRANT) INCORPORATED IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 95-3654013 2300 N.E. BROOKWOOD PARKWAY, HILLSBORO, OR 97124 TELEPHONE: (503) 615-9000 ------------------------ INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES _X_ NO ____ AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, THERE WERE 8,387,958 SHARES OF THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION PAGE NO. - --------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Item 1. Financial Statements Condensed Statements of Operations--Three and six months ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.................................................... 3 Condensed Balance Sheets--June 30, 1997 and December 31, 1996........ 4 Condensed Statements of Cash Flows--Six months ended June 30, 1997 and 1996............................................................. 5 Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.............................. 6 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................................ 8 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION - --------- 21 Item 1. Legal Proceedings.................................................... 21 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K..................................... 22 SIGNATURES......................................................................
2 PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED -------------------- -------------------- JUNE 30, JUNE 30, JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1997 1996 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenues........................................................ $ 18,544 $ 15,095 $ 35,344 $ 28,211 Operating costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold.................................................. 9,559 8,363 18,689 16,291 Research, development and engineering............................... 3,257 2,660 5,800 5,149 Selling, general and administrative................................. 3,332 2,809 6,758 5,205 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total operating costs and expenses................................ 16,148 13,832 31,247 26,645 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income from operations............................................ 2,396 1,263 4,097 1,566 --------- --------- --------- --------- Other income (expense): Interest income..................................................... 863 977 1,687 1,827 Interest expense.................................................... (387) (255) (707) (446) Other, net.......................................................... 32 (2) 68 (6) --------- --------- --------- --------- Total other income, net........................................... 508 720 1,048 1,375 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income before income taxes........................................ 2,904 1,983 5,145 2,941 Income tax expense.................................................... 638 119 1,112 167 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income........................................................ $ 2,266 $ 1,864 $ 4,033 $ 2,774 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income per common and common equivalent share..................... $ 0.25 $ 0.21 $ 0.44 $ 0.32 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding...... 9,185 8,769 9,157 8,696
See notes to Condensed Financial Statements. 3 TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996(1) ---------- ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents............................................................ $ 10,858 $ 13,411 Investments.......................................................................... 13,003 19,264 Accounts receivable, net............................................................. 15,700 12,002 Inventories, net..................................................................... 13,791 9,850 Prepaid expenses and other assets.................................................... 315 523 ---------- ------------ Total current assets............................................................... 53,667 55,050 ---------- ------------ Property, plant and equipment, net..................................................... 25,760 21,987 Restricted investments................................................................. 40,163 30,508 Other non-current assets............................................................... 28 51 ---------- ------------ Total assets....................................................................... $ 119,618 $ 107,596 ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Current installments of capital lease and installment note obligations............... $ 4,238 $ 3,373 Accounts payable and accrued expenses................................................ 16,876 14,011 Other current liabilities............................................................ 41 75 ---------- ------------ Total current liabilities.......................................................... 21,155 17,459 Capital lease and installment note obligations, less current installments.............. 12,873 9,891 ---------- ------------ Total liabilities.................................................................. 34,028 27,350 ---------- ------------ Stockholders' equity: Common stock......................................................................... 110,437 109,128 Accumulated deficit.................................................................. (24,847) (28,882) ---------- ------------ Total stockholders' equity......................................................... 85,590 80,246 ---------- ------------ Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................................. $ 119,618 $ 107,596 ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
- ------------------------ (1) The information in this column was derived from the Company's audited financial statements as of December 31, 1996. See notes to Condensed Financial Statements. 4 TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED ---------------------- JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1997 1996 ---------- ---------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income.............................................................................. $ 4,033 $ 2,774 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization......................................................... 2,077 1,518 (Gain) loss on sale of assets......................................................... 36 (48) Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in: Accounts receivable, net.......................................................... (3,698) (2,442) Inventories, net.................................................................. (3,941) (763) Prepaid expenses and other assets................................................. 231 (350) Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable and accrued expenses............................................. 2,865 984 Other current liabilities......................................................... (34) (137) ---------- ---------- Net cash provided by operating activities............................................. 1,569 1,536 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investments................................................................. (23,715) (33,893) Purchase of restricted investments...................................................... (9,655) (11,661) Sale/Maturity of investments............................................................ 30,479 30,358 Capital expenditures.................................................................... (760) (647) Proceeds from sale of assets............................................................ 220 48 ---------- ---------- Net cash used by investing activities................................................. (3,431) (15,795) ---------- ---------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments under capital lease and installment note obligations................. (2,000) (1,342) Issuance of common stock, net........................................................... 1,309 499 ---------- ---------- Net cash used by financing activities................................................. (691) (843) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents............................................. (2,553) (15,102) Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period.................................. 13,411 35,051 ---------- ---------- Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period........................................ $ 10,858 $ 19,949 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
See notes to Condensed Financial Statements. 5 TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED) 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. However, certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed, or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the statements include all adjustments necessary (which are of a normal and recurring nature) for the fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996, as included in the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Company's quarters end on the Saturday nearest the end of the calendar quarter. For convenience, the Company has indicated that its second quarter ended on June 30. The Company's fiscal year ends on December 31. 2. NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE Net income per common and common equivalent share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares assumed to be outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares consist of options and warrants to purchase common stock. 3. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS The Company charges all research and development costs associated with the development of new products to expense when incurred. Engineering and design costs related to revenues on non-recurring engineering services billed to customers are classified as research, development and engineering expense. Additionally, certain related contract engineering costs are also included in research, development and engineering expense. 4. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes has been recorded based on the current estimate of the Company's annual effective tax rate. For periods of income, this rate differs from the federal statutory rate primarily because of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards. 5. INVENTORIES Inventories, net of reserves, stated at the lower of cost or market consist of:
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 --------- ------------- Raw material......................................................... $ 4,682 $ 3,283 Work in progress..................................................... 6,253 5,136 Finished goods....................................................... 2,856 1,431 --------- ------ Total inventories, net........................................... $ 13,791 $ 9,850 --------- ------ --------- ------
6 6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Shares authorized and outstanding are as follows:
SHARES OUTSTANDING ------------------------ JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 ---------- ------------ Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized....................................................... -- -- Common stock, $.001 par value per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized....................................................... 8,387,958 8,190,125
7. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
SIX MONTHS ENDING ------------------------ JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1997 1996 ----------- ----------- Cash Transactions: Cash paid for interest.................................................. $ 701 $ 446 Cash paid for income taxes.............................................. 48 7 Non-cash Transactions: Purchase of assets through capital leases and installment notes......... $ 5,847 $ 3,717
8. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share." This Statement establishes a different method of computing net income per share than is currently required under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15. Under SFAS No. 128, the Company will be required to present both basic net income per share and diluted net income per share. Basic net income per share is expected to be comparable or slightly higher than the currently presented net income per share as the effect of dilutive stock options will not be considered in computing basic net income per share. Diluted net income per share is expected to be comparable or slightly lower than the currently presented net income per share. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 128 in the fourth quarter of 1997 and at that time all historical net income per share data presented will be restated to conform to the provisions of this Statement. 9. LITIGATION See Part II, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of legal proceedings. 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q (THIS "REPORT") AND IN THE DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN, CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ARE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. WHEN USED IN THIS REPORT, THE WORD "EXPECTS," "ANTICIPATES," "ESTIMATES," AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED. SUCH RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES ARE SET FORTH BELOW UNDER "FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS." THESE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE RISKS DISCUSSED BELOW, AND IN PARTICULAR, THE STATEMENT REGARDING THE COMPANY'S ANTICIPATED VARIABILITY OF OPERATING RESULTS; THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY'S MOVE OF ITS LEASED WAFER FABRICATION FACILITY TO THE HILLSBORO, OREGON LOCATION; THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY'S OPERATING ITS OWN LEASED WAFER FABRICATION FACILITY; AND THE RISK OF LOWER THAN EXPECTED PRODUCTION YIELDS. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. ("TriQuint" or the "Company") designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of high performance analog and mixed signal integrated circuits ("ICs") for the wireless communications, telecommunications, datacom and computing markets. The Company utilizes its proprietary gallium arsenide ("GaAs") technology to enable its products to overcome the performance barriers of silicon devices in a variety of applications. The Company sells its products on a worldwide basis. Its end customers include, in the wireless communications market, Alcatel, Cellnet, Ericsson, Lucent, Motorola, Philips, Qualcomm and Rockwell; in the telecommunications market, Cisco, Lucent, Northern Telecom, Siemens and Stratus; and in the datacom and computing markets, Digital Equipment, Hitachi, IBM, Storage Technology and Texas Instruments. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth the statement of operations data of the Company expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30, -------------------- -------------------- 1997 1996 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenues.................................................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Operating costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold............................................................ 51.5 55.4 52.9 57.7 Research, development and engineering......................................... 17.6 17.6 16.4 18.3 Selling, general and administrative........................................... 18.0 18.6 19.1 18.5 Total operating costs and expenses.......................................... 87.1 91.6 88.4 94.4 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income from operations.......................................................... 12.9 8.4 11.6 5.6 Other income, net............................................................... 2.7 4.8 3.0 4.9 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income before income taxes.................................................... 15.6 13.1 14.6 10.4 Income tax expense.............................................................. 3.4 0.8 3.2 0.6 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income...................................................................... 12.2% 12.3% 11.4% 9.8% --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
TOTAL REVENUES. The Company derives revenues from the sale of standard and customer specific products and services. The Company's revenues also include nonrecurring engineering ("NRE") revenues relating to the development of customer specific products. The Company derives its product and service revenues from three product areas: wireless communications, telecommunications and datacom and computing. Total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997 increased 22.8% and 25.3%, respectively, to $18.5 million and $35.3 million from $15.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively, for the 8 comparable three and six months ended June 30, 1996. The increases in total revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 1997 reflected an overall increase in the volume of product sales to existing and new customers in the wireless communications, telecommunications, and datacom and computing markets. Domestic revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997 increased to $12.1 and $22.8 million, respectively, from to $10.8 and $19.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 1996. International revenues increased to $6.4 and $12.5 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997, respectively, from $4.3 and $8.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 1996. COST OF GOODS SOLD. Cost of goods sold ("CGS") includes all direct material, labor and overhead expenses and certain production costs related to NRE revenues. In general, gross profit generated from the sale of customer specific products and from NRE projects is typically higher than gross profit generated from the sale of standard products. The factors affecting product mix include the relative demand in the various market segments incorporating the Company's customer specific products and standard products, as well as the number of NRE contracts which result in volume requirements for customer specific products. CGS increased to $9.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 1997 from $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 1996. However, CGS as a percentage of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 1997 decreased to 51.5% from 55.4% for the three months ended June 30, 1996. For the six months ended June 30, 1997, CGS rose to $18.7 million from $16.3 in the comparable period a year earlier. Similarly, for the six months ended June 30, 1997, CGS decreased as a percentage of total revenues to 52.9% from 57.7% for the comparable period a year earlier. The decrease in CGS as a percentage of total revenues from the three and six months ended June 30, 1996, was primarily attributable to improvements in production yields, which were partially offset by certain costs associated with the Company's startup of its new leased wafer fabrication facility in Hillsboro. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING. Research, development and engineering ("RD&E") expenses include the costs incurred in the design of products associated with NRE revenues, as well as ongoing product development and research and development activities. The Company's RD&E expenses for the three months ended June 30, 1997 increased 22.4% to $3.3 million from $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 1996, but remained flat at 17.6% as a percentage of total revenues due to the increase in the absolute level of revenues in the more current period. For the six months ended June 30, 1997, the Company's RD&E expenses increased 12.6% to $5.8 million from $5.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 1996. The growth in the absolute dollar amount of RD&E in the six months ended June 30, 1997 compared to the year earlier period resulted from increased head count and expenses associated with increased product development activity. RD&E expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 18.3% for the first six months of 1996 to 16.4% for the first six months of 1997. The decrease in RD&E expenses as a percentage of total revenues was the result of increased sales volume that outpaced the growth of RD&E expenses. The Company is committed to substantial investments in RD&E, and these expenses are expected to increase in absolute dollar amount in the future. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses for the three months ended June 30, 1997 increased 18.6% to $3.3 million from $2.8 million for the comparable period a year earlier. For the three months ended June 30, 1997, SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 18.0% from 18.6% in the comparable period a year earlier. For the six months ended June 30, 1997, SG&A increased 29.8% to $6.8 million from $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 1996. SG&A as a percentage of total revenues increased to 19.1% for the six months ended June 30, 1997 from 18.5% for comparable period a year earlier. The increased level of SG&A was primarily due to increased sales commissions resulting from the increase in total revenue and to costs associated with the Company's move to its new leased Hillsboro facility. OTHER INCOME, NET. For the three and six months ended June 30, 1997, other income, net decreased to $508,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, from $720,000 and $1.4 million for the three and six months 9 ended June 30, 1996, respectively. This decrease resulted from an increase in interest expense due to higher levels of capital lease and installment note obligations. INCOME TAX EXPENSE. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997 were 22.0% and 21.6%, respectively, which are less than the federal and state statutory rate of approximately 40% due to the use of net operating loss carryforwards. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997 increased to $638,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, from $119,000 and $167,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1996, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 1996 was 5.7%. This increase in income tax expense was attributable to higher profits but was offset in part by the use of net operating loss carryforwards. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS. In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share." This Statement establishes a different method of computing net income per share than is currently required under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15. Under SFAS No. 128, the Company will be required to present both basic net income per share and diluted net income per share. Basic net income per share is expected to be comparable or slightly higher than the currently presented net income per share as the effect of dilutive stock options will not be considered in computing basic net income per share. Diluted net income per share is expected to be comparable or slightly lower than the currently presented net income per share. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 128 in the fourth quarter of 1997 and at that time all historical net income per share data presented will be restated to conform to the provisions of this Statement. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES In January 1994, the Company completed its initial public offering raising approximately $16.7 million, net of offering expenses. The Company completed a public offering in September 1995 raising approximately $48.1 million, net of offering expenses. In addition, the Company has funded its operations to date through sales of equity securities, bank borrowings, operating leases, capital equipment leases and cash flow from operations. As of June 30, 1997, the Company had working capital of approximately $32.5 million, including $23.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. The Company has a $10.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a financial institution. As of June 30, 1997, there were no borrowings under this facility. Restrictive covenants included in the line of credit require the Company to maintain (i) a total liability to tangible net worth ratio of not more than 0.75 to 1.00, (ii) a current ratio of not less than 1.75 to 1.00, (iii) minimum tangible net worth of greater than $54 million and (iv) cash and investments, including restricted investments, greater than $45.0 million. As of June 30, 1997, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in this line of credit. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be in compliance with these covenants as of any subsequent date. The construction of a new wafer fabrication and office complex leased by the Company in Hillsboro was recently completed. In the first quarter of 1997, the Company moved its executive, administrative, sales, marketing, test and technical offices to the new leased facility in Hillsboro. Prior to that time, such functions were conducted at the Company's former headquarters in Beaverton, Oregon. The 38,000 square foot Hillsboro wafer fabrication facility is scheduled to begin operations in the second half of 1997 and will include a 16,000 square foot clean room. In May 1996, the Company entered into a five year synthetic lease through a Participation Agreement (the "Agreement") with Wolverine Leasing Corp. ("Wolverine"), Matisse Holding Company ("Matisse") and United States National Bank of Oregon ("USNB"). The lease provides for the construction and occupancy of the Company's new headquarters and wafer fabrication facility in Hillsboro under an operating lease from Wolverine and provides the Company with an option to purchase the property. At the expiration of its five year lease, the Company may exercise the option to purchase the property or renew its lease for an additional five years. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, USNB and Matisse made loans 10 to Wolverine who in turn advanced the funds to the Company for the construction of the Hillsboro facility and other costs and expenses associated therewith. The loan from USNB is collateralized by investment securities pledged by the Company. Such investment securities are classified on the Company's balance sheet as restricted securities. In addition, restrictive covenants in the Agreement require the Company to maintain (i) a total liability to tangible net worth ratio of not more than 0.75 to 1.00, (ii) minimum tangible net worth greater than $50.0 million and (iii) cash and liquid investment securities, including restricted securities, greater than $45.0 million. As of June 30, 1997, the Company was in compliance with the covenants described above. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be in compliance with these covenants as of any subsequent date. The following table presents a summary of the Company's cash flows (in thousands):
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, --------------------- 1997 1996 --------- ---------- Net cash and cash equivalents provided (used) by operating activities.................................................. $ 1,569 $ 1,536 Net cash and cash equivalents provided (used) by investing activities.................................................. (3,431) (15,795) Net cash and cash equivalents provided (used) by financing activities.................................................. (691) (843) --------- ---------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.......... $ (2,553) $ (15,102) --------- ---------- --------- ----------
For the six months ended June 30, 1997, cash provided by operating activities was $1.6 million and related to an increase in cash generated by net income of $4.0 million and growth of $2.9 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million but was offset in part by growth of $3.7 million and $3.9 million in accounts receivable and inventory, respectively. One factor in inventory growth was the Company's impending move to its new leased Hillsboro wafer fabrication facility and concerns about possible reductions in output during the transition and a second factor is increased sales levels. For the six months ended June 30, 1996, cash provided by operating activities was $1.5 million and consisted of net income of $2.8 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decline in inventories, but was partially offset by increases in accounts receivable, prepaid expense and other assets and other current liabilities. For the six months ended June 30, 1997, cash used by investing activities was $3.4 million. Cash used by investing activities grew as a result of the purchase of $23.7 million of investments, the purchase of $9.7 million of restricted investments and capital expenditures of $760,000. The use of cash for investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 1997 was offset in part by the sale and/or maturity of $30 million of investments. In the comparable period year earlier, cash used by investing activities was $15.8 million, and was the result of the net purchase of investments and the purchase of $647,000 of capital equipment. For the six months ended June 30, 1997 and June 30, 1996, cash used by financing activities was $691,000 and $843,000, respectively, and related primarily to the principal payments made on capital leases and installment notes but was partially offset by the issuance of common stock upon option exercises. Capital expenditures were approximately $760,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1997. In this period, the Company also established $5,847,000 in new capital leases. The Company anticipates that its capital equipment needs, including manufacturing and test equipment and computer hardware and software, will require additional expenditures of $3.0 million during the remainder of 1997. 11 The Company believes that its current cash and cash equivalent balances, together with cash anticipated to be generated from operations and anticipated financing arrangements, will satisfy the Company's projected working capital and capital expenditure requirements through the end of 1997. However, the Company may be required to finance any additional requirements through additional equity or debt financings or credit facilities. There can be no assurance that such additional financings or credit facilities will be available, or if available, that they will be on satisfactory terms. FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE RESULTS VARIABILITY OF OPERATING RESULTS. The Company's quarterly and annual results of operations have varied in the past and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors, including cancellation or delay of customer orders or shipments; market acceptance of the Company's or its customers' products; the Company's success in achieving design wins; variations in manufacturing yields; timing of announcement and introduction of new products by the Company and its competitors; changes in revenue and product mix; competitive factors; changes in manufacturing capacity and variations in the utilization of such capacity; variations in average selling prices; variations in operating expenses; the long sales cycles associated with the Company's customer specific products; the timing and level of product and process development costs; the cyclicality of the semiconductor industry; the timing and level of nonrecurring engineering ("NRE") revenues and expenses relating to customer specific products; changes in inventory levels; and general economic conditions. Any unfavorable changes in these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. For example, in June 1994, Northern Telecom, the Company's largest customer, requested that the Company delay shipment of certain of its telecommunications devices to Northern Telecom. This decision, together with a general softness of orders in the telecommunications market, materially adversely affected the Company's revenues and results of operations in the second quarter of 1994 and for the balance of that year. The Company expects that its operating results will continue to fluctuate in the future as a result of these and other factors. In this regard, the Company recently indicated that it expects its rate of sequential revenue growth to decrease for the balance of 1997. The Company's expense levels are based, in part, on its expectations as to future revenue and, as a result, net income would be disproportionately and adversely affected by a reduction in revenue. Due to potential quarterly fluctuations in operating results, the Company believes that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of its results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Furthermore, it is likely that in some future quarter the Company's net sales or operating results will be below the expectations of public market securities analysts or investors. In such event, the market price of the Company's Common Stock would likely be materially adversely affected. EXPIRATION OF FACILITY LEASE; TRANSITION OF MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS TO A NEW FACILITY. The Company's current lease on the wafer fabrication facility owned by Maxim expires in January 1998. The construction of the new wafer fabrication and office complex leased by the Company in Hillsboro, Oregon was recently completed. The Company intends to consolidate all operations into this facility during 1997. The Company's administrative, engineering, sales and marketing offices and test operations moved into this new facility during the first quarter of 1997 and the Company anticipates that it will commence wafer production in the new facility during the second half of 1997. The Company will operate both manufacturing facilities until the Hillsboro facility is operating at normal capacity or until the lease on the Maxim facility expires. Given the long lead times associated with bringing a new facility to full operation, it is likely that the Company will incur substantial expenses before achieving volume production in the Hillsboro facility. The transfer of the Company's wafer fabrication operation to the Hillsboro facility will involve a number of significant risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, manufacturing transition, startup or process problems, construction, process qualification or equipment delays, cost overruns or shortages of equipment or materials, any of which may also adversely affect yields. Should there be delays in commencing production at the Hillsboro facility, the Company may not have adequate capacity to respond to all orders during the transition period. In addition, if the Hillsboro facility does not 12 become fully operational prior to the expiration of the lease on the Maxim facility, there can be no assurance that the Company would not have to reduce its overall level of production. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully transition its manufacturing operations to the Hillsboro facility prior to the expiration of the Company's lease of the Maxim facility or that the Company will not experience difficulties in replicating critical manufacturing processes or a reduction in manufacturing output as a result. Moreover, believing that the Company's transition to the Hillsboro facility could cause manufacturing delays, some customers may have purchased quantities of the Company's products in recent fiscal quarters in excess of such customers' respective immediate needs and may continue to do so. As a result, the Company's operating results in subsequent quarters may be materially adversely affected. The transition of manufacturing operations to the Hillsboro facility could place significant strain on the Company's management and engineering resources and result in diversion of management attention from the day-to-day operation of the Company's business. The Company's lease and operation of its own manufacturing facilities entails a high level of fixed costs. Such fixed costs consist primarily of occupancy costs for the Hillsboro and Maxim facilities, investment in manufacturing equipment, repair, maintenance and depreciation costs related to equipment and fixed labor costs related to manufacturing and process engineering. The Company's manufacturing yields vary significantly among its products, depending on a given product's complexity and the Company's experience in manufacturing such product. The Company has experienced in the past and may experience in the future substantial delays in product shipments due to lower than expected production yields. The Company's transition of manufacturing operations to the higher capacity Hillsboro facility will result in a significant increase in fixed and operating expenses. If revenue levels do not increase sufficiently to offset these additional expense levels, the Company's results of operations will be materially adversely affected in future periods. Because the Company has capitalized and intends to continue to capitalize certain costs associated with bringing the Hillsboro facility to commercial production, the Company will recognize amortization expenses thereafter. In addition, during periods of low demand, high fixed wafer fabrication costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. MANUFACTURING RISKS. The fabrication of integrated circuits, particularly GaAs devices such as those sold by the Company, is a highly complex and precise process. Minute impurities, difficulties in the fabrication process, defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer, wafer breakage or other factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous die on each wafer to be nonfunctional. As compared to silicon technology, the less mature stage of GaAs technology leads to somewhat greater difficulty in circuit design and in controlling parametric variations, thereby yielding fewer good die per wafer. In addition, the more brittle nature of GaAs wafers can result in higher processing losses than those experienced with silicon wafers. The Company has in the past experienced lower than expected production yields, which have delayed product shipments and materially adversely affected the Company's results of operations. This was experienced in the fourth quarter of 1995 and during 1996. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain acceptable production yields in the future. Because the majority of the Company's costs of manufacturing are relatively fixed, the number of shippable die per wafer for a given product is critical to the Company's results of operations. To the extent the Company does not achieve acceptable manufacturing yields or experiences product shipment delays, its results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the Company leases and operates its own wafer fabrication facility, which entails a high level of fixed costs and which requires an adequate volume of production and sales to be profitable. During periods of decreased demand, high fixed wafer fabrication costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Finally, by the end of 1997, the Company will be manufacturing all of its products at the Hillsboro wafer fabrication facility, and any inability to fully utilize such facility as a result of manufacturing transition, start up or process problems, construction, process qualification or equipment delays, cost overruns or shortages associated with the transition to the Hillsboro facility, or as a result of 13 fire, natural disaster or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. PRODUCT QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY. The fabrication of GaAs integrated circuits is a highly complex and precise process. The Company expects that its customers will continue to establish demanding specifications for quality, performance and reliability that must be met by the Company's products. GaAs integrated circuits as complex as those offered by the Company often encounter development delays and may contain undetected defects or failures when first introduced or after commencement of commercial shipments. As has occurred with most other semiconductor manufacturers, the Company has from time to time experienced product quality, performance or reliability problems, although no such problems have had a material adverse effect on the Company's operating results. There can be no assurance, however, that defects or failures will not occur in the future relating to the Company's product quality, performance and reliability that may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Furthermore, the Company's transition to the Hillsboro facility could exacerbate these risks. If such failures or defects occur, the Company could experience lost revenue, increased costs (including warranty expense and costs associated with customer support), delays in or cancellations or rescheduling of orders or shipments and product returns or discounts, any of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. RELIANCE ON SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS; CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION. A significant portion of the Company's revenues in each fiscal period has historically been concentrated among a limited number of customers. In recent periods, sales to certain of the Company's major customers as a percentage of total revenues have fluctuated. In the six months ended June 30, 1997, Northern Telecom accounted for approximately 11.0% of total revenues. In 1996, Cirrus Logic, Giga A/S and Northern Telecom accounted for approximately 16.5%, 12.3%, and 11.9%, respectively, of total revenues. In 1995, Cirrus Logic, Northern Telecom and Giga A/S accounted for approximately 23.7%, 13.5% and 10.9%, respectively, of total revenues. The Company expects that sales to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of its total revenues in future periods. The Company does not have long-term agreements with any of its customers. Customers generally purchase the Company's products pursuant to cancelable short-term purchase orders. The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations have been materially adversely affected in the past by the failure of anticipated orders to materialize and by deferrals or cancellations of orders. If the Company were to lose a major customer, in particular Northern Telecom, or if orders by or shipments to a major customer were to otherwise decrease or be delayed, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. DEPENDENCE ON CUSTOMER SPECIFIC PRODUCTS. A substantial portion of the Company's products are designed to address the needs of individual customers. Frequent product introductions by systems manufacturers make the Company's future success dependent on its ability to select customer specific development projects which will result in sufficient production volume to enable the Company to achieve manufacturing efficiencies. Because customer specific products are developed for unique applications, the Company expects that some of its current and future customer specific products may never be produced in volume. In addition, in the event of delays in completing designs or the Company's failure to obtain development contracts from customers whose systems achieve and sustain commercial market success, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. DEPENDENCE ON NEW PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES. The Company's future success depends on its ability to develop and introduce in a timely manner new products and processes which compete effectively on the basis of price and performance and which adequately address customer requirements. The success of new product and process introductions is dependent on several factors, including proper selection of such products and processes, the ability to adapt to technological changes and to support emerging and established industry standards, successful and timely completion of product and process development and commercialization, market acceptance of the Company's or its customers' new products, achievement of 14 acceptable wafer fabrication yields and the Company's ability to offer new products at competitive prices. No assurance can be given that the Company's product and process development efforts will be successful or that its new products or processes will achieve market acceptance. In addition, as is characteristic of the semiconductor industry, the average selling prices of the Company's products have historically decreased over the products' lives and are expected to continue to do so. To offset such decreases, the Company relies primarily on achieving yield improvements and corresponding cost reductions in the manufacture of existing products and on introducing new products which incorporate advanced features and which therefore can be sold at higher average selling prices. To the extent that such cost reductions and new product or process introductions do not occur in a timely manner or the Company's or its customers' products do not achieve market acceptance, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. PRODUCT AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. The market for the Company's products is characterized by frequent new product introductions, evolving industry standards and rapid changes in product and process technologies. Because of continual improvements in these technologies, including those in high performance silicon where substantially more resources are invested than in GaAs technologies, the Company believes that its future success will depend, in part, on its ability to continue to improve its product and process technologies and to develop in a timely manner new technologies in order to remain competitive. The Company is currently in the process of enhancing its existing fabrication process technologies and developing new fabrication process technologies, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. In addition, the Company must adapt its products and processes to technological changes and to support emerging and established industry standards. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to improve its existing products and process technologies, develop in a timely manner new technologies or effectively support industry standards. The failure of the Company to improve its products and process technologies, develop new technologies and support industry standards would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. EVOLVING INDUSTRY STANDARDS. The markets in which the Company and its customers compete are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and continuous improvements in products and services. If technologies or standards supported by the Company's or its customers' products become obsolete or fail to gain widespread commercial acceptance, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In addition, the increasing demand for wireless communications has exerted pressure on regulatory bodies worldwide to adopt new standards for such products, generally following extensive investigation of and deliberation over competing technologies. The delays inherent in the regulatory approval process may in the future cause the cancellation, postponement or rescheduling of the installation of communications systems by the Company's customers. These delays have in the past had and may in the future have a material adverse effect on the sale of products by the Company and on its business, financial condition and results of operations. PENDING LITIGATION. On June 9, 1994 the Company issued a press release indicating that softness in the Company's telecom revenues would adversely affect the Company's financial results. The cause for the reduction in revenues was a general softness in orders in the telecommunications market, including orders from Northern Telecom, the Company's largest customer. As a result of this announcement, the Company's stock price decreased by 48% on June 10, 1994. On July 12, 1994, a stockholder class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, its underwriters, and certain of its officers, directors and investors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit alleges that the Company, its underwriters, and certain of its officers, directors and investors intentionally misled the investing public regarding the financial prospects of the Company. Certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and indemnification agreements between the Company and its officers and directors require the Company to advance to such officers and directors ongoing legal expenses of 15 defending the suit and may require the Company to indemnify them against judgments rendered on certain claims. Since the filing of the complaint, the plaintiffs have dismissed without prejudice a director defendant, the principal stockholder defendant, the underwriter defendants and certain analyst defendants. On June 21, 1996, the Court granted the Company's motion to transfer the litigation to the District of Oregon. On May 22, 1997, the presiding judge ordered the parties to participate in nonbinding mediation which is scheduled to begin in September 1997. The pretrial discovery phase of the lawsuit ended July 1, 1997. The Company expects to continue to incur significant legal expenses on its behalf and on behalf of such officers and directors in connection with this litigation. In addition, defending this litigation has resulted and will likely continue to result in the diversion of management's attention from the day-to-day operations of the Company's business. Although the Company does not believe that it or any of its officers or directors has engaged in any wrongdoing, there can be no assurance that this stockholder litigation will be resolved in the Company's favor. An adverse result, settlement or prolonged litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. COMPETITION. The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion. Currently, the Company competes primarily with manufacturers of high performance silicon semiconductors such as Cypress, Motorola and Philips and with manufacturers of GaAs semiconductors such as Vitesse and Anadigics. The Company expects increased competition both from existing competitors and from a number of companies which may enter the GaAs integrated circuit market, as well as future competition from companies which may offer new or emerging technologies such as silicon germanium. Most of the Company's current and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company. Additionally, manufacturers of high performance silicon semiconductors have achieved greater market acceptance of their existing products and technologies in certain applications. There can be no assurance that the Company will face increased competition or that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future. The failure of the Company to successfully compete in its markets would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. ADOPTION OF GAAS COMPONENTS BY SYSTEMS MANUFACTURERS. Silicon semiconductor technologies are the dominant process technologies for integrated circuits and these technologies continue to improve in performance. TriQuint's prospective customers are frequently systems designers and manufacturers who are utilizing such silicon technologies in their existing systems and who are evaluating GaAs integrated circuits for use in their next generation high performance systems. Customers may be reluctant to adopt TriQuint's products because of perceived risks relating to GaAs technology generally. Such perceived risks include the unfamiliarity of designing systems with GaAs products as compared with silicon products, concerns related to manufacturing costs and yields, novel design and unfamiliar manufacturing processes and uncertainties about the relative cost effectiveness of the Company's products compared to high performance silicon integrated circuits. In addition, customers may be reluctant to rely on a smaller company such as TriQuint for critical components. There can be no assurance that additional systems manufacturers will design the Company's products into their respective systems, that the companies that have utilized the Company's products will continue to do so in the future or that GaAs technology will achieve widespread market acceptance. Should the Company's GaAs products fail to achieve market acceptance or be utilized in manufacturers' systems, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. GAAS COMPONENTS MORE COSTLY TO PRODUCE. The production of GaAs integrated circuits has been and continues to be more costly than the production of silicon devices. This cost differential relates primarily to higher costs of the raw wafer material, lower production yields associated with the relatively immature GaAs technology and higher unit costs associated with lower production volumes. Although the Company has reduced unit production costs by increasing wafer fabrication yields, by achieving higher volumes and by obtaining lower raw wafer costs, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to 16 decrease production costs. In addition, the Company believes that its costs of producing GaAs integrated circuits will continue to exceed the costs associated with the production of silicon devices. As a result, the Company must offer devices which provide superior performance to that of silicon based devices such that the perceived price/performance of its products is competitive. There can be no assurance that the Company can continue to identify markets which require performance superior to that offered by silicon solutions, or that the Company will continue to offer products which provide sufficiently superior performance to offset the cost differential. MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH. The growth in the Company's business has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on the Company's personnel, management and other resources. The Company's ability to manage any future growth effectively will require it to attract, train, motivate, manage and retain new employees successfully, to integrate new employees into its overall operations and in particular its manufacturing operations, and to continue to improve its operational, financial and management information systems. DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL. The Company's future success depends in large part on the continued service of its key technical, marketing and management personnel and on its ability to continue to identify, attract and retain qualified technical and management personnel, particularly highly skilled design, process and test engineers involved in the manufacture of existing products and the development of new products and processes. Furthermore, there may be only a limited number of persons in the Company's geographic area with the requisite skills to serve in these positions. Several companies have recently announced intentions to build wafer fabrication plants in the Company's geographic area in the near future, and it may become increasingly difficult for the Company to attract and retain such personnel. The competition for such personnel is intense, and the loss of key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company. SOLE SOURCES OF MATERIALS AND SERVICES. The Company currently procures certain components and services for its products from single sources including ceramic packages from Kyocera and packaging services for certain products from Alphatec. The Company purchases these components and services on a purchase order basis, does not carry significant inventories of these components and does not have any long-term supply contracts with its sole source vendors. If the Company were to change any of its sole source vendors, the Company would be required to requalify the components with each new vendor. Requalification could prevent or delay product shipments which could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations. In addition, the Company's reliance on sole source vendors involves several risks, including reduced control over the price, timely delivery, reliability and quality of the components. Any inability of the Company to obtain timely deliveries of components of acceptable quality in required quantities or any increases in the prices of components for which the Company does not have alternative sources could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Although the Company has not to date experienced any significant difficulty in obtaining these components, no assurance can be given that shortages will not occur in the future. CYCLICALITY OF THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY. The semiconductor industry has historically been characterized by wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. From time to time, the industry has also experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, major additions of wafer fabrication capacity, maturing product cycles or declines in general economic conditions. These downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, production overcapacity and subsequent accelerated price erosion, and in some cases have lasted for extended periods of time. The Company's business has in the past been and could in the future be materially adversely affected by industry wide fluctuations. The Company's continued success will depend in large part on the continued growth of the semiconductor industry in general and its customers' markets in particular. No assurance can be given that the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations will not be materially adversely 17 affected in the future by cyclical conditions in the semiconductor industry or in any of the markets served by the Company's products. PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY. The Company's ability to compete is affected by its ability to protect its proprietary information. The Company relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect its intellectual property rights. The Company currently has patents granted and pending in the United States and in foreign countries and intends to seek further international and United States patents on its technology. There can be no assurance that patents will issue from any of the Company's pending applications or applications in preparation or that patents will be issued in all countries where the Company's products can be sold or that any claims allowed from pending applications or applications in preparation will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to the Company. Also, competitors of the Company may be able to design around the Company's patents. The laws of certain foreign countries in which the Company's products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold, including various countries in Asia, may not protect the Company's products or intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, increasing the possibility of piracy of the Company's technology and products. Although the Company intends to vigorously defend its intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company to protect its proprietary information will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of its technology or that the Company's competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the Company's technology. RISK OF THIRD PARTY CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT. The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions, which have resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. Although there is currently no pending intellectual property litigation against the Company, the Company or its suppliers may from time to time be notified of claims that the Company may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third parties. If it is necessary or desirable, the Company may seek licenses under such patents or other intellectual property rights. However, there can be no assurance that licenses will be offered or that the terms of any offered licenses will be acceptable to the Company. The failure to obtain a license from a third party for technology used by the Company could cause the Company to incur substantial liabilities and to suspend the manufacture of products. Furthermore, the Company may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of the Company's proprietary rights or to establish the validity of the Company's proprietary rights. Litigation by or against the Company could result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the Company's technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation results in a favorable determination for the Company. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, the Company could be required to pay substantial damages, indemnify its customers, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain licenses to the infringing technology. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in such development or that such licenses would be available on reasonable terms, or at all, and any such development or license could require expenditures of substantial time and other resources by the Company. In the event that any third party makes a successful claim against the Company or its customers and a license is not made available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations related to the discharge or disposal of toxic, volatile or other hazardous chemicals used in its manufacturing process. The failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on the Company, suspension of production or a cessation of operations. Such regulations could require the Company to acquire significant equipment or to incur substantial other expenses to comply with environmental regulations. In addition, the Company relies to a great extent upon 18 the hazardous waste disposal system of Tektronix at the Maxim wafer fabrication facility. Since the Company's Maxim manufacturing facilities are located in the same building as certain integrated circuit manufacturing operations of Maxim, the Company's waste streams are co-mingled with those of Maxim, which could result in increased liability on the part of the Company, and are treated prior to final discharge or other disposal. Any failure by the Company or Tektronix to control the use of, or to adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances could subject the Company to future liabilities or could cause its manufacturing operations to be suspended, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company will be responsible for hazardous waste disposal and compliance with other regulatory requirements at the Hillsboro wafer fabrication facility. Because of its reliance on Tektronix for these matters in connection with its operation of the Maxim facility, the Company's experience in this area is not as extensive as if the Company had been responsible for these matters at the Maxim facility. Any failure by the Company to comply with applicable environmental and other regulations in connection with its operation of the Hillsboro facility could result in a reduction or suspension of operations or significant fines or other liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INTERNATIONAL SALES. Sales outside of the United States were $12.7 million, $14.8 million, $18.1 million and $12.5 million in 1994, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1997, respectively. These sales involve a number of inherent risks, including imposition of government controls, currency exchange fluctuations, potential insolvency of international distributors and representatives, reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries, the impact of recessionary environments in economies outside the United States, political instability and generally longer receivables collection periods, as well as tariffs and other trade barriers. In addition, due to the technological advantage provided by GaAs in many military applications, all of the Company's sales outside of North America must be licensed by the Office of Export Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Although the Company has not experienced significant difficulty in obtaining these licenses, failure to obtain such licenses or delays in obtaining such licenses in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Furthermore, because substantially all of the Company's foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, increases in the value of the dollar would increase the price in local currencies of the Company's products in foreign markets and make the Company's products less price competitive. There can be no assurance that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's future international sales and, consequently, on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. DEPENDENCE ON ASSEMBLY CONTRACTORS. The Company's finished GaAs wafers are assembled and packaged by five independent subcontractors, three of which are located outside of the United States. Although the Company has not yet experienced significant problems or interruptions in supply from its assembly contractors, any prolonged work stoppages or other failure of these contractors to supply finished products would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. FUTURE ACQUISITIONS. Company management frequently evaluates the strategic opportunities available to it and may in the near-term or long-term future pursue acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses. Future acquisitions by the Company may result in the diversion of management's attention from the day-to-day operations of the Company's business and may include numerous other risks, including difficulties in the integration of the operations, products and personnel of the acquired companies. Future acquisitions by the Company have the potential to result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, and amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets that may materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations. 19 ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF DELAWARE LAW AND CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAWS PROVISIONS ON PRICE OF COMMON STOCK. Certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws such as cumulative voting for directors, the inability of stockholders to act by written consent, the inability of stockholders to call special meetings without the consent of the Board of Directors and advance notice requirements for stockholder meeting proposals or director nominations may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company. Such provisions could limit the price certain investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of the Company's Common Stock. Certain provisions of Delaware law applicable to the Company could also delay or make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years unless certain conditions are met. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of the Company's Common Stock. ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated Preferred Stock and to determine the powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued shares of undesignated Preferred Stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by the Company's stockholders. The Preferred Stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to those of the holders of Common Stock. The issuance of Preferred Stock under certain circumstances could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company. VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE. The market price of the shares of Common Stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and significantly affected by factors such as fluctuations in the Company's operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by the Company or its competitors, changes in analysts' expectations, governmental regulatory action, developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights, general market conditions and other factors. In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. 20 PART II--OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. On June 9, 1994 the Company issued a press release indicating softness in the Company's telecom revenues which would adversely affect the Company's financial results. The cause for the reduction in revenues was a general softness in orders in the telecommunications market, including orders from Northern Telecom, the Company's largest customer. As a result of this announcement, the Company's stock price dropped 48% on June 10, 1994. On July 12, 1994, a stockholder class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, its underwriters, and certain of its officers, directors and investors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit alleges that the Company, its underwriters, and certain of its officers, directors and investors intentionally misled the investing public regarding the financial prospects of the Company. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, costs, attorneys' fees and other relief on behalf of all purchasers of the Company's common stock during the period from December 13, 1993 through June 9, 1994. Since the filing of the complaint, the plaintiffs have dismissed without prejudice a director defendant, the principal stockholder defendant, the underwriter defendants and certain analyst defendants. On June 21, 1996, the court granted the Company's motion to transfer the litigation to the District of Oregon. On May 22, 1997, the presiding judge ordered the parties to participate in nonbinding mediation which is scheduled to occur in September 1997. The pretrial discovery phase of the lawsuit ended on July 1, 1997. A trial date has not been set. There is no assurance, however, that the lawsuit will be resolved in a timely or satisfactory manner or that the lawsuit will be resolved without significant costs to the Company. ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits Exhibit 11.1 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings Exhibit 27.1 Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the three months ended June 30, 1997. 21 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. Dated: July 31, 1997 /s/ STEVEN J. SHARP ----------------------------------------- Steven J. Sharp PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) Dated: July 31, 1997 /s/ EDWARD C.V. WINN ----------------------------------------- Edward C.V. Winn EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER) 22 EX-11.1 2 EXHIBIT 11.1 TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. EXHIBIT 11.1 CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED ------------------------ ------------------------ JUNE 30, JUNE 30, JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1997 1996 1997 1996 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income........................................................... $ 2,266 $ 1,864 $ 4,033 $ 2,774 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Primary weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding................................................. 9,129 8,769 9,097 8,696 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income per common and common equivalent share.................... $ 0.25 $ 0.21 $ 0.44 $ 0.32 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Fully diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding................................................. 9,185 8,788 9,157 8,783 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income per common and common equivalent share.................... $ 0.25 $ 0.21 $ 0.44 $ 0.32 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
23 EX-27.1 3 EXHIBIT 27.1
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 1,000 6-MOS DEC-31-1997 JAN-01-1997 JUN-30-1997 10,858 13,003 15,896 (196) 13,791 53,667 60,144 (34,384) 119,618 21,155 12,873 0 0 110,437 (24,847) 119,618 35,344 35,344 18,689 31,247 (68) 0 707 5,145 1,112 4,033 0 0 0 4,033 0.44 0.44
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----