-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, A4jYZHBVoXBnlfNtRMJIynQ1V2Vytv/BRNtdSnvk9AJdZ0eACUzQGc7KnoonutHc KnRvB4vF/IbBSDy4nFLy4Q== 0000091388-09-000043.txt : 20090911 0000091388-09-000043.hdr.sgml : 20090911 20090911092226 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000091388-09-000043 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 9 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20090802 FILED AS OF DATE: 20090911 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20090911 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SMITHFIELD FOODS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000091388 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MEAT PACKING PLANTS [2011] IRS NUMBER: 520845861 STATE OF INCORPORATION: VA FISCAL YEAR END: 0427 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-15321 FILM NUMBER: 091064270 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 200 COMMERCE STREET STREET 2: EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING CITY: SMITHFIELD STATE: VA ZIP: 23430 BUSINESS PHONE: 7573653000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 200 COMMERCE STREET STREET 2: EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING CITY: SMITHFIELD STATE: VA ZIP: 23430 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: LIBERTY EQUITIES CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19710221 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: LIBERTY REAL ESTATE TRUST DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19661113 10-Q 1 form_10q.htm FORM 10-Q form_10q.htm





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

         
FORM 10-Q
         
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended August 2, 2009
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-15321
         
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
         
200 Commerce Street
Smithfield, Virginia 23430
(757) 365-3000
 
         
 
Virginia
 
52-0845861
 
 
(State of Incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  ¨    No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer                                x
Accelerated filer                                     ¨
Non-accelerated filer                                  ¨
Smaller reporting company                    ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  ¨    No  x
At September 4, 2009, 143,576,842 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock ($.50 par value per share) were outstanding.

 
 

 

SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
   
PAGE
 
 
 
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
          3
     
 
          3
     
 
          4
     
 
          5
     
 
          6
     
Item 2.
          23
     
Item 3.
          39
     
Item 4.
          39
     
     
 
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
          40
     
Item 1A.
          40
     
Item 2.
          43
     
Item 3.
          43
     
Item 4.
          43
     
Item 5.
          43
     
Item 6.
          44
   
      45
 
 
 
2

 

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share data)


   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(unaudited)
 
Sales
  $ 2,715.3     $ 3,141.8  
Cost of sales
    2,616.6       2,946.6  
Gross profit
    98.7       195.2  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    183.8       190.6  
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates
    (10.3 )     2.1  
Operating profit (loss)
    (74.8 )     2.5  
Interest expense
    60.5       45.3  
Loss on debt extinguishment
    7.4       -  
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
    (142.7 )     (42.8 )
Income tax benefit
    (35.0 )     (13.7 )
Loss from continuing operations
    (107.7 )     (29.1 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax of $9.1
    -       15.9  
Net loss
  $ (107.7 )   $ (13.2 )
                 
                 
Income (loss) per basic and diluted share:
               
Continuing operations
  $ (.75 )   $ (.22 )
Discontinued operations
    -       .12  
Net loss
  $ (.75 )   $ (.10 )
                 
Weighted average basic and diluted shares
    143.6       135.5  


 
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements


 
3

 

SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)
 

   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 506.6     $ 119.0  
Accounts receivable, net
    606.8       595.2  
Inventories
    1,845.9       1,896.1  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    180.4       207.3  
Total current assets
    3,139.7       2,817.6  
                 
Property, plant and equipment, net
    2,392.6       2,410.4  
Goodwill
    824.1       820.0  
Investments
    627.0       601.6  
Intangible assets, net
    391.9       391.7  
Other assets
    214.0       158.9  
Total assets
  $ 7,589.3     $ 7,200.2  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Notes payable
  $ 28.3     $ 17.5  
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    270.9       320.8  
Accounts payable
    393.0       390.2  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    483.6       558.3  
Total current liabilities
    1,175.8       1,286.8  
                 
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    3,050.8       2,567.3  
Other liabilities
    743.1       715.5  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Shareholders' equity:
               
Smithfield Foods, Inc. shareholders' equity:
               
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 authorized shares
    -       -  
Common stock, $.50 par value, 200,000,000 authorized shares; 143,576,842 issued and outstanding
    71.8       71.8  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,355.2       1,353.8  
Stock held in trust
    (65.0 )     (64.8 )
Retained earnings
    1,532.4       1,640.1  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (293.4 )     (388.5 )
Total Smithfield Foods, Inc. shareholders’ equity
    2,601.0       2,612.4  
Noncontrolling interests
    18.6       18.2  
Total shareholders' equity
    2,619.6       2,630.6  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 7,589.3     $ 7,200.2  



See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements





 
4

 


SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
 

   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(Unaudited)
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net loss
  $ (107.7 )   $ (13.2 )
Adjustments to reconcile net cash flows from operating activities:
               
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    -       (15.9 )
Impairment of assets
    34.1       -  
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates
    (10.3 )     2.1  
Depreciation and amortization
    61.0       68.9  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and other, net
    89.4       (121.1 )
Net cash flows from operating activities
    66.5       (79.2 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (33.5 )     (83.4 )
Other
    7.3       0.3  
Net cash flows from investing activities
    (26.2 )     (83.1 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
    604.3       400.0  
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    (75.9 )     (14.5 )
Net repayments on revolving credit facilities and notes payables
    (134.8 )     (282.8 )
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock and stock option exercises
    -       122.3  
Purchase of call options
    -       (88.2 )
Proceeds from the sale of warrants
    -       36.7  
Debt issuance costs
    (48.1 )     (11.0 )
Net cash flows from financing activities
    345.5       162.5  
                 
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
               
Net cash flows from operating activities
    -       3.8  
Net cash flows from investing activities
    -       (3.5 )
Net cash flows from financing activities
    -       -  
Net cash flows from discontinued operations activities
    -       0.3  
                 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
    1.8       2.0  
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    387.6       2.5  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    119.0       57.3  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 506.6     $ 59.8  
                 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Investment in Butterball
  $ -     $ (24.5 )

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
 

 
5

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1: GENERAL
 
Smithfield Foods, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), is the largest hog producer and pork processor in the world. We produce and market a wide variety of fresh meat and packaged meats products both domestically and internationally. We conduct our operations through five reporting segments: Pork, International, Hog Production, Other and Corporate.
 
You should read these statements in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009. The enclosed interim consolidated condensed financial information is unaudited. The information reflects all normal recurring adjustments which we believe are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for all periods.
 
Unless otherwise stated, the amounts presented in these notes to our consolidated financial statements are based on continuing operations for all fiscal periods included. The three months ended August 2, 2009 correspond to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the three months ended July 27, 2008 correspond to the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Certain prior year amounts have changed as a result of the adoption of certain accounting pronouncements as discussed in Note 2—Accounting Changes, and to conform to current year presentations.
 
NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING CHANGES
 
SFAS 165
 
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes authoritative accounting and disclosure guidance for recognized and non-recognized subsequent events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. SFAS 165 also requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. We adopted SFAS 165 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements. See Note 17—Subsequent Events for SFAS 165 required disclosures.
 
FSP SFAS 107-1
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSP 107-1). FSP 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments” and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements. We adopted FSP 107-1 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. See Note 14—Fair Value Measurements for FSP 107-1 required disclosures.
 
EITF 07-5
 
In September 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5). EITF 07-5 provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-5 requires retrospective application with restatement of prior periods. We adopted EITF 07-5 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and determined that it had no impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
FSP APB 14-1
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (FSP APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The amount allocated to the equity component represents a discount to the debt, which is amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the debt. We adopted FSP APB 14-1 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, and its provisions have been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
 

 
6

 

Refer to Note 9—Debt for further discussion of the impact of FSP APB 14-1 on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
SFAS 141R
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and disclosure requirements on how to recognize, measure and present the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree and any goodwill recognized in a business combination. The objective of SFAS 141(R) is to improve the information included in financial reports about the nature and financial effects of business combinations. We adopted SFAS 141(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, and will apply SFAS 141(R) prospectively to all future business combinations. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements, and the impact that its adoption will have on our consolidated condensed financial statements in future periods will depend on the nature and size of any future business combinations.
 
SFAS 160
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for a noncontrolling (minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity and should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements, rather than as a liability or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. SFAS 160 also requires consolidated net income be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. We adopted SFAS 160 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, and its provisions are being applied prospectively, except for the consolidated condensed statements of income where income attributable to noncontrolling interests is immaterial for the periods presented. Presentation and disclosure requirements have been applied retrospectively. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
SFAS 157
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years for financial assets and liabilities, and for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and for nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 14— Fair Value Measurements for additional disclosures on fair value measurements.
 
NOTE 3: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
 
Smithfield Beef, Inc. (Smithfield Beef)
 
In March 2008 (fiscal 2008), we entered into an agreement with JBS S.A., a company organized and existing under the laws of Brazil (JBS), to sell Smithfield Beef, our beef processing and cattle feeding operation that encompassed our entire Beef segment. In October 2008 (fiscal 2009), we completed the sale of Smithfield Beef for $575.5 million in cash.
 
The remaining live cattle inventories of Smithfield Beef, which were excluded from the JBS transaction, were sold in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our results from the sale of the live cattle inventories that were excluded from the JBS transaction are reported in income from continuing operations in the Other segment.
 

 
7

 

The results of Smithfield Beef are presented in income from discontinued operations. The following table presents sales, interest expense and net income of Smithfield Beef for the fiscal periods indicated. Interest expense is allocated to discontinued operations based on specific borrowings by the discontinued operations.
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Sales
  $ -     $ 814.1  
Interest expense
    -       9.8  
Net income
    -       17.7  

 
Smithfield Bioenergy, LLC (SBE)
 
In April 2007 (fiscal 2007), we decided to exit the alternative fuels business and in May 2008 (fiscal 2009), we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of SBE for $11.5 million. The results of SBE are presented in income from discontinued operations. The following table presents sales, interest expense and net loss of SBE for the fiscal periods indicated:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Sales
  $ -     $ 3.8  
Interest expense
    -       0.8  
Net loss
    -       (1.8 )

 
NOTE 4: INVENTORIES
 
Inventories consist of the following:
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
 
   
(in millions)
 
Live hogs
  $ 885.3     $ 838.4  
Fresh and packaged meats
    711.1       789.1  
Manufacturing supplies
    78.5       72.7  
Grains and other
    171.0       195.9  
Total inventories
  $ 1,845.9     $ 1,896.1  
                 

 
NOTE 5: DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
 
Our meat processing and hog production operations use various raw materials, primarily live hogs, corn and soybean meal, which are actively traded on commodity exchanges. We hedge these commodities when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate price risk. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also tends to reduce the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices. We attempt to closely match the commodity contract terms with the hedged item. We also enter into interest rate swaps to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates on certain financial instruments and foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain exposures to fluctuating foreign currency rates.
 

 
8

 

We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended (SFAS 133), which requires that all derivatives be recorded in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities at fair value. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it qualifies and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as hedges for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method). Under SFAS 133, we may elect either method of accounting for our derivative portfolio, assuming all the necessary requirements are met. We have in the past, and will in the future, avail our self of either acceptable method. We believe all of our derivative instruments represent economic hedges against changes in prices and rates, regardless of their designation for accounting purposes.
 
We do not offset amounts recognized for derivative instruments and amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) arising from derivative instruments recognized at fair value executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. As of August 2, 2009, prepaid expenses and other current assets included $23.2 million representing the right to reclaim cash collateral under master netting arrangements. We have reviewed our derivative contracts and have determined that they do not contain credit contingent features which would require us to post additional collateral if we did not maintain a credit rating equivalent to what was in place at the time the contracts were entered into.
 
We are exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance or nonpayment by counterparties under financial instruments. Although our counterparties primarily consist of financial institutions that are investment grade, there is still a possibility that one or more of these companies could default.  However, a majority of our financial instruments are held with brokers and counterparties with whom we maintain margin accounts that are settled on a daily basis, and therefore our credit risk is not significant. We maintain credit policies that we believe minimize overall credit risk to within acceptable limits. Determination of the credit quality of our counterparties is based upon a number of factors, including credit ratings and our evaluation of their financial condition. As of August 2, 2009, we had credit exposure of $9.3 million, excluding the effects of netting arrangements. As a result of netting arrangements, our credit exposure was reduced to $5.7 million. No significant concentrations of credit risk existed as of August 2, 2009. 
 
The size and mix of our derivative portfolio varies from time to time based upon our analysis of current and future market conditions. The following table presents the fair values of our open derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis. All grain contracts, livestock contracts and foreign exchange contracts are recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets, as appropriate. Interest rate contracts are recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other liabilities, as appropriate.
 
   
Assets
   
Liabilities
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
 
   
(in millions)
   
(in millions)
 
Derivatives using the "hedge accounting" method:
                       
Grain contracts
  $ 15.5     $ 10.4     $ 32.0     $ 17.7  
Livestock contracts
    6.7       -       -       -  
Interest rate contracts
    -       0.6       9.6       10.3  
Foreign exchange contracts
    1.8       2.8       1.1       14.4  
Total
    24.0       13.8       42.7       42.4  
                                 
Derivatives using the "mark-to-market" method:
                               
Grain contracts
    5.3       10.2       9.4       16.2  
Livestock contracts
    14.9       21.9       7.0       6.3  
Energy contracts
    -       -       8.7       13.0  
Foreign exchange contracts
    1.2       0.3       4.2       1.6  
Total
    21.4       32.4       29.3       37.1  
Total fair value of derivative instruments
  $ 45.4     $ 46.2     $ 72.0     $ 79.5  
 

 
9

 

Hedge Accounting Method
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
We enter into derivative instruments, such as futures, swaps and options contracts to manage our exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows attributable to commodity price risk associated with the forecasted sale of live hogs and the forecasted purchase of corn and soybean meal. We also enter into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates associated with our variable interest rate debt. In addition, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates associated with the forecasted purchase or sale of assets denominated in foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge anticipated transactions beyond twelve months.
 
When cash flow hedge accounting is applied, derivative gains or losses from these cash flow hedges are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. Derivative gains and losses, when reclassified into earnings, are recorded in cost of sales for grain contracts, sales for lean hog contracts, interest expense for interest rate contracts, and selling, general and administrative expenses for foreign currency contracts.  There were no gains or losses reclassified into earnings for lean hog contracts during the periods presented.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the range of notional volumes associated with open derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships was as follows:
 
   
Minimum
   
Maximum
 
Metric
Commodities:
             
Corn
    -       64,650,000  
 Bushels
Soybean meal
    78,900       253,800  
 Tons
Lean Hogs
    -       121,280,000  
 Pounds
Interest rate
    200,000,000       200,000,000  
 U.S. Dollars
Foreign currency (1)
    55,953,813       102,799,453  
U.S. Dollars
__________________
 
(1)
Amounts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of various foreign currency contracts.
 
The following table presents the effects on our consolidated financial statements of gains and losses on derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships for the fiscal periods indicated:
 
   
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)
   
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Earnings (Effective Portion)
   
Loss Recognized in Earnings on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
   
(in millions)
   
(in millions)
 
Commodity contracts
  $ (11.7 )   $ (39.5 )   $ (59.5 )   $ 0.8     $ (2.5 )   $ (6.1 )
Interest rate contracts
    2.7       -       (1.5 )     -       -       -  
Foreign exchange contracts
    6.1       0.8       (7.5 )     0.8       -       -  
Total
  $ (2.9 )   $ (38.7 )   $ (68.5 )   $ 1.6     $ (2.5 )   $ (6.1 )

 

 
10

 

For the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, foreign exchange contracts were determined to be highly effective. In accordance with SFAS 133, we have excluded from the assessment of effectiveness differences between spot and forward rates, which we have determined to be immaterial.
 
As of August 2, 2009 and May 3, 2009, there were deferred net losses of $25.1 million, net of tax of $16.0 million, and $54.4 million, net of tax of $34.6 million, respectively, in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to commodity cash flow hedges. We expect to reclassify $22.7 million ($13.9 million net of tax) of the deferred net losses on closed commodity contracts into earnings within the next twelve months.
 
Fair Value Hedges
 
We enter into derivative instruments (primarily futures contracts) that are designed to hedge firm commitments to buy grains. We also enter into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with our fixed rate borrowings. When fair value hedge accounting is applied, derivative gains and losses from these fair value hedges are recognized in earnings currently along with the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The gains or losses on the derivative instruments and the offsetting losses or gains on the related hedged items are recorded in cost of sales for commodity contracts and interest expense for interest rate contracts.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the range of notional volumes associated with open derivative instruments designated in fair value hedging relationships was as follows:

 
   
Minimum
   
Maximum
 
Metric
Commodities:
             
Corn
    7,510,000       10,705,000  
 Bushels
Interest rate
    -       50,000,000  
 U.S. Dollars
Foreign Currency (1)
    17,766,234       18,765,701  
U.S. Dollars
__________________
 
(1)
Amounts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of various foreign currency contracts.
 
The following table presents the effects on our consolidated statements of income of gains and losses on derivative instruments designated in fair value hedging relationships and the related hedged items for the fiscal periods indicated:
 
   
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivative
   
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Related Hedged Item
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
   
(in millions)
 
Commodity contracts
  $ 2.3     $ (2.6 )   $ (2.0 )   $ 0.1  
Interest rate contracts
    0.6       2.2       (0.6 )     (2.2 )
Foreign exchange contracts
    1.1       (0.5 )     (0.5 )     -  
Total
  $ 4.0     $ (0.9 )   $ (3.1 )   $ (2.1 )

 
Mark-to-Market Method
 
Derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge, that have been de-designated from a hedging relationship, or do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under SFAS 133, are marked-to-market with the unrealized gains and losses together with actual realized gains and losses from closed contracts being recognized in current period earnings. Under the mark-to-market method, gains and losses are recorded in cost of sales for commodity contracts, and selling, general and administrative expenses for interest rate contracts and foreign exchange contracts.
 

 
11

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the range of notional volumes associated with open derivative instruments using the “mark-to-market” method was as follows:
 
   
Minimum
   
Maximum
 
Metric
Commodities:
             
Lean hogs
    56,280,000       167,800,000  
 Pounds
Corn
    4,273,750       27,560,000  
 Bushels
Soybean meal
    96,350       166,350  
 Tons
Soybeans
    140,000       255,000  
 Bushels
Wheat
    20,000       350,000  
 Bushels
Live cattle
    -       640,000  
 Pounds
Pork bellies
    -       1,080,000  
 Pounds
Natural gas
    4,050,000       4,890,000  
 Million BTU
Foreign currency (1)
    66,063,233       139,031,972  
U.S. Dollars
__________________
 
(1)
Amounts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of various foreign currency contracts.
 
The following table presents the amount of gains (losses) recognized in the consolidated statements of income on derivative instruments using the “mark-to-market” method by type of derivative contract for the fiscal periods indicated:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Commodity contracts
  $ 12.1     $ 10.6  
Interest rate contracts
    -       0.2  
Foreign exchange contracts
    (6.2 )     0.4  
Total
  $ 5.9     $ 11.2  

 
NOTE 6: IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
 
In June 2009 (fiscal 2010), management made a decision to further reduce our domestic sow herd by 3%, or approximately 30,000 sows, which will be accomplished by ceasing hog production operations and closing certain of our hog farms that were previously acquired in our merger with Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (PSF). In addition, we are currently negotiating the sale of certain other hog farms that were also previously acquired in our merger with PSF.  As a result of these decisions, we analyzed these hog farms as two separate asset groups in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).
 
As a result of our analysis, we recorded total impairment charges of $34.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to write down the asset groups to their estimated fair values. The impairment charges were recorded in the Hog Production segment. Refer to Note 14—Fair Value Measurements for further discussion.
 
The farm assets we intend to sell, which consist solely of property, plant and equipment, have been reclassified as held for sale within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated condensed balance sheets. The carrying amount of that asset disposal group was $27.9 million as of August 2, 2009 and $33.1 million as of May 3, 2009. We expect the sale of these assets to be completed within the next twelve months.
 
 

 
12

 
 
NOTE 7: RESTRUCTURING
In February 2009 (fiscal 2009), we announced a plan to consolidate and streamline the corporate structure and manufacturing operations of our Pork segment (the Restructuring Plan).  As of August 2, 2009, all of the targeted plants had been closed except for Smithfield Packing’s Smithfield South plant, which is expected to close by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The other restructuring initiatives are ongoing and are expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
 
The following table summarizes the balance of accrued expenses, the cumulative expense incurred to date and the expected remaining expenses to be incurred related to the Restructuring Plan by major type of cost. All of these charges were recorded in the Pork segment.
 
   
Accrued Balance
May 3, 2009
   
Current Period Expense
   
Payments
   
Accrued Balance
August 2, 2009
   
Cumulative Expense-to-Date
   
Estimated Remaining Expense
 
Restructuring charges:
 
(in millions)
 
Employee severance and related benefits
  $ 11.9     $ (0.2 )   $ (0.8 )   $ 10.9     $ 12.1     $ 1.0  
Other associated costs
    0.5       6.5       (5.2 )     1.8       8.2       15.3  
Total restructuring charges
  $ 12.4     $ 6.3     $ (6.0 )   $ 12.7       20.3     $ 16.3  
                                                 
Impairment charges:
                                               
Property, plant and equipment
                                    69.4          
Inventory
                                    4.8          
Total impairment charges
                                    74.2          
Total restructuring and impairment charges
                            $ 94.5          

 
Employee severance and related benefits primarily include employee severance benefits, which were accrued in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43,” and an estimated obligation for the partial withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan.   Other associated costs consist primarily of plant consolidation, asset disposal costs and plant wind-down expenses, all of which are expensed as incurred. Of the $6.3 million of restructuring charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, $4.7 million was recorded in cost of sales with the remainder recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Substantially all of the estimated remaining expenses are expected to be incurred through the end of fiscal 2010.  
 
NOTE 8: INVESTMENTS
 
Investments consist of the following:
 
Equity Investment
 
% Owned
   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
 
         
(in millions)
 
Campofrío Food Group (CFG) (1)
   37%     $ 436.1     $ 417.8  
Butterball, LLC (Butterball)
   49%       77.6       78.2  
Mexican joint ventures
   50%       60.6       53.9  
Other
 
Various
      52.7       51.7  
Total investments
          $ 627.0     $ 601.6  
___________________
 
(1)
Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we owned 50% of Groupe Smithfield S.L. (Groupe Smithfield) and 24% of Campofrío Alimentación, S.A. (Campofrío).  Those entities merged in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to form CFG, of which we currently own 37%.  The amounts presented for CFG throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q represent the combined historical results of Groupe Smithfield and Campofrío.
 

 
13

 

Equity in (income) loss of affiliates consists of the following:
 
           
Three Months Ended
Equity Investment
 
Segment
         
August 2,
2009
 
July 27,
2008
           
(in millions)
Butterball
 
Other
         
 $0.6
 
 $6.5
CFG (1)
 
International
       
 (3.6)
 
 3.7
Mexican joint ventures
 
Various
         
 (5.6)
 
 (7.4)
All other equity method investments
 
Various
         
 (1.7)
 
 (0.7)
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates
             
 $(10.3)
 
 $2.1
____________________ 
 
(1)
CFG prepares its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. Our share of CFG’s results reflects U.S. GAAP adjustments and thus, there may be differences between the amounts we report for CFG and the amounts reported by CFG.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we received a cash dividend from CFG totaling approximately $16.6 million.
 
As of August 2, 2009, we held 37,811,302 shares of CFG common stock. The stock was valued at €6.70 per share (approximately $9.55 per share) on the close of the last day of trading before the end of our first quarter of fiscal 2010. Based on the stock price and foreign exchange rate as of August 2, 2009, the carrying value of our investment in CFG, net of the cumulative translation adjustment, exceeded the market value of the underlying securities by $58.7 million. Based on the intra-day high price of the stock on August 31, 2009, the market value of our investment in CFG had increased to $401.5 million, which reduced the gap to $19.3 million.  We have analyzed our investment in CFG for impairment in accordance with APB No. 18 “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” and have determined that the decline in value is temporary given the historical trading levels of the stock, the short duration of time in which the carrying value of the investment exceeded its fair value and our intent and ability to hold the investment long-term. Based on our assessment, no impairment was recorded.
 
NOTE 9: DEBT
 
2014 Notes
 
In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), we issued $625 million aggregate principal amount of 10% senior secured notes, which will mature in July 2014 (the 2014 Notes). The 2014 Notes were issued at a price equal to 96.201% of their face value. Interest payments are due semi-annually on January 15 and July 15. The 2014 Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The 2014 Notes are secured by first-priority liens, subject to permitted liens and exceptions for excluded assets, in substantially all of the guarantors’ real property, fixtures and equipment (collectively, the Non-ABL Collateral) and are secured by second-priority liens on cash and cash equivalents, deposit accounts, accounts receivable, inventory, other personal property relating to such inventory and accounts receivable and all proceeds therefrom, intellectual property, and certain capital stock and interests, which secure the ABL Credit Facility (as defined below) on a first-priority basis (the ABL Collateral).
 
The 2014 Notes will rank equally in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated debt. The guarantees will rank equally in right of payment with all of the guarantors’ existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated debt. In addition, the 2014 Notes are structurally subordinated to the liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.
 
We incurred offering expenses of approximately $14.8 million, which will be amortized, along with the discount, into interest expense over the five-year life of the 2014 Notes.  We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2014 Notes to repay borrowings and terminate commitments under our then existing $1.3 billion secured revolving credit agreement (the U.S. Credit Facility), to repay and/or refinance other indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
 
Refer to Note 17—Subsequent Events for a discussion of an additional $225 million aggregate principal amount of 10% senior secured notes issued in August 2009 (fiscal 2010).
 

 
14

 

Asset Based Credit Facility
 
In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), we entered into a new asset-based revolving credit agreement totaling $1.0 billion that supports short-term funding needs and letters of credit (the ABL Credit Facility), which, along with the 2014 Notes, replaced the U.S. Credit Facility scheduled to expire in August 2010 (fiscal 2011). Loans made under the ABL Credit Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate in July 2012.  However, the ABL Credit Facility will be subject to an earlier maturity if we fail to satisfy certain conditions related to the refinancing or repayment of our senior notes due 2011.  The ABL Credit Facility provides for an option, subject to certain conditions, to increase total commitments to $1.3 billion in the future.
 
The ABL Credit Facility requires an unused commitment fee of 1% per annum on the undrawn portion of the facility (subject to a stepdown in the event more than 50% of the commitments under the facility are utilized).
 
Obligations under the ABL Credit Facility are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries and are secured by a first-priority lien on the ABL Collateral. Our obligations under the ABL Credit Facility are also secured by a second-priority lien on the Non-ABL Collateral, which secures the 2014 Notes and our obligations under the Rabobank Term Loan (as defined below) on a first-priority basis.
 
Availability under the ABL Credit Facility is based on a percentage of certain eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory and is reduced by certain reserves. After reducing the amount available by outstanding letters of credit issued under the ABL Credit Facility of $237.4 million, the amount available for borrowing, as of August 2, 2009, was $706.1 million. As of August 2, 2009, we had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Credit Facility.
 
We incurred approximately $33.1 million in transaction fees which will be amortized into interest expense over the three-year life of the ABL Credit Facility.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we recognized a $7.4 million charge related to the write-off of amendment fees and costs associated with the U.S. Credit Facility as a loss on debt extinguishment.
 
Rabobank Term Loan
 
In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), we entered into a new $200 million term loan due August 29, 2013 (the Rabobank Term Loan), which replaced our then existing $200 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in August 2011. We are obligated to repay $25 million of the borrowings under the Rabobank Term Loan on each of August 29, 2011 and August 29, 2012. We may elect to prepay the loan at any time, subject to the payment of certain prepayment fees in respect of any voluntary prepayment prior to August 29, 2011 and other customary breakage costs. Outstanding borrowings under this loan will accrue interest at variable rates. Our obligations under the Rabobank Term Loan are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries on a senior secured basis. The Rabobank Term Loan is secured by first-priority liens on the Non-ABL Collateral and is secured by second-priority liens on the ABL Collateral, which secures our obligations under the ABL Credit Facility on a first-priority basis.  Transaction fees for the Rabobank Term Loan were immaterial.
 
Convertible Notes
 
In July 2008 (fiscal 2009), we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4% convertible senior notes due June 30, 2013 (the Convertible Notes) in a registered offering. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations. The Convertible Notes are payable with cash and, at certain times, are convertible into shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 44.082 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $22.68 per share). Upon conversion, a holder will receive cash up to the principal amount of the Convertible Notes and shares of our common stock for the remainder, if any, of the conversion obligation.
 
The Convertible Notes were originally accounted for as a combined instrument pursuant to EITF Issue 90-19, “Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash upon Conversion.” Accordingly, we accounted for the entire agreement as one debt instrument as the conversion feature did not meet the requirements to be accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. On May 9, 2008, the FASB nullified the conclusions in EITF 90-19 and issued FSP APB 14-1. FSP APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The amount allocated to the equity component represents a discount to the debt recorded. This discount represents the amount of additional interest expense to be recognized using the effective interest method over the life of the debt, to accrete the debt to the principal amount due at maturity.

 
15

 

We adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 (beginning May 4, 2009).
 
On the date of issuance of the Convertible Notes, our nonconvertible debt borrowing rate was determined to be 10.2%. Based on that rate of interest, the liability component and equity component of the Convertible Notes were determined to be $304.2 million and $95.8 million, respectively.
 
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 on our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of May 3, 2009:
 
   
As Originally Presented May 3, 2009
   
Adjustments
   
As Adjusted May 3, 2009
 
Other assets
  $ 161.2     $ (2.3 )   $ 158.9  
Total assets
    7,202.5       (2.3 )     7,200.2  
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    2,649.9       (82.6 )     2,567.3  
Other liabilities
    686.2       29.3       715.5  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,294.7       59.1       1,353.8  
Retained earnings
    1,648.2       (8.1 )     1,640.1  
Total Smithfield Foods, Inc. shareholders’ equity
    2,561.4       51.0       2,612.4  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
    7,202.5       (2.3 )     7,200.2  
 
 
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 on our consolidated income statement for fiscal 2009:
 
   
As Originally Presented Fiscal 2009
   
Adjustments
   
As Adjusted Fiscal 2009
 
Interest expense
  $ 209.1     $ 12.7     $ 221.8  
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
    (369.5 )     (12.7 )     (382.2 )
Income tax benefit
    (126.7 )     (4.6 )     (131.3 )
Loss from continuing operations
    (242.8 )     (8.1 )     (250.9 )
Net loss
    (190.3 )     (8.1 )     (198.4 )
                         
                         
Loss per basic and diluted share:
                       
Continuing operations
  $ (1.72 )   $ (.06 )   $ (1.78 )
Net loss
    (1.35 )     (.06 )     (1.41 )

 
The retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed statement of income for the three months ended July 27, 2008.
 

 
16

 

The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 impacted our results for the three months ended August 2, 2009 as follows:
 
   
(in millions)
 
Interest expense
  $ 3.9  
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
    (3.9 )
Income tax benefit
    (1.4 )
Loss from continuing operations
    (2.5 )
Net loss
    (2.5 )
         
         
Loss per basic and diluted share:
       
Continuing operations
  $ (.02 )
Net loss
    (.02 )

 
As of August 2, 2009, the amount of the unamortized debt discount was $78.7 million, which will be amortized into interest expense through maturity of the Convertible Notes in June 2013 (fiscal 2014). As of August 2, 2009, the net carrying amount of the liability component was $321.3 million. In addition to the interest expense recognized due to the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 as presented above, we recognized contractual coupon interest expense on the Convertible Notes of $4.0 million and $0.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock to reduce potential economic dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, and separate warrant transactions (collectively referred to as the Call Spread Transactions). We purchased call options that permit us to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment, which is the number of shares initially issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. In addition, we sold warrants permitting the purchasers to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment. See Note 13—Shareholders’ Equity for more information on the Call Spread Transactions.
 
Debt Covenants and the Incurrence Test
 
Our various debt agreements contain covenants that limit additional borrowings, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing of assets and payments of dividends to shareholders, among other restrictions.
 
Our senior unsecured and secured notes limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions, when our interest coverage ratio is, or after incurring additional indebtedness would be, less than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Incurrence Test).  As of August 2, 2009, we did not meet the Incurrence Test.  Due to the trailing twelve month nature of the Incurrence Test, we do not expect to meet the Incurrence Test again until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 at the earliest.  The Incurrence Test is not a maintenance covenant and our failure to meet the Incurrence Test is not a default. In addition to limiting our ability to incur additional indebtedness, our failure to meet the Incurrence Test restricts us from engaging in certain other activities, including paying cash dividends, repurchasing our common stock and making certain investments. However, our failure to meet the Incurrence Test does not preclude us from borrowing on the ABL Credit Facility or from refinancing existing indebtedness, including our senior unsecured notes maturing in October 2009 ($206.3 million outstanding as of August 2, 2009). Therefore we do not expect the limitations resulting from our inability to satisfy the Incurrence Test to have a material adverse effect on our business or liquidity.
 
Our ABL Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring us to maintain a fixed charges coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0 when the amounts available for borrowing under the ABL Credit Facility are less than the greater of $120 million or 15% of the total commitments under the facility (currently $1.0 billion).  We currently are not subject to this restriction and we do not anticipate that our borrowing availability will decline below those thresholds during fiscal 2010, although there can be no assurance that this will not occur because our borrowing availability depends upon our borrowing base calculated for purposes of that facility.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that we previously and unintentionally breached a non-financial covenant under our senior unsecured notes relating to certain foreign subsidiaries' indebtedness. We promptly cured this minor breach by amending certain debt agreements of the subsidiaries and extinguishing other indebtedness of the subsidiaries, and, as a result, no event of default occurred under our senior unsecured notes or any other facilities.
 

 
17

 

NOTE 10: GUARANTEES
 
As part of our business, we are a party to various financial guarantees and other commitments as described below. These arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk that are not included in the consolidated condensed balance sheets. We could become liable in connection with these obligations depending on the performance of the guaranteed party or the occurrence of future events that we are unable to predict. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for an obligation, we will record the liability on our consolidated balance sheet.
 
We (together with our joint venture partners) guarantee financial obligations of certain unconsolidated joint ventures. The financial obligations are: up to $90.8 million of debt borrowed by Agroindustrial del Noroeste (Norson), of which $72.3 million was outstanding as of August 2, 2009, and up to $3.5 million of liabilities with respect to currency swaps executed by another of our unconsolidated Mexican joint ventures, Granjas Carroll de Mexico (Granjas). The covenants in the guarantee relating to Norson’s debt incorporate our covenants under the ABL Credit Facility. In addition, we continue to guarantee $16.5 million of leases that were transferred to JBS in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef. Some of these lease guarantees will be released in the near future and others will remain in place until the leases expire through August 2021.
 
NOTE 11: INCOME TAXES
 
Our effective tax rate was 25% and 32% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The variation in the effective tax rate during these periods is due primarily to a higher proportion of earnings in international operations with lower effective tax rates in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
 
NOTE 12: PENSION PLANS
 
The components of net periodic pension cost consist of:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Service cost
  $ 5.6     $ 6.4  
Interest cost
    18.4       17.1  
Expected return on plan assets
    (12.3 )     (17.4 )
Net amortization
    5.1       1.6  
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 16.8     $ 7.7  

 
NOTE 13: SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Stock Options
 
We issued 12,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options in fiscal 2009. There were no exercises of common stock options during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. As of August 2, 2009, 2,144,703 stock options were outstanding.
 
Performance Share Units
 
In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), we granted a total of 622,000 performance share units under the 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. Each performance share unit represents and has a value equal to one share of our common stock. The performance share units will vest ratably over a three-year service period provided that the Company achieves a certain earnings target in any of fiscal years 2010, 2011 or 2012. Payment of the vested performance share units shall be in our common stock.
 
The fair value of the performance share units was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The performance share units were valued in separate tranches according to the expected life of each tranche. The weighted average grant-date fair value of the performance share units was $22.14.
 
We also have 160,000 performance share units outstanding, which were granted in fiscal 2009. Compensation cost related to all outstanding performance share units was immaterial for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
 

 
18

 

Call Spread Transactions
 
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes (see Note 9—Debt), we entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock to minimize the impact of potential economic dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, and separate warrant transactions.
 
We purchased call options in private transactions that permit us to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $22.68 per share, subject to adjustment, for $88.2 million. In general, the call options allow us to acquire a number of shares of our common stock initially equal to the number of shares of common stock issuable to the holders of the Convertible Notes upon conversion. These call options will terminate upon the maturity of the Convertible Notes.
 
We also sold warrants in private transactions for total proceeds of approximately $36.7 million. The warrants permit the purchasers to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $30.54 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants expire on various dates from October 2013 (fiscal 2014) to December 2013 (fiscal 2014).
 
The Call Spread Transactions, in effect, increase the initial conversion price of the Convertible Notes from $22.68 per share to $30.54 per share, thus reducing the potential future economic dilution associated with conversion of the notes. The Convertible Notes and the warrants could have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share to the extent that the price of our common stock during a given measurement period exceeds the respective exercise prices of those instruments. The call options are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their impact is anti-dilutive.
 
We have analyzed the Call Spread Transactions under EITF 00-19 and other relevant literature, and determined that they meet the criteria for classification as equity instruments. As a result, we recorded the purchase of the call options as a reduction in additional paid-in capital and the proceeds of the warrants as an increase to additional paid-in capital. In accordance with EITF 00-19, subsequent changes in fair value of those instruments are not recognized in the financial statements as long as the instruments continue to meet the criteria for equity classification.
 
Adoption of FSP APB 14-1
 
As more fully described in Note 9—Debt, we adopted FSP APB 14-1 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, which required us to separately account for the conversion feature of the Convertible Notes as a component of equity, thereby increasing additional paid-in capital by $59.1 million.
 
Comprehensive Income
 
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, consist of:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Net loss
  $ (107.7 )   $ (13.2 )
Hedge accounting
    45.8       (28.2 )
Foreign currency translation
    46.8       13.1  
Pension accounting
    2.5       0.7  
Total comprehensive loss
  $ (12.6 )   $ (27.6 )

 
NOTE 14: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 requires us to consider and reflect the assumptions of market participants in fair value calculations.
 
We use, as appropriate, a market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques), and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) to measure the fair value of an asset or liability.  These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data that management believes are
 

 
19

 

predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of August 2, 2009. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted market prices (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Financial assets and liabilities have been classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
   
Fair Value Measurements
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
   
(in millions)
 
Assets
                       
Derivatives
  $ 45.4     $ 36.0     $ 9.4     $ -  
Money market fund
    408.0       408.0       -       -  
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
    26.6       26.6       -       -  
Total
  $ 480.0     $ 470.6     $ 9.4     $ -  
                                 
                                 
Liabilities
                               
Derivatives
  $ 73.2     $ 44.0     $ 29.2     $ -  

 
When available, we use quoted market prices to determine fair value and we classify such measurements within Level 1.  In some cases where market prices are not available, we make use of observable market based inputs (i.e. Bloomberg and commodity exchanges) to calculate fair value, in which case the measurements are classified within Level 2.  
 
For additional disclosures regarding the fair value of our debt instruments and the location of such amounts in our consolidated condensed balance sheets, refer to Note 5—Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
 
We invest our cash in an overnight money market fund, which is treated as a trading security in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” with the unrealized gains recorded in earnings.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, for example, when there is evidence of impairment.
 
As discussed further in Note 6—Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, we recorded impairment charges totaling $34.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to write down certain farm assets to their estimated fair values. The fair value of these assets, which consisted solely of property, plant and equipment, was determined to be approximately $49.0 million as of August 2, 2009. The fair value measurements of these assets were determined using relevant market data based on recent transactions for similar assets and third party estimates, which we classify as Level 2 inputs, as well as unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the assets, which we classify as Level 3 inputs.
 

 
20

 

Other Financial Instruments
 
We determine the fair value of public debt using quoted market prices. We value all other debt using discounted cash flow techniques at estimated market prices for similar issues. The following table presents the fair value and carrying value of long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt as of August 2, 2009 and May 3, 2009.
 
   
August 2, 2009
   
May 3, 2009
 
   
Fair
Value
   
Carrying Value
   
Fair
Value
   
Carrying Value
 
   
(in millions)
   
(in millions)
 
Total Debt
  $ 3,197.1     $ 3,316.8     $ 2,448.2     $ 2,882.8  

 
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments.
 
NOTE 15: CONTINGENCIES
 
Insurance Recoveries
 
In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), a fire occurred at the primary manufacturing facility of our subsidiary, Patrick Cudahy, Incorporated (Patrick Cudahy), in Cudahy, WI.  The fire damaged a portion of the facility’s production space and required the temporary cessation of operations, but did not consume the entire facility. We have resumed production activities in undamaged portions of the plant, including the distribution center, and have taken steps to address the supply needs for Patrick Cudahy products by shifting production to other Company facilities.
 
The products produced at the facility include precooked and traditional bacon, dry sausage, ham and sliced meats. Patrick Cudahy’s operating results are reported the Pork segment. Annual revenues for Patrick Cudahy’s packaged meats business have exceeded $450 million in recent years.
 
We maintain comprehensive general liability and property insurance, including business interruption insurance, with loss limits that we believe will provide substantial and broad coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this accident.  We are working with our insurance carrier to determine the extent of damage. We have received an advance on the ultimate settlement primarily to cover our out-of-pocket costs. The magnitude and timing of the ultimate settlement is currently unknown. However, we expect the level of insurance proceeds will cover the costs and losses incurred from the fire.
 
Litigation
 
There have been no significant developments regarding the litigation disclosed in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009, nor have any significant new matters arisen during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
 
NOTE 16: SEGMENT DATA
 
We conduct our operations through five reportable segments: Pork, International, Hog Production, Other and Corporate, each of which is comprised of a number of subsidiaries, joint ventures and other investments. As discussed in Note 3—Dispositions, we sold our Beef operations, which are reported as discontinued operations.
 
The Pork segment consists mainly of our three wholly-owned U.S. fresh pork and packaged meats subsidiaries. The International segment is comprised mainly of our meat processing and distribution operations in Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom, as well as our interests in meat processing operations, mainly in Western Europe, Mexico and China. The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations located in the U.S., Poland and Romania as well as our interests in hog production operations in Mexico. The Other segment is comprised of our turkey production operations, our 49% interest in Butterball, and through the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our live cattle operations. The Corporate segment provides management and administrative services to support our other segments.
 

 
21

 

The following table presents sales and operating profit (loss) by segment for the fiscal periods indicated:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Sales:
           
Segment sales—
           
Pork
  $ 2,251.8     $ 2,579.2  
International
    298.3       405.3  
Hog Production
    552.2       725.8  
Other
    71.2       44.2  
Total segment sales
    3,173.5       3,754.5  
Intersegment sales—
               
Pork
    (8.4 )     (14.6 )
International
    (12.6 )     (16.3 )
Hog Production
    (437.2 )     (581.8 )
Total intersegment sales
    (458.2 )     (612.7 )
Consolidated sales
  $ 2,715.3     $ 3,141.8  
                 
Operating profit (loss):
               
Pork
  $ 101.0     $ 61.7  
International
    7.3       5.9  
Hog Production
    (162.1 )     (38.8 )
Other
    (4.6 )     (6.7 )
Corporate
    (16.4 )     (19.6 )
Consolidated operating profit (loss)
  $ (74.8 )   $ 2.5  

 
NOTE 17: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
We have evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on September 10, 2009, which represents the date the consolidated condensed financial statements were issued. The following significant non-recognized subsequent events occurred prior to the filing of this report.
 
Issuance of $225 Million Senior Secured Notes and Cancellation of the Euro Credit Facility
 
In August 2009 (fiscal 2010), we issued an additional $225 million of 10% senior secured notes, which will mature in July 2014. The notes were issued at a price equal to 104% of their face value, plus accrued interest from July 2, 2009 to August 14, 2009. The notes have identical terms and conditions, other than issue date and issue price, as and form a single series with the 2014 Notes and are guaranteed by the same parties and secured by the same assets as the 2014 Notes.
 
We incurred offering expenses of approximately $4.4 million, which have been capitalized and will be amortized, along with the premium, into interest expense over the approximate five-year life of the notes.  We used the proceeds from the notes offering, together with other available cash, to repay the outstanding balance under our European secured revolving credit facility (the Euro Credit Facility) ($320.7 million outstanding as of August 2, 2009), and cancelled the Euro Credit Facility, which was scheduled to mature in August 2010 (fiscal 2011).
 
Increase of Authorized Shares of Common Stock
 
On August 26, 2009, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 200 million to 500 million.
 

 
22

 

ITEM 2.                      MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
You should read the following information in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements and the related notes in this Quarterly Report and the audited financial statements and the related notes as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009.
 
Unless otherwise stated, the amounts presented in the following discussion are based on continuing operations for all fiscal periods included. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentations.
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
 
We are the largest hog producer and pork processor in the world. We produce and market a wide variety of fresh meat and packaged meats products both domestically and internationally. We operate in a cyclical industry and our results are significantly affected by fluctuations in commodity prices for livestock (primarily hogs) and grains. Some of the factors that we believe are critical to the success of our business are our ability to:
 
 
§
maintain and expand market share, particularly in packaged meats,
 
 
§
develop and maintain strong customer relationships,
 
 
§
continually innovate and differentiate our products,
 
 
§
manage risk in volatile commodities markets, and
 
 
§
maintain our position as a low cost producer of live hogs, fresh pork and packaged meats.
 
We conduct our operations through five reporting segments: Pork, International, Hog Production, Other and Corporate. Each segment is comprised of a number of subsidiaries, joint ventures and other investments. The Pork segment consists mainly of our three wholly-owned U.S. fresh pork and packaged meats subsidiaries. The International segment is comprised mainly of our meat processing and distribution operations in Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom, as well as our interests in meat processing operations, mainly in Western Europe, Mexico and China. The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations located in the U.S., Poland and Romania as well as our interests in hog production operations in Mexico. The Other segment is comprised of our turkey production operations, our 49% interest in Butterball and through the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our live cattle operations. The Corporate segment provides management and administrative services to support our other segments.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
First Quarter of Fiscal 2010 Summary
 
Net loss was $107.7 million, or $(.75) per diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to a net loss of $13.2 million, or $(.10) per diluted share, in the same quarter last year. The following significant factors impacted first quarter of fiscal 2010 results compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2009:
 
 
§
Pork segment operating profit increased sharply to $101.0 million driven by substantially improved results related to the packaged meats component of the segment.
 
 
§
International segment operating profit improved from the prior year quarter. The improvement is mainly attributable to favorable results from our equity method investments.
 
 
§
The Hog Production segment incurred significant operating losses due to sharply lower live hog market prices, high feed costs and the recording of a $34.1 million impairment related to certain of its hog production operations.
 
 
§
The Other segment losses were lower due to improved results at Butterball.
 

 
23

 

Outlook
 
The commodity markets affecting our business are extremely volatile and fluctuate on a daily basis. In this erratic and unpredictable operating environment, it is very difficult to make meaningful forecasts of industry trends and conditions. The outlook statements that follow must be viewed in this context.
 
 
§
Pork— Segment operating profits were the highest the Company has ever recorded in the first quarter, despite year over year volume decreases and a weak fresh pork environment for much of the quarter. 
 
Pricing discipline, rationalization of unprofitable business, and the early benefits of the Restructuring Plan (as defined below) pushed packaged meats profits higher in the first quarter, despite a 9% reduction in sales volume and $6 million in charges related to the restructuring effort.  Going into the second quarter, our packaged meats business continues to be solidly profitable. 
 
The fresh pork environment was weak for much of the first quarter, resulting in modest losses.  However, conditions improved late in the quarter and have continued strong in the early weeks of the second quarter of fiscal 2010.  While export volumes to key countries, including China, decreased year over year in the first quarter, overall volumes remain robust in historical terms.  For the balance of the year, the strength of key export markets may depend on the severity of the A(H1N1) influenza outbreak and any political reaction to it.   
 
We are very optimistic about Pork segment results for the full fiscal year.  Near term, the segment should benefit from lower raw material and energy costs as compared to fiscal 2009.  We also anticipate continued cost savings as the full effect of the Restructuring Plan takes permanent hold in fiscal 2010 and beyond.
 
 
§
International—We expect our meat operations in Poland and Romania to continue to improve their operating performance as we move further into fiscal 2010. We expect to see positive contributions from our investment in CFG as an improving pork environment in Europe and the realization of synergies associated with the prior year merger with Groupe Smithfield begin to be more fully realized. 
 
 
§
Hog Production— The swine industry in the United States is currently coping with an oversupply of market hogs and worldwide recessionary conditions.  Hog producers industry-wide have suffered considerable losses as the price of feed grains have risen and, at the same time, oversupply conditions have depressed live hog prices.  Our own hog production losses continued through the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as raising costs remain elevated relative to live hog market prices.   While we have begun to see improvements in domestic raising costs, it has not been enough to offset depressed prices.  Our domestic raising costs for the quarter were $59 per hundredweight compared to $63 per hundredweight in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $61 per hundredweight in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.  Meanwhile, live hog prices averaged only $42 per hundredweight for the first quarter and prices fell even lower in the early weeks of the second quarter.  The decrease in our raising cost is, at least in part, attributable to the fact that we have fed-out the majority of the higher priced corn we locked into in the latter half of calendar 2008.  We expect our raising cost will continue to trend downward throughout fiscal 2010 as cheaper feed grains are fed to our livestock.
 
Most industry observers believe an inflection point has been reached and there are signs that sow liquidations could be occurring.  Herd reductions, when they occur throughout the industry, will over time begin to tighten supplies and should result in higher live hog market prices in the U.S.  However, it may take time for the oversupply situation to correct itself.  As a result, our hog production operations will likely not achieve profitability in the near term. However, we do not anticpate losses will accumulate at last year's levels.
 
Livestock producers continue to feel the negative impacts of the current ethanol policy in the United States.  Currently, it is estimated that 30% of the U.S corn crop is diverted from livestock feed and other consumer products to the ethanol industry.  There are current proposals to increase the allowable ethanol blend in gasoline to 15% from 10%.  We are concerned about these proposals and their impact on the long-term profitability of livestock production in this country.  If such proposals are approved, the portion of the U.S. corn crop diverted to ethanol production could increase to as much as 40%.  The impact to the protein industry would be higher feed costs and, ultimately, higher food prices for consumers.
 

 

 
24

 


 
§
Other—As with the Hog Production segment, high grain costs adversely impacted the profitability of our turkey operations throughout fiscal 2009.  We have seen improvements in turkey raising costs in the first quarter of 2010 as corn prices have declined from last year’s highs.  We expect our turkey operations and our investment in Butterball to continue to improve and return to profitability in the second half of fiscal 2010.
 
 
Significant Fiscal 2010 Events Affecting Results of Operations
 
Hog Farm Impairments
 
In June 2009 (fiscal 2010), management made a decision to further reduce our domestic sow herd by 3%, or approximately 30,000 sows, which will be accomplished by ceasing hog production operations and closing certain of our hog farms that were previously acquired in our merger with Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (PSF). This action brings the total reduction in our sow herd to 13% over the last six quarter. In addition, we are currently negotiating the sale of certain other hog farms that were also previously acquired in our merger with PSF.  As a result of these decisions, we analyzed these hog farms as two separate asset groups in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).
 
As a result of our analysis, we recorded total impairment charges of $34.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to write down the asset groups to their estimated fair values. The impairment charges were recorded in the Hog Production segment. Refer to Note 14—Fair Value Measurements for further discussion.
 
The farm assets we intend to sell, which consist solely of property, plant and equipment, have been reclassified as held for sale within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated condensed balance sheets. The carrying amount of that asset disposal group was $27.9 million as of August 2, 2009 and $33.1 million as of May 3, 2009. We expect the sale of these assets to be completed within the next twelve months.
 
Pork Segment Restructuring Update
 
In February 2009 (fiscal 2009), we announced a plan to consolidate and streamline the corporate structure and manufacturing operations of our Pork segment (the Restructuring Plan).  This restructuring is intended to make us more competitive by improving operating efficiencies and increasing plant utilization.  
 
As of August 2, 2009, all of the targeted plants had been closed except for Smithfield Packing’s Smithfield South plant, which is expected to close by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The other restructuring initiatives are ongoing and are expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The Restructuring Plan is expected to result in annual cost savings and improved pre-tax earnings, after applicable restructuring charges, of approximately $55 million in fiscal 2010 and $125 million by fiscal 2011.
 
The following table summarizes the balance of accrued expenses, the cumulative expense incurred to date and the expected remaining expenses to be incurred related to the Restructuring Plan by major type of cost. All of these charges were recorded in the Pork segment.
 
   
Accrued Balance
May 3, 2009
   
Current Period Expense
   
Payments
   
Accrued Balance
August 2, 2009
   
Cumulative Expense-to-Date
   
Estimated Remaining Expense
 
Restructuring charges:
 
(in millions)
 
Employee severance and related benefits
  $ 11.9     $ (0.2 )   $ (0.8 )   $ 10.9     $ 12.1     $ 1.0  
Other associated costs
    0.5       6.5       (5.2 )     1.8       8.2       15.3  
Total restructuring charges
  $ 12.4     $ 6.3     $ (6.0 )   $ 12.7       20.3     $ 16.3  
                                                 
Impairment charges:
                                               
Property, plant and equipment
                                    69.4          
Inventory
                                    4.8          
Total impairment charges
                                    74.2          
Total restructuring and impairment charges
                            $ 94.5          
 

 
25

 

Of the $6.3 million of restructuring charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, $4.7 million was recorded in cost of sales with the remainder recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Substantially all of the estimated remaining expenses are expected to be incurred through the end of fiscal 2010.  We also estimate that $33 million in capital expenditures will be incurred relative to plant consolidations through the remainder of fiscal 2010.
 
Consolidated Results of Operations
 
Sales and cost of sales
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
 
   
(in millions)
       
Sales
  $ 2,715.3     $ 3,141.8       (14 ) %
Cost of sales
    2,616.6       2,946.6       (11 )
Gross profit
  $ 98.7     $ 195.2       (49 )
Gross profit margin
    4 %     6 %        
 
 
The following items explain the significant changes in sales and gross profit:
 
 
§
Fresh pork sales in the Pork segment decreased 23% from the prior year quarter on an 11% decrease in volumes and a 14% decrease in the average unit selling price.
 
 
§
Packaged meat sales in the Pork segment decreased 2% from the prior year quarter as increases in the average unit selling price of 8% were offset by volume decreases of 9%.
 
 
§
Strengthening underlying foreign currencies decreased sales approximately $126.8 million, or 4% of consolidated prior year sales.
 
 
§
Domestic raising costs decreased to $59 per hundredweight from $61 per hundredweight in the prior year quarter.
 
 
§
Domestic live hog market prices decreased to $42 per hundredweight from $55 in the prior year quarter.
 
 
§
Gross profit for the current quarter includes $34.1 million in impairments in Hog Production related to the anticipated closure of certain farms and the expected sale of certain farms, as well as $4.7 million in restructuring charges related to the Pork segment restructuring.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
   
(in millions)
       
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  $ 183.8     $ 190.6       (4 ) %
 
 
The following items explain the significant changes in selling, general and administrative expenses:
 
 
§
Foreign currency transaction losses for the current year quarter were $4.9 million compared to gains of $9.9 million in the prior year quarter, resulting in a year over year increase of $14.8 million.
 
 
§
The impact of foreign currency translation from our international subsidiaries decreased selling, general and administrative expenses approximately $7.4 million in the current year quarter.
 
 
§
The current year quarter included $2.9 million of income from mark-to-market gains on the cash surrender value of life insurance while the prior year quarter included a mark-to-market loss of $2.3 million, resulting in a year over year decrease of $5.2 million.
 

 
26

 

 
§
Marketing and advertising expenses decreased in the current year quarter by approximately $7.8 million compared to the prior year quarter.
 
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
 
   
(in millions)
       
Butterball, LLC (Butterball)
  $ 0.6     $ 6.5       91 %
Campofrío Food Group (CFG) (1)
    (3.6 )     3.7       197  
Mexican joint ventures
    (5.6 )     (7.4 )     (24 )
All other equity method investments
    (1.7 )     (0.7 )     143  
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates
  $ (10.3 )   $ 2.1    
NM
 
___________________
 
(1)
Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we owned 50% of Groupe Smithfield S.L. (Groupe Smithfield) and 24% of Campofrío Alimentación, S.A. (Campofrío).  Those entities merged in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to form CFG, of which we currently own 37%.  The amounts presented for CFG represent the combined historical results of Groupe Smithfield and Campofrío.
 
 The following items explain the significant changes in equity in (income) loss of affiliates:
 
 
§
Equity income from CFG improved over the prior year quarter. The prior year quarter included $5.5 million of operating losses and impairment charges relating to its discontinued Russian operations.
 
 
§
Butterball’s results improved over the prior year quarter but continued to be negatively impacted by high grain costs.
 
Interest expense
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
   
(in millions)
       
Interest expense
  $ 60.5     $ 45.3       34 %
 
 
The increase in interest expense was primarily due to additional borrowings. The major components of the year over year increase are:
 
 
§
$6.1 million is attributable to interest and amortization of debt cost on the July 2008 Convertible Notes issuance.
 
 
§
$5.3 million is due to interest and amortization of debt costs on the July 2009 $625 million 2014 Notes issuance.
 
 
§
$1.5 million is related to the amortization of debt costs associated with fiscal 2009 amendments.
 
 
§
Approximately $7.8 million of the current quarter interest expense were non-cash expenses.
 
Loss on debt extinguishment
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
%  Change
   
(in millions)
   
Loss on debt extinguishment
  $ 7.4     $ -   NM %
 

 
27

 

As described more fully under “liquidity and capital resources” below, we terminated commitments under our $1.3 billion secured revolving credit agreement (the U.S. Credit Facility) in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, and recognized a $7.4 million charge related to the write-off of amendment fees and costs associated with the U.S. Credit Facility as a loss on debt extinguishment.
 
Income tax expense
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
Income tax expense benefit (in millions)
  $ (35.0 )   $ (13.7 )
Effective tax rate
    25 %     32 %
 
 
The variation in the effective tax rate during these periods is due primarily to a higher proportion of earnings in international operations with lower effective tax rates in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
 
Segment Results
 
The following information reflects the results from each respective segment prior to eliminations of inter-segment sales.
 
Pork Segment
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
 
   
(in millions, unless indicated otherwise)
       
Sales:
                 
Fresh pork
  $ 1,033.4     $ 1,341.2       (23 ) %
Packaged meats
    1,218.4       1,238.0       (2 )
Total
  $ 2,251.8     $ 2,579.2       (13 ) %
                         
Operating profit:
                       
Fresh pork
  $ (6.8 )   $ 27.7       (125 ) %
Packaged meats
    107.8       34.0       217  
Total
  $ 101.0     $ 61.7       64 %
                         
Sales volume (pounds):
                       
Fresh pork
                    (11 ) %
Packaged meats
                    (9 )
Total
                    (10 )
                         
Average unit selling price (dollars):
                       
Fresh pork
                    (14 ) %
Packaged meats
                    8  
Total
                    (3 )
                         
Average domestic live hog prices (per hundred weight) (1)
  $ 42.3     $ 55.4       (24 ) %
 
____________________ 
 
 

(1)
Represents the average live hog market price as quoted by the Iowa-Southern Minnesota hog market.
 
 
 

 
28

 

The following items explain the significant changes in Pork segment sales and operating profit:
 
 
§
Fresh pork sales in the Pork segment decreased 23% in the current year quarter.  Volumes decreased 11% and average unit selling prices decreased 14%.  Fresh pork operating profit in the segment decreased $34.5 million to an operating loss of $6.8 million in the current year quarter from a profit of $27.7 million in the prior year quarter.  These changes are reflective of a weakened fresh pork environment in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the prior year. The impact of the A(H1N1) outbreak hurt fresh pork demand, especially in exports, early in the quarter. By quarter end, fresh pork had returned to profitability.
 
 
§
Packaged meat sales in the Pork segment decreased 2% in the current year quarter.  Volumes decreased 9% but were partially offset by an increase in the average unit selling prices of 8%.  Packaged meats operating profit in the segment improved substantially in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $107.8 million from $34.0 million in prior year quarter.
 
 
§
The Pork segment recorded restructuring charges of $6.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 with $6.0 million recorded in the packaged meats component of the segment and $0.3 million recorded in the fresh pork component of the segment.
 
 
§
Transportation and energy costs decreased 25% and 14%, respectively, compared to the prior year quarter as fuel costs returned to lower levels from the highs seen throughout fiscal 2009.
 
International Segment
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
 
   
(in millions)
       
Sales
  $ 298.3     $ 405.3       (26 ) %
Operating profit
    7.3       5.9       24  
                         
Sales volume (pounds)
                    8 %
Average unit selling price (dollars)
                    (32 )
 
 
The following items explain the significant changes in International segment sales and operating profit:
 
 
§
Sales decreased $107 million, or 26%, primarily due to foreign currency translation. The change is attributable to stronger underlying functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries.
 
 
§
Total sales volume increased 8% with fresh pork volume decreasing 6% and packaged meats volume increasing 28%.
 
 
§
Excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, sales and operating profit were negatively impacted by a 3% decrease in the average unit selling price.
 
 
§
We recorded a profit from our equity method investments of $5.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to a loss of $3.2 million in the same quarter last year. The prior year loss included operating losses and impairment charges taken by CFG on its discontinued Russian operations, our share of which was $5.5 million.
 
 
§
Operating profit was negatively impacted by foreign currency transaction losses.
 

 
29

 
 
Hog Production Segment

 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
 
   
(in millions, unless indicated otherwise)
       
Sales
  $ 552.2     $ 725.8       (24 ) %
Operating loss
    (162.1 )     (38.8 )     (318 )
                         
Head sold
    4.41       4.75       (7 ) %
                         
Average domestic live hog prices (per hundred weight) (1)
  $ 42.30     $ 55.40       (24 ) %
Domestic raising costs (per hundred weight)
    59.48       60.70       (2 )
____________________ 
 
 

(1)
Represents the average live hog market price as quoted by the Iowa-Southern Minnesota hog market.
 
The following items explain the significant changes in Hog Production segment sales and operating profit:
 
 
§
Total head sold decreased 7% reflecting the impact of our sow reduction program.  We expect this will decrease the number of market animals by 2.2 million annually.
 
 
§
Average U.S. market prices decreased 24% due to an oversupply of live hogs.
 
 
§
High grain costs have continued to negatively affect operating profit. Domestic raising costs decreased 2% from the prior year quarter to $59.48 per hundredweight from $60.70 per hundredweight in the prior year.  Corn cost for the quarter decreased 18% while soybean meal prices increased 7%.
 
 
§
Operating loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 included $34.1 million in impairment charges related to the anticipated closure of certain farms and the expected sale of certain farms.
 
Other Segment
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
   
(in millions)
       
Sales
  $ 71.2     $ 44.2       61 %
Operating loss
    (4.6 )     (6.7 )     31  

 
The following items explain the significant changes in Other segment sales and operating profit:
 
 
§
The increase in sales was due to the current year inclusion of sales from our cattle operations. In June, we sold the remaining 21,000 head of Holstein cattle in a single transaction worth $17 million.  The cattle were essentially sold at book value.
 
 
§
We recorded a loss from our equity method investments of $0.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to a loss of $6.4 million in the same quarter last year. This improvement is primarily due improved results at Butterball due to lower raw material costs.
 

 
30

 
 
Corporate Segment
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
   
%  Change
   
(in millions)
       
Operating loss
  $ (16.4 )   $ (19.6 )     16 %
 

 
 
The following items explain the significant changes in the Corporate segment’s operating loss:
 
 
§
Gains on company life insurance policies were $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to losses of $2.3 million in the prior year quarter.  This change decreased SG&A by $5.2 million.
 
 
§
Foreign currency transaction gains were $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to gains of $1.5 million in the same quarter last year.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Summary
 
Our cash requirements consist primarily of the purchase of raw materials used in our hog production and pork processing operations, long-term debt obligations and related interest, lease payments for real estate, machinery, vehicles and other equipment, and expenditures for capital assets, other investments and other general business purposes.  Our primary sources of liquidity are cash we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell, as well as our credit facilities.  
 
Based on the following, we believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations for at least the next twelve months:
 
 
§
As of August 2, 2009, our liquidity position was approximately $1.2 billion, comprised of $706.1 million of availability under the ABL Credit Facility (as defined below), $506.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $29.9 million of availability under international credit lines.
 
 
§
We generated $66.5 million of positive net cash flows from operating activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
 
 
§
Future cash flows from operations should continue to benefit from a significant decline in corn prices since the prior year, as well as improved operating efficiencies and plant utilization as a result of the Restructuring Plan.
 
Our focus has shifted from acquisitions and capital spending to integration and debt reduction. Capital expenditures in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 were 60% lower than the prior year.  Capital expenditures have averaged $365.1 million over the last three full fiscal years. We expect capital spending for the remainder of fiscal 2010 to be well below this average.
 
Sources of Liquidity
 
We have available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external. These resources provide funds required for current operations, acquisitions, integration costs, debt retirement and other capital requirements.
 
Accounts Receivable and Inventories
 
The meat processing industry is characterized by high sales volume and rapid turnover of inventories and accounts receivable. Because of the rapid turnover rate, we consider our meat inventories and accounts receivable highly liquid and readily convertible into cash. In addition, although inventory turnover in the Hog Production segment is slower, mature hogs are readily convertible into cash. Borrowings under our credit facilities are used, in part, to finance increases in the levels of inventories and accounts receivable resulting from seasonal and other market-related fluctuations in raw material costs.
 

 
31

 


 
Credit Facilities
 
   
August 2, 2009
 
Facility
 
Capacity
   
Borrowing Base Adjustment
   
Outstanding Letters of Credit
   
Outstanding Borrowings
   
Amount Available
 
   
(in millions)
 
ABL Credit Facility
  $ 1,000.0     $ (56.5 )   $ (237.4 )   $ -     $ 706.1  
Euro Credit Facility
    320.7       -       -       (320.7 )     -  
Other international facilities
    90.7       -       -       (60.8 )     29.9  
Total credit facilities
  $ 1,411.4     $ (56.5 )   $ (237.4 )   $ (381.5 )   $ 736.0  

 
ABL Credit Facility. In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), we entered into a new asset-based revolving credit agreement totaling $1.0 billion that supports short-term funding needs and letters of credit (the ABL Credit Facility), and terminated the U.S. Credit Facility, which was scheduled to expire in August 2010 (fiscal 2011). Loans made under the ABL Credit Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate in July 2012.  However, the ABL Credit Facility will be subject to an earlier maturity if we fail to satisfy certain conditions related to the refinancing or repayment of our senior notes due 2011.  The ABL Credit Facility provides for an option, subject to certain conditions, to increase total commitments to $1.3 billion in the future.
 
Availability under the ABL Credit Facility is based on a percentage of certain eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory and is reduced by certain reserves.  The ABL Credit Facility requires an unused commitment fee of 1% per annum on the undrawn portion of the facility (subject to a stepdown in the event more than 50% of the commitments under the facility are utilized).
 
Obligations under the ABL Credit Facility are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries and are secured by a first-priority lien on the ABL Collateral (as defined below). Our obligations under the ABL Facility are also secured by a second-priority lien on the Non-ABL Collateral (as defined below), which secures the 2014 Notes (as defined below) and our obligations under the Rabobank Term Loan (as defined below) on a first-priority basis.
 
Euro Credit Facility. In August 2009 (fiscal 2010), we paid off the outstanding balance under the Euro Credit Facility and cancelled the facility, which was scheduled to mature in August 2010 (fiscal 2011).
 
The weighted average interest rate on amounts outstanding under all of our credit facilities and credit lines as of August 2, 2009 was 4.5%.
 
In addition to these credit facilities, we enter into short-term uncommitted credit lines from time to time as an ordinary course financing activity.
 
Securities
 
We have a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register sales of debt, stock and other securities from time to time. We would use the net proceeds from the possible sale of these securities for repayment of existing debt or general corporate purposes.
 

 
32

 

Cash Flows
 
Operating Activities
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Net cash flows from operating activities
  $ 66.5     $ (79.2 )

 
The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
§
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers was significantly less than the prior year due to a 24% decline in average live hog market prices.
 
 
§
Cash paid for grains was significantly less than the prior year due to substantially lower feed prices.
 
 
§
Cash paid for transportation and energy decreased due to significantly lower fuel prices and energy costs.
 
 
§
Cash received for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements was $4.5 million in fiscal 2010 compared to cash paid of $66.2 million in fiscal 2009.
 
 
§
We received a cash dividend from CFG of approximately $16.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
 
 
§
The decline in cash paid for raw materials was partially offset by less cash received from customers primarily as a result of a decline in sales volume.
 
 
§
Net cash receipts related to taxes decreased by $47.9 million due to a large refund in the prior year.
 
Investing Activities
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Capital expenditures
  $ (33.5 )   $ (83.4 )
Other
    7.3       0.3  
Net cash flows from investing activities
  $ (26.2 )   $ (83.1 )

 
The following items explain the significant investing activities for the three months ended August 2, 2009 and July 27 2008:
 
Fiscal 2010
 
 
§
Capital expenditures primarily related to the Restructuring Plan and plant and hog farm improvement projects. Capital spending was reduced in fiscal 2010 due to our continued focus on driving efficiencies and debt reduction.
 
Fiscal 2009
 
 
§
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects.
 

 

 
33

 

Financing Activities
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
July 27,
2008
 
   
(in millions)
 
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
  $ 604.3     $ 400.0  
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    (75.9 )     (14.5 )
Net repayments on revolving credit facilities and notes payables
    (134.8 )     (282.8 )
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock and stock option exercises
    -       122.3  
Purchase of call options
    -       (88.2 )
Proceeds from the sale of warrants
    -       36.7  
Debt issuance costs
    (48.1 )     (11.0 )
Net cash flows from financing activities
  $ 345.5     $ 162.5  

 
The following items explain the significant financing activities for the three months ended August 2, 2009 and July 27, 2008:
 
Fiscal 2010
 
 
§
In July 2009, we issued $625 million aggregate principal amount of 10% senior secured notes, which will mature in July 2014 (the 2014 Notes). The 2014 Notes were issued at a price equal to 96.201% of their face value. Interest payments are due semi-annually on January 15 and July 15. The 2014 Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The 2014 Notes are secured by first-priority liens, subject to permitted liens and exceptions for excluded assets, in substantially all of the guarantors’ real property, fixtures and equipment (collectively, the Non-ABL Collateral) and are secured by second-priority liens on cash and cash equivalents, deposit accounts, accounts receivable, inventory, other personal property relating to such inventory and accounts receivable and all proceeds therefrom, intellectual property, and certain capital stock and interests, which secure the ABL Credit Facility on a first-priority basis (the ABL Collateral).
 
The 2014 Notes will rank equally in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated debt. The guarantees will rank equally in right of payment with all of the guarantors’ existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated debt. In addition, the 2014 Notes are structurally subordinated to the liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.
 
We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2014 Notes to repay borrowings and terminate commitments under the U.S. Credit Facility, repay and/or refinance other indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
 
In July 2009, we entered into a new $200 million term loan due August 29, 2013 (the Rabobank Term Loan), which replaced our then existing $200 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in August 2011. We are obligated to repay $25 million of the borrowings under the Rabobank Term Loan on each of August 29, 2011 and August 29, 2012. We may elect to prepay the loan at any time, subject to the payment of certain prepayment fees in respect of any voluntary prepayment prior to August 29, 2011 and other customary breakage costs. Outstanding borrowings under this loan will accrue interest at variable rates. Our obligations under the Rabobank Term Loan are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries on a senior secured basis. The Rabobank Term Loan is secured by first-priority liens on the Non-ABL Collateral and is secured by second-priority liens on the ABL Collateral, which secures our obligations under the ABL Credit Facility on a first-priority basis.
 
 
§
We paid debt issuance costs totaling $48.1 million related to the 2014 Notes, the Rabobank Term Loan and the ABL Credit Facility. The debt issuance costs were capitalized and will be amortized into interest expense over the life of each instrument.
 
 

 
34

 

 
 
Fiscal 2009
 
 
§
In July 2008, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4% convertible senior notes due June 30, 2013 in a registered offering (the Convertible Notes). The Convertible Notes are payable with cash and, at certain times, are convertible into shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 44.082 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $22.68 per share). Upon conversion, a holder will receive cash up to the principal amount of the Convertible Notes and shares of our common stock for the remainder, if any, of the conversion obligation.
 
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock to reduce potential economic dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, and separate warrant transactions (collectively referred to as the Call Spread Transactions). We purchased call options in private transactions that permit us to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $22.68 per share, subject to adjustment, for $88.2 million. We also sold warrants in private transactions for total proceeds of approximately $36.7 million. The warrants permit the purchasers to acquire up to approximately 17.6 million shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $30.54 per share, subject to adjustment. 
 
We incurred fees and expenses associated with the issuance of the Convertible Notes totaling $11.4 million, which were capitalized and will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the Convertible Notes. The net proceeds of $337.1 million from the issuance of the Convertible Notes and the Call Spread Transactions were used to retire short-term uncommitted credit lines and to reduce amounts outstanding under the U.S. Credit Facility.
 
 
§
In July 2008, we issued a total of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock to Starbase International Limited, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands which is a subsidiary of COFCO (Hong Kong) Limited (COFCO). The shares were issued at a purchase price of $17.45 per share. The proceeds from the issuance of these shares were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the U.S. Credit Facility.
 
 
§
In June 2008, we entered into a $200.0 million unsecured committed credit facility with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., intended to help bridge our working capital needs through the time of the closing of the sale of Smithfield Beef in the event we were unable to issue the Convertible Notes. We only borrowed $50.0 million under this credit facility as it replaced an existing and fully drawn $50.0 million line. We repaid the $50.0 million in June 2008 and terminated this credit facility in July 2008.
 
Credit Ratings
 
As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, our credit ratings were ‘B’ by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P) and ‘B2’ by Moody’s Investor Services (Moody’s).  Although we had no borrowings outstanding on the ABL Credit Facility, the interest expense spread that would have been applicable based on these ratings would have been 4.50%.  On August 7, 2009, S&P downgraded our ‘B’ credit rating to ‘B-‘.  This would not have resulted in an increase in our interest expense spread.  Additionally, a further downgrade by either rating agency would not result in an increase in our interest expense spread because any borrowings would currently be subject to the maximum spread under our ratings based pricing.  
 
Debt Covenants and the Incurrence Test
 
Our various debt agreements contain covenants that limit additional borrowings, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing of assets and payments of dividends to shareholders, among other restrictions.
 
Our senior unsecured and secured notes limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions, when our interest coverage ratio is, or after incurring additional indebtedness would be, less than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Incurrence Test).  As of August 2, 2009, we did not meet the Incurrence Test.  Due to the trailing twelve month nature of the Incurrence Test, we do not expect to meet the Incurrence Test again until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 at the earliest.  The Incurrence Test is not a maintenance covenant and our failure to meet the Incurrence Test is not a default. In addition to limiting our ability to incur additional indebtedness, our failure to meet the Incurrence Test restricts us from engaging in certain other activities, including paying cash dividends, repurchasing our common stock and making certain investments. However, our failure to meet the Incurrence Test does not preclude us from borrowing on the ABL Credit Facility or from refinancing existing indebtedness, including our senior unsecured notes maturing in October 2009 ($206.3 million outstanding as of August 2, 2009). Therefore we do not expect the limitations resulting from our inability to satisfy the Incurrence Test to have a material adverse effect on our business or liquidity.
 

 
35

 

Our ABL Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring us to maintain a fixed charges coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0 when the amounts available for borrowing under the ABL Credit Facility are less than the greater of $120 million or 15% of the total commitments under the facility (currently $1.0 billion).  We currently are not subject to this restriction and we do not anticipate that our borrowing availability will decline below those thresholds during fiscal 2010, although there can be no assurance that this will not occur because our borrowing availability depends upon our borrowing base calculated for purposes of that facility.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that we previously and unintentionally breached a non-financial covenant under our senior unsecured notes relating to certain foreign subsidiaries' indebtedness. We promptly cured this minor breach by amending certain debt agreements of the subsidiaries and extinguishing other indebtedness of the subsidiaries, and, as a result, no event of default occurred under our senior unsecured notes or any other facilities.
 
Fiscal 2010 Activities
 
As noted above, we have taken a number of steps to strengthen our balance sheet during the first part of fiscal 2010 primarily from the issuance of the 2014 Notes, the addition of the ABL Credit Facility and the new Rabobank Term Loan.  Also, in August 2009 (fiscal 2010), we issued an additional $225 million aggregate principal amount of 10% senior secured notes, which will mature in July 2014. The notes were issued at a price equal to 104% of their face value, plus accrued interest from July 2, 2009 to August 14, 2009. The notes have identical terms and conditions, other than issue date and issue price, as and form a single series with the 2014 Notes and are guaranteed by the same parties and secured by the same assets as the 2014 Notes. We incurred offering expenses of approximately $4.4 million, which have been capitalized and will be amortized, along with the premium, into interest expense over the approximate five-year life of the notes.  We used the proceeds from the notes offering, together with other available cash, to repay the outstanding balance under the Euro Credit Facility.
 
These steps have reduced our near-term maturities and increased our liquidity. We also have significantly reduced our exposure to financial covenant maintenance risk, and we believe that the steps we have taken will enable us to better weather the current economic environment.  However, given these uncertain economic times, we continue to evaluate all of our options to strengthen our balance sheet even further.
 
Increase of Authorized Shares of Common Stock
 
On August 26, 2009, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 200 million to 500 million.
 
Guarantees
 
As part of our business, we are a party to various financial guarantees and other commitments as described below. These arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk that are not included in the consolidated condensed balance sheets. We could become liable in connection with these obligations depending on the performance of the guaranteed party or the occurrence of future events that we are unable to predict. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for an obligation, we will record the liability on our consolidated balance sheet.
 
We (together with our joint venture partners) guarantee financial obligations of certain unconsolidated joint ventures. The financial obligations are: up to $90.8 million of debt borrowed by Agroindustrial del Noroeste (Norson), of which $72.3 million was outstanding as of August 2, 2009, and up to $3.5 million of liabilities with respect to currency swaps executed by another of our unconsolidated Mexican joint ventures, Granjas Carroll de Mexico (Granjas). The covenants in the guarantee relating to Norson’s debt incorporate our covenants under the ABL Credit Facility. In addition, we continue to guarantee $16.5 million of leases that were transferred to JBS in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef. Some of these lease guarantees will be released in the near future and others will remain in place until the leases expire through August 2021.
 
Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity
 
Capital Projects
 
As of August 2, 2009, we had total estimated remaining capital expenditures of $68 million on approved projects, including $33 million related to the Restructuring Plan. These projects are expected to be funded over the next several years with cash flows from operations and borrowings under credit facilities. Total capital expenditures are expected to remain below depreciation in fiscal 2010.
 

 
36

 
 
 
Risk Management Activities
 
We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Derivative Financial Instruments” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009. Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the underlying value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decrease, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increase, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, margin deposits ranged from $(11.1) million to $58.4 million (negative amounts representing margin deposits we have received from our brokers). The average daily amount on deposit with brokers during fiscal the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was $14.3 million. As of August 2, 2009, the total amount on deposit with brokers was $23.2 million.
 
The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities tend to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.
 
 Financial Position
 
Our balance sheet as of August 2, 2009, as compared to May 3, 2009, was impacted by the following significant changes:
 
 
§
Cash and cash equivalents increased $387.6 million primarily due to the issuance of the 2014 Notes and the generation of net cash from operations of $66.5 million. As of August 2, 2009, the majority of our cash was invested in a short-term money market fund. However, we subsequently used a portion of our cash to pay off and cancel our Euro Credit Facility, and we intend to use a substantial portion of our cash to pay off our senior unsecured notes that come due in October 2009 (fiscal 2010).
 
 
§
Total debt, including notes payable and capital lease obligations, increased $444.4 million mainly due to (i) the issuance of the 2014 Notes totaling $601.3 million; (ii) the effects of foreign currency translation of approximately $47.6 million; partially offset by net repayments on revolving credit facilities and notes payable of $134.8 million and principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases of $75.9 million. We expect total debt to decrease as we pay off our senior unsecured notes due in October 2009 (fiscal 2010).
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
The preparation of consolidated condensed financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on our experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
The following describes updates to our critical accounting policies and estimates, which are more fully described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009.
 
Goodwill Considerations
 
As set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009 and in accordance with SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142), our policy is to perform an annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year.  SFAS 142 also requires that goodwill be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.  In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we engaged an independent third party valuation specialist to assist us in performing an interim test of goodwill in our U.S. hog production reporting unit. 
 

 
37

 

 
The decision to test goodwill at that date was based upon a perception that certain indicators of impairment, as defined by SFAS 142 and the Securities and Exchange Commission, may have been present, including losses in the reporting unit and a decline in the market price of our common stock.  At that time, the fair value of the reporting unit was determined to be in excess of its carrying value by more than 20 percent.  Accordingly, no impairment of goodwill was indicated.  Since then, we have continued to re-examine key assumptions used in the valuation as well as closely monitor industry macro-economic trends that have the potential to alter or significantly influence those assumptions.  In this regard, we are closely monitoring developments related to U.S. ethanol policy and proposals that promote the production and use of corn-based ethanol, including current proposals that would mandate an increase in blending percentages from 10 to 15 percent.  We are concerned about the effects of the ethanol policy on the price of corn and, ultimately, on the cost of feed grains and resultant impact on longer-term industry profitability.         
 
As of August 2, 2009, the carrying amount of goodwill related to our U.S. hog production operations was $442.9 million. Based on our ongoing evaluation of changes that may have occurred in key assumptions utilized in our prior evaluation of the fair value of the U.S. hog production reporting unit, we believe that fair value still exceeds carrying value.  While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of this reporting unit, it is reasonably possible a material change could occur.  If actual results are not consistent with our estimates or key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of this reporting unit, or if conditions or events change our estimates of future profitability, such as unfavorable developments in US ethanol policies, a material impairment of our goodwill could result.  If goodwill were determined to be impaired, it would result in a non-cash charge to earnings with a corresponding decrease in shareholder’s equity.  However, a non-cash goodwill impairment charge would not have any effect on our liquidity.
 

 
38

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking statements include statements concerning our outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Our forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. These risks and uncertainties include the availability and prices of live hogs, raw materials, fuel and supplies, food safety, livestock disease, live hog production costs, product pricing, the competitive environment and related market conditions, hedging risk, operating efficiencies, changes in interest rate and foreign currency exchange rates, changes in our credit ratings, access to capital, the investment performance of our pension plan assets and the availability of legislative funding relief, the cost of compliance with environmental and health standards, adverse results from on-going litigation, actions of domestic and foreign governments, labor relations issues, credit exposure to large customers, the ability to make effective acquisitions and dispositions and successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into existing operations, our ability to effectively restructure portions of our operations and achieve cost savings from such restructurings and other risks and uncertainties described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because actual results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. Any forward-looking statement that we make speaks only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.
 
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
For complete quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting the Company, see “Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009. Our exposure to market risk from commodities is detailed below.
 
The following table presents the sensitivity of the fair value of our open commodity contracts and interest rate and foreign currency contracts to a hypothetical 10% change in market prices or in interest rates and foreign exchange rates, as of August 2, 2009 and May 3, 2009.
 
   
August 2,
2009
   
May 3,
2009
 
   
(in millions)
 
Livestock
  $ 10.1     $ 12.6  
Grains
    29.0       17.1  
Energy
    1.8       2.0  
Interest rates
    1.1       0.5  
Foreign currency
    8.0       15.7  
 
 
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of August 2, 2009. Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of August 2, 2009.
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our first quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

 
39

 

 
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
Not applicable.
 
RISK FACTORS
 
 
Our level of indebtedness and the terms of our indebtedness could adversely affect our business and liquidity position.
 
As of August 2, 2009, we had:
 
 
§
approximately $3,350.0 million of indebtedness;
 
 
§
guarantees of up to $94.3 million for the financial obligations of certain unconsolidated joint ventures and hog farmers;
 
 
§
guarantees of $16.5 million for leases that were transferred to JBS in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef;
 
 
§
aggregate unused capacity under our Euro Credit Facility totaling $0 million, taking into account outstanding borrowings of $320.7 million and outstanding letters of credit of $0 million; and
 
 
§
aggregate borrowing capacity available under our ABL Credit Facility totaling $706.1 million, taking into account a borrowing base adjustment of $56.5 million, outstanding borrowings of $0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $237.4 million.
 
On August 14, 2009, we issued an additional $225 million aggregate principal amount of our 10% Senior Secured Notes.  Also on August 14, 2009, we repaid the outstanding balance under the Euro Credit Facility with proceeds of the issuance of the additional Senior Secured Notes and other available cash and cancelled the facility.
 
Our indebtedness may increase from time to time in the future for various reasons, including fluctuations in operating results, capital expenditures and potential acquisitions or joint ventures. In addition, due to the volatile nature of the commodities markets, we may have to borrow significant amounts to cover any margin calls under our risk management and hedging programs. During fiscal 2009, margin deposits posted by us ranged from $7.0 million to $272.3 million. Our consolidated indebtedness level could significantly affect our business because:
 
 
§
it may, together with the financial and other restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness, significantly limit or impair our ability in the future to obtain financing, refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise equity on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and materially impair our liquidity,
 
 
§
a downgrade in our credit rating could restrict or impede our ability to access capital  markets at attractive rates and increase our borrowing costs. For example, in fiscal 2009, both Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investors Services twice downgraded our credit ratings, which resulted in increased interest expense, and our credit rating is currently on negative watch by both agencies,
 
 
§
it may reduce our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions or to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise,
 
 
§
a portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to interest payments on our indebtedness and is not available for other purposes, which amount would increase if prevailing interest rates rise,
 
 
§
substantially all of our assets in the United States secure our ABL Credit Facility, our Rabobank Term Loan and our Senior Secured Notes, which could limit our ability to dispose of such assets or utilize the proceeds of such
 

 
40

 

 
dispositions and, upon an event of default under any such secured indebtedness, the lenders thereunder could foreclose upon our pledged assets, and
 
 
§
it could make us more vulnerable to downturns in general economic or industry conditions or in our business.
 
Further, our debt agreements restrict the payment of dividends to shareholders and, under certain circumstances, may limit additional borrowings, investments, the acquisition or disposition of assets, mergers and consolidations, transactions with affiliates, the creation of liens and the repayment of certain debt. For example, we anticipate that, if availability under the ABL Credit Facility does not meet certain thresholds, we will be subject to financial condition maintenance tests under the ABL Credit Facility and the Rabobank Term Loan. In addition, as more fully described in the section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009 entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Debt Covenants and the Incurrence Test,” the indentures relating to our senior unsecured notes preclude us from incurring certain additional indebtedness and restrict us from engaging in certain other activities, including paying cash dividends, repurchasing our common stock and making certain investments when our interest coverage ratio is less than 2.0 to 1.0 (the “Incurrence Test”). As of August 2, 2009, we did not meet the Incurrence Test, and we do not expect to meet the Incurrence Test again until the third quarter of fiscal 2010 at the earliest. Failure to meet the Incurrence Test limits our flexibility in accessing the credit markets and, should this failure continue, could adversely affect our business and financial condition by, among other things, limiting our ability to obtain financing, refinance existing indebtedness when it becomes due and take advantage of corporate opportunities.
 
Should market conditions continue to deteriorate or fail to improve, or our operating results continue to be depressed in the future, we may have to request amendments to our covenants and restrictions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such relief should it be needed in the future. A breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default that would permit our senior lenders, including lenders under the ABL Credit Facility or the Rabobank Term Loan, the holders of our Senior Secured Notes or the holders of our senior unsecured notes, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility, the Rabobank Term Loan, the Senior Secured Notes or the senior unsecured notes to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, and the commitments of the relevant senior lenders to make further extensions of credit under the ABL Credit Facility could be terminated. If we were unable to repay our indebtedness to our lenders under our secured debt, these lenders could proceed, where applicable, against the collateral securing that indebtedness, which could include substantially all of our assets. Our future ability to comply with financial covenants and other conditions, make scheduled payments of principal and interest, or refinance existing borrowings depends on future business performance that is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors, including the other risks set forth in this Item 1A and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009.
 
Our operations are subject to the risks associated with acquisitions and investments in joint ventures.
 
Although our overall focus has shifted from acquisitions to integration of existing operations, we may continue to review opportunities for strategic growth through acquisitions in the future. We have also pursued and may in the future pursue strategic growth through investment in joint ventures. These acquisitions and investments may involve large transactions or realignment of existing investments such as the recent merger of Groupe Smithfield and Campofrío. These transactions present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:
 
 
§
diversion of management attention from other business concerns,
 
 
§
difficulty with integrating businesses, operations, personnel and financial and other systems,
 
 
§
lack of experience in operating in the geographical market of the acquired business,
 
 
§
increased levels of debt potentially leading to associated reduction in ratings of our debt securities and adverse impact on our various financial ratios,
 
 
§
the requirement that we periodically review the value at which we carry our investments in joint ventures, and, in the event we determine that the value at which we carry a joint venture investment has been impaired, the requirement to record a non-cash impairment charge, which charge could substantially affect our reported earnings in the period of such charge, would negatively impact our financial ratios and could limit our ability to obtain financing in the future,
 
 
§
potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business,
 

 
41

 

 
§
assumption of and exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of acquired businesses,
 
 
§
potential disputes with the sellers, and
 
 
§
for our investments, potential lack of common business goals and strategies with, and cooperation of, our joint venture partners.
 
In addition, acquisitions outside the U.S. may present unique difficulties and increase our exposure to those risks associated with international operations.
 
We could experience financial or other setbacks if any of the businesses that we have acquired or may acquire in the future have problems of which we are not aware or liabilities that exceed expectations. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings—Missouri litigation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009 regarding lawsuits filed in Missouri against PSF and CGC by neighboring individuals largely based on the laws of nuisance. Although we are continuing PSF’s vigorous defense of these claims, we cannot assure you that we will be successful, that additional nuisance claims will not arise in the future or that the reserves for this litigation will not have to be substantially increased.
 
Our numerous equity investments in joint ventures, partnerships and other entities, both within and outside the U.S., are periodically involved in modifying and amending their credit facilities and loan agreements. The ability of these entities to refinance or amend their facilities on a successful and satisfactory basis, and to comply with the covenants in their financing facilities, affects our assessment of the carrying value of any individual investment. As of August 2, 2009, none of our equity investments represented more than 6% of our total consolidated assets. If the Company determines in the future that an investment is impaired, we would be required to record a non-cash impairment charge, which could substantially affect our reported earnings in the period of such charge. In addition, any such impairment charge would negatively impact our financial ratios. See the section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2009 entitled “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1: Investments” for a discussion of the accounting treatment of our equity investments.
 

 

 
42

 

ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
 
Period
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
         
Average Price Paid per Share
   
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
   
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
 
May 4, 2009 to June 2, 2009
    9,008           $ 13.50       n/a       2,873,430  
June 3, 2009 to July 2, 2009
    -             n/a       n/a       2,873,430  
July 3, 2009 to August 2, 2009
    -             n/a       n/a       2,873,430  
Total
    9,008       (2 )   $ 13.50       n/a       2,873,430  
____________________ 
 
 

(1)
As of August 2, 2009, our board of directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. The original repurchase plan was announced on May 6, 1999 and increases in the number of shares we may repurchase under the plan were announced on December 15, 1999, January 20, 2000, February 26, 2001, February 14, 2002 and June 2, 2005. There is no expiration date for this repurchase plan.
 
(2)
The purchases were made in open market transactions by Wells Fargo, as trustee, and the shares are held in a rabbi trust for the benefit of participants in the Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan director fee deferral program. The 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan was approved by our shareholders on August 27, 2008.
 
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
Not applicable.
 
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
Not applicable.
 
OTHER INFORMATION
 
Not applicable.
 

 
43

 

EXHIBITS  
 
Exhibit 3.1
Articles of Amendment effective August 27, 2009 to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, including the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended to date (filed herewith).
Exhibit 3.2
Amendment to the Bylaws effective August 27, 2008, including the Bylaws of the Company, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 3, 2008).
Exhibit 4.1
Waiver, dated as of June 22, 2009, to the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2005, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Calyon New York Branch, Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. “Rabobank International,” New York Branch and SunTrust Bank, as co-documentation agents, Citicorp USA, Inc., as syndication agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, relating to a $1,300,000,000 secured revolving credit facility, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6(f) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2009).
Exhibit 4.2
Indenture, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.3
Form of 10% Senior Secured Note Due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.4
Credit Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and joint collateral agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., General Electric Capital Corporation, Barclays Capital, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. and Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as joint bookrunners and co-lead arrangers, General Electric Capital Corporation, as co-documentation and joint collateral agent, Barclay’s Capital and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents and Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as syndication agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.5
Term Loan Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.6
Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.7
Pledge and Security Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.8
Intercreditor Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.9
Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated July 2, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, U.S Bank National Association, as collateral agent, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Notes, and Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2009).
Exhibit 4.10
Form of 10% Senior Secured Note Due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 14, 2009).
Exhibit 10.1
Form of Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan Stock Option Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 10, 2009).
Exhibit 10.2
Form of Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Share Unit Award for fiscal 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 10, 2009).
Exhibit 10.3
Smithfield Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed herewith).
Exhibit 10.4
Compensation for Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2010 (filed herewith).
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of C. Larry Pope, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Robert W. Manly, IV, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of C. Larry Pope, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of Robert W. Manly, IV, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 

 
44

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
     
 
/s/    ROBERT W. MANLY, IV
 
 
 Robert W. Manly, IV
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
     
 
/s/    KENNETH M. SULLIVAN     
 
Kenneth M. Sullivan
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Date: September 11, 2009
 

 
45

 

EX-3.1 2 ex3-1.htm EXHIBIT 3.1 ex3-1.htm

Exhibit 3.1
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
(Conformed Copy incorporating all amendments through August 27, 2009)

ARTICLE I
NAME

The name of the Corporation is Smithfield Foods, Inc.

ARTICLE II
PURPOSE

The Corporation shall have the power to engage in any lawful business not required by the Virginia Stock Corporation Act to be stated in the Articles of Incorporation.

ARTICLE III
AUTHORIZED SHARES

3.1  Number and Designation.  The number and designation of shares that the
Corporation shall have authority to issue and the par value per share are as follows:

Class
 
Number of Shares
 
Par Value
         
Preferred
 
    1,000,000
 
$1.00
         
Common
 
500,000,000
 
$0.50


3.2  Preemptive Rights.  No holder of outstanding shares of any class shall have
any preemptive right with respect to (i) any shares of any class of the Corporation, whether now or hereafter authorized, (ii) any warrants, rights or options to purchase any such shares, or (iii) any obligations convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares or into warrants, rights or options to purchase any such shares.

3.3  Shareholder Approval.  Except as otherwise provided in Article VI, an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be approved if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by each voting group entitled to vote on such action are cast in favor of such action.  Any merger or share exchange to which the Corporation is a party or any direct or indirect sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Corporation's property, otherwise than in the usual and regular course of business, shall be approved if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by each voting group entitled to vote on such action are cast in favor of such action; provided, however, that this sentence shall not affect the power of the Board of Directors to condition its submission of any plan of merger, share exchange or direct or indirect sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Corporation's property, otherwise than in the usual and regular course of business, on any basis, including the requirement of a greater vote.

 
 

 

ARTICLE IV
PREFERRED SHARES

4.1  Issuance in Series.  The Board of Directors is authorized to issue the Preferred Shares from time to time in one or more series and to provide for the designation, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of each series by the adoption of Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation setting forth:

(i)  The maximum number of shares in the series and the designation of the series, which designation shall distinguish the shares thereof from the shares of any other series or class;

(ii)  Whether shares of the series shall have special, conditional or limited voting rights, or no right to vote, except to the extent prohibited by law;

(iii)  Whether shares of the series are redeemable or convertible (x) at the option of the Corporation, a shareholder or another person or upon the occurrence of a designated event, (y) for cash, indebtedness, securities or other property, and (z) in a designated amount or in an amount determined in accordance with a designated formula or by reference to extrinsic data or events;

(iv)  Any right of holders of shares of the series to distributions, calculated in any manner, including the rate or rates of dividends, and whether dividends shall be cumulative, noncumulative or partially cumulative;

(v)  The amount payable upon the shares of the series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation;

(vi) Any preference of the shares of the series over the shares of any other series or class with respect to distributions, including dividends, and with respect to distributions upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation; and

(vii)  Any other preferences, limitations or specified rights (including a right that no transaction of a specified nature shall be consummated while any shares of such series remain outstanding except upon the assent of all or a specified portion of such shares) now or hereafter permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and not inconsistent with the provisions of this Section 4.1.

4.2  Articles of Amendment.  Before the issuance of any shares of a series, Articles of Amendment establishing such series shall be filed with and made effective by the State Corporation Commission of Virginia, as required by law.

 
 

 

4.3    Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares.

(a)  Designation and Amount.  Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on May 30, 2001, 200,000 preferred shares (of $1.00 par value) are hereby constituted as a series of preferred shares of the Corporation which shall be designated as "Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares" (the "Series A Preferred Shares"), the preferences, limitations and relative rights of which are set forth herein.

(b)  Dividends and Distribution.

(i)  Subject to the prior and superior rights of the holders of any preferred shares of any series ranking prior and superior to the Series A Preferred Shares with respect to dividends, the holders of Series A Preferred Shares, in preference to the holders of Common Shares, par value $.50 per share  (the "Common Shares"), of the Corporation shall be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the purpose, quarterly dividends payable in cash on the fifteenth day of January, April, July and October in each year (each such date being referred to herein as a "Quarterly Dividend Payment Date"), commencing on the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date after the first issuance of a share or fraction of a share of Series A Preferred Shares, in an amount per share (rounded to the nearest cent) equal to the greater of (X) $1.00 or (Y) subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, 1,000 times the aggregate per share amount of all cash dividends, and 1,000 times the aggregate per share amount (payable in kind) of all non-cash dividends or other distributions other than a dividend payable in Common Shares or a subdivision of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise), declared on the Common Shares, since the immediately preceding Quarterly Dividend Payment Date or, with respect to the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, since the first issuance of any share or fraction of a share of Series A Preferred Shares.  In the event the Corporation shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares, then in each such case the amount to which holders of Series A Preferred Shares were entitled immediately prior to such event under clause (Y) of the preceding sentence shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

The Corporation shall declare a dividend or distribution on the Series A Preferred Shares as provided in this paragraph (i) immediately after it declares a dividend or distribution on the Common Shares (other than a dividend payable in Common Shares); provided that, in the event no dividend or distribution shall have been declared on the Common Shares during the period between any Quarterly Dividend Payment Date and the next subsequent Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, a dividend of $1.00 per share on the Series A Preferred Shares shall nevertheless be payable on such subsequent Quarterly Dividend Payment Date.

 
 

 

Dividends shall begin to accrue and be cumulative on outstanding Series A Preferred Shares from the Quarterly Dividend Payment Date next preceding the date of issue of such Series A Preferred Shares, unless the date of issue of such shares is prior to the record date for the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, in which case dividends on such shares shall begin to accrue from the date of issue of such shares, or unless the date of issue is a Quarterly Dividend Payment Date or is a date after the record date for the determination of holders of Series A Preferred Shares entitled to receive a quarterly dividend and before such Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, in either of which events such dividends shall begin to accrue and be cumulative from such Quarterly Dividend Payment Date.  Accrued but unpaid dividends shall not bear interest.  Dividends paid on the Series A Preferred Shares in an amount less than the total amount of such dividends at the time accrued and payable on such shares shall be allocated pro rata on a share-by-share basis among all such shares at the time outstanding.  The Board of Directors may fix a record date for the determination of holders of Series A Preferred Shares entitled to receive payment of a dividend or distribution declared thereon, which record date shall be no more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for the payment thereof.

(c)  Voting Rights.  The holders of Series A Preferred Shares shall have the following voting rights:

(i)  Subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, each share of Series A Preferred Shares shall entitle the holder thereof to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders of the Corporation.  In the event the Corporation shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares, then in each such case the number of votes per share to which holders of Series A Preferred Shares were entitled immediately prior to such event shall be adjusted by multiplying such number by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

(ii)  Except as otherwise provided herein or by law, the holders of Series A Preferred Shares and the holders of Common Shares shall vote together as one class on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Corporation.

(iii)  Except as set forth herein, holders of Series A Preferred Shares shall have no special voting rights and their consent shall not be required (except to the extent they are entitled to vote with holders of Common Shares as set forth herein) for taking any corporate action.

(d)  Certain Restrictions.

 
 

 

(i)  Whenever quarterly dividends or other dividends or distributions payable on the Series A Preferred Shares as provided in paragraph (b) are in arrears, thereafter and until all accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions, whether or not declared, on Series A Preferred Shares outstanding shall have been paid in full, the Corporation shall not:
 
(A) declare or pay dividends on, make any other distributions on, or redeem or purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of the Corporation ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) to the Series A Preferred Shares;

(B) declare or pay dividends on or make any other distributions on any shares of the Corporation ranking on a parity (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) with the Series A Preferred Shares, except dividends paid ratably on the Series A Preferred Shares and all such parity shares on which dividends are payable or in arrears in proportion to the total amounts to which the holders of all such shares are then entitled;

(C) redeem or purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of the Corporation ranking on a parity (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) with the Series A Preferred Shares, provided that the Corporation may at any time redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any such parity shares in exchange for any shares of the Corporation ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon dissolution, liquidation or winding up) to the Series A Preferred Shares; or

(D) purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any Series A Preferred Shares, or any shares of the Corporation ranking on a parity with the Series A Preferred Shares, except in accordance with a purchase offer made in writing or by publication (as determined by the Board of Directors) to all holders of such shares upon such terms as the Board of Directors, after consideration of the respective annual dividend rates and other relative rights and preferences of the respective series and classes shall determine in good faith will result in fair and equitable treatment among the respective series or classes.

(ii) The Corporation shall not permit any subsidiary of the Corporation to purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of the Corporation unless the Corporation could, under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph (d), purchase or otherwise acquire such shares at such time and in such manner.

(e)  Reacquired Shares.  Any Series A Preferred Shares purchased or otherwise acquired by the Corporation in any manner whatsoever shall be retired and canceled promptly after the acquisition thereof.  All such shares shall upon their cancellation, and upon the taking of any action required by applicable law, become authorized but unissued preferred shares and may be reissued as part of a new series of preferred shares to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, subject to the conditions and restrictions on issuance set forth herein.

 
 

 

(f)  Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up.  Upon any voluntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, no distribution shall be made:

(A) to the holders of shares of the Corporation ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) to the Series A Preferred Shares unless, prior thereto, the holders of Series A Preferred Shares shall have received an amount per share equal to the greater of (i) $180,000 per share, or (ii) subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, 1000 times the aggregate amount to be distributed per share to holders of Common Shares, plus in each case an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions thereon, whether or not declared, to the date of such payment, or

(B) to the holders of shares of the Corporation ranking on a parity (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) with the Series A Preferred Shares, except distributions made ratably on the Series A Preferred Shares and all other such parity shares in proportion to the total amounts to which the holders of all such shares are entitled upon such liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

In the event the Corporation shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares, then in each such case the aggregate amount to which holders of Series A Preferred Shares were entitled immediately prior to such event under the proviso in clause (A) of the preceding sentence shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

(g)  Consolidation, Merger, etc.  In case the Corporation shall enter into any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which the Common Shares are exchanged for or changed into other shares or securities, cash and/or any other property, then in any such case the Series A Preferred Shares shall at the same time be similarly exchanged or changed in an amount per share (subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth) equal to 1,000 times the aggregate amount of shares, securities, cash and/or any other property (payable in kind), as the case may be, into which or for which each share of Common Shares is changed or exchanged.  In the event the Corporation shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares, then in each such case the amount set forth in the preceding sentence with respect to the exchange or change of Series A Preferred Shares shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

 
 

 

(h)  No Redemption.  The Series A Preferred Shares shall not be redeemable.

(i)  Ranking.  The Series A Preferred Shares shall be junior to all other series of the Corporation's preferred shares as to the payment of dividends passu with the Series A Preferred Shares.

(j)  Amendment.  The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall not be amended in any manner which would materially alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the Series A Preferred Shares so as to affect them adversely without the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds or more of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares voting together as a single class.

4.4  Series B Special Voting Preferred Share

(a) Designation and Amount.  Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on May 27, 1998, one (1) preferred share (of $1.00 par value) is hereby constituted as a series of preferred shares of the Corporation which shall be designated as the "Series B Special Voting Preferred Share" (the "Series B Preferred Share"), the preferences and relative, optional and other special rights of which and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of which shall be as set forth herein.

(b) Dividends and Distributions.  The holder of the Series B Preferred Share shall not be entitled to receive any portion of any dividend or distribution at any time.

(c) Voting Rights.  The holder of the Series B Preferred Share shall have the following voting rights:

(i) The Series B Preferred Share shall entitle the holder thereof to an aggregate number of votes equal to the number of Exchangeable Shares ("Exchangeable Shares"), of Smithfield Canada Limited, an Ontario corporation ("Smithfield Canada"), outstanding from time to time which are not owned by the Corporation or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries.

(ii)  Except as otherwise provided herein or by law, the holder of the Series B Preferred Share and the holders of Common Shares and of Series A Preferred Shares shall vote together as one class on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Corporation.

 
 

 

(iii)  Except as set forth herein, the holder of the Series B Preferred Share shall have no special voting rights, and its consent shall not be required (except to the extent it is entitled to vote with holders of Common Shares and of Series A Preferred Shares as set forth herein) for taking any corporate action.

(d)  Additional Provisions.

(i)  The Holder of the Series B Preferred Share is entitled to exercise the voting rights attendant thereto in such manner as such holder desires.

(ii)  At such time as (A) the Series B Preferred Share entitles its holder to a number of votes equal to zero because there are no Exchangeable Shares of Smithfield Canada outstanding which are not owned by the Corporation or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries, and (B) there is no share of stock, debt, option or other agreement, obligation or commitment of Smithfield Canada which could by its terms require Smithfield Canada to issue any Exchangeable Shares to any person other than the Corporation or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries, then the Series B Preferred Share shall thereupon be retired and cancelled promptly thereafter.  Such Share shall upon its cancellation, and upon the taking of any action required by applicable law, become an authorized but unissued preferred share and may be reissued as part of a new series of preferred shares to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, subject to the conditions and restrictions on issuance set forth herein.

(e) Reacquired Share.  If the Series B Preferred Share should be purchased or otherwise acquired by the Corporation in any manner whatsoever, then the Series B Preferred Share shall be retired and cancelled promptly after the acquisition thereof.  Such share shall upon its cancellation, and upon the taking of any action required by applicable law, become an authorized but unissued preferred share and may be reissued as part of a new series of preferred shares to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, subject to the conditions and restrictions on issuance set forth herein.

(f) Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up.  Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, the holder of the Series B Preferred Share shall not be entitled to any portion of any distribution.

(g) No Redemption or Conversion.  The Series B Preferred Share shall not be redeemable or convertible.

ARTICLE V
COMMON SHARES

5.1  Voting Rights.  The holders of outstanding Common Shares shall, to the exclusion of the holders of any other class of shares of the Corporation, have the sole power to vote for the election of directors and for all other purposes without limitation, except (i) as otherwise provided in the Articles of Amendment establishing any series of Preferred Shares or (ii) as may be required by law.

 
 

 

5.2  Distributions.  Subject to the rights of the holders of shares, if any, ranking senior to the Common Shares as to dividends or rights in the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation, the holders of the Common Shares shall be entitled to distributions, including dividends, when declared by the Board of Directors and to the net assets of the Corporation upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation.

ARTICLE VI
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

6.1  Election and Term.  Commencing with the 2000 annual meeting of shareholders, the Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible.  At the 2000 annual meeting of shareholders, directors of the first class (Class I) shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2001 annual meeting of shareholders; directors of the second class (Class II) shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2002 annual meeting of shareholders; and directors of the third class (Class III) shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders.  At each annual meeting of shareholders after 2000, the successors to the class of directors whose terms shall then expire shall be identified as being of the same class as the directors they succeed and elected to hold office until the third succeeding annual meeting of shareholders.  If the number of directors is changed, any newly created directorships or any decrease in directorships shall be so apportioned among the classes by the Board of Directors as to make all classes as nearly equal in number as possible.

6.2  Removal of Directors.  Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Shares then outstanding, a director may be removed only with cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing at least 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast on such action.

6.3  Newly-Created Directorships; Vacancies.  Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Shares then outstanding, any vacancy occurring in the Board of Directors, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors or the removal of a director, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors remaining in office even if the directors in office constitute less than a quorum of the Board of Directors.

6.4  Amendment or Repeal.  The provisions of this Article shall not be amended
or repealed, nor shall any provision of these Articles of Incorporation be adopted that is inconsistent with this Article, unless such action shall have been approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing at least 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by each voting group entitled to vote on such action.

 
 

 

ARTICLE VII
LIMIT ON LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION

7.1  Definitions.  For purposes of this Article the following definitions shall apply:

(i) "Corporation" means this Corporation only and no predecessor entity or other legal entity;

(ii) "expenses" include counsel fees, expert witness fees, and costs of investigation, litigation and appeal, as well as any amounts expended in asserting a claim for indemnification;

(iii) "liability" means the obligation to pay a judgment, settlement, penalty, fine, or other such obligation, including, without limitation, any excise tax assessed with respect to an employee benefit plan;

(iv) "legal entity" means a corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise;

(v) "predecessor entity" means a legal entity the existence of which ceased upon its acquisition by the Corporation in a merger or otherwise; and

(vi) "proceeding" means any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, proceeding or appeal whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and whether formal or informal.

7.2  Limit on Liability.  In every instance in which the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation or elimination of liability of directors or officers of a corporation to the corporation or its shareholders, the directors and officers of this Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its shareholders.

7.3  Indemnification of Directors and Officers.  The Corporation shall indemnify any individual who is, was or is threatened to be made a party to a proceeding (including a proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation) because such individual is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or because such individual is or was serving the Corporation, or any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Corporation while a director or officer of the Corporation, against all liabilities and reasonable expenses incurred in the proceeding except such liabilities and expenses as are incurred because of such individual's willful misconduct or knowing violation of the criminal law. Service as a director or officer of a legal entity controlled by the Corporation shall be deemed service at the request of the Corporation.  The determination that indemnification under this Section 7.3 is permissible and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made, in the case of a director, as provided by law, and in the case of an officer, as provided in Section 7.4 of this Article; provided, however, that if a majority of the directors of the Corporation has changed after the date of the alleged conduct giving rise to a claim for indemnification, such determination and evaluation shall, at the option of the person claiming indemnification, be made by special legal counsel agreed upon by the Board of Directors and such person.  Unless a determination has been made that indemnification is not permissible, the Corporation shall make advances and reimbursements for expenses incurred by a director or officer in a proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking from such director or officer to repay the same if it is ultimately determined that such director or officer is not entitled to indemnification.  Such undertaking shall be an unlimited, unsecured general obligation of the director or officer and shall be accepted without reference to such director's or officer's ability to make repayment.  The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not of itself create a presumption that a director or officer acted in such a manner as to make such director or officer ineligible for indemnification.  The Corporation is authorized to contract in advance to indemnify and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to any of its directors or officers to the same extent provided in this Section 7.3.

 
 

 

7.4  Indemnification of Others.  The Corporation may, to a lesser extent or to the same extent that it is required to provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its directors and officers pursuant to Section 7.3, provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its employees and agents, the directors, officers, employees and agents of its subsidiaries and predecessor entities, and any person serving any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Corporation, and may contract in advance to do so. The determination that indemnification under this Section 7.4 is permissible, the authorization of such indemnification and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made as authorized from time to time by general or specific action of the Board of Directors, which action may be taken before or after a claim for indemnification is made, or as otherwise provided by law.  No person's rights under Section 7.3 of this Article shall be limited by the provisions of this Section 7.4.

7.5  Miscellaneous.  The rights of each person entitled to indemnification under this Article shall inure to the benefit of such person's heirs, executors and administrators.  Special legal counsel selected to make determinations under this Article may be counsel for the Corporation.  Indemnification pursuant to this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right of indemnification to which any person may be entitled, including indemnification pursuant to a valid contract, indemnification by legal entities other than the Corporation and indemnification under policies of insurance purchased and maintained by the Corporation or others.  However, no person shall be entitled to indemnification by the Corporation to the extent such person is indemnified by another, including an insurer.  The Corporation is authorized to purchase and maintain insurance against any liability it may have under this Article or to protect any of the persons named above against any liability arising from their service to the Corporation or any other legal entity at the request of the Corporation regardless of the Corporation's power to indemnify against such liability.  The provisions of this Article shall not be deemed to preclude the Corporation from entering into contracts otherwise permitted by law with any individuals or legal entities, including those named above.  If any provision of this Article or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Article, and to this end the provisions of this Article are severable.

 
 

 

7.6  Amendments.  No amendment, modification or repeal of this Article shall diminish the rights provided hereunder to any person arising from conduct or events occurring before the adoption of such amendment, modification or repeal.
 
 

EX-10.3 3 ex10-3.htm EXHIBIT 10.3 ex10-3.htm

Exhibit 10.3
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
2008 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
 
1.  Purpose. The purpose of this Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is to further the long-term stability and financial success of Smithfield Foods, Inc. and our related companies by attracting and retaining employees and other service providers through the use of cash and stock incentives. We believe that ownership of our common stock and the use of cash incentives will stimulate the efforts of those service providers upon whose judgment and interests we are and will be largely dependent for the successful conduct of our business. We also believe that these awards will strengthen the desire of our service providers to remain with us and will further identify their interests with those of our shareholders. We also intend to use the Plan to grant stock incentives to compensate non-employee members of our Board of Directors.
 
The Plan replaces and supersedes the Smithfield Foods, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of July 1, 1998 (the “Prior Plan”) and the Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (the “Director Plan”). Upon approval of the Plan by our shareholders, no additional awards shall be made under the Prior Plan or the Director Plan, although outstanding awards previously made under the Prior Plan or the Director Plan will continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the Prior Plan or the Director Plan. Shares that are subject to outstanding awards under the Prior Plan (but not the Director Plan) that expire, are forfeited, or otherwise terminate unexercised may be subjected to new awards under the Plan as provided in Section 4.
 
2.  Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following terms have the meanings indicated:
 
(a) “Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
(b) “Affected Corporation” means, with respect to a Participant, (i) the corporation for whom the Participant is performing services at the time of a Qualifying Change in Control event, (ii) the corporation that is liable for the payment of the deferred compensation (or all corporations liable for the payment if more than one corporation is liable), within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(ii)(2) of the Treasury Regulations; or (iii) a corporation owning more than 50 percent of the total fair market value and total voting power of a corporation described in subsections (i) or (ii) above, or any corporation in a chain of corporations in which each corporation owns more than 50 percent of the total fair market value and total voting power of another corporation in the chain, ending in a corporation described in subsections (i) or (ii) above.
 
(c) “Applicable Withholding Taxes” means the aggregate amount of federal, state and local income and employment taxes that an Employer is required to withhold in connection with any Performance Grant or award of Performance Shares, any lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, any compensatory dividends paid on Restricted Stock, any vesting of Restricted Stock Units or Performance Share Units, or any exercise of a Nonstatutory Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right.
 
(d) “Award” means any Incentive Award or Director Award.
 
(e) “Board” means the board of directors of the Company; provided that, for all purposes relating to Director Awards under the Plan, the Board shall refer solely to the non-employee members of the board of directors of the Company (or any committee appointed by the non-employee members of the board of directors of the Company and composed entirely thereof).
 
(f) “Change of Control” means, unless otherwise provided in the Grant Agreement with respect to a particular Award, the occurrence of any of the following events:
 
(i) The acquisition, other than from the Company, by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Act) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Act) of 20% or more of either the then outstanding shares of Company Stock of or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, but excluding for this purpose, any such acquisition by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or its subsidiaries, or any corporation with respect to which, following such acquisition, more than 50% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of Company Stock of such corporation and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors is then beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Company Stock and voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition in substantially the same proportion as their ownership, immediately prior to such acquisition, of the then outstanding shares of Company Stock or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be; or

 
 

 

(ii) Individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (as of the date hereof the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, provided that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the directors of the Company (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); or
 
(iii) Consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which the individuals and entities who were the respective beneficial owners of the Company Stock and voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of the common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such reorganization, merger or consolidation, or a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or of its sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, provided that upon such consummation, any Change in Control provisions in an Award shall be treated as in effect as of the date of approval by the shareholders of the Company of the reorganization, merger, or consolidation.
 
(g) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
(h) “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, consisting of not less than two directors of the Company, unless the Board shall appoint another committee (or subcommittee) to administer the Plan; provided that, if any member of the Compensation Committee does not qualify as (i) an outside director for purposes of Code section 162(m), (ii) a non-employee director for purposes of Rule 16b-3, and (iii) an independent director for purposes of the rules of the exchange on which the Company Stock is traded, the remaining members of the committee (but not less than two members) shall be constituted as a subcommittee to act as the Committee for purposes of the Plan.
 
(i) “Company” means Smithfield Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
(j) “Company Stock” means the common stock of the Company. In the event of a change in the capital structure of the Company (as provided in Section 16), the shares resulting from the change shall be deemed to be Company Stock within the meaning of the Plan. Shares of Company Stock may be issued under this Plan without cash consideration.
 
(k) “Consultant” means a Service Provider who is not an employee, officer or director of the Company.

 
 

 

(l) “Date of Grant” means (i) with respect to a Non-Option Award, the date on which the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) grants the award; (ii) with respect to a Nonstatutory Option or Stock Appreciation Right, the date on which the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) completes the corporate action necessary to create a legally binding right constituting the Nonstatutory Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right; or (iii) with respect to an Incentive Stock Option, the date on which the Committee completes the corporate action constituting an offer of stock for sale to a Participant under the terms and conditions of the Incentive Stock Option. With respect to any Award, the Committee (and, with respect to any Director Award, the Board) may specify a future date on which the grant is to be granted or become effective.
 
(m) “Deferred Unit” means a vested right to receive Company Stock or cash granted under Section 12(c).
 
(n) “Director Award” means any Nonstatutory Option, Stock Appreciation Right, share of Restricted Stock, Vested Share, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share Unit or Deferred Unit awarded to an Non-Employee Director under the Plan.
 
(o) “Disability” means, as to an Incentive Stock Option, a Disability within the meaning of Code section 22(e)(3). As to all other Awards, Disability (or variations thereof) means, unless otherwise provided in the Grant Agreement with respect to the award, a Disability within the meaning of Code section 409A(a)(2)(C) and Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-3(i)(4) (or any successor provision). The Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) shall determine whether a Disability exists and the determination shall be conclusive.
 
(p) “Effective Date” means the date on which the Plan is approved by shareholders of the Company.
 
(q) “Employee” means a Service Provider who is a common law-employee of a Service Recipient.
 
(r) “Employer” means, with respect to an Employee, the Service Recipient that employs the Employee.
 
(s) “Fair Market Value” means the closing price per share of Company Stock on the exchange on which the Company Stock has the highest trading volume on the Date of Grant or any other date for which the value of Company Stock must be determined under the Plan, or, if the determination date is not a trading day, on the most recent trading day immediately preceding the determination date.
 
(t) “Grant Agreement” means the written or electronic agreement between the Company and a Participant containing the terms and conditions with respect to an Award.
 
(u) “Incentive Award” means any Performance Grant, Performance Share, Option, Stock Appreciation Right, share of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Share Unit awarded to a Service Provider under the Plan.
 
(v) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to meet the requirements of, and qualify for favorable federal income tax treatment under, Code section 422.
 
(w) “Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee and who meets any other qualifications that may be established by the Board to be treated as a Non-Employee Director under the Plan.
 
(x) “Non-Option Award” means an Award other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right.
 
(y) “Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option that does not meet the requirements of Code section 422, or, even if meeting the requirements of Code section 422, is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option and is so designated.

 
 

 

(z) “Option” means a right to purchase Company Stock granted under the Plan, at a price determined in accordance with the Plan granted under Section 10.
 
(aa) “Participant” means any Service Provider or Non-Employee Director who receives an Award under the Plan.
 
(bb) “Performance Criteria” means the performance of the Company, any Related Company, any subsidiary, division, or business unit thereof, or any individual using one or more of the following measures, either on an operating or GAAP basis where applicable, including or excluding nonrecurring or extraordinary items where applicable, and including measuring the performance of any of the following relative to a defined peer group of companies or an index: market value of the Company’s Common Stock; pre-tax profits; unit production costs; asset growth; pre-tax earnings; debt to equity ratio; earnings per share; revenues; operating income; operating costs and efficiencies; operating cash flow; net income, before or after taxes; net income before income taxes, incentive payments and accounting for minority interest; return on total capital, equity, revenue or assets; market share; unit production and sales volume; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, rent and amortization expenses; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings before interest and taxes; any of the prior measures or earnings before taxes and unusual or nonrecurring items as measured either against the annual budget or as a ratio to revenue or return on total capital; net earnings; profit margin; operating margin; operating income; net worth; cash flow; cash flow per share; total stockholder return; revenues; capital expenditures; improvements in capital structure; industry indices; expenses and expense ratio management; debt reduction; profitability of an identifiable business unit or product; or levels of expense, cost or liability by category, operating unit or any other delineation.
 
(cc) “Performance Goal” means an objectively determinable performance goal established by the Committee that relates to one or more Performance Criteria.
 
(dd) “Performance Grant” means a right to receive cash or Company Stock subject to the attainment of Performance Goals as set forth under Section 6.
 
(ee) “Performance Share” means a right to receive a share of Company Stock subject to the satisfaction of performance conditions as set forth in Section 7.
 
(ff) “Performance Share Unit” means a right to receive Company Stock or cash awarded upon the terms and subject to grant and vesting conditions as set forth in Section 9.
 
(gg) “Plan” means this Smithfield Foods, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.
 
(hh) “Plan Year” means the calendar year.
 
(ii) “Qualifying Change of Control” means the date on which the Affected Corporation experiences a change in ownership (as described in subsection (i)), a change in effective control (as described in subsection (ii)), or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of its assets (as described in subsection (iii)):
 
(i) any person or more than one person acting as a group acquires beneficial ownership of Affected Corporation stock that, together with the Affected Corporation stock already held by such person or group, represents more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of the Affected Corporation stock; provided, however, that if any one person or more than one person acting as a group is considered to own more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of the Affected Corporation stock, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or persons is not considered to cause a change in the ownership of the Affected Corporation for purposes of this subsection (i) or to cause a change in effective control of the Affected Corporation for purposes of subsection (ii);
 
(ii)(1) any person or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the twelve-consecutive-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) beneficial ownership of Affected Corporation stock possessing 30 percent or more of the total voting power of the Affected Corporation stock; or (2) a majority of members of the Board is replaced during a twelve-consecutive-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; provided, however, that if any one person or more than one person acting as a group is considered to effectively control the Affected Corporation for purposes of this subsection (ii), the acquisition of additional control of the corporation by the same person or persons is not considered to cause a change in the effective control for purposes of this subsection (ii) or to cause a change in ownership of the Affected Corporation for purposes of subsection (i); or

 
 

 

(iii) any person or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the twelve-consecutive-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or group) assets from the Affected Corporation having a total gross fair market value equal to 40 percent or more of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Affected Corporation immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions; provided that a transfer of assets by an Affected Corporation is not treated as a change in the ownership of such assets if the assets are transferred to (I) a shareholder of the Affected Corporation immediately before the asset transfer in exchange for or with respect to Affected Corporation stock; (II) an entity, 50 percent or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Affected Corporation; (III) a person or more than one person acting as a group that owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of all outstanding Affected Corporation stock; or (IV) an entity, at least 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a person described in (III) above. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (iii), a person’s status is determined immediately after the transfer of the assets. For purposes of this subsection (iii), “gross fair market value” means the value of the assets of the Affected Corporation, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.
 
For purposes of this Section 2(hh), the term “group” shall have the meaning provided in Treasury Regulations sections 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B), (vi)(D) or (vii)(C), as applicable. The term “beneficial ownership” shall have the meaning provided in Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(iii). Notwithstanding anything in this Section 2(hh) to the contrary, an event which does not constitute a change in the ownership, a change in the effective control, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Affected Corporation, each as defined in Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-3(i)(5), shall not constitute a Qualifying Change of Control for purposes of this Plan.
 
(jj) “Related Company” means, (i) for all purposes relating to an Incentive Stock Option awarded or to be awarded under the Plan, any “parent corporation” with respect to the Company within the meaning of Code section 424(e) or any “subsidiary corporation” with respect to the Company within the meaning of Code section 424(f); (ii) for purposes of determining eligibility to receive a Nonstatutory Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right, any corporation or other entity in a chain of corporations or other entities in which each corporation or other entity has a controlling interest (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iii)(E)(1)) in another corporation or other entity in the chain, beginning with a corporation or other entity in which the Company has a controlling interest; (iii) for purposes of determining whether a Participant has experienced a “separation from service” as defined in Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-1(h), any corporation, trade or business that would be required to be treated as a single employer with the Participant’s Service Recipient under Code sections 414(b) or (c), provided that, in applying Code sections 1563(a)(1), (2) and (3) for purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations, or in applying Treasury Regulations section 1.414(c)-2 for purposes of determining trades or businesses under common control, the phrase “at least 50%” shall replace the phrase “at least 80%” each time it appears in those sections; and (iv) for all other purposes under the Plan, each of the Company’s “subsidiaries or parents” within the meaning of General Instruction A.1 to Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 
 

 

(kk) “Repricing” means, with respect to an Option or Stock Appreciation Right, any of the following: (i) the lowering of the exercise price after the Date of Grant; (ii) the taking of any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles; or (iii) the cancellation of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right at a time when its exercise price (or, with respect to the Stock Appreciation Right, the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock covered by the Stock Appreciation Right on the Date of Grant) exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Company Stock in exchange for any other Award, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Corporate Event (as defined in Section 16(b) below).
 
(ll) “Restricted Stock” means Company Stock awarded upon the terms and subject to restrictions as set forth in Section 8.
 
(mm) “Restricted Stock Unit” means a right to receive Company Stock or cash awarded upon the terms and subject to vesting conditions as set forth in Section 9.
 
(nn) “Retirement” means, unless otherwise provided in the Grant Agreement for a particular Award, a Participant’s termination of employment or other separation from service on or after age 65.
 
(oo) “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated under the Act, as amended from time to time.
 
(pp) “Service Provider” means any employee, director or officer of the Company or a Related Company, or any advisor, consultant or other natural person providing bona fide services to the Company, excluding in each case any Non-Employee Director.
 
(qq) “Service Recipient” means the Company or the Related Company to which a Participant provides services.
 
(rr) “Stock Appreciation Right” means a right to receive Company Stock or cash granted under Section 11.
 
(ss) “Tandem Right” means a kind of Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with a Nonstatutory Stock Option as described in Section 11.
 
(tt) “Taxable Year” means the fiscal period used by the Company for reporting taxes on its income under the Code.
 
(uu) “Ten Percent Shareholder” means a person who owns, directly or indirectly, stock possessing more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Related Company. Indirect ownership of stock shall be determined in accordance with Code section 424(d).
 
(vv) “Treasury Regulations” means Title 26 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, as amended from time to time.
 
(ww) “Vested Share” means a share of Company Stock awarded upon the terms set forth in Section 12(b).
 
3.  General. The following types of Awards may be granted under the Plan: Performance Grants, Performance Shares, shares of Restricted Stock, Vested Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Share Units, Deferred Units, Options, or Stock Appreciation Rights. Options granted under the Plan may be Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options.
 
4.  Stock.
 
(a) Reserve. Subject to Section 16 of the Plan, there shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan an aggregate of ten million (10,000,000) shares of Company Stock, which shall be authorized but unissued shares plus any remaining shares authorized for issuance under the Smithfield Foods, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of July 1, 1998 (the “Prior Plan”) as of the Effective Date. Any shares subject to an award under the Prior Plan outstanding as of the Effective Date that expire, are forfeited or otherwise terminate unexercised shall be added to the shares reserved for issuance under the Plan.

 
 

 

(b) Share Use. Shares allocable to Awards or portions thereof granted under the Plan or to incentive awards granted under the Prior Plan that expire, are forfeited, or that terminate unexercised may be subjected to a new Award under the Plan. Any shares of Company Stock tendered or exchanged by a Participant as full or partial payment to the Company of the exercise price under an Option and any shares retained or withheld by the Employer in satisfaction of an Employee’s obligations to pay Applicable Withholding Taxes with respect to any Incentive Award shall not be available for issuance, subjected to new awards or otherwise used to increase the share reserve under the Plan. The cash proceeds from Option exercises shall not be used to repurchase shares on the open market for reuse under the Plan.
 
(c) Prior Plans. Upon approval of the Plan by shareholders, no additional grants of incentive awards shall be made under the Prior Plan or the Director Plan.
 
(d) Plan Limits. All of the shares of Company Stock that may be issued under this Plan may be issued upon the exercise of Options that qualify as Incentive Stock Options. No more than five million (5,000,000) shares of Company Stock may be issued under the Plan under Non-Option Awards, provided that any shares that are issuable under Non-Option Awards that expire, are forfeited, or terminate unexercised shall not count against this limit. No more than one million (1,000,000) shares may be allocated to Awards, including the maximum amounts payable under a Performance Grant, that are granted to any individual Participant during any single Taxable Year. The amount payable under a Performance Grant to any Participant for a Taxable Year may not exceed the greater of two million dollars or three percent of the Company’s net income before income taxes, incentive payments and accounting for minority interests for the year for which the Performance Grant is made.
 
5.  Eligibility.
 
(a) Incentive Awards. All present and future Service Providers of the Company or any Related Company (whether now existing or hereafter created or acquired) who have contributed or who can be expected to contribute significantly to the Company or a Related Company shall be eligible to receive Incentive Awards under the Plan. The Committee shall have the power and complete discretion, as provided in Section 17, to select eligible Service Providers to receive Incentive Awards and to determine for each Service Provider the nature of the award and the terms and conditions of each Incentive Award.
 
(b) Director Awards. All present and future Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to receive Director Awards under the Plan. The Board shall have the power and complete discretion to select eligible Non-Employee Directors to receive Director Awards and to determine for each Non-Employee Director the nature of the award and the terms and conditions of each Director Award.
 
(c) No Contract of Employment or Services. The grant of an Award shall not obligate the Company or any Related Company to pay any Service Provider or Non-Employee Director any particular amount of remuneration, to continue the employment or services of the Service Provider or Non-Employee Director after the grant or to make further grants to the Service Provider or Non-Employee Director at any time thereafter.
 
(d) Foreign Awards. When granting Awards to Service Providers or Non-Employee Directors who are not United States residents, the Committee (or with respect to Director Awards, the Board) shall have complete discretion and authority to grant such Awards in compliance with all present and future laws of the country or countries with laws that may apply to the grant of the Award or the issuance of Company Stock pursuant to the Award. Such authorization shall extend to and include establishing one or more separate sub-plans which include provisions not inconsistent with the Plan that comply with statutory or regulatory requirements imposed by the foreign country or countries in which the Participant resides.

 
 

 

6.  Performance Grants.
 
(a) The Committee may make Performance Grants to eligible Service Providers. Each Performance Grant shall include the Performance Goals for the award, the Performance Criteria with respect to which such goals are to be measured, the target and maximum amounts payable under the award, the period over which the award is to be earned, and any other terms and conditions as are applicable to the Performance Grant. The terms of a Performance Grant may be set in an annual or long-term bonus plan or other similar document. In the event of any conflict between such document and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall control. Performance Grants shall be granted and administered in such a way as to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code section 162(m).
 
(b) The Committee shall establish the Performance Goals for Performance Grants. The Committee shall determine the extent to which any Performance Criteria shall be used and weighted in determining Performance Grants. The Committee may vary the Performance Criteria, Performance Goals, and weightings from Participant to Participant, Performance Grant to Performance Grant and Plan Year to Plan Year. The Committee may increase, but not decrease, the minimum and target levels (but not increase the amount payable) with respect to any Performance Goal after the start of a Performance Period.
 
(c) The Committee shall establish for each Performance Grant the amount of cash or Company Stock payable at specified levels of performance, based on the Performance Goal or Goals with respect to each Performance Criterion. Any Performance Grant shall be made not later than the earlier of (i) 90 days after the start of the period for which the Performance Grant relates and (ii) the completion of 25% of such period. All determinations regarding the achievement of any Performance Goals will be made by the Committee. The Committee may not increase during a Plan Year the amount of cash or Company Stock that would otherwise be payable upon achievement of the Performance Goal or Goals but may reduce or eliminate the payments unless otherwise provided in a Performance Grant. The Committee may provide for a Performance Grant to be payable at the target level (or other level as determined by the Committee in its discretion) prior to the attainment of a Performance Goal or Goals solely upon the Participant’s death, Disability, or the occurrence of a Change of Control or Qualifying Change of Control.
 
(d) The actual payments to a Participant under a Performance Grant will be calculated by measuring the achievement of the Performance Goals with respect to the Performance Criteria as established in the Performance Grant. All calculations of actual payments shall be made by the Committee and the Committee shall certify in minutes of a meeting or other writing the extent, if any, to which the Performance Goals have been met.
 
(e) Performance Grants may be paid in cash, Company Stock, or a fixed combination of Company Stock or cash as provided by the Committee at the time of grant, or the Committee may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time the Performance Grant becomes payable. The Committee may provide in the Grant Agreement that the Participant may make an election to defer the payment under a Performance Grant subject to such terms as the Committee may determine in accordance with Code section 409A.
 
(f) A Participant who receives a Performance Grant payable in Company Stock shall have no rights as a shareholder until the Company Stock is issued pursuant to the terms of the Performance Grant and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied.
 
(g) A Participant’s interest in a Performance Grant may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered.
 
(h) Whenever payments under a Performance Grant are to be made in cash to a Participant who is an Employee, his Employer will withhold therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any Applicable Withholding Taxes. Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree as a condition of receiving a Performance Grant payable in Company Stock to pay to his Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to his Employer regarding the payment to his Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued to the Participant. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes; or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.

 
 

 

7.  Performance Shares.
 
(a) The Committee may grant Performance Shares to eligible Service Providers. Whenever the Committee grants Performance Shares, notice shall be given to the Service Provider stating the number of Performance Shares granted and the terms and conditions to which the grant of Performance Shares is subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Service Provider and, at that time, the Service Provider shall become a Participant. Performance Shares may or may not be intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code section 162(m). If intended to so qualify, the award shall be governed by the provisions of Section 6(b)-(d).
 
(b) The Committee shall establish the performance goals to which each award of Performance Shares shall be subject. The performance goals need not be objective and may be based on any performance conditions selected by the Committee in its discretion. The performance period with respect to an award may be any length of time and the performance goals with respect to such award may be established at any time after the start of such period in the Committee’s discretion. The Committee may vary the performance and other terms and conditions from Participant to Participant, grant to grant and Plan Year to Plan Year. The Committee may increase or decrease the minimum, target or maximum levels with respect to any performance goal after the start of a performance period in its discretion.
 
(c) The Committee shall establish for each award the number of shares of Company Stock payable at specified levels of performance. All determinations regarding the achievement of any performance goals will be made by the Committee. The actual number of shares to be paid to a Participant under an award will be calculated by measuring the achievement of the performance goal(s) with respect to the performance criteria as established by the Committee. All calculations of actual payments shall be made by the Committee whose decision shall be final and binding on all parties.
 
(d) The Committee may reserve the right in a Grant Agreement to settle all or portion of an award of Performance Shares in cash instead of shares of Company Stock, with the cash portion to be determined based on the Fair Market Value as of the date of payment of the shares of Company Stock otherwise payable under the award, or to allow the Participant to defer payment under the award, subject to such terms as the Committee may determine in accordance with Code section 409A.
 
(e) A Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder until shares of Company Stock are issued under the award and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied.
 
(f) A Participant’s interest in an award of Performance Shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered.
 
(g) Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree at the time of receiving an award of Performance Shares, and as a condition thereof, to pay to the Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Employer regarding the payment to the Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued to the Participant. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes; or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.

 
 

 

8.  Restricted Stock Awards.
 
(a) The Committee may grant Restricted Stock to eligible Service Providers. Whenever the Committee deems it appropriate to grant Restricted Stock, notice shall be given to the Service Provider stating the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted and the terms and conditions to which the Restricted Stock is subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Service Provider and, at that time, the Service Provider shall become a Participant.
 
(b) The Committee shall establish as to each award of Restricted Stock the terms and conditions upon which the restrictions set forth in paragraph (c) below shall lapse. The terms and conditions may include the continued performance of services or the achievement of performance conditions measured on an individual, corporate, or other basis, or any combination thereof. Restrictions conditioned on employment and the passage of time shall not expire less than three years from the Date of Grant of the Restricted Stock. Restrictions conditioned on the achievement of Performance Goals or other performance conditions shall not expire less than one year from the Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion and without limitation, provide in the Grant Agreement that restrictions will expire as a result of the Disability, death, Retirement or involuntary termination of the Participant or the occurrence of a Change of Control or Qualifying Change of Control. If the award is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code section 162(m), the award shall be governed by the provisions of Section 6(b)-(d).
 
(c) No shares of Restricted Stock may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the restrictions on the shares established by the Committee have lapsed or been removed.
 
(d) Upon the acceptance by a Participant of an award of Restricted Stock, the Participant shall, subject to the restrictions set forth in paragraph (c) above, have all the rights of a shareholder with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock, including, but not limited to, the right to vote the shares of Restricted Stock and the right to receive all dividends and other distributions paid thereon. Unless otherwise provided in the Grant Agreement, (i) dividends or other distributions paid in shares of Company Stock shall be subject to the same restrictions set forth in paragraph (c) as the shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the dividends or other distributions are paid and (ii) dividends or other distributions paid in cash shall be paid at the same time and under the same conditions as such dividends or other distributions are paid to the shareholders of record of Company Stock. Certificates representing Restricted Stock shall be held by the Company until the restrictions lapse and upon request, the Participant shall provide the Company with appropriate stock powers endorsed in blank.
 
(e) Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree at the time his or her Restricted Stock is granted, and as a condition thereof, to pay to his Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to his Employer regarding the payment to his Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued to the Participant. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes; or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.

 
 

 

9.  Performance Share Units and Restricted Stock Units.
 
(a) The Committee may grant Performance Share Units and Restricted Stock Units to eligible Service Providers. Whenever the Committee deems it appropriate to grant Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units, notice shall be given to the Service Provider stating the number of Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units granted and the terms and conditions to which the Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units are subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Service Provider and, at that time, the Service Provider shall become a Participant.
 
(b) The Committee shall establish as to each award of Performance Share Units the terms and conditions upon which the Performance Share Units shall be earned, vest and be paid. The issuance and vesting of Performance Share Units may be conditioned on the achievement of performance conditions measured on an individual, corporate, or other basis, or any combination thereof and on the continued performance of services. The Committee shall establish as to each award of Restricted Stock Units the terms and conditions upon which the Restricted Stock Units shall vest and be paid. Vesting may be conditioned on the continued performance of services or the achievement of performance conditions measured on an individual, corporate, or other basis, or any combination thereof. A Restricted Stock Unit the vesting of which is conditioned on employment and the passage of time shall not vest less than three years from the Date of Grant of the Restricted Stock Unit. A Performance Share Unit or Restricted Stock Unit the vesting of which is conditioned on the achievement of Performance Goals or other performance conditions shall not vest less than one year from the Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing; the Committee may, in its discretion and without limitation, provide in the Grant Agreement that restrictions will expire as a result of one or more of the Disability, death, Retirement or involuntary termination of the Participant or the occurrence of a Change of Control or Qualifying Change of Control. If the award is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code section 162(m), the award shall be governed by the provisions of Section 6(b)-(d).
 
(c) Performance Share Units and Restricted Stock Units may be paid in cash, Company Stock, or a fixed combination of Company Stock or cash as provided in the Grant Agreement, or the Committee may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time the Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units become payable. The delivery of Company Stock in payment of Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units may be subject to additional conditions established in the Grant Agreement.
 
(d) A Participant who receives Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units payable in Company Stock shall have no rights as a shareholder until the Company Stock is issued pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied. The Committee may, in its discretion, provide that a Participant shall be entitled to receive dividend equivalents on outstanding Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units. Dividend equivalents may be (i) paid in cash, (ii) credited to the Participant as additional Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units, or (iii) a fixed combination of cash and additional Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units as provided in the Grant Agreement, or the Committee may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time dividends are paid to shareholders of record. Unless otherwise provided in the Grant Agreement, (i) dividend equivalents with respect to dividends or other distributions that are paid in shares of Company Stock shall be credited to the Participant as additional Restricted Stock Units subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Stock Units with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid, (ii) dividend equivalents with respect to dividends or other distributions that are paid in cash shall be paid at the same time and under the same conditions as such dividends or other distributions are paid to the shareholders of record of Company Stock, and (iii) the same provisions will apply to outstanding Performance Share Units following the end of the performance period.  During the performance period, dividend equivalents with respect to a Performance Share Unit shall be credited to the Participant as additional Performance Stock Units subject to the same performance conditions as the Performance Stock Unit with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid.

 
 

 

(e) A Participant’s interest in Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered.
 
(f) Whenever payments under Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units are to be made in cash to a Participant who is an Employee, his Employer will withhold therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any Applicable Withholding Taxes. Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree as a condition of receiving Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units payable in the form of Company Stock to pay to his Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to his Employer regarding the payment to his Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued to the Participant. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes; or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.
 
10.  Stock Options.
 
(a) The Committee may grant Options to eligible Service Providers. Whenever the Committee grants Options, notice shall be given to the Service Provider stating the number of shares for which Options are granted, the Option exercise price per share, whether the Options are Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options, the extent, if any, to which associated Stock Appreciation Rights are granted, and the conditions to which the grant and exercise of the Options are subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Service Provider and, at that time, the Service Provider shall become a Participant.
 
(b) The exercise price of shares of Company Stock covered by an Option shall not be, and shall never become, less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value of the shares on the Date of Grant, except as may be provided in Section 16. If the Participant is a Ten Percent Shareholder and the Option is intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, the exercise price shall be not less than 110 percent of the Fair Market Value of such shares on the Date of Grant.
 
(c) Options may be exercised in whole or in part at the times as may be specified by the Committee in the Participant’s Grant Agreement; provided that no Option may be exercised after the expiration of ten (10) years from the Date of Grant. If the Participant is a Ten Percent Shareholder and the Option is intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, the Option may not be exercised after the expiration of five (5) years from the Date of Grant.
 
(d) Options shall not be transferable except to the extent specifically provided in the Grant Agreement in accordance with applicable securities laws. Incentive Stock Options, by their terms, shall not be transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable, during the Participant’s lifetime, only by the Participant.

 
 

 

(e) Options that are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options shall be granted only to Employees.
 
(f) Options that are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options shall, by their terms, not be exercisable after the first to occur of (x) ten years from the Date of Grant (five years if the Participant to whom the Option has been granted is a Ten Percent Shareholder), (y) three months following the date of the Participant’s termination of employment with the Company and all Related Companies for reasons other than Disability or death, or (z) one year following the date of the Participant’s termination of employment on account of Disability or death.
 
(g) Options that are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options shall, by their terms, be exercisable in any calendar year only to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the Date of Grant) of the Company Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time during the Plan Year does not exceed $100,000 (the “Limitation Amount”). Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan and all other plans of the Company and all Related Companies shall be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the Limitation Amount has been exceeded. The Committee may impose any conditions as it deems appropriate on an Incentive Stock Option to ensure that the foregoing requirement is met. If Incentive Stock Options that first become exercisable in a Plan Year exceed the Limitation Amount, the excess Options shall be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options to the extent permitted by law.
 
(h) A Participant who purchases shares of Company Stock under an Option shall have no rights as a shareholder until the Company Stock is issued pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied.
 
(i) Options may be exercised by the Participant giving notice of the exercise to the Company, stating the number of shares the Participant has elected to purchase under the Option. The notice shall be effective only if accompanied by the exercise price in full in cash; provided, however, that if the terms of an Option or the Committee in its discretion so permits, the Participant (i), unless prohibited by law, may deliver a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Company, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the exercise price and, if required by the terms of the Option or the Committee in its discretion, Applicable Withholding Taxes, (ii) may deliver shares of Company Stock for which the holder thereof has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances (valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise) in satisfaction of all or any part of the exercise price, or (iii) may cause to be withheld from the Option shares, shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise) in satisfaction of all or any part of the exercise price; or (iv) may use any other methods of payment as the Committee, at its discretion, deems appropriate. Until the Participant has paid the exercise price and any Applicable Withholding Taxes, no stock certificate shall be issued.
 
(j) Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree as a condition of the exercise of an Option to pay to his Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to his Employer regarding the payment to his Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued upon the exercise of an Option. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes, or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.

 
 

 

(k) Unless specifically provided in the discretion of the Committee in a writing that references and supersedes this Section 10(k), (i) no Modification shall be made in respect to any Option if such Modification would result in the Option constituting a deferral of compensation, and (ii) no Extension shall be made in respect to any Option if such Extension would result in the Option having an additional deferral feature from the Date of Grant, in each case within the meaning of applicable Treasury Regulations under Code section 409A. Subject to the remaining part of this subsection (k), (i) a “Modification” means any change in the terms of the Option (or change in the terms of the Plan or applicable Grant Agreement) that may provide the holder of the Option with a direct or indirect reduction in the exercise price of the Option, regardless of whether the holder in fact benefits from the change in terms; and (ii) an “Extension” means either (A) the provision to the holder of an additional period of time within which to exercise the Option beyond the time originally prescribed, (B) the conversion or exchange of the Option for a legally binding right to compensation in a future taxable year, (C) the addition of any feature for the deferral of compensation to the terms of the Option, or (D) any renewal of the Option that has the effect of (A) through (C) above. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, it shall not be a Modification or an Extension, respectively, to change the terms of an Option in accordance with Section 16 of the Plan, or in any of the other ways or for any of the other purposes provided in applicable Treasury Regulations or other generally applicable guidance under Code section 409A as not resulting in a Modification or Extension for purposes of that section. In particular, it shall not be an Extension to extend the exercise period of an Option to a date no later than the earlier of (i) the latest date upon which the Option could have expired by its original terms under any circumstances or (ii) the tenth anniversary of the original Date of Grant.
 
11.  Stock Appreciation Rights.
 
(a) The Committee may grant Stock Appreciation Rights to eligible Service Providers. Whenever the Committee grants Stock Appreciation Rights, notice shall be given to the Service Provider stating the number of shares with respect to which Stock Appreciation Rights are granted, the extent, if any, to which the Stock Appreciation Rights are granted in connection with all or any part of a Nonstatutory Stock Option (“Tandem Rights”), and the conditions to which the grant and exercise of the Stock Appreciation Rights are subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Service Provider and, at that time, the Service Provider shall become a Participant.
 
(b) Stock Appreciation Rights (other than Tandem Rights) shall entitle the Participant, upon exercise of all or any part of the Stock Appreciation Rights, to receive in exchange from the Company an amount equal to the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered Stock Appreciation Right over (y) the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock on the Date of Grant of the Stock Appreciation Right.
 
(c) Tandem Rights shall entitle the Participant, upon exercise of all or any part of the Tandem Rights, to surrender to the Company unexercised that portion of the underlying Nonstatutory Stock Option relating to the same number of shares of Company Stock as is covered by the Tandem Right (or the portion of the Tandem Right so exercised) and to receive in exchange from the Company an amount equal to the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered portion of the underlying Nonstatutory Stock Option over (y) the exercise price of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered portion of the underlying Nonstatutory Stock Option.
 
(d) Upon the exercise of a Tandem Right and surrender of the related portion of the underlying Nonstatutory Stock Option, the Nonstatutory Stock Option, to the extent surrendered, shall not thereafter be exercisable.
 
(e) Subject to any further conditions upon exercise imposed by the Committee, a Tandem Right shall be granted on the same Date of Grant as the related Nonstatutory Stock Option, be transferable only to the extent that the related Nonstatutory Stock Option is transferable, be exercisable only to the extent that the related Nonstatutory Stock Option is exercisable and shall expire no later than the date on which the related Nonstatutory Stock Option expires.

 
 

 

(f) The Committee may limit the amount that the Participant will be entitled to receive upon exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights.
 
(g) Stock Appreciation Rights shall not be transferable except to the extent specifically provided in the Grant Agreement and in accordance with applicable securities laws.
 
(h) Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised in whole or in part at the times as may be specified by the Committee in the Participant’s Grant Agreement; provided that no Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised after the expiration of ten (10) years from the Date of Grant.
 
(i) A Stock Appreciation Right may only be exercised at a time when the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock covered by the Stock Appreciation Right exceeds the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock on the Date of Grant of the Stock Appreciation Right (or, in the case of a Tandem Right, only to the extent it exceeds the exercise price of the Company Stock covered by the underlying Nonstatutory Stock Option).
 
(j) The manner in which the Company’s obligation arising upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right shall be paid shall be determined by the Committee and shall be set forth in the Grant Agreement. The Grant Agreement may provide for payment in Company Stock or cash, or a fixed combination of Company Stock or cash, or the Committee may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised. Shares of Company Stock issued upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise.
 
(k) A Participant who acquires shares of Company Stock upon exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right shall have no rights as a shareholder until the Company Stock is issued pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied.
 
(l) Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised by the Participant giving notice of the exercise to the Company, stating the number of Stock Appreciation Rights the Participant has elected to exercise.
 
(m) Whenever payments upon exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights are to be made in cash to a Participant who is an Employee, the Employer will withhold therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any Applicable Withholding Taxes. Each Participant who is an Employee shall agree as a condition of receiving Stock Appreciation Rights payable in the form of Company Stock to pay to his Employer, or make arrangements satisfactory to his Employer regarding the payment to his Employer of, Applicable Withholding Taxes. Until the amount has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the Employer have been made, no stock certificate shall be issued to the Participant. Payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be in cash. In addition, if the Committee allows or the Grant Agreement so provides, (A) payment to the Employer in satisfaction of Applicable Withholding Taxes may be made in shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of payment) to which the Participant has good title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (B) the Participant may elect to have his Employer retain that number of shares of Company Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date of such retention) that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes; or (C) unless prohibited by law, the Participant may deliver irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Employer, from the sale or loan proceeds with respect to the sale of Company Stock or a loan secured by Company Stock, the amount necessary to pay the Applicable Withholding Taxes.
 
(n) Unless specifically provided in the discretion of the Committee in a writing that references and supersedes this Section 11(n), (i) no Modification shall be made in respect to any Stock Appreciation Right if such Modification would result in the Stock Appreciation Right constituting a deferral of compensation, and (ii) no Extension shall be made in respect to any Stock Appreciation Right if such Extension would result in the Stock Appreciation Right having an additional deferral feature from the Date of Grant, in each case within the meaning of applicable Treasury Regulations under Code section 409A. Subject to the remaining part of this subsection (n), (i) a “Modification” means any change in the terms of the Stock Appreciation Right (or change in the terms of the Plan or applicable Grant Agreement) that may provide the holder of the Stock Appreciation Right with a direct or indirect reduction in the exercise price of the Stock Appreciation Right, regardless of whether the holder in fact benefits from the change in terms; and (ii) an “Extension” means either (A) the provision to the holder of an additional period of time within which to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right beyond the time originally prescribed, (B) the conversion or exchange of the Stock Appreciation Right for a legally binding right to compensation in a future taxable year, (C) the addition of any feature for the deferral of compensation to the terms of the Stock Appreciation Right, or (D) any renewal of the Stock Appreciation Right that has the effect of (A) through (C) above. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, it shall not be a Modification or an Extension, respectively, to change the terms of a Stock Appreciation Right in accordance with Section 16 of the Plan, or in any of the other ways or for any of the other purposes provided in applicable Treasury Regulations or other generally applicable guidance under Code section 409A as not resulting in a Modification or Extension for purposes of that section. In particular, it shall not be an Extension to extend the exercise period of a Stock Appreciation Right to a date no later than the earlier of (i) the latest date upon which the Stock Appreciation Right could have expired by its original terms under any circumstances or (ii) the tenth anniversary of the original Date of Grant.

 
 

 

12.  Director and Consultant Awards.
 
(a) General. The Board may grant Director Awards to Non-Employee Directors in the form of shares of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Share Units, Nonstatutory Options, or Stock Appreciation Rights as provided in Sections 8 through 11 above, or in the form of Vested Shares or Deferred Units as provided in subsections (b) and (c) below. The Board may also grant to Consultants awards in the same forms as Director Awards. Whenever the Board grants shares of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Share Units, Nonstatutory Options, or Stock Appreciation Rights to an Non-Employee Director, notice shall be given to the Non-Employee Director stating the type of award being made, the number of shares with respect to which the award is granted and the terms and conditions to which the award and (where applicable) the exercise of the award is subject. This notice shall become the Grant Agreement between the Company and the Non-Employee Director and, at that time, the Non-Employee Director shall become a Participant. Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Share Units, Nonstatutory Options, or Stock Appreciation Rights granted to Non-Employee Directors shall otherwise be subject to the terms of the Plan applicable to each type of award as set forth in Sections 8 through 11 above; provided, however, that, notwithstanding anything in Sections 8(b) or 9(b) to the contrary, any service or performance period with respect to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Performance Share Units granted to Non-Employee Directors or Consultants shall not be less than six consecutive months in length; and provided further, that where context reasonably requires, references throughout Sections 8 through 11 above to the “Committee” shall be read instead as references to the Board wherever the award is to be granted to an Non-Employee Director. The Board shall have all the same rights and powers with respect to the administration of Director Awards as the Committee has with respect to Incentive Awards as provided in Section 17 below (provided that the Board may not delegate its authority with respect to the granting of Director Awards pursuant to Section 17(c)(viii)), and the Board shall be subject to the same limitations with respect to the modification and Repricing of outstanding Director Awards as provided therein.
 
(b) Vested Shares. The Board may grant Vested Shares to Non-Employee Directors or Consultants. Vested Shares shall be immediately transferable (subject to compliance with any applicable securities laws) and the Participant receiving an award of Vested Shares shall have all the rights of a shareholder with respect to such shares as of the Date of Grant.
 
(c) Deferred Units.

 
 

 

(i) The Board may grant Deferred Units to Non-Employee Directors or Consultants. The terms relating to an award of Deferred Units may be set forth in an individual grant agreement between the Company and the Non-Employee Director or Consultant or in a deferred compensation plan or other similar document for Non-Employee Directors or Consultants as a group. In the event of any conflict between such document and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall control.
 
(ii) The Board shall establish, or establish procedures for a Participant to elect, as to each Deferred Unit the fixed time(s), schedule or event(s) and the other terms and conditions upon which the Deferred Unit shall be paid in accordance with Code section 409A. Deferred Units may be paid in cash, Company Stock, or a fixed combination of Company Stock or cash as provided by the Board, or the Board may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time the Deferred Unit become payable. The delivery of Company Stock in payment of Deferred Units may be subject to additional conditions established by the Board.
 
(iii) A Participant who receives Deferred Units payable in Company Stock shall have no rights as a shareholder until the Company Stock is issued and all requirements with respect to the issuance of such shares have been satisfied.
 
(iv) The Board may, in its discretion, provide that a Participant shall be entitled to receive dividend equivalents on outstanding Deferred Units. Dividend equivalents may be (i) paid in cash, (ii) credited to the Participant as additional Deferred Units, or (iii) a fixed combination of cash and additional Deferred Units as provided by the Board at the time of grant, or the Board may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time dividends are paid to shareholders of record. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, (i) dividend equivalents with respect to dividends or other distributions that are paid in shares of Company Stock shall be credited to the Participant as additional Deferred Units payable at the same time(s), schedule or event(s) as the Deferred Units with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid and (ii) dividend equivalents with respect to dividends or other distributions that are paid in cash shall be paid at the same time and under the same conditions as such dividends or other distributions are paid to the shareholders of record of Company Stock.
 
(v) A Participant’s interest in Deferred Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered.
 
(vi) Under procedures established by the Board, a Non-Employee Director may elect to defer the payment of cash retainer, meeting and other fees paid in connection with his or her service on the Board for any Plan Year that would otherwise be payable and receive in its place Deferred Units. The Board may establish any other conditions related to the Deferred Units necessary to comply with Code section 409A, including that existing deferral elections made under the Director Plan shall be assumed by this Plan.
 
13.  Effective Date of the Plan. The Plan was approved by the Board on June 17, 2008 and shall become effective as of the date on which it is approved by the shareholders of the Company (the “Effective Date”). Until (i) the Plan has been approved by the Company’s shareholders, and (ii) the requirements of any applicable federal or state securities laws have been met, no shares of Company Stock issuable under Non-Option Awards shall be issued and no Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable that, in either case, are not contingent on the occurrence of both such events.
 
14.  Continuing Securities Law Compliance. If at any time on or after the Effective Date, the requirements of any applicable federal or state securities laws should fail to be met, no shares of Company Stock issuable under Non-Option Awards shall be issued and no Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable until the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) has determined that these requirements have again been met. The Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) may suspend the right to exercise an Option or Stock Appreciation Right at any time when it determines that allowing the exercise and issuance of Company Stock would violate any federal or state securities or other laws, and may provide that any time periods to exercise the Option or Stock Appreciation Right are extended during a period of suspension.

 
 

 

15.  Termination, Modification, Change. If not sooner terminated by the Board, this Plan shall terminate at the close of business on the date that immediately follows the tenth anniversary of the date on which the Plan was approved by the Board. No new Awards shall be granted under the Plan after its termination. The Board may terminate the Plan at any time and may amend the Plan at any time in any respect as it shall deem advisable; provided that no change shall be made that increases the total number of shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan (except pursuant to Section 16), materially modifies the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, or that would otherwise be considered a material revision or amendment under Code section 422 or the listing standards of the exchange on which the Company Stock is traded, unless the change is authorized by the shareholders of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may unilaterally amend the Plan and outstanding Awards with respect to Participants as it deems appropriate to ensure compliance with Rule 16b-3 and other applicable federal or state securities laws and to meet the requirements of the Code and applicable regulations or other generally applicable guidance thereunder. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, a termination or amendment of the Plan shall not, without the consent of the Participant, adversely affect a Participant’s rights under an Award previously granted to him or her.
 
16.  Change in Capital Structure.
 
(a) The Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) shall proportionately adjust the number and kind of shares of stock or securities of the Company to be subject to the Plan and to Awards then outstanding or to be granted thereunder, the maximum number of shares or securities which may be delivered under the Plan (including the maximum limit on Non-Option Awards or Incentive Stock Options under Section 4), the maximum number of shares or securities that can be granted to an individual Participant under Section 4, the exercise price of Options, the initial Fair Market Value of Company Stock under Stock Appreciation Rights, and other relevant terms of the Plan and any Awards whenever, in the event of a stock dividend, stock split or combination of shares, recapitalization or merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation, or other change in the Company’s corporate structure or capital stock without the receipt of consideration by the Company (including, but not limited to, the creation or issuance to shareholders generally of rights, options or warrants for the purchase of common stock or preferred stock of the Company), it deems any such adjustment necessary or desirable to preserve the intended benefits of the Plan and any outstanding Awards for the Company and the Participants. The Committee’s (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board’s) determination in this regard shall be binding on all persons. If the adjustment would produce fractional shares with respect to any unexercised Option or Stock Appreciation Right or fractional cents with respect to the exercise price thereof, the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) shall round down the number of shares covered by the Option or Stock Appreciation Right to the nearest whole share and round up the exercise price to the nearest whole cent.
 
(b) In the event of a Change of Control as described in Sections 2(f)(i) or (iii) or a Qualifying Change of Control as described in Sections 2(hh)(i) or (iii), or if the Company is otherwise a party to a consolidation or a merger in which the Company is not the surviving corporation, a transaction that results in the acquisition of substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock by a single person or entity, or a sale or transfer of substantially all of the Company’s assets occurs (in any such case, a “Corporate Event”), then the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) may take any actions with respect to outstanding Awards as it deems appropriate, consistent with applicable provisions of the Code and any applicable federal or state securities laws.
 
(c) Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Committee (or, with respect to a Director Award, the Board) may take the foregoing actions without the consent of any Participant, and its determination shall be conclusive and binding on all persons and for all purposes.
 
17.  Administration of the Plan.

 
 

 

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Subject to the express provisions and limitations set forth in this Plan or the Committee’s charter or as otherwise established by the Board, the Committee shall be authorized and empowered to do all things necessary or desirable, in its sole discretion, in connection with the administration of this Plan, including, without limitation, the following:
 
(i) to prescribe, amend and rescind policies relating to this Plan, and to interpret the Plan, including defining terms not otherwise defined;
 
(ii) to determine which persons are eligible Service Providers, to which of the Service Providers, if any, Incentive Awards shall be granted hereunder and the timing of any Incentive Awards;
 
(iii) to grant Incentive Awards to Service Providers and determine the terms and conditions thereof, including the number of shares of Company Stock subject to Incentive Awards and the exercise or purchase price of the shares of Company Stock and the circumstances under which Incentive Awards become exercisable or vested or are forfeited or expire, which terms may but need not be conditioned upon the passage of time, continued employment, the satisfaction of performance conditions (including Performance Goals), the occurrence of certain events, or other factors;
 
(iv) to establish or verify the extent of satisfaction of any Performance Goals or other conditions applicable to the grant, issuance, exercisability, vesting and/or ability to retain any Incentive Award;
 
(v) to prescribe and amend the terms of the Grant Agreements or other documents evidencing Incentive Awards made under this Plan (which need not be identical);
 
(vi) to determine whether, and the extent to which, adjustments are required pursuant to Section 16;
 
(vii) to interpret and construe this Plan, any policies under this Plan and the terms and conditions of any Incentive Award granted hereunder, and to make exceptions to any provisions for the benefit of the Company;
 
(viii) to delegate, to the extent permitted by Virginia corporations law, any portion of its authority under the Plan to make Incentive Awards to an executive officer of the Company, subject to any conditions that the Committee may establish (including but not limited to conditions on such officer’s ability to make awards to “executive officers” within the meaning of Section 16 of the Act or to “covered employees” within the meaning of Code section 162(m)(3)); and
 
(ix) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan.
 
The Committee may amend the terms of previously granted Incentive Awards so long as the terms as amended are consistent with the terms of the Plan and provided that the consent of the Participant is obtained with respect to any amendment that would be detrimental to him or her, except that the consent will not be required if the amendment is for the purpose of complying with applicable provisions of the Code or any federal or state securities laws.
 
The Committee is prohibited from Repricing any Option or Stock Appreciation Right without the prior approval of the shareholders of the Company with respect to the proposed Repricing.
 
(b) The interpretation and construction of any provision of the Plan by the Committee shall be final and conclusive as to any Participant. The Committee may consult with counsel, who may be counsel to the Company, and shall not incur any liability for any action taken in good faith in reliance upon the advice of counsel.

 
 

 

(c) A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and all actions of the Committee shall be taken by a majority of the members present. Any action may be taken by the Committee in writing or by electronic transmission or transmissions as permitted by the Bylaws of the Company, and any action so taken shall be fully effective as if it had been taken at a meeting.
 
(d) The Committee may delegate the administration of the Plan to an officer or officers of the Company, and such officer(s) may have the authority to execute and distribute agreements or other documents evidencing or relating to Incentive Awards granted by the Committee under this Plan, to maintain records relating to the grant, vesting, exercise, forfeiture or expiration of Incentive Awards, to process or oversee the issuance of shares of Company Stock upon the exercise, vesting and/or settlement of an Incentive Award, to interpret the terms of Incentive Awards and to take any other actions as the Committee may specify, provided that in no case shall any such officer(s) be authorized to grant Incentive Awards under the Plan, except in accordance with Section 17(a)(viii) above. Any action by an administrator within the scope of its delegation shall be deemed for all purposes to have been taken by the Committee and references in this Plan to the Committee shall include any such officer(s), provided that the actions and interpretations of any such officer(s) shall be subject to review and approval, disapproval or modification by the Committee.
 
18.  Notice. All notices and other communications required or permitted to be given under this Plan shall be in written or electronic form and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally or mailed first class, postage prepaid, as follows (a) if to the Company—at the principal business address of the Company to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of the Company; and (b) if to any Participant—at the last address of the Participant known to the sender at the time the notice or other communication is sent.
 
19.  No Effect on Other Plans. Except as provided in Section 4(c), nothing contained in the Plan will be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the Company or any Related Company from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan, arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in effect.
 
20.  Interpretation. The Plan is intended to operate in compliance with the provisions of Rule 16b-3 and to facilitate compliance with, and optimize the benefits from, Code section 162(m). The terms of this Plan are subject to all present and future regulations and rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States or his or her delegate relating to the qualification of Incentive Stock Options under the Code. This Plan and the individual Awards under the Plan are intended to comply with any applicable requirements of Code section 409A and shall be interpreted to the extent context reasonably permits in accordance with such requirements. If any provision of the Plan conflicts with any such regulation or ruling, then that provision of the Plan shall be void and of no effect. The terms of this Plan shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
 
 

EX-10.4 4 ex10-4.htm EXHIBIT 10.4 ex10-4.htm
 

Exhibit 10.4

Compensation for Named Executive Officers
for fiscal 2010


Name
Principal Position
Annual Base Salary
Annual Cash Bonus
C. Larry Pope
President and Chief Executive Officer
$ 1,100,000
(1)
Robert W. Manly, IV
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
$    600,000
(2)
Carey J. Dubois (3)
Vice President, Finance
$    325,000
(4)
George H. Richter
President and Chief Operating Officer, Pork Group
$    800,000
(5)
Joseph B. Sebring
President of John Morrell
$    700,000
(6)
James C. Sbarro
President of Farmland Foods
$    500,000
(7)
_________

(1)         The bonus formula for Mr. Pope is:
•     0% of the first $100 million of Company net income before deduction for income taxes and incentive payments to key employees (“net profits”),
•     1.5% of Company net profits in excess of $100 million and less than $400 million, and
•     2% of Company net profits in excess of $400 million.

(2)         The bonus formula for Mr. Manly is:
•     0% of the first $100 million of Company net profits,
•     0.5% of Company net profits in excess of $100 million and less than $400 million, and
•     0.75% of Company net profits in excess of $400 million.

 
(3)         Mr. Dubois became Vice President, Finance on July 1, 2008.  He served as Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008
 
(4)         Mr. Dubois is eligible to receive a discretionary bonus.

(5)         The bonus formula for Mr. Richter is:
•     0% of the first $100 million of net profits of the Company’s Pork Group,
•     0.5% of Pork Group net profits in excess of $100 million and less than $400 million, and
•     1.25% of Pork Group net profits in excess of $400 million.
 
(6)         The bonus formula for Mr. Sebring is:    
•     0% of the first $100 million of Pork Group net profts,
•     0.25% of Pork Group net profits in excess of $100 million and less than $400 million, and
•     0.625% of the Pork Group net profits in excess of $400 million.
 
(7)         The bonus formula for Mr. Sbarro is:
•     0% of the first $100 million of Pork Group net profits,
•     0.25% of Pork Group net profits in excess of $100 million and less than $400 million, and
•     0.625% of the Pork Group net profits in excess of $400 million.
 



In addition, effective July 6, 2009, the Compensation Committee awarded stock options and/or performance share units to certain executive officers, including the following six named executive officers, under the Company’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2008 Plan”).
 
Named Executive Officer
 
Title
Option Awards(1)
PSU Awards(2)
 
       
C. Larry Pope
President and CEO
100,000
300,000
Robert W. Manly, IV
EVP and CFO
33,000
100,000
Carey J. Dubois
VP, Finance
5,000
    --
George H. Richter
President and COO, Pork Group
50,000
    --
Joseph B. Sebring
President of John Morrell
15,000
    --
James C. Sbarro
President of Farmland Foods
15,000
    --
 

 
(1)
All options were granted effective July 6, 2009 pursuant to the 2008 Plan and have a seven-year term and vest ratably over three years. The exercise price for these options is $13.30 which was the closing share price on the date of grant.  All options are immediately exercisable upon a Qualifying Change of Control (as defined in the 2008 Plan).
 
 
(2)
All performance share unit awards were granted effective July 6, 2009 pursuant to the 2008 Plan.  For any performance share units to vest, the Company must achieve Profits Before Tax (as such term is defined in the grant letter) of at least $100 million in any one of the Company’s 2010, 2011 or 2012 fiscal years (the “Performance Target”).  If the Performance Target is met, the performance share units vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant.  All performance share units fully vest upon a Qualifying Change of Control (as defined in the 2008 Plan).
 
 
 
 

 
In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time performance-based award for the Company’s chief executive officer, C. Larry Pope, under the 2008 Plan related to our previously announced Pork Group restructuring.  Under the award, Mr. Pope will receive a one-time cash payment of $1.5 million upon the Compensation Committee’s certification that all of the following conditions have been fulfilled:

 
·
as of any date on or after the last day of the third quarter of fiscal 2010 through and including the end of fiscal 2010, the Company achieves operating efficiencies in the Pork Group determined as an annualized projected cost savings run rate of $90 million compared to the annualized Pork Group cost run rate on May 3, 2009;
 
·
the successful closure and rationalization of six specified meat processing plants by March 15, 2010; and
 
·
not more than an aggregate of $60 million in capital expenditures is incurred to carry out the plant consolidations contemplated by the Pork Group restructuring.

 
\9873984.2
 

EX-31.1 5 ex31-1.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 ex31-1.htm

EXHIBIT 31.1
 
Certifications
 
 

I, C. Larry Pope, certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smithfield Foods, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: September 11, 2009
 
 
     
     
 
/s/     C. Larry Pope
 
 
C. Larry Pope
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 

EX-31.2 6 ex31-2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 ex31-2.htm

EXHIBIT 31.2
 
Certifications

I, Robert W. Manly, IV certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smithfield Foods, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: September 11, 2009
 
 
     
     
 
/s/     Robert W. Manly, IV
 
 
Robert W. Manly, IV
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 

EX-32.1 7 ex32-1.htm EXHIBIT 32.1 ex32-1.htm

EXHIBIT 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithfield Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Larry Pope, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
     
     
 
/s/     C. Larry Pope
 
 
C. Larry Pope
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
  Date: Septemeber 11, 2009
 
 

EX-32.2 8 ex32-2.htm EXHIBIT 32.2 ex32-2.htm
 

EXHIBIT 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithfield Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Manly, IV, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
     
     
 
/s/     Robert W. Manly, IV
 
 
Robert W. Manly, IV
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
   Date: September 11, 2009
 
 

GRAPHIC 9 smithfieldlog.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 smithfieldlog.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_X0!F17AI9@``24DJ``@````$`!H!!0`! M````/@```!L!!0`!````1@```"@!`P`!`````@```#$!`@`0````3@`````` M``!@`````0```&`````!````4&%I;G0N3D54('8T+C`P`/_;`$,``@$!`0$! M`@$!`0("`@("!`,"`@("!00$`P0&!08&!@4&!@8'"0@&!PD'!@8("P@)"@H* M"@H&"`L,"PH,"0H*"O_;`$,!`@("`@("!0,#!0H'!@<*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H* M"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"O_``!$(`$D! M``,!(@`"$0$#$0'_Q``?```!!0$!`0$!`0```````````0(#!`4&!P@)"@O_ MQ`"U$``"`0,#`@0#!04$!````7T!`@,`!!$%$B$Q008346$'(G$4,H&1H0@C M0K'!%5+1\"0S8G*""0H6%Q@9&B4F)R@I*C0U-CH.$A8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJ MLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X M^?K_Q``?`0`#`0$!`0$!`0$!`````````0(#!`4&!P@)"@O_Q`"U$0`"`0($ M!`,$!P4$!``!`G<``0(#$00%(3$&$D%1!V%Q$R(R@0@40I&AL<$)(S-2\!5B M7J"@X2%AH>(B8J2DY25EI>8F9JBHZ2EIJ>HJ:JRL[2UMK>X MN;K"P\3%QL?(RKR\_3U]O?X^?K_V@`,`P$` M`A$#$0`_`/W\HHJIKWB#0?"NCW'B+Q/K=IIVGVD1DN[Z_N5AAA0=6=W(50/4 MG%`%NBO$++_@IC_P3EU'Q$OA&P_;W^#4^J-+Y:Z?%\3=+:9GSC:%$^2<\8ZU MZMK7Q'^'OANVM;SQ%X[T;3X;Z,O92WNIQ1+<*`"60LP#C#+R,_>'K0!LT5E^ M&?''@OQHLS^#O%^EZL+8J+AM-OXYQ$6SMW;"<9P<9]#6I0`4444`%%%%`!17 MF/[6_P"V/^S9^PM\'+OX]?M3_%.Q\)^&;29(!>7:2227-PX)2""&)6DGE8*Q M"(K'"LW`4D>=?L"_\%;_`-@K_@I@NJVG[)'QMBUK5=#C$NK>']0TZ>PU"WA+ M;1-Y,Z*9(LD#S$W*"P!()`H`^DZ***`"BN=U/XO_``FT2_ETK6OBAX=L[J!] ML]M=:U!')&WHRLX(/L:L^'/B)\/_`!C=26/A'QSH^JS11[Y8M-U.*=D7.-Q" M,2!D@9-`&S1110`445\9_P#!8'_@M=^S7_P2(^&EGJ'Q`M)?%/CWQ!"[^$_` M&F7:Q3W2*<&YN)"&%M;!OE\PJS,V0B,5;:`?9E%?R^>)_P#@]`_X*?ZCXR;6 M?"WPB^$&F:.LV8=%GT"_N28\_=>;[:K,V/XE"#V'2OUU_P""&G_!?KX6_P#! M7?1]4^&OBOP5!X(^+/ANP%[JOAN"],UIJ=GN"->6;N`^U79%>)LM'YB?,X)( M`/T.HHHH`***H>(O%7ACPA8KJ?BSQ'8:7;-((UN-1NT@C+D$A=SD#.`>/8T` M7Z*Y;_A>?P3_`.BQ>%O_``H;;_XNNEM+NUO[6.]LKA)H9D#Q31.&5U(R&!'! M!'(-`$E%%<]JOQ<^%&@ZA+I.N?$[P]97<#;9K6[UJ".2,XSAE9P0<$=:`.AH MK!T/XJ?##Q-J2:-X;^(^@ZC>2@F.UL=7AFD8`9)"HQ)P.:WJ`(-4U.PT73;C M6-5NT@M;2!YKF>0X6.-069B>P`!-?QM_\%D_^"R'[0W_``5+_:(UO4=3\;:G MIWPLTS598O`G@6WN6CM(;1&*Q75Q&#B:ZD4!V=\E2Q1,*`*_L6\=>%;7QUX) MUCP1?3/'!K.EW%C-)']Y4EC:,D>X#&OX7?VLOV6_B_\`L8?M">*/V:_CEX8N M-+\0^%M4DM+A)HF5+F,,?+N8B?OPRIMD1QPRL#0!]R?LU_\`!JA_P5)_:?\` MV=?#W[2?A`_#O2-+\5Z)!J_A_2/$/BB6*_NK.>,2P2[8;>2./S(V5@KR*P## M<%.0/E/]NOX2?M\?LGZQH?[%'[<%AXETI/`9N[OP=H&M78N;2U@O#$)I;"96 M9'MY&MH^(V*!XVX5]^?1_P!D/_@O?_P58_8C\$:=\+O@A^U1?MX5TB(0Z9X; M\2:7::I:VD(Z11&YB>2&,=`D;JH[`5]A?"/_`(.\_C5XC\0Z;'^WM^PO\)/B MKI=G^[^WV6C?8]2MXV(WM&;C[3"3P#L"1AB!R.M`'TE_P8X_\D]_:._[#/AC M_P!%:G7[R5^>MS_P4-_9@^,?_!%_XT_MV_\`!+DZ5X0U32/A_JER\>F>&K.T MU#1-8M;5I(XKNW5&C:2/>&7.^-E?*E@U?S\-_P`'+/\`P6]1BC_MT:H"#@@^ M$=%!'_DE0!_8C17\EG[4?_!SA_P5K_:&^&WA_P`-_#CXI:GX!T/P_P"'M/T[ MQ!XA\+6:17^MZFEO&EQ>W-XD8\AII@[K#!Y2JKA?G(W5R/[$G_!R5_P5*_9& M^+5CXS\9_M$^(OBKX:\\?VYX.^(&L/>QWD)^\(KB4/+:R8Y5T.`<;D<94@'] M@-%?Q[_M>_\`!PK_`,%D_P!H/QN?&FL_M)^*_AKI&H$SZ'X=\!^9HMG%;Y^4 M)(F)K@=/GDD?/L,"OT6_X-:_^"Y7[7_[2_[3]W^PE^V%\3KSQW;:MX)-9"OJ-I'S'#2;G5H@`<-@`'N_P#P=Y?L&_M6_M@_LR?# M;XA_LS^"=8\76_PZUW49O$_A/0+=[B[EANXH%CO(X$RTWDF!U8(&8+<%@-H< MCXF_X-//^"9_[*?`G@/PKX M%?!]EXYL])A\/:;<(DTUHDDK"2XMG*?"-_X=UFYN]'G\/Z;;K)+#9O)$V^WMHW&U@#@-@] M\T`?;O\`P^*?QCO?VEO$7Q5^(FM>(;R2^\-7 M'GZQJ4MP5DE.K-(RAV(7<<$XP.!Z5^.G_!73]K;]H_\`:V_;B\;:I^T?\1;C MQ%<>#O$FK>'/#,EQI]O;FSTJWU*Z,-N!#&@<*7;YFW,<\L:]'_X(&?ML_M5_ MLR_M^?#;X-?`;XI76A>%_BE\5?"^E_$'3(-,MIUU6S%^(A$[RQ.\0V7,XS&R M'YSSD#`!U7_!R]^QO^T)^SO_`,%,O'?QT^+7@N+3?#/Q;\5ZAJ?@._35+>=M M0MH%MTE=HXI&>'!E3B0*3G@'!KZ>_P"#)'_D]SXP?]DKB_\`3E;UW_\`P?&_ M\CM^SE_V"?$__HW3*_*#_@G?^W;^VM^P]X\UV?\`8(U2ZMO&7CG0QHUT]AX9 MCU.\\A9EFVVT3I*"Y,8);RR0`<8ZT`?VY45_%KXS_P""R?\`P65T'QY=+XW_ M`&]/C)I.MV5R1>:7<^([JS^SR#DH]K\J)_N%`/:OVD_X)0?\%H_VP/VN_P#@ MB=^T]\3_`(G>.4E^*WP,\%ZE<:'XY@TVW26Y#:9<7%G/+%L\EYXY;>0$[-KJ M$W*3N+`'[!?&/XK^"O@1\)O$WQK^)&JK8^'_``EH5WJ^M7C?\LK:WB:61O<[ M5.!W.!7\6/[3?Q]_:%_X*_?\%#[GQ]JBRWWBSXH^,K;2?"FC-*3%I\,TZV]C M8Q_W8XU9%)QR=SGEB3V/[0G_``7>_P""LG[4GPTNU%W$LBR!#);VL<@72X5C;MC MS/L\:%5C?RSDMES^7/\`P:S?\$_OVW/#?_!5_1?C7XK^!GC#P?X5\`:7J\?C M#4/$FA7&GQR//8S6T=B/.1?,E\Z6.0H,E5B+'&!GU#]O3_@MC_P5!^$G_!)W M]C/]HOX=?M3W^F^,OB=:>,G\=:U'X=TQVU1K+4X8;8M&]L8X]D;,H\M5SG)R M>:^9/V2/^#B?_@LK\2/VK/AC\._&O[:VI7VC:]\0M%T[5K)O"VCH+BVGOH8I M8RR688!D9AD$$9X(H`_K0HKXO_X+7?\`!8OX9?\`!(/]GBS\C\2^//% MY@\(?!VQ.G0V-L"`6+6P$@B4L!YD\K`<&OPNM?^"S7_!P#_P2[^.D7@;]HGXQ^/4U>S2*YO/! M7QBLSJ$5];,3M(:<&7RFVL!)!*O*D!L@U_1A_P`$V/\`@I9\.O\`@JM_P3\D M_:<\$Z-_8^I)97NE^+_#C3^8=)U2&`-)$&P-\;))'+&V`2DJY`8,``?Q:$%2 M0>U?W4_L+_\`)DOP=_[)7X>_]-MO7\*\G^L;_>-?V%?M'_\`!2KP3_P2K_X( MJ?#C]IWQ+HR:OJ[_``U\-:3X-\/O-Y8U/5IM+B,4;L.5C1(Y)9".=D3`?,5H M`^\:_E&_X.>/^"=/[6WP9_;D^)?[>?Q#^'$%E\,/B!X^M=/\*Z^FN6DKW=P= M-5@IMXY3-'Q:3G+HH^3KR,^%?'G_`(.#/^"OWQ^\=7/C?5OVW/&'AI)9R]MH MO@:_.CV-HN M,K;P]XUMO$6C>+KZT6+5$,5I=VQMIGB"K<(1=;@[KY@*_P""Y?\`P;N?M3>+=<^!/[9;VLFIV6HKI<^/GM+F"2'S8YHS\K(9ST MR&*D,?R?_P""T_\`P2!\5?\`!'KX_:%\)=7^-.E^.-+\5:(^J:'J=K8FSNHX MDE,3)<6QDD\L[A\K!V5QG&"K*+'Q8_8+_P""SO\`P2C\0-J/ASPU\7?!NFZO M8P7,?B[X;7FI0V-Y$\8=5FELRIBE7<5:&<)(K!OEQ@GRCPI^RQ_P4H_;\^*@ MN=&^#7Q9^)_BK49$BGUC4["^OI/0&>\N,K$@S]Z1U5?44`?J#_P9(>-_%J?M M1?&OX5K-))XIWULW,0O(+Y8H6QTR8[F<>X'M7YE?\%<8TB_X*G?M& MQ1(%5?C?XH"JHP`/[4N.*_>3]B'_`((O_'/_`()1_P#!%K]HC5].N]4O?VB? MB-\.[R8)X"DFEO-)DAM9OL6GV,EO^\DN%DE=VDB^](ZJNX1J[?@WXI_X)O?\ M%6/'/B6_\9^-?V%_CWJ^L:K>27>J:KJ?PWUF>YO+B1BTDTLCP%I'9B69F))) M))H`_>W_`()\^!O!LW_!GMXBCE\+V#"^^"GC_4+T&U7]_=1W.JF.=^/FD4Q1 M;6/(\M,?=&/YH_A]:6U_X]T2QO8%EAFU:VCEC<9#J95!!]B#7[*6/X7ZL&1@<@@B MWX(/>@#]YO\`@]0\,>'+/_@G-\+-0M-"M(I]/^+UO:6,L=NJM;V[Z5?EHD(' MRH3%%E1Q^[7T%?F%_P`&G'_*:[X?_P#8M^(?_37<5]4?MU_L\_\`!1#]H+_@ MVE_9Z\$_$+X*?&/QM\6+/XTZA>>)M*UGP_JFHZ_#:A]<2*:YCE1[A8Q&\"JS MC&UXP#@BOS0^$G[!O_!7_P""GCNS^('PA_8]_:*\)ZW;%HX=;\.>!-"O^Q3\0?\`IODKV_\`X.=OV=/^"F7[1/\`P41U7PW\*_@A M\;_''PSM/#VAW6E6&A>'M7U'1(;\6"I-+$D2/`LV6=691NRS`GDU^?\`\*_V M#_\`@L)\$O&5OX^^#G['_P"T9X2UR!'CAUKPUX%URQNHT<;759H8E'_!ZI:VUK_P`%&_ANEM;I&&^#-LS!%`R?[5U+DX[U[E_P8ZQZ?<0_ MM'QW,<+RI)X4>,.`64?\3;YAGD=N:TO^#K[_`()7?MH_M2^/?A9^UM^SA\&] M?\?6>E?#^/PYXFT?PY9/=ZE8S1W$MQ'.;=`994?[3(I**VTQ?-C<#7YW_P#! M)[]@K_@I?\'_`/@I!\#_`!7K'['?QM\,:##\6/#S^)M1N/`>K6=HEBFHP-*; MF0PJ@A50Q;>=H`)-`'W5_P`'QO\`R.W[.7_8*\3_`/HW3*\U_P"#)S0=%O\` M]O+XJZ]>Z7!+>V'PIVV-S)&"\`DU&V#["?N[@H!QU`Q7BW_!<[]DS_@JC^T= M_P`%,/BU>V7[.'QZ\=>"M,\$]9U+3+2SD*$BQ/EO%'$VQ?\`584[ M1Z"N!_X)>?L;_P#!6G]GC]NWX5>)/#?[+_[07@C1KWXC^'X/&5]8^#M:TZVG MTH:G;M/'>.D2*UML#%UD)3`)/%`'JO\`P>#:-I6E?\%@)KK3=.A@EU#X9:)< M7SQ1@&>4-+S8(F3>H925SD;AZUYC_P;Z?LU_P#!3[]E[_@IM\,[GQQ\ M!_CI\/\`X97>M7-QX];4O#6L:7HD\,6FWGE/?[T2!U1V&TRY"EN,$T`='_P> M/_'CPSXK_P""@7A/]F?P/IUC:6/PU\$1RZI#8VR1XU+47$[A@H&<6T=D1GIO M/K7U!_P98?L;Z!/\&OBY^V%XY\)VEZ='GO[19`D-I']INF3<#P[W% MNN1W@([5^)__``4;_:3H_JT;3^5](@.U`'.?\`!?3PMX9M?^"-7QY6V\.V,8L/`4YL0EH@%N6G MB)*8'R9/7&,U_)1^PA_R?#\&O^RK>'?_`$YV]?T&_P#!WU\.OV[/BMX$^#7@ M/]CWP3\5?$6CZD/$4/CW1OASI^HW5M=0D::;=+^*S#*ZY$Q02@CA\=Z_!W1? M^"9__!4GPWK-IXB\._L%?':PU"PN8[FQOK/X9ZQ%-;S(P9)$=8`4=6`(8$$$ M`B@#[_\`^#TK7/%MY_P4T\#Z!JLDHTBR^#EC+I$1)\O=)J6H>.+S7;>U>>RC'VLVJ1F M>\MR$<^>2%W9,:YQ@9_0OXJ_\$0?VEO^"KO_``1#^`_C+Q[?^(=,_:9^'VE: MPL@^*,EU%?ZU:RZI=/\`V?>R7?[Z.38L3P22?*H)4X23>OY4_!_2O^"UW_!$ MGXVZGXN^'?PD^)/PSURXMC8ZM+<>#C?:7JD*MD*6>*6UN5#_TBS,D$L@D* MR[M2D+[6!*\C&]O6ON7_`(-A/V`OV_\`_@GW\)_VA?`O[9GP+U#P7I7B*RTR M^\+I>:O97*W%Q'!?QW146T\FT[3;9+8S@8S@X_*33/CQ_P`'%_\`P4Z_:,L/ MB/\`#SQ#\3PHDE]@G9]I71-,$&??8]QCVW5^49_X);?\%,BOV-_P""??\`P2C_`&NO^"E?_!"?XC_LL?MF0?$'PW\2/#WQ7_M3X07'Q:M] M0BDT\6VDV<4$"+>#S([&0/!=*_ M;#AT2;1?L5Z_AFT\2",V%QKHC'V2.82?(Q_UAC5N#,L0&20#^I/_``>8^!_V M*=$_9.\#:U+H_AK3_C*WB^"+PX-+AACU*XT;R)OM0F"`,UJK"#:6X60J%QN< M'\)OVB/^"??[;'[)WQ$NOAE\>OV9?&7A_5;2X:-#-HVECIEG<>'KR;5M7,I M(WVUF(VG>WC5+[?X@_!W]CO\`:*\*:]:)(EKK?AOP'KEC=PJZE'59H85=0RDJ M0#R"0>#7]JOA,78\+::+_P`SSQ80^=YV=^_8,[L\YSG.:`-"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*_.O\`X.3/^"GGP_\`V$/^"?\`XL^% MVB>,[4?$[XHZ-/H'A71;>Y'VJWMKA3%=Z@RCYHXXX6D"/WE:,#.&(ZS_`(." M?V:_^"A7[6_[#*_`[_@GE)9IK=_XFM;KQ1GQ,-+O9]/M]TJ0VLK;4#-<+"S% MI$^6/`SN./PH^'G_``:N?\%N_P!H3X@?:?C5X#TGPM]IE47WBCQU\0+2^)4< M%B+.6YFD('0%>>F1UH`^>O\`@AY^P5K'_!0__@I!\/\`X+R:(]UX7TO4TU_Q MY,8\QQ:19NLDJ.>WG-Y=N/\`:G'H:_M#1$C01QJ%51@`#@"OCC_@C;_P1J^! MG_!(3X(WGA#P9K#^)_''B9HI?&OC>ZM!"]ZT8/EV\$>6\FVC+,53
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----