Capital and Other Regulatory Requirements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Capital and Other Regulatory Requirements [Abstract]

Regulatory Capital Requirements under Banking Regulations [Text Block]

Capital and Other Regulatory Requirements

The Company’s activities are subject to significant governmental regulation, both in the United States and overseas. The subsidiaries of the Company were in compliance with all of their regulatory requirements as of June 30, 2015, as follows:

(in millions)			As of June 30, 2015
Subsidiary	Regulatory Authority	Requirement Type	Actual		Minimum Requirement
FCStone, LLC	CFTC	Net capital	$	115.9	$	63.3
FCStone, LLC	CFTC	Segregated funds	$	1,688.6	$	1,641.5
FCStone, LLC	CFTC	Secured funds	$	78.5	$	59.5
INTL FCStone Ltd	FCA (United Kingdom)	Net capital	$	98.1	$	67.3
INTL FCStone Ltd	FCA (United Kingdom)	Segregated funds	$	89.2	$	89.2
INTL FCStone Securities Inc.	SEC	Net capital	$	12.9	$	1.3
FCC Investments, Inc.	SEC	Net capital	$	0.3	$	0.3
INTL FCStone Partners L.P.	SEC	Liquid capital	$	27.1	$	9.9
INTL FCStone Pty Ltd.	Australian Securities and Investment Commission	Net capital	$	1.5	$	0.8
INTL FCStone Pty Ltd.	Australian Securities and Investment Commission	Segregated funds	$	15.1	$	7.7
INTL FCStone Pty Ltd.	New Zealand Clearing Ltd	Capital adequacy	$	11.5	$	3.4
INTL FCStone DTVM Ltda.	Brazilian Central Bank and Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil	Capital adequacy	$	2.9	$	0.5
Gainvest S.A. Sociedad Gerente de FCI	Comision Nacional de Valores	Capital adequacy	$	5.7	$	0.2
Gainvest S.A. Sociedad Gerente de FCI	Comision Nacional de Valores	Net capital	$	0.2	$	0.1
INTL Capital S.A.	General Inspector of Justice (Argentina)	Net capital	$	9.8	$	8.8
INTL CIBSA S.A.	Comision Nacional de Valores	Capital adequacy	$	4.5	$	1.8
INTL CIBSA S.A	Comision Nacional de Valores	Net capital	$	3.7	$	1.0

Certain other non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company are also subject to capital adequacy requirements promulgated by authorities of the countries in which they operate. As of June 30, 2015, these subsidiaries were in compliance with their local capital adequacy requirements.