-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, ItFLSmzYf8QOsWgiBGtGDX2cbUWIivlOkoUBYNkMTlz1HYdWjyGI9YrD2fXQxtFq LHlNgdwZQdzPpGhldy9tEQ== 0001095811-01-001943.txt : 20010402 0001095811-01-001943.hdr.sgml : 20010402 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001095811-01-001943 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K405 PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20001231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20010330 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: LYNX THERAPEUTICS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000913275 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MEDICINAL CHEMICALS & BOTANICAL PRODUCTS [2833] IRS NUMBER: 943161073 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K405 SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22570 FILM NUMBER: 1586859 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3832 BAY CENTER PL CITY: HAYWARD STATE: CA ZIP: 94545 BUSINESS PHONE: 5106709300 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3832 BAY CENTER PLACE CITY: HAYWARD STATE: CA ZIP: 94545 10-K405 1 f70954e10-k405.txt FORM 10-K405 PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 1 ================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ---------------- FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-22570 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 94-3161073 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
25861 Industrial Blvd., Hayward, CA 94545 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (510) 670-9300 (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ] The number of shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding as of February 15, 2001, was 11,459,521. The aggregate market value of the common stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the closing price of the Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq National Market on February 15, 2001, was $108,953,607. ================================================================================ 2 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Business ................................................................................... 1 Item 2. Properties ................................................................................. 17 Item 3. Legal Proceedings .......................................................................... 17 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ........................................ 17 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters ....................... 18 Item 6. Selected Financial Data .................................................................... 19 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ................................................................................. 20 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ................................. 24 Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ................................... 25 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ....... 43 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ......................................... 44 Item 11. Executive Compensation ..................................................................... 46 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ............................. 48 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ............................................. 49 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K ............................. 50 Signatures ........................................................................................... 52
3 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Except for the historical information contained herein, this report contains certain information that is forward-looking in nature. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding Lynx's future financial results, operating results, product successes, business strategies, projected costs, future products, competitive positions and plans and objectives of management for future operations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential" or "continue" or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. In addition, statements that refer to expectations or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause Lynx's or its industry's results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences include, among others, those discussed under the captions "Business," "Business -- Business Risks" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." These and many other factors could affect the future financial and operating results of Lynx. Lynx undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report. Megaclone, MPSS, Megasort, Megatype and Protein ProFiler are trademarks of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. OVERVIEW We are a leader in the development and application of novel technologies for the discovery of gene expression patterns and genomic variations important to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural industries. These technologies are based on Megaclone, our unique and proprietary cloning procedure. Megaclone transforms a sample containing millions of DNA molecules into one made up of millions of micro-beads, each of which carries approximately 100,000 copies of one of the DNA molecules in the sample. In contrast to conventional cloning, in which an individual DNA molecule is selected from a sample and amplified into many copies for analysis or identification, we can capture on one set of micro-beads clones of nearly all the DNA sequences that characterize a sample. Once attached to the micro-beads, these clones can be handled and subjected to experiments and analyses all at the same time. Megaclone thereby enables many analyses or characterizations to be conducted that would otherwise be too cumbersome or onerous to conduct using conventional procedures where each clone must be addressed individually. Based on Megaclone, we have developed a suite of applications that have the potential to enhance the pace, scale and quality of genomics and genetics research programs. Currently, our principal collaborators and customers are BASF AG, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Aventis CropScience GmbH, Oxagen Limited Hybrigenics S.A., Genomics Collaborative Inc., Molecular Engines Laboratories SA, the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Phytera, Inc. and Celera Genomics. Additionally, we have provided a license for the use of certain of our technologies to Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd. Technologies we have developed that leverage the power of Megaclone are: - Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing, or MPSS -- which generates simultaneously, from a million or more Megaclone micro-beads, sequence information that uniquely identifies a sample's DNA molecules without the need for individual conventional sequencing reactions, and produces a comprehensive quantitative profile of gene expression in cells or tissues; and - Megasort -- which enables researchers to focus on potential target genes by permitting, from a single experiment, the direct physical isolation of nearly all the genes differentially expressed between samples. We are also developing the following application based on Megaclone: - Megatype -- which, when fully developed, should enable a single experiment to yield directly, without individual genotyping, those disease- or trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, that differentiate large populations of genomes. We are developing additional applications of these technologies, as well as new technologies aimed at addressing the needs of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural industries. For example, we are working on a new separation technology in the area of proteomics to provide high-resolution analysis of complex mixtures of proteins from cells or tissues of interest. In addition to our and our licensee's work with collaborators and customers, we intend to apply our suite of technologies in selected biological areas to develop products internally to discover and then license or sell gene targets, validated gene targets, genetic associations, genomic maps and other products. For example, we are pursuing projects directed to gene discovery and target validation in immunopathology and, through BASF-LYNX, our joint venture with BASF, central nervous system disorders. 1 4 INDUSTRY BACKGROUND The publication of the first draft sequence of the human genome was a milestone in the history of genetics and genomics. However, the remaining challenge for researchers in industry and academia alike is to explore the multitude of genomic variations and to discover, from the analysis of these differences, the functions of genes and their roles in health and disease. It is this work, post genome-sequencing, that is expected to lead to commercial opportunities and ultimately to the discovery of new therapies for unmet medical needs and to provide the basis for the emerging fields of pharmacogenetics and individualized patient therapy. Many diseases result from a malfunction of the genetically programmed protective response to insults, such as trauma, infection, stress or an inherited mutant gene. That malfunction may result in inadequate, misguided or exaggerated gene expression, unfolding a complex pathogenic process which may resolve itself, linger chronically or evolve with increasingly destructive effects in a manner quite removed from, and even independent of, the original insult. Analyzing which genes are expressed in a cell or tissue, the level of expression can illustrate which physiological pathways are active in the cell and to what degree. By understanding when and where abnormal gene expression occurs and the changes in expression that a drug can cause, the physiological pathways implicated in disease and drug action can be pinpointed. This knowledge could be used to help discover drug targets, screen drug leads, predict a compound's toxic effects, anticipate pharmacological responses to drug leads and tailor clinical trials to the specific needs of subgroups within a population. By recognizing gene expression patterns, researchers, and ultimately physicians, may also be able to determine which treatments are likely to be effective for a specific condition and which may be ineffective or harmful. Genomic approaches to therapeutics seek to identify genes connected to the origin of a disease. Searches to identify such genes generally are laborious and involve a very large amount of conventional DNA sequencing to identify genes or gene fragments. This knowledge of genes is a first step only. While it may pave the way for the development of better diagnostics, it may not necessarily lead to a successful therapy. For example, while a particular gene, or absence of a gene, may predispose a person to a cancer, an entirely different set of genes is likely to govern the tumor and its metastases. Hence, in addition to understanding the cause of disease, it is important to understand entire networks of genes and their functions in both healthy and diseased states in order to identify the optimal targets for therapy. One approach to genomics research is based on the study of gene expression and regulation of gene expression in cells in differing states or conditions. Gene expression in a cell consists of transcription, the process which converts the genetic information encoded in the double-stranded DNA of a gene into mRNA, and translation, the process which converts the genetic information encoded in mRNA into a specific protein molecule. At any one time, any particular human cell expresses thousands of genes. A different number of copies of each mRNA type will be present in each sample depending upon the particular cell, its function and its environmental conditions at the time. Thus, a cell will contain, at any one time, tens of thousands of different mRNAs, in various quantities, for a total on the order of one million or more mRNA molecules. Elucidating gene function involves not only determining which genes are expressed in a healthy or diseased tissue, but also requires determining which of the altered gene expressions cause a disease rather than result from the disease. In general, only the most abundantly expressed genes are currently accessible using conventional methods. In addition, conventional methods are dependent on separating and cloning double-stranded copies of each individual mRNA, or cDNA, prior to analysis. Thus, by conventional methods, it is impractical to obtain a comprehensive, high-resolution analysis of gene expression across one million or more mRNA molecules in cells of interest to the researcher. Another approach to genomics research is based on the study of human genetic variations. It is well known that the incidence of human diseases and their severity differ in different groups and individuals. There are many common diseases in which several genes play a role in the initiation and development of the pathological process, as well as in the responses of the individual to a therapy. This approach studies gene association with diseases by using a large assembly of specific gene variants called polymorphisms. The most abundant of these are single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, which are single-base mutations in the genome. A SNP is found, on average, once in every 1,000 bases. This means if any two individuals are compared, their genomes will be found to differ at more than one million places. Genotyping refers to the process of testing individual genomes for the presence or absence of a set of SNPs. If a SNP correlation to a disorder is proven, it would point to those regions of the genome in which the sequences responsible for the disorder may be located. However, to discover such regions, it is currently believed that one would have to test several hundred individual genomes for the presence or absence of tens of thousands, if not more, SNPs. Thus, there is a real need to employ a technology that can quickly and efficiently determine which of these thousands of SNPs are significantly associated with diseases in large populations of patients and thereby provide a relevant set of SNPs for downstream genotyping of individuals. 2 5 OUR SOLUTION We overcome many of the limitations of current technologies by capturing essentially all of the different DNA molecules in a sample on micro-beads using our Megaclone technology and applying our various analytical technologies to conduct relevant comparisons and other analyses of the captured DNA molecules. Thus, our patented Megaclone technology enables an automated, high-throughput analysis of complex mixtures of DNA molecules. Megaclone is a process that uses a proprietary library of approximately 16.7 million short synthetic DNA sequences, called tags, and their complementary anti-tags, to uniquely mark and process each DNA molecule in a sample. Each unique tag is a permanent identifier of the DNA molecule it is attached to, and all of the tagged molecules in a sample are amplified together to create multiple copies of the tagged molecules. Another proprietary process is used to generate five micron diameter micro-beads, each of which carries multiple copies of a short anti-tag DNA sequence complementary to one of the 16.7 million tags. The amplified tagged DNA molecules are then collected onto the micro-beads through hybridization of the tags to the complementary anti-tags. Each micro-bead carries on its surface enough complementary anti-tags to collect approximately 100,000 identical copies of the corresponding tagged DNA molecule. By this process, each tagged DNA molecule in the original sample is converted into a micro-bead carrying about 100,000 copies of the same sequence. Therefore, in a few steps, our Megaclone technology can transform a complex mixture of a million or more individual DNA molecules into a usable format that provides the following benefits: - substantially all the different DNA molecules present in a sample are represented in the final micro-bead collection; - these million or more DNA molecules can be analyzed simultaneously in various applications; and - the need for storing and handling millions of individual DNA clones is eliminated. Megaclone is the foundation for our analytical applications, including MPSS, which provides gene sequence information and high-resolution gene expression information, Megasort, which provides focused sets of differentially expressed genes and potential gene targets, and Megatype, which is expected to provide SNP disease- or trait-association information. OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY We intend to apply our technologies to maximize the value of human, animal and plant genomic information for our licensee's, collaborators and customers and ourselves through high-resolution gene expression analysis and in the discovery and characterization of important genetic variations. Now that the majority of our technologies have been reduced to practice, we intend to enlarge our presence in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agricultural and other commercially important markets. We believe many drug discovery and development companies now recognize the need for significantly greater resolution and scope in their genomics and genetics research. The primary elements of our business strategy are: - Pursue selected internal programs to capture greater value We intend to use our technologies to discover and develop gene targets, validated gene targets, genetic associations, genomic maps or other products in selected fields. Through these internal programs, we will endeavor to create valuable drug discovery information and related intellectual property that we could license to third parties. If successful, we could realize revenues from licensing our discoveries through licensing fees, milestone payments and royalties or profit-sharing. For example, we have initiated a program directed to the discovery and validation of targets in the field of immunopathology. - Collaborate with others with whom we can create value We will seek to collaborate with companies and research institutions under arrangements in which we provide access to our technologies, and our collaborators provide access to well-defined clinical samples and/or biological expertise. Through these programs, we will endeavor to create valuable drug discovery information and related intellectual property that could be licensed to third parties. If successful, we could realize revenues through a share in any licensing or commercialization by us or our collaborators. 3 6 - Provide high-resolution gene expression information for use in databases We intend to use our technologies, particularly MPSS, to produce high-resolution gene expression information from cells or tissues for inclusion in databases. We believe the distinguishing feature of the information that Lynx could produce is that it represents a comprehensive quantitative profile of gene expression in cells or tissues. Our approach could be either to assemble this information on our own or with a partner in a database format, accessible to others for an access fee and/or continuing subscriptions, or to provide this information to others for inclusion in their existing database products, in return for services fees in producing the information and/or a share of the revenues or profits from the commercialization of the database. - Provide high-resolution gene expression information for the specific programs of others With the assumed accessibility to databases containing high-resolution gene expression information on cells or tissues for comparative purposes, we expect that pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agricultural and other companies will engage us to produce a comprehensive quantitative profile of gene expression in cells or tissues for their specific interests, such as in diseased, abnormal or induced states or conditions. In these arrangements, we could provide information content for each company's specific internal database or programs. In return, we could earn services fees in producing the information and/or a share of the revenues or profits from the commercialization of a product stemming from the use the information by the company. - Continue to grow our genomics discovery services We have generated revenues through agreements for genomics discovery services. We plan to continue to provide such services to pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies for use in their discovery, development and commercialization efforts. The revenue sources from these arrangements typically include technology access and services fees. We have provided a license for the use of certain of our technologies to Takara. The license provides Takara with the right in Japan, Korea and China, including Taiwan, to use our technologies exclusively for at least five years, and non-exclusively thereafter, to provide genomics discovery services and to manufacture and sell microarrays containing content identified by our technologies. Takara also receives from us a non-exclusive license right to manufacture and sell such microarrays elsewhere throughout the world. - Develop new technologies and additional applications of our technologies We intend to continue to develop creative solutions to complex biological problems. We are currently focused on reducing to commercial practice our Megatype technology in order to extract from large populations those genomic fragments exhibiting SNPs and associate these SNPs with traits or diseases. We may further develop our technology to apply it to individual genotyping which would determine the relevant SNPs present in an individual. We are also working in the area of proteomics to provide a means of high-resolution analysis of complex mixtures of proteins from cells or tissues. OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS We have developed or are developing several important analytical applications of our Megaclone technology to better address the need for increased pace, scale and quality of genomics and genetics research programs. Current Applications Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing Technology. Our MPSS technology addresses the need to generate sequence information from millions of DNA fragments. At this extremely large scale, our MPSS approach eliminates the need for individual sequencing reactions and the physical separation of DNA fragments required by conventional sequencing methods. MPSS enables the simultaneous identification of nearly all the DNA molecules in a sample. With MPSS, one million or more Megaclone micro-beads are fixed in a single layer array in a flow cell, so solvents and reagents can be washed over the micro-beads in each cycle of the process. Our proprietary protocol elicits from the Megaclone micro-beads sequence-dependent fluorescent responses, which are recorded by a charged coupled device ("CCD") camera after each cycle. The process produces short 16- to 20-base-pair signature, or identifying, sequences, without requiring fragment separation and separate sequencing reactions as in conventional DNA sequencing approaches. We have developed proprietary instrumentation and software to automate the delivery of reagents and solutions used in our sequencing process and to compile, from the images obtained at each cycle, the signature sequences that result from each experiment. 4 7 We believe MPSS has the following advantages over conventional DNA sequencing methods: - it sequences DNA molecules on as many as one million or more Megaclone beads simultaneously; - it eliminates the need for individual sequencing reactions and gels; - it identifies each of the DNA molecules by a unique 16- to 20-base signature sequence; - it produces a comprehensive quantitative profile of gene expression in cells or tissues of interest; and - it identifies even the rarest expressed genes. We currently have over 30 operational proprietary MPSS instruments. We are utilizing MPSS to generate high-resolution expression data in several biological systems for our collaborators and customers and for ourselves. These data are being derived from tissues and samples that have been prioritized by our collaborators and customers, in addition to those identified by our research teams for our internal programs. We will also generate data that can be delivered directly to our customers to identify new genes and otherwise enhance their databases. MPSS delivers gene sequence information and high-resolution gene expression information and could enable the construction of high-resolution gene expression databases from cells or tissues of interest. Megasort Technology. Our Megasort technology provides a method to identify and physically extract essentially all genes that differ in expression level between two samples. The novelty of Megasort is that the identification and extraction are performed in a single assay. Megasort compares two DNA samples, each containing millions of molecules, and extracts those DNA molecules that are present in different proportions in the samples. These could be differentially expressed genes or DNA fragments that are found in one sample but not the other. Because the comparison and sorting require no prior knowledge of the sequences of the genes in either sample, Megasort can be used with samples isolated from tissues or organisms that are not well characterized. Megasort involves hybridizing two probes prepared separately, one from each of the samples to be compared, with a population of Megaclone micro-beads, each of which carries many copies of a single DNA fragment or gene derived from either of the samples. Because each probe is labeled with a different fluorescent marker, genes or fragments that are under- or over-represented in either sample are readily separated by a fluorescence activated cell sorter, also referred to as a FACS. Genes or fragments of interest can then be recovered from the sorted micro-beads for further study. Megasort technology uses Megaclone micro-beads as a "fluid" microarray. In a single experiment, Megasort can isolate nearly all the potential target genes that are differentially expressed, and remove those that do not differ between the samples. We believe Megasort has the following advantages over conventional gene microarrays: - it interrogates all the expressed genes, including rarely expressed genes, in the two samples being compared, whether known or not; - it does not require advance knowledge about any of the genes in these samples; and - it extracts, at the end of the experiment, physical DNA clones of those genes that are of interest attached to the micro-beads that were sorted. Megasort delivers focused sets of differentially expressed genes and potential gene targets. Technologies, Applications and Products Under Development Megatype Technology. We believe our Megatype technology will permit the comparison of collected genomes of two populations. It is designed to enable the detection and recovery of DNA fragments with the SNPs that distinguish these two populations. In contrast to other SNP validation methods that require thousands or millions of assays, only a single Megatype experiment should be required for SNP association with disease or other traits. 5 8 Megatype is designed to identify SNPs that are differentially represented in two populations of individuals. DNA fragments that exhibit a specific class of SNPs in the combined populations are selected by a proprietary method and loaded onto micro-beads with our Megaclone technology. Using fluorescently labeled probes, prepared through the same proprietary method, from the two separate populations, micro-beads bearing SNP-containing fragments that are under- or over-represented in either of the two populations are easily separated using the FACS. No prior knowledge of the SNP sequences or where they are located in the genome is required to conduct this analysis. We believe the advantages of Megatype will include: - enabling simultaneous discovery of disease- or trait-associated SNPs without prior knowledge of SNP sequences; - identifying, in a single experiment, the genetic differences that distinguish large populations; - extracting fragments containing over- or under-represented SNPs in different populations; - eliminating the need for millions of individual genotyping assays to determine SNP disease association; and - bypassing the prior need for a comprehensive SNP map. We believe our Megatype technology will deliver information on the disease- or trait-association of SNPs and should provide a cost-effective approach to drug discovery and pharmacogenetics. Proteomics. Proteomics is the study of the entire protein complement in cells. Our proteomics technology aims to provide high-resolution analysis of complex mixtures of proteins from cells or tissues. Based on solution-phase electrophoresis in proprietary micro-channel plates, the approach combines the speed of capillary electrophoresis with the resolving power of conventional two- dimensional gel-based techniques. Using this technology, we expect to complement high-resolution gene expression measurements using our MPSS platform with similar high-resolution analysis of a cell's translated proteins. The combined data from these measurements should provide a much more accurate and comprehensive picture of cell and tissue physiology than is available using current techniques. Our goal is to use our proteomics technology to discover drug targets, validate candidate targets and correlate gene expression with protein expression in cells. Genotyping. As a natural extension of our Megatype technology, we may further apply the technology to individual genotyping, which would determine the relevant SNPs present in an individual. This application will attempt to derive more of the downstream value from the scientifically relevant SNPs through the additional enabling of trait selection in crops, and predictive or preventative medicine in humans, thus moving closer to the notion of "personal genomics." Furthermore, we may develop additional assays to help link associated SNPs initially identified by Megatype technology to specific genes responsible for the observed traits. COLLABORATIONS AND CUSTOMERS BASF and BASF-LYNX In October 1996, we entered into an agreement with BASF to provide them with nonexclusive access to certain of our genomics discovery services. In connection with certain technology development accomplishments, BASF paid us a technology access fee of $4.5 million in the fourth quarter of 1999. BASF's access to our genomics discovery services is for a minimum of two years and requires BASF to purchase services at a minimum rate of $4.0 million per year. BASF paid us $4.0 million in each of the fourth quarters of 1999 and 2000 for genomics discovery services to be performed by us. In 1996, we formed a joint venture company with BASF called BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. BASF-LYNX is located in Heidelberg, Germany. BASF-LYNX began operations in 1997 and is employing our technologies to discover and validate novel gene targets for central nervous system ("CNS") disorders. We have contributed access to our technologies to BASF-LYNX in exchange for an initial 49% equity ownership. BASF, by committing to provide research funding to BASF-LYNX of DM50 million (or approximately $23.3 million based on a March 2001 exchange rate) over a five-year period beginning in 1997, received an initial 51% equity ownership in BASF-LYNX. In 1998, BASF agreed to provide an additional $10 million in research funding to BASF-LYNX, of which $4.3 million was paid to us for technology assets related to a CNS program. 6 9 DuPont In October 1998, we entered into a research collaboration agreement with DuPont to apply our technologies on an exclusive basis to the study of certain crops and their protection. Under the terms of the agreement, we could receive payments over a five-year period for genomics discovery services, the achievement of specific technology milestones and the delivery of genomic maps of specified crops. An initial payment of $10 million for technology access was received at the execution of the agreement, with additional minimum service fees of $12 million to be received by us over a three-year period that commenced in January 1999. In the fourth quarter of 1999, we achieved a technology milestone under the agreement that resulted in a $5 million payment from DuPont. Aventis CropScience In March 1999, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, formerly Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., obtained nonexclusive access to certain of our genomics discovery services for the benefit of its affiliate, Aventis CropScience. We received an initial payment for genomics discovery services to be performed by us for Aventis CropScience. The service period, which was renewed in March 2000, ends on March 31, 2001, subject to renewal for up to two additional one-year periods. In September 1999, we signed a three-year research collaboration agreement with Aventis CropScience. Aventis CropScience will receive exclusive access to certain of our genomics discovery services for the study of certain plants, which is aimed at developing new crop varieties and other agricultural products. Under the terms of the agreement, Aventis CropScience paid us a technology access fee upon execution of the agreement. We can earn additional fees for the performance of genomics discovery services, the delivery of genomic maps of certain plants and milestone payments and licensing fees related to the discovery of trait-associated SNPs for the subject plants. Oxagen In May 1999, we entered into an agreement with Oxagen to collaborate on a program to discover and validate disease-associated SNPs using our Megatype technology. The program initially focuses on inflammatory bowel disease, but the companies may extend it to other common human disorders. Under the terms of the agreement, we could receive licensing fees and royalties or otherwise share in the revenues, if any, from the licensing or sale and subsequent commercialization of related products by Oxagen or third parties. Hybrigenics In May 2000, we entered into an agreement with Hybrigenics to collaborate on a program to discover expressed genes and protein interactions and pathways in human obesity, through applying our Megasort and MPSS technologies and Hybrigenics' technologies. The goal is to use the findings to create new diagnostics and treatments for this important disease area. Under the terms of the agreement, we could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. Genomics Collaborative In August 2000, we entered into an agreement with Genomics Collaborative to conduct a comprehensive genome-wide scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, that are associated with type 2 diabetes, also known a non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, using our Megatype technology. Under the terms of the agreement, we could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. Molecular Engines Laboratories In October 2000, we entered into an agreement with Molecular Engines Laboratories SA (MEL) to collaborate on a program to identify differentially expressed genes associated with tumor reversion, through applying our Megasort technology to cancer cell lines provided by MEL. MEL plans to incorporate the findings into its overall research in the areas of tumor reversion, tumor suppression, programmed cell death, cell growth arrest and other processes involving cell death. Elucidation of the differentially expressed genes could lead to the development of research, diagnostic and therapeutic products or services in the cancer field. Under the terms of the agreement, we will receive payments from MEL for genomic discovery services as well as royalty payments from the commercialization of any products or services stemming from the scientific results of the research program. 7 10 Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology In October 2000, we entered into an agreement with the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, or IMCB, an institute affiliated with the National University of Singapore, to collaborate on a broad program designed to discover genes and molecular mechanisms involved in cancer, infectious diseases and other diseases prevalent in Asia Pacific. We will apply our Megasort and MPSS technologies to samples provided by the IMCB to discover differentially expressed genes. The IMCB will then use these discoveries to further characterize the genes involved in the disease processes, using their technologies and biological expertise. The data from the combined program are expected to provide unique insights into diseases that could lead to research, diagnostics and therapeutic products or services. Under the terms of the agreement, we will receive from the IMCB payments for technology access fees and for genomics discovery services to be performed by Lynx. Additionally, we could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. Takara In November 2000, we entered into a technology licensing agreement with Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd. of Japan. The license provides Takara with the right in Japan, Korea and China, including Taiwan, to use our proprietary Megaclone, Megasort and MPSS technologies exclusively for at least five years, and non-exclusively thereafter, to provide genomics discovery services and to manufacture and sell microarrays containing content identified by our technologies. Takara also receives a non-exclusive license right to manufacture and sell such microarrays elsewhere throughout the world. Under the terms of the agreement, we will receive from Takara payments for technology access fees, royalties on sales of microarrays and revenues from genomics discovery services, the sale to Takara of proprietary reagents used in applying our technologies and purchases of Lynx common stock. Phytera In January 2001, we entered into a collaboration with Phytera, Inc. to identify genes from plants involved in the biosynthesis of anti-oxidant polyphenols, naturally occurring compounds with nutraceutical and pharmaceutical activity. Phytera will select plant species from its culture libraries and apply its proprietary ExPAND(R) manipulation technology to regulate the expression of the metabolic pathways and genes responsible for the production of specific anti-oxidant polyphenolic compounds. We will then use our proprietary Megasort technology to identify genes activated after target compounds are induced. Lynx and Phytera intend to validate gene targets and jointly commercialize the genes with other partners in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical sectors. Celera In March 2001, we entered into two agreements with Celera Genomics. The first agreement involves the integration of sets of Lynx's high-resolution gene expression data, derived from normal human tissues analyzed using Lynx's MPSS technology, into Celera's database products for distribution to Celera's customers through the Celera Discovery System (CDS). Under a second agreement, Lynx will apply its MPSS technology to perform additional gene expression analyses of various tissues for Celera and to help supplement the Lynx database offering. COMPETITION Competition among entities attempting to identify the genes associated with specific diseases and to develop products based on such discoveries is intense. We face, and will continue to face, competition from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies, academic and research institutions and government agencies, both in the United States and abroad. Several entities are attempting to identify and patent randomly sequenced genes and gene fragments, while others are pursuing a gene identification, characterization and product development strategy based on positional cloning. We are aware that certain entities are using a variety of gene expression analysis methodologies, including chip-based systems, to attempt to identify disease-related genes. In addition, numerous pharmaceutical companies are developing genomic research programs, either alone or in partnership with our competitors. Competition among such entities is intense and is expected to increase. In order to successfully compete against existing and future technologies, we will need to demonstrate to potential customers that our technologies and capabilities are superior to those of competitors. Some of our competitors have substantially greater capital resources, research and development staffs, facilities, manufacturing and marketing experience, distribution channels and human resources than us. These competitors may discover, characterize or develop important genes, drug targets or drug leads, drug discovery technologies or drugs in advance of our customers or us or which are more effective than those developed by our collaborators and customers or us. They may also obtain regulatory approvals for their 8 11 drugs more rapidly than our collaborators or customers will, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, our competitors may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that could limit our rights or our collaborators' and customers' abilities to use our technologies or commercialize therapeutic, diagnostic or agricultural products. We also face competition from these and other entities in gaining access to cells, tissues and nucleic acid samples for use in our discovery programs. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY We are pursuing a strategy designed to obtain United States and foreign patent protection for our core technologies. Our long-term commercial success will be dependent in part on our ability to obtain commercially valuable patent claims and to protect our intellectual property portfolio. As of December 31, 2000, we owned or controlled 63 issued patents and 117 pending patent applications in the United States and foreign countries relating to our genomics technologies. In addition to acquiring patent protection for our core analysis technologies, as part of our business strategy, we intend to file for patent protection on sets of genes, both known and newly discovered, that have diagnostic or prognostic applications, novel genes that may serve as drug development targets, genetic maps and sets of genetic markers, such as SNPs, that are associated with traits or conditions of medical or economic importance. However, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the availability of such patent protection. Patent law relating to the scope of claims in the technology field in which we operate is still evolving. The degree to which we will be able to protect our technology with patents, therefore, is uncertain. Others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies, duplicate any of our technologies, and, if patents are licensed or issued to us, design around the patented technologies licensed to or developed by us. In addition, we could incur substantial costs in litigation if we are required to defend ourselves in patent suits brought by third parties or if we initiate such suits. With respect to proprietary know-how that is not patentable and for processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our interests. We intend to maintain several important aspects of our technology platform as trade secrets. While we require all employees, consultants, collaborators, customers and licensees to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain that proprietary information will not be disclosed or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES We have devoted our efforts primarily to research and development. Research and development expenses were $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. SCIENTIFIC ADVISORS Our principal scientific advisor: Sydney Brenner, M.B., D.Phil., is a distinguished Professor at the Salk Institute of Biological Studies in La Jolla, California. From July 1996 to January 2001, Dr. Brenner served as Director and President of The Molecular Sciences Institute, a non-profit research institute in Berkeley, California. Until his retirement in 1996, Dr. Brenner was Honorary Professor of Genetic Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, England. Dr. Brenner is known for his work on genetic code and the information transfer from genes to proteins, and for his pioneering research on the genetics and development of the nematode. Dr. Brenner is a Fellow of the Royal Society (1995) and a Foreign Associate of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (1977) and has received numerous awards of recognition, including the Albert Lasker Medical Research Award (1991), the Genetics Society of America Medal (1987) and the Kyoto Prize (1990). Dr. Brenner is the principal inventor of Lynx's bead-based technologies. EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2000, we employed 156 full-time employees, of which 128 were engaged in research and development activities and 28 in finance and administrative activities. We believe we have been successful in attracting skilled and experienced scientific personnel; however, competition for such personnel is intense. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and management considers relations with our employees to be good. 9 12 BUSINESS RISKS Lynx's business faces significant risks. These risks include those described below and may include additional risks of which Lynx is not currently aware or which Lynx currently does not believe are material. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information set forth in this report. OUR TECHNOLOGIES ARE NEW AND UNPROVEN AND MAY NOT ALLOW US OR OUR COLLABORATORS TO IDENTIFY GENES OR TARGETS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY. Our technologies are new and unproven. The application of these technologies is in too early a stage to determine whether they can be successfully implemented. These technologies assume information about gene expression and gene sequences that may enable scientists to better understand complex biological processes. Relatively few therapeutic products based on gene discoveries have been successfully developed and commercialized. Our technologies may not enable us or our collaborators to identify genes or targets for drug discovery. To date, no targets for drug discovery have been identified based on our technologies. WE ARE DEPENDENT ON OUR COLLABORATIONS AND WILL NEED TO FIND ADDITIONAL COLLABORATORS IN THE FUTURE TO DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS. Our strategy for the development and commercialization of our technologies and potential products includes entering into collaborations, service agreements or licensing arrangements with pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies. We do not have the resources to develop or commercialize diagnostic or therapeutic products on our own. We cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate additional collaborative and other arrangements or contracts on acceptable terms, or at all, or that such collaborations or relationships will be successful. Substantially all of our revenues have been derived from corporate collaborations and agreements. Revenues from collaborations and related agreements depend upon continuation of the collaborations, the achievement of milestones and royalties derived from future products developed from our research and technologies. If we are unable to successfully achieve milestones or our collaborators fail to develop successful products, we will not earn the revenues contemplated under such collaborative agreements. If existing agreements are not renewed, or if we are unable to enter into new collaborative and other agreements on commercially acceptable terms, our revenues may decrease, and our activities may fail to lead to commercialized products. Our dependence on collaborative arrangements with third parties subjects us to a number of risks. We have limited or no control over the resources that our collaborators may choose to devote to our joint efforts. Our collaborators may breach or terminate their agreements with us or fail to perform their obligations thereunder. Further, our collaborators may elect not to develop products arising out of our collaborative arrangements or may fail to devote sufficient resources to the development, manufacture, market or sale of such products. Some of our collaborators could also become our competitors in the future. Our business could be harmed if our collaborators: - do not develop commercially successful products using our technologies; - develop competing products; - preclude us from entering into collaborations with their competitors; - fail to obtain necessary regulatory approvals; or - terminate their agreements with us. WE ARE AN EARLY STAGE COMPANY, SO OUR PROFITABILITY IS UNCERTAIN AND THERE IS A HIGH RISK OF FAILURE. You must evaluate us in light of the uncertainties and complexities affecting an early stage genomics company. Our products and services are still in the early stages of commercialization. Our technologies depend on the successful integration of independent technologies, each of which has its own development risks. We cannot assure you that our technologies will continue to be successfully developed, that our services will continue to be sought by customers or that any products developed from our technologies will prove to be commercially successful. Further, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in expanding the 10 13 scope of our research into new areas of pharmaceutical, biotechnology or agricultural research. Significant research and development, financial resources and personnel will be required to capitalize on our technologies. Commercialization of our technologies, whether through the sales of services, royalties or other arrangements, may not generate sufficient or sustainable revenues to enable us to be profitable. WE HAVE A HISTORY OF NET LOSSES. WE EXPECT TO CONTINUE TO INCUR NET LOSSES, AND WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE OR MAINTAIN PROFITABILITY. We have incurred net losses each year since our inception in 1992, including net losses of approximately $4.3 million in 1998, $6.7 million in 1999 and $13.3 million in 2000. As of December 31, 2000, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $66.7 million. We expect these losses to continue for at least the next several years. The size of these net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of growth, if any, in our revenues and on the level of our expenses. Our research and development expenditures and general and administrative costs have exceeded our revenues to date, and we expect research and development expenses to continue to increase due to planned spending for ongoing technology development and implementation, as well as new applications. As a result, we will need to generate significant additional revenues to achieve profitability. Even if we do increase our revenues and achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain profitability. Our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability is dependent on many factors, including: - our ability to enter into additional corporate collaborations and agreements; - our ability to discover genes and targets for drug discovery; - our collaborators' ability to develop diagnostic and therapeutic products from our drug discovery targets; and - the successful clinical testing, regulatory approval and commercialization of such products. The time required to reach profitability is highly uncertain, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve profitability on a sustained basis, if at all. WE MAY NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN THE FUTURE, WHICH MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE TO US. We have invested significant capital in our infrastructure and in our scientific and business development activities. We expect our capital and operating expenditures to increase over the next several years as we expand our operations. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including: - the progress and scope of our collaborative and independent research and development projects; - payments received under collaborative and other agreements; - our ability to establish and maintain collaborative and other arrangements; - the progress of the development and commercialization efforts under our collaborations and corporate agreements; - the costs associated with obtaining access to samples and related information; and - the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights. Changes to our current operating plan may require us to consume available capital resources significantly sooner than we expect. We may be unable to raise sufficient additional capital when we need it, on favorable terms, or at all. If our capital resources are insufficient to meet future capital requirements, we will have to raise additional funds. The sale of equity or convertible debt securities in the future would be dilutive to our stockholders. If we are unable to obtain adequate funds on reasonable terms, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or to obtain funds by entering into financing or collaborative agreements on unattractive terms. 11 14 OUR REVENUES DEPEND ON A SMALL NUMBER OF COLLABORATORS AND CUSTOMERS. To date, we have received a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of collaborators and customers. For the year ended December 31, 2000, revenues from 3 collaborators and customers accounted for 51%, 29% and 11% of our total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 1999, revenues from 3 collaborators and customers accounted for 81%, 13% and 5% of our total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 1998, revenues from three collaborators and customers accounted for 61%, 33% and 5% of our total revenues. Our operating results may be harmed, if we lose one of these collaborators or customers and we are not able to attract new collaborators or customers. WE DEPEND ON A SOLE SUPPLIER TO MANUFACTURE FLOW CELLS USED IN OUR MPSS TECHNOLOGY. The flow cells used in our MPSS technology are obtained from a single supplier. Our reliance on outside vendors generally, and this sole supplier in particular, involves several risks, including: - the inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components due to manufacturing capacity constraints, a discontinuance of a product by a third-party manufacturer or other supply constraints; - reduced control over quality and pricing of components; and - delays and long lead times in receiving materials from vendors. THE GENOMICS INDUSTRY IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE AND EVOLVING RAPIDLY, AND OUR COMPETITORS MAY DEVELOP PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT MAKE OURS OBSOLETE. The biotechnology industry is highly fragmented and is characterized by rapid technological change. In particular, the area of genomics research is a rapidly evolving field. Competition among entities attempting to identify genes associated with specific diseases and to develop products based on such discoveries is intense. Many of our competitors have substantially greater research and product development capabilities and financial, scientific and marketing resources than we do. We face, and will continue to face, competition from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies, as well as academic research institutions, clinical reference laboratories and government agencies. Some of our competitors: - are attempting to identify and patent randomly sequenced genes and gene fragments; - are pursuing a gene identification, characterization and product development strategy based on positional cloning; and - are using a variety of different gene expression analysis methodologies, including the use of chip-based systems, to attempt to identify disease-related genes. In addition, numerous pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies are developing genomic research programs, either alone or in partnership with our competitors. Our future success will depend on our ability to maintain a competitive position with respect to technological advances. Rapid technological development by others may result in our technologies and future products becoming obsolete. Any products that are developed through our technologies will compete in highly competitive markets. Our competitors may be more effective at using their technologies to develop commercial products. Further, we cannot assure you that our competitors will not obtain intellectual property rights that would limit the use of our technologies or the ability to commercialize diagnostic or therapeutic products using our technologies. As a result, our competitors may be able to more easily develop technologies and products that would render our technologies and products, and those of our collaborators, obsolete and noncompetitive. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGIES, THIRD PARTIES MAY BE ABLE TO USE OUR TECHNOLOGY, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE IN THE MARKET. Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and maintain adequate protection of the intellectual property related to our technologies and products. The patent positions of biotechnology companies, including our patent position, are generally uncertain 12 15 and involve complex legal and factual questions. We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary technologies are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S., and many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending their proprietary rights in foreign jurisdictions. We have applied and will continue to apply for patents covering our technologies, processes and products as and when we deem appropriate. However, these applications may be challenged or may fail to result in issued patents. Our existing patents and any future patents we obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patents. In addition, our patents may be challenged or invalidated or fail to provide us with any competitive advantage. We also rely on trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. We have taken security measures to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, but these measures may not provide adequate protection. While we seek to protect our proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, collaborators and consultants, we cannot assure you that our proprietary information will not be disclosed or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition, our competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or may otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market. LITIGATION OR THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT COULD REQUIRE US TO SPEND SUBSTANTIAL TIME AND MONEY AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS. Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to avoid infringing patents and proprietary rights of third parties and not breaching any licenses that we have entered into with regard to our technologies. Other parties have filed, and in the future are likely to file, patent applications covering genes, gene fragments, the analysis of gene expression and the manufacture and use of DNA chips. We intend to continue to apply for patent protection for methods relating to gene expression and for the individual disease genes and drug discovery targets we discover. If patents covering technologies required by our operations are issued to others, we may have to rely on licenses from third parties. We cannot assure you that such licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Third parties may accuse us of employing their proprietary technology without authorization. In addition, third parties may obtain patents that relate to our technologies and claim that use of such technologies infringes these patents. Regardless of their merit, such claims could require us to incur substantial costs, including the diversion of management and technical personnel, in defending ourselves against any such claims or enforcing our patents. In the event that a successful claim of infringement is brought against us, we may be required to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from third parties. We may not be able to obtain these licenses at a reasonable cost, or at all. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of these licenses could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our technologies and products. WE HAVE LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN SALES AND MARKETING AND THUS MAY BE UNABLE TO FURTHER COMMERCIALIZE OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS. Our ability to achieve profitability depends on attracting collaborators and customers for our technologies and products. There are a limited number of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural companies that are potential collaborators and customers for our technologies and products. To market our technologies and products, we must develop a sales and marketing group with the appropriate technical expertise. We may not be able to build such a sales force. We cannot assure you that our sales and marketing efforts will be successful or that our technologies and products will gain market acceptance. OUR SALES CYCLE IS LENGTHY, AND WE MAY SPEND CONSIDERABLE RESOURCES ON UNSUCCESSFUL SALES EFFORTS OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS ON THE SCHEDULE WE ANTICIPATE. Our ability to obtain collaborators and customers for our technologies and products depends in significant part upon the perception that our technologies and products can help accelerate their drug discovery and genomics efforts. Our sales cycle is typically lengthy, because we need to educate our potential collaborators and customers and sell the benefits of our products to a variety of constituencies within such companies. In addition, we may be required to negotiate agreements containing terms unique to each collaborator or customer. We may expend substantial funds and management effort with no assurance that we will successfully sell our technologies and products. Actual and proposed consolidations of pharmaceutical companies have negatively affected, and may in the future negatively affect, the timing and progress of our sales efforts. 13 16 WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY MANAGING OUR GROWTH. We expect to continue to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations. This growth may place a significant strain on our management and operations. As our operations expand, we expect that we will need to manage additional relationships with various collaborators and customers, suppliers and other third parties. Our ability to manage our operations and growth effectively requires us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to manage this growth effectively, our business may be harmed. THE LOSS OF KEY PERSONNEL OR THE INABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL COULD IMPAIR THE GROWTH OF OUR BUSINESS. We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management and scientific staff. The loss of any of these persons' services might adversely impact the achievement of our objectives and the continuation of existing collaborations. In addition, recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel to perform future research and development work will be critical to our success. There is currently a shortage of skilled executives and employees with technical expertise, and this shortage is likely to continue. As a result, competition for skilled personnel is intense and turnover rates are high. Competition for experienced scientists from numerous companies and academic and other research institutions may limit our ability to attract and retain such personnel. We are dependent on our President and Chief Executive Officer, Norman J.W. Russell, Ph.D., the loss of whose services could have a material adverse effect on our business. WE USE HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AND RADIOACTIVE AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS IN OUR BUSINESS. ANY CLAIMS RELATING TO IMPROPER HANDLING, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF THESE MATERIALS COULD BE TIME CONSUMING AND COSTLY. Our research and development processes involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, including chemicals and radioactive and biological materials. Our operations produce hazardous waste products. We cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or discharge and any resultant injury from these materials. Federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials. We may be sued for any injury or contamination that results from our use or the use by third parties of these materials, and our liability may exceed our insurance coverage and our total assets. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental regulations may impair our research, development and production efforts. ETHICAL, LEGAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES MAY LIMIT THE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF, AND DEMAND FOR, OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS. Our collaborators and customers may seek to develop diagnostic products based on genes we discover. The prospect of broadly available gene-based diagnostic tests raises ethical, legal and social issues regarding the appropriate use of gene-based diagnostic testing and the resulting confidential information. It is possible that discrimination by third-party payors, based on the results of such testing, could lead to the increase of premiums by such payors to prohibitive levels, outright cancellation of insurance or unwillingness to provide coverage to individuals showing unfavorable gene expression profiles. Similarly, employers could discriminate against employees with gene expression profiles indicative of the potential for high disease-related costs and lost employment time. Finally, government authorities could, for social or other purposes, limit or prohibit the use of such tests under certain circumstances. We cannot assure you that ethical, legal and social concerns about genetic testing and target identification will not adversely affect market acceptance of our technologies and products. Although our technology is not dependent on genetic engineering, genetic engineering plays a prominent role in our approach to product development. The subject of genetically modified food has received negative publicity, which has aroused public debate. Adverse publicity has resulted in greater regulation internationally and trade restrictions on imports of genetically altered agricultural products. Public attitudes may be influenced by claims that genetically engineered products are unsafe for consumption or pose a danger to the environment. Such claims may prevent genetically engineered products from gaining public acceptance. The commercial success of our future products may depend, in part, on public acceptance of the use of genetically engineered products, including drugs and plant and animal products. IF WE DEVELOP PRODUCTS WITH OUR COLLABORATORS, AND IF PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWSUITS ARE SUCCESSFULLY BROUGHT AGAINST US, WE COULD FACE SUBSTANTIAL LIABILITIES THAT EXCEED OUR RESOURCES. We may be held liable if any product we develop with our collaborators causes injury or is otherwise found unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Although we have general liability and product liability insurance, this insurance may become prohibitively expensive or may not fully cover our potential liabilities. Inability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at 14 17 an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect us against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of products developed with our collaborators. HEALTHCARE REFORM AND RESTRICTIONS ON REIMBURSEMENTS MAY LIMIT OUR RETURNS ON DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS THAT WE MAY DEVELOP WITH OUR COLLABORATORS. If we are successful in validating targets for drug discovery, products that we develop with our collaborators based on those targets may include diagnostic or therapeutic products. The ability of our collaborators to commercialize such products may depend, in part, on the extent to which reimbursement for the cost of these products will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. In the U.S., third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price of medical products and services. The trend towards managed healthcare in the U.S., legislative healthcare reforms and the growth of organizations such as health maintenance organizations that may control or significantly influence the purchase of healthcare products and services, may result in lower prices for any products our collaborators may develop. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare products, and we cannot assure you that adequate third-party coverage will be available to enable our collaborators to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on their investment in research and product development. OUR FACILITIES ARE LOCATED NEAR KNOWN EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONES, AND THE OCCURRENCE OF AN EARTHQUAKE OR OTHER CATASTROPHIC DISASTER COULD CAUSE DAMAGE TO OUR FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT, WHICH COULD REQUIRE US TO CEASE OR CURTAIL OPERATION. Our facilities are located near known earthquake fault zones and are vulnerable to damage from earthquakes. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including fire, floods, power loss, communications failures and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our facilities would be seriously, or potentially completely, impaired. In addition, the unique nature of our research activities could cause significant delays in our programs and make it difficult for us to recover from a disaster. The insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses resulting from disasters or other business interruptions. Accordingly, an earthquake or other disaster could materially and adversely harm our ability to conduct business. OUR STOCK PRICE MAY BE EXTREMELY VOLATILE. The trading price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations. The market prices of the common stock of many publicly held, early stage biotechnology companies have in the past been, and can in the future be expected to be, especially volatile. In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The following factors and events may have a significant and adverse impact on the market price of our common stock: - fluctuations in our operating results; - announcements of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors; - release of reports by securities analysts; - developments or disputes concerning patent or proprietary rights; - developments in our relationships with current or future collaborators, customers or licensees; and - general market conditions. Many of these factors are beyond our control. These factors may cause a decrease in the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND UNDER DELAWARE LAW COULD PREVENT OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL OF OUR COMPANY, EITHER OF WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE. Under our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors has the authority, without further action by the holders of our common stock, to issue 2,000,000 additional shares of preferred stock from time to time in series and with preferences and rights as it 15 18 may designate. These preferences and rights may be superior to those of the holders of our common stock. For example, the holders of preferred stock may be given a preference in payment upon our liquidation or for the payment or accumulation of dividends before any distributions are made to the holders of common stock. Although we have no present intention to authorize or issue any additional series of preferred stock, any authorization or issuance, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could also have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. The preferred stock may have other rights, including economic rights senior to those of our common stock, and, as a result, an issuance of additional preferred stock could adversely affect the market value of our common stock. Provisions of Delaware law may also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS COULD IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 requires us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through net income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in the other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. SFAS 133 is effective for our year ending December 31, 2001. We do not currently hold any derivatives and we do not expect this pronouncement to materially impact results of operations. In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," which must be adopted in the fourth quarter of 2000. SAB 101 summarizes certain areas of the Staff's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue in financial statements and specifically addresses revenue recognition for non-refundable technology access fees. We believe that our revenue recognition policies prior to adoption of SAB 101 complied with the requirements of SAB 101. In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation," which contains rules designed to clarify the application of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 was effective on July 1, 2000 and adopted by us at that time. The adoption of FIN 44 did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial position. 16 19 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES In February 1998, we entered into a noncancelable operating lease for facilities space of approximately 111,000 square-feet in two buildings in Hayward, California. Currently, our corporate headquarters, principal research and development facilities and production facilities are located in one of the two buildings. The remaining space will be developed and occupied in phases, depending on our growth. The lease runs through December 2008. We have an option to extend the lease for an additional five-year period, subject to certain conditions. We have leased approximately 37,000 square feet of additional space in one of the buildings for further expansion purposes. In June 1998, Lynx GmbH entered into a noncancelable operating lease for facilities space of approximately 6,300 square-feet in Heidelberg, Germany, to house its operations. The space will be developed and occupied in phases, depending on the growth of the organization. The lease terminates in June 2005. A portion of this space is currently being subleased by BASF-LYNX. In August 1993, we entered into a noncancelable operating lease for another facility that expires on July 31, 2003. In 1998, we entered into an agreement to sublease a portion of this space, and in 1999, through a subsequent agreement, subleased the remaining portion of the facility. The term of the sublease runs through July 2003. Rent from the sublease is sufficient to cover the rent and other operating expenses incurred by Lynx under the terms of the 1993 lease. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are not a party to any material legal proceedings. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the quarter ended December 31, 2000. 17 20 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS On December 30, 1997, we listed our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market. Prior to December 30, 1997, there was no established public trading market for our voting stock. Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol LYNX. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market:
COMMON STOCK PRICE ------------------ HIGH LOW ------ ------ YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 First Quarter ................... $15.00 $ 8.88 Second Quarter .................. 12.69 9.44 Third Quarter ................... 15.75 10.63 Fourth Quarter .................. 37.00 9.13 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 First Quarter ................... $96.88 $24.06 Second Quarter .................. 47.56 14.25 Third Quarter ................... 48.75 24.00 Fourth Quarter .................. 31.25 7.25
As of March 22, 2001, there were approximately 2,400 stockholders of record of our common stock. On March 22, 2001, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $7.50. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain earnings to support the development of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors. 18 21 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA This section presents our selected consolidated historical financial data. You should read carefully the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this report and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 1999 and 2000 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998 have been derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of the method used to determine the number of shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Technology access and services fees ......... $ 1,958 $ 3,875 $ 2,625 $ 7,833 $ 12,389 Collaborative research and other ............ 7,791 707 4,380 5,042 235 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues ...................... 9,749 4,582 7,005 12,875 12,624 Operating costs and expenses: Cost of services fees ....................... -- -- -- 828 3,652 Research and development .................... 12,545 14,226 13,166 15,510 19,761 General and administrative .................. 3,170 1,930 2,141 4,175 6,170 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total operating costs and expenses .. 15,715 16,156 15,307 20,513 29,583 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Loss from operations .......................... (5,966) (11,574) (8,302) (7,638) (16,959) Interest and other income, net ................ 585 753 4,106 1,232 4,158 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Loss before provision for income taxes ........ (5,381) (10,821) (4,196) (6,406) (12,801) Provision for income taxes .................... 10 -- 151 258 500 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net loss ...................................... $ (5,391) $(10,821) $ (4,347) $ (6,664) $(13,301) ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Basic and diluted net loss per share .......... $ (2.45) $ (3.09) $ (0.45) $ (0.60) $ (1.17) Shares used in per share computation .......... 2,197 3,501 9,642 11,128 11,388
DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments ... $14,082 $24,930 $23,862 $30,786 $18,798 Working capital ..................................... 9,118 21,875 20,834 25,042 10,887 Total assets ........................................ 18,412 29,267 40,334 51,638 39,215 Notes payable -- noncurrent portion ................. -- -- -- 3,471 3,077 Stockholders' equity ................................ $10,732 $25,590 $23,457 $19,646 $ 6,222
SELECTED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
FISCAL YEAR 2000 QUARTER ENDED ----------------------------------------------------- MAR. 31 JUNE 30 SEPT. 30 DEC. 31 -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues .................................. $ 3,016 $ 2,834 $ 3,425 $ 3,349 Loss from operations ...................... (3,918) (3,421) (5,177) (4,443) Net loss .................................. (481) (3,167) (4,966) (4,687) Basic and diluted net loss per share ...... $ (0.04) $ (0.28) $ (0.44) $ (0.41)
FISCAL YEAR 1999 QUARTER ENDED ----------------------------------------------------- MAR. 31 JUNE 30 SEPT. 30 DEC. 31 -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues ...................................... $ 654 $ 961 $ 1,122 $ 10,138 Income (loss) from operations ................. (3,670) (4,602) (4,196) 4,830 Net income (loss) ............................. (3,200) (4,557) (3,950) 5,043 Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share . $ (0.29) $ (0.41) $ (0.36) $ 0.46
19 22 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Except for the historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the words "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "estimate" and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that these statements will prove to be correct. The Lynx's actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this section as well as in the section entitled "Item 1. Business -- Business Risks." Lynx undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any future events or developments. OVERVIEW We are a leader in the development and application of novel technologies for the discovery of gene expression patterns and genomic variations important to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural industries. These technologies are based on Megaclone, our unique and proprietary cloning procedure. Megaclone transforms a sample containing millions of DNA molecules into one made up of millions of micro-beads, each of which carries approximately 100,000 copies of one of the DNA molecules in the sample. Based on Megaclone, we have developed a suite of applications that have the potential to enhance the pace, scale and quality of genomics and genetics research programs. Currently, our principal collaborators and customers are BASF AG, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Aventis CropScience GmbH, Oxagen Limited Hybrigenics S.A., Genomics Collaborative Inc., Molecular Engines Laboratories SA, the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Phytera, Inc. and Celera Genomics. Additionally, we have provided a license for the use of certain of our technologies to Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd. We have incurred net losses each year since our inception in 1992. As of December 31, 2000, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $66.7 million. We expect these losses to continue for at least the next several years. The size of these losses will depend, in part, on the rate of growth, if any, in our revenues and on the level of our expenses. Revenues from technology access fees are generally from upfront payments from our collaborators, customers and licensees who are provided access to our technologies for specified periods. We receive service fees from our collaborators and customers for genomics discovery services performed by us on the biological samples they send to us. Collaborative research revenues are payments received under various agreements and include such items as milestone payments. Other revenues include the proceeds from the sale of our technology assets to BASF-LYNX and product sales under one of our former programs. Technology access fees are deferred and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the noncancelable term of the agreement to which they relate. Payments for services and/or materials provided by us are recognized as revenues when earned over the period in which the services are performed and/or materials are delivered, provided no other obligations, refunds or credits to be applied to future work exist. Milestone payments are recognized as revenues upon the achievement of the related milestone and the satisfaction of any related obligations. Revenues from the sales of products, which have been immaterial to date, are recognized upon shipment to the customer. To date, we have received, and expect to continue to receive in the future, a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of collaborators and customers. During 2000, revenues from 3 collaborators and customers accounted for 51%, 29% and 11% of total revenues. During 1999, revenues from 3 collaborators and customers accounted for 81%, 13% and 5% of total revenues. During 1998, revenues from 3 collaborators and customers accounted for 61%, 33% and 5% of total revenues. Revenues in each quarterly and annual period have in the past, and could in the future, fluctuate due to: the timing and amount of any technology access fee and the period over which the revenue is recognized; the level of service fees, which is tied to the number and timing of biological samples received from our collaborators and customers, as well as our performance of the related genomics discovery services on the samples; the timing of achievement of milestones and the amount of related payments to us; and the number, type and timing of new, and the termination of existing, agreements with collaborators and customers. Cost of services fees includes the costs of direct labor, materials and supplies, outside expenses, equipment and overhead incurred by us in performing our genomics discovery services for our collaborators and customers. Research and development expenses include the costs of personnel, materials and supplies, outside expenses, equipment and overhead incurred by us in our technology and application development efforts. We expect research and development expenses to increase substantially due to planned spending for ongoing technology development and implementation, as well as new applications. General and administrative expenses include the costs of personnel, materials and supplies, outside expenses, equipment and overhead incurred by us primarily in our administrative, 20 23 business development, legal and investor relations activities. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in support of our research and development, commercial and business development efforts. We account for our investment in BASF-LYNX on the equity method, however such investment has a carrying value of zero in the financial statements. As we have no obligation to fund the operations of BASF-LYNX, we have not recognized our share of BASF-LYNX's losses in the accompanying statements of operations. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999 Revenues We had total revenues of $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. Revenues for 2000 included technology access fees and service fees of $12.4 million and collaborative research and other revenue of $0.2 million. Revenues for 1999 included technology access and service fees of $7.8 million and collaborative research revenue from a $5.0 million milestone fee. Operating Costs and Expenses Our total operating costs and expenses were $29.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. Cost of services fees were $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and reflect the costs of providing our genomics discovery services. Research and development expenses were $19.8 million in 2000 and $15.5 million in 1999. The increase in research and development expenses in 2000, as compared to 1999, is due primarily to higher personnel-related and facilities expenses and an increase in materials consumed in research and development efforts. Our efforts in 2000 were directed toward the expansion of the commercial applications of our genomics technologies. These activities included new collaborations and other agreements, internal discovery projects and an internal investment in building a store of human genomic information. We also continued our development work on our Megatype and Protein ProFiler technologies. We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase due to planned spending for ongoing technology development and implementation, as well as new applications. General and administrative expenses were $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel-related expenses and increased costs for outside services. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in support of our research and development, commercial and business development efforts. Interest and Other Income Net interest income decreased to $0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2000, from $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1999, primarily due to lower average cash, cash equivalents and investment balances during 2000, as compared to 1999, and increased interest expense incurred on equipment-related debt outstanding in 2000. Other income was $3.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2000, and $0.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1999. In 2000, other income was due primarily to a gain of approximately $3.1 million from the receipt of shares of common stock from Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation, as part of the proceeds related to the March 1998 sale of our former antisense program. In 1999, other income was attributable to a gain on the sale of certain fixed assets no longer used in our operations. Income Taxes The provision for income taxes of approximately $500,000 for 2000 consisted entirely of foreign withholding tax due on a payment received from one of our customers, collaborators and licensees. The provision for income taxes of approximately $258,000 for 1999 consisted entirely of alternative minimum tax. As of December 31, 2000, we had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $38.6 million, which will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2020, if not utilized. We have a state net operating loss carryforward of approximately $5.3 million, which will expire in 2010. 21 24 As of December 31, 2000, we also had federal and California research and development and other tax credit carryforwards of approximately $3.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The federal research and development credit will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2020, if not utilized. Utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in expiration of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards before full utilization. Utilization of federal and California net operating losses and credit carryforwards incurred prior to February 1994 is limited on an annual basis under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as a result of an ownership change in 1994. YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998 Revenues We had total revenues of $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, compared to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Revenues for 1999 included technology access fees and service fees of $7.8 million and collaborative research revenue from a $5.0 million milestone fee. Revenues for 1998 included technology access fees of $2.6 million and $4.3 million from the sale of our technology assets for certain central nervous system, or CNS, disorders. Operating Costs and Expenses Our total operating costs and expenses were $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, compared to $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Cost of services fees were $0.8 million in 1999 and reflect the costs of providing our genomics discovery services, which commenced in 1999. Research and development expenses were $15.5 million in 1999 and $13.2 million in 1998. The increase in research and development expenses in 1999, as compared to 1998, is due primarily to a higher number of personnel, facilities expansion and activities as we prepared to launch our commercial operations. Our efforts in 1999 focused on initiating production for the commercial application of our genomics technologies and completing the scientific experimentation that led to the successful achievement of technology milestones and achievements under certain of our agreements. We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase substantially due to planned spending for ongoing technology development and implementation, as well as new applications. General and administrative expenses were $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, compared to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel-related expenses, outside services costs and facilities expansion. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in support of our research and development, commercial and business development efforts. Interest and Other Income Net interest income decreased to $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1999, from $1.2 million in the year ended December 31, 1998, primarily due to lower average cash, cash equivalents and investment balances during 1999, as compared to 1998, and interest expense incurred on equipment-related debt outstanding in 1999. Other income was $0.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1999, and $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 1998. In 1998, other income was due primarily to the gain from the sale of the assets associated with our antisense program to Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Income Taxes The provision for income taxes of approximately $258,000 for 1999 and $151,000 for 1998 consisted entirely of alternative minimum tax. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Net cash used in operating activities was $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $7.8 million for the same period in 1999. This change was primarily due to the change in deferred revenue and a higher net loss in 2000, offset partially by the change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the difference in depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and leasehold improvements and the change in accounts receivable. The amount of net cash used in operating activities differed from the 2000 net loss due primarily to the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and leasehold 22 25 improvements and the collection of accounts receivable. The 1999 net cash provided by operating activities differed from the 1999 net loss due primarily to an increase in deferred revenue and collection of accounts receivable, partially offset by a decrease in current liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities of $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, was primarily due to increases in deferred revenue, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable. Net cash used in investing activities of $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, was due primarily to expenditures for leasehold improvements and purchases of equipment, partially offset by net maturities of short-term investments. Net cash used in investing activities of $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, was primarily due to net purchases of short-term investments and leasehold improvements and equipment purchases. Net cash provided by investing activities of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, was primarily due to net maturities of short-term investments, offset in part by expenditures for leasehold improvements and purchases of equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2000 of $1.1 million was due primarily to issuance of common stock from the exercise of employee stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities in 1999 of $4.8 million resulted primarily from borrowings under an equipment loan arrangement. Net cash provided by financing activities of $0.6 million in the year ended December 31, 1998 resulted from the issuance of common stock. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were $18.8 million at December 31, 2000. In late 1998, we entered into a financing agreement with a financial institution under which we drew down $4.8 million during 1999 for the purchase of equipment and certain other capital expenditures. We granted the lender a security interest in all items financed by us under this agreement. Each draw down under the loan has a term of 48 months from the date of the draw down. The original draw down period under the agreement expired on March 31, 2000. In September 2000, we obtained additional financing of $950,000, under an amendment to the original financing agreement. As of December 31, 2000, the principal balance under loans outstanding under this agreement was approximately $4.4 million. We plan to use available funds for ongoing commercial and research and development activities, working capital and other general corporate purposes and capital expenditures. We expect capital investments during 2001 will be comprised primarily of equipment purchases required in the normal course of business and expenditures for leasehold improvements. We intend to invest our excess cash in investment-grade, interest-bearing securities. We have obtained funding for our operations primarily through sales of preferred and common stock to venture capital investors, institutional investors and collaborators, payments under contractual arrangements with customers, collaborators and licensees and interest income. The cost, timing and amount of funds required for specific uses by us cannot be precisely determined at this time and will be based upon the progress and the scope of our collaborative and independent research and development projects; payments received under customer, collaborative and license agreements; our ability to establish and maintain customer, collaborative and license agreements; costs of protecting intellectual property rights; legal and administrative costs; additional facilities capacity needs and the availability of alternate methods of financing. We expect to incur substantial and increasing research and development expenses and intend to seek additional financing, as needed, through arrangements with customers, collaborators and licensees and equity or debt offerings. We cannot assure you that any additional financing we require will be available on favorable terms, or at all. We believe, at current spending levels, our existing capital resources and interest income thereon, will enable us to maintain our current and planned operations through at least the next 12 months. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or "FASB," issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 requires us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through net income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in the other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. SFAS 133 is effective for our year ending December 31, 2001. We do not currently hold any derivatives and we do not expect this pronouncement to materially impact results of operations. 23 26 In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," which must be adopted in the fourth quarter of 2000. SAB 101 summarizes certain areas of the Staff's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue in financial statements and specifically addresses revenue recognition for non-refundable technology access fees. We believe that our revenue recognition policies prior to adoption of SAB 101 complied with the requirements of SAB 101. In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation", which contains rules designed to clarify the application of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 was effective on July 1, 2000 and adopted by us at that time. The adoption of FIN 44 did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial position. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Short-Term Investments The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while, at the same time, maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we invest in highly liquid and high-quality debt securities. Our investments in debt securities are subject to interest rate risk. To minimize the exposure due to adverse shifts in interest rates, we invest in short-term securities and maintain an average maturity of less than one year. As a result, we do not believe we are subject to significant interest rate risk. The Company holds an investment in an equity security that is subject to market volatility. The fair value of the equity security recorded at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $2.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Foreign Currency Rate Fluctuations The functional currency for our German subsidiary is the deutsche mark. Our German subsidiary's accounts are translated from the German deutsche mark to the U.S. dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, for balance sheet accounts, and using the average exchange rate during the period, for revenues and expense accounts. The effects of translation are recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity, and to date, have not been material. Our German subsidiary conducts its business in local European currencies. Exchange gains and losses arising from these transactions are recorded using the actual exchange differences on the date of the transaction. We have not taken any action to reduce our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as options or futures contracts, with respect to transactions with our German subsidiary or transactions with our European collaborators and customers. 24 27 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE ---- Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.................................................... 26 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999......................................... 27 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998........... 28 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. 29 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998........... 30 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................................................... 31
25 28 REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Stockholders Lynx Therapeutics We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Palo Alto, California February 2, 2001 26 29 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 2000 1999 -------- -------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents ............................ $ 7,875 $ 18,050 Short-term investments ............................... 10,923 12,736 Accounts receivable .................................. 1,539 4,045 Other current assets ................................. 2,270 1,379 -------- -------- Total current assets ......................... 22,607 36,210 Property and equipment: Leasehold improvements ............................... 11,527 10,347 Laboratory and other equipment ....................... 13,555 8,025 -------- -------- 25,082 18,372 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization ....... (9,263) (5,494) -------- -------- Net property and equipment ............................. 15,819 12,878 Other non-current assets ............................... 789 2,550 -------- -------- $ 39,215 $ 51,638 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable ..................................... $ 1,640 $ 640 Accrued compensation ................................. 614 356 Deferred revenues -- current portion ................. 7,219 8,438 Note payable -- current portion ...................... 1,319 944 Other accrued liabilities ............................ 928 790 -------- -------- Total current liabilities .................... 11,720 11,168 Deferred revenues ...................................... 17,467 16,896 Note payable ........................................... 3,077 3,471 Other non-current liabilities .......................... 729 457 Commitments Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding ...... -- -- Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 11,443,702 and 11,219,188 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 75,851 74,606 1999, respectively ............................... Notes receivable from stockholders ................... (263) (293) Deferred compensation ................................ (1,557) (2,444) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ........ (1,157) 1,128 Accumulated deficit .................................. (66,652) (53,351) -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity ................... 6,222 19,646 -------- -------- $ 39,215 $ 51,638 ======== ========
See accompanying notes. 27 30 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- Revenues: Technology access and services fees ..... $ 12,389 $ 7,833 $ 2,625 Collaborative research and other ........ 235 5,042 4,380 -------- -------- -------- Total revenues .................. 12,624 12,875 7,005 Operating costs and expenses: Cost of services fees ................... 3,652 828 -- Research and development ................ 19,761 15,510 13,166 General and administrative .............. 6,170 4,175 2,141 -------- -------- -------- Total operating costs and expenses............... 29,583 20,513 15,307 -------- -------- -------- Loss from operations ...................... (16,959) (7,638) (8,302) Interest income, net ...................... 900 1,125 1,241 Other income .............................. 3,258 107 2,865 -------- -------- -------- Loss before provision for income taxes .... (12,801) (6,406) (4,196) Provision for income taxes ................ 500 258 151 -------- -------- -------- Net loss .................................. $(13,301) $ (6,664) $ (4,347) ======== ======== ======== Basic and diluted net loss per share ...... $ (1.17) $ (0.60) $ (0.45) -------- -------- -------- Shares used in per share computation ...... 11,388 11,128 9,642 ======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes. 28 31 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK ----------------------------- ----------------------------- SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1997 ................ 495,587 $ 27,189 5,892,353 $ 46,640 Comprehensive loss: Net loss ................................. -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive income (loss) ........ -- Net unrealized gain on securities ............................. -- -- -- -- Comprehensive loss ......................... -- -- -- -- Exercise of stock options for cash and note receivable ...................... -- -- 334,309 744 Repurchase of common stock ................. -- -- (49,717) (108) Conversion of series B, C and D preferred stock to common stock .......... (495,587) (27,189) 4,955,870 27,189 Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures ...... -- -- -- (416) Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........... -- -- -- 280 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1998 ................ -- -- 11,132,815 74,329 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss ................................. -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive income (loss) ........ Net unrealized gain on securities ........ -- -- -- -- Comprehensive loss ......................... -- -- -- -- Employee stock purchase plan issuance ...... -- -- 17,379 182 Exercise of stock options for cash and repayment of note receivable .... -- -- 68,994 196 Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures ...... -- -- -- (188) Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........... -- -- -- 87 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1999 ................ -- -- 11,219,188 74,606 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss ................................. -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive income (loss) ........ Net unrealized loss on securities ........ -- -- -- -- Comprehensive loss ......................... -- -- -- -- Net exercise of warrants ................... -- -- 29,597 -- Employee stock purchase plan issuance .................................. -- -- 16,532 288 Exercise of stock options for cash and repayment of note receivable .... -- -- 178,385 843 Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures .................... -- -- -- -- Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........... -- -- -- 114 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2000 ................ -- $ -- 11,443,702 $ 75,851 =========== =========== =========== ===========
NOTES ACCUMULATED RECEIVABLE OTHER TOTAL FROM DEFERRED COMPREHENSIVE ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS' STOCKHOLDERS COMPENSATION INCOME (LOSS) DEFICIT EQUITY ------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 ............. $ (460) $ (5,394) $ (45) $ (42,340) $ 25,590 Comprehensive loss: Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (4,347) (4,347) Other comprehensive income (loss) ..... Net unrealized gain on securities .......................... -- -- 38 38 ----------- Comprehensive loss ...................... -- -- -- -- (4,309) Exercise of stock options for cash and note receivable ................... (81) -- -- -- 663 Repurchase of common stock .............. 105 -- -- -- (3) Conversion of series B, C and D preferred stock to common stock ....... -- -- -- -- -- Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures ... -- 1,652 -- -- 1,236 Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........ -- -- -- -- 280 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1998 ............. (436) (3,742) (7) (46,687) 23,457 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (6,664) (6,664) Other comprehensive income (loss) ..... Net unrealized gain on securities ..... -- -- 1,135 -- 1,135 ----------- Comprehensive loss ...................... -- -- -- -- (5,529) Employee stock purchase plan issuance ... -- -- -- -- 182 Exercise of stock options for cash and repayment of note receivable . 143 -- -- -- 339 Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures ... -- 1,298 -- -- 1,110 Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........ -- -- -- -- 87 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1999 ............. (293) (2,444) 1,128 (53,351) 19,646 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (13,301) (13,301) Other comprehensive income (loss) ..... Net unrealized loss on securities ..... -- -- (2,285) -- (2,285) ----------- Comprehensive loss ...................... -- -- -- -- (15,586) Net exercise of warrants ................ -- -- -- -- -- Employee stock purchase plan issuance ............................... -- -- -- -- 288 Exercise of stock options for cash and repayment of note receivable . 30 -- -- -- 873 Amortization of deferred compensation, including forfeitures ................. -- 887 -- -- 887 Consulting and service expense related to stock option grants ........ -- -- -- -- 114 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2000 ............. $ (263) $ (1,557) $ (1,157) $ (66,652) $ 6,222 =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
See accompanying notes. 29 32 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss ............................................... $(13,301) $ (6,664) $ (4,347) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and leasehold improvements ............................ 3,769 1,964 1,176 Issuance of stock options to non-employees in exchange for services ............................. 114 87 111 Amortization of deferred compensation ................ 887 1,110 1,236 Gain on sale of antisense business ................... (3,119) -- -- Other ................................................ -- -- (138) CHANGES IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Accounts receivable .................................. 2,506 1,271 (5,072) Other current assets ................................. (891) (701) (479) Accounts payable ..................................... 1,000 (1,130) 1,579 Accrued liabilities .................................. 396 (3,106) 3,237 Deferred revenues .................................... (648) 14,667 8,375 Other noncurrent liabilities ......................... 272 269 9 -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities .... (9,015) 7,767 5,687 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchases of short-term investments .................... (8,097) (22,121) (21,767) Maturities of short-term investments ................... 12,543 17,016 30,245 Leasehold improvements and equipment purchases, net of retirements .......................................... (6,710) (5,205) (7,254) Notes receivable from officers and employees ........... 30 (248) (175) Other assets ........................................... (38) (122) -- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities .... (2,272) (10,680) 1,049 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Issuance of common stock, net of repurchases ........... 1,131 378 636 Proceeds from equipment loan ........................... 950 4,838 -- Repayment of equipment loan ............................ (969) (423) -- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities .............. 1,112 4,793 636 -------- -------- -------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ... (10,175) 1,880 7,372 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ......... 18,050 16,170 8,798 -------- -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ............... $ 7,875 $ 18,050 $ 16,170 ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION Income taxes paid ...................................... $ 110 $ 303 -- ======== ======== ======== Interest paid .......................................... $ 128 $ 174 -- ======== ======== ======== Following are the effects of the non-cash transactions relating to the sale of the antisense business assets sold, net of depreciation .............. -- -- $ 210 ======== ======== ======== Inex stock received ............................... -- -- $ 603 ======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes. 30 33 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. ("Lynx" or the "Company") is a leader in the development and application of novel technologies for the discovery of gene expression patterns and genomic variations important to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and agricultural industries. These technologies are based on Megaclone, Lynx's unique and proprietary cloning procedure. Megaclone transforms a sample containing millions of DNA molecules into one made up of millions of micro-beads, each of which carries approximately 100,000 copies of one of the DNA molecules in the sample. Based on Megaclone, Lynx has developed a suite of applications that have the potential to enhance the pace, scale and quality of genomics and genetics research programs. Currently, Lynx's principal collaborators and customers are BASF AG, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Aventis CropScience GmbH, Oxagen Limited Hybrigenics S.A., Genomics Collaborative Inc., Molecular Engines Laboratories SA, the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Phytera, Inc. and Celera Genomics. Additionally, Lynx has provided a license for the use of certain of its technologies to Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd. The Company's consolidated financial statements have been presented on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has experienced operating losses since its inception of $66.7 million, including a net loss of $13.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2000, and expects such losses to continue as it proceeds with the development and commercialization of its technology. The Company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $18.8 million at December 31, 2000. Management believes that its current capital resources along with cash to be generated from its existing collaboration arrangements will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its projected operating and capital requirements through December 31, 2001. Additionally, Lynx intends to seek additional financing, as needed, through arrangements with customers, collaborators and licensees and equity or debt offerings. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if required, will be available on satisfactory terms or at all. If the Company is unable to secure additional financing, management may need to reevaluate and revise its current operating plans as well as reduce its anticipated level of expenditures. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lynx Therapeutics GmbH, formed under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS The Company considers all investments in money market mutual funds, commercial paper and corporate bonds and notes with original maturities from the date of purchase of 90 days or less as cash equivalents. Investments with original maturities beyond 90 days are considered to be short-term investments. Equity securities are considered to be short-term investments. The Company's investment policy stipulates that the investment portfolio be maintained with the objectives of preserving principal, maintaining liquidity and maximizing return. The Company determines the appropriate classification of money market mutual funds, commercial paper and corporate bonds and notes at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company has classified its entire investment portfolio as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices, with the unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. The cost of investments in this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, which are included in interest income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, on available-for-sale securities, if any, are included in interest income or expense. The cost of securities sold, if any, is based on the specific identification method. 31 34 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED) The Company invests its excess cash in deposits with major banks and in money market and short-term debt securities of companies with strong credit ratings from a variety of industries. These securities generally mature within 365 days and, therefore, bear minimal interest-rate risk. The Company, by corporate policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and to any one type of investment. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at original cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is generally three years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the facility lease. REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenues from technology access fees have generally resulted from upfront payments from collaborators, customers and licensees who are provided access to Lynx's technologies for specified periods. The Company receives service fees from collaborators and customers for genomics discovery services performed by Lynx on the biological samples they send to Lynx. Collaborative research revenues are payments received under various agreements and include such items as milestone payments. Milestone payments are recognized pursuant to collaborative agreements upon the achievement of specified technology developments, representing the culmination of the earnings process, for financial accounting purposes. Other revenues include non-contract related revenues, such as the proceeds from the sale of technology assets to BASF-LYNX and product sales under one of Lynx's former programs. Technology access fees are deferred and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the noncancelable term of the agreement to which they relate. Payments for services and/or materials provided by Lynx are recognized as revenues when earned over the period in which the services are performed and/or materials are delivered, provided no other obligations, refunds or credits to be applied to future work exist. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the related milestone and the satisfaction of any related obligations. Revenues from the sales of products, which have been immaterial to date, are recognized upon shipment to the customer. During 2000, revenue from 3 collaborators and customers represented 51%, 29% and 11% of total revenues. During 1999, revenue from 3 collaborators and customers represented 81%, 13% and 5% of total revenues. During 1998, revenue from three collaborators and customers represented 61%, 33% and 5% of total revenues. NET LOSS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing income or loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, net of certain common shares outstanding which are subject to continued vesting and the Company's right of repurchase. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company, to the extent such securities are dilutive. Basic and diluted net loss per share is equivalent for all periods presented herein due to the Company's net loss in all periods. At December 31, 2000, options to purchase approximately 2,457,000 shares of common stock at a weighted-average price of $13.16 per share have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for 2000 because the effect of inclusion would be antidilutive. The options will be included in the calculation at such time as the effect is no longer antidilutive, as calculated using the treasury stock method. The weighted-average number of shares subject to repurchase for fiscal years 2000, 1999 and 1998 were 16,000, 55,000 and 152,000, respectively. The common shares which are outstanding but are subject to the Company's right of repurchase, which expires ratably over five years, have been excluded from the calculation of basic loss per share. The repurchasable shares will be included in the calculation of basic EPS at such time as the Company's right of repurchase lapses. See Note 7 for additional disclosure regarding common stock and stock options. 32 35 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related Interpretations. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. All stock option awards to non-employees are accounted for at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, as calculated using the Black-Scholes model, in accordance with FAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services." The option arrangements are subject to periodic remeasurement over their vesting terms. The Company recorded compensation expense related to option grants to non-employees of $114,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000, $87,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $111,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998. SEGMENT REPORTING Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS 131"), establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in financial statements. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company's business activities include the development of technologies aimed at handling and/or analyzing the DNA molecules or fragments in biological samples. Accordingly, the Company operates in only one business segment. All of the Company's assets and revenues are derived from this activity. Substantially all of the Company's assets are located in the United States. To date, revenues have been derived primarily from contracts with companies located in North America, Europe and Asia, as follows (revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customers):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) North America ...... $ 6,480 $10,440 $ 401 Europe ............. 5,394 2,435 6,542 Asia ............... 750 -- 62 ------- ------- ------- $12,624 $12,875 $ 7,005 ======= ======= =======
INCOME TAXES Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"), deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. SFAS 109 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not. Based upon the weight of available evidence, which includes the Company's historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses for the prior three years, the Company has provided a full valuation against its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. The Company intends to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 requires Lynx to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through net income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in the other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in 33 36 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED) earnings. SFAS 133 is effective for Lynx's year ending December 31, 2001. Lynx does not currently hold any derivatives and does not expect this pronouncement to materially impact results of operations. In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," which must be adopted in the fourth quarter of 2000. SAB 101 summarizes certain areas of the Staff's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue in financial statements and specifically addresses revenue recognition for non-refundable technology access fees. Lynx believes that its revenue recognition policies prior to adoption of SAB 101 complied with the requirements of SAB 101. In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation", which contains rules designed to clarify the application of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 was effective on July 1, 2000 and adopted by Lynx at that time. The adoption of FIN 44 did not have a material impact on Lynx's operating results or financial position. 2. INVESTMENTS The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities:
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES ---------------------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE --------- ---------- ---------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) DECEMBER 31, 2000 Equity securities ........... $ 3,791 $ -- $ (1,164) $ 2,627 Money market mutual funds ... 6,951 -- -- 6,951 Corporate bonds and notes ... 8,298 6 -- 8,304 -------- -------- -------- -------- $ 19,040 $ 6 $ (1,164) $ 17,882 ======== ======== ======== ======== DECEMBER 31, 1999 Equity securities ........... $ 603 $ 1,196 $ -- $ 1,799 Money market mutual funds ... 9,624 -- -- 9,624 Commercial paper ............ 10,449 -- (45) 10,404 Corporate bonds and notes ... 8,781 -- (23) 8,758 -------- -------- -------- -------- $ 29,457 $ 1,196 $ (68) $ 30,585 ======== ======== ======== ========
During the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company did not sell any equity securities. As of December 31, 2000, $7.0 million of the marketable securities were classified as cash equivalents and $10.9 million were classified as short-term investments. As of December 31, 1999, $16.1 million of the marketable securities were classified as cash equivalents, $12.7 million were classified as short-term investments and $1.8 million were classified as other non-current assets. All short-term investments have maturities of less than one year. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. 3. COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS BASF and BASF-LYNX In October 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with BASF to provide them with nonexclusive access to certain of its genomics discovery services. In connection with certain technology development accomplishments, BASF paid Lynx a technology access fee of $4.5 million in the fourth quarter of 1999. BASF's access to our genomics discovery services is for a minimum of two years and requires BASF to purchase services at a minimum rate of $4.0 million per year. BASF paid Lynx $4.0 million in each of the fourth quarters of 1999 and 2000 for genomics discovery services to be performed by Lynx. 34 37 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 3. COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) In 1996, the Company formed a joint venture company with BASF called BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. BASF-LYNX is located in Heidelberg, Germany. BASF-LYNX began operations in 1997 and is employing Lynx's technologies primarily to discover and validate novel gene targets for CNS disorders. The Company has contributed access to its technologies to BASF-LYNX in exchange for an initial 49% equity ownership. BASF, by committing to provide research funding to BASF-LYNX of DM50 million (or approximately $23.3 million based on a March 2001 exchange rate) over a five-year period beginning in 1997, received an initial 51% equity ownership in BASF-LYNX. In 1998, BASF agreed to provide an additional $10 million in research funding to BASF-LYNX, of which $4.3 million was paid to Lynx for technology assets related to a CNS program. DuPont In October 1998, the Company entered into a research collaboration agreement with DuPont to apply Lynx's technologies on an exclusive basis to the study of certain crops and their protection. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company could receive payments over a five-year period for genomics discovery services, the achievement of specific technology milestones and the delivery of genomic maps of specified crops. An initial payment of $10 million for technology access was received at the execution of the agreement, with additional minimum service fees of $12 million to be received by Lynx over a three-year period which commenced in January 1999. In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company achieved a technology milestone under the agreement that resulted in a $5 million payment from DuPont. Aventis CropScience In March 1999, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, formerly Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., obtained nonexclusive access to certain of Lynx's genomics discovery services for the benefit of its affiliate, Aventis CropScience. The Company received an initial payment for genomics discovery services to be performed by Lynx for Aventis CropScience. The service period, which was renewed in March 2000, ends on March 31, 2001, subject to renewal for up to two additional one-year periods. In September 1999, the Company signed a three-year research collaboration agreement with Aventis CropScience. Aventis CropScience will receive exclusive access to certain of Lynx's genomics discovery services for the study of certain plants, which is aimed at developing new crop varieties and other agricultural products. Under the terms of the agreement, Aventis CropScience paid Lynx a technology access fee upon execution of the agreement. The Company can earn additional fees for the performance of genomics discovery services, the delivery of genomic maps of certain plants and milestone payments and licensing fees related to the discovery of trait-associated SNPs for the subject plants. Oxagen In May 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with Oxagen to collaborate on a program to discover and validate disease-associated SNPs using Lynx's Megatype technology. The program initially focuses on inflammatory bowel disease, but the companies may extend it to other common human disorders. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company could receive licensing fees and royalties or otherwise share in the revenues, if any, from the licensing or sale and subsequent commercialization of related products by Oxagen or third parties. Hybrigenics In May 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Hybrigenics to collaborate on a program to discover expressed genes and protein interactions and pathways in human obesity, through applying Lynx's Megasort and MPSS technologies and Hybrigenics' technologies. The goal is to use the findings to create new diagnostics and treatments for this important disease area. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. 35 38 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 3. COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) Genomics Collaborative In August 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Genomics Collaborative to conduct a comprehensive genome-wide scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, that are associated with type 2 diabetes, also known a non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, using Lynx's Megatype technology. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. Molecular Engines Laboratories In October 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Molecular Engines Laboratories SA (MEL) to collaborate on a program to identify differentially expressed genes associated with tumor reversion, through applying Lynx's Megasort technology to cancer cell lines provided by MEL. MEL plans to incorporate the findings into its overall research in the areas of tumor reversion, tumor suppression, programmed cell death, cell growth arrest and other processes involving cell death. Elucidation of the differentially expressed genes could lead to the development of research, diagnostic and therapeutic products or services in the cancer field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive payments from MEL for genomic discovery services as well as royalty payments from the commercialization of any products or services stemming from the scientific results of the research program. Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology In October 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, or IMCB, an institute affiliated with the National University of Singapore, to collaborate on a broad program designed to discover genes and molecular mechanisms involved in cancer, infectious diseases, and other diseases prevalent in Asia Pacific. The Company will apply its Megasort and MPSS technologies to samples provided by the IMCB to discover differentially expressed genes. The IMCB will then use these discoveries to further characterize the genes involved in the disease processes, using its technologies and biological expertise. The data from the combined program are expected to provide unique insights into diseases that could lead to research, diagnostics and therapeutic products or services. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive from the IMCB payments for technology access fees and for genomics discovery services to be performed by Lynx. Additionally, the Company could share in the profits, if any, from the licensing or sale of the scientific results of the collaboration to a third party. Takara In November 2000, the Company entered into a technology licensing agreement with Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd. of Japan. The license provides Takara with the right in Japan, Korea and China, including Taiwan, to use Lynx's proprietary Megaclone, Megasort and MPSS technologies exclusively for at least five years, and non-exclusively thereafter, to provide genomics discovery services and to manufacture and sell microarrays containing content identified by Lynx's technologies. Takara also receives from Lynx a non-exclusive license right to manufacture and sell such microarrays elsewhere throughout the world. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive from Takara payments for technology access fees, royalties on sales of microarrays and revenues from genomics discovery services, the sale to Takara of proprietary reagents used in applying Lynx's technologies and purchases of Lynx common stock. 4. SALE OF THE ANTISENSE BUSINESS In March 1998, Lynx sold its portfolio of phosphorothioate antisense patents and licenses and its therapeutic oligonucleotide manufacturing facility (collectively, the "Antisense Business") to Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation ("Inex"), a Canadian company. As partial consideration in this transaction, Lynx received $3 million in cash and will receive 1.2 million shares of Inex common stock, in three equal installments, with the first 400,000 shares received in March 1998, and the second 400,000 shares received in March 2000. The third installment of stock is to be received in March 2001. The Inex common stock received by Lynx is subject to certain restrictions on trading for specific periods of time following receipt by Lynx, with the sale restriction on the initial 400,000 shares and second installment of 400,000 shares having expired on March 10, 2000, and March 10, 2001, respectively. Lynx is also entitled to receive royalties on future sales of phosphorothioate antisense products. In addition, Lynx is also entitled to receive royalties under a license to Inex for phosphoroamidate chemistry for certain therapeutic applications in the fields of cancer and inflammation. 36 39 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. SALE OF THE ANTISENSE BUSINESS (CONTINUED) The gain on the sale of the Antisense Business in 1998 is based on the cash and the first installment of the Inex common stock received on the transaction date, net of the book value of the assets transferred to Inex and certain other costs associated with the transaction and incurred by Lynx. Subsequent installments of Inex common stock are recorded at fair value by Lynx in other income when received. As of December 31, 2000, Inex common stock was classified as equity securities in short-term investments. As of December 31, 1999, Inex common stock was classified as equity securities in other non-current assets. 5. LICENSE AGREEMENTS Lynx has entered into various license agreements with companies and academic institutions. Such agreements generally require Lynx to pay annual or semiannual license fees and are generally cancelable upon 60 to 120 days' notice. The expenses associated with licenses were approximately $90,000 and $86,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Lynx recorded a credit to expense of approximately $27,000 in the year ended December 31, 1998 for license fees which had been paid, then subsequently included in the sale of the antisense business. 6. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM OFFICERS In 1999, the Company entered into loan agreements with officers of the Company. The aggregate loans total $360,000, are secured by second mortgages on real property, have interest accruable at the rate of 4.83% to 6.02% per annum and are subject to early repayment under specified circumstances. The principal and interest on the loans will be forgiven, based on the officers' continuous employment over a four-year period, in the following amounts: 50% on the second anniversary dates of employment; and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates of employment. In August 1998, the Company entered into two loan agreements with an officer of the Company. Each loan is in the amount of $100,000, secured by a second mortgage on real property, with interest accruable at the rate of 5.57% per annum, and subject to early repayment under specified circumstances. The principal and interest on one loan will be forgiven, based on the officer's continuous employment over a four-year period, in the following amounts: 50% on the second anniversary date of employment; and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates of employment. The second loan is to be repaid by the officer according to the following schedule: 50% of the principal on the third anniversary date of employment; and the remainder of the principal plus accrued interest on the fourth anniversary date of employment. In April 1997, the Company entered into a full-recourse loan agreement with an officer of the Company. A note receivable of $250,000 was issued under a stock purchase agreement for the purchase of 50,000 shares of common stock whereby all the shares issued under the agreement are pledged as collateral. The outstanding principal amount is due and payable in full in April 2002, subject to an obligation to prepay under specified circumstances. Interest is payable upon the expiration or termination of the note and accrues at the rate of 6.49% per annum. 7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY PREFERRED STOCK On March 31, 1998, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation, dated September 30, 1997, 332,288 shares of Series B preferred stock, 123,299 shares of Series C preferred stock and 40,000 shares of Series D preferred stock converted into 4,955,870 shares of common stock. 37 40 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED) COMMON STOCK At December 31, 2000, Lynx has reserved 2,915,213 shares of common stock for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding employee and nonemployee stock options and upon the issuance of shares to be purchased pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan as noted below: Stock option grants outstanding ........ 2,456,533 Shares available for option grants ..... 292,591 Employee stock purchase plan shares .... 166,089 --------- 2,915,213 =========
In October 1997, Lynx issued 2,675,500 shares of common stock, resulting in net proceeds of $25.1 million, pursuant to a common stock purchase agreement between the Company and certain investors. In connection with this transaction, warrants were issued by the Company to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $14.00 per share. The warrants were exercised in January 2000. In November 1996, Lynx issued 959,182 shares of common stock in exchange for 737,832 shares of Spectragen, Inc. common stock held by certain officers, employees and one consultant of Spectragen, pursuant to an Agreement of Merger between Lynx and Spectragen. Spectragen was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lynx at the time of the exchange. A portion of the shares are subject to repurchase rights, which expire ratably over a five-year period. Pursuant to the merger, and in accordance with APB 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," Lynx recognized compensation and consultant expense of $2.1 million and recorded approximately $1.4 million in deferred compensation for the difference between the fair market value of the Lynx stock and the deemed fair market value of the Spectragen stock on the day of acquisition. The deferred compensation will be charged ratably to expense as the repurchase rights expire. Also in November 1996, Lynx issued options to purchase 524,355 shares of Lynx common stock in exchange for options to purchase 403,350 Spectragen common stock pursuant to the Agreement of Merger between the Company and Spectragen. In accordance with APB 25, Lynx recognized deferred compensation of $712,000 representing the difference between the exercise price of the options and the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the day of the exchange. The deferred compensation is being charged to expense over the respective vesting period of the grants. 1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN In July 1992, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") adopted, and the stockholders subsequently approved, the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan"). In May 2000, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 1992 Plan, authorizing the increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1992 Plan from a total of 4,200,000 shares to 4,800,000 shares and the inclusion of directors (including non-employee directors) of the Company and its affiliates as eligible to participate in the 1992 Plan. In May 1996, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 1992 Plan extending the term of the 1992 Plan until March 2006. Under the 1992 Plan, the exercise price of incentive options granted may not be less than 100% (110% in the case of options granted to a person who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company) of the fair market value of common stock at the date of grant. Nonqualified options may be granted at not less than 85% of fair market value at the date of grant. Options generally vest over a five-year period from the date of grant and have a term of ten years (five years in the case of options granted to a person who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). In December 1997, the Board of Directors approved the commencement of vesting of certain performance-based stock options that had been granted to certain employees prior to the merger between Spectragen and Lynx. In connection with this action, Lynx recognized deferred compensation of $4.1 million representing the difference between the exercise price of the options and the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the time of the December 1997 approval. The deferred compensation will be charged to expense over the period beginning December 1997, through the end of the five-year vesting period. 38 41 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED) The stock option activity under the 1992 Plan was as follows:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING --------------------------------------------------- AVAILABLE FOR NUMBER OF SHARES WEIGHTED AVERAGE GRANT SUBJECT TO OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE ------------- ------------------ ---------------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 ...... 360,808 1,626,254 $ 3.22 Shares authorized ............... 600,000 -- -- Options granted ................. (407,500) 407,500 $ 11.27 Options exercised ............... -- (334,309) $ 2.27 Options canceled ................ 232,533 (269,723) $ 5.30 ---------- ---------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 ...... 785,841 1,429,722 $ 5.35 Shares authorized ............... 200,000 -- -- Options granted ................. (639,000) 639,000 $ 11.20 Options exercised ............... -- (68,994) $ 2.70 Options canceled ................ 40,246 (57,231) $ 7.10 ---------- ---------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 ...... 387,087 1,942,497 $ 7.32 Shares authorized ............... 600,000 -- -- Options granted ................. (736,500) 736,500 $ 26.42 Options exercised ............... -- (178,385) $ 4.72 Options canceled ................ 42,004 (44,079) $ 11.31 ---------- ---------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 ...... 292,591 2,456,533 $ 13.16 ========== ==========
To date, all options granted under the 1992 Plan are nonqualified options. Certain officers and employees of the Company were granted the right to exercise their options prior to vesting, subject to the Company's right of repurchase at the original issue price, which lapses ratably over five years. As of December 31, 2000, 15,609 shares outstanding were subject to repurchase. The options outstanding at December 31, 2000, have been segregated into ranges for additional disclosure as follows:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ OPTIONS WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED- OPTIONS CURRENTLY WEIGHTED- OUTSTANDING AT REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AT AVERAGE RANGE OF DECEMBER 31, CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE DECEMBER 31, EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICES 2000 (IN YEARS) PRICE 2000 PRICE - --------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- --------- $ 0.10 - $ 1.00 .... 180,809 3.95 $ 0.89 171,889 $ 0.92 $ 1.54 - $ 1.54 .... 268,622 5.60 $ 1.54 127,307 $ 1.54 $ 2.00 - $ 6.00 .... 298,764 5.30 $ 4.97 257,458 $ 4.99 $ 7.13 - $ 9.38 .... 252,400 7.69 $ 8.69 115,129 $ 8.66 $ 9.44 - $11.13 .... 477,750 8.90 $ 10.85 95,734 $ 10.92 $11.50 - $13.13 .... 282,008 8.66 $ 11.81 81,496 $ 11.83 $13.25 - $15.75 .... 332,180 8.04 $ 15.31 103,710 $ 15.00 $16.00 - $40.50 .... 257,500 9.61 $ 27.35 4,313 $ 32.57 $40.88 - $55.25 .... 26,500 9.42 $ 48.70 0 $ 0.00 $76.75 - $ 76.75 ... 80,000 9.15 $ 76.75 10,832 $ 76.75 --------- --------- $ 0.10 - $ 76.75 ... 2,456,533 7.56 $ 13.16 967,868 $ 7.41 ========= =========
As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, options to purchase 967,868, 709,433 and 505,522 shares were exercisable under the 1992 plan, respectively. PRO FORMA INFORMATION Pro forma information regarding net loss and net loss per share is required by SFAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $20.38, $7.87 and $6.74 per share, respectively. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model for the single option approach with the following weighted-average assumptions: a risk-free interest rate of 6.0%, 4.97% and 5.5% for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively; a weighted-average expected life of five years for 2000 grants, five years for 1999 grants and 5.1 years for 1998 grants; an expected dividend yield of zero for all three years; and a volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of 100% for 2000, 86% for 1999 and 64% for 1998. 39 42 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED) The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company's stock options. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards under the plan consistent with the method of SFAS 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) Net loss Historical ........................... $ (13,301) $ (6,664) $ (4,347) Pro forma ............................ $ (16,839) $ (7,874) $ (5,610) Net loss per share Historical ........................... $ (1.17) $ (0.60) $ (0.45) Pro Forma ............................ $ (1.48) $ (0.71) $ (0.58)
1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN In May 1998, the stockholders approved the adoption of the Company's 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"). The Purchase Plan authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares of common stock pursuant to purchase rights granted to employees of the Company and is intended to be an "employee stock purchase plan" as defined in Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of December 31, 2000, a total of 33,911 shares of common stock have been issued to employees at an aggregate purchase price of $470,706 and a weighted average purchase price of $13.88 per share pursuant to offerings under the Purchase Plan, and 166,089 shares remain available for future issuance. Under SFAS 123, the fair value for these purchase options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2000 and 1999, respectively: risk-free interest rate of 6.0% and 4.97%; no dividend yields; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of 100% and 86%; and a weighted average expected life of 0.55 and 0.49 years. The weighted average fair value of those purchase rights granted in 2000 and 1999, respectively, was $7.58 and $5.13. 8. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes of $500,000 for 2000 consists of foreign withholding tax due on a payment received from one of Lynx's customers. The provision for income taxes of approximately $258,000 for 1999 and $151,000 for 1998 consists entirely of alternative minimum tax. The reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) attributable to continuing operations computed at the U.S. federal statutory rates to income tax expense (benefit) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 is as follows (in thousands):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- Tax provision (benefit) at U.S statutory rate .... $(4,352) $(2,178) $(1,427) Alternative minimum tax .......................... -- 258 151 Foreign taxes .................................... 500 -- -- Loss for which no tax benefit is currently recognizable ..................................... 4,352 2,178 1,427 ------- ------- ------- $ 500 $ 258 $ 151 ======= ======= =======
40 43 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows (in thousands):
2000 1999 -------- -------- Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss carryforwards ............... $ 13,427 $ 6,717 Research and development tax credit carryforwards ................................. 5,124 1,816 Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards ... 218 290 Capitalized research and development expenditures ................................. 1,422 859 Deferred revenues .............................. 9,865 10,124 Reserves and accruals .......................... 741 494 Other, net ..................................... -- 702 Valuation allowance ............................ (30,623) (21,002) -------- -------- Net deferred tax assets .......................... 174 -- Deferred tax liabilities: Other ............................................ 174 -- -------- -------- Net deferred tax assets .......................... $ -- $ -- ======== ========
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, if any, the timing and the amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance, in an amount equal to the net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 has been established to reflect these uncertainties. The change in the valuation allowance was a net increase of approximately $9.6 million and $3.6 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Approximately $2.0 million of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets relates to benefits of stock option deductions which, when recognized will be allocated directly to contributed capital. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $38.6 million, which will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2020, if not utilized. The Company has a state net operating loss carryforward of approximately $5.3 million, which will expire in 2010. As of December 31, 2000, the Company also had federal and California research and development and other tax credit carryforwards of approximately $3.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The federal research and development credit will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2020, if not utilized. Utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in expiration of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards before full utilization. Utilization of federal and California net operating losses and credit carryforwards incurred prior to February 1994 is limited on an annual basis under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as a result of an ownership change in 1994. 9. OBLIGATIONS UNDER OPERATING LEASES In August 1993, the Company entered into a noncancelable operating lease for facilities which expires on July 31, 2003. In 1998, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease a portion of this space, and in 1999 through a subsequent agreement, subleased the remaining portion of the facility. The term of the sublease runs through July 2003. Rent from the sublease is sufficient to cover the rent and other operating expenses incurred by Lynx under the terms of the 1993 Lease. In February 1998, the Company entered into a noncancelable operating lease for facilities. The term of the lease commenced on December 15, 1998 and expires on December 14, 2008. Under the terms of the lease, the monthly rental payments are fixed for the first 24 months. Thereafter, the monthly rental payments increase and are subject to annual Consumer Price Index-based adjustments, with minimum and maximum limits. The Company is recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. The Company has the option to extend the lease for an additional five-year period, subject to certain conditions, with payments to be determined at the time of the exercise of the option. 41 44 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 9. OBLIGATIONS UNDER OPERATING LEASES (CONTINUED) In June 1998, Lynx GmbH entered into a noncancelable operating lease for facilities space of approximately 6,300 square feet in Heidelberg, Germany, to house its operations. The space will be developed and occupied in phases, depending on the growth of the organization. The lease terminates in June 2005. A portion of such space is currently being subleased by BASF-LYNX. The Company also leases equipment under various operating lease agreements subject to minimum annual lease payments. Minimum annual rental commitments and sublease income under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
SUBLEASE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31: COMMITMENTS INCOME ----------- -------- 2001 ............... $ 2,792 $ 1,117 2002 ............... 2,901 1,144 2003 ............... 2,691 682 2004 ............... 2,432 -- 2005 ............... 2,498 -- Thereafter ......... 7,524 -- ------- ------- $20,838 $ 2,943 ======= =======
Rent expense for facilities and equipment under operating leases was $2,055,000, $1,733,000 and $738,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Rental income for the facility under sublease was $1,127,000, $990,000 and $186,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. 10. 401(k) PLAN In October 1992, Lynx adopted a 401(k) Plan covering all of its employees. Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to 15% (subject to an annual limit prescribed by the Code as described below) and have the amount of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan permits, but does not require, additional contributions to the 401(k) Plan by Lynx on behalf of all participants in the 401(k) Plan. In the years ended 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company contributed $74,000, $52,000 and $49,000, respectively. 11. EQUIPMENT FINANCING In 1998, the Company entered into a financing agreement with a financial institution ("Lender") under which Lynx drew down $4.8 million during 1999 for the purchase of equipment and certain other capital expenditures. Lynx granted the lender a security interest in all items financed by the Company under this agreement. Each draw down under the loan has a term of 48 months from the date of the draw down at interest rates ranging from 10.9% to 11.8% The original draw down period under the agreement expired on March 31, 2000. In September 2000, Lynx obtained additional financing of $950,000, under an amendment to the original financing agreement. As of December 31, 2000, the principal balance under loans outstanding under this agreement was approximately $4.4 million. Accumulated depreciation relating to these assets amounted to $2.5 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The carrying amounts of the Company's borrowings under its equipment financing approximate their fair values. The fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Principal payments based on equipment loans outstanding at December 31, 2000 are (in thousands): 2001.............................. $1,319 2002.............................. 1,393 2003.............................. 1,420 2004.............................. 264 ------ $4,396 ======
42 45 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED) Phytera In January 2001, the Company entered into a collaboration with Phytera, Inc. to identify genes from plants involved in the biosynthesis of anti-oxidant polyphenols, naturally occurring compounds with nutraceutical and pharmaceutical activity. Phytera will select plant species from its culture libraries and apply its proprietary ExPAND(R) manipulation technology to regulate the expression of the metabolic pathways and genes responsible for the production of specific anti-oxidant polyphenolic compounds. Lynx will then use its proprietary Megasort technology to identify genes activated after target compounds are induced. Lynx and Phytera intend to validate gene targets and jointly commercialize the genes with other partners in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical sectors. Celera In March 2001, the Company entered into two agreements with Celera Genomics. The first agreement involves the integration of sets of Lynx's high-resolution gene expression data, derived from normal human tissues analyzed using Lynx's MPSS technology, into Celera's database products for distribution to Celera's customers through the Celera Discovery System (CDS). Under a second agreement, Lynx will apply its MPSS technology to perform additional gene expression analyses various tissues for Celera and to help supplement the Lynx database offering. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. 43 46 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The Company's executive officers, directors and certain employees, and their ages as of February 15, 2001 are as follows:
NAME AGE POSITION - ---- --- -------- Craig C. Taylor(1)(2)................. 50 Chairman of the Board Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D............ 48 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Edward C. Albini...................... 43 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Stephen C. Macevicz, Ph.D............. 51 Vice President, Intellectual Property William Wong, Ph.D.................... 52 Vice President, Business Development Richard C. Woychik, Ph.D.............. 48 Chief Scientific Officer Sydney Brenner, M.B., D. Phil......... 73 Director and Principal Scientific Advisor William K. Bowes, Jr.(1)(2)........... 74 Director Leroy Hood, M.D., Ph.D................ 62 Director James C. Kitch(1)(2).................. 53 Director
- ------------ (1) Member of the Audit Committee. (2) Member of the Compensation Committee. Craig C. Taylor was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of Lynx in December 2000 and has served as a director since March 1994, and served as Acting Chief Financial Officer from July 1994 to April 1997. He has been active in venture capital since 1977, when he joined Asset Management Company, a venture capital firm. He is a general partner of AMC Partners 89 L.P., which serves as the general partner of Asset Management Associates 1989 L.P., a private venture capital partnership. He currently serves as a director of Pharmacyclics, Inc., a biotechnology company, and several private companies. Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D., joined Lynx in October 1999 as President and Chief Executive Officer and was elected to the Board of Directors in December 1999. Prior to joining Lynx, he was Head of Biological Science and Technology at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceutical company. His previous positions in 20 years at Zeneca included Head of Target Discovery, Head of International Genomics and Head of Biotechnology. Dr. Russell earned a Ph.D. in Physiology from Glasgow University, Scotland. Edward C. Albini has served as Chief Financial Officer of Lynx since April 1997. He was elected Secretary in February 1998. From January 1983 to April 1997, Mr. Albini served in various financial management positions with Genentech, Inc., a biotechnology company. His most recent role at Genentech was as the Director of Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Albini holds a BS degree in Accounting from Santa Clara University and an MBA degree from the Walter A. Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Albini is also a certified public accountant. Stephen C. Macevicz, Ph.D., joined Lynx in September 1995 as Vice President, Intellectual Property. He was Senior Patent Attorney and chief patent counsel at Applied Biosystems, Inc. from 1992 to August 1995 and, from 1986 to 1992, Patent Counsel at DNAX Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, a research subsidiary of Schering-Plough Corporation. He received his law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall, and his Ph.D. in Biophysics from the University of California, Berkeley. William Wong, Ph.D., joined Lynx in January 2001 as Vice President, Business Development. He was Executive Vice President, Business Development at Nexell, a therapeutics company, from 1998 to 2000, Executive Director, Technology and Business Development at Intracel Corp., a biotechnology company, from 1995 to 1998, Sr. Vice President and General Manager at Zynaxis, Inc., a drug delivery and diagnostics company, from 1994 to 1995, and he held various positions at Zynaxis from 1990 to 1994. Dr. Wong received his Ph.D. from the University of Rochester, School of Medicine, Rochester, New York. Richard C. Woychik, Ph.D., joined Lynx in January 2001 as Chief Scientific Officer. Prior to joining Lynx, Dr. Woychik was Senior Director and Head of the Global R&D Molecular Genetics Research Center at Pfizer, a pharmaceutical company, from 1998 to 2000. From 1997 to 1998, Dr. Woychik was a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Genetics and Pharmacology and Vice Chairman for Research in Pediatrics at Case Western Reserve University and from 1987 to 1997, he was a research scientist at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Dr. Woychik earned his Ph.D. in Molecular Biology at Case Western Reserve University. 44 47 Sydney Brenner, M.B., D.Phil., has served as a director of Lynx since October 1993. He is a distinguished Professor at the Salk Institute of Biological Studies in La Jolla, California. He served as Director and President of The Molecular Sciences Institute, a non-profit research institute in Berkeley, California from July 1996 to January 2001, when he retired as Director of Research. In September 1996, he retired from his position of Honorary Professor of Genetic Medicine, University of Cambridge Clinical School. From 1986 to his retirement in 1991, Dr. Brenner directed the Medical Research Council Unit of Molecular Genetics. He was a member of the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, until December 1994. Dr. Brenner is the principal inventor of Lynx's bead-based technologies. William K. Bowes, Jr., has served as a director of Lynx since March 1994. He has been a general partner of U.S. Venture Partners, a venture capital partnership, since 1981. He currently serves as a director of Amgen, Inc., a biotechnology company, AMCC, an integrated circuit company, XOMA Corporation, a biotechnology company, and one U.S. Venture Partners privately owned portfolio company. Leroy Hood, M.D., Ph.D., has served as a director of Lynx since May 2000. In December 1999, he founded the Institute of Systems Biology, a private nonprofit research institute, and currently serves as the President and a director. From 1992 to 1999, he was the Chair of the Molecular Biotechnology Department at the University of Washington and the William Gates III Professor of Biomedical Sciences. Dr. Hood received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins Medical School and Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology. He has been a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1982. James C. Kitch has served as a director of Lynx since February 1993 and Secretary of Lynx from February 1992 to December 1997. Since 1979, he has been a partner at Cooley Godward LLP, a law firm, which has provided legal services to Lynx. COMPLIANCE WITH THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 16(a) Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent (10%) stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, during the calendar year ended December 31, 2000, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent (10%) beneficial owners were complied with. 45 48 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth certain compensation paid by the Company during the calendar years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, to its Chief Executive Officer and the two other most highly compensated executive officers whose compensation exceeded $100,000 (the "Named Executive Officers"): SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM ANNUAL COMPENSATION OTHER ANNUAL NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY (1) OPTIONS (#) COMPENSATION - --------------------------- ---- ---------- ----------- ------------ Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D.(2) ............. 2000 $262,571 -- -- President & Chief Executive Officer ...... 1999 $109,527 200,000 $ 33,212(2) Edward C. Albini ........................... 2000 $196,405 70,000 $ 750(3) Chief Financial Officer .................. 1999 $163,730 -- $ 750(3) 1998 $147,336 50,000 $ 750(3) Stephen C. Macevicz, Ph.D .................. 2000 $191,538 20,000 $ 750(3) Vice President, Intellectual Property .... 1999 $176,549 20,000 $ 750(3) 1998 $167,611 -- $ 750(3)
- ------------ (1) Includes amounts earned but deferred at the election of the Named Executive Officer pursuant to the Company's 401(k) Plan. (2) Dr. Russell joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer on October 18, 1999. Prior to this time, Dr. Russell was employed at Lynx Therapeutics GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, from July 1, 1999. Dr. Russell's compensation received while employed at Lynx GmbH is reflected under Other Annual Compensation. (3) Contributions made by the Company to the Company's 401(k) Plan on behalf of such employee. Except as disclosed above, no compensation characterized as long-term compensation, including restricted stock awards issued at a price below fair market value or long-term incentive plan payouts, was paid by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2000, to any of the Named Executive Officers. STOCK OPTION GRANTS AND EXERCISES The Company grants options to its executive officers under its 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended. As of February 15, 2001, options to purchase a total of 2,655,290 shares were outstanding under the 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and options to purchase 91,499 shares remained available for grant thereunder. The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding options granted during the year ended December 31, 2000. OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT ASSUMED INDIVIDUAL GRANTS ANNUAL RATES --------------------------------------------------------------------- OF STOCK PRICE NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL APPRECIATION SECURITIES OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE OR FOR OPTION TERM (2) UNDERLYING OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE EXPIRATION -------------------------- NAME GRANTED IN FISCAL YEAR (1) ($/SH) DATE 5%($) 10%($) ------------------ ------------------ ----------- ---------- --------- ----------- Edward C. Albini ........... 40,000 5.43% 76.75 02/22/10 1,930,706 4,892,789 30,000 4.07% 15.75 05/26/10 297,153 753,043 Stephen C. Macevicz, Ph.D .. 20,000 2.72% 10.63 12/10/10 133,703 338,830
- ------------ (1) Based on options for an aggregate of 736,500 shares granted to employees of, and consultants to, the Company during the year ended December 31, 2000, including the Named Executive Officer. 46 49 (2) The potential realizable value is calculated based on the term of the option at its time of grant (ten years). It is calculated by assuming that the stock price on the date of grant appreciates at the indicated annual rate, compounded annually for the entire term of the option, and that option is exercised and sold on the last day of the term for the appreciated stock price. The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2000, and the number of shares covered by both exercisable and unexercisable stock options held by the Named Executive Officers. Also reported are values for "in-the-money" options that represent the positive spread between the respective exercise prices of outstanding options and the fair market value of the Company's common stock as of December 29, 2000 ($9.00 per share). AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND OPTION VALUEs
VALUE OF UNEXERCISED NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT SHARES OPTIONS AT YEAR-END YEAR-END (1) ACQUIRED ON VALUE ----------------------------- ---------------------------- NAME EXERCISE REALIZED (1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D. -- -- 56,666 143,334 0 0 Edward C. Albini ......... -- -- 28,333 21,667 0 0 -- -- 6,666 33,334 0 0 -- -- 3,500 26,500 0 0 Stephen C. Macevicz ...... 14,000 238,840 1,000 0 8,000 0 34,666 620,868 4,334 0 38,356 0 -- -- 4,000 16,000 0 0 -- -- 0 20,000 0 0
- ------- (1) Based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock at December 29, 2000 ($9.00), minus the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of shares underlying the options. EMPLOYMENT SEVERANCE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS In October 1999, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Norman J. W. Russell, President and Chief Executive Officer, providing for an annual compensation of $255,000 per year and an option to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.31 per share, subject to a five-year vesting schedule. If Dr. Russell is terminated due to a change in control of the Company, Dr. Russell's shares covered by the option shall accelerate so that fifty percent of the then unvested shares covered by the option shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon the effective date of the change in control. The Company also provided Dr. Russell with a loan in the amount of $250,000 for the sole purpose of the purchase of a house, which loan shall be secured by the property, and is forgivable over a four-year period. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS Directors are not compensated by the Company for services as directors. Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Company's 1992 Plan. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION The Company's Compensation Committee was established in March 1994 and is currently composed of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Bowes, Kitch and Taylor. Mr. Taylor served as Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company from July 1994 to April 1997. There were no officers or employees of the Company who participated in deliberations of the Company's Compensation Committee concerning executive officer compensation during the year ended December 31, 2000. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION The Company's Bylaws provide that the Company will indemnify its directors and executive officers and may indemnify its other officers, employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The Company is also empowered under its Bylaws to enter into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers and to purchase insurance on behalf of any person whom it is required or permitted to indemnify. Pursuant to this provision, the Company has entered into indemnity agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. 47 50 In addition, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, the Company's directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of the directors' fiduciary duty of care to the Company and its stockholders. This provision in the Certificate of Incorporation does not eliminate the duty of care, and in appropriate circumstances, equitable remedies such as an injunction or other forms of nonmonetary relief would remain available under Delaware law. Each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the Company, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law, for acts or omissions that the director believes to be contrary to the best interests of the Company or its stockholders, for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit, for acts or omissions involving a reckless disregard for the director's duty to the Company or its stockholders when the director was aware or should have been aware of a risk of serious injury to the Company or its stockholders, for acts or omissions that constitute an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director's duty to the Company or its stockholders, for improper transactions between the director and the Company and for improper distributions to stockholders and loans to directors and officers. This provision also does not affect a director's responsibilities under any other laws such as the federal securities laws or state or federal environmental laws. No pending material litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer, employee or other agent of the Company as to which indemnification is being sought exists, and the Company is not aware of any pending or threatened material litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director, officer, employee or other agent. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the common stock as of February 15, 2001, by (i) each stockholder who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the common stock; (ii) each Named Executive Officer of the Company listed on the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) each director of the Company; and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
COMMON STOCK (1) ----------------------------- NUMBER NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES PERCENT --------- --------- Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC .................... 723,296 6.3% GEO Capital, LLC ....................................... 654,990 5.7% Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D.(2) ......................... 70,000 ** Edward C. Albini(3) .................................... 95,219 ** Stephen C. Macevicz, Ph.D.(4) .......................... 78,889 ** William K. Bowes, Jr.(5) ............................... 183,496 1.6% Sydney Brenner, M.B., D. Phil.(6) ...................... 329,000 2.9% Leroy Hood, M.D., Ph.D ................................. 6,896 ** James C. Kitch(7) ...................................... 20,620 ** Craig C. Taylor(8) ..................................... 386,434 3.4% All directors and officers as a group (10 persons)(9) .. 1,170,554 9.99%
- ------------ ** Less than one percent. (1) Except as otherwise noted, and subject to community property laws where applicable, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by him, her or it. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 11,459,521 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 15, 2001, except as otherwise noted in the footnotes. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of beneficial ownership of any other person. (2) Consists of 70,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Dr. Russell that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. (3) Includes 44,499 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Mr. Albini that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. 48 51 (4) Includes 12,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Dr. Macevicz that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. (5) Includes 35,401 shares of common stock held by Mr. Bowes, 17,606 shares of common stock held by the William K. Bowes Charitable Remainder Trust, of which Mr. Bowes is Trustee, and 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Mr. Bowes that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. Also includes 122,156 shares of common stock held by entities affiliated with U.S. Venture Partners IV, L.P. or U.S.V.P. IV. Mr. Bowes, a director of Lynx, is a general partner of Presidio Management Group IV, the general partner of U.S.V.P. IV. Mr. Bowes shares the power to vote and control the disposition of shares held by U.S.V.P. IV and, therefore, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Mr. Bowes disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of his pro-rata interest therein. (6) Includes 99,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Dr. Brenner that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. (7) Includes 2,287 shares of common stock, 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Mr. Kitch and 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options also held by Mr. Kitch that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. Mr. Kitch holds these options for the benefit of Cooley Godward LLP. He shares the power to vote and control the disposition of such shares and, therefore, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Mr. Kitch disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of his pro-rata interest therein. (8) Includes 13,997 shares of common stock held by Mr. Taylor and 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by Mr. Taylor. Also includes 364,104 shares of common stock held by Asset Management Associates 1989 L.P. Mr. Taylor, the Chairman of the Board of Lynx, is a general partner of AMC Partners 89, which is the general partner of Asset 1989 L.P. Mr. Taylor shares the power to vote and control the disposition of shares held by Asset 1989 L.P. and, therefore, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Mr. Taylor disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of his pro-rata interest therein. (9) Includes 486,260 shares of common stock held by entities affiliated with certain directors and 423,796 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by directors and officers that are exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2001. See Notes 2 through 8 above. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS In November 1999, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Norman J. W. Russell, Ph.D., President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. The loan is in the amount of $250,000, secured by a second mortgage on real property, with interest accruable at the rate of 6.02% per annum, and subject to early repayment under specified circumstances. The principal and interest on the loan will be forgiven, based on the officer's continuous employment over a four-year period, in the following amounts: 50% on the second anniversary date of employment; and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates of employment. At February 15, 2001, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the loan was $267,224. In April 1997, the Company entered into a full-recourse loan agreement with Edward C. Albini, an officer of the Company. A note receivable of $250,000 was issued under a stock purchase agreement for the purchase of 50,000 shares of common stock whereby all the shares issued under the agreement are pledged as collateral. The outstanding principal amount is due and payable in full in April 2002, subject to an obligation to prepay under specified circumstances. Interest is payable upon the expiration or termination of the note and accrues at the rate of 6.49% per annum. At February 15, 2001, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the loan was $293,988. For legal services rendered during the calendar year ended December 31, 2000, the Company paid approximately $307,500 to Cooley Godward LLP, the Company's counsel, of which Mr. Kitch, a director of the Company, is a partner. The Company's Bylaws provide that the Company will indemnify its directors and executive officers and may indemnify its other officers, employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The Company is also empowered under its Bylaws to enter into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers and to purchase insurance on behalf of any person whom it is required or permitted to indemnify. Pursuant to this provision, the Company has entered into indemnity agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. 49 52 ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS (1) The following index, Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors, and financial statements set forth on pages 26 through 31 of this report are being filed as part of this report: (i) Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. (iii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) All schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable, or the information is included in the consolidated financial statement or notes thereto. (3) The following documents are being filed as part of this report:
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT - ------- ----------------------- 2.1** Acquisition Agreement, dated as of February 4, 1998, by and between the Company and Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 1998. 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000. 3.2 Bylaws of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000. 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.1 Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Company and its directors and officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.2+ The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.3+ Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant under the Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.4+ Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Grant under the Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.5 Agreement of Assignment and License of Intellectual Property Rights, dated June 30, 1992, between the Company and ABI, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.6 Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1995. 10.7+ Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 13, 1996, between Spectragen, Inc. and Sam Eletr. (The Stock Purchase Agreement was assumed by the Company pursuant to the Agreement of Merger between the Company and Spectragen, Inc.), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1996. 10.8** Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of October 23, 1996, between the Company and BASF Aktiengesellschaft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
50 53
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT - ------- ----------------------- 1997. 10.8.1** First Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement dated as of October 23, 1998, between the Company and BASF Aktiengesellschaft. 10.9+ Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 14, 1997, between the Company and Edward C. Albini, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1997. 10.10 Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 28, 1997, by and between the Company and the investors listed therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on October 31, 1997 (File No. 333-39171). 10.11 Lease dated as of February 27, 1998, between the Company and SimFirst, L.P., Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998. 10.12** Technology License and Development Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997, between the Company and BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. 10.12.1** First Amendment to Technology License and Development Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997, between the Company and BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. 10.13 The Company's 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant's Form S-8 (File No. 333-59163). 10.14+ Employment Agreement dated as of October 18, 1999, between the Company and Norman John Wilkie Russell, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999. 21.1 Subsidiary of the Company. 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. 24.1 Power of Attorney. Reference is made to the signature page.
- ------------ (+) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. ** Portions of this agreement have been deleted pursuant to our request for confidential treatment (b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Not applicable. 51 54 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 30th day of March 2001. LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC. By: /s/ NORMAN J.W. RUSSELL, PH.D. -------------------------------------- Norman J.W. Russell, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Edward C. Albini and James C. Kitch, and each or any of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to the Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE --------- ----- ---- /s/ NORMAN J.W. RUSSELL President, Chief Executive Officer and March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- Director (Principal Executive Officer) Norman J.W. Russell /s/ CRAIG C. TAYLOR Chairman of the Board March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- Craig C. Taylor /s/ EDWARD C. ALBINI Chief Financial Officer and Secretary March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Edward C. Albini /s/ WILLIAM K. BOWES, Jr. Director March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- William K. Bowes, Jr. Director March __, 2001 - ------------------------------- Sydney Brenner /s/ JAMES C. KITCH Director March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- James C. Kitch Director March __, 2001 - ------------------------------- Leroy Hood /s/ DAVID C. U'PRICHARD Director March 30, 2001 - ------------------------------- David C. U'Prichard
52 55 EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT - ------- ----------------------- 2.1** Acquisition Agreement, dated as of February 4, 1998, by and between the Company and Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 1998. 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000. 3.2 Bylaws of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000. 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.1 Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Company and its directors and officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.2+ The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.3+ Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant under the Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.4+ Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Grant under the Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.5 Agreement of Assignment and License of Intellectual Property Rights, dated June 30, 1992, between the Company and ABI, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Registrant's Statement Form 10 (File No. 0-22570), as amended. 10.6 Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1995. 10.7+ Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 13, 1996, between Spectragen, Inc. and Sam Eletr. (The Stock Purchase Agreement was assumed by the Company pursuant to the Agreement of Merger between the Company and Spectragen, Inc.), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1996. 10.8** Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of October 23, 1996, between the Company and BASF Aktiengesellschaft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1997. 10.8.1** First Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement dated as of October 23, 1998, between the Company and BASF Aktiengesellschaft. 10.9+ Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 14, 1997, between the Company and Edward C. Albini, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1997. 10.10 Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 28, 1997, by and between the Company and the investors listed therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on October 31, 1997 (File No. 333-39171). 10.11 Lease dated as of February 27, 1998, between the Company and SimFirst, L.P., Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998. 10.12** Technology License and Development Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997, between the Company and BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. 10.12.1** First Amendment to Technology License and Development Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997, between the Company and BASF-LYNX Bioscience AG. 10.13 The Company's 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant's Form S-8 (File No. 333-59163). 10.14+ Employment Agreement dated as of October 18, 1999, between the Company and Norman John Wilkie Russell, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended September
53 56
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT - ------- ----------------------- 30, 1999. 21.1 Subsidiary of the Company. 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. 24.1 Power of Attorney. Reference is made to the signature page.
- ------------ (+) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. ** Portions of this agreement have been deleted pursuant to our request for confidential treatment 54 EX-21.1 2 f70954ex21-1.txt EXHIBIT 21.1 1 EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES LYNX THERAPEUTICS GMBH 55 EX-23.1 3 f70954ex23-1.txt EXHIBIT 23.1 1 EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-39171) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-59163, No. 333-59157, No. 333-21997, No. 33-86634, and No. 33-94872) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP ------------------------------- Palo Alto, California March 28, 2001 56 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----