Terremark Worldwide, Inc.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes þ No o

The registrant had 366,792,198 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of July 31, 2004.

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A is being filed to restate certain amounts associated with the valuation of our 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009 and related embedded derivatives. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for a discussion of the restatement adjustments and the changes resulting from the restatement.

The restatement results in entries to adjust the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives and the resulting impact to interest expense and changes in estimated fair value of derivatives on our Statement of Operations. The effect of the adjustments on our Statement of Operations was an increase of approximately $312,000 in our net loss over the period from April 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004.

We are amending the following items, financial statements, exhibits or other portions of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as set forth herein. Each item of the financial statements and disclosures that was affected by the restatement has been amended and restated. This Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our filings made subsequent to the filing of the original Form 10-Q. All other information not affected by the restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing of the Form 10-Q on August 9, 2004.


	•	ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED). The financial statements and related notes are amended to read in its entirety as set forth at pages 3 through 17.

	•	ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS. The information set forth under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” is amended to read in its entirety as set forth at pages 18 through 30.

	•	ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. The information set forth under the caption “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” is amended to read in its entirety as set forth at pages 30 to 31.

	•	ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The information set forth under the caption “Controls and Procedures” is amended to read in its entirety as set forth on page 31.

	•	ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. The exhibits and reports on Form 8-K information is amended to read in its entirety as set forth on page 32. The list of exhibits set forth in, and incorporated by reference from, the Index to Exhibits, is amended to include the following exhibits, filed within this report.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Terremark Worldwide, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company” or “Terremark”) operates Internet Exchange Point facilities (“IXs”) at strategic locations in Florida, California and Sao Paulo from which the Company assists users of the Internet and large communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. The Company’s primary facility is the NAP of the Americas, a carrier-neutral Tier-1 network access point (the “NAP”) in Miami, Florida. The NAP provides exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multinational enterprises and other end users.

In June 2002, the Company entered into an exclusive agreement with the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid (the “Comunidad”) to develop and operate carrier-neutral network access points in Spain. As part of that agreement, the parties formed NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. (“NAP Madrid”) to own and operate carrier-neutral IXs in Spain, modeled after the NAP of the Americas. The shareholders were the Comunidad through its Instituto Madrileno de Desarrollo (“IMADE”), the Camara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid, Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A., Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A., a subsidiary of Abengoa S.A., and Centro de Transportes de Coslada, S.A. (“CTC”). At the time NAP Madrid was formed, the Company owned 1% of its equity, which was subsequently increased to 10%.

In May 2004, the Company purchased the 20% of the NAP Madrid owned by Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A. for approximately $550,000. In June 2004, the Company purchased the 20% of this entity owned by Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A. for approximately $634,000. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had a 50% equity interest in NAP Madrid. Because the Company exercises control, its accounts as of June 30, 2004 included the assets and liabilities of NAP Madrid, as well as the 50% minority interest. The assets of NAP Madrid include 8.7 million shares of Terremark’s common stock and de minimus operating assets. The liabilities of NAP Madrid consist primarily of a bank loan with a balance of 3.0 million Euros ($3.7 million at June 30, 2004). Because it had not commenced significant operations, NAP Madrid did not have any customers, nor did it have any employees. As a result, the Company concluded that the assets acquired do not constitute a business as such term is defined in SFAS No. 141.

The Company allocated the purchase price based upon the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The following is a final allocation of the purchase price:

In July 2004, the Company purchased the 30% of the interest owned by CTC and IMADE for approximately $1.4 million. As a result of these transactions, the Company presently owns an 80% equity interest of NAP Madrid.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete annual financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2005. Amounts as of March 31, 2004 included in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2004 and for the quarter then ended have been restated. All information in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements gives effect to the aforementioned restatement (see Note 3).

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements to conform with current presentation.

For investments in less than majority-owned entities where the Company does not exercise significant influence, the Company uses the cost method of accounting. For investments in less than majority-owned entities where the Company exercises significant influence, the Company uses the equity method of accounting.

Two customers accounted for approximately 25% and 14% of data center revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2004. One customer accounted for approximately 13% of data center revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2003.

The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for its employee stock-based compensation plans. Under this method, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of grant, between the fair value of the Company’s shares and the option’s exercise price. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to non-employees using the fair value method.

The following table presents what the net loss and net loss per share would have been had the Company accounted for employee stock-based compensation using the fair value method:

Fair value calculations for employee grants were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. However, the Company’s 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009 (the “Senior Notes”) contain embedded derivatives that require separate valuation from the Senior Notes. The Company recognizes these derivatives as liabilities in its balance sheet and measures them at their estimated fair value, and recognizes changes in the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives in earnings in the period of change. See Note 3.

In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, (“SAB 104”), Revenue Recognition. SAB 104 updates portions of existing interpretative guidance in order to be consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

instrument embodies an obligation of the issuer. In November 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FASB 150-3 which deferred the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 150 indefinitely for certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests that were issued before November 5, 2003. The FASB plans to reconsider implementation issues and, perhaps, classification or measurement guidance for those non-controlling interests during the deferral period. In 2003, the Company applied certain disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 150. To date, the impact of the effective provisions of SFAS No. 150 have been the presentation of the Series H redeemable preferred stock as a liability. While the effective date of certain elements of SFAS No. 150 have been deferred, the adoption of SFAS 150 when finalized is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2004, the FASB approved EITF Issue 03-6 “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128.” EITF Issue 03-6 supersedes the guidance in Topic No. D-95, “Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings per Share”, and requires the use of the two-class method of participating securities. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In addition, EITF Issue 03-6 addresses other forms of participating securities, including options, warrants, forwards and other contracts to issue an entity’s common stock, with the exception of stock-based compensation (unvested options and restricted stock) subject to the provisions of Opinion No. 25 and FASB 123. EITF Issue 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported earnings per share. The adoption of EITF Issue 03-6 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004.

The Company’s Senior Notes contain contingent interest provisions which allow the holders of the Senior Notes to participate in any dividends declared on the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Senior Notes are considered participating securities under EITF Issue 03-6. The Senior Notes and their treatment under EITF Issue 03-6 will have a dilutive effect only when the Company has net income available to common stockholders.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2004 have been restated. This restatement is related to the valuation of the derivatives embedded within the Company’s 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009. The Company originally estimated that the embedded derivatives had an initial fair value at the date of issuance of approximately $16.1 million and a June 30, 2004 estimated fair value of approximately $12.6 million, resulting primarily from the conversion option. The change of approximately $3.5 million in the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives was recognized as other income in the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a result of the bifurcation of the embedded derivatives from the Senior Notes, the carrying value of the debt component of the Senior Notes at issuance was approximately $70.3 million. The difference between the face value of the Senior Notes of $86.25 million and their carrying value is accreted to interest expense under the effective interest rate method over the life of the Senior Notes.

In the previously filed June 30, 2004 financial statements, the Company used an inappropriate volatility assumption (relative rate at which the price of the Company’s stock moves up and down) of 17% in estimating the fair value of the embedded derivatives. After receiving a third party valuation of the embedded derivatives, the Company concluded that, because the Company’s Senior Notes are not actively traded and the Company was not able to find other comparable market data, it does not have sufficient quantitative and qualitative market data to support such volatility. Therefore, until such a market develops for the Company’s Senior Notes or the Company is able to find comparable market data, a theoretical

model must be used to estimate the value of the embedded derivatives based on the Company’s annual historical volatility of the Company’s stock. Such historical volatility over the past year was 80%. Should a market develop for the Company’s Senior Notes, or comparable market data develop, which would necessitate a change in the derivatives’ estimated value, such change will be accounted for prospectively.

This restatement corrects the error resulting from the use of an inappropriate volatility assumption in the original valuation of the embedded derivatives within the Senior Notes. The restatement increases the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives to approximately $35.5 million and $32.2 million as of the date of issuance and as of June 30, 2004, respectively, and results in a decrease of approximately $199,000 in change in estimated fair value of derivatives embedded within convertible debt included in other income. Because the embedded derivatives are being accounted for separately, this restatement also had the effect of reducing the carrying value of the Senior Notes at issuance to approximately $50.8 million and increasing by approximately $113,000 the related accretion to interest expense under the effective interest method of the difference between the face value of the Senior Notes of $86.25 million and their carrying value. The net effect of the adjustments summarized above was an increase of approximately $312,000 to net loss. These adjustments had no impact on total assets. However, the restatement increased both the Company’s total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit by approximately $312,000.

The following summarizes the restatement for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (in thousands):

On May 17, 2004, the Company provided certain debenture holders with notice of its intent to redeem $25.0 million of its 10% convertible debentures and $2.8 million of its 13.125% convertible debentures, effective June 1, 2004. As of June 1, 2004, the holders of all of the 10% convertible debentures and $2.5 million in principal of the 13.125% convertible debentures converted their debentures into an aggregate of 54,726,427 shares of the Company’s common stock.

As a result of the extinguishment of notes payable and convertible debentures, the Company recognized a gain on debt restructuring and extinguishment totaling approximately $3.4 million, representing the recognition of the unamortized balance of a debt restructuring deferred gain net of the write-off of debt issuance costs and an early redemption premium payment.

On June 14, 2004, the Company privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to qualified institutional buyers. The Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum, payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004 and are convertible at the option of the holders, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $1.25 per share. The Company used the net proceeds from this offering to pay notes payable amounting to approximately $36.5 million and convertible debt amounting to approximately $9.8 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $6,635,912 in debt issuance costs, including $1,380,000 in estimated fair value of warrants to be issued to purchase 1,815,789 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.95 per share. The Company’s obligation to issue these warrants is included in other liabilities.

The Senior Notes rank pari passu with all existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and rank junior to any future secured indebtedness. If there is a change in control, the holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus

accrued and unpaid interest (the “Repurchase Price”). If a change in control occurs and at least 50% of the consideration for the Company’s common stock consists of cash, the holders of the Senior Notes may elect to receive the greater of the Repurchase Price or the Total Redemption Amount. The Total Redemption Amount will be equal to the product of (x) the average closing prices of the Company’s common stock for the five trading days prior to announcement of the change in control and (y) the quotient of $1,000 divided by the applicable conversion price of the Senior Notes, plus a make whole premium of between $270 per $1,000 of principal if the change in control takes place before December 15, 2004, and $45 per $1,000 of principal if the change in control takes place between June 16, 2008 and December 15, 2008. If the Company issues a cash dividend on its common stock, it will pay contingent interest to the holders equal to the product of the per share cash dividend and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of each holder’s note.

The Company may redeem some or all of the notes for cash at any time on or after June 15, 2007, if the closing price of the Company’s common shares has exceeded 200% of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date it mails the redemption notice. If the Company redeems the notes during the twelve month period commencing on June 15, 2007 or 2008, the redemption price equals 104.5% or 102.25%, respectively, of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus an amount equal to 50% of all remaining scheduled interest payments on the notes from, and including, the redemption date through the maturity date.

The Senior Notes contain an early conversion incentive for holders to convert their notes into shares of common stock on or after December 16, 2004, but before June 15, 2007. If exercised, the holders will receive the number of common shares to which they are entitled and an early conversion incentive payment in cash or common stock, at the Company’s option, equal to one-half the aggregate amount of interest payable through June 15, 2007.

The conversion option, including the early conversion incentive, and the equity participation feature embedded in the Senior Notes were determined to be derivative instruments to be considered separately from the debt and accounted for separately. As a result of the bifurcation of the embedded derivatives, the carrying value of the Senior Notes at issuance was approximately $50.8 million. The Company is accreting the difference between the face value of the Senior Notes ($86.25 million) and the carrying value to interest expense under the effective interest method on a monthly basis over the life of the Senior Notes. Upon registration of the Senior Notes, the make whole premium due upon a change in control will require valuation and accounting separate from the Senior Notes.

The Senior Notes contain two embedded derivatives that require separate valuation from the Senior Notes: a conversion option that includes an early conversion incentive and an equity participation right. Upon registration of the Senior Notes, a third embedded derivative will require separate valuation for a take-over make whole premium. The Company estimated that the embedded derivative related to the equity participation rights did not have a significant value.

The Company estimated that the embedded derivatives had an initial estimated fair value of approximately $35,480,000 and a period-end estimated fair value of approximately $32,180,000, resulting primarily from the conversion option. The change of approximately $3,300,000 in the estimated fair value of the embedded derivative was recognized as other income in the three months ended June 30, 2004.

The Company, using the assistance of a third party valuation, has estimated the fair value of its embedded derivatives using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. These embedded derivatives derive their value primarily based on changes in the price and volatility of the

Company’s common stock. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company may eventually pay to settle these embedded derivatives.

At March 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding an aggregate of $40,506,039 in notes payable which were repaid in June 2004.

On June 1, 2004, the holders of $25.0 million of the Company’s 10% convertible debentures and the holders of $2.5 million of the Company’s 13.125% convertible debentures converted their debentures into 54,726,427 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In April 2004, $262,500 of debt was converted to 350,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.

During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued 336,667 shares of its common stock issued in conjunction with the exercise of 336,667 employee stock options at prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.74 per share.

In May 2004, the Company issued warrants to acquire 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share for warrants to purchase 200,000 shares and $0.70 per share for warrants to purchase 50,000 shares. The warrants were issued in conjunction with short-term borrowings and had an estimated fair value of $172,650.

In May 2004, warrants valued at approximately $121,440 were converted to 151,622 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share.

Due to the nature of the following relationships, the terms of the respective agreements may not be the same as those that would result from transactions among wholly owned unrelated parties.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other related parties have either provided or guaranteed some of the Company’s debt or equity financing. In addition, services are provided to entities in which the Company owns stock.

Following is a summary of transactions for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and balances with related parties included in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2004 and March 31, 2004.

As of June 30, 2004 and March 31, 2004, the Company had two reportable business segments, data center operations and real estate services. The data center operations segment provides Internet infrastructure and managed services in a data center environment. The real estate services segment constructs and manages real estate projects focused in the technology sector. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business operations that offer different products and services.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in significant accounting policies. Revenues generated among segments are recorded at rates similar to those recorded in third-party transactions. Transfers of assets and liabilities between segments are recorded at cost. The Company evaluates performance based on the segment’s net operating results.

The following is a reconciliation of total segment loss from operations to (loss) income before income taxes:

The Company currently owns a .84% interest in Technology Center of the Americas, LLC (“TECOTA”), the entity that owns the building in which the NAP of the Americas is housed. In July 2004, the Company entered into an agreement under which it assumed the obligation to purchase the other equity interests in TECOTA. The Company will pay $40 million for the equity interests and assume $35 million in debt. In connection with the agreement to purchase TECOTA, the Company has deposited an aggregate of $4 million which is nonrefundable except in the case of default by the sellers. The Company is currently exploring financing options for this transaction. The transaction is expected to close by December 31, 2004.

In July 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to certain employees, including some officers of the Company, to purchase 1,185,000 of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share.

On September 30, 2004, the Company’s Chairman and CEO repaid his outstanding $5 million loan from the Company by tendering to the Company approximately 7.7 million shares of Terremark common stock. As a result, the Company no longer guarantees any of his personal debt.

The information in this discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. For example, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Other Factors Affecting Operating Results” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below. All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information available to us as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis, has been revised to reflect the restatement of our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Please see the Introductory Note to this Form 10-Q/A — “Restatement of Prior Financial Information” and Note 3 of our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q/A for a further discussion of the restatement adjustments and changes resulting from the restatement.

We currently own a .84% interest in Technology Center of the Americas, LLC, which we refer to as TECOTA, the entity that owns the building in which the NAP of the Americas is housed. In July 2004, we entered into an agreement under which we assumed the obligation to purchase the other equity interests in TECOTA. In connection with the assumption of the agreement to purchase TECOTA, we have deposited $4 million which amount is nonrefundable except in the case of default by the sellers. We are currently exploring financing options and we expect the transaction to close by December 31, 2004.

On September 30, 2004, our Chairman and CEO repaid his outstanding $5 million loan from us by tendering to us approximately 7.7 million shares of Terremark common stock. As a result, we no longer guarantee any of his personal debt.

In June 2002, we entered into an exclusive agreement with the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid (the “Comunidad”) to develop and operate carrier-neutral Internet exchange points, or IXs, in Spain. As part of that agreement, the parties formed NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A., which we refer to as NAP Madrid, to own and operate carrier-neutral IXs in Spain, modeled after the NAP of the Americas. The shareholders are the Comunidad through its Instituto Madrileno de Desarrollo, the Camara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid, Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A., Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A., a subsidiary of Abengoa S.A., and Centro de Transportes de Coslada, S.A. At the time NAP Madrid was formed, we owned 1% of its equity, which was subsequently increased to 10%.

In May 2004, we purchased the 20% of NAP Madrid owned by Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A. for approximately $550,000. In June 2004, we purchased the 20% of this entity owned by Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A. for approximately $634,000. As of June 30, 2004 we had a 50% equity interest in NAP Madrid. Because we exercised control, the accounts as of June 30, 2004, included the assets and liabilities of NAP Madrid, as well as the 50% minority interest. The assets of NAP Madrid include 8.7 million shares of Terremark common stock and de minimus operating assets. The liabilities of NAP Madrid consist primarily of a bank loan with a balance of 3.0 million Euros ($3.7 million) at June 30, 2004. Because it had not commenced significant operations, NAP Madrid did not have any customers, nor did it have any employees. As a result, we concluded that the assets acquired do not constitute a business as such term is defined in SFAS No. 141.

We allocated the purchase price based upon the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been allocated to treasury shares. The following is a final allocation of the purchase price:

In July 2004, we purchased the 30% of the interest owned by Centro de Transportes de Coslada and Instituto Madrileno de Desarrollo for approximately $1.4 million. As a result of these transactions, we now own an 80% equity interest of NAP Madrid.

Terremark Worldwide, Inc. operates Internet Exchange Point facilities at strategic locations in Miami, Florida; Santa Clara, California; and Sao Paulo, Brazil from which we assist users of the Internet and communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. Our primary facility is the NAP of the Americas located in Miami, where as of July 31, 2004 we have over 166 customers including more than 80 network service providers. We generate revenue by providing exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multi-national enterprises and other end users.

Internet Exchanges, which we refer to as IXs, are locations where two or more networks meet to interconnect and exchange Internet traffic (data, voice, images, video and all forms of digital telecommunications), much like air carriers meet at airports to exchange passengers and cargo. Instead of airlines and transportation companies, however, participation in IXs comes from telecommunications carriers, Internet service providers and large telecommunications and Internet users. Tier-1 IXs, such as the NAP of the Americas, are locations where the primary Internet networks meet to access, exchange and distribute Internet traffic and, following the airport analogy, operate much like large, international airport passenger and cargo transportation terminals or “hubs.”

Initially, four IXs — in New York, Washington, D.C., Chicago, and San Francisco — were created and supported by the National Science Foundation as part of the transition from the United States government-financed Internet to a commercially operated Internet. Since that time, privately owned IXs have been developed, including the NAP of the Americas.

Our Internet Exchange Point facilities are carrier-neutral. We are not owned or controlled by, nor affiliated with, any telecommunications carrier. Rather, we enable our customers to freely choose from among the many carriers available at our Internet Exchange Point facilities. We believe that our carrier neutrality and the diversity of network service providers present at our facilities provides us with a competitive advantage when compared to carrier-operated network access points where customers are limited to conducting business with one carrier.


	•	the site and platform they need to exchange Internet and data traffic;

	•	related professional and managed services; and

	•	space to house their equipment and their network facilities in order to be close to the Internet and data traffic exchange connections that take place at our Internet Exchange Point facilities.

Currently, our customers include telecommunications carriers such as AT&T, MCI, Qwest and Sprint, enterprises such as Bacardi USA, Intrado, and Steiner Leisure, content providers such as Yahoo! and Akamai, and government entities including the Diplomatic Telecommunications Services Programming Office (DTSPO, a division of the United States Department of State), the United States Southern Command, the City of Coral Gables and the County of Miami-Dade.

Revenue. The following charts provide certain information with respect to our revenues:

The increase in data center revenues was primarily the result of growth in our deployed customer base from 86 customers as of June 30, 2003 to 155 customers as of June 30, 2004. Data center revenues consist of:


	•	colocation services, such as licensing of space and provisioning of power;

	•	exchange point services, such as peering and cross connects; and

	•	managed and professional services, such as network management, network monitoring, procurement and installation of equipment and procurement of connectivity, managed router services, technical support and consulting.

Our utilization of total net colocation space increased to 13.5% as of June 30, 2004 from 7.0% as of June 30, 2003. Our utilization of total net colocation space represents the percentage of space billed versus total space available for customers. For comparative purposes, total space available for customers includes third floor space in TECOTA for both June 30, 2004 and 2003. We entered into an agreement to lease the space in the third floor of TECOTA on November 3, 2003. Cross connects billed to customers increased to 1,628 as of June 30, 2004 from 706 as of June 30, 2003. Data Center — Contract termination fee represents amounts received from customers for the termination of their contracted services with the NAP of the Americas. Contract termination fees are recognized upon contract termination when there are no remaining contingencies or obligations on our part.

We anticipate an increase in revenue from colocation, exchange point and managed services as we add more customers to our network of NAPs, sell additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services.

Property and Construction Management Revenues. Development, commission and construction fees were $0 and $41,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We do not expect any revenues from development, commission and construction fees in the foreseeable future.

Management fees decreased $20,000 to $44,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $64,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The only facility we currently manage is TECOTA, the property in which the NAP of the Americas is located. We collect a monthly management fee from TECOTA equal to the greater of approximately $8,000 or 3% of cash collected by TECOTA. Although in the future, we may manage the properties in which our centers are located, we anticipate that management fees will not be a significant source of revenue.

Construction Work Revenue. Construction contract revenue increased $707,000 to $741,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $34,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, we had one construction contract in process. Due to our approach to our construction business, we expect revenues from construction contracts to significantly fluctuate from quarter to quarter. We anticipate focusing our efforts on obtaining construction contracts for projects related to technology infrastructure.

Data Center Operations Expenses. Data center operations expenses increased $3.1 million to $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Data center operations expenses consist mainly of rent, operations personnel, property taxes, electricity, chilled water, procurement of equipment and connectivity and security services. The increase in total data center operations expenses is due to an increase of approximately $1.5 million in rent, an increase of approximately $800,000 in personnel costs and an increase of approximately $500,000 in costs related to the procurement of connectivity under a U.S. Federal government contract. The increase in rent expense is mainly due to the July 2003 opening of our NAP-West facilities in Santa Clara, California and the leasing of an additional 120,000 square feet of space in the third floor of TECOTA, which commenced in November 2003. We have been paying rent for our NAP-West facilities since January 2001 but before we opened these facilities in July 2003, related expenses were recorded as impairment charges. Our quarterly rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004, was approximately $1.0 million and $450,000 for the third floor of TECOTA and our NAP-West facilities, respectively. Rent expense is being recorded on the straight-line method based on contractual amounts even though actual payments for the third floor of TECOTA will not commence until April 2005. The increase in personnel costs is mainly due to staff increases and the grant of an annual incentive bonus. The number of employees whose compensation is included in data center expenses increased to 82 employees from 62 as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which resulted in a $471,000 increase in base payroll and relocation expenses of $74,000. We also paid incentive bonuses to eligible employees, whose salaries are included in data center operations, totaling approximately $238,000. We anticipate that some data center expenses, principally electricity, chilled water, payroll and costs related to managed services, will increase as we provide additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services.

Contract Construction Expenses. Contract construction expenses increased $659,000 to $705,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $46,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This increase is consistent with the increase in construction contracts revenues discussed above. We do not currently anticipate a loss on our construction contract.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 38.5%, to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, professional service fees, travel, and other general corporate expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to in professional services, travel and payroll. Professional services increased by $300,000, including increases of approximately $176,000 in legal and accounting fees and of approximately $123,000 in recruiting fees. Increases in legal and accounting fees are mainly due to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Increase in recruiting fees resulted from the hiring of additional employees in data center services. Travel expenses increased by $209,000 due to increased travel to our facilities in Madrid and Sao Paulo. We also paid incentive bonuses to eligible employees, whose salaries are included in general and administrative expenses, totaling approximately $245,000.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased $200,000, or 25%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $800,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The significant components of sales and marketing expenses are payroll and benefits. The increase in sales and marketing expenses is due to an increase in travel of $49,000, and an increase in payroll and benefits of $69,000. The increase in payroll is mainly due to the addition of an employee and the grant of incentive bonuses to eligible employees whose salaries are included in sales and marketing expenses, totaling $25,000. The increase in travel is consistent with our increase in revenues.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $100,000 to $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was due to additions to property and equipment, mainly due to the build out of third floor of TECOTA.

Change in Fair Value of Derivatives Embedded within Convertible Debt. Our 9% Senior Notes due June 15, 2009 contain embedded derivatives that require separate valuation from the Senior Notes. We recognize these embedded derivatives as a liability in our balance sheet, measure them at their estimated fair value and recognize changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative instruments in earnings. We estimated that the embedded derivatives had an initial estimated fair value of approximately $35,480,000 and a period-end estimated fair value of approximately $32,180,000. The embedded derivatives derive their value primarily based on changes in the price and volatility of our common stock. The closing price of our common stock decreased to $0.85 as of June 30, 2004 from $0.93 per share as of the initial valuation date. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2004, we recognized a $3.3 million change in estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, we did not have any embedded derivatives. Over the life of the Senior Notes, given the historical volatility of our common stock, changes in the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives are expected to have a material effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, we have estimated the fair value of these embedded derivatives using a theoretical model based on the historical volatility of our common stock of 80% over the past year. If a market develops for our Senior Notes or we are able to find comparable market data, we may be able to use in the future market data to adjust our historical volatility by other factors such as trading volume and our estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives could be significantly different. Any such adjustment would be made prospectively.

Gain on Debt Restructuring and Extinguishment. As a result of the extinguishment of notes payable and convertible debentures during the three months ended June 30, 2004, we recognized a gain totaling $3.4 million, representing the recognition of the unamortized balance of a debt restructuring deferred gain and the write off of debt issuance costs, net of an early redemption premium payment. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, we recognized a non-cash gain of $8.5 million related to financing

transactions whereby $21.6 million of our construction payables plus $1.0 million in accrued interest was converted to 30.1 million shares of our common stock with a $14.1 million market value upon conversion.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $3.0 million from $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This increase is mainly due to charges of approximately $1.2 million of amortization of a beneficial conversion feature and debt issuance costs as well as the accretion of Senior Notes to their face value.


(1)	Amount includes a gain on extinguishment and conversion of $3.4 million and $8.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The net loss from data center operations is primarily the result of insufficient revenues to cover our operating and interest expenses. We expect to generate net losses until we reach required levels of monthly revenues.

Although we had a net operating loss for the current period, we anticipate that our real estate activities will generate sufficient revenues to cover their operating expenses.

We privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009 to qualified institutional buyers in June 2004. The notes bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum, payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004 and are convertible at the option of the holders at $1.25 per share. We utilized the net proceeds of $81.0 million to pay approximately $46.3 million of outstanding loans and convertible debt. The balance of the proceeds will be used for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures.

On May 17, 2004, we provided certain debenture holders with notice of our intent to redeem $25.0 million of our 10% convertible debentures and $2.8 million of our 13.125% convertible debentures, effective May 31, 2004. As of May 31, 2004, all of the holders of our 10% convertible debentures and $2.5 million in principal of our 13.125% convertible debentures opted to convert their debentures into an aggregate of 54,726,427 shares of our common stock. In June 2004, the remaining holders of our 13.125% convertible debentures redeemed their debentures for cash. In addition, in June and July 2004, the remaining holders of our 13% convertible debentures redeemed their debentures for an aggregate of $10.3 million.

As of June 30, 2004, our principal source of liquidity was our $33.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. We anticipate that this cash coupled with our anticipated cash flows generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditures, working capital, debt service and corporate overhead requirements to meet our currently identified business objectives.

Historically, we have financed our operations and capital requirements primarily through credit facilities, the issuance of unsecured notes, the issuance of convertible debentures, the private sale of common and preferred stock and vendor financing, including construction payables and capital lease obligations. As of June 30, 2004, our total indebtedness was approximately $111.2 million.

From the time of the Amtec merger through June 30, 2004, we incurred net operating losses of approximately $227.2 million. Our cash flows from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004

and 2003 were negative. Due to the issuance of the $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of our 9% Senior Convertible Notes, our working capital increased from a $10.3 million deficit, as of March 31, 2004, to a $23.2 million surplus, as of June 30, 2004.

Based on customer contracts signed as of July 31, 2004, expected expansions of customers under contract and anticipated future contracts from potential customers in the sales pipeline, we project that our cash flow from operations will be positive by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2005. Our projected revenues and cash flows depend on several factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the rate at which we provide services and these services are accepted by customers under existing contracts, the rate at which new services are sold to the government sector and the commercial sector, the ability to retain the customer base, the willingness and timing of potential customers in outsourcing the housing and management of their technology infrastructure to us, the reliability and cost-effectiveness of our services and our ability to market our services. Although our real estate activities had a net loss of $25,431 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, we anticipate that these activities will generate enough revenues to cover operating expenses. If revenues for real estate activities are below amounts anticipated, cash needs are not expected to exceed $200,000 for the next twelve months. Accordingly, we have the cash resources sufficient to meet our working capital, debt service and corporate overhead requirements associated with our operations for at least the next 18 months.

Under the terms of the agreement to purchase TECOTA, we paid a $4.0 million non-refundable deposit. Closing of this transaction is contingent upon us obtaining financing. While we expect to finance the entire acquisition cost through the issuance of additional indebtedness, this debt financing may not be available to us on favorable terms. If we are able to obtain the financing and close on this transaction we will eliminate rent expense but incur additional interest and depreciation expense. Based on current market rates, we estimate that any negative impact to cash flows as a result of the TECOTA acquisition and related financing for the next twelve months will not exceed $2.0 million.

Cash used in operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $2.8 million compared to cash used in operations of $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, a decrease of $7.2 million. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in cash collections from data center operations of approximately $5.5 million.

Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $3.5 million compared to cash used in investing activities of $395,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $3.1 million. This is due to purchases of property, plant and equipment of $1.1 million and the acquisition of additional equity interest in NAP Madrid.

Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $35.2 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of $14.4 million for the three months ended June, 2003, an increase of $20.8 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, cash provided by financing activities includes net proceeds of $81.0 million of convertible debt financing, net of debt issuance costs of $5.2 million, partially offset by $47.0 million in payments for loans and convertible debt. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, cash provided by financing activities included $15.8 million of new borrowings, partially offset by $1.3 million in payments of debt.

Convertible Debentures: In June 2004, we privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due June 15, 2009, to qualified institutional buyers. The Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum, payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004 and are convertible at the option of the holders, at $1.25 per share. We utilized the net proceeds of $81.0 million of the offer, net of debt issue costs of $5.2 million, to pay approximately $46.3 million of outstanding loans and convertible debt. The remaining proceeds will be used for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. A conversion option, including an early conversion incentive, an equity participation feature, and upon registration of the Senior Notes, a make whole premium due upon a change in control, embedded in the Senior Notes were determined to be

derivative instruments to be considered separately from the debt and accounted for separately. As a result of bifurcation of the embedded derivatives from the Senior Notes, the estimated fair value of the Senior Notes at issuance was approximately $50.8 million. We are accreting the difference between the face value of the Senior Notes ($86.25 million) and the carrying value to interest expense over the life of the issuance.

The Senior Notes contain an early conversion incentive for holders to convert their notes into shares of common stock on or after December 16, 2004, but before June 15, 2007. If exercised, the holders will receive the number of common shares to which they are entitled and an early conversion incentive payment in cash or common stock, at our option, equal to one-half the aggregate amount of unpaid interest payable through June 15, 2007.

Other: As of June 30, 2004, we had not paid approximately $719,000 relating to a capital lease. We are currently negotiating a payment plan.

The Technology Center of the Americas, LLC, an entity in which we have a 0.84% membership interest, owns the building that leases the space to us for the NAP of the Americas under a 20 year lease. The construction of TECOTA was funded with $48.0 million in equity and $35.4 million in construction financing from a consortium of banks. We guaranteed this construction financing during development and construction of TECOTA. After TECOTA was built, some of the banks released us from their portion of the guarantee, the result of which was to reduce our guarantee to $5.5 million. As of June 30, 2004, the TECOTA debt outstanding under the construction loan was approximately $35 million and is due on November 2005. We do not expect to fund any amounts under our guarantee. In July 2004, we entered into an agreement under which we assumed the obligation to purchase the other equity interests in the entity that owns the building where the NAP of the Americas is housed. See “Recent Events” above.

Prior to his repayment in September 2004 of a $5 million loan from us, we guaranteed up to $6.5 million in personal debt of Manuel D. Medina, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman. See Recent Events.

We lease space for our operations, office equipment and furniture under non-cancelable operating leases. Some equipment is also leased under capital leases, which are included in leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment.

The following table represents the minimum future operating and capital lease payments for these commitments, as well as the combined aggregate maturities for the following obligations for each of the twelve months ended June 30:

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies an obligation of the issuer. In November 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FASB 150-3 which deferred the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 150 indefinitely for certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests that were issued before November 5, 2003. The FASB plans to reconsider implementation issues and, perhaps, classification or measurement guidance for those non-controlling interests during the deferral period. In 2003, we applied certain disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 150. To date, the impact of the effective provisions of SFAS No. 150 have been the presentation of Series H redeemable preferred stock as a liability. While the effective date of certain elements of SFAS No. 150 has been deferred, the adoption of SFAS No. 150 when finalized is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2004, the FASB approved EITF Issue 03-6 “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128.” EITF Issue 03-6 supersedes the guidance in Topic No. D-95, “Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings per Share”, and requires the use of the two-class method of participating securities. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In addition, EITF Issue 03-6 addresses other forms of participating securities, including options, warrants, forwards and other contracts to issue an entity’s common stock, with the exception of stock-based compensation (unvested options and restricted stock) subject to the provisions of Opinion No. 25 and FASB 123. EITF Issue 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported earnings per share. The adoption of EITF Issue 03-6 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004.

Our Senior Notes contain contingent interest provisions which allow the holders of the Senior Notes to participate in any dividends declared on our common stock. Accordingly, our Senior Notes are considered participating securities under EITF Issue 03-6. The Senior Notes and their treatment under EITF Issue 03-6 will have a dilutive effect only when we have net income available to common stockholders.

The market for data center services is extremely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Our current and potential competitors include providers of data center services, global, regional and local telecommunications companies and Regional Bell Operating Companies, and information technology outsourcing firms. Many of our existing competitors have greater market presence and financial and personnel resources than we do. Our competitors include Internet data centers operated by established communications carriers such as AT&T, Level 3, MCI and Qwest. We also compete with providers of data services centers, regional Bell operating companies that offer Internet access and information technology outsourcing firms. The principal competitive factors in our market include:


	•	ability to deliver services when requested by the customer;

	•	Internet system engineering and other professional services expertise;

	•	customer service;

	•	network capability, reliability, quality of service and scalability;

	•	variety of managed services offered;

	•	access to network resources, including circuits, equipment and interconnection capacity to other networks;

	•	broad geographic presence;

	•	price;

	•	ability to maintain and expand distribution channels;

	•	brand name recognition;

	•	timing of introductions of new services;

	•	physical and network security;

	•	financial resources; and

	•	customer base.

Some of our competitors may be able to develop and expand their data center services faster, devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. In addition, these competitors have entered and will likely continue to enter into business relationships to provide additional services that compete with the services we provide.

Generally, U.S. Government contracts are subject to oversight audits by government representatives, to profit and cost controls and limitations, and to provisions permitting modification or termination, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the government’s convenience. In some cases, government contracts are subject to the uncertainties surrounding congressional appropriations or agency funding. Government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations. Failure to comply with these

regulations and requirements could lead to suspension or debarment from future government contracting for a period of time.

As of June 30, 2004, our total liabilities including minority interest were approximately $112.8 million, which includes our 9% Senior Notes due June 15, 2009 with a face value of $86.25 million. Obligations guaranteed by us were $10.1 million and our total stockholders’ deficit was $3.0 million.

Each of these obligations requires significant amounts of liquidity. Should we need additional capital or financing, our ability to arrange financing and the cost of this financing will depend upon many factors, including:


	•	general economic and capital markets conditions, and in particular the non-investment grade debt market;

	•	conditions in the Internet infrastructure market;

	•	credit availability from banks or other lenders;

	•	investor confidence in the telecommunications industry generally and our company specifically; and

	•	the success of our facilities.

We are highly dependent on the services of key personnel, particularly Manuel D. Medina, our Chairman. In an attempt to reduce costs, we have eliminated some management positions. Our potential growth and expansion and the merger and integration of separate businesses, are expected to place increased demands on our management skills and resources. Therefore, our success also depends upon our ability to hire and retain additional skilled and experienced management personnel. Employment and retention of qualified personnel is important due to the competitive nature of our industry.

Expenditures commence well before an IX open, and it may take an extended period to approach break-even capacity utilization. It takes a significant period of time to select the appropriate location for a new IX, construct the necessary facilities, install equipment and telecommunications infrastructure and hire operations and sales personnel. As a result, we expect that individual IX will experience losses for more than one year from the time they are opened. As a part of our IX strategy, we intend to rely on third-party financial or strategic partners to fund the development costs. If we are unable to establish such third-party relationships, we may delay or abandon some or all of our development and expansion plans or otherwise forego market opportunities, making it difficult for us to generate additional revenue and to respond to competitive pressures.

Under the terms of our agreement with Manuel D. Medina, our President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as long as Mr. Medina’s guarantees of our debt exist, we have agreed to nominate Mr. Medina to our board of directors and not remove Mr. Medina, unless for good cause, or remove any of our officers without Mr. Medina’s consent. This could delay, defer or prevent change in control of our company or impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination that you, as a stockholder, may otherwise view favorably.

Our inability to support our original valuation for the derivatives embedded within our 9% Senior Convertible Notes led to the restatement of our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Our valuation originally used an inappropriate volatility of approximately 17% as an input in estimating the fair value of the embedded derivatives. A third party valuation subsequently concluded that because the Senior Notes are not actively traded and we are not able to find other comparable market data, we do not have sufficient quantitative and qualitative market data to support the volatility assumption used in our initial valuation. Therefore, until an active market develops for our Senior Notes or we are able to find comparable market data, we must use a theoretical model to estimate the value of the embedded derivatives based on the historical volatility of approximately 80% over the past year. As a result of this restatement there could be a loss of confidence in our financial reporting.

We are in the process of improving our procedures and measures, and in the future plan to continue to work on strengthening these procedures, to enhance the effectiveness of our internal controls. See Item 4. “Controls and Procedures”. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure of our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business.

Our common stock currently trades on the American Stock Exchange (Amex). The Amex requires companies to fulfill specific requirements in order for their shares to continue to be listed. Our securities may be considered for delisting if:


	•	our financial condition and operating results appear to be unsatisfactory;

	•	it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the securities has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the Amex inadvisable; or

	•	we have sustained losses which are so substantial in relation to our overall operations or our existing financial condition has become so impaired that it appears questionable whether we will be able to continue operations and/or meet our obligations as they mature.

For example, the Amex may consider suspension or delisting of a stock if the stock has been selling for a substantial period of time at a low price per share. Our common stock has been trading at relatively low prices for the past eighteen months and we have sustained net losses for the past three fiscal years. Therefore, our common stock is at risk of being delisted by the Amex. If our shares are delisted from the Amex, our stockholders could find it difficult to sell our stock. To date we have had no communication from the Amex regarding delisting. If our common stock is delisted from the Amex, we may apply to have our shares quoted on NASDAQ’s Bulletin Board or in the “pink sheets” maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. The Bulletin Board and the “pink sheets” are generally considered to be less efficient markets than the Amex. In addition, if our shares are no longer listed on the Amex or another national securities exchange in the United States, our shares may be subject to the “penny stock” regulations. If our common stock were to become subject to the penny stock rules it is likely that the price of our common stock would decline and that our stockholders would find it difficult to sell their shares.

Our NAP facilities are susceptible to regional costs of power, electrical power shortages and planned or unplanned power outages caused by these shortages. A power shortage may result in an increase of the cost of energy, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers. We attempt to limit exposure to system downtime by using backup generators and power supplies. Power outages, which last beyond our backup and alternative power arrangements, could harm our customers and our business.

Our results of operations and financial condition may be affected by inflation in each country in which we manage a facility. We maintain operations in Brazil, which has had in the past, and may have now or in the future, a highly inflationary economy, defined as cumulative inflation of about 100% or more over a three calendar year period. Future increases in our costs may exceed the rate of inflation or the amounts, if any, which we may be able to recover from our customers.

We have not entered into any financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes.

Our carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses is a reasonable approximation of their fair value.

Our exposure to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates relates primarily to our debt. An immediate 10% increase or decrease in current interest rates would not have a material impact on our debt obligations due to the fixed nature of our debt obligations. The fair market value of our long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. These interest rate changes may affect the fair market value of the fixed interest rate debt but do not impact our earnings or cash flows.

The estimated fair value of the derivatives embedded within our Senior Notes creates a market risk exposure resulting from changes in the price of our common stock. These embedded derivatives derive their value primarily based on the price and volatility of the Company’s common stock; however, we do not expect significant changes in the near term in the one year historical volatility of our common stock used to calculate the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives. The table below provides information about the estimated fair value of the derivatives embedded within our Senior Notes and the effect that changes in the price of our common stock are expected to have on the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives:

As noted above, the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives increases as the price of our common stock increases. These changes in estimated fair value will affect our results of operations but will not impact our cash flows.

To date, over 99% of our recognized revenue has been denominated in U.S. dollars, generated mostly from customers in the U.S., and our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations has been minimal. In the future, a larger portion of our revenues may be derived from operations outside of the

U.S. and may be denominated in foreign currency. As a result, future operating results of cash flows could be impacted due to currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar.

Furthermore, to the extent we engage in international sales that are denominated in U.S. dollars, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our services less competitive in the international markets. Although we will continue to monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations, and when appropriate, may use financial hedging techniques in the future to minimize the effect of these fluctuations, we cannot conclude that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

Some of our operating costs are subject to price fluctuations caused by the volatility of underlying commodity prices. The commodity most likely to have an impact on our results of operations in the event of significant price change is electricity. We are closely monitoring the cost of electricity. To the extent that electricity costs rise, we are investigating opportunities to pass these additional power costs onto our customers that utilize this power. We do not employ forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge commodity price risk.

In connection with their review of our draft Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, our independent accountants identified certain adjustments that were required to be recorded within the Form 10-Q. The failure of certain of our internal controls to identify these adjustments led management to conclude that “material weaknesses” exist. A “material weakness” is a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

The adjustments to our financial statements involved the identification and resulting accounting for embedded derivatives in our 9% Senior Convertible Notes, and the recording of certain warrants to be issued in connection with our underwriting agreement for such notes. The adjustments were made prior to the public release of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, and do not affect previously announced results. Subsequently, we also made certain further adjustments to our calculations of the value of those embedded derivatives which necessitated the filing of this 10-Q/ A. Management believes that the failure of our internal controls to identify these adjustments indicates the existence of certain material weaknesses in our system of internal controls which are in part due to limited resources in the finance organization.

As a result of the material weaknesses above, we concluded that our internal controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2004. We are in the process of implementing changes to respond to this matter on an immediate and a longer-term basis. The immediate responsive actions being taken include active recruiting to increase staffing levels in certain areas of the finance organization, the implementation of specific additional procedures for the issuance and recording of securities and the retention of a third party valuation expert to assist management in estimating the fair value of derivatives. Our longer term plan includes the implementation of new policies and procedures for gathering, analyzing and consolidating financial and legal documents, and the implementation of a document management system and software. In addition, we have been engaged in an ongoing process of identifying, documenting and testing our internal controls in anticipation of our required compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act at the end of fiscal 2005. Changes have been made and will be made to our internal controls as a result of these efforts.

Other than as described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

(a) The following exhibits, which are furnished with this Quarterly Report or incorporated herein by reference, are filed as part of this Quarterly Report.


*	Previously filed with our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, on August 9, 2004.

(b) We filed a current report on Form 8-K on May 18, 2004 reporting the redemption of some of our convertible debentures.

Other than current reports on Form 8-K under Item 12 and 7 which are not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no other current reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to the report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 9th day of November 2004.


	By:	/s/ MANUEL D. MEDINA



	Manuel D. Medina,
	Chairman of the Board,
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


	By:	/s/ JOSÉ A. SEGRERA



	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

33 EX-31.1 2 g91450exv31w1.htm CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Terremark Worldwide, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:


	(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

	(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


	(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


	/s/ MANUEL D. MEDINA

	Manuel D. Medina
	Chairman of the Board
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 9, 2004 EX-31.2 3 g91450exv31w2.htm CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Terremark Worldwide, Inc. (the “Registrant”);


	(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

	(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


	(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


	/s/ JOSÉ A. SEGRERA

	José A. Segrera
	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 9, 2004 EX-32.1 4 g91450exv32w1.htm CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906

I, Manuel D. Medina, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Terremark Worldwide, Inc.


	/s/ MANUEL D. MEDINA

	Manuel D. Medina
	Chairman of the Board
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Chief Executive Officer)

Date: November 9, 2004 EX-32.2 5 g91450exv32w2.htm CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906

I, José A. Segrera, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(2) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Terremark Worldwide, Inc.


	/s/ JOSÉ A. SEGRERA

	José A. Segrera
	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Accounting Officer)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from to


Delaware		52-1981922
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of June 30, 2004 (as restated) and March 31, 2004		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 (as restated) and 2003		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Three Months Ended June, 30 2004 (unaudited, as restated)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 (as restated) and 2003		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited, as restated)		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18
	Other Factors Affecting Operating Results		27
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		30
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6.	Exhibits and Report on Form 8-K		32


		June 30, 2004			March 31, 2004

		(as restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	33,224,460		$	4,378,614
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $195,000 and $200,000			1,751,721			3,214,101
Note receivable			—			2,285,000
Contracts receivable			357,296			363,043
Prepaid and other current assets ($456,902 and $499,009 due from related party)			1,008,932			1,115,230

	Total current assets		36,342,409			11,355,988
Investment in unconsolidated entities, net			391,884			725,319
Restricted cash			794,018			789,476
Property and equipment, net			53,630,304			53,897,716
Debt issuance costs and other assets			8,553,085			664,334
Goodwill			9,999,870			9,999,870

	Total assets	$	109,711,570		$	77,432,703


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Current portion of notes payable (includes $0 and $4,325,010 due to related parties)		$	3,708,705		$	9,194,145
Construction payables			547,223			1,363,554
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			6,630,567			7,067,319
Current portion of capital lease obligations			1,551,592			1,799,726
Interest payable			510,502			1,952,978
Convertible debt			250,000			250,000

	Total current liabilities		13,198,589			21,627,722
Convertible debt			50,945,123			36,895,239
Derivatives embedded within convertible debt, at estimated fair value			32,179,875			—
Notes payable, less current portion (includes $0 and $31,191,967 due to related parties)			—			31,311,894
Deferred rent			8,327,357			6,938,454
Capital lease obligations, less current portion			82,285			105,886
Other liabilities			1,380,000			—
Deferred revenue			4,449,447			2,686,396
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock: $.001 par value, 294 shares issued and outstanding, at liquidation value			594,214			586,718

	Total liabilities		111,156,890			100,152,309

Stockholders’ deficit:
Minority interest			1,595,769			—
Commitments and contingencies			—			—
Series G convertible preferred stock: $.001 par value, 20 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation value of approximately $2.8 million)			1			1
Series I convertible preferred stock: $.001 par value, 400 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation value of approximately $10.2 million and $10.0 million)			1			1
Common stock: $.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 366,792,198 and 311,227,482 shares issued and outstanding			366,792			311,227
Paid in capital			241,030,991			213,596,501
Common stock warrants			3,693,216			3,642,006
Common stock options			1,545,375			1,545,375
Accumulated deficit			(237,391,292	)		(236,814,717	)
Treasury stock			(7,286,173	)		—
Note receivable — related party			(5,000,000	)		(5,000,000	)

	Total stockholders’ deficit		(3,041,089	)		(22,719,606	)

	Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	109,711,570		$	77,432,703



			For the Three Months Ended
			June 30,

			2004			2003

			(as restated)
Revenues
	Data center		$	7,111,171		$	3,302,152
	Development, commission and construction fees			—			41,081
	Management fees			43,541			64,269
	Construction contracts			740,799			33,695

		Operating revenues		7,895,511			3,441,197

Expenses
	Data center operations, excluding depreciation (includes $1,939,595 and $929,000 of rent expense with a related party)			5,736,681			2,556,550
	Construction contract expenses, excluding depreciation			705,346			46,456
	General and administrative			3,562,114			2,645,782
	Sales and marketing			970,346			772,318
	Depreciation and amortization			1,276,749			1,184,029

		Operating expenses		12,251,236			7,205,135

	Loss from operations			(4,355,725	)		(3,763,938	)

Other (expenses) income
	Change in estimated fair value of derivatives embedded within convertible debt			3,303,375			—
	Gain on debt restructuring and extinguishment, net			3,420,956			8,475,000
	Interest expense (includes $568,660 and $284,000 with a related party)			(2,983,834	)		(1,832,070	)
	Interest income			66,319			23,255
	Other			(27,666	)		27,568

		Total other income		3,779,150			6,693,753

	(Loss) income before income taxes			(576,575	)		2,929,815
Income taxes				—			—

Net (loss) income				(576,575	)		2,929,815
Preferred dividend				(242,310	)		(40,000	)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders			$	(818,885	)	$	2,889,815

Basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share			$	0.00		$	0.01

Weighted average common shares outstanding				329,026,433			289,886,832


Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description

	31.1	CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302
	31.2	CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302
	32.1	CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906
	32.2	CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906



	Stockholders’ Deficit (unaudited)


					Common Stock Par Value
	Pre-		Pre-		$.001																		Note
	ferred		ferred						Additional			Common			Common		Accumu-						Receivable
	Stock		Stock		Issued				Paid-In			Stock			Stock		lated			Treasury			Related
	Series G		Series I		Shares		Amount		Capital			Warrants			Options		Deficit			Stock			Party

																	(as restated)
Balance at March 31, 2004	$	1	$	1		311,227,482	$	311,227	$	213,596,501		$	3,642,006		$	1,545,375	$	(236,814,717	)	$	—		$	(5,000,000	)
Conversion of debt		—		—		55,076,427		55,076		27,980,948			—			—		—			—			—
Exercise of stock options		—		—		336,667		337		122,423			—			—		—			—			—
Warrants issued		—		—		—		—		—			172,650			—		—			—			—
Exercise of warrants		—		—		151,622		152		121,289			(121,440	)		—		—			—			—
Preferred stock
issuance costs		—		—		—		—		(587,860	)		—			—		—			—			—
Accrued dividends on preferred stock		—		—		—		—		(202,310	)		—			—		—			—			—
Net assets acquired from NAP Madrid		—		—		—		—		—			—			—		—			(7,286,173	)		—
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—			—			—		(576,575	)		—			—

Balance at June 30, 2004	$	1	$	1		366,792,198	$	366,792	$	241,030,991		$	3,693,216		$	1,545,375	$	(237,391,292	)	$	(7,286,173	)	$	(5,000,000	)


Assets
Equipment	$	204,040
Terremark stock		7,286,173

Liabilities
Notes payable, current		(3,708,705	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(677,444	)
Minority interest		(1,595,769	)

Net assets		1,508,295
Previous equity ownership		(333,435	)

Investment amount	$	1,174,860


	2004		2003

Risk Free Rate		2.14% - 3.50%		2.14% - 2.90%
Volatility		150%		155%
Expected life		5 years		5 years
Expected dividends		0%		0%


		As reported			Adjustments			As restated

Balance Sheet
	Total assets	$	109,712		$	—		$	109,712


Current liabilities		$	13,154		$	45		$	13,199
Convertible debt			70,265			(19,320	)		50,945
Derivatives embedded within convertible debt			12,593			19,587			32,180
Other long-term liabilities			14,833						14,833

	Total liabilities		110,845			312			111,157

Minority interest			1,596						1,596
Stockholders’ deficit			(2,729	)		(312	)		(3,041	)

	Total liabilities and equity	$	109,712		$	—		$	109,712


Statement of Operations
Operating revenues		$	7,895		$	—		$	7,895
Operating expenses			12,251			—			12,251


Loss from operations			(4,356	)		—			(4,356	)
Change in estimated fair value of derivatives embedded within convertible debt			3,503			(199	)		3,304
Interest expense			(2,871	)		(113	)		(2,984	)
Other income/expenses			3,459			—			3,459

	Net loss	$	(265	)	$	(312	)	$	(577	)


	June 30,			March 31,
	2004			2004

	(As restated)
Senior Notes, with a face value of $86.25 million, due June 15, 2009, and convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.25 per share. Interest at 9% is payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004	$	50,945,123		$	—
Subordinated secured convertible debentures, with a face amount of $25.0 million, due April 30, 2006 and convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. Interest at 10% is payable quarterly beginning July 31, 2003		—			24,095,239
Subordinated secured convertible debentures due December 31, 2005 and convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $2.14 per share. Interest at 13% is payable on each calendar quarter		—			10,300,000
Subordinated secured convertible debentures due August 30, 2004 and convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $0.66 per share. Interest at 13.125% is payable on each calendar quarter. Paid in full in July 2004		250,000			2,750,000

	$	51,195,123		$	37,145,239
Less: Current portion of convertible debt		(250,000	)		(250,000	)

Convertible debentures, less current portion	$	50,945,123		$	36,895,239



	For the Three Months
	Ended June 30,

	2004		2003

Rent expense	$	1,940,000	$	929,000
Services purchased from related parties		239,000		—
Property management and construction fees		44,000		64,000
Revenues from NAP de las Americas — Madrid		—		17,000
Interest income on notes receivable — related party		21,000		19,000
Interest income from shareholder		8,000		8,000
Interest expense		568,660		284,000


10.	Information About the Company’s Operating Segments


	Data Center			Real Estate
For the Three Months Ended June 30,	Operations			Services			Total

2004
Revenue	$	7,111,171		$	784,340		$	7,895,511
Loss from operations		(4,329,316	)		(26,409	)		(4,355,725	)
Net loss (as restated)		(551,144	)		(25,431	)		(576,575	)
2003
Revenue	$	3,302,152		$	139,045		$	3,441,197
Loss from operations		(3,599,768	)		(164,170	)		(3,763,938	)
Net income (loss)		3,093,985			(164,170	)		2,929,815
Assets, as of
June 30, 2004	$	109,401,974		$	309,596		$	109,711,570
March 31, 2004	$	77,101,579		$	331,124		$	77,432,703


Item 2.	*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.*


Item 1.	*Financial Statements*


1.	Business and Organization


2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


4.	Convertible Debt


	*Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 as Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003*



	For the Three
	Months Ended
	June 30,

	2004		2003

Revenue
U.S.		99%		100%
Outside U.S.		1%		0%

		100%		100%

Data Center		90%		96%
Construction Work		9%		1%
Property and Construction Management		1%		3%

		100%		100%


	Capital
	Lease		Operating		Convertible
	Obligation		Leases		Debt		Notes Payable		Total

2005	$	1,551,592	$	5,318,453	$	250,000	$	3,708,705	$	10,828,750
2006		58,624		6,933,609		0		0		6,992,233
2007		21,495		7,765,489		0		0		7,786,984
2008		2,165		7,735,895		0		0		7,738,060
2009		0		7,896,155		86,257,312		0		94,153,467
Thereafter		0		162,735,992		0		0		162,735,992

	$	1,633,876	$	198,385,593	$	86,507,312	$	3,708,705	$	290,235,486


	*We may not be able to compete effectively in the market for data center services.*


	We anticipate that an increasing portion of our revenues will be from contracts with agencies of the United States government, and uncertainties in government contracts could adversely affect our business.


	*We have significant debt service obligations which will require the use of a substantial portion of our available cash.*


	*We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of these key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our success.*


	*If we do not locate financial or strategic partners, we may have to delay or abandon expansion plans.*


	Our president, chairman and chief executive officer, cannot be removed without cause which could delay, defer or prevent change in control of our company or impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination.


	The restatement of our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as a result of our failure to properly account for embedded derivatives in our 9% Senior Notes, could cause the loss of confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our stock.


	*Failure or circumvention of our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over financial reporting could seriously harm our business.*


	*If the price of our shares remains low or our financial condition deteriorates, we may be delisted by the American Stock Exchange.*


	*Our business could be harmed by prolonged electrical power outages or shortages, or increased costs of energy.*


	*Brazilian political and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operations.*


Price		Estimated
Per Share		Fair Value
of Common		of Embedded
Stock		Derivatives

	$0.44	$	13,662,000
	$0.64	$	21,804,000
	$0.84	$	29,937,000
	$1.04	$	37,717,000
	$1.24	$	44,841,000