TERREMARK WORLWIDE 424(B)(3) 333-102286

The selling stockholders named on pages 49 through 53 may offer for sale up to 157,263,605 shares of our common stock, 151,309,338 of which are outstanding and 5,954,267 of which may be issued as a result of the exercise of warrants held by some of the selling stockholders.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling stockholders.

Our common stock is listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “TWW.” On July 12, 2004, the closing price of the common stock was $0.71 per share.

This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Investing in our common stock involves certain risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 6.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus carefully.

Our Business

We operate Internet Exchange Point facilities at strategic locations in Florida, California and Sao Paulo from which we assist users of the Internet and large communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. Our primary facility is the NAP of the Americas, located in Miami, Florida, where we provide exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multi-national enterprises and other end users.

Internet Exchanges, or IXs, are locations where two or more networks meet to interconnect and exchange Internet and data traffic, such as traffic of data, voice, images, video and all forms of digital telecommunications, much like air carriers meet at airports to exchange passengers and cargo. Instead of airlines and transportation companies, however, participation in IXs comes from telecommunications carriers, Internet service providers and large telecommunications and Internet users in general. Tier-1 IXs are large centers that access and distribute Internet traffic and, following the airport analogy, operate much like large, international airport passenger and cargo transportation terminals or “hubs.”

Initially, four IXs — in New York, Washington, D.C., Chicago, and San Francisco — were created and supported by the National Science Foundation as part of the transition from the United States government-financed Internet to a commercially operated Internet. Since that time, privately owned IXs have been developed, including the NAP of the Americas.

Our Internet Exchange Point facilities are carrier-neutral. We enable our customers to freely choose from among the many carriers available at our Internet Exchange Point facilities. We believe the carrier neutrality provides us with a competitive advantage when compared to carrier-operated Internet Exchange Point facilities where customers are limited to conducting business with one carrier.

We generate revenue by providing our customers with:

• the site and platform they need to exchange Internet and data traffic;

• related professional and managed services; and

• space to house their equipment and their network facilities in order to be close to the Internet and data traffic exchange connections that take place at our Internet Exchange Point facilities.

Currently, our customers include telecommunications carriers such as AT&T, MCI, Qwest and Sprint, enterprises such as Bacardi USA, Intrado and Steiner Leisure, and government agencies including the Diplomatic Telecommunications Services Programming Office (DTSPO, a division of the United States Department of State), the United States Southern Command and the City of Coral Gables.

Our Financial Condition

From our April 2000 merger with AmTec through March 31, 2004, we have incurred net operating losses of approximately $222.5 million. Our cash flows from operations for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 were negative and our working capital deficit was approximately $10.2 million and $38.3 million as of March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, respectively.

On June 14, 2004, we privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009. We used the net proceeds from this offering to pay all of our outstanding debt amounting to $40.5 million. The balance of the proceeds will be used for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. The notes are convertible at the option of the holders into our common stock at $1.25 per share. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for the impact of this transaction on our financial condition.

Based on customer contracts signed as of June 14, 2004, existing contracts, including those with the U.S. Government and enterprises, and expected future contracts from potential customers currently in our sales pipeline we project that our cash flow from operations will be positive by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2005. We have identified additional potential customers, including the federal, state and local governments, and are actively offering available services to them. However, our projected revenues and planned cash needs depend on several factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the rate at which our services are sold to the government sector and the commercial sector, the ability to retain our customer base, the willingness and timing of potential customers outsourcing the housing and management of their technology infrastructure to us, the reliability and cost-effectiveness of our services and our ability to market our services.

As of March 31, 2004, we had not paid approximately $719,000 relating to a capital lease. We have negotiated a payment plan with the vendor and are making partial payments.

As of March 31, 2004, we had not paid approximately $489,000 related to our 2002 tangible property taxes. We have negotiated a payment plan with the Miami-Dade Tax Collector and are current with respect to the plan.

Our Strategy

The NAP of the Americas created a new business model for network access points by providing customers with:

• the connectivity of a world-class IX in a carrier-neutral facility;

• highly conditioned space within which to locate equipment next to other customers; and

• managed services meeting the design and operational specifications of multinational carriers, enterprises and government customers.

Our strategy is to leverage our major connectivity hubs to sell services to customers within and outside of our Internet Exchange Point facilities. For example, we have been retained by the U.S. Diplomatic Telecommunications Services Program Office, under three publicly awarded contracts, to design, implement and manage a system which will permit designated overseas locations to have global internet access. Although the NAP of the Americas serves as the hub, we are leveraging our international carrier relationships to provide this customer with connectivity and technology to communicate with U.S. government locations around the world.

Our History

We were formed in 1982 and, along with our subsidiaries, were engaged in the development, sale, leasing, management and financing of various real estate projects. We provided these services to private and institutional investors, as well as for our own account. The real estate projects with which we were involved included retail, high-rise office buildings, mixed-use projects, condominiums, hotels and governmental assisted housing. We were also involved in a number of ancillary businesses that complemented our core development operations. Specifically, we engaged in brokering financial services, property management, construction management, condominium hotel management, residential sales and commercial leasing and brokerage, and advisory services.

On April 28, 2000, Terremark Holdings, Inc. completed a reverse merger with AmTec, Inc., a public company. Contemporaneous with the reverse merger, we changed our corporate name to Terremark Worldwide, Inc. and adopted “TWW” as our trading symbol on the American Stock Exchange. Historical information of the surviving company is that of Terremark Holdings, Inc. In conjunction with our development of the NAP of the Americas, we began to redefine and focus our strategy on providing housing and management of Internet and telecommunications infrastructure and began implementing a plan to exit all lines of business and real estate activities not directly related to the TerreNAP Center strategy. Lines of business discontinued included IP fax services, unified messaging services, and telephony. Non-core real estate activities exited included real estate development, property management, financing and the ancillary businesses that complemented the real estate development operations. Our real estate activities currently include technology construction work and management of the property where the NAP of the Americas is located. As of March 31, 2002, we had completed the exit of lines of business and real estate activities not related to our TerreNAP Center strategy.

Our principal executive office is located at 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33133. Our telephone number is (305) 856-3200.

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following summary selected consolidated annual financial statement data has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.



		Twelve Months Ended March 31,

		2004			2003			2002			2001			2000


		(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Results of operations:
Data center		$	17,034	(3)	$	11,033	(3)	$	3,216		$	253		$	—
Real estate services			1,179			3,661			12,656			39,894			15,390

	Total revenue		18,213			14,694			15,872			40,147			15,390

Data center operations expenses			16,413			11,235			11,231			1,223			—
Construction contract expenses			918			2,968			7,398			20,347			555
Other expenses			23,373			41,718			54,615			39,950			20,868

	Total expenses		40,704			55,921			73,244			61,520			21,423

Loss from continuing operations			(22,491	)		(41,227	)		(57,372	)		(21,373	)		(6,033	)
Loss from discontinued operations			—			—			—			(82,627	)		—
Non-cash preferred dividend			(1,158	)		(160	)		(160	)		(160	)		(160	)
Net loss attributable to common shareholder		$	(23,649	)	$	(41,387	)	$	(57,532	)	$	(104,160	)	$	(6,193	)

Loss from continuing operations per common share		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.09	)
Loss from discontinued operations per common share			—			—			—			(0.44	)		—

Net loss per common share		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.09	)

Financial condition(5):
Real estate inventory		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	11,797
Property and equipment, net			53,898			54,483			61,089			25,066			1,011
Total assets			77,433			69,602			81,024			78,069			77,998
Long term obligations(1)(2)			78,525			74,524			38,210			16,462			28,632
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity(4)			(22,720	)		(46,461	)		(49,276	)		11,163			476

(1) Long term obligations include convertible debt less current portion, deferred rent, deferred revenue, notes payable, less current portion, redeemable preferred stock, and capital lease obligations, less current portion.

(2) Long term obligation as of March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 include $500 in redeemable convertible preferred stock plus accrued dividends.

(3) Amount includes a one-time contract termination fee as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 of $422 and $1,095, respectively.

(4) Stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2000 includes approximately $4,777 in convertible preferred stock.

(5) See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources” regarding subsequent events.

The market for data center services is extremely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Our current and potential competitors include providers of data center services, global, regional and local telecommunications companies and Regional Bell Operating Companies, and information technology outsourcing firms. Many of our existing competitors have greater market presence and financial and personnel resources than we do. Our competitors include Internet data centers operated by established communications carriers such as AT&T, Level 3, MCI and Qwest. We also compete with providers of data services centers, regional Bell operating companies that offer Internet access and information technology outsourcing firms. The principal competitive factors in our market include:


	•	ability to deliver services when requested by the customer;

	•	Internet system engineering and other professional services expertise;

	•	customer service;

	•	network capability, reliability, quality of service and scalability;

	•	variety of managed services offered;

	•	access to network resources, including circuits, equipment and interconnection capacity to other networks;

	•	broad geographic presence;

	•	price;

	•	ability to maintain and expand distribution channels;

	•	brand name recognition;

	•	timing of introductions of new services;

	•	physical and network security;

	•	financial resources; and

	•	customer base.

Some of our competitors may be able to develop and expand their data center services faster, devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. In addition, these competitors have entered and will likely continue to enter into business relationships to provide additional services that compete with the services we provide.

Generally, U.S. Government contracts are subject to oversight audits by government representatives, to profit and cost controls and limitations, and to provisions permitting modification or termination, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the government’s convenience. In some cases, government contracts are subject to the uncertainties surrounding congressional appropriations or agency funding. Government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations and requirements could lead to suspension or debarment from future government contracting for a period of time.

On a proforma basis after the issuance of our $86.25 million in 9% Senior Notes due June 15, 2009, and application of the proceeds from the issuance, our total liabilities are approximately $107.0 million, obligations guaranteed by us were $10.1 million and our total shareholders’ equity was $8.2 million.

Each of these obligations requires significant amounts of liquidity. Should we need additional capital or financing, our ability to arrange financing and the cost of this financing will depend upon many factors, including:


	•	general economic and capital markets conditions, and in particular the non-investment grade debt market;

	•	conditions in the Internet infrastructure market;

	•	credit availability from banks or other lenders;

	•	investor confidence in the telecommunications industry generally and our company specifically; and

	•	the success of our facilities.

We are highly dependent on the services of key personnel, particularly Manuel D. Medina, our Chairman. In an attempt to reduce costs, we have eliminated some management positions. Our potential growth and expansion and the merger and integration of separate businesses, are expected to place increased demands on our management skills and resources. Therefore, our success also depends upon our ability to hire and retain additional skilled and experienced management personnel. Employment and retention of qualified personnel is important due to the competitive nature of our industry.

Expenditures commence well before a TerreNAP Center opens, and it may take an extended period to approach break-even capacity utilization. It takes a significant period of time to select the appropriate location for a new TerreNAP Center, construct the necessary facilities, install equipment and telecommunications infrastructure and hire operations and sales personnel. As a result, we expect that individual TerreNAP Center will experience losses for more than one year from the time they are opened. As a part of our TerreNAP Center strategy, we intend to rely on third-party financial or strategic partners to fund the development costs. If we are unable to establish such third-party relationships, we may delay or abandon some or all of our development and expansion plans or otherwise forego market opportunities, making it difficult for us to generate additional revenue and to respond to competitive pressures.

Under the terms of our agreement with Manuel D. Medina, our President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as long as Mr. Medina’s guarantees of our debt exist, we have agreed to nominate Mr. Medina to our board of directors and not remove Mr. Medina, unless for good cause, or remove any of our officers without Mr. Medina’s consent. This could delay, defer or prevent change in control of our company or impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination that you, as a stockholder, may otherwise view favorably.

Our common stock currently trades on the American Stock Exchange (Amex). The Amex requires companies to fulfill specific requirements in order for their shares to continue to be listed. Our securities may be considered for delisting if:


	•	our financial condition and operating results appear to be unsatisfactory;

	•	it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the securities has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the Amex inadvisable; or

	•	we have sustained losses which are so substantial in relation to our overall operations or our existing financial condition has become so impaired that it appears questionable whether we will be able to continue operations and/or meet our obligations as they mature.

For example, the Amex may consider suspension or delisting of a stock if the stock has been selling for a substantial period of time at a low price per share. Our common stock has been trading at relatively low prices for the past eighteen months and we have sustained net losses for the past three fiscal years. Therefore, our common stock is at risk of being delisted by the Amex. If our shares are delisted from the Amex, our stockholders could find it difficult to sell our stock. To date we have had no communication from the Amex regarding delisting. If our common stock is delisted from the Amex, we may apply to have our shares quoted on NASDAQ’s Bulletin Board or in the “pink sheets” maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. The Bulletin Board and the “pink sheets” are generally considered to be less efficient markets than the Amex. In addition, if our shares are no longer listed on the Amex or another national securities exchange in the United States, our shares may be subject to the “penny stock” regulations. If our common stock were to become subject to the penny stock rules it is likely that the price of our common stock would decline and that our stockholders would find it difficult to sell their shares.

Our NAP facilities are susceptible to regional costs of power, electrical power shortages and planned or unplanned power outages caused by these shortages. A power shortage may result in an increase of the cost of energy, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers. We attempt to limit exposure to system downtime by using backup generators and power supplies. Power outages, which last beyond our backup and alternative power arrangements, could harm our customers and our business.

Our results of operations and financial condition may be affected by inflation in each country in which we manage a facility. We maintain operations in Brazil, which has had in the past, and may have now or in the future, a highly inflationary economy, defined as cumulative inflation of about 100% or more over a three calendar year period. Future increases in our costs may exceed the rate of inflation or the amounts, if any, which we may be able to recover from our customers.

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders under this prospectus. We estimate that our expenses in connection with this offering will be approximately $210,000.

Our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is quoted under the symbol “TWW” on the American Stock Exchange. As of May 31, 2004, we had the authority to issue:


	•	500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share; and

	•	10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, which are issuable in series on terms to be determined by our board of directors, of which 20 shares are designated as Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, 294 shares are designated as Series H Convertible Preferred Stock and 600 shares are designated as Series I Convertible Preferred Stock.


	•	311,798,104 shares of our common stock were outstanding;

	•	20 shares of our Series G Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding and held by an entity in which Manuel Medina, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, owns a 50% interest and could have been converted into 2,163,809 shares of our common stock;

	•	294 shares of our Series H Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding and held by one holder of record. Each share of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into 1,000 shares of our common stock; and

	•	400 shares of our Series I Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding. Each share of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into 33,334 shares of our common stock.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock on the American Stock Exchange. Quotations are based on actual transactions and not bid prices.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends or other distributions when and if declared by our board of directors. The right of our board of directors to declare dividends, however, is subject to any

In May 2004, we issued three senior secured promissory notes in favor of Veritas High Yield Arbitrage I Fund, LLC, Veritas High Yield Arbitrage II Fund, LLC, and Veritas High Yield Arbitrage Fund, (Bermuda) Ltd. (collectively the “Lenders”) for the aggregate amount of $5.2 million. The notes accrue interest at 12% per annum, are paid monthly based on original face amount, and mature on October 29, 2004, with prepayment permitted without penalty after the first month. We also issued 200,000 warrants in favor of the lenders with a strike price of $0.01, which expire two years after the effective date of the registration statement for the underlying common stock. We agreed to file a registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the warrants and to use our best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective by August 15, 2004. In the event the registration statement is not declared effective on or before August 15, 2004, we must deposit 200,000 fully registered shares of common stock into escrow. The notes are secured by 10 million shares of our common stock placed in escrow by certain of our stockholders, as well as two of our directors, Guillermo Amore and Miguel Rosenfeld, including several entities beneficially owned or controlled by them. The shares pledged as security are subject to increase if at any time prior to repayment in full of each note, the ten day moving average price of our common stock is less than 80% of the trailing ten day volume weighted average price prior to closing (as appropriately adjusted for any stock dividends, recapitalizations or similar events), or if we merge, consolidate or undergo a recapitalization, or issue additional securities. We have executed an indemnification agreement in favor of each of the individuals and entities pledging shares of our common stock as security in connection with each of the notes. We paid a finder’s fee of $130,000 to McMahan Securities Co. L.P. in connection with of the issuance of notes and warrants to the lenders. There is certain common ownership between the lenders and McMahan Securities Co. L.P.

On March 31, 2004, we issued 400 shares of Series I 8% Convertible Preferred Stock for $7.8 million in cash and $2.2 million in promissory notes, together with warrants to purchase 2.8 million shares of our common stock. We have collected all amounts due under the promissory note. The Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share. In January 2007, the Series I Preferred Stock dividend rate will increase to 10% per year until January 2009 when it increases to 12%. Dividends are payable quarterly, at our discretion, in shares of our common stock or cash. We have the right to redeem the Series I Preferred Stock at $25,000 per share plus accrued dividends at any time after December 31, 2004.

On April 30, 2003, we issued 10% Subordinated Secured Convertible Debentures due April 30, 2006 for an aggregate principal amount of $25.0 million. The debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.50 per share. Interest is payable quarterly beginning July 31, 2003. The debentures were issued in exchange for $10.3 million in cash, $9.5 million in a promissory note due in full May 30, 2003 and $5.2 million of notes payable converted to the subordinated debentures. Included in the $5.2 million is $2.0 million of cash received in March 2003 in anticipation of the debenture transaction. As of June 1, 2004, all holders of the 10% debentures converted their debentures into shares of our common stock. See discussion in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

These offers and sales of our common stock were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended as the common stock was sold to accredited investors pursuant to Regulation D and to non-United States persons in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S.

The following selected consolidated annual financial data has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes and other financial information elsewhere herein.


(1)	Long term obligations include convertible debt less current portion, deferred rent, deferred revenue, notes payable, less current portion, redeemable preferred stock, and capital lease obligations, less current portion.

(2)	Long term obligation as of March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 include $500 in redeemable convertible preferred stock plus accrued dividends.

(3)	Amount includes a one-time contract termination fee as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 of $422 and $1,095, respectively.

(4)	Stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2000 includes approximately $4,777 in convertible preferred stock.

(5)	See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources” regarding subsequent events.

The quarterly selected financial statement data set forth below has been derived from our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with


(1)	Amount includes a one time contract termination fee of $130, $292 and $1,095 for the three months ended December 31, 2003, June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

This prospectus may contain “forward-looking statements” based on our current expectations, assumptions, and estimates about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may,” and other similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of several factors more fully described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

The following discussion of results of operations and financial condition is based upon and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained elsewhere in this registration statement.

In June 2004, we privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009. We have utilized the net proceeds from this offering to pay all of our outstanding debt, for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. The notes are convertible at the option of the holders into our common stock at $1.25 per share. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for the impact of this transaction on our financial condition.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following significant accounting policies, among others, affect its judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:


	•	revenue recognition and allowance for bad debt;

	•	accounting for income taxes;

	•	impairment of long-lived assets; and

	•	goodwill.

Currently, we derive our revenues from monthly recurring fees for colocation and exchange point services and managed services. We also receive non-recurring installation fee for colocation and exchange point services and for construction activities. Revenues from colocation, exchange point services and managed services are billed monthly and recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Installation fees are generally billed in the period in which the installation is performed but deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. Managed services fees are billed and recognized in the period in which the services are provided. Construction activities are billed in accordance with contract terms, but revenues are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method.

Revenue is recognized as service is provided when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. We assess collection based on a number of factors, including transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. We do not request collateral from customers. If we determine that collection is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. As of March 31, 2004 and 2003, our accounts receivable amounted to $3,214,101 and $494,736, respectively, and were net of allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $200,000 and $120,340, respectively.

Revenues from construction contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for each contract. This method is used because management considers cost incurred to be the best measure of progress on these contracts. The duration of a construction contract generally exceeds one year. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are classified as other liabilities and represent billings in excess of revenues recognized. Construction contract expense costs include all direct material and labor costs and indirect costs related to contract performance such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, bad debt and depreciation. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions can be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, it is possible that our current estimates relating to completion cost and profitability of our uncompleted contracts will vary from actual results. Excluding depreciation, profit margins (construction contract revenue less construction contract expenses) on construction contracts for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $22,432, $315,658 and $857,163, respectively.

We analyze current economic news and trends, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating revenue recognition and the adequacy of our allowance for bad debts.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

Our accounting for deferred taxes involves the evaluation of a number of factors concerning the realizability of our deferred tax assets. To support our conclusion that a 100% valuation allowance was required, we primarily considered such factors as our history of operating losses, the nature of our deferred tax assets and the absence of taxable income in prior carryback years. Although our operating plans assume taxable and operating income in future periods, our evaluation of all the available evidence in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets indicates that such plans are not considered sufficient to overcome the available negative evidence.

Our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, amounting to approximately $137 million, begin to expire in 2011. Utilization of the net operating losses generated prior to the AmTec merger may be limited by the Internal Revenue Code. Should we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the foreseeable future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination is made.

We account for impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which we adopted in fiscal 2003. This standard requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Such events and circumstances include, but are not limited to, prolonged industry downturns, significant decline in our market value and significant reductions in our projected cash flows. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Significant judgments and assumptions are required in the forecast of future operating results used in the

As of March 31, 2004 and 2003, our long-lived assets, including property and equipment, net and identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, totaled $63,897,586 and $64,482,834, respectively. For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recognized impairment charges amounting to $0, $4,020,300, and $18,973,670, respectively.

We account for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step approach. Initially the fair value of the reporting units are compared with their carrying amount, including goodwill, to identify potential impairment. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess, if any, of the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, intangible assets were generally amortized on the straight-line method over five years. In accordance with SFAS 142, we ceased amortization of our intangible assets with indefinite lives and completed an initial impairment test of intangible assets as of April 1, 2002. Management determined in the initial impairment test that these assets were not impaired based on their fair values. Fair value was estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows and the assumed market capitalization at the reporting unit level.

For the year ended March 31, 2004, approximately 94% of our total revenues were generated from data center operations. The remainder was substantially related to construction work. For the year ended March 31, 2003, approximately 75% of our total revenues were generated from data center operations. The remainder was substantially related to construction work. For the year ended March 31, 2002, approximately 20% of our total revenues were generated from data center operations, approximately 52% was from real estate projects and construction work, and approximately 28% was from property and construction management. During the past three years, our results of operations have been significantly impacted by:


	•	our shift in focus to the housing and management of Internet infrastructure after the NAP of the Americas became operational in July 2001;

	•	the sale of our telecom facilities management operations in February 2001; and

	•	our exit from non-core real estate activities by March 31, 2002. Non-core real estate activities included real estate development, property management, financing and other ancillary businesses that complemented the development operations. Our real estate activities currently include technology infrastructure construction work and management of the property where the NAP of the Americas is located.

Revenue. The following charts provide certain information with respect to our revenues:

The increase in data center revenues was primarily the result of growth in our deployed customer base from 86 customers as of March 31, 2003 to 152 customers as of March 31, 2004. Data center revenues consist of:


	•	colocation services, such as leasing of space and provisioning of power;

	•	exchange point services, such as peering and cross connects; and

	•	managed and professional services, such as network management, network monitoring, procurement and installation of equipment and procurement of connectivity, managed router services, technical support and consulting.

Our utilization of total net colocation space increased to 13.2% from 6.3% as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our utilization of total net colocation space represents the percentage of space billed versus total space available for customers. For comparative purposes total space available for customers includes third floor space in TECOTA for both March 31, 2004 and 2003. Cross connects billed to customers increased to 1,417 from 662 as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Data center — contract termination fee represents amounts received from two customers for the termination of their contracted services with the NAP of the Americas. As a result of these contract terminations, we experienced a decrease in monthly recurring revenues of approximately $14,000. Contract termination fees are recognized upon contract termination when there are no remaining contingencies or obligations on our part.

We anticipate an increase in revenue from colocation, exchange point and managed services as we add more customers to our network of NAPs, sell additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services. We also expect managed and professional services to become an important source of revenue and increase as a proportion of data center-services.

Development, commission and construction fees decreased $156,000 to $41,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $197,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. We do not expect any revenues from development, commission and construction fees in the foreseeable future.

Management fees increased $18,000 to $198,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $180,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. The only facility we currently manage is TECOTA, the property in which the NAP of the Americas is located. We collect a monthly management fee from TECOTA equal to the greater of approximately $8,000 or 3% of cash collected by TECOTA. Although in the future, we may manage properties where our centers are including TECOTA, we anticipate that management fees will not be a significant source of revenue in the foreseeable future.

Construction contract revenue decreased $2.4 million to $940,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $3.3 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, we completed three and eleven construction contracts, respectively. As of March 31, 2004, we have one construction contract in process. Due to our approach to our construction business, we expect revenues from construction contracts to significantly fluctuate from quarter to quarter. We anticipate focusing our efforts on obtaining construction contracts for projects related to technology infrastructure.

Data Center Operations Expenses. Data center operations expenses increased $5.2 million, or 46.4%, to $16.4 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $11.2 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. Data center operations expenses consist mainly of rent, operations personnel, property taxes, electricity, chilled water, procurement of equipment and connectivity and security services. The increase in total data center operations expenses is due to an increase of $3.1 million in rent, an increase of $376,000 in electricity and chilled water, an increase of $526,000 in personnel costs and an increase of $717,000 in costs related to the procurement of equipment and connectivity under a U.S. Federal government contract. The increase in rent expense is due to the July 2003 opening of our NAP-West facilities in Santa Clara, California and the leasing of an additional 120,000 square feet of space in the third floor of TECOTA, which commenced in November 2003. We have been paying rent for our NAP-West facilities since January 2001 but before we opened these facilities in July 2003, related expenses were recorded as impairment charges. Rent expense is being recorded on the straight-line method based on contractual amounts even though actual payments for the third floor of TECOTA will not commence until April 2005. The increase in personnel costs is mainly attributable to staff increase from 60 operations employees in fiscal year 2003 to 75 for fiscal year 2004. We anticipate that some data center expenses, principally electricity, chilled water, payroll and costs related to managed services, will increase as we provide additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services.

Contract Construction Expenses. Contract construction expenses decreased approximately $2.0 million to $918,000 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $3.0 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. This decrease is a result of the decrease in number of construction contracts and average dollar amount of those contracts as discussed above in “construction contract revenue.” We do not currently anticipate losses on any of the individual construction contracts.

General and Administrative Expense. Excluding non-cash charges of $2.2 million for stock-based compensation, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 million; or 10.4%, to $11.1 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $12.5 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, professional service fees, rent and other general corporate expenses. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is due to a decrease in payroll of $709,000. In connection with the modification to our employment relationship with three employees, we accelerated the vesting on their outstanding stock options, awarded new stock options and/or extended the life of their outstanding stock options. As a result, we recognized a non-cash, stock-based compensation charge of approximately $2.2 million in the year ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in payroll is mainly due to a reduction in staff levels. The average number of employees whose salaries are included in general and administrative expenses decreased from 60 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003 to 50 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $800,000, or 19.0%, to $3.4 for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $4.2 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. The significant components of sales and marketing expenses are payroll and benefits. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses is due to decreases in investor relations of $442,000, in travel and entertainment of $172,000, and in payroll and benefits of $89,000. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2003, we issued warrants valued at $442,000 to Strategic Growth International for investor relations services. The decrease in payroll is mainly due to staff level reductions. The number of employees whose salaries are included in sales and marketing expenses were 20 and 21 as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in travel and entertainment is the result of overall reduction in spending due to cost containment efforts.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $400,000 to $4.7 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004 from $5.1 million for the twelve months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease was due to reductions in property and equipment resulting primarily from impairment charges recorded during the year ended March 31, 2003, which in turn decreased depreciation expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, we performed our annual test for impairment and concluded that these assets were not impaired.

Debt Restructuring. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2004, we incurred a non-cash gain of $8.5 million related to financing transactions whereby $21.6 million of our construction payables plus $1.0 million in accrued interest was converted to 30.1 million shares of our common stock with a $14.1 million market value upon conversion.

Interest Expense. Excluding non-cash charges, interest expense decreased to $7.1 million from $11.0 million for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We reduced the interest expense as a result of a reduction in the principal balance outstanding and a reduction in the interest rates. Due to the conversion of some of our debt and construction payables to equity which was partially offset by the issuance of new debt, our principal balance outstanding decreased to $77.7 million from $101.7 million as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In addition our average interest rate on our debt decreased to 8.1% from 9.8% for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Net non-cash charges of approximately $7.5 million represent the amortization of a beneficial conversion feature as additional interest expense partially offset by the amortization of a debt restructuring gain as reductions to interest expense.

Other income (expenses). On November 10, 2003, a developer agreed to pay us a $3.8 million non-refundable fee to develop a facility in Australia. The developer paid us $500,000 upon execution of the agreement and the remaining balance of $3.3 million on December 10, 2003. On February 11, 2004, the developer notified us it did not wish to proceed with negotiations regarding the construction of a TerreNAP Center in Australia. On February 19, 2004, we acknowledged receipt of the developer’s notification, and terminated the agreement with the developer. As required by the agreement, we did not conduct any business related to the operation or management of data centers in Australia until the agreement was terminated. We have no further obligations in connection with the agreement with the developer and as a result recognized the $3.8 million non-refundable fee in the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

The net loss from data center operations is primarily the result of insufficient revenues to cover our operating and interest expenses. We expect to generate net losses until we reach required levels of monthly

Revenue. Total revenue decreased $1.2 million, or 7.5%, to $14.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $15.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. The decrease is due to a reduction in our development, management and construction contracts revenue of approximately $9.0 million partially offset by an increase in data center revenue, including contract termination fee, of approximately $7.8 million.

Data center revenue increased $6.7 million to $9.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $3.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. Revenues consisted of recurring revenues of $8.4 million and $2.9 million respectively, for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, primarily from charges for colocation, power, peering and some managed services. Non-recurring revenues were $1.5 million and $355,000, respectively, for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, primarily related to managed services and the recognized portion of deferred installation revenue. Installation fees are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. The increase in revenues was primarily the result of an increase in orders from existing customers and growth in our deployed customer base from 40 customers as of March 31, 2002 to 86 customers as of March 31, 2003. We anticipate an increase in revenues from colocation, power and peering and revenues from managed services as we add more customers to the NAP of the Americas, sell additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services.

Data center services revenues consist of colocation services, such as leasing of space and provisioning of power; exchange point services, such as peering and interconnection; and managed and professional services, such as network management, procurement and installation of equipment and procurement of connectivity, managed router services, technical support and consulting. We anticipate an increase in revenue from colocation and exchange point services as we add more customers to our network of NAPs, sell additional services to existing customers and introduce new products and services. We also expect managed and professional services to become an important source of revenue and increase as a percentage of data center- services. For the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, data center services revenues consisted of the following:

Data center — contract termination fee was $1.1 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 and represents amounts received from two customers for the termination of their contracted services with the NAP of the Americas. No fees were received during the year ended March 31, 2002. Contract termination fees are recognized upon contract termination when there are no remaining contingencies or obligations on our part.

Development, commission and construction fees decreased $3.0 million, or 93.8%, to $197,000 for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $3.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in development, commission and construction fees is primarily the result of our exiting of the underlying non-core real estate activities. We do not expect any significant amount of revenues from development, commission and construction fees.

Management fees decreased $1.0 million, or 83.3%, to $200,000 for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $1.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. The decrease is a result of our exiting the management of commercial and residential properties. The only facility we currently manage is TECOTA, the property in which the NAP of the Americas is located. We collect from TECOTA a monthly management fee of approximately $8,000 or 3% of cash collected by TECOTA, whichever is greater. During the fiscal year ended

Construction contract revenue decreased $5.0 million, or 60.2%, to $3.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $8.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. During the year ended March 31, 2003 we completed eleven contracts and, as of March 31, 2003, had two construction contracts in process. During the year ended March 31, 2002, we completed two contracts and, as of March 31, 2002, we had five construction contracts in process. The decrease in revenues from construction contracts is due to a decrease in the average revenue per contract, which went from average revenue per contract of $3.6 million in fiscal year 2002 to average revenue per contract of $500,000 in fiscal year 2003. Due to our opportunistic approach to our construction business, we expect revenues from construction contracts to significantly fluctuate from quarter to quarter. We anticipate focusing our efforts on obtaining construction contracts for projects related to technology infrastructure.

Data Center Operations Expenses. Excluding depreciation, data center operations expenses remained constant at $11.2 million for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002. Data center operations consist mainly of rent, operations personnel, electricity, chilled water and security services. With the exception of electricity and chilled water, the majority of these expenses are fixed in nature. However, commencing in fiscal year 2004, we anticipate that certain data center expenses, principally costs related to managed services, will increase as we provide additional services to existing customers and introduce into the market new products and services. We also expect that our costs of electricity and chilled water costs will increase in the future as we add more customers to the NAP of the Americas. The number of employees whose salaries are included in data center operations remained constant at 60 during the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.

Contract Construction Expenses. Contract construction expenses decreased $4.4 million, or 59.5%, to $3.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $7.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. This decrease is a result of the decrease in number of contracts and dollar amount of those projects as discussed above in “revenues from construction contracts.” We do not currently anticipate losses on any of the individual contracts.

Start-up Costs — Data Centers. There were no start-up costs for the year ended March 31, 2003. Start-up costs for the year ended March 31, 2002 primarily relate to the NAP of the Americas in Miami, Florida, and were approximately $3.4 million.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased $3.1 million, or 19.9%, to $12.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $15.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, professional service fees, rent and other general corporate expenses. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is mainly due to decreases in rent of $1.9 million and payroll of $1.0 million.

Carrying costs, including rent, for our Corvin facility in Santa Clara, California for the year ended March 31, 2003 were reflected in the facility’s impairment charge in the previous year. In accordance with SFAS No. 121, we recognized as of March 31, 2002 an impairment charge of $5.5 million, including $1.5 million in expected lease carrying costs for the period of time until the facility could be sublet. During the second quarter ended September 30, 2002, an additional $350,000 in expected lease carrying costs were recognized and included as part of impairment of long-lived assets. During the year ended March 31, 2002, the rent for the Corvin facility for that year was included in general and administrative expenses.

The decrease in payroll is mainly attributable to staff reductions. The number of employees whose salaries are included in general and administrative expenses decreased from 63 for the year ended March 31, 2002 to 50 for the year ended March 31, 2003.

The remaining period over period decrease in general and administrative expenses is mainly attributable to a decrease in general corporate overhead resulting from our exit of non-core real estate activities in the year ended March 31, 2002.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased $600,000, or 16.7%, to $4.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $3.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. The significant components of sales and marketing expenses are salaries, commissions, provision for bad debt expenses and marketing. The increase in sales and marketing expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in investor relations expense of $442,000 and an increase in provision for bad debt expenses of approximately $265,000. We issued warrants valued at approximately $442,000 to a third party for investor relations services. Provision for bad debt expense consists of full provisions related to eight customers. We have commenced legal action against many of these customers. The number of employees whose salaries are included in sales and marketing expenses increased slightly from 21 as of March 31, 2002 to 22 as of March 31, 2003.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.2 million, or 30.1%, to $5.1 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $7.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2002. This decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was mainly due to the cessation of $3.5 million in amortization of goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with current accounting standards and a decrease in depreciation of approximately $0.4 million related to our colocation facility in Santa Clara, California and non core assets. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation of approximately $1.7 million primarily from assets of the NAP of the Americas that were put in service during fiscal year 2002 and had a full year of depreciation in fiscal year 2003.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Due principally to the decline and uncertainty of the telecommunications and Internet infrastructure markets, we recognized the following impairment charges:

As a result of impairment charges in the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the long-lived assets described in the table above became fully impaired.

Due to our unsuccessful efforts to lease space at our colocation facility in Santa Clara, California, during the quarter ended September 30, 2001, we granted an option to one of our vendors (a contractor involved with the facility’s build-out) to purchase the leasehold improvements and assume the existing lease for approximately $4.0 million. Based on this option, we recorded a $6.6 million impairment charge in the quarter ended September 30, 2001 to write the improvements down to the option amount. Subsequently, we continued to search for alternatives, which included subleasing or selling our leasehold improvements. In the quarter ended March 31, 2002, upon expiration of the option, we listed our leasehold improvements for sale, indicating a definite change in the strategy. We are now actively looking for a buyer to assume the existing lease or sublease all or a substantial portion of the space. The existing lease is $118,000 per month, with scheduled annual increases, for a twenty-year term ending in 2020. We believe that the most likely outcome is that the property will be subleased or leased from the landlord to a third party and that we will receive no consideration for the leasehold improvements. Based on this most likely scenario, in the quarter ended March 31, 2002, we recorded an additional $5.5 million impairment, resulting in the asset being fully reserved. We also established as of March 31, 2002 reserves for leasehold carrying costs, consisting primarily of monthly rent. As of March 31, 2003, we had approximately $1.4 million in related reserves which we anticipate will carry the facility through March 2004.

The decline in the telecommunications industry and resulting decline in related real estate construction and leasing activities caused us to perform, during the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, impairment analyses of our promote interests in TECOTA acquired in the telecom facilities management operations and

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, we wrote off $450,000 related to equipment that has been held for installation for more than one year and is considered obsolete.

On October 15, 2002, we entered into a joint venture agreement to develop and operate a HIPPA compliant network access point at the NAP of the Americas in Miami, Florida. We acquired a 10% interest in the joint venture company by issuing a $1.0 million promissory note. As the joint venture was not fully funded by December 31, 2002, we determined that our joint venture interest was impaired. Therefore, we recognized a $1.0 million impairment as of December 31, 2002. Effective March 31, 2003, we and the other joint venture partner entered into an agreement to declare void all the then current agreements and contracts, including the joint venture agreement. As a result, we were no longer obligated under the promissory note. The results of operations present, on a net basis, the effects of the formation and the dissolution of the joint venture and accordingly no gain or loss was recognized as a result of these transactions.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $39,000, or 40.2%, to $136,000 for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $97,000 for the year ended March 31, 2002. The increase was due to the recording of interest income on a $5.0 million note receivable from our Chief Executive Officer which began accruing interest in September 2002.

Inducement on Debt Conversion. During the year ended March 31, 2003, we incurred a non-cash expense of $5.0 million related to the $15.8 million of our convertible debt that was converted into 22.0 million shares of our common stock. The debt was converted at $0.75 per share, which was approximately 50% below the stated conversion price. This expense represents the fair value of the additional common shares issued by us as a result of the lower conversion price.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $1.2 million, or 12.2%, to $11.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 from $9.8 million for year ended March 31, 2002. The increase was due to an increase of $33.0 million in the average debt balance outstanding. The increase was offset by the conversion of $15.8 million in convertible debt during the quarter ended December 31, 2002 and reduction in the interest rate of the Ocean Bank loan from 9.25% to 7.50%. Based on the April 30, 2003 transactions, we expect cash interest payments to be reduced by approximately $900,000 for the year ended March 31, 2004.

Gain On the Sale of Real Estate Held for Sale. In July 2001, we sold Fortune House II for $17.2 million and recorded a gain of approximately $3.9 million. During the year ended March 31, 2002, we also sold six condominium units and recorded a net gain of $0.3 million. The last condominium unit was sold in the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

The net loss for the year ended March 31, 2003 is mainly due to non-cash items, including impairment charges of long-lived assets of approximately $4.0 million and depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $5.1 million, interest expense of approximately $11.0 million, and approximately $11.2 million

of expenses generated from the operations of the NAP of the Americas. The net loss for our data center operations segment is primarily the result of insufficient revenues at the NAP of the Americas to cover our operating and interest expenses. We expect to continue generating net losses from the data center operations segment until we reach required levels of monthly revenues. The net loss from our telecom facilities management segment for the year ended March 31, 2002 resulted primarily from impairment, interest and general expenses from our collocation facility in Santa Clara, California. There were no revenues generated from the facility during the period. For the year ended March 31, 2003, the losses related to the facility were insignificant and included in data center operations. The net loss from real estate activities for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 resulted from insufficient revenues to support general and interest costs and impairments. Due to our exit of real estate activities not related to our strategy, we anticipate that the significance of the real estate activities to our overall operations will decrease.

We privately placed $86.25 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009 to qualified institutional buyers on June 14, 2004. The notes bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum, payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004 and are convertible at the option of the holders at $1.25 per share. We utilized approximately $40.5 million of the net proceeds from this offering to pay all of our outstanding debt. The balance of the proceeds will be used for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures.

The notes will rank senior in priority with all existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and rank junior to any future secured indebtedness.

If there is a change in control, the holders have the right to require us to repurchase their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If we issue a cash dividend on our common stock, we will pay contingent interest to the holders equal to the product of the per share cash dividend and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of each holder’s note.

We may redeem some or all of the notes for cash at any time on or after June 15, 2007 if the closing price of our common shares has exceeded 200% of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date we mail the redemption notice. If we redeem the notes during the twelve month period commencing on June 15, 2007 or 2008, the redemption price equals 104.5% or 102.25%, respectively, of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus an amount equal to 50% of all remaining scheduled interest payments on the notes from, and including, the redemption date through the maturity date.

On May 17, 2004, we provided certain debenture holders with notice of our intent to redeem $25.0 million of our 10% convertible debentures and $2.8 million of our 13.125% convertible debentures, effective May 31, 2004. As of May 31, 2004, all of the holders of our 10% convertible debentures and $2.5 million in principal of our 13.125% convertible debentures opted to convert their debentures into an aggregate of 54,726,427 shares of our common stock. In June 2004, the remaining holders of our 13.125% convertible debentures redeemed their debentures for cash. In addition, in June 2004, the remaining holders of our 13% convertible debentures redeemed their debentures for an aggregate of $10.3 million.


	•	closing of the 9% Senior Convertible Notes,

	•	repayment of the $40.5 million in debt,

	•	conversion of the total $27.5 million in 10% and 13.125% convertible debentures to shares of common stock, and

	•	repayment of the total $10.6 million in 13% and 13.125% convertible debentures on a pro forma basis, our total interest expense would have been approximately $8,350,000, and our net loss and net loss per share would have been approximately $16,215,655 and $ 0.05, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2004.

The following table shows our actual capitalization as of March 31, 2004 and our capitalization on a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2004 as adjusted to give effect to the issuance of our 9% Senior Convertible Notes for $86.25 million, the use of those proceeds as discussed in the preceding paragraph and the conversion to equity of $27.5 million in principal of our convertible debentures:


(1)	Reflects the following adjustments:


	(a)	Net proceeds of $80.9 million from the offering, net of $5.4 million in debt issuance costs.
	(b)	Collection of the $2.4 million note receivable related to the Series I convertible preferred stock.
	(c)	Payment of all of our outstanding notes payable, plus accrued interest amounting to $37.2 million.
	(d)	Payment of the remaining $.3 million balance of 13.125% convertible debentures.
	(e)	Payment of all our $11.1 million outstanding 13% convertible debentures, including a 2% early redemption premium and accrued interest.


(2)	Reflects the following adjustments:


	(a)	$4.3 million of unamortized debt restructuring gain.
	(b)	$.9 million of unamortized beneficial conversion feature.
	(c)	$.2 million write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs for debt paid or converted.


(3)	Reflects the conversion to common stock of $27.5 million of our convertible debentures plus $.5 million in accrued interest.

Historically, we have financed our operations and capital requirements primarily through our credit facility with Ocean Bank, issuance of unsecured notes, issuance of convertible debentures, private sale of common and preferred stock and vendor financing, including construction payables and capital lease obligations. As of March 31, 2003, our total indebtedness was approximately $116.1 million. As of March 31,

From the time of the merger through March 31, 2004, we incurred net operating losses of approximately $222.5 million. Our cash flows from operations for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 were negative and the working capital deficit was approximately $10.2 million and $38.3 million as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Based on customer contracts signed as of June 14, 2004, expected expansions of customers under contract and anticipated future contracts from potential customers in the sales pipeline, we project that our cash flow from operations will be positive by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2005. Our projected revenues and cash flows, depend on several factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the rate at which we provides services and these services are accepted by customers under existing contracts, the rate at which new services are sold to the government sector and the commercial sector, the ability to retain the customer base, the willingness and timing of potential customers in outsourcing the housing and management of their technology infrastructure to us, the reliability and cost-effectiveness of our services and the our ability to market our services. Although the real estate activities had a net operating loss of approximately $338,000 for the year ended March 31, 2004, we anticipate that these activities will generate enough revenues to cover operating expenses. If revenues for real estate activities are below amounts anticipated, cash needs are not expected to exceed $200,000 for the next twelve months. Accordingly, we have the cash resources sufficient to meet our working capital, debt service and corporate overhead requirements associated with our operations for at least the next 18 months.

Cash used in operations for the year ended March 31, 2004 was approximately $15.9 million compared to cash used in operations of $18.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $2.4 million. This decrease was primarily due to the collection of $3.8 million fee for the grant of an exclusive right to develop a facility in Australia. Our net loss included the following non-cash items:

Cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2004 was $4.1 compared to cash used in investing activities of $1.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2003, an increase of $2.8 million. This is due to the increase of approximately $3.1 million in leasehold improvements and equipment for the third floor of TECOTA.

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2004 was $22.9 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of $20.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2003, an increase of $2.1 million. For the year ended March 31, 2004, cash provided by financing activities included $27.6 million of debt and equity financing partially offset by $4.6 million in debt repayments. For the year ended March 31, 2003, cash provided by financing activities included $27.0 million of equity and debt financing, partially offset by $5.2 million in payments of debt and construction payables.

On March 31, 2004, we issued 400 shares of Series I 8% Convertible Preferred Stock for $7.8 million in cash and $2.2 million in promissory notes, together with warrants to purchase 2.8 million shares of our common stock and which are exercisable for five years at $0.90 per share. We have collected all amounts due under the promissory notes. The Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share. In January 2007, the Series I Preferred Stock dividend rate will increase to 10% per year until January 2009 when it increases to 12%. Dividends are payable quarterly, at our discretion, in shares of our common stock or cash. We have the right to redeem the Series I Preferred Stock at $25,000 per share plus accrued dividends at any time after December 31, 2004.

As of March 31, 2004, our total indebtedness, including interest, from notes payable, capital lease obligations, convertible debt and Series H preferred stock was approximately $82.1 million. See “Liquidity and Recent Developments” in this section for certain subsequent events.


(1)	Paid in full, in June 2004, with proceeds of our $86.25 million senior convertible notes.
(2)	We did not pay approximately $7.6 million in principal and interest which were due April 1, 2004. We paid in full the notes on or before June 14, 2004.
(3)	Paid in full on June 14, 2004.

Ocean Bank Credit Facility: On September 5, 2001, we borrowed $48.0 million from Ocean Bank. The Ocean Bank credit facility is secured by all of our assets and allows for up to a $25.0 million junior lien position on the assets of our NAP of the Americas, Inc. subsidiary. To obtain the original loan, we paid a $720,000 commitment fee to Ocean Bank. The proceeds of the original credit facility was used to:


	•	repay a $10.0 million short-term loan from Manuel D. Medina, our Chief Executive Officer, the proceeds of which we had used to fund the build out of the NAP of the Americas (Mr. Medina, in turn, used the $10.0 million to repay a personal $10.0 million short-term loan from Ocean Bank);

	•	repay $3.5 million of debt that we owed to Ocean Bank under a line of credit personally guaranteed by Mr. Medina;

	•	pay $1.2 million in loan costs related to the $48.0 million credit facility (including a $720,000 commitment fee); and

	•	fund the NAP of the Americas build out costs.

Mr. Medina has personally guaranteed the credit facility. In addition to Mr. Medina’s personal guarantee of the credit facility, and in order to obtain the facility, Ocean Bank required Mr. Medina, prior to the bank disbursing funds under the credit facility, to provide a $5.0 million certificate of deposit to the bank as collateral on certain personal loans that Mr. Medina has with the bank and commit to accelerate the maturity date of those personal loans to December 31, 2001. Subsequent to September 2001, Mr. Medina and the bank extended the maturity date on his personal loans, first to December 31, 2001 and later to July 1, 2002. In the event of our default under the credit facility, Mr. Medina also agreed to subordinate debt that we owed to him. Mr. Medina has repaid part of those personal loans to Ocean Bank, leaving an outstanding principal balance of approximately $4.6 million as of December 31, 2003. On February 11, 2004, Mr. Medina extended one loan with a principal balance of approximately $3.3 million to February 11, 2005 and made an interest payment of $63,500. On March 8, 2004, Mr. Medina extended the maturity date on the other loan which had a principal balance of approximately $1.3 million to March 8, 2005 and made a $73,446 payment of principal and interest.

In consideration of Mr. Medina’s agreeing to repay his indebtedness to Ocean Bank earlier than otherwise required, pledging the certificate of deposit and personally guaranteeing our credit facility and approximately $21.0 million of construction payables, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with him. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement, we will indemnify Mr. Medina from any personal liability related to his guarantees of our debt, use commercially reasonable efforts to relieve Mr. Medina of all his guarantees of our debt, provide up to $6.5 million of cash collateral to Ocean Bank should Mr. Medina be unable to repay the personal loans when due and provide a non interest- bearing $5.0 million loan to Mr. Medina. Mr. Medina and we had agreed that we have the right to withhold payment to him of $1,375,000 in convertible debentures owned by him until the note receivable is repaid. In June 2004, we paid Mr. Medina approximately $1.4 million upon redemption of our convertible debentures owned by him. The note receivable from Mr. Medina is shown as an adjustment to equity. The $48.0 million credit facility and the note receivable from Mr. Medina were approved by our board of directors.

In July 2002, we and Mr. Medina modified the terms of his $5.0 million non-interest bearing note payable to us. As amended, the note matures September 30, 2004 and bears interest subsequent to September 5, 2002 at 2%, the applicable federal rate. Interest is due in bi-annual installments. We review the collectibility of this note on a quarterly basis.

On April 30, 2003, Ocean Bank revised its $44.0 million credit facility with us by converting $15.0 million of the outstanding principal balance into equity and extending the term of the remaining $29.0 million until April 30, 2006. Concurrent with this transaction, we paid all past due interest as of March 31, 2003, plus accrued interest through April 28, 2003 totaling approximately $1.6 million and prepaid approximately $900,000 of interest. Under the new terms, interest is payable quarterly at an annual rate of 5.25% for the first twelve months and 7.5% thereafter. In June 2004, we paid the Ocean Bank debt in full.

Construction Payables: On November 8, 2002, CRG, LLC entered into an agreement with Cupertino Electric, Inc. to purchase our entire $18.5 million construction payable (including accrued interest) to

On December 5, 2002, CRG entered into an agreement with Kinetics Mechanical Services, Inc. and Kinetics Systems Inc. to purchase our entire $4.1 million construction payable (including accrued interest) to Kinetics. Under the terms of their agreement CRG was to pay Kinetics $1.9 million. On December 5, 2002, we also entered into an agreement with CRG that provided us the option, upon the closing of the purchase of the debt by CRG from Kinetics, to repay the entire debt at a discount by either issuing shares of our common stock valued at $0.75 per share or making a cash payment.

On April 30, 2003, CRG LLC completed the purchase, at a discount, of our $22.6 million construction payables (including accrued interest) to Cupertino and Kinetics. Cupertino and Kinetics were construction contractors for the NAP of the Americas. At the closing, the construction payables were converted into 30,133,334 shares of our common stock.

CRG was created by Mr. Christian Altaba, one of our shareholders, for the purpose of buying our debt from Cupertino Electric and Kinetics Mechanical Services. None of the participants in CRG were or currently are our officers or directors. There is no affiliation between CRG and Cupertino or Kinetics. CRG is managed by Mr. Altaba.

Convertible Debentures: On April 30, 2003, we issued 10% Subordinated Secured Convertible Debentures due April 30, 2006 for an aggregate principal amount of $25.0 million. The debt is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.50 per share. Interest is payable quarterly beginning July 31, 2003. The debentures were issued in exchange for $10.3 million in cash, $9.5 million in a promissory note due in full May 30, 2003 and $5.2 million of notes payable which were converted into the Subordinated Debentures. Included in the $5.2 million is $2.0 million of cash received in March 2003 in anticipation of the transaction.


(1)	Debentures with a carrying value of $26,595,239 were converted to equity in June 2004. The remaining balance of $10,550,000 was paid in June and July 2004 with the proceeds from issuance of $86.25 million Senior Notes.

Supra Group, Inc., the maker of the $9.5 million promissory note failed to pay but agreed on June 16, 2003 to assign the note and the debenture to Gigabyte, LLC, an entity newly formed by Paolo Amore, the son

Other: In August 2002, we modified the terms of a note payable to TotalBank. The maturity date was extended until December 2002 with some principal payments to be made monthly and the remaining principal and interest due at maturity. In conjunction with the modification and extension of this note, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock valued at $180,000 to a shareholder who formerly guaranteed the note. On March 31, 2003, we entered into a forbearance agreement with TotalBank and modified the terms of our note. Under the modified agreement terms, we made principal payments of $100,000 and $125,000 in April 2003 and May 2003, respectively, and TotalBank retained the right to enforce accelerated remedies if we default on the modified note. As of December 31, 2003, the modified note had been assigned to JCH Aston Partners, LLC and we had not paid $367,178 of principal balance due. In February 2004, we paid a $15,000 fee to extend the modified note to March 31, 2004. In April 2004, we further modified the terms of the note and paid $150,000 thereon which amount was applied first to interest and then to principal. We further agreed to extend the modified note to July 5, 2004, increase the annual interest rate to 16%, and to pay down the modified note by an additional $50,000 on July 5, 2004. We were also responsible for nominal attorney’s fees in connection with this extension. In June 2004, we paid the outstanding balance of the note in full.

As of March 31, 2004, we had not paid approximately $719,000 relating to a capital lease. We are currently negotiating a payment plan.

As of March 31, 2004, we have not paid approximately $489,000 related to our 2002 tangible property taxes in Miami-Dade county, Florida. We have negotiated a payment plan with the Tax Collector Public Service Office and are current under the plan.

As of March 31, 2004, we had not paid approximately $429,000 of accrued interest related to our convertible debentures. This amount has been subsequently paid.

Between April 2003 and March 2004, we borrowed an aggregate of $750,000 of short-term debt bearing interest between at 10%. During the same period, we repaid $1,628,000 of our short-term debt.

On October 30, 2002, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Arturo Ehrlich to assist us in raising capital. We issued warrants to purchase 1.2 million shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share to Mr. Ehrlich together with a cash payment of $180,000 as an advance for future expenses. Mr. Ehrlich is a director of SBP Investments, Inc., a corporation that lent us $3.0 million in October 2002.

The Technology Center of the Americas, LLC, (“TECOTA”), an entity in which we have a 0.84% membership interest, owns the building that leases the space to us for the NAP of the Americas under a 20 year lease. The construction of TECOTA was funded with $48.0 million in equity and $35.4 million in construction financing from a consortium of banks. We guaranteed this construction financing during development and construction of TECOTA. After TECOTA was built, some of the banks released us from their portion of the guarantee, the result of which was to reduce the guarantee to $5.5 million. As of March 31, 2004, the TECOTA debt outstanding under the construction loan was $35.4 million. We do not expect to fund any amounts under our guarantee.

We guarantee up to $6.5 million in personal debt of Manuel D. Medina, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources” for details.

We lease space for our operations, office equipment and furniture under non-cancelable operating leases. Some equipment is also leased under capital leases, which are included in leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment.

The following table represents the minimum future operating and capital lease payments for these commitments, as well as the combined aggregate maturities for the following obligations for each of the twelve months ended March 31:

In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition. SAB 104 updates portions of existing interpretative guidance in order to make this consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement requires that an issuer classify financial instruments which are within its scope as a liability. Most of the guidance in SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The impact of the adoption of SFAS 150 on our consolidated financial statements was to present Series H redeemable preferred stock as a liability.

In March 2003, the FASB reached a consensus on Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”. The consensus provides guidance on the accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements. It also provided guidance on how to separate multiple element revenue arrangements into its separate units of accounting and how to measure and allocate the arrangement’s total consideration. The effective date of EITF 00-21 is for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods (interim or annual) beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of EITF 00-21 as of July 1, 2003 has not impacted our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51.” FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective immediately for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB released a revised version of FIN 46 clarifying certain aspects of FIN 46 and providing certain entities with exemptions from the requirements of FIN 46. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004. NAP de las Americas-Madrid S.A. was a variable interest entity but our relationship indicates that it does not require consolidation since we were not the primary beneficiary. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, we purchased an additional 70% interest in NAP de las Americas-Madrid S.A., thereby increasing our equity interest to 80%, from June 2004 forward, the financial position and results of operations of Nap de las Americas-Madrid will be consolidated into our accounts.

We have not entered into any financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes.

Our carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses is a reasonable approximation of their fair value.

Our exposure to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates relates primarily to our debt. An immediate 10% increase or decrease in current interest rates would furthermore not have a material impact on our debt obligations due to the fixed nature of our debt obligations. The fair market value of our long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. These interest rate changes may affect the fair market value of the fixed interest rate debt but do not impact our earnings or cash flows.

To date, over 99% of our recognized revenue has been denominated in U.S. dollars, generated mostly from customers in the U.S., and our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations has been minimal. In the future, a larger portion of our revenues may be derived from operations outside of the U.S. and may be denominated in foreign currency. As a result, our operating results or cash flows may be impacted due to currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar.

Furthermore, to the extent we engage in international sales that are denominated in U.S. dollars, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our services less competitive in the international markets. Although we will continue to monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations, and when appropriate, may use financial hedging techniques in the future to minimize the effect of these fluctuations, we cannot assure you that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

Some of our operating costs are subject to price fluctuations caused by the volatility of underlying commodity prices. The commodity most likely to have an impact on our results of operations in the event of significant price change is electricity. We are closely monitoring the cost of electricity. To the extent that electricity costs continue to rise, we are investigating opportunities to pass these additional power costs onto our customers that utilize this power. We do not employ forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge commodity price risk.

Terremark Worldwide, Inc. operates Internet Exchange Point facilities at strategic locations in Miami, Florida; Santa Clara, California; and Sao Paulo, Brazil, from which we assist users of the Internet and communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. Our primary facility is the NAP of the Americas located in Miami, where as of June 14, 2004 we have over 155 customers including over 80 network service providers. We generate revenue by providing exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multi-national enterprises and other end users.

Internet Exchanges, or IXs, are locations where two or more networks meet to interconnect and exchange Internet and data traffic (data, voice, images, video and all forms of digital telecommunications), much like air carriers meet at airports to exchange passengers and cargo. Instead of airlines and transportation companies, however, participation in IXs comes from telecommunications carriers, Internet service providers and large telecommunications and Internet users. Tier-1 IXs are locations where the primary Internet networks meet to access, exchange and distribute Internet traffic and, following the airport analogy, operate much like large, international airport passenger and cargo transportation terminals or “hubs.”

Our Internet Exchange Point facilities are carrier-neutral. We are not owned or controlled by, nor affiliated with, any telecommunications carrier. Rather, we enable our customers to freely choose from among the many carriers available at our Internet Exchange Point facilities. We believe that our carrier neutrality and the diversity of network service providers present at our facilities provides us with a competitive advantage when compared to carrier-operated Internet Exchange Point facilities where customers are limited to conducting business with one carrier.


	•	the site and platform they need to exchange Internet and data traffic;

	•	related professional and managed services; and

	•	space to house their equipment and their network facilities in order to be close to the Internet and data traffic exchange connections that take place at our Internet Exchange Point facilities.

Currently, our customers include telecommunications carriers such as AT&T, MCI, Qwest and Sprint, enterprises such as Bacardi USA, Intrado, and Steiner Leisure, content providers such as Yahoo! and Akamai, and government agencies including the Diplomatic Telecommunications Services Programming Office (DTSPO, a division of the United States Department of State), the United States Southern Command and the City of Coral Gables.

Prior to April 2000, we were engaged in the development, sales, leasing, management and financing of retail, high-rise office buildings, mixed-use projects, condominiums, hotels and government-assisted housing. We were also involved in a number of ancillary businesses that complemented our development operations. Specifically, we engaged in offering financial services, property management, construction management, condominium hotel management, residential and commercial leasing brokerage, and advisory services. By March 31, 2002, we had exited non-core real estate activities, real estate development, property management, financing and the ancillary businesses that complimented these real-estate development operations. Our remaining real estate activities include technology construction work and management of the property where the NAP of the Americas is located.

Our principal executive office is located at 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33133. Our telephone number is (305) 856-3200.

The Internet is a collection of many independent networks interconnected with each other to form a network of networks. Information that is to be transported over the Internet is divided into discreet identical sized packets that are transmitted over the primary Internet networks, known as backbones, and then reassembled at their destination where they are presented to the end user in the same form as the original information. However, not all Internet backbones reach all locations on the Internet. Therefore, users on different networks need to communicate with each other and transmit packets to each other through interconnection between these networks. To accommodate the fast growth of traffic over the Internet, an organized approach for network interconnection was needed. The exchange of traffic between these networks without payment became known as “peering”. When a fee is paid, it is referred to as “transit.” The points and places where these networks exchange traffic, or peer, with each other are known as Internet Exchanges, or IXs.

Since the beginning of the Internet, major traffic aggregation and exchange points have developed around the world. The first four Tier-1 IXs were built in the United States in the early 1990’s to serve the northern part of the country, from East Coast to West Coast, and are located in New York, Washington, Chicago and San Francisco. These IXs were built with sponsorship from the National Science Foundation in order to promote Internet development and used the existing infrastructures of telecommunication companies, to which ownership of the IXs was eventually transferred. These four Tier-1 IXs offered only connectivity services.

We operate Internet Exchange Point facilities at strategic locations in Miami, Florida; Santa Clara, California; and Sao Paulo, Brazil, from which we assist users of the Internet and large communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. Our primary facility is the NAP of the Americas located in Miami, where we have over 155 customers including over 80 network service providers. We generate revenue by providing exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multi-national enterprises and other end users. Using the airport analogy again, customers at our facilities exchange and redirect Internet and data traffic to multiple destinations, and purchase various managed services, similar to what happens in airport terminals with the provision of fuel, maintenance, spare parts and food.


	•	the connectivity of a world-class IX in a carrier-neutral facility;

	•	highly conditioned space within which to locate equipment next to other customers; and

	•	managed services meeting the design and operational specifications of multinational carriers, enterprises and government customers.

Our strategy is to leverage our major connectivity hubs to sell services to customers within and outside of our Internet Exchange Point facilities. For example, we have been retained by the United States Department Diplomatic Telecommunications Service Program Office, under three publicly awarded contracts, to design, implement and manage the system which will permit designated overseas locations to have global Internet access. Although the NAP of the Americas serves as the hub to manage this solution, we are leveraging our international carrier relationships to provide this customer with connectivity and technology solutions to communicate with U.S. government locations around the world.

Our business model for international expansion requires limited capital investment and is best compared to that of a management company model in the hospitality industry. The model contemplates that a local in-country partner would own and fund the development and build-out of the facility in which our NAP would

In February 2002, we entered into an agreement with Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, the research foundation for the State of Sao Paulo, known as FAPESP, to operate and manage the IX created by FAPESP, which we have renamed the NAP do Brasil. Pursuant to the twenty year agreement, FAPESP turned over the network access point to Terremark, which we moved in February 2004 to permanent facilities in an existing data center where we have contractual control of the data center’s meet point room. The NAP do Brasil is modeled after the operational design of the NAP of the Americas. Pre-existing FAPESP customers have the right to continue to receive services at the then existing levels without payment until February 2004. FAPESP will receive 6% of the revenue generated by the NAP do Brazil for the first five years of operation, 5% during the following five years, and 1% during the last ten years. The term may be extended for an additional ten-year period, during which FAPESP would again receive 1% of the revenues. For the year ended March 31, 2004, our Brazilian operations generated losses of approximately $824,000 on revenues of approximately $160,000.

In June 2002, we entered into an exclusive agreement with the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid to develop and operate carrier-neutral network access points in Spain. As part of that agreement, the parties formed NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. to own and operate carrier-neutral IXs in Spain, modeled after the NAP of the Americas. The shareholders are the Comunidad through its Instituto Madrileno de Desarrollo — IMADE, the Camara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid, Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A., Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A., a subsidiary of Abengoa S.A., and Centro de Transportes de Coslada, S.A. (CTC). At the time the NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. was formed, we owned 1% of its equity, which we subsequently increased to 10%. In May 2004, we purchased the 20% of this entity owned by Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A. for approximately $550,000, and exercised our option to purchase the 30% of the interest owned by the Comunidad (CTC and IMADE) for approximately $1.4 million. In addition, in June 2004, we purchased 20% of this entity owned by Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A. for approximately $634,000. The Camara has decided to retain its 20% interest. These transactions closed in early July 2004. As a result of these transactions, we now have an 80% equity interest in NAP de las Americas — Madrid.

We provided the technical and operational know-how for the development of an interim NAP de las Americas — Madrid which became operational in July 2002. During the year ended March 31, 2004, we recognized approximately $43,000 in revenues from services billed to the NAP de Las Americas — Madrid S.A.

In May 2004, we entered into an agreement with Global Switch LLP to move the NAP de las Americas — Madrid to a facility in Madrid owned by Global Switch LLP.

With our operations in Miami, Santa Clara and Sao Paulo, and the Madrid facility expected to be operational by July 2004, we will have Internet Exchange Point facilities located at major crossroads of Internet and data traffic. PriMetrica (formerly Telegeography), researcher and publisher of international telecom statistics, in its Global Internet Geography 2004, ranked Miami, the home of the NAP of the Americas, as the number one international Internet Hub City for Latin America and the Caribbean, Sao Paulo, where the NAP do Brasil is located, is ranked second. The San Francisco Bay area, where our NAP of the Americas/West facility is located, and Madrid, where our NAP de las Americas — Madrid is being deployed, are ranked fifth and twenty-first, respectively, in the Top 50 Interregional Internet Hub Cities in the world. We believe the Madrid network access point will also benefit from Madrid’s strategic geographic location by serving as an Internet gateway to the European Union, North Africa and the Americas.

We continue to explore other locations and have targeted additional locations in Europe, the Middle East and Mexico as a prospective hub locations.

The combination of connectivity, neutrality and quality of our facilities allows us to provide the following value proposition to our customers:


	•	Carrier-neutrality: Carriers and other customers are willing to locate their equipment within our facility and use our professional managed services because we neither discriminate against nor give preference to any individual or group of customers. Locating equipment at a data center is known in the industry as “colocation.”

	•	Connectivity: Our customers can access any of the more than 80 network providers present at our facilities.

	•	“Zero-Mile” Access: Because our facilities provide carrier-grade colocation space directly adjacent to the point at which the traffic is exchanged, there is effectively “zero” distance between the peering point and customers’ equipment, which reduces costs and points of failure and increases efficiency, and creates a new paradigm, connecting all participants at a distance of zero miles.

	•	Service Level Agreements: We guarantee our customers 100% power availability and environmental stability at the NAP of the Americas.

	•	Outsourcing of Services: Because of our staff’s expertise, our customers find it more cost effective to contract us to design, deploy, operate, monitor and manage their equipment and networks at our facilities than to hire dedicated staff to perform those functions.

	•	Lower Costs, Increased Efficiency and Quality of Service: The combination of these attributes helps our customers reduce their total costs by eliminating local loop charges to connect their facility to the peering point, backhaul charges to and from connecting points, and the cost of redundancy to mitigate risks associated with increased points of failure along these routes.

Furthermore, given the heightened focus on homeland security, we are focusing on meeting the security sensitive technology needs of federal, state and local governments, as well as large enterprises. Our value proposition to this sector revolves around our security, critical mass of Internet and data connectivity and carrier neutrality.

Consequently, we have built a team of employees with federal government security clearances that, as of June 1, 2004, represented approximately 15% of our employee base. In addition, our facility in Miami can provide Secured Compartmentalized Information Facility certified space to customers that require that type of specialized environment.

Exchange Point Service: Our facilities provide a service called Exchange Point Service, which is designed to facilitate both peering and the purchase of transit, among customers.

Colocation Services: Our facilities provide the physical environment necessary to keep a customer’s Internet and telecommunications equipment up and running 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This facility is custom designed to exceed industry standards for electrical and environmental systems. In addition, it offers a wide range of physical security features, including biometric scanners, man traps, smoke detection, fire suppression systems, motion sensors, secured access, video camera surveillance and security breach alarms. High levels of reliability are achieved through a number of redundant subsystems including power and fiber trunks from multiple sources.

Managed Services: Our managed services are designed to support our customers’ mission-critical needs that focus on producing faster network response times. We currently offer the following managed services:


	•	Add/Drop Multiplexer Service (ADMS) — This service provides customers maximum interconnection efficiency using operational support systems to provide rapid provisioning, monitoring and management of customer circuits.

	•	Network Deployment and Relocation Services — This service leverages our team of engineers to assist customers with the deployment and relocation of critical systems both within and outside our facilities. Our team will identify, schedule, document and monitor activities required for successful relocation of equipment as part of the overall network relocation project.

	•	Engineering Services — We offer facility and equipment design and engineering services, including structural, mechanical, electrical and network systems, all provided by our staff of industry certified engineers.

	•	Installation Services — Our installation services specialists provide basic installation of our customers’ equipment. This service reduces our customers’ implementation times, and increases the productivity of our customers’ technical personnel, by avoiding costly downtime due to lack of materials and equipment management and project coordination.

	•	Managed Router Service — Utilizing the large mass of carriers at our facilities, this service offers customers cost savings and convenience by providing Internet access without the need to purchase or manage an Internet router. Customer network performance is optimized and multi-home configurations offer increased redundancy and reliability.

	•	Network Management Services — This service assists customers in achieving maximum uptime by enlisting our engineers at our facility’s Network Operations Center to monitor and manage their equipment located within and outside the facility.

	•	Systems Monitoring Services — This service assists customers in achieving maximum uptime by enlisting engineers to monitor their equipment located at our facilities or anywhere else on their network.

	•	Professional Staging Service — This service turns the implementation of any network or telecom environment into a simple plug and play process. Customers ship their equipment to the NAP or alternate destination for installation, and our staging services team gathers and inspects all the equipment components. The team then assembles, configures, tests, and completes an inventory of the equipment, reducing the time required for a customer to install and load final configurations on site. The service also ensures that all ordered components are configured and installed properly in a controlled and stable environment.

	•	Reference Timing — This service allows our customers to save on equipment costs, installation times and maintenance of our customers’ network timing reference by using our on site Stratum source.

	•	Remote Hands Assistance — Remote Hands assists customers that need to remotely access their equipment to perform simple troubleshooting or minor maintenance tasks on a 24 hours a day, 7 days a week basis that do not require tools or equipment. Remote Hands services are available on demand or per contract.

	•	Smart Hands Assistance — Smart Hands enhances the Remote Hands service with more complex remote assistance using industry certified engineers for troubleshooting and maintenance.

	•	Turn Key Solution — Our staff can provide full integration activities for all aspects of a “turn key” global project. Along with the planning, design and engineering related to the network and the general program management to control the project, we manage vendors, purchase equipment, receive, store and manage inventory, provision, test, ship, track, install, turn up, monitor and manage performance of the network and monitor and maintain equipment and services.

Our customer contracts have terms of between one year and twenty years, with an average of 2.5 years. Our customer contracts do not allow for early termination before the stated maturity date and typically provide for penalties if they are cancelled prior to expiration. Currently we have over 155 customers. The U.S. Federal government and Latin American Nautilus USA Inc. accounted for approximately $2.4 million and $1.7 million, or 14% and 10%, of total data center services revenues, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2004. Latin American Nautilus USA Inc. and Progress Telecom accounted for approximately $1.4 million (or 14%) and $1.0 million (or 10%) in data center revenues, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2003.

Sales. We sell our products and services primarily through our direct sales force, which we organize by industry sectors such as carriers, enterprises, government and educational. We also have sales representatives at our facilities in Santa Clara, California and in San Paulo, Brazil, and expect to have a sales representative in Madrid, Spain by July 2004. We also have a channel marketing program to market our services to promote our products and services to enterprises in various geographic locations. This sales force is supported by a team of trained support engineers who work with our sales executives and their customers to respond to customer questions and design a package of services that best meets the customer’s needs.

Marketing. Our marketing activities are designed to drive awareness of our products and services, and generate qualified sales opportunities through various direct marketing and event driven campaigns. Our marketing team is responsible for providing our sales force with product brochures, collateral and relevant sales tools to improve their sales effectiveness. Our marketing organization also is responsible for our product strategy and direction based upon primary and secondary market research and the advancement of new technologies. We participate in a variety of Internet, computer and financial industry conferences and place our officers and employees in keynote speaking engagements at these conferences. In addition to these activities, we build recognition through sponsoring or leading industry technical forums and participating in Internet industry standard-setting bodies.

Our NAPS are neither a traditional data center, nor a traditional IX. Unlike many IXs in the United States, we combine exchange point services (to facilitate peering) with carrier-grade colocation space and managed services in carrier neutral facilities. Consequently, we believe that our facilities are competitively unique and can only be replicated through the expenditures of significant funds over a lengthy period, an unlikely event in today’s telecommunications environment.

We believe that carriers and Internet service providers have no need to be in two different Tier-1 IXs serving the same geographic area. Therefore, to the extent that carriers are located in our facilities and have already invested significant funds to establish their presence at those facilities, this is an incentive for them to remain our customers. In addition, a competing Tier-1 IX would require the backing of carriers and Internet service providers serving this area, many of which are already our customers.


	•	Internet data centers operated by established U.S., Brazilian and Spanish communications carriers such as AT&T, Qwest, Embratel and Telefonica. Unlike the major network providers, which constructed data centers primarily to help sell bandwidth, we have aggregated multiple networks in one location, which we believe provides diversity, competitive prices and high performance. Carrier operated data centers only provide one choice of carrier and generally require capacity minimums as part of their pricing structures. Our NAPs provide access to a choice of carriers and allow our customers to negotiate the best prices with a number of carriers resulting in better economics and redundancy.

	•	U.S. IXs such as MAE West and carrier operated IXs. IXs, generally operated by carriers, are typically older facilities and may lack the incentive to upgrade the infrastructure in order to scale with traffic growth. In contrast, we provide secure facilities with 24-hour support and a full range of network and managed services.


	•	Vertically integrated web site hosting companies, colocation companies and Internet service providers such as Navisite and Globix. Some managed service providers require that customers purchase their entire network and managed services directly from them. We are a network and service provider aggregator and allow our customers to contract directly with the networks and web-hosting partner best suited for their business.

	•	Neutral colocation and Internet exchange services companies such as Equinix. Geographic location tends to be an important factor in determining where networks will meet to create neutral points of connectivity. The location available may not be where potential buyers need capacity or where demand exists. Also, much of the older data center capacity cannot support current blade server technology that requires much more intensive cooling and power density. Our facilities are neutral connectivity points in their respective geographic areas. We believe that this creates a natural barrier to entry to competitors, as our large customers would likely not incur the expense to relocate or deploy similar infrastructure in other centers within our geographic regions. For this reason, we believe that we have positioned our company as a leader in carrier neutral exchange points connecting the United States and Europe to Latin American markets.

As of March 31, 2004, we had 145 full-time employees in the United States. Of these employees, 75 were in data center operations, 20 were in sales and marketing and 50 were in general and administrative. We also have four sales and administrative representatives in Brazil.

Our employees are not represented by a labor union and are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

We lease 120,000 square feet at the Technology Center of the Americas (“TECOTA”) for the NAP of the Americas. The term of the lease commenced in October 2001 and is for 20 years. Monthly base rent is approximately $216,000. We are also responsible for our pro rata share of common area maintenance expenses and real estate taxes, which amount to approximately $40,000 per month. On November 3, 2003, we entered into an agreement to lease an additional 120,000 square feet of space in the third floor of TECOTA, and extend our existing lease in the second floor to co-terminate with the third floor lease on May 31, 2025. Annual base rent for the third floor is approximately $2.4 million. Monthly base rent payments will commence in April 2005. We will also be responsible for our pro rata share of common area maintenance expenses and real estate taxes.

In Sao Paulo, Brazil, we lease approximately 5,500 feet at a Hewlett Packard data center. Annual rent is approximately $50,000. The term of the lease commenced in October 2003 and is for 18 years.

In Santa Clara, California, we also lease approximately 40,000 square feet for a colocation facility. The term of the lease commenced in January 2001 and is for 20 years. Annual rent is approximately $1,500,000. We are responsible for real estate taxes and property and casualty insurance expenses which in the aggregate amount to approximately $46,000 annually.

We also lease approximately 14,660 square feet for our corporate office in Miami, Florida. The term of the lease commenced in April 2000 and is for five years. Annual rent is approximately $440,000. We are also responsible for our share of common area maintenance expenses and real estate taxes.

Additionally, we lease approximately 12,000 square feet for office space in Miami, Florida. Annual rent is approximately $220,000. The term of the lease commenced in February 2001 and is for five years.

We are not currently subject to any litigation which individually or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Our executive officers and directors and their ages as of March 31, 2004, are as follows:

Manuel D. Medina has served as our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer since April 28, 2000, the date of our merger, and as that of Terremark since its founding in 1982. In addition, Mr. Medina is a managing partner of Communications Investors Group, the holder of the Series G preferred stock. Mr. Medina has been a director of Fusion Telecommunications International since December 14, 1998. Before founding Terremark, Mr. Medina, a certified public accountant, worked with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Subsequently, he established and operated an independent financial and real estate consulting company. Mr. Medina earned a Bachelors of Science degree in Accounting from Florida Atlantic University in 1974.

Joseph R. Wright, Jr. has served as our Vice Chairman of the Board since April 28, 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Wright served as Chairman of the Board from May 1995 to April 2000, when Terremark Holdings, Inc. concluded a reverse merger into Amtec Inc., a telecommunications company of which he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Wright currently is President and Chief Executive Officer of PanAmSat, a global provider of satellite-based communication services. He is also a director of The Titan Corporation. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Wright served as Chairman of the Board of GRC International, Inc., a United States public company that provides technical information technology support to government and private entities. From 1995 to 2003, Mr. Wright also served as Co-Chairman of Baker & Taylor Holdings, Inc., an international book and video distribution company, and Vice Chairman of Jefferson Consulting Group, a Washington D.C. consulting firm. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Wright served as Executive Vice President, Vice Chairman and Director of W.R. Grace & Co., an international chemicals and health care company, President of Grace Energy Corporation and Chairman of Grace Environmental Company. From 1982 to 1989, Mr. Wright held the positions of Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget, The White House, and was a member of President Reagan’s cabinet. Before 1982, he served as Deputy Secretary, United States Department of Commerce, President of Citicorp Retail Services and Retail Consumer Services, held posts in the United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Department of Commerce, and was Vice President and Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton, a management consulting firm.

Guillermo Amore has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2001. From August 2000 to February 2001, Mr. Amore served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Terremark Latin America, Inc., prior to which, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Telecommunications Corporation until its acquisition. Mr. Amore has nearly 35 years of telecommunications experience, much of it focused on the developing markets of Latin America

Timothy Elwes has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2000. Mr. Elwes also served as member of the board of directors of Timothy Elwes & Partners Ltd., a financial services company, from May 1978 until October 1994, the business of which was merged into Fidux Trust Co. Ltd. in December 1995. He has been a non-executive director of Partridge Fine Arts plc, a public company since 1989. Since December 2000 he has served as a director of Timothy Elwes & Partners Ltd., a financial services company.

Antonio S. Fernandez was elected to our Board Directors in September 2003. In 1970, Mr. Fernandez worked as a Systems Engineering Manager at Electronic Data Systems (EDS). In 1971, Mr. Fernandez joined duPont Glore Forgan as a Vice-President in Operations. In 1974, he joined Thomson McKinnon as Director of Operations and Treasurer. In 1979, he worked at Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as Director of Operations and Treasurer where he also served as Chief Financial Officer from 1987 until 1994 and a member of the Board of Directors from 1991 until 1998. In 1991, Mr. Fernandez founded and headed the International Investment Banking Department at Oppenheimer & Co. and served in that capacity until 1999. Mr. Fernandez served on the Board of Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones from 1992 until 1999. He also served as Trustee of Mulhenberg College, PA from 1995 until 1998. He graduated from Pace University, NY in 1968 with a B.B.A.

Fernando Fernandez-Tapias has served as a member of our board of directors since March 31, 2003. Since May 1991, Mr. Fernandez-Tapias has served as the President of Naviera F. Tapias. Mr. Fernandez-Tapias has also served as a board member of Union Fenosa. In addition, Mr. Fernández-Tapias founded Roll-On Roll-Off, Interpuertos, Spain Shipping, Naviera Amura and Naviera Roda. Mr. Fernández-Tapias currently serves as the President of the Cámara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid (Official Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Madrid). Mr. Fernández-Tapias holds a degree from the Instituto Internacional de Empresas de la Universidad Comercial de Deusto.

Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2000. Mr. Figueres-Olsen is the former President of Costa Rica, serving as the head of state of his native country from 1994 to 1998, during which he made sustainable development the cornerstone of his administration and led his country into the digital economy through the implementation of several IT programs and the attraction of foreign investment including Intel. Since leaving office, President Figueres-Olsen has served as a Director of the Digital Nations Consortium, launched by the MIT Media Lab to develop a new generation of technologies and applications that enable people to design, create, and learn new ways to become more active participants in developing societies. President Figueres-Olsen also serves on the Board of Directors of the World Resources Institute, the World Wildlife Fund, the Stockholm Environment Institute, and Leadership in Environment and Development. President Figueres-Olsen holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and a Masters degree in Public Administration (Mason Fellow) from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

Arthur L. Money has served as a member of our board of directors since May 2003. Since September 2002, Mr. Money has been a member of the board of directors of Rainbow Technologies, Inc., a provider of Information Technology security solutions. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Money was the Assistant Secretary of Defense (C3I) and Department of Defense CIO. Prior to this, Mr. Money served as the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Research, Development, and Acquisition, and was Vice President and Deputy General Manager of TRW. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Money was President of ESL, Inc. He has received distinguished public service awards from the U.S. Department of Defense (Bronze Palm), the U.S. Air Force, and the U.S. Navy. He is currently President of ALM Consulting specializing in command control and communications, intelligence, signal processing, and information processing. Mr. Money received his Master of Science Degree

Marvin S. Rosen has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2000. Mr. Rosen is a co-founder of Fusion Telecommunications International and served as its Vice Chairman from December 1998 to April 2000 and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since April 2000. From September 1995 through January 1997, Mr. Rosen served as the Finance Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Rosen currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial, since 1995, Bio-Medical Disposal, Inc., since 1998 and Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc., since 1997, where he has also been Vice-Chairman since December 1998. Mr. Rosen received his Bachelor of Science degree in Commerce from the University of Virginia, his LL.B. from Dickinson School of Law and his LL.M. in Corporations from New York University Law School.

Miguel J. Rosenfeld has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2000. Since November 1991, he has also served as a Senior Vice President of Delia Feallo Productions, Inc., where he has been responsible for the development of soap opera productions in Latin America. From January 1995 until May 1998, he was the Director of Affiliates and Cable for Latin America for Protele, a division of Televisa International LLC. From December 1984 until September 1998, he was a sales manager for Capitalvision International Corporation. Mr. Rosenfeld holds a Bachelors degree in Administration from the University of Buenos Aires which he earned in 1975.

Rodolfo A. Ruiz has served as a member of our Board of Directors since July 2003. Since 2004, Mr. Ruiz has served as Executive Vice President — Spirits for Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Ruiz served as the President and CEO of Bacardi U.S.A. and held a series of senior management positions within the Bacardi organization since 1979, inclusive of having served as President and CEO of Bacardi Global Brands, President and CEO of Bacardi Asia/Pacific Region, and several senior executive sales, marketing, financial and operations positions within Bacardi USA. Prior to joining Bacardi, from 1966 to 1979, Mr. Ruiz, in his capacity as a certified public accountant, served as a Senior Auditor, Senior Internal Auditor, and Audit Manager with Price Waterhouse & Co. for a wide variety of public and private clients and projects in the United States and Mexico, as well as throughout Latin America, interspersed by a term, from 1973 to 1975, with International Basic Economy Corp, otherwise known as IBEC/Rockefeller Group. Mr. Ruiz holds a Bachelor of Business degree, Cum Laude, from the University of Puerto Rico.

Jamie Dos Santos has served as our Chief Marketing Officer since March 2003. From April 2001 to March 2003, Ms. Dos Santos served as Senior Vice President Global Sales. From 1981 to April 2001, Ms. Dos Santos worked with the Bell System. Ms. Dos Santos held various positions during her tenure with Telcordia/Bell Systems including Director of Professional Services Latin America, Regional Account Director starting her career as a Business Service Representative prior to divestiture. Ms. Dos Santos attended the University of Florida and Bellcore’s elite Technical training curriculum receiving various degrees in telecommunications.

Jose E. Gonzalez has served as our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since November 2003. Previously he served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 2001. Prior to joining Terremark, Mr. Gonzalez served as the Vice President and Regional Counsel for Sunbeam Corporation, responsible for legal affairs throughout Canada, Latin America/Caribbean and Asia. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. González was Assistant General Counsel, International, responsible for the international legal affairs of Blockbuster Entertainment, a subsidiary of Viacom, Inc. From 1990 to 1995 Mr. González was a member of the General Counsel’s Office of the American Express Company, where he served as Regional Counsel for Latin America and the Caribbean. Mr. González received his Bachelors of Arts degree from Fordham University in 1982 and his Juris Doctor from Fordham University School of Law in 1985. He is a member of the Bar of the State of New York and certified to practice as in-house counsel by the Bar of the State of Florida.

Jose A. Segrera has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2001. From September 2000 to June 2001, Mr. Segrera served as our Vice President — Finance. From January 2000 to September 2000,

Marvin Wheeler has served as our Chief Operations Officer since November 2003. Previously he served as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations since March 2003. From March 2001 to March 2003, Mr. Wheeler served as Senior Vice President of Operations and General Manager of the NAP of the Americas. From June 1978 to March 2000, Mr. Wheeler managed the Data Center and WAN/LAN Operations for BellSouth, Mr. Wheeler graduated from the University of Florida, where he earned a degree in Business Administration with a concentration in marketing.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of the forms furnished to us and written representations of the reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except Antonio S. Fernandez was late in filing a Form 3 when he became a director; and Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen filed a late Form 4 reporting three transactions.

The following table presents information concerning compensation for our chief executive officer and the four most highly compensated executive officers, which we refer to as our named executive officers, for services in all capacities during the fiscal years indicated.

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of stock options made during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 to our named executive officers. No stock appreciation rights were granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.


(1)	These amounts are based on assumed appreciation rates of 5% and 10% set by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of our stock price.

The following table sets forth information regarding option exercises by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 and options they held on March 31, 2004. No stock appreciation rights were granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.


(1)	Based on a per share price of $0.72, the closing price of the common stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange on March 31, 2004, minus the exercise price of the option, multiplied by the number of shares underlying the option.

We maintain a policy of compensating our directors using stock option grants. Upon their election as a member of our board of directors, each director received 100,000 stock options. Our employee directors receive the same compensation as our non-employee directors. The options granted to our directors vest as follows: options to purchase one-third of the shares vest as of the date of grant, one-third vests as of the first anniversary of the date of grant, and one-third vests as of the second anniversary of the date of grant. We reimburse our directors for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of their duties as directors. We currently do not pay fees to our directors for attendance at meetings. We entered into an agreement with Joseph Wright, Jr., one of our directors, commencing September 21, 2001, engaging Mr. Wright as an independent consultant. The agreement is for a term of one year after which it renews automatically for successive one-year periods. Either party may terminate the agreement by providing 90 days notice. The agreement provides for an annual compensation of $100,000, payable monthly.

Manuel D. Medina entered into a one year agreement, commencing March 10, 2000, employing him as our President and Chairman of the Board. On September 6, 2001, in consideration of Mr. Medina agreeing to repay his indebtedness to Ocean Bank earlier than otherwise required, pledging a certificate of deposit to the bank and personally guaranteeing our credit facility and approximately $21 million of construction payables, Mr. Medina’s employment agreement was amended and restated. The term of the amended and restated agreement commenced April 28, 2001 and employs Mr. Medina as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The amended and restated agreement is for a term of twelve months and automatically renews for successive one year terms until either party gives written notice of its intention not to renew. The amended and restated agreement provides for an annual base salary of $350,000 and is subject to increases. Additionally, as long as Mr. Medina’s guarantees of our debt exist, we have agreed to nominate Mr. Medina to our board of directors and not to remove Mr. Medina, unless for good cause, or remove any of our officers from their positions without Mr. Medina’s consent. Pursuant to the terms of his agreement, Mr. Medina is prohibited from competing with us for a one year period following termination of his employment.

Jamie Dos Santos has entered into an agreement, commencing November 1, 2002, employing her as our Senior Vice President of Global Initiatives. The agreement is effective until either party gives written notice of its intention to terminate. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $250,000 and is subject to increases. Pursuant to the terms of her agreement, Ms. Dos Santos is prohibited from competing with us for a

Jose E. Gonzalez has entered into an agreement, commencing March 3, 2003, employing him as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel. The agreement is for an indefinite term until either party gives written notice of its intention to terminate. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $185,000 and is subject to increases. Pursuant to terms of this agreement, Mr. Gonzalez is prohibited from competing with us for a one year period following termination of his employment.

Jose A. Segrera has entered into a one year employment agreement, commencing September 25, 2001, employing him as our Chief Financial Officer. The agreement automatically renews for successive one year terms until either party gives written notice of its intention not to renew. In June 2001, Mr. Segrera’s title was changed to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $150,000 and is subject to increases. Pursuant to the terms of his agreement, Mr. Segrera is prohibited from competing with us for a one year period following termination of his employment.

Marvin Wheeler has entered into an agreement, commencing November 1, 2002, employing him as our Senior Vice President of Operations. The agreement is effective until either party gives written notice of its intention to terminate. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $175,000 and is subject to increases. Pursuant to the terms of his agreement, Mr. Wheeler is prohibited from competing with us for a one year period following termination of his employment. In November 2003, Mr. Wheeler became our Chief Operations Officer.

If the employment of either Manuel D. Medina or Jose A. Segrera is terminated without cause, each is entitled to continue to receive his annual base salary through the date his employment would have ended under the terms of his agreement, but in no event for more than six months, together with certain other benefits.

If the employment of Jamie Dos Santos, Jose E. González or Marvin Wheeler is terminated without cause, each is entitled to continue to receive his or her annual base salary together with certain other benefits for a period of six months from the date of termination.

If the employment of any of Manuel D. Medina, Jamie Dos Santos, Jose E. Gonzalez, Jose A. Segrera or Marvin Wheeler is terminated within one year of a change in control, each is entitled to continue to receive a payment equal to the sum of two times his annual base salary, incentive compensation, and the value of any fringe benefits plus any accrued incentive compensation through the date of termination and other benefits. The definition of a “change in control” in the applicable employment agreements includes the resignation of Manual D. Medina as both our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, his death, or his absence from the day to day business affairs of the Company for more than 90 consecutive days due to disability or incapacity.

The following directors served as members of our compensation committee during the 2004 fiscal year: Timothy Elwes, Miguel J. Rosenfeld and Antonio S. Fernandez. No member of the compensation committee is now or ever was an officer or an employee of ours. No executive officer of ours serves as a member of the compensation committee of any entity one or more of whose executive officers serves as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee. There were no compensation committee interlocks during fiscal 2004.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws designate the relative duties and responsibilities of our officers, establish procedures for actions by directors and stockholders and other items. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also contain indemnification provisions that permit us to indemnify our officers and directors to the maximum extent provided by Delaware law.

We have obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance with an aggregate liability for the policy year, inclusive of costs of defense, in the amount of $10,000,000. This policy expires April 3, 2005.

Under our 1995 Stock Option Plan, we have reserved for issuance an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2004, we had granted options to purchase 385,000 shares of common stock pursuant to this plan, of which 267,500 have been exercised and 117,500 are vested but have not been exercised.

Under our 1996 Stock Option Plan, we have reserved for issuance an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares of common stock, 11,222,033 of which have been granted. As of June 30, 2004, 9,010,464 granted options have vested but remain unexercised, 2,211,569 granted options remain subject to vesting schedules and 395,134 options have been exercised.

Under our 2000 Stock Option Plan, we have reserved for issuance an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2004, we had granted options to purchase 5,432,164 shares of common stock pursuant to this plan, 3,999,945 of which have vested and 1,000 of which have been exercised.

Unless sooner terminated by the board of directors, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Stock Option Plan will terminate on February 8, 2005, May 7, 2006 and September 21, 2010 respectively, the tenth anniversary date of the effectiveness of each stock option plan.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our capital stock as of March 31, 2004 by:


	•	each of our directors and director nominees;

	•	each of our executive officers named in the Executive Compensation Table;

	•	all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and

	•	each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, Series G Preferred Stock, Series H Preferred Stock or Series I Preferred Stock.

As of March 31, 2004, 311,227,482 shares of our common stock were outstanding, 20 shares of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, 294 shares of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding and 400 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The outstanding shares of Series G, Series H and Series I Convertible Preferred Stock, as of March 31, 2004, were convertible into 2,143,492, 294,000 and 13,333,600 shares of our common stock, respectively.

For purposes of the following table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by the person within 60 days from March 31, 2004 upon the exercise of warrants or options or upon the conversion of debentures or preferred shares. Each beneficial owner’s percentage is determined by assuming that options, warrants or conversion rights that are held by the person, but not those held by any other person, and which are exercisable within 60 days from March 31, 2004, have been exercised. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in this table have sole voting power and investment


	(1)	For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership is computed pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act; the inclusion of shares as beneficially owned should not be construed as an admission that such shares are beneficially owned for purposes of the Exchange Act. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security he or she has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of such security or the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security.

	(2)	Includes 200,000 shares of common stock underlying options and 889,277 shares of common stock underlying convertible debentures. As reported in Mr. Medina’s Schedule 13D, and any amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2002, these include


		7,021,682 shares as to which Mr. Medina has sole voting power but does not have dispositive power. Includes 2,143,492 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock held by Communications Investors Group, an entity in which Mr. Medina is a partner and holds a 50% interest.

	(3)	Includes 3,400,000 shares of common stock underlying options and 10,000 shares owned by Mr. Wright’s sibling, over which Mr. Wright has investment control. Does not include 50,000 shares held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Wright’s grandchildren with respect to which Mr. Wright disclaims beneficial ownership.

	(4)	Includes 200,000 shares underlying options, 400,008 shares which may be acquired upon the conversion of shares of Series I Preferred Stock and 84,000 shares underlying warrants. Also includes 843,936 shares, 2,154,201 shares underlying convertible debentures, 280,006 shares which may be acquired upon the conversion of shares of Series I Preferred Stock and 58,800 shares underlying warrants which are owned by an entity with respect to which Mr. Amore disclaims beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

	(5)	Includes 245,000 shares of common stock underlying options and 205,810 shares underlying convertible debentures.

	(6)	Includes 200,000 shares of common stock underlying options and 1,137,208 shares held indirectly by Mr. Rosenfeld. Does not include 58,105 shares held by Mr. Rosenfeld’s children and mother, with respect to which Mr. Rosenfeld disclaims beneficial ownership.

	(7)	Includes 200,000 shares of common stock underlying options.

	(8)	Includes 34,000 shares of common stock underlying options and 242,884 shares of common stock underlying convertible debentures held by an entity with respect to which Mr. Fernandez disclaims beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

	(9)	Represents shares of common stock underlying options.


(10)	The address of the beneficial owner is 780 N.W. 42nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33126.

(11)	The address of the beneficial owner is Georgetown, Tortola, B.V.I. Francis Lee is the natural person deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held by this entity.

(12)	The address of the beneficial owner is P.O. Box N-65, Charlotte House, Charlotte Street, Nassau, Bahamas. Francis Lee is the natural person deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held by this entity.

(13)	Represents 20 shares of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into 2,143,492 shares of common stock. The partners of Communications Investors Group are Manuel D. Medina and Andres Altaba, each of whom has a 50% interest.

(14)	Represents 294 shares of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 294,000 shares of common stock.

(15)	Represents 80 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 2,666,720 shares of common stock.

(16)	Represents 48 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 1,600,032 shares of common stock. Heinrich Adolf Hans Herweg is the natural person with voting and investment control over the shares.

(17)	Represents 100 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 3,333,400 shares of common stock. Christian Altaba is the natural person with voting and investment control over the shares.

(18)	Represents 20 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 666,680 shares of common stock. Antonio De Reguero is the natural person with voting and investment control over the shares.


(19)	Represents 40 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 1,333,360 shares of common stock. Vincente Perez Cisneros is the natural person with voting and investment control over the shares.

(20)	Represents 28 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock which are convertible into, and have voting rights equivalent to, 933,352 shares of common stock. Roberto Solis Monsato is the natural person with voting and investment control over the shares.

This table summarizes share and exercise price information about our equity compensation plans as of March 31, 2004.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the selling stockholders as of July 1, 2004. All of the information contained in the table below is based upon information provided to us by the selling stockholders and we have not independently verified this information. Except as otherwise disclosed, the selling stockholders do not have and within the past three years have not had any position, office or other material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates or are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers.

Of the shares that may be offered for sale by the selling stockholders named below, 5,954,267 may be issued as a result of the exercise of warrants. Warrants to purchase 5,820,934 shares are currently exercisable, warrants to purchase 66,666 shares will become exercisable on July 10, 2004, warrants to purchase 66,667 shares will become exercisable on July 10, 2005. The warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.40 to $0.75. The number of shares of common stock that may be actually purchased by some selling stockholders under the warrants and the number of shares of common stock that may be actually sold by each selling stockholder will be determined by such selling stockholder. Because some selling stockholders may purchase all, some or none of the shares of common stock which can be purchased under the warrants and each selling stockholder may sell all, some or none of the shares of common stock which each holds, and because the offering contemplated by this prospectus is not currently being underwritten, no estimate can be given as to the number of shares of common stock that will be held by the selling stockholders upon termination of the offering. The information set forth in the following table regarding the beneficial ownership after resale of shares is based on the basis that each selling stockholder will purchase the maximum number of shares of


	*	Less than one percent.

	**	These shares may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.

	(1)	Except as otherwise noted, we determine beneficial ownership in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We include shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options, warrants and convertible securities, to the extent these securities are currently exercisable or convertible within 60 days of March 31, 2004, as outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such securities. Unless otherwise noted, each identified person or group possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. We treat shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person or group to acquire them within 60 days as outstanding only to determine the number and percent owned by such person or group.

	(2)	Assuming that all shares offered here are sold but no other securities held by the selling security holder are sold.

	(3)	Ted L. Kretzschmar is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

	(4)	George T. Yoss is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Adorno & Yoss is a law firm which has provided legal services to us.

	(5)	Andrew Harrington is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

	(6)	Guillermo Amore is a member of our Board of Directors. Includes 333,341 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon conversion of shares of our Series I Preferred Stock and 70,000 shares underlying warrants.

	(7)	Antonio Rodriguez is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

	(8)	Gustavo Tavares is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

	(9)	Miguel J. Rosenfeld is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(10)	Joseph Steinberg is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(11)	Andres Altaba is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(12)	Willy A. Bermello is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(13)	Edward R. Shohat is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(14)	Kenneth I. Starr is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(15)	Aviva Budd is our Senior Vice President of Business Development.

(16)	Ramon Montes is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(17)	Christian Altaba is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Includes 3,333,400 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon conversion of shares of our Series I Preferred Stock and 700,000 shares underlying warrants.

(18)	Jean Edwards Kuriger is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(19)	Seth P. Joseph and Jacqueline Joseph, Tenants by the Entireties are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.

(20)	Laurence M. Kashdin is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(21)	Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen is a member of our Board of Directors.

(22)	Includes 200,000 shares of common stock underlying currently exercisable options.

(23)	Lynn D. Dooley is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(24)	Brian Goodkind was our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer until July 21, 2003.

(25)	Richard Snyder and Roberta Snyder are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.

(26)	Antonio Hernandez Mancha is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(27)	Alberto De Palilo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(28)	Antonio S. Fernandez is a member of our board of directors.

(29)	John H. Reynolds is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(30)	Richard M. Siedel, Jr. and Ben S. Jaffe are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.

(31)	Joseph Dooley and Jean Edwards Kuriger are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.

(32)	Craig Kirk is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(33)	Includes 66,667 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon conversion of shares of our Series I Preferred Stock and 14,000 shares underlying warrants.

(35)	Lynn Wiener is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(36)	Carlos Vasallo Tome is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Miguel Rosenfeld, one of our directors, has power of attorney to take action on behalf of La Rochelle Corp. as instructed by this entity. Mr. Rosenfeld does not have voting or investment control over the shares.

(37)	Guillermo Amore, one of our directors, is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(38)	Manolo Solares is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(40)	John and Ralph Doering are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.


(41)	Antonio Hernandez Mancha is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(42)	Jose Maria Isardo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(43)	Alberto Vega, Ocean Bank’s Chief Financial Officer, is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(44)	Charles G. Palmer is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(45)	Orlando Guerrero Vargas is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Miguel Rosenfeld, one of our directors, has power of attorney to take action on behalf of Probedel S.A. as instructed by this entity. Mr. Rosenfeld does not have voting or investment control over the shares.


(46)	Carlos Vasallo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(47)	Roberto Solis Monsato is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(48)	Includes 496,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants. Includes 933,352 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon conversion of shares of Series I Preferred Stock.

(49)	Beile Gross is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Miguel Rosenfeld, one of our directors, has power of attorney to take action on behalf of Quantum Overseas, Inc. as instructed by this entity. Mr. Rosenfeld does not have voting or investment control over the shares.

(50)	R. Carlisle Roberts is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(51)	Miguel J. Rosenfeld is a member of our board of directors.

(52)	Carlos Pedreschi is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Miguel Rosenfeld, one of our directors, has power of attorney to take action on behalf of Sarati Ocean Corp. as instructed by this entity. Mr. Rosenfeld does not have voting or investment control over the shares.

(53)	Arturo Ehrlich is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(54)	Jose Miguel Alfaro Masis is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(55)	Nestor Eijo and Mario Eijo are the natural persons who exercise voting and investment control over the shares.

(56)	Stanley Altschuler is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. In April 2002, we appointed Strategic Growth International to serve as our investor relations advisor.

(57)	Joseph R. Wright is Vice-Chairman of our board of directors.


(58)	Rafael Acevedo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(59)	Represents the shares held by Bercotrac Investments, Inc. Mr. Altaba is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over these shares.

(60)	Represents the shares held by SBP Investments, Inc. Mr. Ehrlich is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over these shares.

(61)	Represents the shares held by Associated Resources, Inc. Mr. Steinberg is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over these shares.

(62)	Represents the shares held by HugoSabel, SA and MGM Mancha. Mr. Mancha is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over these shares.

(63)	Mr. Roberts is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over these shares.

(64)	Verny Huerta is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(65)	Howard Glicken is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(66)	Marco Cuono, Attorney-in-Fact, is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(67)	Juan Vico is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.


(68)	Includes 250,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(69)	Paolo Amore is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares. Paolo Amore is the son of Guillermo Amore, one of our directors.

(70)	Includes 42,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(71)	Includes 140,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(72)	Includes 21,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(73)	Includes 280,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(74)	Includes 7,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(75)	Includes 4,200 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(76)	Includes 14,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(77)	Includes 28,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(78)	Includes 560,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(79)	Includes 70,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(80)	Includes 392,000 shares underlying exercisable warrants.

(81)	Alexander Gallo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(82)	Antonio De Reguero is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(83)	R. Alan Chase is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(84)	Vicente Perez Cisneros is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(85)	George Brandt is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(86)	Heinrich Adolf Hans Herweg is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(87)	Hector R. Viñas is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(88)	Bernadino de Paulo is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(89)	Casilda Cynthia de Raveneau is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(90)	Robert Moore is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(91)	James Fry, Attorney in fact, is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(92)	Pascual J. Theodora is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(93)	Ricardo Rivas is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(94)	J.L. Hoffman is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(95)	Joshep Prost is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

(96)	Patrick Theodora is the natural person who exercises voting and investment control over the shares.

We are registering the shares on behalf of the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may sell their shares offered here to purchasers directly. Alternatively, the selling stockholders may offer the shares to or through underwriters, brokers/dealers or agents. The selling stockholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the common stock owned by them and, if any selling stockholders default in the performance of such secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the relevant

common stock pursuant to this prospectus. To our knowledge, there are currently no plans, arrangements or understandings between any selling stockholders and any underwriter, broker-dealer or agent regarding the sale of the common stock by the selling stockholders. There can be no assurance that the selling stockholders will not transfer, devise or gift the shares by other means not described in this prospectus. The selling stockholders and any underwriters, brokers/dealers or agents that participate in the distribution of the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act. Any profit realized by them on the sale of such shares and any discounts, commissions, concessions or other compensation received by any underwriter, broker/dealer or agent may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. These discounts, commissions or concessions may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved.


	•	at fixed prices;

	•	at market prices prevailing at the time of sale;

	•	at prices related to prevailing market prices; and/or

	•	at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices.

The sale of shares may be effected in transactions (which may involve crosses or block transactions):


	•	on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the shares may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;

	•	in the over-the-counter market;

	•	in transactions otherwise than on such exchanges or in the over-the-counter market; or

	•	through the writing of options.

Because the selling stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the selling stockholders may be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. We have informed the selling stockholders that the anti-manipulative provisions of Regulation M promulgated under the Securities Act may apply to their sales in the market.

Upon being notified by a selling stockholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed, if required, which supplement will disclose:


	•	the name of each such selling stockholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s);

	•	the number of shares involved;

	•	the price at which the shares were sold;

	•	the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable; and

	•	such other facts as may be material to the transaction.

Pursuant to our agreement with the selling stockholders, we will pay all expenses of the registration of the shares, including, without limitation, commission filing fees and expenses of compliance with state securities or “blue sky” laws. The selling stockholders will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any.

On March 31, 2004, Guillermo Amore, one of our directors, purchased 12 shares of our Series I 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, and Margui Family Partners, Ltd., an entity in which Mr. Amore has an interest,

Upon conversion of outstanding promissory notes in April 2002, two of our directors, Guillermo Amore and Miguel Rosenfeld, received 1,501,503 shares and 1,134,641 shares of our common stock, respectively. The original principal amounts of the notes converted by Messrs. Amore and Rosenfeld were $1,126,127 and $850,980, respectively. The conversion price of $0.75 per share was determined by our management and approved by the board of directors, with Messrs. Amore and Rosenfeld abstaining, after considering recent quoted market prices of our stock, recent equity transactions and our business plan and financial projections.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with all of our directors and some of our officers, to provide them with the maximum indemnification allowed under our bylaws and applicable law, including indemnification for all judgments and expenses incurred as the result of any lawsuit in which such person is named as a defendant by reason of being one of our directors, officers or employees, to the extent such indemnification is permitted by the laws of Delaware. We believe that the limitation of liability provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the indemnification agreements enhance our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors and officers.

On September 5, 2001, we closed on a $48.0 million credit facility with Ocean Bank. In addition to Mr. Medina personally guaranteeing the credit facility, and in order for us to obtain the facility, the bank further required Mr. Medina to, prior to the bank disbursing funds under the credit facility, provide a $5.0 million certificate of deposit to the bank as collateral for certain personal loans Mr. Medina has with the bank and commit to accelerate the maturity date of those personal loans to December 31, 2001. Subsequent to September 2001, Mr. Medina and the bank changed the maturity date on the personal loans, first to December 31, 2001 and later to July 1, 2002. Mr. Medina also agreed to subordinate debt that we owed to Mr. Medina in the event of our default under the credit facility. Mr. Medina has repaid part of those personal loans to Ocean Bank, leaving an outstanding principal balance of approximately $4.6 million as of December 31, 2003. On February 11, 2004, Mr. Medina extended one loan with a principal amount of approximately $3.3 million to February 11, 2005 and made an interest payment of $63,500. On March 8, 2004, Mr. Medina extended the maturity date on the other loan which had a principal amount of approximately $1.3 million to March 8, 2005 and made a $73,446 payment of principal and interest.

On September 5, 2001, in consideration of Mr. Medina agreeing to repay his indebtedness to the bank earlier than otherwise required, pledging the certificate of deposit to the bank and personally guaranteeing the $48 million credit facility and approximately $21 million of construction payables, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with him. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement we will indemnify Mr. Medina from any personal liability related to his guarantees of any of our debt, use commercially reasonable efforts to relieve Mr. Medina of all his guarantees of our debt, provide up to $6.5 million of cash collateral to the bank should Mr. Medina be unable to repay the personal loans when due and provide a non interest-bearing $5.0 million loan to Mr. Medina. If the promissory note becomes in default, we have the right of offset against all amounts payable by us to Mr. Medina, which is approximately $2.2 million as of March 31, 2002. Additionally, as long as Mr. Medina’s guarantees of our debt exist, we have agreed to nominate Mr. Medina to our Board of Directors and not remove Mr. Medina, unless for good cause, or remove any of our officers without Mr. Medina’s consent. There was no change in the amount or timing of Mr. Medina’s cash or non-cash compensation in connection with these agreements, nor did Mr. Medina receive any guarantee fee or other fees in connection with his guaranteeing our indebtedness. We do not anticipate funding the $6.5 million of cash collateral.

No fee was paid to Mr. Medina for his guarantee of the Ocean Bank loan. In July 2002, the terms of our $5.0 million loan to Mr. Medina were amended. The amended note has a maturity date of September 30, 2004 and bears interest subsequent to September 5, 2002.

We entered into an agreement with Joseph Wright, Jr., one of our directors, commencing September 21, 2001, engaging Mr. Wright as an independent consultant. The agreement is for a term of one year after which

In April 2003, in connection with the issuance of the Subordinated Debentures we received $400,000 from two directors, Joseph Wright and Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen, and $50,000 from an employee and shareholder.

One of our subsidiaries, Terremark Financial Services, Inc. acts as consultant to a subsidiary of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc., in connection with telecommunications operations in China. Messrs. Medina, Rosen and Wright are directors of Fusion. During the year ended March 31, 2004, we purchased approximately $500,000 in services from Fusion.

Included in interest income is approximately $61,000 from a $5.0 million receivable from Mr. Medina.

The following description of the terms of our common stock sets forth certain general terms and provisions of our common stock. This section also summarizes relevant provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which we refer to as “Delaware law.” The terms of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, as well as the terms of Delaware law, are more detailed than the general information provided below. Therefore, you should carefully consider the actual provisions of these documents.


	•	500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share; and

	•	10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, which are issuable in series on terms to be determined by our board of directors, of which 20 shares are designated as Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, 294 shares are designated as Series H Convertible Preferred Stock and 600 shares are designated as Series I Convertible Preferred Stock.


	•	311,798,104 shares of our common stock were outstanding;

	•	20 shares of our Series G Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding and held by an entity in which Manuel Medina, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, owns a 50% interest and could have been converted into 2,163,809 shares of our common stock;

	•	294 shares of our Series H Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding. Each share of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into 1,000 shares of our common stock;

	•	400 shares of our Series I Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding. Each share of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into 33,334 shares of our common stock; and

	•	approximately 67,000,000 shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, warrants and convertible debentures.

Preemptive Rights. The holders of our common stock do not have preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for any stock or other securities of ours.

Voting Rights. Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

Dividends. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends or other distributions when and if declared by our board of directors. The right of our board of directors to declare dividends, however, is subject to any rights of the holders of other classes of our capital stock and the availability of sufficient funds

Liquidation Rights. In the event of the liquidation of our company, subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of other classes of our capital stock, the holders of our common stock are entitled to receive any of our assets available for distribution to our stockholders ratably in proportion to the number of shares held by them.

We list our common stock on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “TWW.”

Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of the Charter and Bylaws and of Delaware Law

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt at a price which many stockholders may find attractive. The existence of these provisions could limit the price that investors might otherwise pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Blank Check Preferred Stock. Our board of directors, without stockholder approval, has the authority under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to issue preferred stock with rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock. As a result, preferred stock could be issued quickly and easily, could impair the rights of holders of common stock and could be issued with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change of control or make removal of management more difficult.

Election of Directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a majority of directors then in office may fill any vacancy occurring on the board of directors, even though less than a quorum may then be in office. These provisions may discourage a third party from voting to remove incumbent directors and simultaneously gaining control of the board of directors by filling the vacancies created by that removal with its own nominees.

Stockholder Action. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that stockholders may only act at meetings of stockholders and not by written consent in lieu of a stockholders’ meeting, unless the action that requires stockholder approval is approved by a majority of our continuing directors.

Stockholder Meetings. Our bylaws provide that stockholders may not call a special meeting of the stockholders. Rather, only our board of directors, acting pursuant to a resolution of a majority of the directors then in office, will be able to call special meetings of stockholders. Our bylaws also provide that stockholders may only conduct business at special meetings of stockholders that was specified in the notice of the meeting. These provisions may discourage another person or entity from making a tender offer, even if it acquired a majority of our outstanding voting stock, because the person or entity could only take action at a duly called stockholders’ meeting relating to the business specified in the notice of meeting and not by written consent.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. Our bylaws provide that a stockholder seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting of stockholders, must provide timely notice of this intention in writing. To be timely, a stockholder must deliver or mail the notice and we must receive the notice at our principal executive offices not less than 5 days prior to the date our directors determine for proposals to be received. The bylaws also include a similar requirement for making director nominations and specify requirements as to the form and content of the stockholder’s notice. These provisions could delay stockholder actions that are favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding stock until the next stockholders’ meeting.

Super-Majority Voting. Delaware law generally provides that the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is required to amend a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, unless a

We are a Delaware corporation subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under Section 203, some business combinations between a Delaware corporation whose stock generally is publicly-traded or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders and an interested stockholder are prohibited for a three-year period following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:


	•	the corporation has elected in its restated certificate of incorporation not to be governed by Section 203;

	•	the board of directors of the corporation approved the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder before the stockholder became an interested stockholder;

	•	upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the commencement of the transaction, excluding voting stock owned by directors who are also officers or held in employee benefit plans in which the employees do not have a confidential right to tender stock held by the plan in a tender or exchange offer; or

	•	the board of directors approves the business combination and holders of two-thirds of the voting stock which the interested stockholder did not own authorize the business combination at a meeting.

We have not made an election in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to opt out of Section 203. In addition to the above exceptions to Section 203, the three-year prohibition does not apply to some business combinations proposed by an interested stockholder following the announcement or notification of an extraordinary transaction involving the corporation and a person who was not an interested stockholder during the previous three years or who became an interested stockholder with the approval of a majority of the corporation’s directors. For the purposes of Section 203, a business combination generally includes mergers or consolidations, transactions involving the assets or stock of the corporation or its majority-owned subsidiaries and transactions which increase an interested stockholder’s percentage ownership of stock. Also, an interested stockholder generally includes a stockholder who becomes beneficial owner of 15% or more of a Delaware corporation’s voting stock, together with the affiliates or associates of that stockholder.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation limits the liability of our directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:


	•	any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

	•	acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

	•	unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or

	•	any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

This provision has no effect on any non-monetary remedies that may be available to us or our stockholders, nor does it relieve us or our officers or directors from compliance with federal or state securities laws.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us under the provisions that we describe above or otherwise, we have been

Our bylaws also permit us to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any officer or director for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity, regardless of whether our bylaws would otherwise permit indemnification for that liability. We have obtained liability insurance for our officers and directors in the amount of $10 million. At the present time, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents in which indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding which may result in a claim for indemnification.

Holders of approximately 11,187,823 shares of our common stock have registration rights with respect to those shares.

We are required to bear all registration expenses incurred in connection with these registrations. The holders of shares registered by us will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions applicable to the sale of their securities. We also agreed to indemnify these holders for any damages they suffer due to any untrue statement or omission that we make in a registration statement covering their shares.

The registration rights of these holders will terminate when all of the registrable shares may be sold without registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 144(k).

The validity of the securities being registered hereunder is being passed upon for us by Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, Florida. Marvin S. Rosen, a member of Greenberg Traurig, is one of our directors. Mr. Rosen beneficially owns 1,362,150 shares of common stock, of which 245,000 shares of common stock are underlying options.

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, Florida, have passed upon the validity of the issuance of the shares being offered by this prospectus.

The consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004 included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered certified public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

This prospectus is part of a registration statement on Form S-1 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This prospectus and any subsequent prospectus supplements do not contain all of the information in the registration statement as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, we file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents that we have filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings are also available to the public at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission are also available at the offices of The

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in stockholders’ deficit and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Terremark Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Terremark Worldwide, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) operates facilities at strategic locations in Florida, California, and Sao Paulo from which the Company assists users of the Internet and large communications networks in communicating with other users and networks. The Company’s primary facility is the NAP of the Americas, a carrier-neutral Tier-1 network access point (the “NAP”) in Miami, Florida. The NAP provides exchange point, colocation and managed services to carriers, Internet service providers, network service providers, government entities, multinational enterprises and other end users. The Company’s strategy is to leverage its concentration of connectivity and carrier-neutral status to sell services to customers within and outside of the Company’s TerreNAP Data Centers.

Prior to April 2000, the Company was engaged in the development, sales, leasing, management and financing of retail, high-rise office buildings, mixed-use projects, condominiums, hotels and government-assisted housing. The Company was also involved in a number of ancillary businesses that complemented its development operations. Specifically, the Company engaged in offering financial services, property management, construction management, condominium hotel management, residential and commercial leasing brokerage, and advisory services. By March 31, 2002, the Company had exited non-core real estate activities, real estate development, property management, financing and the ancillary businesses that complimented these real-estate development operations. The Company’s remaining real estate activities include technology construction work and management of the property where the NAP of the Americas is located.

The Company privately placed $75 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Convertible Notes due June 15, 2009 (the “Senior Notes”), to qualified institutional buyers. The Company has also granted the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional $11.25 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes will bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum, payable semi-annually, beginning December 15, 2004 and will be convertible at the option of the holders, at $1.25 per share. The Company will utilize the net proceeds from this offering to pay all of its outstanding debt, for possible acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures.

The Senior Notes will rank senior in priority with all existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and rank junior to any future secured indebtedness. If there is a change in control, the holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Company issue a cash dividend on its common stock, it will pay contingent interest to the holders equal to the product of the per share cash dividend and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of each holder’s note.

The Company may redeem some or all of the notes for cash at any time on or after June 15, 2007 if the closing price of the common shares has exceeded 200% of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date the Company mails the redemption notice. If the Company redeems the notes during the twelve month period commencing on June 15, 2007 or 2008, the redemption price equals 104.5% or 102.25%, respectively, of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus an amount equal to 50% of all remaining scheduled interest payments on the notes from, and including, the redemption date through the maturity date.

On May 17, 2004, the Company provided certain debenture holders with notice of its intent to redeem the $25.0 million 10% convertible debentures and the $2.8 million 13.125% convertible debentures, effective

May 31, 2004. As of May 31, 2004, all of the holders of the 10% convertible debentures and $2.5 million in principal of the 13.125% convertible debentures opted to convert their debentures into an aggregate of 54,726,427 shares of the Company’s common stock. The debt conversion has effectively reduced annual cash interest payments by approximately $2.9 million.

In May 2004, the Company issued three senior secured promissory notes in favor of Veritas High Yield Arbitrage I Fund, LLC, Veritas High Yield Arbitrage II Fund, LLC, and Veritas High Yield Arbitrage Fund, (Bermuda) Ltd. (collectively the “Lenders”) for the aggregate amount of $5.2 million. The notes accrue interest at 12% per annum, are paid monthly based on original face amount, and mature on October 29, 2004, with prepayment permitted without penalty after the first month.

Historically, the Company has financed its operations and capital requirements primarily through the credit facility with Ocean Bank, issuance of unsecured notes, issuance of convertible debentures, private sale of common and preferred stock and vendor financing, including construction payables and capital lease obligations. As of March 31, 2003, total indebtedness was approximately $116.1 million. As of March 31, 2004, this amount was reduced to $82.1, including the conversion to equity of $15.0 million of the Ocean Bank debt and $22.6 million of certain construction payables, including accrued interest.

From the time of the merger through March 31, 2004, the Company has incurred net operating losses of approximately $222.5 million. The Company’s cash flows from operations for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 were negative and the working capital deficit was approximately $10.2 million and $38.3 million as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Based on customer contracts signed as of June 14, 2004, expected expansions of customers under contract and anticipated future contracts from potential customers in the sales pipeline, the Company projects that its cash flow from operations will be positive by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2005. The Company’s projected revenues and cash flows, depend on several factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, including the rate at which the Company provides services and these services are accepted by customers under existing contracts, the rate at which new services are sold to the government sector and the commercial sector, the ability to retain the customer base, the willingness and timing of potential customers in outsourcing the housing and management of their technology infrastructure to the Company, the reliability and cost-effectiveness of the Company’s services and the Company’s ability to market its services. Although the real estate activities had a net operating loss of approximately $338,000 for the year ended March 31, 2004, the Company anticipates that these activities will generate enough revenues to cover operating expenses. If revenues for real estate activities are below amounts anticipated, cash needs are not expected to exceed $200,000 for the next twelve months. Accordingly, the Company believes that its cash resources are sufficient to meet working capital, debt service and corporate overhead requirements associated with the Company’s operations until at least March 31, 2005.

A summary of significant accounting principles and practices used by the Company in preparing its consolidated financial statements follows.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and

liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements to conform with current presentation.

The Company considers all amounts held in highly liquid instruments with an original purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash balances maintained in the operating and interest-bearing money market accounts at the Company’s banks.

For investments in less than majority-owned entities where the Company does not exercise significant influence, the Company uses the cost method of accounting. For investments in less than majority-owned entities where the Company exercises significant influence, the Company uses the equity method of accounting.

Restricted cash represents cash deposits with a financial institution collateralizing a $750,000 letter of credit issued to the lessor of the Company’s colocation facility in Santa Clara, California.

Property and equipment includes acquired assets and those accounted for under capital leases. Acquired assets are recorded at cost and capital leased assets are recorded at the net present value of minimum lease payments. Property and equipment, included in leased assets, are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated remaining useful lives, as follows:

Costs for improvements and betterments that extend the life of assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred.

Other assets consist of loan costs, prepaid expenses and other. Loan costs, principally loan origination and related fees, are deferred and amortized as interest expense over the life of the respective loan using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method.

Goodwill and Impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of

Goodwill represents the unamortized balance of the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of Telecom Routing Exchange Developers, Inc., a corporation holding rights to develop and manage facilities catering to the telecommunications industry.

As of April 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step approach. Initially the fair value of the Company’s reporting units are compared with their carrying amount, including goodwill, to identify potential impairment. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess, if any, of the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, intangible assets were generally amortized on the straight-line method over five years. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company ceased amortization of its intangible assets with indefinite lives and completed an initial impairment test of intangible assets as of April 1, 2002. Management determined in the initial impairment test that these assets were not impaired based on their fair values. Fair value was estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows and the assumed market capitalization at the reporting unit level.

As of April 1, 2002, the Company accounts for impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. This standard requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 144, the Company accounted for long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of.”

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company performed its annual test for impairment. The Company completed its evaluation and concluded that there were no impairments.

Rent expense under operating leases is recorded on the straight-line method based on total contracted amounts. Differences between amounts contractually due and that reported are included in deferred rent.

The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments through the use of public market prices, quotes from financial institutions, discounted cash flow analyses and other available information. Judgment is required in interpreting data to develop estimates of market value and, accordingly, amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The Company does not hold its financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company’s short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities, consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities, the fair value of which, based on management’s estimates, equaled their book value. The fair value of capital lease obligations and convertible debentures, based on management estimates equaled their book value due to obligations or borrowings with similar interest rates, maturities and extent of collateralization. The fair value of the Company’s redeemable preferred stock is estimated to be its liquidation value, which includes accumulated but unpaid dividends. The

fair value of other financial instruments the Company held for which it is practicable to estimate such value is as follows:

As of March 31, 2004, fair value of the Company’s notes payable was based on discounted cash flows using a discount rate of 10%. As of March 31, 2003, fair value of the Company’s notes payable was based on the Company’s stock price as of the April 30, 2003 partial settlement and other reliable information.

As of March 31, 2004, fair value of construction payables was estimated to equal their carrying value due to their short-term nature. As of March 31, 2003, fair value of construction payables, including accrued interest was determined to be $13,537,162 based on the April 30, 2003 settlement.

The Company uses the fair value method to value warrants granted to non-employees. Some warrants are vested over time and some are vested upon issuance. The Company determined the fair value for non-employee warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the same assumption used for employee grants, except for expected life which was assumed to be between 1 and 7 years. When stock warrants are granted in connection with the issuance of debt, the fair value of stock warrants is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate method, over the life of the debt. When stock warrants are granted in connection with the issuance of preferred stock, the fair value of the stock warrants is recognized as a non-cash preferred dividend in determining net loss per share to common stockholders.

Revenue is recognized as service is provided when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. The Company does not request collateral from customers. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. The Company accounts for data center revenues in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” which provides guidance on separating multiple element revenue arrangements into separate units of accounting.

Data center revenues consist of monthly recurring fees for colocation and exchange point services and non-recurring installation and managed services fees. Revenues from colocation and exchange point services are recognized ratably over the period of usage. Installation fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. Managed services fees are recognized in the period in which the services are provided.

Revenues from development, commission, management fees and construction fees are recognized in the period in which the services are provided.

excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are classified as other liabilities and represent billings in excess of revenues recognized. Construction contract expenses costs include all direct material and labor costs and indirect costs related to contract performance such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, bad debt and depreciation. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions can be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, it is possible the current estimates relating to completion cost and profitability of its uncompleted contracts will vary from actual results.

Management analyzes accounts receivable and analyzes current economic news and trends, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating revenue recognition and the adequacy of the allowance for bad debts.

Two customers accounted for approximately 14% and 10% of data center revenues for the year ended March 31, 2004. Two customers accounted for approximately 14% and 10% of data center revenues for the year ended March 31, 2003.

The Company uses the intrinsic value-based method to account for its employee stock-based compensation plans. Under this method, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of grant, between the fair value of the Company’s shares and the option’s exercise price.

The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — An Amendment of SFAS No. 123”. The following table presents what the net loss and net loss per share would have been had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123:

Fair value calculations for employee grants were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

When the Company issues debt or equity which is convertible into common stock at a discount from the common stock market price at the date the debt is issued, a beneficial conversion feature for the difference between the closing price and the conversion price multiplied by the number of shares issuable upon conversion is recognized. The beneficial conversion feature is presented as a discount to the related debt or equity, with an offsetting amount increasing additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized as additional interest expense or dividend from the date the instrument is issued to the date it first becomes convertible.

Basic loss per share (“EPS”) equals net loss divided by the number of weighted average common shares. Diluted EPS includes potentially dilutive securities such as stock options and convertible securities. The effect of shares issuable upon exercise of convertible debt, convertible preferred stock, warrants and stock options is anti-dilutive, therefore diluted loss per share is not presented in a comparative format.

In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, (“SAB 104”), Revenue Recognition. SAB 104 updates portions of existing interpretative guidance in order to be consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement requires that an issuer classify financial instruments which are within its scope as a liability. Most of the guidance in SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The impact of the Company’s adoption of SFAS 150 on its consolidated financial statements was to present Series H redeemable preferred stock as a liability.

In March 2003, the FASB reached a consensus on Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”. The consensus provides guidance on the accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements. It also provided guidance on how to separate multiple element revenue arrangements into separate units of accounting and how to measure and allocate the arrangement’s total consideration. The effective date of EITF 00-21 is for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods (interim or annual) beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company’s adoption of EITF 00-21 as of July 1, 2003 has not impacted its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51.” FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective immediately for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB released a revised version of FIN 46 clarifying certain aspects of FIN 46 and providing certain entities with exemptions from the requirements of FIN 46. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004. NAP de las Americas-Madrid S.A. is a variable interest entity but its current relationship indicates that it does not require consolidation since the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The Company’s maximum related exposure to loss is approximately $500,000 at March 31, 2004. Management does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a significant impact in the Company’s consolidated financial position or result of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB approved SFAS 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections.” In addition to rescinding SFAS 4, 44, and 64 and amending SFAS 13, SFAS 145 establishes a financial reporting standard for classification of extinguishment of debt in the financial statements in accordance with APB 30. SFAS 145 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2004. Management does not expect the adoption of SFAS 145 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position. However, SFAS 145 had an impact on the presentation of the results of operations for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004.

Receivable from related party represents a note receivable due March 31, 2004 for $360,000 from a corporation controlled by a shareholder of the Company and $139,009 of related accrued interest. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Company collected $50,000 and extended the maturity date on this receivable to March 31, 2005.

In June 2002, the Company entered into an exclusive agreement with the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid to develop and operate carrier-neutral network access points in Spain. As part of that agreement, the parties formed NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. to own and operate carrier-neutral NAPs in Spain, modeled after the NAP of the Americas. The shareholders in this new company are the Comunidad through its Instituto Madrileno de Desarrollo — IMADE, the Camara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid, Red Electrica Telecomunicaciones, S.A., Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A., a subsidiary of Abengoa S.A., and Centro de Transportes de Coslada, S.A. (CTC). At the time the NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. was formed, the Company owned 1% of its equity, which was subsequently increased to 10%. In May 2004, the Company purchased the 20% of this entity owned by Telvent Sistemas y Redes S.A. for approximately $550,000, and expects to exercise before June 24, 2004 its option to purchase the 30% of the interest owned by the Comunidad (CTC and IMADE) for approximately $1.2 million. The Camara has decided to retain its 20% interest. The Company expects to close on the option exercise on or before June 24, 2004. As a result of these transactions, the Company will have a 60% equity interest in NAP de las Americas — Madrid. At which time, the entity will be consolidated.

Property and equipment at March 31, 2004 and 2003 includes approximately $53.2 million and $53.7 million, respectively, in assets related to the NAP of the Americas. These amounts are net of accumulated depreciation.

During the year ended March 31, 2003, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $450,000 related to equipment held for installation for more than one year and considered obsolete. The impairment charge reduced the carrying value of the equipment to its estimated salvage value.

During the year ended March 31, 2003, the Company reached a compromise with vendors regarding certain billings and adjusted the asset value to the amount finally paid. As a result the Company recorded a reduction of approximately $1.3 million, in property and equipment.

A reconciliation of net loss and loss per share to exclude amortization expense in the prior year period follows:

The decline in the telecommunications industry and resulting decline in related real estate construction and leasing activities caused the Company to perform an impairment analysis during the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 of its promote interests in TECOTA acquired in the telecom facilities management operations sale and of its goodwill acquired in the Post Shell acquisition. The Company’s analyses were based on estimated fair value determined by the discounted future expected cash flows method and anticipated obtaining additional construction contracts for Post Shell and additional tenants for TECOTA. Based on these analyses, the Company determined that these assets, which are included in its telecom facilities management and real estate services segments, were impaired as of March 31, 2002 by approximately $3.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively. During the year ended March 31, 2003, no significant contracts were awarded to Post Shell and no tenants were added to TECOTA. As a result, the Company impaired the remaining $905,000 in TECOTA promote interests and $2.3 million in Post Shell goodwill.


(1)	Expected to be paid in full, in June 2004, with proceeds from issuance of $75.0 million Senior Notes.

(2)	The Company did not pay approximately $7.6 million in principal and interest which were due April 1, 2004 under some of its short-term notes. Accordingly, these notes were in default. The Company paid in full these short-term notes on or before June 14, 2004. There are no cross defaults with the notes payable to Ocean Bank.

(3)	Paid in full on June 14, 2004.

On September 5, 2001, the Company borrowed $48 million from Ocean Bank. The loan is secured by all of the Company’s assets and allows for up to a $25 million junior lien position on the assets of its NAP of the Americas, Inc. subsidiary. The proceeds of the original credit facility were used to:


	•	repay a $10 million short-term loan from Mr. Medina, the proceeds of which the Company had used to fund the build out of the NAP of the Americas (Mr. Medina, in turn, used the $10 million to repay a personal $10 million short-term loan from Ocean Bank);

	•	repay $3.5 million of debt that the Company owed to Ocean Bank under a line of credit personally guaranteed by Mr. Medina;

	•	pay $1.2 million in loan costs related to the $48 million credit facility (including $720,000 commitment fee); and

	•	fund the NAP of the Americas build out costs.

On April 30, 2003, Ocean Bank revised its loan with the Company by converting, at $.75 per common share, $15.0 million of the outstanding principal balance under the credit facility into 20 million shares of the Company’s common stock with an approximate $9.6 million market value and extending the term of the remaining $29.0 million until April 30, 2006. The resulting $5.4 million debt restructuring gain was deferred and recorded in notes payable and is being amortized as reductions in interest expense over the life of the remaining debt. Under the new terms, interest is payable quarterly at an annual stated rate of 5.25% for the first twelve months and 7.5% thereafter.

Mr. Medina has personally guaranteed the loan with Ocean Bank. In addition to Mr. Medina’s personal guarantee of the loan, and in order to obtain the credit facility, the bank further required Mr. Medina, prior to the bank disbursing funds under the credit facility, to (i) provide a $5.0 million certificate of deposit to the bank as collateral for certain personal loans that Mr. Medina has with the bank and (ii) commit to accelerate the maturity date of those personal loans. In the event of the Company’s default under the credit facility Mr. Medina also agreed to subordinate any debt that the Company owed to Mr. Medina until the credit

facility is repaid in full. Mr. Medina has repaid part of his personal loans to the bank through liquidation of the $5.0 million certificate of deposit in January 2002, leaving an outstanding principal balance of approximately $4.8 million. In July 2003, Mr. Medina exercised his option to extend the loan to December 31, 2003 and made a principal payment of $200,000 resulting in a $4.6 million balance on December 31, 2003. On February 11, 2004, Mr. Medina extended one loan with a principal amount of approximately $3.3 million to February 11, 2005 and made an interest payment of $63,500. On March 8, 2004, Mr. Medina extended the maturity date on the other loan which had a principal balance of approximately $1.3 million to March 8, 2005 and made a $73,446 payment of principal and interest.

On September 5, 2001 and in consideration of Mr. Medina’s agreeing to repay his indebtedness to the bank earlier than otherwise required, pledging the certificate of deposit to the bank and personally guaranteeing the $48 million credit facility and approximately $21 million of construction payables, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with him. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement, the Company will indemnify Mr. Medina from any personal liability related to his guarantees of the Company’s debt, use commercially reasonable efforts to relieve Mr. Medina of all his guarantees of the Company’s debt, provide up to $6.5 million of cash collateral to the bank should Mr. Medina be unable to repay the personal loans when due and provide a non interest-bearing $5.0 million loan to Mr. Medina for as long as his guarantees of the Company’s debt exist. Mr. Medina and the Company have agreed that the Company has the right to withhold payment to Mr. Medina of the $1,375,000 in convertible debt held by him until the note to the Company is repaid. The note receivable from Mr. Medina is shown as an adjustment to equity. The $48 million credit facility and the note receivable from Mr. Medina were approved by the Board of Directors. Mr. Medina’s note to the Company has a maturity date of September 30, 2004 and bears interest at 2%, the applicable federal rate. Interest is due in bi-annual installments. The Company reviews the collectibility of this note on a quarterly basis.

Interest expense of approximately $14.6 million, $11.0 million, and $9.8 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were net of amounts capitalized to leasehold improvements and real estate inventories totaling $0, $0 and $891,644, respectively.

The weighted average interest rate on notes payables outstanding as of March 31, 2004 and maturing within one year is 10.35%.

Construction payables at March 31, 2004 relate to construction at the Company’s colocation facility in Santa Clara, California and the build out of the third floor at TECOTA.

On November 8, 2002, CRG, LLC (“CRG”), an entity newly formed by a shareholder of the Company, entered into an agreement with Cupertino Electric, Inc. to purchase the entire $18.5 million construction payable (including accrued interest) owed to Cupertino. On November 11, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with CRG that provided the Company the option, upon the closing of the purchase of the debt

by CRG from Cupertino, to repay the entire debt at a discount by either issuing shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $0.75 per share or making a cash payment of $9.9 million.

On December 5, 2002, CRG, LLC entered into an agreement with Kinetics Mechanical Services, Inc. and Kinetics Systems Inc. to purchase the Company’s $4.1 million construction payable (including accrued interest) to Kinetics Mechanical Services, Inc. and Kinetics Systems Inc. On December 5, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with CRG that provided the Company with the option, upon the closing of the purchase of the debt by CRG from Kinetics Mechanical Services, Inc. and Kinetics Systems Inc., to repay the entire debt at a discount by either issuing shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $0.75 per share or making a cash payment of $2.4 million.

On April 30, 2003, CRG, LLC completed the purchase, at a discount, of the Company’s $22.6 million construction payables (including accrued interest) to Cupertino Electric, Inc., Kinetics Mechanical Services, Inc. and Kinetics Systems Inc., all of which were construction contractors for the NAP of the Americas. At the closing, CRG’s purchased construction payables were converted at $.75 per common share into 30,133,334 shares of the Company’s common stock with an approximate $14.1 million market value in accordance with the November 11, 2002 and the December 5, 2002 option agreements. As a result of these transactions, the Company recorded a gain on debt restructuring of approximately $8.5 million.

The 10% debentures were issued in exchange for $10.3 million in cash, $9.5 million in a promissory note due in full May 30, 2003 and $5.2 million of notes payable converted to the 10% debentures. The maker of the $9.5 million promissory note failed to pay but agreed on June 16, 2003 to assign the note and the debenture to an entity newly formed by the son of a director of the Company. As of September 22, 2003, the Company had collected the promissory note. In connection with this transaction, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $9.5 million, based on the June 16, 2003 measurement date.

Prepayment by the Company is permitted under the 10% debentures subsequent to April 30, 2004. Prepayment by the Company is permitted under the 13% and 13.125% debentures, but will entitle holders of the 13% debentures to principal plus warrants, or a premium over their outstanding principal and interest based upon the following schedule:

As of March 31, 2004, the Company had not paid approximately $429,000 of accrued interest due on March 31, 2004. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Company paid such amounts.

The Company has the authority to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, which are issuable in series on terms to be determined by its board of directors.

In May 2001, the Company issued 294 shares of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock for $500,000. The preferred stock allows for a preferential annual dividend of $102 per share and is convertible, as of March 31, 2004, into 294,000 shares of common stock. The preferred stock is redeemable at $1,700 per share plus any unpaid dividends at the request of the holder on June 1, 2005. The Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock shall vote together with the company’s common stock based on the then current conversion ratio.

The Company has 20 outstanding shares of Series G convertible preferred stock (“Series G Preferred”), which do not bear dividends. Conversion of the Series G Preferred into common stock is based on the issue price plus an 8% per annum non-compounding premium, divided by the lesser of: (a) $1.50 per Series G Preferred share or (b) the closing price of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the American Stock Exchange, on the business day immediately preceding the conversion. The Series G Preferred also has a stated liquidation preference value of $100,000 per share plus 8% in-kind dividends since March 1999, the date of issuance. The holders have no voting rights except with respect to matters that affect rights related to the Series G Preferred. The holder of these shares is a corporation owned by Mr. Medina, Chief Executive Officer and a shareholder of the Company. As of March 31, 2004, the Series G Preferred shares could have been converted into 2,143,492 of the Company’s common shares.

On March 31, 2004, the Company closed on the issuance of 400 shares of Series I 8% Convertible Preferred Stock for $7.7 million in cash and $2.2 million in promissory notes, together with warrants to purchase 2.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock which are exercisable for five years at $0.90 per share. The Company has collected all amounts due under the promissory notes. The Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.75 per share. In January 2007, the Series I Preferred Stock dividend rate will increase to 10% per year until January 2009 when it increases to 12%. Dividends are payable, at the Company’s discretion, in shares of the Company’s common stock or cash. The

Company has the right to redeem the Series I Preferred Stock at $25,000 per share plus accrued dividends at any time after December 31, 2004. Some of the Series I Preferred Stock shares were committed on dates where the conversion price was less than market. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-cash preferred dividend of approximately $1.0 million in determining net loss per common share for the period ended March 31, 2004. The Series I Preferred Stock shall vote together with the Company’s common stock based on the then current conversion ratio.

In June 2002, the NAP de las Americas — Madrid S.A. purchased 5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. In August 2003, as a result of the subsequent sale of certain common shares, the Company issued an additional 3.7 million shares of its common stock to NAP de Las Americas — Madrid S.A.

In April 2002, the Company received a binding commitment from two directors and some shareholders for the purchase of $7.5 million of common stock at $.75 per share. In May 2002, the Company issued 10 million shares of its common stock for $3.6 million in cash and the conversion of $3.9 million in short-term promissory notes to equity.

In April 2002, the Company entered into a Put and Warrant purchase agreement with TD Global Finance (“TDGF”). On July 19, 2002, the Company exercised its right to sell to TDGF 17,648,824 common shares for $0.58 per share for a total of $10.2 million.

In October 2003, $258,306 of debt was converted to 344,407 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.

In April 2003, in conjunction with the Ocean Bank debt conversion of $15.0 million in debt to equity, the Company issued 20 million shares of its common stock at $0.75 per share.

In April 2003, in conjunction with the CRG transaction whereby $21.6 million in construction payables plus $1.0 million in accrued interest was converted to equity, the Company issued 30.1 million shares of its common stock at $0.75 per share.

On February 19, 2002, $242,700 of convertible debt was converted to 160,071 shares of common stock at $1.52 per share.

During the year ended March 31, 2003, holders of notes payable entered into irrevocable agreements and converted approximately $.8 million in debt and accrued interest into approximately 1.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.75 per share.

In August 2003, $45,004 of debt was converted to 60,005 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.

During the year ended March 31, 2004, 77,271 shares of common stock were issued in conjunction with the exercise of 77,271 employee stock options at prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.78 per share.

In June 2003, warrants valued at approximately $4,000 were converted to 9,500 shares of common stock at $0.48 per share.

During the period from November 2000 through March 2004, the Company issued warrants to third parties for services and to facilitate certain debt and equity transactions. The following table summarizes information about stock warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2004:

The Company has three stock option plans, whereby incentive and nonqualified options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to employees, officers, directors, and consultants. There are 23,500,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under these plans. The exercise price of the options is determined by the Board of Directors, but in the case of an incentive stock option, the exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value at the time of grant. Options vest over periods not to exceed ten years.

On October 19, 2001, the Company issued options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock to each member of the Company’s Board of Directors, for a total of 900,000 options. The exercise price of the options is $0.67 per share and were immediately exercisable.

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at March 31, 2004:

Effective July 22, 2003, Brian Goodkind stepped down as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and became a strategic advisor to the Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this modification to the employment relationship, the Company accelerated the vesting on his outstanding stock options and awarded him new stock options. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash, stock-based compensation charge of approximately $1.8 million in the year ended March 31, 2004.

During the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, $903,000 and $386,000 of deferred revenue were amortized into data center services.

On November 10, 2003, a developer agreed to pay the Company to develop a facility in Australia. The developer paid the Company $500,000 upon execution of the agreement and the remaining balance of $3.3 million on December 10, 2003. On February 11, 2004, the developer notified the Company it did not wish to proceed with negotiations regarding the construction of a facility in Australia. On February 19, 2004, the Company acknowledged receipt of the developer’s notification, and terminated the agreement with the developer. As required by the agreement, The Company did not conduct any business related to the operation or management of data centers in Australia until the agreement terminated. The Company has no further obligations in connection with the agreement and as a result recognized the $3.8 million non-refundable fee as other income in the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

No provision for income taxes was recorded for each of the three years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as the Company incurred net operating losses in each year.

The Company’s accounting for deferred taxes involves the evaluation of a number of factors concerning the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets. To support the Company’s conclusion that a 100% valuation allowance was required, the Company primarily considered such factors as the Company’s history of operating losses, the nature of the Company’s deferred tax assets and the absence of taxable income in prior carryback years. Although the Company’s operating plans assume taxable and operating income in future periods, the Company’s evaluation of all the available evidence in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets indicates that such plans are not considered sufficient to overcome the available negative evidence.

The Company’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, amounting to approximately $137 million, begin to expire in 2011. Utilization of the net operating losses generated prior to the AmTec merger may be limited by the Internal Revenue Code.

The reconciliation between the statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate on pre-tax (loss) income is as follows:

The Company expects to pay a limited amount of tax for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006. The tax costs will be primarily limited to alternative minimum taxes as the Company anticipates utilizing its net operating loss carryforwards and expects to have significant tax deductions attributable to stock options exercised in the years.

The Company leases space for its operations, office equipment and furniture under operating leases. Certain equipment is also leased under capital leases, which are included in leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment.

Technology Center of the Americas LLC (“TECOTA”), an entity in which the Company has a .84% member interest, owns the building which leases the space for the NAP of the Americas to the Company under a 20 year lease. Rent expense under leases amounted to approximately $5.3 million, $3.6 million and $2.7 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

On November 4, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to lease an additional 149,184 square feet of space on the third floor of TECOTA and extend the existing lease for the second floor of the same property to co-terminate with the third floor lease on May 31, 2025. Under the terms of the lease agreement, monthly base rent payments for the third floor space of approximately $2.4 million will commence in April 2005. Effective June 1, 2006 and 2009, annual base rent for the third floor space will increase to approximately $3.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively, with annual increases of 2.5% thereafter.

The Company leases space for the colocation facility in Santa Clara, California. The lease commenced in January 2001 and is for 20 years. Annual rent is approximately $1,500,000.

The Company has entered into capital lease agreements with third parties for equipment related primarily to the NAP of the Americas. Generally, the lease terms are for 48 months, and the aggregate gross related assets total approximately $4.5 million.

Operating lease expense, in the aggregate, amounted to approximately $7.8 million, $6.0 million, and $7.0 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

At March 31, 2004, future minimum lease payments for each of the following five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating and capital leases having a remaining term in excess of one year are as follows:

From time to time, the Company is involved in various litigation relating to claims arising out of the normal course of business. These claims are generally covered by insurance. The Company is not currently subject to any litigation which singularly or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The construction of TECOTA was funded with $48 million in equity and $61 million in construction loans from a consortium of banks. The Company guaranteed the loans during its construction of TECOTA. After TECOTA was built, certain banks released the Company from the guarantee, the result of which was to reduce the guarantee to $5.5 million. As of March 31, 2004, TECOTA debt under the construction loan was $35.4 million and is due in November 2005. The Company does not expect to fund any amounts under the guarantee.

The Company has guaranteed $4.6 million in personal debt of Manuel D. Medina, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

The Company has entered into an agreement to provide construction and management services to TECOTA for fees. For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the Company earned approximately $198,000, $510,000 and $515,000 in related fees, respectively.

As of December 31, 2003, the Company had not paid approximately $792,000 related to its tangible property taxes. The Company negotiated a payment plan with the Miami-Dade Tax Collector and are current under the plan.

Due to the nature of the following relationships, the terms of the respective agreements might not be the same as those that would result from transactions among wholly unrelated parties.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other related parties have either provided or guaranteed some of the Company’s debt or equity financing. In addition, services are provided to entities in which the Company owns stock.

Following is a summary of transactions for the year ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and balances with related parties included in the accompanying balance sheet as of March 31, 2004 and 2003.

In April 2003, two directors purchased $250,000 of the 10% subordinated debentures.

During the twelve months ended March 31, 2004, the Company purchased services from Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc. (“Fusion”). The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors has a minority ownership in Fusion and is a member of its Board of Directors.

As of March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had two reportable business segments, data center operations and real estate services. The data center operations segment provides Tier 1 NAP, Internet infrastructure and managed services in a data center environment. The real estate services segment constructs and manages real estate projects focused in the technology sector. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business operations that offer different products and services.

During the year ended March 31, 2001, the Company had an additional segment, telecom facilities management, which developed, managed and leased facilities catering primarily to the telecommunications industry. In conjunction with the Company’s change in its strategy related to its colocation facility in Santa Clara, California, the Company no longer considers the remaining operations to be separate from its other two segments. Therefore, amounts related to the colocation facility have been reclassified in the current and prior year presentations to their respective March 31, 2003 segments.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in significant accounting policies. Revenues generated among segments are recorded at rates similar to those recorded in third-party transactions. Transfers of assets and liabilities between segments are recorded at cost. The Company evaluates performance based on the segment’s net operating results.

A reconciliation of total segment loss from operations to loss before income taxes follows:

No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations in connection with this offering other than those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, any information and representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the securities to which it relates or an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities in any circumstances in which this offer or solicitation is unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made under this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus or that the information contained in this prospectus is correct as of any time subsequent to its date.


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
RISK FACTORS
USE OF PROCEEDS
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
BUSINESS
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
LEGAL MATTERS
EXPERTS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



	Prices
Fiscal Year 2005
Quarter Ended	High		Low

June 30, 2004	$	1.09	$	0.61
September 30, 2004 (through July 9, 2004)		0.84		0.64



	Prices
Fiscal Year 2004
Quarter Ended	High		Low

June 30, 2003	$	1.21	$	0.33
September 30, 2003		1.00		0.53
December 31, 2003		0.78		0.55
March 31, 2004		0.94		0.60



	Prices
Fiscal Year 2003
Quarter Ended	High		Low

June 30, 2002	$	0.73	$	0.25
September 30, 2002		0.77		0.31
December 31, 2002		0.71		0.22
March 31, 2003		0.49		0.22



		Three Months Ended

		March 31,			December 31,			September 30,			June 30,
		2004			2003			2003			2003


		(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Data center(1)		$	5,199		$	4,592		$	3,941		$	3,302
Real estate services			659			273			108			139

	Total revenue		5,858			4,865			4,049			3,441

Data center operations expenses			5,243			4,664			3,950			2,556
Construction contract expenses			581			229			62			46
Other (income) expenses			5,496			9,124			10,844			(2,091	)

	Total expenses		11,320			14,017			14,856			511

Net loss from operations			(5,462	)		(9,152	)		(10,807	)		2,930
Non-cash preferred dividend			(1,038	)		(40	)		(40	)		(40	)

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders		$	(6,500	)	$	(9,192	)	$	(10,847	)	$	2,890

Net income (loss) per common share		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	0.01


	Page

Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		5
Use of Proceeds		7
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		8
Selected Consolidated Financial Data		10
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		12
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		30
Business		31
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		39
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		46
Selling Stockholders		49
Plan of Distribution		56
Certain Transactions		57
Description of Capital Stock		59
Interests of Named Experts and Counsel		62
Legal Matters		62
Experts		62
Where You can Find Additional Information		62
Index to Financial Statements


	*We may not be able to compete effectively in the market for data center services.*


	We anticipate that an increasing portion of our revenues will be from contracts with agencies of the United States government, and uncertainties in government contracts could adversely affect our business.


	*We have significant debt service obligations which will require the use of a substantial portion of our available cash.*


	*We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of these key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our success.*


	*If we do not locate financial or strategic partners, we may have to delay or abandon expansion plans.*


	Our president, chairman and chief executive officer, cannot be removed without cause which could delay, defer or prevent change in control of our company or impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination.


	*If the price of our shares remains low or our financial condition deteriorates, we may be delisted by the American Stock Exchange.*


	*Our business could be harmed by prolonged electrical power outages or shortages, or increased costs of energy.*


	*Brazilian political and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operations.*


	*Dividend Policy*


	*Overview*


	*Results of Operations for the Year Ended March 31, 2004 as Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2003*



		For the Twelve
		Months Ended
		March 31,

		2004			2003

Revenue
	U.S		99	%		98	%
	Outside U.S		1	%		2	%

			100	%		100	%

	Data Center		94	%		75	%
	Construction Work		5	%		22	%
	Property and Construction Management		1	%		3	%

			100	%		100	%



		For the Twelve Months Ended March 31,

		2004				2003

Colocation		$	9,861,638	58	%	$	6,020,779	55	%
Exchange point services			3,571,709	21	%		2,125,370	19	%
Managed & professional services			3,179,264	19	%		1,791,750	16	%
Contract termination fee			421,766	2	%		1,095,086	10	%

	Data center revenue	$	17,034,377	100	%	$	11,032,985	100	%



	For the Twelve Months
	Ended March 31,

	2004			2003

Data center operations	$	(22,152,261	)	$	(37,565,136	)
Real estate services		(338,316	)		(3,662,169	)

	$	(22,490,577	)	$	(41,227,305	)



	2003				2002


Colocation & exchange point services	$	8,146,149	82	%	$	2,967,207	92	%
Managed & professional services		1,791,750	18	%		248,690	8	%

	$	9,937,899	100	%	$	3,215,897	100	%



	Fiscal year ended March 31,

Asset	2003		2002

Facility in Santa Clara, California	$	350,000	$	11,983,670
Post Shell goodwill		2,315,336		3,190,000
TECOTA promote interest		904,964		3,800,000
Equipment		450,000		—

	$	4,020,300	$	18,973,670



	For the Year Ended March 31,

	2003		2002

Data center operations	$	37,565,136	$	34,971,359
Telecom facilities management		—		16,682,059
Real estate services		3,662,169		5,718,797

	$	41,227,305	$	57,372,215


		Actual			Adjustments			Pro Forma


		Unaudited
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,400,000		$	34,700,000	(1)	$	39,100,000


Notes payable			40,500,000			(40,500,000	)		—
Convertible debt			37,100,000			(37,100,000	)		—
Unsecured senior notes			—			86,250,000			86,250,000
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock			600,000						600,000

	Total debt	$	78,200,000					$	86,850,000

Series G convertible preferred stock		$	—					$	—
Series I convertible preferred stock			—						—
Common stock			300,000			100,000	(3)		400,000
Paid in capital			213,600,000			27,900,000	(3)		241,500,000
Accumulated deficit			(236,800,000	)		3,200,000	(2)		(233,600,000	)
Common stock warrants			3,600,000						3,600,000
Common stock options			1,500,000						1,500,000
Notes receivable — related party			(5,000,000	)					(5,000,000	)

	Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity	$	(22,800,000	)				$	8,400,000



	For the year
	ended March 31,

	2004			2003

Stock-based compensation	$	2,185,463		$	—
Depreciation and amortization		4,698,292			5,092,749
Asset impairments		—			4,020,300
Inducement on debt conversion		—			4,871,245
Gain on debt restructuring		(8,475,000	)		—
Deferred rent		4,327,831			1,135,448
Beneficial conversion features		8,595,239			—

	$	11,331,825		$	15,119,742


		March 31, 2004

Notes payable to unrelated parties:
Unsecured notes payable to SBP Investments, Inc. and Caerulea, Ltd., Principal and interest accruing at 10% due in April 2004(2).		$	2,800,000
Unsecured note payable to Slivovitz Design Limited, Inc., interest accrues at 15%. Principal and interest due in April 2004.(2)			1,000,000
Unsecured notes payable to various individuals, interest ranges from 10% to 15%. Principal and interest due between April 2004 and March 2005.(1)			821,884
Note payable to JCH Aston Partners, LLC, collateralized by certain assets of a director and certain of our shareholders. Interest accrues at 1% over prime, principal and interest due in July 2004.(1)			367,178

	Total notes payable to unrelated parties	$	4,989,062

Notes payable to related parties:
Note payable to Ocean Bank, collateralized by substantially all assets of the NAP of the Americas and a personal guaranty of the Chief Executive Officer. Carrying amount includes an unamortized balance of a debt restructuring gain of $4,309,764. Interest is payable quarterly at an annual rate of 5.25%. Effective May 2004 annual interest increases to 7.5%.(3)		$	33,284,317
Unsecured note payable to Centre Credit Corporation, a corporation controlled by a shareholder, interest accrues at 15%. Principal and interest due in April 2004.(2)			1,600,000
Unsecured notes payable to certain of our executives and directors and corporations in which related parties have an interest, interest accrues at 13%. Principal and interest due in April 2004.(2)			632,660

	Total notes payable to related parties	$	35,516,977

			40,506,039
Less: current portion of notes payable			9,194,145

Notes payable, less current portion		$	31,311,894


	Capital lease
	obligations		Operating leases		Notes Payable		Convertible debt		Total

2005	$	1,799,727	$	4,750,745	$	9,194,145	$	250,000	$	15,994,617
2006		72,068		6,809,342		2,145,607		12,800,000		21,827,017
2007		28,510		7,528,228		29,142,360		25,000,000		61,699,098
2008		5,307		7,651,497		23,927		—		7,680,731
2009		—		7,771,067		—		—		7,771,067
Thereafter		—		164,136,131		—		—		164,136,131

	$	1,905,612	$	198,647,010	$	40,506,039	$	38,050,000	$	279,108,661


Name	Age		Principal Position

Manuel D. Medina		51	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph R. Wright, Jr.		65	Vice Chairman of the Board
Guillermo Amore		65	Director
Timothy Elwes		68	Director
Antonio S. Fernandez		64	Director
Fernando Fernandez-Tapias		65	Director
Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen		49	Director
Arthur L. Money		64	Director
Marvin S. Rosen		62	Director
Miguel J. Rosenfeld		54	Director
Rodolfo A. Ruiz		56	Director
Jamie Dos Santos		42	Chief Marketing Officer
Jose E. Gonzalez		43	Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Jose A. Segrera		33	Chief Financial Officer
Marvin Wheeler		49	Chief Operations Officer


							Long Term
							Compensation
	Annual Compensation						Awards

	Fiscal		Salary		Commissions		Options/
Name and Principal Position	Year		($)		($)		SARS (#)

Manuel D. Medina		2004		350,000		—		—
Chairman of the Board, President and		2003		350,000		—		—
Chief Executive Officer		2002		350,000		—		100,000

Jamie Dos Santos,		2004		250,000		104,000		200,000
Chief Marketing Officer		2003		250,000		23,000		275,000
		2002		175,000		75,000		200,000

Jose A. Segrera		2004		195,000		—		100,000
Chief Financial Officer		2003		170,000		—		100,000
		2002		170,000		—		200,000

Marvin Wheeler,		2004		195,000		—		200,000
Chief Operations Officer		2003		175,000		—		100,000
		2002		135,000		—		105,000

Jose E. Gonzalez,		2004		185,000		—		50,000
Chief Legal Officer		2003		185,000		—		75,000
and Secretary		2002		175,000		—		200,000



										Potential Realizable
										Value At Assumed
										Annual Rates Of
										Stock Price
										Appreciation For
Individual Grants										Option Term(1)

	Number of		% of Total
	Securities		Options Granted			Exercise
	Underlying Options		to Employees in			Price		Expiration		5%		10%
Name	Granted(#)		Fiscal Year			($/Sh)		Date		($)		($)

Manuel D. Medina		—		—			—		—		—		—
Jose A. Segrera		100,000		2	%		0.33		4/1/13		18,194		44,812
Jose E. Gonzalez		50,000		1	%		0.33		4/1/13		9,097		22,406
Jamie Dos Santos		200,000		4	%		0.33		4/1/13		36,388		89,625
Marvin Wheeler		200,000		4	%		0.33		4/1/13		36,388		89,625


	*Aggregated Options Exercises In Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values*



					Number of Securities				Value of Unexercised
					Underlying Unexercised				In-the-Money Options
	Shares				Options at Fiscal Year End				at Fiscal Year End(1)
	Acquired on		Value
Name	Exercise		Realized		Exercisable		Unexercisable		Exercisable		Unexercisable

Manuel D. Medina		—		—		200,000		—		—		—
Jose A. Segrera		—		—		383,334		166,666	$	33,667	$	36,333
Jose E. Gonzalez		—		—		350,000		125,000	$	23,667	$	21,583
Jamie Dos Santos		—		—		533,000		291,667	$	71,167	$	74,583
Marvin Wheeler		—		—		255,001		199,999	$	43,334	$	60,666


	*Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation*


		Amount and Nature of			Percent
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner		Beneficial Ownership(1)			of Class (%)

Common Stock:
	Manuel D. Medina		44,705,282	(2)		14.2
	Joseph R. Wright, Jr.		4,265,042	(3)		1.4
	Guillermo Amore		5,948,265	(4)		1.9
	Marvin S. Rosen		1,362,150	(5)		*
	Miguel J. Rosenfeld		2,586,855	(6)		*
	Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen		300,000	(7)		*
	Timothy Elwes		200,000	(7)		*
	Antonio S. Fernandez		316,884	(8)		*
	Fernando Fernandez-Tapias		66,667	(9)		*
	Arthur L. Money		34,000	(9)		*
	Rodolfo A. Ruiz		34,000	(9)		*
	Jaime Dos Santos		533,000	(9)		*
	Marvin Wheeler		255,001	(9)		*
	Jose A. Segrera		383,334	(9)		*
	Jose E. Gonzalez		350,000	(9)		*
	Ocean Bank		20,000,000	(10)		6.4
	Sun Equity Assets Limited		29,909,128	(11)		9.6
	Paradise Stream (Delaware) LLC		25,000,000	(12)		8.0
	All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)		60,592,483			18.8
Series G Preferred Stock:
	Communications Investors Group		20	(13)		100.0
Series H Preferred Stock:
	One Vision Worldwide, LLC		294	(14)		100.0
Series I Preferred Stock:
	Louisa Stude Sarofim 2004 Terremark Grantor Retained Annuity Trust		80	(15)		20.0
	Guazapa Properties, Inc.		48	(16)		12.0
	CRG, LLC		100	(17)		25.0
	Asturpizza, S.A.		20	(18)		5.0
	CIG Investments, LLLP		40	(19)		10.0
	Promociones Bursatiles, S.A.		28	(20)		7.0


							Number of Shares			Percentage
	Number of						Beneficially			of Shares
	Shares			Number of			Owned			Beneficially Owned
	Beneficially			Shares			After Offering			After Offering
Selling Stockholder	Owned(1)			Offered			(1)(2)			(1)(2)

50 State Security Service, Inc.(3)		212,533			212,533			0			0
Adorno & Yoss(4)		344,408			202,104			142,304			*
AHV Associates LLP(5)		100,000			100,000	**		0			0
Andres Altaba		3,601,308			1,401,308			2,220,000	(59)		*
Francisco Alvarez		200,000			200,000			0			0
Guillermo Amore(6)		5,867,602			611,115			5,256,487			1.7
Anaga Corporation(7)		400,000			400,000			0			0
Andover Capital Management, SA(8)		500,000			500,000			0			0
Arcadia International Corporation(9)		1,134,120			988,000			146,120			*
Associated Resources, Inc.(10)		500,000			500,000			0			0
The Aventura Trust #2		700,000			700,000			0			0
BCT Bank International(64)		1,000,000			1,000,000			0			0
Bercotrac Investments, Inc.(11)		2,200,000			2,200,000			0			0
Jeffrey Berkowitz		2,000,000			2,000,000			0			0
Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc.(12)		432,591			196,917			235,674			*
Bierman, Shohat, Lowey & Klein, PA(13)		9,870			9,870			0			0
Boccador Enterprises Inc. Profit Sharing Plan & Trust 11/1/96(14)		1,000,000			1,000,000			0			0
Aviva Budd(15)		1,547,469			282,721			1,264,748			*
Gisele Bundchen		966,183			966,183			0			0
Cartecla Finance Corporation(16)		120,000			120,000			0			0
CRG, LLC(17)		4,493,676			4,493,676			0			0
Charles Dusseau		102,045			102,045			0			0
Robert Donahue		200,000			200,000	**		0			0
Arturo Ehrlich		3,200,000			1,200,000	**		2,000,000	(60)		*
The Frank James Edwards Estate III Trust(18)		100,000			100,000			0			0
Harold Evans		688,828			688,828			0			0
FA Holdings, Inc.(19)		1,000,000			1,000,000			0			0
Fellows Avenue Management Group, Inc.(20)		10,667			10,667			0			0
Jose Maria Figueres-Olsen(21)		800,000	(22)		500,000			300,000			*
Antonio S. Fernandez(28)		437,552			80,668	(33)		356,884			*
Michael Frankfurt IRA		344,408			344,408			0			0
The Gene E. Dooley GRHC Trust U/A/D 1/31/1989(23)		100,000			100,000			0			0
Mary Gilbert		348,815			348,815			0			0
Thomas and Emma Ginley		1,377,630			878,179			499,451			*
Pablo Gomez		900,000			900,000			0			0
Brian K. Goodkind(24)		273,361			91,361			182,000			*
B & J Grey Investments, LP		732,172			732,172			0			0


(39)	Manuel Medina is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.