XML 47 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Oct. 27, 2012
Income Taxes  
Income Taxes

(6)                                 Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense for the interim periods was computed using the effective tax rate estimated to be applicable for the full fiscal year, along with the impact of any discrete items. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 33.0% for the each of the nine months ended October 27, 2012 and October 29, 2011. The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 included the discrete impact of a $19.5 million settlement charge recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. This unfavorably impacted the mix of taxable income among the Company’s tax jurisdictions, resulting in an increase in the effective income tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2012 of 170 basis points. During the current nine month period, the distribution of earnings among the Company’s tax jurisdictions resulted in a similar estimated tax rate compared to the prior year.

 

From time to time, the Company is subject to routine income tax audits on various tax matters around the world in the ordinary course of business. As of October 27, 2012, several income tax audits were underway for various periods in multiple jurisdictions. Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company received tax audit reports from the Italian tax authority regarding its ongoing audit of one of the Company’s Italian subsidiaries for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years and believed it was likely to receive a formal tax assessment from the tax authority for these two periods for roughly $11 million. During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company received a formal tax assessment that was largely consistent with the Company’s prior expectations, with a total tax assessment for the periods of approximately $12 million. Similar or even larger assessments for periods subsequent to fiscal 2009 or other claims or charges related to the matter continue to be possible.

 

The Company has been advised by its Italian counsel that tax audits like this one in Italy involving proposed income adjustments greater than €2 million are automatically referred for review by a public prosecutor who may seek to pursue charges or close the matter, and that resulting criminal charges, if any, would be instituted against individuals rather than against the affected companies under Italian law. Consistent with this process, a review proceeding by a prosecutor in Italy has been initiated with respect to three current and former members of the Guess European management team and the Company’s former President (as the signing officer for certain Italian tax returns covering the relevant periods). The prosecutor has not yet made a final determination regarding this matter.

 

As is common in tax audit matters, the Company has been working with the Italian tax authority in an attempt to resolve this matter through the standard resolution processes in Italy.  However, the Company continues to disagree with the positions that the Italian tax authority has taken and intends to vigorously contest this matter as appropriate.

 

As required under applicable accounting rules, the Company accrues an amount for its estimate of additional income tax liability which the Company, more likely than not, could incur as a result of the ultimate resolution of the income tax audits (“uncertain tax positions”). The Company reviews and updates the accrual for uncertain tax positions as more definitive information becomes available from taxing authorities, upon completion of tax audits, upon expiration of statutes of limitation, or upon occurrence of other events. The Company does not believe that the resolution of open matters will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity.

 

As of October 27, 2012 and January 28, 2012, the Company had $16.6 million and $16.7 million, respectively, of aggregate accruals for uncertain tax positions, including penalties and interest and net of federal tax benefits. The change in the accrual balance from January 28, 2012 to October 27, 2012 resulted primarily from foreign currency translation.