JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

As of December 31, 2011 the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $2.4 billion, based upon the closing sale prices of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. Shares of common stock held by executive officers and directors have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of July 28, 2012, the Registrant had 231,916,378 shares of common stock outstanding, including 3,937,789 exchangeable shares of JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. Each exchangeable share is exchangeable at any time into common stock on a one-for-one basis, entitles a holder to dividend and other rights economically equivalent to those of the common stock, and through a voting trust, votes at meetings of stockholders of the Registrant.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of the Registrant's Notice of Annual Meeting of stockholders and Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after Registrant's fiscal year end of June 30, 2012 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A forward-looking statement may contain words such as "anticipates," "believes," "can impact," "could," "continue," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "ongoing," "plans," "potential," "projects," "should," "will," "will continue to be," "would," or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include statements such as:

Management cautions that forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties including those set forth in Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, neither we assume nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this Report and subsequent facts or circumstances may contradict, obviate, undermine or otherwise fail to support or substantiate such statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-K to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

JDS Uniphase Corporation ("JDSU," also referred to as "the Company," "we," "our," and "us") is a leading provider of communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, wireless operators, cable operators, network-equipment manufacturers ("NEMs"), and enterprises. JDSU also is an established leader in providing anti-counterfeiting technologies for currencies and other high value documents and products. In addition, the Company is leveraging its core networking and optical technology expertise to deliver high-powered commercial lasers for manufacturing applications and expand into emerging markets, including gesture—recognition solutions for consumer electronics.

To serve its markets, JDSU operates the following business segments: Communications Test and Measurement ("CommTest"), which accounted for approximately 44.9% of net revenue in fiscal 2012; Communications and Commercial Optical Products ("CCOP"), which accounted for approximately 41.7% of net revenue in fiscal 2012; and Advanced Optical Technologies ("AOT"), which accounted for approximately 13.4% of net revenue in fiscal 2012.

The trends that drive the broadband communications industry influence our CommTest and CCOP businesses. Adoption of smart mobile devices and demand for high-speed broadband access to support video and other high-bandwidth network traffic applications are straining networks and creating new challenges for JDSU's customers. The growing use of social networking and cloud computing also make network traffic more unpredictable, generating sudden spikes in volume and making it harder to deliver a quality end user experience. Meeting these challenges requires the deployment of advanced network and service enablement solutions and next generation network technologies such as LTE, 40/100G and FTTx. JDSU is well positioned to continue to benefit from these industry trends, and the network complexity they create, due to its leadership in broadband test and measurement and optical communications.

Trends related to the increasing threat of counterfeiting impact our AOT business. Counterfeiting for currency, pharmaceuticals and other goods, is on the rise because, penalties are relatively light and technological advances, including cheaper, higher-quality printing technology, online marketing that enables counterfeiters to market their products cheaply and anonymously, and cheaper distribution means have made counterfeiting easier than ever. JDSU enjoys long-standing positions with government and leading commercial enterprises built on decades of anti-counterfeiting expertise. JDSU's optically variable pigment technologies protect the integrity of currency and other high value products and documents. We also provide critical optical components for safety, security and consumer markets.

In addition to communications network and service enablement and anti-counterfeiting solutions, JDSU extends its technology expertise to solve complex problems and deliver unique solutions in other industries. For example, our high-precision lasers enable the trend toward smaller integrated circuits for use in today's compact consumer electronics, the classification and sorting of biological cells using induced fluorescence, and deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") sequencing through the appropriate application of monochromatic light. New concentrator photovoltaic ("CPV") cell technology from JDSU captures concentrated sunlight for electrical power generation. Precision optical coatings are

used for emerging gesture-recognition and 3D applications as well as high-performance applications in aerospace, entertainment, and biomedical instrumentation.

JDSU markets its products to telecommunications and cable service providers, NEMs, original equipment manufacturers ("OEM"), enterprises, government organizations, distributors and strategic partners worldwide. Each business segment has a dedicated sales force that communicates directly with customers' executive, technical, manufacturing, and purchasing personnel as needed to determine design, performance, and cost requirements. In addition, all business segments are working to expand opportunities in emerging geographic markets directly and through alternate channels of distribution.

A high level of support is necessary to develop and maintain long-term collaborative relationships with our customers. JDSU develops innovative products by engaging the customer at the initial design phase and continues to build the relationship as customer needs change and develop. Service and support are provided through JDSU offices and those of its partners worldwide.

JDSU was incorporated in California in 1979 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1993. JDSU is the product of several significant mergers and acquisitions including, among others, the combination of Uniphase Corporation and JDS FITEL in 1999, and the acquisition of Acterna, Inc. in 2005. Our strategy is to operate as a company comprised of a portfolio of businesses with a focus on optical and broadband innovation.

We are subject to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, pursuant to which we file annual, quarterly and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. We also post all of our SEC filings on our website at www.jdsu.com/investors as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Our objective is to continue to be a leading provider for all markets and industries we serve. In support of our business segments, we are pursuing a corporate strategy that we believe will best position us for future opportunities. The key elements of our corporate strategy include:

Although we expect to successfully implement our strategy, internal and/or external factors could impact our ability to meet any, or all, of our objectives. These factors are discussed under Item 1A—Risk Factors.

JDSU operates in the following business segments: CommTest, CCOP and AOT. Each segment has its own engineering, manufacturing, sales, and marketing groups to better serve customers and respond quickly to the market needs. In addition, our business segments share common corporate services that provide capital, infrastructure, resources, and functional support, allowing them to focus on core technological strengths to compete and innovate in their markets.

The CommTest business provides instruments, software and services that enable the design, deployment, and maintenance of communication equipment and broadband networks and ensure the quality of services delivered to the end user. These solutions help accelerate the deployment of new

services and lower operating expenses while improving performance and reliability. Included in the product portfolio are test tools, platforms, software, and services for wireless and wireline networks. CommTest products address the test requirements across and at all layers of the network and are used in all phases of the network lifecycle, from R&D in the lab and production line validation to field deployment and service assurance. JDSU also provides test solutions for private enterprise networks, including storage and storage-network technologies.

JDSU provides instruments, software, service assurance systems, and services for communications network operators and equipment manufacturers that deliver and/or operate broadband/IP networks (fixed and mobile) that deliver voice, video, and data services. JDSU communications test solutions support the research, development, and manufacture of network equipment; field service test for fixed and wireless networks, including triple-play deployments for cable, telecom, FTTx, and home networking; and service assurance, which includes monitoring and maintaining quality of experience ("QoE") for cable, wireless and fixed/telecom networks. JDSU also provides protocol-test solutions for the development and field deployment of storage networks.

JDSU customers for CommTest include the world's largest communications service providers, NEMs, government organizations, and large corporate customers. These include major telecom and cable operators such as AT&T, Bell Canada, Bharti Airtel Limited, British Telecom, China Mobile, China Telecom, Chunghwa Telecom, Comcast, CSL, Deutsche Telecom, France Telecom, TalkTalk, Telefónica, Telmex, TimeWarner Cable, and Verizon. JDSU test and measurement customers also include many of the NEMs served by our CCOP segment, including Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Fujitsu and Huawei. JDSU test and measurement customers also include chip and infrastructure vendors, storage-device manufacturers, storage-network and switch vendors, and deployed private enterprise customers. Storage-segment customers include Brocade, Cisco Systems, EMC, Hewlett-Packard and IBM.

As content and application developer providers are developing new business models to expand their distribution capabilities, they are increasingly adopting on-line channels for rich broadband content such as music, gaming, video programming, and movies. Telecommunications and cable service providers are, in turn, planning to increase profitability and average revenue per subscriber ("ARPU") by expanding the capabilities of their packet-based networks to increase their network capacity and to deliver sophisticated, more reliable levels of service required to meet the requirements of content providers, application developers and end users.

Telecommunications, cable television, satellite, and wireless service providers are competing with each other to offer content providers and consumers the ability to carry virtually any type of voice, data and video content to any device, including smart phones and tablets. With more applications and content available, potential benefits for service providers include increased ARPU and less customer turnover due to better service quality, thus increasing profitability and long-term competitive advantage. As a result, many providers are developing consolidated network architectures intended to enable integrated voice, data and video services from a single provider rather than three separate services from different providers. Integrating legacy and next generation network technology and services create new challenges for communications service providers and undermines service quality and reliability.

Additionally, growth in the number of worldwide mobile subscribers and the proliferation of new and higher bandwidth services, including video-based content such as news, movies, and gaming, is generating strong growth in demand for network capacity and faster transmission rates. These trends are driving disproportionate capital spending in network technologies related to next-generation wireless, including 3G and 4G/Long Term Evolution ("LTE") and Ethernet-based backhaul of mobile traffic from cell towers; higher-capacity transport solutions to support video communications (40G/100G); and software-driven network and service enablement systems.

Increasing deployments of higher speed networks, the expansion of IP-based services, the need to reduce deployment time and cost, and the importance of increasing ARPU results in demand for communications test and measurement instruments, systems, software, and services. These solutions support the rapid deployment of new services and sources of revenue, increase customer satisfaction by helping technicians complete installation and repair work quickly and correctly, and lower operating expenses by automating and improving network installation, maintenance, and management processes. Our broad portfolio of test and measurement solutions positions us well to benefit from these developments.

The CommTest business segment plans to improve profitability and increase revenue by continuing to develop and offer higher-margin, software-based solutions that can remotely and more cost-effectively gather network intelligence our customers need to deliver a quality end user experience, increase ARPU, reduce customer churn and lower operating expenses.

JDSU competes against various companies, including Agilent, Anritsu, Danaher (i.e. Fluke and Tektronix), Exfo, Ixia and Spirent. While JDSU faces multiple competitors for each of its product families, it continues to have one of the broadest portfolios of wireline and wireless products and solutions available in the communications test and measurement industry.

JDSU provides end-to-end communications test and measurement solutions for wireless and wireline communications networks, including the core, metro, access, and home networking environments. JDSU is a leader in the test and measurement market and has an installed base of hundreds of thousands of test instruments and systems deployed in communications networks around the world.

JDSU provides instruments that speed the deployment of network technologies and services, ensure reliability and reduce network expenses. Designed to be mobile, these products assist service provider technicians in assessing the performance of network elements and segments or verifying the integrity of the information being transmitted across the network. These instruments incorporate high levels of intelligence and have user interfaces that are designed to simplify operation and minimize training. JDSU test instruments also include those used by NEMs in the design and manufacture of next-generation network equipment. Thorough testing by NEMs plays a critical role in producing the components and equipment that are the building blocks of network infrastructure.

JDSU provides software products and custom software development services to its customers. The Company recently introduced PacketPortal™, a software platform that uses microprobe technology to cost-effectively gather intelligence anywhere in the network for use with a suite of customer care, marketing and other applications. These software applications are created by JDSU as well as third-party application development partners. Another software-driven solution, PacketInsight™, was introduced this year and allows service providers to quickly pinpoint critical data in the core network. JDSU's software solutions are designed to help service providers profitably scale to unprecedented bandwidth demand while providing a high-quality subscriber experience.

JDSU solutions typically consist of integrated hardware and software components that reside in communication networks, such as service assurance solutions. Using an integrated test and measurement system, JDSU customers are able to analyze critical network elements, transmission technologies and protocols from a single console, simplifying the process of deploying, provisioning and managing network equipment and services. From a centralized location, technicians can access the test systems within the network and perform simultaneous test and monitoring functions on one or more elements, either manually or automatically. These capabilities allow network operators to initiate service to new customers faster, decrease the need for technicians to make on-site service calls, help to make necessary repairs faster and, as a result, lower costs while providing higher quality and more reliable services.

JDSU offers a range of product support and professional services geared to comprehensively address our customers' requirements. These services include repair, calibration, software support services and technical assistance for its products. JDSU also offers product and technology training as well as consulting services. JDSU professional services, provided in conjunction with system integration projects, include project management installation and implementation.

The CCOP business segment provides optical communications products used by NEMs for telecommunications and enterprise data communications. These products enable the transmission and transport of video, audio and text data over high-capacity fiber optic cables. Transmission products primarily consist of optical transceivers, optical transponders, and their supporting components such as modulators and source lasers, including innovative products such as the tunable XFP. Transport products primarily consist of amplifiers and reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers ("ROADMs") and their supporting components such as pump lasers, passive devices, and arrayed waveguides ("AWGs"). In fact, many of today's most advanced optical networks are built on our transport and transmission components, modules and subsystems.

CCOP also provides lasers employed in a wide variety of OEM applications. JDSU laser products serve customers in markets and applications such as manufacturing, biotechnology, graphics and imaging, remote sensing, and precision machining such as drilling in printed circuit boards, wafer singulation, and solar cell scribing. These products include diode, direct-diode, diode-pumped solid-state, fiber, and gas lasers.

In addition, our photovoltaics ("PV") products include CPV cells and receivers for generating energy from sunlight, as well as fiber optic-based systems for delivering and measuring electrical power.

The CCOP business segment participates in the optical communications, laser, and PV markets.

JDSU optical communications products include a wide range of components, modules, and subsystems to support and maintain customers in our two market segments: telecommunications, including carrier networks for access (local), metro (intracity), long-haul (city-to-city and worldwide), and submarine (undersea) networks; and enterprise data communications, including storage-access networks ("SANs"), local-area networks ("LANs"), and Ethernet wide-area networks ("WANs").

JDSU's portfolio of laser products includes components and subsystems used in a wide variety of OEM applications that range in output power from milliwatts to kilowatts and include ultraviolet ("UV"), visible, and infrared ("IR") wavelengths. JDSU supports customer applications in the biotechnology, graphics and imaging, remote sensing, materials processing and other precision machining arenas.

The PV business unit provides photonic power for a range of remote sensing applications, including those used by the electric power industry to measure power transmission and is also developing high efficiency concentrator PV cells for the generation of electric power from solar radiation.

CCOP serves optical communications equipment manufacturers such as Adva, Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Infinera, Nokia Siemens Networks, and Tellabs. Customers for JDSU Commercial Lasers include Amada, ASML, Beckman Coulter, Becton Dickinson, Disco, Electro Scientific Industries, and KLA-Tencor. Customers for PV products include Amplifier Research, Beijing Bosin Industrial Technology, ETS-Lindgren, and Siemens.

Long-term trends suggest growing opportunities for CCOP. These trends are discussed, by market, below:

Optical Communications: To remain competitive, network operators worldwide must offer broader suites of digital services. To do this, they are migrating to Internet-protocol ("IP") networks, which effectively deliver triple-play services while lowering capital and operating costs of dense-wavelength-division multiplexing ("DWDM") networks. In data communications, demand for broadband is driven by the growing needs of intracompany LAN and intercompany WAN networks. The growing demand for capacity encourages the adoption of optical communications products across the telecom sector, including long-haul, metro (core and access), cable television ("CATV"), submarine, and FTTP or FTTx. It also increases demand for optical products in the storage and enterprise sectors, including LAN, SAN and WAN.

New, bandwidth-intensive applications can result in sudden and severe changes in demand almost anywhere on the network. Increasing agility in optical networks by employing ROADMs, tunable transponders, and other agile optical products provides an effective way to respond to unpredictable bandwidth demands and manage expenses. With more agile optical networks, a service provider can add capacity by using remote management applications rather than by dispatching technicians to perform manual operations in the field.

In addition, the high-end routers, switches, and cross-connect equipment that must handle legacy and IP traffic are becoming increasingly complex in order to meet higher bandwidth, scalability, speed, and reliability needs. Products must provide higher levels of functionality and performance in compact designs that must also meet requirements for emissions, cost, and reduced power consumption.

Deployment of fiber closer to the end user increases the availability of high-bandwidth services and should result in increased demand on the metro and long-haul networks into which these services feed. The dynamically reconfigurable nature of today's agile networks enables lower operating costs and other competitive advantages, allowing service providers to use and scale network capacity more flexibly, streamline service provisioning, accelerate rerouting around points of failure, and modify network topology through simple point-and-click network management systems.

JDSU is a leading provider of the optical products mentioned above which support the trends in this market. JDSU innovation, particularly in the area of photonic integrated circuits, which can replace many discrete components with a single photonic chip, is resulting in products that have more functionality, are smaller, require less power, and are more cost-effective. For example, the tunable XFP transceiver is 85% smaller than previous tunable models. JDSU also developed the industry's first tunable SFP+ transceiver for enterprise and metro networks. Higher levels of integration have also led to development of the Super Transport Blade ("STB"), which delivers all transport functions in a single, integrated platform, essentially replacing three blades with one.

JDSU, with its innovative optical communications and flexible, cost-effective transport portfolio, is positioned to be the supplier of choice for next-generation networks.

Lasers: As technology advances, high-tech and other vital industries increasingly turn to lasers when they need more precision, higher productivity, and energy efficient or "green" alternatives for problems that cannot be solved by mechanical, electronic or other means. For example, lasers have been used for years to help achieve the scale and precision needed in semiconductor processing. In biotech applications, lasers have been instrumental for advances (and new standard procedures) in cytology, hematology, genome sequencing, and crime scene investigations, among others. The long term trends in these industries should lead to increased demand for lasers.

In addition, demand continues for electronic products, as well as products and components in other industries, to offer greater functionality while becoming smaller, lighter, and less expensive. Product designs that achieve this are requiring precise micromachining and materials processing, such as micro bending, soldering and welding—especially for plastics. At the scale and processing speed needed, lasers are replacing mature mechanical tools such as drills for tiny holes, or "vias," in printed circuit boards and saws and scribes for singulating silicon wafers, resulting in greater precision and productivity. As these trends continue, we believe that manufacturers and industries will increase their reliance on lasers in order to maintain or increase their competitiveness.

There is an increasing trend towards energy efficiency and "green" industry. Industries are using lasers to develop products that are smaller and lighter, and that increase productivity and yield, thereby lowering their energy consumption. More directly, this trend has provided for significant growth in the solar power market segment and applications for lasers used in the production of solar panels.

JDSU is well-positioned with key OEM providers of laser solutions to these industries. We continue to develop our laser portfolio to offer smaller and more cost-effective products designed specifically for the performance, integration, reliability and support needs of our OEM customers.

Photonic Power and Photovoltaics: The trend toward lighter, cleaner, efficient solutions has led to opportunities for photonics in a variety of applications. The use of photonic power for remote sensors solves the problem of electromagnetic interference ("EMI"), radio frequency ("RF") and other interference associated with the use of electrical power. The need for clean energy is fueling an increase in demand for concentrated photovoltaic power. JDSU proprietary technology already in use for powering remote sensors has led to high efficiency products applicable to electric power generation from solar energy.

On July 7, 2011, JDSU acquired product design, intellectual property and other assets from QuantaSol, a CPV provider based in the United Kingdom. The acquisition allows JDSU to leverage industry-leading multiple-quantum-well ("MQW") technology from QuantaSol for its CPV cell product platform. MQW technology allows more light to be converted to electrical power by raising the efficiency of CPV cells, the most important metric in the solar industry.

In optical communications, we are focused on technology leadership through collaborative innovation with our customers, cost leadership, and functional integration. We will continue to align the latest technologies with best-in-class, scalable manufacturing and operations to drive the next phase of optical communications with highly integrated technologies that are faster, more agile, and more reliable, making us a valuable business and technology partner for NEMs.

JDSU leverages its long-term relationships with OEM customers to develop commercial laser innovation. Leveraging established manufacturing, engineering, telecommunications, and photonics expertise, JDSU delivers products that meet cost-of-ownership and reliability needs while delivering on volume production demands.

In photonic power and PV, JDSU is developing best-in-class performance technology applicable to the growing solar power market.

JDSU competes against various public and private companies in markets served by CCOP. A partial list of public company competitors providing optical communications includes Finisar, Fujitsu, Furukawa Electric, Oclaro, Oplink Communications, and Sumitomo Electric. JDSU competitors in the laser market include Coherent, IPG Photonics, Rofin-Sinar, CVI-Melles, and the Spectra-Physics division of Newport Corporation. JDSU competes against Spectrolab and Emcore in the PV market.

In addition to these established companies, JDSU faces significant and focused competition from other companies and emerging startups. While each of its product families has multiple competitors, JDSU has a broad range of products and leading technologies that are aligned with industry trends and the needs of its customers.

JDSU optical communications offerings address two market segments: telecommunications and enterprise data communications. In addition to a full selection of active and passive components, JDSU offers increasing levels of functionality and integration in modules, circuit packs, and subsystems for

transmission, amplification, wavelength management, and more. Our optical communications product offerings are described below:

In the telecommunications market segment, we offer transmission and transport solutions for the synchronous optical network ("SONET"), synchronous-digital-hierarchy ("SDH") and wavelength-division multiplexer ("WDM") applications. Transmission products, such as our tunable transponder, transceiver, and transmitter modules, transmit and receive signals. JDSU also offers transmission components for the previously mentioned products, which include active components such as tunable lasers, detectors/receivers, and modulators.

JDSU transport products, such as ROADMs and other amplifiers, provide switching, routing and conditioning of signals. JDSU also provides components for transport, including passive components such as our attenuators, circulators, couplers/splitters/WDMs, gain flattening filters, hybrid interleavers, multiplexer/demultiplexers polarization components, switches, and wavelength lockers.

Industry-leading innovation led to the STB, which integrates all major optical transport functions (wavelength switching, preamplification, postamplification, and monitoring) into a single-slot blade. This all-in-one solution reduces the size, cost, and power requirements of optical components, incorporates nano wavelength selective switch ("WSS") technology, and enables greater chassis density and a smaller footprint.

In the enterprise data communications market segment, which relies on storing and moving vast amounts of data, JDSU offers transmission products, such as our optical transceivers for Fibre Channel and Gigabit Ethernet applications. JDSU transceivers are also used in Ethernet connections for servers, routers, hubs, and switches for Internet and e-mail services.

JDSU integrated fiber optic transceivers provide a high-speed, serial electrical interface for connecting processors, switches, and peripherals. They are available in hot-pluggable or pin-through-hole versions with a small footprint for use in compact system designs. This allows manufacturers to double the density of transceivers on a board compared to conventional designs.

For higher data transfer rates of 40 and 100G, JDSU offers VCSELs. VCSELs reduce power consumption, heat, EMI, and cost while increasing speed, reliability, and link distance. Our compact arrays offer an innovative solution for the LANs, SANs, broadband Internet, and metro-area network applications that currently depend on high-end routers, switches, and cross-connect equipment to handle legacy and IP traffic.

Our broad range of products includes diode-pumped solid-state, fiber, diode, direct-diode, and gas lasers such as argon-ion and helium-neon ("HeNe") lasers.

Diode-pumped solid-state and fiber lasers that provide excellent beam quality, low noise, and exceptional reliability are used in biotechnology, graphics and imaging, remote sensing, materials processing, and precision machining applications.

Diode and direct-diode lasers address a wide variety of applications, including laser pumping, thermal exposure, illumination, ophthalmology, image recording, printing, plastic welding, and selective soldering.

Gas lasers such as argon-ion and helium-neon lasers provide a stable, low-cost and reliable solution over a wide range of operating conditions, making them well suited for complex, high-resolution OEM

applications such as flow cytometry, DNA sequencing, graphics and imaging, and semiconductor inspection.

Photonic power is an innovative power-over-fiber delivery system that converts optical power to electrical power. Since it is delivered over nonconducting fiber optic cable, it is not affected by RF or EMI, is lighter, generates less heat, is spark-free, and can be used to drive sensors, gauges, actuators, low-power communications devices, and other electronic devices.

JDSU capabilities in converting optical power to electrical power are now being applied to the solar energy market. Multijunction CPV cells generate power under concentrated sunlight. JDSU has developed CPV cells to be available both as chips and in receiver assemblies for generating solar power.

The AOT business segment leverages its core technology strengths of optics and materials science to manage light and color effects. With decades of experience in optical coating and authentication technology, AOT develops innovative anti-counterfeiting solutions for the currency, pharmaceutical and other markets.

Our AOT segment provides overt and covert product verification for protection against diversion, brand erosion, and lost revenue due to counterfeiting. These technologies safeguard currency and high security government documents as well as brands in the transaction card, pharmaceutical, consumer electronics, printing/imaging supplies, and fast-moving consumer goods industries through innovative optically variable pigment, holographic, and microtaggant technologies.

AOT also produces precise, high-performance, optical thin-film coatings for a variety of applications in government and aerospace, biomedical, consumer electronics, telecommunications, office automation, and other markets. These applications include gesture-recognition, night-vision goggles, satellite solar covers, medical instrumentation, computer-driven projectors, 3D cinema and event lighting.

In addition, we offer, custom color solutions for product finishes and decorative packaging that can be applied to a wide variety of substrates. These include innovative optically-based color-shifting and other solutions that provide product enhancement for brands in the pharmaceutical, automotive, consumer electronics, sports apparel, and fast-moving consumer goods industries.

The AOT business segment serves customers such as 3M, Kingston, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Pan Pacific, Seiko Epson and SICPA. JDSU technology is used to protect the currencies of China, the European Union, the United States, and other governments around the world. Leading pharmaceutical companies worldwide also use JDSU solutions to protect their brands, as do major issuers of transaction cards such as MasterCard and American Express. JDSU custom color product differentiation and brand enhancement solutions are used by customers such as DuPont.

Product integrity is a worldwide, multi-billion dollar issue that poses consumer health and safety risks as well as issues such as, corporate liability, devaluation of brand image, weakening of brand loyalty, and lost revenues. Favored targets include currency, pharmaceuticals, imaging supplies, apparel, automotive parts, consumer electronics, and electronic media. Other issues, such as product diversion where distributors divert products intended for lower-priced markets to higher-priced markets, increasingly require brand protection. The spread of counterfeiting can be attributed to several factors, including using the Internet to facilitate distribution, a ready availability of low-cost, high-quality printing equipment to reproduce product packaging, the elimination of international trade barriers, and an increasingly mobile global society.

JDSU technology has become a worldwide standard for currency protection. Additionally, the need to protect high-value documents and offer solutions for authenticating personal, identification, and financial documents also is growing. Our authentication products can be combined to offer multilayer solutions for creating effective security programs that combine secure authentication, flexible aesthetics, and ease of application.

Demand for optical solutions to solve complex problems extends to the aerospace, defense and medical/environmental instrumentation markets, which require customized, high-precision coated products and optical components that selectively absorb, transmit, or reflect light to meet the performance requirements of sophisticated systems. Our custom optics products offer an array of advanced technologies and precision optics—from the UV to the far IR portion of the light spectrum. Most products are custom optical filters, on either a simple or complex irregular shape, that require from one to several hundred layers to create the coating.

Another challenge is the need to differentiate products in order to build brands. Global competition and an increasing range of product offerings are driving designers to look for innovative ways to increase the aesthetic value of their products and make them stand out. Our custom color solutions are used in coatings and packaging to create unique and striking visual effects.

The AOT business segment develops technologies that differentiate and effectively protect valuable brands via a secure, flexible, aesthetically striking optical platform. It also strives to supply the highest-quality, best-in-class optical components and assemblies with innovative thin-film coating processes that help customers protect and/or differentiate their products. JDSU will continue to leverage its intellectual property and leading expertise in optics, light management and material technology to develop solutions that provide a unique advantage to customers.

JDSU's competitors in the markets addressed by AOT include providers of special-effect pigments like Merck KGA and from manufacturers of security holograms including Kurz, De La Rue and OpSec; from coating companies such as Nidek, Toppan, and Toray; from display-component companies such as Asahi, Fuji Photo-Optical, Nikon, and Nitto Optical; and from optics companies such as Barr Associates and Deposition Sciences.

AOT consists of the Authentication Solutions Group ("ASG"), which has offerings for brand protection and document authentication; the Custom Optics Product Group ("COPG"), which offers

optical thin-film coatings for a range of markets; and the Flex Products Group ("Flex"), which offers currency protection, custom color solutions, and printing services.

JDSU's optically variable pigment technology overt security technology has become a standard used by governments worldwide for currency protection. This technology provides a color-shifting effect that enables positive, easy visual verification and deters counterfeiting. In fiscal 2012, we completed most of the expansion of our capacity for optically variable pigment anti-counterfeiting production capabilities in Beijing, China.

To strengthen brand integrity, many corporate brand owners are introducing overt protective measures in packaging that provide consumers and/or inspection personnel with the ability to quickly determine product authenticity by visually detecting a color effect on the package. Covert solutions provide an additional layer of protection that cannot be seen or detected without a visual aid.

JDSU offers both overt and covert solutions for security, including SecureShift® light-interference technology (which allows inks or plastics to exhibit different colors and visual effects from different viewing angles), holographic technology, and Charms™ microstructured taggants. Applications include transaction cards, pharmaceuticals, imaging supplies, electronics, computer, and other consumer goods. JDSU offers these solutions in a wide range of choices by incorporating them into printing inks, product labels, and product packaging.

JDSU optically variable pigment technology, which produces color-shifting and other optical effects, and other authentication technologies are used to combat forgery and counterfeiting, protect against alteration of data, and allow for immediate verification of high-value documents. JDSU works closely with its customers to design these solutions to meet their specific needs for passports, personal identification, and other government and secure documents.

Optical thin-film coatings are submicroscopic (nanometer to micrometer) layers of materials, such as silicon and magnesium fluoride, that are applied to the surface of a substrate, including glass, plastic or metal. Thin-film coatings control the behavior of light to produce effects such as reflection, refraction, absorption, abrasion resistance, antiglare, oxygen and/or moisture transmission, and electrical conductivity for a variety of applications.

Aerospace and defense: JDSU provides customized optics for solar-cell coverglass, thermal-control mirror technology, and optical sensors for aerospace applications. JDSU thin-film optics products can be found on spacecraft and satellites. In addition, JDSU supplies filters used in military applications such as infrared night-vision goggles and electronic countermeasures.

Consumer and commercial electronics: JDSU manufactures and sells coated optics for use in home and business display systems and 3D entertainment systems. These products include bandpass filters, mirrors, polarization compensators, heater panels and other coated optics, and assemblies. Products for the automation market include photo receptors and mirrors for photocopiers, scanners, computer-driven projectors, and facsimile machines.

Instrumentation and lighting: JDSU provides multicavity and linear variable optical filters on a variety of substrates for applications including gas monitoring and analysis, thermal imaging, smart munitions, fire detection, spectroscopy, and pollution monitoring. These filters are also used in biomedical applications, semiconductor test systems, and test and measurement equipment. JDSU also provides advanced optical filters used to create dramatic lighting effects and rich, saturated color in intelligent lighting systems for entertainment and architectural lighting.

For product differentiation and brand enhancement, JDSU provides custom color solutions for a variety of applications using our ChromaFlair® and SpectraFlair® pigments to create color effects that emphasize body contours, create dynamic environments, or enhance products in motion. These pigments are added to paints, plastics, or textiles for products and packaging.

Our line of custom color products uses proprietary manufacturing processes and light interference or diffractive technology to provide specific color characteristics that can be designed to meet the needs of individual products, brands or markets. The products create a durable finish with striking color properties for automotive, consumer electronics, and other applications.

The design process is critical to delivering custom color solutions that meet the needs of specific customers, markets and brands. JDSU color specialists, Color Lab, and prototyping capabilities help customers overcome color design challenges during the design stage.

Proprietary printing processes and a current good manufacturing practices ("cGMP") compliant environment deliver solutions for labels, closures, hang tags, and flexible packaging for authentication and custom color solutions. In addition, JDSU provides high quality flexographic and gravure printing for labels for retail and apparel, healthcare, food and beverage, automotive, consumer goods and personal care.

As part of our strategy, we are committed to the ongoing evaluation of strategic opportunities and, where appropriate, the acquisition of additional products, technologies or businesses that are complementary to, or broaden the markets for our products. We believe we have strengthened our business model by expanding our addressable markets, customer base, and expertise, diversifying our product portfolio, and fortifying our core businesses through acquisition as well as through organic initiatives.

In January 2012, we completed the acquisition of Dyaptive based in Vancouver, Canada. The Company acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of Dyaptive for a total purchase price of approximately CAD 15.0 million in cash, including a holdback payment of approximately CAD 2.1 million which is due in December 2012.

In July 2011, we completed the acquisition of critical product design, patented intellectual property and other assets from QuantaSol, for a cash purchase price consideration of approximately $3.7 million.

In May 2010, we completed the acquisition of the Network Solutions Division ("NSD") of Agilent Technologies, Inc. ("Agilent"), where we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of NSD for a total cash purchase price consideration of approximately $163.8 million.

In July 2009, we completed the acquisition of the Storage Network Tools business ("SNT") from Finisar Corporation ("Finisar"), where we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of SNT for a total cash purchase price consideration of approximately $40.7 million.

Please refer to "Note 5. Mergers and Acquisitions" of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the acquisitions completed during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010.

We continue to consolidate the manufacturing of our products based on core competencies, cost efficiency, and alternative manufacturers, where appropriate. Among other things, we continue to strengthen our partnerships with contract manufacturers. We completed the process of outsourcing a portion of manufacturing in our AOT segment in North America during fiscal 2012. In the last three fiscal years, we restructured and reorganized our CommTest segment to improve the efficiency of the manufacturing operations, R&D and sales organization by reducing/rationalizing headcount, consolidating the number of contract manufacturer locations worldwide and moving them to lower cost regions, and consolidating and centralizing similar functions to fewer sites designed to improve leverage. In the current fiscal year, we initiated the transition of moving the repair organization to an outsourced partner. Additionally, we continue to centralize many administrative functions such as information technology, human resources, and finance to take advantage of common processes and controls, and economies of scale.

Please refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion on these charges.

During fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, we incurred R&D expenses of $246.0 million, $239.9 million, and $174.9 million, respectively. The number of employees engaged in R&D was approximately 1,400 as of June 30, 2012, 1,450 as of July 2, 2011, and 1,350 as of July 3, 2010.

We devote substantial resources to R&D to develop new and enhanced products to serve our markets. Once the design of a product is complete, our engineering efforts shift to enhancing both the performance of that product and our ability to manufacture it in greater volume and at lower cost.

In our CommTest segment, we develop portable test instruments for field service technicians, systems and software used in Network Operations Centers, and instruments used in the development, testing and production of communications network components, modules and equipment. We are increasing our focus on IP-based service assurance and customer experience management, and test instruments for wireless networks and services, while continuing to develop tools for fiber optic, optical transport, Ethernet, broadband access, video test and storage network testing. We have centers of excellence for product marketing and development in Asia, Europe and North America.

In our CCOP segment, we are increasing our focus on the most promising markets while maintaining our capability to provide products throughout the network. We are increasing our emphasis on self-aware network components and modules, such as ROADMs and tunable devices needed for long-haul and metro market segments, as well as expanding our transmission transceiver portfolio to support telecom, local area network, storage area network, and enterprise market segments. We are also responding to our customers' requests for higher levels of integration, including the integration of optics, electronics and software in our modules, subsystems, and circuit packs. We are providing optical

technology for gesture-recognition systems that enable the control of technology by natural body gestures instead of using a remote, mouse, or other device. Emerging gesture recognition systems simplify the way that people interact with technology, and are initially being used in applications for home entertainment and computing. In addition, our CCOP and AOT segments have been working together to develop CPV cells for the solar market aimed at large commercial and utility scale installations. We continue to develop new product offerings in both solid-state and fiber lasers that take advantage of technologies and components developed within our CCOP segment. All these developments are targeted at serving customers engaging in biotechnology, graphics and imaging, remote sensing, and materials processing and precision micromachining markets.

In our AOT segment, our R&D efforts concentrate on developing more innovative solutions from our core anti-counterfeiting technology expertise. Our strong participation in the currency security market is being augmented with new advances in optically variable pigment technology. We are also developing anti-counterfeiting solutions for the pharmaceutical and consumer electronic markets. AOT leverages its optical coating technology expertise to develop applications for the government and defense markets. AOT has also developed new products in the growing spectrometer market, introducing an innovative handheld solution with applications in the law enforcement, pharmaceutical, food and agriculture, and defense and security markets.

As of June 30, 2012 our significant manufacturing facilities were located in the United States, China, France, and Germany. Additionally, our significant contract manufacturing partners were located in China, Malaysia, Mexico, and Thailand.

JDSU uses various suppliers and contract manufacturers to supply parts and components for the manufacture and support of multiple product lines. Although our intention is to establish at least two sources of supply for materials whenever possible, for certain components we have sole or limited source supply arrangements. We may not be able to procure these components from alternative sources at acceptable prices within a reasonable time or at all; therefore the loss or interruption of such arrangements could have an impact on our ability to deliver certain products on a timely basis.

Intellectual property rights that apply to our various products include patents, trade secrets, and trademarks. We do not intend to broadly license our intellectual property rights unless we can obtain adequate consideration or enter into acceptable patent cross-license agreements. As of June 30, 2012, we owned approximately 1,550 U.S. patents and approximately 800 foreign patents, and we have approximately 740 patent applications pending throughout the world.

Backlog consists of purchase orders for products for which we have assigned shipment dates within the following 12 months. As of June 30, 2012 our backlog was approximately $417 million as compared to $398 million at July 2, 2011. Because of possible changes in product delivery schedules and cancellation of product orders and because our sales often reflect orders shipped in the same quarter in which they are received, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual revenue or the level of orders for any succeeding period.

We employed approximately 4,950 employees as of June 30, 2012, compared to approximately 5,000 and 4,700 as of July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively. Our workforce as of June 30, 2012 included approximately 1,950 employees in manufacturing, 1,400 employees in R&D, 600 employees in general and administration, and 1,000 employees in sales and marketing, respectively.

Similar to other technology companies, we rely upon our ability to use stock options, "Full Value Awards", and other forms of stock-based compensation as key components of our executive and employee compensation structure. Full Value Awards include Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and Performance Shares that are granted with the exercise price equal to zero and are converted to shares immediately upon vesting. Historically, these components have been critical to our ability to retain important personnel and offer competitive compensation packages. Without these components, we would be required to significantly increase cash compensation levels or develop alternative compensation structures to retain our key employees.

Outside of the United Sates, our businesses are subject to labor laws that differ from those in the United States. The Company follows statutory requirements and in certain European countries, it is common for a works council, consisting of elected employees, to represent the sites when discussing matters such as compensation, benefits or terminations of employment. We consider our employee relations to be very good.

We have a history of net losses, and our future profitability is not assured.

Although we had net profits of $71.6 million in fiscal 2011, we incurred net losses of $55.6 million and $61.8 million in fiscal years 2012 and 2010, respectively. As a portfolio company, comprised of many product lines, with diverse operating metrics and markets, our profit performance in a particular period is generally a function of both revenue and product mix factors. For example, our product portfolio has a broad gross margin range. Moreover, the profit contribution of each of our business segments currently varies materially. Additionally, for the last several years, we have undergone multiple manufacturing, facility, organizational and product line transitions. We expect some of these activities to continue for the foreseeable future. These activities are costly and impair our profitability objectives while ongoing. Specific factors that may undermine our financial objectives include, among others:

Taken together, these factors limit our ability to predict future profitability levels and to achieve our long-term profitability objectives. While some of these factors may diminish over time as we improve our cost structure and focus on enhancing our product mix, several factors, such as continuous pricing pressure, increasing Asia-based competition, increasing commoditization of previously-differentiated products, a highly concentrated customer base for many of our product lines and seasonal CommTest segment revenue fluctuations, are likely to remain endemic to our businesses. If we fail to achieve profitability expectations, the price of our debt and equity securities, as well as our business and financial condition, may be materially adversely impacted.

Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions.

Economic conditions worldwide have from time to time contributed to slowdowns in the technology industry at large, as well as to the specific segments and markets in which we operate. When combined with ongoing customer consolidation activity and periodic manufacturing and inventory initiatives, the recent worldwide economic downturn and uncertain recovery, including but not limited to the effects of deteriorating credit markets, could lead to reduced demand from our customers and increased price competition for our products, increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories and higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue. The worldwide economic downturn may further negatively impact our operations by affecting the solvency of our customers, the solvency of our key suppliers or the ability of our customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products. If the global economy and credit markets deteriorate and our future sales decline, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be materially adversely impacted.

In particular, recent economic uncertainty in Europe has led to reduced demand in our optical communications product portfolios. If economic conditions in Europe do not recover or continue to deteriorate this may further adversely affect our operations. Actual or perceived currency or budget crises could increase economic uncertainty in Europe, and globally, which could have an adverse effect on our customers' operations, which could reduce demand for our products.

In addition, we have significant long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet. We will continue to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of our goodwill and long-lived assets on an ongoing basis, and we may incur substantial impairment charges, which would adversely affect our financial results. There can be no assurance that the outcome of such reviews in the future will not result in substantial impairment charges. Impairment assessment inherently involves judgment as to assumptions about expected future cash flows and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Future events and changing market conditions may impact our assumptions as to prices, costs, holding periods or other factors that may result in changes in our estimates of future cash flows. Although we believe the assumptions we used in testing for impairment are reasonable, significant changes in any one of our assumptions could produce a significantly different result. If, in any period, our stock price decreases to the point where the fair value of the Company, as determined by our market capitalization, is less than our book value, this too could indicate a potential impairment and we may be required to record an impairment charge in that period.

The manufacture, quality and distribution of our products, as well as our customer relations, may be affected by several factors, including the rapidly changing market for our products, supply issues and internal restructuring efforts. We expect the impact of these issues will become more pronounced as we continue to introduce new product offerings and when overall demand increases.

Our success depends upon our ability to deliver both our current product offerings and new products and technologies on time and at acceptable cost to our customers. The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, substantial capital investment, changes in customer requirements and a constantly evolving industry. Our future performance will depend on the successful development, introduction and market acceptance of new and enhanced products that address these issues and provide solutions that meet our customers' current and future needs. As a technology company, we also constantly encounter quality, volume and cost concerns such as:

These factors have caused considerable strain on our execution capabilities and customer relations. We have and could continue to see (a) periodic difficulty responding to customer delivery expectations for some of our products, (b) yield and quality problems, particularly with some of our new products and higher volume products, and (c) additional funds and other resources to respond to these execution challenges. From time to time, we have had to divert resources from new product research and development and other functions to assist with resolving these matters. If we do not improve our performance in all of these areas, our operating results will be harmed, the commercial viability of new products may be challenged and our customers may choose to reduce or terminate their purchases of our products and purchase additional products from our competitors.

We rely on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our sales.

We believe that we will continue to rely upon a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Any failure by us to continue capturing a significant share of these customers could materially harm our business. Dependence on a limited number of customers exposes us to the risk that order reductions from any one customer can have a material

adverse effect on periodic revenue. Further, to the extent that there is consolidation between our direct communications equipment manufacturer customer base and their customer base, the service providers, we will have increased dependence on fewer customers who may be able to exert increased pressure on our prices and contractual terms in general. Customer consolidation activity and periodic manufacturing and inventory initiatives could also create the potential for disruptions in demand for our products as a consequence of such customers streamlining, reducing or delaying purchasing decisions.

We have a strategic alliance with SICPA, our principal customer for our light interference microflakes that are used to, among other things, provide security features in currency. Under a license and supply agreement, we rely exclusively on SICPA to market and sell one of these product lines, optically variable pigment, for document authentication applications worldwide. The agreement requires SICPA to purchase minimum quantities of these pigments over the term of the agreement. If SICPA fails to purchase these quantities, as and when required by the agreement, our business and operating results (including, among other things, our revenue and gross margin) will be harmed as we may be unable to find a substitute marketing and sales partner or develop these capabilities ourselves.

Our strategy continues to include periodic acquisitions and divestitures of businesses and technologies. Strategic transactions of this nature involve numerous risks, including the following:

Certain of our products are subject to governmental and industry regulations, certifications and approvals.

The commercialization of certain of the products we design, manufacture and distribute through our AOT and CCOP segments may be more costly due to required government approval and industry acceptance processes. Development of applications for our light interference and diffractive microflakes may require significant testing that could delay our sales. For example, certain uses in cosmetics may be regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has extensive and lengthy approval processes. Durability testing by the automobile industry of our decorative microflakes used with automotive paints can take up to three years. If we change a product for any reason, including technological changes or changes in the manufacturing process, prior approvals or certifications may be invalid and we may need to go through the approval process again. If we are unable to obtain these or other government or industry certifications in a timely manner, or at all, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Our customers are located throughout the world. In addition, we have significant offshore operations and operations outside North America, including product development, manufacturing, sales and customer support operations.

In particular, as a result of our efforts to reduce costs, we have expanded our use of contract manufacturers in Shenzhen, China, and we expect to expand our research and development activities there. Our ability to operate in China may be adversely affected by changes in Chinese laws and regulations, such as those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use rights, intellectual property and other matters, which laws and regulations remain highly underdeveloped and subject to change, with little or no prior notice, for political or other reasons.

Our international presence exposes us to certain risks, including the following:

Net revenue from customers outside the Americas accounted for 49.6%, 51.4% and 51.5% of our total net revenue for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We expect that net revenue from customers outside North America will continue to account for a significant portion of our total net revenue. Lower sales levels that typically occur during the summer months in Europe and some other overseas markets may materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, the revenues we derive from many of our customers depend on international sales and consequently further expose us to the risks associated with such international sales.

Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure of our information technology infrastructure.

We rely upon the capacity, reliability and security of our information technology infrastructure and our ability to expand and continually update this infrastructure in response to our changing needs. For example, we recently implemented a global Oracle system rollout to improve system integration and performance. In addition, we rely upon certain third party hosting and support services. Any failure to manage, expand and update our information technology infrastructure, any failure in the extension or operation of this infrastructure, or any failure by our hosting and support partners in certain sites in the performance of their services could materially and adversely harm our business.

Despite our implementation of security measures, our systems are vulnerable to damages from computer viruses, natural disasters, unauthorized access and other similar disruptions. Any system failure, accident or security breach could result in disruptions to our operations. To the extent that any disruptions or security breach results in a loss or damage to our data, or in inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, it could cause significant damage to our reputation and affect our relationships with our customers and ultimately harm our business. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls may adversely affect our stock price.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and to effectively prevent fraud. The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report by management on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Although we review our internal control over financial reporting in order to ensure compliance with these requirements, if we or our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with our internal control over financial reporting or the level at which these controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if our independent registered public accounting firm interprets the requirements, rules and/or regulations differently from our interpretation, then they may issue a qualified report . This could result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock price.

In 2006 we issued $425 million of 1% Senior Convertible Notes due 2026, which could cause dilution to our existing stockholders and lower our reported per share earnings.

We issued $425 million of indebtedness in May and June 2006 in the form of 1% Senior Convertible Notes due 2026. As of June 30, 2012, the principal amount of these notes which remained outstanding is $311.0 million. The issuance of these notes substantially increased our principal payment obligations. The degree to which we are leveraged could materially and adversely affect our ability to

successfully obtain financing for working capital, acquisitions, or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. In addition, the holders of those notes are entitled to convert those notes into shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock under certain circumstances which would cause dilution to our existing stockholders and lower our reported per share earnings.

If we have insufficient proprietary rights or if we fail to protect those we have, our business would be materially harmed.

Our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our products or product roadmaps.

We seek to protect our products and our product roadmaps in part by developing and/or securing proprietary rights relating to those products, including patents, trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation. The steps taken by us to protect our intellectual property may not adequately prevent misappropriation or ensure that others will not develop competitive technologies or products. Other companies may be investigating or developing other technologies that are similar to our own. It is possible that patents may not be issued from any of our pending applications or those we may file in the future and, if patents are issued, the claims allowed may not be sufficiently broad to deter or prohibit others from making, using or selling products that are similar to ours. We do not own patents in every country in which we sell or distribute our products, and thus others may be able to offer identical products in countries where we do not have intellectual property protection. In addition, the laws of some territories in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold, including Europe, Asia-Pacific or Latin America, may not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

Any patents issued to us may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Additionally, we are currently a licensee in all of our operating segments for a number of third-party technologies, software and intellectual property rights from academic institutions, our competitors and others, and are required to pay royalties to these licensors for the use thereof. Unless we are able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms, patents or other intellectual property held by others could inhibit our development of new products, impede the sale of some of our current products, substantially increase the cost to provide these products to our customers, and could have a significant adverse impact on our operating results. In the past, licenses generally have been available to us where third-party technology was necessary or useful for the development or production of our products. In the future licenses to third-party technology may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Our products may be subject to claims that they infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

Lawsuits and allegations of patent infringement and violation of other intellectual property rights occur in our industry on a regular basis. We have received in the past, and anticipate that we will receive in the future, notices from third parties claiming that our products infringe their proprietary rights. Over the past few years there has been a marked increase in the number and potential severity of third-party patent infringement claims, primarily from two distinct sources. First, large technology companies, including some of our customers and competitors, are seeking to monetize their patent portfolios and have developed large internal organizations that have approached us with demands to enter into license agreements. Second, numerous patent-holding companies, entities that do not make or sell products (often referred to as "patent trolls"), have claimed that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights. We will continue to respond to these claims in the course of our business operations. In the past, the settlement and disposition of these disputes has not had a material adverse impact on our business or financial condition, however this may not be the case in the future. Further, the litigation or settlement of these matters, regardless of the merit of the claims, could result in

significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not we are successful. If we are unsuccessful, we could be required to expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain licenses to the technology that is the subject of the litigation. We may not be successful in such development, or such licenses may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Without such a license, we could be enjoined from future sales of the infringing product or products, which could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.

The use of open source software in our products, as well as those of our suppliers, manufacturers and customers, may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property position.

Certain of the software and/or firmware that we use and distribute (as well as that of our suppliers, manufacturers and customers) may be, be derived from, or contain, "open source" software, which is software that is generally made available to the public by its authors and/or other third parties. Such open source software is often made available under licenses which impose obligations in the event the software or derivative works thereof are distributed or re-distributed. These obligations may require us to make source code for the derivative works available to the public, and/or license such derivative works under a particular type of license, rather than the forms of license customarily used to protect our own software products. While we believe we have complied with our obligations under the various applicable licenses for open source software, in the event that a court rules that these licenses are unenforceable, or in the event the copyright holder of any open source software were to successfully establish in court that we had not complied with the terms of a license for a particular work, we could be required to release the source code of that work to the public and/or stop distribution of that work. Additionally, open source licenses are subject to occasional revision. In the event future iterations of open source software are made available under a revised license, such license revisions may adversely affect our ability to use such future iterations.

We are and may become subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in or outside the ordinary course of business. The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Moreover, many of the complaints filed against us do not specify the amount of damages that plaintiffs seek, and we therefore are unable to estimate the possible range of damages that might be incurred should these lawsuits be resolved against us. While we are unable to estimate the potential damages arising from such lawsuits, certain of them assert types of claims that, if resolved against us, could give rise to substantial damages. Thus, an unfavorable outcome or settlement of one or more of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Even if these lawsuits are not resolved against us, the uncertainty and expense associated with unresolved lawsuits could seriously harm our business, financial condition and reputation. Litigation is costly, time-consuming and disruptive to normal business operations. The costs of defending these lawsuits, particularly the securities class actions and stockholder derivative actions, have been significant, will continue to be costly and may not be covered by our insurance policies. The defense of these lawsuits could also result in continued diversion of our management's time and attention away from business operations, which could harm our business. For additional discussion regarding litigation, see the "Legal Proceedings" portion of this Annual Report.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities which could increase our expenses and harm our operating results.

We are subject to various federal, state and foreign laws and regulations governing the environment, including those governing pollution and protection of human health and the environment and, recently, those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products and holding producers of those products financially responsible for the collection, treatment, recycling and disposal

of certain products. Such laws and regulations have been passed in several jurisdictions in which we operate. We will need to ensure that we comply with such laws and regulations as they are enacted, as well as all environmental laws and regulations, and as appropriate or required, that our component suppliers also comply with such laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with such laws, we could face sanctions for such noncompliance, and our customers may refuse to purchase our products, which would have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

With respect to compliance with environmental laws and regulations in general, we have incurred and in the future could incur substantial costs for the cleanup of contaminated properties, either those we own or operate or to which we have sent wastes in the past, or to comply with such environmental laws and regulations. Additionally, we could be subject to disruptions to our operations and logistics as a result of such clean-up or compliance obligations. If we were found to be in violation of these laws, we could be subject to governmental fines and liability for damages resulting from such violations. If we have to make significant capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws, or if we are subject to significant expenditures in connection with a violation of these laws, our financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely impacted.

Our rights plan and certain provisions in our charter and under Delaware laws could hinder a takeover attempt.

In February 2003, we amended and restated our Stockholder Rights Agreement, which contains provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us and may thereby inhibit a change in control. We are also subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibiting, under some circumstances, publicly-held Delaware corporations from engaging in business combinations with some stockholders for a specified period of time without the approval of the holders of substantially all of our outstanding voting stock. Such provisions could delay or impede the removal of incumbent directors and could make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us, even if such events could be beneficial, in the short-term, to the interests of the stockholders. In addition, such provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions providing for the limitations of liability and indemnification of our directors and officers, dividing our board of directors into three classes of directors serving staggered, three-year terms, allowing vacancies on our board of directors to be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors, granting our board of directors the authority to establish additional series of preferred stock and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares (commonly known as "blank check preferred") and providing that our stockholders can take action only at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders, which may only be called by the Chairman of the board, the Chief Executive Officer or the board of directors. These provisions also may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of us.

We own and lease various properties in the United States and in 23 other countries around the world. We use the properties for executive and administrative offices, data centers, product development offices, customer service offices, and manufacturing facilities. Our corporate headquarters of approximately 163,000 square feet is located in Milpitas, California. As of June 30, 2012, our leased and owned properties in total provided us with aggregate square footage of approximately 2.1 million, of which less than 15,000 square feet is owned. Larger leased sites include properties located in China,

Canada, France, Germany, Singapore, and the United States. We believe that our existing properties, including both owned and leased sites, are in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business.

From time to time we consider various alternatives related to our long-term facilities' needs. While we believe our existing facilities are adequate to meet our immediate needs, it may become necessary to lease, acquire, or sell additional or alternative space to accommodate future business needs.

The Company is subject to a variety of claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or statement of cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management's view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "JDSU" and our exchangeable shares of JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "JDU." Holders of exchangeable shares may tender their holdings for common stock on a one-for-one basis at any time. As of July 28, 2012, we had 231,916,378 shares of common stock outstanding, including 3,937,789 exchangeable shares. The closing price on July 27, 2012 was $9.95 for the common stock and Canadian $10.07 for the exchangeable shares. The following table summarizes the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market during fiscal 2012 and 2011.

As of July 28, 2012, we had 5,562 holders of record of our common stock and exchangeable shares. We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

In May 2012, we repurchased $14.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes for $13.9 million in cash.

The information contained in the following graph shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

The following graph and table set forth the Company's total cumulative stockholder return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of an investment of $100 in June 2007 and ending June 2012 in: (i) the Company's Common Stock, (ii) the S&P 500 Index, (iii) the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and, (iv) the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

This table sets forth selected financial data of JDSU, in millions, except share and per share amounts, for the periods indicated. This data should be read in conjunction with and is qualified by reference to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto and our independent registered public accounting firm's report thereon and the other financial information included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The selected data in this section are not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011(4)		July 3, 2010(1)(2)(3)			June 27, 2009(1)(2)			June 28, 2008(1)(2)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenue	$	1,682.1		$	1,804.5	$	1,363.9		$	1,283.3		$	1,512.0
Gross profit		710.0			790.9		547.1			486.6			579.6
Amortization of other intangibles		28.9			32.2		27.8			27.0			30.0
Impairment of goodwill		—			—		—			741.7			37.0
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		22.7			1.5		(2.0	)		13.2			6.7
Restructuring and related charges		12.5			14.8		17.7			38.5			6.7
Total operating expense		739.1			725.5		601.3			1,386.5			713.8
(Loss) income from operations		(29.1	)		65.4		(54.2	)		(899.9	)		(134.2	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax		(55.6	)		71.6		(59.7	)		(906.2	)		(41.5	)
Net (loss) income		(55.6	)		71.6		(61.8	)		(909.5	)		(40.3	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations per share—basic		(0.24	)		0.32		(0.27	)		(4.20	)		(0.19	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations per share—diluted		(0.24	)		0.31		(0.27	)		(4.20	)		(0.19	)
Net (loss) income per share—basic		(0.24	)		0.32		(0.28	)		(4.22	)		(0.18	)
Net (loss) income per share—diluted		(0.24	)		0.31		(0.28	)		(4.22	)		(0.18	)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

JDSU is a leading provider of communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, wireless operators, cable operators, NEMs, and enterprises. JDSU is also an established leader in developing anti-counterfeiting technologies for currencies and other high value documents and products. In addition, the Company is leveraging its core networking and optical technology expertise to deliver high-powered commercial lasers for manufacturing applications and expand into emerging markets, including gesture—recognition solutions for consumer electronics.

To serve its markets, JDSU operates in the following business segments: Communications Test and Measurement ("CommTest"), Communications and Commercial Optical Products ("CCOP"), and Advanced Optical technology ("AOT").

The CommTest business segment provides instruments, software and services for communications network operators and equipment manufacturers that deliver and/or operate wireline and wireless networks.

JDSU communications test solutions help accelerate the deployment of new services, lower operating expenses, reduce customer turnover, and increase productivity across each critical phase of the network lifecycle, including R&D, production, deployment, and customer experience management ("CEM"). JDSU enables the effective management of voice, data and video services by providing visibility into the end-user experience and also by providing repair, calibration, instrument management, and other services to aid its customers in the rapid deployment and repair of networks and services.

JDSU test solutions address lab and production (capacity expansion, 40G/100G), field service (triple-play deployments for cable, telecom, FTTx, and home networking), wireless (load testing, drive test, protocol test), and CEM (quality of experience for wireless and wireline networks). JDSU also provides protocol test solutions for the development and field deployment of storage and storage-network technologies.

JDSU test and measurement customers include the world's largest communications service providers, communications-equipment manufacturers, and government organizations. These include major telecom service providers, wireless operators and cable operators including AT&T, Bell Canada, Bharti Airtel Limited, British Telecom, China Mobile, China Telecom, Chunghwa Telecom, Comcast, CSL, Deutsche Telecom, France Telecom, TalkTalk, Telefónica, Telmex, TimeWarner Cable, and Verizon. Network equipment manufacturing customers include Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Fujitsu, and Huawei. Customers in the storage group are chip and infrastructure vendors, storage-device manufacturers, storage-network and switch vendors, and deployed private enterprise customers. Storage group customers include Brocade, Cisco Systems, EMC, Hewlett-Packard, and IBM.

The CCOP business segment is a leading provider of products and technologies used in the optical communications and commercial laser markets.

CCOP optical communications products include a wide range of components, modules, subsystems, and solutions for two markets: telecommunications, including access (local), metro (intracity), long-haul

(city-to-city and worldwide), and submarine (undersea) networks; and, enterprise data communications including SANs, LANs, and Ethernet WANs. CCOP products enable the transmission and transport of video, audio, and data over high-capacity, fiber-optic cables. Transmission products primarily consist of optical transceivers, optical transponders, and their supporting components such as modulators and source lasers including VCSELs. Transport products primarily consist of amplifiers, ROADMs, and STBs, and their supporting components such as 980 nanometer ("nm") pumps, passive devices, and array waveguides ("AWG"s).

CCOP laser products serve a wide variety of OEM applications from low- to high-power output and with UV, visible, and IR wavelengths. The broad portfolio addresses the needs of laser clients in applications such as micromachining, materials processing, bioinstrumentation, consumer electronics, graphics, medical/dental, and optical pumping. Core laser technologies include continuous-wave ("cw"), q-switched, and mode-locked lasers addressing application needs from cw to megahertz repetition rates. Laser products include diode, direct-diode, diode-pumped solid-state ("DPSS"), fiber and gas lasers.

CCOP provides two lines of PV products. CPV cell products convert light into electrical energy, enabling high efficiency multijunction solar cells and receiver assemblies. Photonic power ("PP") products transport energy over optical fiber, enabling electromagnetic- and radio-interference-free power and data transmission for remote sensors such as high-voltage line current monitors.

Today's most advanced optical networks are built with JDSU transport and transmission components, modules, and subsystems. Customers for our Optical Communications products include Adva, Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Infinera, Nokia Siemens Networks, and Tellabs. Customers for JDSU Commercial Lasers include Amada, ASML, Beckman Coulter, Becton Dickinson, Disco, Electro Scientific Industries, and KLA-Tencor. Customers for Photovoltaic Products include Amplifier Research, Beijing Bosin Industrial Technology, ETS-Lindgren, and Siemens.

The AOT business segment leverages its core technology strengths in optics and materials science to manage light and/or color effects for a wide variety of markets—from product security to space exploration. AOT consists of our Custom Optics Product Group ("COPG"), Flex Products Group ("Flex") , and our Authentication Solutions Group ("ASG").

The Flex group produces color-shifting pigments that protect the currencies of more than 100 countries including China, those in the European Union, and the United States. It also provides anti-counterfeiting solutions to the pharmaceutical and other industries.

The COPG group provides precise, high-performance, optical thin-film coatings for a variety of applications in government and aerospace, biomedical, display, office automation, entertainment, and other emerging markets. These applications include night-vision goggles, satellite solar covers, medical instrumentation, information displays, office equipment, computer-driven projectors, 3D cinema and gesture recognition.

ASG provides multilayer authentication solutions that include overt, covert, forensic, and digital technologies for protection from product and document counterfeiting and tampering. These solutions, many of which leverage AOT color-shifting and holographic technologies, safeguard brands in the secure document, transaction card, pharmaceutical, consumer electronics, printing/imaging supplies, licensing, and fast-moving consumer goods industries.

The AOT business segment serves customers such as 3M, Kingston, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Pan Pacific, Seiko Epson, and SICPA.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The adoption of this guidance may expand existing disclosure requirements, which the Company is currently evaluating.

In June 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The amended guidance eliminates one of the presentation options provided by current U.S. GAAP that is to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. In addition, it gives an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, and will be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance will expand existing disclosure requirements but will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, net revenue and expenses, and the related disclosures. We

base our estimates on historical experience, our knowledge of economic and market factors and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements are, by their nature, uncertain and unpredictable, and depend upon, among other things, many factors outside of our control, such as demand for our products and economic conditions. Accordingly, our estimates and judgments may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ from these estimates under different estimates, assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies are affected by significant estimates, assumptions and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery does not occur until products have been shipped or services have been provided, risk of loss has transferred and in cases where formal acceptance is required, customer acceptance has been obtained or customer acceptance provisions have lapsed. In situations where a formal acceptance is required but the acceptance only relates to whether the product meets its published specifications, revenue is recognized upon shipment provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met. The sales price is not considered to be fixed or determinable until all contingencies related to the sale have been resolved.

We reduce revenue for rebates and other similar allowances. Revenue is recognized only if these estimates can be reliably determined. Our estimates are based on historical results taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement.

In addition to the aforementioned general policies, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for multiple-element arrangements and for each major category of revenue.

In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that applies to arrangements with multiple deliverables. The guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition, on non-software arrangements, and allows the use of management's best estimate of selling price ("BESP") for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") or third-party evidence ("TPE") is unavailable. In addition, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which removes non-software components of tangible products and certain software components of tangible products from the scope of existing software revenue guidance, resulting in the recognition of revenue similar to that for other tangible products. We have adopted these standards at the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified on or after July 3, 2010.

When a sales arrangement contains multiple deliverables, such as sales of products that include services, the multiple deliverables are evaluated to determine the units of accounting, and the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative selling price. Under this approach, the selling price of a unit of accounting is determined by using a selling price hierarchy which requires the use of VSOE of fair value if available, TPE if VSOE is not available, or BESP if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Revenue is recognized when the revenue recognition criteria for each unit of accounting are met.

We establish VSOE of selling price using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and, in remote circumstances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. TPE of selling price is established by evaluating similar and interchangeable competitor goods or

services in sales to similarly situated customers. When VSOE or TPE are not available then we use BESP. Generally, we are not able to determine TPE because our product strategy differs from that of others in our markets, and the extent of customization varies among comparable products or services from our peers. We establish BESP using historical selling price trends and considering multiple factors including, but not limited to geographies, market conditions, competitive landscape, internal costs, gross margin objectives, and pricing practices. When determining BESP, we apply significant judgment in establishing pricing strategies and evaluating market conditions and product lifecycles.

The determination of BESP is made through consultation with and approval by the Segment management. Segment management may modify or develop new pricing practices and strategies in the future. As these pricing strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which may result in changes in BESP. The aforementioned factors may result in a different allocation of revenue to the deliverables in multiple element arrangements from the current fiscal quarter, which may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for these elements but will not change the total revenue recognized for the arrangement.

To the extent that a deliverable(s) in a multiple-element arrangement is subject to specific guidance (for example, software that is subject to the authoritative guidance on software revenue recognition) we allocate the fair value of the units of accounting using relative selling price and that unit of accounting is accounted for in accordance with the specific guidance. Some of our product offerings include hardware that are integrated with or sold with software that delivers the functionality of the equipment. We believe that this equipment is not considered software related and would therefore be excluded from the scope of the authoritative guidance on software revenue recognition.

If the transactions entered into or materially modified on or after July 3, 2010 were subject to the previous accounting guidance, the reported net revenue amount during the year ended July 2, 2011, would decrease by approximately $7 million.

Revenue from hardware sales is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and when there are no unfulfilled company obligations that affect the customer's final acceptance of the arrangement. Any cost of warranties and remaining obligations that are inconsequential or perfunctory are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized.

Revenue from services and system maintenance is typically recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Revenue from time and material contracts is recognized at the contractual rates as labor hours are delivered and direct expenses are incurred. Revenue related to extended warranty and product maintenance contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the delivery period. We also generate service revenue from hardware repairs and calibration which is recognized as revenue upon completion of the service.

Our software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and Post-Contract Support ("PCS"). Generally we have established VSOE of fair value for PCS contracts based on the renewal rate or the bell curve methodology. Revenue from maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical support is recognized over the period such items are delivered. In multiple-element revenue arrangements that include software, software related and non software-related elements are accounted for in accordance with the following policies.

If these criteria are not met, the software revenue is deferred until the earlier of when such criteria are met or when the last undelivered element is delivered. If there is VSOE of the undelivered item(s) but no such evidence for the delivered item(s), the residual method is used to allocate the arrangement consideration. Under the residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered item(s) equals the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate VSOE of the undelivered elements. In cases where VSOE is not established for PCS, revenue is recognized ratably over the PCS period after all software deliverables have been made and the only undelivered item is PCS.

We perform credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We record our bad debt expenses as SG&A expenses. When we become aware that a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to us, for example, as a result of bankruptcy or deterioration in the customer's operating results or financial position, we record a specific allowance to reflect the level of credit risk in the customer's outstanding receivable balance. In addition, we record additional allowances based on certain percentages of our aged receivable balances. These percentages are determined by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, current economic trends, historical payment and bad debt write-off experience. We are not able to predict changes in the financial condition of our customers, and if circumstances related to our customers deteriorate, our estimates of the recoverability of our trade receivables could be materially affected and we may be required to record additional allowances. Alternatively, if we provide more allowances than we need, we may reverse a portion of such provisions in future periods based on our actual collection experience.

We estimate the fair value of stock options with service conditions and employee stock purchase plan awards ("ESPP") using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and a single option award approach. This option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the award's expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected stock price volatility assumption is determined using a combination of historical and implied volatility of our common stock. We use the Lattice model to estimate the fair value of certain performance based options with market conditions. The fair value of the time based Full Value Awards is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of award. We use a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value of certain performance based Full Value Awards with market conditions.

Pursuant to the authoritative guidance, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. When estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary termination behavior as well as future workforce reduction programs. Estimated forfeiture

rates are trued-up to actual forfeiture as the equity awards vest. The total fair value of the equity awards, net of forfeiture, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period, except for performance based Full Value Awards and options with market conditions which are amortized based upon a graded vesting method.

Our investments in debt securities and marketable equity securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale investments or trading securities and are recorded at fair value. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, net of tax, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Gains or losses on trading securities resulting from changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. Our short-term investments include securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are classified as current assets as they are highly liquid and available to support current operations.

We periodically review our investments for impairment. If a debt security's market value is below amortized cost and we either intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, we record an other-than-temporary impairment charge to investment income (loss) for the entire amount of the impairment. For the remaining debt securities, if an other-than-temporary impairment exists, we separate the other-than-temporary impairment into the portion of the loss related to credit factors, or the credit loss portion, and the portion of the loss that is not related to credit factors, or the noncredit loss portion. The credit loss portion is the difference between the amortized cost of the security and our best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security. The noncredit loss portion is the residual amount of the other-than-temporary impairment. The credit loss portion is recorded as a charge to earnings (loss), and the noncredit loss portion is recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss).

We assess the value of our inventory on a quarterly basis and write-down those inventories which are obsolete or in excess of our forecasted usage to their estimated realizable value. Our estimates of realizable value are based upon our analysis and assumptions including, but not limited to, forecasted sales levels by product, expected product lifecycle, product development plans and future demand requirements. Our product line management personnel play a key role in our excess review process by providing updated sales forecasts, managing product rollovers and working with manufacturing to maximize recovery of excess inventory. If actual market conditions are less favorable than our forecasts or actual demand from our customers is lower than our estimates, we may be required to record additional inventory write-downs. If actual market conditions are more favorable than anticipated, inventory previously written down may be sold, resulting in lower cost of sales and higher income from operations than expected in that period.

We test goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis in our fourth quarter and at any other time if events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Circumstances that could trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to: a significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors; an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; change in customer, target market and strategy; unanticipated competition; loss of key personnel; or the likelihood that a reporting unit or significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed.

In fiscal 2012, the FASB amended its guidance to simplify testing goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. If an entity determines that as a result of the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not (>50% likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the quantitative test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. We elected to early adopt this accounting guidance for our annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgments, including: identification of the reporting units; assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units; assigning goodwill to reporting units; a qualitative assessment to determine whether there are any impairment indicators; determining the fair value of each reporting unit; forecasting of future operating results used in the preparation of the estimated future cash flows, including forecasted revenues and costs, timing of overall market growth and our percentage of that market, discount rates and growth rates in terminal values.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions about the future that we believe are reasonable based on available information. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that affect the accuracy of our assumptions, estimates and judgments. For example, if the price of our common stock were to significantly decrease combined with other adverse changes in market conditions, thus indicating that the underlying fair value of our reporting units may have decreased, we might be required to reassess the value of our goodwill in the period such circumstances were identified.

Long-lived Asset Valuation (Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible Assets)

We test long-lived assets or asset groups for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life.

Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amounts of the long-lived assets or asset groups and its fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisals in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

Long-lived assets are classified as held for sale when certain criteria are met, which include: management commitment to a plan to sell the assets; the availability of the assets for immediate sale in their present condition; an active program to locate buyers and other actions to sell the assets has been initiated; whether the sale of the assets is probable and their transfer is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; whether the assets are being marketed at reasonable prices in relation to their fair value; and how unlikely it is that significant changes will be made to the plan to sell the assets. See "Note 10. Loss (Gain) on Disposal and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" for more detail.

We measure long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is determined using quoted market prices or the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.

In accordance with the authoritative guidance on accounting for income taxes, we recognize income taxes using an asset and liability approach. This approach requires the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of current and deferred taxes is based on provisions of the enacted tax law and the effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated.

The authoritative guidance provides for recognition of deferred tax assets if the realization of such deferred tax assets is more likely than not to occur. With the exception of certain international jurisdictions, we have determined that at this time it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets attributable to the remaining jurisdictions will not be realized, primarily due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. Accordingly, we have established a valuation allowance for such deferred tax assets. If there is a change in our ability to realize our deferred tax assets, then our tax provision may decrease in the period in which we determine that realization is more likely than not.

The authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial statements and prescribes the recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, it provides guidance on recognition, classification, and disclosure of tax positions. We are subject to income tax audits by the respective tax authorities in all of the jurisdictions in which we operate. The determination of tax liabilities in each of these jurisdictions requires the interpretation and application of complex and sometimes uncertain tax laws and regulations. We recognize liabilities based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional tax liabilities are more likely than not. If we ultimately determine that the payment of such a liability is not necessary, then we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which the determination is made that the liability is no longer necessary.

The recognition and measurement of current taxes payable or refundable and deferred tax assets and liabilities requires that we make certain estimates and judgments. Changes to these estimates or a change in judgment may have a material impact on our tax provision in a future period.

We provide reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We estimate the costs of our warranty obligations based on our historical experience of known product failure rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise. Should our actual experience relative to these factors differ from our estimates, we may be required to record additional warranty reserves. Alternatively, if we provide more reserves than we need, we may reverse a portion of such provisions in future periods.

In accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities, generally costs associated with restructuring activities are recognized when they are incurred. However, in the case of leases, the expense is estimated and accrued when the property is vacated. Given the significance of, and the timing of the execution of such activities, this process is complex and involves periodic reassessments of estimates made from the time the property was vacated, including evaluating real estate market conditions for expected vacancy periods and sub-lease income. Additionally, a liability for post-employment benefits for workforce reductions related to restructuring activities is recorded when payment is probable, the amount is reasonably estimable, and the obligation relates to rights that have vested or accumulated. We continually evaluate the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under our restructuring initiatives. Although we believe that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of our restructuring plans, actual results may differ, thereby requiring us to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions.

The funded status of our retirement-related benefit plans is recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation at fiscal year end, the measurement date. For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and for the nonpension postretirement benefit plan the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO"). The PBO represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement. The APBO represents the actuarial present value of postretirement benefits attributed to employee services already rendered. The fair value of plan assets represents the current market value of cumulative Company contributions made to an irrevocable trust fund, held for the sole benefit of participants. Unfunded or partially funded plans, with the benefit obligation exceeding the fair value of plan assets, are aggregated and recorded as a retirement and nonpension postretirement benefit obligation equal to this excess. The current portion of the retirement-related benefit obligation represents the actuarial present value of benefits payable in the next 12 months in excess of the fair value of plan assets, measured on a plan-by-plan basis. This liability is recorded in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(Gains) losses and prior service cost (credit) not recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost (income) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as they arise are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balances Sheets, net of tax. Those (gains) losses and prior service cost (credit) are subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic pension period cost (income) pursuant to the recognition and amortization provisions of applicable accounting standards. (Gains) losses arise as a result of differences between actual experience and assumptions or as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions. Prior service cost (credit) represents the cost of benefit improvements attributable to prior service granted in plan amendments.

Net periodic pension cost (income) is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and includes service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost and (gains) losses previously recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Service cost represents the actuarial present value of participant benefits earned in the current year. Interest cost represents the time value of money cost associated with the passage of time. Certain events, such as changes in employee base, plan amendments and changes in actuarial assumptions, result in a change in the benefit obligation and the corresponding change in other comprehensive income. The result of these events is amortized as a component of net periodic cost (income) over the

service lives of the participants, provided such amounts exceed thresholds which are based upon the benefit obligation or the value of plan assets.

The measurement of the benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost (income) is based on our estimates and actuarial valuations provided by third-party actuaries which are approved by our management. These valuations reflect the terms of the plans and use participant-specific information such as compensation, age and years of service, as well as certain assumptions, including estimates of discount rates, expected return on plan assets, rate of compensation increases, and mortality rates. In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider historical returns on plan assets, adjusted for forward-looking considerations, inflation assumptions and the impact of the active management of the plan's invested assets. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions that may be required under new legislation, accounting pronouncements, or otherwise, may materially affect our pension and other post-retirement obligations and our future expense.

We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

The following table sets forth the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of net revenue:

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Segment net revenue:
CommTest		44.9	%		44.5	%		47.1	%
CCOP		41.7			42.7			36.6
AOT		13.4			12.8			16.3

Net revenue		100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of sales		54.3			53.0			56.2
Amortization of acquired technologies		3.5			3.2			3.7

Gross profit		42.2			43.8			40.1

Operating expenses:
Research and development		14.6			13.3			12.8
Selling, general and administrative		25.5			24.2			28.1
Amortization of other intangibles		1.7			1.8			2.0
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		1.3			0.1			(0.1	)
Restructuring and related charges		0.8			0.8			1.3

Total operating expenses		43.9			40.2			44.1

(Loss) income from operations		(1.7	)		3.6			(4.0	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		0.7			0.1			0.6
Interest expense		(1.6	)		(1.4	)		(1.8	)
Gain on sale of investments		0.1			0.2			1.0

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(2.6	)		2.5			(4.2	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		0.7			(1.5	)		0.2

(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax		(3.3	)		4.0			(4.4	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			(0.1	)

Net (loss) income		(3.3	)%		4.0	%		(4.5	)%

The following table summarizes selected Consolidated Statement of Operations items (in millions, except for percentages):

	2012			2011			Change					2011			2010			Change

Segment net revenue:
CommTest	$	754.8		$	803.0		$	(48.2	)			$	803.0		$	642.7		$	160.3
CCOP		701.6			770.8			(69.2	)				770.8			499.3			271.5
AOT		225.7			230.7			(5.0	)				230.7			221.9			8.8

Net revenue	$	1,682.1		$	1,804.5		$	(122.4	)	(6.8	)%	$	1,804.5		$	1,363.9		$	440.6		32.3	%

Gross profit		710.0			790.9			(80.9	)	(10.2	)%		790.9			547.1			243.8		44.6	%
Gross margins		42.2	%		43.8	%							43.8	%		40.1	%
Research and development		246.0			239.9			6.1		2.5	%		239.9			174.9			65.0		37.2	%
Percentage of net revenue		14.6	%		13.3	%							13.3	%		12.8	%
Selling, general and administrative		429.0			437.1			(8.1	)	(1.9	)%		437.1			382.9			54.2		14.2	%
Percentage of net revenue		25.5	%		24.2	%							24.2	%		28.1	%
Amortization of intangibles		87.5			89.1			(1.6	)	(1.8	)%		89.1			78.4			10.7		13.6	%
Percentage of net revenue		5.2	%		4.9	%							4.9	%		5.7	%
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		22.7			1.5			21.2		1,413.3	%		1.5			(2.0	)		3.5		(175.0	)%
Percentage of net revenue		1.3	%		0.1	%							0.1	%		(0.1	)%
Restructuring and related charges		12.5			14.8			(2.3	)	(15.5	)%		14.8			17.7			(2.9	)	(16.4	)%
Percentage of net revenue		0.7	%		0.8	%							0.8	%		1.3	%

Net revenue in fiscal 2012 decreased 6.8%, or $122.4 million, to $1,682.1 million from $1,804.5 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in volume in our CommTest and CCOP segments.

Net revenue decreased by $48.2 million in our CommTest segment primarily due to uncertainty in the macro-economic environment which reduced carriers' spending in North America broadly across products in the instruments product portfolio. Carriers are spending cautiously as their end customers are delaying purchases, particularly in Europe and North America. This decrease was partially offset by growth within the instruments product portfolio and the customer experience management ("CEM") product portfolio in the Asia-Pacific region. Net revenue decreased by $69.2 million in our CCOP segment. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in volume due to reduced demand in our optical communications product portfolios arising from uncertainty in the macro-economic environment, particularly in Europe, flooding in Thailand and price reductions in line with business expectations. This decline was partially offset by an increase in volume and demand in our Pluggables and Fiber Lasers product lines. Within the optical communications product portfolio, volume declined in our gesture recognition products compared to the successful launch of these products in fiscal 2011. Volume also declined in our Circuit Packs and ROADMs product lines. During the second fiscal quarter of 2012 flooding in Thailand temporarily suspended operations of Fabrinet, one of CCOP's

primary manufacturing partners, affecting net revenue by approximately $15 million. Net revenue in our AOT segment decreased $5.0 million due primarily due to reduced demand for our gesture recognition products, which was partially offset by increases in our currency products.

Net revenue in fiscal 2011 increased 32.3%, or $440.6 million, to $1,804.5 million from $1,363.9 million in fiscal 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increased demand for our products driven by a broad based improvement in the global macro-economic environment, and specifically in the markets in which our segments operate. The significant yearly revenue increase was magnified relative to fiscal 2010, because fiscal 2010 net revenue was adversely impacted by the worldwide global recession in the first half of fiscal 2010. We saw the recovery from this recession begin during the second half of fiscal 2010 and continue at an increasing pace in fiscal 2011. In addition to the impact of the improvements in the global macro-economic environment on demand for our products, there were other factors which contributed to our increase in net revenue, as discussed below.

CommTest revenue increased $160.3 million largely due to the NSD acquisition in May 2010, the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, which contributed $112.3 million of the increase in revenue in fiscal 2011. The overall improvements in the macro-economic environment in fiscal 2011 helped drive an increase in revenues across a broad portfolio of our product lines, including Fiber, Video Broadband & Access and Metro/Transport. CCOP revenue increased $271.5 million primarily due to improvements in the economic environment of the optical communication industry in fiscal 2011 that led to an increase in demand and volume of our Pluggables, High Powered Lasers, Modulators, Tunables, ROADMS, Commercial Lasers and Circuit Pack product lines. Another factor in the fiscal 2011 increase in revenue was the introduction of new product platforms and product variants and the expansion of our market share in certain customer accounts. The full year impact of revenue from new products such as Tunable XFP and Gesture Recognition in the CCOP segment, which were introduced in the second and third quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively, was realized in fiscal 2011. The CCOP segment released new ROADM product variants in fiscal 2011, which also contributed to the increase in net revenue. AOT revenue increased $8.8 million due to higher demand for Gesture Recognition and Transaction Card products.

Going forward, we expect to continue to encounter a number of industry and market structural risks and uncertainties that may limit our visibility, and consequently, our ability to predict future revenue, profitability and general financial performance, and that could create quarter over quarter variability in our financial measures. For example, recent economic uncertainty in Europe has led to decreased demand in our optical communications product portfolios, and we cannot predict when or to what extent this demand will recover. These structural risks and uncertainties include: (a) strong pricing pressures, particularly within our CCOP markets, due to, among other things, a highly concentrated customer base, increasing Asia-based competition, and a general commoditization trend for certain products; (b) high product mix variability, particularly in our CCOP markets, which causes revenue variability, as well as gross profit variability due to, among other things, factory utilization fluctuations and inventory and supply chain management complexities; and (c) continuing service provider seasonality, which causes demand, revenue and profitability volatility at each level of the communications industry. Moreover, the current trend of communication industry consolidations is expected to continue, directly affecting our CCOP and CommTest customer base and adding additional risk and uncertainty to our financial and business predictability. Our program of assembly manufacturing transitions will continue, but until completed, these activities will continue to present additional supply chain and product delivery disruption risks, yield and quality concerns and risk of increased cost. These risks, while expected to diminish over the next several quarters, limit our ability to predict longer term revenue, profitability and general financial performance.

We operate primarily in three geographic regions: Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa ("EMEA") and Asia-Pacific. The following table presents net revenue by geographic regions (in millions):

Net revenue was assigned to geographic regions based on the customers' shipment locations. Net revenue for Americas included net revenue from United States of $686.8 million, $695.9 million, and $532.8 million, for the fiscal years ended 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, based on customers' shipment location. Net revenue from customers outside the Americas represented 49.6%, 51.4%, and 51.5% of net revenue for the fiscal years ended 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Consolidated revenues decreased year over year and in each geographical region in which we operate. While the proportion of consolidated revenues contributed by each geographical region did not change significantly from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012, the impact of the uncertainty in the macro-environment in Europe resulted in a small decrease in the proportion of revenue attributed to that region. We expect revenue from our customers outside of North America to continue to be an important part of our overall net revenue and an increasing focus for net revenue growth.

During fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, no one single customer accounted for more than 10% of net revenue.

Gross margin in fiscal 2012 decreased 1.6 percentage points to 42.2% from 43.8% in fiscal 2011. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to declines in net revenue and unfavorable product mix in our CCOP and AOT segments. Net revenue decreased in our optical communications product portfolios of our CCOP segment, particularly in our gesture recognition products and Circuit Pack and ROADMs product lines, due to reductions in pricing and volume which reduced absorption of manufacturing costs and decreased operating efficiency. Additionally, our CCOP segment experienced higher production variances as a result of flooding in Thailand which temporarily suspended the operations of Fabrinet, one of CCOP's primary manufacturing partners, during the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Net revenue decreased in our gesture recognition products of our AOT segment, due to reductions in volume, which reduced absorption of manufacturing costs. Additionally, the decline in gross margin in our AOT segment, was due to a decline in the pricing of certain currency products. Gross margin in our CommTest segment remained relatively flat in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.

Gross margin in fiscal 2011 increased 3.7 percentage points to 43.8% from 40.1% in fiscal 2010. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to greater manufacturing efficiencies resulting from increases in product volume, which improved overhead absorption in our CCOP and CommTest segments, as well as improved product mix. Our CCOP segment experienced higher absorption of manufacturing cost from higher product volumes, thereby increasing gross margin, particularly in our Pluggables, High Powered Lasers, Modulators, Tunables, ROADMS, Commercial Lasers and Circuit Pack product lines. Our CCOP segment also introduced new product platforms and product variants in fiscal 2010 and 2011 and further increased manufacturing efficiencies in fiscal 2011 as compared to

fiscal 2010 from the on-going consolidation of CCOP manufacturing sites which took place in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 contributing to an increase in gross margin. In our CommTest segment, the increase in gross margin was primarily due to improved product mix, which in part was driven by the acquisition of the NSD business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The acquisition of the NSD business helped to significantly improve product offering mix with an emphasis on software and solution sales contributing to higher gross margin for the overall CommTest segment. As in our CCOP segment, CommTest also benefitted significantly from higher volumes of multiple product lines such as Fiber, Video Broadband & Access, Metro/Transport which also resulted in higher absorption of manufacturing cost thereby increasing gross margin. Gross margin decreased slightly in the AOT segment due to change in product mix.

As discussed in more detail under "Net Revenue" above, we sell products in certain markets that are consolidating, undergoing product, architectural and business model transitions, have high customer concentrations, are highly competitive (increasingly due to Asia-Pacific based competition), are price sensitive and are affected by customer seasonal and mix variant buying patterns. We expect these factors to continue to result in quarterly variability of our gross margin.

R&D expense in fiscal 2012 increased 2.5%, or $6.1 million, to $246.0 million from $239.9 million in fiscal 2011. The increase in R&D expense was primarily due to increased investment in R&D projects to develop new product platforms and drive future growth, particularly in our CCOP segment. The increase was partially offset by reductions in our CommTest segment's R&D spending as a result of restructuring activities, reductions in headcount, and decreased variable incentive pay due to a decrease in operating income. Total R&D headcount decreased from approximately 1,450 in fiscal 2011 to 1,400 in fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expense increased from 13.3% in fiscal 2011 to 14.6% in fiscal 2012.

R&D expense in fiscal 2011 increased 37.2%, or $65.0 million, to $239.9 million from $174.9 million in fiscal 2010. The increase was primarily a result of increased investment in development projects, together with higher compensation and benefits costs due to increased headcount, partly as a result of the acquisition of NSD in fiscal 2010, but also as a result of increased organic investment. Total R&D headcount increased from approximately 1,350 in fiscal 2010 to 1,450 in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expense slightly increased from 12.8% in fiscal 2010 to 13.3% in fiscal 2011.

We believe that investment in R&D is critical to attaining our strategic objectives. Historically, we have devoted significant engineering resources to assist with production, quality and delivery challenges which can impact our new product development activities. We plan to continue to invest in R&D and new products that will further differentiate us in the marketplace.

SG&A expense in fiscal 2012 decreased 1.9%, or $8.1 million, to $429.0 million from $437.1 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease in SG&A expense was primarily due to decreased variable incentive pay and lower sales commissions due to a decrease in net revenue and operating income, partially offset by increased investment in information technology and a litigation settlement. Please refer to "Note 18. Commitment and Contingencies" for more information on legal proceedings. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses increased from 24.2% in fiscal 2011 to 25.5% in fiscal 2012.

SG&A expense in fiscal 2011 increased 14.2%, or $54.2 million, to $437.1 million from $382.9 million in fiscal 2010. The dollar increase was primarily related to higher sales commissions due

to increased revenues, increased variable incentive pay due to improved operating performance and increased investment in information technology, together with increases associated with the NSD acquisition. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses decreased from 28.1% in fiscal 2010 to 24.2% in fiscal 2011.

We intend to continue to focus on reducing our SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue. We have in the recent past, experienced and may continue to experience in the future, certain non-core expenses, such as mergers and acquisitions related expenses and legal expenses in connection with litigation, which could increase our SG&A expenses, and potentially impact our profitability, in any particular quarter. We are also increasing SG&A expenses in near term to upgrade business infrastructure and systems.

Amortization of intangibles for fiscal 2012 decreased 1.8%, or $1.6 million, to $87.5 million from $89.1 million in fiscal 2011.

Amortization of intangibles for fiscal 2011 increased 13.6%, or $10.7 million, to $89.1 million from $78.4 million in fiscal 2010, due to additional intangible assets acquired through the NSD acquisition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

In accordance with authoritative guidance, we recognize IPR&D at fair value as of the acquisition date, and subsequently account for it as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until completion or abandonment of the associated R&D efforts. We periodically review the stage of completion and likelihood of success of each IPR&D project. The nature of the efforts required to develop IPR&D projects into commercially viable products principally relates to the completion of all planning, designing, prototyping, verification and testing activities that are necessary to establish that the products can be produced to meet their design specifications, including functions, features and technical performance requirements. During fiscal 2010, we acquired IPR&D through the acquisitions of SNT and NSD. The current status of our significant IPR&D projects from acquisitions is as follows:

SNT was acquired in July 2009 and was accounted for in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations. At the time of acquisition, SNT was in the process of developing technology, on two projects, to be used in the next generation of test and measurement platform. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 we completed one project and began amortizing the developed technology over a 5 year useful life. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011 we completed the second project and began amortizing the developed technology over an 8 year useful life.

NSD was acquired in May 2010 and was accounted for in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations. At the time of acquisition, NSD was in the process of developing the next generation network probes. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012 we completed the $9.8 million IPR&D project and transferred it from indefinite life intangible assets to acquired developed technology and began amortizing the developed technology intangible asset over its useful life of 5 years.

The following table summarizes the components of the impairment of intangibles and gain/loss on long-lived assets (in millions):

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Company made an assessment based on business conditions and market forecast to explore strategic alternatives for its holograms business within AOT reportable segment which may result in exit activities significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

Correspondingly, under the authoritative guidance, the Company estimated the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated using a probability-weighed approach for various scenarios. The cash flow period was based on the remaining useful life of the primary asset. The estimated future net undiscounted cash flows were then compared to the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group. The result of the analysis indicated that the estimated undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group, and accordingly the long-lived asset group related to holograms business is not recoverable. The Company recorded the long-lived asset impairment charge of $18.8 million related to the intangibles and $2.7 million related to plant, property and equipment based on the discounted cash-flows under various scenarios. The entire impairment amount was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long lived assets.

The fair value of the aforementioned long-lived assets was determined based on an income approach using the discounted cash flow method. These assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

During fiscal 2012, we recorded a loss of $1.8 million on the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to accelerated depreciation in facilities at Everbright, Camerillo and Fort Collins sites.

During fiscal 2012, we recorded a gain of $0.7 million on the sale of asset primarily related to sale of certain building and land in Eningen, Germany under a sale and leaseback arrangement. See "Note 18. Commitments and Contingencies" for details.

During fiscal 2011, we recorded loss of $1.6 million on the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to accelerated depreciation in facilities at Ottawa and Fort Collins sites.

During fiscal 2010, we recorded a gain of $1.9 million for the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to cash receipts from Sanmina-SCI on leasehold improvements related to the sale of certain assets and liabilities related to manufacturing operations in Shenzhen, China in fiscal 2009 that had previously been written-off, partially offset by accelerated depreciation.

We continue to take advantage of opportunities to further reduce costs through targeted restructuring efforts intended to consolidate and rationalize business functions and related locations based on core competencies and cost efficiencies, together with the need to align the business in response to the market conditions. We estimate annualized cost savings of approximately $32 million excluding any one-time charge as a result of the restructuring activities initiated in the past year. See "Note 12. Restructuring and Related Charges" for more detail.

During the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred restructuring expenses of $12.5 million. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

During the twelve months ended July 2, 2011, we incurred restructuring expenses of $14.8 million. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

During the twelve months ended July 3, 2010, we incurred restructuring expenses of $17.7 million. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

Our ability to generate sublease income, as well as our ability to terminate lease obligations and recognize the anticipated related savings, is highly dependent upon the economic conditions, particularly commercial real estate market conditions in certain geographies, at the time we negotiate the lease termination and sublease arrangements with third parties as well as the performances by such third parties of their respective obligations. While the amount we have accrued represents the best estimate of the remaining obligations we expect to incur in connection with these plans, estimates are subject to change. Routine adjustments are required and may be required in the future as conditions and facts change through the implementation period. Our restructuring and other lease exit cost obligations are net of sublease income or lease settlement estimates of approximately $4.0 million. If adverse macroeconomic conditions continue, particularly as they pertain to the commercial real estate market, or if, for any reason, tenants under subleases fail to perform their obligations, we may be required to reduce estimated future sublease income and adjust the estimated amounts of future settlement agreements, and accordingly, increase estimated costs to exit certain facilities. Amounts related to the lease expense, net of anticipated sublease proceeds, will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2019.

During fiscal 2012, interest and other income (expense), net, increased by 409.1%, or $9.0 million, to $11.2 million from $2.2 million in fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily due to $9.4 million of other income recorded in fiscal 2012 related to the insurance proceeds received from our claims on loss associated with the Thailand flooding. This increase was partially offset by $0.7 million loss on repurchase of convertible notes in fiscal 2012.

During fiscal 2011, interest and other income (expense), net decreased by 73.2%, or $6.0 million, to $2.2 million from $8.2 million in fiscal 2010. The decrease was primarily due to $3.4 million of gains recorded in 2010 related to the distribution of proceeds from a class action settlement with Nortel, $2.0 million of gains on sale of equity investments in fiscal 2010 and $2.4 million reduction in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower average cash balances. The decrease was partially offset by an additional $1.2 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity investments and asset-backed securities in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2011.

During fiscal 2012, interest expense increased by 7.5%, or $1.9 million, to $27.3 million from $25.4 million in fiscal 2011, primarily due to an increase in accretion of debt discount cost.

During fiscal 2011, interest expense decreased by 4.5%, or $1.1 million, to $25.4 million from $24.3 million in fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase in accretion of debt discount cost.

During fiscal 2011, we recorded net gains on sale of investment of $3.4 million, primarily due to the sale of 393,150 shares of common stock in Fabrinet at $10.00 per share, receiving net proceeds of $3.7 million after deduction of 7% for underwriting fees. These shares of common stock had a carrying value of $1.00 per share.

During fiscal 2010, we recorded net gains on sale of investments of $13.1 million, primarily due to the sale of 1,606,850 shares of common stock in Fabrinet, in connection with their initial public offering, receiving net proceeds of $14.9 million or $9.30 per share, after deduction of 7% for

underwriting fees, on June 30, 2010. These shares of common stock had a carrying value of $1.00 per share.

We recorded an income tax expense of $12.0 million for fiscal 2012. The expected tax benefit derived by applying the federal statutory rate to our loss before income taxes for fiscal 2012 differed from the income tax expense recorded primarily as a result of domestic and foreign losses that were not benefited due to valuation allowances.

Based on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction review of anticipated future income and due to the continued economic uncertainty in the industry, management has determined that in most of our jurisdictions, it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will not be realized in those jurisdictions. During fiscal 2012, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $25.8 million. The increase was primarily due to domestic and foreign tax net operating losses sustained during the fiscal year, offset by utilization and expiration of domestic and foreign net operating losses. We are currently subject to various federal, state and foreign audits by taxing authorities. We believe that adequate amounts have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations.

We recorded an income tax benefit of $26.0 million for fiscal 2011. The expected tax expense derived by applying the federal statutory rate to our income before income taxes for fiscal 2011 differed from the income tax benefit recorded primarily due to a net reduction in our valuation allowance related to the valuation allowance release and utilization of domestic and foreign net operating losses.

During fiscal 2011, we determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets of a subsidiary in a non-US jurisdiction (the "foreign subsidiary") will be realized after considering all positive and negative evidence. Prior to fiscal 2011, because of significant negative evidence including principally continued economic uncertainty in the industry in the foreign jurisdiction specifically and reorganization activity that would adversely affect the foreign subsidiary's future operations and profit levels on a continuing basis in future years, we determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would not be realized. However, during fiscal 2011, the foreign subsidiary had realized cumulative pre-tax income for the preceding three years and as a result of the finalization of our reorganization plans during the year had forecasted future pre-tax income sufficient to realize a portion of its deferred tax assets prior to the expiration of its operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Upon considering the relative impact of all evidence, both negative and positive, and the weight accorded to each, we concluded that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets of the foreign subsidiary would be realized and that such portion of the valuation allowance should be released.

Accordingly, a deferred tax valuation allowance release of $34.9 million was recorded as an income tax benefit during the year. Our conclusion that it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred tax assets will be realized is strongly influenced by our forecast of future taxable income. We believe our forecast of future taxable income is reasonable; however, it is inherently uncertain. Therefore, if we realize materially less future taxable income than forecasted or have material unforeseen losses, then our ability to generate sufficient income necessary to realize a portion of the deferred tax assets may be reduced and an additional charge to increase the valuation allowance may

be recorded. Conversely, if we generate taxable income materially greater than what was forecasted, then a further release of valuation allowance may be possible.

Based on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction review of anticipated future income and due to the continued economic uncertainty in the industry, management has determined that in most of our jurisdictions, it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will not be realized in those jurisdictions. During fiscal 2011, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets decreased by $91.4 million. The decrease was primarily related to the valuation release mentioned above and the utilization and expiration of domestic and foreign net operating losses. We are currently subject to various federal, state and foreign audits by taxing authorities. We believe that adequate amounts have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations.

We recorded an income tax expense of $2.5 million for fiscal 2010. The expected tax benefit derived by applying the federal statutory rate to our loss before income taxes for fiscal 2010 differed from the income tax expense recorded primarily due to a net increase in our valuation allowance related to the increase in domestic and foreign tax net operating losses sustained during the fiscal year.

Based on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction review of anticipated future income and due to the continued economic uncertainty in the industry, management has determined that in most of our jurisdictions, it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will not be realized in those jurisdictions. During fiscal 2010, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $26.0 million. The increase was primarily due to domestic and foreign tax net operating losses sustained during the fiscal year, offset by utilization and expiration of domestic and foreign net operating losses.We are currently subject to various federal, state and foreign audits by taxing authorities. We believe that adequate amounts have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations.

During fiscal 2010, we sold certain non-core assets related to our wholly owned subsidiary da Vinci Systems LLC ("da Vinci"). Da Vinci represented a separate component of the CommTest segment and was considered as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. The sale generated total gross proceeds of $2.5 million and a gain of $0.2 million, which was recognized in the first fiscal quarter of 2010.

The decrease in CommTest net revenue fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 was primarily due to uncertainty in the macro-economic environment in North America within the instruments product portfolio, slightly offset by growth in the Asia-Pacific region. The decline in operating income was primarily driven by the decrease in net revenue, partially offset by reductions in SG&A and R&D expense as a result of savings obtained through our targeted restructuring activities to consolidate and rationalize business functions to achieve cost efficiencies within the CommTest segment.

The increase in CommTest net revenue between fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was mainly related to the NSD acquisition, which contributed a further $112.3 million to revenue in fiscal 2011, combined with continued improvement in macro-economic conditions during the whole of the year. Operating income increased due to increased revenue and continued focus on expense management, offset by increased investments in research and development.

The decrease in CCOP net revenue between fiscal 2012 and 2011 was due was primarily due to uncertainty in the macro-economic environment in Europe impacting our optical communications product portfolio, flooding in Thailand and price reductions in line with business expectations. Specifically, volume declined in our gesture recognition products compared to the successful launch of these products in fiscal 2011 and in our Circuit Packs and ROADMs product lines. The decline in operating income was primarily due to decreased net revenue, paired with increased investments in research and development.

The increase in CCOP net revenue between fiscal 2011 and 2010 was due to an increase in demand in most product lines, such as Pluggables, High Powered Lasers, Modulators, Tunables, ROADMS, Commercial Lasers and Circuit Packs, and the introduction of new product platforms which improved the profitability of our portfolio. Operating income increased year over year due to the increased volumes, together with an improved mix of higher margin products, offset by increased investments in research and development.

The decrease in AOT net revenue between fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 was primarily due reduced demand for our gesture recognition products, which was partially offset by increases in our currency products. The decline in operating income was primarily due to reduced demand in gesture recognition products and a decline in pricing for certain currency products, resulting in reduced absorption of manufacturing costs.

The increase in AOT net revenue between fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was primarily due to greater demand in our Gesture Recognition and Transaction Card product markets. Operating income declined as a result of lower margins resulting from changes in product mix, together with increased investments in research and development.

Our cash investments are made in accordance with an investment policy approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In general, our investment policy requires that securities purchased be rated A-1/P-1, A/A2 or better. Securities that are downgraded subsequent to purchase are evaluated and may be sold or held at management's discretion. No security may have an effective maturity that exceeds 37 months, and the average duration of our holdings may not exceed 18 months. At any time, no more than 5% of the investment portfolio may be concentrated in a single issuer other than the U.S. government or U.S. agencies. Our investments in debt securities and marketable equity securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale investments or trading securities and are recorded at fair value. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. We did not hold any investments in auction rate securities, mortgage backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, or variable rate demand notes at June 30, 2012 and virtually all debt securities held were of investment grade (at least BBB-/Baa3). As of June 30, 2012, approximately 88% of our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were held in the U.S.

As of June 30, 2012, the majority of our cash investments have maturities of 90 days or less and are of high credit quality. During fiscal 2012, we recognized $0.3 million of investment losses and can provide no assurances that the value or the liquidity of our other investments will not also be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. In addition, we maintain cash balances in operating accounts that are with third party financial institutions. These balances in the U.S. may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance limits. While we monitor the cash balances in our operating accounts and adjust the cash balances as appropriate, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail.

We had a combined balance of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash of $752.7 million at June 30, 2012, an increase of $24.0 million from July 2, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $5.7 million in the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of $119.8 million, offset by $72.2 million used for the purchases of property, plant and equipment, net cash outflows of $26.6 million used for the purchase of available-for-sale investments, $12.5 million used for the acquisition of QuantaSol and Dyaptive and $2.6 million used in financing activities.

Cash provided by operating activities was $119.1 million, resulting from our net income adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, impairment of long-lived assets and stock-based compensation of $199.4 million, and changes in operating assets and liabilities that used $80.3 million

related primarily to a decrease in accounts payable of $29.2 million, a decrease in accrued payroll and related expenses of $25.3 million, an increase in other current and non-current assets of $16.8 million, a decrease in other current and non-current liabilities of $12.6 million, and an increase in inventories of $7.7 million, offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $17.2 million primarily due to decrease in net revenue compared with fiscal 2011.

The $29.2 decrease in accounts payable was primarily due to timing of purchases and payments. The $25.3 million decrease in accrued payroll and related expenses was primarily due to timing of salary and payroll tax payments and lower bonus and commission accruals. The $16.8 million increase in other current and non-current assets was primarily due to higher advances to our contract manufacturers to support future growth and increases in value-added tax receivables and prepayments of license and maintenance fees. The $12.6 million decrease in other current and non-current liabilities was mainly due to timing of invoicing and lower accrual related to contract manufacturing scrap expenses.

Cash used by investing activities was $105.7 million, primarily related to cash used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $72.2 million, net cash outflows used for the purchase of available-for-sale investments of $26.6 million, and cash used for the acquisition of QuantaSol and Dyaptive of $12.5 million, offset by proceeds from sale of assets of $2.1 million. Since we continue to invest in new technology, laboratory equipment, and manufacturing capacity to support revenue growth across all three segments, significant investments were made during fiscal 2012 to increase our manufacturing capacity in Asia and the U.S. and to upgrade our information technology systems.

Our financing activities used cash of $1.9 million, related to repayments of the carrying amount and reacquisition of the equity component of our 1% Senior Convertible Notes in the amount of $13.2 million, payments made on financing obligations of $11.6 million primarily related to software licenses, and payments for issuance cost of our revolving credit facility of $1.9 million, offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan of $17.9 million and proceeds from financing obligation of $6.9 million related to the Eningen sale and leaseback transaction.

We had a combined balance of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash of $728.7 million at July 2, 2011, an increase of $128.6 million from July 3, 2010. Significant inflows included $205.3 million provided by operating activities and $38.1 million from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of stock under employee stock plans. Significant outflows included $116.7 million of cash used for purchases of property, plant and equipment. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $55.2 million in fiscal 2011, primarily due to the above-referenced items offset by purchases of available-for-sale investments in excess of sales and maturities of $70.0 million.

Operating activities provided $205.3 million of cash during fiscal 2011, resulting from our net income adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, and various gains and losses of $288.8 million, together with changes in operating assets and liabilities that used $83.5 million related primarily to an increase in trade receivable of $52.8 million due to the increase in sales, an increase in inventories of $38.6 million, an increase in other current and non-current assets of $23.7 million and a decrease in accrued expenses and other current and non-current liabilities of $17.2 million offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $44.1 and an increase of $9.7 million in accounts payable.

Cash used by investing activities was $188.3 million during fiscal 2011, primarily due to $116.7 million of cash used for purchases of property and equipment, $73.6 million for purchases of available-for-sale investments, net of maturities and sales of investments, offset by $3.6 million from the

sale of our Fabrinet investment. Since we continue to invest in new technology, lab equipment, and manufacturing capacity to support revenue growth across all three segments, significant investments were made during fiscal 2011 to increase our manufacturing capacity in China and the United States, to set up and /or improve facilities and purchase equipment to support our NSD business, and to upgrade our information technology systems.

Our financing activities provided cash of $31.1 million, primarily related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options and issuance of stock under employee stock plans of $38.1 million offset by the payments on financing obligations of $6.8 million.

We had a combined balance of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash of $600.1 million at July 3, 2010, a decrease of $95.4 million from June 27, 2009. Significant inflows included $119.2 million provided by operating activities, $14.9 million from the sale of our Fabrinet investment, and $9.6 million from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of stock under employee stock plans. Significant outflows included $207.3 million of cash used in acquisitions and $41.4 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $53.3 million in fiscal 2010, primarily due to the above-referenced items and sales and maturities of investments in excess of purchases of $181.5 million.

Operating activities provided $119.2 million of cash during fiscal 2010, resulting from our net loss adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, and various gains and losses, of $118.2 million, together with changes in operating assets and liabilities that provided $1.0 million related primarily to an increase in deferred revenue of $33.4 million, a decrease in inventory of $22.2 million, an increase in accounts payable of $20.8 million, a decrease in other current and non-current assets of $18.3 million and an increase in accrued payroll and related of $11.7 million, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $62.3 million due to the increase in sales, a decrease in accrued expenses and other current and non-current liabilities of $33.6 million and a decrease in income taxes payable of $9.5 million.

Cash used by investing activities was $65.4 million during fiscal 2010, primarily due to $207.3 million of cash used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired and $41.4 million used for purchases of property and equipment offset by $196.4 million from sales and maturities of investments in excess of purchases, including $14.9 million from the sale of our Fabrinet investment.

Our financing activities provided cash of $1.0 million, primarily related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options and issuance of stock under employee stock plans of $9.6 million offset by the payments on financing obligations of $8.6 million.

The following summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2012, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow over the next five years (in millions):

	Payments due by period

	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Contractual Obligations
Asset retirement obligations—expected cash payments	$	10.8	$	1.6	$	3.7	$	2.1	$	3.4
Short-term debt: (1)
1% Senior convertible notes		311.0		311.0		—		—		—
Estimated interest payments		2.7		2.7		—		—		—
Purchase obligations (2)		139.4		129.4		8.1		1.9		—
Operating lease obligations (2)		147.2		29.4		51.4		35.3		31.1
Software lease obligations (2)		3.8		1.9		1.9		—		—
Pension and postretirement benefit payments (3)		89.5		5.1		9.8		12.1		62.5

Total	$	704.4	$	481.1	$	74.9	$	51.4	$	97.0

As of June 30, 2012, operating lease obligations of $6.8 million in connection with our restructuring and related activities were accrued in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Operating lease obligations of $1.6 million were included in "Other current liabilities" and $5.2 million was accrued in "Other non-current liabilities."

Purchase obligations represent legally-binding commitments to purchase inventory and other commitments made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements. Of the $139.4 million of purchase obligations as of June 30, 2012, $50.6 million are related to inventory and the $88.8 million are non-inventory items.

As of June 30, 2012, our other non-current liabilities primarily relate to asset retirement obligations, pension and financing obligations which are presented in various lines in the preceding table.

As we are unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits including penalties and interest, the table does not include $26.8 million of such liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as such term is defined in rules promulgated by the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

As part of our strategy, we are committed to the ongoing evaluation of strategic opportunities and, where appropriate, the acquisition of additional products, technologies or businesses that are complementary to, or broaden the markets for our products. We believe we strengthened our business model by expanding our addressable market, customer base, and expertise, diversifying our product portfolio, and fortifying our core businesses through acquisition as well as through organic initiatives.

In May 2010, we completed the acquisition of NSD from Agilent, where we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of NSD, for a total purchase price consideration of approximately $163.8 million.

In July 2009, we completed the acquisition of the SNT business from Finisar, where we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of SNT for a total cash purchase price consideration of approximately $40.7 million.

Please refer to "Note 5. Mergers and Acquisitions" of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our stock option and Full Value Award program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain employees and align stockholder and employee interests. As of June 30, 2012, we have available for issuance 6.3 million shares of common stock for grant primarily under our Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2003 Plan") and 2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"). The exercise price for the options is equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Options generally become exercisable over a four-year or three-year period and, if not exercised, expire from five to ten years post grant date. The majority of our employees participate in our stock option program. "Full Value Awards" refer to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and Performance Shares that are granted with the exercise price equal to zero and are converted to shares immediately upon vesting. These Full Value Awards are performance based, time based, or a combination of both and are expected to vest over one to five years except with respect to awards with performance conditions, which are achieved on a different timeline. The fair value of the time based Full Value Awards is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of award. See "Note 15. Stock-Based Compensation" for more detail.

As a result of acquiring Acterna in August 2005 and NSD in May 2010, we sponsor pension plans for certain past and present employees in the United Kingdom ("UK") and Germany. We also are responsible for the nonpension postretirement benefit obligation of a previously acquired subsidiary. Most of these plans have been closed to new participants and no additional service costs are being accrued, except for the plans assumed during fiscal 2010 in connection with the NSD acquisition. The

UK plan is partially funded and the German plans, which were initially established as "pay-as-you-go" plans, are unfunded. The authoritative guidance of pension and other postretirement benefits requires the recognition of the funded status of the pension plans and nonpension postretirement benefit plans (retirement-related benefit plans) as an asset or a liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The authoritative guidance also requires the recognition of changes in that funded status in the year in which they occur through the Gains and (losses) not affecting retained earnings, net of tax, and the recognition of previously unrecognized gains/(losses), prior service costs/(credits) and transition assets as a component of Accumulated gains and (losses) not affecting retained earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity. The funded status of a retirement plan is the difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of its plan assets. The projected benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of all benefits attributed by the plan's benefit formula to employee service. At June 30, 2012, our pension plans were under funded by $88.4 million since the projected benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of its plan assets. Similarly, we had accrued $1.1 million related to our non-pension postretirement benefit plan.

We anticipate future annual outlays related to the German plans will approximate estimated future benefit payments. These future benefit payments have been estimated based on the same actuarial assumptions used to measure our projected benefit obligation and currently are forecasted to range between $3.9 million and $5.1 million per annum. In addition, we expect to contribute approximately $0.7 million to the UK plan during fiscal 2013.

During fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, we contributed GBP 0.3 million and GBP 0.2 million or approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, to our UK pension plan. These contributions allowed the Company to comply with regulatory funding requirements.

A key actuarial assumption in calculating the net periodic cost and the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") is the discount rate. Changes in the discount rate impact the interest cost component of the net periodic benefit cost calculation and PBO due to the fact that the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") is calculated on a net present value basis. Decreases in the discount rate will generally increase pre-tax cost, recognized expense and the PBO. Increases in the discount rate tend to have the opposite effect. We estimate a 50 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would cause a corresponding increase or decrease, respectively, in the PBO of approximately $7.0 million based upon June 30, 2012 data.

Our primary liquidity and capital spending requirements over the next 12 months will be the funding of our operating activities, capital expenditures, and making periodic interest payments on our outstanding debt. As of June 30, 2012 our expected commitments for capital expenditures totals approximately $10.6 million. We believe that our existing cash balances, investments and availability under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital spending requirements, including the repayment of the principal balance of $311.0 million outstanding under the 1% Senior Convertible Notes, which is expected to be paid no later than May 2013 based on the put and call provisions of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes. However, there are a number of factors that could positively or negatively impact our liquidity position, including:

We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts and other instruments, including option contracts, to hedge foreign currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily certain short-term intercompany receivables and payables. Our foreign exchange forward contracts and other instruments are accounted for as derivatives whereby the fair value of the contracts are reflected as other current assets or other current liabilities and the associated gains and losses are reflected in Interest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our hedging programs reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. The gains and losses on those derivatives are expected to be offset by re-measurement gains and losses on the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

The following table provides information about our foreign currency forward and option contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2012. The forward contracts, most with a term of less than 120 days, were transacted near month end; therefore, the fair value of the contracts is not significant.

*(in millions)*		Contract Amount (USD)

Canadian Dollar (contracts to buy CAD / sell USD)	CAD 42.6	$	41.4
Chinese Renmimbi (contracts to buy CNY / sell USD)	CNY 230.9		36.3
British Pound (contracts to sell GBP / buy USD)	GBP 2.2		3.4
Euro (contracts to buy EUR / sell USD)	EUR 8.0		10.0
Hong Kong Dollar (contracts to sell HKD / buy USD)	HKD 61.8		8.0
Singapore Dollar (contracts to sell SGD / buy USD)	SGD 42.5		33.3
Mexican Peso (contracts to buy MXN / sell USD)	MXN 56.1		4.1
Australian Dollar (contracts to sell AUD / buy USD)	AUD 7.0		7.0
Brazilian Real (contracts to sell BRL / buy USD)	BRL 2.2		1.0
Japanese Yen (contracts to sell JPY / buy USD)	JPY 648.2		8.1

Total notional amount of outstanding Foreign Exchange Contracts		$	152.6

The counterparties to these hedging transactions are creditworthy multinational banks. The risk of counterparty nonperformance associated with these contracts is not considered to be material. Notwithstanding our efforts to mitigate some foreign exchange risks, we do not hedge all of our foreign currency exposures, and there can be no assurances that our mitigating activities related to the exposures that we do hedge will adequately protect us against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.

We maintain an investment portfolio in a variety of financial instruments, including, but not limited to, U.S. government and agency bonds, corporate obligations, money market funds, asset-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities. The majority of these investments pay a fixed rate of interest. The securities in the investment portfolio are subject to market price risk due to changes in interest rates, perceived issuer creditworthiness, marketability, and other factors. These investments are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of Stockholders' equity.

Investments in both fixed-rate and floating-rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. The fair market values of our fixed-rate securities decline if interest rates rise, while

floating-rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may be less than expectations because of changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if we sell securities that have experienced a decline in market value because of changes in interest rates.

The following table (in millions) presents the hypothetical changes in fair value in the available-for-sale debt instruments held at June 30, 2012 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. These instruments are not leveraged or hedged and are held for purposes other than trading. Investments in money market funds and similar investment funds that seek to maintain a constant net asset value per unit of investment are not considered to be subject to market price risk and are not included in this sensitivity analysis. The modeling technique used measures the change in fair values arising from selected potential changes in interest rates. Market changes reflect immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points ("BPS"), 100 BPS, and 150 BPS over a 12-month horizon. Beginning fair values represent the market value, excluding accrued interest and dividends at June 30, 2012.

We seek to mitigate the credit risk of our portfolio of fixed-income securities by holding only high-quality, investment-grade obligations with effective maturities of 37 months or less. We also seek to mitigate marketability risk by holding only highly liquid securities with active secondary or resale markets. However, the investments may decline in value or marketability due to changes in perceived credit quality or changes in market conditions.

The fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes ("Convertible Notes") is subject to interest rate and market price risk due to the convertible feature of the notes and other factors. Generally the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair market value of the notes may also increase as the market price of JDSU stock rises and decrease as the market price of the stock falls. Interest rate and market value changes affect the fair market value of the notes but do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. Based on quoted market prices, as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes was approximately $307.3 million and $332.1 million, respectively. Changes in fair market value reflect changes in the market price of the notes. For additional information, see "Note 11. Debt and Letters of Credit".

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of JDS Uniphase Corporation and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance which applies to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables and to certain software arrangements on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified on or after July 4, 2010.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Net revenue	$	1,682.1		$	1,804.5		$	1,363.9
Cost of sales		913.5			956.7			766.2
Amortization of acquired technologies		58.6			56.9			50.6

Gross profit		710.0			790.9			547.1

Operating expenses:
Research and development		246.0			239.9			174.9
Selling, general and administrative		429.0			437.1			382.9
Amortization of other intangibles		28.9			32.2			27.8
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		22.7			1.5			(2.0	)
Restructuring and related charges		12.5			14.8			17.7

Total operating expenses		739.1			725.5			601.3

(Loss) income from operations		(29.1	)		65.4			(54.2	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		11.2			2.2			8.2
Interest expense		(27.3	)		(25.4	)		(24.3	)
Gain on sale of investments		1.6			3.4			13.1

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(43.6	)		45.6			(57.2	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		12.0			(26.0	)		2.5

(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax		(55.6	)		71.6			(59.7	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			(2.1	)

Net (loss) income	$	(55.6	)	$	71.6		$	(61.8	)

Basic net (loss) income per share from:
Continuing operations	$	(0.24	)	$	0.32		$	(0.27	)
Discontinued operations		—			—			(0.01	)

Net (loss) income	$	(0.24	)	$	0.32		$	(0.28	)

Diluted net (loss) income per share from:
Continuing operations	$	(0.24	)	$	0.31		$	(0.27	)
Discontinued operations		—			—			(0.01	)

Net (loss) income	$	(0.24	)	$	0.31		$	(0.28	)

Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic		230.0			224.4			218.9
Diluted		230.0			232.6			218.9

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and par value data)

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	401.1		$	395.4
Short-term investments		320.5			297.4
Restricted cash		31.1			35.9
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6)		305.8			334.0
Inventories, net		174.5			171.2
Prepayments and other current assets		77.2			70.2

Total current assets		1,310.2			1,304.1
Property, plant and equipment, net		252.9			248.9
Goodwill		68.7			67.4
Intangibles, net		178.8			275.4
Long-term investments		1.3			2.9
Other non-current assets		57.6			52.0

Total assets	$	1,869.5		$	1,950.7

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	117.6		$	145.4
Accrued payroll and related expenses		68.6			76.7
Income taxes payable		20.7			21.5
Deferred revenue		81.2			83.5
Accrued expenses		35.3			50.5
Short-term debt		292.8			—
Other current liabilities		37.9			41.0

Total current liabilities		654.1			418.6

Long-term debt		—			285.8
Other non-current liabilities		176.6			180.9
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 million shares authorized; 1 share at June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, issued and outstanding
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 billion shares authorized; 232 million shares at June 30, 2012 and 228 million shares at July 2, 2011, issued and outstanding		0.2			0.2
Additional paid-in capital		69,695.7			69,641.4
Accumulated deficit		(68,664.6	)		(68,609.0	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7.5			32.8

Total stockholders' equity		1,038.8			1,065.4

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,869.5		$	1,950.7

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(55.6	)	$	71.6		$	(61.8	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense		70.3			64.1			58.3
Asset retirement obligations and deferred rent expenses		(0.2	)		0.7			(7.1	)
Amortization of acquired technologies and other intangibles		87.5			89.1			78.4
Amortization of stock-based compensation		49.1			41.4			43.1
Amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of debt discount		20.9			19.5			17.9
Amortization of discount and premium on investments, net		3.8			3.5			2.9
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		22.7			1.5			(1.3	)
Gain on sale of investments, net		(1.6	)		(3.4	)		(13.1	)
Impairment of investments		0.3			0.2			1.4
Dividends received from long-term investments		—			—			(2.0	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns		2.2			0.6			1.5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisitions of businesses and dispositions of assets:
Accounts receivable		17.2			(52.8	)		(62.3	)
Inventories		(7.7	)		(38.6	)		22.2
Other current and non-current assets		(16.8	)		(23.7	)		18.3
Accounts payable		(29.2	)		9.7			20.8
Income taxes payable		(0.8	)		(4.0	)		(9.5	)
Deferred revenue, current and non-current		(5.1	)		44.1			33.4
Accrued payroll and related expenses		(25.3	)		(1.0	)		11.7
Accrued expenses and other current and non-current liabilities		(12.6	)		(17.2	)		(33.6	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		119.1			205.3			119.2

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of available-for-sale investments		(444.8	)		(355.3	)		(427.1	)
Maturities and sales of investments		418.2			285.3			623.5
Changes in restricted cash		3.5			(2.3	)		(21.1	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(12.5	)		—			(207.3	)
Purchases of long-term investments		—			—			(0.5	)
Proceeds received from divestiture of business, net of selling costs		—			—			2.0
Acquisition of property and equipment		(72.2	)		(116.7	)		(41.4	)
Proceeds from sale of assets, net of selling costs		2.1			0.7			1.0
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary		—			—			3.5
Dividends received from long-term investments		—			—			2.0

Net cash used in investing activities		(105.7	)		(188.3	)		(65.4	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of financing obligations		(11.6	)		(6.8	)		(8.6	)
Proceeds from financing obligations		6.9			—			—
Redemption of convertible debt		(13.2	)		(0.2	)		—
Payment of debt issuance costs		(1.9	)		—			—
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan		17.9			38.1			9.6

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1.9	)		31.1			1.0

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(5.8	)		7.1			(1.5	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		5.7			55.2			53.3
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		395.4			340.2			286.9

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	401.1		$	395.4		$	340.2

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	6.0		$	5.8		$	6.1
Cash paid for taxes		16.2			15.3			9.6
Non-cash transactions:
Purchase of infrastructure technology equipment and licenses		3.2			7.1			—

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in millions)

	Common Stock										Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit						Total
Balance at June 27, 2009		217.0		0.2		69,530.5			(68,618.8	)		22.6			934.5
Net loss		—		—		—			(61.8	)		—			(61.8	)
Change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments		—		—		—			—			6.2			6.2
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—			(4.6	)		(4.6	)
Defined benefit obligation, net of tax		—		—		—			—			(9.1	)		(9.1	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—			—						(69.3	)

Shares issued under employee stock plans, net of tax effects		4.1		—		0.4			—			—			0.4
Stock-based compensation		—		—		43.1			—			—			43.1

Balance at July 3, 2010		221.1		0.2		69,574.0			(68,680.6	)		15.1			908.7
Net income		—		—		—			71.6			—			71.6
Change in net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments		—		—		—			—			(2.3	)		(2.3	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—			12.1			12.1
Defined benefit obligation, net of tax		—		—		—			—			7.9			7.9

Comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—			89.3

Shares issued under employee stock plans, net of tax effects		6.5		—		25.7			—			—			25.7
Stock-based compensation		—		—		41.7			—			—			41.7

Balance at July 2, 2011		227.6		0.2		69,641.4			(68,609.0	)		32.8			1,065.4
Net loss		—		—		—			(55.6	)		—			(55.6	)
Change in net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments		—		—		—			—			(1.2	)		(1.2	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—			(9.4	)		(9.4	)
Defined benefit obligation, net of tax		—		—		—			—			(14.7	)		(14.7	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—			(80.9	)

Shares issued under employee stock plans, net of tax effects		4.3		—		5.0			—			—			5.0
Stock-based compensation		—		—		49.5			—			—			49.5
Reacquisition of equity component related to convertible debt repurchase		—		—		(0.2	)		—			—			(0.2	)

Balance at June 30, 2012		231.9	$	0.2	$	69,695.7		$	(68,664.6	)	$	7.5		$	1,038.8

Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

JDS Uniphase Corporation ("JDSU") is a leading provider of communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, cable operators, and network equipment manufacturers. JDSU technologies also enable broadband and optical innovation in many essential industries such as biomedical and environmental instrumentation, semiconductor processing, aerospace and defense, and brand protection. In addition, our optical coatings are used in visual display and decorative product differentiation applications.

The Company utilizes a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to June 30th. The Company's fiscal 2012 ended on June 30, 2012 and was a 52 week year. The Company's fiscal 2011 ended on July 2, 2011 was a 52 week year. The Company's fiscal 2010 ended on July 3, 2010 was a 53 week year.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the reported amount of net revenue and expenses and the disclosure of commitments and contingencies during the reporting periods. The Company bases estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions about the future that are believed to be reasonable based on available information. The Company's reported financial position or results of operations may be materially different under different conditions or when using different estimates and assumptions, particularly with respect to significant accounting policies. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to differ from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.

The Company considers highly liquid instruments such as treasury bills, commercial paper and money market instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

At June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the Company's short-term restricted cash balances were $31.1 million and $35.9 million, respectively, and the Company's long-term restricted cash balances were $6.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. They primarily include interest-bearing investments in

bank certificates of deposit and money market funds which act as collateral supporting the issuance of letters of credit and performance bonds for the benefit of third parties.

The Company's investments in debt securities and marketable equity securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale investments or trading securities and are recorded at fair value. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, net of tax, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Gains or losses on trading securities resulting from changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. The Company's short-term investments include securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are classified as current assets as they are highly liquid and available to support current operations.

The Company periodically reviews these investments for impairment. If a debt security's market value is below amortized cost and the Company either intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, the Company records an other-than-temporary impairment charge to investment income (loss) for the entire amount of the impairment. For the remaining debt securities, if an other-than-temporary impairment exists, the Company separates the other-than-temporary impairment into the portion of the loss related to credit factors, or the credit loss portion, and the portion of the loss that is not related to credit factors, or the noncredit loss portion. The credit loss portion is the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the Company's best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security. The noncredit loss portion is the residual amount of the other-than-temporary impairment. The credit loss portion is recorded as a charge to earnings (loss), and the noncredit loss portion is recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss).

The carrying amounts of certain of the Company's financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and deferred compensation liability, approximate fair value because of their short maturities. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. There is an established hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability.

Estimates of fair value of fixed-income securities are based on third party, market-based pricing sources which the Company believes to be reliable. These estimates represent the third parties' good faith opinion as to what a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a security in a current sale. For instruments that are not actively traded, estimates may be based on current treasury yields adjusted by an estimated market credit spread for the specific instrument. The use of different valuation methodologies or market assumptions could have a material impact on estimated fair value amounts. The fair market value of the Company's 1% Senior Convertible Notes fluctuates with interest rates and

with the market price of the stock, but does not affect the carrying value of the debt on the balance sheet. Refer to the Company's "Note 11. Debts and Letters of Credit" for more detail.

Inventory is valued at standard cost, which approximates actual cost computed on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of net realizable market value. The Company assesses the valuation on a quarterly basis and writes down the value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon estimates of future demand, including warranty requirements.

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: 10 to 50 years for building and improvements, 2 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, and 2 to 5 years for furniture, fixtures, software and office equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized by the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the term of the lease.

Costs related to software acquired, developed or modified solely to meet the Company's internal requirements and for which there are no substantive plans to market are capitalized in accordance with the authoritative guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. Only costs incurred after the preliminary planning stage of the project and after management has authorized and committed funds to the project are eligible for capitalization. Costs capitalized for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are included in Property, Plant and Equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired enterprise or assets over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company tests for impairment of goodwill on an annual basis in the fourth quarter and at any other time when events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. See "Note 8. Goodwill" for more detail.

Circumstances that could trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to: a significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors; an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; change in customer, target market and strategy; unanticipated competition; loss of key personnel; or the likelihood that a reporting unit or significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed.

In fiscal 2012, the FASB amended its guidance to simplify testing goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. If an entity determines that as a result of the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not (>50% likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the quantitative test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The Company elected to early adopt this accounting guidance for its annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Under the quantitative test, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations as "Impairment of goodwill". Measurement of the fair value of a reporting unit is based on one or more of the following fair value measures including: amounts at which the unit as a whole could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties; using present value techniques of estimated future cash flows; or using valuation techniques based on multiples of earnings or revenue, or a similar performance measure.

Intangible assets consist primarily of intellectual property acquired and purchased intangible assets. Purchased intangible assets primarily include acquired developed technologies (developed and core technology), proprietary know-how, trade secrets, trademarks and trade names, and customer base. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives which is the period during which expected cash flows support the fair value of such intangible assets.

The Company tests long-lived assets for recoverability, at the asset group level, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; or current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. See "Note 10. Loss (Gain) on Disposal and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" for more detail.

Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized in the Statement of Operations as "Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets" when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

The Company measures long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is determined using quoted market prices or the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.

The funded status of the Company's retirement-related benefit plans is recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation at fiscal year end, the measurement date. For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and for the nonpension postretirement benefit plan the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO"). The PBO represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement. The APBO represents the actuarial present value of postretirement benefits attributed to employee services already rendered. The fair value of plan assets represents the current market value of cumulative company contributions made to an irrevocable trust fund, held for the sole benefit of participants, which are invested by the trust fund. Unfunded or partially funded plans, with the benefit obligation exceeding the fair value of plan assets, are aggregated and recorded as a retirement and nonpension postretirement benefit obligation equal to this excess. The current portion of the retirement-related benefit obligation represents the actuarial present value of benefits payable in the next 12 months in excess of the fair value of plan assets, measured on a plan-by-plan basis. This liability is recorded in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The measurement of the benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost (income) is based on the Company's estimates and actuarial valuations provided by third-party actuaries which are approved by the Company's management. These valuations reflect the terms of the plans and use participant-specific information such as compensation, age and years of service, as well as certain assumptions, including estimates of discount rates, expected return on plan assets, rate of compensation increases, and

mortality rates. In estimating the expected return on plan assets, the Company considers historical returns on plan assets, adjusted for forward-looking considerations, inflation assumptions and the impact of the active management of the plan's invested assets. While the Company believes that these assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in the actual experience or significant changes in the assumptions that may be required under new legislation, or accounting pronouncements, or otherwise may materially affect the Company's pension and other post-retirement obligations and related future expense.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, investments and trade receivables. The Company's cash equivalents and short-term investments are held in safekeeping by large, creditworthy financial institutions. The Company invests its excess cash primarily in U.S. government and agency bonds, corporate securities, money market funds, asset-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities. The Company has established guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification and maturities that seek to maintain safety and liquidity.

The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally does not require collateral from its customers. These evaluations require significant judgment and are based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, current economic trends, historical payment, bad debt write-off experience, and financial review of the customer.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. When the Company becomes aware that a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations, the Company records a specific allowance to reflect the level of credit risk in the customer's outstanding receivable balance. In addition, the Company records additional allowances based on certain percentages of aged receivable balances. These percentages take into account a variety of factors including, but not limited to, current economic trends, historical payment and bad debt write-off experience.The Company classifies bad debt expenses as selling, general and administrative expenses.

The Company is not able to predict changes in the financial stability of its customers. Any material change in the financial status of any one or a group of customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. Although such losses have been within management's expectations to date, there can be no assurance that such allowances will continue to be adequate. The Company has significant trade receivables concentrated in the telecommunications industry. While the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts balance is based on historical loss experience along with anticipated economic trends, unanticipated financial instability in the telecommunications industry could lead to higher than anticipated losses. No one customer accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivables and revenue during the periods presented.

The Company generally uses a rolling twelve month forecast based on anticipated product orders, customer forecasts, product order history and backlog to determine its material requirements. Lead times for the parts and components that the Company orders vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier, contract terms and demand for a component at a given time. If the forecast does not meet actual demand, the Company may have excess or shortfalls of some materials and components, as well as excess inventory purchase commitments. The Company could experience

reduced or delayed product shipments or incur additional inventory write-downs and cancellation charges or penalties, which would increase costs and could have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations.

The Company conducts its business and sells its products directly to customers primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. In the normal course of business, the Company's financial position is routinely subject to market risks associated with foreign currency rate fluctuations due to balance sheet positions in foreign currencies. The Company evaluates foreign exchange risks and utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to reduce such risks. The change in fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts is recorded as income or loss in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Interest and other income (expense), net.

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in a local currency environment, where that local currency is the functional currency, are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments directly recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, within Shareholder's Equity. Income and expense accounts are translated at the prior month balance sheet exchange rates, which are deemed to approximate average monthly rate. Gains and losses from re-measurement of assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currencies are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Interest and other income (expense), net.

The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery does not occur until products have been shipped or services have been provided, risk of loss has transferred and in cases where formal acceptance is required, customer acceptance has been obtained or customer acceptance provisions have lapsed. In situations where a formal acceptance is required but the acceptance only relates to whether the product meets its published specifications, revenue is recognized upon shipment provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met. The sales price is not considered to be fixed or determinable until all contingencies related to the sale have been resolved.

The Company reduces revenue for rebates and other similar allowances. Revenue is recognized only if these estimates can be reliably determined. The Company's estimates are based on its historical results taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement.

In addition to the aforementioned general policies, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for multiple-element arrangements and for each major category of revenue.

In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that applies to arrangements with multiple deliverables. The guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition, on non-software arrangements, and allows the use of management's best estimate of selling price ("BESP") for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") or third-party evidence ("TPE") is unavailable. In addition, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which removes non-software components of tangible products and certain software components of tangible products from the scope of existing software revenue guidance, resulting in the recognition of revenue similar to that for other tangible products. The Company adopted these standards at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2011 on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified on or after July 3, 2010.

The Company establishes VSOE of selling price using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and, in remote circumstances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. TPE of selling price is established by evaluating similar and interchangeable competitor goods or services in sales to similarly situated customers. When VSOE or TPE are not available the Company then uses BESP. Generally, the Company is not able to determine TPE because its product strategy differs from that of others in our markets, and the extent of customization varies among comparable products or services from its peers. The Company establishes BESP using historical selling price trends and considering multiple factors including, but not limited to geographies, market conditions, competitive landscape, internal costs, gross margin objectives, and pricing practices. When determining BESP, the Company applies significant judgment in establishing pricing strategies and evaluating market conditions and product lifecycles.

The determination of BESP is made through consultation with and approval by the segment management. Segment management may modify or develop new pricing practices and strategies in the future. As these pricing strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which may result in changes in BESP. The aforementioned factors may result in a different allocation of revenue to the deliverables in multiple element arrangements from fiscal 2011, which may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for these elements but will not change the total revenue recognized for the arrangement.

To the extent that a deliverable(s) in a multiple-element arrangement is subject to specific guidance (for example, software that is subject to the authoritative guidance on software revenue recognition) the Company allocates the fair value of the units of accounting using relative selling price and that unit of accounting is accounted for in accordance with the specific guidance. Some product offerings include hardware that are integrated with or sold with software that delivers the functionality of the equipment. The Company believes that this equipment is not considered software related and would therefore be excluded from the scope of the authoritative guidance on software revenue recognition.

Revenue from services and system maintenance is typically recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Revenue from time and material contracts is recognized at the contractual rates as labor hours are delivered and direct expenses are incurred. Revenue related to extended warranty and product maintenance contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the delivery period. The Company also generate service revenue from hardware repairs and calibration which is recognized as revenue upon completion of the service.

The Company's software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and PCS. Generally the Company has established VSOE of fair value for PCS contracts based on the renewal rate or the bell curve methodology. Revenue from maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical support is recognized over the period such items are delivered. In multiple-element revenue arrangements that include software, software related and non software-related elements are accounted for in accordance with the following policies.

The Company provides reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. It estimates the costs of its warranty obligations based on its historical experience of known product failure rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise.

The Company records costs related to shipping and handling of revenue in cost of sales for all periods presented.

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs totaled $1.2 million, $1.4 million, and $1.5 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Costs related to research and development, which primarily consists of labor and benefits, supplies, facilities, consulting, and outside service fees, are charged to expense as incurred, except as follows: capitalization of material software development costs begins when a product's technological feasibility has been established in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility, which the Company has defined as the establishment of a working model, and which typically occurs when beta testing commences, and the general availability of such software has been very short. Accordingly, software development costs have been expensed as incurred.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options with service conditions and employee stock purchase plan awards ("ESPP") using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and a single option award approach. This option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the award's expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected stock price volatility assumption is determined using a combination of historical and implied volatility of the Company's common stock. The Company uses the Lattice model to estimate the fair value of certain performance based options with market conditions. The fair value of the time based Full Value Awards is based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of award. The Company uses the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value of certain performance based Full Value Awards with market conditions.

The Company estimates the expected forfeiture rate and only recognizes expense for those shares expected to vest. When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as future workforce reduction programs. Estimated forfeiture rates are trued-up to actual forfeiture as the equity awards vest. The total fair value of the equity awards, net of forfeiture, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period, except for performance based Full Value Awards and options with market conditions which are amortized based upon graded vesting method.

In accordance with the authoritative guidance on accounting for income taxes, the Company recognizes income taxes using an asset and liability approach. This approach requires the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in its consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of current and deferred taxes is based on provisions of the enacted tax law and the effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated.

The authoritative guidance provides for recognition of deferred tax assets if the realization of such deferred tax assets is more likely than not to occur. With the exception of certain international jurisdictions, the Company has determined that at this time it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets attributable to the remaining jurisdictions will not be realized, primarily due to uncertainties related to its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. Accordingly, the Company has established a valuation allowance for such deferred tax assets. If there is a change in the Company's ability to realize its deferred tax assets, then its tax provision may decrease in the period in which it determines that realization is more likely than not.

The authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial statements and prescribes the recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, it provides guidance on recognition, classification, and disclosure of tax positions. The Company is subject to income tax audits by the respective tax authorities in all of the jurisdictions in which it operates. The determination of tax liabilities in each of these jurisdictions requires the interpretation and application of complex and sometimes uncertain tax laws and regulations. The Company recognizes liabilities based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional tax liabilities are more likely than not. If the Company ultimately determines that the payment of such a liability is not necessary, then it reverses the liability and recognizes a tax benefit during the period in which the determination is made that the liability is no longer necessary.

The recognition and measurement of current taxes payable or refundable and deferred tax assets and liabilities requires that the Company make certain estimates and judgments. Changes to these estimates or a change in judgment may have a material impact on the Company's tax provision in a future period.

In accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities, generally costs associated with restructuring activities are recognized when they are incurred. However, in the case of leases, the expense is estimated and accrued when the property is vacated. Given the significance of, and the timing of the execution of such activities, this process is complex and involves periodic reassessments of estimates made from the time the property was vacated, including evaluating real estate market conditions for expected vacancy periods and sub-lease income. Additionally, a liability for post-employment benefits for workforce reductions related to restructuring activities is recorded when payment is probable, the amount is reasonably estimable, and the obligation relates to rights that have vested or accumulated. The Company continually evaluates the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under its restructuring initiatives. Although the Company believes that these

estimates accurately reflect the costs of its restructuring plans, actual results may differ, thereby requiring the Company to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions.

The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as its ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information available to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

Asset retirement obligations ("ARO") are legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. These liabilities are initially recorded at fair value and the related asset retirement costs are capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related assets by the same amount as the liability. Asset retirement costs are subsequently depreciated over the useful lives of the related assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, the Company records period-to-period changes in the ARO liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows. The Company derecognizes ARO liabilities when the related obligations are settled. At June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, $1.6 million and $0.9 million of ARO was included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in "Other current liabilities" and the remainder of $9.2 million and $9.4 million was included in "Other non-current liabilities".

applied retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance will expand existing disclosure requirements but will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) income per share (in millions, except per share data):

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011		July 3, 2010
Numerator:
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(55.6	)	$	71.6	$	(59.7	)
(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—		(2.1	)

Net (loss) income	$	(55.6	)	$	71.6	$	(61.8	)

Denominator:
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
Basic		230.0			224.4		218.9
Effect of dilutive securities from stock-based benefit plans		—			8.2		—

Diluted		230.0			232.6		218.9

(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax—basic	$	(0.24	)	$	0.32	$	(0.27	)
(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax—basic		—			—		(0.01	)

Net (loss) income—basic	$	(0.24	)	$	0.32	$	(0.28	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax—diluted	$	(0.24	)	$	0.31	$	(0.27	)
(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax—diluted		—			—		(0.01	)

Net (loss) income—diluted	$	(0.24	)	$	0.31	$	(0.28	)

The following table sets forth the weighted-average potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of the diluted (loss) income per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in millions):

The 1% convertible notes are not included in the table above. The par amount of convertible notes is payable in cash equal to the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and then the "in-the-money" conversion benefit feature at the conversion price above $30.30 per share is payable in shares of the Company's common stock or cash. See "Note 11. Debts and Letters of Credit" for more details.

The Company's accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments, foreign currency translation adjustments, and defined benefit obligation. At June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, balances for the components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows (in millions):

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows (in millions):

In January 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Dyaptive Systems Inc. ("Dyaptive") based in Vancouver, Canada. The Company acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of Dyaptive for a total purchase price of CAD 14.9 million (approximately USD 14.8 million) in cash, including a holdback payment of CAD 2.0 million (approximately USD 2.0 million), which is reserved for potential breach of representations and warranties, due on December 14, 2012.

Dyaptive is a provider of wireless laboratory test tools for base station and network load simulators. By acquiring Dyaptive, the Company expects to strengthen its laboratory product portfolio and to offer field service and production test tools that are complementary to its current products. Dyaptive is included in the Company's Communications Test and Measurement ("CommTest") segment.

The Company accounted for the transaction in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value (in millions):

The fair value of acquired developed technology and customer relationships was determined based on an income approach using the discounted cash flow method. The acquired developed technology and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of four years. Acquired intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The goodwill arising from this acquisition is primarily attributed to sales of future products and services and the assembled workforce of Dyaptive. Goodwill is not being amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with authoritative guidance. Goodwill has been assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes.

Dyaptive's results of operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to prior period financial statements.

In July 2011, the Company purchased critical product design, patented intellectual technology, and other assets from QuantaSol, a concentrated photovoltaic ("CPV") provider, for a total cash purchase

price consideration of $3.7 million. The purchased assets are included in the Company's Communications and Commercial Optical Products ("CCOP") segment.

The Company accounted for the transaction in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The acquired intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The $3.7 million purchase price was allocated primarily to developed technology and is being amortized over an estimated useful life of four years.

In May 2010, the Company purchased NSD from Agilent Technologies, Inc. for a total purchase price consideration of approximately $163.8 million in cash. NSD is included in the Company's CommTest segment.

The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired at fair value (in millions):

The acquired intangible assets, except for in-process research and development ("IPR&D"), are being amortized over their estimated useful lives, which are presented in the table below :

NSD's results of operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition. The financial information in the table below summarizes the results of operations of the Company and NSD, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies have been combined as of the beginning of each of the years presented:

In July 2009, the Company purchased the Storage Network Tools business ("SNT") from Finisar for approximately $40.7 million in cash. SNT is included in JDSU's Communications Test and Measurement segment.

The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired at fair value (in millions):

The acquired intangible assets, except for IPR&D, are being amortized over their estimated useful lives, which are presented in the table below:

The components of account receivable reserves and allowances were as follows (in millions):

The activities and balances for allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows (in millions):

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, and include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. The components of inventories, net were as follows (in millions):

The components of property, plant and equipment, net were as follows (in millions):

At June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, net included $14.6 million and $17.3 million in land and buildings, respectively, related to the Santa Rosa sale and leaseback transactions accounted for under the financing method. At June 30, 2012, property, plant and equipment, net included $6.8 million in land and buildings related to the Eningen site sale and leaseback transactions accounted for under the financing method. See "Note 18. Commitments and Contingencies" for more detail.

During fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded $70.3 million, $64.1 million, and $58.3 million, respectively, of depreciation expense.

During fiscal 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded a loss on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets of $22.7 million and $1.5 million , respectively. During fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a gain on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets of $2.0 million. See "Note 10. Loss (Gain) on Disposal and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" for more detail.

The components of prepayments and other current assets were as follows (in millions):

The components of other non-current liabilities were as follows (in millions):

The components of interest and other income (expense), net were as follows (in millions):

The Company's investments in marketable debt and equity securities were primarily classified as available-for-sale investments.

At June 30, 2012 the Company's available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

The Company generally classifies debt securities as cash equivalents, short-term investments, or long-term investments based on the stated maturities, however certain securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are highly liquid and available to support current operations are classified as current assets. As of June 30, 2012, of the total estimated fair value, $21.3 million was classified as cash equivalents, $315.9 million was classified as short-term investments, and $1.3 million was classified as long-term investments.

In addition to the amounts presented above, at June 30, 2012, the Company's short-term investments classified as trading securities, related to the deferred compensation plan, were $4.6 million, of which $0.9 million were invested in debt securities, $0.5 million were invested in money market instruments and funds and $3.2 million were invested in equity securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized in Interest and other income (expense), net.

During fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, on asset backed securities.

At June 30, 2012, the Company's gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, aggregated by type of investment instrument were as follows (in millions):

At June 30, 2012, contractual maturities of the Company's debt securities classified as available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

At July 2, 2011, the Company's available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

The Company generally classifies debt securities as cash equivalents, short-term investments, or long-term investments based on the stated maturities, however certain securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are highly liquid and available to support current operations are classified as current assets. As of July 2, 2011, of the total estimated fair value, $23.7 million was classified as cash equivalents, $291.7 million was classified as short-term investments, and $2.9 million was classified as long-term investments.

In addition to the amounts presented above, at July 2, 2011, the Company's short-term investments classified as trading securities, related to the deferred compensation plan, were $5.7 million, of which $0.9 million were invested in debt securities, $0.5 million were invested in money market instruments and funds and $4.3 million were invested in equity securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized in interest and other income (expense), net.

At July 2, 2011, the Company's gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, aggregated by type of investment instrument were as follows (in millions):

As of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the Company did not hold any marketable equity securities that are classified as available-for-sale securities.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company sold the remaining 393,150 shares of common stock in Fabrinet at $10.0 per share and recognized a gain of $3.3 million, the difference between the net proceeds of $3.7 million and the cost of $0.4 million.

During fiscal 2010, the Company recorded net gains on sale of investments of $13.1 million, primarily due to the sale of 1,606,850 shares of common stock in Fabrinet, in connection with their initial public offering, receiving net proceeds of $14.9 million or $9.30 per share, after deduction of 7% of underwriting fees, on June 30, 2010. These shares of common stock had a carrying value of $1.00 per share. As of July 3, 2010, the Company owned 393,150 shares of Fabrinet's common stock that was previously reported as a long-term investment at a carrying cost of $1.00 per share. Since the Company subsequently sold the remaining shares in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company reported the investment in Fabrinet as a short-term available-for-sale investment held at a fair value of $10.76 per share as of July 3, 2010 and recorded an unrealized gain of approximately $3.8 million in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Assets measured at fair value at June 30, 2012 are summarized below (in millions):

			Fair value measurement as of June 30, 2012

	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Assets:
Debt available-for-sale securities
U.S. treasuries	$	52.0	$	52.0	$	—
Agencies
U.S.		65.3		—		65.3
Foreign		3.3		—		3.3
Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments		11.4		—		11.4
Asset-backed securities		21.7		—		21.7
Corporate securities		184.8		—		184.8

Total debt available-for-sale securities		338.5		52.0		286.5
Money market instruments and funds		350.7		350.7		—
Trading securities		4.6		4.6		—

Total assets (1)	$	693.8	$	407.3	$	286.5

The Company measures its cash equivalents, marketable securities, and foreign currency forward contracts at fair value, which does not materially differ from the carrying values of these instruments in the financial statements.

The Company's cash and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy based on quoted prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

There was no transfer between level 1 and level 2 for fiscal year 2012 and 2011.

As of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the Company did not hold any Level 3 investment securities.

The forward contracts, most with a term of less than 120 days, were transacted near month end; therefore, the fair value of the contracts as of both June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, is not significant. The change in the fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts is recorded as income or loss in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Interest and other income (expense), net.

The following table presents the changes in goodwill allocated to the reportable segments (in millions):

The following table presents gross goodwill and accumulated impairment balances for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, and July 2, 2011 (in millions):

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. No triggering events were noted during the interim periods of fiscal 2012, 2011 or 2010 and thus, the Company reviewed goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter. The Company determined that, based on its cash flow structure, organizational structure and the financial information that is provided to and reviewed by management for the periods ended fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, its reporting units are: CommTest, CCOP, COPG, ASG, and Flex.

In September 2011, the FASB amended its guidance to simplify testing goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company elected to early adopt this accounting guidance during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Per the qualitative assessment, the Company concluded that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units that currently have goodwill recorded exceeded its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Company considered the impact of these key factors: change in industry and competitive environment, market capitalization, earnings multiples, budgeted-to-actual operating performance from prior year, and consolidated company stock price and performance etc. As such, it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test at this time and hence the Company recorded no impairment charge in accordance with its annual impairment test.

Under the first step of the authoritative guidance for impairment testing, the fair value of the reporting units was determined based on a combination of the income approach, which estimates the fair value based on the future discounted cash flows, and the market approach, which estimates the fair value based on comparable market prices. Based on the first step of the analysis, the Company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit is significantly above its carrying amount. As such, the Company was not required to perform the second step analysis on any reporting unit to determine the amount of the impairment loss. The Company recorded no impairment charge in accordance with its annual impairment test.

The following tables present details of the Company's acquired developed technology and other intangibles (in millions):

Other intangibles consists of patents, trademarks, trade names, proprietary know-how and trade secrets, customer and secure government relationships, customer backlog, and non-competition agreements. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company completed the $9.8 million IPR&D project related to the NSD business acquisition of fiscal 2010 and transferred it from indefinite life intangible assets to acquired developed technology and began amortizing the developed technology intangible asset over its useful life of five years.

During fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded $18.8 million, zero and zero, respectively, of impairments in the carrying value of acquired developed technology and other intangibles as a result of impairment analyses performed in accordance with authoritative guidance. The impairment is presented in the "Accumulated amortization" line in the preceding table. See "Note 10. Loss (Gain) on Disposal and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" for more detail.

During fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded $87.5 million, $89.1 million, and $78.4 million, respectively, of amortization related to acquired developed technology and other intangibles. The following table presents details of the Company's amortization (in millions):

Based on the carrying amount of other intangibles as of June 30, 2012, and assuming no future impairment of the underlying assets, the estimated future amortization is as follows (in millions):

During fiscal 2012 and 2011, we recorded $22.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively of loss on disposal and impairments of our long-lived assets in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance regarding disposal or impairment of long-lived assets. During fiscal 2010, we recorded $2.0 million of gain on disposal and impairment of our long-lived assets in accordance with the same guidance. The carrying values of assets held for sale at June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011 were both zero. The following table summarizes the components of the impairments and gain/losses of long-lived assets (in millions):

were less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group, and accordingly the long-lived asset group related to holograms business is not recoverable. The Company recorded the long-lived asset impairment charge of $18.8 million related to the intangibles and $2.7 million related to plant, property and equipment based on the discounted cash-flows under various scenarios. The entire impairment amount was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long lived assets.

During fiscal 2012, the Company recorded a loss of $1.8 million on the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to accelerated depreciation in facilities at Everbright, Camerillo and Fort Collins sites.

During fiscal 2012, the Company recorded a gain of $0.7 million on the sale of asset primarily related to sale of certain building and land in Eningen, Germany under a sale and leaseback arrangement. See note 18. Commitments and Contingencies for details.

During fiscal 2011, the Company recorded a loss of $1.6 million on the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to accelerated depreciation on facilities at Ottawa and Fort Collins.

During fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $1.9 million for the disposal of assets other than sale primarily related to cash receipts from Sanmina-SCI on leasehold improvements related to the sale of certain assets and liabilities related to manufacturing operations in Shenzhen, China in fiscal 2009 that had previously been written-off, partially offset by accelerated depreciation.

The following table presents details of the Company's debt as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011 (in millions):

The Company expects to repay all or part of the principal balance of $311.0 million outstanding under the 1% Senior Convertible Notes no later than May 2013. Therefore, 1% senior Convertible Notes was classified as short term debt as of June 30, 2012.

On June 5, 2006, the Company completed an offering of $425 million aggregate principal amount of 1% Senior Convertible Notes due 2026. Proceeds from the notes amounted to $415.9 million after issuance costs. The notes bear interest at a rate of 1.00% per year and are convertible into a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $30.30 per share. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on November 15, 2006. The notes mature on May 15, 2026.

The holders of the notes may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of the notes on each of May 15, 2013, May 15, 2016 and May 15, 2021 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. In addition, upon certain fundamental changes, holders may require the Company to purchase for cash the notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. The Company may not redeem the notes before May 20, 2013. On or after that date, the Company may redeem all or part of the notes for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Upon adoption of the authoritative guidance which applies to the 1% Senior Convertible Notes, the Company calculated the carrying value of the liability component at issuance as the present value of its cash flows using a discount rate of 8.1%, based on the 7-year swap rate plus credit spread as of the issuance date. The credit spread for JDSU is based on the historical average "yield to worst" rate for BB-rated issuers. The carrying value of the liability component was determined to be $266.5 million. The equity component, or debt discount, of the notes was determined to be $158.5 million. The debt discount is being amortized using the effective interest rate of 8.1% over the period from issuance date through May 15, 2013 as a non-cash charge to interest expense. As of June 30, 2012, the remaining term of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes is less than one year and accordingly is classified as short-term debt.

The $9.1 million of costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the notes were capitalized and bifurcated into debt issuance cost of $5.7 million and equity issuance cost of $3.4 million. The debt issuance cost is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method from issuance date through May 15, 2013.

During fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased $14.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes for $13.9 million in cash. In connection with the repurchase, a loss of $0.7 million was recognized in interest and other income (loss), net in compliance with the authoritative guidance. After giving effect to the repurchase, the total amount of 1% Senior Convertible Notes outstanding as of June 30, 2012 was $292.8 million.

As of June 30, 2012, the unamortized portion of the debt issuance cost related to the notes is $0.7 million and is included in Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the carrying amounts of the liability and equity components (in millions):

Based on quoted market prices, as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes was approximately $307.3 million and $332.1 million, respectively. Changes in fair market value reflect the change in the market price of the notes. The 1% Senior Convertible Notes are classified within level 2 as they are not actively traded in markets; and the bond parity derivatives related to the convertible notes are classified within level 1 since the quoted market price for identical instrument are available in active markets. The fair value of the bond parity derivatives is approximately zero as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011.

The following table presents the effective interest rate and the interest expense for the contractual interest and the accretion of debt discount (in millions, except for the effective interest rate):

The increase of the debt related to the interest accretion is treated as a non-cash transaction and the repayment of the carrying amount of the debt is classified as a financing activity within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

On January 20, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement (the "Credit Agreement") for a five-year $250.0 million revolving credit facility that matures in January 2017. At the Company's option, the principal amount available under the facility may be increased by up to an additional $100 million. Borrowings under the credit facility bear an annual interest rate, at the Company's option, equal to either (i) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the applicable margin for base rate loans, which ranges between 0.75% and 2.00%, based on the Company's leverage ratio or (ii) the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the applicable margin for Eurocurrency loans, which ranges between 1.75% and 3.00%, based on the Company's leverage ratio. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee on the unutilized portion of the facility of between 0.25% and 0.50%, based on the Company's leverage ratio.

Obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company ("the Guarantors"). The Company's obligations under the Credit Agreement have been secured by a pledge of substantially all assets of the Company and the Guarantors (subject to certain exclusions), full pledges of equity interests in certain domestic subsidiaries and partial pledges of equity interests in certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company has also agreed to maintain at least $200 million of cash and permitted investments in accounts which are subject to a control agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, which include, among other things, restrictions on their ability to (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) make certain investments, (iii) acquire other entities, (iv) dispose of assets, (v) incur liens and (vi) make certain payments including those related to dividends or repurchase of equity. The Credit Agreement also contains financial maintenance covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and the requirement to maintain minimum liquidity.

The $1.9 million of costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the revolving credit facility were capitalized and are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over five years based on the contractual term of the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2012, the unamortized portion of debt issuance cost related to the revolving credit facility was $1.7 million, and was included in Other current assets and Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

There was no drawdown under the facility during fiscal 2012, and the outstanding balance as of June 30,2012 is zero.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had 15 standby letters of credit totalling $34.9 million.

The Company continues to take advantage of opportunities to further reduce costs through targeted restructuring events intended to consolidate its operations and rationalize the manufacturing of its products based on core competencies and cost efficiencies, together with the need to align the business in response to the market conditions. As of June 30, 2012, the Company's total restructuring accrual was $12.6 million. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the

Company recorded $12.5 million and $14.8 million in restructuring and related charges, respectively. The Company's restructuring charges can include severance and benefit costs to eliminate a specified number of positions, facilities and equipment costs to vacate facilities and consolidate operations, and lease termination costs. The timing of associated cash payments is dependent upon the type of restructuring charge and can extend over multiple periods.

The adjustments to the accrued restructuring expenses related to all of the Company's restructuring plans described below for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 were as follows:

	Balance July 2, 2011		Fiscal Year 2012 Charges			Cash Settlements			Non-cash Settlements and Other Adjustments			Balance June 30, 2012

CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan	$	—	$	4.3		$	(0.4	)	$	—		$	3.9
AOT Business Consolidation Plan		—		0.8			—			—			0.8
CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan (Workforce Reduction)		—		2.8			(0.3	)		—			2.5
CommTest Solutions Business Restructuring Plan (Workforce Reduction)		—		1.7			(1.5	)		—			0.2
CommTest Germantown Tower Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)		—		0.6			(0.1	)		—			0.5
CCOP Fiscal Q1 2012 Plan (Workforce Reduction)		—		1.1			(1.1	)		—			—
CommTest Sales Rebalancing Restructuring Plan (Workforce Reduction)		4.5		(0.9	)		(3.6	)		—			—
CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan
Workforce Reduction	$	3.6	$	(0.3	)	$	(3.2	)	$	—		$	0.1
Facilities and Equipment		—		0.7			(0.7	)		—			—
Lease Costs		—		1.0			(0.2	)		0.1			0.9

Total CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan	$	3.6	$	1.4		$	(4.1	)	$	0.1		$	1.0
CommTest US Manufacturing Outsourcing Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)		1.8		(0.1	)		(0.8	)		0.2			1.1
CommTest Germany Restructuring Plan (Workforce Reduction)		3.3		0.7			(1.0	)		(0.6	)		2.4
Other plans
Workforce Reduction		1.0		—			(0.8	)		(0.1	)		0.1
Facilities and Equipment		—		0.9			(0.9	)		—			—
Lease Costs		1.2		(0.8	)		(0.3	)		—			0.1

Total other plans	$	2.2	$	0.1		$	(2.0	)	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2

Total	$	15.4	$	12.5		$	(14.9	)	$	(0.4	)	$	12.6

Ottawa Lease Exit Costs		5.9		0.1			(1.2	)		(0.2	)		4.6

As of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, the Company included the long-term portion of the restructuring liability of $4.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively, as "restructuring accrual", a

component under other non-current liabilities, and the short-term portion as "restructuring accrual", a component under other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company had also previously recorded lease exit charges, net of assumed sub-lease income in prior fiscal years related to the Ottawa facility that was included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income is $4.6 million and $5.9 million as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011 respectively. The Company included the long-term portion of the contract obligations of $3.7 million and $5.0 million in other non-current liabilities as of each period end, and the short-term portion in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The payments related to these lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan which focuses on three areas in the CommTest segment: (1) moving the repair organization to a repair outsourcing partner; (2) reorganizing the R&D global team because of portfolio prioritization primarily in the CEM ("Customer Experience Management") business to consolidate key platforms from several sites to single site; (3) reorganizing Global Sales to focus on strategic software growth, wireless growth, and to ensure sales account resources on the most critical global growth accounts. This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected 117 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions. The employees being affected are located in America, Europe and Asia. As a result, a restructuring charge of $4.3 million was recorded towards severance and employee benefits. As of June 30, 2012, 5 of these employees have been terminated. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2013.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan to consolidate and re-align the various business units within its AOT segment to improve synergies. This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected 17 employees primarily in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions. The employees being affected are located in the United States. As a result, a restructuring charge of $0.8 million was recorded towards severance and employee benefits. As of June 30, 2012, none of these employees have been terminated. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan to continue to consolidate its manufacturing support operations in the CommTest segment, by reducing the number of contract manufacturer locations worldwide and moving most of them to lower cost regions such as Mexico and China. This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected 80 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions. The employees being affected are located in North America, Europe and Asia. As a result, a restructuring charge of $2.8 million was recorded towards severance and employee benefits. As of June 30, 2012, 2

employees have been terminated. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2013.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan to re-organize the Customer Experience Management business of the CommTest segment to improve business efficiencies with greater focus on the mobility and video software test business, and to re-organize CommTest's global operations to reduce costs by moving towards an outsourcing model. Approximately 57 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. The employees being affected are located in North America, Europe and Asia. As a result, a restructuring charge of $1.7 million was recorded towards severance and employee benefits. As of June 30, 2012, 55 employees have been terminated. Payments related to the remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan to consolidate workspace in Germantown, Maryland, primarily used by the CommTest segment. As of December 31, 2011, the Company exited the workspace in Germantown under the plan. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of June 30, 2012 was $0.5 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2019.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, management approved a plan to restructure certain CCOP segment functions and responsibilities to drive efficiency and segment profitability in light of current economic conditions. 40 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. As a result, a restructuring charge of $1.1 million was recorded towards severance and employee benefits. As of December 31, 2011, all the employees under the plan have been terminated. The employees affected were located in North America and Asia. Payments related to severance and benefits were paid by October 2011.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, management approved a plan to re-organize the sales organization and one of the product portfolios in the CommTest segment to focus efforts on higher growth technologies and regions. This re-organization was designed to improve the effectiveness of the segment's sales organization and re-align the research and development projects towards the overall growth strategy of the segment. Approximately 87 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. As of June 30, 2012, all employees have been terminated. The employees being affected are located in America, Europe and Asia. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, the Company adjusted down the accrual by $0.9 million, due to management's decision to re-locate employees who were originally included in the workforce reduction plan in order to realize co-location efficiencies. Payments related to remaining the severance and benefits accrual were paid by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, management approved a plan for the CommTest segment to focus on higher growth products and services in lower cost markets with higher growth potential. This resulted in termination of employment, exit of three facilities and manufacturing transfer costs. Approximately 127 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. As of June 30, 2012, all employees have been terminated. The employees being affected are located in North America, Europe and Asia. Payments related to the remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of June 30, 2012 was $0.9 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2016.

During fiscal 2010, the Company exited facilities in the states of Maryland and Indiana as part of its restructuring plan in the CommTest segment to reduce and/or consolidate manufacturing locations. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of June 30, 2012 was $1.1 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015 for its facilities in the state of Indiana. Payments related the lease costs for its facilities in the state of Maryland were paid out as of December 31, 2011.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company implemented a restructuring plan for its site in Germany in its CommTest segment to significantly change the overall cost structure and complexity of the site, and to align the cost of the site more with market demand. 77 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. As of June 30, 2012, 65 employees have been terminated. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

Other plans account for a minor portion of total restructuring accrual, with minimal or no revisions recorded.

The Company's income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following (in millions):

The Company's income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in millions):

The federal deferred tax expense primarily relates to the amortization of tax deductible goodwill. The foreign current expense primarily relates to the Company's profitable operations in certain foreign jurisdictions. The foreign deferred tax benefit primarily relates to the amortization of foreign intangibles.

There was no material tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, July 2, 2011, and July 3, 2010.

A reconciliation of the Company's income tax expense (benefit) at the federal statutory rate to the income tax expense (benefit) at the effective tax rate is as follows (in millions):

The components of the Company's net deferred taxes consisted of the following (in millions):

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Gross deferred tax assets:
Tax credit carryforwards	$	148.0		$	140.1		$	158.4
Net operating loss carryforwards		2,288.2			2,273.4			2,334.1
Inventories		15.3			15.5			18.1
Accruals and reserves		41.0			43.6			27.1
Other		102.3			102.1			92.5
Acquisition-related items		127.2			155.4			186.3

Gross deferred tax assets		2,722.0			2,730.1			2,816.5
Valuation allowance		(2,637.0	)		(2,611.2	)		(2,702.6	)

Deferred tax assets		85.0			118.9			113.9

Gross deferred tax liabilities:
Acquisition-related items		(35.2	)		(65.1	)		(86.3	)
Undistributed foreign earnings		(2.9	)		(2.3	)		(4.0	)
Other		(12.3	)		(20.4	)		(29.2	)

Deferred tax liabilities		(50.4	)		(87.8	)		(119.5	)

Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	$	34.6		$	31.1		$	(5.6	)

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had federal, state and foreign tax net operating loss carryforwards of $5,876.5 million, $2,223.8 million and $867.3 million, respectively, and federal, state and foreign research and other tax credit carryforwards of $74.5 million, $37.3 million and $47.4 million, respectively. Of this amount, approximately $81.5 million when realized will be credited to additional paid-in capital. The Company's policy is to account for the utilization of tax attributes under a with-and-without approach. The tax net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates through 2032 if not utilized. Utilization of the tax net operating losses may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state and foreign provisions. Loss carryforward limitations may result in the expiration or reduced utilization of a portion of the Company's net operating losses.

U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes associated with the repatriation of earnings of foreign subsidiaries have not been provided on $186.1 million of undistributed earnings for certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely outside of the United States. The Company estimates that an additional $8.2 million of U.S. income or foreign withholding taxes would have to be provided if these earnings were repatriated back to the U.S.

The valuation allowance increased by $25.8 million in fiscal 2012, decreased by $91.4 million in fiscal 2011, and increased by $26.0 million in fiscal 2010. The increase during fiscal 2012 was primarily due to increases in domestic and foreign tax net operating losses sustained during the year, offset by utilization and expiration of domestic and foreign net operating losses. The decrease during fiscal 2011 was primarily due to release of the deferred tax valuation allowance for a non-US jurisdiction and the utilization and expiration of domestic and foreign net operating losses. The increase during fiscal 2010

was primarily due to increases in domestic and foreign tax net operating losses sustained during the year, offset by utilization of foreign net operating losses.

Approximately $514.7 million of the valuation allowance as of June 30, 2012 was attributable to pre-fiscal 2006 windfall stock option deductions, the benefit of which will be credited to paid-in-capital if and when realized through a reduction in income tax payable. Beginning with fiscal 2006, the Company began to track the windfall stock option deductions off-balance sheet. If and when realized, the tax benefit associated with those deductions will be credited to additional paid-in-capital.

During fiscal 2011, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets of a subsidiary in a non-US jurisdiction (the "foreign subsidiary") will be realized after considering all positive and negative evidence. Prior to fiscal 2011, because of significant negative evidence including principally continued economic uncertainty in the industry in the foreign jurisdiction specifically and reorganization activity that would adversely affect the foreign subsidiary's future operations and profit levels on a continuing basis in future years, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would not be realized. However, during fiscal 2011, the foreign subsidiary had realized cumulative pre-tax income for the preceding three years and as a result of the finalization of the Company's reorganization plans during the year had forecasted future pre-tax income sufficient to realize a portion of its deferred tax assets prior to the expiration of its operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Upon considering the relative impact of all evidence, both negative and positive, and the weight accorded to each, the Company concluded that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets of the foreign subsidiary would be realized and that such portion of the valuation allowance should be released.

Accordingly, a deferred tax valuation allowance release of $34.9 million was recorded as an income tax benefit during the year. The Company's conclusion that it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred tax assets will be realized is strongly influenced by its forecast of future taxable income. The Company believes its forecast of future taxable income is reasonable; however, it is inherently uncertain. Therefore, if the Company realizes materially less future taxable income than forecasted or has material unforeseen losses, then its ability to generate sufficient income necessary to realize a portion of the deferred tax assets may be reduced and an additional charge to increase the valuation allowance may be recorded. Conversely, if the Company generates taxable income materially greater than what was forecasted, then a further release of valuation allowance may be possible.

A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits between June 27, 2009 through June 30, 2012 is as follows (in millions):


Balance at June 27, 2009		69.3
Additions based on the tax positions related to the current year		1.1
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations		(7.3	)
Additions due to foreign currency rate fluctuation		2.7
Reductions based on the tax positions related to the prior year		(0.6	)

Balance at July 3, 2010		65.2
Additions based on the tax positions related to the current year		3.6
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations		(3.6	)
Reductions due to foreign currency rate fluctuation		(0.5	)
Reductions based on the tax positions related to the prior year		(0.7	)

Balance at July 2, 2011		64.0
Additions based on the tax positions related to the current year		3.4
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations or for audit settlements		(1.9	)
Reductions due to foreign currency rate fluctuation		(1.5	)
Reductions based on change of tax rate		(2.7	)

Balance at June 30, 2012	$	61.3

The liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to the allocations of revenue and costs among the Company's global operations. In addition, utilization of the Company's tax net operating losses may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state and foreign provisions. As a result, loss carryforward limitations may result in the expiration or reduced utilization of a portion of the Company's net operating losses.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2012 are $3.8 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2012 are $57.5 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in adjustments to the valuation allowance.

The Company's policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax provision. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011 was approximately $23.0 million and $23.8 million, respectively. During fiscal 2012, the Company's accrued interest and penalties was reduced by $0.8 million primarily because of the lapse of statute of limitations and foreign currency rate fluctuations. Due to the uncertainties related to current examinations in various jurisdictions, other changes could occur in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months which the Company is unable to estimate at this time.

The following table summarizes the Company's major tax jurisdictions and the tax years that remain subject to examination by such jurisdictions as of June 30, 2012:

In February 2003, the Company amended and restated its Stockholder Rights Agreement (the "Company Rights Agreement") and currently each share of the Company's outstanding common stock is associated with eight rights. Each right entitles stockholders to purchase 1/100,000 share of the Company's Series B Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $21.00. The rights only become exercisable in certain limited circumstances following the tenth day after a person or group announces an acquisition of or tender offers for 15% or more of the Company's common stock. For a limited period of time following the announcement of any such acquisition or offer, the rights are redeemable by the Company at a price of $0.01 per right. If the rights are not redeemed, each right will then entitle the holder to purchase common stock having the value of twice the then-current exercise price. For a limited period of time after the exercisability of the rights, each right, at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors, may be exchanged for either 1/100,000 share of Series B Preferred Stock or one share of common stock per right. The rights expire on June 22, 2013.

The Company's Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 499,999 shares of undesignated preferred stock (in addition to the 500,000 shares of designated Series B Preferred Stock) and to determine the powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued shares of undesignated preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without the consent of the Company's stockholders. The preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to those of the holders of common stock. The issuance of Series B Preferred Stock or any preferred stock subsequently issued by the Company's Board of Directors, under some circumstances, could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control.

On June 30, 1999, in connection with the merger with JDS FITEL, JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, adopted a Rights Agreement (the "Original Exchangeable Rights Agreement") substantially equivalent to the Company Rights Agreement. In February 2003, in connection with the amendment and restatement of the Company Rights Agreement, the Original Exchangeable Rights Agreement was amended and restated (as amended and restated, the "Exchangeable Rights Agreement"). Under the Exchangeable Rights Agreement, each exchangeable share issued has an associated right (an "Exchangeable Share Right") entitling the holder of such Exchangeable Share Right to acquire additional exchangeable shares on terms and conditions substantially the same as the terms and conditions upon which a holder of shares of common stock is entitled to acquire either 1/100,000 share of the Company's Series B Preferred Stock or, in certain

circumstances, shares of common stock under the Company Rights Agreement. The definitions of beneficial ownership, the calculation of percentage ownership and the number of shares outstanding and related provisions of the Company Rights Agreement and the Exchangeable Rights Agreement apply, as appropriate, to shares of common stock and exchangeable shares as though they were the same security. The Exchangeable Share Rights are intended to have characteristics essentially equivalent in economic effect to the Rights granted under the Company Rights Agreement. The Company has the right to force conversion of the exchangeable shares in fiscal 2014.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had 15.3 million shares of stock options and Full Value Awards (as defined below) issued and outstanding to employees and directors under the Company's 2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"), Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2003 Plan"), and various other plans the Company assumed through acquisitions. The exercise price for stock options is equal to the fair value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Options generally become exercisable over a three-year or four-year period and, if not exercised, expire from five to ten years after the date of grant.

On November 14, 2006, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2003 Plan, under which (1) 12,500,000 shares of Common Stock were added to the pool of shares reserved for issuance under the 2003 Plan and (2) all future grants of "Full Value Awards" (as defined below) will reduce the share reserve by one and one-half shares for each share subject to such Awards. On November 12, 2008, the Company's shareholders approved the following amendments to the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. The first amendment increased the number of shares that may be issued under 2003 Equity Plan by 12,000,000. The second amendment increased the maximum number of shares granted to any employee in any fiscal year to 1,000,000. On November 30, 2010, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment to the 2003 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued under this plan by 12,200,000 shares.

On August 17, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors adopted and approved the Flexible Stock Incentive—2005 Plan (the "2005 Plan"). Pursuant to Section 3(a) of the 2005 Plan, and in accordance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Company registered 16.0 million shares, which have been reserved for issuance under the 2005 Plan. The adoption and approval of the 2005 Plan did not affect any of the options granted under the Flexible Stock Incentive—Amended and Restated 1993 Plan which was adopted in fiscal 1993, as amended, and currently outstanding, all of which remain exercisable in accordance with their terms. On May 2, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved to increase the 2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan by 800,000 shares.

As of June 30, 2012, 12.6 million shares of common stock, primarily under the 2003 Plan and the 2005 Plan, were available for grant.

In June 1998, the Company adopted the JDS Uniphase Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the "1998 Purchase Plan"). The 1998 Purchase Plan, which became

effective August 1, 1998, provides eligible employees with the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company through periodic payroll deductions and provides a discounted purchase price as well as a look-back period. The 1998 Purchase Plan is structured as a qualified employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. However, the 1998 Purchase Plan is not intended to be a qualified pension, profit sharing or stock bonus plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The 1998 Purchase Plan will terminate upon the earlier of August 1, 2018 or the date on which all shares available for issuance have been sold. Of the 50.0 million shares authorized to be issued under the 1998 Purchase Plan, 6.3 million shares remained available for issuance as of June 30, 2012.

Effective with the purchase period that began on February 1, 2006, the 1998 Purchase Plan was modified to provide a 5% discount and a six month look-back period. Previously, the 1998 Purchase Plan had provided a 15% discount and up to a two year look-back period.

"Full Value Awards" refer to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock Units, Performance Units, and Performance Shares that are granted with the exercise price equal to zero and are converted to shares immediately upon vesting. These Full Value Awards are performance based, time based, or a combination of performance and time based and expected to vest over one to four years. The fair value of the time based Full Value Awards is based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of award.

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and recognized in expense over the requisite service period. As required by the authoritative guidance, management has made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest. The impact on the Company's results of operations of recording stock-based compensation by function for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 was as follows (in millions):

Approximately $2.0 million of stock-based compensation was capitalized to inventory at June 30, 2012.

On November 5, 2010, the Company completed an Offer to Exchange Certain Stock Options for a Number of Restricted Stock Units, Replacement Options or Cash (the "Exchange Offer"). Pursuant to

the Exchange Offer, 3,555,241 eligible stock options were tendered, representing approximately 83% of the total stock options eligible for exchange. The Company granted a total of 230,494 new restricted stock units ("RSU") and 64,763 replacement options in exchange for the eligible stock options surrendered. The grant date fair value of the new RSUs and the exercise price of the replacement options is $11.40, which was the closing price of the Company's common stock on November 5, 2010 as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Company also paid a total of $0.2 million to certain participating employees who would have received in the aggregate less than 100 RSUs or replacement options upon exchange.

The stock option exchange was accounted for as a modification of the options tendered for exchange pursuant to the authoritative guidance of stock-based compensation. Approximately $0.4 million of incremental cost, as well as approximately $0.2 million of unamortized expense related to the cancelled options will be recognized over one or two years, the modified requisite service period of the replaced awards.

The Company did not grant any options during fiscal 2012. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended June 30, 2012 was $11.0 million. In connection with these exercises, the tax benefit realized by the Company was immaterial due to the fact that the Company has no material benefit in foreign jurisdictions and a full valuation allowance on its domestic deferred tax assets.

The Company issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options. All new hire stock option grants vest over four years with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% vesting every quarter thereafter. Focal stock option grants vest over three or four years with various vesting schedules. In fiscal 2009 and 2010 the Company granted performance-based options with market conditions ("the market-condition options") to named executives. The market-condition options are being amortized based upon the graded vesting method.

As of June 30, 2012, $5.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to stock options remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized over an estimated amortization period of 1.0 years.

The following is a summary of option activities (amount in millions except per share amounts):

	Options Outstanding

	Number Of Shares			Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Balance as of June 27, 2009		16.8			33.65
Granted		5.2			6.13
Exercised		(1.1	)		4.56
Forfeited		(1.1	)		6.37
Canceled		(3.0	)		74.57

Balance as of July 3, 2010		16.8			21.54
Granted		3.6			11.91
Exercised		(4.1	)		7.71
Forfeited		(0.5	)		5.99
Canceled		(4.9	)		52.52

Balance as of July 2, 2011		10.9			10.42
Exercised		(1.4	)		5.84
Forfeited		(0.6	)		7.03
Canceled		(0.7	)		26.32

Balance as of June 30, 2012		8.2			10.02

The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2012:

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company's closing stock price of $11.0 as of June 30, 2012, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of June 30, 2012 was 3.4 million.

The compensation expense in connection with the Company's employee stock purchase plan for the year ended June 30, 2012 was $2.1 million. The expense related to the plan is recorded on a straight-line basis over the relevant subscription period.

The following table summarizes the shares issued and the fair market value at purchase date, pursuant to the Company's employee stock purchase plan during the year ended June 30, 2012:

As of June 30, 2012, $0.2 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to ESPP remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized through the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved the grant of 5.0 million Full Value Awards to the Company's Board of Directors and employees. Time based Full Value Awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the probable vesting periods. Performance based Full Value Awards are amortized based upon the graded vesting method. During fiscal years 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded $36.0 million, $27.0 million, and $26.2 million of such compensation expenses, respectively.

As of June 30, 2012, $55.9 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to Full Value Awards remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized over an estimated amortization period of 2.1 years.

A summary of the status of the Company's nonvested Full Value Awards as of June 30, 2012 and changes during the same period is presented below (amount in millions, except per share amounts):

	Full Value Awards

	Performance shares			Non- performance shares			Total number of shares			Weighted-average grant-dated fair value
Nonvested at June 27, 2009		0.7			5.7			6.4			9.38
Awards granted		0.1			2.8			2.9			8.41
Awards vested		(0.4	)		(2.5	)		(2.9	)		10.05
Awards forfeited		(0.1	)		(0.9	)		(1.0	)		9.47

Nonvested at July 3, 2010		0.3			5.1			5.4			8.49
Awards granted		0.1			3.5			3.6			12.34
Awards vested		(0.4	)		(2.1	)		(2.5	)		9.02
Awards forfeited		—			(0.5	)		(0.5	)		9.43

Nonvested at July 2, 2011		—			6.0			6.0			10.49
Awards granted		0.5			4.5			5.0			12.31
Awards vested		—			(3.0	)		(3.0	)		9.01
Awards forfeited		—			(0.8	)		(0.8	)		11.67

Nonvested at June 30, 2012		0.5			6.7			7.2			12.37

Full Value Awards are converted into shares upon vesting. Shares equivalent in value to the minimum withholding taxes liability on the vested shares are withheld by the Company for the payment of such taxes.

The Company estimates the fair value of the majority of stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) valuation model. The fair value is estimated on the date of grant using the BSM option valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Expected Term: The Company's expected term represents the period that the Company's stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.

Expected Volatility: The Company determined that a combination of the implied volatility of its traded options and historical volatility of its stock price based on the expected term of the equity instrument most appropriately reflects market expectation of future volatility. Implied volatility is based on traded options of the Company's common stock with a remaining maturity of six months or greater.

Risk-Free Interest Rate: The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the BSM valuation method on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. Where the expected term of the Company's stock-based awards do not correspond with the terms for which interest rates are quoted, the Company performed a straight-line interpolation to determine the rate from the available maturities.

Expected Dividend: The BSM valuation model calls for a single expected dividend yield as an input. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying any dividends in the near future.

Estimated Pre-vesting Forfeitures: When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as future workforce reduction programs. Estimated forfeiture rates are trued-up to actual forfeiture results as the stock-based awards vest.

During the twelve month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company granted 0.5 million shares of Restricted Stock Units with market condition and 0.5 million represent the target amount of grants. The actual number of shares awarded upon vesting of the MSUs may be higher or lower depending upon the achievement of the relevant market conditions. The majority of MSUs vest in equal annual installments over three years based on the attainment of certain total shareholder return performance measures and the employee's continued service through the vest date. The aggregate grant-date fair value of MSUs was estimated to be $9.0 million and was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation.

The Company sponsors the JDS Uniphase Corporation Employee 401(k) Retirement Plan (the "401(k) Plan"), a Defined Contribution Plan under ERISA, which provides retirement benefits for its

eligible employees through tax deferred salary deductions. The 401(k) Plan allows employees to contribute up to 50% of their annual compensation, with contributions limited to $17,000 in calendar year 2012 as set by the Internal Revenue Service.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Plan provided for a 100% match of employees' contributions up to the first 3% of annual compensation and 50% match on the next 2% of compensation. Effective January 1, 2009, through the remainder of fiscal 2009, there was no Company match. Effective April 2010, the Company restored employer matching contributions to all eligible participants who have completed 180 days of service with JDSU. All matching contributions are made in cash and vest immediately. The Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $7.2 million, $7.7 million, and $4.3 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

The Company also provides a non-qualified retirement plan for the benefit of certain eligible employees in the U.S. This plan is designed to permit employee deferral of a portion of salaries in excess of certain tax limits and deferral of bonuses. This plan's assets are designated as trading securities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. See "Note 7. Investments and Fair Value Measurements" for more detail. Effective January 1, 2011, the Company suspended all employee contribution into the plan.

The Company sponsors qualified and non-qualified pension plans for certain past and present employees in the UK and Germany. The Company also is responsible for the nonpension postretirement benefit obligation of a previously acquired subsidiary. Most of the plans have been closed to new participants and no additional service costs are being accrued, except for the plans assumed during fiscal 2010 in connection with the NSD acquisition. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. As of June 30, 2012 the UK plan was partially funded while the other plans were unfunded. The Company's policy for funded plans is to make contributions equal to or greater than the requirements prescribed by law or regulation. For unfunded plans, the Company pays the postretirement benefits when due. Future estimated benefit payments are summarized below. No other required contributions to defined benefit plans are expected in fiscal 2013, but the Company, at its discretion, can make contributions to one or more of the defined benefit plans.

The Company accounts for its obligations under these pension plans in accordance with authoritative guidance which requires the Company to record its obligation to the participants, as well as the corresponding net periodic cost. The Company determines its obligation to the participants and its net periodic cost principally using actuarial valuations provided by third-party actuaries. The obligation the Company records in its Consolidated Balance Sheets is reflective of the total projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and the fair value of plan assets.

The following table presents the components of the net periodic cost for the pension and benefits plans (in millions):

The Company's accumulated other comprehensive income includes unrealized net actuarial (gains)/losses. The amount expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost during fiscal 2013 is $0 million.

The changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets of the pension and benefits plans were (in millions):

	Pension Benefit Plans						Other Post Retirement Benefit Plans

	2012			2011			2012			2011
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	108.7		$	99.9		$	0.9		$	0.8
Service cost		0.2			0.3			—			—
Interest cost		5.5			5.3			0.1			0.1
Actuarial (gains)/losses		15.3			(6.4	)		0.1			—
Benefits paid		(4.8	)		(5.0	)		—			—
Foreign exchange impact		(13.0	)		14.6			—			—

Benefit obligation at end of year	$	111.9		$	108.7		$	1.1		$	0.9

Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	23.4		$	19.4		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		1.1			2.9			—			—
Employer contributions		4.5			4.6			—			—
Benefits paid		(4.8	)		(5.0	)		—			—
Foreign exchange impact		(0.7	)		1.5			—			—

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	23.5		$	23.4		$	—		$	—

Funded status	$	(88.4	)	$	(85.3	)	$	(1.1	)	$	(0.9	)

Accumulated benefit obligation	$	111.3		$	108.2

	Pension Benefit Plans					Other Post Retirement Benefit Plans

	2012			2011		2012		2011
Amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at end of year
Current liabilities	$	4.3		$	4.9	$	—	$	—
Non-current liabilities		84.1			80.4		1.1		0.9

Net amount recognized at end of year	$	88.4		$	85.3	$	1.1	$	0.9

Amount recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income at end of year
Actuarial gains/(losses), net of tax	$	(0.3	)	$	14.4	$	—	$	—

Net amount recognized at end of year	$	(0.3	)	$	14.4	$	—	$	—

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net actuarial gains/(losses)	$	(14.3	)	$	7.9	$	—	$	—
Amortization of accumulated net actuarial gains		(0.4	)		—		—		—

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(14.7	)	$	7.9	$	—	$	—

During fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, the Company contributed GBP 0.3 million and GBP 0.2 million or approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, to its UK pension plan. These contributions allowed the Company to comply with regulatory funding requirements.

Underlying both the calculation of the PBO and net periodic cost are actuarial valuations. These valuations use participant-specific information such as salary, age, years of service, and assumptions about interest rates, compensation increases and other factors. At a minimum, the Company evaluates these assumptions annually and makes changes as necessary.

The discount rate reflects the estimated rate at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. In developing the discount rate, the Company considered the yield available on an appropriate AA corporate bond index, adjusted to reflect the term of the scheme's liabilities as well as a yield curve model developed by the Company's actuaries.

The expected return on assets was estimated by using the weighted average of the real expected long term return (net of inflation) on the relevant classes of assets based on the target asset mix and adding the chosen inflation assumption.

The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost and benefit obligation for the Company's UK and German pension plans, and other post retirement benefit plans.

The Company's investment objectives for its funded pension plan are to ensure that there are sufficient assets available to pay out members' benefits as and when they arise and that should the plan be discontinued at any point in time there would be sufficient assets to meet the discontinuance liabilities. To achieve the objectives, the trustees of the plan are responsible for regularly monitoring the funding position and managing the risk by investing in assets expected to outperform the increase in value of the liabilities in the long term and by investing in a diversified portfolio of assets in order to minimize volatility in the funding position. The trustees invest in a range of frequently traded funds ("pooled funds") rather than direct holdings in individual securities to maintain liquidity, achieve diversification and reduce the potential for risk concentration. The funded plan assets are managed by professional third-party investment managers.

The following table sets forth the plan's assets at fair value and the percentage of assets allocations as of June 30, 2012.

The following table sets forth the plan's assets at fair value and the percentage of assets allocations as of July 2, 2011.

The Company's pension assets consist of four institutional funds ("pension funds") of which the fair values are based on the quoted prices of the underlying funds. Pension funds are classified as Level 2 assets since such funds are not directly traded in active markets.

Global equity fund consists primarily of index funds that invest approximately 60% in UK equities as represented by the FTSE All-Share Index and 40% in overseas equities as represented by the appropriate sub-divisions of FTSE All-World Index.

Fixed income consists of two funds that invest primarily in index-linked Gilts (over 5 year) and sterling-denominated investment grade corporate bonds, respectively.

Other consists of the diversified growth fund that invests in equity index, private equity, global real estate, infrastructure, and high yield bonds funds.

The following table reflects the total expected benefit payments to defined benefit pension plan participants. These payments have been estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company's PBO at year end and include benefits attributable to estimated future compensation increases.

During fiscal 2010, the Company held an investment in Fabrinet, a publicly held contract manufacturing company. As of July 3, 2010, the Company owned 393,150 shares of Fabrinet's common stock that was reported as short-term available-for-sale investment. Since the Company subsequently sold the remaining shares on July 6, 2010, Fabrinet was no longer a related party from that date forward. The Company did not engage in any material transactions with Fabrinet between July 4, 2010, and July 6, 2010, the period in fiscal 2011 when Fabrinet was a related party.

As of June 30, 2012, one member of the Board of Directors of JDSU was also a member of the Board of Directors of KLA-Tencor, a publicly held company which provides process control and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing. KLA-Tencor is a customer of the Company.

Transactions and balances with the Company's related parties were as follows (in millions):

The Company leases certain real and personal property from unrelated third parties under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through fiscal 2021. Certain leases require the Company to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance, and include escalation clauses.

As of June 30, 2012, future minimum annual lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases were as follows (in millions):

Included in the future minimum lease payments table above is $6.8 million related to lease commitments in connection with the Company's restructuring activities. See "Note 12. Restructuring and Related Charges" for more detail.

The aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancellable subleases totaled $1.3 million as of June 30, 2012. Rental expense relating to building and equipment was $28.1 million, $25.2 million, and $20.1 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Purchase obligations of $139.4 million as of June 30, 2012, represent legally-binding commitments to purchase inventory and other commitments made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements. Although open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow the option to cancel, reschedule and adjust the requirements based on the Company's business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services. Obligations to purchase inventory and other commitments are generally expected to be fulfilled within one year.

The Company depends on a limited number of contract manufacturers, subcontractors, and suppliers for raw materials, packages and standard components. The Company generally purchases these single or limited source products through standard purchase orders or one-year supply agreements and has no significant long-term guaranteed supply agreements with such vendors. While the Company seeks to maintain a sufficient safety stock of such products and maintains ongoing communications with its suppliers to guard against interruptions or cessation of supply, the Company's business and results of operations could be adversely affected by a stoppage or delay of supply, substitution of more expensive or less reliable products, receipt of defective parts or contaminated materials, increases in the price of such supplies, or the Company's inability to obtain reduced pricing from its suppliers in response to competitive pressures.

Financing Obligations—Eningen, Santa Rosa and Payment Plan Agreements for Software Licenses

On December 16, 2011, the Company executed and closed the sale and leaseback transaction of certain buildings and land in Eningen, Germany. The Company sold approximately 394,217 square feet of land, nine buildings with approximately 386,132 rentable square feet, and parking areas. The Company leased back approximately 158,154 rentable square feet comprised of two buildings and a portion of a basement of another building (the "Leased Premises"). The lease term is 10 years with the

right to cancel a certain portion of the lease after 5 years. The gross cash proceeds received from the transaction were approximately €7.1 million.

Concurrent with the sale and lease back, the Company has provided the following as collateral in case of a default by the Company relative to future lease payments for the Leased Premises:

Upon execution and close of the sale and lease-back transaction, the Company began consolidating from four currently-occupied buildings into the Leased Premises. The consolidation was completed by the end of fiscal 2012.

Due to the continuing involvement as described above, the related portion of the cash proceeds and transaction costs, associated with the Leased Premises and other buildings which the Company continues to occupy, was recorded under the financing method in accordance with the authoritative guidance on leases and sales of real estate. Accordingly, the carrying value of these buildings and associated land will remain on the Company's books and the buildings will continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The portion of the proceeds received have been recorded as a financing obligation, a portion of the lease payments are recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion is recognized as interest expense. Imputed rental income from the buildings sold but not leased back and currently being occupied is recorded as a reduction in the financing obligation.

The Company completed the consolidation and exited one of the buildings, which it previously occupied and is not being leased, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Upon exit, the Company had no form of continuing involvement for the aforementioned building and associated land. The Company accordingly removed the carrying value of the building, the associated land and the financing liability and recognized a gain of $0.5 million.

During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company has recognized a loss, net of transaction costs, of $0.2 million on sale of remaining five buildings and associated land on which there is no form of continuing involvement.

As of June 30, 2012, of the total financing obligation related to the Eningen transaction, $0.1 million was included in Other current liabilities, and $4.9 million was included in Other non-current liabilities.

On August 21, 2007, the Company entered into a sale and lease back of certain buildings and land in Santa Rosa, California. The Company sold approximately 45 acres of land, 13 buildings with approximately 492,000 rentable square feet, a building pad, and parking areas. The Company leased back 7 buildings with approximately 286,000 rentable square feet. The net cash proceeds received from the transaction were $32.2 million. The lease terms range from a five year lease with a one year renewal option to a ten year lease with two five year renewal options.

The Company has an ongoing obligation to remediate an environmental matter required by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board which existed at the time of sale. Concurrent with the sale and lease back, the Company has issued an irrevocable letter of credit for $3.8 million as security for the remediation of the environmental matter that remains in effect until the issuance of a notice of no further action letter from the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, the lease agreement for one building included an option to purchase at fair market value, at the end of the lease term. Due to these various forms of continuing involvement the transaction was recorded under the financing method in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance for leases and real estate sales.

Accordingly, the value of the buildings and land will remain on the Company's books and the buildings will continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The proceeds received have been recorded as a financing obligation and a portion of the lease payments are recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion is recognized as interest expense. Imputed rental income from the buildings sold but not leased back is recorded as a reduction in the financing obligation.

As of June 30, 2012, $0.9 million was included in Other current liabilities, and $28.5 million was included in Other non-current liabilities. As of July 2, 2011, $0.7 million was included in Other current liabilities, and $29.4 million was included in Other non-current liabilities.

The lease payments due under the agreement reset to fair market rental rates upon the Company's execution of the renewal options.

During fiscal 2011 and 2009, the Company capitalized approximately $7.1 million and $11.1 million, respectively, of cost incurred for the purchase of perpetual software licenses from the same supplier, in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance. The Company entered into a three-year payment plan agreement ("PPA") with the supplier towards software licenses and technical support purchased in fiscal 2009. Under this PPA, payments are made on a quarterly basis starting the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company entered into a four-year payment plan agreement ("PPA") with the supplier towards software licenses and technical support purchased in fiscal 2011. Under this PPA, payments are made on an annual basis starting the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The principal portion of the payment is accounted for as a financing activity and the remaining interest portion is accounted for as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has a contractual commitment of $3.8 million towards the payment of software licenses, of which $1.9 million is due in fiscal 2013 and $1.9 million is due in fiscal 2014.

During the fiscal years 2012, 2011, and 2010 the Company recorded amortization expense of $3.6 million, $2.2 million, and $2.2 million respectively.

In accordance with authoritative guidance which requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. In addition, disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued, including a tabular reconciliation of the changes of the entity's product warranty liabilities, are required.

The Company from time to time enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) divestiture agreements, under which the Company may provide customary indemnifications to purchasers of the Company's businesses or assets; (ii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from the Company's use of the applicable premises; and (iii) certain agreements with the Company's officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship.

The terms of such obligations vary. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts of these types of agreements often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on its balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011.

In general, the Company offers a three-month to one-year warranty for most of its products. The Company provides reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The Company estimates the costs of its warranty obligations based on its historical experience of known product failure rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise with specific products. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

The following table presents the changes in the Company's warranty reserve during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 (in millions):

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company received an unfavorable arbitrator's decision in a legal dispute unrelated to current or future quarters. The arbitrator's decision was related to, and contrary to the result of, an action which commenced in 2006 in the Western District of Pennsylvania in which the Company was a nominal plaintiff. The Pennsylvania matter was resolved in the Company's favor in 2009 and was subsequently affirmed by a Federal Appeals Court in January 2011. The arbitration award was confirmed at the California State Superior Court in October, 2011. On March 5, 2012 the Pennsylvania District Court denied JDSU's request to vacate the arbitration award, and the

parties subsequently reached a settlement agreement on March 22, 2012 pursuant to which the Company paid $7.9 million on April 2, 2012 in full and final settlement of the matter. The related charge is included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Company has been subject to Texas franchise tax audits related to allocated taxable surplus capital for Texas report years 2001 through 2006. While the Company believes that it is reasonably possible this audit may result in additional tax liabilities, based on currently available information, the Company believes the ultimate outcome of this audit will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows or overall trends in results of operations. There is the possibility of a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows or overall trends in results of operations for the period in which this matter is ultimately resolved, if it is resolved unfavorably, or in the period in which an unfavorable outcome becomes probable. The range of the potential total tax liability related to these matters is estimated to be from $0 million to $34.2 million, plus interest and penalties.

The Company evaluates its reportable segments in accordance with the authoritative guidance on segment reporting. The Company's Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Waechter, is the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") pursuant to the guidance. The CODM allocates resources to the segments based on their business prospects, competitive factors, net revenue, and operating results.

JDSU is a leading provider of communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, wireless operators, cable operators, network-equipment manufacturers ("NEMs"), and enterprises. JDSU is also an established leader in developing anti-counterfeiting technologies for currencies and other high value documents and products. In addition, the Company is leveraging its core networking and optical technology expertise to expand into emerging markets, including high-powered commercial lasers for manufacturing applications and gesture—recognition solutions for consumer electronics. The major segments the Company serves are:

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating income (loss) excluding unallocated amounts. The Company does not maintain total assets information by reportable segment.

The amounts shown as Corporate consist of certain unallocated corporate-level operating expenses. In addition, the Company does not allocate stock-based compensation, acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangibles, restructuring and related charges, income taxes, or non-operating income and expenses to its segments.

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Net revenue:
Communications Test and Measurement	$	755.4		$	814.7		$	652.2
Communications and Commercial Optical Products		701.6			770.8			499.3
Advanced Optical Technologies		225.7			230.7			221.9
Deferred revenue related to purchase accounting adjustment		(0.6	)		(11.7	)		(9.5	)

Net revenue	$	1,682.1		$	1,804.5		$	1,363.9

Operating income (loss):
Communications Test and Measurement	$	98.3		$	119.4		$	81.5
Communications and Commercial Optical Products		72.0			130.0			33.4
Advanced Optical Technologies		72.7			77.7			82.5
Corporate		(89.3	)		(96.4	)		(100.0	)

Total segment operating income		153.7			230.7			97.4
Unallocated amounts:
Stock based compensation		(49.1	)		(41.4	)		(43.1	)
Acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangibles		(87.2	)		(100.9	)		(88.0	)
(Loss) gain on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets		(22.7	)		(1.5	)		2.0
Restructuring and related charges		(12.5	)		(14.8	)		(17.7	)
Realignment and other charges		(11.3	)		(6.7	)		(4.8	)
Interest and other income, net		11.2			2.2			8.2
Interest expense		(27.3	)		(25.4	)		(24.3	)
Gain on sale of investments		1.6			3.4			13.1

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	(43.6	)	$	45.6		$	(57.2	)

The Company operates primarily in three geographic regions: Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific. The following table presents net revenue and identifiable assets by geographic regions (in millions):

Long-lived assets, namely net property, plant and equipment were identified based on the operations in the corresponding geographic areas.

During fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, no customer accounted for more than 10% of net revenue.

On September 4, 2009, the Company sold certain non-core assets related to its wholly owned subsidiary da Vinci Systems LLC ("da Vinci"). Da Vinci represented a separate component of the CommTest segment and was considered as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. The sale generated total gross proceeds of $2.5 million and a gain of $0.2 million, which was recognized in the first fiscal quarter of 2010.

On July 2, 2012, the Company repurchased an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 1% Senior Convertible Notes for $49.8 million in cash. The Company expects to record a loss on this repurchase of approximately $2.1 million in compliance with the authoritative guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

On August 17, 2012 ("Closing Date"), the Company completed the acquisition of GenComm based in Seoul, South Korea. The Company acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of GenComm for a total purchase price of approximately USD 15.0 million in cash subject to working capital adjustments, including holdback payments of approximately USD 3.5 million which are due 18 months after the closing date and approximately USD 0.5 million which is due 60 months after the closing date. After the Closing Date, GenComm was integrated in the Company's Communications Test and Measurement segment.

Due to the timing of the closing, the Company has not completed the purchase accounting for this transaction as of August 24, 2012, the date the financial statements were issued.

The following table presents the Company's quarterly consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012 and 2011 (in millions, except per share data):

	June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			October 1, 2011			July 2, 2011			April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011			October 2, 2010

Net revenue	$	439.3		$	409.2		$	412.8		$	420.8		$	471.8		$	454.0		$	473.5		$	405.2
Cost of sales		241.8			225.4			222.4			223.9			253.3			240.0			245.6			217.8
Amortization of acquired technologies		14.8			14.1			15.4			14.3			14.4			14.3			14.1			14.1

Gross profit		182.7			169.7			175.0			182.6			204.1			199.7			213.8			173.3
Operating expenses:
Research and development		64.3			62.5			59.4			59.8			62.7			60.6			60.2			56.4
Selling, general and administrative		107.4			105.1			105.8			110.7			109.7			110.7			109.5			107.2
Amortization of other intangibles		7.3			7.5			7.2			6.9			7.6			8.0			8.0			8.6
Loss (gain) on disposal and impairment of long-lived assets (3)		21.8			0.2			0.2			0.5			1.3			0.2			—			—
Restructuring and related charges		5.0			2.0			4.0			1.5			4.4			7.6			2.5			0.3

Total operating expenses		205.8			177.3			176.6			179.4			185.7			187.1			180.2			172.5

(Loss) income from operations		(23.1	)		(7.6	)		(1.6	)		3.2			18.4			12.6			33.6			0.8
Interest and other income (expense), net (4)		10.3			0.1			0.9			(0.1	)		0.4			—			1.5			0.3
Interest expense		(7.2	)		(6.9	)		(6.6	)		(6.6	)		(6.5	)		(6.2	)		(6.4	)		(6.3	)
Gain on sale of investments		0.3			0.1			0.1			1.1			—			0.1			0.1			3.2

(Loss) income before income taxes, net		(19.7	)		(14.3	)		(7.2	)		(2.4	)		12.3			6.5			28.8			(2.0	)
Income tax expense (benefit) (2)		2.5			3.1			3.0			3.4			3.0			(32.1	)		5.2			(2.1	)

Net (loss) income	$	(22.2	)	$	(17.4	)	$	(10.2	)	$	(5.8	)	$	9.3		$	38.6		$	23.6		$	0.1

Net (loss) income per share—basic (1)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.04		$	0.17		$	0.11		$	—

Net (loss) income per share—diluted (1)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.04		$	0.16		$	0.10		$	—

Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic		231.7			230.6			229.4			228.4			227.2			225.6			222.9			221.8
Diluted		231.7			230.6			229.4			228.4			235.7			235.4			229.1			227.5

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2012. The Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 8.

Except as described below there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company had an ongoing initiative to upgrade its enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in various sites across the world to improve operational efficiency and effectiveness. The upgrade was implemented in certain sites in EMEA and Asia-Pacific during the second and fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, respectively. Management believes that effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained during the upgrade process.

Information regarding the Company's executive officers and directors required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Proposal One—Elections of Directors" in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement"), which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics entitled the "JDS Uniphase Code of Business Conduct," which is applicable to all employees, officers and directors of the Company. The full text of the JDS Uniphase Code of Business Conduct is included under the Company's Corporate Governance information available at the Company's website at www.jdsu.com.

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Executive Compensation," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Director Compensation," "Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Compensation Committee Report" in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement.

Information regarding the Company's stockholder approved and non-approved equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Equity Compensation Plans" in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Relationships Among Directors or Executive Officers," "Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions," and "Code of Ethics," "Director Independence," and "Board Committees and Meetings" under the "Corporate Governance" heading in the Proxy Statement.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Audit and Non-Audit Fees" in the Proxy Statement.

		Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description	Form	Exhibit	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
4.2	Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated July 6, 1999, between JDS Uniphase, JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company	10-K	4.2	9/1/99
4.3	Exchangeable Share Support Agreement dated July 6, 1999, between JDS Uniphase, JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. and JDS Uniphase Nova Scotia Company	10-K	4.3	9/1/99
4.4	Registration Rights Agreement dated July 6, 1999, between JDS Uniphase, JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. and The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd	10-K	4.5	9/1/99
4.5	Fifth Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated February 15, 2003, between JDS Uniphase and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company	8-A12G/A	1	2/18/03
4.6	Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated February 6, 2003, between JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company	10-K	4.6	9/24/03
4.7	Indenture dated October 31, 2003	S-3	4.7	11/14/03
4.8	Registration Rights Agreement dated October 27, 2003, between JDS Uniphase, Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc, Goldman Sachs & Co. and CIBC World Markets Corp	S-3	4.9	11/14/03
10.1	Support Agreement dated April 29, 1999, between Uniphase Corporation, 3506967 Canada Inc., The Furukawa Electric Company, Ltd., and JDS FITEL Inc.	10-K	10.23	9/1/99
10.2	Amended and Restated 1993 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of November 9, 2001)	10-Q	10.1	2/11/02
10.3	Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	10-K	10.3	8/30/11
10.4	Amended and Restated 1999 Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated as of July 31, 2002)	10-K	10.4	9/17/02
10.5	2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan	10-K	10.3	8/30/11
10.6	2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan Form of Stock Option Award Agreement	10-K	10.6	9/30/05
10.7	2005 Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement	10-K	10.7	9/30/05
10.8	2008 Change of Control Benefits Plan	8-K	10.8	8/15/11
10.9	Form of Indemnification Agreement	8-K	10.9	8/15/11

		Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description	Form	Exhibit	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
10.10	Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan	14A	App. A	9/26/08
10.12	Promotion Letter for Alan Lowe	10-Q	10.22	11/12/09
10.16	Employment Agreement for Thomas Waechter	8-K	10.25	12/18/08
10.17	Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement	8-K	10.18	10/9/07
10.20	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (for the U.S.)	10-K	10.20	8/31/10
10.21	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (for China)	10-K	10.21	8/31/10
10.22	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (for France)	10-K	10.22	8/31/10
10.23	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (for the Rest of World)	10-K	10.23	8/31/10
10.24	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for the U.S.)	10-K	10.24	8/31/10
10.25	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for China)	10-K	10.25	8/31/10
10.26	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for France)	10-K	10.26	8/31/10
10.27	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for the Rest of World)	10-K	10.27	8/31/10
10.28	Amendment to Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	14A	App. E	9/25/09
10.29	Credit Agreement dated January 20, 2012, among JDS Uniphase Corporation, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.	8-K	10.1	1/26/12
10.30	Pledge and Security Agreement dated January 20, 2012, among JDS Uniphase Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.	8-K	10.2	1/26/12
10.31	2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Market Stock Unit Award Agreement				X
21.1	Subsidiaries of JDS Uniphase Corporation				X
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP)				X

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


(Mark One)
þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012
		OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-22874


Delaware		94-2579683
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
430 North McCarthy Boulevard, Milpitas, California 95035 (Address of principal executive offices including Zip code)
(408) 546-5000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Title of each class		Name of exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value of $0.001 per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights


Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

			PAGE

PART I
	ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	4
	ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	21
	ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	29
	ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	29
	ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	30
	ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	30
PART II
	ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	31
	ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	33
	ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	35
	ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	67
	ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	69
	ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	137
	ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	137
	ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	137
PART III
	ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	138
	ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	138
	ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	138
	ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	138
	ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	138
PART IV
	ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	139
SIGNATURES			143

	High		Low

Fiscal 2012:
Fourth Quarter	$	14.59	$	9.45
Third Quarter		14.93		10.68
Second Quarter		12.64		8.99
First Quarter		16.70		9.85
Fiscal 2011:
Fourth Quarter	$	22.06	$	15.51
Third Quarter		28.16		14.78
Second Quarter		14.63		10.24
First Quarter		12.82		9.19



JDS Uniphase Corporation	100.00	84.59	42.59	73.27	124.05	81.91
S&P 500	100.00	85.14	61.15	68.56	87.85	90.61
NASDAQ Composite	100.00	88.08	70.49	81.02	106.54	112.75
NASDAQ Telecommunications	100.00	89.12	72.12	71.84	81.44	70.79

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011(1)		July 3, 2010(1)(3)		June 27, 2009(1)		June 28, 2008(1)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash	$	752.7	$	728.7	$	600.1	$	695.5	$	884.7
Working capital		656.1		885.5		723.7		797.9		983.8
Total assets		1,869.5		1,950.7		1,703.6		1,668.1		2,904.6
Long-term obligations		176.6		466.7		444.0		423.7		524.8
Total stockholders' equity		1,038.8		1,065.4		908.7		934.5		1,934.5

	Valuation of Securities Given an Interest Rate Decrease of "X" BPS								Valuation of Securities Given an Interest Rate Increase of "X" BPS

	150 BPS		100 BPS		50 BPS		Fair Value as of June 30, 2012		50 BPS		100 BPS		150 BPS
U.S. treasuries	$	52.8	$	52.5	$	52.2	$	52.0	$	51.7	$	51.4	$	51.1
U.S. agencies		66.7		66.2		65.8		65.3		64.8		64.4		63.9
Foreign agencies		3.4		3.3		3.3		3.3		3.3		3.3		3.3
Municipals		11.5		11.5		11.4		11.4		11.3		11.3		11.2
Asset-backed securities		21.9		21.9		21.8		21.7		21.6		21.5		21.5
Corporate securities		184.9		184.5		184.1		183.6		183.2		182.8		182.4

Total	$	341.2	$	339.9	$	338.6	$	337.3	$	335.9	$	334.7	$	333.4

*(in millions)*	Balance at Beginning of Period								Balance at End of Period

Asset Retirement Obligations:
Year ended June 30, 2012	$	10.3	0.4	(0.5	)	0.6	—		$	10.8
Year ended July 2, 2011	$	7.9	1.9	0.1		0.5	(0.1	)	$	10.3

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
Unrealized losses on investments, net of tax	$	(2.8	)	$	(1.6	)
Foreign currency translation gains		10.6			20.0
Defined benefit obligation, net of tax		(0.3	)		14.4

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	7.5		$	32.8


Net tangible assets acquired	$	3.4
Intangible assets acquired:
Developed technology		6.2
Customer relationships		2.3
Others		0.9
Goodwill		2.0

Total purchase price	$	14.8


Cash	$	4.0
Accounts receivable		0.9
Inventories		0.8
Property and equipment		0.5
Accounts payable		(0.2	)
Deferred revenue		(0.3	)
Employee related liabilities		(2.3	)

Net tangible assets acquired	$	3.4


Net tangible assets acquired	$	27.9
Intangible assets acquired:
Developed technology		42.7
Customer relationships		30.8
In-process research and development		9.8
Customer backlog		5.8
Goodwill		46.8

Total purchase price	$	163.8


Accounts receivable	$	26.8
Inventories		4.7
Property and equipment		4.8
Accounts payable		(4.8	)
Deferred revenue		(6.3	)
Other assets and liabilities, net		2.7

Net tangible assets acquired	$	27.9


Developed technology		5 years
Customer relationships		5 to 9 years
Customer backlog		1 to 2 years

*(in millions, except per share data)*

Pro forma net revenue	1,497.5
Pro forma net loss	(79.1	)
Pro Forma net loss per share—basic and diluted	(0.36	)


Customer relationships		6 years
Developed technology		5 years
Trademark/tradename		5 years
Internally used software		3 years

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2.2	$	2.3
Allowance for sales returns and other		0.4		0.5

Total accounts receivable reserves and allowances	$	2.6	$	2.8

	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charged to Costs and Expenses				Balance at End of Period

Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year ended June 30, 2012	$	2.3	$	1.8	(1.9	)	$	2.2
Year ended July 2, 2011		2.6		0.5	(0.8	)		2.3
Year ended July 3, 2010		2.3		1.2	(0.9	)		2.6

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
Finished goods	$	89.5	$	86.5
Work in process		37.3		30.4
Raw materials and purchased parts		47.7		54.3

Total inventories, net	$	174.5	$	171.2

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
Land	$	14.1		$	16.5
Buildings and improvements		35.8			39.9
Machinery and equipment		421.3			370.8
Furniture, fixtures, software and office equipment		166.1			152.4
Leasehold improvements		95.3			86.5
Construction in progress		33.0			36.8

		765.6			702.9
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(512.7	)		(454.0	)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$	252.9		$	248.9

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
Prepayments	$	30.9	$	33.4
Advances to contract manufacturers		18.4		13.2
Deferred income tax		2.3		2.0
Refundable income taxes		4.7		2.5
Other receivables		13.0		10.0
Other current assets		7.9		9.1

Total prepayments and other current assets	$	77.2	$	70.2

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
Deferred compensation plan	$	4.6	$	5.7
Warranty accrual		8.1		7.9
VAT liabilities		2.7		3.2
Restructuring accrual		8.6		11.0
Deferred taxes		3.1		1.5
Other		10.8		11.7

Total other current liabilities	$	37.9	$	41.0

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
Pension accrual and post-employment benefits	$	85.2	$	81.3
Deferred taxes		4.7		8.6
Restructuring accrual		4.0		4.4
Financing obligation		35.4		33.2
Non-current income taxes payable		9.3		10.2
Asset retirement obligations		9.2		9.4
Long-term deferred revenue		16.1		22.1
Other		12.7		11.7

Total other non-current liabilities	$	176.6	$	180.9

	Amortized Cost / Carrying Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value

Debt securities:
U.S. treasuries	$	52.0	$	—	$	—		$	52.0
Agencies
U.S.		65.1		0.2		—			65.3
Foreign		3.3		—		—			3.3
Municipal bonds & sovereign debt instruments		11.4		—		—			11.4
Asset-backed securities		21.9		0.2		(0.4	)		21.7
Corporate securities		183.6		1.3		(0.1	)		184.8

Total available-for-sale securities	$	337.3	$	1.7	$	(0.5	)	$	338.5

	Less than 12 Months		Greater than 12 Months		Total

Asset-backed securities	$	—	$	0.4	$	0.4
Corporate securities		0.1		—		0.1

Total gross unrealized losses	$	0.1	$	0.4	$	0.5

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value

Amounts maturing in less than 1 year	$	227.1	$	228.3
Amounts maturing in 1 - 5 years		108.7		108.9
Amounts maturing more than 5 years		1.5		1.3

Total debt securities	$	337.3	$	338.5

	Amortized Cost / Carrying Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value

Debt securities:
U.S. treasuries	$	27.7	$	0.1	$	—		$	27.8
Agencies
U.S.		48.5		0.3		—			48.8
Foreign		3.2		—		—			3.2
Municipal bonds & sovereign debt instruments		7.2		—		—			7.2
Asset-backed securities		20.0		1.0		(0.4	)		20.6
Corporate securities		209.1		1.6		—			210.7

Total available-for-sale securities	$	315.7	$	3.0	$	(0.4	)	$	318.3

	Communications Test & Measurement			Advanced Optical Technologies		Total

Balance as of July 3, 2010 (1)	$	57.7		$	8.3	$	66.0
Goodwill from Acquisition		—			—		—
Adjustments primarily including currency translation adjustments related to the NSD Acquisition		1.4			—		1.4

Balance as of July 2, 2011 (2)	$	59.1		$	8.3	$	67.4
Goodwill from Dyaptive Acquisition (3)		2.0			—		2.0
Adjustments primarily including currency translation adjustments related to the NSD Acquisition		(0.7	)		—		(0.7	)

Balance as of June 30, 2012 (4)	$	60.4		$	8.3	$	68.7

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011

Gross goodwill balance	$	5,747.6		$	5,746.3
Accumulated impairment losses		(5,678.9	)		(5,678.9	)

Net goodwill balance	$	68.7		$	67.4

As of June 30, 2012	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net

Acquired developed technology	$	534.8	$	(398.6	)	$	136.2
Other		279.3		(236.7	)		42.6

Total intangibles	$	814.1	$	(635.3	)	$	178.8

As of July 2, 2011	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net

Acquired developed technology	$	517.4	$	(344.1	)	$	173.3
Other		300.5		(208.2	)		92.3

Total intangibles subject to amortization		817.9		(552.3	)		265.6
Indefinite life intangibles		9.8		—			9.8

Total intangibles	$	827.7	$	(552.3	)	$	275.4

Fiscal Years

2013	$	68.3
2014		42.5
2015		34.8
2016		12.9
2017		10.4
Thereafter		9.9

Total amortization	$	178.8

	Years Ended

	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
Carrying amount of equity component	$	158.3		$	158.5

Principal amount of 1% Senior Coupon Notes		311.0			325.0
Unamortized discount of liability component		(18.2	)		(39.2	)

Carrying amount of liability component	$	292.8		$	285.8