XML 58 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

5. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The hierarchy for inputs used in determining fair value maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Assets and liabilities recorded on the Statements of Financial Position at fair value are categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the observability of inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company can access.

Level 2: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following:

(a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
(b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or
(c) Valuation models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the assets and liabilities.

The availability of observable inputs varies by instrument. In situations where fair value is based on internally developed pricing models or inputs that are unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. The degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is typically greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. In many instances, valuation inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The category level in the fair value hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market disruption. In periods of market disruption, the ability to observe prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments.

The Company is responsible for the determination of fair value and the supporting assumptions and methodologies. The Company gains assurance that assets and liabilities are appropriately valued through the execution of various processes and controls designed to ensure the overall reasonableness and consistent application of valuation methodologies, including inputs and assumptions, and compliance with accounting standards. For fair values received from third parties or internally estimated, the Company’s processes and controls are designed to ensure that the valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistently applied, the inputs and assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the objective of determining fair value, and the fair values are accurately recorded. For example, on a continuing basis, the Company assesses the reasonableness of individual fair values that have stale security prices or that exceed certain thresholds as compared to previous fair values received from valuation service providers or brokers or derived from internal models. The Company performs procedures to understand and assess the methodologies, processes and controls of valuation service providers. In addition, the Company may validate the reasonableness of fair values by comparing information obtained from valuation service providers or brokers to other third party valuation sources for selected securities. The Company performs ongoing price validation procedures such as back-testing of actual sales, which corroborate the various inputs used in internal models to market observable data. When fair value determinations are expected to be more variable, the Company validates them through reviews by members of management who have relevant expertise and who are independent of those charged with executing investment transactions.

The Company has two types of situations where investments are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The first is where quotes continue to be received from independent third-party valuation service providers and all significant inputs are market observable; however, there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset when compared to normal market activity such that the degree of market observability has declined to a point where categorization as a Level 3 measurement is considered appropriate. The indicators considered in determining whether a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for a specific asset has occurred include the level of new issuances in the primary market, trading volume in the secondary market, the level of credit spreads over historical levels, applicable bid-ask spreads, and price consensus among market participants and other pricing sources.

The second situation where the Company classifies securities in Level 3 is where specific inputs significant to the fair value estimation models are not market observable. This primarily occurs in the Company’s use of broker quotes to value certain securities where the inputs have not been corroborated to be market observable, and the use of valuation models that use significant non-market observable inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company principally uses the market approach which generally utilizes market transaction data for the same or similar instruments. To a lesser extent, the Company uses the income approach which involves determining fair values from discounted cash flow methodologies. For the majority of Level 2 and Level 3 valuations, a combination of the market and income approaches is used.

Summary of significant valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Level 1 measurements

Fixed income securities: Comprise certain U.S. Treasuries. Valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company can access.

Short-term: Comprise actively traded money market funds that have daily quoted net asset values for identical assets that the Company can access.

Separate account assets: Comprise actively traded mutual funds that have daily quoted net asset values for identical assets that the Company can access. Net asset values for the actively traded mutual funds in which the separate account assets are invested are obtained daily from the fund managers.

Level 2 measurements

Fixed income securities:

U.S. government and agencies: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

Municipal: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

Corporate, including privately placed: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads. Also included are privately placed securities valued using a discounted cash flow model that is widely accepted in the financial services industry and uses market observable inputs and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. The primary inputs to the discounted cash flow model include an interest rate yield curve, as well as published credit spreads for similar assets in markets that are not active that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer.

Foreign government: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

RMBS and ABS: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, collateral performance and credit spreads.

CMBS: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, collateral performance and credit spreads.

Short-term: The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads. For certain short-term investments, amortized cost is used as the best estimate of fair value.

Level 3 measurements

Fixed income securities:

Corporate: Valued based on models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry with certain inputs to the valuation model that are significant to the valuation, but are not market observable.

RMBS: Valued based on non-binding broker quotes received from brokers who are familiar with the investments and where the inputs have not been corroborated to be market observable.

Contractholder funds: Derivatives embedded in certain life and annuity contracts are valued internally using models widely accepted in the financial services industry that determine a single best estimate of fair value for the embedded derivatives within a block of contractholder liabilities. The models primarily use stochastically determined cash flows based on the contractual elements of embedded derivatives, projected option cost and applicable market data, such as interest rate yield curves and equity index volatility assumptions. These are categorized as Level 3 as a result of the significance of non-market observable inputs.

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2012:

($ in thousands) Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Balance as of
December 31,
2012

Assets:

Fixed income securities:

U.S. government and agencies

$ 34,303 $ 57,784 $ $ 92,087

Municipal

2,900 2,900

Corporate

191,656 312 191,968

Foreign government

5,264 5,264

RMBS

29,737 29,737

CMBS

8,603 8,603

Total fixed income securities

34,303 295,944 312 330,559

Short-term investments

18,793 5,410 24,203

Separate account assets

1,625,669 1,625,669

Total recurring basis assets

1,678,765 301,354 312 1,980,431

Total assets at fair value

$ 1,678,765 $ 301,354 $ 312 $ 1,980,431

% of total assets at fair value

84.7 % 15.2 % 0.1 % 100.0 %

Liabilities:

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ $ $ (314,926 ) $ (314,926 )

Total liabilities at fair value

$ $ $ (314,926 ) $ (314,926 )

% of total liabilities at fair value

% % 100.0 % 100.0 %

The following table summarizes quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012.

($ in thousands)

Fair value

Valuation
technique

Unobservable
input

Range Weighted
average

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts—Equity-indexed and forward starting options

$ (295,305 ) Stochastic cash flow model Projected option cost 1.0 – 2.0 % 1.96 %

If the projected option cost increased (decreased), it would result in a higher (lower) liability fair value

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2011:

($ in thousands) Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Balance as of
December 31,
2011

Assets:

Fixed income securities:

U.S. government and agencies

$ 36,883 $ 53,119 $ $ 90,002

Municipal

2,898 2,898

Corporate

181,228 598 181,826

Foreign government

5,237 5,237

RMBS

40,186 2,321 42,507

CMBS

8,356 8,356

ABS

2,814 2,814

Total fixed income securities

36,883 293,838 2,919 333,640

Short-term investments

1,925 11,049 12,974

Separate account assets

1,682,128 1,682,128

Total recurring basis assets

1,720,936 304,887 2,919 2,028,742

Total assets at fair value

$ 1,720,936 $ 304,887 $ 2,919 $ 2,028,742

% of total assets at fair value

84.8 % 15.0 % 0.2 % 100.0 %

Liabilities:

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ $ $ (506,678 ) $ (506,678 )

Total liabilities at fair value

$ $ $ (506,678 ) $ (506,678 )

% of total liabilities at fair value

% % 100.0 % 100.0 %

The following table presents the rollforward of Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2012.

($ in thousands) Total gains (losses)
included in:
Balance as of
December 31,
2011
Net
income(1)
OCI Transfers
into

Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ 598 $ $ $ $

RMBS

2,321 (2,321 )

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ 2,919 $ $ $ $ (2,321 )

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ (506,678 ) $ 131,054 $ $ $

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

$ (506,678 ) $ 131,054 $ $ $

Purchases Sales Issues Settlements Balance as of
December 31,
2012

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ $ $ $ (286 ) $ 312

RMBS

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ $ $ $ (286 ) $ 312

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ $ $ (11,024 ) $ 71,722 $ (314,926 )

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

$ $ $ (11,024 ) $ 71,722 $ (314,926 )

(1)

The amount attributable to derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts is reported as follows: $125.9 million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $5.1 million in contract benefits. These amounts are ceded in accordance with the Company’s reinsurance agreements.

The following table presents the rollforward of Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2011.

($ in thousands) Total gains (losses)
included in:
Balance as of
December 31,
2010
Net
income(1)
OCI Transfers
into
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ 852 $ $ 199 $ $ (10,199 )

RMBS

6,880 (4 ) (108 ) (3,577 )

CMBS

1,916 (49 ) (1,867 )

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ 9,648 $ (4 ) $ 42 $ $ (15,643 )

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ (494,149 ) $ (110,951 ) $ $ $

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

$ (494,149 ) $ (110,951 ) $ $ $

Purchases Sales Issues Settlements Balance as of
December 31,
2011

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ 10,000 $ $ $ (254 ) $ 598

RMBS

(870 ) 2,321

CMBS

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ 10,000 $ $ $ (1,124 ) $ 2,919

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ $ $ (55,559 ) $ 153,981 $ (506,678 )

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

$ $ $ (55,559 ) $ 153,981 $ (506,678 )

(1)

The amount attributable to fixed income securities is reported in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as net investment income. The amount attributable to derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts is reported as follows: $(106.6) million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $(4.3) million in contract benefits. These amounts are ceded in accordance with the Company’s reinsurance agreements.

The following table presents the rollforward of Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands) Total gains (losses)
included in:
Purchases, sales,
issues and
settlements, net
Transfers
into

Level 3
Transfers
out of

Level 3
Balance as of
December 31,

2010
Balance as of
December 31,
2009
Net
income(1)
OCI

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ 1,089 $ (1 ) $ $ 7,740 $ $ (7,976 ) $ 852

RMBS

(17 ) 131 9,459 (2,693 ) 6,880

CMBS

1,158 758 1,916

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ 2,247 $ (18 ) $ 889 $ 17,199 $ $ (10,669 ) $ 9,648

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ (15,526 ) $ (4,877 ) $ $ $ (473,746 ) $ $ (494,149 )

Total recurring Level 3liabilities

$ (15,526 ) $ (4,877 ) $ $ $ (473,746 ) $ $ (494,149 )

(1)

The amount attributable to fixed income securities is reported in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as net investment income. The amount attributable to derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts is reported as a component of contract benefits and is ceded in accordance with the Company’s reinsurance agreements.

Transfers between level categorizations may occur due to changes in the availability of market observable inputs, which generally are caused by changes in market conditions such as liquidity, trading volume or bid-ask spreads. Transfers between level categorizations may also occur due to changes in the valuation source. For example, in situations where a fair value quote is not provided by the Company’s independent third-party valuation service provider and as a result the price is stale or has been replaced with a broker quote whose inputs have not been corroborated to be market observable, the security is transferred into Level 3. Transfers in and out of level categorizations are reported as having occurred at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. Therefore, for all transfers into Level 3, all realized and changes in unrealized gains and losses in the quarter of transfer are reflected in the Level 3 rollforward table.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2012, 2011 or 2010.

During 2011, certain RMBS and CMBS were transferred into Level 2 from Level 3 as a result of increased liquidity in the market and a sustained increase in market activity for these assets. When transferring these securities into Level 2, the Company did not change the source of fair value estimates or modify the estimates received from independent third-party valuation service providers or the internal valuation approach. Accordingly, for securities included within this group, there was no change in fair value in conjunction with the transfer resulting in a realized or unrealized gain or loss.

During 2011, a corporate fixed income security was transferred into Level 2 from Level 3 due to a change in the valuation model to use primarily market observable inputs. Transfers out of Level 3 during 2012, 2011 and 2010 included situations where a broker quote was used in the prior period and a fair value quote became available from the Company’s independent third-party valuation service provider in the current period. A quote utilizing the new pricing source was not available as of the prior period, and any gains or losses related to the change in valuation source for individual securities were not significant.

Transfers into Level 3 during 2010 also included derivatives embedded in equity-indexed life and annuity contracts due to refinements in the valuation modeling resulting in an increase in significance of non-market observable inputs.

The following table provides the change in unrealized gains and losses included in net income for Level 3 assets and liabilities held as of December 31.

($ in thousands) 2012 2011 2010

Assets

Fixed income securities:

Corporate

$ $ (2 ) $ (2 )

RMBS

(5 ) (11 )

CMBS

(1 )

Total recurring Level 3 assets

$ $ (7 ) $ (14 )

Liabilities

Contractholder funds:

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

$ 131,054 $ (110,951 ) $ (4,877 )

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

$ 131,054 $ (110,951 ) $ (4,877 )

The amounts in the table above represent the change in unrealized gains and losses included in net income for the period of time that the asset or liability was determined to be in Level 3. The amounts attributable to fixed income securities are reported in net investment income. The amount attributable to derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts is reported as follows: $125.9 million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $5.1 million in contract benefits in 2012, $(106.6) million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $(4.3) million in contract benefits in 2011, and $(4.9) million in contract benefits in 2010. These amounts are ceded in accordance with the Company’s reinsurance agreements.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, financial instruments not carried at fair value included contractholder funds on investment contracts. The carrying value and fair value of contractholder funds on investment contracts were $9.16 billion and $9.14 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2012 and were $10.66 billion and $10.33 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. The fair value of contractholder funds on investment contracts is based on the terms of the underlying contracts utilizing prevailing market rates for similar contracts adjusted for the Company’s own credit risk. Deferred annuities included in contractholder funds are valued using discounted cash flow models which incorporate market value margins, which are based on the cost of holding economic capital, and the Company’s own credit risk. Immediate annuities without life contingencies are valued at the present value of future benefits using market implied interest rates which include the Company’s own credit risk. The fair value measurements for contractholder funds on investment contracts are categorized as Level 3.