Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

(10)Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is currently involved in various legal claims arising from the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that the disposition of these matters will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain of its licensees, distributors, and promotional partners in connection with claims related to the use of the Company’s intellectual property. The terms of such agreements range up to five years initially and generally do not provide for a limitation on the maximum potential future payments. Management believes the likelihood of any payments is remote and would be immaterial. The Company determined the risk was low based on a prior history of insignificant claims. The Company is not currently involved in any indemnification matters in regards to its intellectual property.

The Company files income tax returns in the US federal jurisdiction and various state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to US federal, state, local, or non-US income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2009 are under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In connection with the examination, the Company has received notices of proposed adjustments (NOPAs), which the Company agreed with and recorded in its condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2011, the Company received a NOPA related to transfer pricing arrangements with the Company’s subsidiaries in which adjustments were asserted totaling approximately $55,000 of additional taxable income, representing additional federal taxes and penalties of approximately $27,000, excluding interest. The Company responded to this NOPA indicating that it disagrees with the proposed adjustments. Subsequent to March 31, 2012, the Company and its representatives had a meeting with IRS Appeals in an attempt to resolve the areas of disagreement between the IRS and the Company.  A second meeting has been scheduled with IRS Appeals in June 2012.  The Company does not know if this meeting will result in a material effect to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s unrecognized tax benefit could change; however, the Company believes its unrecognized tax benefits are adequate.

Although the Company believes its tax estimates are reasonable and prepares its tax filings in accordance with all applicable tax laws, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the Company’s estimates or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on operating results or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, or interest assessments.

The Company has on-going income tax examinations under various state tax jurisdictions.  It is the opinion of management that these audits and inquiries will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company has unconditional purchase obligations relating to sheepskin contracts.  The Company enters into contracts requiring minimum purchase commitments of sheepskin that Deckers’ affiliates, manufacturers, factories, and other agents (each or collectively, a “Buyer”) must make on or before a specified target date.  Under certain contracts, the Company may pay an advance deposit, which is included in other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and shall be repaid to the Company as Buyers purchase goods under the terms of these agreements. In the event that a Buyer does not purchase certain minimum commitments on or before certain target dates, the supplier may retain a portion of the advance deposit until the amounts of the commitments are fulfilled.  These agreements may result in unconditional purchase obligations if a Buyer does not meet the minimum purchase requirements.  In the event that a Buyer does not purchase such minimum commitments, the Company shall be responsible for compliance with any and all minimum purchase commitments under these contracts.  The contracts do not permit net settlement.  The Company expects sheepskin purchases by third party factories will eventually exceed the contract levels.  Therefore, management believes the likelihood of any non-performance payments under these contractual arrangements is remote and would have an immaterial effect on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.  The Company determined this based upon its projected sales and inventory purchases.  Minimum commitments by contract as of March 31, 2012 were as follows:

Contract Effective Date	Final Target Date	Advance Deposit		Total Minimum Commitment		Remaining Deposit		Remaining Commitment, Net of Deposit
October 2011	July 31, 2012	$	50,000	$	158,000	$	50,000	$	66,758

Subsequent to March 31, 2012, the Company amended the October 2011 contract with a new final target date of January 31, 2013 and an additional minimum purchase commitment of approximately $25,000 for a total minimum commitment of approximately $183,000.

In July 2011, the Company acquired the Sanuk brand, and the total purchase price included contingent consideration payments. As of March 31, 2012, the remaining contingent consideration payments, which have no maximum, are as follows:

·51.8% of the Sanuk brand gross profit in 2012,

·36.0% of the Sanuk brand gross profit in 2013, and

·40.0% of the Sanuk brand gross profit in 2015.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, contingent consideration of $62,794 and $91,600, respectively, are included within other accrued expenses and long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Refer to note 6 for further information on the contingent consideration amounts.