XML 23 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
 
 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
 
June 30, 2019
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Impaired properties held for sale
(1)
$
2,700

 
$

 
$
1,500

 
$
1,200

 
 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
 
December 31, 2018
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Interest rate swap assets
(2)
$
76

 
$

 
$
76

 
$

Impaired real estate assets
(3)
$
35,036

 
$

 
$

 
$
35,036

(1)
Represents a non-recurring fair value measurement. Fair value as of the date of the impairment was determined by the signed purchase agreement for the property located in Albany, GA and an internal valuation of fair value prepared for the property located in Watertown, NY.
(2)
The interest rate swap assets related to the Company's $300,000 term loan expired in January 2019.
(3)
Represents a non-recurring fair value measurement as of the date of impairment.
The majority of the inputs used to value the Company's interest rate swaps fell within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, such as observable market interest rate curves; however, the credit valuation associated with the interest rate swaps utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of December 31, 2018, the Company determined that the credit valuation adjustment relative to the overall fair value of the interest rate swaps was not significant. As a result, the interest rate swaps were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company estimates the fair value of its real estate assets, including non-consolidated real estate assets, by using income and market valuation techniques. The Company may estimate fair values using market information such as recent sale contracts (Level 2 inputs) or recent sale offers or discounted cash flow models, which primarily rely on Level 3 inputs. The cash flow models include estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows may include contractual rental revenues, projected future rental revenues and expenses and forecasted tenant improvements and lease commissions based upon market conditions determined through discussion with local real estate professionals, experience the Company has with its other owned properties in such markets and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are estimated by management based upon rates that management believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties based upon an analysis of factors such as property and tenant quality, geographical location and local supply and demand observations. To the extent the Company under estimates forecasted cash outflows (tenant improvements, lease commissions and operating costs) or over estimates forecasted cash inflows (rental revenue rates), the estimated fair value of its real estate assets could be overstated.
The table below sets forth the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, excluding held for sale assets.
 
As of June 30, 2019
 
As of December 31, 2018
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Debt
$
1,410,106

 
$
1,362,438

 
$
1,492,483

 
$
1,409,773


The fair value of the Company's debt is primarily estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs by using a discounted cash flow analysis, based upon estimates of market interest rates, except for the Company's senior notes payable. The Company determines the fair value of its senior notes payable using market prices. The inputs used in determining the fair value of these notes are categorized as Level 1 due to the fact that the Company uses quoted market rates to value these instruments. However, the inputs used in determining the fair value could be categorized as Level 2 if trading volumes are low.
Fair values cannot be determined with precision, may not be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets and may not be realized upon sale. Additionally, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, liquidity risks and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the fair value measurement amounts.
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable. The Company estimates that the fair value of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of the instruments.