XML 56 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities from continuing operations measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
September 30, 2015
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Impaired real estate assets*
$
475

 
$

 
$

 
$
475

Interest rate swap liabilities
$
(6,216
)
 
$

 
$
(6,216
)
 
$

 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
December 31, 2014
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Interest rate swap assets
$
1,153

 
$

 
$
1,153

 
$

Impaired real estate assets*
$
25,679

 
$

 
$

 
$
25,679

Impaired loan receivable*
$
3,296

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,296

Interest rate swap liabilities
$
(749
)
 
$

 
$
(749
)
 
$

*Represents a non-recurring fair value measurement.
The table below sets forth the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 
As of September 30, 2015
 
As of December 31, 2014
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans Receivable (Level 3)
$
95,806

 
$
95,535

 
$
105,635

 
$
105,061

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Debt (Level 3)
$
2,021,365

 
$
2,007,831

 
$
2,092,675

 
$
2,091,364


The majority of the inputs used to value the Company's interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, such as observable market interest rate curves; however, the credit valuation associated with the interest rate swaps utilizes Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company determined that the credit valuation adjustment relative to the overall fair value of the interest rate swaps was not significant. As a result, the interest rate swaps have been classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company estimates the fair value of its real estate assets, including non-consolidated real estate assets, by using income and market valuation techniques. The Company may estimate fair values using market information such as broker opinions of value, recent sales data for similar assets or discounted cash flow models, which primarily rely on Level 3 inputs. The cash flow models include estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows may include contractual rental revenues, projected future rental revenues and expenses and forecasted tenant improvements and lease commissions based upon market conditions determined through discussion with local real estate professionals, experience the Company has with its other owned properties in such markets and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are estimated by management based upon rates that management believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties based upon an analysis of factors such as property and tenant quality, geographical location and local supply and demand observations. To the extent the Company underestimates forecasted cash outflows (tenant improvements, lease commissions and operating costs) or overestimates forecasted cash inflows (rental revenue rates), the estimated fair value of its real estate assets could be overstated.
The Company estimates the fair values of its loans receivable by using an estimated discounted cash flow analysis and/or the estimated value of the underlying collateral using Level 3 inputs consisting of scheduled cash flows and discount rate estimates to approximate those that a willing buyer and seller might use. The fair value of the Company's debt is estimated by using a discounted cash flow analysis using Level 3 inputs, based upon estimates of market interest rates.
Fair values cannot be determined with precision, may not be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets and may not be realized upon sale. Additionally, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, liquidity risks and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the fair value measurement amounts.
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable. The Company estimates that the fair value of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of the instruments.