8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): October 10, 2006

Lexington Corporate Properties Trust

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

1-12386	13-3717318
(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015 New York, New York	10119-4015
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(212) 692-7200

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

     Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 8.01. Other Events.

Lexington Corporate Properties Trust (the “Trust”) is electing to reclassify the presentation of distributions from its investments in non-consolidated entities from operating activities to investing activities in the Trust’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The effect of the change is $7,102,000, $124,000 and $2,932,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and represents distributions in excess of accumulated earnings from these investments accounted for on the equity method.

This change in classification does not affect the total net change in cash and cash equivalents for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and has no impact on the Trust’s consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of income, consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity or the related income per share amounts for the applicable annual periods.

This Current Report on Form 8-K updates Items 6, 7 and 8 of Amendment No. 1 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”), to reflect the reclassification. The updates to the Annual Report speak as of the date of the original Annual Report, March 14, 2006, and do not reflect events occurring after the filing of such report or update or modify the disclosures therein in any way other than the updates to Items 6, 7 and 8 of the Annual Report.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(a)	Not applicable
(b)	Not applicable
(c)	Exhibits

99.1	Updated Items on Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
	(a) Item 6 Selected Financial Data
	(b) Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	(c) Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	Lexington Corporate Properties Trust
Date: October 10, 2006	By:	/s/ Patrick Carroll
		Patrick Carroll
		Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit Index

99.1	Updated Items on Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
	(a) Item 6 Selected Financial Data
	(b) Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	(c) Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

EX-99.1

Explanatory Note

Set forth below are Items 6, 7 and 8 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005, which have been updated pursuant to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

      The following sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the Company as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2005. The selected consolidated financial data for the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. ($000’s, except per share data)

	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
Total gross revenues	$	197,132		$	143,364		$	105,974		$	85,093		$	74,602
Expenses applicable to revenues		(94,400	)		(49,684	)		(33,696	)		(25,760	)		(21,594	)
Interest and amortization expense		(65,065	)		(44,857	)		(34,168	)		(32,354	)		(29,416	)
Income from continuing operations		18,192			35,293			24,411			22,409			15,180
Total discontinued operations		14,503			9,514			9,238			8,186			2,882
Net income		32,695			44,807			33,649			30,595			18,062
Net income allocable to common shareholders		16,260			37,862			30,257			29,902			15,353
Income from continuing operations per common share — basic		0.04			0.61			0.62			0.80			0.64
Income from continuing operations per common share — diluted		0.04			0.59			0.61			0.79			0.63
Income from discontinued operations — basic		0.29			0.20			0.27			0.31			0.15
Income from discontinued operations — diluted		0.29			0.21			0.27			0.30			0.14
Net income per common share — basic		0.33			0.81			0.89			1.11			0.79
Net income per common share — diluted		0.33			0.80			0.88			1.09			0.77
Cash dividends declared per common share		1.445			1.410			1.355			1.325			1.290
Net cash provided by operating activities (as reclassified)		105,457			90,736			68,883			56,834			40,750
Net cash used in investing activities (as reclassified)		(643,777	)		(202,425	)		(295,621	)		(106,166	)		(63,794	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		444,878			242,723			228,986			47,566			32,115
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends		1.15			1.57			1.59			1.82			1.47
Real estate assets, net		1,641,927			1,227,262			1,001,772			779,150			714,047
Investments in non-consolidated entities		191,146			132,738			69,225			54,261			48,764
Total assets		2,160,232			1,697,086			1,207,411			902,471			822,153
Mortgages, notes payable and credit facility, including discontinued operations		1,170,560			765,909			551,385			491,517			455,771
Shareholders’ equity		891,310			847,290			579,848			332,976			266,713
Preferred share liquidation preference		234,000			214,000			79,000			—			25,000

2

Item 7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

      The Company, which has elected to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Code, acquires and manages net leased commercial properties throughout the United States. The Company believes it has operated as a REIT since October 1993. As of December 31, 2005, the Company owned or had interests in 189 real estate properties encompassing 40.2 million rentable square feet. During 2005, the Company purchased 43 properties, including non-consolidated investments, for a capitalized cost of $1.1 billion.

      During 2005, the Company sold eight properties, including one in a non-consolidated entity, to unrelated third parties for a net sales price of $74.7 million. In addition, the Company contributed seven properties to its various non-consolidated entities for $124.7 million which approximated original cost.

      As of December 31, 2005, the Company, including its non-consolidated entities, leased properties to 137 tenants in 20 different industries. The Company’s revenues and cash flows are generated predominantly from property rent receipts. Growth in revenue and cash flows is directly correlated to the Company’s ability to (i) acquire income producing properties and (ii) to release properties that are vacant, or may become vacant at favorable rental rates. The challenge the Company faces in purchasing properties is finding investments that will provide an attractive return without compromising the Company’s real estate underwriting criteria. The Company believes it has access to acquisition opportunities due to its relationship with developers, brokers, corporate users and sellers.

      The Company has experienced minimal lease turnover in the recent past, and accordingly, minimal capital expenditures. There can be no assurance that this will continue. Through 2010, the Company, including its non-consolidated entities, has 57 leases expiring which generate approximately $72.0 million in base rent, including the Company’s proportionate share of base rent from properties owned by non-consolidated entities. Releasing these properties and properties currently vacant at favorable effective rates is the primary focus of the Company.

      The primary risks associated with re-tenanting properties are (i) the period of time required to find a new tenant, (ii) whether rental rates will be lower than previously received, (iii) the significant leasing costs such as commissions and tenant improvement allowances and (iv) the payment of operating costs such as real estate taxes and insurance while there is no offsetting revenue. The Company addresses these risks by contacting tenants well in advance of lease maturity to get an understanding of their occupancy needs, contacting local brokers to determine the depth of the rental market and retaining local expertise to assist in the re-tenanting of a property. As part of the acquisition underwriting process, the Company focuses on buying general purpose real estate which can be leased to other tenants without significant modification to the properties. No assurance can be given that once a property becomes vacant it will subsequently be re-let.

      During 2004, the Company sold eight properties to unrelated parties for a net sales price of $36.7 million. In addition, the Company contributed eight properties to its various non-consolidated entity programs for $197.0 million, which approximated carrying costs. In addition, the Company was reimbursed for certain holding costs by the partners in the respective venture. During 2003, the Company sold four properties for $11.1 million to unrelated parties, which resulted in an aggregate gain of approximately $2.2 million. During 2003, the Company contributed two properties to LION for $23.8 million, which approximated carrying costs.

Inflation

      Certain of the Company’s long-term leases on its properties contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on its operating results. Such provisions include clauses entitling the Company to receive (i) scheduled fixed base rent increases and (ii) base rent increases based upon the consumer price index. In addition, a majority of the Company’s leases require tenants to pay operating expenses, including maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses. In addition, the Company’s leases are structured in a way that minimizes its responsibility for capital improvements.

3

Critical Accounting Policies

      The Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The following are critical accounting policies which are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and which require some of management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. The accounting for these matters involves the making of estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which could change in a manner that would materially affect management’s future estimates with respect to such matters. Accordingly, future reported financial conditions and results could differ materially from financial conditions and results reported based on management’s current estimates.

      Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate. The Company allocates the purchase price of real estate acquired in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141”). SFAS 141 requires that the fair value of the real estate acquired, which includes the impact of mark-to-market adjustments for assumed mortgage debt relating to property acquisitions, is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, other value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values.

      The fair value of the tangible assets, which includes land, building and improvements, and fixtures and equipment, of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to the tangible assets based on management’s determination of relative fair values of these assets. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions.

      In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the difference between the current in-place lease rent and a management estimate of current market rents. Below-market lease intangibles are recorded as part of deferred revenue and amortized into rental revenue over the non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. Above-market leases are recorded as part of intangible assets and amortized as a direct charge against rental revenue over the non-cancelable portion of the respective leases.

      The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant, determined as set forth above. This aggregate value is allocated between in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place leases and customer relationships are amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases.

      Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 Accounting for Leases, as amended (“SFAS 13”). SFAS 13 requires that revenue be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the leased property. Renewal options in leases with rental terms that are lower than those in the primary term are excluded from the calculation of straight line rent, if they do not meet the criteria of a bargain renewal option. In those instances in which the Company funds tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be owned by the Company, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant. When the Company determines that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, the Company commences revenue recognition when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. The lease incentive is recorded as a reduction to revenue on a straight-line basis over the respective lease term.

      Gains on sales of real estate are recognized pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 66 Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, as amended (“SFAS 66”). The specific timing of the sale is measured against various

4

criteria in SFAS 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance associated with the properties. If the sales criteria are not met, the gain is deferred and the finance, installment or cost recovery method, as appropriate, is applied until the sales criteria are met.

      Accounts Receivable. The Company continuously monitors collections from its tenants and would make a provision for estimated losses based upon historical experience and any specific tenant collection issues that the Company has identified. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts.

      Impairment of Real Estate. The Company evaluates the carrying value of all real estate held when a triggering event under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, as amended (“SFAS 144”) has occurred to determine if an impairment has occurred which would require the recognition of a loss. The evaluation includes reviewing anticipated cash flows of the property, based on current leases in place, and an estimate of what lease rents will be if the property is vacant coupled with an estimate of proceeds to be realized upon sale. However, estimating market lease rents and future sale proceeds is highly subjective and such estimates could differ materially from actual results.

      Depreciation is determined by the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic useful lives of the properties.

      Tax Status. The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its shareholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code.

      The Company is now permitted to participate in certain activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code. LRA, Lexington Contributions Inc. (“LCI”) and LSAC are taxable REIT subsidiaries. As such, the Company is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income it receives from these activities.

      Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

      Properties Held For Sale. The Company accounts for properties held for sale in accordance with SFAS 144. SFAS 144 requires that the assets and liabilities of properties that meet various criteria be presented separately in the statement of financial position, with assets and liabilities being separately stated. The operating results of these properties are reflected as discontinued operations in the income statement. Properties that do not meet the held for sale criteria of SFAS 144 are accounted for as operating properties.

      Basis of Consolidation. The Company determines whether an entity for which it holds an interest should be consolidated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). If the entity is not a variable interest entity, and the Company controls the entity’s voting shares or similar rights, the entity is consolidated. FIN 46R requires the Company to evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Since becoming a public company, the Company’s principal sources of capital for growth have been the public and private equity markets, selective secured indebtedness, its unsecured revolving credit facility, issuance of OP Units and undistributed funds from operations. The Company expects to continue to have access to and use these sources in the future; however, there are factors that may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s access to capital sources. The Company’s ability to incur additional debt to fund

5

acquisitions is dependent upon its existing leverage, the value of the assets the Company is attempting to leverage and general economic conditions which may be outside of management’s influence.

      During 2005, the Company replaced its $100 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a new $200 million unsecured revolving credit facility which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 120-170 basis points depending on the leverage (as defined) of the Company and matures in June 2008. The credit facility contains customary financial covenants including restrictions on the level of indebtedness, amount of variable rate debt to be borrowed and net worth maintenance provisions. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants, no borrowings were outstanding on the facility, $198.5 million was available to be borrowed and $1.5 million in letters of credit were outstanding.

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company completed common share offerings of 2.5 million and 6.9 million shares, respectively, raising aggregate net proceeds of $60.7 million and $144.0 million, respectively. During 2005, the Company issued 400,000 cumulative convertible preferred shares, at $50 per share and a dividend rate of 6.50%, raising net proceeds of $19.5 million. During 2004, the Company issued 2.7 million cumulative convertible preferred shares at $50 per share and a dividend rate of 6.50%, raising net proceeds of $131.1 million. Currently these 3.1 million preferred shares are convertible into 5.8 million common shares.

      The Company has made equity commitments of $192.1 million to its various joint venture programs, of which $27.7 million is unfunded as of December 31, 2005. This amount will be funded as investments are made. In addition, the joint venture agreements provide the partners, under certain circumstances, the ability to put their interests to the Company for cash or common shares. Exercise of these put rights could require the Company to use its resources to purchase these assets instead of more favorable investment opportunities. As of December 31, 2005, the aggregate contingent commitment is approximately $443.9 million. This assumes the Company issues common shares to settle the put and that the Company does not use its ability to block certain properties to be put to it.

      Dividends. In connection with its intention to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Company expects to continue paying regular dividends to its shareholders. These dividends are expected to be paid from operating cash flows and/or from other sources. Since cash used to pay dividends reduces amounts available for capital investments, the Company generally intends to maintain a conservative dividend payout ratio as a percentage of FFO, reserving such amounts as it considers necessary for the maintenance or expansion of properties in its portfolio, debt reduction, the acquisition of interests in new properties as suitable opportunities arise, and such other factors as the Board of Trustees considers appropriate.

      Dividends paid to common shareholders increased to $72.6 million in 2005, compared to $65.1 million in 2004 and $45.8 million in 2003. Preferred dividends paid were $14.5 million, $6.4 million and $1.8 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Although the Company receives the majority of its base rent payments on a monthly basis, it intends to continue paying dividends quarterly. Amounts accumulated in advance of each quarterly distribution are invested by the Company in short-term money market or other suitable instruments.

      The Company believes that cash flows from operations will continue to provide adequate capital to fund its operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations and all dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short-term and long-term. In addition, the Company anticipates that cash on hand, borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, issuance of equity and debt, as well as other alternatives, will provide the necessary capital required by the Company. Cash flows from operations as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows increased to $105.5 million for 2005 from $90.7 million for 2004 and $68.9 million for 2003. The underlying drivers that impact working capital and therefore cash flows from operations are the timing of collection of rents, including reimbursements from tenants, the collection of advisory fees, payment of interest on mortgage debt and payment of operating and general and administrative costs. The Company believes the net lease structure of the majority of its tenants’ leases enhances cash flows from operations since the payment and timing of operating costs related to the properties are generally borne directly by the tenant. Collection and timing of tenant rents is closely monitored by management as part of its cash management program.

6

      Net cash used in investing activities totaled $643.8 million in 2005, $202.4 million in 2004 and $295.6 million in 2003. Cash used in investing activities related primarily to investments in real estate properties and joint ventures. Cash provided by investing activities related primarily to collection of notes receivable, proceeds from the sale of properties and distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings. Therefore, the fluctuation in investing activities relates primarily to the timing of investments and dispositions.

      Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $444.9 million in 2005, $242.7 million in 2004 and $229.0 million in 2003. Cash provided by financing activities during each year was primarily attributable to proceeds from equity offerings and non-recourse mortgages offset by dividend and distribution payments and debt payments.

      UPREIT Structure. The Company’s UPREIT structure permits the Company to effect acquisitions by issuing to a property owner, as a form of consideration in exchange for the property, OP Units in operating partnerships controlled by the Company. All outstanding OP Units are redeemable at certain times for common shares on a one-for-one basis and substantially all outstanding OP Units require the Company to pay quarterly distributions to the holders of such OP Units. The Company accounts for outstanding OP Units in a manner similar to a minority interest holder. The number of common shares that will be outstanding in the future should be expected to increase, and minority interest expense should be expected to decrease, as such OP Units are redeemed for common shares.

      The following table provides certain information with respect to such OP Units as of December 31, 2005 (assuming the Company’s annualized dividend rate remains at the current $1.46 per share).

					Current		Total
					Annualized		Current
	Total				Per OP		Annualized
Redeemable for	Number		Affiliate		Unit		Distribution
common shares:	of OP Units		OP Units		Distribution		($000)
At any time		3,476,236		1,404,015	$	1.46	$	5,075
At any time		1,199,652		65,874		1.08		1,296
At any time		108,724		52,144		1.12		122
January 2006		171,168		416		—		—
January 2006		231,763		120,662		1.46		338
February 2006		28,230		1,743		—		—
May 2006		9,368		—		0.29		3
May 2006		97,828		27,212		1.46		143
November 2006		397,102		44,858		1.46		580
		5,720,071		1,716,924	$	1.32	$	7,557

      Affiliate OP Units, which are included in total OP Units, represent OP Units held by the Chairman of the Company, E. Robert Roskind (including his affiliates) and the Vice Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of the Company, Richard J. Rouse.

Financing

      Revolving Credit Facility. The Company’s $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which expires June 2008, bears interest at 120-170 basis points over LIBOR depending on the leverage (as defined) of the Company. The credit facility contains customary financial covenants including restrictions on the level of indebtedness, amount of variable debt to be borrowed and net worth maintenance provisions. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants, no borrowings were outstanding and $198.5 million was available to be borrowed. The Company has four letters of credit outstanding under the facility aggregating $1.5 million issued in accordance with provisions in certain non-recourse mortgages.

      Debt Service Requirements. The Company’s principal liquidity needs are the payment of interest and principal on outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2005, a total of 98 of the Company’s 126 consolidated properties were subject to outstanding mortgages which had an aggregate principal amount of $1.2 billion, including properties included in discontinued operations. As of December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s outstanding debt was approximately 6.0%. The scheduled principal

7

amortization payments for the next five years are as follows: $27.8 million in 2006, $35.7 million in 2007, $30.5 million in 2008, $31.6 million in 2009 and $30.5 million in 2010. Approximate balloon payment amounts, having a weighted average interest rate of 7.3%, due the next five years are as follows: $11.9 million in 2006, $0 in 2007, $59.0 million in 2008, $47.7 million in 2009 and $56.6 million in 2010. The ability of the Company to make such balloon payments will depend upon its ability to refinance the mortgage related thereto, sell the related property, have available amounts under its unsecured revolving credit facility or access other capital. The ability of the Company to accomplish such goals will be affected by numerous economic factors affecting the real estate industry, including the availability and cost of mortgage debt at the time, the Company’s equity in the mortgaged properties, the financial condition of the Company, the operating history of the mortgaged properties, the then current tax laws and the general national, regional and local economic conditions.

      The Company expects to continue to use property specific, non-recourse mortgages as it believes that by properly matching a debt obligation, including the balloon maturity risk, with a lease expiration the Company’s cash-on-cash returns increase and the exposure to residual valuation risk is reduced. In December 2005, the Company informed the lender for its Milpitas, California property that it will no longer make debt service payments and its intention is to complete a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure to satisfy the mortgage. The Company recorded a $12.1 million impairment charge in 2005 relating to this property.

Other

      Lease Obligations. Since the Company’s tenants generally bear all or substantially all of the cost of property operations, maintenance and repairs, the Company does not anticipate significant needs for cash for these costs. For seventeen of the properties, the Company has a level of property operating expense responsibility. The Company generally funds property expansions with additional secured borrowings, the repayment of which is funded out of rental increases under the leases covering the expanded properties. To the extent there is a vacancy in a property, the Company would be obligated for all operating expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance. As of December 31, 2005, three properties were fully vacant.

      The Company’s tenants pay the rental obligations on ground leases either directly to the fee holder or to the Company as increased rent. The annual ground lease rental payment obligations for each of the next five years is $1.2 million in 2006, $1.2 million in 2007, $1.2 million in 2008, $1.2 million in 2009 and $1.0 million in 2010. These amounts do not include payments due under bond leases in which a right of offset exists between the lease obligation of the Company and the debt service due to the Company.

Step Down Renewals

      The leases on the following properties contain renewal options, exercisable by the tenant, with rents per square foot less than that paid in 2005. The Company does not believe that any of these renewal options are bargain renewal options, and, accordingly, the renewal periods are excluded from straight-line rent calculations.

				Annual Rent
				per Net
				Rentable
	Tenant	Rentable		Square Foot —		Renewal Option Term and Renewal
Property Location	(Guarantor)	Square Feet		2005		Net Rent per Square Foot
295 Chipeta Way Salt Lake City, UT	Northwest Pipeline Corp.		295,000	$	27.66	10/01/09 - 09/15/18: $11.73 plus base cost component ($.06) adjusted by CPI, plus ($.03)
450 Stern Street Oberlin, OH	Johnson Controls, Inc.		111,160	$	6.29	12/23/06 - 12/22/11: $3.65 12/23/11 - 12/22/16: $4.20
46600 Port Street Plymouth, MI	Johnson Controls, Inc.		134,160	$	6.89	12/23/06 - 12/22/11: $4.00 12/23/11 - 12/22/16: $4.60

8

				Annual Rent
				per Net
				Rentable
	Tenant	Rentable		Square Foot —		Renewal Option Term and Renewal
Property Location	(Guarantor)	Square Feet		2005		Net Rent per Square Foot
541 Perkins Jones Road Warren, OH	Kmart Corp.		1,462,642	$	6.40	10/01/07 - 09/30/12: $3.10 10/01/12 - 09/30/17: $3.10 10/01/17 - 09/30/22: $3.10 10/01/22 - 09/30/27: $3.10 10/01/27 - 09/30/32: $3.10 10/01/32 - 09/30/37: $3.10 10/01/37 - 09/30/42: FMV 10/01/42 - 09/30/47: FMV 10/01/47 - 09/30/52: FMV 10/01/52 - 09/30/57: FMV
24100 Laguna Hills Mall Laguna Hills, CA	Federated Department Stores, Inc.		160,000	$	4.24	04/17/14 - 04/16/29: $1.81 04/17/29 - 04/16/44: $1.81 04/17/44 - 04/16/50: $1.81
6910 S. Memorial Highway Tulsa, OK	Toys “R” Us, Inc.		43,123	$	8.44	06/01/11 - 05/31/16: $5.92 06/01/16 - 05/31/21: $5.92 06/01/21 - 05/31/26: $5.92 06/01/26 - 05/31/31: $5.92
12535 S.E. 82nd Avenue Clackamas, OR	Toys “R” Us, Inc.		42,842	$	10.06	06/01/11 - 05/31/16: $6.96 06/01/16 - 05/31/21: $6.96 06/01/21 - 05/31/26: $6.96 06/01/26 - 05/31/31: $6.96
18601 Alderwood Mall Boulevard Lynnwood, WA	Toys “R” Us, Inc.		43,105	$	9.24	06/01/11 - 05/31/16: $6.48 06/01/16 - 05/31/21: $6.48 06/01/21 - 05/31/26: $6.48 06/01/26 - 05/31/31: $6.48
9580 Livingston Road Oxon Hill, MD	GFS Realty, Inc. (Giant Food, Inc.)		107,337	$	1.91	03/01/14 - 02/29/19: $1.53 03/01/19 - 02/29/24: $1.53 03/01/24 - 02/29/29: $1.15 03/01/29 - 02/29/34: $1.15
Rockshire Village Center 2401 Wootton Parkway Rockville, MD	GFS Realty, Inc. (Giant Food, Inc.)		51,682	$	2.57	06/01/27 - 05/31/37: $1.33 06/20/17 - 05/31/27: $1.78
590 Ecology Lane Chester, SC	Owens Corning		420,597	$	5.22	01/01/21 - 12/31/25: $3.99 01/01/26 - 12/31/30: $4.41

      Contractual Obligations. The following summarizes the Company’s principal contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 ($000’s):

											2011 and
	2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		thereafter		Total(3)
Mortgages payable - normal amortization	$	27,804	$	35,657	$	30,481	$	31,621	$	30,517	$	160,733	$	316,813
Mortgages payable - balloon maturities		11,870		—		58,969		47,681		56,558		678,669		853,747
Purchase obligations		48,785		—		—		—		—		—		48,785
Credit facility(2)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations(1)		1,856		1,851		1,823		1,225		995		12,140		19,890
	$	90,315	$	37,508	$	91,273	$	80,527	$	88,070	$	851,542	$	1,239,235

9

(1)	Includes ground lease payments and office rent. Amounts disclosed through 2008 include rent for the Company’s principal executive office which is fixed through 2008 and adjusted to fair market value as determined at January 2009. Therefore, the amounts for 2009 and thereafter do not include principal executive office rent.
(2)	The Company has $1,521 in outstanding letters of credit.
(3)	The Company has approximately $27,700 of unfunded equity commitments to joint ventures. In addition, the joint venture agreements provide the partners, under certain circumstances, the ability to put their interest to the Company for cash or common shares. The aggregate contingent commitment as of December 31, 2005 is approximately $443,882 to be issued in common shares.

      Capital Expenditures. Due to the net lease structure, the Company does not incur significant expenditures in the ordinary course of business to maintain its properties. However, as leases expire, the Company expects to incur costs in extending the existing tenant leases or re-tenanting the properties. The amounts of these expenditures can vary significantly depending on tenant negotiations, market conditions and rental rates. These expenditures are expected to be funded from operating cash flows or borrowings on the unsecured revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had entered into binding letters of intent to purchase two properties upon completion of (i) construction and commencement of rent from the tenants and/or (ii) the seller fulfilling its contractual obligation concerning certain deliverables. As of December 31, 2005 the aggregate estimated obligation was $48.8 million.

      Shares Repurchase. In September 1998, the Company’s Board of Trustees approved a funding limit for the repurchase of 1.0 million common shares/OP Units, and authorized any repurchase transactions within that limit. In November 1998, the Company’s Board of Trustees approved an additional 1.0 million common shares/OP Units for repurchase, thereby increasing the funding limit to 2.0 million common shares/OP Units available for repurchase. From September 1998 to March 2005, the Company has repurchased approximately 1.4 million common shares/OP Units at an average price of $10.62 per share/OP Unit. In November 2005, the Company’s Board of Trustees increased the remaining amount of common shares/OP Units eligible for repurchase, so that an aggregate of 2.0 million common shares/OP Units are available for repurchase under the Company’s share repurchase program. No common share/OP Unit repurchases have been made under this increased share repurchase program.

Comparison of 2005 to 2004

      Changes in the results of operations for the Company are primarily due to the growth of its portfolio and costs associated with such growth. Of the increase in total gross revenues in 2005 of $53.8 million, $47.8 million is attributable to increases in rental revenue. The remaining $6.0 million increase in gross revenues in 2005 was attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursements of $5.5 million and a $0.5 million increase in advisory fees. The increase in interest and amortization expense of $20.2 million is due to increased leverage incurred relating to acquisitions and has been partially offset by interest savings resulting from scheduled principal amortization payments, lower interest rates and mortgage satisfactions. The increase in depreciation and amortization of $32.0 million is due primarily to the growth in real estate and intangibles due to property acquisitions. The Company’s general and administrative expenses increased by $3.7 million primarily due to greater professional service fees ($0.4 million), personnel costs ($2.0 million), terminated deal costs ($0.3 million), technology costs ($0.3 million), insurance ($0.2 million) and rent ($0.2 million). The increase in property operating expenses of $12.7 million is due primarily to incurring property level operating expenses for properties in which the Company has operating expense responsibility and an increase in vacancy. Debt satisfaction charges decreased by $4.5 million due to the payoff of certain mortgages in 2005 which resulted in a net gain. Impairment charges increased by $8.5 million due to an impairment of one property in 2005 of $12.1 million compared to an impairment charge in 2004 aggregating $3.6 million. The impairment charge in 2005 was recorded when the Company decided that it would no longer continue making debt service payments on a mortgage encumbering a property and would deliver the property to the lender as a deed in lieu of foreclosure to satisfy the mortgage. The Company incurred a $2.9 million write-off of assets relating to the bankruptcy of a tenant in its Dallas, Texas property in 2004. Non-operating income decreased

10

$1.8 million primarily due to the decrease in reimbursement of certain costs from non-consolidated entities and a reduction of interest earned. The provision for income taxes decreased $1.3 million due to decreased earnings in taxable REIT subsidiaries primarily due to fewer properties held in the taxable REIT subsidiaries. Minority interest expense decreased by $0.3 million due to the decrease in earnings at the partnership level. Equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities decreased $1.0 million due to a decrease in net income of non-consolidated entities, related primarily to increased depreciation. Net income decreased primarily due to the impact of items discussed above offset by an increase in total discontinued operations of $5.0 million. The total discontinued operations income increase was comprised of an increase in gains on sale of properties of $6.1 million, an increase in debt satisfaction charges of $0.7 million, a reduction in impairment charges of $2.0 million and a reduction in income from discontinued operations of $2.4 million. Net income allocable to common shareholders decreased due to the items discussed above plus an increase in preferred dividends of $9.5 million resulting from the issuance of preferred shares.

      Any increase in net income in future periods will be closely tied to the level of acquisitions made by the Company. Without acquisitions, which in addition to generating rental revenue, generate acquisition, debt placement and asset management fees when such properties are acquired by joint venture or advisory programs, growth in net income is dependent on index adjusted rents, percentage rents, reduced interest expense on amortizing mortgages and by controlling variable overhead costs. However, there are many factors beyond management’s control that could offset these items including, without limitation, increased interest rates of debt and tenant monetary defaults.

Comparison of 2004 to 2003

      Changes in the results of operations for the Company are primarily due to the growth of its portfolio and costs associated with such growth. Of the increase in total gross revenues in 2004 of $37.4 million, $32.7 million is primarily attributable to increases in rental revenue. The remaining $4.7 million increase in gross revenues in 2004 was attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursements of $1.2 million and a $3.5 million increase in advisory fees. The increase in interest and amortization expense of $10.7 million is due to increased leverage incurred relating to acquisitions and has been partially offset by interest savings resulting from scheduled principal amortization payments, lower interest rates and mortgage satisfactions. The increase in depreciation and amortization of $12.8 million is due, primarily to the growth in real estate and intangibles due to property acquisitions. The Company’s general and administrative expenses increased by $4.2 million primarily due to greater professional service fees ($1.2 million), personnel costs ($1.2 million), severance costs for a former officer ($0.5 million), trustee fees ($0.3 million) and investor relations/financial reporting ($0.2 million). The Company incurred a $2.9 million write-off of assets relating to the bankruptcy of the tenant in its Dallas, Texas property in 2004. The increase in property operating expenses of $3.2 million is due primarily to incurring property level operating expenses for properties in which the Company has operating expense responsibility and an increase in vacancy. Debt satisfaction charges decreased by $7.4 million due to the payoff of certain mortgages in 2003. Non-operating income increased $1.8 million primarily due to reimbursement of certain costs from non-consolidated entities and greater interest earned. The provision for income taxes increased by $0.9 million due to increased earnings in taxable REIT subsidiaries. Minority interest expense decreased by $1.0 million due to the decrease in earnings at the partnership level. Equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities increased $1.5 million due to an increase in assets owned and net income of non-consolidated entities. Net income increased primarily due to the impact of items discussed above plus a $0.3 million increase in the total discontinued operations income. The total discontinued operations income increase was comprised of an increase in gains on sales of properties of $3.3 million, an increase in impairment charges of $2.8 million, a reduction in income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million and a reduction in debt satisfaction charges of $0.1 million. Net income allocable to common shareholders increased due to the items discussed above offset by an increase in preferred dividends of $3.6 million resulting from the issuance of preferred shares in 2004 and 2003.

      Environmental Matters. Based upon management’s ongoing review of its properties, management is not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of the Company’s properties, which would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that

11

(i) the discovery of environmental conditions, which were previously unknown, (ii) changes in law, (iii) the conduct of tenants or (iv) activities relating to properties in the vicinity of the Company’s properties, will not expose the Company to material liability in the future. Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise adversely affect the operations of the Company’s tenants, which would adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

      In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, as amended, (“SFAS 150”). SFAS 150 establishes standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, SFAS 150 was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. SFAS 150 has been deferred indefinitely for certain types of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. The adoption of the required portions of SFAS 150 had no impact on the Company.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123, (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), which supersedes Accounting Principals Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. The cost will be recognized over the period in which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. SFAS 123R is effective for fiscal years beginning after January 1, 2006, based on new rules issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The impact of adopting this statement will result in the elimination of $11,401 of deferred compensation and additional paid-in-capital from shareholders’ equity. The adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 153, Exchange of Non-monetary Assets — an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“SFAS 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an Interpretation of SFAS Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 clarifies the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset when the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The application of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

      In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“SFAS 154”) which replaces APB Opinions No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It

12

establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of adopting this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In June 2005, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force’s (“EITF”) consensus on EITF 04-05, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. EITF 04-05 provides a framework for determining whether a general partner controls, and should consolidate, a limited partnership or a similar entity. It was effective after June 29, 2005, for all newly formed limited partnerships and for any pre-existing limited partnerships that modify their partnership agreements after that date. General partners of all other limited partnerships will apply the consensus no later than the beginning of the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of the adoption of EITF 04-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In 2005, the EITF released Issue No. 05-6, Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements (“EITF 05-6”), which clarifies the period over which leasehold improvements should be amortized. EITF 05-6 requires all leasehold improvements to be amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets, or the applicable lease term, as defined. The applicable lease term is determined on the date the leasehold improvements are acquired and includes renewal periods for which exercise is reasonably assured. EITF 05-06 was effective for leasehold improvements acquired in reporting periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The impact of the adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      Non-Consolidated Real Estate Entities. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has investments in various real estate entities with varying structures. These investments include the Company’s 33¹/3% non-controlling interest in Lexington Acquiport Company, LLC; its 25% non-controlling interest in Lexington Acquiport Company II, LLC; its 40% non-controlling interest in Lexington Columbia LLC; its 30% non-controlling interest in Lexington/Lion Venture L.P.; its 30% non-controlling interest in Triple Net Investment Company LLC; its 33¹/3% non-controlling interest in Lexington Durham Limited Partnership; its 32.3% non-controlling interest in Lexington Strategic Asset Corp. and through Oklahoma City, its 40% non-controlling tenancy in common interest in real property. The properties owned by these entities are financed with individual non-recourse mortgage loans. Non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders’ sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage. The lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the members of the borrower, except for certain specified expectations listed in the particular loan documents. These exceptions generally relate to limited circumstances including breaches of material representations.

      The Company invests in entities with third parties to increase portfolio diversification, reduce the amount of equity invested in any one property and to increase returns on equity due to the realization of advisory fees. See footnote 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for summary combined balance sheet and income statement data relating to these entities.

      In addition, the Company has issued $1.5 million in letters of credit.

13

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

	Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		15-16
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004		17
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003		18
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003		19
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (as reclassified)		20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (as reclassified for Note 2)		21-47
Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation		48-51

14

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Shareholders

Lexington Corporate Properties Trust:

      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, that Lexington Corporate Properties Trust (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements and financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index, and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

New York, New York

March 10, 2006

15

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Shareholders

Lexington Corporate Properties Trust:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Lexington Corporate Properties Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lexington Corporate Properties Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

New York, New York

March 10, 2006

16

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

($000 except per share amounts)

Years ended December 31,

			2005			2004
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost
	Buildings and building improvements		$	1,608,175		$	1,182,171
	Land and land estates			259,682			210,764
	Land improvements			2,044			2,154
	Fixtures and equipment			13,214			12,783
				1,883,115			1,407,872
	Less: accumulated depreciation			241,188			180,610
				1,641,927			1,227,262
Properties held for sale — discontinued operations				49,397			13,216
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $13,277 in 2005 and $3,101 in 2004)				128,775			54,736
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities				191,146			132,738
Cash and cash equivalents				53,515			146,957
Deferred expenses (net of accumulated amortization of $4,740 in 2005 and $4,896 in 2004)				13,582			7,860
Rent receivable — current				7,673			4,123
Rent receivable — deferred				24,778			23,923
Notes receivable from affiliate				—			45,800
Notes receivable				11,050			—
Other assets, net				38,389			40,471
			$	2,160,232		$	1,697,086
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages and notes payable			$	1,139,971		$	765,144
Liabilities — discontinued operations				32,145			1,688
Accounts payable and other liabilities				13,250			12,406
Accrued interest payable				5,859			5,808
Prepaid rent				10,054			3,818
Deferred revenue				6,271			4,173
				1,207,550			793,037
Minority interests				61,372			56,759
				1,268,922			849,796
Commitments and contingencies (notes 7, 8, 9 and 14)
Shareholders’ equity:
	Preferred shares, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares;
		Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred, liquidation preference, $79,000, 3,160,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004		76,315			76,315
		Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred, liquidation preference $155,000 and $135,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively; 3,100,000 and 2,700,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively		150,589			131,126
	Common shares, par value $0.0001 per share, authorized 160,000,000 and 80,000,000 shares in 2005 and 2004, respectively; 52,155,855 and 48,621,273 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively			5			5
	Additional paid-in-capital			848,564			766,882
	Deferred compensation, net			(11,401	)		(8,692	)
	Accumulated distributions in excess of net income			(172,762	)		(118,346	)
		Total shareholders’ equity		891,310			847,290
			$	2,160,232		$	1,697,086

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

17

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIS TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

($000 except per share amounts)

Years ended December 31,

			2005			2004			2003
Gross revenues:
	Rental		$	180,871		$	133,050		$	100,355
	Advisory fees			5,365			4,885			1,429
	Tenant reimbursements			10,896			5,429			4,190
		Total gross revenues		197,132			143,364			105,974
Expense applicable to revenues:
	Depreciation and amortization			(70,906	)		(38,928	)		(26,106	)
	Property operating			(23,494	)		(10,756	)		(7,590	)
General and administrative				(17,612	)		(13,877	)		(9,652	)
Impairment charges				(12,050	)		(3,584	)		—
Non-operating income				1,519			3,272			1,426
Interest and amortization expense				(65,065	)		(44,857	)		(34,168	)
Debt satisfaction gain (charges), net				4,409			(56	)		(7,459	)
Write-off — tenant bankruptcy				—			(2,884	)		—
Income before benefit (provision) for income taxes, minority interests, equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities and discontinued operations				13,933			31,694			22,425
Benefit (provision) for income taxes				150			(1,181	)		(259	)
Minority interests				(2,111	)		(2,414	)		(3,462	)
Equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities				6,220			7,194			5,707
Income from continuing operations				18,192			35,293			24,411
Discontinued operations, net of minority interests
	Income from discontinued operations			4,479			6,830			7,138
	Debt satisfaction charges			(725	)		—			(91	)
	Impairment charges			(829	)		(2,791	)		—
	Gains on sales of properties			11,578			5,475			2,191
	Total discontinued operations			14,503			9,514			9,238
Net income				32,695			44,807			33,649
Dividends attributable to preferred shares — Series B				(6,360	)		(6,360	)		(3,392	)
Dividends attributable to preferred shares — Series C				(10,075	)		(585	)		—
Net income allocable to common shareholders			$	16,260		$	37,862		$	30,257
Income per common share — basic:
Income from continuing operations			$	0.04		$	0.61		$	0.62
Income from discontinued operations				0.29			0.20			0.27
Net income			$	0.33		$	0.81		$	0.89
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic				49,835,773			46,551,328			34,074,935
Income per common share — diluted:
Income from continuing operations			$	0.04		$	0.59		$	0.61
Income from discontinued operations				0.29			0.21			0.27
Net income			$	0.33		$	0.80		$	0.88
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted				49,902,649			52,048,909			34,277,439

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

18

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

($000 except per share amounts)

Years ended December 31,

																Accumulated			Notes
	Number of				Number of					Additional			Deferred			Distributions			Receivable			Total
	Preferred				Common					Paid-in			Compensation,			In Excess of			Officers /			Shareholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount		Capital			net			Net Income			Shareholders			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2002		—	$	—		29,742,160		$	3	$	414,989		$	(1,766	)	$	(77,777	)	$	(2,473	)	$	332,976
Net income		—		—		—			—		—			—			33,649			—			33,649
Dividends paid to common shareholders ($1.34 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(45,777	)		—			(45,777	)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders ($0.5702 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(1,802	)		—			(1,802	)
Issuance of common shares, net		—		—		10,810,177			1		188,985			(5,887	)		—			—			183,099
Issuance of preferred shares, net		3,160,000		76,315		—			—		—			—			—			—			76,315
Amortization of deferred compensation		—		—		—			—		—			1,388			—			—			1,388
Repayments on notes		—		—		(158,224	)		—		(2,473	)		—			—			2,473			—
Balance at December 31, 2003		3,160,000		76,315		40,394,113			4		601,501			(6,265	)		(91,707	)		—			579,848
Net income		—		—		—			—		—			—			44,807			—			44,807
Dividends paid to common shareholders ($1.40 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(65,086	)		—			(65,086	)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders ($2.0125 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(6,360	)		—			(6,360	)
Issuance of common shares, net		—		—		7,939,272			1		161,572			(4,381	)		—			—			157,192
Issuance of preferred shares, net		2,700,000		131,126		—			—		—			—			—			—			131,126
Amortization of deferred compensation		—		—		—			—		—			1,954			—			—			1,954
Reclass of common shares from mezzanine equity		—		—		287,888			—		3,809			—			—			—			3,809
Balance at December 31, 2004		5,860,000		207,441		48,621,273			5		766,882			(8,692	)		(118,346	)		—			847,290
Net income		—		—		—			—		—			—			32,695			—			32,695
Dividends paid to common shareholders ($1.44 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(72,617	)		—			(72,617	)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders ($2.0125 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(6,360	)		—			(6,360	)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders ($2.62 per share)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(8,134	)		—			(8,134	)
Issuance of common shares, net		—		—		3,534,582			—		81,682			(5,575	)		—			—			76,107
Issuance of preferred shares, net		400,000		19,463		—			—		—			—			—			—			19,463
Amortization of deferred compensation		—		—		—			—		—			2,866			—			—			2,866
Balance at December 31, 2005		6,260,000	$	226,904		52,155,855		$	5	$	848,564		$	(11,401	)	$	(172,762	)	$	—		$	891,310

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

19

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($000 except per share amounts)

Years ended December 31,

				2005			2004			2003
				(as reclassified — See Note 2)
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net income			$	32,695		$	44,807		$	33,649
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, net of effects from acquisitions:
		Depreciation and amortization			73,034			41,710			29,572
		Minority interests			2,165			2,983			4,276
		Gains on sales of properties			(11,578	)		(5,475	)		(2,191	)
		Debt satisfaction gain, net			(4,536	)		—			—
		Impairment charges			12,879			6,375			—
		Write-off-tenant bankruptcy			—			2,884			—
		Straight-line rents			(3,447	)		(3,395	)		(3,790	)
		Other non-cash charges			4,196			2,556			2,026
		Equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities			(6,220	)		(7,194	)		(5,707	)
		Distributions of accumulated earnings from non-consolidated entities			7,561			5,170			5,563
		Deferred tax assets			(466	)		(2,026	)		—
		Increase in accounts payable and other liabilities			(788	)		1,710			1,708
		Other adjustments, net			(38	)		631			3,777
			Net cash provided by operating activities		105,457			90,736			68,883
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Net proceeds from sales/transfers of properties				96,685			101,367			34,943
	Investments in real estate properties and intangible assets				(759,656	)		(203,678	)		(327,435	)
	Investments in and advances to non-consolidated entities				(41,943	)		(86,171	)		(6,824	)
	Investment in convertible mortgage receivable				—			(19,800	)		—
	Collection (issuance) of notes from affiliate				45,800			(32,800	)		(2,331	)
	Collection of notes from non-affiliate				3,488			—			—
	Real estate deposits				1,579			1,180			(23,222	)
	Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings				17,202			38,651			29,831
	Increase in deferred leasing costs				(2,919	)		(207	)		(1,034	)
	Change in escrow deposits and restricted cash				(4,013	)		(967	)		451
			Net cash used in investing activities		(643,777	)		(202,425	)		(295,621	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds of mortgages and notes payable				516,520			159,760			90,882
	Change in credit facility borrowing, net				—			(94,000	)		63,000
	Dividends to common and preferred shareholders				(87,111	)		(71,446	)		(47,579	)
	Dividend reinvestment plan proceeds				13,815			10,608			7,095
	Principal payments on debt, excluding normal amortization				(50,936	)		(6,543	)		(107,942	)
	Principal amortization payments				(25,313	)		(19,704	)		(16,121	)
	Debt deposits				1,334			(1,384	)		121
	Origination fee amortization payments				—			(29	)		(406	)
	Proceeds from the sale of common/preferred shares, net				80,671			275,644			250,467
	Contributions from minority partners				9,412			—			—
	Cash distributions to minority partners				(7,028	)		(8,975	)		(6,618	)
	Increase in deferred financing costs				(6,403	)		(1,087	)		(3,913	)
	Common shares/partnership units repurchased				(83	)		(121	)		—
			Net cash provided by financing activities		444,878			242,723			228,986
Cash attributable to newly consolidated entity					—			—			1,578
Change in cash and cash equivalents					(93,442	)		131,034			3,826
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year					146,957			15,923			12,097
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year				$	53,515		$	146,957		$	15,923

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

($000 except per share amounts)

(1) The Company

      Lexington Corporate Properties Trust (the “Company”) is a self-managed and self-administered Maryland statutory real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that acquires, owns, and manages a geographically diversified portfolio of net leased office, industrial and retail properties and provides investment advisory and asset management services to institutional investors in the net lease area. As of December 31, 2005, the Company owned or had interests in 189 properties in 39 states. The real properties owned by the Company are generally subject to triple net leases to corporate tenants, however sixteen provide for operating expense stops and one is subject to a modified gross lease. As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned or had interests in 154 properties in 37 states.

      The Company believes it has qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Accordingly, the Company will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its shareholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under the Code. The Company is permitted to participate in certain activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) under the Code. As such, the TRS will be subject to federal income taxes on the income from these activities.

      The Company’s Board of Trustees authorized the Company to repurchase, from time to time, up to 2.0 million common shares and/or operating partnership units (“OP Units”) in its three controlled operating partnership subsidiaries, depending on market conditions and other factors. As of December 31, 2005, the Company repurchased approximately 1.4 million common shares/ OP Units at an average price of approximately $10.62 per common share/ OP Unit. In November 2005, the Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to a maximum of 2.0 million additional common shares/OP Units. No repurchases have been made under this authorization.

(2) Reclassification

      Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, management elected to reclassify the presentation of distributions from its investments in non-consolidated entities from “net cash provided by operating activities” to “net cash used in investing activities” in the Trust’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The effect of the change is $7,102, $124 and $2,932 for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, and represents distributions in excess of accumulated earnings from these investments accounted for on the equity method. Previously, the Company looked to the source of the distributions from the non-consolidated entities to determine classification on the cash flow statement. The reclassification does not affect the total net change in cash and cash equivalents for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and has no impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of income or the related income per share amounts.

21

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

	For The Year
	Ended December 31, 2005
(Amounts in thousands)	As Reported			As Reclassified
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Distributions of accumulated earnings from non-consolidated entities	$	14,663		$	7,561
Net cash provided by operating activities		112,559			105,457
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings		10,100			17,202
Net cash used in investing activities		(650,879	)		(643,777	)

	For The Year
	Ended December 31, 2004
(Amounts in thousands)	As Reported			As Reclassified
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Distributions of accumulated earnings from non-consolidated entities	$	5,294		$	5,170
Net cash provided by operating activities		90,860			90,736
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings		38,527			38,651
Net cash used in investing activities		(202,549	)		(202,425	)

	For The Year
	Ended December 31, 2003
(Amounts in thousands)	As Reported			As Reclassified
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Distributions of accumulated earnings from non-consolidated entities	$	8,495		$	5,563
Net cash provided by operating activities		71,815			68,883
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings		26,899			29,831
Net cash used in investing activities		(298,553	)		(295,621	)

(3) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

      Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. The financial statements reflect the accounts of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries, including Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (“LCIF”), Lepercq Corporate Income Fund II L.P. (“LCIF II”), Net 3 Acquisition L.P. (“Net 3”), Lexington Realty Advisors, Inc. (“LRA”), Lexington Contributions, Inc. (“LCI”) and Six Penn Center L.P. LRA and LCI are wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, and the Company is the sole unitholder of the general partner and the majority limited partner of each of LCIF, LCIF II, Net 3 and Six Penn Center L.P. The Company determines whether an entity for which it holds an interest should be consolidated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). FIN 46R requires the Company to evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means

22

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

other than voting rights. If the entity is not a variable interest entity and the Company controls the entity’s voting shares or similar rights, the entity is consolidated.

      Earnings Per Share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income reduced by preferred dividends, if applicable, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share amounts are similarly computed but include the effect, when dilutive, of in-the-money common share options, OP Units, put options of certain partners’ interests in non-consolidated entities and convertible preferred shares.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards.

      FASB Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, as amended, (“SFAS 150”), was issued in May 2003. SFAS 150 establishes standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, SFAS 150 was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. SFAS 150 has been deferred indefinitely for certain types of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. The adoption of the required portions of SFAS 150 had no impact on the Company.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), which supersedes Accounting Principals Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. The cost will be recognized over the period in which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. SFAS 123R is effective for fiscal years beginning after January 1, 2006, based on new rules issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The impact of adopting this statement will result in the elimination of $11,401 of deferred compensation and additional paid-in-capital from the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity. The adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 153, Exchange of Non-monetary Assets — an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“SFAS 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges, occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an Interpretation of SFAS Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 clarifies the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset when the

23

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The application of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

      In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“SFAS 154”) which replaces APB Opinions No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of adopting this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In June 2005, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force’s (“EITF”) consensus on EITF 04-05, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. EITF 04-05 provides a framework for determining whether a general partner controls, and should consolidate, a limited partnership or a similar entity. It was effective after June 29, 2005, for all newly formed limited partnerships and for any pre-existing limited partnerships that modify their partnership agreements after that date. General partners of all other limited partnerships will apply the consensus no later than the beginning of the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of the adoption of EITF 04-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      In 2005, the EITF released Issue No. 05-6, Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements (“EITF 05-6”), which clarifies the period over which leasehold improvements should be amortized. EITF 05-6 requires all leasehold improvements to be amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets, or the applicable lease term, as defined. The applicable lease term is determined on the date the leasehold improvements are acquired and includes renewal periods for which exercise is reasonably assured. EITF 05-06 was effective for leasehold improvements acquired in reporting periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The impact of the adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

      Use of Estimates. Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant estimates made include the recoverability of accounts receivable (primarily related to straight-line rents), allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets, the determination of impairment of long-lived assets and the useful lives of long-lived assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

      Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate. The fair value of the real estate acquired, which includes the impact of mark-to-market adjustments for assumed mortgage debt related to property acquisitions, is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, other value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values.

      The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land, building and improvements and fixtures and equipment) is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and improvements based on management’s determination of relative fair values of these assets. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses

24

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions.

      In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the difference between the current in-place lease rent and a management estimate of current market rents. Below-market lease intangibles are recorded as part of deferred revenue and amortized into rental revenue over the non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. Above-market leases are recorded as part of intangible assets and amortized as a direct charge against rental revenue over the non-cancelable portion of the respective leases.

      The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant, determined as set forth above. This aggregate value is allocated between in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place leases and customer relationships are amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases.

      Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 Accounting for Leases, as amended (“SFAS 13”). SFAS 13 requires that revenue be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the leased property. Renewal options in leases with rental terms that are lower than those in the primary term are excluded from the calculation of straight line rent if they do not meet the criteria of a bargain renewal option. In those instances in which the Company funds tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be owned by the Company, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant. When the Company determines that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, the Company commences revenue recognition when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. The lease incentive is recorded as a reduction to revenue on a straight-line basis over the respective lease term.

      Gains on sales of real estate are recognized pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66 Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, as amended (“SFAS 66”). The specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in SFAS 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance associated with the properties. If the sales criteria are not met, the gain is deferred and the finance, installment or cost recovery method, as appropriate, is applied until the sales criteria are met.

      Accounts Receivable. The Company continuously monitors collections from its tenants and would make a provision for estimated losses based upon historical experience and any specific tenant collection issues that the Company has identified. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts.

      Impairment of Real Estate. The Company evaluates the carrying value of all real estate held when a triggering event under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, as amended (“SFAS 144”) has occurred to determine if an impairment has occurred which would require the recognition of a loss. The evaluation includes reviewing anticipated cash flows of the property, based on current leases in place, coupled with an estimate of proceeds to be realized

25

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

upon sale. However, estimating future sale proceeds is highly subjective and such estimates could differ materially from actual results.

      Depreciation is determined by the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic useful lives of the properties. The Company generally depreciates buildings and building improvements over periods ranging from 8 to 40 years, land improvements from 15 to 20 years, and fixtures and equipment from 5 to 16 years.

      Only costs incurred to third parties in acquiring properties are capitalized. No internal costs (rents, salaries, overhead) are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renovations which extend the useful life of the properties are capitalized.

      Properties Held For Sale. The Company accounts for properties held for sale in accordance with SFAS 144. SFAS 144 requires that the assets and liabilities of properties that meet various criteria in SFAS 144 be presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with assets and liabilities being separately stated. The operating results of these properties are reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Properties that do not meet the held for sale criteria of SFAS 144 are accounted for as operating properties.

      Investments in non-consolidated entities. The Company accounts for its investments in less than 50% owned entities under the equity method, unless pursuant to FIN 46R consolidation is required.

      Deferred Expenses. Deferred expenses consist primarily of debt and leasing costs. Debt costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the interest method, over the terms of the debt instruments and leasing costs are amortized over the term of the related lease.

      Deferred Compensation. Deferred compensation consists of the value of non-vested common shares issued by the Company to employees. The deferred compensation is amortized ratably over the vesting period which generally is five years. Certain common shares vest only when certain performance based measures are met.

      Tax Status. The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its shareholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code.

      The Company is now permitted to participate in certain activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries under the Code. LRA and LCI are taxable REIT subsidiaries. As such, the Company is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these activities.

      Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

26

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      A summary of the average taxable nature of the Company’s common dividends for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, is as follows:

	2005			2004			2003
Total dividends per share	$	1.44		$	1.40		$	1.34
Ordinary income		87.29	%		84.09	%		68.94	%
Short-term capital gain		—			—			—
15% rate — qualifying dividend		1.04			6.82			—
15% rate gain		8.72			0.34			3.10
20% rate gain		—			—			—
25% rate gain		2.95			2.28			0.70
Return of capital		—			6.47			27.26
		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

      A summary of the average taxable nature of the Company’s dividend on Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, is as follows:

	2005			2004			2003
Total dividends per share	$	2.0125		$	2.0125		$	0.5702
Ordinary income		87.29	%		89.91	%		89.20	%
15% rate — qualifying dividend		1.04			7.29			—
15% rate gain		8.72			0.37			8.05
25% rate gain		2.95			2.43			2.75
		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

      A summary of the average taxable nature of the Company’s dividend on Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares for the year ended December 31, 2005, is as follows:

	2005
Total dividends per share	$	2.6239
Ordinary income		87.29	%
15% rate — qualifying dividend		1.04
15% rate gain		8.72
25% rate gain		2.95
		100.00	%

      Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

      Common Share Options. The Company has elected to continue to account for its option plan under the recognition provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income with regard to options granted.

27

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      Common share options granted generally vest ratably over a four-year term and expire five years from the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding common share option awards in each period:

		2005		2004		2003
Net income allocable to common shareholders, as reported — basic		$	16,260	$	37,862	$	30,257
	Add: Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income		—		—		—
	Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards		6		255		509
Pro forma net income — basic		$	16,254	$	37,607	$	29,748
Net income per share — basic
	Basic — as reported	$	0.33	$	0.81	$	0.89
	Basic — pro forma	$	0.33	$	0.81	$	0.87
Net income allocable to common shareholders, as reported — diluted		$	16,260	$	41,615	$	30,257
	Add: Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income		—		—		—
	Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards		6		255		509
Pro forma net income — diluted		$	16,254	$	41,360	$	29,748
Net income per share — diluted
	Diluted — as reported	$	0.33	$	0.80	$	0.88
	Diluted — pro forma	$	0.33	$	0.79	$	0.87

      The value of common share options issued in 2003 was estimated to be $2.42. There were no common share options issued in 2005 and 2004. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R.

      Environmental Matters. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances. These liabilities may include government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Although the Company’s tenants are primarily responsible for any environmental damage and claims related to the leased premises, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of the tenant of such premises to satisfy any obligations with respect to such environmental liability, the Company may be required to satisfy any obligations. In addition, the Company as the owner of such properties may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims irrespective of the provisions of any lease. As of December 31, 2005, the Company is not aware of any environmental matter that could have a material impact on the financial statements.

      Segment Reporting. The Company operates in one industry segment, investment in single tenant, net leased real properties.

      Reclassifications. Certain amounts included in prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation including reclassifying certain income statement captions for properties held for sale as of December 31, 2005 and properties sold during 2005, which are presented as discontinued operations.

28

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

(4) Earnings Per Share

      The following is a reconciliation of numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005:

	2005			2004			2003
BASIC
Income from continuing operations	$	18,192		$	35,293		$	24,411
Less — dividends attributable to preferred shares		(16,435	)		(6,945	)		(3,392	)
Income attributable to common shareholders from continuing operations		1,757			28,348			21,019
Total discontinued operations		14,503			9,514			9,238
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	16,260		$	37,862		$	30,257
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		49,835,773			46,551,328			34,074,935
Income per common share - basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.04		$	0.61		$	0.62
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.20			0.27
Net income	$	0.33		$	0.81		$	0.89
DILUTED
Income attributable to common shareholders from continuing operations - basic	$	1,757		$	28,348		$	21,019
Add — incremental income attributable to assumed conversion of dilutive interests		—			2,416			—
Income attributable to common shareholders from continuing operations		1,757			30,764			21,019
Income from discontinued operations		14,503			10,851			9,238
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	16,260		$	41,615		$	30,257
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of basic earnings per share		49,835,773			46,551,328			34,074,935
Add — incremental shares representing:
Shares issuable upon exercise of employee share options		66,876			131,415			202,504
Shares issuable upon conversion of dilutive interests		—			5,366,166			—
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of diluted earnings per common share		49,902,649			52,048,909			34,277,439
Income per common share - diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.04		$	0.59		$	0.61
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.21			0.27
Net income	$	0.33		$	0.80		$	0.88

29

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

(5) Investments in Real Estate and Intangible Assets

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company made acquisitions, excluding acquisitions made directly by non-consolidated entities totaling $733,830 and $467,940, respectively. These amounts include properties purchased by the Company that were subsequently transferred to non-consolidated entities. During 2004, the Company issued a $19,800 convertible mortgage note secured by a property in Carrollton, Texas. The note, which bore interest at 8.20%, provided for interest only payments through December 2004. In December 2004, the Company exercised its option to purchase the property by converting the note and paying $2,190 in cash. This purchase is included in the amount above.

      In 2005, the Company contributed seven properties, including intangible assets, to various non-consolidated entities for $124,706, which approximated cost, and the non-consolidated entities assumed $36,041 in non-recourse mortgages. The Company received a cash payment of $55,534 relating to these contributions. In 2004, the Company contributed eight properties, including intangible assets, to various non-consolidated entities for $196,982 which approximated cost, and the non-consolidated entities assumed $97,641 in non-recourse debt. The Company received a cash payment of $68,203 related to these contributions.

      The Company sold to unrelated parties, seven properties in 2005, eight properties in 2004 and four properties in 2003, for aggregate net proceeds of $41,151, $36,651 and $11,094, respectively, which resulted in gains in 2005, 2004 and 2003 of $11,578, $5,475 and $2,191, respectively, which are included in discontinued operations. During 2004, the tenant in the Company’s Dallas, Texas property filed for bankruptcy and disaffirmed the lease resulting in the Company writing-off $2,884 of assets.

      During 2005, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $12,050 relating to one property when the property became vacant in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the Company notified the lender of its intention to cease making debt service payments on the related non-recourse mortgage. The charge was determined based upon the difference between the carrying cost of the property of $17,253 and the estimated fair market value of $5,203 determined by the Company based upon the estimated discounted cash flow technique. The impairment charge of $3,584 recognized in 2004 and included in continuing operations relates to a property that was originally classified as held for sale in 2004 but was reclassified as held for investment in 2005.

      For properties acquired during 2005 and owned as of December 31, 2005, the components of intangible assets and their respective weighted average lives are as follows:

			Weighted
			Average
	Costs		Life (yrs)
Lease origination costs	$	54,938		10.8
Customer relationships		20,796		7.9
Above - market leases		9,952		10.1
Below - market leases		1,596		7.4
	$	87,282

30

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      As of December 31, 2005 and 2004 the components of intangible assets are as follows:

	2005		2004
Origination costs	$	98,229	$	44,625
Customer relationships		26,416		5,620
Above-market leases		13,508		4,876
Below-market leases		3,899		2,716
	$	142,052	$	57,837

      The estimated amortization expense of the above intangibles for each of the next five years is $13,771. The liabilities related to the below-market leases are included in deferred revenue.

(6) Discontinued Operations and Assets Held For Sale

      At December 31, 2005, the Company had three properties held for sale with aggregate assets of $49,397 and liabilities, principally mortgage notes payable, aggregating $32,145. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had four properties held for sale, with aggregate assets of $13,216 and liabilities of $1,688, three of which were sold in 2005 and one of which was reclassified as held for investment and depreciated. In 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded impairment charges of $829 and $2,791, respectively, related to discontinued operations.

      The following presents the operating results for the properties sold and held for sale during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004		2003
Total gross revenues	$	7,309	$	11,668	$	13,025
Pre-tax income, including gains on sales	$	14,503	$	9,514	$	9,398

      During 2005, the Company sold one property for an aggregate sales price of $14,500 and provided $11,050 in secured financing to the buyer at a rate of 5.46% which matures on August 1, 2015. The note is interest only through August 2007 and requires annual debt service payments of $750 thereafter and a balloon payment of $9,688 at maturity. In addition, annual real estate tax and insurance escrows are required.

(7) Investment in Non-Consolidated Entities

      The Company has investments in various real estate joint ventures. The business of each joint venture is to acquire, finance, hold for investment or sell single tenant net leased real estate.

Lexington Acquiport Company, LLC (Company has 33¹/3% interest.)

      Lexington Acquiport Company, LLC (“LAC”), is a joint venture with the Comptroller of the State of New York as Trustee for the Common Retirement Fund (“CRF”). The joint venture agreement expires in December 2011. The Company and CRF originally committed to contribute up to $50,000 and $100,000, respectively, to invest in high quality office and industrial net leased real estate. The partners agreed that they would close the funding obligations to LAC. LRA earns annual management fees of 2% of rent collected and acquisition fees equaling 75 basis points of the purchase price of each property investment. All allocations of profit, loss and cash flows from LAC are made one-third to the Company and two-thirds to CRF.

      During 2005, LAC sold a property for net proceeds of $23,496 which resulted in a gain of $5,219.

31

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

Lexington Acquiport Company II, LLC (Company has 25% interest.)

      During 2001, the Company and CRF announced the formation of Lexington Acquiport Company II, LLC (“LAC II”). The Company and CRF have committed $50,000 and $150,000, respectively. In addition to the fees LRA currently earns on acquisitions and asset management in LAC, LRA will also earn 50 basis points on all mortgage debt directly placed in LAC II. All allocations of profit, loss and cash flows from LAC II will be allocated 25% to the Company and 75% to CRF. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $135,088 and $76,494, respectively, had been funded by the members.

      CRF can presently elect to put their equity position in LAC and LAC II to the Company. The Company has the option of issuing common shares for the fair market value of CRF’s equity position (as defined) or cash for 110% of the fair market value of CRF’s equity position. The per common share value of shares issued for CRF’s equity position will be the greater of (i) the price of the Company’s common shares on the closing date (ii) the Company’s funds from operations per share (as defined) multiplied by 8.5 or (iii) $13.40 for LAC properties and $15.20 for LAC II properties. The Company has the right not to accept any property (thereby reducing the fair market value of CRF’s equity position) that does not meet certain underwriting criteria (e.g. lease term and tenant credit). If CRF exercised this put, it is the Company’s current intention to settle this amount in cash. In addition, the operating agreement contains a mutual buy-sell provision in which either partner can force the sale of any property.

      During 2005, LAC II purchased four properties for a capitalized cost of $181,867, two of which were transferred from the Company for $52,125. LAC II partially funded these acquisitions by the use of $124,155 in non-recourse mortgages, which bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.2% to 5.9% and mature at various dates ranging from 2013 to 2020.

      During 2004, LAC II purchased nine properties for a capitalized cost of $239,683, four of which were transferred from the Company for $131,596. LAC II partially funded these acquisitions by the use of $118,690 in non-recourse mortgages, which bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.3% to 6.3% and mature at various dates ranging from 2014 to 2019. In addition, LAC II borrowed $45,800 in non-recourse mortgages, with stated interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 5.2%, from the Company for these acquisitions, which was repaid in 2005.

Lexington Columbia LLC (The Company has a 40% interest.)

      Lexington Columbia LLC (“Columbia”) is a joint venture established December 30, 1999 with a private investor. Its sole purpose is to own a property in Columbia, South Carolina net leased to Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc. through September 2009. The purchase price of the property was approximately $42,500. In accordance with the operating agreement, net cash flows, as defined, will be allocated 40% to the Company and 60% to the other member until both parties have received a 12.5% return on capital. Thereafter cash flows will be distributed 60% to the Company and 40% to the other member.

      During 2001, Columbia expanded the property by 107,894 square feet bringing the total square feet of the property to 456,304. The $10,900 expansion was funded 40% by the Company and 60% by the other member. The tenant has leased the expansion through September 2009 for an average annual rent of $2,000. Cash flows from the expansion will be distributed 40% to the Company and 60% to the other member.

      LRA earns annual asset management fees of 2% of rents collected.

32

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

Lexington/ Lion Venture L.P. (The Company has a 30% interest.)

      Lexington/ Lion Venture L.P. (LION) was formed on October 1, 2003 by the Company and CLPF-LXP/ Lion Venture GP, LLC (Clarion), to invest in high quality single tenant net leased retail, office and industrial real estate. The limited partnership agreement provides for a ten-year term unless terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement. The limited partnership agreement provided for the Company and Clarion to invest up to $30,000 and $70,000, respectively, and to leverage these investments up to a maximum of 60%. During 2004, the Company and Clarion increased their equity commitment by $25,714 and $60,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $187,289 and $149,641, respectively had been funded by the partners, and as of December 31, 2005, all funding requirements have been met. LRA earns acquisition and asset management fees as defined in the operating agreement. All allocation of profit, loss and cash flows are made 30% to the Company and 70% to Clarion until each partner receives a 12% internal rate of return. The Company is eligible to receive a promoted interest of 15% of the internal rate of return in excess of 12%. No promoted interest was earned in 2005 or 2004 by the Company.

      Clarion can elect to put their equity position in LION to the Company. The Company has the option of issuing common shares for the fair market value of Clarion’s equity position (as defined) or cash for 100% of the fair market value of Clarion’s equity position. The per common share value of shares issued for Clarion’s equity position will be the greater of (i) the price of the Company’s common shares on the closing date (ii) the Company’s funds from operations per share (as defined) multiplied by 9.5 or (iii) $19.98. The Company has the right not to accept any property (thereby reducing the fair market value of Clarion’s equity position) that does not meet certain underwriting criteria (e.g. lease term and tenant credit). If Clarion exercises this put, it is the Company’s current intention to settle this amount in cash. In addition, the operating agreement contains a mutual buy-sell provision in which either partner can force the sale of any property.

      During 2005, LION purchased three properties for a capitalized cost of $92,400. These acquisitions were partially funded by $54,780 in non-recourse mortgages which bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.0% to 5.6% and mature at various dates ranging from 2012 to 2019.

      During 2004, LION purchased ten properties for a capitalized cost of $291,254, one of which was transferred from the Company for $20,727. These acquisitions were partially funded by $173,292 in non-recourse mortgage which bear interest at fixed rates (including imputed rates) ranging from 4.8% to 6.8% and mature at various dates ranging from 2009 to 2019. Of the total mortgages incurred in 2004 of $173,292, $18,936 is an imputed value based on a 6.0% market rate. The face value of the mortgage was $17,380 with a stated interest rate of 7.3%.

Triple Net Investment Company LLC (The Company has a 30% interest.)

      In June 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with the State of Utah Retirement Systems (“Utah”). The joint venture entity, Triple Net Investment Company, LLC (“TNI”), was created to acquire high quality office and industrial properties net leased to investment and non-investment grade single tenant users, however TNI has acquired retail properties. The operating agreement provides for a ten-year term unless terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement. The Company and Utah initially committed to make equity contributions to TNI of $15,000 and $35,000, respectively. In December 2004, the Company and Utah increased their contribution by $21,429 and $50,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $83,015 and $39,946, respectively had been funded. In addition, TNI finances a portion of acquisition costs through the use of non-recourse mortgages. During 2005, TNI made three acquisitions aggregating $126,781. The acquisitions were partially funded through the use of $83,327 in non-recourse mortgages, which bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.1% to 5.2% and mature at various dates ranging in 2012 and 2013.

33

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      During 2004, TNI made eleven acquisitions aggregating $114,506, three of which were transferred from the Company for $45,957. The acquisitions were partially funded through the use of $73,894 non-recourse mortgages, which bear interest at fixed rates (including imputed rates) ranging from 4.9% to 7.9% and mature at various dates ranging from 2010 to 2018. Of the total mortgages incurred in 2004 of $73,894, $20,585 is an imputed value based on a 6.0% market rate. The face value of the mortgages was $18,119 with stated interest rates ranging from 8.8% to 9.4%.

      Utah can elect to put their equity position in TNI to the Company. The Company has the option of issuing common shares for the fair market value of Utah’s equity position (as defined) or cash for 100% of the fair market value of Utah’s equity position. The per common share value of shares issued for Utah’s equity position will be the greater of (i) the price of the Company’s common shares on the closing date (ii) the Company’s funds from operations per share (as defined) multiplied by 12.0 or (iii) $21.87. The Company has the right not to accept any property (thereby reducing the fair market value of Utah’s equity position) that does not meet certain underwriting criteria (e.g. lease term and tenant credit). If Utah exercises this put, it is the Company’s current intention to settle this obligation in cash. In addition, the operating agreement contains a mutual buy-sell provision in which either partner can force the sale of any property.

Lexington Florence LLC (The Company had a 22.7% interest.)

      Lexington Florence LLC (“Florence”) was a joint venture established in January 2002 with unaffiliated investors. Its sole purpose was to own a property in Florence, South Carolina net leased to Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. through June 2008. In 2002, the Company sold a 77.3% interest in Florence to the unaffiliated investors for $4,581. The investors had the right to put their interests in Florence to the Company for OP Units in LCIF (valued at $4,581). During 2004, the Company repurchased the 77.3% interest for $6,137.

Oklahoma City (The Company owns a 40% tenancy in common interest in a real property.)

      Oklahoma City (“TIC”) is a tenancy in common established in 2005. The Company sold, at cost, a 60% tenancy in common interest in one of the properties it acquired during 2005 for $3,961 in cash and the assumption of $8,849 in mortgage debt.

Lexington Strategic Asset Corp. (The Company has a 32.3% interest.)

      Lexington Strategic Asset Corp. (“LSAC”) was established in 2005. During 2005, the Company contributed four properties at a carrying value of $50,821 (three of which were subject to non-recourse mortgages of $21,293) plus financing deposits to LSAC in exchange for 3,319,600 common shares of LSAC at a value of $10.00 per share. In addition, LSAC sold 6,738,000 common shares, at $10.00 per common share, generating net proceeds of $61,595, after deducting offering costs and expenses. The mortgages bear interest at rates ranging from 5.1% to 5.3% and mature in 2015. LRA is the advisor of LSAC. LRA earns a base advisory fee of (i) 1.75% of LSAC’s shareholders’ equity, as defined, up to $500,000 and 1.50% of LSAC’s shareholders’ equity in excess of $500,000 and (ii) incentive advisory fees (promoted interest) based upon LSAC’s performance. The Company granted certain officers the right to 40% of the promoted interest earned by LRA. Also, certain officers purchased 220,000 common shares of LSAC at its formation for $110 and an additional 100,000 common shares in the offering for $1,000. During 2005, LSAC acquired two properties for an aggregate capitalized cost of $25,036. In addition, LSAC obtained a $10,100 non-recourse mortgage note, secured by one property, which bears interest at 5.46% and matures in 2020.

34

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

Summarized Financial Data

      Summarized combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and income statements for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 for these non-consolidated entities are as follows:

	2005		2004
Real estate, net	$	1,384,361	$	1,033,801
Other assets		267,310		121,307
	$	1,651,671	$	1,155,108
Mortgage payable	$	993,454	$	659,524
Mortgages payable - the Company		—		45,800
Other liabilities		26,767		16,244
The Company’s capital		192,466		133,381
Other partners/members capital		438,984		300,159
	$	1,651,671	$	1,155,108

	2005		2004		2003
Revenues	$	145,830	$	83,387	$	50,857
Expenses, net		132,878		62,764		34,353
Debt satisfaction charge		1,952		—		—
Gain on sale of property		5,219		—		—
Net income	$	16,219	$	20,623	$	16,504

      The Company, through LRA, earns advisory fees from these non-consolidated entities for services related to acquisitions, asset management and debt placement. In addition, the Company earns asset management fees for advising third parties. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized the following fees:

Fees	2005		2004
Acquisition	$	2,363	$	3,226
Asset management		2,710		1,314
Debt placement		292		345
	$	5,365	$	4,885

      In addition, the Company received $1,240 in reimbursed costs from the partners of the non-consolidated entities during 2004.

(8) Mortgages and Notes Payable

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s mortgage and notes payable as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

										2006 Estimated
								Maturity		Annual Debt		Balloon
Property Level Debt — Fixed Rate	2005		2004		Interest Rate			(Mo/Yr)		Service (h)		Payment
Warren, OH(d)	$	11,313	$	16,412		7.000	%		10-07	$	6,160	$	—
Bristol, PA		9,514		9,627		7.400	%		02-08		831		9,262

35

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

										2006 Estimated
								Maturity		Annual Debt		Balloon
Property Level Debt — Fixed Rate	2005		2004		Interest Rate			(Mo/Yr)		Service (h)		Payment
Boca Raton, FL(f)		15,275		15,275		5.250	%		03-08		802		15,275
Decatur, GA		6,420		6,562		6.720	%		06-08		579		6,049
Phoenix, AZ		13,558		13,907		7.890	%		06-08		1,434		12,591
Palm Beach Gardens, FL		10,966		11,160		7.010	%		06-08		970		10,418
Canton, OH		3,171		3,252		7.150	%		08-08		313		2,936
Spartanburg, SC		2,634		2,700		7.150	%		08-08		260		2,438
Florence, SC		9,065		9,237		7.500	%		02-09		869		8,443
Canton, OH		1,057		1,330		9.490	%		02-09		388		—
Baton Rouge, LA		1,751		1,827		7.375	%		03-09		208		1,478
Livonia, MI (2 properties)		10,770		10,904		7.800	%		04-09		992		10,236
Bristol, PA		5,769		5,916		7.250	%		04-09		571		5,228
Westland, MI		2,109		2,545		10.500	%		09-09		683		—
Salt Lake City, UT		9,388		11,474		7.610	%		10-09		2,901		—
High Point, NC		8,585		8,786		5.750	%		10-09		695		7,741
Hebron, OH		16,132		16,311		8.100	%		02-10		1,511		15,257
Hampton, VA		7,147		4,432		8.270	%		04-10		677		6,758
Hampton, VA		4,383		7,227		8.260	%		04-10		415		4,144
Tampa, FL		8,156		5,970		6.930	%		08-10		674		7,603
Tampa, FL		5,899		8,253		6.880	%		08-10		485		5,495
Herndon, VA		18,458		18,642		8.180	%		12-10		1,723		17,301
Columbia, SC		3,294		3,362		7.540	%		01-11		317		2,905
Tuscon, AZ		2,355		2,404		7.500	%		01-11		226		2,076
Valley Forge, PA		12,578		12,838		7.120	%		02-11		1,166		10,927
Glendale, AZ		14,458		14,625		7.400	%		04-11		1,258		13,365
Allen, TX		30,582		—		5.126	%		05-11		1,589		30,582
Farmington Hills, MI		20,550		—		5.126	%		05-11		1,225		19,020
Wallingford, CT		3,453		—		4.926	%		05-11		200		3,187
Auburn Hills, MI		6,915		7,061		7.010	%		06-11		637		5,918
Plymouth, MI		4,602		4,695		7.960	%		07-11		463		3,949
Newport, OR		6,772		6,894		5.030	%		08-11		470		5,980
Greenville, SC		13,429		13,663		4.415	%		01-12		841		11,806
New Kingston, PA		7,043		7,159		7.790	%		01-12		678		6,101
Mechanicsburg, PA		5,199		5,285		7.780	%		01-12		500		4,503
New Kingston, PA		3,355		3,411		7.780	%		01-12		323		2,906
Lake Forest, CA		10,611		10,727		7.260	%		02-12		901		9,708
Millington, TN		17,827		—		5.247	%		05-12		1,081		16,222
Lakewood, CO		8,694		—		5.097	%		05-12		516		7,890
Groveport, OH		7,650		7,742		6.030	%		10-12		563		6,860
San Antonio, TX		29,629		30,017		6.080	%		10-12		2,260		26,025
Foxboro, MA(d)		17,764		19,425		6.000	%		01-13		2,817		—
Fort Mill, SC		11,233		11,394		6.000	%		01-13		839		9,904
Waterloo, IA		6,251		6,533		5.610	%		02-13		672		3,505
Atlanta, GA		45,238		—		5.268	%		05-13		2,752		40,356
Houston, TX		17,660		—		5.218	%		05-13		1,067		15,737
Southington, CT		13,780		—		5.018	%		05-13		809		12,228

36

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

										2006 Estimated
								Maturity		Annual Debt		Balloon
Property Level Debt — Fixed Rate	2005		2004		Interest Rate			(Mo/Yr)		Service (h)		Payment
Tempe, AZ		13,648		—		5.148	%		05-13		816		12,144
Indianapolis, IN		9,638		—		5.168	%		05-13		578		8,580
Fort Meyers, FL		8,912		—		5.268	%		05-13		476		8,550
Chelmsford, MA		7,008		—		5.118	%		05-13		417		6,231
Lancaster, CA (first)		10,303		10,464		7.020	%		09-13		900		8,637
Lancaster, CA (second)		8,677		8,794		5.920	%		09-13		642		7,518
Knoxville, TN		5,165		5,233		5.950	%		09-13		381		4,496
Foxboro, MA(d)		22,385		23,649		6.000	%		01-14		3,270		—
Moody, AL		7,483		7,596		4.978	%		01-14		493		6,350
Mechanicsburg, PA		13,410		13,679		5.730	%		03-14		1,045		10,538
Redmond, OR		9,888		10,018		5.616	%		04-14		697		8,484
Clive, IA		5,920		—		5.139	%		05-14		354		5,151
Fort Mill, SC		20,300		20,300		5.373	%		05-14		1,106		18,311
Philadelphia, PA(i)		49,000		—		5.060	%		07-14		2,514		43,547
Jackson, TN		10,219		10,343		5.930	%		07-14		743		8,820
Eau Claire, WI		1,927		2,079		8.000	%		07-14		313		—
Carrollton, TX		14,342		14,520		5.530	%		01-15		993		12,022
Southfield, MI		10,764		11,319		4.550	%		02-15		1,058		4,454
Franklin, NC		1,729		1,847		8.500	%		03-15		271		—
Kalamazoo, MI		17,625		—		5.411	%		05-15		1,094		15,087
Houston, TX		16,977		—		5.160	%		05-15		1,017		14,408
Houston, TX		13,254		—		5.210	%		05-15		800		11,265
Indianapolis, IN		13,182		—		5.160	%		05-15		790		11,188
San Antonio, TX		13,071		—		5.340	%		05-15		803		11,149
Los Angeles, CA		11,500		—		5.110	%		05-15		684		9,760
Atlanta, GA		11,325		—		5.260	%		05-15		604		10,502
Richmond, VA		10,608		—		5.310	%		05-15		649		9,055
Harrisburg, PA		9,180		—		5.110	%		05-15		546		7,780
Elizabethtown, KY(k)		16,687		—		4.990	%		07-15		1,647		13,868
Hopkinsville, KY(k)		9,777		—		4.990	%		07-15		965		8,126
Dry Ridge, KY(k)		7,905		—		4.990	%		07-15		780		6,569
Owensboro, KY(k)		7,069		—		4.990	%		07-15		698		5,875
Elizabethtown, KY(k)		3,144		—		4.990	%		07-15		310		2,611
Southborough, MA		1,885		2,013		7.500	%		09-15		275		—
Houston, TX(d)		65,893		68,163		6.250	%		09-15		5,595		18,318
Houston, TX(d)		27,150		27,488		6.250	%		09-15		2,828		6,985
Sugar Land, TX(d)		17,560		18,050		6.250	%		09-15		1,770		6,286
Houston, TX(d)		7,612		7,788		6.250	%		09-15		700		2,222
Temple, TX		8,997		9,106		6.090	%		01-16		668		7,446
Danville, IL		6,412		6,522		9.000	%		01-16		692		4,578
Bremerton, WA		6,650		6,731		6.090	%		04-16		494		5,465
Dillon, SC		11,450		11,793		7.900	%		12-16		1,263		5,273
Dubuque, IA		10,875		—		5.402	%		06-17		733		8,725
Westmont, IL		15,559		15,877		6.210	%		03-18		1,292		9,662
Houston, TX		10,000		—		5.640	%		01-21		692		7,018

37

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

										2006 Estimated
								Maturity		Annual Debt		Balloon
Property Level Debt — Fixed Rate	2005		2004		Interest Rate			(Mo/Yr)		Service (h)		Payment
Wall Township, NJ(d)		29,752		29,899		6.250	%		01-21		2,013		—
Chester, SC		13,842		—		5.380	%		08-25		1,144		362
Dubuque, IA(j)(g)		—		7,200		4.890	%		—		—		—
Ocala, FL(l)		—		12,626		7.250	%		—		—		—
Henderson, NC(l)		—		4,319		7.390	%		—		—		—
San Diego, CA(g)		—		4,156		7.500	%		—		—		—
Dallas, TX(m)		—		20,912		7.490	%		—		—		—
	$	1,128,101	$	751,468		6.001	%			$	96,924	$	813,729
Property Level Debt — Variable Rate
Milpitas, CA(a)(b)(c)	$	11,870	$	13,676		8.090	%		07-06	$	11,870	$	11,870
Corporate Level Debt
Credit Facility(e)		—		—		—			06-08		—		—
Total	$	1,139,971	$	765,144		6.023	%			$	108,794	$	825,599

(a)	Floating rate debt, 30 day LIBOR plus 400 basis points.
(b)	All property cash flows, net of interest expense are used for principal amortization.
(c)	The Company has informed the lender that it will no longer make debt service payments on this mortgage.
(d)	Amounts based upon imputed interest rates.
(e)	In 2005, the Company obtained a $200,000 unsecured revolving credit facility, which expires June 2008, bears interest at 120-170 basis points over LIBOR depending on the amount of the Company’s leverage level and has an interest rate period of one, three or six months, at the option of the Company. The credit facility is provided by Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and Key Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent. The credit facility contains various leverage, debt service coverage, net worth maintenance and other customary covenants with which the Company is in compliance as of December 31, 2005. Approximately $198,479 was available under this credit facility to the Company at December 31, 2005. The Company has outstanding letters of credit aggregating $1,521. The Company pays an unused facility fee equal to 25 basis points if 50% or less of the facility is utilized and 15 basis points if greater than 50% of the facility is utilized. This facility replaced a $100,000 facility, which bore interest at 150-250 basis points over LIBOR. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2004.
(f)	Interest only through maturity.
(g)	Satisfaction of these mortgages resulted in an aggregate charge of $899.
(h)	For mortgages with less than twelve months to maturity, amounts represent remaining payments.
(i)	The Company has an 80.5% interest in this property.
(j)	Mortgage was refinanced in 2005.
(k)	The Company paid $22,998 to the lender of these loans, which aggregate original balance was $68,400, for a subordinated interest in $30,000 of the outstanding balances. The Company gave the lender a three year call option to repurchase the subordinated interest for an amount that will give the Company a 10% return on its investment. The amount paid by the Company along with a determined value of the call option of $512 has been presented as a reduction in mortgages payable. The $512 is included in other liabilities.

38

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

(l)	Mortgages are reclassified as discontinued operations in 2005.
(m)	Mortgage satisfied in 2005 which resulted in a gain of $5,087.

      Certain mortgages payable have yield maintenance or defeasance requirements relating to any repayments. In addition, three sets of two properties are cross-collaterized.

      Scheduled principal amortization and balloon payments for mortgages and notes payable, including mortgages payable relating to discontinued operations of $30,589, for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Years ending	Scheduled		Balloon
December 31,	Amortization		Payments		Total
2006	$	27,804	$	11,870	$	39,674
2007		35,657		—		35,657
2008		30,481		58,969		89,450
2009		31,621		47,681		79,302
2010		30,517		56,558		87,075
Thereafter		160,733		678,669		839,402
	$	316,813	$	853,747	$	1,170,560

(9) Leases

      Lessor:

      Minimum future rental receipts under the noncancellable portion of tenant leases, including leases on properties held for sale, assuming no new or re-negotiated leases, for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Year ending
December 31,
2006	$	192,247
2007		185,414
2008		172,214
2009		162,725
2010		140,353
Thereafter		710,434
	$	1,563,387

      The above minimum lease payments do not include reimbursements to be received from tenants for certain operating expenses and real estate taxes and do not include early termination payments provided for in certain leases.

      Certain leases allow for the tenant to terminate the lease if the property is deemed obsolete, as defined, but must make a termination payment to the Company, as stipulated in the lease. In addition, certain leases provide the tenant with the right to purchase the leased property at fair market value or a stipulated price.

39

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      Lessee:

      The Company holds leasehold interests in seventeen properties. The ground rents on these properties are either paid directly by the tenants to the fee holder or reimbursed to the Company as additional rent. Two properties are economically owned through the holding of industrial revenue bonds and as such neither ground lease payments nor bond debt service payments are made or received, respectively. For certain of the properties, the Company has an option to purchase the land.

      Minimum future rental payments under noncancellable leasehold interests, excluding leases held through industrial revenue bonds and lease payments in the future that are based upon fair market value, collectively, for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Year ending
December 31,
2006	$	1,220
2007		1,214
2008		1,184
2009		1,184
2010		974
Thereafter		12,140
	$	17,916

      Rent expense for the leasehold interests was $528, $288 and $238 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      The Company leases its corporate headquarters. The lease expires December 2015, with rent fixed at $599 per annum through December 2008 and will be adjusted to fair market value, as defined, thereafter. The Company is also responsible for its proportionate share of operating expense and real estate taxes. As an incentive to enter the lease the Company received a payment of $845 which it is amortizing as a reduction of rent expense. The Company also leases a regional office until July 2010 from LION. The minimum lease payments for these offices are $636 for 2006, $637 for 2007, $639 for 2008, $41 for 2009 and $21 for 2010. Rent expense for these offices for 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $861, $618 and $557, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses.

(10) Minority Interests

      In conjunction with several of the Company’s acquisitions, property owners were issued OP Units as a form of consideration in exchange for the property. All of such interest are redeemable at certain times, only at the option of the holders, for common shares on a one-for-one basis at various dates through November 2006 and are not otherwise mandatorily redeemable by the Company. During 2005, the Company issued 352,244 OP Units for $7,714 in cash. As of December 31, 2005, there were 5,720,071 OP Units outstanding, of which 4,784,612 were currently redeemable for common shares. Of the total OP Units outstanding, 1,716,924 are held by two executive officers of the Company. All units have stated distributions in accordance with their respective partnership agreement. To the extent that the Company’s dividend per share is less than the stated distribution per unit per the applicable partnership agreement, the distributions per unit are reduced by the percentage reduction in the Company’s dividend. No units have a liquidation preference. As of December 31, 2004, there were 5,408,699 OP Units outstanding.

40

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

(11) Preferred and Common Shares

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 2,500,000 and 6,900,000 common shares in public offerings raising $60,722 and $144,045 in proceeds, respectively, which was used to retire mortgage debt and fund acquisitions.

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 400,000 shares (which were issued pursuant to an underwriters over allotment option) and 2,700,000 shares of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock raising net proceeds of $19,463 and $131,126, respectively. The shares have a dividend of $3.25 per share per annum, have a liquidation preference of $20,000 and $135,000, respectively, and the Company commencing November 2009, if certain common share prices are achieved, can force conversion into common shares. In addition, each share is currently convertible into 1.8643 common shares. This conversion ratio may increase over time if the Company’s common share dividend exceeds certain quarterly thresholds.

      If certain fundamental changes occur, holders may require the Company, in certain circumstances, to repurchase all or part of their Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, the Company will under certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional common shares or, in lieu thereof, may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate upon the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock becoming convertible into shares of the public acquiring or surviving company.

      On or after November 16, 2009, the Company may, at the Company’s option, cause the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to be automatically converted into that number of common shares that are issuable at the then prevailing conversion rate. The Company may exercise its conversion right only if, at certain times, the closing price of the Company’s common shares equal or exceeds 125% of the then prevailing conversion price of the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock.

      Investors in the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights, but will have limited voting rights if the Company fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters and under certain other circumstances. Upon conversion the Company may choose to deliver the conversion value to investors in cash, common shares, or a combination of cash and common shares.

      During 2003, the Company issued 3,160,000 Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares raising net proceeds of $76,315. These shares have a dividend of $2.0125 per share per annum, have a liquidation preference of $79,000, have no voting rights, and are redeemable by the Company at $25.00 per share ($79,000) commencing June 2008.

      During 2005 and 2004, holders of an aggregate of 37,200 and 114,159 OP Units redeemed such OP Units for common shares of the Company. These redemptions resulted in an increase in shareholders’ equity and corresponding decrease in minority interest of $441 and $1,487, respectively.

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 276,608 and 201,029 common shares, respectively, to certain employees resulting in $6,080 and $4,381 of deferred compensation, respectively. These common shares generally vest ratably, primarily over a 5 year period, however in certain situations the vesting is cliff based after 5 years and in other cases vesting only occurs if certain performance criteria are met.

      During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company issued 658,122, 551,516 and 423,035 common shares, respectively, under its dividend reinvestment plan which allows shareholders to reinvest dividends to purchase common shares at a 5% discount to its market value, as defined.

41

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      In 1999, the Company issued 287,888 common shares which it had the obligation to repurchase for $13.50 per share through December 2004. As of December 31, 2004 the obligation expired and the Company has included such shares in shareholders’ equity.

(12) Benefit Plans

      The Company maintains a common share option plan pursuant to which qualified and non-qualified options may be issued. Options granted under the plan generally vest over a period of one to four years and expire five years from date of grant. No compensation cost is reflected in net income as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant.

      Share option activity during the years indicated is as follows:

					Weighted-Average
		Number of			Exercise Price
		Shares			Per Share
Balance at December 31, 2002			1,233,057		$	13.39
	Granted		30,000			16.15
	Exercised		(687,527	)		12.94
	Forfeited		(10,500	)		15.97
	Expired		(43,500	)		15.25
Balance at December 31, 2003			521,530			13.94
	Granted		—			—
	Exercised		(345,200	)		13.48
	Forfeited		—			—
	Expired		—			—
Balance at December 31, 2004			176,330			14.70
	Granted		—			—
	Exercised		(133,830	)		14.71
	Forfeited		(2,000	)		13.66
	Expired		—			—
Balance at December 31, 2005			40,500		$	14.71

      The following is additional disclosures for common share options outstanding at December 31, 2005:

		Options Outstanding							Exercisable Options
				Weighted							Weighted
Range of				Average		Remaining					Average
Exercise				Exercise		Life					Exercise
Prices		Number		Price		(Years)			Number		Price
	$11.8125		9,000	$	11.81		—	(1)		9,000	$	11.81
	$15.50-$15.90		31,500		15.53		1.1			31,500		15.53
			40,500	$	14.71		0.8			40,500	$	14.71

(1)  All common share options are scheduled to expire January 3, 2006.

42

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      There are 1,230,571 options available for grant at December 31, 2005.

      The Company has a 401(k) retirement savings plan covering all eligible employees. The Company will match 25% of the first 4% of employee contributions. In addition, based on its profitability, the Company may make a discretionary contribution at each fiscal year end to all eligible employees. The matching and discretionary contributions are subject to vesting under a schedule providing for 25% annual vesting starting with the first year of employment and 100% vesting after four years of employment. Approximately $179, $171 and $127 of contributions are applicable to 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      During 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 276,608 and 201,029 common shares, respectively, to certain employees resulting in $6,080 and $4,381 of deferred compensation, respectively. These common shares generally vest ratably, primarily over a 5 year period, however in certain situations the vesting is cliff based after 5 years and in other cases, vesting only occurs if certain performance criteria are met.

      As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, 547,555 and 452,723 common shares were non-vested, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, 151,687, 122,813, and 100,474 common shares vested, respectively, which generated compensation expense of $2,866, $1,954 and $1,389, respectively.

      The Company has established a trust for certain officers in which non-vested common shares, which generally vest ratably over five years, granted for the benefit of the officers are deposited. The officers exert no control over the common shares in the trust and the common shares are available to the general creditors of the Company. As of December 31, 2005, and 2004, there were 427,531 and 784,761 common shares, respectively, in the trust.

(13) Income Taxes

      The (benefit) provision for income taxes relates primarily to the taxable income of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The earnings, other than in taxable REIT subsidiaries, of the Company are not generally subject to Federal income taxes at the Company level due to the REIT election made by the Company.

      Income taxes have been provided for on the asset and liability method as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

      The Company’s (benefit) provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is summarized as follows:

		2005			2004			2003
Current:
	Federal	$	222		$	2,249		$	—
	State and local		93			958			259
Deferred:
	Federal		(358	)		(1,722	)		—
	State and local		(107	)		(304	)		—
		$	(150	)	$	1,181		$	259

43

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      Deferred tax assets of $2,492 and $2,026, respectively are included in other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively and are realizable based upon projected future taxable income. These deferred tax assets relate primarily to differences in the timing of the recognition of income/(loss) between GAAP and tax basis of real estate investments and interest.

      The income tax (benefit) provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax operating income as follows (in thousands):

	2005			2004			2003
Federal (benefit) provision at statutory tax rate (34%)	$	(96	)	$	1,106		$	—
State and local taxes, net of Federal benefit		(24	)		195			—
Other		(30	)		(120	)		259
	$	(150	)	$	1,181		$	259

(14) Commitments and Contingencies

      The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

      The Company, including its non-consolidated entities, are obligated under certain tenant leases to fund the expansion of the underlying leased properties.

      The Company has entered into letters of intent to purchase, upon completion of construction and rent commencement from the tenant, two properties for an estimated aggregate obligation of $48,785.

(15) Related Party Transactions

      During 2003, the Company issued 231,763 OP Units to satisfy outstanding obligations that resulted in a gain of $896. Of the OP Units issued, the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Company received 120,662 units.

      During 2003, three executive officers repaid recourse notes to the Company including accrued interest thereon, of $2,522 by delivering to the Company 158,224 common shares.

      As of December 31, 2003, the Company was obligated for $808 resulting from the acquisition of certain properties in 1996. Of the $808, the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees were owed $414. During 2004, this obligation was satisfied as part of the acquisition by the Company of 100% of the partnership interests it did not already own of a partnership that owned a single tenant net leased property. The acquisition was effected through the issuance of 97,828 OP Units, of which the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees received an aggregate 27,212.

      In 2002, the Company issued 34,483 common shares in respect of a 15-year, 8% interest only recourse note to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company for $500. This note was satisfied in 2003.

      All related party acquisitions, sales and loans were approved by the independent members of the Board of Trustees or the Audit Committee.

      In addition, the Company earns fees from its non-consolidated investments (See note 7).

44

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

(16) Fair Market Value of Financial Instruments

     Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable

      The Company estimates that the fair value approximates carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of the instruments.

     Mortgages and Notes Payable

      The Company determines the fair value of these instruments based on a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate that approximates the current borrowing rates for instruments of similar maturities. Based on this, the Company has determined that the fair value of these instruments exceeds carrying value by $24,440 and $29,536 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

     Derivative Instruments

      The Company retained a third party to value the $512 call option granted to a lender in association with its repurchase of debt instruments (See Note 8 item k).

(17) Concentration of Risk

      The Company seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through diversification achieved by the geographic distribution of its properties, avoiding dependency on a single property and the creditworthiness of its tenants.

      For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, no tenant represented 10% or more of gross revenues.

(18) Supplemental Disclosure of Statement of Cash Flow Information

      During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company paid $65,635, $41,179 and $36,467, respectively, for interest and $1,703, $4,024 and $282, respectively, for income taxes.

      During 2005, the Company provided $11,050 in secured financing related to the sale of a property.

      During 2005, in connection with certain mortgage financings the lender withheld $5,600 in proceeds which will be disbursed upon expansion of the mortgaged properties.

      During 2005, the Company recorded a derivative obligation of $512.

      During 2004, the Company sold a property for $4,324 and received as a part of the consideration a note receivable of $3,488. The note was repaid in 2005.

      During 2005, 2004 and 2003, holders of an aggregate of 37,200, 114,159 and 71,567 OP Units, respectively, redeemed such units for common shares of the Company. These redemptions resulted in increases in shareholders’ equity and corresponding decreases in minority interests of $441, $1,487 and $915, respectively.

      During 2004, the Company issued 97,828 OP Units valued at $1,801 to acquire 100% of the partnership interest in a partnership it did not already own. The partnership owned a single net leased property. Of these OP Units, 27,212 were issued to the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees.

      During 2003, the Company issued 231,763 OP Units to satisfy $5,641 in outstanding obligations which resulted in a gain of $896.

45

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      During 2003, three executive officers repaid recourse notes to the Company including accrued interest thereon, of $2,522 by delivering to the Company 158,224 common shares.

      During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company issued 276,608, 201,029 and 336,992 common shares to certain employees and trustees resulting in $6,080, $4,381 and $5,887 of deferred compensation.

      During 2004, the Company assumed $273,260 in liabilities relating to the acquisition of real estate, including the acquisition of the remaining 77.3% partnership interest it did not already own in Florence. The other assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the Florence acquisition were not material.

      In 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company contributed properties (along with non-recourse mortgage notes of $36,041, $97,641 and $0, respectively) to joint venture entities for capital contributions of $32,170, $13,718 and $11,649, respectively. In addition, during 2004 the Company issued mortgage notes receivable of $45,800 relating to these contributions, which were repaid in 2005.

      During 2003, LRA became a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The assets and liabilities of LRA, which were consolidated as of January 1, 2003 and were treated as non-cash activities for the Statement of Cash Flows, were as follows:

Real estate, net	$	41,613
Cash		1,578
Other assets		1,221
Mortgage payable		30,028
Other liabilities		1,468

(19) Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data

		2005
		3/31/05		6/30/05		9/30/05		12/31/05
Total gross revenues(1)		$	37,442	$	50,036	$	55,729	$	53,925
Net income (loss)		$	9,526	$	15,949	$	8,970	$	(1,750	)
Net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders – basic		$	5,417	$	11,841	$	4,861	$	(5,859	)
Net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders – per share:
	Basic	$	0.11	$	0.24	$	0.10	$	(0.11	)
	Diluted	$	0.11	$	0.22	$	0.08	$	(0.11	)

		2004
		3/31/04		6/30/04		9/30/04		12/31/04
Total gross revenues(1)		$	32,174	$	35,981	$	37,314	$	37,895
Net income		$	11,978	$	14,617	$	11,163	$	7,049
Net income allocable to common shareholders – basic		$	10,388	$	13,027	$	9,573	$	4,874
Net income allocable to common shareholders – per share:
	Basic	$	0.24	$	0.27	$	0.20	$	0.10
	Diluted	$	0.24	$	0.27	$	0.19	$	0.09

(1)  All periods have been adjusted to reflect the impact of properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and properties classified as held for sale which are reflected in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

46

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST

AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

($000 except per share amounts)

      The sum of the quarterly income per common share amounts may not equal the full year amounts primarily because the computations of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each quarter and the full year are made independently.

(20) Subsequent Events

      Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the following events occurred:

      In January 2006, LSAC acquired a property, which is currently undergoing an expansion, for $4,724. LSAC is obligated to fund the expansion of the property to a maximum of $2,814.

      In January 2006, the Company obtained a $23,750 non-recourse mortgage, on its Dillon, South Carolina property, with an interest rate of 5.97%, which matures in 2022. The Company used the proceeds to repay the existing debt on the property of $11,420 and incurred prepayment penalties of $740.

      In January 2006, the Company acquired a property, located in the Netherlands, for approximately $39,394. The Company partially financed this acquisition by obtaining a non-recourse mortgage for approximately $32,506, at a rate of 5.30% and maturing in 2011. The Company acquired this property in a joint venture structure with a third party. The Company contributed 90% of the required equity to finance the purchase of the property. Under the terms of the partnership agreement distributions shall be made monthly as follows:

•  90% to the Company until the Company has received a 10% internal rate of return (“IRR”);

•  80% to the Company until the Company has received a 12% IRR;

•  70% to the Company until the Company has received a 15% IRR;

•  50% to the Company thereafter.

      In March 2006, LSAC obtained individual non-recourse mortgages on its Omaha, Nebraska and Tempe, Arizona properties which aggregated $17,500. Each mortgage has an interest rate of 5.61% and matures in 2016.

      In March 2006, the Company sold its Countryside, Illinois property for gross proceeds of $5,900.

      In March 2006, Dana Corporation, a tenant in 10 of the Company’s properties (including one in a non-consolidated entity) as of December 31, 2005, declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy. As of December 31, 2005 the aggregate net carrying cost of the 9 consolidated properties was $144,597, aggregate non-recourse mortgages encumbering these properties was $82,757 and scheduled cash rent due in 2006 is $12,455. The aggregate carrying cost of the 1 non-consolidated property was $24,029, the non-recourse mortgage encumbering the property was $14,297 and scheduled cash rent in 2006 is $2,444. The Company has a 30% interest in this non-consolidated entity.

47

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

Schedule III ($000)

Initial cost to Company and Gross Amount at which carried at End of Year(A)

										Accumulated
				Land and		Buildings				Depreciation						Useful life computing
				Land		and				and		Date		Date		depreciation in latest
Description	Location	Encumberances		Estates		Improvements		Total		Amortization		Acquired		Constructed		income statements (years)
R&D	Glendale, AZ	$	14,458	$	4,996	$	24,392	$	29,388	$	13,515		Nov-86		1985		12 & 40
Retail/ Health Club	Voorhees, NJ		—		577		4,820		5,397		2,553		Jul-87		1987		12 & 40
Retail/ Health Club	Countryside, IL		—		628		4,549		5,177		2,045		Jul-87		1987		12, 17 & 40
Industrial	Marshall, MI		—		33		3,932		3,965		1,785		Aug-87		1968/1972		12,20 & 40
Industrial	Marshall, MI		—		14		926		940		483		Aug-87		1979		12,20 & 40
Retail	Newport, OR		6,772		1,400		7,270		8,670		3,918		Sep-87		1986		12,15 & 40
Office/ Warehouse	Tampa, FL		8,156		1,900		9,854		11,754		4,263		Nov-87		1986		20 & 40
Office/ Warehouse	Memphis, TN		—		1,053		11,438		12,491		7,721		Feb-88		1987		15
Retail	Klamath Falls, OR		—		727		9,160		9,887		4,074		Mar-88		1986		40
Office	Tampa, FL		5,899		1,389		7,866		9,255		3,790		Jul-88		1986		10 & 40
Warehouse/ Industrial	Jacksonville, FL		—		258		3,637		3,895		1,446		Jul-88		1958/1969		20 & 40
Warehouse/ Distribuion	Mechanicsburg, PA		13,410		1,439		13,986		15,425		5,008		Oct-90		1985/1995		40
Retail	Laguna Hills, CA		—		255		5,035		5,290		2,536		Aug-95		1974		17 & 20
Retail	Oxon Hill, MD		—		403		2,765		3,168		1,357		Aug-95		1976		18.21 & 24
Retail	Rockville, MD		—		—		1,784		1,784		893		Aug-95		1977		20 & 22
Retail/ Health Club	Canton, OH		1,057		602		3,820		4,422		955		Dec-95		1987		40
Office	Salt Lake City, UT		9,388		—		55,404		55,404		20,551		May-96		1982		26
Retail	Honolulu, HI		—		—		11,147		11,147		6,338		Dec-96		1980		5
Industrial	Oberlin, OH		—		276		4,515		4,791		1,016		Dec-96		1996		40
Manufacturing	Franklin, NC		1,729		386		3,062		3,448		689		Dec-96		1996		40
Retail	Clackamas, OR		—		523		2,847		3,370		1,429		Dec-96		1981		14 & 24
Retail	Lynwood, WA		—		488		2,658		3,146		1,334		Dec-96		1981		14 & 24
Retail	Tulsa, OK		—		447		2,432		2,879		1,220		Dec-96		1981		14 & 24
Warehouse	New Kingston, PA		7,043		1,380		10,963		12,343		2,410		Mar-97		1989		40
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA		5,199		1,012		8,039		9,051		1,767		Mar-97		1985		40
Warehouse	New Kingston, PA		3,355		674		5,360		6,034		1,178		Mar-97		1981		40
Office	Dallas, TX		—		3,582		31,247		34,829		6,354		Sep-97		1986		40
Warehouse	Waterloo, IA		6,251		1,025		8,296		9,321		1,702		Oct-97		1996/1997		5 & 40
Office	Richmond, VA		—		—		27,282		27,282		6,768		Dec-97		1990		32.25
Office	Decatur, GA		6,420		975		13,677		14,652		2,735		Dec-97		1983		40
Office/ R&D	Milpitas, CA		11,870		3,542		6,717		10,259		5,056		Dec-97		1985		20
Office	Hebron, OH		16,132		1,063		4,271		5,334		432		Dec-97		2000		40
Industrial	Gordonsville, TN		—		52		3,325		3,377		766		Dec-97		1983/1985		34.75
Office/ Warehouse	Bristol, PA		9,514		2,508		10,031		12,539		1,944		Mar-98		1982		40
Office	Hebron, KY		—		1,615		7,390		9,005		1,275		Mar-98		1987		12 & 40
R&D	Livonia, MI		—		2,008		6,936		8,944		1,344		Mar-98		1987/1988		40
Office	Livonia, MI		10,770		1,554		6,859		8,413		1,243		Mar-98		1988		40
Office	Palm Beach Gardens, FL		10,966		3,578		14,249		17,827		2,716		May-98		1996		40
Industrial	Lancaster, CA		18,980		2,028		28,183		30,211		3,706		Jun-98		1998/2002		40
Industrial	Auburn Hills, MI		6,915		2,788		11,151		13,939		2,073		Jul-98		1989/1998		40
Warehouse/ Distribuion	Warren, OH		11,313		10,231		51,110		61,341		15,725		Aug-98		1982		9 & 40
Warehouse/ Distribuion	Baton Rouge, LA		1,751		685		3,316		4,001		531		Oct-98		1998		9 & 40
Office	Herndon, VA		18,458		5,127		20,730		25,857		3,097		Dec-99		1987		40
Office	Bristol, PA		5,769		1,073		7,709		8,782		1,164		Dec-99		1998		40

48

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

Schedule III ($000) — (continued)

										Accumulated
				Land and		Buildings				Depreciation						Useful life computing
				Land		and				and		Date		Date		depreciation in latest
Description	Location	Encumberances		Estates		Improvements		Total		Amortization		Acquired		Constructed		income statements (years)
Office	Southborough, MA		1,885		456		4,291		4,747		648		Dec-99		1984		40
Office	Hampton, VA		7,147		2,333		9,352		11,685		964		Mar-00		1999		40
Office	Phoenix, AZ		13,558		4,666		18,664		23,330		2,625		May-00		1997		40
Office	Phoenix, AZ		—		2,909		10,830		13,739		8,896		Nov-88		1960/1979		3 & 26
Industrial	Danville, IL		6,412		1,796		7,182		8,978		907		Dec-00		2000		40
Industrial	Chester, SC		13,842		558		21,391		21,949		4,567		Jan-01		2001/2005		25 & 40
Office	Bremerton, WA		6,650		2,144		8,577		10,721		474		Oct-01		2001		40
Office	Phoenix, AZ		—		2,287		12,412		14,699		967		Nov-01		1985/1994/2005		5 & 40
Industrial	Plymouth, MI		4,602		1,533		6,130		7,663		632		Nov-01		1996		40
Retail	Westland, MI		2,109		1,444		5,777		7,221		596		Nov-01		1987/1997		40
Office	Hampton, VA		4,383		1,353		5,441		6,794		788		Nov-01		2000		40
Industrial	Columbia, SC		3,294		928		3,871		4,799		390		Nov-01		1968/1998		40
Retail	Canton, OH		3,171		883		3,534		4,417		364		Nov-01		1995		40
Retail	Eau Claire,WI		1,927		860		3,442		4,302		355		Nov-01		1994		40
Retail	Spartanburg, SC		2,634		834		3,334		4,168		344		Nov-01		1996		40
Office	Tucson, AZ		2,355		657		2,842		3,499		304		Nov-01		1988		40
Industrial	Columbus,OH		—		319		1,275		1,594		132		Nov-01		1990		40
Retail	Stockton, CA		—		259		1,037		1,296		107		Nov-01		1968		40
Industrial	Dillon, SC		11,450		3,223		26,054		29,277		1,584		Dec-01		2001/2005		22 & 40
Industrial	Hebron, OH		—		1,682		6,779		8,461		691		Dec-01		1999		5 & 40
Office	Lake Forest, CA		10,611		3,442		13,769		17,211		1,305		Mar-02		2001		40
Office	Knoxville, TN		5,165		1,624		6,497		8,121		548		Aug-02		2002		40
Office	Valley Forge, PA		12,578		3,960		15,880		19,840		1,340		Sep-02		1985/2001		40
Industrial	Groveport, OH		7,650		2,384		9,546		11,930		786		Sep-02		2002		40
Office	Westmont, IL		15,559		4,978		20,003		24,981		1,518		Dec-02		1989		40
Office	Fort Mill, SC		11,233		3,601		14,404		18,005		1,095		Dec-02		2002		40
Office	Boca Raton, FL		15,275		4,290		17,161		21,451		1,233		Feb-03		1983/2002		40
Office	Greenville, SC		13,429		4,059		16,236		20,295		998		Jul-03		2000/2001		40
Industrial	Dubuque, IA		10,875		2,052		8,425		10,477		507		Jul-03		2002		12 & 40
Industrial	Minneapolis, MN		—		922		3,652		4,574		225		Jul-03		2003		40
Office	Temple, TX		8,997		2,890		11,561		14,451		638		Oct-03		2001		40
Industrial	Waxahachie, TX		—		652		13,045		13,697		1,873		Dec-03		1996/1997		10, 16 & 40
Office	Wallingford, CT		3,453		1,049		4,198		5,247		214		Dec-03		1978/1985		40
Office	Wall Township, NJ		29,752		8,985		26,961		35,946		2,058		Jan-04		1983		22 & 40
Office	Redmond, OR		9,888		1,925		13,731		15,656		1,063		Feb-04		2004		20 & 40
Industrial	Moody, AL		7,483		655		9,981		10,636		981		Feb-04		2004		10, 15 & 40
Office	Houston, TX		65,893		16,613		52,682		69,295		2,305		Mar-04		1976/1984		40
Industrial	Houston, TX		27,150		13,894		14,488		28,382		634		Mar-04		1992		40
Office	Sugar Land, TX		17,560		1,834		16,536		18,370		723		Mar-04		1997		40
Office	Houston, TX		7,612		644		7,424		8,068		325		Mar-04		1981/1999		40
Office	Florence, SC		9,065		3,235		12,941		16,176		1,272		May-04		1998		40
Office	Carrollton, TX		14,342		2,487		18,157		20,644		815		Jun-04		2003		19 & 40
Office	Clive, IA		5,920		1,603		7,453		9,056		688		Jun-04		2003		12, 13 & 40
Industrial	San Antonio, TX		29,629		2,482		38,535		41,017		2,705		Jul-04		2001		17 & 40
Industrial	High Point, NC		8,585		1,330		11,183		12,513		725		Jul-04		2002		18 & 40
Office	Southfield, MI		10,764		—		12,080		12,080		1,175		Jul-04		1963/1965		7, 16 & 40

49

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

Schedule III ($000) — (continued)

										Accumulated
				Land and		Buildings				Depreciation						Useful life computing
				Land		and				and		Date		Date		depreciation in latest
Description	Location	Encumberances		Estates		Improvements		Total		Amortization		Acquired		Constructed		income statements (years)
Office	Chelmsford, MA		7,008		1,063		10,565		11,628		840		Aug-04		1985		14 & 40
Office	Fort Mill, SC		20,300		1,798		25,192		26,990		1,832		Nov-04		2004		15 & 40
Office/ R&D	Foxboro, MA		17,764		1,586		18,245		19,831		1,018		Nov-04		1965/1988		15 & 40
Office	Foxboro, MA		22,385		2,231		25,653		27,884		1,354		Dec-04		1982		16 & 40
Office	Los Angeles, CA		11,500		5,110		10,859		15,969		668		Dec-04		2000		13 & 40
Industrial	Jackson, TN		10,219		644		13,683		14,327		917		Dec-04		2004		20 & 40
Industrial	Olive Branch, MS		—		198		10,350		10,548		634		Dec-04		1989		8, 15 & 40
Office	Atlanta, GA		45,238		4,600		55,184		59,784		2,273		Apr-05		2003		13 & 40
Office	Allen, TX		30,582		7,600		35,343		42,943		1,768		Apr-05		1981/1983		11 & 40
Office	Farmington Hills, MI		20,550		3,400		22,140		25,540		610		Apr-05		1999		22 & 40
Office	Houston, TX		17,660		3,750		21,099		24,849		890		Apr-05		2000		13 & 40
Office	Houston, TX		16,977		800		22,478		23,278		1,083		Apr-05		2000		11 & 40
Industrial	Millington, TN		17,827		700		18,694		19,394		638		Apr-05		1997		16 & 40
Industrial	Kalamazoo, MI		17,625		960		17,714		18,674		488		Apr-05		1999		22 & 40
Office	Indianapolis, IN		13,182		1,700		16,262		17,962		885		Apr-05		1999		10 & 40
Office	San Antonio, TX		13,071		2,800		14,587		17,387		722		Apr-05		2000		11 & 40
Office	Houston, TX		13,254		1,500		14,581		16,081		561		Apr-05		2003		14 & 40
Office	Tempe, AZ		13,648		—		14,564		14,564		598		Apr-05		1998		13 & 40
Office	Atlanta, GA		11,325		3,200		10,903		14,103		493		Apr-05		2001		12 & 40
Office	Indianapolis, IN		9,638		1,100		12,796		13,896		555		Apr-05		2002		12 & 40
Office	Richmond, VA		10,608		1,100		11,919		13,019		451		Apr-05		2000		15 & 40
Office	Fort Meyers, FL		8,912		1,820		10,198		12,018		430		Apr-05		1997		13 & 40
Office	Harrisburg, PA		9,180		900		10,526		11,426		629		Apr-05		1998		9 & 40
Office	Lakewood, CO		8,694		1,400		8,525		9,925		381		Apr-05		2002		12 & 40
Office	Philadelphia, PA		49,000		13,209		50,592		63,801		1,549		Jun-05		1957		14,15&40
Industrial	Elizabethtown, KY		16,687		890		26,868		27,758		467		Jun-05		1995/2001		25&40
Industrial	Hopkinsville, KY		9,777		631		13,512		14,143		235		Jun-05		Various		25&40
Industrial	Dry Ridge, KY		7,905		560		12,553		13,113		218		Jun-05		1988		25&40
Industrial	Owensboro, KY		7,069		393		7,356		7,749		127		Jun-05		1998/2000		25&40
Industrial	Elizabethtown, KY		3,144		352		4,862		5,214		84		Jun-05		2001		25&40
Office	Southington, CT		13,780		3,240		20,439		23,679		10,739		Nov-05		1983		12,28&40
Office	Houston, TX		10,000		2,725		10,014		12,739		51		Nov-05		2004		20&40
Industrial	Collierville, TN		—		714		2,293		3,007		11		Dec-05		2005		20&40
		$	1,139,971	$	259,682	$	1,623,433	$	1,883,115	$	241,188

50

LEXINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTIES TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

Schedule III ($000) — (continued)

      (A) The initial cost includes the purchase price paid by the Company and acquisition fees and expenses. The total cost basis of the Company’s properties at December 31, 2005 for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $1,740,000.

	2005			2004			2003
Reconciliation of real estate owned:
Balance at the beginning of year	$	1,407,872		$	1,162,395		$	913,370
Additions during year		671,955			472,988			312,209
Properties sold during year		(34,120	)		(31,452	)		(9,978	)
Property contributed to joint venture during year		(117,411	)		(186,456	)		(58,837	)
Properties consolidated during the year		—			16,176			43,499
Reclassified held for sale properties		(32,339	)		(25,779	)		(37,868	)
Properties impaired during the year		(12,842	)		—			—
Balance at end of year	$	1,883,115		$	1,407,872		$	1,162,395
Balance of beginning of year	$	180,610		$	160,623		$	134,220
Depreciation and amortization expense		60,096			36,561			27,335
Accumulated depreciation and amortization of properties sold during year		(4,811	)		(6,612	)		(1,428	)
Accumulated depreciation of property contributed to joint venture		(1,024	)		(1,852	)		—
Accumulated depreciation of properties consolidated during the year		—			750			1,886
Accumulated depreciation reclassified as held for sale		6,317			(8,860	)		(1,390	)
Balance at end of year	$	241,188		$	180,610		$	160,623

51 GRAPHIC 3 y25730y2573001.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 y25730y2573001.gif M1TE&.#EAB``=`.8``*VMK>WM[;BXN"$A(;JZNBHJ*BTM+?#P\#`P,-;6UA45 M%=K:VAT='34U-GIVQL;%Y>7LC(R,;&QJ&AH8>'AP0$!`P,#'IZ M>JFIJ6IJ:H"`@&)B8GY^?F5E97AX>)*2DG5U=4I*2DA(2(V-C3@X.%Q<7&9F M9@D)":^OKU!04'1T=$U-328F)H*"@D!`0!D9&41$1%965E145(Z.CHJ*BF!@ M8$)"0FAH:%)24B0D)#P\/#HZ.CX^/DY.3F]O;_W]_?;V]O?W]^_O[_KZ^OS\ M_.[N[O7U]>KJZOGY^>OKZ_+R\M[>WNCHZ)B8F//S\_O[^^?GY^GIZ9J:FK.S ML[*RLMW=W(B8J+C(V.CY!_DI.4E9:2?F`.$7Z7GI^@ MH:*CI*6FI8("-3)LG:>OL+&RLZ!^564&?3UDKK2^O\#!G7<(?0H46;W!R\S` M@[51),5*)%3/S=C9IWY8$@E_RI-^82@#?08:BK^"VNVA?E0W)D%8X8(1,GWZ M!2\W+"HN0'3H4.(#&RGL8`D:(2"!)4I,"3/28B5$M+R(V4BBRF]_(@1@N,K,4>F*CNQ]P4<0&KP MB+$@M=0["DRDH;IA3I\3-PBXQ^3&2>\-4PF2CV]6,(!#`BJ8H$M44F'@6!\Z M,#@(!3(LT8,"%UQP@@)%7('=.^`U<(9S.O3A0A@9>.%%"GP``,`+)SQ`0@L% M]($#`B1$5@0.%^`1@`Z.%0#`=9_XP<82?2S1"O\A%O041!@"*(!##0KVT4!A M4A%@CH(L!#C!$0]RA(,)"I0!CBQ^/*$59N+X48P7"!5B1PTG6$!3`B/0D"%N MSKE@@@D_+&$"#ATX4%4M!/B%PB`:H`#D.754P4-O'0V1C"")UD"!`@IXL18& M0I#7``@;$$!`&G2(<-PL?KC0AP0R"5+,D@GYH8&-*Q`2``LFQLI%,1R98$&< MM?A1@CX#+%%##0-4:<.(4`![05]]V`"&('48*`$=)B!PAR!ZY--'$&5P,85K MUV"2;G8W]`'@8EO4"(<](O2AQ(AU.19#K7Y,$&9O2@C!8$IMS%">,2ND$09C MY/V@1@8D?%5#44"&8@)&$ M@@9TX4<76_8Q`!K7^;%!'R$(LH#!)N28TQDE\("``07T,`"&&LIPZ#L3X-`` MW'8'T<<-7"W&!<\*7K"$#ANPX7E,?E!P00]F#&('WA1]X!I8E1_!R>14Y&)" M_P:#1%#,#V98`\X'?1@QB-'C.E"(#0?_Q0,(:$A>"P5]L'``YDCJ0)P((88? MX,`#"^!"&`)0A?T(0GH#:`\FOE`&QR@@!E=HX$6\T`<0J`5\-;J`!&WQA@3, M:RH$P$'J!(&!+2EA`U&PAA\^,(`:A```"XA`#TQ`@3!,(0HDJUP1.D&%+'SA M`&!`$AVB<(`IY($+;[A*$$[`IW4=K@(7*$#UVG2&C<2,#'*X%CO\,(4A0"8E M5*C1#RS2IHMP008_B&(G``"L$S3`"VW0P@'PH(;A".(,6"&`.)\A0,Q$P!S1`00M+*$`JW\&!&A#!0V"A`AT0H"`R"4%^*`G% M%:S00%&8KH,!D@($5!"?^NG#!$GX'RKT$`,9R``$*1`!'*P@!RMT00P(#8`5 MMG"M*;Q@![L3!11^"(640.$+`F@"$!3$`PX8,`.QMS&!(2E MOV=000I1Z&D<%F"%J*KO%88N(%E2MP$%*5PAI]GP@QF&H`2S@65D,('(5\): 5!Q#489!;3:M<606%+%1AKMD(!``[ ` end -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----