-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, JhO8W0tU8KwoTgjooivi4CNODqsioJMUi+LZ3qGcA8wqfVkpQn+ljK/CzHzjLaN8 0dmcY6fWxr39kEi0iOHLFA== 0001047469-99-012641.txt : 19990402 0001047469-99-012641.hdr.sgml : 19990402 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001047469-99-012641 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19981231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990331 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ULTRATECH STEPPER INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000909791 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, NEC [3559] IRS NUMBER: 943169580 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22248 FILM NUMBER: 99580124 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3050 ZANKER RD CITY: SAN JOSE STATE: CA ZIP: 95134 BUSINESS PHONE: 4083218835 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3050 ZANKER RD CITY: SAN JOSE STATE: CA ZIP: 95134 10-K 1 FORM 10-K - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ------------------------ FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (MARK ONE) /X/ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 / / Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-22248 ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 94-3169580 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation) 3050 ZANKER ROAD SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134 (Address of principal executive (Zip Code) offices) (408) 321-8835 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: COMMON STOCK; SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK ------------------------ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / / Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. / / The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing sale price of the Common Stock on March 22, 1999, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was approximately $246,000,000. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of March 22, 1999, the Registrant had 21,124,464 shares of Common Stock outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 3, 1999 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements that involve significant risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results could differ materially from the information set forth in any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below under "Additional Risk Factors", as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. THE COMPANY Ultratech Stepper, Inc. ("Ultratech" or the "Company") develops, manufactures and markets photolithography equipment designed to reduce the cost of ownership for manufacturers of integrated circuits, photomasks for the integrated circuit industry, thin film magnetic recording devices and micromachined components. The Company supplies step-and-repeat systems based on one-to-one ("1X") and reduction optical technology to customers located throughout the United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Japan. Ultratech believes that its 1X steppers offer cost and certain performance advantages, as compared with competitors' reduction steppers, to semiconductor device manufacturers for applications involving line geometries of 0.65 microns or greater ("noncritical feature sizes") and to thin film head manufacturers. The Company's 1X steppers do not currently address applications involving line geometries of less than 0.65 microns ("critical feature sizes"). The Company's 1X steppers are also used in "mix-and-match" applications to complement reduction steppers and step-and-scan systems in advanced semiconductor device fabrication. The Company's 1X steppers also are used as replacements for scanners in existing fabrication facilities to enable semiconductor manufacturers to extend the useful life and increase the capabilities of their facilities. In addition, the Company's steppers are used to manufacture high volume, low cost semiconductors used in a variety of applications such as telecommunications, automotive control systems and consumer electronics. Ultratech also supplies photolithography systems to thin film head manufacturers and believes that its steppers offer advantages over certain competitive reduction lithography tools with respect to field size, throughput, specialized substrate handling and cost. Additionally, the Company supplies photolithography equipment to the micromachining market, where certain technical features such as high resolution at g-line wavelengths and superior depth of focus are seen as offering advantages over competitive tools. The Company markets and manufactures the UltraBeam "V" Model electron beam pattern generation system based on vector-scan technology for use in the development and production of photomasks for the integrated circuit industry. The Company acquired this technology in February 1997 when it acquired the assets of Lepton, Inc. On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Integrated Solutions, Inc. ("ISI"), a privately held manufacturer of i-line and deep ultra-violet (DUV) reduction lithography systems (the "Acquisition") for approximately $19.2 million in cash, $2.6 million in transaction costs and the assumption of certain liabilities. With this Acquisition, the Company has expanded its photolithography stepper product line to include reduction steppers. The reduction steppers complement the 1X steppers for use in the thin film head, micromachining, and selected semiconductor markets, as their resolution requirements go below 0.65 microns. BACKGROUND The fabrication of devices such as integrated circuits ("semiconductors" or "ICs") and thin film magnetic recording heads ("thin film heads" or "TFHs") requires a large number of complex processing steps, including deposition, photolithography and etching. Deposition is a process in which a layer of either electrically insulating or electrically conductive material is deposited on the surface of a wafer. The 1 photolithographic imaging process imprints device features on a light sensitive polymer photoresist. After development of the photoresist, etching selectively removes material from areas not covered by the imprinted pattern. Photolithography is one of the most critical and expensive steps in IC and TFH device manufacturing. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association, a significant portion of the cost of processing silicon wafers in the fabrication of ICs is related to photolithography. Photolithography exposure equipment is used to image device features on the surface of thin deposition films by selectively exposing a light sensitive polymer photoresist coated on the wafer surface, through a photomask containing the master image of a particular device layer. Exposure of each process layer imprints a different set of features on the device. These device layers must be properly aligned to previously defined layers before imaging takes place, so that structures formed on the wafers are correctly placed, one on top of the other, in order to ensure a functioning device. Since the introduction of the earliest commercial photolithography tools for IC manufacturing in the early 1960s, a number of tools have been introduced to enable manufacturers to produce increasingly complex devices that incorporate progressively finer line widths. In the late 1970s, photolithography tools known as step-and-repeat projection aligners, or steppers, were introduced. Unlike prior tools, such as contact printers which required the photomask to physically contact the wafer in order to transfer the entire pattern during a single exposure, and scanners, which transferred the device image by scanning a narrow slit of light across the entire photomask and wafer in a single, continuous motion, steppers expose only a small square or rectangular portion of the wafer in a single exposure, then move or "step" to an adjacent site to repeat the exposure. This stepping process is repeated as often as necessary until the entire wafer has been exposed. By imaging a small area, steppers are able to achieve finer resolution and better alignment between the multiple device layers and higher yield and productivity in certain devices than possible with earlier tools. Since the late 1980s, 1X steppers have become a critical tool for the fabrication of thin film heads because of their performance characteristics. Thin film heads are devices that form the small read/write component in the most advanced disk drives and have enabled disk drives to increase in speed and memory capacity and perform more efficiently. Steppers are currently the predominant lithography tools used in the manufacture of devices such as ICs and TFHs. The Company believes that manufacturers of leading-edge TFH devices are relying increasingly on reduction steppers to address the more critical feature sizes for these devices in their front-end applications. According to VLSI Research, Inc. ("VLSI"), a semiconductor industry market research firm, the two principal types of steppers currently in use by the semiconductor industry are reduction steppers, which are the most widely used steppers, and one-to-one steppers. Reduction steppers, which typically have reduction ratios of four or five-to-one, are tools in which the photomask pattern containing the design is typically four or five times larger than the device pattern that is to be exposed on the wafer surface. Additionally, step-and-scan systems have been introduced recently in order to address device sizes of .18 micron and below. In contrast to steppers, which expose the entire field in a single exposure, step-and-scan systems scan across the field until the entire field is exposed. The Company believes that one of the fastest growing segments of the photolithography equipment market is reduction steppers and step-and-scan systems that use a deep ultra-violet light source ("DUV"). The lower DUV wavelength allows IC manufacturers to produce critical geometries of 0.25 microns and below. The Company's 4X reduction stepper product line includes DUV systems at both 248nm and 193nm wavelengths. The 248nm DUV system is a production tool capable of 0.25 micron geometries. The 193nm DUV system is a research and development tool that has assisted in the development of 193nm photoresists throughout the semiconductor industry. In addition to the reduction steppers, the Company markets certain of its 1X products in mix-and-match applications with these lithography systems. The principal advantage of reduction steppers and step-and-scan systems is that they may be used in manufacturing steps requiring critical feature sizes and are therefore necessary for manufacturing 2 advanced ICs. One-to-one steppers, on the other hand, are tools in which the photomask containing the design is the same size as the device pattern that is exposed on the wafer surface. Current one-to-one steppers, unlike most current reduction steppers, are based on different technology which incorporates both reflective and refractive elements in its optical lens imaging system that, although highly sophisticated in design, is much simpler than a current reduction stepper's lens imaging system which incorporates only refractive elements. As a result, current 1X steppers are generally less expensive than current reduction steppers required for critical feature sizes. Because of their optical design, 1X steppers typically are also able to expose larger areas and deliver greater energy to the wafer surface, which generally results in higher throughput than is achievable with most reduction steppers required for critical feature sizes. One-to-one steppers, however, are currently limited to use in manufacturing steps involving noncritical feature sizes. Accordingly, the Company believes that sales of these systems are highly dependent upon capacity expansions by its customers. Competitors to Ultratech have also introduced their own mix-and-match steppers to complement their critical layer tools. Additionally, the Company believes that competition for the mix-and-match business has increased due to the ability of manufacturers of reduction steppers to mix-and-match their systems with step-and-scan systems. See "Risk Factors: Importance of Mix-and-Match Strategy." In recent years, the complexity of ICs has increased significantly while, at the same time, product cycles have shortened and the price per function of such devices has continued to decline. As device complexity has increased, the device geometries have continued to shrink, which in turn has increased the need for tools such as reduction steppers that are capable of imaging very critical feature sizes. For example, fabrication of a 64-megabit dynamic random access memory ("DRAM") device with a minimum feature size of 0.25 microns involves an average of 22-25 mask levels and approximately 400 process steps. Certain mask levels in the fabrication of advanced devices require photolithography equipment such as DUV reduction steppers and step-and-scan systems that are capable of imaging lines with critical feature sizes. A majority of the masking layers in such devices, however, only require photolithography tools capable of imaging lines with noncritical feature sizes. In addition, many IC devices, such as application specific integrated circuits ("ASICs") used in various applications including telecommunications, consumer electronics and automotive control systems, can be manufactured using 1X steppers for the masking layers. Many advanced thin film head devices, which currently require less critical feature size imaging, are manufactured using 1X steppers for the masking layers. However, the Company believes that future thin film head device manufacturing will involve certain steps that require critical feature size imaging. The Company has developed a reduction stepper specifically for the TFH market with 0.25 micron imaging capability to address this requirement. In the past, manufacturers of ICs and similar devices purchased capital equipment based principally on technological capabilities. In view of the significant capital expenditures required to construct, equip and maintain fabrication facilities, relatively short product cycles and manufacturers' increasing concern for overall fabrication costs, the Company believes that manufacturers of ICs and thin film heads increasingly are focusing on reducing their total cost to manufacture a device. A major component of this cost is the cost of ownership of the equipment used for a particular application in a fabrication facility. Cost of ownership is measured in terms of the costs associated with the acquisition of equipment as well as factors such as throughput, yield, up-time, service, labor overhead, maintenance, and various other costs of owning and using the equipment. With increasing importance being placed upon a system's overall cost of ownership, in many cases the system with the most technologically advanced capabilities will not necessarily be the manufacturing system of choice. As part of the focus on cost reduction, the Company believes that device manufacturers are attempting to extend the useful life and enhance the production capabilities of fabrication facilities by selecting equipment that can replace existing tools while offering better performance in a cost-effective manner. 3 PRODUCTS The Company currently offers three different series of 1X systems for use in the semiconductor fabrication process: the model 1500 and 1500 MVS Series, which address the markets for scanner replacement and high volume/low cost semiconductor fabrication; the Saturn Wafer Stepper-Registered Trademark- Family, which addresses the market for mix-and-match in advanced semiconductor fabrication and bump processing for flip chips; and the Titan Wafer Stepper-Registered Trademark- Family, which addresses the market for photosensitive polyimide applications and bump processing for flip chip devices, as well as the markets for scanner replacement and high volume/low cost semiconductor fabrication. These steppers currently offer feature size capabilities ranging from 1.4 microns to 0.65 microns and typically range in price from $800,000 to $2.1 million. The model 1500 Series and the Titan Wafer Stepper Family offer g- and h-line illumination specifications. The Saturn Wafer Stepper Family features an i-line illumination specification that is designed to make them compatible with advanced i-line reduction steppers. The Company shipped its first Saturn Wafer Stepper in the fourth quarter of 1995. The Saturn Wafer Stepper Family, with its 0.65 micron capability, extends mix-and-match applications to the 64/256-megabit dynamic random access memories and equivalent logic technology. In bump processing, the Saturn and Titan steppers are used in conjunction with electroplating to produce a pattern of bumps, or metal connections, on the bond pads of the die for flip chip devices. This pattern can be placed in a tight array across the entire die, as opposed to the conventional method of wire bonding which is limited to the periphery of the die. This allows manufacturers to shrink the die size. The flip chip device can then be placed in a small outline package or directly on a printed circuit board. The Saturn and Titan Wafer Stepper Families also address, among other markets, an application called photosensitive polyimide processing. This process is used in the protective layer, between the inside of the device package and the active device. The polyimide process is also commonly used in the manufacture of advanced DRAMs and microprocessors. The primary advantage of a photosensitive polyimide process is that it reduces process steps required in the fabrication of these devices. The Saturn and Titan wafer stepper families can also be used for advanced mix-and-match applications where the critical layers are produced on step-and-scan systems. The Saturn and Titan widefield systems have a unique D-shaped field that allows for a one-to-one field match with step-and-scan systems, or a two-to-one match with reduction steppers. The D-shaped field allows the semiconductor manufacturer to optimize overlay and throughput for its non-critical mix-and-match layers. The Company is also in the process of defining the reduction stepper product line for selected semiconductor markets. In the meantime, the Company continues to offer the existing reduction product line acquired in the Acquisition. The major products include the XLS 7500, XLS 7800 and the XLS 193nm systems. The XLS 7500 is an i-line reduction system with a minimum resolution of 0.5 microns. It is used primarily in low-cost, high volume production applications. The XLS 7800 is a DUV version of the tool, utilizing a DUV wavelength of 248nm. The XLS 7800 provides a low-cost entry point into DUV processing. The XLS 193nm system is a small-field DUV tool used for research and development of 193nm materials and processes. The Company offers four different 1X systems for use in the fabrication of thin film heads at the wafer, or substrate, level: the model 1700 series, which the Company believes is the most widely used stepper for the TFH market; the model 4700, which provides manufacturers the ability to print rowbars with a single exposure, further enhancing both yields and magnetic recording head performance; and the model 6700 and 6800, which extend the model 4700 capabilities into the submicron range by utilizing i-line and gh-line exposure, respectively. The Company is presently in development of an i-line reduction stepper, the XLS 9800, to meet customers' requirement for shrinking geometries on their critical layers. In addition, the Company provides three steppers capable of patterning features on rowbars utilizing an alternate alignment system (Machine Vision System, or "MVS"). The model 1700 MVS and 1700 ABS are used to expose the Air Bearing Surface (ABS) pattern, while the model 1800 extends capabilities to much smaller submicron patterns used for pole trimming. The Company's TFH steppers offer feature size capabilities ranging from 2.0 to 0.35 microns and typically range in price from $800,000 to $2.6 million. 4 The Company also offers photolithography equipment for use in the micromachining market. Micromachining combines electronics with mechanics in small devices for detection and control of a wide variety of parameters. Examples include accelerometers used to activate air bags in automobiles, and membrane pressure sensors used in industrial control systems. These micromachined devices are manufactured on silicon substrates using photolithographic techniques similar to those used for manufacturing semiconductors and thin film head devices. The Company believes that its model 1500 and 1500 MVS Series and the Saturn Wafer Stepper Family offer resolution and depth of focus advantages over alternative technologies, to the manufacturers of micromachined devices. The UltraBeam "V" Model electron beam pattern generation system is based on vector-scan technology and is designed for use in the development and production of photomasks for the IC industry. The UltraBeam system addresses the production requirements of photomasks for .25 micron design rule and below. Using the vector/raster-scan technology employed by the Company, the electron beam moves directly to those areas of the photomask that are to be exposed, bypassing unexposed areas, and then rasters in the area to be exposed. In contrast, alternative technologies use an electron beam that is scanned continuously back and forth over the entire photomask. The Company believes that its UltraBeam "V" Model system will offer certain cost and productivity advantages, as compared with certain competitive systems. The Company also sells upgrades and refurbishments to certain older product lines in its installed base. These refurbished older systems typically have a purchase price significantly less than the purchase price for the Company's newer systems. Features of the Company's current stepper systems are set forth below:
FEATURE SIZE PRODUCT LINE WAVELENGTH (MICRON) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- ---------------- SEMICONDUCTOR/MICRO-MACHINING: Model 1500; 1500 MVS........................................................ gh-line 1.0 Model 1500; 1500 MVS........................................................ gh-line 0.8 Saturn Wafer Stepper Family: Saturn I; Saturn II; Saturn III........................................... i-line 1.0; 0.75; 0.65 Titan Wafer Stepper Family: Titan I; Titan II; Titan III.............................................. gh-line 1.4;1.0; 0.75 Reduction Steppers XLS 7500.................................................................. i-line 0.5 XLS 7800.................................................................. DUV (248 nm) 0.25 XLS 193nm................................................................. DUV (193 nm) 0.16 PHOTOMASK: UltraBeam "V" Model......................................................... n/a 0.65 THIN-FILM HEAD: 1700 Series................................................................. gh-line 1.2; 1.0 1700 MVS.................................................................... gh-line 1.0 1700 ABS.................................................................... gh-line 2.0 1800........................................................................ gh-line 0.8 4700........................................................................ gh-line 1.0 6700........................................................................ i-line 0.65 6800........................................................................ gh-line 0.75 Reduction Steppers XLS 9800.................................................................. i-line 0.35
5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING The semiconductor and magnetic recording head manufacturing industries are subject to rapid technological change and new product introductions and enhancements. The Company believes that continued and timely development and introduction of new and enhanced systems are essential for the Company to maintain its competitive position. The Company has made a substantial investment in the research and development of its core optical technology, which the Company believes is critical to its financial results. The Company intends to continue to develop its technology and to develop innovative products and product features to meet customer demands. Current engineering projects include the continued development of the UltraBeam electron beam pattern generation system, continued research and development of the Verdant system for rapid thermal annealing/laser doping and creation of ultrashallow junctions, continued development of the Company's 1X and 4X reduction optical products and development of larger and more flexible optical systems. Other research and development efforts are currently focused on reliability improvement; manufacturing cost reduction; and performance enhancement and development of new features for existing systems, both for inclusion in the Company's systems and to meet specific customer order requirements. These research and development efforts are undertaken, principally, by the Company's research, development and engineering organizations and costs are generally expensed as incurred. Other operating groups within the Company support the above referenced research, development and engineering efforts, and the associated costs are charged to these organizations as incurred. The Company also has programs devoted to the development of new photolithography systems, including new generations of photolithography systems for existing and new markets, enhancements and extensions of existing photolithography systems for existing and new markets and custom engineering for specific customers. The Company works with many customers to develop technology required to manufacture advanced devices or to lower the customer's cost of ownership. The Company maintains an engineering department that supports customer design of 1X stepper photomasks for both test and production purposes and an applications engineering group, consisting of highly qualified engineers located throughout the world that assist customers in optimizing the use of the Company's systems. The Company has historically devoted a significant portion of its financial resources to research and development programs and expects to continue to allocate significant resources to these efforts in the future. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately 103 full-time employees engaged in research, development, and engineering. For 1998, 1997 and 1996, total research, development, and engineering expenses were approximately $26.7 million, $26.4 million and $27.2 million, respectively, and represented 32.8%, 17.9% and 14.1% of the Company's net sales, respectively. SALES AND SERVICE The Company markets and sells its products in the United States and Europe principally through its direct sales organization. The Company sells its products in the Asia/Pacific region primarily through outside sales organizations. In December 1997, the Company terminated its relationship with its Japanese distributor, Innotech Corporation and has established a direct sales force in Japan. This strategy contributed to higher selling, general and administrative expenses in 1998, relative to 1997, related to transitional costs as well as higher ongoing expenses. (See "Risk Factors: International Sales; Japanese Market"). Ultratech's service personnel are based throughout the United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Japan. The Company currently leases five sales and service offices in the United States outside of California, maintains subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Japan, Korea and Thailand and leases offices for its branch in Taiwan to service equipment and support customers in such locations. As part of its customer service, Ultratech maintains an on-line computerized network of the Company's parts inventory in the United States, Europe and Japan. 6 The Company believes that as semiconductor and thin film head manufacturers produce increasingly complex devices, they will require a higher degree of support. Reliability, performance, yield, cost, uptime and mean time between failure are increasingly important factors by which customers evaluate potential suppliers of photolithography equipment. The Company believes that the strength of its worldwide service and support organization is an important factor in its ability to sell its systems, maintain customer loyalty and reduce the maintenance costs of its systems. In addition, the Company believes that working with its suppliers and customers is necessary to ensure that the Company's systems are cost effective, technically advanced and designed to satisfy customer requirements. The Company supports its customers with field service, technical service engineers and training programs. The Company provides its customers with comprehensive support and service before, during and after delivery of its systems. To support the sales process and to enhance customer relationships, the Company works closely with prospective customers to develop hardware and software test specifications and benchmarks, and often designs customized applications to enable prospective customers to evaluate the Company's equipment for their specific needs. Prior to shipment, Ultratech's support personnel typically assist the customer in site preparation and inspection, and typically provide customers with training at the Company's facilities or at the customer's location. The Company currently offers to its customers various courses of instruction on the Company's systems, including instructions in system hardware and software tools for optimizing the Company's systems. The Company's customer training program also includes instructions in the maintenance of the Company's systems. The Company's field support personnel work with the customer's employees to install the system and demonstrate system readiness. Technical support is also available through on-site Company personnel. In general, the Company warrants its new systems against defects in design, materials and workmanship for one year. The Company offers its customers additional support after the warranty period in the form of maintenance contracts for specified time periods. Such contracts include various options such as priority response, planned preventive maintenance, scheduled one-on-one training, daily on-site support, and monthly system and performance analysis. MANUFACTURING The Company performs all of its manufacturing activities (final assembly, system testing and certain subassembly) in clean room environments totaling approximately 45,000 square feet. These facilities are located in California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. Performing manufacturing operations in California exposes the Company to a higher risk of natural disasters, particularly floods and earthquakes. The Company's manufacturing activities consist of assembling and testing components and subassemblies, which are then integrated into finished systems. The Company is relying increasingly on outside vendors and subcontractors to manufacture certain components and subassemblies. This strategy has enabled the Company to increase its manufacturing capacity. The Company orders one of the most critical components of its technology, the glass for its 1X lenses, from suppliers on purchase orders. The Company designs the 1X lenses and provides the lens specifications to other suppliers that grind the lens elements. The Company then assembles and tests the optical 1X lenses in its metrology laboratory. The Company has recorded the critical parameters of each of its optical lenses sold since 1982, and believes that such information enables it to supply lenses to its customers that match the characteristics of its customers' existing lenses. Additionally, the Company orders reduction lenses from suppliers on purchase orders. These lenses are designed to the Company's specifications and tested by the supplier. Prior to shipment, the customer's engineers may perform acceptance tests at Ultratech's facility. After passing the acceptance test, the system is packaged in the clean room environment and prepared for shipment. The Company procures certain of its critical systems' components, subassemblies and services from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers in order to ensure overall quality and timeliness of delivery. To date, the Company has been able to obtain adequate services and supplies of components and 7 subassemblies for its systems in a timely manner. However, disruption or termination of certain of these sources, due to year 2000 compliance issues or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is relying increasingly on outside vendors to manufacture certain components of its products. The Company's reliance on sole or a limited group of suppliers and the Company's increasing reliance on subcontractors involve several risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components due to the suppliers' failure or inability to provide such components in a timely manner, or at all, and reduced control over pricing and timely delivery of components. Although the timeliness, yield and quality of deliveries to date from the Company's subcontractors have been acceptable, manufacture of certain of these components and subassemblies is an extremely complex process, and long lead-times are required. Any inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other circumstance that would require the Company to seek alternative sources of supply or to manufacture such components internally could delay the Company's ability to ship its products, which could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and therefore would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. (See "Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure", as well as "Additional Risk Factors"). The Company maintains a company-wide quality program. The intent of the program is to provide continuous improvement in the Company's steppers and services to meet customer requirements. The Company trains all of its employees in basic quality skills and regularly participates in quality sharing meetings with other equipment manufacturers and customer quality audits of procedures and personnel. The Company's 1X operation achieved ISO 9001 certification in 1996, and has maintained this certification uninterrupted through this report date. COMPETITION The capital equipment industry in which the Company operates is intensely competitive. A substantial investment is required to install and integrate capital equipment into a semiconductor or thin film head production line. The Company believes that once a device manufacturer has selected a particular vendor's capital equipment, the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and, to the extent possible, subsequent generations of similar products. Accordingly, it is difficult to achieve significant sales to a particular customer once another vendor's capital equipment has been selected. The Company experiences intense competition worldwide from a number of leading foreign and domestic stepper manufacturers, such as Nikon Inc. ("Nikon"), Canon Inc. ("Canon"), ASM Lithography, Ltd. ("ASML") and Silicon Valley Group ("SVG"), Inc.'s Micralign products, all of which have substantially greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources than the Company. Nikon supplies a 1X stepper for use in the manufacture of liquid crystal displays and Canon, Nikon and ASML offer reduction steppers for thin film head fabrication. Additionally, the XLS reduction stepper product line acquired by the Company from ISI competes directly with advanced reduction steppers offered by Canon, Nikon and ASML. The Company believes that future thin film head production will involve manufacturing steps that require critical feature sizes. Although the reduction stepper product lines acquired from ISI address critical feature sizes, additional development of these product lines may be necessary to fully address the unique requirements of thin film head manufacturing. Additionally, in the market for mix-and-match semiconductor applications, Nikon and Canon are shipping their own widefield mix-and-match lithography systems. (See: "Additional Risk Factors: Importance of Mix-and-Match Strategy"). ASML has recently announced its intent to compete in the low-cost lithography market. In addition, ASML and Nikon have each introduced an i-line step-and-scan system as a lower cost alternative to the DUV step-and-scan system for use on the less critical layers. These systems are expected to compete with widefield steppers, such as the Saturn and Titan families, for advanced mix-and-match applications. The Company's UltraBeam "V" model electron beam pattern generation system competes against systems produced by ETEC Systems, Inc.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Leica Camera AG; and JEOL, Ltd. ("Japan Electron Optical Laboratory"). In addition, the Company believes that the high cost of developing new lithography tools has caused its competitors to collaborate with customers and other parties in various areas such as 8 research and development, manufacturing and marketing, thereby resulting in a combined competitive threat with significantly enhanced financial, technical and other resources. The Company expects its competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products. These competitors have stated that they will introduce new products with improved price and performance characteristics that will compete directly with the Company's products. This could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of the Company's steppers, and thereby materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that enhancements to, or future generations of, competing products will not be developed that offer superior cost of ownership and technical performance features. The Company believes that to be competitive, it will require significant financial resources in order to continue to invest in new product development, features and enhancements, to introduce next generation stepper systems on a timely basis, and to maintain customer service and support centers worldwide. In marketing its products, the Company may also face competition from vendors employing other technologies. In addition, increased competitive pressure has led to intensified price-based competition, resulting in lower prices and margins. This pressure has been caused, in part, from the relative weakness of the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar and the current cyclical downturn in both the semiconductor and thin film head industries. Should these competitive trends continue, the Company's business, financial condition and operating results would continue to be materially adversely affected. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future. Foreign IC manufacturers have a significant share of the worldwide market for certain types of ICs for which the Company's systems are used. However, the Japanese stepper manufacturers are well established in the Japanese stepper market, and it is extremely difficult for non-Japanese lithography equipment companies to penetrate the Japanese stepper market. To date, the Company has not established itself as a major competitor in the Japanese equipment market and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve significant sales to Japanese manufacturers in the future. (See "International Sales; Japanese Market"). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Although the Company attempts to protect its intellectual property rights through patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other measures, it believes that any success will depend more upon the innovation, technological expertise and marketing abilities of its employees. Nevertheless, the Company has a policy of seeking patents when appropriate on inventions resulting from its ongoing research and development and manufacturing activities. The Company owns various United States and foreign patents, which expire on dates ranging from July 2000 to February 2017, and has various United States and foreign patent applications pending. The Company also has various registered trademarks and copyright registrations covering mainly software programs used in the operation of its stepper systems. The Company also relies upon trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to protect its technology adequately or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently. There can be no assurance that any of the Company's pending patent applications will be issued or that foreign intellectual property laws will protect the Company's intellectual property rights. In addition, litigation may be necessary to enforce the Company's patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights, to protect the Company's trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. There can be no assurance that any patent issued to the Company will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to the Company. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop similar products, duplicate the Company's products or, if patents are issued to the Company, design around the patents issued to the Company. 9 Although there are no pending lawsuits against the Company regarding infringement claims with respect to any existing patent or any other intellectual property right, the Company has from time to time been notified of claims that it may be infringing intellectual property rights possessed by third parties. Certain of the Company's customers have received notices of infringement from Technivision Corporation and the Lemelson Medical, Education and Research Foundation, Limited Partnership alleging that the manufacture of certain semiconductor products and/or the equipment used to manufacture those semiconductor products infringes certain issued patents. The Company has been notified by certain of such customers that the Company may be obligated to defend or settle claims that the Company's products infringe any of such patents and, in the event it is subsequently determined that the customer infringes any of such patents, they intend to seek reimbursement from the Company for damages and other expenses resulting from this matter. Although there are no pending lawsuits against the Company regarding infringement claims with respect to any existing patents or any other intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that infringement claims by third parties or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims in the future will not be asserted, or that such assertions, if proven to be true, will not materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of the outcome of any litigation. With respect to any such future claims, the Company may seek to obtain a license under the third party's intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance, however, that a license will be available on reasonable terms or at all. The Company could decide, in the alternative, to resort to litigation to challenge such claims. Such challenges could be extremely expensive and time consuming and could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of the outcome of any litigation. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS The Company is subject to a variety of governmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used to manufacture the Company's systems. The Company believes that it is currently in compliance in all material respects with such regulations and that it has obtained all necessary environmental permits to conduct its business. Nevertheless, the failure to comply with current or future regulations could result in substantial fines being imposed on the Company, suspension of production, alteration of the manufacturing process or cessation of operations. Such regulations could require the Company to acquire expensive remediation equipment or to incur substantial expenses to comply with environmental regulations. Any failure by the Company to control the use, disposal or storage of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous or toxic substances could subject the Company to significant liabilities. CUSTOMERS, APPLICATIONS AND MARKETS The Company sells its systems to semiconductor, photomask, thin film head and micromachining manufacturers located throughout the United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Japan. Semiconductor manufacturers have purchased the model 1500 Series steppers, the Saturn Wafer Stepper Family, and the Titan Wafer Stepper Family for the fabrication of microprocessors, microcontrollers, DRAMs and ASICs. Such systems are used in mix-and-match environments with other lithography tools, as replacements for scanners and contact printers, in start-up fabrication facilities, in packaging for ultrathin and flip chip applications and for high volume, low cost noncritical feature size semiconductor production. The new reduction stepper product line, acquired in the Acquisition, will continue to address selected semiconductor markets with an emphasis on low-cost, high-volume applications. Thin film head manufacturers have purchased the model 1700 Series steppers, the model 4700 stepper and the model 6700 stepper because of their advantages in yield, throughput and overall cost of ownership. The XLS 9800, first introduced in 1998, is being developed as an i-line reduction stepper designed specifically for the thin film head market. Manufacturers of micromachined components have purchased the model 1500 Series steppers and Saturn/ 10 Titan wafer stepper families because of high throughput and flexible field size advantages along with cost-effective, submicron imaging capabilities. Additionally, during 1997 the Company introduced its UltraBeam electron beam lithography system for the manufacture of photomasks for the IC industry. Historically, the Company has sold a substantial portion of its systems to a limited number of customers. Sales to one customer accounted for approximately 25% and 14% of the Company's net sales in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Additionally, in 1997, a second customer accounted for approximately 10% of the Company's net sales. In 1996, sales to two customers accounted for approximately 17% and 12% of the Company's net sales. The Company expects that sales to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its net sales in the foreseeable future and believes that the Company's financial results depend in significant part upon the success of these major customers, and the Company's ability to meet their future capital equipment needs. Although the composition of the group comprising the Company's largest customers may vary from period to period, the loss of a significant customer or any reduction in orders by any significant customer, including reductions due to market, economic or competitive conditions in the semiconductor or magnetic recording head industries or in the industries that manufacture products utilizing integrated circuits or thin film heads, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's ability to maintain or increase its sales in the future will depend, in part, upon its ability to obtain orders from new customers as well as the financial condition and success of its customers and the general economy, of which there can be no assurance. (See "Cyclicality of Semiconductor and Thin Film Head Industries"). In addition to the business risks associated with the dependence on these major customers, these significant customer concentrations have in the past resulted, and currently result in significant concentrations of accounts receivable and leases receivable. In particular, sales to a relatively few customers in the thin film head industry currently make up a significant portion of the Company's receivables. Recently, the Company has increased its level of customer leasing activity and has granted extended payment terms to many of its customers. The formation of significant and concentrated long-term receivables and the granting of extended payment terms exposes the Company to additional risks, including the risk of default by one or more customers representing a significant portion of the Company's total receivables. During the three month periods ended September 30 and December 31, 1998, the Company recorded significant reserves against its trade accounts receivable and leases receivable. If additional lease and accounts receivable reserves were to be required, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Sales of the Company's systems depend, in significant part, upon the decision of a prospective customer to increase manufacturing capacity or to restructure current manufacturing facilities, either of which typically involves a significant commitment of capital. In view of the significant investment involved in a system purchase, the Company has experienced and may continue to experience delays following initial qualification of the Company's systems as a result of delays in a customer's approval process. For this and other reasons, the Company's systems typically have a lengthy sales cycle during which the Company may expend substantial funds and management effort in securing a sale. Lengthy sales cycles subject the Company to a number of significant risks, including inventory obsolescence and fluctuations in operating results, over which the Company has little or no control. BACKLOG The Company schedules production of its systems based upon order backlog, informal customer commitments and general economic forecasts for its targeted markets. The Company includes in its backlog all customer orders for its one-to-one and reduction optical technology systems for which it has accepted purchase order numbers and assigned shipment dates within six months, all customer orders for its electron beam lithography systems for which it has accepted purchase order numbers and assigned 11 shipment dates within one year, as well as all orders for service, spare parts and upgrades. All orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer with limited or no penalties. Because of orders received for systems to be shipped in the same quarter in which the order is received, possible changes in system delivery schedules, cancellations of orders and potential delays in system shipments, the Company's backlog at any particular date may not necessarily be representative of actual sales for any succeeding period. As of December 31, 1998, the Company's backlog was approximately $29.4 million, compared with approximately $65.6 million as of December 31, 1997. EMPLOYEES At December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately 488 full-time employees, including 103 engaged in research, development, and engineering, 23 in sales and marketing, 167 in customer service and support, 124 in manufacturing and 71 in general administration and finance. The Company believes any future success, should it occur, would depend, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees. None of the employees of the Company is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company considers its relationships with its employees to be good. ADDITIONAL RISK FACTORS CYCLICALITY OF SEMICONDUCTOR AND THIN FILM HEAD INDUSTRIES The Company's business depends in significant part upon capital expenditures by manufacturers of semiconductors, photomasks and thin film head magnetic recording devices, which in turn depend upon the current and anticipated market demand for such devices and products utilizing such devices. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and historically has experienced recurring periods of oversupply, as evidenced by the current prolonged downturn in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. This has, from time to time, resulted in significantly reduced demand for capital equipment including the systems manufactured and marketed by the Company. The Company believes that markets for new generations of semiconductors will also be subject to similar fluctuations. In the past, the semiconductor industry has experienced significant growth, which, in turn, has caused significant growth in the capital equipment industry. However, the semiconductor industry has been experiencing a substantial and lengthy cyclical downturn, which has resulted in a significant reduction in capital spending. Additionally, the Company has been experiencing cancellation of purchase orders, shipment delays and purchase order restructurings by several of its customers and there can be no assurance that this trend will not continue in the future. Accordingly, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain its current level of sales. The Company attempts to mitigate the risk of cyclicality by participating in both the semiconductor and thin film head markets, as well as diversifying into new markets such as photolithography for micromachining and the development of photomasks. Despite such efforts, when one or more of such markets experiences a downturn or slowdown, such as is currently occurring in the semiconductor and thin film head markets, the Company's net sales and operating results continue to be materially adversely affected, and has resulted in net losses for the Company in 1998. The Company presently expects that net sales for the three-month period ending March 31, 1999 will be lower than net sales in the comparable period in 1998. Additionally, due to lack of order visibility, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain its current sales levels. The Company presently expects to recognize an operating and net loss for the quarter ending March 31, 1999. Due, in part, to the significant level of planned research, development and engineering spending, relative to anticipated sales, and the current low rate of capacity utilization, these losses may extend to future quarters. During 1998, 1997 and 1996, approximately 50%, 50% and 40%, respectively, of the Company's net sales were derived from sales to thin film head manufacturers and micromachining customers. The Company has experienced a significant decline in orders from customers in the thin film head market in terms of absolute dollars. Additionally, several companies within the thin film head and disk drive 12 industries have announced significantly lower than expected earnings and have announced restructuring or other non-recurring charges. The Company believes these events indicate that the thin film head and disk drive industries continue to have excess capacity in the near-term. This has and will continue to result in lower sales and delays or deferrals of customer orders from these industries, which will continue to materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations in the near term. Additionally, the Company is experiencing increased competition in this market from Nikon, Canon and ASML. The Company's business and operating results would be materially adversely affected by continued downturns or slowdowns in the thin film head market or by loss of market share. IMPORTANCE OF MIX-AND-MATCH STRATEGY A principal element of the Company's strategy has been to sell its 1X lithography systems to advanced semiconductor fabrication facilities for mix-and-match applications. This strategy depends, in significant part, upon the recognition by semiconductor manufacturers that costs can be reduced by using the Company's systems to perform exposure on semiconductor process layers requiring feature sizes of 0.65 microns or greater and the willingness of such manufacturers to implement processes to lower manufacturing costs. Many semiconductor fabrication facilities have limited or no experience with integrating lithography tools in the manner necessary for full implementation and acceptance of a mix-and-match manufacturing strategy, and there can be no assurance that semiconductor manufacturers will adopt such a strategy. The Company has designed certain of its systems to operate in a compatible manner with its i-line and DUV reduction steppers and its competitors' reduction steppers and step-and-scan systems, which are used to process layers with feature sizes below 0.65 microns. The successful implementation of the Company's strategy, however, will result in a loss of sales by manufacturers of reduction steppers and will cause these competitors to respond with lower prices, productivity improvements or new technical designs for their systems that may eliminate the need for the Company's steppers or make it difficult for the Company's systems to attain compatibility with such systems. Also, certain of the Company's competitors, which also manufacture widefield systems, including Nikon and Canon, are shipping their own widefield mix-and-match lithography systems. The introduction, development and sales of such competitive systems could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. To facilitate its mix-and-match strategy, the Company has developed and is continuing to develop a family of products. In 1995, the Company commenced shipment and volume production of the Titan Wafer Stepper and commenced shipment of the Saturn Wafer Stepper. Additionally, during 1997 the Company added multiple versions of its Titan and Saturn wafer steppers in order to more fully address the needs of the mix-and-match market. As is typical with newly introduced systems in the capital equipment industry, the Company has experienced and may continue to experience technical or other difficulties with its mix-and-match family of products. The Company believes that the market acceptance and process verification combined with volume production of the mix-and-match family of products is of critical importance to the successful implementation of its mix-and-match strategy and its future financial results. Recently, this market segment of the Company's business has experienced a pronounced downturn due, in part, to the recent cyclical downturn in the semiconductor industry and the strength of the U.S. dollar in relationship to the Japanese yen. Additionally, the Company believes that existing capital budgets of semiconductor manufacturers are currently focusing on technology buys, and not capacity additions. This places the Company at a disadvantage, since its steppers address non-critical geometries. To the extent that the mix-and-match family of products does not achieve or maintain significant sales due to a continued cyclical downturn in the semiconductor industry; technical, manufacturing or other difficulties associated with these products; lack of customer acceptance; an inability to reduce the significantly long manufacturing cycle of these products; an inability to increase capacity for the production of the mix-and-match family of products; direct competition from other widefield mix-and-match and i-line step-and-scan systems from Nikon, Canon, and ASML, among others; or any other reason, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In addition, the increase in mix-and-match stepper production has resulted and will continue to result in higher inventory levels and operating expenses. Failure to achieve or maintain significant sales of these steppers has led and could 13 continue to lead, among other things, to an increase in inventory obsolescence and an increase in expenses without corresponding sales, both of which have and could continue to have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCT LINES; EXPANSION OF OPERATIONS; ASSIMILATION OF ACQUIRED PRODUCT LINES Currently, the Company is devoting significant resources to the development, introduction and commercialization of new products and technologies that are outside the Company's core businesses (see "Research, Development and Engineering"). During 1999, the Company will continue to develop these products and will continue to incur significant operating expenses in the areas of research, development and engineering and general and administrative costs in order to further develop and support these new products. Additionally, gross profit margins and inventory levels may be further adversely impacted in the future by costs associated with the initial production of these new product lines. These costs include, but are not limited to, additional manufacturing overhead, additional inventory write-offs, costs associated with managing multiple sites and the establishment of additional after-sales support organizations. Additionally, there can be no assurance that operating expenses will not increase, relative to sales, as a result of adding additional marketing and administrative personnel, among other costs, to support the Company's new products. If the Company is unable to achieve significantly increased net sales or its sales fall below expectations, the Company's operating results will be materially adversely affected until, among other factors, costs and expenses can be reduced. On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of ISI, a privately held manufacturer of i-line and DUV reduction lithography systems (the "Acquisition"). Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; risks of entering markets in which the Company has no or limited direct experience; and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. In the event the Company acquires product lines, technologies or businesses which do not complement the Company's business, or which otherwise do not enhance the Company's sales or operating results, the Company may incur substantial write-offs and higher recurring operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the effect of the Acquisition on the Company's business, financial condition or operating results. In conjunction with the Acquisition, significant intangible assets were acquired. The creation of additional intangible assets has the impact of increasing amortization expense, which may continue to have a material adverse affect on the Company's results of operations should significant sales for these newly acquired product lines not materialize. Additionally, prior to the Acquisition, ISI had recently completed several significant restructurings of its businesses and organization and had incurred substantial operating losses. Additionally, the Company is presently in the process of consolidating certain of its acquired facilities. The Company has purchased significant levels of plant and equipment for the anticipated volume production of the UltraBeam "V" Model electron beam lithography system. To date, the Company has shipped one UltraBeam system to a customer. The Company believes that any future success of this product line is dependent, in large part, on the Company's ability to further develop this system and the customers' ability to integrate this highly technical product into their existing processes. In December 1997, the Company terminated its distributor relationship with Innotech, its Japan distributor. The Company expanded its operations in Japan during 1998, by establishing a direct sales force, leasing additional facilities and by making significant capital expenditures for sales and applications support. Should additional gross profit on sales to the Japan marketplace not be sufficient to fund these expanded operations, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; IMPORTANCE OF TIMELY PRODUCT INTRODUCTION The semiconductor and magnetic recording head manufacturing industries are subject to rapid technological change and new 14 product introductions and enhancements. The Company's ability to be competitive in these and other markets will depend, in part, upon its ability to develop new and enhanced systems and related software tools, and to introduce these systems and related software tools at competitive prices and on a timely and cost-effective basis to enable customers to integrate them into their operations either prior to or as they begin volume product manufacturing. The Company will also be required to enhance the performance of its existing systems and related software tools. Any success of the Company in developing new and enhanced systems and related software tools depends upon a variety of factors, including product selection, timely and efficient completion of product design, timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing and assembly processes, product performance in the field and effective sales and marketing. In particular, the Company has not yet fully defined the markets and applications for the Titan Wafer Stepper Family and the Saturn Wafer Stepper Family and is in the process of assimilating the product lines acquired from ISI. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, new product decisions must anticipate both future demand and the technology that will be available to supply that demand. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products and related software tools or enhancing its existing products and related software tools. Any such failure would materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Because of the large number of components in the Company's systems, significant delays can occur between a system's introduction and the commencement by the Company of volume production of such systems. The Company has experienced delays from time to time in the introduction of, and technical and manufacturing difficulties with, certain of its systems and enhancements and related software tools and may experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of new systems or enhancements and related software tools. In particular, the Company has very little experience in manufacturing its UltraBeam electron beam lithography system. Due to the significant manufacturing cycle time required for the production of this system, its lengthy sales cycle, lack of adequate documentation for the product and the complex nature of this system, delays in production and/or shipment have resulted and will continue to result from time to time. Due to the high selling price of this system, delays in shipments from one quarter to the next would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations for that quarter. Additionally, the Company is in the process of assimilating the operations acquired in the Acquisition and developing related marketing and product development plans. This has resulted and could continue to result in a delay of any eventual volume production of the products acquired. (See "Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). There can be no assurance that the Company will not encounter additional technical, manufacturing or other difficulties that could further delay future introductions or volume production of systems or enhancements. The Company's inability to complete the development or meet the technical specifications of any of its systems or enhancements and related software tools, or its inability to manufacture and ship these systems or enhancements and related software tools in volume and in time to meet the requirements for manufacturing the future generation of semiconductor or thin film head devices would materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company may incur substantial unanticipated costs to ensure the functionality and reliability of its products early in the products' life cycles. If new products have reliability or quality problems, reduced orders or higher manufacturing costs, delays in collecting accounts receivable and additional service and warranty expenses may result. Any of such events may materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. INTERNATIONAL SALES; JAPANESE MARKET International sales accounted for approximately 47%, 33% and 53% of total net sales for the years 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company anticipates that international sales, which typically have lower gross margins than domestic sales, principally due to higher field service and support costs, will continue to account for a significant portion of total net sales. As a result, a significant portion of the Company's sales will continue to be subject to certain risks, including 15 unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, difficulty in satisfying existing regulatory requirements, exchange rate fluctuations, tariffs and other barriers, political and economic instability, difficulties in accounts receivable collections, natural disasters, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary and branch operations and potentially adverse tax consequences. Although the Company generally transacts its international sales in U.S. dollars, international sales expose the Company to a number of additional risk factors, including fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, which, in turn, impact the relative cost of ownership of the Company's products and may further impact the purchasing ability of its international customers. In Japan, however, the Company has recently commenced direct sales operations and orders are typically denominated in Japanese yen. This may subject the Company to a higher degree of risk from currency fluctuations. The Company attempts to mitigate this exposure through the use of foreign exchange contracts. The Company is also subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of semiconductors and magnetic recording head products. The Company cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes or other charges or restrictions will be implemented by the United States, Japan or any other country upon the importation or exportation of the Company's products in the future. There can be no assurance that any of these factors or the adoption of restrictive policies will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the Company believes that the severe currency and equity market fluctuations that have been experienced recently by many of the Asian markets have caused and may continue to cause a further reduction in orders of the Company's products, particularly in the short-term, which will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Although the Company has sold a number of its systems to Japanese thin film head manufacturers, to date, the Company has made limited sales of its systems to Japanese semiconductor manufacturers. The Japanese semiconductor market segment is large, represents a substantial percentage of the worldwide semiconductor manufacturing capacity, and is difficult for foreign companies to penetrate. The Company is at a competitive disadvantage with respect to Japanese semiconductor capital equipment suppliers that have been engaged for some time in collaborative efforts with Japanese semiconductor manufacturers, and currently dominate the Japanese stepper market. The Company believes that increased penetration of the Japanese market is critical to its financial results and intends to continue to invest significant resources in Japan in order to meet this objective. As part of its strategy to penetrate the Japanese market, in 1993, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Innotech Corporation, a local distributor of products. This agreement was terminated in December 1997, and the Company expanded its operations in Japan during 1998 by establishing a direct sales force and creating sales and applications support organizations. (See "Additional Risk Factors: Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL The Company's future operating results depend, in significant part, upon the continued contributions of key personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. None of such persons has an employment or noncompetition agreement with the Company. The Company does not maintain any life insurance on any of its key persons. The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In addition, the Company's future operating results depend in significant part upon its ability to attract and retain other qualified management, manufacturing, and technical, sales and support personnel for its operations. There are only a limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions and it may become increasingly difficult for the Company to hire such personnel over time. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. The failure to attract or retain such persons would materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. During the last several years, the Company has experienced an increased level of employee turnover. The Company believes that this increase has been due to several factors, including: the continued semiconductor industry slowdown, which resulted in planned reductions in the Company's workforce 16 during the fourth fiscal quarter of 1996 and the third fiscal quarter of 1998, and which has further resulted in an increased level of uncertainty within the workforce; an expanding economy within the geographic area that the Company maintains its principal business offices, making it more difficult for the Company to retain its employees; and the declining value of stock options granted to employees, relative to their total compensation, as a result of the full vesting of options granted prior to the Company's initial public offering and significant numbers of options granted at prices well in excess of the current market value of the Company's stock. Additionally, the Company has implemented various cost-saving measures, including additional scheduled plant shutdowns and required time-off for its employees. Due to these and other factors, the Company may continue to experience high levels of employee turnover, which could adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. EFFECTS OF CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS Certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, equity incentive plans, Shareholder Rights Plan, Bylaws and Delaware law may discourage certain transactions involving a change in control of the Company. In addition to the foregoing, the Company's classified board of directors, the shareholdings of the Company's officers, directors and persons or entities that may be deemed affiliates and the ability of the Board of Directors to issue "blank check" preferred stock without further stockholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of holders of Common Stock. VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE The Company believes that factors such as announcements of developments related to the Company's business, fluctuations in the Company's operating results, sales of securities of the Company into the marketplace, general conditions in the semiconductor and magnetic recording head industries or the worldwide or regional economies, an outbreak of hostilities, a shortfall in revenue or earnings from, or changes, in analysts' expectations, announcements of technological innovations or new products or enhancements by the Company or its competitors, developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and developments in the Company's relationships with its customers and suppliers could cause the price of the Company's Common Stock to fluctuate, perhaps substantially. In addition, in recent years the stock market in general, and the market for shares of small capitalization stocks in particular, including the Company's, have experienced extreme price fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. There can be no assurance that the market price of the Company's Common Stock will not continue to experience significant fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations that may be unrelated to the Company's performance. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company maintains its headquarters and manufacturing operations in San Jose, California in three leased facilities, totaling approximately 149,000 square feet, which contain general administration and finance, marketing and sales, customer service and support, manufacturing and research, development, and engineering. Additionally, the Company leases approximately 21,000 square feet in New Providence, New Jersey for its UltraBeam product line, and approximately 65,000 square feet in Wilmington, Massachusetts for its reduction lithography product lines, which contain manufacturing, research, and development, engineering and general administration. The leases for these facilities expire at various dates from December 2000 to March 2005. The Company also leases 6.4 acres of undeveloped land near its headquarters in San Jose. This lease expires in November 1999. As part of this transaction, the Company presently has segregated $5.5 million of its securities as collateral for certain obligations of the lessor pertaining to this land. The Company also leases five sales and support offices in the United States in Phoenix, Arizona; Woburn, Massachusetts; Allentown, Pennsylvania; Austin, Texas; and Richardson, Texas under leases with terms expiring between one month to five years. The Company also maintains a branch office in Taiwan and sales, service and support subsidiaries in Japan, Korea, the United Kingdom and Thailand, with terms expiring between one month and fifteen years. The Company believes that its existing facilities will be adequate to meet its currently anticipated requirements and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed. 17 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is not a party to any material litigation. From time to time, however, the Company may be subject to claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 1998. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT As of December 31, 1998, the executive officers of the Company, who are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors, were as follows:
NAME AGE POSITION WITH THE COMPANY - ----------------------------------------------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------- Arthur W. Zafiropoulo................................ 59 Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President Daniel H. Berry...................................... 53 Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President William G. Leunis, III............................... 43 Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Mr. Zafiropoulo founded the Company in September 1992 to acquire certain assets and liabilities of the Ultratech Stepper Division (the "Predecessor") of General Signal Corporation and, since March 1993, has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Additionally, Mr. Zafiropoulo served as President of the Company from March 1993 to March 1996, resumed the position of President of the Company in May 1997 and presently serves in this capacity. Between September 1990 and March 1993, he was President of the Predecessor. From February 1989 to September 1990, Mr. Zafiropoulo was President of General Signal's Semiconductor Equipment Group International, a semiconductor equipment company. From August 1980 to February 1989, Mr. Zafiropoulo was President and Chief Executive Officer of Drytek, Inc., a plasma dry-etch company that he founded in August 1980, and which was later sold to General Signal in 1986. From July 1987 to September 1989, Mr. Zafiropoulo was also President of Kayex, a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, which is a unit of General Signal. Mr. Zafiropoulo is a director of Advanced Energy Inc., a manufacturer of advanced RF and DC power supplies. In addition, Mr. Zafiropoulo is a director of Semi/Sematech, an association of U.S.-owned suppliers of equipment, materials and services to the semiconductor industry and SEMI (Semiconductor and Equipment Materials International), an international trade association. Mr. Berry has served as Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company since June 1998, and Senior Vice President, Sales and Service of the Company since March 1993. Between December 1990 and March 1993, he served as Vice President, Sales and Service of the Predecessor. From November 1989 to December 1990, Mr. Berry was director of international operations for General Signal's Semiconductor Equipment Group International, a semiconductor equipment company. From July 1976 to November 1989, he held various management positions including director of marketing for optical lithography, at Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a semiconductor equipment manufacturer. Since December 1998, Mr. Berry has served as a director of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. Flanders, New Jersey, a manufacturer of precision film metrology instruments for semiconductor markets Mr. Leunis has served as Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since January 1997. Between March 1993 and December 1996, he served as Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company. Between September 1990 and March 1993, he served as Vice President, Finance of the Predecessor. From August 1986 to August 1990, Mr. Leunis was Chief Financial Officer of the Predecessor. From 1978 to August 1986, Mr. Leunis held various financial positions at General Signal. 18 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth, for periods indicated, the range of high and low sale prices of the Company's Common Stock, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.:
FISCAL 1998--FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 - --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------ Market Price: (1) High......................................... $ 24.000 $ 26.625 $ 23.000 $ 20.500 Low............................................ $ 18.125 $ 18.500 $ 14.000 $ 12.750 FISCAL 1997--FISCAL QUARTER ENDED - --------------------------------------------------------------- Market Price: (1) High......................................... $ 30.625 $ 25.375 $ 34.375 $ 34.500 Low............................................ $ 20.500 $ 17.000 $ 22.500 $ 18.500
(1) The Company's Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market-Registered Trademark- under the symbol UTEK. The market prices per share represent the highest and lowest closing prices for the Company's Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market during each fiscal quarter. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately 870 stockholders of record. The Company's fiscal quarters in 1998 ended on April 4, 1998, July 4, 1998, October 3, 1998 and December 31, 1998, and the Company's fiscal quarters in 1997 ended on April 5, 1997, July 5, 1997, October 4, 1997, and December 31, 1997, respectively. For convenience of presentation, the Company's 1998 fiscal quarters have been shown as ending on March 31, 1998, June 30, 1998, September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1998, and the Company's 1997 fiscal quarters have been shown as ending on March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997, September 30, 1997 and December 31, 1997. The Company has not paid cash dividends on its Common Stock since inception, and its Board of Directors presently plans to reinvest the Company's earnings in its business. Accordingly, it is anticipated that no cash dividends will be paid to holders of Common Stock in the foreseeable future. 19 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA 1998*** 1997** 1996 1995 1994 1993* 1992* - ------------------------------ -------- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- OPERATIONS: Net sales..................... $ 81,457 $ 147,349 $ 193,508 $ 157,831 $ 91,344 $ 54,136 $ 35,309 Gross profit (loss)........... (1,319) 77,678 104,893 82,288 46,037 26,683 17,548 Gross profit (loss) as a percentage of net sales..... (2)% 53% 54% 52% 50% 49% 50% Operating income (loss)....... $(70,426) $ 18,001 $ 46,678 $ 31,782 $ 15,291 $ 6,833 $ 2,220 Income (loss) before income taxes (benefit)............. (64,126) 25,094 52,707 36,170 16,445 6,689 2,089 Pre-tax income (loss) as a percentage of net sales..... (79)% 17% 27% 23% 18% 12% 6% Net income (loss)............. $(57,944) $ 17,566 $ 35,311 $ 24,234 $ 11,019 $ 4,123 $ 1,304 Net income (loss) per share--basic................ $ (2.76) $ 0.85 $ 1.76 $ 1.32 $ 0.68 N/A N/A Number of shares used in per share computation--basic.... 20,958 20,553 20,079 18,425 16,293 N/A N/A Net income (loss) per share--diluted.............. $ (2.76) $ 0.81 $ 1.66 $ 1.20 $ 0.65 N/A N/A Number of shares used in per share computation--diluted........ 20,958 21,681 21,271 20,154 16,917 N/A N/A BALANCE SHEET: Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments...... $146,107 $ 164,349 $ 167,409 $ 161,356 $ 50,246 $ 26,242 $ 176 Working capital............... 166,417 223,226 212,684 176,174 69,368 32,977 6,307 Total assets.................. 245,935 300,001 280,772 245,428 104,789 56,381 16,765 Long-term obligations, less current portion............. -- -- -- -- 400 800 -- Stockholders' equity.......... 210,151 263,632 239,947 199,658 80,027 38,091 8,323 OTHER DATA: Return on average equity...... (24)% 7% 16% 17% 19% 18% 15% Book value per common share outstanding................. $ 9.96 $ 12.68 $ 11.81 $ 10.08 $ 4.84 $ 3.00 N/A Current ratio................. 5.70 7.60 6.40 4.94 3.93 2.89 1.76 Long term debt to equity ratio....................... 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 Capital expenditures.......... $ 9,510 $ 9,337 $ 7,849 $ 9,760 $ 7,759 $ 2,752 $ 972 Income tax/benefit as percentage of pre-tax income/loss................. 10% 30% 33% 33% 33% 38% 38%
20 QUARTERLY DATA
UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH - ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1998 *** Net sales.......................................................... $ 27,782 $ 22,395 $ 12,359 $ 18,921 Gross profit (loss)................................................ 11,864 6,247 (13,803) (5,627) Operating loss..................................................... (1,785) (19,452) (32,935) (16,254) Net income (loss).................................................. 361 (15,364) (28,166) (14,775) Net income (loss) per share--basic................................. $ 0.02 $ (0.74) $ (1.34) $ (0.70) Number of shares used in per share computation--basic.............. 20,833 20,895 21,014 21,090 Net income (loss) per share--diluted............................... $ 0.02 $ (0.74) $ (1.34) $ (0.70) Number of shares used in per share computation--diluted............ 21,697 20,895 21,014 21,090 1997 ** Net sales.......................................................... $ 38,733 $ 38,054 $ 36,752 $ 33,810 Gross profit....................................................... 21,033 19,979 19,228 17,438 Operating income................................................... 4,916 6,543 5,648 894 Net income......................................................... 4,533 5,727 5,405 1,901 Net income per share--basic........................................ $ 0.22 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 $ 0.09 Number of shares used in per share computation--basic.............. 20,371 20,451 20,626 20,765 Net income per share--diluted...................................... $ 0.21 $ 0.27 $ 0.25 $ 0.09 Number of shares used in per share computation--diluted............ 21,526 21,442 21,851 21,862
- ------------------------ * ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. (THE "COMPANY") ACQUIRED CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF THE ULTRATECH STEPPER DIVISION (THE "PREDECESSOR") OF GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION ON MARCH 8, 1993. THE AMOUNTS, AS PRESENTED ABOVE, REFLECT HISTORICAL RESULTS AND DO NOT INCLUDE PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN INCURRED AS AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY. NET INCOME PER SHARE FOR EACH OF THE TWO YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 IS NOT PRESENTED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF COMPARABILITY BETWEEN THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY AND THE PREDECESSOR. ** RESULTS OF OPERATIONS IN 1997 INCLUDE A CHARGE OF $3,619,000, OR $0.12 PER SHARE--BASIC AND DILUTED, TO REFLECT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COST INCURRED IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1997 IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF THE ASSETS OF LEPTON INC., AND A SPECIAL CHARGE OF $3,450,000, OR $0.12 PER SHARE--BASIC, $0.11 PER SHARE--DILUTED, TO ACCOUNT FOR TERMINATION OF THE COMPANY'S JAPAN DISTRIBUTOR IN THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1997. *** GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) IN 1998 INCLUDES SPECIAL CHARGES OF $15,231,000 AND $11,177,000 IN THE THIRD AND FOURTH QUARTERS, RESPECTIVELY, RELATING PRIMARILY TO THE WRITE-DOWN OF INVENTORIES AND PROVISIONS FOR ESTIMATED LOSSES ON PURCHASE COMMITMENTS. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS IN 1998 INCLUDE A CHARGE OF $12,566,000 IN THE SECOND QUARTER, OR $0.60 PER SHARE--BASIC AND DILUTED, TO REFLECT ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF ISI, AND A RELATED ADJUSTMENT TO OPERATIONS OF $7,458,000 IN THE FOURTH QUARTER, OR $0.35 PER SHARE, TO REDUCE THE IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CHARGE AS A RESULT OF THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION. ADDITIONALLY, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS IN 1998 INCLUDE SPECIAL CHARGES OF $5,775,000 AND $5,400,000 IN THE THIRD AND FOURTH QUARTERS, RESPECTIVELY, REFLECTING PROVISIONS FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND LEASES RECEIVABLE, PROVISIONS FOR SALES RETURNS AND ALLOWANCES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REDUCTION IN THE COMPANY'S WORKFORCE. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW Ultratech develops, manufactures and markets photolithography equipment (steppers) designed to reduce the cost of manufacturing integrated circuits, thin film heads for disk drives and micromachined 21 components. The Company supplies step-and-repeat systems based on one-to-one and reduction optical technologies to customers located throughout the United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Japan. These products range from low-cost systems for high-volume manufacturing to advanced systems for cost-effective production of leading-edge devices and for research and development applications. Additionally, the Company manufactures and markets the UltraBeam "V" Model electron beam pattern generation system based on vector-scan technology for use in the development and production of photomasks for the IC industry. On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Integrated Solutions, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of i-line and deep ultra-violet reduction lithography systems (the "Acquisition") for approximately $19.2 million in cash, $2.6 million in transaction costs and the assumption of certain liabilities. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company's operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate significantly in the future depending upon a variety of factors, including substantial cyclicality in the Company's target markets; various competitive factors including price-based competition and competition from vendors employing other technologies; the timing and terms of significant orders; lengthy sales cycles for the Company's products; concentration of credit risk; delayed shipments to customers due to customer configuration changes and other factors; acquisition activities requiring the devotion of substantial management resources; the mix of products sold; lengthy manufacturing cycles for the Company's products; lengthy product development cycles for new products; the timing of new product announcements and releases by the Company or its competitors; market acceptance of new products and enhanced versions of the Company's products; manufacturing inefficiencies associated with the startup of new product introductions; customer concentration; ability to volume produce systems and meet customer requirements; patterns of capital spending by customers; product discounts; changes in pricing by the Company, its competitors or suppliers; political and economic instability throughout the world, in particular the Asia/Pacific region; natural disasters; regulatory changes; and business interruptions related to the Company's occupation of its facilities. The Company's gross profit as a percentage of sales has been and will continue to be significantly affected by a variety of factors, including inventory and open purchase commitment reserve provisions; the rate of capacity utilization; the mix of products sold; nonlinearity of shipments during the quarter; increased competition in the Company's targeted markets; the introduction of new products, which typically have higher manufacturing costs until manufacturing efficiencies are realized and are typically discounted more than existing products until the products gain market acceptance; the percentage of international sales, which typically have lower gross margins than domestic sales principally due to higher field service and support costs; and the implementation of subcontracting arrangements. The Company derives a substantial portion of its total net sales from sales of a relatively small number of newly manufactured systems, which typically range in price from $800,000 to $2.1 million for the Company's 1X steppers, and $1.5 million to $4.0 million for the Company's reduction steppers. Additionally, the Company's UltraBeam electron beam lithography system is anticipated to sell in a range of $6.0 million to $9.0 million. As a result of these high sale prices, the timing of recognition of revenue from a single transaction has had and will continue to have a significant impact on the Company's net sales and operating results. The Company's backlog at the beginning of a period typically does not include all of the sales needed to achieve the Company's objectives for that period. In addition, orders in backlog are subject to cancellation, delay, deferral or rescheduling by a customer with limited or no penalties. Consequently, the Company's net sales and operating results for a period have been and will continue to be dependant upon the Company obtaining orders for systems to be shipped in the same period in which the order is received. The Company's business and financial results for a particular period could be materially adversely affected if an anticipated order for even one system is not received in time to permit shipment during the particular period. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the Company's net sales has historically 22 been realized near the end of each quarter. Accordingly, the failure to receive anticipated orders or delays in shipments near the end of a particular quarter, due, for example, to reschedulings, delays, deferrals or cancellations by customers, additional customer configuration requirements, or to unexpected manufacturing difficulties or delays in deliveries by suppliers due to their long production lead times or otherwise, has caused and may continue to cause net sales in a particular period to fall significantly below the Company's expectations, which has and could continue to materially adversely affect the Company's operating results for such period. In particular, the long manufacturing cycles of the Company's Titan and Saturn steppers, and the Company's newly acquired XLS advanced reduction stepper and 193nm small-field research and development reduction stepper (both product lines were acquired through the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of ISI), and the long lead time for lenses and other materials, could cause shipments of such products to be delayed from one quarter to the next, which could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations for a particular quarter. Additionally, the Company has very limited experience in the manufacture of its UltraBeam electron beam pattern generation systems. The UltraBeam systems are extremely complex and the product has significantly long manufacturing and sales cycles, which greatly increases the likelihood of delays in shipments from one quarter to the next. Due to the high list price for these systems, shipment delays would materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations for a particular quarter if the shipment were delayed to the following quarter. Additionally, the Company may experience difficulties in assimilating the operations acquired in the Acquisition. (See "Additional Risk Factors: Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). The impact of these and other factors on the Company's sales and operating results in any future period cannot be forecast with certainty. The Company's business has in prior years been subject to seasonality, although the Company believes such seasonality has been masked in recent years by cyclical trends within the semiconductor and thin film industries. In addition, the need for continued expenditures for research and development, capital equipment purchases and ongoing training and customer service and support worldwide, among other factors, will make it difficult for the Company to reduce its significant operating expenses in a particular period if the Company fails to achieve its net sales goals for the period. Additionally, the Company has recently experienced manufacturing inefficiencies associated with shifts in product demand and under-utilization of manufacturing capacity and the Company presently anticipates that these trends will continue for at least the next few quarters. Such continuation would materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company presently expects that net sales for the three-month period ending March 31, 1999 will be lower than net sales in the comparable period in 1998. Additionally, due to lack of order visibility, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain its current sales levels. The Company presently expects to recognize an operating and net loss for the quarter ending March 31, 1999. These losses may extend to future quarters due, in part, to the significant level of planned research, development and engineering spending, relative to anticipated sales; the current low rate of capacity utilization; and the current backlog and order levels for the Company's products. Certain of the statements contained in this report may be considered forward-looking statements that may involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In addition to the factors discussed herein, among other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: highly competitive industry; difficulties in assimilating acquired operations; international sales; development of new product lines; rapid technological change; importance of timely product introductions; importance of the Company's mix-and-match strategy; year 2000 compliance; future acquisitions; expansion of the Company's product lines; dependence on key personnel; sole or limited sources of supply; intellectual property matters; environmental regulations; effects of certain anti-takeover provisions; volatility of stock price; and the other risk factors listed from time to time in the Company's SEC reports. 23 Due to these and additional factors, certain statements, historical results and percentage relationships discussed below will not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for any future period. NET SALES 1998 vs. 1997 Net sales consist of revenue from system sales, spare parts sales, and service. For the year ended December 31, 1998, net sales were $81.5 million, a decrease of 45% as compared with net sales of $147.3 million for 1997. The decline, relative to 1997, was primarily attributed to the extremely weak market conditions in the semiconductor industry and the related markets for semiconductor capital equipment. Within this market segment, the Company experienced significantly lower unit system shipments across all product lines. Additionally, the Company experienced lower system shipments for front-end thin film head processing, micromachining applications and the production of photomasks. For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company's unit system shipments decreased 53%, relative to 1997, while the weighted-average selling price of all systems sold declined slightly. Net sales from spare parts and service increased 31% for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to 1997, primarily as a result of the acquisition of the product lines and related service business of ISI. For the year ended December 31, 1998, international net sales were $38.5 million, as compared with $48.4 million for 1997, a decline of 20%. International net sales represented 47% of total net sales for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared with 33% for 1997. This year-over-year decline, in absolute dollars, was primarily attributed to decreased system sales to the Asian market. The Company believes that the severe currency and equity market fluctuations that have been experienced recently by many of the Asian markets has resulted, and may continue to result, in delays, deferrals and cancellations of orders of the Company's products, particularly in the short-term, which will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's operations in foreign countries are not generally subject to significant exchange rate fluctuations, principally because sales contracts for the Company's systems are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. In Japan, however, the Company has commenced direct sales operations and orders are typically denominated in Japanese yen. This may subject the Company to a higher degree of risk from currency fluctuations. The Company attempts to mitigate this exposure through the use of foreign exchange contracts; however, there can be no assurance of the success of any such efforts. International sales expose the Company to a number of additional risks, including fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, which, in turn, impact the relative cost of ownership of the Company's products. (See "Additional Risk Factors: International Sales; Japanese Market"). The Company believes that its sales have been and continue to be adversely impacted by reduced capital capacity spending levels within the semiconductor and thin film head industries. During 1997 and 1998, the Company experienced a significant level of shipment delays and purchase order restructurings by several of its customers, and also experienced purchase order cancellations. There can be no assurance that this trend will not continue in the future. Accordingly, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain its current or prior level of sales. The Company believes that the current strength of the U.S. dollar, particularly in relation to the Japanese yen, places the Company at a competitive disadvantage. Additionally, the Company has recently experienced a significant downturn in orders from customers in the thin film head industry, particularly for front-end applications. Several companies within the thin film head and disk drive industries have recently announced lower than expected earnings, layoffs and restructuring or other charges. The Company believes these events indicate that the thin film head and disk drive industries have excess capacity in the near-term. This has resulted, and will continue to result, in lower sales as a result of cancellations, delays and deferrals of customer orders, which will materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the TFH industry is presently in the process of transitioning from the production of magneto-resistive heads to giant magneto-resistive heads. This transition could further disrupt the flow of orders for 24 new equipment from the TFH industry until, among other factors, customer requirements are more fully defined. The Company presently expects that net sales for the three-month period ending March 31, 1999 will be lower than net sales in the comparable period in 1998. Additionally, due to lack of order visibility, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain its current sales levels. Because the Company's net sales are subject to a number of risks, including intense competition in the capital equipment industry and the timing and market acceptance of the Company's products, there can be no assurance that the Company will exceed or maintain its current level of net sales for any period in the future. Additionally, the Company believes that the market acceptance and volume production of its UltraBeam electron beam lithography system, XLS advanced reduction stepper (acquired from ISI), and its Titan, Saturn and 1000 series families of wafer steppers, are of critical importance to its future financial results. To the extent that these products do not achieve significant sales due to difficulties involving manufacturing or engineering, the inability to reduce the current long manufacturing cycles for such products, competition, excess capacity in the semiconductor industry, or any other reason, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. 1997 vs. 1996 Net sales for 1997 were $147.3 million, a decrease of 24% as compared with net sales of $193.5 million for 1996. The decline, relative to 1996, was primarily attributed to significantly lower unit sales of the Company's Model 1500 Series steppers, which address the markets for scanner replacement and high-volume/low-cost semiconductor fabrication, and lower unit sales of the Company's Model 1700 Series steppers with machine vision system (MVS), which address the market for back-end processing of thin film heads, partially offset by the shipment of the Company's first UltraBeam "V" Model electron beam lithography system. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company's system shipments decreased 34%, relative to 1996, while the weighted-average selling price of all systems sold was essentially unchanged. Net sales from spare parts and service increased 10% for the year ended December 31, 1997, as compared to 1996. International sales for 1997 were $48.4 million, a decline of 53% over international sales of $102.1 million in 1996. This year-over-year decline, in absolute dollars, was primarily attributed to decreased system sales to the Asian, European and Japanese markets. During 1997, international sales represented 33% of total sales, as compared to 53% in 1996. GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) 1998 vs. 1997 The Company's gross loss as a percentage of net sales was (1.6%) for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared with positive gross margin of 52.7% for 1997. In 1998, the Company recognized $26.4 million in special charges related primarily to the write-down of inventories and provisions for estimated losses associated with open purchase commitments. These charges were primarily a result of the Company's lower sales and bookings levels in 1998, revised sales demand forecasts for 1999 and delays in the production-readiness of the Company's electron beam lithography system. In addition to the special charges recognized in 1998, the decline in gross profit as a percentage of net sales can be further attributed to significantly lower capacity utilization; lower product margins as a result of higher production costs; changes in product mix; a higher percentage of service and spare parts sales relative to total net sales, which typically have lower standard margins than system sales; and continued manufacturing inefficiencies as a result of non-linearity of system shipments and customer cancellations, deferrals and reschedulings. The Company believes that increased competition from Canon, Nikon, ASML and SVG, among others, together with generally weak conditions in the markets the Company serves, will make it difficult for the Company to increase gross margin percentages in the near term. Additionally, in 1998, the Company added capacity for the anticipated volume production of several new products that are outside 25 the Company's core reflective and refractive optical technologies. In addition to the purchase of significant levels of plant and equipment for these new products, the commencement of production of the UltraBeam electron beam lithography system has resulted and will continue to result in the purchase and retention of significant levels of inventory to support manufacturing requirements, hiring of additional production and manufacturing support personnel and the incurrence of other related manufacturing overhead costs. (See "Additional Risk Factors: Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). The purchase of additional inventories will continue to result in a significantly higher risk of obsolescence, which has required and may continue to require additional inventory write-offs, which negatively impact gross margins. Additionally, new products generally have lower gross margins until production and after-sales efficiencies can be achieved. Should these new products, including products recently acquired in the Acquisition, fail to develop or generate significant market demand, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. As a result of these and other factors, the Company presently expects that gross profit as a percentage of net sales will be significantly lower for the three-month period ending March 31, 1999, relative to levels achieved in the comparable period in 1998. 1997 vs. 1996 The Company's gross profit as a percentage of sales was 52.7% for 1997 as compared with 54.2% for 1996. This decline in gross margin as a percentage of net sales can be primarily attributed to the shift away from the Company's more mature product lines, which typically have higher margins due to manufacturing efficiencies and lower required after-sales support, toward the Company's newer and more advanced systems; manufacturing inefficiencies caused by underutilization of manufacturing capacity; changes in the Company's shipment schedule and an unusually high degree of nonlinearity of shipments during the 1997 periods; partially offset by lower required inventory reserves; lower international sales relative to total sales for the Company; improved margins from spare parts and service; and increased after-sales support efficiencies. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING EXPENSES 1998 vs. 1997 The Company's research, development and engineering expenses, net of third party funding for certain projects, were $26.7 million for 1998, as compared with $26.4 million for 1997. Despite lower net sales, the Company continues to invest significant resources in the development and enhancement of its UltraBeam electron beam lithography system and in the development of its Verdant rapid thermal annealing/laser doping systems and technologies, together with continuing expenditures for its 1X optical products and technologies. Additionally, in 1998 the Company commenced research, development and engineering spending in the area of reduction lithography, as a direct result of the Acquisition. The Company presently expects that the absolute dollar amount of research, development and engineering expenses for the quarter ending March 31, 1999 will be lower, relative to the comparable period in 1998, due primarily to cost containment measures implemented by the Company during the last half of 1998. (See "Additional Risk Factors: Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). 1997 vs. 1996 The Company's research, development and engineering expenses, net of third-party funding for certain porjects, were $26.4 million for 1997, as compared with $27.2 million recorded for 1996. This decrease was primarily attributed to decreased spending for the development, enhancement, manufacturing support and sales demonstration support of the Company's Model 2244i stepper, Model 4700 stepper, Titan Wafer Stepper family and Saturn Wafer Stepper family, partially offset by increased spending for the 26 Company's Model 1800 MVS Series steppers, development of its electron beam lithography system and development of its rapid thermal annealing/laser doping technologies and systems. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 1998 vs. 1997 Selling, general and administrative expenses were $26.2 million for both 1998 and 1997. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 32.1% of net sales in 1998, as compared to 17.8% of net sales in 1997. In 1998, higher general and administrative expenses related to the operations acquired in the Acquisition and higher general and administrative expenses for the Company's Verdant and UltraBeam operations were offset by cost containment measures implemented during the year and lower expenses as are typically associated with a reduction in sales. The Company presently anticipates that selling, general and administrative expenses will increase during the quarter ending March 31, 1999 relative to the comparable period in 1998, due primarily to the amortization of intangible assets and additional general and administrative expenses relative to the operations acquired in the Acquisition, partially offset by cost containment measures implemented by the Company during the last half of 1998. (See "Additional Risk Factors: Development of New Product Lines; Expansion of Operations; Assimilation of Acquired Product Lines"). 1997 vs. 1996 Selling, general and administrative expenses were $26.2 million for 1997, a decrease of 16% over the $31.0 million recorded for 1996. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 17.8% of net sales in 1997, as compared to 16.0% of net sales in 1996. The dollar decrease for the year ended 1997, relative to 1996, reflects in large part the Company's decrease in sales, service and support expenses typically associated with a decrease in sales; cost containment measures implemented during late 1996; significantly lower required provisions for the Company's profit sharing and executive incentive plans; and lower commission expense resulting from lower sales and higher direct sales relative to total net sales for the period. ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Integrated Solutions, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of i-line and deep ultra-violet reduction lithography systems. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recognized a charge for acquired in-process research and development ("IPR&D") expense of $5.1 million, or $0.24 per share net of tax benefits, representing products in development stage that were not considered to have reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. The Company's management made certain assessments with respect to the determination of all identifiable assets resulting from, or to be used in, research and development activities as of the acquisition date. Each of these activities was evaluated, by both interviews and data analysis, to determine its state of development and related fair value. The Company's review indicated that the IPR&D had not reached a state of technological feasibility and the underlying technology had no alternative future use to the Company in other research and development projects or otherwise. In the case of IPR&D, fair values of the corresponding technologies were determined using an income approach, which included a discounted future earnings methodology. Under this methodology, the value of the in-process technology is comprised of the total present value of the anticipated net cash flows attributable to the in-process project, discounted to net present value, taking into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the purchased IPR&D. During late 1998, the SEC issued guidance on acquired in-process research and development related to purchase acquisitions. During the quarter ended December 31, 1998, the Company recognized an 27 adjustment of $7.5 million, or $0.35 per share, to reduce the IPR&D expense relative to the acquisition of ISI in order to reflect the final purchase price allocation. The IPR&D associated with the ISI acquisition related to the development of optical and post-optical lithography systems. Included were five projects: (i) the XLS/ISIS 3160 and 3155 project, which was 73% complete as of the acquisition date; (ii) the Unity project, which was 56% complete as of the acquisition date; (iii) the XLS 193nm Mid-field and 157nm Small-field platforms, which were 70% complete as of the acquisition date; (iv) the Scalpel engineering feasibility project, which was 35% complete as of the acquisition date; and (v) the EUV stage project, which was 38% complete as of the acquisition date. The aforementioned completion percentages are based on an estimated weighted-average of the time, cost, and complexity required to bring the projects to fruition. The significant technological hurdles remaining to be addressed include: the development of high resolution optical systems with off-axis illumination; the integration of complex sub-systems into production worthy tools with user friendly operator interfaces, while achieving more precise overlay; the ability to design vacuum and inert gas containment systems without unacceptable reductions in throughput; the development of CaF2 optical elements in sizes that have never been built; and the development of an autofocus system that is four times more accurate than any system ever developed. The Company estimates that as of the acquisition date, the remaining research and development work on these projects will cost approximately $35.0 million and will be completed over the next one to five years. These projects have progressed more slowly than originally projected due to lower than anticipated staffing. The lower staffing levels were a result of the Company's actions to reduce expenses during a period of reduced revenues and earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete the development and successful marketing of any products resulting from the completion of these projects. A failure to successfully develop and market such products could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. During the first quarter of 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of Lepton Inc., a developer of electron beam lithography systems. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recognized a charge for technology acquired for a research and development project of $3.6 million, or $0.12 per share, net of related income tax benefits. SPECIAL CHARGE RELATING TO TERMINATION OF JAPAN DISTRIBUTOR In December 1997, the Company terminated its relationship with its Japan distributor, Innotech Corporation. This resulted in a special charge of $3.5 million, or $0.11 per share, in the quarter ended December 31, 1997, net of related income tax benefits, primarily related to termination fees negotiated between the Company and Innotech. SPECIAL CHARGES Due primarily to the continued downturn in the thin film head and semiconductor industries, the Company realized significantly lower sales and bookings levels during 1998. As a result, the Company significantly reduced its production demand forecast for 1999 and implemented various cost containment measures beginning in the third quarter of 1998. During the third and fourth quarters of 1998, the Company recognized special charges in the amount of $15.2 million and $11.2 million, respectively, for the write-down of excess inventories and provisions for estimated losses on open purchase commitments. These charges are included in cost of sales. During the third and fourth quarters of 1998, the Company recognized charges in the amount of $3.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to collection uncertainty of certain accounts and leases receivable and provisions for sales returns and allowances. Additionally, during the third quarter of 1998, the Company recognized charges of $2.6 million as a result of the reduction in the Company's workforce and the consolidation of certain of its facilities. These charges have been included in operating expenses for 1998. 28 INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME, NET Other income, net, which consists primarily of interest income, was $6.7 million for 1998 as compared with $7.3 million for 1997 and $6.3 million for 1996. INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) Income taxes (benefit) represented 10%, 30% and 33% of income (loss) before income taxes for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The decline in the tax rate for 1998, relative to 1997, is primarily a result of not recognizing a benefit for the 1998 net operating loss carryforward and certain deferred tax asset reserves recognized during the year. The decrease in the tax rate for 1997, relative to 1996, is primarily a result of benefits associated with the Company's research and development efforts together with higher tax-exempt income, relative to total income before income taxes. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Cash flows provided by operating activities were $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared with $5.6 million provided by operating activities during the comparable period in 1997. Positive cash flows from operating activities during 1998 were primarily attributed to a reduction in accounts and leases receivable of $47.4 million, a reduction in inventories of $10.6 million and total non-cash charges to income of $19.9 million, partially offset by the net loss of $57.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1998 and a decline in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $10.8 million. The significant dollar decrease in accounts receivable was partially the result of the sale of accounts receivable to third-party financial institutions. The Company sells certain of its accounts and leases receivable in order to mitigate its credit risk and to enhance cash flow. Sales of accounts receivable typically preceed final customer acceptance of the system. Among other terms and conditions, the agreements include provisions that require the Company to repurchase receivables if certain conditions are present including, but not limited to, disputes with the customer regarding suitability of the product, and from time-to-time the Company has repurchased certain accounts receivable in accordance with these terms. At December 31, 1998, approximately $8.6 million of sold accounts receivable and $11.0 million of sold leases receivable were outstanding to third-party financial institutions. The Company presently anticipates that the current trend of non-linear shipments and extended customer payment cycles will continue for some time. Accordingly, the Company expects that accounts receivable will remain at unusually high levels for at least the next several quarters. Such trends, should they continue, would expose the Company to numerous risks, which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company may continue to attempt to mitigate the impact of extended payment terms by selling up to a substantial portion of its accounts receivable in the future. There can be no assurance that this financing will be available on reasonable terms, or at all. The Company believes that because of the relatively long manufacturing cycle of certain of its systems, particularly newer products, the Company's inventories will continue to represent a significant portion of working capital. Additionally, in 1998, the Company invested $2.2 million in plant and equipment as a result of the anticipated volume production of its electron beam lithography system, and $5.0 million in plant and equipment as a result of the anticipated introduction of its rapid thermal annealing/laser doping system. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately $4.8 million of inventories and $7.0 million of net long-lived assets related to these new product lines. As such, these assets may be subject to a greater risk of impairment, which could materially adversely affect the Company's operating results and financial condition. During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company used $2.1 million of cash in its investing activities, as cash investments of $9.5 million for capital expenditures and $21.8 million for the Acquisition were partially offset by a net $29.4 million in cash generated by the Company's investment activities. The significant level of capital asset additions during 1998 was primarily attributed to facilities expansions for 29 the manufacture and sales demonstration support of the Company's electron beam lithography and rapid thermal annealing/laser doping systems, together with fixed assets acquired from ISI. As a result of these capital expenditures and the acquisition of ISI, the Company's depreciation and amortization costs have increased significantly and may negatively impact the Company's results of operations in the event of a continued downturn in the Company's business cycles. For the year ended December 31, 1998, cash provided by financing activities was $5.4 million, principally as a result of $3.6 million generated from the issuance of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options and the Company's employee stock purchase plan and $1.8 million in additional borrowings under the Company's existing lines of credit. At December 31, 1998, the Company had working capital of $166.4 million. The Company's principal sources of liquidity at December 31, 1998 consisted of $146.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The development and manufacture of new lithography systems and enhancements are highly capital-intensive. In order to be competitive, the Company must continue to make significant expenditures for capital equipment, sales, service, training and support capabilities; investments in systems, procedures and controls; expansion of operations and research and development, among many other items. The Company expects that anticipated cash flow from operations, its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and funds available under its lines of credit will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash requirements for the next twelve months. Beyond the next twelve months, the Company may require additional equity or debt financing to address its working capital or capital equipment needs. Additionally, the Company may in the future pursue additional acquisitions of complementary product lines, technologies or businesses. Future acquisitions by the Company may result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could materially adversely affect any Company profitability. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; risks of entering markets in which the Company has no or limited direct prior experience; and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. In the event the Company acquires product lines, technologies or businesses which do not complement the Company's business, or which otherwise do not enhance the Company's sales or operating results, the Company may incur substantial write-offs and higher recurring operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In the event that any such acquisition does occur, there can be no assurance as to the effect thereof on the Company's business or operating results. Additionally, the Company is experiencing continued interest in its equipment leasing program and this may result in the further formation of significant long-term receivables, which, in turn, would require the use of substantial amounts of working capital. The formation of significant long-term receivables and the granting of extended customer payment terms exposes the Company to additional risks, including potentially higher customer concentration and higher potential operating expenses relating to customer defaults. During the three-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1998, the Company took significant reserves against potentially non-performing leases receivable. If defaults on additional lease receivables were to occur, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. To the extent that the Company's financial resources are insufficient to fund the Company's activities, additional funds will be required. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on reasonable terms, or at all. YEAR 2000 READINESS DISCLOSURE: Many currently installed computer systems and software products are coded to accept only two digit entries in the attached date code field. Beginning in the year 2000, these date code fields will need to accept four digit entries to distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century dates. As a result, in less than 30 one year, computer systems and/or software used by many companies may need to be upgraded to comply with such "Year 2000" (Y2K) requirements. The Company has provided an assessment, below, of the state of readiness of its information and non-information technology systems, together with a summary of the status of related testing, remediation and implementation. The Company presently estimates that the total cost for the entire Y2K project will approximate one million dollars and that the remaining project cost is approximately $400,000. The Company plans to fund these remaining costs from cash generated by operations or from cash and short-term investments on hand. However additional requirements may be identified and unscheduled costs may be incurred as the project proceeds. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company, or its vendors, will be able to timely and cost-effectively update its products to avoid Y2K date errors, and this may result in material costs to the Company, including costs associated with detecting and fixing such errors and costs incurred in litigation due to any such errors. Many commentators have predicted that a significant amount of litigation will arise out of year 2000 compliance issues and the Company is aware of several such suits that are currently pending. Because of the unprecedented nature of such litigation and the highly technical nature of the Company's products, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be materially adversely affected by claims related to Y2K compliance. Although the Company presently believes that it has or will timely make required changes to the software in its products, it believes that the most likely worst case scenario is from unknown impacts to its customers' manufacturing processes, which could potentially adversely impact product yields and throughput. In addition to possible litigation, the Company could incur substantially higher product returns and warranty related expenses, either of which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the Company's customers may be required to devote substantial financial resources to their own internal Y2K audit and compliance. This may result in fewer financial resources available to purchase the Company's products, fewer system sales by the Company, and could have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company believes that its own Y2K efforts have resulted, and will continue to result in, a diversion of management and financial resources, which has further resulted in the delay or deferral of various information technology and engineering projects. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS: The Company has commenced, for all of its information systems, a Y2K conversion project to address necessary code changes, testing, and implementation and contingency plans. The Company has completed testing and verification of its primary business/information system and has identified the significant potential risks associated with Y2K. The Company believes it has remedied these potential errors and that it has provided for contingency plans to further minimize risks to its business system associated with Y2K. Although the Company is not aware of any material operational issues or costs associated with preparing its internal systems for Y2K, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience serious unanticipated negative consequences and/or material costs caused by undetected errors or defects in technology used in its internal operating systems, which are composed primarily of third party software and hardware technology. Additionally, although the Company has made inquiries of its key information technology vendors, and is in the process of collecting and reviewing survey responses, the Company believes it will not be able to obtain adequate assurances from all its key vendors. Even where assurances are received from third parties, there remains a risk that failure of systems and products of other companies on which the Company relies could have a material adverse affect on the Company. Accordingly the Company continues to assess the degree of risk to the Company and is preparing contingency plans. The Company is presently working to minimize risk from vendors through understanding and implementing necessary remediation and/or contingency plans. There can be no assurance that such contingency plans will be adequate and that the Company will not incur significant additional costs or business interruptions in connection with such transition, either of which could have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. 31 NON-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS: The Company has commenced, for all of its key vendors, physical plant and software contained in the products it sells, a Y2K conversion project to address necessary remediation, testing, implementation and contingency plans. The Company believes it has identified the required changes for its products' hardware and software components to attain Y2K readiness and is currently completing product modifications and working with customers to assist in understanding these requirements. The Company presently expects such modifications to be made on a timely basis. The Company has obligations to provide these modifications to customers with systems under warranty or currently under service contract. The Company presently expects that these modifications will be installed on a timely basis. In addressing customer inquiries regarding the Company's Y2K readiness and in making inquiries of the Company's vendors, the Company has adopted the Sematech process for investigating and responding to the Y2K subject. This process includes a survey form, a readiness matrix and a testing scenario. Although the Company has made inquiries of its key physical plant and materials vendors in order to assess their state of readiness, and is in the process of collecting and reviewing survey responses, the Company believes it will not be able to obtain adequate assurances from all its key vendors. Even where assurances are received from third parties, there remains a risk that failure of systems and products of other companies on which the Company relies could have a material adverse affect on the Company. Accordingly the Company continues to assess the degree of risk to the Company and is preparing contingency plans. These contingency plans may result, among other things, in the development of alternative suppliers and the purchase of additional inventories. The Company is presently working to minimize risk from vendors through understanding and implementing necessary remediation and/or contingency plans. There can be no assurance that such contingency plans will be adequate and that the Company will not incur significant additional costs or business interruptions in connection with such transition, either of which could have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. (See "Manufacturing"). The foregoing statements are based upon management's best estimates at the present time, which were derived utilizing numerous assumptions of future events, including the continued availability of certain resources, third party modification plans and other factors. There can be no guarantee that these estimates will be achieved and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Specific factors that might cause such material differences include, but are not limited to, the availability and cost of personnel trained in this area, the ability to locate and correct all relevant computer codes, the nature and amount of programming required to upgrade or replace each of the affected programs, the rate and magnitude of related labor and consulting costs and the success of the Company's external customers and vendors in addressing the Y2K issue. The Company's evaluation is ongoing and it expects that new and different information will become available to it as that evaluation continues. Consequently, there is no guarantee that all material elements will be Y2K ready in time. ADOPTION OF THE EURO The Company does not presently expect that introduction and use of the Euro will materially affect the Company's foreign exchange and hedging activities or the Company's use of derivative instruments. Management does not expect that the introduction of the Euro will result in any material increase in costs to the Company and all costs, if any, associated with the introduction of the Euro will be expensed to operations as incurred. While the Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the Euro introduction over time, based on currently available information, management does not believe that the introduction of the Euro currency will have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or overall trends in results of operations. 32 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company's exposure to market risk, for changes in interest rates, relates primarily to the Company's investment portfolio, which consisted primarily of fixed interest rate instruments as of December 31, 1998. The Company maintains a strict investment policy, which is designed to ensure the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting market risk and the risk of default. The following table presents the hypothetical changes in fair values in the financial instruments held by the Company at December 31, 1998. These instruments are comprised of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted long-term investments. These instruments are not leveraged and are held for purposes other than trading. The modeling techniques used measures the change in fair values arising from selected hypothetical changes in interest rates. Assumed market value changes to the Company's portfolio reflects immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points (BPS), 100 BPS, and 150 BPS over a twelve-month time horizon. Beginning fair values represent the market principal plus accrued interest for financial reporting purposes at December 31, 1998. Ending fair values comprise the estimated market principal plus accrued interest at a twelve-month time horizon, and assumes no change in the investment principal or portfolio mix. This table estimates the fair value of the portfolio at a twelve-month time horizon:
NO CHANGE VALUATION OF SECURITIES GIVEN IN VALUATION OF SECURITIES GIVEN AN INTEREST RATE DECREASE OF INTEREST AN INTEREST RATE INCREASE OF X BASIS POINTS RATE X BASIS POINTS ---------------------------------- ---------- ---------------------------------- (150 BPS) (100 BPS) (50 BPS) 0 BPS 50 BPS 100 BPS 150 BPS ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS, IN THOUSANDS - -------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies............................ $ 19,376 $ 19,142 $ 18,906 $ 18,672 $ 18,438 $ 18,202 $ 17,968 Obligations of states and political subdivisions........................ 37,631 37,312 36,999 36,640 36,280 35,967 35,649 U.S. corporate debt securities........ 66,523 66,099 65,671 65,237 64,803 64,376 63,951 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total short-term investments.......... $ 123,530 $ 122,553 $ 121,576 $ 120,549 $ 119,521 $ 118,545 $ 117,568 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RESTRICTED LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS, IN THOUSANDS - -------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies............................ $ 5,587 $ 5,560 $ 5,534 $ 5,507 $ 5,481 $ 5,455 $ 5,429 U.S. corporate debt securities........ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total restricted long-term investments......................... $ 5,589 $ 5,562 $ 5,536 $ 5,509 $ 5,483 $ 5,457 $ 5,431 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $ 129,119 $ 128,115 $ 127,112 $ 126,058 $ 125,004 $ 124,002 $ 122,999 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The above table was developed based on the fact that a 50-BPS move in the Federal Funds Rate has occurred in 9 of the last 10 years; a 100-BPS move in the Federal Funds Rate has occurred in 6 of the last 10 years; and a 150-BPS move in the Federal Funds Rate has occurred in 4 for the last 10 years. The Company mitigates default risk by attempting to invest in high credit quality securities and by constantly positioning its portfolio to respond appropriately to a significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment issuer or guarantor. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity and maintains a prudent amount of diversification. To date, the Company has not experienced liquidity problems with its portfolio. 33 Although comparative information at December 31, 1997 is not presented, the Company has not materially altered its investment objectives or criteria and believes that, although the composition of the Company's portfolio has changed, the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates would have been materially the same as presented above. The Company's operations in foreign countries are not generally subject to significant exchange rate fluctuations, principally due to the limited scope of those operations and because sales contracts for the Company's systems are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. In Japan, however, the Company has commenced direct sales operations and orders are typically denominated in Japanese yen. This may subject the Company to a higher degree of risk from currency fluctuations. The Company attempts to mitigate this exposure through the use of foreign exchange contracts. The realized gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and offset against realized and unrealized gains and losses from the settlement of the related yen-denominated receivables. At December 31, 1998 there were no outstanding foreign currency contracts. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The Selected Financial Data information contained in Item 6 of Part II hereof is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 8 of Part II of this form 10-K. ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8:
PAGE NUMBER ----------- Consolidated Balance Sheets--December 31, 1998 and 1997................................................. 35 Consolidated Statements of Operations--Years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996.................... 36 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996..................... 37 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity--Years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996......................................................................................... 38 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................................................. 39-54 Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors....................................................... 55
34 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS 1998 1997 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents....................................................... $ 54,142 $ 43,898 Short-term investments.......................................................... 91,965 120,451 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,196 in 1998 and $2,258 in 1997................................................................ 11,899 45,947 Inventories..................................................................... 36,750 37,337 Leases receivable--current portion, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $841 in 1998 and $0 in 1997........................................................ 2,012 2,408 Prepaid expenses and other current assets....................................... 5,088 1,840 Deferred income taxes........................................................... -- 5,142 ------------ ------------ Total current assets.............................................................. 201,856 257,023 Equipment and leasehold improvements, net......................................... 23,319 22,285 Restricted investments............................................................ 5,510 5,325 Leases receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,603 in 1998 and $0 in 1997......................................................................... 1,536 11,354 Intangible assets, net............................................................ 8,438 355 Other assets...................................................................... 5,276 3,659 ------------ ------------ Total assets...................................................................... $ 245,935 $ 300,001 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Notes payable................................................................... $ 1,881 $ 94 Accounts payable................................................................ 8,541 12,295 Accrued expenses................................................................ 21,693 17,502 Advance billings................................................................ 1,694 872 Income taxes payable............................................................ 1,630 3,034 ------------ ------------ Total current liabilities......................................................... 35,439 33,797 Deferred income taxes............................................................. -- 2,103 Other liabilities................................................................. 345 469 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Preferred Stock, $.001 par value: 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued...................................... -- -- Common Stock, $.001 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding--21,105,733 at December 31, 1998 and 20,786,288 at December 31, 1997................................ 21 21 Additional paid-in capital...................................................... 174,155 170,200 Accumulated other comprehensive income, net..................................... 779 271 Retained earnings............................................................... 35,196 93,140 ------------ ------------ Total stockholders' equity........................................................ 210,151 263,632 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........................................ $ 245,935 $ 300,001 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 35 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS 1998 1997 1996 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- Net sales Products.................................................................... $ 65,569 $ 136,677 $ 185,058 Services.................................................................... 15,888 10,672 8,450 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total net sales............................................................... 81,457 147,349 193,508 Cost of sales Cost of products sold....................................................... 46,016 62,995 82,425 Cost of services............................................................ 10,352 6,676 6,190 Write-down of inventory..................................................... 20,559 -- -- Provision for estimated losses on purchase commitments...................... 5,849 -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross profit (loss)........................................................... (1,319) 77,678 104,893 Research, development, and engineering........................................ 26,654 26,431 27,220 Selling, general, and administrative.......................................... 26,170 26,177 30,995 Acquired in-process research and development.................................. 5,108 3,619 -- Special charge relating to termination of Japan distributor................... -- 3,450 -- Special charges............................................................... 11,175 -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Operating income (loss)....................................................... (70,426) 18,001 46,678 Interest expense.............................................................. (445) (165) (236) Interest and other income, net................................................ 6,745 7,258 6,265 ---------- ---------- ---------- Income (loss) before income taxes (benefit)................................... (64,126) 25,094 52,707 Income taxes (benefit)........................................................ (6,182) 7,528 17,396 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income (loss)............................................................. (57,944) 17,566 35,311 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income (loss) per share--basic............................................ $ (2.76) $ 0.85 $ 1.76 Number of shares used in per share computations--basic........................ 20,958 20,553 20,079 Net income (loss) per share--diluted.......................................... $ (2.76) $ 0.81 $ 1.66 Number of shares used in per share computations--diluted...................... 20,958 21,681 21,271 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 36 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 1996 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss).......................................................... $ (57,944) $ 17,566 $ 35,311 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation........................................................... 7,672 5,600 4,449 Amortization........................................................... 2,931 1,634 1,611 Loss on disposal of equipment.......................................... 1,179 93 43 Deferred income taxes.................................................. 3,039 4,566 (898) Write-off of acquired in-process research and development.............. 5,108 3,619 -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable.................................................. 37,171 (6,102) (15,928) Inventories.......................................................... 10,580 (1,813) (8,137) Prepaid expenses and other current assets............................ 677 (1,025) 677 Leases receivable--current portion................................... 396 (2,215) (193) Leases receivable--long term......................................... 9,818 (10,929) (425) Intangible assets.................................................... -- (160) -- Other assets......................................................... (1,744) (874) (1,184) Accounts payable..................................................... (6,957) 2,895 (3,525) Accrued expenses..................................................... (3,875) (6,427) 712 Advance billings..................................................... 32 226 (3,425) Income taxes payable................................................. (1,404) (251) 3,738 Other liabilities.................................................... 186 (761) (186) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities.................................. 6,865 5,642 12,640 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures....................................................... (9,510) (9,337) (7,849) Investments in securities.................................................. (430,079) (681,316) (593,545) Proceeds from sales of investments......................................... 111,106 165,192 266,593 Proceeds from maturing investments......................................... 348,407 515,342 337,442 Purchase of certain assets of Lepton Inc................................... -- (3,101) -- Purchase of certain assets and liabilities of Integrated Solutions Inc., net of cash acquired..................................................... (21,819) -- -- Segregation of restricted investments...................................... (159) (175) (170) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities........................ (2,054) (13,395) 2,471 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Repayment of promissory note............................................... -- -- (400) Proceeds from notes payable................................................ 1,787 99 7,500 Repayment of notes payable................................................. -- (5) (7,500) Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock..................................... 3,646 3,786 2,699 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by financing activities.................................. 5,433 3,880 2,299 ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS....................... 10,244 (3,873) 17,410 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD........................... 43,898 47,771 30,361 ----------- ----------- ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD................................. $ 54,142 $ 43,898 $ 47,771 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: Interest............................................................... $ 445 $ 185 $ 238 Income taxes........................................................... 840 3,254 14,500 Other non-cash changes Systems transferred from inventory to equipment and other assets....... $ 4,018 $ 4,208 $ 2,384
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 37 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCUMULATED COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL OTHER TOTAL ---------------------- PAID-IN COMPREHENSIVE RETAINED STOCKHOLDERS' IN THOUSANDS SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL INCOME EARNINGS EQUITY - --------------------------------------------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------------- --------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1995................. 19,802 $ 20 $ 159,154 $ 221 $ 40,263 $ 199,658 Net issuance of Common Stock under stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan....................................... 508 -- 2,700 -- -- 2,700 Income tax benefit from stock option and stock purchase plan transactions........... -- -- 2,420 -- -- 2,420 Amortization of deferred compensation........ -- -- 14 -- -- 14 Components of comprehensive income Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax.................. -- -- -- (156) -- (156) Net Income................................. -- -- -- -- 35,311 35,311 ------------ Total comprehensive income................... 35,155 --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1996................. 20,310 $ 20 $ 164,288 $ 65 $ 75,574 $ 239,947 --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ Net issuance of Common Stock under stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan....................................... 476 1 3,785 -- -- 3,786 Income tax benefit from stock option and stock purchase plan transactions........... -- -- 2,121 -- -- 2,121 Amortization of deferred compensation........ -- -- 6 -- -- 6 Components of comprehensive income Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments, net of tax.................. -- -- -- 206 -- 206 Net Income................................. -- -- -- -- 17,566 17,566 ------------ Total comprehensive income................... 17,772 --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1997................. 20,786 $ 21 $ 170,200 $ 271 $ 93,140 $ 263,632 --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ Net issuance of Common Stock under stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan....................................... 320 -- 3,646 -- -- 3,646 Income tax benefit from stock option and stock purchase plan transactions........... -- -- 309 -- -- 309 Components of comprehensive income Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments.............................. -- -- -- 508 -- 508 Net loss................................... -- -- -- -- (57,944) (57,944) ------------ Total comprehensive loss..................... (57,436) --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1998................. 21,106 $ 21 $ 174,155 $ 779 $ 35,196 $ 210,151 --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------ --------- --- ---------- ----- --------- ------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 38 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. COMPANY AND INDUSTRY INFORMATION On December 31, 1998 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 131 "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS 131"). The new rules establish revised standards for public companies relating to the reporting of financial information about operating segments. MAJOR CUSTOMERS Sales to one customer accounted for 25% and 14% of the Company's net sales in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Additionally, in 1997, a second customer accounted for 10% of the Company's net sales. In 1996, sales to two customers accounted for 17% and 12% of the Company's net sales. BUSINESS SEGMENTS In evaluating its business segments, the Company gave consideration to the Chief Executive Officer's review of financial information and the organizational structure of the Company's management. Based on this review, the Company concluded that, at the present time, resources are allocated and other financial decisions are made based, primarily, on consolidated financial information. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in one business segment, which is the manufacture and distribution of photolithography equipment to manufacturers of integrated circuits, photomasks for the production of integrated circuits, thin film heads and micromachined components. ENTERPRISE-WIDE DISCLOSURES The Company's products are manufactured in the United States and are sold worldwide. The Company markets internationally through domestic and foreign-based sales and service operations and independent sales organizations. The following table presents enterprise-wide sales to external customers and long-lived assets by geographic region:
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996 - ----------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- Net sales: United States of America................................. $ 36,192 $ 96,753 $ 89,156 Germany.................................................. 10,613 5,288 14,796 Japan.................................................... 11,282 7,324 16,084 Thailand................................................. 3,153 1,906 20,682 Rest of world............................................ 20,217 36,078 52,790 --------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................. $ 81,457 $ 147,349 $ 193,508 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- Long-lived assets: United States of America................................. $ 42,130 $ 42,030 $ 26,433 Rest of world............................................ 1,949 948 2,274 --------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................. $ 44,079 $ 42,978 $ 28,707 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------
The Company believes that the severe currency and equity market fluctuations that have been experienced recently by many of the Asian markets has resulted, and may continue to result in delays, deferrals and cancellations of orders of the Company's products, particularly in the short-term, which will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's operations in foreign countries are not currently subject to significant exchange rate 39 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 1. COMPANY AND INDUSTRY INFORMATION (CONTINUED) fluctuations, principally because sales contracts for the Company's systems are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. However, international sales expose the Company to a number of additional risk factors, including fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, which, in turn, impact the relative cost of ownership of the Company's products. 2. CONCENTRATIONS OF RISKS Sales of the Company's systems depend, in significant part, upon the decision of a prospective customer to increase manufacturing capacity or to restructure current manufacturing facilities, either of which typically involves a significant commitment of capital. For this and other reasons, the Company's systems typically have a lengthy sales cycle during which the Company may expend substantial funds and management effort in securing a sale. Additionally, the markets for the Company's products are subject to rapid technological change, which requires the Company to respond with new products and enhanced versions of existing products. Lengthy sales cycles and rapid technological change subject the Company to a number of significant risks, including inventory obsolescence, significant after-sales support and fluctuations in operating results, which are difficult to estimate and over which the Company has little or no control. Sole-source and single-source suppliers provide critical components and services for the manufacture of the Company's products. The reliance on sole or limited groups of suppliers may subject the Company from time to time to quality, allocation and pricing constraints. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables and long-term customer financing. These credit risks include the potential inability of an issuer or customer to honor their obligations under the terms of the instrument. The Company places its cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted investments with high credit-quality financial institutions. The Company invests its excess cash in commercial paper, readily marketable debt instruments and collateralized funds of U.S. and state government entities. The Company has established guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification and maturities that seek to maintain safety and liquidity. A majority of the Company's trade receivables and lease receivables are derived from sales in various geographic areas, principally the U.S., Europe, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Southeast Asia, to large companies within the integrated circuit, thin film head, photomask and micromachining industries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and requires collateral, whenever deemed necessary. The Company maintains an allowance for uncollectible accounts and leases receivable based upon expected collectibility and a reserve for estimated returns and allowances. The formation of significant long-term receivables and the granting of extended customer payment terms exposes the Company to additional risks, including potentially higher customer concentration and higher potential operating expenses relating to customer defaults. During 1998, the Company put in place a program to sell certain of its accounts receivable to third-party financial institutions, in order to mitigate its credit risk and to enhance cash flow. Sales of accounts receivable typically preceed final customer acceptance of the system. Among other terms and conditions, the agreements include provisions that require the Company to repurchase receivables if certain conditions are present including, but not limited to, disputes with the customer regarding suitability of the product, and from time-to-time the Company has repurchased certain accounts receivable in accordance with these terms. At December 31, 1998, $8.6 million of sold accounts receivable and approximately $11.0 million of sold leases receivable were outstanding to third-party financial institutions. 40 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 2. CONCENTRATIONS OF RISKS (CONTINUED) As of December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately $4.8 million of inventories and $7.0 million of net long-lived assets related to product lines that are outside of the Company's core technologies. As such, these assets may be subject to a greater risk of impairment. 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Reclassifications have been made to the prior years' consolidated financial statements to conform to the 1998 presentation. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date at acquisition of three months or less. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value. INVESTMENTS Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, all investments in the Company's portfolio were classified as "available for sale," in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in a separate component of stockholders' equity. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization, as well as interest, dividends, realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included in other income, net. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. INVENTORIES Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Demonstration units, included in other assets, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, and are depreciated over 36 months. LONG-LIVED ASSETS Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives (three to seven years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related assets or the lease term, whichever is shorter. 41 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization, which is being provided on a straight-line basis over the economic lives of the respective assets, generally five to seven years. The Company applies the provision of FAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of," in evaluating its fixed and intangible assets. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING Off-balance-sheet transactions, consisting of forward currency contracts, have from time to time been utilized by the Company to hedge obligations denominated in foreign currencies. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Gains and losses related to qualified accounting hedges of firm commitments are deferred and recognized in interest and other income, net, when the hedged transaction occurs. These gains and losses were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and there were no hedge transactions outstanding as of December 31, 1998. In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires recognition of all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measurement of those instruments at fair value. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. Because of the Company's minimal use of derivatives, management does not anticipate that the adoption of the new Statement will have a significant effect on earnings or the financial position of the Company. REVENUE RECOGNITION Sales of the Company's products are generally recorded upon shipment, which usually precedes final customer acceptance, provided that final customer acceptance and collection of the related receivable are probable. The Company also sells service contracts for which revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the contract period. From time to time, the Company leases its products to customers, typically as sales-type leases, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases." These leases generally have a five-year term. WARRANTY The Company generally warrants its products for a period of up to 12 months from the date of customer acceptance for material and labor to repair the product; accordingly, a provision for the estimated cost of the warranty is recorded at the time revenue is recognized. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING EXPENSES The Company is actively engaged in basic technology and applied research programs designed to develop new products and product applications. In addition, substantial ongoing product and process improvement engineering and support programs relating to existing products are conducted within engineering departments and elsewhere. Research, development and engineering costs are charged to operations as incurred. The Company has entered into various research and development arrangements with certain third parties to jointly develop new products and technology. Under such programs, the Company generally 42 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) receives funding from the third parties over an extended period based on achieving certain milestones or based on a cost-sharing arrangement. Such funds are not anticipated to cover all the costs of the programs and are recorded as reductions to research, development and engineering expense based on the percentage of completion of each project. For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company recognized approximately $401,000, $580,000 and $2,688,000, respectively, in related funding. As of December 31, 1998, there were no amounts remaining to be funded on these contracts. ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Integrated Solutions, Inc. (ISI), a privately held manufacturer of i-line and deep ultra-violet reduction lithography systems. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recognized a charge for acquired in-process research and development expense of $5.1 million. The Company's management made certain assessments with respect to the determination of all identifiable assets resulting from, or to be used in, research and development activities as of the acquisition date. Each of these activities was evaluated, by both interviews and data analysis, to determine its state of development and related fair value. The Company's review indicated that the IPR&D had not reached a state of technological feasibility and the underlying technology had no alternative future use to the Company in other research and development projects or otherwise. In the case of IPR&D, fair values of the corresponding technologies were determined using an income approach, which included a discounted future earnings methodology. Under this methodology, the value of the in-process technology is comprised of the total present value of the anticipated net cash flows attributable to the in-process project, discounted to net present value, taking into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the purchased IPR&D. During the first quarter of 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of Lepton Inc., a developer of electron beam lithography systems. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recognized a charge in the quarter ended March 31, 1997 for a research and development project of $3.6 million. SPECIAL CHARGE RELATING TO TERMINATION OF JAPAN DISTRIBUTOR In December 1997, the Company terminated its relationship with its Japan distributor, Innotech Corporation. This resulted in a special charge of $3.5 million in the quarter ended December 31, 1997, related primarily to termination fees negotiated between the Company and Innotech. SPECIAL CHARGES Due primarily to the continued downturn in the thin film head and semiconductor industries, the Company realized significantly lower sales and bookings levels during 1998. As a result, the Company significantly reduced its production demand forecast for 1999 and implemented various cost containment measures beginning in the third quarter of 1998. During 1998, the Company recognized special non-cash charges in the amount of $26.4 million for the write-down of excess inventories and provisions for estimated losses on open purchase commitments. These charges are included in cost of sales. During 1998, the Company recognized non-cash charges in the amount of $8.6 million related to collection uncertainty of certain accounts and leases receivable and provisions for sales returns and allowances. Additionally, during 1998, the Company recognized cash charges of $2.0 million and non-cash 43 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) charges of $0.6 million as a result of the reduction in the Company's workforce and the consolidation of certain of its facilities. These charges have been included in operating expenses. FOREIGN CURRENCY ACCOUNTING The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all foreign operations. Foreign exchange gains and losses, which result from the process of remeasuring foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars or from transactions during the period, have been immaterial and are included in interest and other income, net. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25), and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options and stock purchase plan. Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is disclosed as required by the FASB's Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (FAS 123), which also requires that the information be determined as if the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that Statement. BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS 1998 1997 1996 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Numerator: Net income (loss)............................................................. $ (57,944) $ 17,566 $ 35,311 Denominator: Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share............................. 20,958 20,553 20,079 Effect of dilutive Employee Stock Options..................................... -- 1,128 1,192 ---------- --------- --------- Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share........................... 20,958 21,681 21,271 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- --------- Net income (loss) per share--basic.............................................. $ (2.76) $ 0.85 $ 1.76 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- --------- Net income (loss) per share--diluted............................................ $ (2.76) $ 0.81 $ 1.66 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
For the year ended December 31, 1998, options to purchase 3,169,000 shares of Common Stock at an average exercise price of $16.20 were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. This compares to the exclusion of 392,000 options at an average exercise price of $30.35 for the year ended December 31, 1997, and 363,000 options at an average exercise price of $31.75 for the year ended December 31, 1996. Options are anti-dilutive when the Company has a net loss or when the exercise price of the stock option is greater than the average market price of the Company's Common Stock. 44 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (FAS 130) "Reporting Comprehensive Income" is effective beginning with the Company's first fiscal quarter of 1998. FAS 130 requires that, for all periods presented, comprehensive income be reported with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income includes net income plus other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income for the Company is comprised of changes in unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax. Accumulated other comprehensive income and changes thereto at December 31 consist of:
IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 1996 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- Accumulated other comprehensive income at beginning of year Unrealized gain, net of tax............................................................ $ 271 $ 65 $ 221 Change of accumulated other comprehensive income during the year Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities................................ 508 308 (116) Tax effect............................................................................. -- (102) (40) --------- --------- --------- Accumulated other comprehensive income at year end....................................... $ 779 $ 271 $ 65 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
4. INVESTMENTS The Company classified all of its investments as "available for sale" as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Accordingly, the Company states its investments at estimated fair value. Fair values are estimated based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market rates. The Company deems all investments, except those restricted, to be available to meet current working capital requirements. 45 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 4. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) The following is a summary of the Company's investments:
DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997 -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS UNREALIZED ESTIMATED UNREALIZED ESTIMATED SHORT-TERM AMORTIZED -------------- FAIR AMORTIZED -------------- FAIR INVESTMENTS, IN THOUSANDS COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ---------------------------------------- --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies........... $ 18,500 $196 $ 26 $ 18,670 $ 16,744 $ 9 $22 $ 16,731 Obligations of states and political subdivisions.......................... 36,158 481 -- 36,639 106,459 311 16 106,754 U.S. corporate debt securities.......... 65,045 240 46 65,239 29,943 93 9 30,027 --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- $ 119,703 $917 $ 72 $ 120,548 $ 153,146 $413 $47 $ 153,512 --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- RESTRICTED LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS, IN THOUSANDS - ---------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies........... $ 5,471 $ 47 $ 11 $ 5,507 $ 3,606 $ 7 $-- $ 3,613 Obligations of states and political subdivisions.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- U.S. corporate debt securities.......... 3 -- -- 3 1,712 -- -- 1,712 --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- $ 5,474 $ 47 $ 11 $ 5,510 $ 5,318 $ 7 $-- $ 5,325 --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- $ 125,177 $964 $ 83 $ 126,058 $ 158,464 $420 $47 $ 158,837 --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ----- ------ ---------
The following is a reconciliation of the Company's investments to the balance sheet classifications at December 31:
IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- Cash equivalents...................................................... $ 28,583 $ 33,061 Short-term investments................................................ 91,965 120,451 Restricted investments................................................ 5,510 5,325 ---------- ---------- Investments, at estimated fair value.................................. $ 126,058 $ 158,837 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross realized gains and losses were not material for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996. 46 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 4. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company's investments at December 31, 1998, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.
AMORTIZED IN THOUSANDS COST FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- Due in one year or less............................................... $ 48,042 $ 48,140 Due after one year through five years................................. 77,135 77,918 ---------- ---------- $ 125,177 $ 126,058 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
5. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------- IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- Inventories: Raw materials....................................................... $ 21,668 $ 20,297 Work-in-process..................................................... 6,808 9,739 Finished products................................................... 8,274 7,301 ---------- ---------- Total............................................................. $ 36,750 $ 37,337 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Equipment and leasehold improvements: Machinery and equipment............................................. $ 23,750 $ 18,739 Leasehold improvements.............................................. 4,960 2,877 Office furniture and equipment...................................... 16,543 15,457 ---------- ---------- $ 45,253 $ 37,073 Accumulated depreciation and amortization............................. (21,934) (14,788) ---------- ---------- Total............................................................. $ 23,319 $ 22,285 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Accrued expenses: Salaries and benefits............................................... $ 3,865 $ 5,018 Warranty reserves................................................... 4,207 5,871 Settlement/Japan distributor........................................ -- 3,051 Reserve for losses on purchase order commitments.................... 5,849 -- Provision for sales return and allowances........................... 2,000 684 Other............................................................... 5,772 2,878 ---------- ---------- Total............................................................. $ 21,693 $ 17,502 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
6. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN Under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended, qualified employees, nonemployee Board members and consultants may receive options to purchase shares of Common Stock at 85% to 100% of fair value at certain specified dates. These options generally vest in equal monthly installments over a period of approximately four years, with a minimum vesting period of twelve months from grant date, and generally expire ten years from date of grant. The plan will terminate on the earlier of January 6, 2003, or the date 47 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 6. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED) on which all shares available for issuance under the Plan have been issued. The plan includes a provision to automatically increase the shares reserved for issuance by an amount equal to 1.4% of the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, through the year 2000. Under the plan, approximately 733,000 and 883,000 options were available for issuance at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information follows:
1998 1997 1996 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- Outstanding at January 1.......... 2,560,252 $ 14.94 2,350,208 $ 12.34 2,295,735 $ 9.95 Granted........................... 1,132,250 $ 19.04 1,017,300 $ 20.37 787,349 $ 17.92 Exercised......................... (232,642) $ 9.01 (379,730) $ 6.09 (421,329) $ 3.45 Forfeited......................... (290,895) $ 21.84 (427,526) $ 21.49 (311,547) $ 20.86 ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ Outstanding at December 31........ 3,168,965 $ 16.20 2,560,252 $ 14.94 2,350,208 $ 12.34
At December 31, 1998, options outstanding were as follows:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING ------------------------------------------------ WEIGHTED-AVERAGE OPTIONS EXERCISABLE REMAINING ----------------------------- RANGE OF CONTRACTUAL LIFE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICES OPTIONS (YEARS) EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE - --------------------------------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- $ 0.050 - $14.499................ 666,095 4.40 $ 2.20 662,398 $ 2.15 $14.500 - $19.999................ 1,892,496 8.71 17.71 516,132 $ 17.49 $20.000 - $33.625................ 610,374 8.20 26.80 262,690 $ 29.72 ---------- ------ ------ ---------- ------ $ 0.050 - $33.625................ 3,168,965 7.70 $ 16.20 1,441,220 $ 12.67
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN In August 1995, the Company established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The plan permits virtually all employees to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the first or last day of the offering period. The offering periods are twelve months. Under the Plan, approximately 181,000 shares and 268,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved and available for issuance at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company has elected to follow APB 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for employee stock-based compensation because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under FAS 123 requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. 48 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 6. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED) Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by FAS 123, which also requires that the information be determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options (including purchase rights issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan) granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that Statement. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option- pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
1998 1997 1996 ----- ----- ----- Expected life (in years): stock options........... 3.5 3.5 3.5 Expected life (in years): Employee Stock Purchase Plan............................................ 1.0 1.0 1.0 Risk-free interest rate........................... 4.6 % 5.6 % 6.1 % Volatility factor................................. 0.56 0.62 0.50 Dividend yield.................................... 0 % 0 % 0 %
The weighted-average expected life of stock options is computed assuming a multiple-point approach with annual vesting periods. The weighted-average fair value per share of stock options granted during 1998, 1997 and 1996 were $8.36, $9.74, and $7.32 respectively. The weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan during 1998, 1997 and 1996 were $7.64, $7.73, and $6.51, respectively. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of options granted is amortized to expense over the stock options' four-year vesting period and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan's one year purchase period. Stock option grants are divided into annual vesting periods, resulting in the recognition of approximately 50% of the total compensation expense of the grant in the first year. Additionally, the potential tax benefit associated with the issuance of incentive stock options is not reflected until realized upon the disqualifying disposition of the shares. The Company's pro forma information follows:
IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS 1998 1997 1996 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Net income (loss) as reported................................................... $ (57,944) $ 17,566 $ 35,311 Pro forma net income (loss) under FAS 123....................................... $ (62,174) $ 14,453 $ 31,985 Net income (loss) per share--basic, as reported................................. $(2.76) $0.85 $1.76 Pro forma net income (loss) per share--basic, under FAS 123..................... $(3.03) $0.71 $1.61 Net income (loss) per share--diluted, as reported............................... $(2.76) $0.81 $1.66 Pro forma net income (loss) per share--diluted, under FAS 123................... $(3.03) $0.67 $1.52
Because FAS 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, its pro forma effect was not fully reflected until 1998. 49 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY--SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN In January 1997, the Board approved the adoption of a Shareholder Rights Plan ("Rights Plan"). Among other things, the Rights Plan provides that each Right will be distributed as a dividend at the rate of one Preferred Share Purchase Right on each outstanding share of the Company's Common Stock held by stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 24, 1997. The rights expire on February 9, 2007. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock or announces a tender offer the consummation of which would result in ownership by a person or group of 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock. Each Right will entitle stockholders to buy one one-hundredth of a share of a new series of Junior Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $145.00 upon certain events. The Rights are redeemable, in whole but not in part, at the option of the Board of Directors at $.01 per Right, at any time within 10 days of the date they become exercisable and in certain other circumstances and will not become exercisable in certain instances where a transaction is approved by the Company's Board of Directors. The Rights will not prevent a takeover of the Company, but should encourage anyone seeking to acquire the Company to negotiate with the Company's Board of Directors. Shares reserved for issuance under the Plan were 350,000 at December 31, 1998. 8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS EMPLOYEE BONUS PLANS The Company currently sponsors a profit sharing plan and an executive incentive bonus plan that distribute employee awards based on the achievement of predetermined operating income targets. The Company has recognized expense of $0, $0, and $2,126,000 under these various employee bonus plans for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN The Company currently sponsors a 401(k) employee salary deferral plan that allows voluntary contributions by all full-time employees of from 1% to 20% of their pretax earnings. Company contributions will be made only if certain predetermined operating income targets are achieved. The Company has recognized expense of $0, $0, and $797,000 relating to this benefit plan for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. 9. INCOME TAXES The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 1996 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Domestic........................................................................ $ (65,582) $ 23,326 $ 48,058 Foreign......................................................................... 1,456 1,768 4,649 ---------- --------- --------- Income (loss) before income taxes............................................... $ (64,126) $ 25,094 $ 52,707 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
50 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) Income taxes included the following:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 1996 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Federal: Current........................................................................ $ (9,847) $ 2,142 $ 14,513 Deferred....................................................................... 2,634 3,925 (847) ---------- --------- --------- (7,213) 6,067 13,666 State: Current........................................................................ -- 365 2,301 Deferred....................................................................... 263 644 (31) ---------- --------- --------- 263 1,009 2,270 Foreign: Current........................................................................ 768 455 1,480 Deferred....................................................................... -- (3) (20) ---------- --------- --------- 768 452 1,460 ---------- --------- --------- Total income tax provision (benefit)............................................. $ (6,182) $ 7,528 $ 17,396 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
The tax benefit associated with stock options and employee stock purchase plan transactions increased tax refunds receivable by $309,000 for 1998, and reduced taxes currently payable by $2,121,000 and $2,420,000 for 1997 and 1996, respectively. Such benefits are credited to stockholders' equity when realized. The difference between the provision (benefit) for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate (35 percent) to income before income taxes is explained below:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 1996 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Tax computed at statutory rate................................................... $ (22,444) $ 8,783 $ 18,447 State income taxes, net of federal benefit....................................... 171 656 1,476 Foreign sales corporation........................................................ -- (90) (1,179) Tax exempt income................................................................ (1,142) (1,747) (1,640) Credits for research and development............................................. (1,304) (612) (693) Losses not benefited............................................................. 19,775 -- -- Other, net....................................................................... (1,238) 538 985 ---------- --------- --------- Income tax provision (benefit)................................................... $ (6,182) $ 7,528 $ 17,396 ---------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
51 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
IN THOUSANDS 1998 1997 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- Deferred tax assets: Inventory valuation...................................................................... 11,105 3,869 Bad debt reserve......................................................................... 2,503 652 Fixed assets............................................................................. 2,404 -- Tax credit carryforwards................................................................. 1,696 519 Warranty reserves........................................................................ 542 2,141 Accrued vacation......................................................................... 136 590 Other.................................................................................... 5,419 1,290 ---------- --------- Total deferred tax assets.................................................................. $ 23,805 $ 9,061 Valuation allowance........................................................................ (19,563) -- ---------- --------- Net deferred tax assets.................................................................... $ 4,242 $ 9,061 ---------- --------- ---------- --------- Deferred tax liabilities: Lease revenue............................................................................ (1,489) (1,489) Deferred income.......................................................................... (1,185) (3,919) Other.................................................................................... (1,568) (614) ---------- --------- Total deferred tax liabilities............................................................. (4,242) (6,022) ---------- --------- ---------- --------- Net deferred tax assets.................................................................... $ 0 $ 3,039 ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
FASB Statement No. 109 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not. Based upon the weight of available evidence, which includes the Company's historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in all prior years, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets. The net valuation allowance increased by $19,563,000 during the year ended December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1,304,000. The tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2001 through 2018, if not utilized. Utilization of tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitation provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of the tax credit carryforwards before utilization. 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company leases its facilities, undeveloped land and certain equipment under operating leases expiring through December, 2015. Under certain of its leasing arrangements, the Company is subject to escalation charges and also retains certain renewal and purchase options. Additionally, the table below is 52 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) presented net of subleases the Company has executed in the amount of $777,000, expiring through December, 2000. As of December 31, 1998, the minimum annual rental commitments are as follows: 1999........................................................... $4,581,000 2000........................................................... 3,614,000 2001........................................................... 2,403,000 2002........................................................... 1,729,000 2003........................................................... 1,164,000 Thereafter..................................................... 1,906,000 ---------- $15,397,000 ---------- ----------
Rent expense was approximately $4,783,000, $3,401,000 and $2,841,000 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company presently leases 6.4 acres of land located in San Jose, California. This lease expires in November 1999. As part of this transaction, the Company has segregated $5.5 million of its securities as collateral for the debt obligations of the lessor pertaining to this land. These securities are restricted as to withdrawal, and are managed, subject to certain limitations, by the Company under its investment policy. The Company is not a party to any material litigation. From time to time, however, the Company may be subject to claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. 11. ACQUISITION On June 11, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Integrated Solutions, Inc. (ISI), a privately held manufacturer of i-line and deep ultra-violet reduction lithography systems. The Company accounted for this acquisition based on the purchase method of accounting and allocated the purchase price based on fair values of assets acquired as of the acquisition date. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recognized a charge for acquired in-process research and development expense of $5.1 million. The final purchase price consisted of net cash consideration of approximately $19.2 million, $2.6 million for transaction costs and $8.9 million for assumed liabilities. Based on the final purchase price allocation, the excess cost over fair value of net assets was $9.1 million, to be amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of three to seven years. As of December 31, 1998, the accumulated amortization related to the excess cost over fair value of this acquisition was $914,000. The results of the acquired operations are included from the date of acquisition. The Company's management made certain assessments with respect to the determination of all identifiable assets resulting from, or to be used in, research and development activities as of the acquisition date. Each of these activities was evaluated, by both interviews and data analysis, to determine its state of development and related fair value. The Company's review indicated that the IPR&D had not reached a state of technological feasibility and the underlying technology had no alternative future use to the Company in other research and development projects or otherwise. In the case of IPR&D, fair values of the corresponding technologies were determined using an income approach, which included a discounted future earnings methodology. Under this methodology, the value of the in-process technology is comprised of the total present value of the anticipated net cash flows attributable to the in-process project, discounted to net present value, taking into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the purchased IPR&D. 53 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 11. ACQUISITION (CONTINUED) The following unaudited pro forma net sales, net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share combine the historical net sales, net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share of the Company and ISI for the year ended December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented. These balances do not reflect the charge for acquired in-process research and development of $5.1 million, or $0.24 per share, due to its non-recurring nature.
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) 1998 1997 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- Net sales............................................................. $ 93,668 $ 194,730 Net income (loss)..................................................... (55,993) 13,734 Net income (loss) per share--basic.................................... (2.67) 0.67 Net income (loss) per share--diluted.................................. (2.67) 0.63 Number of shares used--basic.......................................... 20,958 20,553 Number of shares used--diluted........................................ 20,958 21,681
54 REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP San Jose, California January 29, 1999 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. 55 PART III Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report in that the Registrant will file a definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of its fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 3, 1999 and the information included therein is incorporated herein by reference as set forth below. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The information concerning the Company's directors required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Item captioned "Election of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement"). The information required by this Item relating to the Company's executive officers is included under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I, Item 4 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Item captioned "Executive Compensation and Related Information" in the Proxy Statement. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Items captioned "Election of Directors" and "Ownership of Securities" in the Proxy Statement. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the item captioned "Certain Transactions" in the Proxy Statement. PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report on Form 10-K (1) Financial Statements The financial statements (including the notes thereto) listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule (set forth in Item 8 of part II of this Form 10-K) are filed within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (2) Financial Statement Schedules The following consolidated financial statement schedule is included herein:
PAGE NUMBER ------------ Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.................... S-1
Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted since they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or related notes. 56 (3) Exhibits The following exhibits are referenced or included in this report:
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION - ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ 2.1(1) Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 8, 1993, among Registrant, General Signal Corporation and General Signal Technology Corporation. 3.1(1) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed October 6, 1993. 3.1.1(11) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed June 17, 1998. 3.2(6) Bylaws of Registrant, as amended. 3.3(6) Certified Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 17, 1995. 4.5(1) Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Registrant. 4.6(7) Shareholder Rights Agreement between Registrant and the First National Bank of Boston dated February 11, 1997. 4.6.1(9) Shareholder Rights Agreement between Registrant and the First National Bank of Boston, filed on February 11, 1997, as amended on March 18, 1998. 4.6.2(11) Second Amendment to Shareholder Rights Agreement dated February 11, 1997 between Registrant and BankBoston, N.A. (formerly known as the First National Bank of Boston) as of October 12, 1998, and Certification of Compliance with Section 27 thereof. 10.1(1)(2) Distributor Agreement dated June 22, 1993 between the Company and Innotech Corporation. 10.2(1)(5) 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement with respect to the automatic option grant program, as amended. 10.3(8) 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (Amended and Restated on August 8, 1997). 10.4(1) Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Registrant and each of its officers and directors. 10.5(1) Standard Industrial Lease--Single Tenant, Full Net between The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, as Landlord, and Registrant, as Tenant, dated August 27, 1993. 10.6(3) Executive Incentive Plan. 10.7(3) Profit Sharing Plan. 10.8(4) Standard Industrial Lease Mutual Tenant, Full Net between Orchard Investment Company Number 701, As Landlord, and Registrant, As Tenant dated May 17, 1994 and as amended, October 18, 1994. 10.8.1(9) Second Amendment to Lease and Agreement to Release between the Receiver of the Estate of Orchard Investment Company Number 701, As Original Landlord, Orchard Properties, and Registrant, As Tenant dated May 25, 1995. 10.8.2(9) Third Amendment to Lease between Orchard Investment Company Number 701, As Landlord, and Registrant, As Tenant dated November 16, 1995. 10.8.3(9) Fourth Amendment to Lease between San Jose Acquisition Co., L.L.C. (successor of Orchard Investment Company Number 701), As Landlord, and Registrant, As Tenant dated February 6, 1996. 10.8.4(9) Fifth Amendment to Lease between Silicon Valley Properties, L.L.C. (successor of San Jose Acquisition Co., L.L.C., and Orchard Investment Company Number 701), As Landlord and Registrant, As Tenant dated December 1, 1997. 10.11(5) 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
57
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION - ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ 11.1(10) Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 19, 1998, by and among the Registrant, Ultratech Stepper East, Inc. (formerly known as Ultratech Acquisition Sub, Inc., formerly known as Ultratech Capital, Inc., formerly known as Ultratech Stepper Capital, Inc.), Integrated Solutions, Inc., and Integrated Acquisition Corp. 11.1.1(12) Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 19, 1998, by and among the Registrant, Ultratech Stepper East, Inc. (formerly known as Ultratech Acquisition Sub, Inc., formerly known as Ultratech Capital, Inc., formerly known as Ultratech Stepper Capital, Inc.), Integrated Solutions, Inc., and Integrated Acquisition Corp. 11.2 Sublease between Lam Research Corporation, as Sublessor, and Registrant, as Sublessee dated September 16, 1998. 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant. 23 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. 24 Power of Attorney 27 Financial Data Schedule 27.1(9) Financial Data Schedule for fiscal year ended 1997. 27.2(9) Financial Data Schedule for fiscal quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 31, 1997, respectively. 27.3(9) Financial Data Schedule for fiscal quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 31, 1996, respectively, and fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
- ------------------------ (1) Previously filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 declared effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 1993. File No. 33-66522. (2) Confidential Treatment has been granted for the deleted portions of this document. (3) Previously filed with the Company's 1993 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-22248). (4) Previously filed with the Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-22248). (5) Previously filed with the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-22248). (6) Previously filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 (Commission File No. 0-22248). (7) Previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 26, 1997. (8) Previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form S-8, dated August 8, 1997. (9) Previously filed with the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-22248). (10) Previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 11, 1998. (11) Previously filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-22248). (12) Previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated August 25, 1998. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 1998. (c) Exhibits. See list of exhibits under (a)(3) above. 3 (d) Financial Statement Schedules. See list of schedules under (a)(2) above. 58 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunder duly authorized. Date: March 30, 1999 ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. /s/ ARTHUR W. ZAFIROPOULO ---------------------------------------- Arthur W. Zafiropoulo CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT By: Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- ------------------- Chairman of the Board of /s/ ARTHUR W. ZAFIROPOULO Directors, Chief - ------------------------------ Executive Officer March 30, 1999 Arthur W. Zafiropoulo (Principal Executive Officer) and President Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial /s/ WILLIAM G. LEUNIS, III Officer, Secretary and - ------------------------------ Treasurer (Principal March 30, 1999 William G. Leunis, III Financial and Accounting Officer) /s/ KENNETH A. LEVY - ------------------------------ Director March 30, 1999 Kenneth A. Levy /s/ GREGORY HARRISON - ------------------------------ Director March 30, 1999 Gregory Harrison /s/ LARRY R. CARTER - ------------------------------ Director March 30, 1999 Larry R. Carter /s/ THOMAS D. GEORGE - ------------------------------ Director March 30, 1999 Thomas D. George /s/ JOEL GEMUNDER - ------------------------------ Director March 30, 1999 Joel Gemunder
SCHEDULE II ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (IN THOUSANDS)
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF COSTS AND OTHER END OF DESCRIPTION PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS(1) PERIOD - ----------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ----------- Allowance for doubtful accounts Year ended December 31, 1996 Trade accounts receivable.................. $ 613 $ 1,225 $ -- $ (687) $ 1,151 ------ ----------- ----- ------------- ----------- Year ended December 31, 1997 Trade accounts receivable.................. $ 1,151 $ 2,205 $ -- $ (1,098) $ 2,258 ------ ----------- ----- ------------- ----------- Year ended December 31, 1998 Trade accounts receivable.................. $ 2,258 $ 1,907 $ 153 $ (2,122) $ 2,196 Leases receivable.......................... -- 6,444 -- -- 6,444 ------ ----------- ----- ------------- ----------- $ 2,258 $ 8,351 $ 153 $ (2,122) $ 8,640 ------ ----------- ----- ------------- ----------- ------ ----------- ----- ------------- -----------
- ------------------------ (1) Deductions represent write-offs against reserve account balances. S-1 EX-11.2 2 EXHIBIT 11.2 EXHIBIT 11.2 SUBLEASE THIS SUBLEASE (the "Sublease") is dated for reference purposes as of September 16th, 1998, and is made by and between LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Sublessor"), and ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Sublessee"). Sublessor and Sublessee hereby agree as follows: 1. RECITALS: This Sublease is made with reference to the fact that Judith A. Spinelli, of Cambridge, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, a proprietorship, as landlord ("Master Lessor"), and Sublessor, as tenant, entered into that certain undated Lease, commencing as of September 1, 1996 (the "Master Lease"), with respect to, among other things, that certain premises consisting of approximately 65,240 square feet of space comprising approximately fifty-nine percent (59%) of the rentable area of the building located at 16 Jonspin Road, Wilmington, Massachusetts (the "Building,"). A copy of the Master Lease is attached hereto as EXHIBIT A and incorporated by reference herein. The Master Lease also includes as part of the premises thereunder approximately 19,117 square feet of rentable area in a building located at 65 (but sometimes referred to as "53") Jonspin Road, Wilmington, Massachusetts ("65 Jonspin Premises") which is not subject to this Sublease. 2. PREMISES: Sublessor hereby leases to Sublessee, and Sublessee hereby leases from Sublessor, the portion of the premises under the Master Lease which is referred to therein as 16 Jonspin Road, including, but not limited to, the Building and the Sublessor's rights under the Master Lease to the nonexclusive use of the common areas (hereinafter the "Subleased Premises"). Sublessee's lease of the Subleased Premises, together with the appurtenant right to use the common areas, is expressly conditioned upon and subject to the continuing compliance by Sublessee with (i) all of the terms and conditions of this Sublease, (ii) all of the terms and conditions of the Master Lease, except for the payment of Rent thereunder, which are assumed by Sublessee hereunder, (iii) all rules and regulations reasonably established by the Master Lessor pursuant to the Master Lease, and (iv) all laws and private restrictions, easements and other matters of public record affecting the Subleased Premises. The Subleased Premises do not include the 65 Jonspin Premises or any of Sublessor's appurtenant rights thereto. 3. TERMS: 3.1 TERM. The term (the "Term") of this Sublease shall be for a period commencing on the "Commencement Date", as hereafter defined, and ending on August 31, 2001 (the "Expiration Date"), except to the extent that this Sublease is sooner terminated pursuant to its terms or the Master Lease is sooner terminated pursuant to its terms. For purposes of this Sublease, the Commencement Date shall be the date on which Sublessor has (i) vacated the Subleased Premises and tendered possession thereof to Sublessee sanitized and decontaminated from any chemicals or other contaminants and broom clean as required by Section 25 of the Master Lease, and (ii) delivered to Sublessee an environmental closure report, and (iii) obtained the written consent of the Master Lessor to this Sublease. 3.2 NO OPTION TO EXTEND. The parties hereby acknowledge that the expiration date of the Master Lease is August 31, 2001, and that Sublessee has no option to extend the Term of this Sublease. Upon Sublessee's acceptance of the Subleased Premises and payment of the First Month's Rent, Sublessor agrees to enter into an amendment of the Master Lease with the Master Lessor deleting Sublessor's option to extend the Term of the Master Lease in order to enable Master Lessor and Sublessee to enter into a direct lease of the Subleased Premises which will commence upon the termination of this Sublease. 3.3 EARLY POSSESSION. If Sublessor permits Sublessee to occupy the Subleased Premises prior to the Commencement Date, such occupancy (i) shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Sublease, except the obligation to pay Rent and (ii) shall not advance the Expiration Date of this Sublease. 3.4 HOLDOVER. The parties hereby acknowledge that the expiration date of the Master Lease is August 31, 2001, and that it is therefore critical that Sublessee surrender the Subleased Premises to Sublessor no later than the Expiration Date in accordance with Section 17 hereof. In the event that Sublessee does not surrender the Subleased Premises by the Expiration Date in accordance with Section 17 hereof, Sublessee shall, and hereby agrees to, indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to Sublessor) and hold harmless Sublessor from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, damages and liabilities ("Claims") resulting from Sublessee's delay in surrendering the Subleased Premises and Sublessee shall pay Sublessor holdover (i) Base Monthly Rent equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the Base Monthly Rent (as such term is defined in Subsection 4.1 hereinbelow) payable under this Sublease during the last month of the Term, and (ii) Additional Rent (as such term is defined in Section 4.2 hereinbelow). 4. RENT: 4.1 BASE MONTHLY RENT. Sublessee shall pay to Sublessor as base rent for the Subleased Premises for each month during the Term the amount of Thirty-nine Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen and 83/100ths Dollars ($39,415.83) per month ("Base Monthly Rent"). Base Monthly Rent shall be paid to Sublessor on or before the first (1st) day of each month of the Term. Base Monthly Rent and Additional Rent (as defined in Subsection 4.2 below) for any period during the Term hereof which is for less than one month of the Term shall be a pro rata portion of the monthly installment based on a 30-day month. Base Monthly Rent and Additional Rent shall be payable without notice or demand (except as otherwise provided herein) and without any deduction, offset, or abatement, in lawful money of the United States of America. Base Monthly Rent and Additional Rent shall be paid directly to Sublessor at Lam Research Corporation, Accounts Receivable Department, 4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, California 94538, or such other address as may be designated in writing by Sublessor. 4.2 ADDITIONAL RENT. In addition to Base Monthly Rent, Sublessee shall pay to Sublessor all amounts payable with respect to the Subleased Premises by Sublessor to Master Lessor under the Master Lease (other than Base Monthly Rent), including, but not limited to, all amounts payable to Master Lessor as "Additional Rent" (as set forth in Section 4 of the Master Lease). All monies other than Base Monthly Rent required to be paid by Sublessee under this Sublease, including, without limitation, any amounts payable by Sublessor to the Master Lessor as "Additional Rent" shall be deemed additional rent ("Additional Rent") for purposes of this Sublease and shall be paid to Sublessor within ten (10) days of receipt from Sublessor of written notice and copy of the Master Lessor's statement for each item of Additional Rent. Base Monthly Rent and Additional Rent are collectively referred to herein as "Rent". Upon receipt from the Master Lessor of a reconciliation of Additional Rent payable for the current lease year (pursuant to Section 4(IV) of the Master Lease), Sublessor and Sublessee shall prorate between them any credit and allocate any underpayment due on the basis of the number of months of the Sublease Term which are included in the applicable lease year. Within eight (8) days of receipt of the Master Lessor's billing for any underpayment, Sublessee shall pay Sublessee's share of such underpayment to Sublessor as hereinabove provided. Notwithstanding anything in this Subsection 4.2 to the contrary, Sublessee shall not be liable hereunder for the payment of any amounts payable by Sublessor to Master Lessor under the Master Lease as a result of Sublessor's default under the Master Lease unless Sublessor's default was directly or indirectly caused in whole or in part by Sublessee's failure to perform in a timely manner any of Sublessee's duties or obligations under this Sublease. 4.3 PAYMENT OF FIRST MONTH'S RENT. Upon execution of this Sublease, Sublessee shall pay to Sublessor ("First Month's Rent") the sum of Thirty-nine Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen and 83/100ths Dollars ($39,415.83), which shall constitute Base Monthly Rent for the first full calendar month of the Term for which Rent is due as hereafter provided. No Rent shall be due or payable for the first thirty (30) calendar days of the Term commencing on the Commencement Date. On or before the thirty-first (31st) day of the Term (unless the Commencement Date is on the first day of a calendar month) Sublessee shall pay to Sublessor pro-rata Rent for the remaining calendar days of the month in which the thirty-first (31st) day of the Term falls and First Month's Rent shall be applied to the next succeeding calendar month. 5. (Intentionally Omitted) 6. REPAIRS: 6.1 AS IS. The parties acknowledge and agree that, except as provided in Subsection 6.2 hereof, Sublessee is subleasing the Subleased Premises on an "AS IS" basis, and acknowledge and agree that, except as provided in Section 26 hereof Sublessor has made no representations or warranties with respect to the condition of the Subleased Premises as of the Commencement Date, or with respect to the Building's compliance or non-compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, codes, rules, orders, directions and regulations of lawful governmental authorities, including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Except as set forth in Subsection 6.2 below, Sublessor shall have no obligation whatsoever to make or pay the cost of any alterations, improvements or repairs to the Subleased Premises, including, without limitation, any improvement or repair required to comply with any law, regulation, building code or ordinance (including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990). If Master Lessor shall fail to perform any of its obligations in accordance with the terms of the Master Lease (including, without limitation, its obligations to make repairs), Sublessor, upon receipt of written notice from Sublessee, shall attempt to enforce such obligations of Master Lessor under the Master Lease(without requiring Sublessor to spend more than a nominal sum, which nominal sum shall be limited to all costs associated with the preparation of and transmittal to Master Lessor of documentation from Sublessor or Sublessor's attorneys detailing the obligations to be performed by Master Lessor under the Master Lease). If, after receipt of written request from Sublessee, Sublessor shall fail or refuse to take action for the enforcement of Sublessor's rights against Master Lessor with respect to the Subleased Premises ("Action"), Sublessee shall have the right to take such Action in its own name. If any Action against Subleased Premises in Sublessee's name shall be barred by reason of lack of privity, nonassignability or otherwise, Sublessee may take such Action in Sublessor's name; provided that Sublessee has obtained the prior written consent of Sublessor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and provided, further, that Sublessee shall indemnify, protect, defend by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Sublessor and hold Sublessor harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, libilities, obligations, losses, damages, judgements, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees) which Sublessor may incur or suffer by reason of such Action. If a default by Subleased Premises under the terms of the Master Lease shall result in the excuse of Sublessor from the performance of any of its obligations to be performed under the Master Lease or result in any reduction or abatement in the base rent or additional rent to be paid by Sublessor thereunder, then Sublessee shall be excused from the performance of a corresponding obligation and/or shall be entitled to a corresponding reduction in or abatement of the Rent to be paid by Sublessee hereunder. 6.2. SUBLESSOR'S OBLIGATIONS. Sublessor shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform the following repairs only to the Building and its systems: 6.2.1. On the Commencement Date, all existing plumbing, lighting, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems and sprinkler systems, parking areas, and the building exterior within the Subleased Premises shall be in good working order. Provided that Sublessee has given Sublessor written notice within thirty (30) days after the Commencement Date of any such item which was not in good working order on the Commencement Date, Sublessor shall, at its sole cost and expense, place such item in good working order. 7. INDEMNITY: 7.1. SUBLESSEE'S OBLIGATION. Except as provided in Section 14 hereof and except to the extent caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Sublessor, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees, Sublessee shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to Sublessor), protect and hold Sublessor harmless from and against any and all Claims (including reasonable attorneys' and professionals' fees), caused by or arising in connection with: (i) the use or occupancy of the Subleased Premises by Sublessee; (ii) the negligence or willful misconduct of Sublessee or its employees, contractors, agents or invitees; or (iii) a breach of Sublessee's obligations under this Sublease or the provisions of the Master Lease assumed by Sublessee hereunder. Sublessee's indemnification of Sublessor shall survive termination of this Sublease. 7.2. SUBLESSOR'S OBLIGATION. Except as provided in Section 14 hereof and except to the extent caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Sublessee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees, or a breach of Sublessee's obligations under this Sublease, Sublessor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to Sublessee), protect and hold Sublessee harmless from and against any and all reasonable Claims (including reasonable attorneys' and professionals' fees), caused by or arising in connection with: (i) a breach of Sublessor's obligations under this Sublease; (ii) a breach of Sublessor's obligations as tenant under the Master Lease; or (iii) the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Sublessor or its agents, employees, contractors or invitees occurring on or about the Subleased Premises. Sublessor's indemnification of Sublessee shall survive termination of this Sublease. 8. RIGHT TO CURE DEFAULTS: 8.1. SUBLESSOR'S RIGHTS. If Sublessee fails to pay any sum of money to Sublessor, or fails to perform any other act on its part to be performed hereunder, then Sublessor may, but shall not be obligated to, after passage of any applicable notice and cure periods, make such payment or perform such act. All such sums paid, and all reasonable costs and expenses of performing any such act, shall be deemed Additional Rent payable by Sublessee to Sublessor upon demand, together with interest thereon at the rate stated in Section 18 of the Master Lease ("Interest Rate"), from the date of the expenditure until repaid. 8.2. SUBLESSEE'S RIGHTS. Provided that Sublessee is not in default of any of its obligations under this Sublease, if Sublessor fails to perform any act on its part to be performed by Sublessor under the Master Lease, then Sublessee may, but shall not be obligated to, after thirty (30) days from the date of Sublessee's written notice to Sublessor and Master Lessor identifying the failure, and after the passage of any notice and cure periods, perform such act. All such sums paid, and all reasonable costs and expenses of performing any such act, shall be payable promptly by Sublessor to Sublessee, together with interest thereon at the Master Lease Interest Rate, from the date of the expenditure until repaid. 9. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Subject to the terms and conditions of Article 10 of the Master Lease, Sublessee may not assign this Sublease, sublet the Subleased Premises, transfer any interest of Sublessee therein or permit any use of the Subleased Premises by another party (collectively, "Transfer"), without the prior written consent of Sublessor (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and Master Lessor. A consent to one Transfer shah not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent Transfer. Any Transfer without such consent shall be void and, at the option of Sublessor, shall terminate this Sublease. Sublessor's and Master Lessor's waiver or consent to any assignment or subletting shall be ineffective unless set forth in writing, and Sublessee shall not be relieved from any of its obligations under this Sublease unless the consent expressly so provides. 10. USE: 10. 1. PERMITTED USE. Subject to the provisions of Article 3 of the Master Lease, Sublessee shall use the Subleased Premises only for office, light industrial, light manufacturing or light assembly purposes, or for any other lawful purpose related to the business operations of Sublessee. Sublessee shall not use the Subleased Premises in any manner which would constitute a violation of the Master Lease. 10.2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Except as permitted by the Master Lease and applicable law, Sublessee shall not use, store, transport or dispose of any Hazardous Materials in or about the Subleased Premises. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Sublessee, at its sole cost, shall comply with all laws and all provisions of the Master Lease relating to Hazardous Materials. If Hazardous Materials are discovered at or about the Subleased Premises, and such Hazardous Materials were used, stored, transported or disposed of by Sublessee, then Sublessee, at its sole expense, shall promptly take all action necessary to return the Subleased Premises to the condition existing prior to the appearance of the Hazardous Material. Sublessee shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to Sublessor), and Master Lessor and hold Sublessor and Master Lessor harmless from and against all Claims, investigations, detoxifications, remediations, removals, and expenses of every type and nature (including reasonable attorneys' and other professionals' fees), to the extent caused by the use, storage, transportation, release, disposal, discharge or emission of Hazardous Materials at or about the Subleased Premises during the Term of this Sublease by Sublessee or its agents, contractors, invitees or employees. For purposes of this Sublease, "Hazardous Materials" shall have the same meaning as is given that term in the Master Lease. 10.3. NO INJURY TO PREMISES; REGULATIONS. Sublessee shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the Subleased Premises which would (i) damage the Subleased Premises, or (ii) unreasonably vibrate or shake, or overload, or impair the efficient operation of the Subleased Premises or the sprinkler systems, heating, ventilating or air conditioning equipment, or utilities systems located therein. Sublessee shall not store any materials, supplies, finished or unfinished products, or articles of any nature outside of the Subleased Premises. For purposes of this Sublease and the Master Lease, Sublessee shall comply with all reasonable rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by either Sublessor or Master Lessor. 11. EFFECT OF CONVEYANCE: As used in this Sublease, the term "Sublessor" means the holder of the tenant's interest under the Master Lease. In the event of any assignment, transfer or termination of the Sublessor's interest under the Master Lease, which is consented to in writing by Master Lessor, Sublessor shall be and hereby is entirely relieved of all covenants and obligations of Sublessor hereunder accruing after the effective date of such transfer (except for its indemnification obligation pursuant to Subsection 7.2 hereof), and it shall be deemed and construed, without further agreement between the parties, that (i) in the event of any assignment or transfer, the assignee or transferee, as applicable, has assumed and shall carry out all covenants and obligations thereafter to be performed by Sublessor hereunder, or (ii) in the event of a termination, this Sublease shall also be terminated. Sublessor shall transfer and deliver any Security Deposit of Sublessee to the assignee or transferee of the tenant's interest under the Master Lease, and only thereupon shall Sublessor be discharged from any further liability with respect thereto. 12. DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE: If Sublessor is unable to deliver possession of the Subleased Premises to Sublessee on or before the Commencement Date for any reason whatsoever, then this Sublease shall neither be void nor voidable, nor shall Sublessor be liable to Sublessee for any loss or damage; provided, however, that in such event, Rent, if otherwise then payable hereunder, shall abate until Sublessor delivers possession of the Subleased Premises to Sublessee. By taking possession of the Subleased Premises, Sublessee shall conclusively be deemed to have accepted the Subleased Premises in its "as is", then-existing condition, without any warranty whatsoever of Sublessor with respect thereto, except as otherwise set forth in Sections 6.18 and 26 hereof. 13. IMPROVEMENTS: No alteration or improvements shall be made to the Subleased Premises except in accordance with the Master Lease, and with the prior written consent, when required by the Master Lease, of both Master Lessor and Sublessor. Sublessor shall not unreasonably withhold Sublessor's consent to any alteration or improvement which has been consented to in writing by Master Lessor. 14. RELEASE: Sublessor and Sublessee hereby release each other from any injury to persons, damage to property or loss of any kind which is caused by or results from any risk insured against under any valid insurance policy carried by either party which contains a waiver of subrogation by the insurer; provided, however, that the liability shall be released only to the extent that the damages are covered by such insurance, and only if the insurance permits a partial release. This release shall be in effect only so long as the applicable insurance policy contains a clause to the effect that this release shall not affect the right of the insured to recover under the policy. Each party shall use its best efforts to cause each insurance policy obtained by it to provide that the insurer waives all right of recovery against the other party and its agents and employees in connection with any damage or injury covered by the policy, and each party shall notify the other party if it is unable to obtain a waiver of subrogation. Except to the extent of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Sublessor, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees, Sublessor shall not be liable to Sublessee, nor shall Sublessee be entitled to terminate this Sublease or to abate Rent for any reason, including, without limitation: (i) failure or interruption of any utility system or service; (ii) failure of Master Lessor to maintain the Subleased Premises as may be required under the Master Lease; or (iii) penetration of water into or onto any portion of the Subleased Premises. The obligations of Sublessor shall not constitute the personal obligations of the officers, directors, trustees, partners, joint venturers, members, owners, stockholders, or other principals or representatives of the Sublessor. 15. DEFAULT: Sublessee shall be in material default of its obligations under this Sublease ("Event of Default") if any of the following events occur: 15.1. Sublessee fails to pay any Rent when due, when such failure continues for three (3) business days after Sublessee's receipt or refusal of written notice from Sublessor to Sublessee that any such sum is due; or 15.2. Sublessee fails to perform any term, covenant or condition of this Sublease (except those requiring payment of Rent) and fails to cure such breach within seven (7) days after delivery of a written notice specifying the nature of the breach; provided, however, that if more than seven (7) days reasonably are required to remedy the failure, then Sublessee shall not be in default if Sublessee commences the cure within the seven (7) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes the cure to completion; or 15.3. Sublessee makes a general assignment of its assets for the benefit of its creditors, including attachment of, execution on, or the appointment of a custodian or receiver with respect to, a substantial part of Sublessee's property or any property essential to the conduct of its business; or 15.4. Sublessee vacates the Subleased Premises; or 15.5. A petition is filed by or against Sublessee under the bankruptcy laws of the United States or any other debtors' relief law or statute, unless such petition is dismissed within sixty (60) days after filing; or 15.6. A court directs the winding up or liquidation of Sublessee; or 15.7. A substantial part of Sublessee's property or any property essential to the conduct of its business is attached or executed upon and not released from the attachment or execution within sixty (60) days; or 15.8. A custodian or receiver is appointed for a substantial part of Sublessee's property or any property essential to the conduct of its business and not discharged within sixty (60) days; or 15.9. Sublessee commits any other act or omission which constitutes an event of default under Article 18 of the Master Lease, which has not been cured after delivery of written notice and passage of the applicable grace period provided in the Master Lease as modified, if at all, by the provisions of this Sublease. 16. REMEDIES: In the event of any default by Sublessee, Sublessor shall have all remedies provided pursuant to Article 18 of the Master Lease and by applicable law. Sublessor may resort to its remedies cumulatively or in the alternative. 17. SURRENDER: Prior to expiration of this Sublease, Sublessee shall remove all of its trade fixtures and shall surrender the Subleased Premises to Sublessor in good condition, in compliance with the Master Lease and Subsection 10.2 hereof, reasonable wear and tear excepted. In no event shall Sublessee have any obligation to remove any alterations or improvements that were not installed in the Subleased Premises by Sublessee. If the Subleased Premises are not so surrendered, then Sublessee shall be liable to Sublessor for all Claims incurred by Sublessor in returning the Subleased Premises to the required condition, plus interest thereon at the Interest Rate. 18. BROKER: Sublessor recognizes CB Richard Ellis, Inc. as Sublessee's representing broker and agrees that this broker will be paid by Sublessor a commission of three percent (3%) of gross rentals of the Sublease on a cash-out basis, to be paid one-half upon mutual execution of this Sublease and one-half upon Sublessee's occupancy of the Subleased Premises. Sublessor and Sublessee each represent to the other that they have dealt with no other real estate brokers, finders, agents or salesmen in connection with this transaction. Each party, agrees to hold the other party harmless from and against all claims for brokerage commissions, finder's fees or other compensation made by any other agent, broker, salesman or finder as a consequence of said party's actions or dealings with such agent, broker, salesman, or finder. Neither Sublessee nor Master Lessor shall be responsible for payment of any brokerage commission in connection with the transaction contemplated by this Sublease. 19. NOTICES: Unless at least five (5) days' prior written notice is given in the manner set forth in this Section, the address of each party and Master Lessor for all purposes connected with this Sublease shall be that address set forth below their signatures at the end of this Sublease (except that the address for payment of Rent is set forth in Subsection 4.1 hereof). All notices, demands or communications in connection with this Sublease shall be (a) personally delivered; or (b) properly addressed and either (i) submitted to an overnight courier service, charges prepaid, or (ii) deposited in the mail (registered or certified, return receipt requested, and postage prepaid). All notices given to Master Lessor under the Master Lease shall be considered received only when delivered in accordance with the Master Lease to all parties hereto at the addresses set forth below their signatures at the end of this Sublease. Notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt or refusal to accept delivery. 20. AMENDMENT: This Sublease may not be amended except by the written agreement of Sublessor and Sublessee, with written consent by Master Lessor. 21. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE: Sublessee and Sublessor each represent and warrant to the other that each person executing this Sublease on behalf of each party is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Sublease on behalf of that party. 22. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE: The terms and conditions of this Sublease shall include the following specifically identified sections of the Master Lease, which are incorporated into this Sublease as if fully set forth, except that: (i) each reference in such incorporated sections to "Lease" shall be deemed a reference to "Sublease"; (ii) each reference to the "Premises" shall be deemed a reference to the "Subleased Premises"; (iii) each reference to "Landlord" and "Tenant" shall be deemed a reference to "Sublessor" and "Sublessee," respectively, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein; (iv) with respect to work, services, repairs, restoration, insurance or the performance of any other obligation of Master Lessor under the Master Lease, the sole obligation of Sublessor to Sublessee shall be to request the same in writing from Master Lessor as and when requested to do so by Sublessee, and to use Sublessor's reasonable efforts (without requiring Sublessor to spend more than a nominal sum) to obtain Master Lessor's performance; (v) with respect to any obligation of Sublessee to be performed under this Sublease, except to the extent a grace period is explicitly provided for herein wherever the Master Lease grants to Sublessor a specified number of days to perform its obligations under the Master Lease, except as otherwise provided herein, Sublessee shall have three (3) fewer days to perform the obligation (except in the event that only five (5) days are granted to Sublessor to cure, in which case Sublessee shall have two (2) fewer days), including, without limitation, curing any defaults (unless otherwise expressly provided in this Sublease); and (vi) with respect to any approval required to be obtained from the "Landlord" under the Master Lease, such consent must be obtained from both Master Lessor and Sublessor, and the approval of Sublessor may be withheld if Master Lessor's consent is not obtained; provided, however, that Sublessor shall not unreasonably withhold Sublessor's consent to any request of Sublessee which has been consented to in writing by Master Lessor. 4(II), 5 (EXCLUDING THE FIRST SENTENCE), 6, 7, 8 (EXCLUDING THE FIRST SENTENCE), 9, 11, 12, 13 (EXCEPT THAT THE TERM "LESSOR" IN THE FIRST SENTENCE SHALL READ "MASTER LESSOR"), 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 25, 27 AND 28. 23. ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS: This Sublease is and at all times shall be subject and subordinate to the Master Lease and the rights of Master Lessor thereunder. If for any reason the term of the Master Lease is amended or terminated prior to the expiration date of this Sublease, this Sublease shall thereupon be amended or terminated and neither Sublessor nor Master Lessor shall be liable to Sublessee by reason thereof unless such termination is due to the wrongful acts or omissions of Sublessor or Master Lessor, respectively. Sublessee hereby expressly assumes and agrees with respect to Sublessor only (i) to comply with all provisions of the Master Lease which are assumed by Sublessee hereunder, and (ii) to perform all the obligations on the part of the "Tenant" to be performed under the terms of the Master Lease during the term of this Sublease which are assumed by Sublessee hereunder. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Sublease and the Master Lease, as between Sublessor and Sublessee, the provisions of this Sublease shall control. 24. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT: This Sublease and Sublessor's and Sublessee's obligations hereunder are not effective until the written consent of Master Lessor is obtained. If such written consent has not been received within ten (10) business days of the date of this Sublease, Sublessee may terminate this Sublease upon written notice thereof to Sublessor given not later than fifteen (15) business days after the date of this Sublease, and neither party shall have any continuing obligation to the other with respect to the Premises; provided Sublessor shall return the Security Deposit any other prepaid amounts, if previously delivered to Sublessor, to Sublessee. 25. SUBLESSOR'S COVENANTS: Except as expressly set forth in this Sublease or required under the Master Lease, Sublessor covenants and agrees that it shall not enter, without the prior written consent of Sublessee, which consent may be withheld in Sublessee's sole discretion, any termination of or amendment to the Master Lease which prevents or materially adversely affects the use by Sublessee of the Subleased Premises in accordance with the terms of this Sublease, materially increases the obligations of Sublessee under this Sublease or materially restricts Sublessee's rights under this Sublease. Sublessor further covenants and agrees that so long as Sublessee is not then in default under this Sublease beyond any applicable notice and cure period, Sublessor will perform and discharge all of its duties and obligations under the Master Lease to the extent that such are not the duty or obligation of Sublessee pursuant to this Sublease. 26. SUBLESSOR'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: As an inducement to Sublessee to enter this Sublease, to the Sublessor's actual knowledge, Sublessor represents and warrants with respect to the Subleased Premises that: 26. 1. The Master Lease is in full force and effect, and there exists under the Master Lease no default or event of default by either Master Lessor or Sublessor, nor has there occurred any event which, with the giving of notice or passage of time, or both, could constitute such a default or event of default. 26.2. There are no pending or threatened actions, suits or proceedings before any court or administrative agency against Sublessor or against Master Lessor or third parties which could, in the aggregate, adversely affect the Subleased Premises or any part thereof or the ability of Master Lessor to perform its obligations under the Master Lease or of Sublessor to perform its obligations under this Sublease, and Sublessor is not aware of any facts which might result in any such actions, suits or proceedings. 26.3. There is no pending or threatened condemnation or similar proceeding affecting the Subleased Premises or any portion thereof, and Sublessor has no knowledge that any such action currently is contemplated. 26.4. Sublessor has not received any notice from any insurance company of any defects or inadequacies in the Subleased Premises or any part thereof which could adversely affect the insurability of the Subleased Premises or the premiums for the insurance thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sublease as of the day and year first above written.
SUBLESSEE SUBLESSOR ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC., a Delaware LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION, corporation a Delaware corporation By: w/s/WILLIAM G. LEUNIS III By: ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Printed Name: William G. Leunis III Printed Name: ------------------------ Its: Senior VP Finance, CFO Its: --------------------------------- Address: 16 Jonspin Road Address: Facilities Department Wilmington, MA 01887 4650 Cushing Parkway Fremont, California 94538 Attention: Ed Novak Telephone: Telephone: (510) 659-0200
CONSENT TO SUBLEASE Master Lessor hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Sublease, and consents to the terms and conditions of this Sublease, but without releasing Sublessor, as "Tenant" under the Master Lease, from its liability under the Master Lease. By this consent, Master Lessor shall not be deemed in any way to have entered into the Sublease or to have waived the provisions of the Master Lease which require Master Lessor's prior written consent to any subsequent assignments or subletting of the Subleased Premises or any portion thereof. Master Lessor further agrees that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Master Lease, Master Lessor shall deliver to Sublessee at the Subleased Premises written notices of any defaults under the Master Lease at the same time such written notices are sent to Sublessor as set forth in the Master Lease. Upon default of the Sublessor, Sublessee shall have, in addition to the time granted to Sublessor under the Master Lease, (i) an additional period of five (5) days to cure any monetary default and (ii) an additional period of thirty (30) days to cure any non-monetary default provided that if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such period Sublessee shall have such reasonable period as may be required to cure the default if Sublessee within said thirty (30) day period commences and then in good faith diligently continues to cure the default. Master Lessor hereby acknowledges and certifies to Sublessor and Sublessee that: (i) the document attached hereto as EXHIBIT A is a full, true, and correct copy of the Master Lease; (ii) the Master Lease is in full force and effect; (iii) there exists under the Master Lease no default or event of default by either Master Lessor or Sublessor nor has there occurred, to the knowledge of Master Lessor, any event which, with the giving of notice or passage of time, or both, could constitute such a default or event of default, and (iv) none of the existing tenant improvements are required to be removed at the end of the Master Lease Term. Master Lessor further acknowledges and agrees that Section 27 of the Master Lease shall not apply to Sublessee or to any of Sublessee's property which is' in the Subleased Premises. MASTER LESSOR: JUDITH A. SPINELLI of Cambridge, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, a proprietorship. By: --------------------------------- PRINTED Name: ------------------------------- Its: -------------------------------- Address: ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Attention: -------------------------- Telephone: -------------------------- EXHIBIT A MASTER LEASE COMMERCIAL LEASE In consideration of the covenants herein contained, JUDITH A. SPINELLI of Cambridge Middlesex County, Massachusetts, a proprietorship, hereinafter called LESSOR, does hereby lease to LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION hereinafter called LESSEE, the following described premises, hereinafter called the leased premises: 16 JONSPIN ROAD, WILMINGTON, MA containing approximately 65,240 square feet and 65 JONSPIN ROAD, WILMINGTON, MA containing approximately 19,117 square feet. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the leased premises for a term of five years commencing at noon on September 1, 1996 and ending at noon on August 31, 2001 unless sooner terminated as herein provided. LESSOR and LESSEE now covenant and agree that the following terms and conditions shall govern this lease during the term hereof and for such further time as LESSEE shall hold the leased premises. 1. RENT: LESSEE shall pay to LESSOR base rent at the rate of _____________ for 16 Jonspin Road and __________for 65 Jonspin Road, U.S. dollars per year, drawn on a U.S. bank, payable in advance in monthly installments of $___________ and on the first day in each calendar month in advance, the first monthly payment to be made on or before September 1, 1996, including payment in advance of appropriate fractions of a monthly payment for any portion of a month at the commencement or end of said lease term. All payments shall be made to LESSOR or agent at 745 Concord Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, or at such other place as LESSOR shall from time to time in writing designate. 2. SECURITY DEPOSIT: INTENTIONALLY DELETED 3. USE OF PREMISES: LESSEE use of the leased premises shall include any configuration of a.) all lawful general office purposes, b.) all lawful light industrial purposes, c.) all lawful light manufacturing and light assembly purposes, and d.) all lawful purposes related to the business operations of LESSEE. 4. ADDITIONAL RENT: LESSEE shall pay to LESSOR as additional rent a proportionate share (based on square footage leased by LESSEE as compared with the total leaseable square footage of the building of which the leased premises are a part) of any real estate taxes levied against the land and building of which the leased premises are a part. LESSEE shall make payment within thirty (30) days of written notice including invoice and copy of tax bill from the LESSOR that such taxes are payable, and any additional rent shall be pro-rated should the lease terminate before the end of any tax year. LESSEE's proportionate share of each building should be specified , along with the total rentable area for each such building (See Exhibit D). In the event that said building was not assessed as a completed building as of the aforementioned date, then the base assessment shall be as of the first date when the building is assessed as a completed structure. LESSEE shall not be responsible for late charges arising from LESSOR's late payment of said taxes. LESSOR will charge LESSEE as "Additional Rent" customary as set forth on Exhibit A affixed to this lease and incorporated into its terms of reference common area maintenance ("CAM") charges. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such additional rental charges shall at all times be limited to the following conditions: I.) In no event will LESSEE be obligated to pay its pro rata share of any increases in CAM charges in excess of four percent (4.0%) on a non cumulative basis of the previous years base amount for any discrete CAM cost component which is deemed to "reasonably controllable by LESSOR". Within the context of this provision, all CAM charges are deemed to be reasonably controllable by LESSOR except those associated with a.) real estate taxes, b.) common area utilities, c.) and common area insurance premiums. LESSEE shall not be responsible for late charges arising from LESSOR's late payment of real estate taxes. II.) LESSEE will directly maintain all base building mechanical systems and electrical service within the Leased Premises. LESSEE's obligation is to maintain building systems or portions of systems which serve the leased premises. LESSEE shall provide at its sole cost and expense, or cause to be provided via reasonable service contracts, all normal and customary preventive maintenance to all such building mechanical and electrical systems during the term of the lease. LESSEE also agrees to provide to LESSOR copies of all preventive maintenance agreements entered into with respect to the terms of this paragraph. III.) The CAM services which are permitted to be charged to LESSEE during the initial lease term shall be in substantial accordance with EXHIBIT A - CAM SERVICES attached to the lease agreement. The EXHIBIT A -CAM SERVICES specify both the CAM services to be provided to LESSEE and LESSOR's reasonable estimate of what the actual pro-rated CAM costs will be during the first year of the lease term (the "CAM Base Year"). Notwithstanding the forgoing, and for the purposes of projecting the cost of ice and snow removal during the first lease year only, LESSOR will use the averaged time period of "Winter 93/94 and Winter 94/95" for such cost projection. LESSEE will pay to LESSOR as Additional Rent calculated and payable by LESSEE to LESSOR on a quarterly averaged basis, its projected CAM charges during the first year of the lease term based on the projected CAM Base Year. Said CAM costs shall be charged to LESSEE on a prorated basis according to the square footage occupied reflecting the portion of the building occupied by LESSEE. IV.) Within ninety (90) days after the end of the first lease year anniversary and continuing on each anniversary thereafter, LESSOR will submit to LESSEE a CAM reconciliation statement which specifies the actual CAM costs incurred for the North Wilmington Industrial Park (EXHIBIT D) in which the premises are a part as compared with the sum of quarterly CAM payments made by LESSEE to LESSOR. To the extent that the sum of quarterly CAM payments made by LESSEE per the CAM Base Year are in excess of the pro-rated actual CAM costs incurred for the Park, LESSOR will provide to LESSEE a rent credit equal to the amount of the overpayment for the next rental period following. Alternatively, if the sum of quarterly CAM payments made by LESSEE per the CAM Base Year are less than the pro-rated actual CAM costs actually incurred by the Park, Lessee will pay to Lessor the full amount of the difference as increased Additional Rent (subject to the provision of 4.I above). LESSEE shall not be obligated to pay to LESSOR any CAM cost pass throughs for any one or more lease years related to costs which are presented to LESSEE within twelve (12) months after the end of any one lease year or portion thereof. 5. UTILITIES: LESSOR shall provide equipment per LESSOR's building standard specifications to heat the leased premises in season and to cool all areas between May 1 and November 1. LESSEE shall pay all charges for heat and electricity used on the leased premises. LESSEE shall pay LESSOR for all water and sewer use as determined by LESSOR either by a separate water meter serving the leased premises, or as a proportionate share of water and sewer charges for the entire building of which the leased premises are a part if not separately metered. LESSEE shall pay all cost for providing and installing a separate water meter if LESSEE deems necessary. LESSEE also shall pay LESSOR a proportionate share of any other fees and charges relating in any way to water or sewer use at the building. No plumbing, construction or electrical work of any type shall be done without LESSOR's prior written approval which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and/or the appropriate municipal permit. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: LESSEE acknowledges that no trade, occupation, activity or work shall be conducted in the leased premises or use made thereof which may be unlawful, noisy, offensive, or contrary to any applicable statute, regulation, ordinance or bylaw. LESSEE shall keep all employees working in the leased premises covered with Worker's Compensation Insurance and shall obtain any licenses and permits necessary for LESSEE's occupancy. LESSEE shall be responsible for insuring that it's business operations within the leased premises and any alterations by LESSEE which are allowed hereunder to be in full compliance with any applicable statute, regulation, ordinance or bylaw. 7. FIRE, CASUALTY, EMINENT DOMAIN: Should a substantial portion of the leased premises, or of the property of which they are a part, be substantially damaged by fire or other casualty, or be taken by eminent domain, LESSOR may elect to terminate this lease. When such fire, casualty, or taking renders the leased premises substantially unsuitable for their intended use, a just and proportionate abatement of rent shall be made, and LESSEE may elect to terminate this lease if: (a) LESSOR fails to give written notice within thirty (30) days of the event of casualty of intention to restore the leased premises, or (b) LESSOR fails to restore the leased premises to a condition substantially suitable for their intended use within ninety (90) days of said fire, casualty or taking. LESSOR reserves all rights for damages or injury to the leased premises for any taking by eminent domain, except for damage to LESSEE's property or equipment. For the purposes of this lease substantially unsuitable for the intended use means that LESSEE's business activities cannot be consistently carried on for a period of 90 consecutive days. LESSEE may terminate the lease or portion thereof in any affected building in the event that greater than twenty-five (25%) percent of the leased area in such building is rendered un-occupiable or taken via eminent domain for greater than 90 days. 8. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES: LESSOR will be responsible to pay at its sole cost and expense for all structural and roof maintenance of the leased premises, but specifically excluding damage caused by the careless, malicious, willful, or negligent acts of LESSEE or LESSEE's operation and chemical, water or corrosion damage from any source due to LESSEE's operation. LESSEE agrees to maintain at its expense all other aspects of the leased premises in substantially the same condition as they are at the commencement of the term or as they may be put in during the term of this lease, normal wear and tear and damage by fire or other casualty only excepted, and whenever necessary, to replace light bulbs, plate glass and other glass therein, acknowledging that the leased premises are now in good order and the light bulbs and glass whole. LESSEE will property control or vent all solvents, degreasers, smoke, odors etc., and shall not cause the area surrounding the leased premises to be in anything other than a neat and clean condition, depositing all waste in appropriate receptacles. LESSEE shall be solely responsible for any damage to plumbing equipment, sanitary lines, or any other portion of the building. LESSEE shall not knowingly or through acts of negligence permit the leased premises to be overloaded, damaged, stripped or defaced, nor suffer any waste, and will not keep animals within the leased premises. All maintenance provided by LESSOR shall be during LESSOR's normal business hours. 9. ALTERATIONS: Except as provided for in Paragraph 30 herein, LESSEE shall not make structural alterations or additions of any kind to the leased premises, but may make non-structural alterations provided LESSOR consents thereto in writing with such consent not to be unreasonably withheld conditioned or delayed. LESSOR will respond to LESSEE's request for approval on a timely basis and within thirty (30) days. All such allowed alterations shall be at LESSEE's expense and shall conform with LESSOR's construction specifications which are similar and like quality and design as in 16 Jonspin Road. If LESSOR provides any services or maintenance for LESSEE in connection with such alterations or otherwise under this lease, any just invoice will be promptly paid. LESSEE shall not permit any mechanics' liens, or similar liens, to remain upon the leased premises in connection with work of any character performed or claimed to have been performed at the direction of LESSEE and shall cause any such lien to be released or removed forthwith without cost to LESSOR. Any alterations or additions shall become part of the leased premises and the property of LESSOR all equipment owned by LESSEE not structurally a component and all trade fixtures owned by LESSEE, shall at all times remain the property of LESSEE subject to LESSEE removing same and restoring any resultant damage to the leased area at the end of the lease term. None of the improvements constructed by LESSOR shall be subject to a restoration obligation on the part of LESSEE. Any alterations completed by LESSOR shall be LESSOR's "building standard" unless noted otherwise. LESSOR shall have the right at any time to change the arrangement of parking areas, stairs, walkways or other common areas of the building of which the leased premises are a part provided that such changes do not materially diminish the aesthetics or operational ease of LESSEE's leasehold interest. 10. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLEASING: LESSEE shall not assign this lease or sublet or allow any other firm or individual to occupy the whole or any part of the leased premises without LESSOR's prior written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. LESSOR will respond to LESSEE's request within thirty (30) days. LESSOR shall not be able to with hold approval for assignment or sublet based on the fact that LESSOR has prime space within the park available for lease. Notwithstanding such assignment or subleasing, LESSEE shall remain liable to LESSOR for the payment of all rent and for the full performance of the covenants and conditions of this lease. LESSEE shall pay LESSOR promptly for reasonable legal and administrative expenses incurred by LESSOR in connection with any consent requested hereunder by LESSEE. Such approval shall not be required if such assignment or sublease is to a parent, subsidiary or other organization affiliated with LESSEE. In the event such assignment or sublease shall result in excess profits after reasonable administrative expenses have been deducted, such profits shall be split equally between LESSEE and LESSOR. Said administrative costs shall not include vacancy, promotional materials, A & E fees, permits or commissions that are related to said sublease. 11. SUBORDINATION: This lease shall be subject and subordinate to any and all mortgages and other instruments in the nature of a mortgage, now or at any time hereafter, and LESSEE shall, when requested, within thirty (30) days of receipt by LESSEE execute and deliver such written instruments as shall be necessary to show the subordination of this lease to said mortgages or other such instruments in the nature of a mortgage. LESSOR shall obtain a non-disturbance agreement for any pertinent mortgagee or future mortgagee the substance of which shall state that LESSEE shall not be disturbed and LESSEE's leasehold interest shall not be diminished in terms of operational or contractual benefits in its possession of the leased premises as long as LESSEE is not in default in the terms of this lease. 12. LESSOR'S ACCESS: LESSOR or agents of LESSOR may at any reasonable time enter to view the leased premises, to make repairs and alterations as LESSOR should elect to do for the leased premises, the common areas or any other portions of the building of which the leased premises are a part, to make repairs which LESSEE is required but has failed to do after applicable notice and cure period and to show the leased premises to others. LESSOR agrees to give 24 hour notice except for making emergency repairs and be subject to LESSEE's security requirements. LESSOR's access for marketing purposes should be limited to the last six months of the lease term or as soon as LESSEE has given notice of its intention to vacate. 13. SNOW REMOVAL: The plowing of snow from all roadways, accessways and unobstructed parking and loading areas shall be at the sole responsibility of LESSOR and paid for by LESSEE subject to the provisions of 4.1 herein. The control of snow and ice on all steps serving the leased premises and all other areas not readily accessible to plows shall be the sole responsibility of LESSEE. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, LESSEE shall hold LESSOR and OWNER harmless from any and all claims by LESSEE's agents, representatives, employees, callers of invitees for damage or personal injury resulting in any way from snow or ice an any area serving the leased premises except in the case of negligence or willful misconduct caused by LESSOR. 14. ACCESS AND PARKING: LESSEE shall have the right without additional charge to use parking facilities provided for the leased premises in common with others entitled to the use thereof. Said parking areas plus any stairs, walkways, elevators or other common areas shall in all cases be considered a part of the leased premises to the extent that they are utilized by LESSEE, or LESSEE's employees, agents, callers or invitees. LESSEE will not obstruct in any manner any portion of the building or the walkways or approaches to said building. LESSEE will use reasonable efforts and LESSEE will not permit any employee or business invitee to violate this or any other covenant or obligation of LESSEE. Unregistered or disabled vehicles, or storage trailers of any type, may not be parked at any time except that construction trailers and dumpsters and equipment on the grounds are expressly permitted and must be removed within ten (10) days of substantial completion of construction. LESSOR shall not be responsible for providing any security services for the leased premises. 15. FIRE INSURANCE: LESSEE shall not knowingly permit any use of the leased premises which will adversely affect or make voidable any insurance on the property of which the leased premises are a part, or on the contents of said property, or which shall be contrary to any law or regulation from time to time established by the Insurance Services Office (or successor), local Fire Department, LESSOR's insurer, or any similar body. LESSEE shall on demand reimburse LESSOR, all extra insurance premiums determined to have been caused by LESSEE's use of the leased premises which currently to LESSOR's knowledge does not adversely effect insurance rates or make insurance voidable. 16. BROKERAGE: LESSEE warrants and represents to LESSOR that LESSEE has utilized only The Staubach Company as their exclusive representative with respect to this lease and LESSEE agrees to indemnify LESSOR against any brokerage claims arising from an alleged dual representation of LESSEE under this lease. LESSOR warrants and represents to LESSEE that LESSOR has employed Stephen M. Frohn as agent in connection with the letting of the leased premises. LESSOR shall pay brokerage commission The Staubach Company as the exclusive representative of LESSEE in the amount of one dollar and eighty eight cents ($1.88) per rentable square foot leased at 16 Jonspin Road and one dollar and & fifty cents ($1.50) per rentable square fact at 65 Jonspin Road. Such commissions shall be due and payable to The Staubach Company and Stephen Frohn in full upon mutual execution and ratification by LESSOR and LESSEE of such a new lease. 17. SIGNS: LESSOR authorizes, and LESSEE, at LESSEE's expense agrees to erect signage for the leased premises in accordance with the by laws and ordinances of Town of Wilmington for style, size, location, etc. LESSEE shall obtain the prior written consent of LESSOR which shall not be unreasonably withheld or conditioned or delayed before erecting any sign on the leased premises and any permits required by the Town of Wilmington. LESSEE may install comparable signage for 65 Jonspin Road as exists at 16 Jonspin Road subject to local and municipal ordinances. All signage rights are assignable to assignees and/or successors of LESSEE. 18. DEFAULT AND ACCELERATION OF RENT: In the event that: (a) LESSEE shall default in the observance or performance of any of LESSEE's covenants, agreements, or obligations hereunder, other than substantial monetary payments as provided below, and such default shall not be corrected within ten (10) days after written notice thereof or (b) LESSEE vactes the leased premises, then LESSOR shall have the right thereafter, while such default continues and without demand or further notice, to re-enter and take possession of the leased premises, to declare the term of this lease ended, and to remove LESSEE's effects, without being guilty of any manner of trespass, provided such LESSOR entry complies with all applicable statutes and without prejudice to any remedies which might be otherwise used for arrears of rent or other default or breach of the lease. If LESSEE shall default in the payment of the rent taxes, or any substantial invoice for goods and/or services or other sum herein specified, and such default shall continue for ten (10) days after written notice thereof, and, because both parties agree that nonpayment of said sums when due is a substantial breach of the lease, and, because the payment of rent in monthly installments is for the sole benefit and convenience of LESSEE, then in addition to the foregoing remedies the entire balance of rent which is due hereunder shall become immediately due and payable as liquidated damages. LESSOR, without being under any obligation to do so and without thereby waving any default may remedy same for the account and at the expense of LESSEE. If LESSOR pays or incurs any obligations payment of money in connection therewith such sums paid or obligations incurred plus interest and costs, shall be paid to LESSOR by LESSEE as additional rent. Any sums received by LESSOR from or on behalf of LESSEE at any time shall be applied first to any unamortized improvements completed for LESSEE's occupancy, then to offset any outstanding invoice or other payment due to LESSOR, with the balance applied to outstanding rent. LESSEE agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fees and/or administrative costs incurred by LESSOR in enforcing any or all obligations of LESSEE under this lease at any time provided that LESSOR is the prevailing party. LESSEE shall pay LESSOR interest at the rate of eighteen (18%) percent per annum on any payment from LESSEE to LESSOR which is past due. 19. NOTICE: Any notice from LESSOR to LESSEE relating to the leased premises or to the occupancy thereof shall be deemed duly served when served by constables or sent to the leased premises by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to LESSEE Attention: Facilities Manager.. Any notice from LESSEE to LESSOR relating to the leased premises or to the occupancy thereof shall be deemed duly served when served by constable or delivered to LESSOR by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to LESSOR at 745 Concord Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138 or at LESSOR's last designated address. No oral notice or representation shall have any force or effect. Time is of the essence in service of any notice. 20. OCCUPANCY: in the event that LESSEE takes possession of said leased premises prior to the start of said term, LESSEE will perform and observe all of LESSEE's covenants from the date upon which LESSEE takes possession except the obligation for the payment of extra rent for any period of less than one month. Provided that LESSEE gives to LESSOR not less than six (6) months advance written notice prior to the end of the initial lease term, LESSEE will have a one (1) time right to holdover in the Premises at the end of the initial lease term for three (3) months at 100 % of the then current Base Rent and Additional Rent in effect immediately prior to lease expiration. After the aforementioned three (3) month period, the Base Rent will be 150% of the immediately prior Base Rent and 100 % of the then current Additional Rent in effect immediately prior to the expiration of the holdover period. Holdover thereafter shall be on a month-to-month basis terminable by either party with ninety (90) days prior notice. All other terms of this lease shall remain in effect during this holdover period, it being understood between the parties that such extended occupancy is as a tenant at sufferance and is solely for the benefit and convenience of LESSEE and as such has greater rental value. LESSEE's control or occupancy of all or any part of the leased premise beyond noon an the last day of any monthly rental period shall constitute LESSEE's occupancy for an entire additional month, and increased rent as provided in this section shall be due and payable immediately in advance. LESSOR's acceptance of any payment for LESSEE during such extended occupancy shall not alter LESSEE's status as a tenant at sufferance. 21. FIRE PREVENTION: LESSEE agrees to use every reasonable precaution against fire and agrees to provide and maintain approved, labeled fire extinguishers, emergency lighting equipment and exit signs and complete any other modifications within the leased premises as required or recommended by the Insurance Services Office (or successor organization), OSHA, the local Fire Department, or any similar body. 22. OUTSIDE AREA: No goods, equipment, or things of any type or description shall be held or stored outside the leased premises at any time without prior written consent from LESSOR. Placement of construction trailers and related dumpsters and equipment on the grounds are permitted during construction projects in a designated area and must be removed within ten (10) days of substantial completion. LESSOR consents to the existing LN 2 Tank and the existing trash compactor unit. Any additional goods equipment or things left outside the leased premises without LESSOR's prior written consent shall be deemed abandoned and may be removed at LESSEE's expense with 30 days prior notice by LESSOR. 23. ENVIRONMENT: LESSEE will so conduct and operate the leased premises as not to interfere in any way with the use and enjoyment of other portions of the same or neighboring buildings by others by reason of odors, smoke, smells, noise, pets, accumulation of garbage or trash, vermin or other pests, and will at its expense employ a professional pest control service if necessary. LESSEE agrees to maintain efficient and effective devices for preventing damage to heating equipment from solvents, degreasers, cutting oils, propellants, etc. which may be present at the leased premises. No hazardous materials or wastes shall be stored, disposed of, or allowed to remain at the leased premises at any time, and LESSEE shall be solely responsible for any and all corrosion or other damage associated with the use, storage and/or disposal of same by LESSEE. LESSOR recognizes the LESSEE uses and stores on site certain controlled and hazardous substances in the ordinary course of its business and such continued use will at all times be permitted subject to all local, state, and federal laws copies of permits and licenses shall be delivered to LESSOR upon receipt. 24. RESPONSIBILITY: Except in the case of negligence, willful misconduct of breach of lease by LESSOR, LESSOR shall not be held liable to anyone for loss or damage caused in any way by the use, leakage, seepage or escape of water from any source, or for the cessation of any service rendered customary to said premises or buildings, or agreed to by the terms of this lease, due to any accident, the making of repairs, alterations or improvement, labor difficulties, weather conditions, mechanical breakdowns, trouble or scarcity in obtaining fuel electricity, service or supplies from the sources from which they are usually obtained for said building or any cause beyond LESSOR's immediate control. Not withstanding the forgiving LESSOR agrees to use its reasonable best efforts to restore such services to the leased premises in a prompt and timely manner. 25. SURRENDER: LESSEE shall at the termination of this lease remove all of LESSEE's goods and effects from the leased premises. LESSEE shall deliver to LESSOR the leased premises and all keys and locks thereto, all fixtures and equipment connected therewith, and all alterations, additions and improvements made to or upon the leased premises, whether completed by LESSEE, LESSOR or others, including but not limited to any offices partitions, window blinds, floor coverings (including computer floors), plumbing fixtures, air conditioning equipment and ductwork of any type, exhaust fans or heaters, water coolers, burglar alarms, telephone wiring, telephone equipment, air or gas distribution piping, compressors, overhead cranes, hoists, trolleys or conveyors, counters, shelving or signs attached to walls or floors, all electrical work, including but not limited to lighting fixtures of any type, wiring, conduit, EMT, transformers, distribution panels, raceways, outlets and disconnects, and furnishings or equipment which have been bolted, welded, nailed, screwed, glued or otherwise attached to any wall, floor or ceiling, or which have been directly wired to any portion of the electrical system or which have been plumbed to the water supply, drainage or venting systems serving the leased premises. LESSEE shall deliver the leased premises sanitized and/or decontaminated from any chemicals or other contaminants, and broom clean and in the same condition as they were at the commencement of this lease or any prior lease between the parties for the leased premises, or as they were modified during said term with LESSOR's written consent reasonable wear and tear and damage by fire or other casualty only excepted. In the event of LESSEE's failure to remove any LESSEE's property from the leased premises upon termination of the lease, LESSOR is hereby authorized, without liability to LESSEE for loss or damage thereto, and at the sole risk of LESSEE, to remove and store any such property at LESSEE's expense, or to retain same under LESSOR's control, or to sell at public or private sale (without notice), any or all of the property not so removed and to apply the net proceeds of such sale to the payment of any sum due hereunder, or to destroy such abandoned property. In no case shall the leased premises be deemed surrendered to LESSOR until the termination date provided herein or such other date as may be specified in a written agreement between the parties, notwithstanding the delivery of any keys to LESSOR. 26. GENERAL: (a) The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this lease shall not affect or render invalid or unenforceable any other provision hereof (b) The obligations of this lease shall run with the land, and this lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, except that LESSOR and OWNER shall be liable only for obligations occurring while current LESSOR, OWNER, or master LESSEE are owners of the premises. (c) Any action or proceeding arising out of the subject matter of this lease shall be brought by LESSEE within one year after the cause of action has accrued and only in a court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (d) If LESSOR is not the owner (OWNER) of the leased premises, LESSOR represents that said OWNER has agreed to be bound by the terms of this lease unless LESSEE is in default hereof. (e) This lease is made and delivered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall be interpreted, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws thereof. (f) This lease was the result of negotiations between parties of equal bargaining strength, and when executed by both parties shall constitute the entire agreement between said parties. No other oral or written representation shall have any effect hereon, and this agreement may not be altered, extended or amended except by written agreement attached hereto or as otherwise provided herein. (g) Notwithstanding any other statements herein, LESSOR makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the suitability of the leased premises for LESSEE's intended use. (h) LESSEE agrees that if LESSOR does not deliver possession of the leased premises as herein provided for any reason, LESSOR shall not be liable for any damages to LESSEE for such failure, but LESSOR agrees to use reasonable efforts to deliver possession to LESSEE at the earliest possible date, and a proportionate abatement of rent for such time as LESSEE may be deprived of possession of said leased premises shall be LESSEE's sole remedy. (i) Neither the submission of this lease form, not the prospective acceptance of the security deposit and/or rent shall constitute a reservation of or option for the leased premises, or an offer to lease, it being expressly understood and agreed that this lease shall not bind either party in any manner whatsoever until it has been executed by both parties. (j) LESSEE shall not be entitled to exercise any option contained herein if LESSEE is in default of any terms or conditions hereof. (k) The headings in this lease are for convenience only and shall not be considered part of the terms hereof. LESSEE's trade fixtures shall not be construed to be a part of this paragraph. All improvements constructed by LESSOR shall not be subject to restoration. 27. SECUIUTY AGREEMENT: LESSEE hereby grants LESSOR a continuing security interest in all existing or hereafter acquired property of LESSEE which is in the leased premises to secure the payment of rent, the cost of leasehold improvements, and the performance of any other obligations of LESSEE under this lease. Default in payment or performance of any of LESSEE's obligations hereunder is a default under this Security Agreement, and shall entitle LESSOR to immediately exercise all of the rights and remedies of a Secured Party under the Uniform Commercial Code. LESSEE also agrees to execute a UCC-1 Financing Statement and any other financing agreement required by LESSOR in connection with this security interest. 28. WAIVERS, ETC.: No consent or waiver, express or implied, by LESSOR, or LESSEE to or of any breach of any covenant, condition or duty of LESSEE or LESSOR shall be construed as a consent or waiver to or of any other breach of the same or any other covenant, condition or duty. If LESSEE is several persons, several corporations or a partnership, LESSEE's obligations are joint or partnership and also several. Unless repugnant to the context, "LESSOR" and "LESSEE" mean the person or persons, natural or corporate, named above as LESSOR and as LESSEE respectively, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 29. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: 29.1 LESSOR FUNDED WORK TO THE PREMISES -16 JONSPIN ROAD (a) None. Premises to be lease "as-is". (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing in (a) above, LESSOR will at all times during the initial lease term be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for repairs and maintenance of 1.) base building structural systems 2.) roof system, and 3.) base building mechanical and electric systems, (c) It is agreed that with respect to all construction work to be done in the Premises that does not involve specialty technical expertise uniquely related to LESSEE's business, that LESSOR acting as a general contractor will be notified by Lessee of such planned work and be invited to competitively bid on all such planned construction work. While Tenant will in no event be obligated to award any such work to Lessor Lessee agrees to give Lessor fair and objective consideration for the award of such work that does not involve specialty technical expertise uniquely related to LESSEE's business. 29.2 (a) LESSOR agrees to use its best efforts to assist LESSEE in securing local and/or municipal approvals for an expansion to the base building per LESSEE's concept drawings attached hereto as EXHIBIT B - TENANTS BUILDING ENPANSION. To the extent that such approval is achieved, LESSOR agrees to work in good faith with LESSEE to develop and approve plans and specifications to undertake such expansion to the base building. (b) Such base building expansion is to be undertaken in substantial accordance with to-be-developed building plans which are to be jointly created by LESSOR and LESSEE and reasonably approved by LESSOR. LESSEE will provide and manage all planning and construction services related to such expansion. LESSOR will respond to LESSEE's request for plan approval within ten (10) days. (c) All costs related to planning and construction such building expansion are to borne solely by LESSEE. (d) In consideration of 29.2c above, LESSOR shall not assess on LESSEE any rental charge, CAM charge, use charge, or any other charge related to LESSEE construction and use of the expansion area during the initial leased term or during subsequent renewal periods. Notwithstanding the forgoing, LESSEE will pay as Additional Rent any increased real estate taxes that are assessed on Park or Leased Premises as a result of such new construction undertaken by LESSEE. (e) It agreed that with respect to all construction work to be done in the Premises that does not involve specialty technical expertise uniquely related to LESSEE's business, that LESSOR acting as a general contractor will be notified by LESSEE of such planned work and be invited to competitively bid on all such planned construction work. While LESSEE will in no event be obligated to award such work to LESSOR, LESSEE agrees to give to LESSOR fair and objective consideration for the award of such work that does not involve specialty technical expertise uniquely related to LESSEE's business. (f) It is agreed and understood that LESSOR may elect at its sole discretion, to have LESSEE remove the subject expansion to the base building and restore the building and the site to substantially its similar condition as existed prior to the construction of such expansion area. LESSOR's right hereunder shall commence when LESSEE's lease or renewal period terminates. All costs associated with such removal and restoration shall be borne solely by LESSEE. This provisions of paragraph 29.2e. above apply under this provision. 29.3 LESSOR FUNDED WORK - 65 JONSPIN READ (a) As part of and included in the Base Rent, Lessor shall provide to Lessee a refurbishment allowance of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per rentable square foot ($47,792.25) to be used to perform any refurbishment items required by Lessee in the Premises. Such funds shall be made available to Lessee by Lessor as of the date that Lessor and Lessee have mutually executed and ratified a legally binding agreement. (b) Lessor will at all times during the initial lease term be responsible, at its sole cost and expense for repairs and maintenance of 1.) base building structural system, 2.) roof system, and 3.) base building mechanical and electric systems, (c) same as 29.2 above. 29.4 LESSEE FUNDED INTERIOR RENOVATIONS (a) LESSOR agrees to use its best efforts to assist LESSEE in securing local and/or municipal approvals for the contemplated interior renovations to the premises. (b) Such interior renovations are to be undertaken in substantial accordance with developed renovation plans which are to be created by LESSEE and reasonably approved by LESSOR. LESSEE will provide and manage all planning and construction services related to such expansion. (c) All costs related to planning and constructing such renovations are to borne solely by LESSEE notwithstanding the provisions above, except as provided above in 29.3. 29.5 Lessee shall have the Right of First Refusal on all other space controlled and/or owned by LESSOR in the Park which may become available during the lease term or any extensions thereto at a Base Rent equal to the lessor of 1.) 95% of then current market leasing rate being offered to prospective tenants or 2.) the then current Base Rent in effect for LESSEE plus one dollar ($1.00) per square foot. LESSEE shall have five (5) business days from the date of notice of space availability by LESSOR to LESSEE to elect to lease such additional space. LESSOR shall have no responsibility to the Staubach Company for any future commissions regarding LAM Research Corporation with regards to additional space. 29.6 LESSEE shall have the right to renew the lease for one(1) additional five (5) year term at 95% of the then prevailing Fair Market Value including adjustment being made for all applicable market concessions and transaction expense for comparable industrial real estate locate in Wilmington, Massachusetts. A three (3) broker arbitration method shall be used for renewal rent determination if LESSOR and LESSEE fail to agree on fair market rental rate. 29.7 It is hereby understood and agreed that LESSOR agrees subject to plan approval by LESSOR and the Town of Wilmington to allow LESSEE to construct additional mezzanine level office space of approximately 6,600 square feet to be determined when construction is completed at 65 Jonspin Road. In consideration of LESSEE paying one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of construction and improvements, LESSOR will not charge LESSEE rent for this space during the initial term of this lease. However, during the renewal and/or extension of this lease the rental rate for the newly constructed mezzanine level space and only this space shall be added to the base rent at a pre determined rate of $5.25 per square foot. LESSEE will be responsible for all additional CAM costs for this space during the initial term and/or any extensions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LESSOR AND LESSEE have hereunto set their hands and common seals and intended to be legally bound hereby this ___day of _____________19____. LESSOR: LESSEE: By: By: ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- Judith A Spinelli, Owner President EXHIBIT A COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE CHARGES To help determine the common area base charges an average of snow plowing costs were taken from the Winter of 93/94 and the Winter of 94/95. In addition, the current contracts from Lam Research were also taken into consideration therefore the following price structure will be in effect for the new lease term. Landscaping .18p.s.f Snowplowing .15p.s.f. Insurance Real Estate Taxes Tenant's Responsibility EX-21 3 EXHIBIT 21 EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC. The following is a list of Ultratech Stepper Inc.'s subsidiaries including their states of incorporation as of December 31, 1998:
SUBSIDIARIES STATE AND COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION ------------ ----------------------------------- Integrated Lithography Systems, Inc. Korea Integrated Semiconductor Solutions, Ltd. United Kingdom Ultratech Stepper International, Inc. State of Delaware, USA Ultratech Stepper UK Limited United Kingdom Ultratech Stepper Foreign Sales Corp. Barbados Ultratech Kabushiki Kaisha Japan Ultratech Stepper East, Inc. (formerly UTS Acquisition State of Delaware, USA Sub, Inc., Ultratech Capital, Inc., and Ultratech Stepper Capital, Inc.) Ultratech Stepper (Thailand) Co. LTD. Thailand U.S. Advanced Lithography LLC State of Delaware, USA
EX-23 4 EXHIBIT 23 EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-51117 and 333-33197) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP San Jose, California March 30, 1999 EX-24 5 EXHIBIT 24 EXHIBIT 24 POWER OF ATTORNEY The undersigned directors and officers of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, hereby constitute and appoint Arthur W. Zafiropoulo and William G. Leunis, III, and each of them with full power to act without the other, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead in the undersigned's capacity as an officer and/or director of the Company, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned an annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (the "Report"), under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to file such Report, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done and to take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required of, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of March, 1999.
Signature Title Date /s/ ARTHUR W. ZAFIROPOULO Chairman of the Board of Directors, March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer (Principal Arthur W. Zafiropoulo Executive Officer) and President /s/ WILLIAM G. LEUNIS, III Senior Vice President, Finance, March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer, Secretary William G. Leunis, III and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) /s/ KENNETH A. LEVY Director March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Kenneth A. Levy /s/ GREGORY HARRISON Director March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Gregory Harrison /s/ LARRY R. CARTER Director March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Larry R. Carter /s/ THOMAS D. GEORGE Director March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Thomas D. George /s/ JOEL GEMUNDER Director March 30, 1999 - ------------------------------ Joel Gemunder
EX-27 6 EXHIBIT 27
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRATECH STEPPER INC., FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 1,000 3-MOS YEAR DEC-31-1998 DEC-31-1998 OCT-01-1998 JAN-01-1998 DEC-31-1998 DEC-31-1998 54,142 54,142 91,965 91,965 14,095 14,095 2,196 2,196 36,750 36,750 201,856 201,856 45,253 45,253 21,934 21,934 245,935 245,935 35,439 35,439 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 210,130 210,130 245,935 245,935 14,664 65,569 18,921 81,457 21,192 72,424 24,548 82,776 (1,702) 31,762 4,816 8,351 153 445 (14,775) (64,126) 0 6,182 (14,775) (57,944) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (14,775) (57,944) (0.70) (2.76) (0.70) (2.76)
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----