CORRESPONDENCE

Set forth below are the responses of PMC Commercial Trust (“PMC Commercial”) to the Staff’s comment letter dated September 27, 2013 (the “Comment Letter”) regarding the referenced Registration Statement on Form S-4.

For your convenience, we have set forth below the Staff’s comments followed by PMC Commercial’s responses thereto in bold typeface. The numbered paragraphs and headings below correspond to the numbered paragraphs and headings contained in the Comment Letter. The page numbers referenced below refer to the page numbers of Amendment No. 1 to the referenced Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the “Registration Statement”) which is filed herewith. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to such terms in the Registration Statement.

To expedite your review, we are sending to you via FedEx a copy of this letter, together with clean and marked copies of the Registration Statement showing changes made to the initial filing. As noted in our response below to Comment #5, we are also delivering to you under separate cover and pursuant to Securities Act Rule 418 materials responsive to such Comment.

We confirm that PMC Commercial will file with the Commission all materials used in connection with the solicitation of proxies in compliance with Regulation 14A. Please note that the proposed form of proxy card is attached as Exhibit 99.9 to the Registration Statement.

The “board book” presented by Sandler O’Neill to the Board of Trust Managers of PMC Commercial on July 5, 2013 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. We confirm that this board book reflects the only presentation materials submitted by Sandler O’Neill to PMC Commercial in support of its fairness opinion delivered to the Board of Trust Managers. Please be advised that it is PMC Commercial’s understanding that no fairness opinion or “board books” or similar documentation were submitted in connection with CIM REIT’S approval of the proposed transaction. We believe that the information required by Item 1015 of Regulation M-A is disclosed under the caption “THE MERGER—Opinion of PMC Commercial’s Financial Advisor” beginning on page 75.

The Declaration of Trust of PMC Commercial Trust currently provides for 100,000,000 authorized shares of beneficial interest, consisting of common shares and “such other types of classes of securities of the Trust as the Trust Managers may create and authorize from time to time and designate as representing a beneficial interest in the Trust”. At June 30, 2013, approximately 10,596,000 PMC Commercial Common Shares were outstanding. The only other authorized class of shares of beneficial interest will be the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares, no shares of which are currently outstanding. Under the Merger Agreement, 22,000,003 PMC Commercial Common Shares and 65,028,571 PMC Commercial Preferred Shares will be issued to the CIM Parties. The PMC Commercial Common Shares and Preferred Shares to be issued to the CIM Parties in the Merger, when added to the currently outstanding PMC Commercial Common Shares, will be within the total authorized shares.

The Statement of Designation of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares has been duly authorized by the Board of Trust Managers and will be filed with the Office of the County Clerk of Dallas County, Texas immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. The issuance of the PMC Commercial Common Shares and Preferred Shares in connection with the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement, which includes the issuance of PMC Commercial Common Shares upon conversion of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares, has been duly approved by the Board of Trust Managers. These are the only actions required under the Declaration of Trust and the Texas Business Organizations Code to authorize the issuance of these shares to the CIM Parties in connection with the Merger. Neither action requires a vote of the shareholders on the Merger or on the issuance of shares (although, as noted in response to Comment #4 below, shareholder approval of the issuance of such shares is required by the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE MKT). Therefore, upon the issuance of the PMC Commercial Common Shares and Preferred Shares in the Merger itself pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, such shares will be duly authorized and validly issued.

Section 200.102 of the Texas Business Organizations Code expressly authorizes a real estate investment trust (REIT) to set the “terms and conditions of a conversion” of a class of shares in its Certificate of Formation (the Declaration of Trust). Under Section 5(a) of the Statement of Designation of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares, which when filed will constitute part of the Certificate of Formation of PMC Commercial Trust, those shares are not, and will not be, convertible

until “there are sufficient authorized but unissued shares to convert all of the [PMC Commercial] Preferred Shares into Common Shares”, and, when that condition is satisfied, the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares will automatically be converted into PMC Commercial Common Shares. Thus, at the time of issuance of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares, the PMC Commercial Common Shares to be issued upon conversion of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares will not be capable of being converted or issued because the condition will not have then been satisfied. Upon the approval and filing of the amendment to the Declaration of Trust to increase the number of authorized PMC Commercial Common Shares, the PMC Commercial Common Shares issuable upon conversion of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares will be duly authorized. When the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares are thereupon automatically converted into PMC Commercial Common Shares, those PMC Commercial Common Shares will be validly issued. Thus at the time the PMC Commercial Common Shares to be issued upon conversion of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares are issued, they will be duly authorized and validly issued.

Should the amendment to the Declaration of Trust increasing the number of PMC Commercial authorized shares not become effective for any reason, the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares will simply remain outstanding as preferred shares. They will not then be currently convertible into PMC Commercial Common Shares, and no PMC Commercial Common Shares will be issuable with respect to them until that condition is satisfied. Thus, no PMC Commercial Common Shares will be outstanding at any time that have not theretofore been duly authorized and validly issued.

The merging parties involved in the Merger are CIM Merger Sub, which is a Delaware limited liability company, and PMC Merger Sub, which is also a Delaware limited liability company. While PMC Commercial is a party to the Merger Agreement, it is not a constituent entity to the Merger and is not a merging party. Under Section 18-209(b) of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, the only persons whose votes are required to authorize the Merger are the members of the merging entities. In this case, the sole member of CIM Merger Sub is CIM REIT, and the sole member of PMC Merger Sub is PMC Commercial. The Delaware Act does not “look through” a member to require a vote of the holders of equity interests in that member for the approval of this Merger.

We further confirm that neither the Texas Business Organizations Code nor the Declaration of Trust contains any provisions that would independently require the holders of shares of PMC Commercial to approve a merger of a subsidiary of PMC Commercial. Further, the Merger Agreement contains no such provision.

Because of the number of shares that are being issued in connection with the Merger, the holders of PMC Commercial Common Shares are required by the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE MKT to approve the issuance of the PMC Commercial Common Shares and PMC Commercial Preferred Shares to be issued pursuant to the Merger Agreement. That vote is being sought pursuant to the Proxy Statement / Prospectus.

We have provided support for the quantitative and qualitative business and industry data under separate cover pursuant to Securities Act Rule 418 using cross reference pages from the original registration statement filing on August 30, 2013 (which we trust is acceptable to the Staff, as no new business or industry data was added in the Registration Statement filed herewith). In addition, we have highlighted the specific portions of that supporting data that we relied upon for your ease of reference. We confirm, on behalf of CIM Urban, that the third party data included in the Registration Statement were not prepared for or commissioned by CIM Group (or PMC Commercial or its affiliates), except that the Smith Travel Research, Inc. (STR) reports relating to CIM Urban’s limited number of hotel properties were commissioned for those properties in the ordinary course of managing those properties either by CIM Urban or the related hotel management company.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, we have (a) added a list in Annex A, beginning on page A-48, identifying the contents of all omitted schedules and supplements and (b) added language to the Exhibit Index stating that PMC Commercial will furnish a copy of any omitted schedules to the Commission upon request.

The parties have determined not to list the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares, and CIM Group no longer intends to transfer PMC Commercial Preferred Shares to its affiliates. Accordingly, we have revised the disclosure in “ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT” at the beginning of the proxy statement/prospectus and throughout the proxy statement/prospectus (including the substantive discussions on pages 86 and 105) to remove references to the listing of the PMC Commercial Preferred Shares and the distribution of such shares to affiliates; we have also deleted the “PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION” section.

We have added disclosure on the cover, as well as at the beginning of Q&A on page 2 (the first page thereof following the indicated definitions), with respect to the vote of the holders of PMC Commercial Common Shares required to approve the transaction.

The disclosure on page 6 has been expanded to discuss the fair value methodology and the significant assumptions used in the valuation.

The Summary Term Sheet on page 18 has been expanded to include information on the material transaction fees that have been or are expected to be incurred. The updated transaction fees have been incorporated into the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements beginning on page 25.

The disclosure on page 18 of the Registration Statement has been revised to briefly describe and, where possible, quantify the interests of the Trust Managers and executive officers that are different from, or in addition to, interests of other shareholders.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the disclosure on page 16 to identify the executive officers and Trust Managers and describe the management structure post-Merger and included a cross reference to the more detailed sections in the proxy statement/prospectus.

We have expanded the disclosure in the preliminary purchase price allocation table to include a calculation of the total purchase price based on the shares of PMC Commercial outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and utilizing the closing price as of October 8, 2013 of PMC Commercial. The impact of the updated purchase price has been reflected in the pro forma financial statements and related footnote disclosures.

We followed ASC 805-40-30-2 in concluding that the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred by the accounting acquirer (in this case, CIM Urban, the legal acquiree) for its interest in the accounting acquiree (PMC Commercial, the legal acquirer) is based on the number of equity interests CIM Urban would have had to issue to give the shareholders of PMC Commercial the same percentage equity interest in the combined entity that results from the reverse acquisition. Based on the structure of the Merger, such amount was deemed to be the equivalent of the outstanding shares of PMC Commercial. Furthermore, we determined that the fair value of the shares of the accounting acquiree (PMC Commercial) should be used to measure consideration transferred since the value of PMC’s equity interests are more reliably measurable than the value of CIM Urban’s equity interest due to the public market for PMC Commercial’s shares and the publicly available information on CIM Urban, as provided in the initial registration statement filed on August 30, 2013. Accordingly, we

followed ASC 805-30-30-2 in determining the total consideration by using a current-date (October 8, 2013) closing price of PMC Commercial’s shares. The final determination of the purchase price will be based on the price of PMC Commercial shares at the time of the closing of the transaction.

As noted in our response to Comment #13, we have updated the pro forma financial statements to utilize the closing price as of October 8, 2013 of PMC Commercial in the calculation of the total purchase price. The impact of the updated purchase price has been reflected in the pro forma financial statements and related footnote disclosures. As noted in Comment #13, in accordance with ASC 805, the final determination of the purchase price will be based on the price of PMC Commercial shares at the time of the closing of the transaction.

Management of PMC Commercial evaluated the outstanding options and determined that the Merger triggers a reconsideration event. Accordingly, for the initial filing of the registration statement on August 30, 2013, the 98,500 options that remained outstanding as of June 30, 2013 were evaluated using the Black-Scholes model and the expense related to the reconsideration event was approximately $175,000. In addition, the 6,666 shares of outstanding restricted share awards that would vest upon closing of the Merger had approximately $25,000 of remaining unamortized expense relating to those restricted share awards. The aggregate of $200,000 was considered as part of the estimated transaction costs. Note (C) has been updated to indicate that other transaction costs includes this component of compensation expense.

For the Registration Statement filed herewith, based on the purchase price adjustment to $8.78 per share, the expense related to the reconsideration event has been adjusted to $75,000 and the aggregate compensation cost of $100,000 has been reflected as such in the revisions to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.

Management of PMC Commercial Trust also identified that an adjustment to the previously issued Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements was necessary to reflect the consideration to be provided to executives under the amended employment agreements which would become effective upon consummation of the Merger. As part of the employment agreements, Messrs. Salit and Berlin (the “PMC Executives”) are to be awarded fixed stock awards of 300,000 and 225,000 shares, respectively, on January 1, 2016. The service period for the PMC Executives is anticipated to be approximately two years. The value of the awards was determined to be $3.28 per share or $1,722,000. The value per share was based on the per share price of the common shares of beneficial interest on October 8, 2013, or $8.78 per share, less the special dividend of $5.50 per share. For purposes of the pro forma presentation, this aggregate compensation expense is amortized over the two-year service period. Accordingly, an adjustment has been made to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements to reflect compensation expense of $861,000 and $431,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

PMC Commercial’s loans receivable are held for investment and as such are carried at their unamortized principal balance less net loan origination fees, discounts and loan loss reserves. PMC Commercial records loan loss reserves based on a process which identifies and evaluates exposure to probable loan losses, under both ASC 310-10 (for loans with specifically identified impairments) and ASC 450-20 (for the determination of general reserves when it is determined that it is probable that a loss has occurred in the portfolio and an estimate of the loss can be reasonably estimated).

An incurred loan loss recognition model is inherently different than a full fair value estimate utilized for purchase accounting purposes. It should be noted that none of the differences in the underlying assumptions is related to the credit risk inherent in the portfolio. CIM Urban’s preliminary valuation of PMC Commercial’s commercial loan portfolio is based upon a market participant’s approach to determining fair value of the loan portfolio. A market participant’s approach to valuation, in the absence of similar active trades or a readily ascertainable market value, differs from PMC Commercial’s recorded value of the loan portfolio in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). CIM Urban’s valuation incorporates various assumptions including, but not limited to, expected holding periods, expected rates of returns, discount rates, default rates, and related market interest rates. CIM Urban’s assumptions, primarily as it relates to selecting an appropriate discount rate to apply in its preliminary valuation model, were influenced by the various strategic alternatives available to a market participant with the long or short term hold decisions to be made with respect to the loan portfolio. All the above were considered by CIM Urban when assessing the appropriate overall discount rate to be used in its fair value determination.

CIM Urban’s preliminary valuation, which utilized a discount rate of 11.3% on the loan portfolio held by the two SBIC entities (PMC Investment Corporation and Western Financial Capital Corporation) and PMC Commercial (the “non-SBA 7(a) loan portfolio”), all of which loans were not originated under the Small Business Administration’s 7(a) Government Guaranteed Loan Program, resulted in a lower preliminary valuation. Based upon general discussions regarding this type of loan portfolio with marketplace participants and considering the strategic alternatives available to a potential buyer with current market risk adjusted expected returns, CIM Urban determined that the non-SBA 7(a) loan portfolio warranted such selected discount rate due to the following risk considerations and market factors:

1. Bulk Sale Discount – Given the small average size of the loans (approximately $1 million), CIM Urban believes that a market participant would determine that it is most efficient to sell the loan portfolio in bulk, which would likely require offering a discount to potential buyers for the complexity associated with inheriting a sizable volume of loans with non-institutional borrowers.

2. Borrowers’ Financial Information – PMC Commercial’s borrowers are predominantly sole proprietors and/or small business owners. As such, financial information related to the borrowers is generally less transparent and may not be readily available.

3. Illiquidity – There are limited comparable loan portfolio market trades given the concentration in the underlying collateral (predominately limited-service hotels), diversified geography of the underlying collateral, borrower profile, and average loan size. As a result, the esoteric nature of the portfolio will require offering a discount to buyers to overcome the illiquidity inherent in the asset.

4. Term to Maturity – The loans in the non-SBA 7(a) loan portfolio have an average term to maturity of approximately 11 years, which is significantly longer than many loans for sale in the marketplace today. As a result, it is likely that an additional discount may be necessary to compensate buyers for the relatively long term to maturity of the loan portfolio.

For the aforementioned reasons, on a preliminary fair value basis that is subject to change, CIM Urban has applied a discount rate employed in valuing PMC Commercial’s non-SBA 7(a) loan portfolio that has resulted in a substantial discount compared to the portfolio as recorded on the

books and records of PMC Commercial. It should be noted that none of the differences in the underlying assumptions is related to the credit risk inherent in the portfolio. A more detailed analysis of the loan portfolio is expected to be completed in conjunction with the final purchase price allocation at Closing, which may include the use of third-party valuation experts.

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of record at the close of the business day prior to the closing of the Merger will receive a special cash dividend of $5.50 per common share payable on or prior to the tenth business day following the effective date of the Merger. Accordingly, the pro forma balance sheet has assumed the declaration of the dividend on the closing date of the Merger. Additionally, as the combined company does not have available cash to fund the dividend, the pro forma financial statements have assumed the receipt of $58,279,000 in cash obtained from CIM Urban’s existing line of credit. In response to the Staff’s comment, we have modified Note 4(D) to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements to further clarify this pro forma adjustment.

For purposes of valuation of the portion of PMC Commercial’s portfolio that has been originated pursuant to the SBA 7(a) government guaranteed loan program and owned by a taxable REIT subsidiary, it was determined that the market rate for the sold portion of loans retained on its books is based on the rate that PMC Commercial would pay to a secondary market purchaser if the loan was sold at par as of the date of valuation. At June 30, 2013 the rate used was 1.375%, which is the rate that was available to PMC Commercial on sales of the government guaranteed portion of the loan. As a result of the value pertaining to the $37.0 million of loans with a weighted average interest rate of 5.97% as of June 30, 2013 that have a government guarantee, there is a net increase in value for the taxable REIT subsidiary.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As disclosed in Note 4(K) to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements, PMC Commercial’s noncontrolling interest represents cumulative preferred stock held by the SBA. The preferred stock was issued by a specialized small business investment company (“SSBIC”) pursuant to the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. The SSBIC which issued the preferred stock is required to be structured as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) solely as a result of the outstanding preferred stock. Additionally, SSBICs have more restrictive lending requirements than many other forms of regulated entities. Accordingly, management believes that a market participant with sufficient liquidity would affect necessary steps to create a more tax efficient structure while also easing certain

lending requirements in an effort to deploy incremental capital to fund loans. Accordingly, management estimated the fair value of the noncontrolling interest at $3.0 million which is equal to the par value of the SSBIC preferred stock.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the risk factor on page 44. CIM Urban’s current leases with government tenants do not permit them to cancel their leases.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, the disclosure has been clarified on page 56 to indicate that no such significant development or repositioning projects are currently planned.

We have revised the risk factor on page 60 to provide the requested disclosure.

As requested, the disclosure under “THE MERGER – Background of the Merger” beginning on page 71 has been revised to include the subject matter of the third party advisor’s due diligence effort (which we now more appropriately refer to as the “third party service provider”). We have referred to the third party service provider that assisted us with financial and tax due diligence, but have not included its specific identity for the reasons discussed below. We have re-characterized the third party service provider’s work product as a summary rather than a report since that is what it was in substance and to remove any implication that it might be a “report” as that term is used in Item 4(b) of Form S-4.

The financial and tax due diligence work performed by the third party service provider was only a part of the overall due diligence effort conducted by PMC Commercial with respect to CIM REIT. Due diligence was also conducted by management, Sandler O’Neill and legal counsel on other aspects of CIM REIT. There was no special significance to the due diligence performed by this third party service provider - it was no more important than that conducted by any of the others engaged in the due diligence effort. The financial and tax due diligence performed by the third party service provider was intended to confirm PMC Commercial’s understanding of certain financial and tax aspects of

CIM REIT. It revealed nothing materially negative about CIM REIT. It was not regarded as material by the Board of Trust Managers and was not cited by it in the Board resolutions approving the transaction.

The reference to due diligence, including this financial and tax due diligence, was initially included because it was part of the process engaged in by PMC Commercial in connection with the transaction, which is described in great detail in “THE MERGER” section of the proxy statement/prospectus. In an effort to provide a complete and accurate picture of the process engaged in by PMC Commercial in connection with the transaction, and the incurring of associated costs, that disclosure mentions in numerous places the due diligence efforts by management, Sandler O’Neill, legal counsel, and by this third party service provider.

We believe the disclosure as revised gives an accurate depiction of the process involved in the transaction, without attaching undue significance to this particular aspect of the due diligence.

Due diligence reports are a normal part of any merger transaction. The results of due diligence are customarily reported to management and summarized for the board in virtually every such transaction. The results of such work, however delivered to management or a board, have not historically been regarded as “reports, opinions or appraisals” as contemplated by Item 4(b) of Form S-4. We respectfully suggest that language implies, and the Item is intended to elicit, expertised material, not routine due diligence work.

In addition, in this case, because nothing materially negative resulted from the third party service provider’s due diligence work, it is not “material” as that term is customarily used and understood under the securities laws. If the summary is not material, it need not be disclosed to comply with the securities laws generally. As to the particular requirements of Form S-4, since it is not material, it cannot be “materially related to the transaction” within the meaning of Item 4(b).

The delivery of the third party service provider’s summary of its due diligence work was presented to the Board of Trust Managers at the July 5 meeting only because the timing of the completion of its work happened to coincide with the time of that meeting. Management, as well as the Board of Trust Managers, had been given ongoing interim briefings as to the results of this due diligence as they progressed, just as they had been receiving briefings from others assisting in due diligence efforts. Because completion of the third party service provider’s work was delayed due to the need for additional input from CIM REIT, it happened to finally conclude at this time. It was, as a matter of ease and efficiency, presented at the meeting rather than to the management separately, as was originally contemplated and was the case with the results of other due diligence. It was not presented at the Board of Trust Managers meeting because it had any special significance.

The third party service provider was selected to do this due diligence work because PMC Commercial has a very small employee staff. PMC Commercial’s management and staff had the competence to do the due diligence work performed by the third party service provider, but they did not have the time to do it in light of ongoing business operations, other due diligence being done by them, and the other demands on their time imposed by the transaction. The third party service provider was engaged not for its special expertise or to render an opinion, but because it could supply the manpower to accomplish routine work in a timely manner.

There is no special significance associated with the identity of the third party service provider, and naming the provider of a summary that is itself not material would not add information that would be material to investors. Therefore, we respectfully request the Staff to allow the reference to the third party service provider without naming it.

We have revised the disclosure on page 81 to include the amount of the transaction fee and the maximum amount of expenses to be reimbursed pursuant the engagement agreement between PMC Commercial and Sandler O’Neill.

We have deleted all language in the Registration Statement suggesting that shareholders may not rely on Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion.

The Security Ownership of PMC Commercial’s Board of Trust Managers and Executive Officers and Current Beneficial Owners, page 83

We have revised our disclosure on page 86 to identify the natural persons who have investment control over REIT Redux LP and Hoak Public Equities, L.P.

The Registration Rights and Lockup Agreement: Master Services Agreement, page 103

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the disclosure relating to the Investment Management Agreement on page 160 to describe the fee payable to the Advisor and included a cross reference to such section in the risk factor “The Manager’s and the Advisor’s fees are payable regardless…” on page 47.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the disclosure on pages 107-108. It is not possible to quantify the amounts payable for third party services because they will be dependent on the number, character and complexity of future transactions, which are not known at this time.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the disclosure on pages 107-108.

Further to the Staff’s request and our subsequent conversation, the requested clarifying disclosure is provided on pages 108-109.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised the disclosure on page 139 to disclose that there is no restriction on the amount of leverage CIM Urban may incur. PMC Commercial has also revised the risk factor “CIM Urban has incurred indebtedness and expects to incur significant additional indebtedness…” on page 45.

Of the $166,250,797 total annualized rent presented in the tables, $8,251,407 represents the estimated annualized impact of expense reimbursements necessary to convert the net lease presentation to gross lease presentation. As noted, this annualized impact is based on leases commenced as of June 30, 2013, multiplied by twelve. The expense reimbursements are based on the amounts billed to tenants for the month of June 2013, multiplied by twelve. As these reimbursements are subject to true-up with the tenants and therefore subject to change, they are described as “may be estimated” in the related footnotes.

Based on our telephone discussion with the Staff, we have revised the related footnote on pages 144, 146, 147, 149, 150, 152 and 164 to disclose the amount of the expense reimbursements and how the amount is calculated. In addition, we revised the Office Portfolio – Lease Distribution and – Lease Expiration charts on page 150 to identify the number of leases that are gross and the number of leases that are net.

We have expanded the disclosure on page 147 to specifically identify in the footnotes those tenants that account for 10% or more of our annualized rental revenue. Other than the GSA tenants disclosed in footnote 2, which represents 20 different government tenants, CIM Urban has only one other tenant that accounts for 10% or more of its annualized revenue. We have added additional disclosure with respect to the greater than 10% tenant in a new footnote 4. In addition, we have revised the table to more specifically describe the industries for the tenants presented.

Pursuant to the Staff’s request, PMC Commercial has revised its disclosure under “Los Angeles Hotel” on page 141 to disclose that the foreclosure proceedings occurred on October 8, 2013 and that a subsidiary of CIM Urban has taken possession of the LAX Holiday Inn. PMC Commercial has also revised the Hotel Portfolio table on page 153 to include the hotel property type for each hotel owned by CIM Urban.

We have expanded our disclosures in the “Rental Rate Trends” section of MD&A on page 165 to discuss rents related to expiring leases and new leases, as well as current market rates.

We have expanded our disclosures in the “Rental Rate Trends” section of MD&A on page 165 to describe leasing results for prior periods, including per square foot costs on new leases and renewals.

We have modified the summary segment results tables included throughout the “Results of Operations” discussion to remove the disclosure of Segment Net Operating Income.

We have expanded the disclosure on page 168 regarding the asset management fee paid to the Manager to clarify who performs the appraisals and the role of CIM Urban’s Advisory Board in determining the final valuation. We have included the expanded disclosure in the first instance of discussion of the asset management fee paid to the related party in the discussion of “Results of Operations,” which occurs on page 168.

The management fee with respect to CIM Urban’s assets will continue to be calculated as required under the Investment Management Agreement based on a percentage of the gross fair value of CIM Urban’s investments after consummation of the Merger. The appraisals will continue to be performed annually. As noted elsewhere in the Registration Statement, it is also anticipated that the Manager will earn an incremental fixed fee of $1 million annually for providing Base Services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement.

Both the below-market lease value and the amortization period for acquired below-market leases include consideration of any below-market, fixed-rate renewal periods. In valuing the acquired below-market leases and determining the related amortization period, leases with fixed stated below- market options were assumed to be exercised, as there is a high probability that the tenant will take advantage of a below-market contract.

We have modified the language under “Critical Accounting Policies” on page 176 to correctly reflect that the amortization period, not just the valuation, of below-market leases includes any below-market, fixed rate renewal periods.

CIM Urban evaluated the note receivable for the hotel property near the Los Angeles Airport for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10-35 using the fair market value of collateral method. When the loan went into default, CIM Urban performed an impairment analysis based on the assumption that the loan would be repaid through the liquidation or foreclosure of the collateral. The loan was considered collateral-dependent, as the most likely source of repayment expected is the underlying hotel collateral and there were no other expected cash flows. In such assessment, CIM Urban determined the amount it expects to recover to be the value of the collateral, which was based on a December 31, 2012 independent third-party appraisal of the note receivable, which considered the value of the hotel property. Based on such assessment, CIM Urban concluded that the fair value of the collateral exceeded the carrying basis of the impaired loan and, accordingly, no reserve was recorded.

Please note that previously unfiled Exhibits 5.1 and 99.9 are filed with the Registration Statement. We are not at this time in a position to file the tax opinions (Exhibits 8.1 and 8.2), so we are attaching drafts of those opinions as Exhibit B hereto. We expect to file the consents of the Trust Managers (Exhibits 99.2-99.8) by amendment to the Registration Statement.

If you have any questions regarding the above responses, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned by phone at
214-740-8675 or by email at jmcknight@lockelord.com, or Mr. Jan Salit by phone at 972-349-3200, or by email at j.salit@pmctrust.com. We look forward to working with you to complete the Registration Statement. Thank you.

This presentation, and the oral or video presentation that supplements it, have been developed by and are proprietary to

Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. and were prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of the recipient. Neither

the

printed

presentation

nor

the

oral

video

presentation

that

supplements it, nor any of their contents, may be

reproduced, distributed or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of Sandler O'Neill & Partners,

L.P.

The analyses contained herein rely upon information obtained from the recipient or from public sources, the accuracy of

which has not been verified, and cannot be assured, by Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. Moreover, many of the

projections

and

financial

analyses

herein

are

based

estimated

financial performance prepared by or in consultation

with the recipient and are intended only to suggest reasonable ranges of results. Finally, the printed presentation is

incomplete without the oral or video presentation that supplements it.

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. prohibits employees from offering, directly or indirectly, favorable research, a specific

rating

specific

price

target,

offering

threatening

change

research,

rating or a price target to a company as

consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or compensation. The Firm also prohibits research analysts from

being compensated for their involvement in, or based upon, specific investment banking transactions.

Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. is a limited partnership, the sole general partner of which is Sandler O'Neill & Partners

Corp.,

New

York

corporation.

Sandler

O'Neill

Partners,

L.P.

registered broker-dealer and a member of the

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Sandler O'Neill Mortgage Finance L.P. is an indirect subsidiary of Sandler O'Neill

& Partners Corp.

This material is protected under applicable copyright laws and does not carry any rights of publication or disclosure.

GENERAL INFORMATION AND LIMITATIONS

Transaction Overview

Overview

Transaction Structure

Merger Consideration

•

C2 will be merged with and into P2

•

P2 will be the surviving corporation in the merger, with the combined entity

renamed C2

Pro Forma Ownership

•

P2:

2.17%

•

C2:

97.83%

•

C2 shareholders to receive 477.2 million shares of P2

–

Contributing real estate portfolio with an equity value

(1)

of $2.386 billion

–

P2 will also assume $342 million in property indebtedness

–

Total enterprise value of $2.73 billion

•

P2 shareholders to receive the following

–

$5.50/share cash dividend

–

Retain current 10.6 million shares at $5.00/share implied value

–

At implied value of $5.00/share of the merger, deal value would be $10.50; aggregate

value of $111.4 million

Tax Treatment

•

Dividend to P2 shareholders will be taxed as a return of capital

•

No tax effect on retention of P2 shares

Termination Fee

•

$4.0 million paid (1.8% of P2 enterprise value) by P2 to C2 if P2 accepts a

superior proposal; reduced to $3.0 million during Go Shop period

Go Shop

•

30 days

Data as of 7/1/13

Source: SNL Finance

(1) Represents the negotiated value for the portfolio

Overview of P2

Historical Financials

Data as of 7/1/13

Source: P2 Management

(1) Represents extraordinary costs relating to exploration of strategic alternatives

P2 Historical Income Statement

2010

2011

2012

3/31/2012

3/31/2013

Revenues

Interest income

13,537

13,571

13,896

3,561

3,439

Income from retained interests in transferred assets

163

216

200

Premium income

709

1,452

1,889

797

820

Other income

1,054

840

1,079

456

224

Total revenues

15,463

16,079

17,064

4,864

4,516

Interest

4,016

3,693

3,536

887

812

Salaries and related benefits

3,927

4,329

4,273

1,092

1,019

General and administrative

1,843

2,010

2,127

495

517

Severance and related benefits

Permanent impairments

325

Provision for loss on RITA

Provision for loan losses, net

641

460

1,934

242

Total expenses

10,752

10,492

11,870

2,527

2,590

EBITDA

4,711

5,587

5,195

2,337

1,926

Income tax benefit (provision)

131

(114)

(567)

(272)

(386)

Transaction costs

(1)

(778)

(5,984)

(1,421)

(125)

Discontinued operations

(545)

(1,044)

(822)

(171)

(155)

Net Income

4,297

3,651

(2,178)

473

1,261

add: Transaction costs

(1)

778

5,984

1,421

125

Adjusted Net Income

4,297

4,429

3,806

1,894

1,386

Overview of P2

Commercial Mortgage REIT Comparable Analysis

Data as of 7/1/13

Source: SNL Financial

(In thousands except per share data)

Capitalization

Total

Debt/

Price

Div.

Week

Market

Pref

Total

7/1/13

Yield

High

Cap

Equity

Debt

Cap

'13 EPS

'14 EPS

LTM 'EPS

REIT

Description

($)

(%)

($)

($mm)

(%)

(x)

Apollo Commercial Real Estate

Mortgage Loans, MBS, and Debt Investments

15.90

10.06

18.28

586

212

885

24.0

11.1

9.6

10.1

1.0

Arbor Realty Trust Inc.

Bridge & Mezzanine Loans; Commercial Mortgage; Multi-family

6.40

7.50

8.60

276

1,328

1,643

80.8

15.2

13.3

7.4

0.9

BRT Realty Trust

Commercial Mortgage, Multi-family

7.15

0.00

7.77

101

258

359

71.8

0.7

Colony Financial Inc.

Mortgage Loans, CMBS, REO, and Other CRE Investments

19.81

7.07

23.73

1280

252

103

1,635

6.3

14.7

10.1

16.6

1.1

RAIT Financial Trust

Commercial Mortgage; Fixed Rate Mortgage, ARM; Mezzanine

7.68

6.77

8.85

537

192

1,889

2,618

72.1

9.1

6.3

0.8

Resource Capital Corp.

Commercial Mortgage; Mezzanine Real Estate

6.12

13.07

6.96

777

1,650

2,500

66.0

7.7

7.0

9.4

1.1

High

19.81

13.1

23.73

1,280

252

1,889

2,618

80.8

15.2

13.3

16.6

1.1

Mean

10.51

7.4

12.37

593

107

907

1,607

53.5

11.6

9.3

10.9

0.9

Low

6.12

0.0

6.96

101

103

359

6.3

7.7

6.3

7.4

0.7

Commercial Lending; Small Business/SBA, Hospitality

8.37

5.97

8.54

106

194

54.3

15.3

14.2

17.7

0.6

Valuation

Price/

Overview of P2

P2 Historical Market Performance

One Year Stock Performance

Five Year Stock Performance

Three Year Stock Performance

Five Year P/BV Comp

ADV:

17,573

ADV:

14,001

-20%

-10%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Russell 2000

SNL Finance REIT

P2 Comps

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Russell 2000

SNL Finance REIT

P2 Comps

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

20%

40%

60%

Russell 2000

SNL Finance REIT

P2 Comps

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

SNL Finance REIT

P2 Comps

Data as of 6/26/13

Source: SNL Finance as of 7/1/13

Comps are consistent w/ those outlined in p.11; Five year stock performance excludes ARI and CLNY given IPOs post 2008

P2 Valuation Analysis

Implied Valuation –

Comparable Transactions

LTM

Earnings

(1)

Book Value

Basis

5,005

139,284

Price/

LTM Earnings

Book Value

High

12.8x

1.52x

Mean

8.9x

1.19x

Low

3.7x

.98x

P2 Transaction Multiples

22.3x

.80x

High

$64,272

$211,089

Mean

$44,679

$165,654

Low

$18,683

$136,234

P2 Basis as of 3/31/13

M&A Transaction Multiples

(2)

Implied P2 Valuation

(3)

(1)

LTM earnings include add backs of one-time transaction related expenses of exploring strategic alternatives

(2)

Transaction multiples listed on the next page

(3)

Based on $5.50 dividend and retention of 10.6 million shares at an implied valuation of $5.00 per share, the aggregate consideration would be $111.4 million

(In thousands except per share data)

P2 Valuation Analysis

Implied

Valuation

–

Comparable

Transactions

Source: SNL Financial and Company filings

(In thousands except per share data)

Buyer Name

Target Name

Target Description

Completion

Date

Deal Value

Trailing

EPS

(x)

Book

Value

(x)

Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.

Purchaser of charged-off consumer debt

06/13/13

203,169

1.33

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.

CreXus Investment Corp.

Commercial mortgage debt

05/23/13

875,832

12.8

1.09

Varde Partners, Inc.

FirstCity Financial Corporation

Distressed asset investments

05/17/13

106,949

7.5

1.18

BFC Financial Corporation

Bluegreen Corporation

Timeshare sales, marketing and resort management

04/02/13

147,622

3.7

0.98

Parthenon Capital Partners

White River Capital, Inc.

Sub-prime auto loan purchaser and receiver

02/14/13

79,400

9.0

1.03

Aquiline Capital Partners LLC

First Investors Financial Services Group

Auto-loan originator

11/01/12

98,658

11.6

1.52

High

12.8

1.52

Mean

8.9

1.19

Low

3.7

0.98

Price/

P2 Valuation Analysis

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis –

P2 Stand Alone

(1)

Based on P2 Company projections

(2)

Terminal multiple represents current mean forward EPS

(3)

See p. 24 for P2 WACC analysis

Metric

Discount Rate

(3)

NPV

Outstanding

Value/

High

9.0%

$81,401

10,610

7.67

Mid

10.5%

$76,717

10,610

7.23

Low

12.0%

$72,381

10,610

6.82

P2 Stand Alone Entity

(1)

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Revenues

Interest income

14,511

15,667

17,213

17,729

18,261

Income from retained interests in transferred assets

145

123

104

107

111

Premium Income

2,936

3,188

3,634

3,743

3,855

Other income

1,239

1,430

1,618

1,666

1,716

Total revenues

18,830

20,407

22,569

23,246

23,943

Salaries and related benefits

(4,063)

(4,270)

(4,351)

(4,438)

(4,527)

General and administrative

(2,376)

(2,352)

(2,448)

(2,497)

(2,547)

Provision for loan losses, net

(1,296)

(1,361)

(1,414)

(1,442)

(1,471)

EBITDA

11,095

12,424

14,356

14,869

15,398

Interest

(4,073)

(4,694)

(5,504)

(5,615)

(5,727)

Income tax benefit (provision)

(1,218)

(1,487)

(1,821)

(1,857)

(1,894)

Recognition of Prior Deferred Gains/Recoveries

Impairment Losses

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Assets

Discontinued Operations

Net Income

5,805

6,243

7,031

7,397

7,777

Terminal Multiple: 10.9x

(2)

84,774

Free Cash Flow

5,805

6,243

7,031

7,397

92,552

Overview of C2

Historical Financials

C2 audited financial statements

Excludes discontinued operations

C2 Historical Income Statement

2010

2011

2012

3/31/2012

3/31/2013

Revenues

Rent

156,781

160,603

181,042

44,949

45,591

Expense reimbursements

14,150

8,310

9,194

2,147

2,450

Hotel

32,869

34,695

36,858

9,859

9,577

Interest and fees

4,517

6,119

3,891

1,101

317

Other income

2,344

3,566

1,529

349

374

Total revenues

210,662

213,293

232,513

58,406

58,309

Expenses

Rental operating

71,634

70,252

74,006

17,915

18,282

Hotel operating

23,800

24,834

25,582

6,626

6,439

Asset management fees to related parties

17,657

19,326

20,924

5,255

5,409

Interest

17,058

18,128

18,856

4,750

4,677

General and administrative

1,201

2,066

2,772

486

542

Acquisition related costs

2,562

3,574

632

17,137

Depreciation and amortization

71,204

68,804

69,943

16,922

Total expenses

205,117

206,983

212,716

51,954

52,486

Net Income

5,545

6,309

19,797

6,452

5,822

•

The following assumptions were made in the pro forma model:

–

Levered current C2 portfolio by applying $1.1B of additional debt in 1Q14; no financing contingency

Used to purchase additional properties @ 6.0% NOI yield

–

Calculated

management

fee

based

.2125%

quarterly

fee

total

asset

value

–

Draw down on line of credit to fund $5.50/share cash dividend

–

Loans maturing in 2013 are extended

Pro Forma Analysis

Model Assumptions

Pro Forma Analysis

Pro Forma Financials

Source: C2 and P2 projections

(1)

Includes property management fee of 3% on total revenue

(2)

Fee based on C2 fund docs

(3)

Represents certain one-time below the line operating expenses at select C2 properties

(4)

Represents P2 expenses such as, losses from operating properties and income tax benefit (provision)

(5)

Capex assumptions for C2 are based on budgeted 2014 numbers and increased at 4% annually

Pro Forma Combined Entity

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Operating income and expenses

C2 Rental revenue

355,058

369,260

384,030

399,391

415,367

C2 Property operating expenses

(1)

(142,128)

(146,392)

(150,784)

(155,307)

(159,967)

Net operating income

212,929

222,868

233,246

244,084

255,401

P2 Interest revenue

20,407

22,569

23,246

23,943

24,661

Less: investment management fee

(2)

(34,924)

(36,321)

(37,774)

(39,285)

(40,856)

Less: P2 G&A

(6,622)

(2,448)

(2,497)

(2,547)

(2,598)

Less: other expenses

(3)

(1,361)

(1,414)

(1,442)

(1,471)

(1,500)

EBITDA

190,429

205,254

214,779

224,725

235,108

Depreciation & amortization

(88,880)

EBIT

101,549

116,373

125,899

135,844

146,227

Interest expense

(55,524)

(Gain) loss on disposal of assets

Other Expenses

(4)

(1,811)

(2,145)

(2,181)

(2,218)

(2,256)

Net income to common shareholder

44,214

58,704

68,194

78,102

88,447

Add: D&A

88,880

less: (Gain) loss on disposal of assets

Straightlining of rents

12,250

FFO

145,344

159,835

169,324

179,232

189,577

Less: Capex

(5)

(9,003)

(9,363)

(9,737)

(10,127)

(10,532)

Less: straightline of rents

(12,250)

AFFO

124,091

138,222

147,337

156,856

166,796

Shares Outstanding

487,810

FFO/Share

$0.30

$0.33

$0.35

$0.37

$0.39

AFFO/Share

$0.25

$0.28

$0.30

$0.32

$0.34

Pro Forma Analysis

Office REIT Comparable Company Analysis

Data as of 7/1/13

Source: SNL Financial

(In thousands except per share data)

2013

Total

EV/

Price

Div.

AFFO

Market

Total

Debt/

Recurring

7/1/13

Yield

Payout

Cap

Debt

Cap

Total Cap

LTM

Est. '13

Est. '14

LTM

Est. '13

Est. '14

EBITDA

REIT

Ticker

($)

(%)

($mm)

(%)

(x)

Boston Properties Inc.

BXP

104.76

2.5

65.8

15,898

8,872

24,964

35.5

21.6

20.8

18.7

38.7

27.9

25.0

22.8

Brookfield Office Ppts.

BPO

16.65

3.4

72.6

8,408

11,820

21,573

54.8

13.9

14.2

16.4

25.6

22.7

30.2

10.2

CommonWealth REIT

CWH

23.39

4.3

74.9

2,767

3,658

7,059

51.8

7.0

8.6

15.2

16.5

16.6

13.2

Douglas Emmett Inc.

DEI

24.91

2.9

64.8

3,551

3,351

6,903

48.5

17.9

17.0

16.3

24.7

22.4

21.3

20.4

Hudson Pacific Properties Inc.

HPP

21.12

2.4

69.0

1,197

530

1,873

28.3

23.2

21.6

18.9

33.0

22.7

SL Green Realty Corp.

SLG

87.87

1.5

46.2

8,058

6,721

15,182

44.3

16.5

17.6

16.3

26.7

25.3

23.3

17.9

High

104.76

4.3

74.9

15,898

11,820

24,964

54.8

23.2

21.6

18.9

38.7

27.9

33.0

22.8

Mean

46.45

2.8

65.5

6,647

5,825

12,926

43.9

16.7

16.6

15.9

26.2

23.0

24.9

17.9

Median

24.15

2.7

67.4

5,805

5,190

11,121

46.4

17.2

17.3

16.4

25.6

22.7

24.2

19.1

Low

16.65

1.5

46.2

1,197

530

1,873

28.3

7.0

8.6

15.2

16.5

16.6

10.2

C2 Pro Forma

5.00

3.50

68.8

2,439

1,631

4,070

40.1

23.5

16.8

24.9

19.7

21.3

Price/

FFO

AFFO

Pro Forma Analysis

FFO & AFFO Per Share Analysis

FFO/Share

AFFO/Share

Data as of 7/1/13

Source: SNL Financial

(In thousands)

(In thousands except per share data)

(In thousands)

Price

7/1/13

Est. '14

REIT Comparable Companies

Ticker

($)

(x)

Boston Properties Inc.

BXP

104.76

18.7

25.0

Brookfield Office Ppts.

BPO

16.65

16.4

30.2

CommonWealth REIT

CWH

23.39

8.6

16.6

Douglas Emmett Inc.

DEI

24.91

16.3

21.3

Hudson Pacific Properties Inc.

HPP

21.12

18.9

33.0

SL Green Realty Corp.

SLG

87.87

16.3

23.3

High

104.76

18.9

33.0

Mean

46.45

15.9

24.9

Median

24.15

16.4

24.2

Low

16.65

8.6

16.6

Price/

FFO

AFFO

Metric

2014

FFO

Multiple

Projected

2014

FFO/Share

Implied

Value/Share

Implied

Market

Capitalization

(1)

Implied

Total

Capitalization

(2)

High

18.9x

0.30

5.64

2,753,062

4,383,763

Mean

15.9x

0.30

4.73

2,306,481

3,937,182

Median

16.4x

0.30

4.87

2,376,806

4,007,507

Low

8.6x

0.30

2.57

1,254,594

2,885,295

Metric

2014

AFFO

Multiple

Projected

2014

AFFO/Share

Implied

Value/Share

Implied

Market

Capitalization

(1)

Implied

Total

Capitalization

(2)

High

33.0x

0.25

8.39

4,095,014

5,725,715

Mean

24.9x

0.25

6.33

3,089,859

4,720,560

Median

24.2x

0.25

6.14

2,997,431

4,628,132

Low

16.6x

0.25

4.23

2,065,833

3,696,535

(1)

Assumes proforma shares of 487,809,554

(2)

Assumes $1,630,701 2014 proforma debt as per C2 and P2 projections

Pro Forma Analysis

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis –

Combined Entity

Source: C2 and P2 projections

Metric

Discount Rate

(5)

NPV

Outstanding

Value/

High

NPV @ 7.0%

$3,797,544

487,810

$7.78

Mid

NPV @ 9.0%

$3,492,460

487,810

$7.16

Low

NPV @ 11.0%

$3,218,113

487,810

$6.60

Pro Forma Combined Entity

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Operating income and expenses

C2 Rental revenue

355,058

369,260

384,030

399,391

415,367

C2 Property operating expenses

(1)

(142,128)

(146,392)

(150,784)

(155,307)

(159,967)

Net operating income

212,929

222,868

233,246

244,084

255,401

P2 Interest revenue

20,407

22,569

23,246

23,943

24,661

Less: investment management fee

(2)

(34,924)

(36,321)

(37,774)

(39,285)

(40,856)

Less: P2 G&A

(6,622)

(2,448)

(2,497)

(2,547)

(2,598)

Less: other expenses

(3)

(1,361)

(1,414)

(1,442)

(1,471)

(1,500)

EBITDA

190,429

205,254

214,779

224,725

235,108

Terminal Value: 17.9x

(4)

4,103,729

Cash Flow

190,429

205,254

214,779

224,725

4,338,837

(1)

Includes property management fee of 3% on total revenue

(2)

Fee based on C2 fund docs

(3)

Represents certain one-time ‘below the line’ operating expenses at select C2 properties

(4)

Represents average EV/Recurring EBITDA for C2 comp group

(5)

See p. 25 for WACC analysis

"Has" P2

$2.50

$5.00

$7.50

Interest in P2

100%

2.17%

Equity Value of Entity

(1)

88,802

1,219,524

2,439,048

3,658,572

Interest in Combined Entity

88,802

26,524

53,048

79,572

plus: Dividend

(2)

58,353

Total

88,802

84,876

111,400

137,924

Per Share

8.37

8.00

10.50

13.00

P2 Shareholders

"Gets" Range

Pro Forma Analysis

Has/Gets Summary

(1)

P2 economic value based on share price (as of 7/1/13) times total shares outstanding; C2 economic values based on imputed high, mean and low ranges of pro forma

FFO, AFFO and discounted cash flow analysis

(2)

Based on $5.50/share dividend on 10,609,554 shares

(In thousands except per share data)

•

To determine a range of discount rates, we calculated the cost of equity using the following

methodology:

–

Risk free rate + equity risk premium + size premium + industry premium = cost of equity

•

Risk free rate is the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate as of July 1, 2013

•

Market risk premium, size premium and industry premium based on data from Ibbotson Associates

•

We then selected the discount rate ranges based on P2’s cost of equity and WACC

Appendix

P2 WACC Analysis

Capital

Target

Pre-Tax

After-Tax

Cost of Common Equity

Source

Weight

Cost

Risk-Free Rate

(1)

2.5%

Debt

(5)

50.0%

4.5%

Market Risk Premium

(2)

5.7%

Equity

50.0%

16.0%

Size Premium

(3)

3.8%

Preferred

0.0%

8.0%

Industry Premium

(4)

4.4%

Cost of Common Equity

16.4%

WACC

10.3%

(1)

Source: Bloomberg

(2)

Ibbotson Long Horizon Equity Risk Premium through 2012

(3)

Ibbotson Size Premium as of December 2012, for companies with market caps $1.2MM - $477.5MM

(4)

Ibbotson Industry Premium as of December 2012, for “Non-depository Credit Institutions” companies

(5)

Represents average cost of debt for commercial mortgage REITs (source: Bloomberg)

•

To determine a range of discount rates, we calculated the cost of equity using the following

methodology:

–

Risk free rate + equity risk premium + size premium + industry premium = cost of equity

•

Risk free rate is the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate as of July 1, 2013

•

Market risk premium, size premium and industry premium based on data from Ibbotson Associates

•

We then selected the discount rate ranges based on C2’s cost of equity and WACC

Appendix

C2 WACC Analysis

Cost of Common Equity

Risk-Free Rate

(1)

2.5%

Market Risk Premium

(2)

5.7%

Size Premium

(3)

1.1%

Industry Premium

(4)

-0.7%

Cost of Common Equity

8.6%

(1)

Source: Bloomberg

(2)

Ibbotson Long Horizon Equity Risk Premium through 2012

(3)

Ibbotson Size Premium as of December 2012, for companies with market caps $1.912B - $7.687B

(4)

Ibbotson Industry Premium as of December 2012, for “Real Estate” companies

We have acted as counsel to PMC Commercial Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust (“PMC Commercial”), in connection with the Special Dividend (defined below) and Merger (as defined below) as described in a Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-190934, and the related joint proxy statement/prospectus filed by PMC Commercial, Southfork Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PMC Merger Sub”), CIM Urban REIT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CIM REIT”), and CIM Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability (“CIM Merger Sub”), with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on October , 2013 (the “Registration Statement”). In connection with the filing of the Registration Statement, we have been asked to provide you with this letter regarding the United States federal income tax treatment of the Special Dividend (as defined below).

CIM REIT, CIM Merger Sub, PMC Commercial and PMC Merger Sub are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 8, 2013 (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, CIM Merger Sub will merge with and into PMC Merger Sub (the “Merger”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the board of trust managers of PMC Commercial will declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of PMC Commercial common shares (each, a “PMC Commercial Common Share”) as of the last business day prior to consummation of the Merger, providing for the payment of $5.50 per PMC Commercial Common Share plus that portion of PMC Commercial’s regular quarterly dividend accrued through that day, which in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement shall be payable on or prior to the tenth business day after consummation of the Merger (the “Special Dividend”).

In rendering our opinion, we are relying upon the accuracy and completeness at all relevant times of the facts, information, statements, representations, warranties and covenants contained in (i) the Merger Agreement, (ii) the Registration Statement, and (iii) such other information and documentation as we have deemed necessary or appropriate. In addition, we have assumed that the Special Dividend will be paid in the manner contemplated by, and in accordance with the provisions of, the Merger Agreement and the Registration Statement, and that none of the terms or conditions contained in the Merger Agreement will be waived or modified.

Subject to the assumptions, exceptions, qualifications and limitations stated herein and in the Registration Statement, we hereby confirm that, in our opinion, the conclusions of law with respect to United States federal income tax matters set forth in the Registration Statement under the subheading “Tax Consequences to PMC Commercial Shareholders of the Special Dividend” (which is a subsection of the discussion under the heading “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences”) are accurate and complete in all material respects.

We express no opinion as to any matter not discussed in the Registration Statement under the subheading “Tax Consequences to PMC Commercial Shareholders of the Special Dividend.” Our opinion is limited to the federal income tax laws of the United States and does not purport to discuss the consequences or treatment of the Special Dividend under any other laws.

Our opinion is rendered to you as of the effective date of the Registration Statement, and we undertake no obligation to update our opinion subsequent to the date hereof. Our opinion is based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, existing Treasury regulations thereunder, current administrative rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), and court decisions, all of which are subject to change at any time possibly with retroactive effect. Any change in applicable law or facts and circumstances surrounding the Special Dividend, or any inaccuracy or incompleteness in the statements, facts, information, assumptions, representations, warranties or covenants on which our opinion is based could affect our conclusions. Our opinion is not binding on the IRS or the courts, and no ruling has been, or will be, obtained from the IRS as to any federal income tax consequences of the Special Dividend.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of our name in the Registration Statement. This consent does not constitute an admission that we are “experts” within the meaning of such term as used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued thereunder.

We have acted as counsel to CIM Urban REIT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CIM REIT”), in connection with the Merger (defined below) as described in a Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-190934, and the related joint proxy statement/prospectus filed by PMC Commercial (as defined below), PMC Merger Sub (as defined below), CIM REIT and CIM Merger Sub (as defined below) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 11, 2013 (the “Registration Statement”). This opinion letter is furnished to you at your request to enable PMC Commercial to fulfill the requirements of Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K, 17 C.F.R. § 229.601(b)(8), in connection with the Registration Statement.

CIM REIT, CIM Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a subsidiary of CIM REIT (“CIM Merger Sub”), PMC Commercial Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust (“PMC Commercial”), and Southfork Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of PMC Commercial (“PMC Merger Sub”), are parties to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 8, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, CIM Merger Sub will merge with and into PMC Merger Sub (the “Merger”), with PMC Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PMC Commercial. CIM REIT and PMC Commercial have requested our opinion with respect to the matters set forth below.

In connection with rendering the opinion expressed below, we have examined originals (or copies identified to our satisfaction as true copies of the originals) of the following documents (collectively, the “Reviewed Documents”):

In addition, we have relied upon the factual representations contained in the certificate issued by PMC Commercial, dated as of the date thereof, executed by a duly appointed officer of PMC Commercial, setting forth certain representations relating to the organization and proposed operation of PMC Commercial and its subsidiaries.

For purposes of our opinion, we have not made an independent investigation of the facts set forth in the documents we reviewed. We consequently have assumed that the information presented in such documents or otherwise furnished to us accurately and completely describes all material facts relevant to our opinion. No facts have come to our attention, however, that would cause us to question the accuracy and completeness of such facts or documents in a material way. Any representation or statement in any document upon which we rely that is made “to the best of our knowledge” or otherwise similarly qualified is assumed to be correct. Any alteration of such facts may adversely affect our opinion.

In our review, we have assumed, with your consent, that all of the representations and statements of a factual nature set forth in the documents we reviewed are true and correct, and all of the obligations imposed by any such documents on the parties thereto have been and will be performed or satisfied in accordance with their terms. We have also assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the proper execution of all documents, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to originals of documents submitted to us as copies, and the authenticity of the originals from which any copies were made.

The opinion set forth in this Letter is based on relevant provisions of the Code, the regulations promulgated thereunder by the United States Department of the Treasury (“Regulations”) (including proposed and temporary Regulations), and interpretations of the foregoing as expressed in court decisions, the legislative history, and existing administrative rulings and practices of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), including its practices and policies in issuing private letter rulings, which are not binding on the IRS except with respect to a taxpayer that receives such a ruling, all as of the date hereof.

In rendering this opinion, we have assumed that the transactions contemplated by the Reviewed Documents have been or will be consummated in accordance with the terms and provisions of such documents, and that such documents accurately reflect the material facts of such transactions. In addition, the opinion is based on the assumption that PMC Commercial and its subsidiaries (if any) will each be operated in the manner described in the Declaration of Trust of PMC Commercial and the other organizational documents of each such entity and their subsidiaries, as the case may be, and all terms and provisions of such agreements and documents will be complied with by all parties thereto.

It should be noted that statutes, regulations, judicial decisions, and administrative interpretations are subject to change at any time and, in some circumstances, with retroactive effect. A material change that is made after the date hereof in any of the foregoing bases for our opinion could affect our conclusions. Furthermore, if the facts vary from those relied upon (including any representations, warranties, covenants or assumptions upon which we have relied are inaccurate, incomplete, breached or ineffective), our opinion contained herein could be inapplicable. Moreover, the qualification and taxation of PMC Commercial as REIT depends upon its ability to meet, through actual annual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of share ownership and the various qualification tests imposed under the Code, the results of which will not be reviewed by the undersigned. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the operations of PMC Commercial for any one taxable year will satisfy such requirements.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the conclusions of law with respect to the United States federal income tax matters set forth in the Registration Statement under the heading “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences,” excluding the matters set forth under the subheading “Tax Consequences to PMC Commercial Shareholders of the Special Dividend” (for which Locke Lord LLP, counsel to PMC Commercial, shall render an opinion) are accurate and complete in all material respects.

The foregoing opinion is limited to the matters specifically discussed herein, which are the only matters to which you have requested our opinion. Other than as expressly stated above, we express no opinion on any issue relating to the Company or to any investment therein.

We assume no obligation to advise you of any changes in the foregoing subsequent to the date of this Letter, and we are not undertaking to update this Letter from time to time. You should be aware that an opinion of counsel represents only counsel’s best legal judgment, and has no binding effect or official status of any kind, and that no assurance can be given that contrary positions may not be taken by the IRS or that a court considering the issues would not hold otherwise.

This opinion is rendered only to you and may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to, nor be filed with, or furnished to, any other person or entity in connection with the Registration Statements, except as follows. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K, 17 C.F.R § 229.601(b)(8), and the reference to DLA Piper LLP (US) contained under the heading “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are included in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.


		2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200
		Dallas, Texas 75201
		Telephone: 214-740-8000
		Fax: 214-740-8800 www.lockelord.com
		John B. McKnight
		Direct Telephone: 214-740-8675
		Direct Fax: 214-756-8675 jmcknight@lockelord.com