Life is a journey, not a destination.

It’s pretty simple. Life changes. And when “real life” changes, it’s just smart to make sure your financial life changes with it. That’s why the Meta team developed a unique program with one goal in mind: Make money management easier for customers through every life change. Our unique Life Change Program^SM coaches customers through the personal and financial challenges of life’s most common changes… so they can spend more time enjoying the journey.

COMPANY STRUCTURE

COMPANY PROFILE

Meta Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) is a $741 million bank holding company for MetaBank, MetaBank West Central, and Meta Trust Company. Headquartered in Storm Lake, Iowa, the Company converted from mutual ownership to stock ownership in 1993. Its primary business is marketing deposits, loans and other financial services and products to meet the needs of its commercial, agricultural, and retail customers. MFG shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market.^SM

          MFG operates under a super-community banking philosophy that allows the Company to grow while maintaining its community bank roots, with local decision making and customer service. Administrative functions, transparent to the customer, are centralized to enhance the banks’ operational efficiencies and to improve customer service capabilities.

          MetaBank is a federally-chartered savings bank with four market areas: Northwest Iowa, Brookings, Central Iowa, Sioux Empire; and the nationally recognized Meta Payment Systems division. Meta Payment Systems manages four primary business lines that contribute to revenue and deposits: prepaid cards, credit cards, Automated Teller Machine (ATM) sponsorship and Automated Clearing House (ACH) origination. MetaBank West Central is a state-chartered commercial bank located in West Central Iowa. Nineteen bank offices and one additional administrative office support customers throughout central and northwest Iowa and in Brookings and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Meta Trust provides professional trust services.

Banks are Members FDIC and Equal Housing Lenders. The Company and its subsidiaries exceed regulatory capital requirements.

CONTENTS
Company Structure & Profile	i
Letter to Shareholders	ii-iii
Financials	1-34
Directors & Senior Officers	35
Investor Information	36
Locations	37

i

To Our Shareholders

L TO R: J. TYLER HAAHR, JAMES S. HAAHR

Meta Financial Group (MFG) reported net income of $3.92 million or $1.55 per diluted share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. This compares to a net loss of $924,000 or $0.38 per diluted share for fiscal year 2005. Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $661,000 or $0.26 per diluted share compared to $546,000 or $0.22 per diluted share during the same period in 2005, representing an 18 percent growth in earnings per share on a matched quarter basis.

Things do
not change;
we change.

—Henry David Thoreau

2006 earnings were higher because of increased card fee income, non-recurring fee income, and a lower provision for loan loss, offset in part by higher expenses such as compensation, card processing fees, legal and consulting fees. Negative earnings for 2005 were impacted by a significant loan loss related to loans given to three affiliated companies involved in automobile sales, service and financing, and to the owners thereof.

          Net income at Meta Payment Systems (MPS), a separate reportable business unit of the Company, was $4.5 million or $1.78 per diluted share for fiscal year 2006. This compares to a loss of $808,000 or $0.33 per diluted share for same period in 2005, when MPS was in its start-up phase. Net income for the traditional banking unit was $1.35 million or $0.54 per diluted share for fiscal year 2006 and $958,000 or $0.39 per diluted share for the same period in 2005. The remaining business units netted losses of $1.94 million or $0.77 per diluted share for fiscal year 2006 and $1.08 million or $0.44 per diluted share for the same period in 2005.

          While earnings greatly improved from 2005 to 2006, more significant is the continued progress toward initiatives that we believe will enhance long-term performance and earnings:

1.	Growth of Meta Payment Systems, a division of MetaBank;
2.	Growth of low-cost deposits;
3.	Analysis of operations for improved efficiencies;
4.	Branch expansion; and
5.	Human resource development and expansion.

          Focused efforts by the Meta team contributed, in part, to the Company’s improved credit quality ratios. The improvements resulted in fewer non-performing loans which contributed to a negative provision for loan losses in fiscal 2006.

          On the deposit side, the Company continues to improve its funding mix by replacing higher-costing certificates of deposit, public funds deposits, and wholesale borrowings with low-cost deposits such as checking and money market accounts. Total checking deposits rose 59.2 percent during fiscal year 2006, from $135.9 million at September 30, 2005 to $216.3 million at September 30, 2006. A significant portion of this growth came from deposits generated by MPS. Total money market accounts increased 38.5 percent from $74.6 million to $103.3 million while savings and certificates of deposit declined 25.5 percent from $330.5 million to $246.1 million during the same time period. The Company used deposit increases to pay down wholesale borrowing sources. Total wholesale borrowings at September 30, 2006 were $124.6 million, down 34.4 percent from $190.0 million at September 30, 2005.

          The Company’s steadfast efforts to improve its funding mix has shifted the percentage of low-cost funds from 24.5 percent of total deposits to 56.5 percent during the past five years. The shift

ii

directly improves the Company’s net interest income and loan-to-deposit interest rate spreads.

          Meta Financial Group’s net interest income for fiscal year 2006 was $19.64 million compared to $19.24 million for 2005. The 2 percent increase was driven by a higher net interest margin, offset in part by a smaller earning asset base. Net interest margin for fiscal year 2006 was 2.84 percent, compared to 2.56 percent in 2005.

          The Company’s non-interest income rose from $3.73 million in fiscal year 2005 to $13.41 million in 2006, up $9.68 million or 259 percent. The majority of this growth is related to higher fee income earned on prepaid debit cards and other card-related products and services offered by MPS. The increase also includes $2.57 million of non-recurring fee income related to a purchased portfolio of prepaid debit cards.

LOW-COST
DEPOSIT BALANCES
In millions

LOW-COST
DEPOSIT BALANCES
As a percentage of
total deposit balances

          As a principal member of MasterCard,^® Visa,^® Discover^® and the regional debit networks, MPS expands the Company’s opportunity and reach in the growing payments industry. It serves banks, card processors, and third-party marketing companies nationwide. The MPS group launched and now manages four primary business lines that contribute to the Company’s revenue and deposits: prepaid cards, credit cards, Automated Teller Machine (ATM) sponsorship, and Automated Clearing House (ACH) origination.

          As of fiscal year end, MPS supported clients by implementing more than 500 prepaid programs and issuing more than 20 million cards. MPS also recently completed two patent applications for software developed to support client programs. Its ATM Services unit now sponsors more than 25 percent of the white-label ATMs placed nationwide. MPS joined as a founding member of the National Branded Prepaid Card Association (NBPCA) in an effort to assist in the ongoing formation of the branded prepaid card industry. MPS President, Brad Hanson, was invited to serve on the NBPCA Board of Directors.

          In addition to MPS’ expansion, the Company opened two new offices in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and one in West Des Moines, Iowa. The Company continues to consider branching structure and additional opportunities to maximize branch profitability and contributions.

          In January 2006, the Company was pleased to appoint Jonathan M. Gaiser, CFA, as Senior Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer for MFG and MetaBank, and Secretary for MetaBank West Central. He and other senior officers such as Brian Bond, Ron Butterfield, Ray Frohnapfel, John Hagy, Barb Koopman and Kathy Thorson, who joined the Company or assumed new responsibilities during the fiscal year, have joined other talented Meta associates to fulfill the Company’s mission: Make money management easy for customers through every life change.

          Also in January 2006, MFG welcomed Mr. Frederick V. Moore, President of Buena Vista University, as an independent director of the Company, MetaBank and MetaBank West Central. He is very well-qualified and has been quick to make contributions for the betterment of the Company.

          At September 30, 2006, the Company had assets totaling $741.1 million, compared to $775.8 million at September 30, 2005. The reduction in assets primarily reflects the Company’s planned strategy to reduce the level of lower yielding investment securities and reduce higher costing deposits and wholesale borrowings.

          Meta Financial Group shares closed at $18.66 on September 30, 2005 and increased to $24.60 on September 30, 2006. On behalf of all Meta Financial Group associates, we remain dedicated to increasing shareholder value and enhancing your return.

          It is not a coincidence that Meta means change. Thank you for your interest in our company. Invest in us. Bank with us. Enjoy the journey.

JAMES S. HAAHR
Chairman of the Board

J. TYLER HAAHR
President & CEO

iii

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(Dollars in Thousands except Per Share Data)	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
AT SEPTEMBER 30
Total assets	$	741,132		$	775,839		$	780,799		$	772,285		$	607,648
Total loans, net		388,762			440,190			404,051			349,692			341,937
Total deposits		565,710			541,042			461,581			435,553			355,780
Shareholders’ equity		45,332			42,959			47,274			43,031			44,588
Book value per common share	$	17.89		$	17.16		$	18.98		$	17.25		$	18.06
Total equity to assets		6.12	%		5.54	%		6.05	%		5.57	%		7.34	%
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
Net interest income	$	19,636		$	19,239		$	17,769		$	15,728		$	13,700
Net income (loss)		3,921			(924	)		3,987			3,397			2,157
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	1.55		$	(0.38	)	$	1.57		$	1.36		$	0.87
Return on average assets		.52	%		-0.12	%		.51	%		.47	%		.38	%
Return on average equity		9.09	%		-2.05	%		8.69	%		7.57	%		4.95	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets		2.84	%		2.56	%		2.40	%		2.31	%		2.56	%

TOTAL ASSETS In millions	TOTAL LOANS, NET In millions	TOTAL DEPOSITS In millions	TOTAL NET INCOME In thousands

FINANCIAL CONTENTS
Financial Highlights	1
Selected Consolidated Financial Information	2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis	3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	11
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at September 30, 2006 and 2005	12
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	13
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	13
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	14
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	15
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	16

1

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SEPTEMBER 30,		2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
SELECTED FINANCIAL CONDITION DATA
(In Thousands)
Total assets	$	741,132		$	775,839		$	780,799		$	772,285		$	607,648
Loans receivable, net		388,762			440,190			404,051			349,692			341,937
Securities available for sale		186,176			230,893			322,524			366,075			218,247
Goodwill		3,403			3,403			3,403			3,403			3,403
Deposits		565,710			541,042			461,581			435,553			355,780
Total borrowings		124,576			190,012			269,109			291,486			205,266
Shareholders’ equity		45,332			42,959			47,274			43,031			44,588
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
SELECTED OPERATIONS DATA
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Total interest income	$	40,578		$	41,093		$	36,180		$	35,179		$	35,434
Total interest expense		20,942			21,854			18,411			19,451			21,734
Net interest income		19,636			19,239			17,769			15,728			13,700
Provision for loan losses		(454	)		5,482			489			350			1,090
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		20,090			13,757			17,280			15,378			12,610
Total non-interest income		13,406			3,731			3,596			3,555			2,781
Total non-interest expense		27,625			19,097			14,830			13,858			12,268
Income (loss) before income taxes		5,871			(1,609	)		6,046			5,075			3,123
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,950			(685	)		2,059			1,678			966
Net income (loss)		3,921			(924	)		3,987			3,397			2,157
Earnings (loss) per common share
Basic	$	1.58		$	(0.38	)	$	1.61		$	1.37		$	0.88
Diluted	$	1.55		$	(0.38	)	$	1.57		$	1.36		$	0.87
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS AND OTHER DATA
PERFORMANCE RATIOS
Return on average assets		0.52	%		-0.12	%		0.51	%		0.47	%		0.38	%
Return on average equity		9.09	%		-2.05	%		8.69	%		7.57	%		4.95	%
Net interest margin		2.84	%		2.56	%		2.40	%		2.31	%		2.56	%
Operating expense to average assets		3.69	%		2.43	%		1.91	%		1.93	%		2.16	%
QUALITY RATIOS
Non-performing assets to total assets at end of year		0.56	%		0.69	%		0.09	%		0.28	%		0.58	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		146	%		1057	%		754	%		493	%		220	%
CAPITAL RATIOS
Shareholders’ equity to total assets at end of period		6.12	%		5.54	%		6.05	%		5.57	%		7.34	%
Average shareholders’ equity to average assets		5.76	%		5.77	%		5.91	%		6.25	%		7.68	%
OTHER DATA
Book value per common share outstanding.	$	17.89		$	17.16		$	18.98		$	17.25		$	18.06
Dividends declared per share	$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.52
Number of full-service offices		19			17			16			16			15

2

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

GENERAL

Meta Financial Group, Inc.^® (the “Company”) is a bank holding company whose primary subsidiaries are MetaBank and MetaBank West Central (“MetaBank WC”). The Company was incorporated in 1993 as a unitary non-diversified savings and loan holding company that, on September 20 of that year, acquired all of the capital stock of MetaBank, a federal savings bank, in connection with MetaBank’s conversion from mutual to stock form of ownership. On September 30, 1996, the Company became a bank holding company in conjunction with the acquisition of MetaBank WC, a state-chartered commercial bank.

          The Company focuses on establishing and maintaining long-term relationships with customers, and is committed to serving the financial service needs of the communities in its market area. The Company’s primary market area includes the following counties: Adair, Buena Vista, Dallas, Guthrie, Pocahontas, Polk, and Sac located in central and northwestern Iowa, and Brookings, Lincoln, and Minnehaha located in east central South Dakota. The Company attracts retail deposits from the general public and uses those deposits, together with other borrowed funds, to originate and purchase residential and commercial mortgage loans, to originate consumer, agricultural and other commercial loans. Meta Payment Systems,^® a division of MetaBank, (“MPS”) is an industry leader in the issuance of prepaid debit cards and the provider of a wide range of debit card and money transfer related products and services.

OVERVIEW OF CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS

In November 2005 the Company opened a new full-service branch in the Sioux Falls market. The branch includes administrative office space which houses much of the Information Systems department and MPS division. In September 2006, the Company opened a new full-service branch in the Des Moines market. The Company now operates 19 branches in Brookings (1) and Sioux Falls (4), South Dakota, and Des Moines (5), Northwest (6), and West-Central (3), Iowa. In August 2006, the Company also leased office space at another location in Sioux Falls to house various administrative support functions and MPS offices. As a result of these branch and office openings, the Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, increases in both compensation and occupancy and equipment expense. Management believes these increases will be offset by additional net interest income and fee income as the new branches mature, and as MPS grows.

          During the first half of fiscal year 2006, the company completed its foreclosure, repossession, and liquidation of the majority of remaining assets of three companies involved in automobile sales, service, and financing. Two of these companies had filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in June 2005. MetaBank had been the lead lender and servicer of approximately $32.0 million in loans to these three companies and their principal owners. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had charged off all remaining loan balances related to this relationship, and had only one related property left in its possession, with a carrying value of $35,000. At this time, the Company continues to expect that total cash expenditures on legal and collection efforts related to these loans will range between $750,000 and $1,100,000, of which approximately $700,000 has already been incurred.

          The participation of the aforementioned auto-dealership related loans remains the subject of dispute between several of the participants and MetaBank. In March 2006, the Company reached a settlement agreement with one of the participant banks. In June 2006, MetaBank was named in lawsuits filed by three of the participant banks related to these loans. The Company is vigorously defending these claims. See “Legal Proceedings” under Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          MPS exhibited rapid growth during fiscal year 2006. The division was created in May 2004 to take advantage of opportunities in the growing area of prepaid debit cards, ATM sponsorship, and other money transfer systems and services. After approximately one year of start-up and development, the division had reached profitability by the end of fiscal year 2005. By June 2006 the division had recouped all of the Company’s initial investment in the division, and is now a significant contributor to the Company’s financial performance. The division’s efforts have also resulted in the filing of two patent applications to protect the Company’s investment in its intellectual property. See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In June 2006, the Company recorded $2,570,000 in non-recurring pre-tax fee income at MPS related to fees received on a purchased portfolio of prepaid debit cards.

          The Company’s stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “CASH.”

FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following discussion of the Company’s consolidated financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Selected Consolidated Financial Information and Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.

          The Company’s total assets at September 30, 2006 were $741.1 million, a decrease of $34.7 million, or 4.5 percent, from $775.8 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease in assets was due primarily to a planned decrease in securities available for sale and a decrease in the Company’s purchased loan participation portfolio, offset in part primarily by an increase in total cash and cash equivalents.

          Total cash and cash equivalents increased by $95.0 million from $14.4 million at September 30, 2005 to $109.4 million at September 30, 2006. The Company’s portfolio of securities purchased under agreements to resell and available for sale decreased $76.3 million, or 28.4 percent, to $192.1 million at September 30, 2006 from $268.4 million at September 30, 2005. The Company’s portfolio of securities available for sale consists primarily of mortgage-backed securities, most with balloon maturities, which have relatively short expected average lives and limited maturity extension risk. During fiscal year 2006, the company purchased only one security for its available for sale portfolio totaling $108,000, and did not sell any securities. Principal cash flows from the available for sale portfolio decreased to $41.7 million in 2006 from $78.0 million in 2005. See Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          The Company’s portfolio of net loans receivable decreased by $51.4 million, or 11.7%, to $388.8 million at September 30, 2006 from $440.2 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease was mainly the result of pay offs and pay downs in the Company’s purchased loan participation portfolio, which is concentrated in commercial real estate and commercial operating credits. The Company experienced slight growth in its agricultural real estate and agricultural operating portfolios. See Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          The Company owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Des Moines as well as in the Federal Reserve Bank due to its membership and participation in these banking systems. The Company’s investment in such stock decreased $2.5 million, or 30.1%, to $5.8 million at September 30, 2006 from $8.3 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease was due to a decrease in the level of borrowings from the FHLB, which require a calculated level of stock investment based on a formula determined by the FHLB.

          Deposit balances increased by $24.7 million, or 4.6%, to $565.7 million at September 30, 2006 from $541.0 million at September 30, 2005. The increase in deposits is primarily due to growth in low- and no-cost demand deposits and money market accounts, offset by decreases in higher costing certificates and public funds deposits. Most of the growth in demand deposits originated from MPS. Total checking deposits increased by $80.4 million, or 59.2%, to $216.3 million at September 30, 2006 from $135.9 million at September 30, 2005. Total savings and certificates of deposit declined $84.4 million, or 25.5%, to $246.1 million at September 30, 2006 from $330.5 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease in savings and certificates resulted primarily from the runoff of higher costing public funds deposits. Money market

3

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

accounts also exhibited growth during fiscal year 2006, increasing $28.7 million, or 38.5%, to $103.3 million at September 30, 2006 from $74.6 million at September 30, 2005. Money market deposits grew from increased market penetration by the Company’s retail banking operations and as customers’ opportunity cost of holding balances in savings and checking accounts rose with the level of short term interest rates during the year. See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          The Company’s wholesale borrowings portfolio decreased $65.4 million, or 34.4%, to $124.6 million at September 30, 2006 from $190.0 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily the result of decreased borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines in conjunction with management’s planned strategy of reducing the size of the balance sheet, and the Company’s reliance on these higher costing funding sources. See Notes 9, 10, and 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Shareholders’ equity increased $2.3 million, or 5.5%, to $45.3 million at September 30, 2006 from $43.0 million at September 30, 2005. The increase in shareholders’ equity was primarily due to net income, partially offset by cash dividends and an increase in other accumulated comprehensive loss associated with the Company’s securities available for sale portfolio. See Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the Company’s results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Selected Consolidated Financial Information and Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.

          The Company’s results of operations are dependent on net interest income, non-interest income, non-interest expense, and income tax expense. Net interest income is the difference, or spread, between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. The interest rate spread is affected by regulatory, economic, and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand, and deposit flows. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the extent that its interest earning assets mature or reprice at different times, or on a different basis, than its interest bearing liabilities.

          The Company’s non-interest income is derived primarily from card fees attributable to the activities of MPS and fees charged on loans and transaction accounts. This income is offset, in part, by expenses, such as card processing expenses, attributable to MPS, as well as additional compensation and occupancy expenses associated with additional personnel and office locations. To a lesser extent, non-interest income is derived from gains or losses on the sale of loans and securities available for sale as well as the Company’s holdings of bank owned life insurance. Additionally, non-interest income has been derived from the activities of Meta Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Meta Financial Group, which provides a variety of professional trust services.

COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

GENERAL

The Company recorded net income of $3,921,000 for the year ended September 30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $924,000 for the year ended September 30, 2005. Earnings in fiscal year 2006 were primarily impacted by card fees, non-recurring fee income, and a negative provision for loan loss, partially offset by higher compensation, occupancy, legal and consulting, and card processing expenses. Earnings in fiscal year 2005 were impacted by a large provision for loan loss.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income for the year ended September 30, 2006 increased by $397,000, or 2.1 percent, to $19,636,000 from $19,240,000 for the year ended September 30, 2005. The increase in net interest income reflects a higher net interest margin, offset in part by a smaller average earning asset base. Net interest margin increased 28 basis points to 2.84 percent in fiscal year 2006 from 2.56 percent in fiscal year 2005. The improvement resulted primarily from the shift in the Company’s funding mix attributable to growth in non-interest-bearing and money market deposits and decreases in higher costing certificates, public funds deposits, and wholesale borrowings.

          The Company’s average earning assets decreased $58.6 million, or 7.8 percent, to $692.0 million during fiscal year 2006 from $750.6 million during fiscal year 2005. The decrease is primarily the result of a smaller portfolio of securities available for sale and a smaller average loan portfolio. The Company’s yield on earning assets rose 38 basis points to 5.86 percent during fiscal year 2006 from 5.48 percent during fiscal year 2005. The increase is the result primarily of increasing yields on the Company’s adjustable rate loan portfolio due to an increasing interest rate environment during 2006.

          The Company’s average total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities decreased $38.2 million, or 5.2 percent, to $699.8 million during fiscal year 2006 from $738.0 million during fiscal year 2005. The decrease resulted mainly from a decrease in the Company’s portfolio of advances from the FHLB and other wholesale borrowings. Decreases in public funds deposits were more than offset by growth in non-interest bearing checking accounts. The Company’s cost of total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities rose 3 basis points during fiscal year 2006 to 2.99 percent during fiscal year 2006 from 2.96 percent during fiscal year 2005. Despite an increasing interest rate environment in 2006, which drove the costs of certificates and money market deposits higher, the Company was able to limit the increase in its overall cost of funds by shifting its portfolio mix away from higher costing certificates, public funds deposits, and wholesale borrowings, into lower costing demand deposits.

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

In fiscal year 2006, the Company recorded a negative provision for loan losses of $454,500, compared to a positive provision for loan losses of $5,482,000 for fiscal year 2005. The negative provision in 2006 relates in part to the Company’s settlement agreement with one of several participants in the aforementioned auto-dealership related lending relationship. Additionally, shrinkage in the Company’s loan portfolio during the year reduced the level of required loan loss allowances on the portfolio. The large provision for loan losses in fiscal year 2005 stemmed primarily from provisions related to losses in the aforementioned auto-dealership related loans. The relatively large provision in fiscal year 2005 and the negative provision in fiscal year 2006 is the primary reason that net interest income after provision for loan losses increased by $6.3 million, from $13.8 million in fiscal 2005 to $20.1 million in fiscal year 2006.

          Management closely monitors economic developments both regionally and nationwide, and considers these factors when assessing the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses. Although current economic conditions are relatively strong, management is aware that many economists have forecasted a slowdown in economic growth during calendar year 2007. Additionally, management has monitored the disinflationary trend in residential and commercial real estate prices in recent quarters. Economic conditions in the agricultural sector of the Company’s market area are relatively strong. Recent rises in agricultural commodity prices will serve to offset more modest yields this year. The agricultural economy is accustomed to commodity price fluctuations and is generally able to handle such fluctuations without significant problems. The recent decrease in energy prices should also help to improve cash flows of consumers and businesses alike if the decrease persists during 2007.

          Management believes that, based on a detailed review of the loan portfolio, historic loan losses, current economic conditions, the size of the loan portfolio, and other factors, the current level of the allowance for loan losses reflects an adequate allowance against probable losses from the loan portfolio. Although the Company maintains its allowance

4

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST RATES AND YIELDS

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. No tax equivalent adjustments have been made. Non-accruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,			2006					2005							2004
(Dollars in Thousands)
	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned /Paid		Yield /Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned /Paid		Yield /Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned /Paid		Yield /Rate
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	415,248	$	29,743		7.16	%	$	436,146	$	29,831		6.84	%	$	374,450	$	24,260		6.48	%
Mortgage-backed securities		179,500		6,776		3.77	%		265,996		9,644		3.63	%		317,489		10,871		3.42	%
Other investments		97,223		4,059		4.17	%		48,449		1,618		3.34	%		49,248		1,049		2.13	%
Total interest-earning assets		691,971	$	40,578		5.86	%		750,591	$	41,093		5.48	%		741,187	$	36,180		4.88	%
Non-interest-earning assets		57,439							35,607							34,477
Total assets	$	749,410						$	786,198						$	775,664
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	150,509	$	—		0.00	%	$	34,794	$	—		0.00	%	$	19,419	$	—		0.00	%
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing checking and money markets	$	114,201	$	3,293		2.88	%	$	112,495	$	1,856		1.65	%	$	112,817	$	1,289		1.14	%
Savings		48,839		1,402		2.87	%		57,566		1,321		2.29	%		36,236		475		1.31	%
Time deposits		232,822		8,810		3.78	%		285,115		8,903		3.12	%		304,322		7,875		2.59	%
FHLB advances		126,573		6,066		4.79	%		209,618		8,295		3.96	%		203,135		7,549		3.72	%
Other borrowings		26,846		1,371		5.11	%		38,377		1,478		3.85	%		49,287		1,223		2.48	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		549,281		20,942		3.81	%		703,171		21,853		3.11	%		705,797		18,411		2.61	%
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities		699,790	$	20,942		2.99	%		737,965	$	21,853		2.96	%		725,216	$	18,411		2.54	%
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		6,484							2,882							4,582
Total liabilities		706,274							740,847							729,798
Shareholders’ equity		43,136							45,351							45,866
Total Liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	749,410						$	786,198								$	775,664
Net interest income and net interest rate spread including non-interest bearing deposits			$	19,636		2.87	%			$	19,240		2.52	%			$	17,769		2.34	%
Net interest margin						2.84	%						2.56	%						2.40	%

⁽¹⁾ Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses.

for loan losses at a level that it considers to be adequate, investors and others are cautioned that there can be no assurance that future losses will not exceed estimated amounts, or that additional provisions for loan losses will not be required in future periods. In addition, the Company’s determination of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by its regulatory agencies, which can require the establishment of additional general or specific allowances.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income increased by $9,675,000, or 259.3 percent, to $13,406,000 for the fiscal year 2006 from $3,731,000 from fiscal year 2005. The majority of this growth is related to higher fee income earned on prepaid debit cards and other products and services offered by MPS. The increase also includes $2,570,000 of non-recurring fee income related to a purchased portfolio of prepaid debit cards.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

Non-interest expense increased by $8,528,000, or 44.6%, to $27,625,000 for fiscal year 2006 from $19,097,000 for fiscal year 2005. Several factors contributed to this increase. Compensation expense rose $1,822,000 during the year, from $11,399,000 in fiscal year 2005 to $13,221,000 in fiscal year 2006. The increase stems primarily from staff acquisition costs related to growth at MPS and the staffing of two de novo branch facilities in the Sioux Falls market. The new branch in Des Moines did not significantly impact non-interest expense for the year, due to its opening late in the fiscal year.

          Costs associated with the processing of card-related products at MPS also increased during fiscal year 2006. Card processing expense rose $2,648,000 from $338,000 in fiscal year 2005 to $2,986,000 in fiscal year 2006 as a result of the significant growth in the division’s product lines. These expenses stem primarily from fees charged by third party card and network transaction processors as well as costs associated with issuing MetaBank branded prepaid debit cards. Management expects that these costs will continue to rise as MPS issues more cards; however it is anticipated that overall costs will rise less than revenues associated with these cards.

          Legal and consulting expense increased $2,230,000 in fiscal year 2006, from $796,000 in fiscal year 2005 to $3,026,000 in fiscal year 2006. Several factors contributed to this increase. The Company incurred expenses related to the aforementioned auto dealership-related loans during the course of foreclosing on and liquidating the remaining assets of the borrowers. Additionally, as previously mentioned, the Company has been named in several lawsuits by banks that participated with MetaBank in these

5

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS

The following schedule presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the increase related to higher outstanding balances and that due to the levels and volatility of interest rates. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (i.e. changes in volume multiplied by old rate) and (ii) changes in rate (i.e. changes in rate multiplied by old volume). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,	2006 VS. 2005									2005 VS. 2004
(in Thousands)
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Volume			Increase (Decrease) Due to Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)			Increase (Decrease) Due to Volume			Increase (Decrease) Due to Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Loans Receivable	$	(1,463	)	$	1,375		$	(88	)	$	4,220		$	1,351		$	5,571
Mortgage-backed securities		(3,251	)		383			(2,868	)		(1,867	)		640			(1,227	)
Other investments		1,955			486			2,441			(27	)		596			569
Total interest-earning assets	$	(2,759	)	$	2,244		$	(515	)	$	2,326		$	2,587		$	4,913
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Interest-bearing checking and money markets	$	29		$	1,408		$	1,437		$	(5	)	$	572		$	567
Savings		(219	)		300			81			489			357			846
Time deposits		(1,793	)		1,700			(93	)		(600	)		1,628			1,028
FHLB advances		(3,739	)		1,510			(2,229	)		257			489			746
Other borrowings		(514	)		407			(107	)		(420	)		675			255
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(6,236	)	$	5,325		$	(911	)	$	(279	)	$	3,721		$	3,442
Net effect on net interest income	$	3,477		$	(3,081	)	$	396		$	2,605		$	(1,134	)	$	1,471

lending relationships. The Company has also incurred expenses related to its retention of an outside consulting firm to complete implementation work related to section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. At this time, the Company does not anticipate that expenses associated with this implementation work will continue at present levels over the long term. Finally, the Company has also chosen to outsource a significant portion of its internal audit work to an outside consulting firm.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Income tax expense for fiscal year 2006 was $1,950,000. In fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $685,000 due to the net loss recorded that year. The increase in income taxes is primarily the result of the positive change in operating results between the comparable periods.

COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

GENERAL

The Company recorded a net loss of $924,000 for the year ended September 30, 2005, compared to net income of $3,987,000 for the year ended September 30, 2004. The decrease in net income primarily reflects a substantial increase in the provision for loan losses. In addition, there was an increase in non-interest expense. These items were partially offset by an increase in net interest income and a small increase in non-interest income.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income for the year ended September 30, 2005 increased by $1,471,000, or 8.3 percent, to $19,240,000 compared to $17,769,000 for the period ended September 30, 2004. The increase in net interest income reflects a $9,404,000 increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets, and an increase in net interest margin. Net interest margin increased to 2.56 percent for the period ended September 30, 2005 from 2.40 percent for the same period in 2004. The increase in net interest margin was due primarily to a change in the composition of the balance sheet during the year which resulted in significant growth in loans receivable and a significant reduction in securities available for sale.

          Average yields on earning assets rose 60 basis points to 5.48 percent in fiscal year 2005 from 4.88 percent in fiscal year 2004. The increase in yields is primarily the result of increasing yields on the Company’s adjustable rate loan portfolio and the origination of new loans in a higher interest rate environment than the previous year.

          The Company’s cost on total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities rose 42 basis points to 2.96 percent during fiscal year 2005 from 2.54 percent during fiscal year 2004. The increase in cost reflects primarily the general increase in market rates on deposits.

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

The provision for loan losses for the year ended September 30, 2005 was $5,482,000 compared to $489,000 for the same period in 2004. The primary reason for the significant increase in the provision for loan losses was the losses on the aforementioned auto-dealership related loans. Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at a level that it considers to be adequate, investors and others are cautioned that there can be no assurance that future losses will not exceed estimated amounts, or that additional provisions for loan losses will not be required in future periods. In addition, the Company’s determination of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by its regulatory agencies, which can require the establishment of additional general or specific allowances.

6

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income increased by $135,000, or 3.8%, to $3,731,000 for the year ended September 30, 2005 from $3,596,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to an increase in card fee income of $1,240,000 generated by MPS, offset by a non-recurring gain of $1,113,000 on the sale of a branch office during 2004.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

Non-interest expense increased by $4,266,000, or 28.8%, to $19,097,000 for the year ended September 30, 2005 from $14,831,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase in non-interest expense primarily reflects the costs associated with the start-up of operations for MPS, costs related to the process of changing corporate names, costs associated with the liquidation of repossessed assets and foreclosed real estate, a full year of operations of the second Sioux Falls office (which opened late in fiscal 2004), the opening of a third office and preparation for opening a fourth office in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and additional staffing in the lending departments.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Due to the net loss for the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded a benefit of $685,000, compared to an expense of $2,059,000 for the year ended September 30, 2004. The change in income taxes is reflective of the change in operating result between the comparable periods.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICY

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to the allowance for loan losses and asset impairment judgments including the recoverability of goodwill.

          The Company’s estimated allowance for loan losses incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, which are reviewed as of each reporting date. Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in nonperforming loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers’ sensitivity to interest rate movements. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company’s markets, including economic conditions throughout the Midwest and, in particular, the state of certain industries. Size and complexity of individual credits in relation to loan structure, existing loan policies, and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in the estimate. Management may report a materially different amount for the provision for loan losses in the statement of operations to change the allowance for loan losses if its assessment of the above factors changes. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein, as well as the portion of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis section entitled “Asset Quality.” Although management believes the levels of the allowance as of both September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 were adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in local economic conditions or other factors, could result in increasing losses. See Notes 1 and 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a purchase acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND MARKET RISK

QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF MARKET RISK

As stated above, the Company derives its income primarily from the excess of interest collected over interest paid. The rates of interest the Company earns on assets and pays on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations, like those of most financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and the Company’s ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is the Company’s only significant “market” risk.

QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF MARKET RISK

The Company monitors and measures its exposure to changes in interest rates in order to comply with applicable government regulations and risk policies established by the Board of Directors, and in order to preserve shareholder value. In monitoring interest rate risk, the Company analyzes assets and liabilities based on characteristics including size, coupon rate, repricing frequency, maturity date, and likelihood of prepayment.

          If the Company’s assets mature or reprice more rapidly or to a greater extent than its liabilities, then net portfolio value and net interest income would tend to increase during periods of rising rates and decrease during periods of falling interest rates. Conversely, if the Company’s assets mature or reprice more slowly or to a lesser extent than its liabilities, then net portfolio value and net interest income would tend to decrease during periods of rising interest rates and increase during periods of falling interest rates.

          The Company currently focuses lending efforts toward originating and purchasing competitively priced adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loan products with short to intermediate terms to maturity, generally 5 years or less. This theoretically allows the Company to maintain a portfolio of loans that will have relatively little sensitivity to changes in the level of interest rates, while providing a reasonable spread to the cost of liabilities used to fund the loans.

          The Company’s primary objective for its investment portfolio is to provide a source of liquidity for the Company. In addition, the investment portfolio may be used in the management of the Company’s interest rate risk profile. The investment policy generally calls for funds to be invested among various categories of security types and maturities based upon the Company’s need for liquidity, desire to achieve a proper balance between minimizing risk while maximizing yield, the need to provide collateral for borrowings, and to fulfill the Company’s asset/liability management goals.

          The Company’s cost of funds responds to changes in interest rates due to the relatively short-term nature of its deposit portfolio, and due to the relatively short-term nature of its borrowed funds. The Company’s growing portfolio of low- or no-cost deposits provides a stable and profitable funding vehicle, but also subjects the Company to greater risk in a falling interest rate environment than it would otherwise have without this portfolio. This risk is due to the fact that, while asset yields may decrease in a falling interest rate environment, the Company cannot significantly reduce interest costs associated with these deposits; thereby compressing the Company’s net interest margin. As a result of the Company’s new interest rate risk exposure in this regard, the Company has elected not to enter in to any new longer term wholesale borrowings, and generally has not emphasized longer term time deposit products.

          The Board of Directors and relevant government regulations establish limits on the level of acceptable interest rate risk at the Company, to which management adheres. There can be no assurance, however, that, in the event of an adverse change in interest rates, the Company’s efforts to limit interest rate risk will be successful.

NET PORTFOLIO VALUE

The Company uses a net portfolio value (“NPV”) approach to the quantification of interest rate risk. This approach calculates the difference between the present value of expected

7

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

cash flows from assets and the present value of expected cash flows from liabilities, as well as cash flows from any off balance-sheet contracts. Management of the Company’s assets and liabilities is performed within the context of the marketplace, but also within limits established by the Board of Directors on the amount of change in NPV that is acceptable given certain interest rate changes.

          Presented below, as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, is an analysis of the Company’s interest rate risk as measured by changes in NPV for an instantaneous and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve, in 100 basis point increments, up and down 200 basis points. As illustrated in the table below, the Company’s NPV at September 30, 2006 was relatively balanced. Growth in the Company’s portfolio of non-interest bearing deposits during fiscal year 2006 has contributed to a balance sheet that is more asset sensitive, i.e. exhibits more favorable changes in a rising rate environment, as of September 30, 2006, than was the case at September 30, 2005.

          Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets such as adjustable rate mortgage loans have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short term basis and over the life of the asset. Furthermore, although management has estimated changes in the levels of prepayments and early withdrawal in these rate environments, such levels would likely deviate from those assumed in calculating the table. Finally, the ability of some borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.

          In addition to the NPV approach, the Company also reviews gap reports, which measure the differences in assets and liabilities repricing in given time periods, and net income simulations to assess its interest rate risk profile. Management reviews its interest rate risk profile on a quarterly basis.

ASSET QUALITY

It is management’s belief, based on information available at fiscal year end, that the Company’s current asset quality is satisfactory. At September 30, 2006, non performing assets, consisting of non-accruing loans, accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more, restructured loans, foreclosed real estate, and repossessed consumer property, totaled $4.15 million, or 0.56% of total assets, compared to $5.39 million, or 0.69% of total assets, at September 30, 2005.

          Non-accruing loans at September 30, 2006 include, among others, a commercial loan in the amount of $3.64 million secured by commercial paving equipment and related property. Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets at September 30, 2006 totaled $49,500 related to commercial and residential real estate.

          The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses because of the potential that some loans may not be repaid in full. See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At September 30, 2006, the Company had an allowance for loan losses in the amount of $5.97 million as compared to $7.22 million at September 30, 2005. Management’s periodic review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on various subjective and objective factors including the Company’s past loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. While management may allocate portions of the allowance for specifically identified problem loan situations, the majority of the allowance is based on judgmental factors related to the overall loan portfolio and is available for any loan charge-offs that may occur. In addition, the Company’s banks are subject to intensive review by banking regulatory bodies, which have the authority to require management to make changes to the allowance for loan losses.

          In determining the allowance for loan losses, the Company specifically identifies loans that it considers to have potential collectibility problems. Based on criteria established by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, some of these loans are considered to be “impaired” while others are not considered to be impaired, but possess weaknesses that the Company believes merit additional analysis in establishing the allowance for loan losses. All other loans are evaluated by applying estimated loss ratios to various pools of loans. The Company then analyzes other factors (such as economic conditions) in determining the aggregate amount of the allowance needed.

          At September 30, 2006, $839,000 of the allowance for loan losses was allocated to impaired loans, representing 20.5 percent of the related loan balances. See Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. $2.03 million of the allowance was allocated to other identified problem loan situations, representing 8.2 percent of the related loan balances, and $3.10 million, representing 0.85 percent of the related loan balances, was allocated to the remaining overall loan portfolio based on historical loss experience and general economic conditions. At September 30, 2005, $251,000 of the allowance for loan losses was allocated to impaired loans, representing 37.1 percent of the related loan balances. $2.45 million was allocated to other identified problem loan situations, and $4.52 million was allocated against losses from the overall loan portfolio based on historical loss experience and general economic conditions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage backed securities, and maturing investment securities. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and early loan repayments are influenced by the level of interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition.

          The Company relies on advertising, quality customer service, convenient locations, and competitive pricing to attract and retain its deposits and only solicits these deposits from its primary market area. Based on its experience, the Company believes that its consumer checking, savings, and money market accounts are relatively stable sources of

Change in Interest Rate     (Basis Points)		Board Limit % Change			$ Change				At September 30, 2006 % Change			$ Change				At September 30, 2005 % Change
Dollars In Thousands
+200	bp		(40	)%		$	548			1	%		$	(1,904	)		(3	)%
+100	bp		(25	)			562			1				(411	)		(1	)
0			—				—			—				—			—
- 100	bp		(25	)			(907	)		(1	)			(2,773	)		(5	)
- 200	bp		(40	)			(4,139	)		(6	)			(9,183	)		(16	)

8

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

deposits. The Company’s ability to attract and retain time deposits has been, and will continue to be, affected by market conditions. However, the Company does not foresee any significant funding issues resulting from the sensitivity of time deposits to such market factors.

          The Company is aware that, due to higher levels of concentration risk, the low- and no-cost checking deposits generated through MPS may carry a greater degree of liquidity risk than traditional consumer checking deposits. As a result, the Company closely monitors balances in these accounts, and maintains a portfolio of highly liquid assets to fund potential deposit outflows. To date, the Company has not experienced any inordinate or unusual outflows related to MPS, though no assurance can be given that this will continue to be the case.

          MetaBank and MetaBank WC are required by regulation to maintain sufficient liquidity to assure their safe and sound operation. In the opinion of management, both MetaBank and MetaBank WC are in compliance with this requirement.

          Liquidity management is both a daily and long term function of the Company’s management strategy. The Company adjusts its investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) the projected availability of purchased loan products, (iii) expected deposit flows, (iv) yields available on interest bearing deposits, and (v) the objectives of its asset/liability management program. Excess liquidity is generally invested in interest earning overnight deposits and other short term government agency obligations. If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, it has additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB and other wholesale funding sources. The Company is not aware of any significant trends in the Company’s liquidity or its ability to borrow additional funds if needed.

          The primary investing activities of the Company are the origination and purchase of loans and the purchase of securities. During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company originated loans totaling $357.2 million, $382.5 million, and $295.5 million, respectively. Purchases of loans totaled $68.3 million, 39.7 million, and $39.5 million during the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company purchased mortgage-backed securities and other securities available for sale in the amount of $108,000, $17.6 million, and $46.2 million, respectively. (See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)

          At September 30, 2006, the Company had unfunded loan commitments of $52.9 million. See Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less from September 30, 2006 totaled $152.0 million. Based on its historical experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with the Company, however, there can be no assurance that the Company can retain all such deposits. Management believes that loan repayment and other sources of funds will be adequate to meet the Company’s foreseeable short and long-term liquidity needs.

          The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2006 (in thousands):

Contractual Obligations		Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Time deposits	$	216,217	$	151,996	$	49,917	$	14,285	$	19
Long-term debt		114,744		40,444		37,000		30,000		7,300
Operating leases		2,188		301		604		486		797
Subordinated debentures Issued to capital trust		9,831		—		—		—		9,831
Data processing services		1,008		354		654		—		—
Total	$	343,988	$	193,095	$	88,175	$	44,771	$	17,947

          During July 2001, the Company’s unconsolidated trust subsidiary, First Midwest Financial Capital Trust I, sold $10 million in floating rate cumulative preferred securities. Proceeds from the sale were used to purchase subordinated debentures of Meta Financial Group, which mature in the year 2031, and are redeemable at any time after five years. The Company used the proceeds for general corporate purposes. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          The Company and its banking subsidiaries, MetaBank and MetaBank WC, meet regulatory requirements for classification as well capitalized institutions. See Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to its capital structure.

          On August 23, 2004, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized the Company’s ESOP to purchase up to 40,000 shares of the Company’s stock through open market and privately negotiated transactions. The ESOP stock purchase was completed on April 18, 2005 at a total cost of $897,000. At September 30, 2006, the ESOP held 22,312 unallocated shares, which will be used to fund future contributions to qualified employees.

          On April 26, 2005, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s stock through open market and privately negotiated transactions. This repurchase authorization expired on April 30, 2006, with no shares having been repurchased under this authorization. Given the impact on shareholders’ equity of the aforementioned provision for loan loss incurred during fiscal year 2005, management determined that it was not in the best interests of shareholders to proceed with share repurchases during the authorized period.

          The payment of dividends and repurchase of shares has the effect of reducing stockholders’ equity. Prior to authorizing such transactions, the Board of Directors considers the effect the dividend or repurchase of shares would have on liquidity and regulatory capital ratios.

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

The Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction, or to the same extent, as the prices of goods and services.

9

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” which permits, but does not require, fair value accounting for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The statement also subjects beneficial interests in securitized financial assets to the requirements of SFAS No. 133. For the Company, this statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to remeasurement after the beginning of its fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” The statement amends SFAS No. 140 by (1) requiring the separate accounting for servicing assets and servicing liabilities, which arise from the sale of financial assets; (2) requiring all separately recognized serving assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; and (3) permitting an entity to choose between an amortization method or a fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” This interpretation applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 109 by defining the criteria that an individual tax position must meet in order for the position to be recognized within the financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition for tax positions. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this interpretation will have on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. This Statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather, it provides enhanced guidance to other pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, (“SFAS No. 158”), “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires a company that sponsors a postretirement benefit plan to fully recognize, as an asset or liability, the over- or under-funded status of its benefit plan in its balance sheet. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its benefit obligation (projected benefit obligation for pension plans and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement benefit plans). Currently, the funded status of such plans are reported in the notes to the financial statements. This provision is effective for public companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. In addition, SFAS No. 158 also requires a company to measure its plan assets and benefit obligations as of its year end balance sheet date. Currently, a company is permitted to choose a measurement date up to three months prior to its year end to measure the plan assets and obligations. This provision is effective for all companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, MetaBank, MetaBank WC, and Meta Trust, may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements,” including statements contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in its reports to shareholders, and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

          These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, expectations, estimates, and intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. Such statements address the following subjects: future operating results; customer growth and retention; loan and other product demand; net interest income; earnings growth and expectations; new products and services, such as those offered by MPS or MetaBank; credit quality and adequacy of reserves; technology; and our employees. The following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s financial performance to differ materially from the expectations, estimates, and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary, and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; inflation, interest rate, market, and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services offered by the Company as well as risks (including litigation) attendant thereto and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users; the impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations; technological changes; acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at managing and collecting assets of borrowers in default and managing the risks (including litigation) involved in the foregoing.

          The foregoing list of factors is not exclusive. Additional discussion of factors affecting the Company’s business and prospects is contained in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC. The Company does not undertake, and expressly disclaims any intent or obligation, to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

10

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STORM LAKE, IOWA

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Des Moines, lowa
November 22, 2006

11

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005

	2006			2005
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	7,404,812		$	5,390,455
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		101,947,810			8,979,299
Total cash and cash equivalents		109,352,622			14,369,754
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		5,891,025			37,513,348
Securities available for sale		186,176,130			230,892,565
Loans receivable—net of allowance for loan losses of $5,967,774 at September 30, 2006 and $7,222,404 at September 30, 2005		388,761,911			440,190,245
Loans held for sale		507,600			306,000
Federal Home Loan and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost		5,768,300			8,286,800
Accrued interest receivable		4,378,814			4,240,694
Premises and equipment, net		17,623,060			15,126,069
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets		49,500			4,706,414
Bank owned life insurance		12,952,837			12,332,337
Goodwill		3,403,019			3,403,019
Other assets		6,267,215			4,472,017
Total assets	$	741,132,033		$	775,839,262
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Non-interest-bearing checking	$	189,506,062		$	102,435,429
Interest-bearing checking		26,828,157			33,481,270
Savings deposits		29,868,960			62,370,483
Money market deposits		103,290,548			74,632,300
Time certificates of deposit		216,216,848			268,122,096
Total deposits		565,710,575			541,041,578
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		99,565,000			159,705,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		15,179,334			20,507,051
Subordinated debentures		9,831,256			9,800,320
Accrued interest payable		971,917			941,935
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		4,542,283			884,688
Total liabilities		695,800,365			732,880,572
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 15)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, 800,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 5,200,000 shares authorized, 2,957,999 shares issued, 2,534,367 and 2,503,655 shares outstanding at September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively		29,580			29,580
Additional paid-in capital		20,968,492			20,646,513
Retained earnings—substantially restricted		37,186,249			34,557,258
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(4,547,719	)		(3,180,607	)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares		(509,201	)		(825,057	)
Treasury stock, 423,632 and 454,344 common shares, at cost, at September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively		(7,795,733	)		(8,268,997	)
Total shareholders’ equity		45,331,668			42,958,690
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	741,132,033		$	775,839,262

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

12

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004

	2006			2005			2004
Interest and dividend income:
Loans receivable, including fees	$	29,742,992		$	29,831,923		$	24,259,727
Mortgage backed securities		6,776,539			9,644,201			11,698,933
Other investments		4,058,444			1,617,184			221,596
		40,577,975			41,093,308			36,180,256
Interest expense:
Deposits		13,505,392			12,080,046			9,639,441
FHLB advances and other borrowings		7,436,543			9,773,747			8,771,744
		20,941,935			21,853,793			18,411,185
Net interest income		19,636,040			19,239,515			17,769,071
Provision for loan losses		(454,500	)		5,482,000			488,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		20,090,540			13,757,515			17,280,571
Non-interest income:
Deposit Fees		1,004,200			1,330,750			1,275,452
Loan Fees		457,141			291,882			272,969
Gain on sales of loans, net		62,908			47,719			56,404
(Loss) on sales of foreclosed real estate, net		(1,936	)		—			(8,752	)
(Loss) on sales of securities available for sale, net		—			(19,334	)		—
Gain on sale of branch office		—			—			1,113,230
Card fees		10,499,490			1,240,202			650
Bank owned life insurance income		620,500			484,916			546,030
Other income		763,554			354,472			339,786
Total non-interest income		13,405,857			3,730,607			3,595,769
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits		13,221,122			11,398,887			9,473,684
Occupancy and equipment expense		3,133,459			2,555,574			1,123,687
Marketing		735,464			828,802			437,461
Data processing expense		714,684			660,070			400,542
Card processing expense		2,986,034			337,549			24,407
Legal and consulting expense		3,026,054			795,586			128,116
Other expense		3,808,808			2,520,590			3,242,695
Total non-interest expense		27,625,625			19,097,058			14,830,592
Net income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		5,870,772			(1,608,936	)		6,045,748
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,949,810			(684,685	)		2,058,698
Net income (loss)		3,920,962			(924,251	)		3,987,050
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	1.58		$	(0.38	)	$	1.61
Diluted		1.55			(0.38	)		1.57
Dividends declared per common share:	$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.52

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004

	2006			2005			2004
Net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Other comprehensive (loss):
Net change in net unrealized (loss) on securities available for sale		(2,186,114	)		(3,090,094	)		2,848,264
Deferred income tax benefit		(819,002	)		(1,149,825	)		1,059,840
Total other comprehensive (loss)		(1,367,112	)		(1,940,269	)		1,788,424
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	2,553,850		$	(2,864,520	)	$	5,775,474

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan Shares			Treasury Stock			Total Sharehholders’ Equity
Balance, September 30, 2003	$	29,580	$	20,538,879		$	34,057,741		$	(3,028,762	)	$	(401,676	)	$	(8,164,963	)	$	43,030,799
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($.52 per share)		—		—			(1,286,533	)		—			—			—			(1,286,533	)
Puchase of 39,470 common shares of treasury stock		—		—			—			—			—			(906,650	)		(906,650	)
Issuance of 36,546 common shares from treasury stock due to exercise of stock options		—		68,057			—			—			—			514,500			582,557
Purchase of 10,000 common shares for ESOP		—		—			—			—			(212,400	)		—			(212,400	)
13,000 common shares committed to be released under the ESOP		—		71,708			—			—			219,310			—			291,018
Net change in net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of income taxes		—		—			—			1,788,424			—			—			1,788,424
Net income for year ended September 30, 2004		—		—			3,987,050			—			—			—			3,987,050
Balance, September 30, 2004	$	29,580	$	20,678,644		$	36,758,258		$	(1,240,338	)	$	(394,766	)	$	(8,557,113	)	$	47,274,265
Balance, September 30, 2004	$	29,580	$	20,678,644		$	36,758,258		$	(1,240,338	)	$	(394,766	)	$	(8,557,113	)	$	47,274,265
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($.52 per share)		—		—			(1,276,749	)		—			—			—			(1,276,749	)
Puchase of 1,000 common shares of treasury stock		—		—			—			—			—			(25,655	)		(25,655	)
Issuance of 13,630 common shares from treasury stock due to exercise of stock options		—		(83,357	)		—			—			—			313,771			230,414
Purchase of 30,000 common shares for ESOP		—		—			—			—			(684,133	)		—			(684,133	)
14,000 common shares committed to be released under the ESOP		—		51,226			—			—			253,842			—			305,068
Net change in net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of income taxes		—		—			—			(1,940,269	)		—			—			(1,940,269	)
Net (loss) for year ended September 30, 2005		—		—			(924,251	)		—			—			—			(924,251	)
Balance, September 30, 2005	$	29,580	$	20,646,513		$	34,557,258		$	(3,180,607	)	$	(825,057	)	$	(8,268,997	)	$	42,958,690
Balance, September 30, 2005	$	29,580	$	20,646,513		$	34,557,258		$	(3,180,607	)	$	(825,057	)	$	(8,268,997	)	$	42,958,690
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($.52 per share)		—		—			(1,291,971	)		—			—			—			(1,291,971	)
Issuance of 18,712 common shares from treasury stock due to exercise of stock options		—		(155,865	)		—			—			—			429,150			273,285
Issuance of 3,667 common shares from treasury stock due to issuance of nonvested shares		—		(44,114	)		—			—			—			44,114			—
Stock compensation		—		481,117			—			—			—			—			481,117
14,500 common shares committed to be released under the ESOP		—		40,841			—			—			315,856			—			356,697
Net change in net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of income taxes		—		—			—			(1,367,112	)		—			—			(1,367,112	)
Net income for year ended September 30, 2006		—		—			3,920,962			—			—			—			3,920,962
Balance, September 30, 2006	$	29,580	$	20,968,492		$	37,186,249		$	(4,547,719	)	$	(509,201	)	$	(7,795,733	)	$	45,331,668

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

14

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004

	2006			2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Effect of contribution to employee stock ownership plan		356,697			305,068			291,018
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net		3,204,005			3,276,520			4,365,294
Provision for loan losses		(454,500	)		5,482,000			488,500
Loss on the sale of securities available for sale, net		—			19,334			—
Stock compensation		481,117			—			—
Net change in loans held for sale		264,508			11,719			912,714
(Gain) on sale of branch office		—			—			(1,113,230	)
(Gain) loss on sales of foreclosed real estate, net		1,936			—			8,752
(Gain) on sales of loans, net		(62,908	)		(47,719	)		(56,404	)
Net change in accrued interest receivable		(138,120	)		(391,479	)		77,343
Net change in other assets		(2,241,216	)		(1,268,382	)		(864,592	)
Net change in accrued interest payable		29,982			468,509			(33,435	)
Net change in accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,657,595			(1,259,560	)		710,759
Net cash provided by operating activities		9,020,058			5,671,759			8,773,769
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available for sale		(108,522	)		(17,628,374	)		(46,204,355	)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		—			25,842,710			—
Net change in securities purchased under agreement to resell		31,622,323			(37,513,348	)		—
Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments of securities available for sale		41,723,244			78,086,047			89,167,761
Loans purchased		68,294,224			(39,697,273	)		(39,542,108	)
Net change in loans receivable		(17,067,490	)		(6,708,447	)		(16,106,777	)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate		4,656,914			22,028			1,158,935
Cash transferred to buyer on sale of branch		—			—			(14,154,359	)
Net change in FHLB / FRB stock		2,518,500			2,891,700			(122,400	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(3,772,850	)		(4,434,538	)		(1,364,922	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		127,866,343			860,505			(27,168,225	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in checking, savings, and money market deposits		76,574,245			75,877,809			66,137,257
Net change in time deposits		(51,905,248	)		3,366,561			(24,052,970	)
Net repayments of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(60,140,000	)		(66,545,000	)		2,465,606
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(5,327,717	)		(12,042,326	)		(25,152,657	)
Cash dividends paid		(1,291,971	)		(1,276,749	)		(1,286,533	)
Purchase of shares by ESOP		—			(684,133	)		(212,400	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		187,158			230,414			582,557
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(25,655	)		(906,650	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(41,903,533	)		(1,099,079	)		17,574,210
Net change in cash and equivalents		94,982,868			5,433,185			(820,246	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		14,369,754			8,936,569			9,756,815
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	109,352,622		$	14,369,754		$	8,936,569
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	20,911,953		$	21,385,284		$	18,444,620
Income taxes		1,689,334			605,911			2,213,428
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate	$	49,500		$	4,728,442		$	58,349
Sale of Branch
Assets disposed:
Loans		—			—			(730,704	)
Accrued interest receivable		—			—			(5,518	)
Premises and equipment		—			—			(110,818	)
Liabilities assumed by buyer:
Noninterest-bearing demand, savings, NOW and money market demand deposits		—			—			6,349,270
Time deposits		—			—			9,753,484
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		—			—			5,749
Other Liabilities		—			—			6,126
(Gain) on sale of office property, net		—			—			(1,113,230	)
Cash paid		—			—			14,154,359

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Meta Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) a bank holding company located in Storm Lake, Iowa, and its wholly owned subsidiaries which include MetaBank (the “Bank”), a federally chartered savings bank whose primary regulator is the Office of Thrift Supervision, MetaBank West Central (MBWC), a state chartered commercial bank whose primary regulator is the Federal Reserve, (together the “Banks”), First Services Financial Limited and Brookings Service Corporation, which offer noninsured investment products, Meta Trust Company, which offers various trust services. The Company also owns 100% of First Midwest Financial Capital Trust I (the Trust), which was formed in July 2001 for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. The Company presents the activity in the Trust under FASB Interpretation 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires the Company to use the equity method of accounting for this investment. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

NATURE OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION

The primary source of income for the Company is interest from the purchase or origination of consumer, commercial, agricultural, commercial real estate, and residential real estate loans. The Company accepts deposits from customers in the normal course of business primarily in northwest and central Iowa and eastern South Dakota. The Company operates primarily in the banking industry, which accounts for the majority of its revenues, operating income and assets, with the remaining operations consisting of payment processing services. The Company uses the “management approach” for reporting information about segments in annual and interim financial statements. The management approach is based on the way the chief operating decision-maker organizes segments within a company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure and any other manner in which management disaggregates a company. Based on the management approach model, the Company has determined that its business is comprised of two reporting segments.

          Assets held in trust or fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Company and, accordingly, are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

USE OF ESTIMATES IN PREPARING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses and the fair values of securities and other financial instruments. These estimates are reviewed by management regularly; however, they are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the future.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents is defined to include the Company’s cash on hand and due from financial institutions and short-term interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions. The Company reports net cash flows for customer loan transactions, securities purchased under agreement to resell, deposit transactions, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and FHLB advances with terms less than 90 days. The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank, based on a percentage of deposits. The total of those reserve balances was approximately $5.95 million and $3.56 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company at times maintains balances in excess of insured limits at various financial institutions including the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, the Federal Reserve Bank, and other private institutions. At September 30, 2006 the Company had $79.8 million of interest bearing deposits held at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines. The Company does not believe these deposits carry a significant risk of loss, but cannot provide assurances that no losses could occur if these institutions were to become insolent.

SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENT TO RESELL

Securities purchased under agreement to resell generally mature or reprice within one week and are carried at cost.

SECURITIES

The Company classifies all securities as available for sale. Available for sale securities are those the Company may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available for sale securities are reported at fair value, with net unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income or loss as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.

          Gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method based on amortized cost and are reflected in results of operations at the time of sale. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount over the estimated life of the security using the level yield method, is included in income as earned.

          Declines in the fair value of individual securities below their amortized cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to income. As assets specifically acquired for resale, the origination of, disposition of and gain/loss on these loans are classified as operating activities in the statement of cash flows.

LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding principal balances reduced by the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans.

          Premiums or discounts on purchased loans are amortized to income using the level yield method over the remaining period to contractual maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments.

          Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loans based upon the amount of principal outstanding except when serious doubt exists as to the collectibility of a loan, in which case the accrual of interest is discontinued. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received until, in management’s judgment, the borrower has the ability to make contractual interest and principal payments, in which case the loan is returned to accrual status.

LOAN ORIGINATION FEES, COMMITMENT FEES AND RELATED COSTS

Loan fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an adjustment to interest income using the interest method.

16

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Because some loans may not be repaid in full, an allowance for loan losses is recorded. The allowance for loan losses is increased by a provision for loan losses charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). Estimating the risk of loss and the amount of loss on any loan is necessarily subjective. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. While management may periodically allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loan situations, the entire allowance is available for any loan charge-offs that occur.

          Loans are considered impaired if full principal or interest payments are not anticipated in accordance with the contractual loan terms. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require an increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses.

          The allowance consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified either as doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

          Smaller-balance homogeneous loans are evaluated for impairment in total. Such loans include residential first mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residences, residential construction loans, and automobile, manufactured homes, home equity and second mortgage loans. Commercial and agricultural loans and mortgage loans secured by other properties are evaluated individually for impairment. When analysis of borrower operating results and financial condition indicates that underlying cash flows of the borrower’s business are not adequate to meet its debt service requirements, the loan is evaluated for impairment. Often this is associated with a delay or shortfall in payments of 90 days or more. Non-accrual loans are often also considered impaired. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

FORECLOSED REAL ESTATE AND REPOSSESSED ASSETS

Real estate properties and repossessed assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less selling costs at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Any reduction to fair value from the carrying value of the related loan at the time of acquisition is accounted for as a loan loss and charged against the allowance for loan losses. Valuations are periodically performed by management and valuation allowances are adjusted through a charge to income for changes in fair value or estimated selling costs.

INCOME TAXES

The Company records income tax expense based on the amount of taxes due on its tax return plus deferred taxes computed based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Land is carried at cost. Buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization computed principally by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 15 to 39 years for buildings and 3 to 7 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. These assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred costs and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE

Bank-owned life insurance represents the cash surrender value of investments in life insurance contracts. Earnings on the contracts are based on the earnings on the cash surrender value, less mortality costs.

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

The Company accounts for its employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 93-6. Under SOP 93-6, the cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, are presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. Compensation expense is recorded based on the market price of the shares as they are committed to be released for allocation to participant accounts. The difference between the market price and the cost of shares committed to be released is recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. Dividends on unallocated shares are used to reduce the accrued interest and principal amount of the ESOP’s loan payable to the Company.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

The Company, in the normal course of business, makes commitments to make loans which are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

GOODWILL

Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to an impairment test at least annually or more often if conditions indicate a possible impairment.

SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase with primary dealers only, which provide for the repurchase of the same security. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase identical securities are collateralized by assets which are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank or security by the dealers who arranged the transaction. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as financings, and the obligations to repurchase such securities are reflected as a liability. The securities underlying the agreements remain in the asset accounts of the Company.

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is based on the net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Allocated ESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings per common share calculations, as they are committed to be released; unallocated ESOP shares are not considered outstanding.

17

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Diluted earnings per common share shows the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock option plans.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes the net change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects, and is recognized as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

STOCK COMPENSATION

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using a modified prospective application. Prior to that date, the Company accounted for stock option awards under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), compensation expense for share based awards is recorded over the vesting period at the fair value of the award at the time of grant. The recording of such compensation expense began on October 1, 2005 for shares not yet vested as of that date and for all new grants subsequent to that date. Prior years’ results have not been restated. The exercise price of options or fair value of nonvested shares granted under the Company’s incentive plans is equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The Company assumes no projected forfeitures on its stock based compensation, since actual historical forfeiture rates on its stock based incentive awards has been negligible.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain 2005 and 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. There were no changes to previously reported shareholders’ equity.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” which permits, but does not require, fair value accounting for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The statement also subjects beneficial interests in securitized financial assets to the requirements of SFAS No. 133. For the Company, this statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to remeasurement after the beginning of its fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” The statement amends SFAS No. 140 by (1) requiring the separate accounting for servicing assets and servicing liabilities, which arise from the sale of financial assets; (2) requiring all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; and (3) permitting an entity to choose between an amortization method or a fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” This interpretation applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 109 by defining the criteria that an individual tax position must meet in order for the position to be recognized within the financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition for tax positions. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this interpretation will have on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. This Statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather, it provides enhanced guidance to other pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

          In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, (“SFAS No. 158”), “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires a company that sponsors a postretirement benefit plan to fully recognize, as an asset or liability, the over- or under-funded status of its benefit plan in its balance sheet. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its benefit obligation (projected benefit obligation for pension plans and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement benefit plans). Currently, the funded status of such plans are reported in the notes to the financial statements. This provision is effective for public companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. In addition, SFAS No. 158 also requires a company to measure its plan assets and benefit obligations as of its year end balance sheet date. Currently, a company is permitted to choose a measurement date up to three months prior to its year end to measure the plan assets and obligations. This provision is effective for all companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

18

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is presented below:

	2006			2005			2004
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Numerator, net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Denominator, weighted average common shares outstanding		2,511,754			2,497,954			2,498,403
Less weighted average unallocated ESOP and nonvested shares		(27,949	)		(37,063	)		(16,724	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,483,805			2,460,891			2,481,679
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	1.58		$	(0.38	)	$	1.61
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Numerator, net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Denominator, weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share		2,483,805			2,460,891			2,481,679
Add dilutive effect of assumed exercises of stock options, net of tax benefits		38,052			—			52,744
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding		2,521,857			2,460,891			2,534,423
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	1.55		$	(0.38	)	$	1.57

The calculation of the diluted loss per share for the year ended September 30, 2005 does not reflect the assumed exercise of 46,624 stock options because the effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the period. Stock options totaling 99,355, 60,315, and 91,315 were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, because they were not dilutive.

NOTE 3. SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL

In September 2005, the Company entered into a contract to assume the processing of a gift card portfolio. As part of the contract, the funds supporting the outstanding balances of the portfolio were invested in securities purchased under an agreement to resell through Bank of America. The contract provides for a fixed rate of return of 4.50% during its term. The investment in securities purchased under an agreement to resell matures weekly. Prior to reinvestment, the balance is reduced by an estimate of the amount that will be needed to cover gift card settlements the following week. The estimated amount, along with the previous week’s interest, is wired to the Company. The securities purchased under this agreement are comprised of U.S. Government agency securities.

19

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. SECURITIES

Year end securities available for sale were as follows:

2006	AMORTIZED COST		GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS		GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES			FAIR VALUE
Debt securities
Trust preferred and corporate securities	$	26,772,809	$	113,881	$	(608,228	)	$	26,278,462
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		146,218		—		(1,342	)		144,876
Mortgage-backed securities		165,798,153		14,728		(7,110,988	)		158,701,893
Other		109,697		—		(247	)		109,450
Total debt securities		192,826,877		128,609		(7,720,805	)		185,234,681
Marketable equity securities		602,331		339,118		—			941,449
Total securities	$	193,429,208	$	467,727	$	(7,720,805	)	$	186,176,130

2005	AMORTIZED COST		GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS		GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES			FAIR VALUE
Debt securities
Trust preferred and corporate securities	$	27,261,733	$	123,965	$	(735,248	)	$	26,650,450
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		443,129		349		(2,609	)		440,869
Mortgage-backed securities		207,652,399		31,615		(4,762,913	)		202,921,101
Total debt securities		235,357,261		155,929		(5,500,770	)		230,012,420
Marketable equity securities		602,331		277,814		—			880,145
Total securities	$	235,959,592	$	433,743	$	(5,500,770	)	$	230,892,565

Gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

2006	LESS THAN 12 MONTHS					OVER 12 MONTHS					TOTAL
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Debt securities
Trust preferred and corporate securities	$	—	$	—		$	24,165,062	$	(608,228	)	$	24,165,062	$	(608,228	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		—			94,876		(1,342	)		94,876		(1,342	)
Mortgage-backed securities		777,037		(15,222	)		157,720,348		(7,095,766	)		158,497,385		(7,110,988	)
Other		109,450		(247	)		—		—			109,450		(247	)
Total debt securities	$	886,487	$	(15,469	)	$	181,980,286	$	(7,705,336	)	$	182,866,773	$	(7,720,805	)

2005	LESS THAN 12 MONTHS					OVER 12 MONTHS					TOTAL
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Debt securities
Trust preferred and corporate securities	$	—	$	—		$	24,027,396	$	(735,248	)	$	24,027,396	$	(735,248	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		290,520		(2,609	)		—		—			290,520		(2,609	)
Mortgage-backed securities		43,671,997		(699,413	)		157,847,666		(4,063,500	)		201,519,663		(4,762,913	)
Total debt securities	$	43,962,517	$	(702,022	)	$	181,875,062	$	(4,798,748	)	$	225,837,579	$	(5,500,770	)

As of September 30, 2006, the investment portfolio included 43 securities with current unrealized losses which have existed for longer than one year. All of these securities are considered to be acceptable credit risks. Because the declines in fair value were due to changes in market interest rates, not in estimated cash flows, no other-than-temporary impairment was recorded at September 30, 2006. In addition, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investment securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery.

          The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity are shown below. Certain securities have call features which allow the issuer to call the security prior to maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Marketable equity securities are not included in the following maturity summary.

20

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	255,915	$	254,326
Due after one year through five years		999,519		1,002,800
Due after ten years		25,773,290		25,275,662
		27,028,724		26,532,788
Mortgage-backed securities		165,798,153		158,701,893
	$	192,826,877	$	185,234,681

Activities related to the sale of securities available for sale are summarized below.

	2006		2005			2004
Proceeds from sales	$	—	$	25,842,710		$	—
Gross gains on sales		—		221,868			—
Gross (losses) on sales		—		(241,202	)		—

NOTE 5. LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET

Year end loans receivable were as follows:

	2006			2005
One to four family residential mortgage loans	$	59,330,439		$	70,165,219
Commercial and multi-family real estate loans		167,590,032			214,048,999
Agricultural real estate loans		16,146,672			15,245,600
Consumer loans		31,164,854			31,663,259
Commercial business loans		92,384,484			101,772,452
Agricultural business loans		30,064,102			24,528,747
		396,680,583			457,424,276
Less:
Allowance for loan losses		(5,967,774	)		(7,222,404	)
Undisbursed portion of loans in process		(1,772,894	)		(9,732,776	)
Net deferred loan origination fees		(178,004	)		(278,851	)
	$	388,761,911			440,190,245

Annual activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Beginning balance	$	7,222,404		$	5,370,994		$	4,961,777
Provision for loan losses		(454,500	)		5,482,000			488,500
Recoveries		329,180			146,820			29,210
Charge offs		(1,129,310	)		(3,777,410	)		(108,493	)
Ending balance	$	5,967,774		$	7,222,404		$	5,370,994

Virtually all of the Company’s originated loans are to Iowa- and South Dakota-based individuals and organizations. The Company’s purchased loans totaled approximately $50,752,562 at September 30, 2006, and were secured by properties located, as a percentage of total loans, as follows: 4% in Iowa, 2% in Arizona, 1% each in Minnesota, South Dakota, Illinois, Florida, California, and Washington, and the remaining 1% in eight other states. The Company’s purchased loans totaled approximately $60,968,000 at September 30, 2005, and were secured by properties located, as a percentage of total loans, as follows: 1% in Washington, 1% in Colorado, 2% in Minnesota, 3% in Iowa, 2% in Arizona, 1% in Missouri and the remaining 3% in 12 other states.

          The Company originates and purchases commercial real estate loans. These loans are considered by management to be of somewhat greater risk of uncollectibility due to the dependency on income production. The Company’s commercial real estate loans include $10,424,000 of loans secured by hotel properties and $29,957,000 million of multi-family properties at September 30, 2006. The Company’s commercial real estate loans include $33,554,000 of loans secured by hotel properties and $45,566,000 of multi-family properties at September 30, 2005. The remainder of the commercial real estate portfolio is diversified by industry. The Company’s policy for requiring collateral and guarantees varies with the creditworthiness of each borrower.

21

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Impaired loans were as follows:

	2006		2005
Year-end impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated	$	—	$	—
Year-end impaired loans with allowance for loan losses allocated		4,100,265		664,056
Amount of the allowance allocated to impaired loans		839,508		250,803
Average of impaired loans during the year		4,402,198		1,701,941

Interest income and cash interest collected on impaired loans was not material during the years ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, and 2004.

NOTE 6. LOAN SERVICING

Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets. The unpaid principal balances of these loans at year end were as follows:

	2006		2005
Mortgage loan portfolios serviced for FNMA	$	22,900,000	$	25,241,000
Other		25,800,000		26,039,000
	$	48,700,000	$	51,280,000

NOTE 7. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Year end premises and equipment were as follows:

	2006			2005
Land	$	2,858,410		$	2,858,410
Buildings		13,481,353			12,484,587
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		8,806,715			6,021,614
		25,146,478			21,364,611
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,523,418	)		(6,238,542	)
	$	17,623,060		$	15,126,069

Depreciation of premises and equipment included in occupancy and equipment expense was approximately $1,276,000, $999,000, and $917,000 for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

NOTE 8. DEPOSITS

Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more were approximately $44.3 million and $128.2 million at September 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

          At September 30, 2006, the scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit were as follows for the years ending September 30:

2007	$	151,996,116
2008		35,404,213
2009		14,512,695
2010		11,357,984
2011		2,927,265
Thereafter		18,575
	$	216,216,848

NOTE 9. ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

At September 30, 2006, the Company’s advances from the FHLB of Des Moines had fixed rates ranging from 2.56% to 7.19% with a weighted average rate of 4.97%.

The scheduled maturities of FHLB advances were as follows for the years ending September 30:

2007	$	25,265,000
2008		25,000,000
2009		12,000,000
2010		20,000,000
2011		10,000,000
Thereafter		7,300,000
	$	99,565,000

Advances totaling $31.7 million, with a weighted average fixed rate of 5.75%, carry quarterly call provisions, whereby the FHLB can elect to accelerate the maturity of these borrowings. These advances are shown in the above table at their stated maturity date, which range from 2008 to 2010.

          As of September 30, 2005, the Company’s FHLB advance portfolio totaled $159,705,000 and carried a weighted average rate of 4.56%.

          MetaBank and MBWC have executed blanket pledge agreements whereby the Banks assign, transfer, and pledge to the FHLB and grant to the FHLB a security interest in all

22

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

mortgage collateral and securities collateral. The Banks have the right to use, commingle, and dispose of the collateral they have assigned to the FHLB. Under the agreements, the Banks must maintain “eligible collateral” that has a “lending value” at least equal to the “required collateral amount,” all as defined by the agreements.

          At year end 2006, and 2005, the Banks collectively pledged securities with fair values of approximately $54.6 million and $103.4 million, respectively, against specific FHLB advances. In addition, qualifying mortgage loans of approximately $79.1 million, and $89.8 million were pledged as collateral at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

NOTE 10. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled approximately $15.2 million and $20.5 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

          An analysis of securities sold under agreements to repurchase follows:

	2006			2005
Highest month-end balance	$	20,369,469		$	33,077,141
Average balance		16,616,456			28,066,924
Weighted average interest rate during the period		3.01	%		2.78	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period		3.13	%		2.89	%

At September 30, 2006, securities sold under agreements to repurchase had a weighted average maturity of less than five months.

          The Company pledged securities with fair values of approximately $20.5 million and $22.3 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

NOTE 11. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

Subordinated debentures are due to First Midwest Financial Capital Trust I, a 100%-owned unconsolidated subsidiary of the Company. The debentures were issued in 2001 in conjunction with the Trust’s issuance of 10,000 shares of Trust Preferred Securities. The debentures bear the same interest rate and terms as the trust preferred securities. The debentures are included on the balance sheet as liabilities, net of applicable unamortized issuance costs.

          The Company issued all of the 10,000 authorized shares of trust preferred securities of First Midwest Financial Capital Trust I holding solely subordinated debt securities. Distributions are paid semi-annually. Cumulative cash distributions are calculated at a variable rate of LIBOR (as defined) plus 3.75% (9.30% at September 30, 2006 and 7.67% at September 30, 2005), not to exceed 12.5%. The Company may, at one or more times, defer interest payments on the capital securities for up to 10 consecutive semi-annual periods, but not beyond July 25, 2031. At the end of any deferral period, all accumulated and unpaid distributions are required to be paid. The capital securities are required to be redeemed on July 25, 2031; however, the Company has the option to shorten the maturity date to a date not earlier than July 25, 2006. The redemption price is $1,000 per capital security plus any accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption plus, if redeemed prior to July 25, 2011, a redemption premium as defined in the Indenture agreement.

          Holders of the capital securities have no voting rights, are unsecured and rank junior in priority of payment to all of the Company’s indebtedness and senior to the Company’s common stock.

          Although the securities issued by the trusts are not included as a component of shareholders’ equity, the securities are treated as capital for regulatory purposes, subject to certain limitations.

NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP AND PROFIT SHARING PLANS

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for eligible employees who have 1,000 hours of employment with the Bank, have worked one year at the Bank and who have attained age 21. The ESOP has borrowed money from the Company to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares purchased by the ESOP are held in suspense for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid. ESOP expense of $356,697, $305,068 and $291,018 was recorded for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Contributions of $315,856, $253,842 and $219,310 were made to the ESOP during the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

          Contributions to the ESOP and shares released from suspense in an amount proportional to the repayment of the ESOP loan are allocated among ESOP participants on the basis of compensation in the year of allocation. Benefits generally become 100% vested after seven years of credited service. Prior to the completion of seven years of credited service, a participant who terminates employment for reasons other than death or disability receives a reduced benefit based on the ESOP’s vesting schedule. Forfeitures are reallocated among remaining participating employees in the same proportion as contributions. Benefits are payable in the form of stock upon termination of employment. The Company’s contributions to the ESOP are not fixed, so benefits payable under the ESOP cannot be estimated.

          For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, 14,500, 14,000 and 13,000 shares with a fair value of $24.60, $21.79 and $22.37 per share, respectively, were released. Also for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, allocated shares and total ESOP shares reflect 11,332, 45,042, and 15,056 shares, respectively, withdrawn from the ESOP by participants who are no longer with the Company or by participants diversifying their holdings and 5,358, 5,152, and 5,426 shares, respectively, purchased for dividend reinvestment.

Year-end ESOP shares are as follows:

	2006		2005		2004
Allocated shares		238,454		229,928		255,818
Unearned shares		22,312		36,812		20,812
Total ESOP shares		260,766		266,740		276,630
Fair value of unearned shares	$	548,875	$	686,912	$	462,859

The Company also has a profit sharing plan covering substantially all full-time employees. Contribution expense for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $322,226, $233,453, and $276,923, respectively.

23

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company maintains the 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which, among other things, provides for the awarding of stock options and nonvested (restricted) shares to certain officers and directors of the Company. Awards are granted by the Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors based on the performance of the award recipients, or other relevant factors.

          Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment using a modified prospective application. Prior to adopting this standard the Company accounted for stock options under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), the Company, during the year ended September 30, 2006, began recording expense associated with the awarding of stock options and restricted stock. Prior years’ results have not been restated to reflect the impact of this change. The following tables show the effect to income, net of tax benefits, of share-based expense recorded in the year ended September 30, 2006, as well as the pro forma effect to income and earnings per share had the Company used the accounting methodology under SFAS No. 123(R) for fiscal years 2005 and 2004.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

	2006		2005		2004
Total employee stock-based compensation expense recognized in income, net of tax effects of $163,580	$	317,537	$	—	$	—

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

	2005			2004
Net income (loss) as reported	$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Deduct: Total employee stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax effects		(154,126	)		(229,967	)
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(1,078,377	)	$	3,757,083
Earnings (loss) per common share—basic
As reported		(0.38	)		1.61
Pro forma		(0.44	)		1.51
Earnings (loss) per common share—diluted
As reported		(0.38	)		1.57
Pro forma		(0.44	)		1.48

As of September 30, 2006, stock based compensation expense not yet recognized in income totaled $620,126. which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 1.45 years.

At grant date, the fair value of options awarded to recipients is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The exercise price of stock options equals the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The following table shows the key valuation assumptions used for options granted during the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and other information. Options are issued for 10 year periods with 100% vesting generally occurring either at grant date or over a four year period.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

	2006			2005			2004
Risk-free interest rate		4.40% - 5.09	%		4.30	%		3.83% - 4.42	%
Expected annual standard deviation
Range		19.46% - 20.60	%		20.60	%		21.85% - 22.45	%
Weighted average		19.93	%		20.60	%		22.16	%
Expected life (years)		7			7			7
Expected dividend yield
Range		2.13% - 2.55	%		2.76	%		2.18% - 2.54	%
Weighted average		2.32	%		2.76	%		2.26	%
Weighted average fair value of options granted during period	$	5.51		$	4.03		$	5.32
Intrinsic value of options exercised during period	$	217,760		$	98,446		$	262,980

24

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Although authorized under the Company’s 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company had not, prior to fiscal year 2006, awarded nonvested (restricted) shares to employees or directors. The Company did award nonvested shares during the year ended September 30, 2006. Nonvested shares vest immediately or over a period of four years. The following table shows the weighted average fair value of nonvested shares awarded and the total fair value of novested shares which vested during the year ended September 30, 2006. The fair value is determined based upon the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the grant date.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

	2006		2005		2004
Weighted average fair value of nonvested shares granted during period	$	24.43		n/a		n/a
Total fair value of nonvested shares vested during period	$	89,585		n/a		n/a

In addition to the Company’s active 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company also maintains the 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. No new options were, or could have been, awarded under the 1995 and 1993 plans during the year ended September 30, 2006; however previously awarded but unexercised shares were outstanding under these plans during the year.

          The following tables shows the activity of options and nonvested shares granted, exercised, or forfeited under all of the Company’s option and incentive plans during the year ended September 30, 2006.

	NUMBER OF SHARES			WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE		WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING CONTRACTUAL TERM (YRS)		AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
Options outstanding, September 30, 2005		311,328		$	18.11		5.99	$	668,629
Granted		114,903			23.16
Exercised		(28,250	)		14.57
Forfeited or expired		(11,556	)		20.71
Options outstanding, September 30, 2006		386,425		$	19.79		6.65	$	1,792,717
Options exercisable end of year		276,925		$	18.74		5.75	$	1,575,099

	NUMBER OF SHARES			WEIGHTED AVERAGE MKT VAL AT GRANT
Nonvested shares outstanding, September 30, 2005		—		$	—
Granted		12,000			24.43
Vested		(3,667	)		24.43
Forfeited or expired		—			—
Nonvested shares outstanding, September 30, 2006		8,333		$	24.43

On August 28, 2006, the Board of Directors approved the First Amendment to the Company’s 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which, among other things, increased the number of shares eligible for award under the plan from 200,000 to 400,000. This Amendment is subject to shareholder approval at the Company’s annual meeting scheduled for January 2007. The preceding option table includes 28,701 options granted subject to final approval by the Company’s shareholders.

25

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return on a fiscal year basis.

The provision for income taxes consists of:

Years ended September 30,

	2006		2005			2004
Federal:
Current	$	1,331,116	$	115,151		$	2,120,464
Deferred		290,820		(670,140	)		(333,905	)
	$	1,621,936	$	(554,989	)	$	1,786,559
State:
Current		282,855		(46,076	)		288,092
Deferred		45,019		(83,620	)		(15,953	)
	$	327,874	$	(129,696	)	$	272,139
Income tax expense (benefit)	$	1,949,810	$	(684,685	)	$	2,058,698

Total income tax expense (benefit) differs from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

Years ended September 30,

	2006			2005			2004
Income tax expense (benefit) at 35% federal tax rate	$	2,055,000		$	(563,000	)	$	2,116,000
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State income taxes net of federal benefit		171,335			(26,000	)		191,000
Nontaxable buildup in cash surrender value		(217,175	)		(165,000	)		(186,000	)
Other, net		(59,350	)		69,315			(62,302	)
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	1,949,810		$	(684,685	)	$	2,058,698

Year-end deferred tax assets and liabilities included in other assets consist of:

September 30,

	2006			2005
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:
Bad debts	$	2,225,650		$	2,694,000
Stock based compensation		90,862			—
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale		2,705,421			1,886,420
Other, net		120,813			75,589
		5,142,746			4,656,009
Deferred tax liabilities:
FHLB stock dividend		(452,000	)		(452,000	)
Premises and equipment		(476,575	)		(463,000	)
Deferred loan fees		(140,000	)		(150,000	)
		(1,068,575	)		(1,065,000	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	4,074,171		$	3,591,009

          Federal income tax laws provided savings banks with additional bad debt deductions through September 30, 1987 totaling $6,744,000 for the Bank. Accounting standards do not require a deferred tax liability to be recorded on this amount, which liability otherwise would total approximately $2,300,000 at September 30, 2006, and 2005. If the Bank were to be liquidated or otherwise cease to be a bank, or if tax laws were to change, the $2,300,000 would be recorded as expense.

26

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 15. CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON RETAINED EARNINGS

The Company has two primary subsidiaries, MetaBank and MBWC. MetaBank and MBWC are subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory or discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, MetaBank and MBWC must meet specific quantitative capital guidelines using their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The requirements are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

          Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require MetaBank and MBWC to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total risk-based capital and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and a leverage ratio consisting of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). As of September 30, 2006, MetaBank and MBWC met all capital adequacy requirements.

MetaBank’s and MBWC’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.

	ACTUAL					MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES					MINIMUM REQUIREMENT TO BE WELL CAPITALIZED UNDER PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION PROVISIONS
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Dollars in thousands)
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2006:
MetaBank
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	48,609		6.97	%	$	10,462		1.50	%	$	—		—
Tier 1 (core) capital (to adjusted total assets)		48,609		6.97	%		27,899		4.00	%		34,874		5.00	%
Total risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		54,401		12.21	%		35,652		8.00	%		44,565		10.00	%
MetaBank West Central
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)		4,071		9.71	%		1,677		4.00	%		2,097		5.00	%
Tier 1 risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		4,071		14.90	%		1,093		4.00	%		1,640		6.00	%
Total risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		4,338		15.87	%		2,186		8.00	%		2,733		10.00	%
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2005:
MetaBank
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	46,412		6.38	%	$	10,911		1.50	%	$	—		—
Tier 1 (core) capital (to adjusted total assets)		46,412		6.38	%		29,065		4.00	%		36,332		5.00	%
Total risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		52,857		10.33	%		40,944		8.00	%		51,180		10.00	%
MetaBank West Central
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)		3,762		7.37	%		2,042		4.00	%		2,553		5.00	%
Tier 1 risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		3,762		11.73	%		1,277		4.00	%		1,915		6.00	%
Total risk based capital (to risk weighted assets)		4,162		12.98	%		2,566		8.00	%		3,208		10.00	%

Regulations limit the amount of dividends and other capital distributions that may be paid by a financial institution without prior approval of its primary regulator. The regulatory restriction is based on a three-tiered system with the greatest flexibility being afforded to well-capitalized (Tier 1) institutions. MetaBank and MBWC are currently Tier 1 institutions. Accordingly, MetaBank and MBWC can make, without prior regulatory approval, distributions during a calendar year up to 100% of their retained net income for the calendar year-to-date plus retained net income for the previous two calendar years (less any dividends previously paid) as long as they remain well-capitalized, as defined in prompt corrective action regulations, following the proposed distribution. Accordingly, at September 30, 2006, approximately $2.7 million of MetaBank’s retained earnings and none of MBWC’s retained earnings were potentially available for distribution to the Company.

27

-Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, the Company’s subsidiary banks make various commitments to extend credit which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

          At September 30, 2006 and 2005, unfunded loan commitments approximated $52.9 million and $69.6 million respectively, excluding undisbursed portions of loans in process. Unfunded loan commitments at September 30, 2006 and 2005 were principally for variable rate loans. Commitments, which are disbursed subject to certain limitations, extend over various periods of time. Generally, unused commitments are canceled upon expiration of the commitment term as outlined in each individual contract.

          The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by other parties to financial instruments for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The same credit policies and collateral requirements are used in making commitments and conditional obligations as are used for on-balance-sheet instruments.

          Since certain commitments to make loans and to fund lines of credit and loans in process expire without being used, the amount does not necessarily represent future cash commitments. In addition, commitments used to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.

          Securities with fair values of approximately $26,402,000 and $63,313,000 at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public funds on deposit. Securities with fair values of approximately $8,931,000 and $13,400,000 at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged as collateral for individual, trust and estate deposits.

          Under employment agreements with certain executive officers, certain events leading to separation from the Company could result in cash payments totaling approximately $2.8 million as of September 30, 2006.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

MetaBank has been named in several lawsuits whose eventual outcome could have an adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company. Because the likelihood or amount of an adverse resolution to these matters cannot currently be assessed, the Company has not recorded a contingent liability related to these potential claims.

          On June 11, 2004, the Sioux Falls School District filed suit in the Second Judicial Circuit Court alleging that MetaBank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, improperly allowed funds, which belonged to the school district, to be deposited into, and subsequently withdrawn from, a corporate account established by an employee of the school district. The school district is seeking in excess of $600,000. MetaBank has submitted the claim to its insurance carrier, and is working with counsel to vigorously contest the suit.

          On or about March 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed five class-action suits on behalf of themselves and all other purchasers of vehicles from Prairie Auto Group, Inc., Dan Nelson Automotive Group, Inc.’s Rapid City, South Dakota location, and other not-yet-identified auto sales entities owned or operated by defendants. Each complaint states that it is a “companion” to the other four and names the same defendants (approximately twenty-five) including the Company and affiliates thereof (the “MetaBank Defendants”). None of these complaints has yet been served on any of the MetaBank Defendants. The thrust of the complaints is that plaintiffs allegedly suffered damages as a result of a scheme by defendants to use fraudulent statements, misrepresentations and omissions to sell vehicles and extended warranties to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs claim that they and other similarly situated purchasers paid too much for their vehicles and were induced to buy warranties that were not honored and otherwise proved worthless. Plaintiffs allege that defendants reaped considerable profits through fraudulent sales methods; by refusing to make warrantied repairs; and by engaging in usurious repossession and resale practices. Plaintiffs allege that these practices were part of a business plan that originated with the franchisor-defendants and was purchased and employed by the franchisee-defendants. It appears that the principal basis for naming the MetaBank Defendants is that they loaned money to finance some of the defendants’ business operations, purportedly with some degree of knowledge about the defendants’ allegedly abusive consumer practices.

          In addition to seeking certification as a class, plaintiffs seek cancellation of the automobile purchase contracts; monetary damages including the initial purchase price warranty charges, finance costs and related repossession and other charges; costs of allegedly warrantied repairs that were not made by defendants; consequential damages relating to the alleged wrongful repossession of vehicles and deficiency judgments associated therewith; damages for emotional and mental suffering; punitive and treble damages; and attorneys’ fees. The amount of the alleged damages is not specified in the complaints.

          During the third fiscal quarter of 2005, the company determined that $9.8 million of its assets were impaired under generally accepted accounting principles. The Company was the lead lender and servicer of approximately $32.0 million in loans to three auto-dealership related companies and their owners. Approximately $22.2 million of the total had been sold to ten participating financial institutions. Each participation agreement with the ten participant banks provides that the participant bank shall own a specified percentage of the outstanding loan balance at any give time. Each agreement also recites the maximum amount that can be loaned by MetaBank on that particular loan. MetaBank allocated to some participants an ownership in the outstanding loan balance in excess of the percentage specified in the participation agreement. MetaBank believes that in each instance this was done with the full knowledge and consent of the participant. Several participants have demanded that their participations be adjusted to match the percentage specified in the participant agreement. Based on the total loan recoveries projected as of September 30, 2006, MetaBank calculated that it would cost approximately $953,000 to adjust these participations as the participants would have them adjusted. A few participants have more recently asserted that MetaBank owes them additional monies based on additional legal theories. MetaBank denies any obligation to make the requested adjustments on these or related claims. Other than as described below, MetaBank cannot predict at this time whether any of these claims will be the subject of litigation.

          Four lawsuits were filed against the Company’s MetaBank subsidiary in 2006. Three of the complaints are related to the Company’s alleged actions in connection with its activities as lead lender to three companies involved in auto sales, service, and financing and their owner. The fourth complaint alleges patent infringement. All four actions are in their infancy and materiality cannot be determined at this time. The Company intends, however, to vigorously defend its actions.

          On June 28, 2006, First Midwest Bank-Deerfield Branches and Mid-Country Bank filed suit against MetaBank in South Dakota’s Second Judicial Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. The complaint alleges that plaintiff banks, who were participating lenders with MetaBank on a series of loans made to Dan Nelson Automotive Group (“DNAG”) and South Dakota Acceptance Corporation (“SDAC”), suffered damages exceeding $1 million as a result of MetaBank’s placement and administration of the loans that were the subject of the loan participation agreements. On July 17, 2006, MetaBank removed the case from state court to the United States District Court.

          On July 5, 2006, First Premier Bank filed suit against MetaBank in South Dakota’s Second Judicial Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. The complaint alleges that First Premier, a participating lender with MetaBank on a series of loans made to SDAC, has suffered damages in an as yet undetermined amount as a result of MetaBank’s actions in selling to First Premier a participation in a loan made to SDAC and MetaBank’s actions in administering that loan. On July 17, 2006, MetaBank removed the case from state court to the United States District Court.

          On June 26, 2006, Home Federal Bank filed suit against MetaBank and two individuals, J. Tyler Haahr and Daniel A. Nelson, in South Dakota’s Second Judicial Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. The complaint alleges that Home Federal, a participating lender with MetaBank on a series of loans made to DNAG and SDAC, suffered damages exceeding

28

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

$3.8 million as a result of failure to make disclosures regarding an investigation of Nelson, DNAG and SDAC by the Iowa Attorney General at the time Home Federal agreed to an extension of the loan participation agreements.

          Subject to a reservation of rights, the Company’s insurance carrier has agreed to cover the three claims described above.

          On July 21, 2006, Meridian Enterprises Corporation (“Meridian”) filed suit against Meta Financial Group, Inc. (Meta Payment Systems division) (“Meta”) and other banks and financial institutions in U.S. District Court. The complaint alleges that Meta infringed on a patent owned by Meridian. Meta is vigorously contesting the suit.

          There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

NOTE 17. LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company has leased property under various noncancelable operating lease agreements which expire at various times through 2024, and require annual rentals ranging from $3,000 to $118,000 plus the payment of the property taxes, normal maintenance, and insurance on the property.

          The following table shows the total minimum rental commitment at September 30, 2006, under the leases.

2007	$	301,576
2008		304,559
2009		299,531
2010		268,219
2011		217,750
Thereafter		796,803
	$	2,188,438

NOTE 18. SEGMENT REPORTING

An operating segment is generally defined as a component of a business for which discrete financial information is available and whose results are reviewed by the chief operating decision-maker. The Company has determined that it has two reportable segments: The traditional banking segment consisting of its two banking subsidiaries, MetaBank and MetaBank West Central, and Meta Payment Systems, a division of MetaBank. MetaBank and MetaBank West Central operate as traditional community banks providing deposit, loan, and other related products to individuals and small businesses, primarily in the communities where their offices are located. Meta Payment Systems provides a number of products and services, primarily to third parties, including financial institutions and other businesses. These products and services include issuance of prepaid debit cards, sponsorship of ATMs into the debit networks, ACH origination services, and a gift card program. Other related programs are in the process of development. The remaining grouping under the caption “All Others” consists of the operations of the Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Meta Trust Company.

          Transactions between affiliates, the resulting revenues of which are shown in the inter-segment revenue category, are conducted at market prices, meaning prices that would be paid if the companies were not affiliates.

	TRADITIONAL BANKING			PAYMENT SYSTEMS			ALL OTHERS			TOTAL
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
Net interest income (loss)	$	16,345,621		$	4,036,927		$	(746,508	)	$	19,636,040
Provision for loan losses		(454,500	)		—			—			(454,500	)
Non-interest income		2,559,977			10,743,642			102,238			13,405,857
Non-interest expense		17,354,579			8,109,772			2,161,274			27,625,625
Net income (loss) before tax		2,005,519			6,670,797			(2,805,544	)		5,870,772
Income tax expense (benefit)		651,528			2,168,151			(869,869	)		1,949,810
Net income (loss)	$	1,353,991		$	4,502,646		$	(1,935,675	)	$	3,920,962
Inter-segment revenue (expense)	$	(3,162,873	)	$	3,162,873		$	—		$	—
Total assets		571,609,070			166,556,254			2,966,709			741,132,033
Total deposits		402,596,772			163,113,803			—			565,710,575
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
Net interest income (loss)	$	19,283,531		$	410,538		$	(454,554	)	$	19,239,515
Provision for loan losses		5,482,000			—			—			5,482,000
Non-interest income		2,514,617			1,591,031			(375,041	)		3,730,607
Non-interest expense		15,071,276			3,247,205			778,577			19,097,058
Net income (loss) before tax		1,244,872			(1,245,636	)		(1,608,172	)		(1,608,936	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		286,694			(438,000	)		(533,379	)		(684,685	)
Net income (loss)	$	958,178		$	(807,636	)	$	(1,074,793	)	$	(924,251	)
Inter-segment revenue (expense)	$	(365,442	)	$	365,442		$	—		$	—
Total assets		703,917,118			70,905,966			1,016,178			775,839,262
Total deposits		468,504,300			72,537,278			—			541,041,578
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
Net interest income (loss)	$	18,085,514		$	7		$	(316,450	)	$	17,769,071
Provision for loan losses		488,500			—			—			488,500
Non-interest income		3,491,125			3,611			101,033			3,595,769
Non-interest expense		13,085,259			770,609			974,724			14,830,592
Net income (loss) before tax		8,002,880			(766,991	)		(1,190,141	)		6,045,748
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,740,346			(277,000	)		(404,648	)		2,058,698
Net income (loss)	$	5,262,534		$	(489,991	)	$	(785,493	)	$	3,987,050
Inter-segment revenue (expense)	$	(3,200	)	$	3,200		$	—		$	—
Total assets		720,453,922			145,353			60,199,249			780,798,524
Total deposits		461,542,864			38,013			—			461,580,877

29

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 19. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Presented below are condensed financial statements for the parent company, Meta Financial Group, Inc.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005

	2006			2005
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,849,225		$	51,676
Securities available for sale		1,678,624			2,177,472
Investment in subsidiaries		51,751,058			50,598,010
Loan receivable from ESOP		509,201			825,057
Other assets		140,638			715,002
Total assets	$	55,928,746		$	54,367,217
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Loan payable to subsidiaries	$	710,000		$	1,200,000
Subordinated debentures		9,831,256			9,800,320
Other liabilities		55,822			408,207
Total liabilities	$	10,597,078		$	11,408,527
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock		29,580			29,580
Additional paid-in capital		20,968,492			20,646,513
Retained earnings		37,186,249			34,557,258
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(4,547,719	)		(3,180,607	)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares		(509,201	)		(825,057	)
Treasury stock, at cost		(7,795,733	)		(8,268,997	)
Total shareholders’ equity	$	45,331,668		$	42,958,690
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	55,928,746		$	54,367,217

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004

	2006			2005			2004
Dividend income from subsidiaries	$	3,700,000		$	2,510,000		$	2,300,000
Other income		190,779			303,755			317,635
Total income		3,890,779			2,813,755			2,617,635
Interest expense		936,149			761,799			634,083
Other expense		1,956,224			1,060,084			752,257
Total expense		2,892,373			1,821,883			1,386,340
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		998,406			991,872			1,231,295
Income tax (benefit)		(834,531	)		(503,000	)		(354,000	)
Income before equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries		1,832,937			1,494,872			1,585,295
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries		2,088,025			(2,419,123	)		2,401,755
Net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050

30

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 20043

	2006			2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	3,920,962		$	(924,251	)	$	3,987,050
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activites
Equity in undistributed net (income) loss of subsidiaries		(2,088,025	)		2,419,123			(2,401,755	)
Change in other assets		574,364			(367,893	)		365,401
Change in other liabilities		244,205			180,671			(70,949	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,651,506			1,307,650			1,879,747
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in subsidiary		(75,000	)		(275,000	)		—
Maturity of securities		500,000			500,000			—
Loan to ESOP		—			(684,133	)		(212,400	)
Net change in loan receivable		—			1,261,188			46,071
Repayments on loan receivable from ESOP		315,856			253,842			219,310
Net cash provided by investment activites		740,856			1,055,897			52,981
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in loan payable to subsidiaries		(490,000	)		(1,350,000	)		(350,000	)
Cash dividends paid		(1,291,971	)		(1,276,749	)		(1,286,533	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		187,158			230,414			582,557
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(25,655	)		(906,650	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(1,594,813	)		(2,421,990	)		(1,960,626	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,797,549		$	(58,443	)	$	(27,898	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Beginning of year	$	51,676		$	110,119		$	138,017
End of year		1,849,225			51,676			110,119

The extent to which the Company may pay cash dividends to shareholders will depend on the cash currently available at the Company, as well as the ability of the subsidiary banks to pay dividends to the Company.

31

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 20. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

	QUARTER ENDED
	December 31		March 31			June 30			September 30
FISCAL YEAR 2006
Interest income	$	10,176,873	$	10,194,707		$	10,314,706		$	9,891,689
Interest expense		5,456,620		5,205,522			5,190,253			5,089,540
Net interest income		4,720,253		4,989,185			5,124,453			4,802,149
Provision for loan losses		40,500		(350,000	)		—			(145,000	)
Net income (loss)		515,420		261,381			2,482,863			661,298
Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.10		$	1.00		$	0.27
Diluted		0.21		0.10			0.98			0.26
Dividend declared per share		0.13		0.13			0.13			0.13
FISCAL YEAR 2005
Interest income	$	9,784,691	$	10,372,608		$	10,812,675		$	10,123,334
Interest expense		5,097,674		5,383,453			5,697,041			5,675,625
Net interest income		4,687,017		4,989,155			5,115,634			4,447,709
Provision for loan losses		177,000		257,500			4,956,000			91,500
Net income (loss)		441,942		399,374			(2,311,994	)		546,427
Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share:
Basic	$	0.18	$	0.16		$	(0.94	)	$	0.22
Diluted		0.18		0.16			(0.94	)		0.22
Dividend declared per share		0.13		0.13			0.13			0.13
FISCAL YEAR 2004
Interest income	$	9,053,707	$	8,890,641		$	9,043,212		$	9,192,696
Interest expense		4,585,909		4,475,826			4,523,366			4,826,084
Net interest income		4,467,798		4,414,815			4,519,846			4,366,612
Provision for loan losses		101,000		56,000			167,500			164,000
Net income (loss)		976,942		1,675,397			836,609			498,102
Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share:
Basic	$	0.39	$	0.67		$	0.34		$	0.20
Diluted		0.39		0.67			0.34			0.20
Dividend declared per share		0.13		0.13			0.13			0.13

32

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 21. FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table discloses the Company’s estimated fair value amounts of its financial instruments. It is management’s belief that the fair values presented below are reasonable based on the valuation techniques and data available to the Company as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, as more fully described below. The operations of the Company are managed from a going concern basis and not a liquidation basis. As a result, the ultimate value realized for the financial instruments presented could be substantially different when actually recognized over time through the normal course of operations. Additionally, a substantial portion of the Company’s inherent value is the subsidiary banks’ capitalization and franchise value. Neither of these components have been given consideration in the presentation of fair values below.

          The following presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of the financial instruments held by the Company at September 30, 2006 and 2005. The information presented is subject to change over time based on a variety of factors.

Dollars in thousands	2006				2005
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	109,353	$	109,353	$	14,370	$	14,370
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		5,891		5,891		37,513		37,513
Securities available for sale		186,176		186,176		230,893		230,893
Loans receivable, net		388,762		386,078		440,190		434,521
Loans held for sale		508		514		306		306
FHLB and FRB stock		5,768		5,768		8,287		8,287
Accrued interest receivable		4,379		4,379		4,241		4,241
Financial liabilities
Noninterest bearing demand deposits		189,506		189,506		102,435		102,435
Interest bearing demand deposits, savings, and money markets		159,988		159,988		170,484		170,484
Certificates of deposit		216,217		214,786		268,122		265,828
Total deposits		565,711		564,280		541,041		538,747
Advances from FHLB		99,565		101,189		159,705		160,675
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		15,179		15,064		20,507		20,340
Subordinated debentures		9,831		10,035		9,800		10,336
Accrued interest payable		972		972		942		942
Off-balance-sheet instruments, loan commitments		—		—		—		—

33

Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following sets forth the methods and assumptions used in determining the fair value estimates for the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2006 and 2005.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The carrying amount of cash and short-term investments is assumed to approximate the fair value.

SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENT TO RESELL

The carrying amount of securities purchased under agreement to resell is assumed to approximate the fair value.

SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

To the extend available, quoted market prices or dealer quotes were used to determine the fair value of securities available for sale. For those securities which are thinly traded, or for which market data was not available, management estimated prices using other available data. The amount of securities for which prices were not available is not material to the portfolio as a whole.

LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET

The fair value of loans was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar remaining maturities. When using the discounting method to determine fair value, loans were gathered by homogeneous groups with similar terms and conditions and discounted at a target rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers as of September 30, 2006 and 2005. In addition, when computing the estimated fair value for all loans, allowances for loan losses have been subtracted from the calculated fair value for consideration of credit quality.

LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Fair values are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold on the secondary market.

FHLB AND FEDERAL RESERVE STOCK

The fair value of such stock approximates book value since the Company is able to redeem this stock at par value.

ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable is assumed to approximate the fair value.

DEPOSITS

The carrying values of non-interest bearing checking deposits, interest bearing checking deposits, savings, and money markets is assumed to approximate fair value, since such deposits are immediately withdrawable without penalty. The fair value of time certificates of deposit was estimated by discounting expected future cash flows by the current rates offered as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 on certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities.

          In accordance with SFAS No. 107, no value has been assigned to the Company’s long-term relationships with its deposit customers (core value of deposits intangible) since such intangible is not a financial instrument as defined under SFAS No. 107.

ADVANCES FROM FHLB

The fair value of such advances was estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows using current interest rates as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 for advances with similar terms and remaining maturities.

SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE AND SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

The fair value of these instruments was estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows using derived interest rates approximating market as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 over the contractual maturity of such borrowings.

ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable is assumed to approximate the fair value.

LOAN COMMITMENTS

The commitments to originate and purchase loans have terms that are consistent with current market terms. Accordingly, the Company estimates that the fair values of these commitments are not significant.

LIMITATIONS

It must be noted that fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. Additionally, fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business, customer relationships and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time. Furthermore, since no market exists for certain of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates may be based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with a high level of precision. Changes in assumptions as well as tax considerations could significantly affect the estimates. Accordingly, based on the limitations described above, the aggregate fair value estimates are not intended to represent the underlying value of the Company, on either a going concern or a liquidation basis.

34

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

James S. Haahr
Chairman of the Board for Meta Financial Group, MetaBank, and MetaBank West Central

E. Wayne Cooley
Consultant Emeritus of the Iowa Girls’ High School Athletic Union

E. Thurman Gaskill
Iowa State Senator and Grain and Livestock Farming Operation Owner

J. Tyler Haahr
President and Chief Executive Officer for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank, Chief Executive Officer for MetaBank West Central, and President of Meta Trust

SENIOR OFFICERS

James S. Haahr
Chairman of the Board for Meta Financial Group, MetaBank, and MetaBank West Central

J. Tyler Haahr
President and Chief Executive Officer for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank, Chief Executive Officer for MetaBank West Central, and President of Meta Trust

Troy Moore
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank

Brad C. Hanson
Executive Vice President for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank and President of Meta Payment Systems Division

Jonathan M. Gaiser, CFA
Senior Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank, and Secretary for MetaBank West Central

Ellen E. Moore
Vice President of Marketing and Sales for Meta Financial Group and Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales for MetaBank and MetaBank West Central

Brian R. Bond
Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer

Brad C. Hanson
Executive Vice President for Meta Financial Group and MetaBank and President of Meta Payment Systems Division

Frederick V. Moore
President of Buena Vista University

Rodney G. Muilenburg
Retired Dairy Specialist Manager for Purina Mills, Inc.; Consultant for TransOva Genetics Dairy Division; and Director of Sales and Marketing for TransOva Genetics

Jeanne Partlow
Retired Chairman of the Board and President of Iowa Savings Bank

Ron Butterfield
Senior Vice President of Meta Payment Systems Division

Raymond J. Frohnapfel
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Sandra K. Hegland
Senior Vice President of Human Resources

Ben Guenther
President of MetaBank Northwest Iowa Market

Tim D. Harvey
President of MetaBank Brookings Market

I. Eugene Richardson, Jr.
President of MetaBank Central Iowa Market and MetaBank West Central and Member of the MetaBank West Central Board of Directors

Kathy M. Thorson
President of MetaBank Sioux Empire Market

Lisa J. Binder
Vice President of Marketing and Sales

John Hagy
Vice President, Chief Risk Officer and General Counsel

Barb Koopman
Vice President of Operations

35

INVESTOR INFORMATION

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will convene at 1:00 pm on Monday, January 22, 2007. The meeting will be held in the Board Room of MetaBank, 121 East Fifth Street, Storm Lake, Iowa. Further information with regard to this meeting can be found in the proxy statement.

General Counsel

Mack, Hansen, Gadd, Armstrong & Brown, P.C.
316 East Sixth Street
P.O. Box 278
Storm Lake, Iowa 50588

Special Counsel

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
1025 Thomas Jefferson Street NW
East Lobby, Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20007-5201

Independent Auditors

McGladrey & Pullen LLP
400 Locust Street, Suite 640
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2372

Shareholder Services and Investor Relations

Shareholders desiring to change the name, address, or ownership of stock; to report lost certificates; or to consolidate accounts, should contact the corporation’s transfer agent:

Registrar & Transfer Company
10 Commerce Drive
Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Telephone: 800.368.5948
Email: invrelations@rtco.com
Web site: www.rtco.com

Form 10-K

Copies of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 (excluding exhibits thereto) may be obtained without charge by contacting:

Investor Relations
Meta Financial Group
MetaBank Building
121 East Fifth Street
P.O. Box 1307
Storm Lake, Iowa 50588
Telephone: 712.732.4117
Email: invrelations@metacash.com
Web site: www.metacash.com

DIVIDEND AND STOCK MARKET INFORMATION

Meta Financial Group’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market^SM under the symbol “CASH.” The Wall Street Journal publishes daily trading information for the stock under the abbreviation, “MetaFnl,” in the National Market Listing. Quarterly dividends for 2005 and 2006 were $0.13. The price range of the common stock, as reported on the Nasdaq System, was as follows:

	FISCAL YEAR 2006				FISCAL YEAR 2005
	LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH
FIRST QUARTER	$	18.55	$	23.00	$	22.50	$	26.00
SECOND QUARTER		19.04		28.10		22.25		24.49
THIRD QUARTER		21.01		23.18		18.15		24.09
FOURTH QUARTER		22.32		25.73		16.51		19.89

Prices disclose inter-dealer quotations without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and do not necessarily represent actual transactions.

          Dividend payment decisions are made with consideration of a variety of factors including earnings, financial condition, market considerations, and regulatory restrictions. Restrictions on dividend payments are described in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

          As of September 30, 2006, Meta Financial Group had 2,526,034 shares of common stock outstanding, which were held by 237 shareholders of record, and 386,425 shares subject to outstanding options. The shareholders of record number does not reflect approximately 500 persons or entities who hold their stock in nominee or “street” name.

          The following securities firms indicated they were acting as market makers for Meta Financial Group stock as of September 30, 2006: Archipelago Stock Exchange; Automated Trading Desk; B-Trade Services LLC; Boston Stock Exchange; Citadel Derivatives Group LLC; Citigroup Global Markets Inc.; E*Trade Capital Markets LLC; Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.; FTN Financial Securities Corp; FTN Midwest Research Securities Corp.; Hill, Thompson, Magid and Co.; Howe Barnes Investments; Knight Equity Markets, L.P.; Nasdaq Execution Services LLC; National Stock Exchange; Sandler O’Neill & Partners; and UBS Securities LLC.

36

METABANK

NORTHWEST IOWA MARKET

STORM LAKE MAIN OFFICE

121 East Fifth Street

P.O. Box 1307

Storm Lake, Iowa 50588

712.732.4117

800.792.6815

712.732.8122 fax

Storm Lake Plaza

1413 North Lake Avenue

P.O. Box 1307

Storm Lake, Iowa 50588

712.732.6655

712.732.7924 fax

Lake View

419 Main Street

P.O. Box 649

Lake View, Iowa 51450

712.657.2721

712.657.2896 fax

Laurens

104 North Third Street

Laurens, Iowa 50554

712.841.2588

712.841.2029 fax

Odebolt

219 South Main Street

P.O. Box 465

Odebolt, Iowa 51458

712.668.4881

712.668.4882 fax

Sac City

518 Audubon Street

P.O. Box 6

Sac City, Iowa 50583

712.662.7195

712.662.7196 fax

METABANK

BROOKINGS MARKET

BROOKINGS MAIN OFFICE

600 Main Avenue

P.O. Box 98

Brookings, South Dakota 57006

605.692.2314

800.842.7452

605.692.7059 fax

METABANK

CENTRAL IOWA MARKET

CENTRAL IOWA MAIN OFFICE

4848 86th Street

Urbandale, Iowa 50322

515.309.9800

515.309.9801 fax

Highland Park

3624 Sixth Avenue

Des Moines, Iowa 50313

515.288.4866

515.288.3104 fax

Ingersoll

3401 Ingersoll Avenue

Des Moines, Iowa 50312

515.274.9674

515.274.9675 fax

Jordan Creek

270 South 68th Street

West Des Moines, Iowa 50266

515.223.0440

515.223.0439 fax

West Des Moines

3448 Westown Parkway

West Des Moines, Iowa 50266

515.226.8474

515.226.8475 fax

METABANK

SIOUX EMPIRE MARKET

SIOUX FALLS MAIN OFFICE

4900 South Western Avenue

P.O. Box 520

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101

605.338.0059

605.338.0155 fax

North Minnesota

1600 North Minnesota Avenue

P.O. Box 520

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101

605.338.3470

605.338.3471 fax

South Minnesota

2500 South Minnesota Avenue

P.O. Box 520

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101

605.977.7500

605.977.7501 fax

West 12th Street

2104 West 12th Street

P.O. Box 520

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101

605.336.8900

605.336.8901 fax

MPS and Administrative Office

101 West 69th Street, Suite 104

P.O. Box 520

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101

605.338.0774

605.338.0596 fax

METABANK

WEST CENTRAL

WEST CENTRAL MAIN OFFICE

615 South Division

P.O. Box 606

Stuart, Iowa 50250

515.523.2203

800.523.8003

515.523.2460 fax

Casey

101 East Logan

P.O. Box 97

Casey, Iowa 50048

641.746.3366

800.746.3367

641.746.2828 fax

Menlo

501 Sherman

P.O. Box 36

Menlo, Iowa 50164

641.524.4521

META PAYMENT SYSTEMS
4900 South Western Avenue
P.O. Box 520
Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101
605.275.9555
800.550.6382
605.782.1701 fax
metapay.com

META TRUST
4900 South Western Avenue
Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57101
605.782.1780
605.338.0155 fax

metabankonline.com

37

Invest in us. Bank with us.
Enjoy the journey.

MetaBank Building
121 East Fifth Street
P.O. Box 1307
Storm Lake, Iowa 50588
metacash.com