-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, B+46VSLn9cQJxgNAZmJsMQiFaEAt2ShFlz4cEP/ej7LFknD0oCmv4iKFBtGPg0j+ TmankDC3UKykGvekAuBWpA== 0000914317-05-002653.txt : 20050815 0000914317-05-002653.hdr.sgml : 20050815 20050815124448 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000914317-05-002653 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20050630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050815 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20050815 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: META FINANCIAL GROUP INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000907471 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS, NOT FEDERALLY CHARTERED [6036] IRS NUMBER: 421406262 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0930 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22140 FILM NUMBER: 051024786 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 121 EAST FIFTH STREET STREET 2: P O BOX 1307 CITY: STORM LAKE STATE: IA ZIP: 50588 BUSINESS PHONE: 7127324117 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 121 EAST FIFTH STREET STREET 2: P O BOX 1307 CITY: STORM LAKE STATE: IA ZIP: 50588 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: FIRST MIDWEST FINANCIAL INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19930618 10-Q 1 form10q-70334_metafin.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 [ ] TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transaction period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number: 0-22140 META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 42-1406262 -------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 121 East Fifth Street, Storm Lake, Iowa 50588 --------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (712) 732-4117 -------------- (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X --- --- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Class: Outstanding at August 15, 2005: Common Stock, $.01 par value 2,503,655 Common Shares META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q INDEX
Page No. -------- Part I. Financial Information - ------------------------------- Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited): Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months And Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 4 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 5 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 8 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk 23 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 25 Part II. Other Information - --------------------------- Item 1. Legal Proceedings 26 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 26 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 26 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 27 Item 5. Other Information 27 Item 6. Exhibits 27 Signatures 28
2 META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
ASSETS June 30, 2005 September 30, 2004 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash and due from banks $ 2,947,175 $ 1,591,982 Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions - short-term (cost approximates market value) 4,965,726 7,344,587 ------------------------------------- Total cash and cash equivalents 7,912,901 8,936,569 Securities available for sale, amortized cost of $255,208,924 at June 30, 2005 and $324,500,510 at September 30, 2004 250,802,241 322,523,577 Loans receivable - net of allowance for loan losses of of $9,568,620 at June 30, 2005 and $5,370,994 at September 30, 2004 459,689,897 404,051,379 Loans held for sale 2,478,292 270,000 Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost 10,413,500 11,052,700 Accrued interest receivable 3,896,671 3,849,215 Premises and equipment, net 13,861,581 11,690,437 Foreclosed real estate, net 19,528 -- Bank owned life insurance 12,186,176 11,847,420 Other assets 7,416,282 6,577,227 ------------------------------------- Total assets $ 768,677,069 $ 780,798,524 ===================================== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY LIABILITIES Noninterest-bearing demand deposits $ 41,178,750 $ 19,537,370 Savings, NOW and money market demand deposits 158,365,383 177,287,972 Time certificates of deposit 294,325,455 264,755,535 ------------------------------------- Total deposits 493,869,588 461,580,877 Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 195,430,000 226,250,000 Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 23,538,909 32,549,377 Subordinated debentures 10,310,000 10,310,000 Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance 266,161 216,331 Accrued interest payable 1,018,554 473,426 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,192,908 2,144,248 ------------------------------------- Total liabilities 725,626,120 733,524,259 ------------------------------------- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock, 800,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding -- -- Common stock, $.01 par value; 5,200,000 shares authorized, 2,957,999 shares issued, 2,503,655 and 2,491,025 shares outstanding at June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, respectively 29,580 29,580 Additional paid-in capital 20,636,272 20,678,644 Retained earnings - substantially restricted 34,313,180 36,758,258 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,765,977) (1,240,338) Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares (893,109) (394,766) Treasury stock, 454,344 and 466,974 common shares, at cost, at June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 respectively (8,268,997) (8,557,113) ------------------------------------- Total shareholders' equity 43,050,949 47,274,265 ------------------------------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 768,677,069 $ 780,798,524 =====================================
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Interest and Dividend Income: Loans receivable, including fees $ 7,931,647 $ 6,465,018 $ 22,031,011 $ 17,992,328 Securities available for sale 2,754,168 2,535,342 8,652,487 8,834,059 Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stock 126,860 42,852 286,476 161,173 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Total interest and dividend income 10,812,675 9,043,212 30,969,974 26,987,560 Interest Expense: Deposits 3,106,402 2,428,676 8,694,306 7,182,561 FHLB advances and other borrowings 2,590,639 2,094,690 7,483,862 6,402,540 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Total interest expense 5,697,041 4,523,366 16,178,168 13,585,101 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Net interest income 5,115,634 4,519,846 14,791,806 13,402,459 Provision for loan losses 4,956,000 167,500 5,390,500 324,500 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Net interest income after provision for loan losses 159,634 4,352,346 9,401,306 13,077,959 Noninterest income: Deposit service charges and other fees 340,767 304,257 950,505 933,726 Gain on sales of loans, net 55,811 107,648 137,119 227,748 Bank owned life insurance 126,645 151,532 379,936 469,373 Loss on sales of securities available for sale, net (20,413) -- (19,334) -- Gain on sale of branch office -- -- -- 1,113,230 Loss on sales of foreclosed real estate, net -- (2,560) -- (3,052) Other income 445,885 78,810 786,223 264,041 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Total noninterest income 948,695 639,687 2,234,449 3,005,066 Noninterest expense: Employee compensation and benefits 2,923,900 2,422,886 8,615,950 6,848,008 Occupancy and equipment expense 931,871 597,056 2,693,974 1,720,735 Deposit insurance premium 17,111 17,378 53,185 48,824 Data processing expense 188,320 175,176 556,446 537,106 Other expense 604,326 518,359 2,095,223 1,600,393 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Total noninterest expense 4,665,528 3,730,855 14,014,778 10,755,066 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Income (loss) before income taxes (3,557,199) 1,261,178 (2,379,023) 5,327,959 Income tax expense (benefit) (1,245,205) 424,569 (908,345) 1,839,011 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Net income (loss) $ (2,311,994) $ 836,609 $ (1,470,678) $ 3,488,948 ============ =========== ============ ============ Earnings (loss) per common share: Basic $ (0.94) $ 0.34 $ (0.60) $ 1.41 ============ =========== ============ ============ Diluted $ (0.94) $ 0.33 $ (0.60) $ 1.38 ============ =========== ============ ============ Dividends declared per common share $ 0.13 $ 0.13 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 ============ =========== ============ ============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $(2,311,994) 836,609 $(1,470,678) $ 3,488,948 Other comprehensive income (loss): Net change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale 1,343,396 (6,439,564) (2,429,750) (1,339,005) Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 499,879 (2,396,139) (904,111) (498,221) ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Total other comprehensive income (loss) 843,517 (4,043,425) (1,525,639) (840,784) ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Total comprehensive income (loss) $(1,468,477) (3,206,816) $(2,996,317) $ 2,648,164 =========== ========== =========== ===========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005
Accumulated Unearned Other Employee Additional Comprehensive Stock Common Paid-in Retained Income (Loss), Ownership Stock Capital Earnings Net of Tax Plan Shares - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance, September 30, 2004 $ 29,580 $ 20,678,644 $ 36,758,258 $ (1,240,338) $(394,766) Cash dividends declared on common stock ($.39 per share) -- -- (974,400) -- -- Purchase of 1,000 common shares of treasury stock -- -- -- -- -- Issuance of 13,630 common shares from treasury stock due to exercise of stock options -- (95,597) -- -- -- Tax benefit from exercise of stock options -- 12,240 -- -- -- Purchase 30,000 common shares for ESOP -- -- -- -- (684,133) 9,900 common shares committed to be released under the ESOP -- 40,985 -- -- 185,790 Change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of effect of income taxes of ($901,111) -- -- -- (1,525,639) -- Net loss for nine months ended June 30, 2005 -- -- (1,470,678) -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance, June 30, 2005 $ 29,580 $ 20,636,272 $ 34,313,180 $ (2,765,977) $(893,109) ======================================================================= Total Treasury Shareholders' Stock Equity - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance, September 30, 2004 $ (8,557,113) $ 47,274,265 Cash dividends declared on common stock ($.39 per share) -- (974,400) Purchase of 1,000 common shares of treasury stock (25,655) (25,655) Issuance of 13,630 common shares from treasury stock due to exercise of stock options 313,771 218,174 Tax benefit from exercise of stock options -- 12,240 Purchase 30,000 common shares for ESOP -- (684,133) 9,900 common shares committed to be released under the ESOP -- 226,775 Change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of effect of income taxes of ($901,111) -- (1,525,639) Net loss for nine months ended June 30, 2005 -- (1,470,678) ----------------------------- Balance, June 30, 2005 $ (8,268,997) $ 43,050,949 =============================
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 2004 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ (1,470,678) $ 3,488,948 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities: Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net 2,736,379 3,733,747 Provision for loan losses 5,390,500 324,500 Loss on the sale of securities available for sale, net 19,334 -- Loss on sales of foreclosed real estate, net -- 3,052 Gain on the sale of branch office -- (1,113,230) Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale 6,850,685 13,695,203 Originations of loans held for sale (9,058,977) (12,568,893) Net change in accrued interest receivable (47,456) 418,452 Net change in other assets (273,701) (586,085) Net change in accrued interest payable 545,128 (32,752) Net change in accrued expenses and other liabilities (951,339) 725,871 ---------------------------- Net cash provided by operating activities 3,739,875 8,088,813 Cash flow from investing activities: Purchase of securities available for sale (15,459,228) (15,463,098) Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 25,842,709 -- Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments of securities available for sale 57,174,746 67,024,122 Net change in loans receivable (27,475,818) (9,955,846) Loans purchased (33,637,751) (34,325,665) Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate 2,500 1,123,934 Cash transferred to buyer on sale of branch -- (14,154,359) Change in FHLB stock 639,200 908,400 Purchase of premises and equipment (2,904,200) (1,197,562) ---------------------------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 4,182,158 (6,040,074) Cash flows from financing activities: Net change in noninterest-bearing demand, savings, NOW, and money market demand deposits 2,718,791 (9,132,202) Net change in other time deposits 29,569,920 50,931,974 Proceeds from advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 2,566,400,000 1,655,190,000 Repayments of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (2,597,220,000) (1,675,511,784) Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase (9,010,468) (22,596,875) Net change in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance 49,830 (6,146) Cash dividends paid (974,400) (975,896) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 230,414 582,555 Purchase of shares by ESOP (684,133) -- Purchase of treasury stock (25,655) (764,865) ---------------------------- Net cash used in financing activities (8,945,701) (2,283,239) ---------------------------- Net change in cash and cash equivalents (1,023,668) (234,500) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 8,936,569 9,756,815 ---------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 7,912,901 $ 9,522,315 ============================ Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information Cash paid during the period for: Interest $ 15,633,040 $ 13,617,853 Income taxes 563,911 1,692,500 Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate $ 22,028 $ 58,349 Sale of branch Assets disposed: Loans $ (730,704) Accrued interest receivable (5,518) Premises and equipment (110,818) Liabilities assumed by buyer: Non-interest bearing demand, savings, NOW 6,314,066 and money market demand accounts Time deposits 9,788,688 Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance 5,749 Other liabilities 6,126 Gain on sale of office property, net (1,113,230) ------------ Cash paid $ 14,154,359 ============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accounting policies followed by Meta Financial Group, Inc., formerly First Midwest Financial, Inc., ("Meta Group" or the "Company") and its consolidated subsidiaries, MetaBank, MetaBank West Central ("MetaBank WC"), Meta Trust Company ("Meta Trust"), First Services Financial Limited and Brookings Service Corporation, for interim reporting are consistent with the accounting policies followed for annual financial reporting. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods reported have been included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accompanying financial statements do not purport to contain all the necessary financial disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles that might otherwise be necessary in the circumstances and should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended September 30, 2004. 2. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES At June 30, 2005, the Company has established an allowance for loan losses totaling $9.6 million. The allowance represented approximately 117.1% of the total non-performing loans at June 30, 2005, while the allowance at September 30, 2004 represented approximately 754.4% of the total non-performing loans at that date. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was due primarily to additional reserves recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 relating to $9.8 million of assets determined to be impaired, and to the increase in the loan portfolio. Approximately $7.6 million of the impaired assets were placed on non-accrual status, and are included in non-performing loans, and $1.3 million of the impaired assets were written off as of June 30, 2005, The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the Company's allowance for loan losses for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004: 2005 2004 ----- ---- (In Thousands) Balance, September 30, $ 5,371 $ 4,962 Charge-offs (1,313) (25) Recoveries 120 13 Additions charged to operations 5,391 324 -------- -------- Balance, June 30, $ 9,569 $ 5,274 ======== ======== The allowance for loan losses reflects management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio based on currently available information. Future additions to the allowance for loan losses may become necessary based upon changing economic conditions, increased loan balances or changes in the underlying collateral of the loan portfolio. 8 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share is based on net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share shows the dilutive effect of additional common shares issuable under stock options. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic earnings (loss) per common share and the diluted earnings per common share computations for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is presented below.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------- -------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Numerator: Net Income (Loss) $(2,311,994) $ 836,609 $(1,470,678) $ 3,488,948 =========== =========== =========== =========== Denominator: Weighted average common shares outstanding 2,502,521 2,497,197 2,496,033 2,500,437 Less: Weighted average unallocated ESOP shares (41,473) (13,263) (36,147) (17,779) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share 2,461,048 2,483,934 2,459,886 2,482,658 =========== =========== =========== =========== Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.94) $ 0.34 $ (0.60) $ 1.41 =========== =========== =========== ===========
The calculations for the diluted loss per share for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2005 do not reflect the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options of 42,798 and 54,042 shares, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss in those periods.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------- -------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Numerator: Net Income (loss) $(2,311,994) $ 836,609 $(1,470,678) $ 3,488,948 =========== =========== =========== =========== Denominator: Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share 2,461,048 2,483,934 2,459,886 2,482,658 Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercise of stock options, net of tax benefits -- 54,599 -- 54,205 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding 2,461,048 2,538,533 2,459,886 2,536,863 =========== =========== =========== =========== Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.94) $ 0.33 $ (0.60) $ 1.38 =========== =========== =========== ===========
9 4. COMMITMENTS At June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate and purchase loans totaling $65.7 million and $60.2 million, respectively, excluding undisbursed portions of loans in process. It is expected that outstanding loan commitments will be funded with existing liquid assets. 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS As of June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 the Company had intangible assets of $3,403,019, all of which has been determined to be goodwill. There was no goodwill impairment loss or amortization related to goodwill during the three-month or nine-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. 6. CURRENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement 123 (Revised), Share-Base Payment. This Statement establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity engages its equity instruments for goods and services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods and services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments, or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FAS 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. FAS 123(R) replaces existing requirements under FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. For the Company, the Statement is effective for the quarter beginning October 1, 2005. The Company is currently assessing the impact that FAS 123(R) will have on its consolidated financial statements at the time of adoption. 7. STOCK OPTION PLAN FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, establishes a fair value based method for financial accounting and reporting for stock-based employee compensation plans and for transactions in which an entity issues its equity instruments to acquire goods and services from non-employees. However, the standard allows compensation to continue to be measured by using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, but requires expanded disclosures. The Company has elected to apply the intrinsic value based method of accounting for stock options issued to employees. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Had compensation cost for the Plan been determined based on the grant date fair values of awards (the method described in FASB Statement No. 123), the approximate reported income and earnings per common share would have been decreased to the pro forma amounts shown below: 10
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------- -------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net income (loss), as reported $(2,311,994) $836,609 $(1,470,678) $3,488,948 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects (20,098) (15,092) (67,718) (26,720) ----------- -------- ----------- ---------- Pro forma net income (loss) $(2,332,092) $821,517 $(1,538,396) $3,462,228 =========== ======== =========== ========== Earnings per common share - basic: As reported $(0.94) $0.34 $(0.60) $1.41 Pro forma $(0.95) $0.33 $(0.63) $1.38 Earnings per common share - diluted: As reported $(0.94) $0.33 $(0.60) $1.38 Pro forma $(0.95) $0.32 $(0.63) $1.36
8. SEGMENT INFORMATION An operating segment is generally defined as a component of a business for which discrete financial information is available and whose results are reviewed by the chief operating decision-maker. The Company has determined that it has two reportable segments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information": a traditional banking segment consisting of its two banking subsidiaries, MetaBank and MetaBank West Central, and Meta Payment Systems, a division of MetaBank. MetaBank and MetaBank West Central operate as traditional community banks providing deposit, loan and other related products to individuals and small businesses, primarily in the communities where their offices are located. Meta Payment Systems provides a number of products and services, primarily to third parties, including financial institutions and other businesses. These products and services include issuance of prepaid cards, issuance of credit cards, sponsorship of ATMs into the debit networks, ACH origination services and a gift card program. Other related programs are in the process of development. The remaining grouping under the caption "All Others" consists of the operations of the Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Meta Trust Company.
(Unaudited) Traditional Payment Banking Systems All Others Total ------- ------- ---------- ----- Three months ended June 30, 2005: Interest income $ 10,752,866 $ -- $ 59,809 $ 10,812,675 Provision for loan and lease losses 4,956,000 -- -- 4,956,000 Non-interest income 467,993 457,413 23,289 948,695 Inter-segment revenue (expense) 57,786 80,108 (137,894) -- Non-interest expense 3,742,628 770,654 152,246 4,665,528 Income (loss) before income taxes (2,945,812) (235,664) (375,723) (3,557,199)
11 Three months ended June 30, 2004: Interest income $ 8,974,970 $ -- $ 68242 $ 9,043,212 Provision for loan and lease losses 167,500 -- -- 167,500 Non-interest income 614,222 -- 25,467 639,689 Inter-segment revenue (expense) 131,484 (627) (130,857) -- Non-interest expense 3,384,946 220,611 125,300 3,730,857 Income (loss) before income taxes 1,765,418 (221,238) (283,002) 1,261,178 Nine months ended June 30, 2005: Interest income $ 30,773,619 $ -- $ 196,355 $ 30,969,974 Provision for loan and lease losses 5,390,500 -- -- 5,390,500 Non-interest income 1,448,776 705,495 80,178 2,234,449 Inter-segment revenue (expense) 281,564 117,602 (399,166) -- Non-interest expense 11,331,984 2,156,182 526,612 14,014,778 Income (loss) before income taxes 86,164 (1,335,864) (1,129,323) (2,379,023) Nine months ended June 30, 2004: Interest income $ 26,765,388 $ -- $ 222,172 $ 26,987,560 Provision for loan and lease losses 324,500 -- -- 324,500 Non-interest income 2,934,265 -- 70,801 3,005,066 Inter-segment revenue (expense) 398,440 (627) (397,813) -- Non-interest expense 10,143,790 220,611 390,665 10,755,066 Income (loss) before income taxes 6,413,161 (221,238) (863,964) 5,327,959
Substantially all of the Company's assets were in the traditional banking segment for all periods presented. 12 Part I. Financial Information Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES GENERAL Meta Financial Group, Inc. ("Meta Financial" or the "Company") is a bank holding company whose primary assets are MetaBank, formerly First Federal Savings Bank of the Midwest ("First Federal"), and MetaBank West Central ("MetaBank WC"), formerly Security State Bank ("Security"). The Company was incorporated in 1993 as First Midwest Financial, Inc., a unitary non-diversified savings and loan holding company and, on September 20, 1993, acquired all of the capital stock of First Federal in connection with First Federal's conversion from mutual to stock form of ownership. On September 30, 1996, the Company became a bank holding company in conjunction with the acquisition of Security. Pursuant to requisite shareholder and regulatory approvals, the Company and its banking subsidiaries changed their names as of the close of business on January 28, 2005. The following discussion focuses on the consolidated financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries, at June 30, 2005, compared to September 30, 2004, and the consolidated results of operations for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same periods in 2004. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended September 30, 2004. CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS On June 20, 2005, the Company determined that $9.8 million of its assets were impaired under generally accepted accounting principles. The Company is the lead lender and servicer of approximately $32.0 million in loans to three affiliated companies and their owners. Approximately $22.2 million of the total had been sold to ten participating financial institutions. The Company's portion of the affected assets includes total operating loans secured by new and used cars and contracts receivable of approximately $6.8 million to two of the companies, which filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on the evening of June 20, 2005. The Company also had real estate loans totaling approximately $2.0 million to the third company, and $1.0 million to the majority owner of the three companies. As of June 30, 2005, $7.6 million of the loans related to these borrowers were deemed non-performing, and placed on non-accrual status. On July 8, 2005 the Company took possession of the assets of one of the companies that had filed for reorganization, while the other company remains in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The process of liquidation of assets of all three companies is underway. Since July 8, 2005, the Company has been in the process of organizing, reviewing and evaluating the assets to determine their estimated net realizable value. The Company concluded that, as of June 30, 2005, additional loan loss reserves were required in the amount of $4.8 million. Net of the effect of income taxes these additional reserves resulted in a reduction in net income of $3.1 million, or $1.25 per diluted share, for both the three month and nine month periods ended June 30, 2005. One loan totaling $1.3 million was charged to the loss reserves as of June 30, 2005. While the Company believes that the $4.8 million in additional reserves related to the impaired assets is reasonable based on the information currently available, it is possible that other factors and circumstances could result in a different final realized loss on these assets. We can make no prediction at this time as to any other losses or recoveries that might occur related to the bankruptcy and related matters. See "Non-performing Assets and Allowance For Loan Losses," herein. Though no longer "well-capitalized" under Federal banking guidelines due to the additional loan loss reserves taken this quarter, MetaBank had a capital ratio well in excess of minimum regulatory 13 requirements at June 30, 2005, with Tier I and Tier II capital ratios of 6.37 percent and 9.98 percent, respectively. The Company itself and MetaBank West Central remain well-capitalized. In May of 2004, the Company announced that MetaBank was in the process of forming of a new operating division to position the Company to take advantage of opportunities in the growing area of prepaid debit cards and related systems and services. The division, Meta Payment Systems, is based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. During the first year of operations, through June 30, 2005, the division has generated a net loss of almost $1.4 million, $490,000 in fiscal 2004 and $867,000 to date in fiscal 2005. The cumulative net loss for the division is higher than was originally projected. Management anticipates that the operations of Meta Payment Systems will become profitable sooner than expected and that the third year of operations will result in net income sufficient for the cumulative operations of the division to become positive. The net loss of Meta Payment Systems for 2005 resulted in a reduction in diluted earning per share of $.06 for the quarter and $.34 per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. During both the comparable periods of 2004, Meta Payment Systems had a net loss of $141,000, or $.06 per diluted share. Effective this quarter, the Company presents Meta Payment Systems as a separate business segment. See "Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)," herein. As indicated above, effective January 28, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries, having obtained the necessary approvals, changed their names from First Midwest Financial, Inc., First Federal Savings Bank of the Midwest, Security State Bank, and First Services Trust Company, to Meta Financial Group, Inc., MetaBank, MetaBank West Central and Meta Trust Company, respectively. As a result of marketing and other costs associated with the name changes, the Company incurred expenses totaling $679,000, or $428,000, net of income taxes. The expenses, net of income taxes, related to the name change resulted in a reduction in diluted earnings per share of $.02 for the quarter and $.17 per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The Company is in the process of expanding its presence in the Sioux Falls, South Dakota market. A building, which will house a full-service banking office and the Meta Payment Systems operations, is under construction in Sioux Falls. Occupancy is anticipated to be either late in the third or early in the fourth calendar quarter of 2005. In addition, a small branch office, formerly occupied by another financial institution, became available for lease in Sioux Falls. This office, which is a good strategic fit for operations in Sioux Falls, will open in August. FINANCIAL CONDITION Total assets decreased by $12.1 million, or 1.6%, to $768.7 million at June 30, 2005, from $780.8 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease in total assets was primarily attributable to a decrease in securities available for sale which was substantially offset by growth in loans during the nine month period. The excess funds from the decrease in securities available for sale, along with growth in deposits, were used to reduce advances from the FHLB and other borrowed money. The portfolio of net loans receivable increased by $55.6 million, or 13.8%, to $459.7 million at June 30, 2005, from $404.1 million at September 30, 2004. The increase reflects increased origination of commercial and multi-family real estate loans on existing and newly constructed properties and by increased origination of commercial business loans. There were also small increases in conventional one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and in agricultural business loans. These increases were slightly offset by a small reduction in consumer loans, as existing consumer loans were repaid in amounts greater than new originations during the period. The additional reserves of $4.8 million also reduced the June 30, 2005 balances of net loans. Deposit balances increased by $32.3 million, or 7.0%, to $493.9 million at June 30, 2005, from $461.6 million at September 30, 2004. The increase in deposit balances resulted from increases in checking 14 accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit in the amounts of $26.4 million, $11.4 million and $29.6 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in money market accounts of $35.1 million during the period. The increase in deposit balances is attributable to the activities of Meta Payment Systems and an increase in public funds deposits. The portfolio of securities available for sale decreased $71.7 million, or 22.2%, to $250.8 million at June 30, 2005, from $322.5 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease reflects $57.2 million of maturities and principal repayments, the sale of $25.8 million of such securities and by the change in market value of securities available for sale, which were partially offset by $15.5 million of purchases. The balance in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB) decreased by $30.8 million, or 13.6%, to $195.4 million at June 30, 2005 from $226.2 million at September 30, 2004. The balance in securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased by $9.0 million, or 27.7%, to $23.5 million at June 30, 2005 from $32.5 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease in advances from the FHLB and in securities sold under agreements to repurchase reflects the replacement of borrowed funds through deposit growth during the period. Total shareholders' equity decreased $4.2 million, or 8.9%, to $43.1 million at June 30, 2005 from $47.3 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease in shareholders' equity was primarily due to the net loss of $1.5 million for the nine month period, a $1.5 million change, in accordance with SFAS 115, from a $1.2 million unrealized loss to a $2.7 million unrealized loss, net of income tax, on securities available for sale, the purchase of stock for the ESOP totaling $684,000 and the payment of dividends to shareholders of $974,000, during the period. NON-PERFORMING ASSETS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES Generally, when a loan becomes delinquent 90 days or more or when the collection of principal or interest becomes doubtful, the Company will place the loan on non-accrual status and, as a result of this action, previously accrued interest income on the loan is taken out of current income. The loan will remain on non-accrual status until the loan has been brought current or until other circumstances occur that provide adequate assurance of full repayment of interest and principal. At June 30, 2005, the Company had loans delinquent 30 days and over totaling $6.6 million, or 1.42% of total loans compared to $1.9 million, or 0.47%, of total loans at September 30, 2004. At June 30, 2005, there were two commercial and multi-family real estate loans totaling $1,239,000, or 0.27% of total loans, delinquent 30 days and over. This compares to $1,350,000, or 0.33% of total loans at September 30, 2004. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by one-to-four family residences. This greater risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effect of general economic conditions on income producing properties and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. These loans are being closely monitored by management, however, there can be no assurance that all loans will be fully collectible. At June 30, 2005, commercial business loans delinquent 30 days and over totaled $4,831,000, or 1.05% of the total loan portfolio. Included in the commercial business loans delinquent 30 days and over at June 30, 2005 are $4.5 million of the impaired loans discussed earlier. There were no commercial business loans delinquent 30 days and over at September 30, 2004. Commercial business lending involves a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans because of the typically larger loan amounts. In addition, payments on loans are typically dependent on the cash flows derived from the operation or management of the business to which the loan is made. The success of the loan may also be affected by factors outside the control of the business, such as 15 unforeseen changes in economic conditions for the business, the industry in which the business operates or the general environment. Although management believes the Company's portfolio of commercial business loans is well structured and adequately secured, there can be no assurance that all loans will be fully collectible. At June 30, 2005, agricultural operating loans delinquent 30 days and over totaled $220,000, or 0.05% of the total loan portfolio as compared to $254,000, or 0.06% of total loans at September 30, 2004. Agricultural lending involves a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans because of the typically larger loan amounts. In addition, payments on loans are dependent on the successful operation or management of the farm property securing the loan or for which an operating loan is utilized. The success of the loan may also be affected by factors outside the control of the agricultural borrower, such as the weather and grain and livestock prices. Although management believes the Company's portfolio of agricultural real estate and operating loans is well structured and adequately secured, there can be no assurance that all loans will be fully collectible. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing assets in the Company's loan portfolio. The Company's restructured loans (which involved forgiving a portion of the interest or principal on the loan or making loans at a rate materially less than market rates) are included in the table and were performing as agreed at the date shown. Foreclosed assets include assets acquired in settlement of loans.
June 30, 2005 September 30, 2004 ------------- ------------------ (Dollars in Thousands) Non-accruing loans: One-to four family $ 23 $ -- Commercial and multi-family 2,281 399 Agricultural real estate -- -- Consumer 50 59 Agricultural operating 220 254 Commercial business 5,570 -- ------ ---- Total non-accruing loans 8,144 712 Accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more -- -- ------ ---- Total non-performing loans 8,144 712 ------ ---- Restructured loans: Consumer -- -- Agricultural operating 7 9 Commercial business -- 8 ------ ---- Total restructured loans 7 17 ------ ---- Foreclosed assets: One-to four family -- -- Commercial real estate -- -- Consumer 20 -- Agricultural operating -- -- Commercial business -- -- ------ ---- Total foreclosed assets 20 -- ------ ---- Total non-performing assets $8,171 $729 ====== ==== Total as a percentage of total assets 1.06% 0.09% ====== ====
Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets as "substandard", "doubtful" or "loss", based on the level of weakness determined to be inherent in the collection of the principal and interest. When loans are classified as either substandard or doubtful, the Company may establish general allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem loans. When assets are classified as loss, the Company is required 16 either to establish a specific allowance for loan losses equal to 100% of that portion of the loan so classified, or to charge-off such amount. The Company's determination as to the classification of its loans and the amount of its allowances for loan losses are subject to review by its regulatory authorities, which may require the establishment of additional general or specific allowances for loan losses. On the basis of management's review of its loans and other assets, at June 30, 2005, the Company had classified a total of $15.2 million of its assets as substandard, $1,000 as doubtful and none as loss as compared to classifications at September 30, 2004 of $12.9 million substandard, $11,000 doubtful and none as loss. Allowance for Loan Losses. The Company establishes its provision for loan losses, and evaluates the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses based upon a systematic methodology consisting of a number of factors including, among others, historic loss experience, the overall level of classified assets and non-performing loans, the composition of its loan portfolio and the general economic environment within which the Bank and its borrowers operate. Current economic conditions in the agricultural sector of the Company's market area are stable due to generally stable or higher commodity prices and a history of government subsidies. Price levels for grain crops and livestock are currently at levels that present minimal concern. The agricultural economy is accustomed to commodity price fluctuations and is generally able to handle such fluctuations without significant problem. Although the Company underwrites its agricultural loans based on normal expectations for commodity prices and yields, an extended period of low commodity prices or adverse growing conditions could result in weakness in the agricultural loan portfolio and could create a need for the Company to increase its allowance for loan losses through increased charges to the provision for loan losses. (See "CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES") At June 30, 2005, the Company has established an allowance for loan losses totaling $9.6 million. The allowance represented approximately 117.1% of the total non-performing loans at June 30, 2005, while the allowance at September 30, 2004 represented approximately 754.4% of the total non-performing loans at that date. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was due primarily to the additional reserves recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 relating to the impairment of assets discussed earlier, and to the increase in the loan portfolio. The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the Company's allowance for loan losses for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004: 2005 2004 ---- ---- (In Thousands) Balance, September 30, $ 5,371 $ 4,962 Charge-offs (1,313) (25) Recoveries 120 13 Additions charged to operations 5,391 324 ------- ------- Balance, June 30, $ 9,569 $ 5,274 ======= ======= The allowance for loan losses reflects management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio based on currently available information. Future additions to the allowance for loan losses may become necessary based upon changing economic conditions, increased loan balances or changes in the underlying collateral of the loan portfolio. 17 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to the allowance for loan losses and asset impairment judgments including the recoverability of goodwill. The Company's allowance for loan loss methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative in establishing an allowance for loan loss that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include the Company's historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in nonperforming loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers' sensitivity to interest rate movements. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company's markets, including economic conditions throughout the Midwest and in particular, the state of certain industries. Size and complexity of individual credits in relation to loan structure, existing loan policies and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in the methodology. As the Company adds new products and increases the complexity of its loan portfolio, it will enhance its methodology accordingly. Management may report a materially different amount for the provision for loan losses in the statement of operations to change the allowance for loan losses if its assessment of the above factors were different. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein, as well as the portion of this Management's Discussion and Analysis section entitled "Nonperforming Assets and Allowance for Loan Losses." Although management believes the levels of the allowance as of both June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 were adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in local economic conditions, or other factors, could result in increasing losses. Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a purchase acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS General. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded a net loss of $2,312,000 compared to net income of $837,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005, the net loss was $1,471,000 compared to net income of $3,489,000 for the same period in 2004. The net losses for the three and nine month periods of 2005 were primarily the result of $4.8 million in additional loan loss reserves recorded during the three month period. Both periods reflect increases in net interest income and in the provision for loan losses. The three month period reflects an increase in non-interest income while the nine month period reflects a decrease. Non-operating expense increased during both the three month and nine month periods, and there was an income tax benefit in both periods of 2005 compared to income tax expense during the 2004 periods. The decrease in non-interest income for the nine month period reflects primarily a gain of $1,113,000, on the sale of the Manson, Iowa branch office during the 2004 period. The increases in non-interest expense were the result of increases in compensation and benefits, and to expenses related to the name changes, which totaled $64,000 and $679,000 for the three and nine month periods, respectively. The decrease in net income was also attributable to the net loss of Meta Payment Systems, which totaled $156,000 and $867,000 for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $596,000, or 13.2%, to $5,116,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $4,520,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended 18 June 30, 2005, net interest income increased $1,390,000, or 10.4%, to $14,792,000 from $13,402,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase in net interest income for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 included an increase in total interest income of $1,769,000, or 19.6%, which was partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $1,174,000 or 26.0%, compared to the same period in 2004. The increase in total interest income reflects an increase in the yield of interest-earning assets to 5.69% from 4.90%, and an increase of $22.5 million in the average balance of interest-earning assets during the period. The increase in total interest expense reflects an increase in the cost on interest-bearing liabilities to 2.63% from 2.38%, and an increase of $29.3 million in the average balance of interest bearing-liabilities during the period. The increase in net interest income for the nine month period ended June 30, 2005 included an increase in total interest income of $3,982,000, or 14.8%, which was partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $2,593,000 or 19.1%, compared to the same period in 2004. The increase in total interest income reflects an increase in the yield of interest-earning assets to 5.40% from 4.85%, and an increase of $22.7 million in the average balance of interest-earning assets during the period. The increase in total interest expense reflects an increase in the cost on interest-bearing liabilities to 2.89% from 2.50%, and an increase of $23.6 million in the average balance of interest bearing-liabilities during the period. Provision for Loan Losses. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the provision for loan losses was $4,956,000 compared to $168,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005, the provision for loan losses was $5,391,000 compared to $325,000 for the same period in 2004. The increases in both the three-month and nine-month periods were due primarily to the $4.8 million provision in June 2005 related to the impaired loans discussed earlier and to loan growth. Management believes that, based on a detail review of the loan portfolio, historic loan losses, current economic conditions, and other factors, the current level of provision for loan losses, and the resulting level of the allowance for loan losses, reflects an adequate allowance against probable losses from the loan portfolio. See "Non-Performing Assets and Allowance for Loan Losses." Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $309,000, or 48.3%, to $949,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $640,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005, non-interest income decreased $771,000, or 25.6%, to $2,234,000 from $3,005,000 for the same period in 2004. The decrease in non-interest income for the nine month period reflects a non-recurring gain in January, 2004 of $1,113,000 on the sale of a branch office, which net of income taxes added $.27 per diluted share to the nine month period ended June 30, 2004. There was an increase in both periods in deposit service charges and other income. These increases were partially offset by decreases in income from Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) and net gain on the sale of loans. The increase in other income was primarily the result of Meta Payment Systems programs and activities which began to generate revenue during the period. The decrease in income from BOLI was the result of a reduction in the in the guaranteed return rate, and the decrease in net sale on the sale of loans was the result of a lower volume of loans originated for sale. Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $935,000, or 25.1%, to $4,666,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $3,731,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005, non-interest expense increased $3,260,000, or 30.3%, to $14,015,000 from $10,755,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase in non-interest expense was the result of increases in compensation and benefit expense, occupancy and equipment expense and other expense during both the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2005. Salary and benefit costs for Meta Payment Systems increased from $194,000 for both the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2004 to $573,000 and $1,561,000, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2005. The increases were also attributable to other factors, including other costs associated with Meta Payment Systems, totaling, excluding compensation and benefits, $198,000 and $595,000 for the three and nine month periods, respectively, and the marketing and other costs related to the corporate name changes, which totaled $64,000 and $679,000 for the three and nine month periods, 19 respectively. Meta Payment Systems had non-operating expenses of $221,000 for both the three and nine month periods of fiscal 2004. Additional factors contributing to the increase in expenses were the opening of a second branch office in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in May 2004, and additional staffing and other costs related to initiating and proceeding with the process aimed at compliance, in fiscal 2006, with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Normal increases in costs have also contributed to the increase. Income Tax Expense. The income tax benefit was $1,245,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to income tax expense of $425,000 for the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended June 30, 2005, the income tax benefit was $908,000 compared to income tax expense of $1,839,000 for the same period in 2004. The change for both periods reflects the 2005 net loss compared to net income in 2004, before income tax expense (benefit). LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company's primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, principal and interest payments on loans, investments and mortgage-backed securities, and funds provided by other operating activities. While scheduled payments on loans, mortgage-backed securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and early loan repayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company uses its capital resources principally to meet ongoing commitments to fund maturing certificates of deposits and loan commitments, to maintain liquidity, and to meet operating expenses. At June 30, 2005, the Company had commitments to originate and purchase loans totaling $65.7 million. The Company believes that loan repayment and other sources of funds will be adequate to meet its foreseeable short- and long-term liquidity needs. Regulations require the MetaBank and MetaBank WC to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and a leverage ratio consisting of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The following table sets forth MetaBank's and MetaBank WC's actual capital and required capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2005 which, at that date, exceeded the minimum capital adequacy requirements:
Minimum Requirement To Be Minimum Well Capitalized Requirement For Under Prompt Capital Adequacy Corrective Action Actual Purposes Provisions ------ -------- ---------- At June 30, 2005 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio - ---------------- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- (Dollars in Thousands) Total Capital (to risk weighted assets): MetaBank $52,175 9.98% $41,827 8.00% $52,284 10.00% MetaBank WC 4,129 12.08 2,733 8.00 3,417 10.00 Tier 1 (Core) Capital (to risk weighted assets): MetaBank 45,543 8.71 20,914 4.00 31,370 6.00 MetaBank WC 3,695 10.81 1,367 4.00 2,050 6.00 Tier 1 (Core) Capital (to average assets): MetaBank 45,543 6.23 29,236 4.00 36,546 5.00 MetaBank WC 3,695 6.14 2,406 4.00 3,008 5.00 Tier 1 (Core) Capital (to adjusted total assets): MetaBank 45,543 6.37 28,598 4.00 35,748 5.00
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) established five regulatory capital categories and authorized the banking regulators to take prompt corrective action 20 with respect to institutions in an undercapitalized category. At June 30, 2005, MetaBank WC and the Company exceeded minimum requirements for the well-capitalized category, while MetaBank was considered adequately capitalized due to its risk-based capital ratio having fallen below 10.0%. As a result of its status as an adequately capitalized institution, MetaBank will need to seek regulatory approval (or non-objection) from the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) prior to the declaration of a dividend to the Company. No prediction can be made as to whether or to what extent any request to declare a dividend will be granted. Traditionally, the Company has utilized dividends received from its subsidiary banks to pay dividends to its shareholders. Though the Company has assets that could be liquidated at the holding company level in order to pay dividends, no assurance can be given that such assets will be sufficient to pay regular dividends over an extended period of time, or that regulatory approval for the payment of such dividends will not be restricted by the Federal Reserve. It is the position of the Federal Reserve that bank holding companies should serve as a source of strength to their insured subsidiaries. Furthermore, MetaBank's ability as an adequately capitalized institution to accept brokered deposits will be subject to OTS permission and certain restrictions on the amount of interest the bank may pay on such deposits. This is not expected to have a material impact on MetaBank, since it has no brokered deposits. In addition, MetaBank's ability to transfer small business loans pursuant to certain preferable regulations will be contingent on OTS approval. Finally, Metabank may not be eligible for expedited regulatory processing of certain applications. Neither of these limitations is expected to have a material impact on MetaBank or the Company. Forward-Looking Statements The Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, MetaBank and MetaBank WC, may from time to time make written or oral "forward-looking statements," including statements contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in its reports to shareholders, and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company's beliefs, expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors, some of which are beyond the Company's control. Such statements address the following subjects: future operating results; customer growth and retention; loan and other product demand; earnings growth and expectations; new products and services, such as those offered by the Meta Payment Systems Division; credit quality and adequacy of reserves; technology; and our employees. The following factors, among others, could cause the Company's financial performance to differ materially from the expectations, estimates, and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary, and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; inflation, interest rate, market, and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users; the impact of changes in financial services' laws and regulations; technological changes; acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at managing and collecting assets of borrowers in default and managing the risks involved in the foregoing. The foregoing list of factors is not exclusive. Additional discussion of factors affecting the Company's business and prospects is contained in the Company's periodic filings with the SEC. The Company 21 does not undertake, and expressly disclaims any intent or obligation, to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company. 22 Part I. Financial Information Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk Market Risk The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and changes in the market value of its investments. The Company currently focuses lending efforts toward originating and purchasing competitively priced adjustable-rate loan products and fixed-rate loan products with relatively short terms to maturity. This allows the Company to maintain a portfolio of loans that will be sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates while providing a reasonable spread to the cost of liabilities used to fund the loans. The Company's primary objective for its investment portfolio is to provide the liquidity necessary to meet loan funding needs. This portfolio is used in the ongoing management of changes to the Company's asset/liability mix, while contributing to profitability through earnings flow. The investment policy generally calls for funds to be invested among various categories of security types and maturities based upon the Company's need for liquidity, desire to achieve a proper balance between minimizing risk while maximizing yield, the need to provide collateral for borrowings, and to fulfill the Company's asset/liability management goals. The Company's cost of funds responds to changes in interest rates due to the relatively short-term nature of its deposit portfolio. Consequently, the results of operations are generally influenced by the level of short-term interest rates. The Company offers a range of maturities on its deposit products at competitive rates and monitors the maturities on an ongoing basis. The Company emphasizes and promotes its savings, money market, demand and NOW accounts and, subject to market conditions, certificates of deposit with maturities of three months through five years, principally from its primary market area. The savings and NOW accounts tend to be less susceptible to rapid changes in interest rates. In managing its asset/liability mix, the Company, at times, depending on the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and consumer preference, may place somewhat greater emphasis on maximizing its net interest margin than on strictly matching the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities. Management believes that the increased net income which may result from an acceptable mismatch in the actual maturity or repricing of its asset and liability portfolios can provide sufficient returns to justify the increased exposure to sudden and unexpected increases in interest rates which may result from such a mismatch. The Company has established limits, which may change from time to time, on the level of acceptable interest rate risk. There can be no assurance, however, that, in the event of an adverse change in interest rates, the Company's efforts to limit interest rate risk will be successful. Net Portfolio Value The Company uses a Net Portfolio Value ("NPV") approach to the quantification of interest rate risk. This approach calculates the difference between the present value of expected cash flows from assets and the present value of expected cash flows from liabilities, as well as cash flows from off-balance-sheet contracts. Management of the Company's assets and liabilities is performed within the context of the marketplace, but also within limits established by the Board of Directors on the amount of change in NPV that is acceptable given certain interest rate changes. Presented below, as of June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, is an analysis of the Company's interest rate risk as measured by changes in NPV for an instantaneous and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve, in 100 basis point increments, up and down 200 basis points. As illustrated in the table, 23 the Company's NPV at June 30, 2005 and at September 30, 2004 was slightly more sensitive to decreasing interest rates than to increasing interest rates. This reflects management's efforts to maintain and manage the Company's interest rate sensitivity in light of the events over the past twelve months. Market interest rates began to increase as the result of concern over the prospect of an increase in the rate of inflation. As the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") began a measured process of bringing short-term interest rates back to a more normal level through 25 basis point increases in the target rate for overnight money, long-term rates moderated creating a flattening in the yield curve. Between June 2004 and August 2005, the FOMC increased the target rate ten times for a total increase of 250 basis points. While management does not anticipate a significant shift in market interest rates in the near future, it does believe that there is less risk from declining rates than from rising rates, and its management of interest rate risk has reflected this belief. Management closely monitors the Company's interest rate sensitivity.
At June 30, 2005 At September 30, 2004 Change in Interest Rates Board Limit ---------------- --------------------- (Basis Points) % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change ------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (Dollars in Thousands) +200 bp (40)% $(4,828) (10)% $(5,473) (12)% +100 bp (25) (1,567) (3) (1,580) (3) 0 bp -- -- -- -- -- -100 bp (25) (1,625) (3) (3,130) (7) -200 bp (40) (6,676) (13) (5,631) (12)
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets such as adjustable-rate mortgage-loans have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayments and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate from those assumed in calculating the tables. Finally, the ability of some borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. The Company considers all of these factors in monitoring its exposure to interest rate risk. 24 Part I. Financial Information Item 4. Controls and Procedures Controls and Procedures Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable (not absolute) assurance that its objectives will be met. Furthermore, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by the report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2005 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that (i) the information required to be disclosed by us in this Report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting 25 META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION FORM 10-Q Item 1. Legal Proceedings - On June 11, 2004, the Sioux Falls School District filed suit in the Second Judicial Circuit Court, against First Federal Savings Bank of the Midwest, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, alleging that First Federal (now MetaBank) improperly allowed funds, which belonged to the school district, to be deposited into, and subsequently withdrawn from, a corporate account established by an employee of the school district. The school district is seeking in excess of $600,000. MetaBank has submitted the claim to its insurance carrier, and is working with counsel to vigorously contest the suit. On June 20, 2005, Dan Nelson Auto Group and South Dakota Acceptance Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division. The case numbers, respectively, are 05-40865 and 05-40866. MetaBank is a secured creditor with respect to such cases. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Corporate Developments", herein. There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses. Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds - ------------------------------------------------------------ (a) None (c) The following table provides information about purchases by the Company or its affiliates during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Number of Shares Maximum Number of Total Number Average Price Purchased as Part of Shares that May Yet Period of Common Paid Per Share Publicly Announced Be Purchased Under Shares Purchased Purchased Program(s) the Program(s) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/1/05 - 4/30/05 10,900(1) $22.67 40,000(1) 100,000(2) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5/1/05 - 5/31/05 -- -- -- 100,000(2) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6/1/05 - 6/30/05 -- -- -- 100,000(2) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 10,900(1) $22.67 40,000(1) 100,000(2) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) was authorized in September 2004 to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company's stock. Through March 31, 2005, it had purchased 29,100 shares. On April 18, 2005, the ESOP completed the authorized purchase. (2) On April 25, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 100,000 shares of the Company's stock in a repurchase program that runs through April 30, 2006. (As of August 12, 2005, no shares had been purchased under this program.) Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None ------------------------------- Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None --------------------------------------------------- 26 Item 5. Other Information - None ----------------- Item 6. Exhibits -------- (a) Exhibits: 31.1 Section 302 certification of Chief Executive Officer. 31.2 Section 302 certification of Chief Financial Officer. 32.1 Section 906 certification of Chief Executive Officer. 32.2 Section 906 certification of Chief Financial Officer. 27 META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Date: August 15, 2005 By: /s/ J. Tyler Haahr --------------- ------------------ J. Tyler Haahr, President, and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 15, 2005 By: /s/ Ronald J. Walters --------------- --------------------- Ronald J. Walters, Senior Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 28 EX-31.1 2 ex31-1.txt Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, J. Tyler Haahr, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meta Financial Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 15, 2005 ---------------- /s/ J. Tyler Haahr ------------------ Chief Executive Officer 29 EX-31.2 3 ex31-2.txt Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ronald J. Walters, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meta Financial Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 15, 2005 --------------- /s/ Ronald J. Walters --------------------- Chief Financial Officer 30 EX-32.1 4 ex32-1.txt Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Meta Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Tyler Haahr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By: /s/ J. Tyler Haahr -------------------- Name: J. Tyler Haahr Chief Executive Officer August 15, 2005 31 EX-32.2 5 ex32-2.txt Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Meta Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald J. Walters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By: /s/ Ronald J. Walters ----------------------- Name: Ronald J. Walters Chief Financial Officer August 15, 2005 32 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----