XML 40 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 15 - Regulatory Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Dividends
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Regulatory Capital Requirements under Banking Regulations [Text Block] Note 15.                 Regulatory Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Dividends
The Company (on a consolidated basis) and the subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company and subsidiary banks’ financial statements.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the subsidiary banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.  Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the subsidiary banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).   Management believes, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, that the Company and the subsidiary banks met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, to be categorized as “well capitalized,” an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables.  The Company and the subsidiary banks’ actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are also presented in the following table (dollars in thousands).  As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the subsidiary banks met the requirements to be “well capitalized”.

                             
To Be Well
 
                             
Capitalized Under
 
               
For Capital
   
Prompt Corrective
 
   
Actual
   
Adequacy Purposes
   
Action Provisions
 
   
Amount
   
Ratio
   
Amount
 
Ratio
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
As of December 31, 2011:
                                       
Company:
                                       
Total risk-based capital
  $ 191,419       13.84 %   $ 110,686  
>
    8.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    169,360       12.24 %     55,343  
>
    4.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Tier 1 leverage
    169,360       8.70 %     77,857  
>
    4.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Quad City Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 98,382       13.03 %   $ 60,391  
>
    8.0 %   $ 75,488  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    90,336       11.97 %     30,195  
>
    4.0       45,293  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    90,336       8.21 %     44,009  
>
    4.0       55,012  
>
    5.00 %
Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 56,312       14.44 %   $ 31,198  
>
    8.0 %   $ 38,998  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    51,415       13.18 %     15,599  
>
    4.0       23,399  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    51,415       9.02 %     22,807  
>
    4.0       28,509  
>
    5.00 %
Rockford Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 36,259       15.27 %   $ 19,001  
>
    8.0 %   $ 23,752  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    33,277       14.01 %     9,501  
>
    4.0       14,251  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    33,277       11.31 %     11,770  
>
    4.0       14,713  
>
    5.00 %

                             
To Be Well
 
                             
Capitalized Under
 
               
For Capital
   
Prompt Corrective
 
   
Actual
   
Adequacy Purposes
   
Action Provisions
 
   
Amount
   
Ratio
   
Amount
 
Ratio
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
As of December 31, 2010:
                                       
Company:
                                       
Total risk-based capital
  $ 183,030       13.70 %   $ 106,870  
>
    8.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    161,939       12.12 %     53,435  
>
    4.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Tier 1 leverage
    161,939       8.71 %     74,342  
>
    4.0 %     N/A         N/A  
Quad City Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 95,875       13.12 %   $ 58,455  
>
    8.0 %   $ 73,069  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    86,821       11.88 %     29,228  
>
    4.0 %     43,841  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    86,821       8.48 %     40,965  
>
    4.0 %     51,206  
>
    5.00 %
Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 55,401       14.14 %   $ 31,335  
>
    8.0 %   $ 39,169  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    50,465       12.88 %     15,667  
>
    4.0 %     23,501  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    50,465       9.03 %     22,354  
>
    4.0 %     27,942  
>
    5.00 %
Rockford Bank & Trust:
                                                   
Total risk-based capital
  $ 33,852       15.82 %   $ 17,119  
>
    8.0 %   $ 21,399  
>
    10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    31,171       14.57 %     8,560  
>
    4.0 %     12,839  
>
    6.00 %
Tier 1 leverage
    31,171       11.31 %     11,027  
>
    4.0 %     13,784  
>
    5.00 %

The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders may be affected by both general corporate law considerations and policies of the Federal Reserve applicable to bank holding companies.
The payment of dividends by any financial institution or its holding company is affected by the requirement to maintain adequate capital pursuant to applicable capital adequacy guidelines and regulations, and a financial institution generally is prohibited from paying any dividends if, following payment thereof, the institution would be undercapitalized.  Notwithstanding the availability of funds for dividends, however, the Federal Reserve may prohibit the payment of any dividends by the Banks if the Federal Reserve determines such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

The Company also has certain contractual restrictions on its ability to pay dividends.  The Company has issued junior subordinated debentures in four private placements.  Under the terms of the debentures, the Company may be prohibited, under certain circumstances, from paying dividends on shares of its common stock.  Additionally, the Company has issued shares of non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and under the terms of this preferred stock, the Company may be prohibited, under certain circumstances, from paying dividends on shares of its common stock.  None of these circumstances currently exist.