0001204459-12-001487.txt : 20120629 0001204459-12-001487.hdr.sgml : 20120629 20120629145746 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001204459-12-001487 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 6-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20120629 FILED AS OF DATE: 20120629 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20120629 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Rouge Resources Ltd. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000906361 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MINING, QUARRYING OF NONMETALLIC MINERALS (NO FUELS) [1400] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 STATE OF INCORPORATION: A1 FISCAL YEAR END: 0131 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 6-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-31799 FILM NUMBER: 12935675 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 203 - 409 GRANVILLE STREET CITY: VANCOUVER STATE: A1 ZIP: V6C 1T2 BUSINESS PHONE: 604-831-2739 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 203 - 409 GRANVILLE STREET CITY: VANCOUVER STATE: A1 ZIP: V6C 1T2 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: GEMSTAR RESOURCES LTD DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19930602 6-K 1 d6k.htm FORM 6-K Rouge Resources Inc.: Form 6-K - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16
OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of June 2012

Commission File Number: 001-31799

ROUGE RESOURCES INC.
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)

#203-409 Granville St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 1T2
(Address of principal executive offices)

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F]

Form 20-F [X]  Form 40-F [  ]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1)]

Yes [  ]  No [X]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7)]

Yes [  ]  No [X]

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12-g-3-3(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]

Yes [  ]  No [X]

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_______________


SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits  
99.1

Interim Financial Statements for three months ended April 30, 2012

99.2

Management Discussion and Analysis for three months ended April 30, 2012

99.3

Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Interim Filings - CEO

99.4

Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Interim Filings - CFO

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Company by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  Rouge Resources Ltd.
   
Dated: June 29, 2012 By: /s/ Linda Smith                 
    Linda Smith
   
  Title: Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.1 2 exhibit99-1.htm EXHIBIT 99.1

Exhibit 99.1

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2012

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


Statements of Financial Position

Statements of Comprehensive Loss

Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency)

Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Financial Statements

 

NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3) (a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the condensed interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited condensed interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared by management and approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors of the Company. They include appropriate accounting principles, judgement and estimates in accordance with IFRS for interim financial statements.

The Company’s independent auditors have not performed a review of these condensed interim financial statements in accordance with the standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of condensed interim financial statements by an entity’s auditors.



Rouge Resources Ltd.                        
Condensed Interim Statements of Financial Position                    
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)                        
                         
                         
    Notes     April 30, 2012     April 30, 2011     January 31, 2012  
                      (audited)  

ASSETS

                       

 

                       

Current assets

                       

Cash

      $  5,960   $  114,803   $  17,823  

Harmonized sales tax refundable

        7,449     11,275     2,951  

 

        13,409     126,078     20,774  

Non-current assets

                       

Credit card security deposit

        6,900     6,900     6,900  

Equipment – net

  4     2,393     2,670     2,587  

Exploration and evaluation assets

  5     229,246     212,879     212,879  

 

        238,539     222,449     222,366  

 

                       

TOTAL ASSETS

      $  251,948   $  348,527   $  243,140  

 

                       

LIABILITIES

                       

 

                       

Current liabilities

                       

Trade payables and accrued liabilities

  6   $  79,378   $  114,539   $  67,064  

Related party payables

  7     282,223     133,282     245,084  

 

        361,601     247,821     312,148  

Non-current liability

                       

  Loan payable

  8     39,676     -     39,676  

 

                       

TOTAL LIABILITIES

        401,278     247,821     351,824  

 

                       

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

                       

 

                       

Share capital

  9     3,110,796     3,110,796     3,110,796  

Equity component of convertible note

        53,357     53,357     53,357  

Deficit

        (3,361,483 )   (3,063,447 )   (3,272,837 )

 

                       

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

        (149,330 )   100,706     (108,684 )

 

                       

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

      $  251,948   $  348,527   $  243,140  

 

                       

 

                       

Going concern

  1                    

 

                       

 

                       

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors:

                       

“Linda Smith”   “Ronald McGregor”
Director   Director

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

2




Rouge Resources Ltd.                        
Condensed Interim Statements of Comprehensive Loss              
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)              
                         
                      Year ended  
    Notes     Three months ended April 30,     January 31,  
          2012     2011     2012  
                      (audited)  
Expenses                        
   Amortization       $  194   $  216   $  1,008  
   Accounting and audit fees         2,820     3,887     36,262  
   Listing application expenses   9     55,879     25,092     90,507  
   Management fees   7     15,000     15,000     60,000  
   Office and miscellaneous   7     10,359     14,838     55,859  
   Professional fees         1,767     6,809     11,125  
   Transfer agent and filing fees         1,866     1,444     16,360  
   Travel and promotion         761     2,608     8,163  
                         
Comprehensive loss       $  (88,646 ) $  (69,894 ) $  (279,284 )
                         
Loss per share                        
   – basic and diluted   9   $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                        
   – basic and diluted         40,565,171     40,565,171     40,565,171  

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

3




Rouge Resources Ltd.                                    
Condensed Interim Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency)                          
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)                                    
                      Equity                
                Share     Component              
    Common Shares     Subscriptions      of Convertible              
    Number     Amount     Received      Note     Deficit     Total  

Balance at February 1, 2011

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  -   $  53,357   $  (2,993,553 ) $  170,600  
                                     

Comprehensive loss for the three months ended April 30, 2011

                  (69,894 )   (69,894 )
                                     

Balance at April 30, 2011

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  -   $  53,357   $  (3,063,447 ) $  100,706  
                                     

Balance at May 1, 2011

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  -   $  53,357   $  (3,063,447 ) $  100,706  
                                     

Comprehensive loss for the nine months ended January 31, 2012

                  (209,390 )   (209,390 )
                                     

Balance at January 31, 2012

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  -   $  53,357   $  (3,272,837 ) $  (108,684 )

 

                                   

Balance at February 1, 2012

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  -   $  53,357   $  (3,272,837 ) $  (108,684 )
                                     

Comprehensive loss for the three months ended April 30, 2012

                  (88,646 )   (88,646 )

Share subscriptions received

              48,000                 48,000  
                                     

Balance at April 30, 2012

  40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  48,000   $  53,357   $  (3,361,483 ) $  (149,330 )

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

4




Rouge Resources Ltd.                  
Condensed Interim Statements of Cash Flows                  
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)                  
                   
                Year ended  
    Three months ended April 30,     January 31,  
    2012     2011     2012  
Operating activities                  
Comprehensive loss $  (88,646 ) $  (69,894 ) $  (279,284 )
Adjustments for non-cash item:                  
   Amortization   194     216     1,008  
    (88,452 )   (69,678 )   (278,276 )
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                  
   Harmonized sales tax refundable   (4,498 )   (2,856 )   5,468  
   Trade payables and accrued liabilities   12,315     22,016     14,217  
                   
Net cash flows used in operating activities   (80,635 )   (50,518 )   (258,591 )
                   
Investing activities                  
Expenditures on equipment               (709 )
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets   (16,367 )   (12,000 )   (12,000 )
                   
Net cash flows used in investing activities   (16,367 )   (12,000 )   (12,709 )
                   
Financing activities                  
Change in related party payable   37,139     32,369     144,171  
Share subscriptions received   48,000     -     -  
                   
Net cash flows from financing activities   85,139     32,369     144,171  
                   
Decrease in cash   (11,863 )   (30,149 )   (127,129 )
Cash, beginning   17,823     144,952     144,952  
                   
Cash, end $  5,960   $  114,803   $  17,823  

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

5




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

1. Nature and continuance of operations

Rouge Resources Ltd (the “Company”) was incorporated on March 31, 1988 in British Columbia, Canada. The Company’s registered office address is located at 203 - 409 Granville St., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1T2. The Company is an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of exploration and evaluation assets in Canada. The Company’s stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States.

These condensed interim financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at April 30, 2012, the Company had not yet determined whether its property contains economically recoverable resources, but anticipates having access to sufficient cash reserves to finance day to day operations into the foreseeable future. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the successful results from its mineral property exploration activities and its ability to attain profitable operations and generate funds there from and/or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. Management intends to finance operating expenses over the next twelve months with existing cash reserves, private placement of common shares and/or loans from officers/ directors.

2. Significant accounting policies and basis of preparation

These financial statements were authorized for issue on June 27, 2012 by the directors of the Company.

Statement of compliance and conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards

These condensed interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) along with interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Therefore, these financial statements comply with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 34, Interim Financial Reporting.

This interim financial report does not include all of the information required of a full annual financial report and is intended to provide users with an update in relation to events and transactions that are significant to an understanding of the changes in financial position and performance of the Company since the end of the last annual reporting period. It is therefore recommended that this financial report be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2012.

However, this interim financial report provides selected significant disclosures that are required in the annual financial statements under IFRS.

Basis of preparation

These condensed interim financial statements of the Company are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted; have been prepared on an accrual basis; and are based on historical costs, modified where applicable.

Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual outcomes can differ from these estimates.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

6




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Areas requiring a significant degree of estimation and judgment relate to the determination of the useful lives of equipment, the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, the measurement of accrued liabilities and the recoverability/ measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates and judgments.

Foreign currency translation and balances

The functional currency of the Company is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. The financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars which is the Company’s function currency.

Foreign currency transactions, where applicable, are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items, if any, are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period in which they arise, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) insufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to mining property and development assets.

Recoverability of the carrying amount of any exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

Loss per share

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in the period. For all periods presented, the loss attributable to common shareholders equals the reported loss attributable to owners of the Company. Diluted loss per share is calculated by the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the calculation of diluted loss per share assumes that the proceeds to be received on the exercise of dilutive share options and warrants are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

7




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Share-based payments

The Company has a stock option plan. Share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the instruments issued and amortized over the vesting periods. Share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. The corresponding amount is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using a Black–Scholes pricing model which incorporates all market vesting conditions. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each reporting period such that the amount recognized for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted shall be based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest.

Financial instruments

The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: fair value through profit or loss investments, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale investments and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

Financial assets are classified at fair value through profit or loss when they are held-for-trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or when they are designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets, or classified as non-current assets where maturities are greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments, and it is the Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those instruments that are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary financial assets. Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortized cost.

Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortized cost.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date, ie. the date on which the group commits to purchase the asset.

Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

8




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Impairment of assets

The carrying amount of the Company’s non-financial assets, which includes equipment and exploration and evaluation assets, is reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. An impairment loss is recognized whenever the carrying amount of an asset or its cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.

The recoverable amount of assets is the greater of an asset’s fair value less cost to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate cash inflows largely independent of those from other assets, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

An impairment loss is only reversed if there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount, however, not to an amount higher than the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized in previous years.

Assets that have an indefinite useful life not subject to amortization are tested annually for impairment.

Income taxes

Current income tax

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income.

Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax

Deferred income tax is provided using the balance sheet method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

9




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Flow-through shares

On the issuance of flow-through shares, any premium received in excess of the closing market price of the Company’s common shares is initially recorded as a liability (“flow-through tax liability”) and included in trade payables and accrued liabilities. Provided that the Company has renounced the related expenditures, or that there is a reasonable expectation that it will do so, the flow-through tax liability is reduced on a pro-rata basis as the expenditures are incurred and a deferred tax liability is recognized. The reduction to the flow-through tax liability is recognized in profit or loss as other income.

To the extent that the Company has suitable unrecognized deductible temporary differences, an offsetting recovery of deferred income taxes would be recorded.

Restoration and environmental obligations

The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflects the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. The restoration asset will be depreciated on the same basis as other mining assets.

The Company’s estimates of restoration costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to mining assets with a corresponding entry to the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of reclamation costs, are charged to profit and loss for the period. The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to profit or loss in the period incurred.

The costs of restoration projects that were included in the provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The costs to prevent and control environmental impacts at specific properties are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets.

At present, the Company is not required to provide for restoration and environmental obligations. Accordingly, no provision has been made.

Equipment

Equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of loss and comprehensive loss during the financial period in which they are incurred.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.

Amortization is calculated on a declining balance method to write off the cost of the assets to their residual values at the rate of 30% per year.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

10




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

3. Accounting standards issued but not yet effective

Certain pronouncements were issued by the IASB or the IFRIC that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2012 or later periods.

The following new standards, amendments and interpretations have not been early adopted in these financial statements and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s future results and financial position:

  a)

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (New to replace IAS 39 and IFRIC 9)

     
  b)

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (New to replace consolidation requirements in IAS 27 as amended in 2008 and SIC-12)

     
  c)

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (New to replace IAS 31 and SIC-13)

     
  d)

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (New to replace disclosure requirements in IAS 27 as amended in 2008, IAS 28 (as revised in 2003 and IAS 31)

     
  e)

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (New; to replace fair value measurement guidance in other IFRSs)

     
  f)

IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, (Amendments regarding Presentation of Other Comprehensive Income)

     
  g)

IAS 19 Employee Benefits (Amended in 2011)

     
  h)

IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (Amended in 2011)

     
  i)

IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amended in 2011), and

     
  j)

IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine (New).

     
4. Equipment

            Accumulated     Net book  
      Cost     amortization     Value  
  Balance at February 1, 2011 $  8,001   $  (5,115 ) $  2,886  
  Additions   709           709  
  Amortization         (1,008 )   (1,008 )
  Balance at January 31, 2012 $  8,710   $  (6,123 ) $  2,587  
  Additions   -           -  
  Amortization         (194 )   (194 )
  Balance at April 30, 2012 $  8,710   $  (6,317 ) $  2,393  

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

11




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

5. Exploration and evaluation assets

The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and year ended January 31, 2012:

                Total for        
                three months     Total for  
                ended     year ended  
    Canada     Canada     April30,     January 31,  
    Dotted Lake     Lampson Lake     2012     2012  
Property acquisition costs                        
Balance, beginning $  15,261   $  21,033   $  36,294   $  24,294  
   Additions   -     16,000     16,000     12,000  
Balance, end   15,261   $  37,033   $  52,294   $  36,294  
                         
Exploration and evaluation costs                        
Balance, beginning $  176,595   $  -   $  176,585   $  176,585  
Additions                        
   Drilling and related costs                        
   Field and camp costs                        
   Geological consulting                        
   Project administration   367           367        
   Travel and accommodation                        
Balance, end $  176,952   $  -   $  176,952   $  176,585  
Total balance, end $  192,213   $  37,033   $  229,246   $  212,879  

The original Dotted Lake Property (“Dotted Lake Property”) was originally comprised of one claim acquired by the Company in 2001 at a cost of $200,000. The claim was allowed to lapse in 2002 and accordingly was written off during the year ended January 31, 2003. It was re-staked by the Company in March 2003. In October 2009, the Company expanded its 100% owned holdings in the original Dotted Lake Property from a single claim to ten claims by means of staking at a cost of approximately $11,055. Title to the Property was originally held in trust for the Company by a director of the Company. Title was transferred to the Company during the year ended January 31, 2012.

On April 20, 2010, the Company entered into an option to purchase agreement with local prospectors (the “Optionors”) regarding an additional two claims adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property, known as the Lampson Lake Property. The Company has an exclusive option to purchase a 100% interest in these two claims by making option payments totaling $60,000 as follows: $7,000 paid on April 20, 2010 when the agreement was signed; $12,000 paid on April 20, 2011; $16,000 paid on April 20, 2012; and $25,000 payable on April 20, 2013. These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the Optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the Optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% Net Sales Return royalty payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious stones recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the Optioners for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000. In anticipation of meeting the final payment schedule, title was transferred to the Company during the year ended January 31, 2012. However, beneficial interest in the property will not be transferred until the final option payment of $25,000 is made on or before April 20, 2013.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

12




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our exploration and evaluation assets. Further exploration is required before a final evaluation of the economic feasibility can be determined. Significant additional financing and considerable time and effort will be required before our mineral claims can be further explored and, if warranted, developed into a commercial enterprise.

6. Trade payables and accrued liabilities                  
                     
      April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
      2012     2011     2012  
  Trade payables $  59,928   $  75,589   $  18,430  
  Accrued liabilities   19,450     38,950     30,300  
  Related party payable   -     -     9,034  
    $  79,378   $  114,539   $  67,064  
                     
7. Related party payable and transactions                  

The following related party payable to two directors and officers of the Company is unsecured, non-interest bearing and has no fixed term of repayment as at April 30 and January 31, 2012.

      April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
      2012     2011     2012  
  Payable to Company two directors and officers of the Company $  282,223   $ 132,282   $ 245,084  

The Company had the following transactions with two directors and officers of the Company during the three months ended April 30, 2011 and 2012 and year ended January 31, 2012:

                  Year ended  
      Three months ended April 30,     January 31,  
      2012     2011     2012  
  Accounting and financial reporting services $  2,820   $  -   $  -  
  Management services   15,000     15,000   $  60,000  
  Office rent   7,500     7,500     30,000  
    $  25,320   $  22,500   $  90,000  

These transactions are recorded at the exchange amount, which is the consideration agreed to between the related parties.

8. Loan payable

In February 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to defer $39,676 of debt owed to a professional advisor to a date beyond July 31, 2013. Accordingly, this amount has been reclassified from trade payable to a long term liability of the Company as at January 31, 2012. The amount is unsecured and non-interest bearing.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

13




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

9. Share capital

Authorized share capital

Unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Issued share capital

At April 31, 2012, there were 40,565,171 issued and fully paid common shares (January 31, 2012 – 40,565,171). No shares were issued during the three months ended April 30, 2012 nor during the year ended January 31, 2012.

Subsequent to January 31, 2012, the Company applied to the TSX Venture Exchange for the listing of its common shares. Conditional approval was received on April 25, 2012 subject to the fulfillment of certain regulatory requirements and a private placement financing of up to $1,200,000 from issuance of a maximum of 4,800,000 units at $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant will entitle the holder to acquire one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.40 per share for a period of one year from the date of closing. The financing was not closed on the date of these condensed interim financial statements.

Basic and diluted loss per share

The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was based on the comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders of $86,646 (April 30, 2011 - $69,894) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 40,565,171 (April 30, 2012 – 40,565,171).

Diluted loss per share does not include effect of the 30,000,000 share purchase warrants which expired on April 30, 2012.

Stock options

The Company’s stock option plan is in the form of a rolling stock option plan, which provides that a committee of the Board of Directors may from time to time, at its discretion, grant to directors, officers, employees and consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of common shares reserved for issuance in any twelve month period will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 5 years from the date of grant at a price not less than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day before the grant of such options less any discount, in any event, not less than $0.10 per share

The number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one optionee insider in any twelve month period will not exceed ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares and the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one employee or consultant will not exceed two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding common shares. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days following cessation of the optionee’s position with the Company or 30 days following cessation of an optionee conducting investor relations activities’ position.

At April 30, 2012, the Company had no issued and outstanding stock options.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

14




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Share purchase warrants

The changes in share purchase warrants during the three month period ended April 30, 2012 and the year ended January 31, 2012 are as follows:

    April 30, 2012     January 31, 2012  
          Weighted           Weighted  
          average           average  
    Number of     exercise     Number of     exercise  
    warrants     price     warrants     price  
Balance, beginning                        
    30,000,000   $  0.10     30,000,000   $  0.10  
   Warrants issued   -                    
   Warrants expired   (30,000,000 )                  
                         
Balance, end   -     -     30,000,000   $  0.10  

On April 30, 2012, the 30,000,000 warrants expired without being exercised.

10. Income taxes

The Company has non-capital losses available for carry forward against future taxable income totaling approximately $1,354,000, excluding the comprehensive loss of $88,646 for three months ended April 30, 2012, which expire as follows:

2015 $  84,000  
2026   132,000  
2027   176,000  
2028   152,000  
2029   183,000  
2030   105,000  
2031   243,000  
2032   279,000  
  $  1,354,000  

A valuation allowance has been used to offset the net benefit related to the future tax assets due to the uncertainty associated with the ultimate realization of these non-capital losses before expiry.

11.

Financial risk and capital management

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its cash held in bank accounts. The majority of cash is deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies. The Company’s secondary exposure to risk is on its harmonized sales tax refundable which is minimal since it is recoverable from the Canadian Government.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

15




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis. The Company attempts to ensure there is sufficient access to funds to meet on-going business requirements, taking into account its current cash position and potential funding sources.

Historically, the Company's source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash through private placements or loans from directors and officers. The Company’s access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant funding from these sources.

Foreign exchange risk

Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are denominated in currencies that differ from the Company’s functional currency. The Company only operates in Canada and is therefore not exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to its ability to earn interest income on cash balances at variable rates. Changes in short term interest rates will not have a significant effect on the fair value of the Company’s cash account.

Capital Management

The Company's policy is to maintain a strong capital base sufficient to maintain investor and creditor confidence and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Company consists of working and share capital. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the period and the Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

Classification of financial instruments                  
               
Financial assets included in the statement of financial position are as follows:              
                   
    April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
    2012     2011     2012  
Financial assets:                  
      Cash $  5,960   $  114,803   $  17,823  
      Harmonized sales tax refundable   7,449     11,275     2,951  
      Credit card security deposit   6,900     6,900     6,900  
  $  20,309   $  132,978   $  27,674  
                   
Other financial liabilities included in the statement of financial position are as follows:        
                   
    April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
    2012     2011     2012  
Other financial liabilities:                  
      Trade payables $  59,928   $  75,589   $  27,464  
      Related party payables   282,223     133,282     245,084  
      Loan payable   39,676     -     39,676  
  $  381,827   $  208,871   $  312,224  

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

16




Rouge Resources Ltd.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)
For the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011

Fair value

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts.

Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

  • Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

  • Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

  • Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

The following is a breakdown of the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value as at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012:

          As at April 30, 2012        
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
 Cash $  5,960   $  -   $  -  
 Harmonized sales tax refundable   7,449              
 Credit card security deposit   6,900              
                   
          As at January 31, 2012        
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
 Cash $  17,823   $  -   $  -  
 Harmonized sales tax refundable   2,951              
 Credit card security deposit   6,900              

12.

Segmented information

The Company operates in a single reportable operating segment – the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. All of its non-current assets are located in Canada.

See accompanying notes to these condensed interim financial statements

17



EX-99.2 3 exhibit99-2.htm EXHIBIT 99.2 Rouge Resources Inc.: Exhibit 99.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.2

.Rouge Resources Ltd
Management Discussion and Analysis
Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

 

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2012
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

 

 

1


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

ITEM 1.1 DATE AND INTRODUCTION

This Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) was prepared as of June 27, 2012 and should be read in conjunction with the condensed interim financial statements and notes for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained herein along with the audited financial statements and notes for the year ended January 31, 2012. This report was authorized for issue by the directors of the Company on June 28, 2012.

The financial statements contained herein are stated in Canadian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) along with interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Therefore, they comply with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 34 “Interim Financial Reporting” and are stated in Canadian dollars.

We (“or the Company”) were incorporated under the name “Gemstar Resources Ltd.” on March 31, 1988 pursuant to the provisions of the Company Act (British Columbia). In March 2006, we were transitioned to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). On March 25, 2008, we announced the following: a change in Company name to “Rouge Resources Ltd; consolidation of our outstanding share capital on a one new for ten old (1:10) share basis; and an increase in our authorized share capital from 10 million shares without par value to an unlimited number of shares without per value. The 1:10 share consolidation resulted in all share and per share information in the financial statements being presented on a retroactive basis as if the share consolidation took place at the beginning of all years presented.

Our registered and records office is located at 203-409 Granville Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 1T2. We have been a reporting issuer in British Columbia and Alberta since April 3, 1989 and became a foreign issuer in the United States pursuant to filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on or about November 15, 2003. Our common shares are quoted on the OTCQB in the United States under the trading symbol ROUGF.

As at April 30, 2012, there were 40,565,171 common shares issued and outstanding which have not changed since the January 31, 2012 year end nor have any more shares been issued to the date of this report. However, we have a new financing currently in progress which is discussed below.

We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets. Additional information relating to the Company, including our listing application conditionally approved by the TSX Venture Exchange on April 25, 2012, is available on both SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.

Description of business

We are an exploration stage company focused on the exploration of certain mining claims located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario, Canada, called the Dotted Lake Property and have no current revenues nor have we earned any since inception. We hold a 100% interest in the original Dotted Lake Property, which has been the only focus of our exploration activities to date, and have an exclusive option agreement to acquire the mineral interests in the Lampson Lake Property adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property.

2


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

ITEM 1.2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, a total of $16,367 was spent on our exploration and evaluation assets. $16,000 of this amount was the 3rd payment on the Lampson Lake option agreement which requires total vendor payments of $60,000 over the three year period ending April 30, 2013. $35,000 has now been paid to date with the final payment of $25,000 due on or before April 20, 2013. No other exploration work was conducted during this period primarily due to the significant effort expended on the private placement financings still in progress and required to be completed before final approval of the Company’s listing application is recveived. The listing application was written to apply for Company shares to be listed on The TSX Venture Exchange (“The Exchange”) which was conditionally approved by the Exchange on April 25, 2012. Final listing approval is subject to fulfilling all remaining regulatory requirements including, without limitation, completion of the two previously announced brokered and non-brokered private placement financings of up to $1.2 million from issuance of a maximum of 4,800,000 units at $0.25 per unit.

The net proceeds we expect to receive are $1,130,000 assuming completion of both the $930,000 maximum Brokered Offering (4,000,000 units), after deducting the Agent’s 7% commission, and the $200,000 maximum Non-brokered Offering (800,000 units). The proposed use of these funds is estimated as follows:

  •  
  • remaining costs of the listing application including legal, Agent and regulatory fees $ 121,000  
  •  
  • working capital deficiency as at April 30, 2012 $ 348,000  
  •  
  • remaining payment on the Lampson Lake option agreement $  25,000  
  •  
  • phase 1 of recommended work program on the Dotted Lake Property $ 226,000  
  •  
  • operating expenses for the ensuing 12 month period $ 197,000  
  •  
  • remaining proceeds for ongoing working capital purposes $ 213,000  
                   Total use of proceeds $ 1,130,000  

    Although the Company intends to spend its available funds as stated above, there may be circumstances when, for sound business reasons, a reallocation of funds may be necessary.

    3


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Exploration and evaluation assets

    The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and year ended January 31, 2012:

                    Total for        
                    three months     Total for  
                    ended     year ended  
        Canada     Canada     April30,     January 31,  
        Dotted Lake     Lampson Lake     2012     2012  
    Property acquisition costs                        
    Balance, beginning $  15,261   $  21,033   $  36,294   $  24,294  
         Additions   -     16,000     16,000     12,000  
    Balance, end   15,261   $  37,033   $  52,294   $  36,294  
                             
    Exploration and evaluation costs                        
    Balance, beginning $  176,585   $  -   $  176,585   $  176,585  
    Additions                        
       Drilling and related costs                        
       Field and camp costs                        
       Geological consulting                        
       Project administration   367     -     367     -  
       Travel and accommodation                        
    Balance, end $  176,952   $  -   $  176,952   $  176,585  
    Total balance, end $  192,213   $  37,033   $  229,246   $  212,879  

    The original Dotted Lake Property was comprised of one claim acquired by the Company in 2001 at a cost of $200,000. The claim was allowed to lapse in late calendar 2002 and accordingly was written off during year ended January 31, 2003. It was re-staked by the Company in March 2003 since it was less expensive than completing the exploration work assessment during the extreme winter weather conditions existing at the time. Since then, the Company has conducted certain acquisition and exploration activities on the Property; completed a National Instrument 43-101 compliant geological report; and kept its mineral interests in The Property in good standing with the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (“MNDM”) for future exploration. In October 2009, the Company expanded its 100% owned holdings in the original Property from a single 15-unit claim to ten claims of 82 units by means of staking at a cost of approximately $11,000. Title to the Property was originally held in trust for the Company by a director of the Company but was since transferred to the Company during the year ended January 31, 2012.

    On April 20, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement with local prospectors (the “Optionors”) regarding the Lampson Lake Property consisting of two additional claims comprising an aggregate of 22 units adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property. The Company has an exclusive option to purchase a 100% interest in these two claims by making option payments totalling $60,000 as follows: $7,000 paid on April 20, 2010 when the agreement was signed; $12,000 paid on April 20, 2011; $16,000 on April 20, 2012; and $25,000 payable on April 20, 2013. These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the Optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the Optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% Net Sales Return royalty payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious minerals recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the Optionors for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters 3/4 of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000. In anticipation of meeting the final payment schedule, title was transferred to the Company on January 27, 2012. However, beneficial interest in the property will not be transferred until the final option payment of $25,000 is made on or before April 20, 2013.

    4


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Following this final option payment on April 20, 2013, the Company’s holdings will total 12 claims of 104 mining units on 1,683 hectares. At present and pending approval of the MNDM, the Company will have $46,776 in banked credits which means all claims can be kept in good standing until 2013 with $18,107 credits remaining. The Dotted Lake Property is currently in good standing with the MNDM with due dates for work credits to be applied on claim anniversary dates ranging from November 17, 2012 to March 14, 2013.

    The Company continues to monitor claims in the Dotted Lake area and may make additional acquisitions from time to time when management considers the purchase to be strategic or otherwise potentially beneficial to the Company.

    Pursuant to the NI 43-101 recommendations from the Company’s consulting geologist, Fladgate Exploration Consulting, we plan to conduct future exploration on our mineral property interests as soon as possible at an estimated cost of $226,000, subject to funds availability from the new financings currently in progress. These exploration funds are required for additional soil sampling, prospecting and trenching to expand on the anomalous zinc and coincident gold anomalies observed from previous soil samples. Once started, the program is expected to complete within three weeks followed by compilation and testing over an additional two months.

    There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our exploration and evaluation assets. Further exploration is required before a final evaluation of the economic feasibility can be determined. Significant financing and considerable time and effort will be required before our mineral claims can be further explored and, if warranted, developed into a commercial enterprise.

    ITEM 1.3 SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION

    The following table summarizes selected information as at and for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 with comparative figures as at and for the year ended January 31, 2012:

        April 30, 2012     April 30, 2011     January 31, 2012  
    FINANCIAL POSITION                  
    Total Assets $  251,948   $  348,527   $  243,140  
    Total Liabilities $  401,278   $  247,821   $  351,824  
    Accumulated Deficit $  (3,361,483 ) $  (3,063,447 ) $  (3,272,837 )
    OPERATIONS                  
    Total Revenues   Nil     Nil     Nil  
    Comprehensive Loss $  (88,646 ) $  (69,894 ) $  (279,284 )
    Comprehensive Loss per $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )

    5


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    ITEM 1.4 DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2012

    The following table summarizes results of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 with comparative figures for year ended January 31, 2012:

        Three Months     Three Months        
        Ended     Ended     Year Ended  
        April 30, 2012     April 30, 2011     January 31, 2012  
    Revenue $  Nil   $  Nil   $  Nil  
                       
    Expenses                  
             Amortization and accretion   194     216     1,008  
             Listing application fees & exp.   55,879     25,092     90,507  
             Management fees   15,000     15,000     60,000  
             Office administration and travel   11,120     17,446     64,022  
             Professional fees   4,587     10,696     47,387  
             Transfer agent and filing fees   1,866     1,444     16,360  
                         Total expenses   (88,646 )   (69,894 )   (279,284 )
                       
    Comprehensive loss $  (88,646 ) $  (69,894 ) $  (279,284 )

    Revenue

    The Company is in the exploration stage and has not generated any revenues since inception.

    Comprehensive loss

    The Company reported a comprehensive loss of $88,646 for three months ended April 30, 2012 compared to a comprehensive loss of $69,894 for the same period last year. This $18,752 increase in comprehensive loss resulted from the following:

    • minor $22 decrease in amortization.

    • $30,787 increase in listing application fees and expenses due to intensity of the documentation required by our lawyer, the Agent’s lawyer and the regulatory authorities in connection with the listing application conditionally approved by the TSX-Venture Exchange on April 25, 2012. It has been underway since the quarter ended January 31, 2011 and has not yet been approved to the date of these financial statements pending completion of the two financings currently in progress along with meeting other regulatory requirements.

    • $6,326 decrease in office administration and travel expenses mainly due to successful efforts at reducing overhead expenses.

    • $6,109 decrease in professional fees (legal, audit and accounting) primarily due to concentration of time and effort by our company lawyer on the listing application disclosed as separate line item above.

    • minor $422 increase in transfer agent and filing fees

    6


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    ITEM 1.5 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

    The following table summarizes operating results for the eight most recently completed quarters:

        1st Qtr     4th Qtr     3rd Qtr     2nd Qtr     1st Qtr     4th Qtr     3rd Qtr     2nd Qtr  
        ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended  
        Apr. 30 12     Jan. 31 12     Oct. 31 11     July 31 11     Apr. 30 11     Jan. 31 11     Oct. 31 10     July 31 10  

    Total revenues

      Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  

    Comprehensive loss

      ($88,646     ($83,074 )   ($78,377 ) $  (47,939 )   ($69,894 )   ($108,336 )   ($41,844 )   ($46,107 )

    Loss per share

      ($0.00 )   ($0.01 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.01 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )

    Operating cash flow (Deficiency)

    ($80,635 ) ($66,515 ) ($84,188 ) ($ 57,370 ) ($50,518 ) ($72,760 ) ($45,508 ) ($67,199
    )

    Our comprehensive losses are fairly consistent from quarter to quarter being comprised substantially of on-going management fees, professional fees, office administration and transfer agent & filing fees. The five quarters ended April 30, 2012, January 31, 2012, October 31, 2011, April 30, 2011 and January 31, 2011 show greater losses than normal due to the legal and regulatory fees & expenses incurred regarding the listing application conditionally approved by TSX-Venture Exchange on April 25, 2012.

    Reconciliation of previous Canadian GAAP to IFRS

    IFRS requires the Company to reconcile to previous Canadian GAAP for equity, comprehensive loss and cash flow for comparative periods. The Company’s adoption of IFRS did not have a monetary impact on equity, comprehensive loss and operating, investing or financing cash flows in the prior periods. As a result, there were no adjustments to the statements of financial position, comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the above eight quarters.

    ITEM 1.6 LIQUIDITY

    The following table summarizes the Company’s working capital (deficiency) position as at April 30, 2012 and 2011 with comparative figures as at January 31, 2012 year end:

        As at     As at     As at  
    Working Capital (Deficiency)   April 30, 2012     April 30, 2011     January 31, 2012  
    Current assets $  13,409   $  126,078   $  20,774  
    Current liabilities   (361,601 )   (247,821 )   (312,148 )
                       
    Working capital (deficiency) $  (348,192 ) $  (121,743 ) $  (291,374 )

    During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the working capital deficiency increased to $348,192 from $291,374 as at January 31, 2012 primarily due to decrease in cash balance and increase in current liabilities, both resulting from the funding requirements of on-going operating losses.

    This working capital deficiency at April 30, 2012 includes related party payables of $282,223 (January 31, 2012 - $245,084). This amount is primarily due to one of our directors, who continued to fund ongoing operating expenses in order to finance the Company’s business pending approval of its listing on the Exchange. The Company expects to repay the related party payable upon completion of the two previously announced financings of up to $1.2 million currently in progress.

    7


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    The following table summarizes cash flows for three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 with comparative figures for year ended January 31, 2012:

        Three Months     Three Months        
    Cash Flows   Ended     Ended     Year Ended  
        April 30, 2012     April 30, 2011     January 31, 2012  
    Net cash used in operating activities $  (80,635 ) $  (50,518 ) $  (258,591 )
    Net cash used in investing activities   (16,367 )   (12,000 )   (12,709 )
    Net cash provided by financing activities   85,139     32,369     144,171  
    Increase (decrease) in cash $  (11,863 ) $  (30,149 ) $  (127,129 )
                       
    Cash, beginning   17,823     144,952     144,952  
                       
    Cash, end $  5,960   $  114,803   $  17,823  

    As at April 30, 2012, the Company’s cash position was $5,960 compared to $17,823 as at January 31, 2012. The $11,863 decrease in cash for three months ended April 30, 2012 (“2012 period”) and the $30,149 decrease in cash for three months ended April 30, 2011 (“2011 period”) resulted from the following cash flow activities:

      (i)

    Net cash used in operating activities of $80,635 in 2012 period and $50,518 in 2011 period was due in both periods to on-going operating losses adjusted for a minor non- cash item and changes in non-cash working capital items.

         
      (ii)

    Net cash used in investing activities of $16,367 in 2012 period and $12,000 in 2011 period were scheduled payments of $16,000 and $12,000 respectively under the exclusive option agreement to purchase the Lampson Lake Property.

         
      (iii)

    Net cash provided by financing activities of $85,139 in the 2012 period was due to $48,000 of share subscriptions received under the financing currently in progress along with increase in related party payable used for funding of operating expenses. The $32,149 of funding in the 2011 period was due entirely to funding from related party payable.

       
    ITEM 1.7 CAPITAL RESOURCES

    Share Capital

    Authorized

    Unlimited number of common shares without par value.

    Issued share capital

    At April 31, 2012, there were 40,565,171 issued and fully paid common shares (January 31, 2012 –40,565,171). No shares were issued during the three months ended April 30, 2012 nor during the year ended January 31, 2012.

    Subsequent to January 31, 2012, the Company applied to the TSX Venture Exchange for the listing of its common shares. Conditional approval was received on April 25, 2012 subject to the fulfillment of certain regulatory requirements and a private placement financing of up to $1,200,000 from issuance of a maximum of 4,800,000 units at $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant will entitle the holder to acquire one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.40 per share for a period of one year from the date of closing. The financing has not closed as of the date of these condensed interim financial statements.

    8


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Basic and diluted loss per share

    The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was based on the comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders of $86,646 (April 30, 2011 - $69,894) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 40,565,171 (April 30, 2011 –40,565,171).

    Diluted loss per share does not include effect of the 30,000,000 share purchase warrants which expired on April 30, 2012.

    Stock options

    The Company’s stock option plan is in the form of a rolling stock option plan, which provides that a committee of the Board of Directors may from time to time, at its discretion, grant to directors, officers, employees and consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of common shares reserved for issuance in any twelve month period will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 5 years from the date of grant at a price not less than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day before the grant of such options less any discount. In any event, the exercise price will not be less than $0.10 per share

    The number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one optionee insider in any twelve month period will not exceed ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares and the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one employee or consultant will not exceed two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding common shares. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days following cessation of the optionee’s position with the Company or 30 days following cessation of an optionee conducting investor relations activities’ position.

    As at April 30, 2012, the Company had no issued and outstanding stock options.

    Share purchase warrants

    The changes in share purchase warrants during the three month period ended April 30, 2012 and the year ended January 31, 2012 are as follows:

        April 30, 2012     January 31, 2012  
              Weighted           Weighted  
              average           average  
        Number of     exercise     Number of     exercise  
        warrants     price     warrants     price  
    Balance, beginning   30,000,000   $  0.10     30,000,000   $  0.10  
                             
         Warrants issued   -                    
         Warrants expired   (30,000,000 )                  
    Balance, end   -     -     30,000,000   $  0.10  

    On April 30, 2012, the 30,000,000 warrants expired without being exercised.

    9


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    With no operating revenues to date, we continue to finance our operations through the issuance of common shares and advances from related parties. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or, if available, on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on a timely basis, either through issuance of more common shares or obtaining additional advances from related parties, we may not be able to meet our obligations as they come due which may impact our ability to continue as a going concern in the future.

    To a significant extent, our ability to raise capital is affected by trends and uncertainties beyond our control. These include general economic conditions do not improve, the market prices for base and precious metals and results from our exploration programs. The Company’s ability to reach its business objectives may be significantly impaired if general economic conditions continue to deteriorate, prices for metals such as zinc, gold, copper and platinum fall or if results from the intended exploration programs on our mineral properties are unsuccessful.

    ITEM 1.8 OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

    The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

    ITEM 1.9 TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN RELATED PARTIES

    The following related party payable to two directors and officers of the Company is unsecured, non-interest bearing and has no fixed term of repayment as at April 30, 2012 and 2011 and year ended January 31, 2012:

        April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
        2012     2011     2012  
    Payable to two directors and officers of the Company $ 282,223 $ 133,282 $ 254,118 *

    * Reclassified to coincide with April 30, 2012 disclosure

    The Company had the following transactions with two directors and officers of the Company during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 and year ended January 31, 2012:

                    Year ended  
        Three months ended April 30,     January 31,  
        2012     2011     2012  
    Accounting and financial services reporting $ 2,820 $ - $ -
    Management services   15,000     15,000     60,000  
    Office rent   7,500     7,500     30,000  
      $  25,320   $  22,500   $  90,000  

    These transactions are recorded at the exchange amount, which is the consideration agreed to between the related parties.

    ITEM 1.10 FOURTH QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012

    Not applicable at this time.

    10


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    ITEM 1.11 SUBSEQUENT AND PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

    Despite very challenging market conditions, the Company continues to try to complete its private placement financings of up to $1,200,000 from issuance of a maximum of 4,800,000 units at $0.25 per unit. Final approval of its listing application on the TSX-Venture Exchange, conditionally approved on April 25, 2012, depends upon fulfillment of certain regulatory requirements and completion of this financing.

    ITEM 1.12 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

    The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual outcomes can differ from these estimates.

    Areas requiring a significant degree of estimation and judgment relate to the determination of the useful lives of furniture and equipment, the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, and the recoverability and measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates and judgments.

    ITEM 1.13 CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES, INCLUDING INITIAL ADOPTION

    Certain pronouncements were issued by the IASB or the IFRIC that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2012 or later periods.

    The following new standards, amendments and interpretations have not been early adopted in these financial statements and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s future results and financial position:

    a)

    IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (New to replace IAS 39 and IFRIC 9)

      
    b)

    IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (New to replace consolidation requirements in IAS 27 as amended in 2008 and SIC-12)

      
    c)

    IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (New to replace IAS 31 and SIC-13)

      
    d)

    IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (New to replace disclosure requirements in IAS 27 as amended in 2008, IAS 28 (as revised in 2003 and IAS 31)

      
    e)

    IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (New to replace fair value measurement guidance in other IFRSs)

      
    f)

    IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, (Amendments regarding Presentation of Other Comprehensive Income)

      
    g)

    IAS 19 Employee Benefits (Amended in 2011)

      
    h)

    IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (Amended in 2011)

      
    i)

    IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amended in 2011), and

      
    j)

    IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine (New).

    11


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    ITEM 1.14 FINANCIAL AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

    The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: fair value through profit or loss investments, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale investments and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

    Financial assets are classified at fair value through profit or loss when they are held-for-trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or when they are designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

    Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets or classified as non-current assets where maturities are greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

    Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments, and it is the Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those instruments that are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

    Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary financial assets which are included in net income.

    Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortized cost.

    Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date, ie. the date on which the group commits to purchase the asset.

    Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

    12


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis

    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Classification of financial instruments                  
                       
    Financial assets included in the statement of financial position are as follows:  
                   
        April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
        2012     2011     2012  
    Financial assets:                  
          Cash $  5,960   $  114,803   $  17,823  
          Harmonized sales tax refundable   7,449     11,275     2,951  
          Credit card security deposit   6,900     6,900     6,900  
      $  20,309   $  132,978   $  27,674  
                       
    Other financial liabilities included in the statement of financial position are as follows:        
                       
        April 30,     April 30,     January 31,  
        2012     2011     2012  
    Other financial liabilities:                  
         Trade payables $  59,928   $  75,589   $  18,430*  
          Related party payables   282,223     133,282     254,118*  
          Loan payable   39,676     -     39,676  
      $  381,827   $  208,871   $  312,224  

      * Reclassified to coincide with April 30, 2012 disclosure

    Fair value

    The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts. Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

    • Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

    • Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

    • Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

     The following is a breakdown of the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value as at April 30 and January 31, 2012:

     

    As at April 30, 2012

     
        Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    Cash $  5,960   $  -   $  -  
    Harmonized sales tax refundable   7,449              
    Credit card security deposit   6,900              
                       
        As at January 31, 2012  
        Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    Cash $  17,823   $  -   $  -  
    Harmonized sales tax refundable   2,951              
    Credit card security deposit   6,900              

    13


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Financial Risk Management

    We are exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:

    Credit risk

    Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. Our primary exposure to credit risk is on our cash held in bank accounts. The majority of cash is deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies. Our secondary exposure to risk is minimal, harmonized sales tax refundable, since it is recoverable from the Canadian Government.

    Liquidity risk

    Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our financial obligations as they fall due. We have a planning and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required to support our normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis. We attempt to ensure there is sufficient access to funds to meet our short-term business requirements, taking into account our anticipated cash flows from operations and our holdings of cash and cash equivalents.

    Historically, our source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash, primarily through private placements, or loans from directors and officers. Our access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity funding.

    Foreign exchange risk

    Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are denominated in currencies that differ from the respective functional currency. We operate primarily in Canada and therefore are not exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

    Interest rate risk

    Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our exposure to interest rate risk relates to our ability to earn interest income on cash balances at variable rates. Changes in short term interest rates will not have a significant effect on the fair value of the Company’s cash account.

    Capital management

    The Company's policy is to maintain a capital base sufficient to maintain investor and creditor confidence and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Company consists of share capital net of accumulated deficit. There have been no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the current period and the Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

    ITEM 1.15 OTHER MD&A REQUIREMENTS

    Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

    Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

    14


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    Disclosure Controls and Procedures

    We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in filings pursuant to regulatory requirements is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Our management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial statements, including the maintenance of appropriate information systems, procedures and internal controls. Our management is also responsible to ensure that information disclosed externally, including the financial statements and MD&A, is complete and reliable.

    Our CEO and CFO have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting for the period and have concluded they are operating effectively notwithstanding the inherent weakness of a small company having a very small staff. This lack of segregation of duties is overcome by heavy reliance on senior management and directors during the review and approval process along with the annual statutory audit.

    Business and Regulatory Risks

    We are engaged in the mineral exploration business and manage related industry risk directly. We are potentially at risk for environmental reclamation and fluctuations and commodity-based market prices associated with resource property interests. Management is of the opinion that the Company addresses environmental risk and compliance in accordance with industry standards and specific project environmental requirements. At present, the Company is not required to provide for restoration and environmental obligations so no provision has been made. However, there is no certainty that all environmental risks and contingencies have been addressed.

    Our exploration program will require significant future expenditures and there is no assurance any commercial mineral quantities will be found. If we are unable to generate significant revenues from our mineral claims, continued losses are expected into the foreseeable future. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood we will prove successful, and there is no assurance that we will generate any revenues nor ever achieve profitability. If unsuccessful in addressing these risks, the business will fail and investors could lose all of their investment in the company.

    Regulatory risks include the possible delays in getting regulatory approval to the transactions that senior management and the Board of Directors believe to be in the Company’s best interest, increased fees for statutory filings, and the introduction of increasingly more complex reporting requirements which must be complied with in order to maintain our public company position.

    Forward-looking statements

    This Management Discussion and Analysis may contain certain “forward-looking statements”, as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, relating to the proposed use of proceeds. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts; they are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” ”projects,” “aims,” “potential,” “goal,” “objective,” “prospective,” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “can,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: a change in the use of proceeds, the volatility of mineral prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated

    15


    Rouge Resources Ltd.
    Management Discussion and Analysis
    Three Months Ended April 30, 2012

    geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, and the other risk factors discussed in greater detail in the Company’s various filings on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) with Canadian securities regulators and its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    16


    EX-99.3 4 exhibit99-3.htm EXHIBIT 99.3 Rouge Resources Inc.: Exhibit 99.3 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.3

    FORM 52-109FV2
    CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM FILINGS
    VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

    I, Linda Smith, Chief Executive Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

    1.

    Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together the “interim filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the interim period ended April 30, 2012.

      
    2.

    No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

      
    3.

    Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

    Date: June 28, 2012

    /s/ Linda Smith                  
    Linda Smith
    Chief Executive Officer
    Rouge Resources Ltd

     

    NOTE TO READER

    In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

     

    i)

    controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

     

     

     

     

    ii)

    a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

    The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

    Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.
     

     


    EX-99.4 5 exhibit99-4.htm EXHIBIT 99.4 Rouge Resources Inc.: Exhibit 99.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.4

    FORM 52-109FV2
    CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM FILINGS
    VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

    I, Ronald McGregor, Chief Financial Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

    1.

    Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together the “interim filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the interim period ended April 30, 2012.

      
    2.

    No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

      
    3.

    Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

    Date: June 28, 2012

    /s/ Ronald McGregor            
    Ronald McGregor
    Chief Financial Officer
    Rouge Resources Ltd

     

    NOTE TO READER

    In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

     

    i)

    controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

     

     

     

     

    ii)

    a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

    The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

    Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.