8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 14, 2005

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	0-22056	86-0746929
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

9221 East Via De Ventura

Scottsdale, Arizona

85258

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (480) 606-3886

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 8.01. Other Events.

Explanatory Note

We retain certain levels of exposure with respect to our general liability and workers compensation insurance programs and we purchase coverage from third party insurers for exposures in excess of those levels. Until December 31, 2004, we established reserves for claims, both reported and incurred but not reported, within our level of retention based on currently available information as well as our historical claims experience. However, as we are the primary obligor for payment of all claims, during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we determined that we should present our claim reserves on a gross basis along with a corresponding equal insurance receivable. As a result of this revision in classification, we have increased our general liability and workers compensation claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $10.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively and we have recorded a corresponding equal receivable from our insurers as a current asset. We will continue our past practice of evaluating the financial capacity of our insurers to assess the recoverability of the related insurer receivable. This revision in classification had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows from operations or working capital.

This Form 8-K is being filed to provide the following information, which reflects the change in classification. This information is being provided to certain investors in connection with our previously announced refinancing and accordingly is being filed on this Form 8-K to make it publicly available:

• Supplemental Selected Financial Data as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, which reflect an increase in total assets from the selected financial information we have previously reported;

• Additional discussion of our insurance programs under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Conditions – Insurance Programs”;

• Additional information in our contractual obligations table set forth under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Contractual Obligations and Commitments”;

• Audited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, which reflect increases in total current assets and total current liabilities as a result of the changes described in the foregoing paragraph; and

• Audited Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, which, while not making an overall change in cash flows from operations, reflect changes to add a new line “receivable from insurers” and make a corresponding increase in accrued liabilities and other liabilities.

Other than the changes regarding this revision in classification and related disclosures, no other information in this Form 8-K has been updated to reflect any subsequent information or events since the original filing of the Form 10-K on September 28, 2004.

- 2 -

Supplemental Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data are derived from our historical consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years then ended have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000 are unaudited. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this Report (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Years Ended June 30,
Statement of Operations Data	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Net Revenue	$	526,603		$	484,639		$	453,151		$	440,970		$	458,890
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		277,549			266,713			250,724			251,718			269,678
Provision for doubtful accounts		87,268			77,184			70,689			74,158			85,788
Depreciation and amortization		11,404			12,587			14,443			23,312			27,523
Other operating expenses		114,855			107,574			96,581			123,718			108,830
Asset impairment charges (1)		—			—			194			27,778			—
Contract termination costs and related asset impairment (1)		—			—			(107	)		9,256			—
Restructuring charge and other (1)		—			(1,421	)		(713	)		9,034			32,730
Operating income (loss)		35,527			22,002			21,340			(78,004	)		(65,659	)
Interest expense		(29,243	)		(28,012	)		(25,462	)		(30,624	)		(25,938	)
Interest income		97			197			644			642			596
Other income (expense), net		—			—			—			(4,053	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest, extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,381			(5,813	)		(3,478	)		(112,039	)		(91,001	)
Income tax (provision) benefit		(300	)		(118	)		2,531			(1,112	)		30,935
Minority interest		475			(1,507	)		(750	)		705			1,907
Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,556			(7,438	)		(1,697	)		(112,446	)		(58,159	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (1) (2)		(345	)		16,404			3,046			(92,844	)		(2,337	)
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,211			8,966			1,349			(205,290	)		(60,496	)
Extraordinary loss on expropriation of Canadian ambulance service licenses (3)		—			—			—			—			(1,200	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (4)		—			—			(49,513	)		—			(541	)
Net income (loss)		6,211			8,966			(48,164	)		(205,290	)		(62,237	)
Less: Net income allocated to redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock under the two-class method		(1,262	)		—			—			—			—
Less: Accretion of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		(6,320	)		(3,604	)		—			—			—
Add: Credit related to settlement of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock with common stock		10,066			—			—			—			—
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	8,695		$	5,362		$	(48,164	)	$	(205,290	)	$	(62,237	)

- 3 -

	Years Ended June 30,
EPS Data	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Basic earnings per share (5):
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.54		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(7.63	)	$	(3.99	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations applicable to common stock (2)		(0.02	)		1.02			0.20			(6.30	)		(0.16	)
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.52			0.33			0.09			(13.92	)		(4.15	)
Extraordinary loss on expropriation of Canadian ambulance service licenses (3)		—			—			—			—			(0.08	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (4)		—			—			(3.26	)		—			(0.04	)
Net income (loss)	$	0.52		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)	$	(13.92	)	$	(4.27	)
Diluted earnings per share (5):
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.30		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(7.63	)	$	(3.99	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations applicable to common stock (2)		(0.02	)		1.02			0.20			(6.30	)		(0.16	)
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.28			0.33			0.09			(13.93	)		(4.15	)
Extraordinary loss on expropriation of Canadian ambulance service licenses (3)		—			—			—			—			(0.08	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (4)		—			—			(3.26	)		—			(0.04	)
Net income (loss)	$	0.28		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)	$	(13.93	)	$	(4.27	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		16,645			16,116			15,190			14,744			14,592
Diluted		21,817			16,116			15,190			14,744			14,592

	As of June 30,
Balance Sheet Data	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Total assets (8)	$	215,207		$	198,971		$	200,708		$	264,006		$	435,414
Current portion of long-term debt (6)		1,495			1,329			1,633			294,439			299,104
Long-term debt, net of current portion (6)		304,057			305,310			298,529			1,286			2,850
Redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock (7)		—			7,793			—			—			—
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(192,226	)		(210,160	)		(205,752	)		(168,419	)		36,257

- 4 -

	Years Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Data	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities	$	14,501		$	13,146		$	9,634		$	6,710		$	(8,537	)
Cash flow used in investing activities		(8,421	)		(7,582	)		(5,832	)		(3,805	)		(13,640	)
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,269	)		(3,659	)		(3,170	)		(6,339	)		25,996

(1) During the year ended June 30, 2001, the Company recorded asset impairments, restructuring and other charges totaling $122.1 million, including $46.3 million relating to its Latin American operations which were disposed of in September 2002 and $15.7 million relating to operations that have been classified as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. During the year ended June 30, 2000, the Company recorded restructuring charges totaling $32.9 million relating to its decision to exit certain underperforming service areas, of which $1.3 million has been classified as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes..

(2) During fiscal 2004 we ceased operating in 10 medical transportation service areas as a result of these service areas not meeting internal operational and profitability measures. We also ceased operating in three fire and other service areas, one of which was due to the customer filing Chapter 11, one of which was sold as we continue to dispose of non-core businesses and one of which was due to the city converting the service area to a fire district. The results of these service areas are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations. Effective September 27, 2002, the Company sold its Latin American operations to local management in exchange for the assumption of such operations’ net liabilities. The gain on the disposition totaled $12.5 million. For financial reporting purposes, the results of the aforementioned discontinued service areas and the Company’s former Latin American operations have been included in income (loss) from discontinued operations. See Note 4, Discontinued Operations, in our consolidated financial statements.

(3) During the year ended June 30, 2000, we recorded an extraordinary loss on the expropriation of Canadian ambulance service licenses of approximately $1.2 million (net of $0 of income taxes). We received approximately $2.2 million from the Ontario Ministry of Health as compensation for the loss of the licenses and incurred costs and wrote-off assets, mainly goodwill, totaling $3.4 million.

(4) Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). In connection with the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company discontinued amortizing its goodwill effective July 1, 2001. Additionally, the Company recognized an approximate $49.5 million transitional impairment charge (both before and after tax), which has been reflected as the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in fiscal 2002. See Note 7, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in our consolidated financial statements.

Effective July 1, 1999, the Company changed its method of accounting for start-up costs, including organization costs. In connection with that change, the Company wrote-off $0.9 million of previously capitalized organization costs ($0.5 million after tax benefits) and classified such charge as the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2000.

(5) As described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we restated our earnings per share amounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as well as for certain interim periods in fiscal 2003 as a result of the issuance of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share” (“EITF 03-6”) in

- 5 -

March 2004 which clarified the use of the “two-class” method. As a result of this guidance, our basic and diluted earnings per share amounts for fiscal 2003 were increased by $0.05 per share from the amounts previously reported.

(6) Our current liabilities exceeded our current assets at June 30, 2001 and 2000 as a result of the classification of amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and our 7 ⁷/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (Senior Notes) as current liabilities. Such classification resulted from the fact that we were not in compliance with certain of the covenants contained in our revolving credit agreement and because of the related provisions contained in the agreement relating to our Senior Notes. Amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and our Senior Notes were classified as long-term liabilities as of June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as a result of amendments to our credit facility the most recent of which became effective September 30, 2003. Such amendments waived previous covenant violations and extended the maturity date of the credit facility from March 16, 2003 to December 31, 2006. See Note 11, Long-Term Debt, in our consolidated financial statements.

(7) On June 30, 2004, the Company settled the Series B redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock (the “Series B Shares”) by the issuance of 2,115,490 common shares.

(8) As discussed in Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements, during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we have revised our classification of estimated insurance recoveries as a current asset. As a result of this revision in classification, we have increased our general liability and workers compensation claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $10.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and have recorded a corresponding receivable from our insurers as a current asset.

- 6 -

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Supplemental Selected Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere herein.

Introduction

Business Structure

Rural/Metro Corporation is a leading national provider of medical transportation and related services. We provide ambulance services in response to emergency medical calls (emergency ambulance services) and non-emergency transport services (general transport services) to municipal, residential, commercial and industrial customers. These services are provided under contracts with governmental entities, hospitals, health care facilities and other health care organizations. We primarily derive our revenue under these contracts through reimbursements from private insurance programs and government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and reimbursement from a variety of governmental entities, as well as through fees paid directly by the patients utilizing our services.

We also provide fire protection services and other safety and health care related services, including dispatch, fleet services and home health services. These services are provided on a subscription fee basis to individual homeowners or commercial property owners and under contracts with municipalities, fire districts or other agencies.

Because of the nature of our ambulance services, it is necessary to respond to a number of calls that may not result in transports. Results of operations are discussed below on the basis of actual transports because transports are more closely identified with revenue. Expenses associated with calls that do not result in transports are included in operating expenses. The percentage of calls not resulting in transports varies substantially depending upon the mix of non-emergency ambulance and emergency ambulance service calls in individual markets and is generally higher in service areas in which the calls are primarily emergency ambulance service calls. Rates in our markets take into account the anticipated number of calls that may not result in transports. We do not separately account for expenses associated with calls that do not result in transports.

Managements’ Objectives

The results of fiscal 2004 reflect our continued focus on growing and strengthening our base of core operations throughout the country. We placed particular emphasis during the year on expanding service areas that we have identified for future long-term growth, sought targeted new-contract opportunities and continued to implement new programs that concentrate on added operating efficiencies.

In order to improve cash flow from operations to enable us to service our long-term debt, remain in compliance with various restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements and to fund working capital, capital expenditures and business development efforts, we will continue to target a variety of areas for growth and improvement, including:

• Organic Growth:

We have targeted select, new 911 ambulance contracts in regions with acceptable payer mixes and forecasted population growth. Positive growth continues in existing local and regional service areas, including our focus on new contracts, general rate increases and overall efforts to maximize operational efficiencies. Contract activities during fiscal 2004 included the award of long-term, exclusive medical transportation renewal contracts in a variety of communities and health care systems throughout the nation, as well as a renewal for ARFF services at a municipal airport.

- 7 -

• Billing and Collections:

We have implemented new initiatives to enhance our cash flow performance and streamline the ambulance billing process, including the use of software designed to create added controls over the day-to-day flow of claims, creating systems to improve the return on difficult-to-collect accounts and placing a higher priority on submitting ambulance claims electronically in order to expedite payment and maximize the efficiencies afforded by such systems. We have also initiated a pilot study of handheld portable devices that will eventually be carried on board our ambulances and emergency vehicles. The devices are designed to enhance the speed, accuracy and effectiveness of patient information collected in the field. Another important component of our strategic plan focuses on reducing bad debt expense through billing-oriented initiatives. Our team of internal billing and collections specialists focused on several initiatives during 2004, including maximizing electronic submissions, providing web-based payment alternatives and expanding collection data sources.

• Operational Efficiencies:

We continue to emphasize the importance of creating operations and administrative efficiencies that will result in cost savings and improved margins. One area of focus relates to improving the efficiency of work force scheduling in order to minimize unscheduled overtime among our EMS and fire personnel, who represent the majority of our work force. In fiscal 2004, we began implementing a customized software program that more fully automates the work scheduling process. Another area of focus is workplace health and safety. In fiscal 2004, our efforts included the introduction of facility audits, new EMS based driver development programs and enhanced driver safety criteria.

In evaluating our business, we further monitor a number of key operating and financial statistics, including average patient charge, average daily deposits, days sales outstanding and transport volume, among others. The results and trends indicated by these statistics provide us with important data that we use to analyze our performance and guide the business going forward.

Because a percentage of our medical transportation revenue is paid through the Medicare system, we note that Congressional passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 included an increase in reimbursement for ambulance services provided to Medicare patients. Among other relief, the Act provided for a 1% increase in reimbursement for urban transports and a 2 % increase for rural transports, which took effect July 2004 and will remain in place for the balance of the phase-in of the national ambulance fee schedule. This phase-in period will be complete in December 2010. Although we expect this provision under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 will ultimately benefit the portion of Rural/Metro’s medical transportation revenue that is paid by Medicare, we are currently unable to determine the ultimate impact.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, general liability and workers’ compensation claim reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified the following accounting policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The discussion below is not intended to represent a comprehensive list of our accounting policies. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 – “The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies”, to our consolidated financial statements, which contains accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

- 8 -

Medical Transportation and Revenue Recognition

Ambulance and alternative transportation service fees are recognized when services are provided and are recorded net of discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers. Because of the length of the collection cycle with respect to ambulance and alternative transportation service fees, it is necessary to estimate the amount of these discounts at the time revenue is recognized. The collectibility of ambulance and alternative transportation service fees is analyzed using historical collection experience within each service area. Using collection data resident in our billing system, we estimate the percentage of gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees that will not be collected and record a provision for discounts and doubtful accounts. The portion of the provision allocated to discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers is based on historical write-offs relating to such discounts as a percentage of the related gross revenue recognized for each service area. The ratio is then applied to current period gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees to determine the portion of the provision that will be recorded as a reduction in revenue. The remaining amount of the provision is classified as provision for doubtful accounts. If the historical data used to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect the ultimate collectibility of the current revenue stream, revenue could be overstated or understated. Discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers related to continuing operations, which are reflected as a reduction of medical transportation revenue, totaled $180.0 million, $147.9 million and $131.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

As discussed above, the provisions for Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payer discounts as a percentage of gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees are as follows:

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2002
Medicare	14.7	%	12.3	%	11.3	%
Medicaid	8.7	%	8.2	%	8.2	%
Other third-party	6.8	%	7.8	%	7.8	%
Total discounts	30.2	%	28.3	%	27.3	%

The increase in discounts as a percentage of gross revenue is a result of rate increases, some of which we are unable to pass on to Medicare and Medicaid. Based on the allocation of provisions between discounts and doubtful accounts an increase/decrease of 1% in our estimated collection percentage would have resulted in an increase/decrease in net revenue of $4.0 million, $3.4 million and $3.2 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts for Medical Transportation Revenue

Ambulance and alternative transportation service fees are billed to various payer sources. As discussed above, discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers are recorded as reductions of gross revenue. We also estimate provisions related to the potential uncollectibility of amounts billed to other payers based on historical collection data and historical write-off activity within each service area. The provision for doubtful accounts percentage that is applied to gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fee revenue is calculated as the difference between the total expected collection percentage less percentages applied for discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers described above. If historical data used to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect the ultimate collectibility of the current revenue stream, the provision for doubtful accounts may be overstated or understated. The provision for doubtful accounts on ambulance and alternative transportation service revenue from continuing operations totaled $87.3 million, $77.2 million and $70.7 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

- 9 -

As discussed above, the provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees is as follows:

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2002
Doubtful accounts	14.6	%	14.8	%	14.6	%

Based on the allocation of provisions between discounts and doubtful accounts, an increase/decrease of 1% in our estimated collections percentage would have resulted in an increase/decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts of $2.0 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Workers’ Compensation Reserves

Beginning May 1, 2002, we began purchasing corporate-wide workers’ compensation insurance policies, for which we pay premiums that can be increased or decreased at certain intervals based upon a retrospective review of incurred losses. Under such policies, we have no obligation to pay any deductible amounts on claims occurring during the policy period. Accordingly, provisions for workers’ compensation expense for claims arising on and after May 1, 2002 are reflective of premium costs only. Each of these annual policies covers all workers’ compensation claims made by employees of all of our domestic subsidiaries. A premium payroll audit of the policy year that began May 1, 2002 resulted in a refund of premiums of approximately $1.2 million. We do not currently expect any adverse findings on any subsequent policy year reviews.

Prior to May 1, 2002, our workers’ compensation policies included a deductible obligation with no aggregate limit. Claim provisions were estimated based on historical claims data and the ultimate projected value of those claims. For claims occurring prior to May 1, 2002, our third-party administrator established initial estimates at the time a claim was reported and periodically reviews the development of the claim to confirm that the estimates are adequate. We engage independent actuaries to assist us in the determination of our workers’ compensation claims reserves. If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than has been estimated, the related reserves for workers’ compensation claims could be overstated or understated. Reserves related to workers’ compensation claims totaled $8.4 million and $12.0 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

General Liability Reserves

We are subject to litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. In order to minimize the risk of our exposure, we maintain certain levels of coverage for comprehensive general liability, automobile liability, and professional liability. These policies currently are, and historically have been, underwritten on a deductible basis. Provisions are made to record the cost of premiums as well as the total estimated liability for claims net of the amount we believe will be recoverable from the insurance companies. Our third-party administrator establishes initial estimates at the time a claim is reported and periodically reviews the development of the claim to confirm that the estimates are adequate. We engage independent actuaries to assist us in the determination of our general liability claim reserves. If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than has been estimated, the reserves for general liability claims could be overstated or understated. Reserves related to general liability claims totaled $25.4 million and $16.0 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

- 10 -

Asset Impairment

We review our property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable by comparing the carrying amount of such assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with them. In cases where the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the related carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets. The fair value is determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved.

Our goodwill balances are reviewed for impairment annually (and interim periods if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related asset may be impaired) using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We perform our annual impairment test on June 30.

- 11 -

Results of Operations

Year Ended June 30, 2004 Compared To Year Ended June 30, 2003

Overview

The following table sets forth a comparison of certain items from our statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The comparison includes the line items expressed as a percentage of net revenue as well as the dollar value and percentage change in each line item (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			% of Net Revenue		2003			% of Net Revenue		$ Change			% Change
Net revenue	$	526,603		100.0	%	$	484,639		100.0	%	$	41,964		8.7	%
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		277,549		52.7	%		266,713		55.0	%		10,836		4.1	%
Provision for doubtful accounts		87,268		16.6	%		77,184		15.9	%		10,084		13.1	%
Depreciation and amortization		11,404		2.2	%		12,587		2.6	%		(1,183	)	-9.4	%
Other operating expenses		114,855		21.8	%		107,574		22.2	%		7,281		6.8	%
Restructuring charge and other		—		—			(1,421	)	-0.3	%		1,421		100.0	%
Total operating expenses		491,076		93.3	%		462,637		95.5	%		28,439		6.1	%
Operating income		35,527		6.7	%		22,002		4.5	%		13,525		61.5	%
Interest expense		(29,243	)	-5.6	%		(28,012	)	-5.8	%		(1,231	)	4.4	%
Interest income		97		0.0	%		197		0.0	%		(100	)	-50.8	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interests		6,381		1.2	%		(5,813	)	-1.2	%		12,194		209.8	%
Income tax provision		(300	)	-0.1	%		(118	)	0.0	%		(182	)	154.2	%
Minority interest		475		0.1	%		(1,507	)	-0.3	%		1,982		131.5	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations		6,556		1.2	%		(7,438	)	-1.5	%		13,994		188.1	%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(345	)	-0.1	%		16,404		3.4	%		(16,749	)	-102.1	%
Net income	$	6,211		1.2	%	$	8,966		1.9	%	$	(2,755	)	-30.7	%

We generated net revenue of $526.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to $484.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. Of the $42.0 million increase in net revenue, approximately $18.1 million is due to an increase in transports, and approximately $23.1 million is due to an increase in rates.

Total operating expenses increased $28.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. However, as a percentage of net revenue, operating expenses were 220 basis points lower for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The decrease is primarily a result of a decrease of 230 basis points in payroll and employee benefits as a percentage of net revenue for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 as a result of an increase in operational efficiencies, which resulted in less overtime and regular pay to service the increase in net revenue.

For the year ended June 30, 2004, our income from continuing operations was $6.6 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to a loss from continuing operations of $7.4 million, or $0.69 per diluted share for the year ended June 30, 2003. These results reflect the increase in interest expense of $1.4 million primarily related to increased interest rates resulting from the renegotiation of our credit facility in fiscal 2003 and increased amortization of deferred financing costs related to the renegotiation as well as the additional items and factors discussed below.

- 12 -

Net Revenue

A comparison of net revenue by segment is included in the table below (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,				$ Change		% Change
	2004		2003
Medical transportation and related services	$	452,254	$	411,399	$	40,855	9.9	%
Fire and other		74,349		73,240		1,109	1.5	%
Total net revenue	$	526,603	$	484,639	$	41,964	8.7	%

Medical Transportation and Related Services — Medical transportation and related service revenue increased $40.9 million, or 9.9%, from $411.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2003 to $452.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2004. This increase is primarily comprised of a $36.1 million increase in same service area revenue attributable to an increase in transports and an increase in rates. Additionally, there was a $5.8 million increase in revenue related to new contracts offset by a $1.1 million decrease related to service areas that were closed in fiscal 2003.

A comparison of transports is included in table below:

	Years Ended June 30,		Transport Change	% Change
	2004	2003
Ambulance transports	1,105,912	1,053,074	52,838	5.0	%
Alternative transportation transports	99,351	97,388	1,963	2.0	%
Total transports from continuing operations	1,205,263	1,150,462	54,801	4.8	%

Transports in areas that we served in both fiscal 2004 and 2003 increased by approximately 42,200 transports. The increase in transports is a result of an overall aging population, increase in population density where we have significant operations and increased patient travel between specialized treatment health care facilities. Additionally, there was an increase of approximately 14,300 transports related to new contracts as well as a decrease of approximately 1,700 transports in a service area closed in fiscal 2003. The net/net average patient charge, or “net/net APC” (defined as gross EMS transport revenue minus provisions for contractual allowances and doubtful accounts), for ambulance transports made in fiscal 2004 was $310 compared to $293 for fiscal 2003. The increase in net/net APC for ambulance transports is primarily a result of rate escalators and other general rate increases that are contained or allowed in contracts to provide EMS services, the discontinuation of lower rate contracts and an increase in overall operating efficiencies associated with billing initiatives.

Fire and Other — Fire and other revenue increased $1.1 million, or 1.5%, from $73.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2003 to $74.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2004. The increase is primarily due to an increase in fire subscription revenue of $3.1 million, or 9.6%, as a result of an increase in rates. Forestry and fire fee revenue totaled $3.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $1.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2004, with the decrease primarily related to the particularly active wildfire season in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2004.

Operating Expenses

Payroll and Employee Benefits — The increase in payroll and employee benefits is primarily related to an increase in transports, which in turn resulted in an increase in regular, overtime and fill-in wages of $9.2 million. In addition, we received a worker’s compensation premium refund of approximately $1.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2003. Payroll and employee benefits’ as a percentage of net revenue was 52.7% and 55.0% for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, with the decrease resulting primarily from operational efficiencies, which have yielded less overtime and regular pay to service the increase in net revenue.

- 13 -

Provision for Doubtful Accounts — The increase in the provision for doubtful accounts is related to the increase in medical transportation and related service revenue. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees was 14.6% and 14.8% for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This percentage has remained consistent as the mix in the relationship between Medicare, Medicaid and other third party payer discounts and doubtful accounts has remained stable year over year.

A summary of activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
Balance at beginning of year	$	48,422		$	37,966
Provision for doubtful accounts - continuing operations		87,268			77,184
Provision for doubtful accounts - discontinued operations		4,209			7,862
Write-offs of uncollectible accounts		(80,469	)		(74,590	)
Balance at end of year	$	59,430		$	48,422

Depreciation and Amortization — The decrease in depreciation and amortization is primarily due to reduced capital expenditures in recent years as well as certain assets becoming fully depreciated.

Other Operating Expenses — Other operating expenses increased $7.3 million, or 6.8%, from $107.6 million to $114.9 million and consist primarily of rent and related occupancy expenses, vehicle and equipment maintenance and repairs, insurance, fuel and supplies, travel and professional fees. The increase in other operating expenses is primarily due to increases in general liability insurance expenses of $3.6 million due to increased premium rates in the new policy year, an increase in vehicle related expenses of $1.5 million due to an aging fleet of ambulances and an increase in fuel costs, as well as general increases in other operating expense categories.

Restructuring and Other — Fiscal 2003 included the reversal of restructuring charges of $1.4 million originally recorded in fiscal 2001. The restructuring charge recorded in fiscal 2001 included $1.5 million for severance, lease termination and other costs relating to an under performing service area that we had planned to exit at the time of contract expiration in December 2001. During fiscal 2002, the contract was extended for a one-year period at the request of the municipality to enable it to transition medical transportation service to a new provider. In connection with the contract extension, we reversed $0.2 million of previously accrued lease termination costs relating to the extension period, which was reflected as a credit to restructuring and other in the consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2002. The operating environment in this service area improved, and in November 2002 we were awarded a new multi-year contract. As a result, the remaining reserve of $1.3 million was released to income during fiscal 2003. In addition to this reversal, several other individually insignificant adjustments were made to prior restructuring charges in fiscal 2003.

A summary of activity in the restructuring reserve, which is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

	Severance Costs			Lease Termination Costs			Other Exit Costs			Total
Balance at July 1, 2002	$	757		$	1,514		$	32		$	2,303
Fiscal 2003 usage		(29	)		(207	)		(71	)		(307	)
Adjustments		(728	)		(732	)		39			(1,421	)
Balance at June 30, 2003		—			575			—			575
Fiscal 2004 usage		—			(212	)		—			(212	)
Balance at June 30, 2004	$	—		$	363		$	—		$	363

- 14 -

The restructuring reserve as of June 30, 2004 relates to lease termination costs for which payments will be made through December 2006.

Interest Expense — The balance on our credit facility was $152.6 million at June 30, 2004 as compared to $152.4 million at June 30, 2003. The average rate charged on the credit facility, including additional amounts accrued due to noncompliance with covenants, was 8.92% for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to 8.25% for the year ended June 30, 2003. The change in interest rate accounts for an increase of approximately $1.0 million in interest expense. Amortization of deferred financing costs totaled $2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. Amortization of deferred financing costs in the year ended June 30, 2004 includes amortization of costs incurred relating to the 2002 Amended Credit Facility, the 2003 Second Amended and Restated Credit Facility and the Senior Notes. Additionally, upon negotiation of the 2003 Second Amended and Restated Credit Facility, the amortization period of the costs associated with the 2002 Amended Credit Facility was extended through December 31, 2006. See further discussion of the 2003 Second Amended and Restated Credit Facility in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Minority Interest — The decrease in minority interest is a result of the net loss at our joint venture for the year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to net income generated for the year ended June 30, 2003. The loss in current year is primarily a result of an increase in general, auto and professional insurance expense of approximately $0.6 million and an increase in payroll and payroll related costs of approximately $1.3 million.

Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations — During fiscal 2004 we ceased operating in 10 medical transportation service areas as a result of these service areas not meeting internal operational and profitability measures. We also ceased operating in three fire and other service areas, one of which was due to the customer filing Chapter 11, one of which was sold as we continue to dispose of non-core businesses and one of which was due to the city converting the service area to a fire district. The results of these service areas for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations. Net revenue for discontinued medical transportation and related service areas totaled approximately $13.1 million and $30.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These service areas generated a loss of approximately $1.1 million in the year ended June 30, 2004 and net income of approximately $3.1 million in the year ended June 30, 2003.

Net revenue for discontinued fire and other service areas totaled approximately $3.4 million and $5.1 million for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These service areas generated net income of approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million in the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

On June 18, 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell one of our fire and other service areas, which is included in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2004. Net revenue totaled approximately $0.3 million for both years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. This service area generated net income of approximately $0.2 million for both years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

- 15 -

Due to deteriorating economic conditions and the continued devaluation of the local currency, we reviewed our strategic alternatives with respect to the continuation of operations in Latin America, including Argentina and Bolivia, and determined that we would benefit from focusing on our domestic operations. Effective September 27, 2002, we sold our Latin American operations to local management in exchange for the assumption of net liabilities. The gain on the disposition of our Latin American operations totaled $12.5 million and is included in income from discontinued operations for the year ended June 30, 2003. The gain includes the assumption by the buyer of net liabilities of $3.3 million (including, among other things, accounts receivable of $0.6 million and accrued liabilities of $4.8 million) as well as the recognition of related cumulative translation adjustments of $10.1 million.

Medical transportation and related service revenue relating to our Latin American operations totaled $2.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. Fire and other revenue for these operations totaled $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. Our Latin American operations generated a loss of $0.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.

- 16 -

Year Ended June 30, 2003 Compared To Year Ended June 30, 2002

Overview

The following table sets forth a comparison of certain items from our statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. The comparison includes the line items expressed as a percentage of net revenue as well as the dollar value and percentage change in each line item (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2003			% of Net Revenue		2002			% of Net Revenue		$ Change			% Change
Net revenue	$	484,639		100.0	%	$	453,151		100.0	%	$	31,488		6.9	%
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		266,713		55.0	%		250,724		55.3	%		15,989		6.4	%
Provision for doubtful accounts		77,184		15.9	%		70,689		15.6	%		6,495		9.2	%
Depreciation and amortization		12,587		2.6	%		14,443		3.2	%		(1,856	)	-12.9	%
Other operating expenses		107,574		22.2	%		96,581		21.3	%		10,993		11.4	%
Restructuring charge and other		(1,421	)	-0.3	%		(626	)	-0.1	%		(795	)	127.0	%
Total expenses		462,637		95.5	%		431,811		95.3	%		30,826		7.1	%
Operating income		22,002		4.5	%		21,340		4.7	%		662		3.1	%
Interest expense		(28,012	)	-5.8	%		(25,462	)	-5.6	%		(2,550	)	10.0	%
Interest income		197		0.0	%		644		0.1	%		(447	)	-69.4	%
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(5,813	)	-1.2	%		(3,478	)	-0.8	%		(2,335	)	67.1	%
Income tax (provision) benefit		(118	)	0.0	%		2,531		0.6	%		(2,649	)	-104.7	%
Minority interest		(1,507	)	-0.3	%		(750	)	-0.1	%		(757	)	100.9	%
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(7,438	)	-1.5	%		(1,697	)	-0.4	%		(5,741	)	338.3	%
Income from discontinued operations		16,404		3.4	%		3,046		0.7	%		13,358		438.5	%
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		8,966		1.9	%		1,349		0.3	%		7,617		564.6	%
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—		—			(49,513	)	-11.0	%		49,513		-100.0	%
Net income (loss)	$	8,966		1.9	%	$	(48,164	)	-10.6	%	$	57,130		-118.6	%

We generated net revenue of $484.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2003 compared to $453.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2002. The overall increase in revenue of $31.4 million for fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 was offset by an increase in total operating expenses of $31.0 million for fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002. Of the $31.0 million increase in net revenue, approximately $4.5 million is due to an increase in transports, and approximately $21.9 million is due to an increase in rates. The increase in operating expenses was primarily a result of an increase in payroll expenditures of $15.9 million due to general wage increases and overtime costs, increased other operating costs of $11.0 million primarily resulting from increased general insurance costs due to increased claims and premium rates, and an increase in provision for doubtful accounts of $6.5 million as a result of the increase in medical transportation and related service revenue.

For the year ended June 30, 2003, our loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principal was $7.4 million, or $0.69 per diluted share, compared to a loss from continuing operations of $1.7 million, or $0.11 per diluted share for the year ended June 30, 2002. These results reflect the increase in interest expense of $2.6 million primarily related to increased interest rates resulting from the renegotiation of our credit facility in fiscal 2003 and increased amortization of deferred financing costs related to the renegotiation, as well as the additional items and factors discussed below.

- 17 -

In addition, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.5 million in fiscal 2002 compared to an income tax expense of $0.2 million in fiscal 2003. The benefit recorded in fiscal 2002 was a result of federal income tax refunds of $0.6 million resulting from legislation enacted in 2002 that allowed us to carry back a portion of our net operating losses to prior years as well as refunds of $1.6 million applicable to prior years for which recognition was deferred until receipt.

Net Revenue

A comparison of net revenue by segment is included in the table below (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,				$ Change		% Change
	2003		2002
Medical transportation and related services	$	411,399	$	385,995	$	25,404	6.6	%
Fire and other		73,240		67,156		6,084	9.1	%
Total net revenue	$	484,639	$	453,151	$	31,488	6.9	%

Medical Transportation and Related Services — The increase in medical transportation and related services is primarily comprised of a $28.3 million increase in same service area revenue attributable to overall rate increases, enhanced call screening procedures and other factors. Additionally, there was a $3.3 million increase in revenue related to two new 911 contracts that began during fiscal 2003 offset by a $2.0 million decrease related to the loss of the 911 contract in Arlington, Texas and a $4.2 million decrease related to service areas that were closed in fiscal 2002.

A comparison of transports is included in the table below:

	Years Ended June 30,		Transport Change		% Change
	2003	2002
Ambulance transports	1,053,074	1,037,103	15,971		1.5	%
Alternative transportation transports	97,388	142,610	(45,222	)	-31.7	%
Total transports from continuing operations	1,150,462	1,179,713	(29,251	)	-2.5	%

Transports in areas that we served in both fiscal 2003 and 2002 decreased by approximately 18,000 transports. Additionally, there was an increase of 6,000 transports related to two 911 contracts that began during fiscal 2003 offset by a 4,000 transport decrease related to the loss of the 911 contract in Arlington and a 13,000 transport decrease related to service areas which were closed in fiscal 2002. The net/net APC for ambulance transports made in fiscal 2003 was $293 compared to $277 for fiscal 2002. The increase in net/net APC for ambulance transports is primarily a result of rate escalators and other general rate increases that are contained or allowed in contracts to provide EMS services, the discontinuance of lower rate contracts and an increase in overall operating efficiencies associated with payroll and billing initiatives.

Fire and Other — Fire protection services revenue increased primarily due to rate and utilization increases in our subscription fire programs of $2.6 million, rate increases on existing and additional fire contracts of $1.5 million and a $0.7 million increase in wild land fire services revenue. We experienced a particularly active wildfire season in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. Additionally there was an increase of $1.3 million in other revenue relating to revenues from dispatch, fleet, billing, training and home health care services.

Operating Expenses

Payroll and Employee Benefits — The increase in payroll and employee benefit expenses is primarily related to an increase in regular, overtime and fill-in wages of $6.2 million, an increase in vacation expense

- 18 -

of $2.0 million, an increase in 401(k) expense of $1.5 million as a result of the company not contributing to the 401(k) plan in fiscal 2002 and increased health insurance costs of $2.5 million primarily due to increased health insurance claims, partially offset by a worker’s compensation premium refund of approximately $1.2 million received during 2003.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts — The increase in the provision for doubtful accounts is primarily related to the increase in medical transportation and related service revenue. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross ambulance and alternative transportation service fees was 14.8% and 14.6% for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This percentage has remained consistent as the mix in the relationship between Medicare, Medicaid and other third party payer discounts and doubtful accounts has remained stable year over year.

A summary of activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2003			2002
Balance at beginning of year	$	37,966		$	60,812
Provision for doubtful accounts - continuing operations		77,184			70,689
Provision for doubtful accounts - discontinued operations		7,862			7,191
Write-offs of uncollectible accounts		(74,590	)		(100,726	)
Balance at end of year	$	48,422		$	37,966

Depreciation and Amortization — The decrease in depreciation and amortization is primarily due to reduced capital spending in recent years as well as certain assets becoming fully depreciated.

Other Operating Expenses — Other operating expenses consist primarily of rent and related occupancy expenses, vehicle and equipment maintenance and repairs, insurance, fuel and supplies, travel and professional fees. The increase in other operating expenses is primarily due to increases in general liability insurance expenses of $5.1 million due to increased premium rates, professional fees of $1.3 million related to the amendment of our credit facility on September 30, 2002 and general increases in other operating expense categories.

Restructuring and Other — Fiscal 2003 includes the reversal of restructuring charges of $1.4 million originally recorded in fiscal 2001. The restructuring charge recorded in fiscal 2001 included $1.5 million for severance, lease termination and other costs relating to an under performing service area that we had planned to exit at the time of contract expiration in December 2001. During fiscal 2002, the contract was extended for a one-year period at the request of the municipality to enable it to transition medical transportation service to a new provider. In connection with the contract extension, we reversed $0.2 million of previously accrued lease termination costs relating to the extension period, which was reflected as a credit to restructuring and other in the consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2002. The operating environment in this service area improved, and in November 2002 we were awarded a new multi-year contract. As a result, the remaining reserve of $1.3 million was released to income during fiscal 2003. In addition to this reversal, several other individually insignificant adjustments were made to prior restructuring charges in fiscal 2003.

A summary of activity in the restructuring reserve, which is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

	Severance Costs			Lease Termination Costs			Other Exit Costs			Total
Balance at July 1, 2001	$	1,834		$	3,234		$	1,101		$	6,169
Fiscal 2002 usage		(1,025	)		(1,172	)		(951	)		(3,148	)
Adjustments		(52	)		(548	)		(118	)		(718	)
Balance at June 30, 2002		757			1,514			32			2,303
Fiscal 2003 usage		(29	)		(207	)		(71	)		(307	)
Adjustments		(728	)		(732	)		39			(1,421	)
Balance at June 30, 2003	$	—		$	575		$	—		$	575

- 19 -

The restructuring reserve as of June 30, 2003 relates to lease termination costs for which payments will be made through December 2006.

Interest Expense — The increase in interest expense was primarily due to increased interest rates resulting from the renegotiation of our credit facility in September 2002. Amortization of deferred financing costs totaled $2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2003 compared to $0.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2002. See further discussion of the 2002 Amended Credit Facility in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Interest Income — The decrease in interest income relates to $0.5 million of income received in conjunction with an income tax refund that was included in the results for the year ended June 30, 2002.

Income Taxes — The income tax benefit in 2002 resulted from federal income tax refunds of $0.6 million resulting from legislation that allowed us to carry back a portion of our net operating losses to prior years as well as refunds of $1.6 million applicable to prior years for which recognition had been deferred until receipt. We did not recognize the future income tax benefits attributable to our domestic net operating losses in either 2003 or 2002 as it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized.

Income From Discontinued Operations — During fiscal 2004, we ceased operating in 10 medical transportation service areas as a result of these service areas not meeting internal operational and profitability measures. We also ceased operating in three fire and other service areas, one of which was due to the customer filing Chapter 11, one of which was sold as we continue to dispose of non-core businesses and one of which was due to the city converting the service area to a fire district. The results of these service areas for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are included in income from discontinued operations. Net revenue for discontinued medical transportation and related service areas totaled approximately $30.4 million and $30.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These service areas generated income of approximately $3.1 million and $0.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Net revenue for discontinued fire and other service areas totaled approximately $5.1 million and $4.8 million for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These service areas generated net income of approximately $0.7 for each of the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

On June 18, 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell one of our fire and other service areas which is included in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2004. Net revenue totaled approximately $0.4 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. This service area generated net income of approximately $0.2 for each of the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

Due to deteriorating economic conditions and the continued devaluation of the local currency, we reviewed our strategic alternatives with respect to the continuation of operations in Latin America, including Argentina and Bolivia, and determined that we would benefit from focusing on our domestic operations. Effective September 27, 2002, we sold our Latin American operations to local management in exchange for the assumption of net liabilities. The gain on the disposition of our Latin American operations totaled $12.5 million and is included in income from discontinued operations for the year ended June 30, 2003.

- 20 -

Medical transportation and related service revenue related to our Latin American operations totaled $2.1 million and $23.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Fire and Other revenue related to our Latin American operations totaled $0.3 million and $1.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Our Latin American operations generated a net loss of $0.2 million through September 27, 2002 and net income of $1.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2002.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle — We adopted the new rules on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective July 1, 2001. Under the transitional provisions of SFAS 142, we performed impairment tests on the net goodwill and other intangible assets associated with each of our reporting units with the assistance of independent valuation experts and determined that a transitional goodwill impairment charge of $49.5 million, both before and after tax, was required. The impairment charge primarily related to our domestic medical transportation and related services segment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations as well as existing cash balances. At June 30, 2004, we had cash of $16.4 million. Our liquidity needs are primarily to service our long-term debt and fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and business development activities. Our ability to generate cash from operating activities is subject to, among other things, our future operating performance as well as general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, some of which may be beyond our control.

We do not believe that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to satisfy the principal payment required on the 2003 Amended Credit Facility that will be due on December 31, 2006. Consequently, we will seek to refinance the credit facility with cash obtained through additional borrowings or the issuance of additional equity. There can be no assurance that such equity or borrowings will be available or, if available, will be at rates or prices acceptable to us.

In order to improve cash flow from operations, we plan to target a variety of areas for growth and cash flow improvement, including:

• Organic Growth:

We have targeted select new 911 ambulance contracts in regions with aging populations and forecasted population growth. Positive growth continues in existing local and regional service areas, including our focus on contract renewals, general rate increases and overall efforts to maximize operational efficiencies.

• Billing and Collections:

We have implemented new initiatives to enhance our cash flow performance and streamline the ambulance billing process, including the use of software designed to create added controls over the day-to-day flow of claims, creating systems to improve the return on difficult-to-collect accounts and placing a higher priority on submitting ambulance claims electronically in order to expedite payment and maximize the efficiencies afforded by such systems.

• Operational Efficiencies:

We continue to emphasize the importance of creating operations and administrative efficiencies that will result in cost savings and improved margins. One area of focus relates to improving the efficiency of work force scheduling in order to minimize unscheduled overtime among our EMS and fire personnel, who represent the majority of our work force. In fiscal 2004, we began implementing a customized software program that more fully automates the work scheduling process. Another area of focus is workplace health and safety. In fiscal 2004, our efforts included the introduction of facility audits, new EMS based driver development programs and enhanced driver safety criteria.

- 21 -

If we fail to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, we will need to raise additional equity or borrow additional funds to achieve our longer-term business objectives. There can be no assurance that such equity or borrowings will be available or, if available, will be at rates or prices acceptable to us.

We believe that cash flow from operations coupled with existing cash balances will be adequate to fund our operating and capital needs as well as enable us to maintain compliance with our various debt agreements through June 30, 2005. To the extent that actual results or events differ from our financial projections or business plans, our liquidity may be adversely impacted.

Cash Flow

During the year ended June 30, 2004, we generated net income of $6.2 million compared with net income of $9.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. Net income for the year ended June 30, 2003 included a non-cash gain on the disposal of our Latin American operations of $12.5 million and a $1.4 million non-cash reversal of restructuring charges. Cash provided by operating activities totaled $14.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2004 and $13.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2004, we had cash of $16.4 million, total debt of $305.6 million and a stockholders’ deficit of $192.2 million. Our total debt at June 30, 2004 primarily consists of $149.9 million of our 7 ⁷/8% Senior Notes due March 15, 2008 and $152.6 million outstanding under our credit facility.

Throughout the year, we periodically experience significant outflows of cash. These outflows include our $5.9 million, semi-annual interest payments on our Senior Notes (these payments are due March 15 and September 15 through March 2008), as well as interest payments on our credit facility of approximately $1.1 million per month. In addition, annual workers’ compensation and general liability insurance premiums are paid in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. These deposits totaled $7.2 million and $5.4 million in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Historically we have also paid a discretionary employer 401(k) matching contribution and management incentive bonuses, generally in the second quarter of the fiscal year. These payments totaled $3.9 million and $1.9 million in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The table below summarizes cash flow information for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	14,501		$	13,146		$	9,634
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,421	)		(7,582	)		(5,832	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,269	)		(3,659	)		(3,170	)

Operating activities - Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2004 primarily relates to net income of $6.2 million and depreciation and amortization of $12.3 million offset by the growth in accounts receivables of $4.9 million. The growth in receivables is primarily related to new service areas and transport growth in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003.

Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2003 primarily relates to net income of $9.0 million, depreciation and amortization of $13.3 million and a decrease in net accounts receivable of $3.5 million offset by the non-cash portion of the gain on disposition of our Latin American operations of $13.7 million. The decrease in net accounts receivable is a result of an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts. .

Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2002 primarily relates to a net loss of $48.2 million which includes the cumulative effect of change in accounting principal of $49.5 million. Other significant components of cash provided by operating activities include depreciation and

- 22 -

amortization of $16.2 million offset by a decrease in accrued and other liabilities of $9.9 million. The decrease in accrued and other liabilities is a result of timing of payments on several accruals including the usage of general liability and workers’ compensation claim reserves.

Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, was $65.3 million and $60.4 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in net accounts receivable is primarily due to increased ambulance transports, rate increases, billings on new contracts and the timing of billings and collections. Days sales outstanding, calculated on a year to date basis, was 42 days and 44 days at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts increased from approximately $48.4 million at June 30, 2003 to approximately $59.4 million at June 30, 2004, primarily as a result of the increase in revenue.

Average daily cash deposits totaled $1.8 million for both years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We experience several variables regarding the timing and amount of cash collected during any period. See further discussion of those variables in “Risk Factors – We depend on reimbursements by third-party payers and individuals.” While management believes that we have a predictable method of determining the realizable value of our accounts receivable, based on continuing difficulties in the healthcare reimbursement environment, there can be no assurance that there will not be additional future write-offs.

Investing activities – Cash used in investing activities primarily relates to capital expenditures. We had capital expenditures totaling $8.6 million and $9.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Financing activities – Cash used in financing activities primarily relates to repayments on debt and capital lease obligations as well as cash paid for debt modification costs and distributions to minority shareholders. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2004 includes a $1.0 million payment on our credit facility related to asset sale proceeds as required under the 2002 amendment to the credit facility and $1.2 million of principal payments on other debt and capital lease obligations.

We had working capital of $10.7 million at June 30, 2004, including cash of $16.4 million, compared to working capital of $1.6 million, including cash of $12.6 million, at June 30, 2003. The increase in working capital is primarily related to the increase in receivables due to increased transports, rate increases, billings on new contracts and the timing of billings and collections.

On June 10, 2004, our stockholders voted to amend our certificate of incorporation to authorize 17.0 million new shares of common stock at our annual meeting. On June 30, 2004 we settled our Series B Shares and Series C redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock (the “Series C Shares”) by issuing 4,955,278 shares of common stock to our lenders.

Long Term Debt

Credit Facility:

1998 Revolving Credit Facility – In March 1998, we entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility that was originally scheduled to mature on March 16, 2003. The credit facility was unsecured and was unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of our domestic wholly-owned current and future subsidiaries. Interest rates and availability under the credit facility depended on us meeting certain financial covenants.

Non-Compliance with Covenants under the 1998 Revolving Credit Facility – In December 1999, we were not in compliance with the total debt leverage ratio, total debt to total capitalization ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants contained in the original credit facility. We received a series of compliance waivers regarding these covenants through April 1, 2002. The waivers precluded additional borrowings under the credit facility, required us to accrue additional interest expense at a rate of 2.0% per annum on the amount outstanding under the credit facility, and required us to make unscheduled principal payments totaling $5.2 million.

- 23 -

2002 Amended Credit Facility/Issuance of Series B Shares – As discussed in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, we were not in compliance with the total debt leverage ratio, total debt to total capitalization ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants contained in our credit facility at June 30, 2002. Effective September 30, 2002, we entered into the 2002 Amended Credit Facility with our lenders pursuant to which, among other things, all prior covenant violations were permanently waived, the maturity date of the facility was extended to December 31, 2004, the interest rate was increased to LIBOR + 7% and unpaid additional interest and various fees and expenses associated with the amendment were added to the amount outstanding under the credit facility, resulting in an outstanding balance of $152.4 million. Additionally, the financial covenants contained in the original agreement were revised to levels that were consistent with our business levels and outlook at that time.

In consideration for the amendment, we paid the lenders an amendment fee of $1.2 million as well as issued 211,549 of our Series B Shares. On June 30, 2004, we settled the Series B Shares by the issuance of 2,115,490 common shares. See further discussion on the Series B Shares at Note 13.

The 2002 Amended Credit Facility was not considered to represent a substantial modification for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the $1.2 million amendment fee plus the estimated fair value of the Series B shares at the time of issuance of $4.2 million were capitalized as debt issue costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the amended agreement while professional fees and other related costs incurred in connection with the amendment totalling $1.6 million were expensed. Unamortized debt issue costs related to this amendment, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, totalled $2.3 million and $3.6 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Non-Compliance with Covenants under the 2002 Amended Credit Facility – As a result of a restatement to the consolidated financial statements for years prior to 2003, we were not in compliance with the minimum tangible net worth covenant contained in the 2002 Amended Credit Facility. Additionally, the restatement also resulted in a delay in the filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, thereby causing us to fall out of compliance with the reporting requirements contained in both the 2002 Amended Credit Facility and the indenture relating to the Senior Notes described below. The lack of compliance with these covenants triggered the accrual of additional interest at the rate of 2.0% per annum on the amount outstanding under the credit facility from May 15, 2003, the original required filing date for the Form 10-Q.

2003 Amended Credit Facility/Issuance of Series C Shares – We entered into an amended credit facility, effective September 30, 2003, with our lenders pursuant to which, among other things, all prior covenant violations were permanently waived, the maturity date of the facility was extended to December 31, 2006, and the financial covenants contained in the September 2002 amendment were revised to levels consistent with our current business levels. We also made a $1.0 million principal payment related to asset sale proceeds as required under the 2002 amendment. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the credit facility remained unchanged at LIBOR +7%.

In consideration for the amendment, we paid certain of the lenders amendment fees totalling $0.5 million and issued certain of the lenders 283,979 of our Series C Shares. On June 30, 2004, we settled the Series C Shares by the issuance of 2,839,788 common shares. See further discussion on the Series C Shares at Note 13.

The 2003 Amended Credit Facility was not considered to represent a substantial modification for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the $0.5 million amendment fee plus the estimated fair value of the Series C shares at the time of issuance of $3.4 million were capitalized as debt issue costs and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the amended agreement. Professional fees and other related costs of $0.3 million incurred in connection with the amendment were expensed. Unamortized debt issue costs related to this amendment, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, totaled $3.0 million at June 30, 2004.

For the year ended June 30, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on credit facility borrowings was approximately 8.92%. At June 30, 2004, there was $152.6 million outstanding on the credit facility as well as $2.5 million in letters of credit issued under the credit facility. The terms of the 2003 Amended Credit Facility do not permit additional borrowings thereunder.

- 24 -

Current Covenants – The 2003 Amended Credit Facility includes various non-financial covenants similar in scope to those included in the 1998 Revolving Credit Facility. These covenants include restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales and other matters. The 2003 Amended Credit Facility includes extensive financial reporting obligations and provides that an event of default occurs should we lose customer contacts in any fiscal quarter with an aggregate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) contribution of $5.0 million or more (net of anticipated EBITDA contribution from new contracts). The revised financial covenants and levels achieved by us are presented below:

Financial Covenant	Period Covered By Covenant	Level Specified in Agreement	Level Achieved for Specified Period
Debt leverage ratio	Nine months ended June 30, 2004, annualized	< 7.45	6.41
Minimum tangible net worth	At June 30, 2004	< $280.0 million deficit	$244.7 million deficit
Fixed charge coverage ratio	Nine months ended June 30, 2004, annualized	> 1.05	1.23
Limitation on capital expenditures	Cumulative for fiscal year 2004	< $11.0 million	$8.6 million
Annual operating lease expense to consolidated net revenue	Nine months ended June 30, 2004, annualized	< 3.1%	2.2%

We must achieve the following levels of compliance at September 30, 2004: a total debt leverage ratio of less than 7.53; a minimum tangible net deficit of less than $280.0 million; a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.03; annual capital expenditures less than $11.5 million; and, an annual operating lease expense equivalent to less than 3.10% of consolidated net revenue for the last twelve months.

Senior Notes:

In March 1998, we issued $150.0 million of 7  ⁷/8% Senior Notes due March 15, 2008 (the “Senior Notes”). Interest under the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on September 15 and March 15. We incurred expenses related to the offering of approximately $5.3 million and are amortizing such costs over the term of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company and are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of our domestic wholly owned current and future subsidiaries. The Senior Notes contain certain covenants that, among other items, limit our ability to incur certain indebtedness, sell assets or enter into certain mergers or consolidations.

Restrictions on Debt and Equity Financing

The terms of our 2003 Amended Credit Facility do not permit additional borrowings there under. In addition, the 2003 Amended Credit Facility and the Senior Notes restrict our ability to obtain additional debt from other sources or provide collateral to any prospective lender.

If we are unable to meet our targeted levels of operating cash flow, or in the event of an unanticipated cash requirement (such as an adverse litigation outcome, reimbursement delays, significantly increased costs of insurance or other matters) we may be limited in our ability to pursue additional debt or equity financing. See “Risk Factors – We may not be able to generate sufficient operating cash flow.”

If we fail to remain in compliance with financial and other covenants set forth in the 2003 Amended Credit Facility, we will also be in default under our Senior Notes. A default under the Senior Notes or 2003 Amended Credit Facility may, among other things, cause all amounts owed by us under such facilities to become due immediately upon such default. Any inability to resolve a violation through waivers or other means could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

There can be no assurance that we will not incur significant unanticipated liabilities. Similarly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on terms satisfactory to

- 25 -

us, or at all, should cash flow from operations and our existing cash resources prove to be inadequate. As discussed above, we will not have access to additional borrowings under such facility. If we are required to seek additional financing, any such arrangement may involve material and substantial dilution to existing stockholders resulting from, among other things, issuance of equity securities or the conversion of all or a portion of our existing debt to equity. In such event, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders will be materially reduced, and such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our current common stockholders. If we require additional financing but are unable to obtain it, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially adversely affected.

Insurance Programs

Many of our operational contracts, as well as laws in certain of the areas where we operate, require that we carry specified amounts of insurance coverage. Additionally, in the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to accident, injury and professional liability claims as a result of the nature of our business and the day-to-day operation of our vehicle fleet. In order to minimize our risk of exposure, and to comply with such legal and contractual requirements, we carry a broad range of insurance policies, including comprehensive general liability, automobile, property damage, professional, workers’ compensation and other lines of coverage. We typically renew each of these policies annually and purchase limits of coverage at levels we believe are appropriate, taking into account historical and projected claim trends, reasonable protection of our assets and operations and the economic conditions in the insurance market. Depending upon the specific line of coverage, the total limits of insurance maintained by us may be achieved through a combination of primary policies, excess policies and self-insurance. See “Risk Factors — Claims against us could exceed our insurance coverage and we may not have coverage for certain claims.”

We retain certain levels of exposure with respect to our general liability and workers’ compensation programs and purchase coverage from third party insurers for exposures in excess of those levels. In addition to expensing premiums and other costs relating to excess coverage, we establish reserves for claims, both reported and incurred but not reported. See “Risk Factors – Our claim reserves may prove inadequate.”

We engage third-party administrators (“TPAs”) to manage claims resulting from our general liability and workers’ compensation programs. The TPAs establish initial loss reserve estimates at the time a claim is reported and then monitor the development of the claim over time to confirm that such estimates continue to be appropriate. We periodically review the claim reserves established by the TPAs and engage independent actuaries to assist with the evaluation of the adequacy of our reserves on an annual basis. We adjust our claim reserves with an associated charge or credit to expense as new information on the underlying claims is obtained.

Since fiscal year 2000, we have experienced a substantial rise in the costs associated with our insurance program, including total premium costs, fees for TPAs to process claims, brokerage costs and other risk management expenses. These increases have primarily resulted from an increase in insurance premiums, our historical claim trends and the general increase in costs of claims and related litigation. See “Risk Factors — We have experienced material increases in the cost of our insurance and surety programs and in related collateralization requirements.”

We retain certain levels of exposure with respect to our general liability and workers compensation insurance programs and we purchase coverage from third party insurers for exposures in excess of those levels. Until Decemsber 31, 2004, we have established reserves for claims, both reported and incurred but not reported, within our level of retention based on currently available information as well as our historical claims experience. However, as we are the primary obligor for payment of all claims, during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we have determined that we should present our claim reserves on a gross basis along with a corresponding equal insurance receivable. As a result of this revision in classification, we have increased our general liability claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $9.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and we have recorded a corresponding receivable from our insurers as a current asset. In addition, we have increased our workers compensation claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively and we have recorded a corresponding receivable from our insurers as a current asset. We will continue our past practice of evaluating the financial capacity of our insurers to assess the recoverability of the related insurer receivable. This revision in classification had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows from operations or working capital.

- 26 -

General Liability - We have historically maintained insurance policies for comprehensive general liability, automobile liability and professional liability. Throughout this report, these three types of policies are referred to collectively as the “general liability policies.” These policies are typically renewed annually. We engage independent actuaries to assist us with our evaluation of the adequacy of our general liability claim reserves. If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than has been estimated, the reserves for general liability claims could be overstated or understated. See “Risk Factors – Our claim reserves may prove inadequate.”

A summary of activity in our general liability claim reserves, which are included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

	Gross Claims Liability			Accounts Receivable from Insurers		Net Claims Liability
Balance, July 1, 2001	$	19,715		$	—	$	19,715
Provision charged to other operating expense		2,442			—		2,442
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,724	)		—		(6,724	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			—		—
Balance June 30, 2002		15,433			—		15,433
Provision charged to other operating expense		4,506			—		4,506
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,004	)		—		(6,004	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		2,101			2,101		—
Balance June 30, 2003		16,036			2,101		13,935
Provision charged to other operating expense		7,020			—		7,020
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(5,219	)		—		(5,219	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		7,564			7,564		—
Balance June 30, 2004	$	25,401		$	9,665	$	15,736

Certain insurers require us to deposit cash into designated loss funds in order to fund claim payments within our retention limits. Cash deposits relating to our general liability program totaled $5.1 million at June 30, 2004 of which $2.4 million is included in prepaid expenses and other and $2.7 million is included in insurance deposits. Cash deposits relating to our general liability program totaled $2.9 million at June 30, 2003 of which $1.8 million is included in prepaid expenses and other and $1.1 million is included in insurance deposits.

Our general liability policies corresponding with fiscal years 2001 and 2002 were issued by Legion. Legion’s obligations under such policies were reinsured by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company (“Transatlantic”), an unrelated insurance carrier that was identified and approved by us. At the time the coverage was purchased, Legion was an “A” rated insurance carrier while Transatlantic was an A++ rated carrier. Under this policy, Legion’s obligation (as well as that of Transatlantic) to pay covered losses commences once we satisfy our aggregate retention limits for the respective policy years. We have met our aggregate retention limit with respect to the policy corresponding to fiscal 2001. Pursuant to this policy, Legion (and Transatlantic) is obligated to fund all claim-related payments in excess of our retention limits.

- 27 -

On July 25, 2003, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (the “Department”) placed Legion into liquidation. The Department is conducting the liquidation process, subject to judicial review by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (the “Court”). On May 19, 2004, the Department, on behalf of Legion, Transatlantic, and Rural/Metro executed an Assumption Reinsurance and Substitution Agreement (the “Agreement”), whereby Transatlantic agreed to assume Legion’s obligations on the policies and be substituted as the primary insurance carrier on such policies. The Court approved the Agreement on May 26, 2004. As a result of the Agreement, Transatlantic will pay 70% of all claims and we will pay the remaining 30%. Our portion of this liability, which has been based on an actuarial calculation, has been included in the reserve for general liability claims as of June 30, 2004.

Workers’ Compensation - We have historically maintained insurance policies for workers’ compensation and employer’s liability. We are required by law and by most of our operational contracts to maintain minimum statutory limits of workers’ compensation insurance. These policies are typically renewed annually. We also engage independent actuaries to assist with our evaluation of the adequacy of our workers’ compensation claim reserves. If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than has been estimated, the reserves for workers’ compensation claims could be overstated or understated, See “Risk Factors – Our claim reserves may prove inadequate.”

A summary of activity in our workers’ compensation claim reserves, which are included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

	Gross Claims Liability			Accounts Receivable from Insurers			Net Claims Liability
Balance, July 1, 2001	$	14,944		$	—		$	14,944
Provision charged to other operating expense		7,318			—			7,318
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,338	)		—			(6,338	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			—			—
Balance June 30, 2002		15,924			—			15,924
Provision charged to other operating expense		—			—			—
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(4,669	)		—			(4,669	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		704			704			—
Balance June 30, 2003		11,959			704			11,255
Provision charged to other operating expense		—			—			—
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(3,165	)		—			(3,165	)
Decrease in accounts receivable from insurers		(403	)		(403	)		—
Balance June 30, 2004	$	8,391		$	301		$	8,090

Effective May 1, 2002, we began fully insuring our workers’ compensation coverage and no longer retain any of the related obligations. We are, however, subject to retrospective premium adjustments should losses exceed previously established limits. As a result of this change in coverage, we no longer establish reserves for claims incurred subsequent to April 30, 2002. We were subject to a premium payroll audit of the policy year that began May 1, 2002 which resulted in a refund of premiums of approximately $1.2 million.

Certain insurers require us to deposit cash into designated loss funds in order to fund claim payments within our retention limits. Additionally, we have also been required to provide other forms of financial assurance including letters of credit and surety bonds. Cash deposits relating to our workers’ compensation program totaled $6.6 million at June 30, 2004 all of which is included in insurance deposits. Cash deposits relating to our workers’ compensation program totaled $6.8 million at June 30, 2003 all of which is included in insurance deposits.

- 28 -

During fiscal years 1992 through 2001, we purchased certain portions of our workers’ compensation coverage from Reliance. At the time we purchased such coverage, Reliance was an “A” rated insurance company. In connection with this coverage, we provided Reliance with various amounts and forms of collateral to secure our performance under the respective policies as was customary at the time. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, we had $3.0 million of cash on deposit with Reliance, which is included in insurance deposits. We also have provided Reliance with letters of credit totaling $2.5 million and $3.5 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which mature on December 31, 2004, and surety bonds totaling $2.6 million and $2.9 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

On October 3, 2003, the Department placed Reliance into liquidation. Under a recently enacted Pennsylvania law (Act 46 of 2004, or “Act 46”), it is our understanding that cash on deposit with Reliance will be returned to us on or before the date that all related claims have been satisfied, so long as we have met our claim payment obligations within our retention limits under the related policies. Under Act 46, our cash cannot be used by the Reliance estate as a general asset but must be used in connection with our claims. Based on the information currently available, we believe that the cash on deposit with Reliance is fully recoverable and will either be returned to us or used by the liquidator, with our prior consent, to pay claims on our behalf. In the event that we are unable to access the funds on deposit with Reliance or the Reliance liquidator refuses to refund such deposits, such deposits may become impaired. Additionally, Reliance’s liquidation could put our workers’ compensation insurance coverage at risk for the related policy years; however, based upon information currently available, we believe that either Reliance or the applicable state guaranty funds will continue to pay claims. To the extent that such losses are not covered by either Reliance or the applicable state guaranty funds, we may be required to fund the related workers’ compensation claims for the applicable policy years. Our inability to access the funds on deposit with Reliance or obtain state guaranty fund coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “Risk Factors — Two insurance companies with which we have previously done business are in financial distress.”

During fiscal 2002, we purchased certain portions of our workers’ compensation coverage from Legion. Legion required assurances that we would be able to fund our related retention obligations, which were estimated by Legion to approximate $6.2 million. We provided this assurance by purchasing a deductible reimbursement policy from Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd. (“Mutual Indemnity”), a Legion affiliate. That policy required us to deposit approximately $6.2 million with Mutual Indemnity and required Mutual Indemnity to utilize such funds to satisfy our retention obligations under the Legion policy. We funded these deposits on a monthly basis during the policy term. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, we had net deposits with respect to this coverage totaling $3.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, which are included in insurance deposits.

As mentioned previously, the Department placed Legion into liquidation on July 25, 2003. In January 2003, the Court ordered the Legion liquidator and Mutual Indemnity to establish segregated trust accounts to be funded by cash deposits held by Mutual Indemnity for the benefit of individual insureds such as us. It is our understanding that the Legion liquidator and Mutual Indemnity continue to negotiate the legal framework for the form and administration of these trust accounts and that no final agreement has yet been reached. We are actively participating in the Court proceedings to cause such a trust account or other mechanism to be created and to operate so as to fully cover all our deductible obligations as originally intended and to return to us any remaining deposit balance once all related claims have been closed. Even assuming such trust accounts are not created, under Act 46 the Legion liquidator is required to first utilize the cash deposits available with Mutual Indemnity before attempting to collect any amounts from us. Therefore, based on the information currently available, we believe that the amounts on deposit with Mutual Indemnity are fully recoverable and will either be returned to us or used to pay claims on our behalf. In the event that we, or the Legion liquidator are unable to access the funds on deposit with Mutual Indemnity, we may be required to fund the related workers’ compensation claims for the applicable policy years, to the extent that such losses are not covered by the applicable state guaranty funds. Our inability to access the funds on deposit with Mutual Indemnity or obtain state guaranty fund coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In fiscal

- 29 -

2003 and 2004, the Legion liquidator ordered our TPA to forward all workers’ compensation claims related to fiscal year 2002 to the state guarantee funds whom will be administering these claims. We have reserves in the amount of approximately $3.6 million and $4.4 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, relating to these claims as well as deposits in the amount of approximately $3.0 million and $3.3 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Since these claims are not in our control, we may not be able to obtain current information as to the settlement of these claims and to the use of our deposits to satisfy these claims. See “Risk Factors — Two insurance companies with which we have previously done business are in financial distress.”

Indemnifications

We are a party to a variety of agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business pursuant to which we may be obligated to indemnify the other parties for certain liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the agreements. Some of the agreements entered into by us require us to indemnify the other party against losses due to property damage including environmental contamination, personal injury, failure to comply with applicable laws, our negligence or willful misconduct or breach of representations and warranties and covenants.

Additionally, some of our agreements with customers require us to provide certain assurances related to the performance of our services. Such assurances, from time to time, obligate us to; (i) pay penalties for failure to meet response times or other requirements, (ii) lease, sell or assign equipment or facilities (either temporarily or permanently) in the event of uncured material defaults or other certain circumstances, or (iii) provide surety bonds or letters of credit issued in favor of the customer to cover costs resulting, under certain circumstances, from an uncured material default or transition to a new service provider. With respect to such surety bonds, we are also required to indemnify the surety company for losses paid as a result of any claims made against such bonds.

We provide for indemnification of directors, officers and other persons in accordance with limited liability agreements, certificates of incorporation, bylaws, articles of association or similar organizational documents, as the case may be. We maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance which should enable us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

In addition to the above, from time to time we provide standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with sales of our securities and the engagement of financial advisors and also provide indemnities that protect the counterparties to these contracts in the event they suffer damages as a result of a breach of such representations and warranties or in certain other circumstances relating to the sale of securities or their engagement by us.

While our future obligations under certain agreements may contain limitations on liability for indemnification, other agreements do not contain such limitations and under such agreements it is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by us under any of these indemnities have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Additionally, we do not believe that any amounts that we may be required to pay under these indemnities in the future will be material to our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Nasdaq Listing

Dating back to May 22, 2003, we have had periodic correspondence with the Nasdaq regarding our noncompliance with certain of the Nasdaq SmallCap Market listing standards. Most recently, on July 12, 2004 we received notice from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel that we do not meet the market value of listed securities requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Effective with the open of business on July 13, 2004, our common stock began trading on the OTCBB. On July 21, 2004, we requested the Listing Council to review the Listing Qualification Panel’s decision. We are currently awaiting a decision from the Listing Council.

- 30 -

Effects of Inflation and Foreign Currency Exchange Fluctuations

As a result of the sale of our Latin American operations in September 2002, we no longer have operations located outside the United States. Additionally, inflation has not had a significant impact on our business.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

We have certain contractual obligations related to our debt instruments that come due at various times over the periods presented below. In addition we have other commitments in the form of standby letters of credit and surety bonds. The following table illustrates the expiration of our contractual obligations as well as other commitments as of June 30, 2004 (in thousands):

	Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year or less		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Credit facility	$	152,555	$	—	$	152,555	$	—	$	—
Senior Notes		149,904		—		—		149,904		—
Capital leases and note payable		3,093		1,494		1,493		15		91
Operating leases		43,396		8,224		12,839		7,895		14,438
Total contractual cash obligations	$	348,948	$	9,718	$	166,887	$	157,814	$	14,529
Other Commitments	Amount of Commitment Expiration By Period
Standby letters of credit	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	—	$	—	$	—
Surety bonds	$	9,091	$	9,032	$	59	$	—	$	—
Self-insurance retention obligations	$	9,525	$	4,575	$	4,950	$	—	$	—

Quarterly Results

The following table summarizes our unaudited quarterly operating results for each quarter of fiscal 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per share amounts). Net revenue and operating income included in the table relate to our continuing operations and exclude amounts applicable to our Latin American operations that were disposed of in September 2002 and other service areas classified as discontinued operations.

- 31 -

	2004
	First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
Net revenue	$	128,655		$	130,904		$	134,252		$	132,792
Operating income		9,005			9,532			8,919			8,071
Income from continuing operations		660			2,068			2,014			1,814
Net income		606			2,175			2,167			1,263
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.60
Basic income (loss) per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	0.57
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.08
Diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	0.06
	2003
	First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
Net revenue	$	120,621		$	119,534		$	121,636		$	122,848
Operating income		5,934			6,551			7,598			1,919
Loss from continuing operations		(882	)		(1,413	)		(164	)		(4,979	)
Net income (loss)		12,753			(252	)		535			(4,070	)
Basic loss from continuing operations applicable to common stock per share (1)	$	—		$	(0.16	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.39	)
Basic income (loss) per share (1)	$	—		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.33	)
Diluted loss from continuing operations applicable to common stock per share (1)	$	—		$	(0.16	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.39	)
Diluted income (loss) per share (1)	$	—		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.33	)

(1) As described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we restated our earnings per share amounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as well as for certain interim periods in fiscal 2003 as a result of the issuance of EITF 03-6 in March 2004 which clarified the use of the “two-class” method. As a result, basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 decreased by ($0.03) per share. On June 30, 2004, the Series B and Series C Shares were settled by the issuance of 4,955,278 common shares.

- 32 -

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Rural/Metro Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rural/Metro Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2, the Company changed its method of calculating earnings per share under the two-class method. Additionally, as discussed in Note 7, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill effective July 1, 2001.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

September 27, 2004, except for the first paragraph of

Note 10, for which the date is February 14, 2005

- 33 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(in thousands)

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	16,372		$	12,561
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $59,430 and $48,422 at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively		65,348			60,428
Accounts receivable from insurers		9,966			2,805
Inventories		11,738			11,504
Prepaid expenses and other		8,512			7,511
Total current assets		111,936			94,809
Property and equipment, net		40,283			43,010
Goodwill		41,100			41,167
Insurance deposits		9,244			7,937
Other assets		12,644			12,048
Total assets	$	215,207		$	198,971
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST, REDEEMABLE NONCONVERTIBLE PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	13,833		$	13,778
Accrued liabilities		67,239			60,503
Deferred revenue		18,650			17,603
Current portion of long-term debt		1,495			1,329
Total current liabilities		101,217			93,213
Long-term debt, net of current portion		304,057			305,310
Other liabilities		—			181
Deferred income taxes		650			650
Total liabilities		405,924			399,354
Minority interest		1,509			1,984
Redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		—			7,793
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 21,890,816 and 16,315,367 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively		222			166
Additional paid-in capital		147,072			135,405
Treasury stock		(1,239	)		(1,239	)
Accumulated deficit		(338,281	)		(344,492	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(192,226	)		(210,160	)
	$	215,207		$	198,971

See accompanying notes

- 34 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands)

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Net revenue	$	526,603		$	484,639		$	453,151
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		277,549			266,713			250,724
Provision for doubtful accounts		87,268			77,184			70,689
Depreciation and amortization		11,404			12,587			14,443
Other operating expenses		114,855			107,574			96,581
Restructuring and other		—			(1,421	)		(626	)
Total operating expenses		491,076			462,637			431,811
Operating income		35,527			22,002			21,340
Interest expense		(29,243	)		(28,012	)		(25,462	)
Interest income		97			197			644
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,381			(5,813	)		(3,478	)
Income tax (provision) benefit		(300	)		(118	)		2,531
Minority interest		475			(1,507	)		(750	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,556			(7,438	)		(1,697	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(345	)		16,404			3,046
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,211			8,966			1,349
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			(49,513	)
Net income (loss)		6,211			8,966			(48,164	)
Less: Net income allocated to redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock under the two-class method		(1,262	)		—			—
Less: Accretion of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		(6,320	)		(3,604	)		—
Add: Credit related to settlement of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock with common stock		10,066			—			—
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	8,695		$	5,362		$	(48,164	)
Income (loss) per share
Basic -
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.54		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations applicable to common stock		(0.02	)		1.02			0.20
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.52			0.33			0.09
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			(3.26	)
Net income (loss)	$	0.52		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)
Diluted-
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.30		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations applicable to common stock		(0.02	)		1.02			0.20
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.28			0.33			0.09
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			(3.26	)
Net income (loss)	$	0.28		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)
Average number of common shares outstanding - Basic		16,645			16,116			15,190
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted		21,817			16,116			15,190

See accompanying notes

- 35 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(in thousands)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance at July 1, 2001	$	152	$	137,948		$	(1,239	)	$	(305,294	)	$	14		$	(168,419	)
Issuance of 559,668 shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan		5		264			—			—			—			269
Issuance of 191,507 shares of common stock due to options exercised under Stock Option Plans		2		185			—			—			—			187
Fair value of options issued to non-employee		—		73			—			—			—			73
Comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Net loss		—		—			—			(48,164	)		—			(48,164	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—		—			—			—			10,302			10,302
Comprehensive loss																(37,862	)
Balance at June 30, 2002		159		138,470			(1,239	)		(353,458	)		10,316			(205,752	)
Issuance of 570,801 shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan		6		336			—			—			—			342
Issuance of 93,471 shares of common stock due to options excercised under Stock Option Plans		1		64			—			—			—			65
Non-cash stock compensation expense relating to stock option modification		—		139			—			—			—			139
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock		—		(3,604	)		—			—			—			(3,604	)
Comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Net income		—		—			—			8,966			—			8,966
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—		—			—			—			(242	)		(242	)
Recognition of foreign currency translation adjustments in conjunction with the disposition of Latin American operations		—		—			—			—			(10,074	)		(10,074	)
Comprehensive loss																(1,350	)
Balance at June 30, 2003		166		135,405			(1,239	)		(344,492	)		—			(210,160	)
Issuance of 341,430 shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan		3		309			—			—			—			312
Issuance of 278,741 shares of common stock due to options excercised under Stock Option Plans		3		179			—			—			—			182
Issuance of 4,955,278 shares of common stock upon settlement of redeemable preferred stock		50		7,433			—			—			—			7,483
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock		—		(6,320	)		—			—			—			(6,320	)
Credit related to settlement of redeemable preferred stock with common shares		—		10,066			—			—			—			10,066
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net income		—		—			—			6,211			—			6,211
Comprehensive income																6,211
Balance at June 30, 2004	$	222	$	147,072		$	(1,239	)	$	(338,281	)	$	—		$	(192,226	)

See accompanying notes

- 36 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	6,211		$	8,966		$	(48,164	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities -
Non-cash portion of gain on disposition of Latin American operations		—			(13,732	)		—
Non-cash reversal of restructuring charge and other		—			(1,421	)		(718	)
Depreciation and amortization		12,256			13,313			16,210
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment		39			(540	)		(285	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		91,477			85,046			77,880
Earnings (losses) of minority shareholder		(475	)		1,507			750
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,753			2,038			726
Amortization of debt discount		26			26			26
Non-cash portion of contract termination charges		—			—			(107	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			49,513
Deferred income taxes		—			—			(300	)
Non-cash stock compensation expense		—			—			73
Other		—			(176	)		(8	)
Change in assets and liabilities -
Increase in accounts receivable		(96,397	)		(81,589	)		(73,771	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		(7,161	)		(2,805	)		—
(Increase) decrease in inventories		(234	)		656			948
Increase in prepaid expenses and other		(1,001	)		(476	)		(2,792	)
(Increase) decrease in insurance deposits		(1,307	)		291			(4,492	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(477	)		126			1,871
Increase in accounts payable		55			1,545			1,453
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and other liabilities		7,689			(537	)		(9,881	)
Increase in deferred revenue		1,047			908			702
Net cash provided by operating activities		14,501			13,146			9,634
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(8,646	)		(9,400	)		(6,854	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		225			1,818			1,022
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,421	)		(7,582	)		(5,832	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments on credit facility		(1,000	)		—			(1,263	)
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations		(1,248	)		(1,569	)		(1,862	)
Distributions to minority shareholders		—			(914	)		(501	)
Cash paid for debt modification costs		(515	)		(1,583	)		—
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		494			407			456
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,269	)		(3,659	)		(3,170	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash		—			(21	)		302
Increase in cash		3,811			1,884			934
Cash, beginning of year		12,561			10,677			9,743
Cash, end of year	$	16,372		$	12,561		$	10,677

See accompanying notes

- 37 -

(1) The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business and Operations

Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a diversified emergency services company providing medical transportation, fire protection and other related services in 23 states. The Company provides emergency and non-emergency ambulance services to patients on both a non-refundable subscription fee basis and a fee-for-service basis. Fire protection services are provided either under contracts with municipalities or fire districts, or on a subscription fee basis to individual homeowners or commercial property owners. Through September 27, 2002, the Company provided urgent home medical care and ambulance services under capitated service arrangements in Latin America.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates have been used by management in conjunction with the measurement of discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, workers’ compensation and general liability claim reserves, fair values of reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment testing and future cash flows associated with long-lived assets. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and a majority-owned subsidiary which it controls. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in companies that represent less than 20% of the related voting stock are accounted for on the cost basis.

Revenue Recognition

Medical transportation and related services revenue includes emergency and non-emergency ambulance and alternative transportation service fees as well as municipal subsidies and subscription fees. Domestic ambulance and alternative transportation service fees are recognized as services are provided and are recorded net of estimated discounts applicable to Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payers. Such discounts applicable to continuing operations, which totaled $180.0 million, $147.9 million and $131.9 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are reflected in net revenue in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Ambulance subscription fees, which are generally received in advance, are deferred and recognized on a pro rata basis over the term of the subscription agreement, which is generally one year.

Revenue generated under fire protection service contracts is recognized over the life of the contract. Subscription fees, which are generally received in advance, are deferred and recognized on a pro rata basis over the term of the subscription agreement, which is generally one year.

The Company charges an enrollment fee for new subscribers under its fire protection service contracts. Such fees are deferred and recognized over the estimated customer relationship period of nine years. Other revenue primarily consists of dispatch, fleet, billing, training and home health care service fees, which are recognized when the services are provided.

- 38 -

An allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical collection trends, credit risk assessments applicable to certain types of payers and other relevant information. A summary of activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Balance at beginning of year	$	48,422		$	37,966		$	60,812
Provision for doubful accounts - continuing operations		87,268			77,184			70,689
Provision for doubful accounts - discontinued operations		4,209			7,862			7,191
Write-offs of uncollectible accounts		(80,469	)		(74,590	)		(100,726	)
Balance at end of year	$	59,430		$	48,422		$	37,966

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical and fleet supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, and is depreciated over the estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Equipment and vehicles are depreciated over three to ten years and buildings are depreciated over fifteen to thirty years. Property and equipment held under capital leases is stated at the present value of minimum lease payments, net of accumulated amortization. These assets are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the underlying assets using the straight-line method. Major additions and improvements are capitalized; maintenance and repairs which do not improve or significantly extend the life of assets are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and intangible net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized. The Company reviews its goodwill balances for impairment annually (and interim periods if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related asset may be impaired) using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test on June 30.

Impairment of Other Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable, by comparing the carrying amount of such assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with them. In cases where the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the related carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets. The fair value is determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved.

- 39 -

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized.

Stock Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock compensation using the intrinsic value method specified by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations (“APB 25”). The Company accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements with non-employees in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services” (“EITF 96-18”).

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) defines a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock options or similar equity instruments but also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost related to stock options issued to employees using the method of accounting prescribed by APB 25. The Company has elected to continue following APB 25, and must make pro forma disclosures of net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share, as if the fair value based method of accounting defined in SFAS 123 had been applied.

Because stock option exercise prices have equaled the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, stock compensation expense has not been reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations at the date of grant. Stock compensation expense has been recognized for certain modifications made to existing stock options at the time of such modifications. The Company has computed, for pro forma disclosure purposes, the value of all option shares granted and Employee Stock Purchase Program (“ESPP”) discounts during fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004				2003				2002
	Option		ESPP		Option		ESPP		Option		ESPP
Risk-free interest rate	1.95	%	1.18	%	1.61	%	1.38	%	2.27	%	1.89	%
Expected dividend yield	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%
Expected lives in years (after vesting for options)	1.20		0.5		1.21		0.5		2.72		0.5
Expected volatility	137.53	%	100.00	%	143.51	%	100.00	%	80.33	%	119.30	%

The total value of options granted and the ESPP share discount were estimated to be the following amounts, which would be amortized on the straight-line basis over the vesting period (in thousands):

	Options		ESPP
For the year ended June 30, 2004	$	13	$	96
For the year ended June 30, 2003		2,554		102
For the year ended June 30, 2002		409		77

- 40 -

If the Company had accounted for its stock-based compensation plans using a fair value based method of accounting, the Company’s pro forma net income (loss) and diluted income (loss) per share would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	8,695		$	5,362		$	(48,164	)
Deduct: Stock based employee compensation determined under the fair value method for all awards applicable to common stock, net of tax		(621	)		(1,605	)		(585	)
Proforma net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	8,074		$	3,757		$	(48,749	)
Income (loss) per share:
Basic - As reported	$	0.52		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)
Basic - Pro forma	$	0.48		$	0.23		$	(3.21	)
Diluted - As reported	$	0.28		$	0.33		$	(3.17	)
Diluted - Pro forma	$	0.25		$	0.23		$	(3.21	)

The effects of applying SFAS 123 for providing pro forma disclosures for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 are not likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income (loss) and diluted income (loss) per share for future years, because options vest over several years and additional awards are made each year.

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates earnings per share following the guidance outlined in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”), as well as related guidance issued by the EITF and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As a result of the issuance of its redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred shares (“Series B Shares” in September 2002 and “Series C Shares” in September 2003), the Company began calculating earnings per share using the “two-class” method described in SFAS 128 whereby net income (loss) for the period is allocated between common shares and other participating securities on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during a given period. This allocation was also impacted by the accretion of the Series B and Series C Shares to their respective cash redemption values as described in Note 13. Under SFAS 128 and related EITF and SEC guidance, basic earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method while diluted earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method or the “if converted” method, whichever is more dilutive.

As a result of the issuance in March 2004 of EITF No. 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128” (“EITF 03-6”), described in Note 2, the Company modified the manner in which net income (loss) is allocated under the two-class method.

As described in Note 13, the Company settled the Series B and Series C Shares on June 30, 2004 by exchanging such shares for shares of its common stock. As a result, use of the two-class method will no longer be required.

- 41 -

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators (weighted average number of shares outstanding) utilized in the basic and diluted income (loss) per share computations for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	6,556		$	(7,438	)	$	(1,697	)
Less: Income from continuing operations allocated to redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock under the two-class method		(1,262	)		—			—
Less: Accretion of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		(6,320	)		(3,604	)		—
Add: Credit related to settlement of redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock with common stock		10,066			—			—
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock	$	9,040		$	(11,042	)	$	(1,697	)
Average number of shares outstanding - Basic		16,645			16,116			15,190
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of stock options		927			—			—
Settlement of Series B and Series C redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		4,245			—			—
Average number of shares outstanding - Diluted		21,817			16,116			15,190
Income (loss) per share - Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.54		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)
Income (loss) per share - Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common stock before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.30		$	(0.69	)	$	(0.11	)

As a result of anti-dilutive effects, approximately 1.4 million and 0.6 million option shares for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which had exercise prices below the applicable market prices, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share. Stock options with exercise prices above the applicable market prices have also been excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share. Such options totaled 4.2 million, 4.8 million and 4.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

Prior to the disposition on September 27, 2002, the Company’s Argentine subsidiaries utilized the peso as their functional currency as their business was primarily transacted in pesos. Since 1991, the Argentine peso had been pegged to the U.S. dollar at an exchange rate of 1 to 1. In December 2001, the Argentine government imposed exchange restrictions, which severely limited cash conversions and withdrawals. When exchange houses reopened on January 11, 2002, the peso to dollar exchange rate closed at 1.7 pesos to the dollar.

In order to prepare the accompanying financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company translated the statements of operations and cash flows of its Argentine subsidiaries through September 27, 2002 using the weighted average exchange rate in effect during the respective period.

- 42 -

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with federally insured institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers and their geographical dispersion.

Reclassifications of 2003 and 2002 Financial Information

Certain financial information relating to prior years has been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

(2) Accounting Change

In March 2004, the EITF of the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued EITF 03-6. Under this guidance, which is effective for periods beginning after March 31, 2004, losses for a given period will not be allocated to participating securities unless the holder of such securities has a contractual obligation to fund losses of the issuing entity or the contractual principal or mandatory redemption amount of the participating security is reduced as a result of losses incurred by the Company. As a result of the EITF 03-6 guidance, the Company no longer allocates losses in any given interim or annual period to its Series B Shares and Series C Shares for purposes of calculating earnings per share as the holders of such shares were neither required to fund losses of the Company nor would the redemption amounts of such shares have been reduced as a result of losses incurred by the Company. Earnings per share amounts for the year ended June 30, 2003 (as well as for certain quarterly periods within that year) have been restated to reflect this new guidance as required by EITF 03-6. As a result, basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended June 30, 2003 were both increased by $0.05 per share.

(3) Liquidity

During fiscal 2004, the Company generated net income of $6.2 million compared with net income of $9.0 million in fiscal 2003 and a net loss of $48.2 million in fiscal 2002. Net income in fiscal 2003 included a gain of $12.5 million relating to the disposal of the Company’s Latin American operations as discussed in Note 4. The net loss in fiscal 2002 included a charge of $49.5 million relating to the adoption, effective July 1, 2001, of SFAS 142 as discussed in Note 7. The Company’s operating activities provided cash totaling $14.5 million in 2004, $13.1 million in 2003 and $9.6 million in 2002.

At June 30, 2004, the Company had cash of $16.4 million, debt of $305.6 million and a stockholders’ deficit of $192.2 million. The Company’s long-term debt primarily consists of $149.9 million of 7  ⁷/8% Senior Notes due March 2008 and $152.6 million outstanding under its credit facility due December 31, 2006.

Management does not believe that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to satisfy the principal payment required on the 2003 Amended Credit Facility that will be due on December 31, 2006. Consequently, the Company will seek to refinance the credit facility with cash obtained through additional borrowings or the issuance of additional equity. There can be no assurance that such equity or borrowings will be available or, if available, will be at rates or prices acceptable to the Company.

The Company’s ability to service its long-term debt, to remain in compliance with the various restrictions and covenants contained in its debt agreements and to fund working capital, capital expenditures and business development efforts will depend on its ability to generate cash from operating activities which is subject to, among other things, future operating performance as well as to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, some of which may be beyond its control.

- 43 -

If the Company fails to generate sufficient cash from operations, it may need to raise additional equity or borrow additional funds to achieve its longer-term business objectives. There can be no assurance that such equity or borrowings will be available or, if available, will be at rates or prices acceptable to the Company. Management believes that cash flow from operating activities coupled with existing cash balances will be adequate to fund the Company’s operating and capital needs as well as enable it to maintain in compliance with its various debt agreements through June 30, 2005. To the extent that actual results or events differ from the Company’s financial projections or business plans, its liquidity may be adversely impacted.

(4) Discontinued Operations

Domestic Discontinued Operations

During fiscal 2004, the Company ceased operating in 10 medical transportation service areas as a result of these service areas not meeting internal operational and profitability measures. The Company also ceased operating in three fire and other service areas, one of which was due to the customer filing Chapter 11, one of which was sold, as the Company continues to dispose of non-core businesses and one of which was due to the city converting the service area to a fire district. The results of these service areas for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations.

On June 18, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to sell one of its fire and other service areas which is included in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2004. Net revenue related to this service area totaled approximately $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This service area generated net income of approximately $0.2 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002. Net assets of this service area were approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Latin America

Due to the deteriorating economic conditions and the continued devaluation of the local currency, the Company reviewed its strategic alternatives with respect to the continuation of operations in Latin America, including Argentina and Bolivia, and determined that it would benefit from focusing on its domestic operations. Effective September 27, 2002, the Company sold its Latin American operations to local management in exchange for the assumption of such operation’s net liabilities. The gain on the disposition of the Company’s Latin American operations totaled $12.5 million and is included in income from discontinued operations for the year ended June 30, 2003. The gain includes the assumption by the buyer of net liabilities of $3.3 million (including, among other things, accounts receivable of $0.6 million and accrued liabilities of $4.8 million) as well as the recognition of related cumulative translation adjustments of $10.1 million.

Results of discontinued operations for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003		2002
Revenue:
Medical transportation and related services	$	13,128		$	30,393	$	30,675
Fire and other		3,701			5,450		5,154
Latin America		—			2,388		25,394
	$	16,829		$	38,231	$	61,223
Net income (loss):
Medical transportation and related services	$	(1,108	)	$	3,146	$	1,209
Fire and other		763			925		858
Latin America		—			12,332		979
	$	(345	)	$	16,403	$	3,046

- 44 -

(5) Restructuring and Other

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company decided to close or downsize nine service areas and in connection therewith, recorded restructuring charges as well as other related charges totaling $9.1 million. These charges included $1.5 million to cover severance costs associated with the termination of approximately 250 employees, lease termination costs of $2.4 million, asset impairment charges for goodwill of $4.1 million and other exit costs of $1.1 million, respectively, related to the impacted service areas. The service areas selected for closure or downsizing generated revenue of $11.8 million, operating income of $1.0 million and cash flow of $2.5 million in fiscal 2002.

The previously mentioned charge included accrued severance, lease termination and other costs totaling $1.5 million relating to an under performing service area that the Company had planned to exit at the time of contract expiration in December 2001. During fiscal 2002, the contract was extended for a one-year period at the request of the municipality to enable it to transition medical transportation service to a new provider. In connection with the contract extension, the Company released $0.2 million of previously accrued lease termination costs relating to the extension period to income. The operating environment in this service area improved and in November 2002, the Company was awarded a new multi-year contract. As a result, the remaining reserve of $1.3 million originally recorded in 2001 was released to income during fiscal 2003.

A summary of activity in the Company’s restructuring reserves are as follows (in thousands):

	Severance Costs			Lease Termination Costs			Other Exit Costs			Total
Balance at July 1, 2001	$	1,834		$	3,234		$	1,101		$	6,169
Fiscal 2002 usage		(1,025	)		(1,172	)		(951	)		(3,148	)
Adjustments		(52	)		(548	)		(118	)		(718	)
Balance at June 30, 2002		757			1,514			32			2,303
Fiscal 2003 usage		(29	)		(207	)		(71	)		(307	)
Adjustments		(728	)		(732	)		39			(1,421	)
Balance at June 30, 2003		—			575			—			575
Fiscal 2004 usage		—			(212	)		—			(212	)
Balance at June 30, 2004	$	—		$	363		$	—		$	363

The restructuring reserve as of June 30, 2004 relates to lease termination costs for which payments will be made through December 2006.

(6) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, including equipment held under capital leases, consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
Equipment	$	56,821		$	55,641
Vehicles		76,805			74,715
Land and buildings		16,684			16,715
Leasehold improvements		6,457			6,632
		156,767			153,703
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(116,484	)		(110,693	)
	$	40,283		$	43,010

- 45 -

The Company had vehicles and equipment with a gross carrying value of approximately $4.5 million and $12.9 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, under capital lease agreements. Accumulated depreciation on these assets totaled approximately $4.3 million and $11.5 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company has pledged land, a building, leasehold improvements and equipment with a net book value of approximately $10.7 million to secure certain of its obligations under its insurance and surety bonding programs.

(7) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”) effective July 1, 2001 and discontinued amortization of goodwill as of that date. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company identified its various reporting units which consist of the individual cost centers within its Medical Transportation and Fire and Other operating segments for which separately identifiable cash flow information is available. During the second quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company completed the first step impairment test as of July 1, 2001. Potential goodwill impairments were identified in certain of these reporting units. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company completed the second step test and determined that all or a portion of the goodwill applicable to certain of its reporting units was impaired as of July 1, 2001 resulting in an aggregate charge of $49.5 million. The fair value of the reporting units was determined using the discounted cash flow method and a discount rate of 15.0%. This charge has been reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations as the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

	Medical Transportation Segment			Fire and Other Segment			Total
Balance at July 1, 2001	$	89,598		$	1,159		$	90,757
Adoption of SFAS No. 142		(49,513	)		—			(49,513	)
Balance at June 30, 2002		40,085			1,159			41,244
Disposition of Latin American operations		(77	)		—			(77	)
Balance at June 30, 2003		40,008			1,159			41,167
Impairment write-down		—			(67	)		(67	)
Balance at June 30, 2004	$	40,008		$	1,092		$	41,100

As discussed in Note 4, on June 18, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to sell one of its fire and other service areas. The proposed selling price was less than the carrying amount of the service area, including goodwill. The Company performed a related impairment analysis and recognized an impairment write-down of approximately $0.1 million in the year ended June 30, 2004.

- 46 -

The changes in the carrying amount of other intangible assets during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,462		$	600		$	1,654
Additions		—			1,065			—
Impairment write-offs		(799	)		—			—
Amortization		(238	)		(203	)		(1,054	)
Balance at end of year	$	425		$	1,462		$	600

Other intangible assets are generally comprised of non-compete agreements relating to prior business combinations and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. During 2004, the Company wrote off the remaining balance of a non-compete agreement in the amount of approximately $0.4 million associated with one of its discontinued medical transportation and related service areas. Additionally, the Company wrote off the remaining balance of a non-compete agreement for one of its medical transportation and related service areas in the amount of approximately $0.4 million upon the death of a related individual. This amount has been included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Amortization of other intangible assets for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, are as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	135
2006		110
2007		110
2008		55
2009		1
Thereafter		14
	$	425

(8) Other Assets

Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004		2003
Debt issuance costs (see Note 11)	$	7,375	$	6,177
Note receivable - officer (see Note 19)		1,393		—
Intangible assets, net (see Note 7)		425		1,462
Other		3,451		4,409
Total other assets	$	12,644	$	12,048

- 47 -

(9) Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004		2003
Workers compensation claim reserves (see Note 10)	$	8,391	$	11,959
General liability claim reserves (see Note 10)		25,401		16,036
Accrued salaries, wages and related payroll		11,890		11,433
Accrued interest		5,270		4,370
Other		16,287		16,705
Total accrued liabilities	$	67,239	$	60,503

The decrease in workers compensation claim reserves is primarily the result of the settlement of claims from policy years ending prior to April 30, 2002. Effective May 1, 2002, the Company began fully insuring its workers’ compensation coverage and no longer retains any of the related obligations. The increase in general liability claim reserves is primarily a result of claims in fiscal 2004 offset by payments on current and prior years’ claims.

(10) Insurance Programs

Revision in Classification:

The Company retains certain levels of exposure with respect to its general liability and workers compensation insurance programs and purchases coverage from third party insurers for exposures in excess of those levels. Until December 31, 2004, the Company has established reserves for claims, both reported and incurred but not reported, within its level of retention based on currently available information as well as its historical claims experience. However, as the Company is the primary obligor for payment of all claims, during the second quarter ended December 31, 2004, the Company has determined that it should present its claim reserves on a gross basis along with a corresponding equal insurance receivable. As a result of this revision in classification, the Company has increased its general liability claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $9.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively and has recorded a corresponding receivable from its insurers as a current asset. In addition, the Company has increased its workers compensation claim reserves as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 by $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and has recorded a corresponding receivable from its insurers as a current asset. The Company will continue its past practice of evaluating the financial capacity of its insurers to assess the recoverability of the related insurer receivable. This revision in classification had no impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows from operations or working capital.

General Liability and Workers’ Compensation Programs:

The Company retains certain levels of exposure with respect to its general liability and workers’ compensation programs and purchases coverage from third party insurers for exposures in excess of those levels. In addition to expensing premiums and other costs relating to excess coverage, the Company establishes reserves for claims, both reported and incurred but not reported, within its level of retention based on currently available information as well as its historical claims experience.

The Company engages third-party administrators (“TPAs”) to manage claims resulting from its general liability and workers’ compensation programs. The TPAs establish initial loss reserve estimates at the time a claim is reported and then monitor the development of the claim over time to confirm that such estimates continue to be appropriate. The Company periodically reviews the claim reserves established by the TPAs and engages independent actuaries to assist with the evaluation of the adequacy of its reserves on an annual basis. The Company adjusts its claim reserves with an associated charge or credit to expense as new information on the underlying claims is obtained.

- 48 -

General Liability: A summary of activity in the Company’s general liability claim reserves, which are included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

General Liability

	Gross Claims Liability			Accounts Receivable from Insurers		Net Claims Liability
Balance, July 1, 2001	$	19,715		$	—	$	19,715
Provision charged to other operating expense		2,442			—		2,442
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,724	)		—		(6,724	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			—		—
Balance June 30, 2002		15,433			—		15,433
Provision charged to other operating expense		4,506			—		4,506
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,004	)		—		(6,004	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		2,101			2,101		—
Balance June 30, 2003		16,036			2,101		13,935
Provision charged to other operating expense		7,020			—		7,020
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(5,219	)		—		(5,219	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		7,564			7,564		—
Balance June 30, 2004	$	25,401		$	9,665	$	15,736

Certain insurers require the Company to deposit cash into designated loss funds in order to fund claim payments within the Company’s retention limits. Cash deposits relating to the Company’s general liability program totaled $5.1 million at June 30, 2004 of which $2.4 million is included in prepaid expenses and other and $2.7 million is included in insurance deposits. Cash deposits totaled $2.9 million at June 30, 2003 of which $1.8 million is included in prepaid expenses and other and $1.1 million is included in insurance deposits.

The Company’s general liability policies corresponding with fiscal years 2001 and 2002 were issued by Legion Insurance Company (“Legion”). Legion’s obligations under such policies were reinsured by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company (“Transatlantic”), an unrelated insurance carrier that was identified and approved by the Company. At the time the coverage was purchased, Legion was an “A” rated insurance carrier while the reinsurer was an A++ rated carrier. Under these policies, Legion’s obligation (as well as that of Transatlantic) to pay covered losses commenced once the Company satisfied its aggregate retention limits for the respective policy years. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had met its aggregate retention limit with respect to the policies corresponding to fiscal 2001 and anticipated that it would meet its aggregate retention limit for the policies corresponding to fiscal 2002. Pursuant to these policies, Legion (and Transatlantic) is obligated to fund all claim-related payments in excess of the Company’s retention limits.

On July 25, 2003, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (the “Department”) placed Legion into liquidation. The Department is conducting the liquidation process, subject to judicial review by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (the “Court”). On May 19, 2004, the Department, on behalf of Legion, Transatlantic, and the Company executed an Assumption Reinsurance and Substitution Agreement (the “Agreement”), whereby Transatlantic agreed to assume Legion’s obligations on the policies and be substituted as the primary insurance carrier on such policies. The Court approved the Agreement on May 26, 2004. As a result of the Agreement, Transatlantic will pay 70% of all claims and the Company will pay the remaining 30%. The Company’s portion of this liability, which has been based on an actuarial calculation, has been included in the reserve for general liability claims as of June 30, 2004.

- 49 -

Workers’ Compensation: A summary of activity in the Company’s workers’ compensation claim reserves, which are also included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, is as follows (in thousands):

Worker’s Comp

	Gross Claims Liability			Accounts Receivable from Insurers			Net Claims Liability
Balance, July 1, 2001	$	14,944		$	—		$	14,944
Provision charged to other operating expense		7,318			—			7,318
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(6,338	)		—			(6,338	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			—			—
Balance June 30, 2002		15,924			—			15,924
Provision charged to other operating expense		—			—			—
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(4,669	)		—			(4,669	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		704			704			—
Balance June 30, 2003		11,959			704			11,255
Provision charged to other operating expense		—			—			—
Claim payments charged against the reserve		(3,165	)		—			(3,165	)
Decrease in accounts receivable from insurers		(403	)		(403	)		—
Balance June 30, 2004	$	8,391		$	301		$	8,090

Effective May 1, 2002, the Company began fully insuring its workers’ compensation coverage and no longer retains any of the related obligations. The Company is, however, subject to retrospective premium adjustments should losses exceed previously established limits. As a result of this change in coverage, the Company no longer establishes reserves for claims incurred subsequent to April 30, 2002. The Company was subject to a premium payroll audit of the policy year that began May 1, 2002 which resulted in a refund of premiums of approximately $1.2 million.

Certain insurers require the Company to deposit cash into designated loss funds in order to fund claim payments within the Company’s retention limits. Additionally, the Company has been required to provide other forms of financial assurance including letters of credit and surety bonds. Cash deposits relating to the Company’s workers’ compensation program totaled $6.6 and $6.8 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are included in insurance deposits.

During fiscal years 1992 through 2001, the Company purchased certain portions of its workers’ compensation coverage from Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”). At the time the Company purchased such coverage, Reliance was an “A” rated insurance company. In connection with this coverage, the Company provided Reliance with various amounts and forms of collateral to secure its performance under the respective policies as was customary at the time. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had $3.0 million of cash on deposit with Reliance, which is included in insurance deposits. The Company has also provided Reliance with letters of credit totaling $2.5 million and $3.5 million, which mature on December 31, 2004, and surety bonds totaling $2.6 million and $2.9 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

On October 3, 2003, the Department placed Reliance into liquidation. Under a recently enacted Pennsylvania law (Act 46 of 2004, or “Act 46”), it is the Company’s understanding that cash on deposit with Reliance will be returned to the Company on or before the date that all related claims have been satisfied, so long as the Company has met its claim payment obligations within its retention limits under the related policies. Under Act 46, the Company’s cash cannot be used by the Reliance estate as a general asset but must be used in connection with the Company’s claims. Based on the information currently available, the Company believes the cash on deposit with Reliance is fully recoverable and will either be

- 50 -

returned to the Company or used by the liquidator, with the Company’s prior consent, to pay claims on its behalf. In the event the Company is unable to access the funds on deposit with Reliance or the Reliance liquidator refuses to refund such deposits, such deposits may become impaired. Additionally, Reliance’s liquidation could put the Company’s workers’ compensation insurance coverage at risk for the related policy years; however, based upon information currently available, the Company believes that either Reliance or the applicable state guaranty funds will continue to pay claims. To the extent that such losses are not covered by either Reliance or the applicable state guaranty funds, the Company may be required to fund the related workers’ compensation claims for the applicable policy years.

During fiscal 2002, the Company purchased certain portions of its workers’ compensation coverage from Legion. Legion required assurances that the Company would be able to fund its related retention obligations, which were estimated by Legion to approximate $6.2 million. The Company provided this assurance by purchasing a deductible reimbursement policy from Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd. (“Mutual Indemnity”), a Legion affiliate. That policy required the Company to deposit approximately $6.2 million with Mutual Indemnity and required Mutual Indemnity to utilize such funds to satisfy the Company’s retention obligations under the Legion policy. The Company funded these deposits on a monthly basis during the policy term. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had net deposits with respect to this coverage totaling $3.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, which are included in insurance deposits.

As mentioned previously, the Department placed Legion into liquidation on July 25, 2003. In January 2003, the Court ordered the Legion liquidator and Mutual Indemnity to establish segregated trust accounts to be funded by cash deposits held by Mutual Indemnity for the benefit of individual insureds such as the Company. It is the Company’s understanding that the Legion liquidator and Mutual Indemnity continue to negotiate the legal framework for the form and administration of these trust accounts and that no final agreement has yet been reached. The Company is actively participating in the Court proceedings to cause such a trust account mechanism to be created and to operate so as to fully cover all its deductible obligations as originally intended and to return to the Company any remaining deposit balance once all related claims have been closed. Even assuming such trust accounts are not created, under Act 46 the Legion liquidator is required to first utilize the cash deposits available with Mutual Indemnity before attempting to collect any amounts from the Company. Therefore, based on the information currently available, the Company believes that the amounts on deposit with Mutual Indemnity are fully recoverable and will either be returned to the Company or used to pay claims on its behalf. In the event that the Company or the Legion liquidator are unable to access the funds on deposit with Mutual Indemnity, the Company may be required to fund the related workers’ compensation claims for the applicable policy years, to the extent that such losses are not covered by the applicable state guaranty funds. The Company’s inability to access the funds on deposit with Mutual Indemnity or obtain state guaranty fund coverage could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In fiscal 2003 and 2004, the Legion liquidator ordered the Company’s TPA to forward all workers’ compensation claims related to fiscal year 2002 to the state guarantee funds whom will be administering these claims. The Company has reserves in the amount of approximately $3.6 million and $4.4 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, relating to these claims as well as deposits in the amount of approximately $3.0 million and $3.3 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Since these claims are not in the Company’s control, it may not be able to obtain current information as to the settlement of these claims and to the use of their deposits to satisfy these claims.

- 51 -

(11) Long-Term Debt

Notes payable and capital lease obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
7 7/8% senior notes due March 2008	$	149,904		$	149,877
Credit facility due December 2006		152,555			152,420
Capital leases and other obligations, at varying rates from 6.0% to 12.75%, due through 2013		3,093			4,342
		305,552			306,639
Less: Current maturities		(1,495	)		(1,329	)
	$	304,057		$	305,310

Credit Facility

1998 Revolving Credit Facility – In March 1998, the Company entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility that was originally scheduled to mature on March 16, 2003. The credit facility was unsecured and was unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of the Company’s domestic, wholly-owned current and future subsidiaries. Interest rates and availability under the credit facility depended on the Company meeting certain financial covenants.

Non-Compliance with Covenants under the 1998 Revolving Credit Facility – In December 1999, the Company was not in compliance with the total debt leverage ratio, total debt to total capitalization ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants contained in the original credit facility. The Company received a series of compliance waivers regarding these covenants through April 1, 2002. The waivers precluded additional borrowings under the credit facility, required the Company to accrue additional interest expense at a rate of 2.0% per annum on the amount outstanding under the credit facility, and required the Company to make unscheduled principal payments totaling $5.2 million.

2002 Amended Credit Facility/Issuance of Series B Shares – The Company was not in compliance with the total debt leverage ratio, total debt to total capitalization ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants contained in its credit facility at June 30, 2002. Effective September 30, 2002, the Company entered into the 2002 Amended Credit Facility with its lenders pursuant to which, among other things, all prior covenant violations were permanently waived, the maturity date of the facility was extended to December 31, 2004, the interest rate was increased to LIBOR + 7%, and unpaid additional interest and various fees and expenses associated with the amendment were added to the amount outstanding under the credit facility, resulting in an outstanding balance of $152.4 million. Additionally, the financial covenants contained in the original agreement were revised to levels that were consistent with the Company’s business levels and outlook at that time.

In consideration for the amendment, the Company paid the lenders an amendment fee of $1.2 million as well as issued 211,549 of its Series B Shares. On June 30, 2004, the Company settled the Series B Shares by the issuance of 2,115,490 common shares. See further discussion on the Series B Shares in Note 13.

The 2002 Amended Credit Facility was not considered to represent a substantial modification for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the $1.2 million amendment fee plus the estimated fair value of the Series B Shares at the time of issuance of $4.2 million were capitalized as debt issue costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the amended agreement while professional fees and other related costs incurred in connection with the amendment totalling $1.6 million were expensed.

- 52 -

Unamortized debt issue costs related to this amendment, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, totalled $2.3 million and $3.6 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Non-Compliance with Covenants under the 2002 Amended Credit Facility - As a result of a restatement of its consolidated financial statements for years prior to 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the minimum tangible net worth covenant contained in the 2002 Amended Credit Facility. Additionally, the restatement also resulted in a delay in the filing of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, thereby causing the Company to fall out of compliance with the reporting requirements contained in both the 2002 Amended Credit Facility and the indenture relating to the Senior Notes described below. The lack of compliance with these covenants triggered the accrual of additional interest at the rate of 2.0% per annum on the amount outstanding under the credit facility from May 15, 2003, the original required filing date for the Form 10-Q.

2003 Amended Credit Facility/Issuance of Series C Shares – The Company entered into an amended credit facility, effective September 30, 2003, with its lenders pursuant to which, among other things, all prior covenant violations were permanently waived, the maturity date of the facility was extended to December 31, 2006, and the financial covenants contained in the September 2002 amendment were revised to levels consistent with the Company’s business levels and outlook at that time. The Company also made a $1.0 million principal payment related to asset sale proceeds as required under the 2002 amendment. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the credit facility remained unchanged at LIBOR +7%.

In consideration for the amendment, the Company paid certain of the lenders amendment fees totalling $0.5 million and issued certain of the lenders 283,979 of its Series C Shares. On June 30, 2004, the Company settled the Series C Shares by the issuance of 2,839,788 common shares. See further discussion on the Series C Shares in Note 13.

The 2003 Amended Credit Facility was not considered to represent a substantial modification for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the $0.5 million amendment fee plus the estimated fair value of the Series C Shares at the time of issuance of $3.4 million were capitalized as debt issue costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the amended agreement. Professional fees and other related costs of $0.3 million incurred in connection with the amendment were expensed. Unamortized debt issue costs related to this amendment, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, totaled $3.0 million at June 30, 2004.

For the year ended June 30, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on credit facility borrowings was approximately 8.92%. At June 30, 2004, there was $152.6 million outstanding on the credit facility as well as $2.5 million in letters of credit issued under the credit facility. The terms of the 2003 Amended Credit Facility do not permit additional borrowings thereunder.

7 ⁷/8% Senior Notes Due 2008

In March 1998, the Company issued $150.0 million of its 7 ⁷/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (the “Senior Notes”). Interest under the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on September 15 and March 15. The Company incurred expenses related to the offering of approximately $5.3 million and is amortizing these costs to interest expense over the life of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its domestic wholly-owned current and future subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”). The Senior Notes contain certain covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability to incur certain indebtedness, sell assets, or enter into certain mergers or consolidations.

- 53 -

The Company does not believe that the separate financial statements and related footnote disclosures concerning the Guarantors provide any additional information that would be material to investors in making an investment decision. Consolidating financial information for the Company (the “Parent”), the Guarantors and the Company’s remaining subsidiaries (the “Non-Guarantors”) is as follows:

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2004

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	—		$	15,934		$	438		$	—		$	16,372
Accounts receivable, net		—			57,548			7,800			—			65,348
Accounts receivable from insurers		—			9,966			—			—			9,966
Inventories		—			11,611			127			—			11,738
Prepaid expenses and other		—			8,510			2			—			8,512
Total current assets		—			103,569			8,367			—			111,936
Property and equipment, net		—			40,113			170			—			40,283
Goodwill		—			41,100			—			—			41,100
Insurance deposits		—			9,244			—			—			9,244
Due from (to) affiliates		229,366			(203,312	)		(26,054	)		—			—
Other assets		7,371			4,745			528			—			12,644
Investment in subsidiaries		(122,012	)		—			—			122,012			—
Total assets	$	114,725		$	(4,541	)	$	(16,989	)	$	122,012		$	215,207
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST, AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		—			12,586			1,247			—			13,833
Accrued liabilities		4,492			62,342			405			—			67,239
Deferred revenue		—			18,650			—			—			18,650
Current portion of long-term debt		—			1,495			—			—			1,495
Total current liabilities		4,492			95,073			1,652			—			101,217
Long-term debt, net of current portion		302,459			1,598			—			—			304,057
Deferred income taxes		—			650			—			—			650
Total liabilities		306,951			97,321			1,652			—			405,924
Minority interest		—			—			—			1,509			1,509
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock		222			82			8			(90	)		222
Additional paid-in capital		147,072			54,622			20,168			(74,790	)		147,072
Treasury stock		(1,239	)		—			—			—			(1,239	)
Accumulated deficit		(338,281	)		(156,566	)		(38,817	)		195,383			(338,281	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(192,226	)		(101,862	)		(18,641	)		120,503			(192,226	)
	$	114,725		$	(4,541	)	$	(16,989	)	$	122,012		$	215,207

- 54 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2003

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	—		$	11,362		$	1,199		$	—		$	12,561
Accounts receivable, net		—			49,502			10,926			—			60,428
Accounts receivable from insurers		—			2,805			—			—			2,805
Inventories		—			11,504			—			—			11,504
Prepaid expenses and other		—			7,467			44			—			7,511
Total current assets		—			82,640			12,169			—			94,809
Property and equipment, net		—			42,862			148			—			43,010
Goodwill		—			41,167			—			—			41,167
Insurance deposits		—			7,937			—			—			7,937
Due from (to) affiliates		255,078			(228,366	)		(26,712	)		—			—
Other assets		6,177			5,453			418			—			12,048
Investment in subsidiaries		(157,533	)		—			—			157,533			—
Total assets	$	103,722		$	(48,307	)	$	(13,977	)	$	157,533		$	198,971
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST, REDEEMABLE NONCONVERTIBLE PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		—			12,087			1,691			—			13,778
Accrued liabilities		3,791			56,448			264			—			60,503
Deferred revenue		—			17,603			—			—			17,603
Current portion of long-term debt		—			1,329			—			—			1,329
Total current liabilities		3,791			87,467			1,955			—			93,213
Long-term debt, net of current portion		302,298			3,012			—			—			305,310
Other liabilities		—			181			—			—			181
Deferred income taxes		—			650			—			—			650
Total liabilities		306,089			91,310			1,955			—			399,354
Minority interest		—			—			—			1,984			1,984
Redeemable nonconvertible participating preferred stock		7,793			—			—			—			7,793
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock		166			82			8			(90	)		166
Additional paid-in capital		135,405			54,622			20,168			(74,790	)		135,405
Treasury stock		(1,239	)		—			—			—			(1,239	)
Accumulated deficit		(344,492	)		(194,321	)		(36,108	)		230,429			(344,492	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(210,160	)		(139,617	)		(15,932	)		155,549			(210,160	)
	$	103,722		$	(48,307	)	$	(13,977	)	$	157,533		$	198,971

- 55 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	—		$	500,584		$	47,888		$	(21,869	)	$	526,603
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		—			275,278			2,271			—			277,549
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			75,953			11,315			—			87,268
Depreciation and amortization		—			11,326			78			—			11,404
Other operating expenses		252			100,791			35,681			(21,869	)		114,855
Total operating expenses		252			463,348			49,345			(21,869	)		491,076
Operating income (loss)		(252	)		37,236			(1,457	)		—			35,527
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		35,521			—			—			(35,521	)		—
Interest expense		(29,058	)		(185	)		—			—			(29,243	)
Interest income		—			96			1			—			97
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest		6,211			37,147			(1,456	)		(35,521	)		6,381
Income tax (provision) benefit		—			(305	)		5			—			(300	)
Minority interest		—			—			—			475			475
Income (loss) from continuing operations		6,211			36,842			(1,451	)		(35,046	)		6,556
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			909			(1,254	)		—			(345	)
Net income (loss)	$	6,211		$	37,751		$	(2,705	)	$	(35,046	)	$	6,211

- 56 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	—		$	458,260		$	45,024		$	(18,645	)	$	484,639
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		—			264,953			1,760			—			266,713
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			67,203			9,981			—			77,184
Depreciation and amortization		—			12,490			97			—			12,587
Other operating expenses		1,603			93,155			31,461			(18,645	)		107,574
Restructuring charge and other		—			(1,401	)		(20	)		—			(1,421	)
Total operating expenses		1,603			436,400			43,279			(18,645	)		462,637
Operating (loss) income		(1,603	)		21,860			1,745			—			22,002
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		37,224			12,488			—			(49,712	)		—
Interest expense		(26,655	)		(1,357	)		—			—			(28,012	)
Interest income		—			197			—			—			197
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest		8,966			33,188			1,745			(49,712	)		(5,813	)
Income tax provision		—			(118	)		—			—			(118	)
Minority interest		—			—			—			(1,507	)		(1,507	)
Income from continuing operations		8,966			33,070			1,745			(51,219	)		(7,438	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			2,459			1,457			12,488			16,404
Net income	$	8,966		$	35,529		$	3,202		$	(38,731	)	$	8,966

- 57 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	—		$	432,371		$	36,753		$	(15,973	)	$	453,151
Operating expenses:
Payroll and employee benefits		—			249,146			1,578			—			250,724
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			63,559			7,130			—			70,689
Depreciation and amortization		—			14,322			121			—			14,443
Other operating expenses		—			85,505			27,049			(15,973	)		96,581
Restructuring charge and other		—			(697	)		71			—			(626	)
Total operating expenses		—			411,835			35,949			(15,973	)		431,811
Operating income		—			20,536			804			—			21,340
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		24,812			—			—			(24,812	)
Interest expense		(24,107	)		(404	)		(951	)		—			(25,462	)
Interest income		644			—			—			—			644
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		1,349			20,132			(147	)		(24,812	)		(3,478	)
Income tax benefit		—			2,531			—			—			2,531
Minority interest		—			—			—			(750	)		(750	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		1,349			22,663			(147	)		(25,562	)		(1,697	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			1,522			1,524			—			3,046
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		1,349			24,185			1,377			(25,562	)		1,349
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(49,513	)		(49,513	)		—			49,513			(49,513	)
Net income (loss)	$	(48,164	)	$	(25,328	)	$	1,377		$	23,951		$	(48,164	)

- 58 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	6,211		$	37,751		$	(2,705	)	$	(35,046	)	$	6,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities -
Depreciation and amortization		—			11,760			496			—			12,256
Loss on sale of property and equipment		—			34			5			—			39
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			80,419			11,058			—			91,477
Losses of minority shareholder		—			—			—			(475	)		(475	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,753			—			—			—			2,753
Amortization of debt discount		26			—			—			—			26
Change in assets and liabilities —
Increase in accounts receivable		—			(88,465	)		(7,932	)		—			(96,397	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			(7,161	)		—			—			(7,161	)
Increase in inventories		—			(107	)		(127	)		—			(234	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other		—			(1,043	)		42			—			(1,001	)
Increase in insurance deposits		—			(1,307	)		—			—			(1,307	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		—			50			(527	)		—			(477	)
Decrease in due to/from affiliates		(6,700	)		(28,156	)		(665	)		35,521			—
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		—			499			(444	)		—			55
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and other liabilities		(1,269	)		8,817			141			—			7,689
Increase in deferred revenue		—			1,047			—			—			1,047
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		1,021			14,138			(658	)		—			14,501
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			(8,542	)		(104	)		—			(8,646	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		—			224			1			—			225
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(8,318	)		(103	)		—			(8,421	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments on credit facility		(1,000	)		—			—			—			(1,000	)
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations		—			(1,248	)		—			—			(1,248	)
Cash paid for debt modification costs		(515	)		—			—			—			(515	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		494			—			—			—			494
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,021	)		(1,248	)		—			—			(2,269	)
Increase (decrease) in cash		—			4,572			(761	)		—			3,811
Cash, beginning of year		—			11,362			1,199			—			12,561
Cash, end of year	$	—		$	15,934		$	438		$	—		$	16,372

- 59 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,966		$	35,529		$	3,202		$	(38,731	)	$	8,966
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities -
Non-cash portion of gain on disposition of Latin American operations		139			—			(13,871	)		—			(13,732	)
Non-cash reversal of restructuring charge and other		—			(1,401	)		(20	)		—			(1,421	)
Depreciation and amortization		—			13,131			182			—			13,313
Gain on sale of property and equipment		—			(406	)		(134	)		—			(540	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			74,320			10,726			—			85,046
Earnings of minority shareholder		—			—			—			1,507			1,507
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,038			—			—			—			2,038
Amortization of debt discount		26			—			—			—			26
Deferred income taxes		—			(1,164	)		1,164			—			—
Other		—			(176	)		—			—			(176	)
Change in assets and liabilities —
Increase in accounts receivable		—			(69,386	)		(12,203	)		—			(81,589	)
Increase in accounts receivable from insurers		—			(2,805	)		—			—			(2,805	)
(Increase) decrease in inventories		—			674			(18	)		—			656
Increase in prepaid expenses and other		—			(391	)		(85	)		—			(476	)
Decrease in insurance deposits		—			291			—			—			291
(Increase) decrease in other assets		1,842			(2,757	)		1,041			—			126
Increase (decrease) in due to/from affiliates		(12,290	)		(32,653	)		7,740			37,203			—
Increase in accounts payable		—			977			568			—			1,545
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and other liabilities		476			(3,727	)		2,714			—			(537	)
Increase in deferred revenue		—			908			—			—			908
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,197			10,964			1,006			(21	)		13,146
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			(9,251	)		(149	)		—			(9,400	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		—			1,780			38			—			1,818
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(7,471	)		(111	)		—			(7,582	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations		—			(1,555	)		(14	)		—			(1,569	)
Distributions to minority shareholders		—			—			(914	)		—			(914	)
Cash paid for debt modification costs		(1,583	)		—			—			—			(1,583	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		407			—			—			—			407
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,176	)		(1,555	)		(928	)		—			(3,659	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash		(21	)		—			(21	)		21			(21	)
Increase (decrease) in cash		—			1,938			(54	)		—			1,884
Cash, beginning of year		—			9,424			1,253			—			10,677
Cash, end of year	$	—		$	11,362		$	1,199		$	—		$	12,561

- 60 -

RURAL/METRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

(in thousands)

	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(48,164	)	$	(25,338	)	$	1,377		$	23,961		$	(48,164	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities -
Non-cash reversal of restructuring charge and other		—			(618	)		(100	)		—			(718	)
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,128			1,082			—			16,210
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment		—			152			(437	)		—			(285	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			69,964			7,916			—			77,880
Earnings of minority shareholder		—			—			—			750			750
Amortization of deferred financing costs		726			—			—			—			726
Amortization of debt discount		26			—			—			—			26
Non-cash portion of contract termination charges		—			(107	)		—			—			(107	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			49,513			—			—			49,513
Deferred income taxes		—			(300	)		—			—			(300	)
Non-cash stock compensation expense		73			—			—			—			73
Other		—			(8	)		—			—			(8	)
Change in assets and liabilities —
Increase in accounts receivable		—			(67,533	)		(6,238	)		—			(73,771	)
Decrease in inventories		—			915			33			—			948
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other		(51	)		(2,756	)		15			—			(2,792	)
Increase in insurance deposits		—			(4,492	)		—			—			(4,492	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(819	)		3,861			(1,171	)		—			1,871
Increase (decrease) in due to/from affiliates		46,114			(19,723	)		(1,982	)		(24,409	)		—
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		—			1,571			(118	)		—			1,453
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and other liabilities		2,600			(10,633	)		(1,848	)		—			(9,881	)
Increase in deferred revenue		—			702			—			—			702
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		505			10,298			(1,471	)		302			9,634
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			(6,360	)		(494	)		—			(6,854	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		—			422			600			—			1,022
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			(5,938	)		106			—			(5,832	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments on credit facility		(1,263	)		—			—			—			(1,263	)
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations		—			(1,700	)		(162	)		—			(1,862	)
Distributions to minority shareholders		—			—			(501	)		—			(501	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		456			—			—			—			456
Net cash used in financing activities		(807	)		(1,700	)		(663	)		—			(3,170	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash		302			—			302			(302	)		302
Increase (decrease) in cash		—			2,660			(1,726	)		—			934
Cash, beginning of year		—			6,763			2,980			—			9,743
Cash, end of year	$	—		$	9,423		$	1,254		$	—		$	10,677

- 61 -

Debt Maturities

Aggregate annual maturities on long-term debt as of June 30, 2004 for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, are as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	1,495
2006		1,476
2007		152,570
2008		149,904
2009		15
Thereafter		92
	$	305,552

The Company incurred interest expense of approximately $29.2 million, $28.0 million and $25.5 million and paid interest of approximately $28.3 million, $25.4 million and $21.9 million in the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $2.5 million, which mature on December 31, 2004 and $3.5 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for insurance and guarantees under contracts.

(12) Income Taxes

The components of the income tax (provision) benefit applicable to continuing operations were as follows (in thousands):

	Year ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Current:
Federal	$	—		$	—		$	—
State		(300	)		(118	)		(119	)
Total current provision		(300	)		(118	)		(119	)
Deferred:
Federal		—			—			2,650
State		—			—			—
Total deferred benefit		—			—			2,650
Total (provision) benefit	$	(300	)	$	(118	)	$	2,531

The income tax benefit in 2002 included federal income tax refunds of $0.6 million resulting from legislation that allowed the Company to carry back a portion of its net operating losses to prior years as well as refunds of $1.6 million applicable to prior years for which recognition was deferred until receipt.

- 62 -

The income tax (provision) benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Federal income tax (provision) benefit at statutory rate	$	(2,232	)	$	1,109		$	753
State taxes, net of federal benefit		(191	)		(77	)		(74	)
Change in valuation allowance		3,475			(994	)		1,951
Other, net		(1,352	)		(156	)		(99	)
Total (provision) benefit	$	(300	)	$	(118	)	$	2,531

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	85,019		$	82,906
Capital loss carryforwards		14,630			14,630
Accelerated depreciation and amortization		6,615			10,575
Accounts receivable valuations		5,359			6,335
Insurance claim reserves		10,845			11,382
Compensation and benefits		1,952			2,052
Other		1,778			1,987
Deferred tax assets		126,198			129,867
Deferred tax liabilities:
Partnership losses		(6,606	)		(6,800	)
Other		(650	)		(650	)
Deferred tax liabilities		(7,256	)		(7,450	)
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		118,942			122,417
Less: Valuation allowance		(119,592	)		(123,067	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(650	)	$	(650	)

As of June 30, 2004, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $202 million and $301 million, respectively, which expire in 2014-2024. The Company also had capital loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $38 million, which expire in 2006-2009. If the Company experiences an ownership change as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, its ability to utilize its carryforwards may be limited.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance for the portion of its net deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. The valuation allowance, which totaled $119.6 million, $123.1 million and $124.1 million at June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, was

- 63 -

based upon management’s analysis of available information including the net operating losses experienced in recent years. The Company will begin to release the valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized.

Cash payments (refunds) for income taxes were $0.3 million, $0.3 million and ($2.2 million) during the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(13) Redeemable Nonconvertible Participating Preferred Stock

As discussed in Note 11, in connection with the 2002 Amended Credit Facility and the 2003 Amended Credit Facility, the Company issued 211,549 Series B Shares and 283,979 Series C Shares to certain of its lenders.

The Company recorded the Series B and Series C Shares at their estimated fair value at the date of issuance ($4.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively) with an offsetting increase in debt issue costs, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Due to the cash redemption clauses (as discussed above), such shares were classified outside of stockholders’ equity (deficit). Additionally, the original value of the Series B and Series C Shares was being accreted to their respective redemption values through December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2006, respectively, with an offsetting charge to additional paid-in capital. Series B Share accretion totaled $4.8 million and $3.6 million for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Series C Share accretion totaled $1.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2004.

As a sufficient number of common shares were not available to permit settlement, the Company sought and obtained stockholder approval at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 10, 2004 to amend its certificate of incorporation to authorize additional common shares. The amendment increased the Company’s authorized common shares from 23,000,000 to 40,000,000.

On June 30, 2004, the Company settled the Series B and Series C Shares by the issuance of 4,955,278 common shares. Due to the settlement of the Series B and Series C Shares, as of June 30, 2004 there are currently no Series B or Series C Shares outstanding, and the related rights and privileges associated with the Series B or Series C Shares expired upon the settlement. On September 10, 2004, the Company received written notice from the holders of at least 20% of the outstanding common stock that was issued upon settlement of the Series B and Series C Shares requesting the registration of the common shares issued upon settlement of the Series B and Series C Shares. The Company is proceeding with the registration process required by the registration rights agreement, although no definitive completion date has been established.

The fair market value of the common shares issued to effect the settlement of the Series B and Series C Shares was $7.5 million based upon a closing price of $1.51 per share. The Series B and the Series C Shares had carrying values of $12.6 million and $5.0 million at the date of settlement, respectively, which represented the original issuance amount plus accretion through June 30, 2004. The $10.1 million difference between the fair market value of the common shares and the carrying value of the Series B and Series C Shares on the date of settlement was credited to additional paid in capital.

Both the Series B Shares and the Series C Shares were not convertible by the holder but could be settled at the Company’s option by the issuance of 10 common shares to for each preferred share. At the election of the holder, the Series B and Series C Shares carried voting rights as if such shares were converted into common shares. The Series B and Series C Shares were not entitled to a dividend except if declared by the Board. In the event a dividend was declared on the Company’s common stock, the holders of the Series B and Series C Shares would have been entitled to receive at least the equivalent amount of dividends they would have received had their Series B and Series C Shares been converted to common stock. The Series B and Series C Shares were, and the common shares issued upon settlement of the Series B and Series C Shares are, entitled to certain registration rights. The terms of the Series B and Series C Shares limited the Company from issuing senior or pari passu preferred shares and from paying dividends on, or redeeming, shares of junior stock.

- 64 -

Had the Series B Shares not been settled by December 31, 2004, the Company would have been required to redeem the Series B Shares for a price equal to the greater of $15.0 million or the value of the common shares into which the Series B Shares would otherwise have been convertible. Had the Series C Shares not been settled by December 31, 2006, the Company would have been required to redeem the Series C Shares for a price equal to the greater of $10.0 million or the value of the common shares into which the Series C Shares would otherwise have been convertible.

(14) Stockholders’ Rights Plan

In August 1995, the Company adopted a shareholders’ rights plan, which authorized the distribution of one right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of $0.01 par value Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (a Right) for each share of common stock of the Company. The Rights will become exercisable following the tenth day (or such later date as may be determined by the Board of Directors) after a person or group (a) acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company’s common stock, or (b) announces a tender or exchange offer, the consummation of which would result in ownership by a person or group of 15% or more of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the 2003 Amended Credit Facility, the Company adopted an amendment providing that ownership solely of Series B Shares or Series C Shares (or common stock issued or issuable upon settlement thereof) does not constitute a triggering event under the plan.

Upon exercise, each Right will entitle the holder (other than the party seeking to acquire control of the Company) to acquire shares of common stock of the Company or, in certain circumstances, such acquiring person at a 50% discount from market value. The Rights may be terminated by the Board of Directors at any time prior to the date they become exercisable at a price of $0.01 per Right; thereafter, they may be redeemed for a specified period of time at $0.01 per Right.

(15) Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company established the ESPP through which eligible employees could purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at semi-annual intervals through periodic payroll deductions. The ESPP is a qualified employee benefit plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company had reserved 2,150,000 shares of stock for issuance under the ESPP. The purchase price per share was the lower of 85% of the closing price of the stock on the first day or the last day of the offering period or on the nearest prior day on which trading occurred. Employees purchased 341,430, 570,801 and 559,668 shares of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP during fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, at average per share prices of $0.98, $0.60 and $0.48. The ESPP expired on June 30, 2004.

1992 Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 1992 Stock Option Plan (the “1992 Plan”) was adopted in November 1992 and expired November 5, 2002. The 1992 Plan provided for the granting of up to 6.0 million options to acquire common stock of the Company, direct granting of the common stock of the Company (“Stock Awards”), the granting of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), or the granting of other cash awards (“Cash Awards”) (Stock Awards, SARs and Cash Awards are collectively referred to herein as “Awards”). At June 30, 2004, approximately 962,000 options had been exercised. Approximately 3.8 million options remain outstanding under the 1992 Plan at June 30, 2004. Options were granted as incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options.

Options and Awards were granted only to persons who at the time of grant were either key personnel of the Company or consultants and independent contractors who provided valuable services to the Company. Options that are incentive stock options could be granted only to key personnel of the Company.

The terms of each Award were established by the Board of Directors at the time of grant. Options granted under the 1992 Plan vest over periods not exceeding five years.

- 65 -

Awards granted in the form of SARs entitled the recipient to receive a payment equal to the appreciation in market value of a stated number of shares of common stock from the price stated in the award agreement to the market value of the common stock on the date first exercised or surrendered. The Board of Directors determined such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, on any SARs.

2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”) was adopted in August 2000 and provides for the granting of options to acquire common stock of the Company. At the time of adoption, the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable under the 2000 Plan was 2.0 million of which approximately 372,000 options have been exercised. Approximately 1.2 million of options remain outstanding under the 2000 Plan as of June 30, 2004.

Options may be granted only to persons who at the time of grant are either regular employees, excluding Directors and Officers, or persons who provide consulting or other services as independent contractors to the Company.

The terms of each Award were established by the Board of Directors at the time of grant. Options granted to date vest over periods not exceeding three years.

- 66 -

The following summarizes stock option activity in the 1992 Plan and the 2000 Plan:

	Year Ended June 30, 2004
	Number of Shares		Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at beginning of year	6,130,291		$0.39 - $36.00	$	5.25
Granted	10,000		$1.89	$	1.89
Cancelled	(859,598	)	$ 0.39 - $32.25	$	4.43
Exercised	(278,965	)	$ 0.39 - $2.00	$	0.65
Options outstanding at end of year	5,001,728		$0.39 - $36.00	$	5.65
Options exercisable at end of year	4,538,146		$0.39 - $36.00	$	6.04
Options available for grant at end of year	442,329
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted				$	1.29
	Year Ended June 30, 2003
	Number of Shares		Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at beginning of year	5,198,978		$0.39 - $36.00	$	7.79
Granted	1,697,000		$2.00 - $2.24	$	2.00
Cancelled	(672,216	)	$0.39 - $32.88	$	15.60
Exercised	(93,471	)	$0.39 - $1.50	$	0.69
Options outstanding at end of year	6,130,291		$0.39 - $36.00	$	5.25
Options exercisable at end of year	4,173,976		$0.39 - $36.00	$	7.00
Options available for grant at end of year	265,246
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted				$	1.43
	Year Ended June 30, 2002
	Number of Shares		Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at beginning of year	4,441,668		$1.25 - $36.00	$	11.77
Granted	1,818,000		$0.39 - $0.86	$	0.56
Cancelled	(869,183	)	$0.39 - $33.38	$	14.48
Exercised	(191,507	)	$0.39 - $1.50	$	0.98
Options outstanding at end of year	5,198,978		$0.39 - $36.00	$	7.79
Options exercisable at end of year	3,654,817		$0.39 - $36.00	$	10.48
Options available for grant at end of year	1,750,294
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted				$	0.26

- 67 -

The following table summarizes options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2004 for options issued under the 1992 Plan and the 2000 Plan:

	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.39	644,328	7.47	$	0.39	644,328	$	0.39
$0.44 - $0.86	544,000	7.36	$	0.84	444,000	$	0.84
$1.25 - $1.38	10,400	5.29	$	1.35	10,400	$	1.35
$1.50	849,499	6.14	$	1.50	849,499	$	1.50
$1.56 - $1.89	27,500	7.32	$	1.69	20,833	$	1.62
$2.00	1,404,177	7.90	$	2.00	1,047,262	$	2.00
$2.24 - $7.81	693,750	4.80	$	6.94	693,750	$	6.94
$8.00 - $29.00	572,481	3.63	$	17.76	572,481	$	17.76
$32.25 - $34.50	233,093	2.48	$	32.58	233,093	$	32.58
$36.00	22,500	2.39	$	36.00	22,500	$	36.00
$0.39 - $36.00	5,001,728	6.28	$	5.65	4,538,146	$	6.04

During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded non-cash stock compensation expense totaling $139,000 relating to the modification of stock options for certain executives of the Company’s former Latin American operations. The related charges are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. During 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $73,000 in other operating expenses relating to stock options issued to non-employees in exchange for services rendered.

401(k) Plan

The Company has a contributory retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering eligible employees who are at least 18 years old. The 401(k) Plan is designed to provide tax-deferred income to the Company’s employees in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The 401(k) Plan provides that each participant may contribute up to 50% of his or her respective salary, not to exceed the annual statutory limit, except for highly compensated employees, whose contributions are limited to 4%. The Company, at its discretion, may elect to make matching contributions in the form of cash or the Company’s common stock to each participant’s account as determined by the Board of Directors. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, the Company may also make discretionary profit sharing contributions. Profit sharing contributions are allocated among participants based on their annual compensation. Each participant has the right to direct the investment of his or her funds.

Matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $1.6 million for each fiscal year. The Company accrued a matching contribution of approximately $1.7 million for the 401(k) Plan year ended December 31, 2000. During fiscal 2002, the Company made the decision not to make this discretionary contribution and reversed the accrual of $1.7 million to income. The Company did not elect to make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in fiscal years 2004, 2003 or 2002.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The Company established the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) in 1979 and makes related contributions at the discretion of the Board of Directors. No discretionary contributions were made during

- 68 -

fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002. The ESOP held approximately 3.1% and 4.5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company for the benefit of all participants as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The ESOP is administered by the ESOP’s Advisory Committee, consisting of certain officers of the Company.

In July 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to “freeze” the ESOP, effective June 30, 1999 with respect to all employees other than members of collective bargaining agreements that include participation in the ESOP. All participants’ accounts were fully vested as of June 30, 1999. The Company does not intend to make any contributions to the ESOP in the future.

(16) Commitments And Contingencies

Medicare Fee Schedule

Prior to April 1, 2002, when the national fee schedule began a five-year phase-in, Medicare used a charge-based reimbursement system for ambulance services and reimbursed 80% of charges determined to be reasonable, subject to the limits fixed for the particular geographic area. The patient was responsible for co-pay amounts, deductibles and the remaining balance, if the Company did not accept the assigned reimbursement, and Medicare required the Company to expend reasonable efforts to collect the balance. In determining reasonable charges, Medicare considered and applied the lowest of various charge factors, including the actual charge, the customary charge, the prevailing charge in the same locality, the amount of reimbursement for comparable services, or the inflation-indexed charge limit.

On April 1, 2002, the Medicare Ambulance Fee Schedule Final Rule became effective. The Final Rule categorizes seven levels of ground ambulance services, ranging from basic life support to specialty care transport, and two categories of air ambulance services. The base rate conversion factor for services to Medicare patients was set at $170.54 (which is adjusted each year by the CPI) plus separate mileage charges based on specified relative value units for each level of ambulance service. Adjustments also were included to recognize differences in relative practice costs among geographic areas, and higher transportation costs that may be incurred by ambulance providers in rural areas with low population density. The Final Rule requires ambulance providers to accept assignment on Medicare claims, which means a provider must accept Medicare’s allowed reimbursement rate as full payment. Medicare typically reimburses 80% of that rate and the remaining 20% is collectible from a secondary insurance or the patient.

Originally, the Final Rule called for a five-year phase-in period to allow time for providers to adjust to the new payment rates. The national fee schedule was to be phased in at 20-percent increments each year, with payments being made at 100 percent of the national fee schedule in 2006 and thereafter.

With the passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, modifications were made to the phase-in of the ambulance fee schedule. Effective July 1, 2004, a regional fee schedule component of reimbursement is being phased in with the original national fee schedule. In addition, the new legislation extended the phase-in period to 2010. Under the new rules, the Medicare allowable reimbursement rate will be the greater of (a) the national fee schedule, or (b) a blend of the national fee schedule and the regional fee schedule. For 2004, that blended rate will be 20% of the national fee schedule and 80% of the regional fee schedule. For each succeeding year through 2007, the percentages will increase 20% for the national fee schedule and decrease 20% for the regional fee schedule portions of the blended rate. For 2008 and 2009, the fee schedule will remain at the 2007 mix of 80% national and 20% regional. In addition to the fee schedule changes, a provision for additional reimbursement for ambulance services was provided to Medicare patients. Among other relief, the Act provides for a 1% increase in reimbursement for urban transports and a 2% increase for rural transports for the remainder of the original phase-in period of the national ambulance fee schedule or through 2006. Although the Company expects this provision under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 will benefit the portion of Rural/Metro’s medical transportation revenue that is reimbursed through Medicare, the Company is currently unable to predict the total impact.

Reimbursement by Medicare accounted for 28%, 27%, and 25% of the Company’s net ambulance fee collections for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

- 69 -

The Company believes the Medicare Ambulance Fee Schedule will have a neutral impact on its medical transportation revenue at incremental and full phase-in periods, primarily due to the geographic diversity of its operations. These rules could, however, result in contract renegotiations or other actions by the Company to offset any negative impact at the regional level that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Changes in reimbursement policies, or other governmental action, together with the financial challenges of some private, third-party payers and budget pressures on other payer sources could influence the timing and, potentially, the receipt of payments and reimbursements. A reduction in coverage or reimbursement rates by third-party payers, or an increase in our cost structure relative to the rate of increase in the CPI, or costs incurred to implement the mandates of the fee schedule could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Surety Bonds

Certain counties, municipalities, and fire districts require the Company to provide a surety bond or other assurance of financial or performance responsibility. The Company may also be required by law to post a surety bond as a prerequisite to obtaining and maintaining a license to operate. As a result, the Company has surety bonds that are renewable annually. The Company has $9.1 million of surety bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2004.

Operating Leases

The Company leases various facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Rental expense charged to operations under these leases (including leases with terms of less than one year) was approximately $11.0 million, $10.7 million and $10.5 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002. respectively.

Minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases for each of the years ending June 30 are as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	8,224
2006		7,150
2007		5,689
2008		4,282
2009		3,613
Thereafter		14,438
	$	43,396

Indemnifications

The Company is a party to a variety of agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other parties for certain liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the agreements. Some of the agreements entered into by the Company require it to indemnify the other party against losses due to property damage including environmental contamination, personal injury, failure to comply with applicable laws, the Company’s negligence or willful misconduct, or breach of representations and warranties and covenants.

Additionally, some of the Company’s agreements with customers require the Company to provide certain assurances related to the performance of its services. Such assurances, from time to time, obligate the Company to (i) pay penalties for failure to meet response times or other requirements, (ii) lease, sell or assign equipment or facilities (either temporarily or permanently) in the event of uncured material defaults or other certain circumstances, or (iii) provide surety bonds or letters of credit issued in favor of the customer to cover costs resulting, under certain circumstances, from an uncured material default. With respect to such surety bonds, the Company is also required to indemnify the surety company for losses paid as a result of any claims made against such bonds.

- 70 -

The Company and its subsidiaries provide for indemnification of directors, officers and other persons in accordance with limited liability agreements, certificates of incorporation, by-laws, articles of association or similar organizational documents, as the case may be. The Company maintains directors’ and officers’ insurance, which should enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

In addition to the above, from time to time the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with sales of its securities and the engagement of financial advisors, and also provides indemnities that protect the counterparties to these contracts in the event they suffer damages as a result of a breach of such representations and warranties, or in certain other circumstances relating to the sale of securities or their engagement by the Company.

While the Company’s future obligations under certain agreements may contain limitations on liability for indemnification, other agreements do not contain such limitations, and under such agreements it is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments due to the conditional nature of the Company’s obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under any of these indemnities have not had a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and cash flows or results of operations. Additionally, the Company does not believe that any amounts that it may be required to pay under these indemnities in the future will be material to the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is subject to litigation and regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the resolution of currently pending claims or legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company is unable to predict with certainty the outcome of pending litigation and regulatory investigations. In some pending cases, insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all liabilities in excess of its deductible or self-insured retention arising out of such claims. Unfavorable resolutions of pending or future litigation, regulatory reviews and/or investigations, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Haskell v. Rural/Metro Corporation, et al. and Ruble v. Rural/Metro Corporation: The Company, Warren S. Rustand, the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, James H. Bolin, the former Vice Chairman of the Board, and Robert E. Ramsey, Jr., its former Executive Vice President and former Director, were named as defendants in two purported class action lawsuits: HASKELL V. RURAL/METRO CORPORATION, ET AL., Civil Action No. C-328448 filed on August 25, 1998 in Pima County, Arizona Superior Court and RUBLE V. RURAL/METRO CORPORATION, ET AL., CIV 98-413-TUC-JMR filed on September 2, 1998 in United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The two lawsuits, which contained virtually identical allegations, were brought on behalf of a class of persons who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities including its common stock between April 24, 1997 and June 11, 1998. The complaints alleged that the defendants issued certain false and misleading statements regarding certain aspects of the Company’s financial status and that these statements allegedly caused the Company’s common stock to be traded at artificially inflated prices. The complaints also alleged that Mr. Bolin and Mr. Ramsey sold stock during this period, allegedly taking advantage of inside information that the stock prices were artificially inflated.

On April 17, 2003, Rural/Metro and the individual defendants agreed to settle the Haskell v. Rural/Metro and Ruble v. Rural/Metro cases with plaintiffs, subject to notice to the class and final court approval. Rural/Metro’s primary and excess carriers funded the settlement on June 5, 2003 by depositing the funds in a designated escrow account and waived any claims for reimbursement of the funds subject to final court approval of the class action settlement. After a hearing on the final settlement agreement, the court entered an order approving the settlement and dismissing the Ruble case without prejudice on December 10, 2003. The Haskell case was dismissed with prejudice on January 13, 2004.

- 71 -

In the settlement agreement, the Company and the individual defendants expressly denied all charges of liability or wrongdoing and continued to assert that at all relevant times they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Springborn, et al. v. Rural/Metro Corporation, et al.: The Company, Arthur Andersen LLP, Cor Clement and Jane Doe Clement, Randall L. Harmsen and Jane Doe Harmsen, Warren S. Rustand and Jane Doe Rustand, James H. Bolin and Jane Doe Bolin, Jack E. Brucker and Jane Doe Brucker, Robert B. Hillier and Jane Doe Hillier, John S. Banas III and Jane Doe Banas, Louis G. Jekel and Karen Whitmer, Mary Anne Carpenter and John Doe Carpenter, William C. Turner and Jane Doe Turner, Henry G. Walker and Jane Doe Walker, Louis A. Witzeman and Jane Doe Witzeman, John Furman and Jane Doe Furman, and Mark Liebner and Jane Doe Liebner were named as defendants in a purported class action lawsuit: STEVEN A. SPRINGBORN V. RURAL/METRO CORPORATION, ET AL., Civil Action No. CV 2002-019020 filed on September 30, 2002 in Maricopa County, Arizona Superior Court. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of employee firefighters in Maricopa County who participated in the Company’s ESOP, ESPP and/or 401(k) Plan from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 2001. The plaintiffs amended the Complaint on October 17, 2002, adding Barry Landon and Jane Doe Landon as defendants and making certain additional allegations and claims. The primary allegations of the complaint included violations of various state and federal securities laws, breach of contract, common law fraud, and mismanagement of the Plans.

On October 30, 2002, defendant Arthur Andersen LLP removed the action to the United States District Court, District of Arizona, CIV-02-2183-PHX-JWS. The Company and the individual defendants consented to this removal. On February 21, 2003, the Company and its current directors and officers moved to dismiss the amended complaint, and its former directors and officers subsequently joined in this motion.

On July 29, 2003, the court granted the motion to dismiss, which disposed of all claims against the Company and its current and former officers and directors. On August 28, 2003, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the court’s July 29, 2003 order to the Ninth Circuit. The appeal was dismissed as premature on October 27, 2003. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ remaining claims against Arthur Andersen on January 27, 2004, and entered final judgment. On February 10, 2004, the Company and its current directors and officers filed a notion for attorneys’ fees. On February 26, 2004, the plaintiffs appealed the trial courts judgment to the Ninth Circuit. On March 9, 2004, the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their appeal of the final judgment, and the Company agreed to withdraw all motions that were pending relating to the lawsuit.

On March 5, 1999, the Company made a voluntary disclosure to the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) concerning questionable billing practices by a subsidiary operating in Pennsylvania. These practices evidently began prior to the January 1997 acquisition of that subsidiary by the Company and continued, to some extent, until December 1998. On October 25, 1999, a lawsuit styled THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. RICHARD S. BUCKMAN V. RURAL METRO CORPORATION AND DONLOCK, LTD., Civil Action No. 3:CV 99-1883, was filed under seal in United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit alleged various improper billing practices under the Medicare program, including those practices the Company self-disclosed to the OIG several months earlier. On November 15, 2002, the government elected to intervene in one count concerning the issue the Company self-disclosed to the OIG and declined to intervene in the lawsuit’s remaining counts. The seal was lifted by court order on February 26, 2004. Accrued liabilities at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively include a $1.0 million and $0.8 million reserve for this matter. An unfavorable resolution of this lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Regulatory Compliance

The healthcare industry is subject to numerous laws and regulations of federal, state, and local governments. These laws and regulations include, but are not necessarily limited to, matters such as licensure, accreditation, government healthcare program participation requirements, reimbursement for patient services, and Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. Recently, government activity has increased

- 72 -

with respect to investigations and allegations concerning possible violations of fraud and abuse statutes and regulations by healthcare providers. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in expulsion from government healthcare programs together with the imposition of significant fines and penalties, as well as significant repayments for patient services previously billed. The Company believes that it is substantially in compliance with fraud and abuse statutes as well as their applicable government review and interpretation as well as regulatory actions unknown or unasserted at this time.

The Company has been subject to investigations in the past relating to Medicare and Medicaid laws pertaining to its industry. The Company cooperated fully with the government agencies that conducted these investigations. Those reviews cover periods prior to the Company’s acquisition of certain operations as well as periods subsequent to acquisition. Management believes that the reserves established for specific contingencies which totaled $1.4 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are sufficient so that the ultimate outcome of these matters would not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Nasdaq Listing

Dating back to May 22, 2003, the Company has had periodic correspondence with the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) regarding its noncompliance with certain of the Nasdaq SmallCap Market listing standards. Most recently, on July 12, 2004 the Company received notice from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel that it did not meet the market value of listed securities requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Effective with the open of business on July 13, 2004, the Company’s common stock began trading on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board. On July 21, 2004, the Company requested the Listing Council to review the Listing Qualification Panel’s decision. The Company is currently awaiting a decision from the Listing Council.

(17) Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by the Company using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates may not be indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value assumptions.

The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of notes payable and capital lease obligations approximate the related fair values as rates on these instruments approximate market rates currently available for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair value of the Senior Notes was determined by the market price as of June 30, 2004 and 2003. The relationship between the fair value and carrying value of the Senior Notes was then applied to the amount outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility to arrive at its estimated fair value. The fair value of the Company’s Series B Shares was determined by reference to the market price for the Company’s common stock at June 30, 2003. A comparison of the fair value and carrying value of the Senior Notes and Amended Credit Facility is as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004				2003
	Fair Value		Recorded Value		Fair Value		Recorded Value
Credit Facility	$	132,723	$	152,555	$	121,936	$	152,420
Senior Notes		130,416		149,904		119,902		149,878
Series B Redeemable Nonconvertible Participating Preferred Stock		—		—		2,433		7,793

- 73 -

(18) Segment Reporting

For financial reporting purposes, the Company has classified its operations into two reporting segments that correspond with the manner in which such operations are managed: the Medical Transportation and Related Services Segment and the Fire and Other Segment. Each reporting segment consists of cost centers (operating segments) representing the Company’s various service areas that have been aggregated on the basis of the type of services provided, customer type and methods of service delivery.

The Medical Transportation and Related Services Segment includes emergency ambulance services provided to individuals pursuant to contracts with counties, fire districts, and municipalities, as well as non-emergency ambulance services provided to individuals requiring either advanced or basic levels of medical supervision during transport. The Fire and Other Segment includes a variety of fire protection services including fire prevention, suppression, training, alarm monitoring, dispatch, fleet and billing services.

The accounting policies described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements have also been followed in the preparation of the accompanying financial information for each reporting segment. For internal management purposes, the Company’s measure of segment profitability is defined as income (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Additionally, segment assets are defined as consisting solely of accounts receivable. The following tables summarize the information required by SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”) (in thousands):

	Medical Transportation and Related Services		Fire and Other		Total
Year ended June 30, 2004
Net revenues from external customers	$	452,254	$	74,349	$	526,603
Segment profit		53,994		6,991		60,985
Segment assets		64,199		1,149		65,348
Year ended June 30, 2003
Net revenues from external customers	$	411,399	$	73,240	$	484,639
Segment profit		44,997		7,078		52,075
Segment assets		58,782		1,646		60,428
Year ended June 30, 2002
Net revenues from external customers	$	385,995	$	67,156	$	453,151
Segment profit		47,933		5,626		53,559
Segment assets		62,867		1,594		64,461

- 74 -

A reconciliation of segment profit to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle is as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2002
Segment profit	$	60,985		$	52,075		$	53,559
Unallocated corporate overhead		(14,055	)		(17,486	)		(17,776	)
Depreciation and amortization		(11,404	)		(12,587	)		(14,443	)
Interest expense		(29,243	)		(28,012	)		(25,462	)
Interest income		97			197			644
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	6,380		$	(5,813	)	$	(3,478	)

A reconciliation of segment assets to total assets is as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30,
	2004		2003		2002
Segment assets	$	65,348	$	60,428	$	64,461
Cash		16,372		12,561		10,677
Accounts receivable from insurers		9,966		2,805		—
Inventories		11,738		11,504		12,220
Prepaid expenses and other		8,512		8,498		7,231
Property and equipment, net		40,283		43,010		48,532
Goodwill		41,100		41,167		41,244
Insurance deposits		9,244		6,950		8,228
Other assets		12,644		12,048		8,115
Total assets	$	215,207	$	198,971	$	200,708

Related Party Transactions

The Company incurred legal fees of approximately $16,000 and $138,000 in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively, with a law firm in which a member of the Board of Directors is a partner.

The Company incurred rental expense of approximately $84,000, $69,000 and $69,000 in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 related to leases of fire and ambulance facilities with a former director of the Company.

The Company incurred consulting fees of approximately $89,000 for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, with a former director of the Company.

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an officer, which expires in December 2010. Under the terms of this agreement, the officer was paid a retention bonus of approximately $1.5 million which is subject to repayment should the Company terminate the officer’s employment without cause or should the officer terminate his employment without good reason. The unamortized balance at June 30, 2004 is $1.4 million. This retention bonus is being amortized ratably over the term of the agreement.

- 75 -

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

- 76 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	RURAL/METRO CORPORATION
Date: February 16, 2005	By:	/s/ Michael S. Zarriello
		Michael S. Zarriello Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

- 77 -

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
23.1	Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-76526, 33-80454, 33-88302, 333-2818, 333-07457, 333-62517, 333-62983, 333-64139, 333-68161, 333-49004, 333-61412, 333-76826), the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-39453) and the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-37393) of Rural/Metro Corporation of our report dated September 27, 2004, except for the first paragraph of Note 10, for which the date is February 14, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 8-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

February 16, 2005