United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Certified Shareholder
Report of Registered Management Investment Companies
Investment Company Act file number 811-07736
Janus
Aspen Series
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
151 Detroit Street, Denver,
Colorado 80206
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Byron D. Hittle, 151 Detroit
Street, Denver, Colorado 80206
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 303-333-3863
Date of fiscal year end: 12/31
Date of reporting period:
June 30, 2020
Item 1 - Reports to Shareholders
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | |||||
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | |||||
Janus Aspen Series | |||||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
| |||||
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio
performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned -0.15% and -0.27%, respectively, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2020. That compares with -3.08% for the Portfolio’s primary benchmark, the S&P 500® Index, and 6.14% for the Portfolio’s secondary benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The Balanced Index, an internally calculated benchmark composed of a 55% weighting in the S&P 500 Index and a 45% weighting in the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, returned 1.46%.
INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
During the first half of the period, U.S. stocks faced an unprecedented sell-off, with speed and magnitude of historic proportion. The exogenous shock of the COVID-19 coronavirus ushered in a period of severe economic uncertainty and market volatility as governments around the world restricted travel and social activity to help contain the virus. Contributing to the malaise was a collapse in oil prices when the virus-related drop in demand was met by a flood of supply after OPEC and Russia failed to agree on production cutbacks. Across the globe, central bank and government stimulus action was swift and aggressive. The Federal Reserve (Fed) cut policy rates to zero, committed to open-ended quantitative easing and introduced programs to support bond market liquidity while Congress approved trillions of dollars in crisis support to consumers and small and large businesses.
The staggering levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus provided a backstop that bolstered investor confidence in the second half of the period. Optimism on reopening the U.S. economy further buoyed investor sentiment and U.S. equities rebounded strongly, although volatility remained high.
Investors sought relative safety in U.S. Treasuries, particularly early in the period, and rates fell across the yield curve. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield closed June at 0.66%, down from 1.92% in December. Corporate and securitized credit largely tracked the volatility in equities, with heightened risk of downgrades and defaults causing spreads over Treasuries to widen dramatically in the first half of the period. Fed support helped credit retrace most of its losses. Investment-grade corporate bonds ultimately generated positive returns versus negative returns for their high-yield counterparts.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
Heading into March’s precipitous decline in risk markets, we had been trimming equity exposure – particularly in travel and leisure, energy and rate-sensitive financials – and adopting a more defensive stance within the fixed income sleeve. By late March, over half of the Portfolio was allocated to fixed income, with an increased allocation to 30-year Treasuries to provide some hedge against volatility in risk assets. In the latter half of the period, robust monetary and fiscal stimulus, the reopening of economies and progress in treating the virus gave us confidence to begin shifting the portfolio toward a more aggressive stance. The Portfolio’s asset allocation ended the period approximately 58% equity, 41% fixed income and a small allocation to cash, reflecting our view that equities presented more attractive risk-adjusted opportunities relative to fixed income at period end.
The Portfolio’s equity sleeve underperformed the S&P 500 Index. Stock selection detracted from relative performance, particularly in the industrials and consumer discretionary sectors. Aircraft manufacturer Boeing was the largest individual detractor from relative performance. Boeing’s 737 MAX aircraft remained grounded, and the pandemic could result in long-lasting headwinds for global air traffic and Boeing’s airline partners. We became concerned with the level of debt the company accumulated amid these challenges and closed the position, but the stock gained ground after our exit.
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Chemicals producer LyondellBasell also detracted. The stock struggled given prices for ethylene – a primary product line – are generally tied to oil prices, which fell to extremely low levels during the period. We exited the position in the first half of the period.
Contributing to relative results was our relative sector positioning, including a material underweight to energy – the worst-performing benchmark sector during the period – and an overweight to the strong-performing information technology sector. The COVID-19 pandemic radically accelerated the digital transformation, and companies offering services and products relevant to this shift in technology and capital spending were rewarded by the market. Positions in Adobe and Microsoft were among the sleeve’s top performers.
Home Depot also contributed, benefiting from its “essential service designation” and increased home improvement activity amid stay-at-home orders. Home Depot’s ongoing investment in its online presence also proved beneficial as the trend toward e-commerce accelerated over the period.
The Portfolio’s fixed income sleeve outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
We adjusted our allocations throughout the period to account for the levels of risk and reward we were identifying across fixed income sectors, reducing our credit allocations into the height of the market sell-off and adding risk back to the sleeve as the Fed’s backstop solidified. Our allocation decisions, including an overweight to investment-grade corporate credit, contributed to relative performance. As the period progressed, moving further underweight agency mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasuries also aided results. Modest allocations to high-yield corporate bonds and asset-backed securities detracted from relative returns as they generally lagged other fixed income sectors.
At the issuer level, food services company Sysco was a top contributor, performing well after an attractive new issue was launched in March. However, a position in Continental Resources weighed on results when its credit ratings were downgraded, reflecting reduced profitability and cash flows amid highly volatile oil prices.
DERIVATIVES USAGE
Please see the Derivative Instruments section in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for a discussion of derivatives used by the Fund.
OUTLOOK
Monetary and fiscal stimulus measures have had substantial positive impact on capital markets, and we expect that to continue in the near term – though we are mindful of the potential longer-term repercussions. With this support and the pent-up demand that was created from shelter-in-place orders, we are optimistic that U.S. economic growth will accelerate off its lows in the quarters ahead.
Such a prominent backstop does not yet exist in regard to the health care crisis, creating a delicate balancing act. Uncertainty will remain high as social distancing restrictions are reduced; rebounds in cases and the advent of the fall/winter flu season will surely contribute to the pace at which the economy can reopen. However, an effective vaccine that can be produced at scale could materially speed up the recovery in the economy and positively impact markets.
We also have an eye on the upcoming U.S. elections. We expect political-related volatility to pick up as November approaches and will be monitoring proposed policies that could affect the regulatory and tax landscape of the companies in which we invest.
Despite the risks, we believe the Fund’s tilt toward equities is validated by the fact that equity dividends and cash flow yields generally look attractive relative to bond yields. Within the equity sleeve, our approach remains focused on high-quality growth companies with strong balance sheets and significant free cash flow that should enable them to evolve with a rapidly changing economy and return value to shareholders. In fixed income, we expect bonds across most credit sectors to remain in demand, driven by Fed support and the additional yield available over very low policy rates. While we think investment-grade companies have the strength to better weather a slow growth environment, we remain focused on valuations and diligent in identifying attractive risk-adjusted returns across the ratings spectrum. We are also maintaining our exposure in securitized credit with a focus on higher-quality structures that can withstand the elevated economic uncertainty, believing the Fed’s aggressive actions should help support liquidity and the underlying fundamentals of these securities. As always, we will dynamically adjust the portfolio based on market conditions and the investment opportunities our equity and fixed income teams identify through their bottom-up, fundamental research.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Thank you for your investment in the Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio.
Janus Aspen Series | 3 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Contributors - Equity Sleeve Holdings | 5 Top Detractors - Equity Sleeve Holdings | |||||||
|
| Average
|
| Relative
|
|
| Average |
| Relative
|
| Microsoft Corp | 7.75% |
| 0.67% |
| Boeing Co | 1.23% |
| -0.89% |
| Adobe Inc | 2.89% |
| 0.66% |
| LyondellBasell Industries NV | 0.78% |
| -0.76% |
| Home Depot Inc | 3.02% |
| 0.35% |
| Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd | 0.29% |
| -0.61% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.00% |
| 0.34% |
| US Bancorp | 1.33% |
| -0.53% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.24% |
| 0.27% |
| Sysco Corp | 1.08% |
| -0.50% |
| 5 Top Contributors - Equity Sleeve Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Equity Sleeve | S&P 500 Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Information Technology |
| 1.29% |
| 29.85% | 25.26% |
| Financials |
| 0.96% |
| 10.63% | 11.36% |
| Energy |
| 0.64% |
| 0.78% | 3.26% |
| Utilities |
| 0.20% |
| 0.11% | 3.37% |
| Health Care |
| 0.02% |
| 14.73% | 14.72% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Detractors - Equity Sleeve Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Equity Sleeve | S&P 500 Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Industrials |
| -1.04% |
| 7.90% | 8.38% |
| Consumer Discretionary |
| -0.72% |
| 14.20% | 10.10% |
| Materials |
| -0.70% |
| 0.90% | 2.50% |
| Consumer Staples |
| -0.45% |
| 8.98% | 7.35% |
| Communication Services |
| -0.44% |
| 7.40% | 10.73% |
| Relative contribution reflects
how the portolio's holdings impacted return relative to the benchmark. Cash and securities not held in
the portfolio are not shown. For equity portfolios, relative contribution compares the performance of
a security in the portfolio to the benchmark's total return, factoring in the difference in weight of
that security in the benchmark. Returns are calculated using daily returns and previous day ending weights
rolled up by ticker, excluding fixed income securities, gross of advisory fees, may exclude certain derivatives
and will differ from actual performance. | |||||
* | Based on sector classification according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) codes, which are the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. |
4 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
5 Largest Equity Holdings - (% of Net Assets) | |
Microsoft Corp | |
Software | 5.0% |
Apple Inc | |
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 2.9% |
Mastercard Inc | |
Information Technology Services | 2.4% |
Amazon.com Inc | |
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail | 2.2% |
Alphabet Inc - Class C | |
Interactive Media & Services | 2.2% |
14.7% |
Asset Allocation - (% of Net Assets) | |||||
Common Stocks | 57.9% | ||||
Corporate Bonds | 23.0% | ||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 8.6% | ||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 5.0% | ||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds | 4.4% | ||||
Investment Companies | 2.7% | ||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans | 0.2% | ||||
Rights | 0.0% | ||||
Other | (1.8)% | ||||
100.0% |
Top Country Allocations - Long Positions - (% of Investment Securities) | |
As of June 30, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 |
Janus Aspen Series | 5 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
See important disclosures on the next page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return - for the periods ended June 30, 2020 |
|
| Expense Ratios | |||||||
|
| Fiscal
| One
| Five
| Ten | Since
|
|
| Total Annual Fund | |
Institutional Shares |
| -0.15% | 8.46% | 8.82% | 9.99% | 9.83% |
|
| 0.62% | |
Service Shares |
| -0.27% | 8.19% | 8.55% | 9.72% | 9.64% |
|
| 0.87% | |
S&P 500 Index |
| -3.08% | 7.51% | 10.73% | 13.99% | 9.50% |
|
|
| |
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
| 6.14% | 8.74% | 4.30% | 3.82% | 5.28% |
|
|
| |
Balanced Index |
| 1.46% | 8.66% | 8.10% | 9.57% | 7.87% |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Quartile - Institutional Shares |
| - | 1st | 1st | 1st | 1st |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Ranking - based on total returns for Allocation - 50% to 70% Equity Funds |
| - | 57/685 | 19/626 | 44/516 | 9/209 |
|
|
|
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold. For the most recent month-end performance call 800.668.0434 or visit janushenderson.com/VITperformance.
Performance may be affected by risks that include those associated with non-diversification, portfolio turnover, short sales, potential conflicts of interest, foreign and emerging markets, initial public offerings (IPOs), high-yield and high-risk securities, undervalued, overlooked and smaller capitalization companies, real estate related securities including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), derivatives, and commodity-linked investments. Each product has different risks. Please see the prospectus for more information about risks, holdings and other details.
Returns do not reflect the deduction of fees, charges or expenses of any insurance product or qualified plan. If applied, returns would have been lower.
Returns include reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares. The returns do not include adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes.
Performance for Service Shares prior to December 31, 1999 reflects the performance of Institutional Shares, adjusted to reflect the expenses of Service Shares.
Ranking is for the share class shown only; other classes may have different performance characteristics.
© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information for index definitions.
6 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
See “Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report.”
Effective February 1, 2020, Jeremiah Buckley, Michael Keough, Marc Pinto and Greg Wilensky are Co-Portfolio Managers of the Portfolio.
*The Portfolio’s inception date – September 13, 1993
‡ As stated in the prospectus. See Financial Highlights for actual expense ratios during the reporting period.
Janus Aspen Series | 7 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (unaudited)
Expense Examples
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares only); transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement; and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The example is based upon an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the six-months indicated, unless noted otherwise in the table and footnotes below.
Actual Expenses
The information in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based upon the Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Additionally, for an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in either share class or other similar funds, please visit www.finra.org/fundanalyzer.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as any charges at the separate account level or contract level. These fees are fully described in the Portfolio’s prospectuses. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Actual |
| Hypothetical
|
| ||||
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Net Annualized | ||
Institutional Shares | $1,000.00 | $998.50 | $3.08 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,021.78 | $3.12 | 0.62% | ||
Service Shares | $1,000.00 | $997.30 | $4.27 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,020.59 | $4.32 | 0.86% | ||
† | Expenses Paid During Period are equal to the Net Annualized Expense Ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses in the examples include the effect of applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, if any. Had such waivers and/or reimbursements not been in effect, your expenses would have been higher. Please refer to the Notes to Financial Statements or the Portfolio’s prospectuses for more information regarding waivers and/or reimbursements. |
8 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – 5.0% | |||||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2018-2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.7600%, 3.6740%, 7/27/48 (144A)‡ | $573,187 | $583,372 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2019-5, 2.5930%, 10/25/49 (144A)‡ | 2,629,613 | 2,658,383 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2019-6, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.9500%, 2.6200%, 11/25/59 (144A)‡ | 2,541,237 | 2,573,063 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2020-3, 2.4100%, 4/25/65 (144A)‡ | 3,736,000 | 3,735,962 | |||||
Applebee's Funding LLC / IHOP Funding LLC, 4.1940%, 6/7/49 (144A) | 3,756,000 | 3,296,697 | |||||
Arroyo Mortgage Trust 2018-1, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.8500%, 3.7630%, 4/25/48 (144A)‡ | 775,516 | 796,030 | |||||
Bank 2018-BN12 A4, 4.2550%, 5/15/61‡ | 1,122,676 | 1,319,348 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN17, 3.7140%, 4/15/52 | 2,498,288 | 2,889,274 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN18, 3.5840%, 5/15/62 | 4,251,505 | 4,901,356 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN20, 3.0110%, 9/15/62 | 2,044,338 | 2,261,132 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN23, 2.9200%, 12/15/52 | 3,677,640 | 4,054,341 | |||||
Bank 2019-BNK24, 2.9600%, 11/15/62 | 864,000 | 955,758 | |||||
Barclays Comercial Mortgage Securities LLC 2017-DELC, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8500%, 1.0348%, 8/15/36 (144A)‡ | 2,087,000 | 1,991,700 | |||||
BBCMS Trust 2015-SRCH, 4.1970%, 8/10/35 (144A) | 2,528,000 | 2,780,000 | |||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust 2020-B16, 2.7320%, 2/15/53 | 2,207,000 | 2,389,111 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-IND, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7500%, 0.9348%, 11/15/35 (144A)‡ | 3,054,680 | 3,022,971 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-XL, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9200%, 1.1048%, 10/15/36 (144A)‡ | 4,275,417 | 4,238,567 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-XL, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.0800%, 1.2648%, 10/15/36 (144A)‡ | 693,621 | 681,494 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.2020%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 4,457,000 | 4,649,067 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.6050%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 2,229,000 | 2,226,080 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.8560%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 2,229,000 | 2,125,932 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 4.0755%, 12/9/41 (144A)‡ | 3,343,000 | 3,093,283 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 4.0755%, 12/9/41 (144A)‡ | 851,000 | 755,260 | |||||
BXP Trust 2017-GM, 3.3790%, 6/13/39 (144A) | 1,140,000 | 1,248,281 | |||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-3, 2.7200%, 5/15/23 | 2,701,000 | 2,722,460 | |||||
Chase Home Lending Mortgage Trust 2019-ATR2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 7/25/49 (144A)‡ | 527,739 | 526,578 | |||||
COLT Funding LLC 2020-2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.5000%, 1.8530%, 3/25/65 (144A)‡ | 2,280,121 | 2,292,124 | |||||
COLT Funding LLC 2020-3, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.2000%, 1.5060%, 4/27/65 (144A)‡ | 2,190,000 | 2,175,539 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2014-C04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 4.9000%, 5.0845%, 11/25/24‡ | 520,131 | 538,982 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2016-C03, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.9000%, 6.0845%, 10/25/28‡ | 857,053 | 890,995 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2016-C04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 4.2500%, 4.4345%, 1/25/29‡ | 2,008,683 | 2,059,764 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2017-C01, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 3.5500%, 3.7345%, 7/25/29‡ | 2,723,562 | 2,768,124 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2018-C05, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.3500%, 2.5345%, 1/25/31‡ | 1,668,633 | 1,632,867 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R02, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.3000%, 2.4845%, 8/25/31 (144A)‡ | 1,856,453 | 1,829,084 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R03, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1500%, 2.3345%, 9/25/31 (144A)‡ | 3,854,153 | 3,799,594 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1000%, 2.2845%, 6/25/39 (144A)‡ | 2,625,921 | 2,537,227 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R05, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 7/25/39 (144A)‡ | 5,281,799 | 5,165,579 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R07, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1000%, 2.2845%, 10/25/39 (144A)‡ | 5,609,662 | 5,437,374 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2020-R01, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8000%, 0.9845%, 1/25/40 (144A)‡ | 1,718,457 | 1,707,760 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 9 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2020-R02, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 1/25/40 (144A)‡ | $5,273,843 | $4,980,540 | |||||
Cosmopolitan Hotel Trust 2017, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9300%, 1.1148%, 11/15/36 (144A)‡ | 2,618,339 | 2,506,081 | |||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2018-2, 3.9400%, 7/15/27 (144A) | 1,172,000 | 1,209,225 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 3.7870%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 1,628,693 | 1,670,654 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 4.0210%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 1,025,253 | 1,074,553 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 4.3520%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 1,302,160 | 1,379,700 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 3.0820%, 7/25/47 (144A) | 720,525 | 728,049 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.1180%, 7/25/47 (144A) | 918,450 | 985,856 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.1160%, 7/25/48 (144A) | 3,374,888 | 3,580,775 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.3280%, 7/25/48 (144A) | 2,030,828 | 2,203,007 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 3.6680%, 10/25/49 (144A) | 6,486,405 | 6,806,382 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1, 5.1700%, 9/16/24 | 2,997,000 | 3,055,302 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2, 5.2700%, 11/15/24 | 2,613,000 | 2,672,984 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3, 3.5300%, 12/15/23 (144A) | 719,747 | 729,917 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A, 4.1600%, 5/15/24 (144A) | 1,112,760 | 1,130,244 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4, 3.6600%, 11/15/24 | 1,062,911 | 1,074,526 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2, 3.0400%, 3/15/23 | 1,584,893 | 1,590,290 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.0000%, 5.1845%, 7/25/25‡ | 3,184,387 | 3,260,706 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.7000%, 5.8845%, 4/25/28‡ | 1,614,343 | 1,683,010 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9500%, 1.1345%, 10/25/29‡ | 61,000 | 60,943 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 3/25/31‡ | 4,477,630 | 4,315,216 | |||||
Fannie Mae REMICS, 3.0000%, 5/25/48 | 4,655,964 | 4,997,230 | |||||
Fannie Mae REMICS, 3.0000%, 11/25/49 | 6,731,232 | 6,960,355 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7700%, 0.9545%, 11/25/49 (144A)‡ | 95,841 | 95,752 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.7000%, 1.8845%, 1/25/50 (144A)‡ | 3,914,000 | 3,620,746 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7500%, 0.9345%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 419,844 | 417,230 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 3.0000%, 0%, 6/25/50‡ | 2,004,000 | 2,004,000 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.0340%, 1.2188%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 1,067,000 | 1,021,911 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.3340%, 1.5188%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 1,195,000 | 1,126,544 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.6330%, 1.8178%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 1,332,000 | 1,230,587 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS10, 4.1550%, 7/10/51‡ | 1,603,823 | 1,873,599 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS9, 3.9920%, 3/10/51‡ | 2,669,380 | 3,087,687 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2020-GC45, 2.9106%, 2/13/53 | 2,189,000 | 2,389,396 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2020-GC47, 2.3772%, 5/12/53 | 3,112,000 | 3,302,309 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A23, 4.9700%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 3,537,225 | 3,619,410 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A2I, 3.9820%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 3,537,225 | 3,638,683 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A2II, 4.4760%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 4,975,000 | 5,161,298 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 11/25/49 (144A)‡ | 292,613 | 292,611 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-7, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 1,985,447 | 1,980,999 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-INV1, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9500%, 1.1345%, 10/25/49 (144A)‡ | 1,301,547 | 1,301,517 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-LTV2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 12/25/49 (144A)‡ | 1,380,600 | 1,377,796 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2020-3A11, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1683%, 8/25/50 (144A)‡ | 1,606,833 | 1,635,735 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
10 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares or | Value | |||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | ||||||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2020-4, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.2500%, 1.4401%, 11/25/50 (144A)‡ | $2,030,000 | $2,029,930 | ||||||
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust 2018-1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8500%, 1.0345%, 11/25/51 (144A)‡ | 4,395,333 | 4,385,687 | ||||||
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust 2018-1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.0500%, 1.2345%, 11/25/51 (144A)‡ | 385,333 | 384,639 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UB11, 2.7820%, 8/15/49 | 2,782,000 | 2,948,815 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2019-H6, 3.4170%, 6/15/52 | 1,423,916 | 1,601,300 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2015-UBS8, 3.8090%, 12/15/48 | 2,221,000 | 2,435,507 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2018-H3, 4.1770%, 7/15/51 | 2,249,599 | 2,632,547 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2018-H4, 4.3100%, 12/15/51 | 3,365,443 | 3,988,207 | ||||||
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2018-2, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 6 Month + 0.6800%, 4.5000%, 2/25/58 (144A)‡ | 987,063 | 1,049,574 | ||||||
OneMain Direct Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, 3.8500%, 10/14/25 (144A) | 570,000 | 573,726 | ||||||
OneMain Direct Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, 4.4000%, 1/14/28 (144A) | 566,000 | 584,089 | ||||||
Planet Fitness Master Issuer LLC, 3.8580%, 12/5/49 (144A) | 3,389,965 | 2,904,662 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-1A, 4.5000%, 1/25/24 (144A)Ç | 1,367,908 | 1,379,275 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-2A, 3.9670%, 4/25/24 (144A)Ç | 2,643,480 | 2,657,559 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-3A, 3.3510%, 7/25/24 (144A)Ç | 2,019,560 | 2,017,975 | ||||||
Provident Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-1, 3.0000%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 1,853,515 | 1,897,702 | ||||||
PRPM 2020-1A LLC, 2.9810%, 2/25/25 (144A)Ç | 1,083,614 | 1,073,339 | ||||||
PRPM LLC, 3.3510%, 11/25/24 (144A)Ç | 2,680,846 | 2,664,524 | ||||||
Santander Consumer Auto Receivables Trust 2020-AA, 1.3700%, 10/15/24 (144A) | 3,413,580 | 3,433,656 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-3, 4.2900%, 2/15/24 | 3,056,000 | 3,102,832 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 A2A, 2.0700%, 1/17/23 | 1,989,000 | 2,005,418 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-5, 2.5000%, 5/25/43 (144A)‡ | 2,249,541 | 2,293,824 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7, 3.0000%, 6/25/43‡ | 668,184 | 688,268 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-9, 3.5000%, 7/25/43 (144A) | 320,133 | 329,247 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2019-3, 3.5000%, 9/25/49 (144A)‡ | 699,368 | 714,817 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2020-2, 3.5000%, 3/25/50 (144A)‡ | 1,010,770 | 1,031,564 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH1 A1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.9500%, 2.5210%, 1/28/50 (144A)‡ | 909,950 | 910,361 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH1 A2, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.0500%, 2.6240%, 1/28/50 (144A)‡ | 2,242,143 | 2,222,055 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH2, 3.4070%, 6/25/55 (144A)‡ | 7,964,000 | 7,963,894 | ||||||
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust 2020-2, 2.7180%, 4/25/60 (144A)‡ | 2,059,846 | 2,093,876 | ||||||
Station Place Securitization Trust Series 2019-10, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0848%, 10/24/20 (144A)‡ | 9,057,000 | 9,056,639 | ||||||
Taco Bell Funding LLC, 4.9400%, 11/25/48 (144A) | 769,285 | 814,488 | ||||||
Towd Point Asset Funding LLC 2019-HE1 A1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 4/25/48 (144A)‡ | 1,512,257 | 1,490,027 | ||||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2019-1 C, 3.1600%, 8/12/24 (144A) | 1,635,000 | 1,654,366 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust 2019-4, | ||||||||
3.5000%, 9/25/49 (144A)‡ | 1,667,318 | 1,701,242 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.5730%, 3/15/48 (144A) | 1,139,775 | 1,178,562 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.8840%, 3/15/48 (144A) | 325,650 | 343,664 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.7830%, 6/15/49 (144A) | 2,098,180 | 2,207,136 | ||||||
WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C25, 3.6310%, 11/15/47 | 2,351,000 | 2,552,499 | ||||||
Total Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $275,004,532) | 278,141,360 | |||||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans – 0.2% | ||||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – 0.2% | ||||||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.7500%, 3.4044%, 2/4/27ƒ,‡ (cost $9,485,638) | 9,485,638 | 9,027,197 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – 23.0% | ||||||||
Banking – 4.1% | ||||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.5120%, 3.7050%, 4/24/28‡ | 9,368,000 | 10,587,415 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.0700%, 3.9700%, 3/5/29‡ | 3,294,000 | 3,773,127 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, SOFR + 2.1500%, 2.5920%, 4/29/31‡ | 14,103,000 | 14,917,471 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.7050%, 6.2500%‡,µ | 4,689,000 | 4,853,443 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 11 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Banking – (continued) | |||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.8980%, 6.1000%‡,µ | $2,051,000 | $2,163,805 | |||||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp, | |||||||
US Treasury Yield Curve Rate + 4.3580%, 4.7000%‡,µ | 8,577,000 | 8,920,080 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 2.2350%, 4.7050%, 1/10/25 (144A)‡ | 3,042,000 | 3,366,908 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.1110%, 2.8190%, 11/19/25 (144A)‡ | 2,067,000 | 2,164,743 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, SOFR + 1.5070%, 3.0520%, 1/13/31 (144A)‡ | 5,635,000 | 5,927,702 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.5630%, 3.8870%, 1/10/28‡ | 9,899,000 | 11,156,312 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, SOFR + 3.9140%, 4.4120%, 3/31/31‡ | 6,795,000 | 8,036,364 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 4.0680%, 5.9500%‡,µ | 3,565,000 | 3,529,188 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, 5.9000%µ | 452,000 | 449,460 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9050%, 5.9500%‡,µ | 2,339,000 | 2,322,627 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 3.7500%, 7/1/24 | 860,000 | 924,520 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 4.3500%, 8/1/25 | 613,000 | 678,499 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 4.3000%, 12/3/25 | 2,207,000 | 2,469,449 | |||||
Credit Agricole SA/London, SOFR + 1.6760%, 1.9070%, 6/16/26 (144A)‡ | 1,778,000 | 1,802,446 | |||||
First Republic Bank/CA, 4.6250%, 2/13/47 | 1,653,000 | 1,983,617 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group Inc, 3.5000%, 4/1/25 | 15,092,000 | 16,548,493 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9220%, 4.3696%‡,µ | 8,396,000 | 7,696,613 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, SOFR + 1.8500%, 2.0830%, 4/22/26‡ | 16,792,000 | 17,422,231 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.2450%, 3.9600%, 1/29/27‡ | 8,352,000 | 9,513,324 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.3300%, 4.4520%, 12/5/29‡ | 8,224,000 | 9,859,158 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, SOFR + 2.5150%, 2.9560%, 5/13/31‡ | 13,078,000 | 13,906,867 | |||||
Morgan Stanley, SOFR + 1.9900%, 2.1880%, 4/28/26‡ | 12,644,000 | 13,149,897 | |||||
Morgan Stanley, 4.3500%, 9/8/26 | 3,985,000 | 4,595,283 | |||||
Morgan Stanley, 3.9500%, 4/23/27 | 6,273,000 | 7,060,528 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, SOFR + 1.6000%, 1.6540%, 6/2/24‡ | 5,572,000 | 5,662,233 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 0.7500%, 2.1640%, 2/11/26‡ | 11,255,000 | 11,616,176 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, SOFR + 2.0000%, 2.1880%, 4/30/26‡ | 8,861,000 | 9,161,985 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.1700%, 2.8790%, 10/30/30‡ | 5,182,000 | 5,537,922 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9900%, 5.8750%‡,µ | 4,797,000 | 4,985,858 | |||||
226,743,744 | |||||||
Basic Industry – 0.5% | |||||||
Allegheny Technologies Inc, 5.8750%, 12/1/27 | 4,100,000 | 3,802,135 | |||||
Constellium NV, 5.7500%, 5/15/24 (144A) | 4,159,000 | 4,159,000 | |||||
Ecolab Inc, 4.8000%, 3/24/30 | 2,336,000 | 2,961,635 | |||||
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 3.1630%, 11/15/21 (144A) | 4,380,000 | 4,502,660 | |||||
Hudbay Minerals Inc, 7.2500%, 1/15/23 (144A) | 4,363,000 | 4,297,555 | |||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co, 4.5000%, 4/15/23 | 2,242,000 | 2,408,091 | |||||
Steel Dynamics Inc, 5.5000%, 10/1/24 | 4,065,000 | 4,176,787 | |||||
26,307,863 | |||||||
Brokerage – 0.6% | |||||||
Cboe Global Markets Inc, 3.6500%, 1/12/27 | 2,983,000 | 3,351,501 | |||||
Charles Schwab Corp, 4.2000%, 3/24/25 | 4,685,000 | 5,374,039 | |||||
Charles Schwab Corp, US Treasury Yield Curve Rate + 4.9710%, 5.3750%‡,µ | 15,360,000 | 16,409,395 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 5.6250%, 4/1/24 | 1,553,000 | 1,769,676 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 4.6500%, 4/1/30 | 1,983,000 | 2,370,660 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 4.9500%, 7/15/46 | 2,715,000 | 3,283,081 | |||||
32,558,352 | |||||||
Capital Goods – 1.8% | |||||||
Avery Dennison Co, 2.6500%, 4/30/30 | 5,093,000 | 5,218,761 | |||||
BAE Systems PLC, 3.4000%, 4/15/30 (144A) | 2,256,000 | 2,460,354 | |||||
Boeing Co, 4.5080%, 5/1/23 | 6,065,000 | 6,404,094 | |||||
Boeing Co, 4.8750%, 5/1/25 | 1,957,000 | 2,130,885 | |||||
Boeing Co, 2.2500%, 6/15/26 | 504,000 | 487,191 | |||||
Boeing Co, 3.6000%, 5/1/34 | 5,168,000 | 4,883,553 | |||||
Boeing Co, 5.7050%, 5/1/40 | 4,984,000 | 5,636,549 | |||||
Boeing Co, 5.8050%, 5/1/50 | 2,938,000 | 3,466,558 | |||||
Boeing Co, 5.9300%, 5/1/60 | 2,292,000 | 2,708,305 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
12 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Capital Goods – (continued) | |||||||
General Dynamics Corp, 3.2500%, 4/1/25 | $3,543,000 | $3,929,266 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp, 3.5000%, 4/1/27 | 5,123,000 | 5,867,097 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp, 4.2500%, 4/1/50 | 1,005,000 | 1,305,432 | |||||
General Electric Co, 3.4500%, 5/1/27 | 1,854,000 | 1,901,776 | |||||
General Electric Co, 6.7500%, 3/15/32 | 2,125,000 | 2,601,643 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 3.8440%, 5/1/25 (144A) | 3,563,000 | 3,868,793 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 5.0000%, 11/15/25 (144A) | 6,055,000 | 6,269,045 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 4.2000%, 5/1/30 (144A) | 6,409,000 | 7,139,821 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 4.4000%, 5/1/30 | 3,546,000 | 4,297,758 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 5.1500%, 5/1/40 | 1,541,000 | 2,050,682 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 5.2500%, 5/1/50 | 1,981,000 | 2,848,642 | |||||
Otis Worldwide Corp, 2.0560%, 4/5/25 (144A) | 2,877,000 | 3,015,036 | |||||
Vulcan Materials Co, 3.5000%, 6/1/30 | 2,835,000 | 3,078,588 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 4.4000%, 3/15/24 | 3,516,000 | 3,727,464 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 3.4500%, 11/15/26 | 975,000 | 1,003,646 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 4.9500%, 9/15/28 | 10,832,000 | 12,052,420 | |||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp, 3.2000%, 6/15/25 | 4,854,000 | 4,955,299 | |||||
103,308,658 | |||||||
Communications – 2.3% | |||||||
AT&T Inc, 3.6000%, 7/15/25 | 1,905,000 | 2,115,756 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 5.2500%, 3/1/37 | 865,000 | 1,069,237 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 4.8500%, 3/1/39 | 2,536,000 | 3,057,805 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 4.7500%, 5/15/46 | 1,803,000 | 2,135,120 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 4.5000%, 3/9/48 | 3,645,000 | 4,277,224 | |||||
CenturyLink Inc, 6.4500%, 6/15/21 | 2,658,000 | 2,718,337 | |||||
CenturyLink Inc, 5.8000%, 3/15/22 | 1,479,000 | 1,519,672 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 2.8000%, 4/1/31 | 8,917,000 | 9,034,969 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 6.4840%, 10/23/45 | 936,000 | 1,243,609 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 5.3750%, 5/1/47 | 749,000 | 884,117 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 4.8000%, 3/1/50 | 4,793,000 | 5,432,411 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 3.7000%, 4/1/51 | 4,654,000 | 4,527,218 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.1000%, 4/1/25 | 1,383,000 | 1,519,167 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.1500%, 3/1/26 | 2,206,000 | 2,468,388 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.3000%, 4/1/27 | 3,768,000 | 4,235,575 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 4.6000%, 10/15/38 | 2,000,000 | 2,546,975 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.7500%, 4/1/40 | 1,775,000 | 2,087,863 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 3.6500%, 9/1/27 | 1,958,000 | 2,180,803 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 4.3000%, 2/15/29 | 3,161,000 | 3,667,494 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 3.1000%, 11/15/29 | 4,247,000 | 4,551,695 | |||||
CSC Holdings LLC, 4.1250%, 12/1/30 (144A) | 5,750,000 | 5,700,032 | |||||
Fox Corp, 4.0300%, 1/25/24 | 2,592,000 | 2,873,106 | |||||
Level 3 Financing Inc, 3.8750%, 11/15/29 (144A) | 5,118,000 | 5,396,010 | |||||
Sirius XM Radio Inc, 4.1250%, 7/1/30 (144A) | 6,938,000 | 6,844,059 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 6.3750%, 3/1/25 | 4,820,000 | 4,952,550 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.5000%, 4/15/25 (144A) | 5,114,000 | 5,574,362 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 1.5000%, 2/15/26 (144A) | 1,246,000 | 1,245,913 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.7500%, 4/15/27 (144A) | 12,066,000 | 13,387,227 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 2.0500%, 2/15/28 (144A) | 1,148,000 | 1,148,540 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.8750%, 4/15/30 (144A) | 4,058,000 | 4,522,925 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 2.5500%, 2/15/31 (144A) | 1,557,000 | 1,562,481 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 2.6250%, 8/15/26 | 4,241,000 | 4,614,414 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 3.0000%, 3/22/27 | 2,200,000 | 2,440,130 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.8620%, 8/21/46 | 1,321,000 | 1,795,768 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.5220%, 9/15/48 | 975,000 | 1,288,427 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 13 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Communications – (continued) | |||||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.0000%, 3/22/50 | $1,330,000 | $1,674,338 | |||||
126,293,717 | |||||||
Consumer Cyclical – 2.6% | |||||||
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc, 2.9500%, 1/25/30 (144A) | 1,264,000 | 1,310,275 | |||||
AutoZone Inc, 3.7500%, 4/18/29 | 3,471,000 | 3,943,673 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.1000%, 4/13/25 | 11,477,000 | 12,895,348 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.5000%, 4/13/27 | 5,945,000 | 6,824,627 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.6250%, 4/13/30 | 4,148,000 | 4,851,147 | |||||
Choice Hotels International Inc, 3.7000%, 12/1/29 | 4,189,000 | 4,196,415 | |||||
Dollar General Corp, 3.5000%, 4/3/30 | 3,266,000 | 3,658,377 | |||||
Dollar General Corp, 4.1250%, 4/3/50 | 3,153,000 | 3,762,521 | |||||
Experian Finance PLC, 2.7500%, 3/8/30 (144A) | 10,283,000 | 10,956,731 | |||||
General Motors Co, 4.2000%, 10/1/27 | 1,542,000 | 1,570,952 | |||||
General Motors Co, 5.0000%, 10/1/28 | 4,428,000 | 4,702,384 | |||||
General Motors Co, 5.4000%, 4/1/48 | 1,505,000 | 1,487,452 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3500%, 4/9/25 | 2,570,000 | 2,712,419 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3000%, 7/13/25 | 790,000 | 823,172 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3500%, 1/17/27 | 2,216,000 | 2,292,542 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 3.3500%, 9/1/24 | 693,000 | 692,446 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.2500%, 6/1/25 | 1,284,000 | 1,396,234 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.3750%, 4/15/26 | 2,597,000 | 2,838,209 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.3000%, 1/15/29 | 344,000 | 372,236 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 4.0000%, 1/15/30 | 4,670,000 | 4,643,614 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 4.0000%, 1/15/31 | 1,839,000 | 1,817,098 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd, 5.0000%, 11/1/22 (144A) | 1,475,000 | 1,581,667 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd, 4.7500%, 2/15/25 (144A) | 2,588,000 | 2,898,560 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 4.0000%, 4/15/25 | 5,315,000 | 6,064,782 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 4.5000%, 4/15/30 | 5,499,000 | 6,744,591 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 5.0000%, 4/15/40 | 2,810,000 | 3,650,520 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 5.1250%, 4/15/50 | 3,841,000 | 5,302,014 | |||||
Marriott International Inc, 5.7500%, 5/1/25 | 6,416,000 | 6,992,289 | |||||
Mastercard Inc, 3.3000%, 3/26/27 | 4,422,000 | 5,007,476 | |||||
Mastercard Inc, 3.3500%, 3/26/30 | 5,603,000 | 6,481,725 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.3000%, 7/1/25 | 1,499,000 | 1,665,294 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.5000%, 7/1/27 | 4,713,000 | 5,350,623 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.6250%, 9/1/49 | 2,238,000 | 2,480,234 | |||||
MDC Holdings Inc, 5.5000%, 1/15/24 | 2,249,000 | 2,406,430 | |||||
MGM Resorts International, 7.7500%, 3/15/22 | 544,000 | 553,357 | |||||
Nordstrom Inc, 4.3750%, 4/1/30 | 4,539,000 | 3,560,417 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 3.6000%, 9/1/27 | 90,000 | 101,128 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 4.3500%, 6/1/28 | 696,000 | 811,317 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 3.9000%, 6/1/29 | 4,040,000 | 4,651,686 | |||||
144,051,982 | |||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – 4.1% | |||||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.4500%, 3/15/22 (144A) | 5,518,000 | 5,732,717 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.2500%, 10/1/22 (144A) | 2,482,000 | 2,596,551 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 2.8000%, 3/15/23 (144A) | 197,000 | 204,422 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 2.6000%, 11/21/24 (144A) | 2,765,000 | 2,944,392 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.8000%, 3/15/25 (144A) | 2,964,000 | 3,304,969 | |||||
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc, | |||||||
4.9000%, 2/1/46 | 4,540,000 | 5,553,015 | |||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc, 4.3500%, 6/1/40 | 3,603,000 | 4,103,011 | |||||
Aramark Services Inc, 6.3750%, 5/1/25 (144A) | 8,497,000 | 8,774,257 | |||||
Baxter International Inc, 3.7500%, 10/1/25 (144A) | 4,735,000 | 5,394,733 | |||||
Baxter International Inc, 3.9500%, 4/1/30 (144A) | 4,133,000 | 4,900,157 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 3.7500%, 3/1/26 | 2,874,000 | 3,263,494 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 4.0000%, 3/1/29 | 1,009,000 | 1,154,288 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 4.7000%, 3/1/49 | 1,617,000 | 2,062,094 | |||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, 3.4000%, 7/26/29 (144A) | 1,857,000 | 2,164,295 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
14 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – (continued) | |||||||
Campbell Soup Co, 3.9500%, 3/15/25 | $1,915,000 | $2,152,836 | |||||
Cargill Inc, 1.3750%, 7/23/23 (144A) | 1,379,000 | 1,402,796 | |||||
Cargill Inc, 2.1250%, 4/23/30 (144A) | 2,027,000 | 2,124,315 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 3.4000%, 9/17/21 | 600,000 | 620,287 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 2.4000%, 3/15/30 | 1,946,000 | 2,018,954 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 3.2000%, 3/15/40 | 885,000 | 937,176 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 3.4000%, 3/15/50 | 1,335,000 | 1,438,182 | |||||
Coca-Cola Co, 3.3750%, 3/25/27 | 4,536,000 | 5,200,961 | |||||
Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV, 2.7500%, 1/22/30 | 2,607,000 | 2,757,088 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.1000%, 3/25/25 | 4,998,000 | 5,649,842 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 3.0000%, 8/15/26 | 498,000 | 544,497 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.3000%, 3/25/28 | 3,115,000 | 3,641,722 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.1250%, 4/1/40 | 2,449,000 | 2,888,400 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 5.0500%, 3/25/48 | 2,563,000 | 3,333,869 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.2500%, 4/1/50 | 1,209,000 | 1,454,219 | |||||
DaVita Inc, 4.6250%, 6/1/30 (144A) | 4,493,000 | 4,468,288 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 2.2000%, 11/15/24 | 2,099,000 | 2,206,068 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 2.6000%, 11/15/29 | 1,151,000 | 1,224,621 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 3.4000%, 11/15/49 | 1,481,000 | 1,663,052 | |||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 1.3750%, 9/29/25 | 3,173,000 | 3,228,085 | |||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 2.0000%, 4/29/30 | 2,989,000 | 3,092,633 | |||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 2.1250%, 4/29/32 | 2,398,000 | 2,485,719 | |||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc, 5.0220%, 8/28/23Ç | 1,436,000 | 1,507,800 | |||||
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV, 3.5000%, 1/16/50 | 3,146,000 | 3,245,757 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.0000%, 11/19/24 | 2,378,000 | 2,490,122 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.5500%, 11/19/26 | 3,161,000 | 3,340,338 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.9000%, 11/19/29 | 8,515,000 | 8,865,137 | |||||
HCA Inc, 4.7500%, 5/1/23 | 3,958,000 | 4,294,711 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.3750%, 2/1/25 | 2,189,000 | 2,344,966 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.8750%, 2/15/26 | 1,152,000 | 1,264,320 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.3750%, 9/1/26 | 883,000 | 961,366 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.6250%, 9/1/28 | 1,250,000 | 1,394,262 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.8750%, 2/1/29 | 1,902,000 | 2,152,284 | |||||
HCA Inc, 3.5000%, 9/1/30 | 6,704,000 | 6,455,541 | |||||
JBS USA LUX SA / JBS USA Finance Inc, 6.7500%, 2/15/28 (144A) | 1,271,000 | 1,342,506 | |||||
JM Smucker Co, 2.3750%, 3/15/30 | 2,799,000 | 2,857,117 | |||||
JM Smucker Co, 3.5500%, 3/15/50 | 1,316,000 | 1,357,202 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 4.5970%, 5/25/28 | 5,023,000 | 6,023,656 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 3.2000%, 5/1/30 | 1,004,000 | 1,110,689 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 3.8000%, 5/1/50 | 2,293,000 | 2,615,772 | |||||
Mars Inc, 2.7000%, 4/1/25 (144A) | 1,642,000 | 1,757,524 | |||||
Mars Inc, 4.2000%, 4/1/59 (144A) | 1,714,000 | 2,197,599 | |||||
Mondelez International Holdings Netherlands BV, 2.2500%, 9/19/24 (144A) | 3,844,000 | 4,043,924 | |||||
Mondelez International Inc, 2.1250%, 4/13/23 | 1,460,000 | 1,512,169 | |||||
Mondelez International Inc, 2.7500%, 4/13/30 | 720,000 | 776,584 | |||||
PepsiCo Inc, 2.2500%, 3/19/25 | 3,214,000 | 3,437,914 | |||||
PepsiCo Inc, 2.6250%, 3/19/27 | 994,000 | 1,086,422 | |||||
Pfizer Inc, 2.6250%, 4/1/30 | 1,389,000 | 1,528,050 | |||||
Procter & Gamble Co, 3.0000%, 3/25/30 | 1,184,000 | 1,356,704 | |||||
Procter & Gamble Co, 3.5500%, 3/25/40 | 2,356,000 | 2,841,343 | |||||
Procter & Gamble Co, 3.6000%, 3/25/50 | 1,253,000 | 1,559,846 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 2.5000%, 7/15/21 | 629,000 | 639,868 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 5.6500%, 4/1/25 | 3,781,000 | 4,423,223 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 2.4000%, 2/15/30 | 1,208,000 | 1,193,820 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 5.9500%, 4/1/30 | 8,085,000 | 10,131,076 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 6.6000%, 4/1/40 | 4,697,000 | 6,357,333 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 6.6000%, 4/1/50 | 3,580,000 | 4,917,933 | |||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 3.0250%, 7/9/40 | 1,392,000 | 1,402,614 | |||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 3.3750%, 7/9/60 | 1,392,000 | 1,392,105 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 15 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – (continued) | |||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, 4.1330%, 3/25/25 | $2,746,000 | $3,136,400 | |||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, 4.4970%, 3/25/30 | 6,440,000 | 7,965,976 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 1.6500%, 6/22/25 (144A) | 884,000 | 901,198 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 2.3000%, 6/22/27 (144A) | 1,024,000 | 1,057,146 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 3.8500%, 6/22/40 (144A) | 1,022,000 | 1,096,075 | |||||
227,022,397 | |||||||
Electric – 1.2% | |||||||
AEP Transmission Co LLC, 3.6500%, 4/1/50 | 2,835,000 | 3,272,042 | |||||
Ameren Corp, 3.5000%, 1/15/31 | 11,657,000 | 13,030,734 | |||||
Berkshire Hathaway Energy, 4.2500%, 10/15/50 (144A) | 4,831,000 | 6,050,596 | |||||
Black Hills Corp, 2.5000%, 6/15/30 | 1,743,000 | 1,780,523 | |||||
Dominion Energy Inc, 3.3750%, 4/1/30 | 5,928,000 | 6,557,738 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 1.3000%, 6/15/25 (144A) | 705,000 | 708,865 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 2.0000%, 6/15/30 (144A) | 648,000 | 646,633 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 3.0000%, 6/15/50 (144A) | 942,000 | 940,439 | |||||
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings Inc, 2.7500%, 5/1/25 | 2,601,000 | 2,808,512 | |||||
NRG Energy Inc, 7.2500%, 5/15/26 | 4,447,000 | 4,691,585 | |||||
NRG Energy Inc, 6.6250%, 1/15/27 | 4,756,000 | 4,970,020 | |||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC, 3.8000%, 6/1/49 | 4,242,000 | 5,133,387 | |||||
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, 2.1000%, 8/1/27 | 2,051,000 | 2,025,506 | |||||
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, 2.5000%, 2/1/31 | 4,212,000 | 4,117,651 | |||||
PPL WEM Ltd / Western Power Distribution Ltd, 5.3750%, 5/1/21 (144A) | 2,553,000 | 2,615,023 | |||||
Southern Co, 3.7000%, 4/30/30 | 8,879,000 | 10,133,799 | |||||
69,483,053 | |||||||
Energy – 0.8% | |||||||
Cheniere Corpus Christi Holdings LLC, 3.7000%, 11/15/29 (144A) | 7,836,000 | 8,023,686 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 5.8750%, 1/15/24 | 1,589,000 | 1,777,163 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 5.5000%, 6/1/27 | 1,185,000 | 1,321,606 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 4.9500%, 6/15/28 | 184,000 | 197,560 | |||||
Hess Midstream Operations LP, 5.1250%, 6/15/28 (144A) | 6,466,000 | 6,223,008 | |||||
Kinder Morgan Inc/DE, 6.5000%, 9/15/20 | 133,000 | 134,468 | |||||
Kinder Morgan Inc/DE, 4.3000%, 3/1/28 | 1,871,000 | 2,120,037 | |||||
NGPL PipeCo LLC, 4.3750%, 8/15/22 (144A) | 3,174,000 | 3,273,727 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 5.8500%, 1/15/26 | 1,593,000 | 1,819,061 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 6.3500%, 1/15/31 | 3,407,000 | 3,987,352 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 7.1500%, 1/15/51 | 890,000 | 1,080,810 | |||||
Plains All American Pipeline LP / PAA Finance Corp, 4.6500%, 10/15/25 | 1,223,000 | 1,306,039 | |||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd, 4.1000%, 4/15/30 | 7,412,000 | 8,439,161 | |||||
WPX Energy Inc, 4.5000%, 1/15/30 | 4,829,000 | 4,266,953 | |||||
43,970,631 | |||||||
Finance Companies – 0% | |||||||
USAA Capital Corp, 2.1250%, 5/1/30 (144A) | 284,000 | 292,397 | |||||
Financial Institutions – 0.2% | |||||||
Equifax Inc, 2.6000%, 12/15/25 | 4,708,000 | 5,015,075 | |||||
Equifax Inc, 3.1000%, 5/15/30 | 4,291,000 | 4,561,299 | |||||
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc, 4.4000%, 11/15/22 | 2,938,000 | 3,079,571 | |||||
12,655,945 | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.1% | |||||||
General Electric Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.3300%, 5.0000%‡,µ | 5,540,000 | 4,349,454 | |||||
Insurance – 0.7% | |||||||
Brown & Brown Inc, 4.5000%, 3/15/29 | 2,493,000 | 2,685,965 | |||||
Centene Corp, 4.7500%, 5/15/22 | 180,000 | 182,482 | |||||
Centene Corp, 5.3750%, 6/1/26 (144A) | 6,364,000 | 6,597,304 | |||||
Centene Corp, 4.2500%, 12/15/27 | 5,363,000 | 5,534,133 | |||||
Centene Corp, 4.6250%, 12/15/29 | 8,060,000 | 8,533,686 | |||||
Centene Corp, 3.3750%, 2/15/30 | 3,535,000 | 3,569,325 | |||||
Molina Healthcare Inc, 4.3750%, 6/15/28 (144A) | 12,101,000 | 12,131,252 | |||||
39,234,147 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
16 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 0.2% | |||||||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc, 4.9000%, 12/15/30 | $4,758,000 | $5,924,736 | |||||
Camden Property Trust, 2.8000%, 5/15/30 | 6,129,000 | 6,621,076 | |||||
12,545,812 | |||||||
Technology – 3.4% | |||||||
Analog Devices Inc, 2.9500%, 4/1/25 | 2,815,000 | 3,050,028 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.7000%, 4/15/25 (144A) | 7,427,000 | 8,361,900 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 3.1500%, 11/15/25 (144A) | 6,292,000 | 6,680,247 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.1500%, 11/15/30 (144A) | 5,187,000 | 5,643,686 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.3000%, 11/15/32 (144A) | 4,150,000 | 4,581,284 | |||||
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc, 2.9000%, 12/1/29 | 8,389,000 | 8,964,950 | |||||
CoStar Group Inc, 2.8000%, 7/15/30 (144A) | 5,760,000 | 5,893,148 | |||||
Dell International LLC / EMC Corp, 5.8750%, 6/15/21 (144A) | 5,481,000 | 5,482,644 | |||||
Equifax Inc, 2.6000%, 12/1/24 | 6,943,000 | 7,342,832 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 2.6250%, 11/18/24 | 2,016,000 | 2,146,274 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 2.9000%, 11/18/26 | 1,688,000 | 1,819,529 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 1.8000%, 7/15/27 | 5,872,000 | 5,878,048 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 3.2000%, 11/18/29 | 3,797,000 | 4,121,568 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 2.1500%, 7/15/30 | 2,665,000 | 2,632,567 | |||||
Global Payments Inc, 3.2000%, 8/15/29 | 1,143,000 | 1,224,153 | |||||
Global Payments Inc, 2.9000%, 5/15/30 | 4,310,000 | 4,507,665 | |||||
Intuit Inc, 0.9500%, 7/15/25 | 969,000 | 969,833 | |||||
Intuit Inc, 1.3500%, 7/15/27 | 1,012,000 | 1,016,469 | |||||
Keysight Technologies Inc, 3.0000%, 10/30/29 | 4,569,000 | 4,942,084 | |||||
Lam Research Corp, 4.0000%, 3/15/29 | 758,000 | 900,600 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 2.9500%, 5/15/23 (144A) | 808,000 | 841,694 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 3.6250%, 5/15/25 (144A) | 3,135,000 | 3,416,366 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 4.3750%, 5/15/30 (144A) | 4,468,000 | 5,032,979 | |||||
Marvell Technology Group Ltd, 4.2000%, 6/22/23 | 1,361,000 | 1,462,466 | |||||
Marvell Technology Group Ltd, 4.8750%, 6/22/28 | 7,627,000 | 9,172,776 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc, 2.6700%, 9/1/23 (144A) | 6,452,000 | 6,639,479 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc, 4.2500%, 9/1/25 (144A) | 5,055,000 | 5,096,649 | |||||
Micron Technology Inc, 2.4970%, 4/24/23 | 6,560,000 | 6,812,166 | |||||
MSCI Inc, 4.0000%, 11/15/29 (144A) | 422,000 | 430,440 | |||||
MSCI Inc, 3.6250%, 9/1/30 (144A) | 3,328,000 | 3,311,360 | |||||
MSCI Inc, 3.8750%, 2/15/31 (144A) | 4,798,000 | 4,893,960 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 1.3500%, 6/1/23 | 1,208,000 | 1,233,126 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.4000%, 10/1/24 | 2,178,000 | 2,311,659 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 1.6500%, 6/1/25 | 2,243,000 | 2,321,717 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.6500%, 10/1/26 | 6,511,000 | 7,075,708 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.3000%, 6/1/30 | 2,592,000 | 2,693,597 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 3.2500%, 6/1/50 | 3,571,000 | 3,888,464 | |||||
Total System Services Inc, 4.8000%, 4/1/26 | 3,189,000 | 3,739,232 | |||||
Trimble Inc, 4.7500%, 12/1/24 | 5,510,000 | 5,994,383 | |||||
Trimble Inc, 4.9000%, 6/15/28 | 9,681,000 | 11,110,478 | |||||
Verisk Analytics Inc, 5.5000%, 6/15/45 | 1,616,000 | 2,215,478 | |||||
Verisk Analytics Inc, 3.6250%, 5/15/50 | 2,972,000 | 3,366,706 | |||||
VMware Inc, 4.5000%, 5/15/25 | 5,017,000 | 5,489,062 | |||||
VMware Inc, 4.6500%, 5/15/27 | 5,629,000 | 6,225,422 | |||||
190,934,876 | |||||||
Transportation – 0.2% | |||||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 3.9000%, 4/1/25 | 2,989,000 | 3,393,091 | |||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 5.2000%, 4/1/40 | 1,707,000 | 2,356,023 | |||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 5.3000%, 4/1/50 | 3,690,000 | 5,271,947 | |||||
11,021,061 | |||||||
Water Utilities – 0.2% | |||||||
American Water Capital Corp, 2.8000%, 5/1/30 | 3,746,000 | 4,072,914 | |||||
American Water Capital Corp, 3.4500%, 5/1/50 | 4,451,000 | 5,000,750 | |||||
9,073,664 | |||||||
Total Corporate Bonds (cost $1,184,876,680) | 1,279,847,753 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 17 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – 8.6% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
2.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | $2,625,400 | $2,709,387 | |||||
2.5000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 8,099,200 | 8,463,988 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 1,845,800 | 1,939,345 | |||||
3.5000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 5,925,619 | 6,221,959 | |||||
4.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 1,692,784 | 1,790,119 | |||||
2.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 365,600 | 373,058 | |||||
2.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 1,340,000 | 1,393,546 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 6,813,400 | 7,159,316 | |||||
3.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 26,051,209 | 27,392,846 | |||||
4.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 1,358,000 | 1,458,899 | |||||
58,902,463 | |||||||
Fannie Mae Pool: | |||||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | 758,858 | 801,898 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 469,705 | 496,302 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/34 | 278,396 | 296,873 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/34 | 270,254 | 287,922 | |||||
6.0000%, 2/1/37 | 97,494 | 117,094 | |||||
4.5000%, 11/1/42 | 597,127 | 666,700 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/42 | 2,508,675 | 2,717,684 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/43 | 316,468 | 338,306 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/43 | 92,465 | 98,734 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/43 | 1,166,005 | 1,261,064 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/43 | 1,833,320 | 1,982,782 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/43 | 6,478,814 | 7,006,999 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/43 | 4,139,750 | 4,377,694 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/43 | 659,883 | 704,492 | |||||
3.5000%, 11/1/43 | 3,536,707 | 3,831,366 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/44 | 1,206,462 | 1,330,616 | |||||
5.0000%, 7/1/44 | 77,793 | 86,815 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/44 | 1,351,686 | 1,539,185 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/45 | 965,450 | 1,044,158 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/45 | 2,109,467 | 2,402,080 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/45 | 1,264,631 | 1,409,726 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/45 | 850,924 | 937,293 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/46 | 158,291 | 167,389 | |||||
4.5000%, 2/1/46 | 2,954,334 | 3,298,553 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 1,551,094 | 1,689,962 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/46 | 8,621,584 | 9,215,832 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/47 | 28,648,405 | 30,623,014 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/47 | 2,782,604 | 2,979,302 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 443,866 | 492,911 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 400,713 | 438,917 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 393,855 | 433,265 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 280,823 | 307,597 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 271,274 | 301,249 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 210,572 | 231,642 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 133,637 | 147,009 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 93,148 | 103,440 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 92,106 | 102,283 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 370,380 | 394,736 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 202,386 | 217,010 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 173,674 | 185,094 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 88,321 | 94,703 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/47 | 1,872,460 | 2,019,091 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/47 | 151,789 | 168,561 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 304,238 | 324,245 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 298,772 | 318,419 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 96,484 | 102,829 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 62,106 | 66,190 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
18 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Fannie Mae Pool – (continued) | |||||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | $1,369,918 | $1,477,195 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | 961,957 | 1,037,288 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | 853,597 | 920,442 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/47 | 1,357,463 | 1,453,157 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/47 | 754,337 | 795,995 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/47 | 442,785 | 489,392 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/1/47 | 613,943 | 654,316 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/1/47 | 347,292 | 370,130 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/1/47 | 1,418,653 | 1,529,747 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/1/47 | 176,211 | 190,579 | |||||
4.0000%, 9/1/47 | 152,907 | 164,880 | |||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | 1,356,608 | 1,462,843 | |||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | 797,217 | 859,646 | |||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | 521,457 | 562,292 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 825,485 | 879,769 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 634,698 | 684,399 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 596,320 | 643,015 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 469,753 | 500,644 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 419,017 | 451,828 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/47 | 156,053 | 168,273 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/47 | 112,576 | 121,392 | |||||
4.0000%, 11/1/47 | 990,183 | 1,055,297 | |||||
4.0000%, 11/1/47 | 354,119 | 377,406 | |||||
4.5000%, 11/1/47 | 901,731 | 972,345 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 2,339,996 | 2,497,964 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 1,040,262 | 1,103,070 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 261,007 | 288,481 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 123,853 | 136,890 | |||||
4.0000%, 12/1/47 | 1,311,145 | 1,397,366 | |||||
3.5000%, 1/1/48 | 1,724,173 | 1,844,194 | |||||
3.5000%, 1/1/48 | 1,688,375 | 1,802,354 | |||||
4.0000%, 1/1/48 | 6,812,495 | 7,327,635 | |||||
4.0000%, 1/1/48 | 6,079,897 | 6,567,004 | |||||
4.0000%, 1/1/48 | 444,673 | 473,915 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/48 | 1,181,536 | 1,272,835 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/48 | 1,119,036 | 1,192,510 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/48 | 182,471 | 200,691 | |||||
4.0000%, 3/1/48 | 2,284,290 | 2,459,997 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/48 | 1,197,336 | 1,289,526 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/48 | 88,296 | 95,201 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/48 | 2,108,225 | 2,309,911 | |||||
4.5000%, 4/1/48 | 1,322,233 | 1,424,039 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/48 | 645,681 | 684,656 | |||||
4.0000%, 5/1/48 | 2,302,037 | 2,436,406 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/48 | 809,449 | 871,773 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/48 | 748,387 | 806,010 | |||||
5.0000%, 5/1/48 | 2,011,247 | 2,195,938 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/48 | 1,392,313 | 1,499,515 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/48 | 824,451 | 887,930 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/1/48 | 79,358 | 85,249 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/48 | 3,697,565 | 3,901,090 | |||||
3.5000%, 11/1/48 | 3,491,491 | 3,825,508 | |||||
4.0000%, 2/1/49 | 1,258,443 | 1,331,897 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/49 | 1,696,980 | 1,783,267 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/49 | 1,592,892 | 1,707,200 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/49 | 308,892 | 328,363 | |||||
4.0000%, 9/1/49 | 2,740,611 | 2,975,502 | |||||
2.5000%, 1/1/50 | 663,797 | 697,079 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 1,482,436 | 1,561,801 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 19 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Fannie Mae Pool – (continued) | |||||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | $19,378,461 | $20,440,128 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/56 | 4,702,176 | 5,112,232 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/57 | 4,409,341 | 4,725,927 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/57 | 9,094,646 | 9,956,048 | |||||
3.0000%, 6/1/57 | 81,174 | 86,965 | |||||
207,565,363 | |||||||
Freddie Mac Gold Pool: | |||||||
6.0000%, 4/1/40 | 1,627,652 | 1,960,860 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/42 | 315,687 | 342,072 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/42 | 386,087 | 418,355 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/42 | 337,898 | 366,139 | |||||
3.0000%, 6/1/43 | 460,748 | 484,909 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/44 | 533,843 | 595,319 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 7,429,902 | 8,185,900 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/46 | 516,036 | 544,531 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/47 | 249,549 | 271,927 | |||||
3.5000%, 9/1/47 | 5,232,436 | 5,522,480 | |||||
3.5000%, 9/1/47 | 2,712,615 | 2,863,076 | |||||
3.5000%, 9/1/47 | 886,210 | 935,365 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 3,672,955 | 3,981,673 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/48 | 80,946 | 86,974 | |||||
5.0000%, 9/1/48 | 325,089 | 357,013 | |||||
26,916,593 | |||||||
Freddie Mac Pool: | |||||||
3.0000%, 5/1/31 | 6,495,256 | 6,877,587 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/32 | 1,417,403 | 1,501,675 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/32 | 755,236 | 794,606 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/33 | 815,729 | 864,228 | |||||
2.5000%, 12/1/33 | 7,312,791 | 7,667,873 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | 1,402,434 | 1,487,702 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | 571,307 | 603,710 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 1,973,638 | 2,085,397 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 382,305 | 403,953 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/43 | 1,018,411 | 1,101,280 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/43 | 3,225,091 | 3,447,211 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/44 | 1,036,349 | 1,120,678 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/44 | 6,660,649 | 7,202,631 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/45 | 2,096,815 | 2,223,390 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/46 | 216,587 | 235,170 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 1,479,716 | 1,606,847 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/46 | 3,339,792 | 3,551,651 | |||||
4.0000%, 3/1/47 | 654,191 | 710,900 | |||||
3.0000%, 4/1/47 | 801,514 | 845,632 | |||||
3.5000%, 11/1/47 | 2,086,821 | 2,227,477 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 1,585,672 | 1,692,549 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/48 | 1,638,175 | 1,745,674 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/48 | 1,469,256 | 1,561,674 | |||||
4.0000%, 3/1/48 | 1,681,781 | 1,810,655 | |||||
4.0000%, 4/1/48 | 3,608,268 | 3,813,830 | |||||
4.0000%, 4/1/48 | 1,854,172 | 1,988,602 | |||||
4.0000%, 5/1/48 | 3,495,539 | 3,698,803 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/48 | 762,732 | 822,275 | |||||
4.5000%, 12/1/48 | 1,349,729 | 1,487,120 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/49 | 1,429,571 | 1,517,814 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/49 | 510,546 | 547,184 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/49 | 514,613 | 540,780 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/49 | 310,233 | 326,007 | |||||
3.5000%, 9/1/49 | 850,196 | 899,394 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 1,400,568 | 1,474,017 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
20 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Freddie Mac Pool – (continued) | |||||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | $1,303,341 | $1,374,571 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 845,906 | 890,267 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 478,790 | 504,957 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 1,708,389 | 1,797,982 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 1,230,196 | 1,294,711 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 1,018,024 | 1,071,412 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 665,254 | 701,612 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 1,621,898 | 1,706,955 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 996,177 | 1,048,420 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 913,605 | 961,517 | |||||
2.5000%, 1/1/50 | 309,419 | 324,933 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 2,740,678 | 2,890,460 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 278,264 | 293,733 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/50 | 764,379 | 806,870 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | 1,111,354 | 1,172,888 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | 1,089,692 | 1,149,392 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/50 | 626,418 | 668,375 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/50 | 5,451,534 | 5,756,540 | |||||
94,901,571 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae: | |||||||
2.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 20,540,500 | 21,562,595 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 3,638,300 | 3,844,592 | |||||
4.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 390,000 | 416,247 | |||||
25,823,434 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae I Pool: | |||||||
4.0000%, 1/15/45 | 6,413,811 | 6,985,201 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/15/46 | 6,717,070 | 7,449,800 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/15/47 | 1,786,197 | 1,943,267 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/15/47 | 399,094 | 434,188 | |||||
4.0000%, 11/15/47 | 737,946 | 802,837 | |||||
4.0000%, 12/15/47 | 933,445 | 1,015,527 | |||||
18,630,820 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae II Pool: | |||||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 669,377 | 720,739 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 170,187 | 185,964 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 91,318 | 98,325 | |||||
4.5000%, 2/20/48 | 1,083,342 | 1,168,817 | |||||
4.0000%, 5/20/48 | 601,473 | 641,950 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/20/48 | 3,356,387 | 3,609,297 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/20/48 | 491,803 | 528,862 | |||||
5.0000%, 5/20/48 | 5,578,574 | 6,081,955 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/20/48 | 6,003,622 | 6,407,651 | |||||
5.0000%, 6/20/48 | 2,626,458 | 2,863,456 | |||||
5.0000%, 8/20/48 | 4,481,226 | 4,859,079 | |||||
5.0000%, 4/20/49 | 14,920,873 | 16,178,984 | |||||
43,345,079 | |||||||
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $461,320,449) | 476,085,323 | ||||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds – 4.4% | |||||||
1.5000%, 9/15/22 | 21,241,300 | 21,869,412 | |||||
2.8750%, 11/30/23 | 12,934,000 | 14,110,186 | |||||
0.5000%, 3/31/25 | 25,464,500 | 25,735,060 | |||||
0.2500%, 6/30/25 | 21,237,000 | 21,195,522 | |||||
1.5000%, 2/15/30 | 14,744,700 | 15,937,523 | |||||
0.6250%, 5/15/30 | 8,195,400 | 8,170,430 | |||||
1.1250%, 5/15/40 | 1,108,000 | 1,097,526 | |||||
2.7500%, 8/15/42 | 40,320,100 | 51,680,603 | |||||
2.3750%, 11/15/49 | 23,605,700 | 29,141,052 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 21 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
2.0000%, 2/15/50 | $51,211,500 | $58,617,163 | |||||
Total United States Treasury Notes/Bonds (cost $237,820,929) | 247,554,477 | ||||||
Common Stocks – 57.9% | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.1% | |||||||
General Dynamics Corp | 410,009 | 61,279,945 | |||||
Air Freight & Logistics – 0.4% | |||||||
United Parcel Service Inc | 195,968 | 21,787,722 | |||||
Banks – 1.1% | |||||||
Bank of America Corp | 1,594,277 | 37,864,079 | |||||
US Bancorp | 665,453 | 24,501,979 | |||||
62,366,058 | |||||||
Beverages – 0.7% | |||||||
Monster Beverage Corp* | 534,019 | 37,018,197 | |||||
Biotechnology – 0.7% | |||||||
AbbVie Inc | 385,216 | 37,820,507 | |||||
Capital Markets – 2.7% | |||||||
Apollo Global Management Inc | 136,039 | 6,791,067 | |||||
Blackstone Group Inc | 853,030 | 48,332,680 | |||||
CME Group Inc | 244,853 | 39,798,407 | |||||
Morgan Stanley | 835,613 | 40,360,108 | |||||
S&P Global Inc | 49,485 | 16,304,318 | |||||
151,586,580 | |||||||
Chemicals – 0.4% | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co | 39,662 | 22,918,687 | |||||
Consumer Finance – 0.8% | |||||||
American Express Co | 338,197 | 32,196,354 | |||||
Synchrony Financial | 497,893 | 11,033,309 | |||||
43,229,663 | |||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.4% | |||||||
Corning Inc | 794,978 | 20,589,930 | |||||
Entertainment – 0.7% | |||||||
Walt Disney Co | 329,234 | 36,712,883 | |||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 1.0% | |||||||
Crown Castle International Corp | 219,188 | 36,681,112 | |||||
MGM Growth Properties LLC | 653,015 | 17,768,538 | |||||
54,449,650 | |||||||
Food & Staples Retailing – 1.4% | |||||||
Costco Wholesale Corp | 210,414 | 63,799,629 | |||||
Sysco Corp | 261,009 | 14,266,752 | |||||
78,066,381 | |||||||
Food Products – 0.5% | |||||||
Hershey Co | 194,107 | 25,160,149 | |||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.2% | |||||||
Abbott Laboratories | 636,088 | 58,157,526 | |||||
Intuitive Surgical Inc* | 21,647 | 12,335,110 | |||||
Medtronic PLC | 380,317 | 34,875,069 | |||||
Stryker Corp | 80,697 | 14,540,792 | |||||
119,908,497 | |||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.0% | |||||||
UnitedHealth Group Inc | 380,087 | 112,106,661 | |||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.3% | |||||||
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | 329,346 | 24,190,464 | |||||
McDonald's Corp | 419,995 | 77,476,478 | |||||
Starbucks Corp | 379,825 | 27,951,322 | |||||
129,618,264 | |||||||
Household Products – 1.1% | |||||||
Clorox Co | 66,954 | 14,687,699 | |||||
Procter & Gamble Co | 383,889 | 45,901,608 | |||||
60,589,307 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
22 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.9% | |||||||
Honeywell International Inc | 345,347 | $49,933,723 | |||||
Information Technology Services – 3.8% | |||||||
Accenture PLC | 362,821 | 77,904,925 | |||||
Mastercard Inc | 452,055 | 133,672,663 | |||||
211,577,588 | |||||||
Insurance – 1.5% | |||||||
Marsh & McLennan Cos Inc | 153,936 | 16,528,108 | |||||
Progressive Corp | 836,942 | 67,047,424 | |||||
83,575,532 | |||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 2.2% | |||||||
Alphabet Inc - Class C* | 86,338 | 122,048,260 | |||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail – 2.2% | |||||||
Amazon.com Inc* | 45,142 | 124,538,652 | |||||
Leisure Products – 0.5% | |||||||
Hasbro Inc | 362,392 | 27,161,280 | |||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.9% | |||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 140,792 | 51,014,573 | |||||
Machinery – 0.6% | |||||||
Deere & Co | 214,865 | 33,766,035 | |||||
Media – 1.2% | |||||||
Comcast Corp | 1,741,605 | 67,887,763 | |||||
Multiline Retail – 0.9% | |||||||
Dollar General Corp | 275,205 | 52,429,305 | |||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.3% | |||||||
Sempra Energy | 133,999 | 15,708,703 | |||||
Personal Products – 0.2% | |||||||
Estee Lauder Cos Inc | 61,547 | 11,612,688 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.8% | |||||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 973,535 | 57,243,858 | |||||
Eli Lilly & Co | 436,224 | 71,619,256 | |||||
Merck & Co Inc | 1,093,190 | 84,536,383 | |||||
213,399,497 | |||||||
Real Estate Management & Development – 0.4% | |||||||
CBRE Group Inc* | 546,655 | 24,719,739 | |||||
Road & Rail – 0.7% | |||||||
CSX Corp | 555,127 | 38,714,557 | |||||
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment – 3.9% | |||||||
Intel Corp | 1,007,160 | 60,258,383 | |||||
Lam Research Corp | 211,796 | 68,507,534 | |||||
NVIDIA Corp | 129,375 | 49,150,856 | |||||
Texas Instruments Inc | 328,578 | 41,719,549 | |||||
219,636,322 | |||||||
Software – 7.8% | |||||||
Adobe Inc* | 256,430 | 111,626,543 | |||||
Microsoft Corp | 1,379,957 | 280,738,772 | |||||
salesforce.com Inc* | 218,039 | 40,845,246 | |||||
433,210,561 | |||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.9% | |||||||
Home Depot Inc | 425,591 | 106,614,801 | |||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 2.9% | |||||||
Apple Inc | 435,882 | 159,009,754 | |||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.8% | |||||||
NIKE Inc | 466,905 | 45,780,035 | |||||
Tobacco – 0.7% | |||||||
Altria Group Inc | 957,946 | 37,599,380 | |||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.3% | |||||||
T-Mobile US Inc* | 176,002 | 18,330,608 | |||||
Total Common Stocks (cost $2,188,915,031) | 3,223,478,437 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 23 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Rights – 0% | |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0% | |||||||
T-Mobile US Inc* (cost $0) | 175,583 | $29,498 | |||||
Investment Companies – 2.7% | |||||||
Money Markets – 2.7% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº,£ (cost $152,765,206) | 152,755,214 | 152,770,490 | |||||
Total Investments (total cost $4,510,188,465) – 101.8% | 5,666,934,535 | ||||||
Liabilities, net of Cash, Receivables and Other Assets – (1.8)% | (99,083,912) | ||||||
Net Assets – 100% | $5,567,850,623 |
Summary of Investments by Country - (Long Positions) (unaudited) | |||||
% of | |||||
Investment | |||||
Country | Value | Securities | |||
United States | $5,596,333,610 | 98.8 | % | ||
United Kingdom | 24,838,545 | 0.4 | |||
Canada | 14,046,991 | 0.2 | |||
France | 13,261,799 | 0.2 | |||
Belgium | 9,656,026 | 0.2 | |||
Mexico | 6,002,845 | 0.1 | |||
Japan | 2,794,719 | 0.1 |
Total | $5,666,934,535 | 100.0 | % |
Schedules of Affiliated Investments – (% of Net Assets)
Dividend Income | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 2.7% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 2.7% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | $ | 620,217 | $ | 4,450 | $ | 5,686 | $ | 152,770,490 | ||
Value at 12/31/19 | Purchases | Sales Proceeds | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 2.7% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 2.7% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | 105,128,872 | 1,183,549,895 | (1,135,918,413) | 152,770,490 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
24 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
Balanced Index | Balanced Index is an internally-calculated, hypothetical combination of total returns from the S&P 500® Index (55%) and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (45%). |
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based measure of the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. |
S&P 500® Index | S&P 500® Index reflects U.S. large-cap equity performance and represents broad U.S. equity market performance. |
ICE | Intercontinental Exchange |
LIBOR | London Interbank Offered Rate |
LLC | Limited Liability Company |
LP | Limited Partnership |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
SOFR | Secured Overnight Financing Rate |
TBA | (To Be Announced) Securities are purchased/sold on a forward commitment basis with an approximate principal amount and no defined maturity date. The actual principal and maturity date will be determined upon settlement when specific mortgage pools are assigned. |
144A | Securities sold under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are subject to legal and/or contractual restrictions on resale and may not be publicly sold without registration under the 1933 Act. Unless otherwise noted, these securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total value of 144A securities as of the period ended June 30, 2020 is $465,794,377, which represents 8.4% of net assets. |
* | Non-income producing security. |
ƒ | All or a portion of this position is not funded, or has been purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. If applicable, interest rates will be determined and interest will begin to accrue at a future date. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
‡ | Variable or floating rate security. Rate shown is the current rate as of June 30, 2020. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread; they are determined by the issuer or agent and current market conditions. Reference rate is as of reset date and may vary by security, which may not indicate a reference rate and/or spread in their description. |
ºº | Rate shown is the 7-day yield as of June 30, 2020. |
µ | Perpetual security. Perpetual securities have no stated maturity date, but they may be called/redeemed by the issuer. The date indicated, if any, represents the next call date. |
Ç | Step bond. The coupon rate will increase or decrease periodically based upon a predetermined schedule. The rate shown reflects the current rate. |
£ | The Portfolio may invest in certain securities that are considered affiliated companies. As defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, an affiliated company is one in which the Portfolio owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control. |
Janus Aspen Series | 25 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
The following is a summary of the inputs that were used to value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments as of June 30, 2020. See Notes to Financial Statements for more information. | ||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs Summary | ||||||||||||
Level 2 - | Level 3 - | |||||||||||
Level 1 - | Other Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Investments In Securities: | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | $ | - | $ | 278,141,360 | $ | - | ||||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans | - | 9,027,197 | - | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | - | 1,279,847,753 | - | |||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | - | 476,085,323 | - | |||||||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds | - | 247,554,477 | - | |||||||||
Common Stocks | 3,223,478,437 | - | - | |||||||||
Rights | 29,498 | - | - | |||||||||
Investment Companies | - | 152,770,490 | - | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,223,507,935 | $ | 2,443,426,600 | $ | - | ||||||
26 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Unaffiliated investments, at value(1) |
| $ | 5,514,164,045 |
| |
| Affiliated investments, at value(2) |
|
| 152,770,490 |
| |
| Cash |
|
| 4,778,853 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation |
|
| 114,348 |
| |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Investments sold |
|
| 30,383,064 |
|
|
| Interest |
|
| 12,639,650 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares sold |
|
| 4,639,540 |
|
|
| Dividends |
|
| 3,342,702 |
|
|
| Dividends from affiliates |
|
| 15,713 |
|
| Other assets |
|
| 14,409 |
| |
Total Assets |
|
| 5,722,862,814 |
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Payables: |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Investments purchased |
|
| 149,959,442 |
|
|
| Advisory fees |
|
| 2,472,095 |
|
|
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees |
|
| 1,037,858 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares repurchased |
|
| 956,244 |
|
|
| Transfer agent fees and expenses |
|
| 235,301 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation fees |
|
| 114,348 |
|
|
| Professional fees |
|
| 28,834 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' fees and expenses |
|
| 25,859 |
|
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 11,237 |
|
|
| Custodian fees |
|
| 10,090 |
|
|
| Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
| 160,883 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 155,012,191 |
| ||
Net Assets |
| $ | 5,567,850,623 |
| ||
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) |
| $ | 4,425,410,907 |
| |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) |
|
| 1,142,439,716 |
| |
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 5,567,850,623 |
| ||
Net Assets - Institutional Shares |
| $ | 421,860,873 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 10,989,788 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 38.39 |
| ||
Net Assets - Service Shares |
| $ | 5,145,989,750 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 126,745,984 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 40.60 |
|
(1) Includes cost of $4,357,423,259. (2) Includes cost of $152,765,206. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 27 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Statement of Operations (unaudited)
For the period ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
| ||
| Interest | $ | 31,755,537 |
| |
| Dividends |
| 27,838,478 |
| |
| Dividends from affiliates |
| 620,217 |
| |
| Other income |
| 153,364 |
| |
| Foreign tax withheld |
| (73,820) |
| |
Total Investment Income |
| 60,293,776 |
| ||
Expenses: |
|
|
| ||
| Advisory fees |
| 14,228,386 |
| |
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees: |
|
|
| |
|
| Service Shares |
| 5,941,626 |
|
| Transfer agent administrative fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 103,410 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 1,190,080 |
|
| Other transfer agent fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 10,066 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 52,912 |
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees |
| 64,674 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses |
| 47,408 |
| |
| Professional fees |
| 36,774 |
| |
| Custodian fees |
| 31,059 |
| |
| Shareholder reports expense |
| 19,494 |
| |
| Registration fees |
| 7,009 |
| |
| Other expenses |
| 167,647 |
| |
Total Expenses |
| 21,900,545 |
| ||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 38,393,231 |
| ||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and foreign currency transactions |
| (15,210,652) |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 4,450 |
| |
Total Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments |
| (15,206,202) |
| ||
Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation |
| (31,757,749) |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 5,686 |
| |
Total Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation |
| (31,752,063) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | (8,565,034) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
28 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 38,393,231 |
| $ | 80,027,111 |
| |
| Net realized gain/(loss) on investments |
| (15,206,202) |
|
| 87,916,180 |
| |
| Change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation |
| (31,752,063) |
|
| 729,551,886 |
| |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| (8,565,034) |
|
| 897,495,177 |
| ||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (10,793,423) |
|
| (19,713,876) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| (118,342,022) |
|
| (174,336,200) |
|
Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
| (129,135,445) |
|
| (194,050,076) |
| ||
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (11,525,829) |
|
| (23,374,008) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 425,084,454 |
|
| 763,429,463 |
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions |
| 413,558,625 |
|
| 740,055,455 |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
| 275,858,146 |
|
| 1,443,500,556 |
| ||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Beginning of period |
| 5,291,992,477 |
|
| 3,848,491,921 |
| |
| End of period | $ | 5,567,850,623 |
| $ | 5,291,992,477 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 29 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Financial Highlights
Institutional Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $39.48 |
|
| $33.75 |
|
| $35.27 |
|
| $30.32 |
|
| $30.08 |
|
| $31.43 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.32 |
|
| 0.74 |
|
| 0.66 |
|
| 0.64 |
|
| 0.58 |
|
| 0.63 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (0.40) |
|
| 6.74 |
|
| (0.42) |
|
| 4.92 |
|
| 0.77 |
|
| (0.41) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (0.08) |
|
| 7.48 |
|
| 0.24 |
|
| 5.56 |
|
| 1.35 |
|
| 0.22 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.37) |
|
| (0.72) |
|
| (0.77) |
|
| (0.54) |
|
| (0.67) |
|
| (0.50) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (0.64) |
|
| (1.03) |
|
| (0.99) |
|
| (0.07) |
|
| (0.44) |
|
| (1.07) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (1.01) |
|
| (1.75) |
|
| (1.76) |
|
| (0.61) |
|
| (1.11) |
|
| (1.57) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $38.39 |
|
| $39.48 |
|
| $33.75 |
|
| $35.27 |
|
| $30.32 |
|
| $30.08 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (0.15)% |
|
| 22.59% |
|
| 0.68% |
|
| 18.43% |
|
| 4.60% |
|
| 0.62% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $421,861 |
|
| $446,026 |
|
| $402,796 |
|
| $429,403 |
|
| $403,833 |
|
| $444,472 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $418,366 |
|
| $426,775 |
|
| $429,843 |
|
| $417,575 |
|
| $413,338 |
|
| $467,346 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.63% |
|
| 0.63% |
|
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.58% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.63% |
|
| 0.63% |
|
| 0.62% |
|
| 0.58% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 1.70% |
|
| 1.99% |
|
| 1.85% |
|
| 1.94% |
|
| 1.94% |
|
| 2.03% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 58%(2) |
|
| 79%(2) |
|
| 97%(2) |
|
| 67%(2) |
|
| 80% |
|
| 73% |
| ||
Service Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $41.70 |
|
| $35.59 |
|
| $37.09 |
|
| $31.89 |
|
| $31.61 |
|
| $32.97 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.29 |
|
| 0.68 |
|
| 0.60 |
|
| 0.58 |
|
| 0.53 |
|
| 0.58 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (0.43) |
|
| 7.11 |
|
| (0.44) |
|
| 5.17 |
|
| 0.80 |
|
| (0.42) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (0.14) |
|
| 7.79 |
|
| 0.16 |
|
| 5.75 |
|
| 1.33 |
|
| 0.16 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.32) |
|
| (0.65) |
|
| (0.67) |
|
| (0.48) |
|
| (0.61) |
|
| (0.45) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (0.64) |
|
| (1.03) |
|
| (0.99) |
|
| (0.07) |
|
| (0.44) |
|
| (1.07) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (0.96) |
|
| (1.68) |
|
| (1.66) |
|
| (0.55) |
|
| (1.05) |
|
| (1.52) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $40.60 |
|
| $41.70 |
|
| $35.59 |
|
| $37.09 |
|
| $31.89 |
|
| $31.61 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (0.27)% |
|
| 22.27% |
|
| 0.43% |
|
| 18.13% |
|
| 4.32% |
|
| 0.41% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $5,145,990 |
|
| $4,845,966 |
|
| $3,445,696 |
|
| $2,887,613 |
|
| $2,227,878 |
|
| $1,831,930 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $4,813,052 |
|
| $4,109,486 |
|
| $3,235,435 |
|
| $2,523,514 |
|
| $1,938,234 |
|
| $1,645,283 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.86% |
|
| 0.87% |
|
| 0.88% |
|
| 0.88% |
|
| 0.87% |
|
| 0.84% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.86% |
|
| 0.87% |
|
| 0.88% |
|
| 0.88% |
|
| 0.87% |
|
| 0.84% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 1.46% |
|
| 1.74% |
|
| 1.62% |
|
| 1.69% |
|
| 1.71% |
|
| 1.79% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 58%(2) |
|
| 79%(2) |
|
| 97%(2) |
|
| 67%(2) |
|
| 80% |
|
| 73% |
| ||
* Total return includes adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the year or period end and are not annualized for periods of less than one full year. Total return does not include fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and life insurance contracts for which Janus Aspen Series serves as an underlying investment vehicle. ** Annualized for periods of less than one full year. (1) Per share amounts are calculated based on average shares outstanding during the year or period. (2) Portfolio Turnover Rate excludes TBA (to be announced) purchase and sales commitments. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
30 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a series of Janus Aspen Series (the “Trust”), which is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and therefore has applied the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946. The Trust offers 11 portfolios, each of which offers multiple share classes, with differing investment objectives and policies. The Portfolio seeks long-term capital growth, consistent with preservation of capital and balanced by current income. The Portfolio is classified as diversified, as defined in the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio currently offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Service Shares. Each class represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Institutional Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans. Service Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans that require a fee from Portfolio assets to procure distribution and administrative services to contract owners and plan participants.
Shareholders, including other portfolios, participating insurance companies, as well as accounts, may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) a significant percentage of the Portfolio’s Shares and can be considered to “control” the Portfolio when that ownership exceeds 25% of the Portfolio’s assets (and which may differ from control as determined in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting priciples ("US GAAP")).
The following accounting policies have been followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with US GAAP.
Investment Valuation
Securities held by the Portfolio are valued in accordance with policies and procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees (the “Valuation Procedures”). Equity securities traded on a domestic securities exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If such price is lacking for the trading period immediately preceding the time of determination, such securities are valued at their current bid price. Equity securities that are traded on a foreign exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on such markets. In the event that there is no current trading volume on a particular security in such foreign exchange, the bid price from the primary exchange is generally used to value the security. Securities that are traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets are generally valued at their closing or latest bid prices as available. Foreign securities and currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Portfolio will determine the market value of individual securities held by it by using prices provided by one or more approved professional pricing services or, as needed, by obtaining market quotations from independent broker-dealers. Most debt securities are valued in accordance with the evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service that is intended to reflect market value. The evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service is an evaluation that may consider factors such as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Certain short-term securities maturing within 60 days or less may be evaluated and valued on an amortized cost basis provided that the amortized cost determined approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations or evaluated prices are not readily available or deemed unreliable are valued at fair value determined in good faith under the Valuation Procedures. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant event that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy, or significant issuer-specific development; (ii) an event that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; (iii) a nonsignificant event such as a market closing early or not opening, or a security trading halt; and (iv) pricing of a nonvalued security and a restricted or nonpublic security. Special valuation considerations may apply with respect to “odd-lot” fixed-income transactions which, due to their small size, may receive evaluated prices by pricing services which reflect a large block trade and not what actually could be obtained for the odd-lot position. The Portfolio uses systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties to value international equity securities in order to adjust for stale pricing, which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE.
Valuation Inputs Summary
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This standard emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that
Janus Aspen Series | 31 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets the Portfolio has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Assets or liabilities categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy generally include: debt securities fair valued in accordance with the evaluated bid or ask prices supplied by a pricing service; securities traded on OTC markets and listed securities for which no sales are reported that are fair valued at the latest bid price (or yield equivalent thereof) obtained from one or more dealers transacting in a market for such securities or by a pricing service approved by the Portfolio’s Trustees; certain short-term debt securities with maturities of 60 days or less that are fair valued at amortized cost; and equity securities of foreign issuers whose fair value is determined by using systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties in order to adjust for stale pricing which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE. Other securities that may be categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy include, but are not limited to, preferred stocks, bank loans, swaps, investments in unregistered investment companies, options, and forward contracts.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.
There have been no significant changes in valuation techniques used in valuing any such positions held by the Portfolio since the beginning of the fiscal year.
The inputs or methodology used for fair valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of inputs used as of June 30, 2020 to fair value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments is included in the “Valuation Inputs Summary” in the Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for as of the date purchased or sold (trade date). Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend, if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividends from foreign securities may be subject to withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. The Portfolio classifies gains and losses on prepayments received as an adjustment to interest income. Debt securities may be placed in non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivables when collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Income, as well as gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets.
Expenses
The Portfolio bears expenses incurred specifically on its behalf. Each class of shares bears a portion of general expenses, which are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets. Expenses directly attributable to a specific class of shares are charged against the operations of such class.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
32 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts that contain provisions for indemnification of other parties against certain potential liabilities. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, and would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred. Currently, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Foreign Currency Translations
The Portfolio does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held at the date of the financial statements. Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency translations arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities held at the date of the financial statements, resulting from changes in the exchange rates and changes in market prices of securities held.
Currency gains and losses are also calculated on payables and receivables that are denominated in foreign currencies. The payables and receivables are generally related to foreign security transactions and income translations.
Foreign currency-denominated assets and forward currency contracts may involve more risks than domestic transactions, including currency risk, counterparty risk, political and economic risk, regulatory risk and equity risk. Risks may arise from unanticipated movements in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Dividends and Distributions
The Portfolio may make semiannual distributions of substantially all of its investment income and an annual distribution of its net realized capital gains (if any).
The Portfolio may make certain investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which pay dividends to their shareholders based upon funds available from operations. It is quite common for these dividends to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits, resulting in the excess portion of such dividends being designated as a return of capital. If the Portfolio distributes such amounts, such distributions could constitute a return of capital to shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years, generally a three-year period, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
2. Other Investments and Strategies
Additional Investment Risk
The Portfolio may be invested in lower-rated debt securities that have a higher risk of default or loss of value since these securities may be sensitive to economic changes, political changes, or adverse developments specific to the issuer.
In the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the financial sector experienced reduced liquidity in credit and other fixed-income markets, and an unusually high degree of volatility, both domestically and internationally. In response to the crisis, the United States and certain foreign governments, along with the U.S. Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks, took a number of unprecedented steps designed to support the financial markets. For example, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 provided for widespread regulation of financial institutions, consumer financial products and services, broker-dealers, over-the-counter derivatives, investment advisers, credit rating agencies, and mortgage lending, which expanded federal oversight in the financial sector, including the investment management industry. More recently, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have taken extraordinary actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets, including reducing interest rates to record low levels. The withdrawal of this support, a failure of measures put in place in response to such economic uncertainty, or investor perception that such efforts were not sufficient could each negatively affect financial markets generally, and the value and liquidity of specific
Janus Aspen Series | 33 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
securities. In addition, policy and legislative changes in the United States and in other countries continue to impact many aspects of financial regulation.
Widespread disease, including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and weather-related phenomena generally, have been and can be highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States. These disruptions could prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective(s). Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value of a Fund. In addition, these disruptions could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Fund’s service providers, including Janus Capital or the subadviser (as applicable), rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of the Fund.
A number of countries in the European Union (“EU”) have experienced, and may continue to experience, severe economic and financial difficulties. In particular, many EU nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. Financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit. As a result, financial markets in the EU have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. The risk of investing in securities in the European markets may also be heightened due to the referendum in which the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”). The United Kingdom formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into an eleven-month transition period, during which the United Kingdom will remain subject to EU laws and regulations. There is considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the United Kingdom’s exit and how negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted or concluded.
Certain areas of the world have historically been prone to and economically sensitive to environmental events such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, tornadoes, mudslides, or other weather-related phenomena. Such disasters, and the resulting physical or economic damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Portfolio’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Portfolio invests to conduct their businesses as they would under normal conditions. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance and reinsurance companies that insure or reinsure against the impact of natural disasters.
Loans
The Portfolio may invest in various commercial loans, including bank loans, bridge loans, debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) loans, mezzanine loans, and other fixed and floating rate loans. These loans may be acquired through loan participations and assignments or on a when-issued basis. Commercial loans will comprise no more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total assets. Below are descriptions of the types of loans held by the Portfolio as of June 30, 2020.
· Bank Loans - Bank loans are obligations of companies or other entities entered into in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, and refinancings. The Portfolio’s investments in bank loans are generally acquired as a participation interest in, or assignment of, loans originated by a lender or other financial institution. These investments may include institutionally-traded floating and fixed-rate debt securities.
· Floating Rate Loans – Floating rate loans are debt securities that have floating interest rates, that adjust periodically, and are tied to a benchmark lending rate, such as London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In other cases, the lending rate could be tied to the prime rate offered by one or more major U.S. banks or the rate paid on large certificates of deposit traded in the secondary markets. If the benchmark lending rate changes, the rate payable to lenders under the loan will change at the next scheduled adjustment date specified in the loan agreement. Floating rate loans are typically issued to companies (‘‘borrowers’’) in
34 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, and refinancings. Floating rate loan investments are generally below investment grade. Senior floating rate loans are secured by specific collateral of a borrower and are senior in the borrower’s capital structure. The senior position in the borrower’s capital structure generally gives holders of senior loans a claim on certain of the borrower’s assets that is senior to subordinated debt and preferred and common stock in the case of a borrower’s default. Floating rate loan investments may involve foreign borrowers, and investments may be denominated in foreign currencies. Floating rate loans often involve borrowers whose financial condition is troubled or uncertain and companies that are highly leveraged. The Portfolio may invest in obligations of borrowers who are in bankruptcy proceedings. While the Portfolio generally expects to invest in fully funded term loans, certain of the loans in which the Portfolio may invest include revolving loans, bridge loans, and delayed draw term loans.
Purchasers of floating rate loans may pay and/or receive certain fees. The Portfolio may receive fees such as covenant waiver fees or prepayment penalty fees. The Portfolio may pay fees such as facility fees. Such fees may affect the Portfolio’s return.
· Mezzanine Loans - Mezzanine loans are secured by the stock of the company that owns the assets. Mezzanine loans are a hybrid of debt and equity financing that is typically used to fund the expansion of existing companies. A mezzanine loan is composed of debt capital that gives the lender the right to convert to an ownership or equity interest in the company if the loan is not paid back in time and in full. Mezzanine loans typically are the most subordinated debt obligation in an issuer’s capital structure.
Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities represent interests in “pools” of commercial or residential mortgages or other assets, including consumer loans or receivables. The Portfolio may purchase fixed or variable rate commercial or residential mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), or other governmental or government-related entities. Ginnie Mae’s guarantees are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, which means that the U.S. Government guarantees that the interest and principal will be paid when due. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), an agency of the U.S. Government, placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship. Since that time, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received capital support through U.S. Treasury preferred stock purchases, and Treasury and Federal Reserve purchases of their mortgage-backed securities. The FHFA and the U.S. Treasury have imposed strict limits on the size of these entities’ mortgage portfolios. The FHFA has the power to cancel any contract entered into by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac prior to FHFA’s appointment as conservator or receiver, including the guarantee obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The Portfolio may also purchase other mortgage- and asset-backed securities through single- and multi-seller conduits, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles, and other similar securities. Asset-backed securities may be backed by various consumer obligations, including automobile loans, equipment leases, credit card receivables, or other collateral. In the event the underlying loans are not paid, the securities’ issuer could be forced to sell the assets and recognize losses on such assets, which could impact your return. Unlike traditional debt instruments, payments on these securities include both interest and a partial payment of principal. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are subject to both extension risk, where borrowers pay off their debt obligations more slowly in times of rising interest rates, and prepayment risk, where borrowers pay off their debt obligations sooner than expected in times of declining interest rates. These risks may reduce the Portfolio’s returns. In addition, investments in mortgage- and asset-backed securities, including those comprised of subprime mortgages, may be subject to a higher degree of credit risk, valuation risk, and liquidity risk than various other types of fixed-income securities. Additionally, although mortgage-backed securities are generally supported by some form of government or private guarantee and/or insurance, there is no assurance that guarantors or insurers will meet their obligations.
Real Estate Investing
The Portfolio may invest in equity and debt securities of real estate-related companies. Such companies may include those in the real estate industry or real estate-related industries. These securities may include common stocks, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, and other equity securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed securities, real estate-backed securities, securities of REITs and similar REIT-like entities. A REIT is a trust that invests in real estate-related projects, such as properties, mortgage loans, and construction loans. REITs are generally categorized as equity, mortgage, or hybrid REITs. A REIT may be listed on an exchange or traded OTC.
Janus Aspen Series | 35 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Sovereign Debt
The Portfolio may invest in U.S. and non-U.S. government debt securities (“sovereign debt”). Some investments in sovereign debt, such as U.S. sovereign debt, are considered low risk. However, investments in sovereign debt, especially the debt of less developed countries, can involve a high degree of risk, including the risk that the governmental entity that controls the repayment of sovereign debt may not be willing or able to repay the principal and/or to pay the interest on its sovereign debt in a timely manner. A sovereign debtor’s willingness or ability to satisfy its debt obligation may be affected by various factors including, but not limited to, its cash flow situation, the extent of its foreign currency reserves, the availability of foreign exchange when a payment is due, the relative size of its debt position in relation to its economy as a whole, the sovereign debtor’s policy toward international lenders, and local political constraints to which the governmental entity may be subject. Sovereign debtors may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies, and other entities. The failure of a sovereign debtor to implement economic reforms, achieve specified levels of economic performance, or repay principal or interest when due may result in the cancellation of third party commitments to lend funds to the sovereign debtor, which may further impair such debtor’s ability or willingness to timely service its debts. The Portfolio may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such sovereign debt and to extend further loans to governmental entities, which may adversely affect the Portfolio’s holdings. In the event of default, there may be limited or no legal remedies for collecting sovereign debt and there may be no bankruptcy proceedings through which the Portfolio may collect all or part of the sovereign debt that a governmental entity has not repaid. In addition, to the extent the Portfolio invests in non-U.S. sovereign debt, it may be subject to currency risk.
TBA Commitments
The Portfolio may enter into “to be announced” or “TBA” commitments. TBAs are forward agreements for the purchase or sale of securities, including mortgage-backed securities, for a fixed price, with payment and delivery on an agreed upon future settlement date. The specific securities to be delivered are not identified at the trade date. However, delivered securities must meet specified terms, including issuer, rate, and mortgage terms. Although the particular TBA securities must meet industry-accepted “good delivery” standards, there can be no assurance that a security purchased on forward commitment basis will ultimately be issued or delivered by the counterparty. During the settlement period, the Portfolio will still bear the risk of any decline in the value of the security to be delivered. Because TBA commitments do not require the purchase and sale of identical securities, the characteristics of the security delivered to the Portfolio may be less favorable than the security delivered to the dealer. If the counterparty to a transaction fails to deliver the security, the Portfolio could suffer a loss.
When-Issued, Delayed Delivery and Forward Commitment Transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell securities on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis. When purchasing a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Portfolio assumes the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations, and takes such fluctuations into account when determining its net asset value. Typically, no income accrues on securities the Portfolio has committed to purchase prior to the time delivery of the securities is made. Because the Portfolio is not required to pay for the security until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with the Portfolio’s other investments. If the other party to a transaction fails to deliver the securities, the Portfolio could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity. If the Portfolio remains substantially fully invested at a time when when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment purchases are outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage.
When the Portfolio has sold a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Portfolio does not participate in future gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a transaction fails to pay for the securities, the Portfolio could suffer a loss. Additionally, when selling a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis without owning the security, the Portfolio will incur a loss if the security’s price appreciates in value such that the security’s price is above the agreed upon price on the settlement date. The Portfolio may dispose of or renegotiate a transaction after it is entered into, and may purchase or sell when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment securities before the settlement date, which may result in a gain or loss.
3. Investment Advisory Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Portfolio pays Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus Capital”) an investment advisory fee which is calculated daily and paid monthly. The Portfolio’s contractual investment advisory fee rate (expressed as an annual rate) is 0.55% of its average daily net assets.
36 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Janus Services LLC (“Janus Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, is the Portfolio’s transfer agent. Janus Services receives an administrative services fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets of the Portfolio for arranging for the provision by participating insurance companies and qualified plan service providers of administrative services, including recordkeeping, subaccounting, order processing, or other shareholder services provided on behalf of contract holders or plan participants investing in the Portfolio. Other shareholder services may include the provision of order confirmations, periodic account statements, forwarding prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other materials to existing investors, and answering inquiries regarding accounts. Janus Services expects to use this entire fee to compensate insurance companies and qualified plan service providers for providing these services to their customers who invest in the Portfolio. Any unused portion will be reimbursed to the applicable share class at least annually.
In addition, Janus Services provides or arranges for the provision of certain other internal administrative, recordkeeping, and shareholder relations services for the Portfolio. Janus Services is not compensated for these internal services related to the shares, except for out-of-pocket costs. These amounts are disclosed as “Other transfer agent fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Under a distribution and shareholder servicing plan (the “Plan”) adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Service Shares may pay the Trust’s distributor, Janus Distributors LLC (“Janus Distributors”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, a fee for the sale and distribution and/or shareholder servicing of the Service Shares at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Service Shares. Under the terms of the Plan, the Trust is authorized to make payments to Janus Distributors for remittance to insurance companies and qualified plan service providers as compensation for distribution and/or shareholder services performed by such entities. These amounts are disclosed as “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” on the Statement of Operations. Payments under the Plan are not tied exclusively to actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees, and the payments may exceed 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees actually incurred. If any of the Portfolio’s actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees incurred during a calendar year are less than the payments made during a calendar year, the Portfolio will be refunded the difference. Refunds, if any, are included in “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” in the Statement of Operations.
Janus Capital serves as administrator to the Portfolio pursuant to an administration agreement between Janus Capital and the Trust. Under the administration agreement, Janus Capital is obligated to provide or arrange for the provision of certain administration, compliance, and accounting services to the Portfolio, including providing office space for the Portfolio, and is reimbursed by the Portfolio for certain of its costs in providing these services (to the extent Janus Capital seeks reimbursement and such costs are not otherwise waived). In addition, employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates may serve as officers of the Trust. The Portfolio pays for some or all of the salaries, fees, and expenses of Janus Capital employees and Portfolio officers, with respect to certain specified administration functions they perform on behalf of the Portfolio. The Portfolio pays these costs based on out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Janus Capital, and these costs are separate and apart from advisory fees and other expenses paid in connection with the investment advisory services Janus Capital (or any subadvisor, as applicable) provides to the Portfolio. These amounts are disclosed as “Affiliated portfolio administration fees” on the Statement of Operations. In addition, some expenses related to compensation payable to the Portfolio’s Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff, all of whom are employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates, are shared with the Portfolio. Total compensation of $20,422 was paid to the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff by the Trust during the period ended June 30, 2020. The Portfolio's portion is reported as part of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for independent Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Portfolio. All deferred fees are credited to an account established in the name of the Trustees. The amounts credited to the account then increase or decrease, as the case may be, in accordance with the performance of one or more of the Janus Henderson funds that are selected by the Trustees. The account balance continues to fluctuate in accordance with the performance of the selected fund or funds until final payment of all amounts are credited to the account. The fluctuation of the account balance is recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) and is included as of June 30, 2020 on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the asset, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation,” and liability, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation fees.” Additionally, the recorded unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is included in “Total distributable earnings (loss)” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferred compensation expenses for the period ended June 30, 2020 are included in “Non-interested Trustees’ fees
Janus Aspen Series | 37 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
and expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Trustees are allowed to change their designation of mutual funds from time to time. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the Deferred Plan. Deferred fees of $220,425 were paid by the Trust to the Trustees under the Deferred Plan during the period ended June 30, 2020.
Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act and related rules, the Portfolio may participate in an affiliated or non-affiliated cash sweep program. In the cash sweep program, uninvested cash balances of the Portfolio may be used to purchase shares of affiliated or non-affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles that operate as money market funds. The Portfolio is eligible to participate in the cash sweep program (the “Investing Funds”). As adviser, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest because of its fiduciary duties to the affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles and the Investing Funds. Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC (the “Sweep Vehicle”) is an affiliated unregistered cash management pooled investment vehicle that invests primarily in highly-rated short-term fixed-income securities. The Sweep Vehicle operates pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act that govern the operation of money market funds and prices its shares at NAV reflecting market-based values of its portfolio securities (i.e., a “floating” NAV) rounded to the fourth decimal place (e.g., $1.0000). The Sweep Vehicle is permitted to impose a liquidity fee (of up to 2%) on redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle or a redemption gate that temporarily suspends redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle for up to 10 business days during a 90 day period. There are no restrictions on the Portfolio's ability to withdraw investments from the Sweep Vehicle at will, and there are no unfunded capital commitments due from the Portfolio to the Sweep Vehicle. The Sweep Vehicle does not charge any management fee, sales charge or service fee.
Any purchases and sales, realized gains/losses and recorded dividends from affiliated investments during the period ended June 30, 2020 can be found in the “Schedules of Affiliated Investments” located in the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio is permitted to purchase or sell securities (“cross-trade”) between itself and other funds or accounts managed by Janus Capital in accordance with Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Rule 17a-7”), when the transaction is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio and in accordance with the Internal Cross Trade Procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any cross-trade of securities by the Portfolio from or to another fund or account that is or could be considered an affiliate of the Portfolio under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser, common Officer, or common Trustee complies with Rule 17a-7. Under these procedures, each cross-trade is effected at the current market price to save costs where allowed. During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio engaged in cross trades amounting to $23,567,215 in purchases and $12,976,055 in sales, resulting in a net realized gain of $403,253. The net realized gain is included within the “Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” section of the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations.
4. Federal Income Tax
Income and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for items such as net short-term gains, deferral of wash sale losses, foreign currency transactions, net investment losses, and capital loss carryovers.
The Portfolio has elected to treat gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts as capital gains and losses, if applicable. Other foreign currency gains and losses on debt instruments are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The aggregate cost of investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investment securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2020 are noted below. The primary differences between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of investments are wash sale loss deferrals and investments in partnerships.
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Net
Tax Appreciation/ |
$ 4,530,237,325 | $1,188,487,493 | $(51,790,283) | $ 1,136,697,210 |
38 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
5. Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended June 30, 2020 |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||
|
| Shares | Amount |
| Shares | Amount |
Institutional Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 497,643 | $ 18,897,692 |
| 761,195 | $ 28,340,063 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 288,594 | 10,793,423 |
| 536,983 | 19,713,876 | |
Shares repurchased | (1,095,326) | (41,216,944) |
| (1,933,358) | (71,427,947) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | (309,089) | $ (11,525,829) |
| (635,180) | $ (23,374,008) | |
Service Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 11,403,939 | $458,725,206 |
| 20,594,452 | $809,496,215 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 2,991,457 | 118,342,022 |
| 4,493,890 | 174,336,200 | |
Shares repurchased | (3,865,601) | (151,982,774) |
| (5,686,724) | (220,402,952) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 10,529,795 | $425,084,454 |
| 19,401,618 | $763,429,463 |
6. Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities
For the period ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding any short-term securities, short-term options contracts, TBAs, and in-kind transactions, as applicable) was as follows:
Purchases of | Proceeds from Sales | Purchases
of Long- | Proceeds
from Sales |
$ 2,244,099,023 | $ 1,791,939,097 | $ 1,041,953,018 | $ 1,204,651,546 |
7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-08, Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities ("ASU 2017-08") to amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The guidance requires certain premiums on callable debt securities to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amortization period for callable debt securities purchased at a discount will not be impacted. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management has adopted the amendments as of the beginning of this fiscal period and concluded these changes do not have a material impact on the Portfolio’s financial statements.
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), in August 2018. The new guidance removes, modifies and enhances the disclosures to Topic 820. For public entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted, and Management has decided, to early adopt the removed and modified disclosures in these financial statements. Management is also evaluating the implications related to the new disclosure requirements and has not yet determined the impact to the financial statements.
8. Other Matters
An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 has been, and may continue to be, highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Portfolio's investments. This may impact liquidity in the marketplace, which in turn may affect the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests. Public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, and economic risks in certain countries or globally. The duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects cannot be determined with certainty, and could prevent a Portfolio from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Portfolio's ability to achieve its investment objective.
Janus Aspen Series | 39 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
9. Subsequent Event
Management has evaluated whether any events or transactions occurred subsequent to June 30, 2020 and through the date of issuance of the Portfolio’s financial statements and determined that there were no material events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
40 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Policies and Voting Record
A description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities is available without charge: (i) upon request, by calling 1-800-525-1093; (ii) on the Portfolio’s website at janushenderson.com/proxyvoting; and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, information regarding the Portfolio’s proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is also available, free of charge, through janushenderson.com/proxyvoting and from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Full Holdings
The Portfolio is required to disclose its complete holdings as an exhibit to Form N-PORT within 60 days of the end of the first and third fiscal quarters, and in the annual report and semiannual report to Portfolio shareholders. Historically, the Portfolio filed its complete portfolio holdings (schedule of investments) with the SEC for the first and third quarters each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Form N-PORT and Form N-Q filings: (i) are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; (ii) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330); and (iii) are available without charge, upon request, by calling a Janus Henderson representative at 1-877-335-2687 (toll free) . Portfolio holdings consisting of at least the names of the holdings are generally available on a monthly basis with a 30-day lag. Holdings are generally posted approximately two business days thereafter under Full Holdings for the Portfolio at janushenderson.com/vit.
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD
The Trustees of Janus Aspen Series, each of whom serves as an “independent” Trustee (the “Trustees”), oversee the management of each Portfolio of Janus Aspen Series (each, a “VIT Portfolio,” and collectively, the “VIT Portfolios”), as well as each Fund of Janus Investment Fund (together with the VIT Portfolios, the “Janus Henderson Funds,” and each, a “Janus Henderson Fund”). As required by law, the Trustees determine annually whether to continue the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund and the subadvisory agreements for the Janus Henderson Funds that utilize subadvisers.
In connection with their most recent consideration of those agreements for each Janus Henderson Fund, the Trustees received and reviewed information provided by Janus Capital and the respective subadvisers in response to requests of the Trustees and their independent legal counsel. They also received and reviewed information and analysis provided by, and in response to requests of, their independent fee consultant. Throughout their consideration of the agreements, the Trustees were advised by their independent legal counsel. The Trustees met with management to consider the agreements, and also met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and their independent fee consultant.
At a meeting held on December 5, 2019, based on the Trustees’ evaluation of the information provided by Janus Capital, the subadvisers, and the independent fee consultant, as well as other information, the Trustees determined that the overall arrangements between each Janus Henderson Fund and Janus Capital and each subadviser, as applicable, were fair and reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital, its affiliates and the subadvisers, the fees charged for those services, and other matters that the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. At that meeting, the Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund, and the subadvisory agreement for each subadvised Janus Henderson Fund, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 1, 2021, subject to earlier termination as provided for in each agreement.
In considering the continuation of those agreements, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. However, the material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the agreements are discussed separately below. Also included is a summary of the independent fee consultant’s conclusions and opinions that arose during, and were included as part of, the Trustees’ consideration of the agreements. “Management fees,” as used herein, reflect actual annual advisory fees and, for the purpose of peer comparisons, any administration fees (excluding out of pocket costs), net of any waivers, paid by a fund as a percentage of average net assets.
Janus Aspen Series | 41 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees reviewed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital and the subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds, taking into account the investment objective, strategies and policies of each Janus Henderson Fund, and the knowledge the Trustees gained from their regular meetings with management on at least a quarterly basis and their ongoing review of information related to the Janus Henderson Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the resources and key personnel of Janus Capital and each subadviser, particularly noting those employees who provide investment and risk management services to the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Janus Henderson Funds by Janus Capital or the subadvisers, such as managing the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of broker-dealers for those transactions. The Trustees considered Janus Capital’s role as administrator to the Janus Henderson Funds, noting that Janus Capital generally does not receive a fee for its services but is reimbursed for its out-of-pocket costs. The Trustees considered the role of Janus Capital in monitoring adherence to the Janus Henderson Funds’ investment restrictions, providing support services for the Trustees and Trustee committees, and overseeing communications with shareholders and the activities of other service providers, including monitoring compliance with various policies and procedures of the Janus Henderson Funds and with applicable securities laws and regulations.
In this regard, the independent fee consultant noted that Janus Capital provides a number of different services for the Janus Henderson Funds and fund shareholders, ranging from investment management services to various other servicing functions, and that, in its view, Janus Capital is a capable provider of those services. The independent fee consultant also provided its belief that Janus Capital has developed a number of institutional competitive advantages that should enable it to provide superior investment and service performance over the long term.
The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital or the subadviser to each Janus Henderson Fund were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective advisory and subadvisory agreements, and that, taking into account steps taken to address those Janus Henderson Funds whose performance lagged that of their peers for certain periods, the Janus Henderson Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services. They also concluded that Janus Capital and each subadviser had sufficient personnel, with the appropriate education and experience, to serve the Janus Henderson Funds effectively and had demonstrated its ability to attract well-qualified personnel.
Performance of the Funds
The Trustees considered the performance results of each Janus Henderson Fund over various time periods. They noted that they considered Janus Henderson Fund performance data throughout the year, including periodic meetings with each Janus Henderson Fund’s portfolio manager(s), and also reviewed information comparing each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups identified by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent data provider, and with the Janus Henderson Fund’s benchmark index. In this regard, the independent fee consultant found that the overall Janus Henderson Funds’ performance has been reasonable: for the 36 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 71% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar.
The Trustees considered the performance of each Janus Henderson Fund, noting that performance may vary by share class, and noted the following with respect to the VIT Portfolios:
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance.
42 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the third Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital and Intech had taken or were taking to improve performance, and the performance trend was improving.
In consideration of each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance, the Trustees concluded that, taking into account the factors relevant to performance, as well as other considerations, including steps taken to improve performance, the Janus Henderson Fund’s performance warranted continuation of such Janus Henderson Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory agreement(s).
Costs of Services Provided
The Trustees examined information regarding the fees and expenses of each Janus Henderson Fund in comparison to similar information for other comparable funds as provided by Broadridge, an independent data provider. They also reviewed an analysis of that information provided by their independent fee consultant and noted that the rate of management fees (investment advisory and any administration, but excluding out-of-pocket costs) for many of the Janus Henderson Funds, after applicable waivers, was below the average management fee rate of the respective peer group of funds selected by an independent data provider. The Trustees also examined information regarding the subadvisory fees charged for subadvisory services, as applicable, noting that all such fees were paid by Janus Capital out of its management fees collected from such Janus Henderson Fund.
The independent fee consultant provided its belief that the management fees charged by Janus Capital to each of the Janus Henderson Funds under the current investment advisory and administration agreements are reasonable in relation to the services provided by Janus Capital. The independent fee consultant found: (1) the total expenses and management fees of the Janus Henderson Funds to be reasonable relative to other mutual funds; (2) the total expenses, on average, were 10% under the average total expenses of their respective Broadridge Expense Group peers; and (3) and the management fees for the Janus Henderson Funds, on average, were 7% under the average management fees for their Expense Groups. The Trustees also considered the total expenses for each share class of
Janus Aspen Series | 43 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
each Janus Henderson Fund compared to the average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Group peers and to average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Universe.
For certain Janus Henderson Funds, the independent fee consultant also performed a systematic “focus list” analysis of expenses which assessed fund fees in the context of fund performance being delivered. Based on this analysis, the independent fee consultant found that the combination of service quality/performance and expenses on these individual Janus Henderson Funds was reasonable in light of performance trends, performance histories, and existence of performance fees, breakpoints, and/or expense waivers on such Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees considered the methodology used by Janus Capital and each subadviser in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers, the competitive environment for investment management talent, and the competitive market for mutual funds in different distribution channels.
The Trustees also reviewed management fees charged by Janus Capital and each subadviser to comparable separate account clients and to comparable non-affiliated funds subadvised by Janus Capital or by a subadviser (for which Janus Capital or the subadviser provides only or primarily portfolio management services). Although in most instances subadvisory and separate account fee rates for various investment strategies were lower than management fee rates for Janus Henderson Funds having a similar strategy, the Trustees considered that Janus Capital noted that, under the terms of the management agreements with the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital performs significant additional services for the Janus Henderson Funds that it does not provide to those other clients, including administration services, oversight of the Janus Henderson Funds’ other service providers, trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in serving the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital assumes many legal risks and other costs that it does not assume in servicing its other clients. Moreover, they noted that the independent fee consultant found that: (1) the management fees Janus Capital charges to the Janus Henderson Funds are reasonable in relation to the management fees Janus Capital charges to funds subadvised by Janus Capital and to the fees Janus Capital charges to its institutional separate account clients; (2) these subadvised and institutional separate accounts have different service and infrastructure needs; and (3) Janus Henderson mutual fund investors enjoy reasonable fees relative to the fees charged to Janus Henderson subadvised fund and separate account investors; (4) 11 of 12 Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar funds subadvised by Janus Capital; and (5) six of nine Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar separate accounts managed by Janus Capital.
The Trustees considered the fees for each Janus Henderson Fund for its fiscal year ended in 2018, including the VIT Portfolios, and noted the following with regard to each VIT Portfolio’s total expenses, net of applicable fee waivers (the VIT Portfolio’s “total expenses”):
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
44 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for its sole share class.
The Trustees reviewed information on the overall profitability to Janus Capital and its affiliates of their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds, and considered profitability data of other publicly traded mutual fund advisers. The Trustees recognized that profitability comparisons among fund managers are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund manager is affected by numerous factors, including the organizational structure of the particular fund manager, differences in complex size, difference in product mix, difference in types of business (mutual fund, institutional and other), differences in the types of funds and other accounts it manages, possible other lines of business, the methodology for allocating expenses, and the fund manager’s capital structure and cost of capital.
Additionally, the Trustees considered the estimated profitability to Janus Capital from the investment management services it provided to each Janus Henderson Fund. In their review, the Trustees considered whether Janus Capital and each subadviser receive adequate incentives and resources to manage the Janus Henderson Funds effectively. In reviewing profitability, the Trustees noted that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund is necessarily a product of the allocation methodology utilized by Janus Capital to allocate its expenses as part of the estimated profitability calculation. In this regard, the Trustees noted that the independent fee consultant found that (1) the expense allocation methodology and rationales utilized by Janus Capital were reasonable and (2) no clear correlation between expense allocations and operating margins. The Trustees also considered that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund was influenced by a number of factors, including not only the allocation methodology selected, but also the presence of fee waivers and expense caps, and whether the Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management agreement contained breakpoints or a performance fee component. The Trustees determined, after taking into account these factors, among others, that Janus Capital’s estimated profitability with respect to each Janus Henderson Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the variation in the range of such estimated profitability among the Janus Henderson Funds was not a material factor in the Board’s approval of the reasonableness of any Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management fees.
The Trustees concluded that the management fees payable by each Janus Henderson Fund to Janus Capital and its affiliates, as well as the fees paid by Janus Capital to the subadvisers of subadvised Janus Henderson Funds, were reasonable in relation to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, taking into account the fees charged by other advisers for managing comparable mutual funds with similar strategies, the fees Janus Capital and the subadvisers charge to other clients, and, as applicable, the impact of fund performance on management fees payable by the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also concluded that each Janus Henderson Fund’s total expenses were reasonable, taking into account the size of the Janus Henderson Fund, the quality of services provided by Janus Capital and any subadviser, the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund, and any expense limitations agreed to or provided by Janus Capital.
Economies of Scale
The Trustees considered information about the potential for Janus Capital to realize economies of scale as the assets of the Janus Henderson Funds increase. They noted that their independent fee consultant published a report to the Trustees in November 2019 which provided its research and analysis into economies of scale. They also noted that, although many Janus Henderson Funds pay advisory fees at a base fixed rate as a percentage of net assets, without any breakpoints or performance fees, their independent fee consultant concluded that 64% of these Janus Henderson Funds’ share classes have contractual management fees (gross of waivers) below their Broadridge expense group averages. They also noted the following: (1) that for those Janus Henderson Funds whose expenses are being reduced by the contractual expense limitations of Janus Capital, Janus Capital is subsidizing certain of these Janus Henderson Funds because they have not reached adequate scale; (2) as the assets of some of the Janus Henderson Funds have declined in the past few years, certain Janus Henderson Funds have benefited from having advisory fee rates that have remained constant rather than increasing as assets declined; (3) performance fee structures have been implemented for various Janus Henderson Funds that have caused the effective rate of advisory fees payable by such a
Janus Aspen Series | 45 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Janus Henderson Fund to vary depending on the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund relative to its benchmark index over the measurement period; and (4) a few Janus Henderson Funds have fee schedules with breakpoints and reduced fee rates above certain asset levels. The Trustees also noted that the Janus Henderson Funds share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of all of the Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees also considered the independent fee consultant’s conclusion that, given the limitations of various analytical approaches to economies of scale and their conflicting results, it is difficult to analytically confirm or deny the existence of economies of scale in the Janus Henderson complex. In this regard, the independent consultant concluded that (1) to the extent there were economies of scale at Janus Capital, Janus Capital’s general strategy of setting fixed management fees below peers appeared to share any such economies with investors even on smaller Janus Henderson Funds which have not yet achieved those economies and (2) by setting lower fixed fees from the start on these Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital appeared to be investing to increase the likelihood that these Janus Henderson Funds will grow to a level to achieve any scale economies that may exist. Further, the independent fee consultant provided its belief that Janus Henderson Fund investors are well-served by the fee levels and performance fee structures in place on the Janus Henderson Funds in light of any economies of scale that may be present at Janus Capital.
Based on all of the information reviewed, including the recent and past research and analysis conducted by the Trustees’ independent fee consultant, the Trustees concluded that the current fee structure of each Janus Henderson Fund was reasonable and that the current rates of fees do reflect a sharing between Janus Capital and the Janus Henderson Fund of any economies of scale that may be present at the current asset level of the Janus Henderson Fund.
Other Benefits to Janus Capital
The Trustees also considered benefits that accrue to Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds from their relationships with the Janus Henderson Funds. They recognized that two affiliates of Janus Capital separately serve the Janus Henderson Funds as transfer agent and distributor, respectively, and the transfer agent receives compensation directly from the non-money market funds for services provided, and that such compensation contributes to the overall profitability of Janus Capital and its affiliates that results from their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered Janus Capital’s past and proposed use of commissions paid by the Janus Henderson Funds on portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services benefiting the Janus Henderson Fund and/or other clients of Janus Capital and/or Janus Capital, and/or a subadviser to a Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees concluded that Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ use of these types of client commission arrangements to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidelines and was likely to benefit each Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees also concluded that, other than the services provided by Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers pursuant to the agreements and the fees to be paid by each Janus Henderson Fund therefor, the Janus Henderson Funds and Janus Capital and the subadvisers may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other in other ways. They concluded that Janus Capital and its affiliates share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of the Janus Henderson Funds and other clients serviced by Janus Capital and its affiliates. They also concluded that Janus Capital and/or the subadvisers benefit from the receipt of research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Janus Henderson Funds and that the Janus Henderson Funds benefit from Janus Capital’s and/or the subadvisers’ receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of Janus Capital and/or other clients of the subadvisers. They further concluded that the success of any Janus Henderson Fund could attract other business to Janus Capital, the subadvisers or other Janus Henderson funds, and that the success of Janus Capital and the subadvisers could enhance Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ ability to serve the Janus Henderson Funds.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Janus Henderson Funds (other than the money market funds) have adopted and implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “LRMP”) as required by Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”). Rule 22e-4, requires open-end funds to adopt and implement a written liquidity risk management program that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk, which is the risk that a fund could not meet redemption requests without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interest in the fund. The LRMP
46 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
incorporates the following elements: (i) assessment, management, and periodic review of liquidity risk; (ii) classification of portfolio investments; (iii) the establishment and monitoring of a highly liquid investment minimum, as applicable; (iv) a 15% limitation on a Portfolio’s illiquid investments; (v) redemptions in-kind; and (vi) board oversight.
The Trustees have designated Janus Capital Management LLC, the Portfolio’s investment adviser (“Janus Capital”), as the Program Administrator for the LRMP responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of the LRMP. A working group comprised of various groups within Janus Capital’s business is responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of different aspects of the LRMP.
The Liquidity Rule requires the Trustees to review at least annually a written report provided by the Program Administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and the effectiveness of its implementation, including, if applicable, the operation of the highly liquid investment minimum, and any material changes to the LRMP (the “Program Administrator Report”). During the semi-annual period ended June 30, 2020, the Program Administrator provided the Program Administrator Report to the Trustees which covered the operation of the LRMP from December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”). No significant liquidity events impacting the Portfolio were noted in the Program Administrator Report, and the Portfolio was able to process redemptions during the normal course of business during the Reporting Period. In addition, the Program Administrator expressed its belief in the Program Administrator Report that:
· the LRMP is reasonably designed and adequate to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, taking into account the Portfolio’s particular risks and circumstances, and includes policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement each required component of the Liquidity Rule; and
· the LRMP, including the Highly Liquid Investment Minimum where applicable, was implemented and operated effectively to achieve the goal of assessing and managing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk.
There can be no assurance that the LRMP will achieve its objectives in the future. Please refer to your Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.
Janus Aspen Series | 47 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Management Commentary in this report includes valuable insight as well as statistical information to help you understand how your Portfolio’s performance and characteristics stack up against those of comparable indices.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, this report may include information about country exposure. Country exposure is based primarily on the country of risk. A company may be allocated to a country based on other factors such as location of the company’s principal office, the location of the principal trading market for the company’s securities, or the country where a majority of the company’s revenues are derived.
Please keep in mind that the opinions expressed in the Management Commentary are just that: opinions. They are a reflection based on best judgment at the time this report was compiled, which was June 30, 2020. As the investing environment changes, so could opinions. These views are unique and are not necessarily shared by fellow employees or by Janus Henderson in general.
Performance Overviews
Performance overview graphs compare the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Portfolio with one or more widely used market indices. When comparing the performance of the Portfolio with an index, keep in mind that market indices are not available for investment and do not reflect deduction of expenses.
Average annual total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with more than one year of performance history. Average annual total return is calculated by taking the growth or decline in value of an investment over a period of time, including reinvestment of dividends and distributions, then calculating the annual compounded percentage rate that would have produced the same result had the rate of growth been constant throughout the period. Average annual total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Cumulative total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with less than one year of performance history. Cumulative total return is the growth or decline in value of an investment over time, independent of the period of time involved. Cumulative total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Pursuant to federal securities rules, expense ratios shown in the performance chart reflect subsidized (if applicable) and unsubsidized ratios. The total annual fund operating expenses ratio is gross of any fee waivers, reflecting the Portfolio’s unsubsidized expense ratio. The net annual fund operating expenses ratio (if applicable) includes contractual waivers of Janus Capital and reflects the Portfolio’s subsidized expense ratio. Ratios may be higher or lower than those shown in the “Financial Highlights” in this report.
Schedule of Investments
Following the performance overview section is the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments. This schedule reports the types of securities held in the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period. Securities are usually listed by type (common stock, corporate bonds, U.S. Government obligations, etc.) and by industry classification (banking, communications, insurance, etc.). Holdings are subject to change without notice.
The value of each security is quoted as of the last day of the reporting period. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies is converted into U.S. dollars.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, it will also provide a summary of investments by country. This summary reports the Portfolio exposure to different countries by providing the percentage of securities invested in each country. The country of each security represents the country of risk. The Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments relies upon the industry group and country classifications published by Barclays and/or MSCI Inc.
Tables listing details of individual forward currency contracts, futures, written options, swaptions, and swaps follow the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments (if applicable).
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
This statement is often referred to as the “balance sheet.” It lists the assets and liabilities of the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period.
48 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Portfolio’s assets are calculated by adding the value of the securities owned, the receivable for securities sold but not yet settled, the receivable for dividends declared but not yet received on securities owned, and the receivable for Portfolio shares sold to investors but not yet settled. The Portfolio’s liabilities include payables for securities purchased but not yet settled, Portfolio shares redeemed but not yet paid, and expenses owed but not yet paid. Additionally, there may be other assets and liabilities such as unrealized gain or loss on forward currency contracts.
The section entitled “Net Assets Consist of” breaks down the components of the Portfolio’s net assets. Because the Portfolio must distribute substantially all earnings, you will notice that a significant portion of net assets is shareholder capital.
The last section of this statement reports the net asset value (“NAV”) per share on the last day of the reporting period. The NAV is calculated by dividing the Portfolio’s net assets for each share class (assets minus liabilities) by the number of shares outstanding.
Statement of Operations
This statement details the Portfolio’s income, expenses, realized gains and losses on securities and currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of Portfolio holdings.
The first section in this statement, entitled “Investment Income,” reports the dividends earned from securities and interest earned from interest-bearing securities in the Portfolio.
The next section reports the expenses incurred by the Portfolio, including the advisory fee paid to the investment adviser, transfer agent fees and expenses, and printing and postage for mailing statements, financial reports and prospectuses. Expense offsets and expense reimbursements, if any, are also shown.
The last section lists the amounts of realized gains or losses from investment and foreign currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Portfolio will realize a gain (or loss) when it sells its position in a particular security. A change in unrealized gain (or loss) refers to the change in net appreciation or depreciation of the Portfolio during the reporting period. “Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” is affected both by changes in the market value of Portfolio holdings and by gains (or losses) realized during the reporting period.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
These statements report the increase or decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets during the reporting period. Changes in the Portfolio’s net assets are attributable to investment operations, dividends and distributions to investors, and capital share transactions. This is important to investors because it shows exactly what caused the Portfolio’s net asset size to change during the period.
The first section summarizes the information from the Statement of Operations regarding changes in net assets due to the Portfolio’s investment operations. The Portfolio’s net assets may also change as a result of dividend and capital gains distributions to investors. If investors receive their dividends and/or distributions in cash, money is taken out of the Portfolio to pay the dividend and/or distribution. If investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions, the Portfolio’s net assets will not be affected. If you compare the Portfolio’s “Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions” to “Reinvested Dividends and Distributions,” you will notice that dividends and distributions have little effect on the Portfolio’s net assets. This is because the majority of the Portfolio’s investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions.
The reinvestment of dividends and distributions is included under “Capital Share Transactions.” “Capital Shares” refers to the money investors contribute to the Portfolio through purchases or withdrawals via redemptions. The Portfolio’s net assets will increase and decrease in value as investors purchase and redeem shares from the Portfolio.
Financial Highlights
This schedule provides a per-share breakdown of the components that affect the Portfolio’s NAV for current and past reporting periods as well as total return, asset size, ratios, and portfolio turnover rate.
The first line in the table reflects the NAV per share at the beginning of the reporting period. The next line reports the net investment income/(loss) per share. Following is the per share total of net gains/(losses), realized and unrealized. Per share dividends and distributions to investors are then subtracted to arrive at the NAV per share at the end of the period. The next line reflects the total return for the period. The total return may include adjustments in accordance with
Janus Aspen Series | 49 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the total return may differ from the total return reflected for individual shareholder transactions. Also included are ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets.
The Portfolio’s expenses may be reduced through expense offsets and expense reimbursements. The ratios shown reflect expenses before and after any such offsets and reimbursements.
The ratio of net investment income/(loss) summarizes the income earned less expenses, divided by the average net assets of the Portfolio during the reporting period. Do not confuse this ratio with the Portfolio’s yield. The net investment income ratio is not a true measure of the Portfolio’s yield because it does not take into account the dividends distributed to the Portfolio’s investors.
The next figure is the portfolio turnover rate, which measures the buying and selling activity in the Portfolio. Portfolio turnover is affected by market conditions, changes in the asset size of the Portfolio, fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, the nature of the Portfolio’s investments, and the investment style and/or outlook of the portfolio manager(s) and/or investment personnel. A 100% rate implies that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio was replaced once during the fiscal year; a 50% rate means that an amount equal to the value of half the portfolio is traded in a year; and a 200% rate means that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio is traded every six months.
50 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage1
Janus Aspen Series | 51 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage2
52 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage3
Janus Aspen Series | 53 |
Knowledge Shared
At Janus Henderson, we believe in the sharing of expert insight for better investment and business decisions. We call this ethos Knowledge Shared.
Learn more by visiting janushenderson.com.
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Portfolio. It is not an offer or solicitation for the Portfolio and is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus. | ||||||||
Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc Janus Henderson Distributors | ||||||||
109-24-81113 08-20 |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | ||
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio | ||
Janus Aspen Series | ||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
|
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio
performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
During the six months ended June 30, 2019, Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned -6.92% and -7.02, respectively. Meanwhile, the Portfolio’s benchmark, the Russell Midcap® Growth Index, returned 4.16%.
INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
Mid-cap stocks experienced heightened volatility in the first half of 2020 as the COVID 19 outbreak that began in China spread worldwide, disrupting travel and supply chains. The pandemic halted economic activity and triggered a first quarter equity sell-off of historic proportions. Stocks recovered ground in the second quarter as declining COVID-19 infection rates led many states to reopen their economies in May and June. As a result, investors looked past weak economic data to focus on prospects for recovery later this year. The Federal Reserve (Fed) provided support for the U.S. economy with near-zero interest rates and expanded asset buying.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
In our view, one of the most stunning developments of this unprecedented period has been the extreme outperformance of the most expensive index stocks – both through the market decline in the first quarter and the rebound of the second quarter. Segmenting the Index into deciles based on a price-to-sales basis, the most expensive decile had a total return of 50.2% for the first half of 2020, compared to a 4.2% total return for the Index. Additionally, the second most-expensive decile’s total return was 22.6% in the first half of 2020. The remaining 80% of the benchmark’s contribution to return was -5.1%.
An unusual combination of factors has contributed to this imbalance, including a winner-take-all economy that allows companies to quickly scale and dominate markets. Fed stimulus has also fueled higher valuations for growth stocks. Many of these companies may take years to reach profitability, and falling interest rates have reduced the market’s discounting mechanism. This combination of inexpensive capital and the Fed’s willingness to backstop debt markets has likely encouraged investors to take on greater risk. Additionally, heightened uncertainty around COVID-19 has led investors to pay high prices for any stocks they view as either insulated or benefiting from disruptions to the physical economy. This confluence of forces has pushed valuations higher even when companies have not substantially raised their revenue or earnings outlooks. Instead, these valuation increases have been driven by multiple expansion, a dynamic we find worrisome and unsustainable. In our view, these expensive stocks, in many cases, will fail to produce the future growth rates needed to justify current valuations.
While our more cautious approach to these overvalued stocks hurt relative performance, we recognize a wider disconnect with the capitalization-weighted Index itself. The Russell Midcap Growth Index has become increasingly narrow, shrinking from 500 names in 2016 to just 330 today. (It shrunk 18% with the recent June reconstitution.) As the Index has shrunk, more moderate growth stocks have fallen away, while a few high-value names are having an outsized effect. Worrisome to us, as the Index has become more concentrated, is it has also become more expensive. The Index forward price-to-earnings ratio reached 41.7 as of June 30, compared with a multiple of 31 before the June reconstitution, and an average of 20 to 25 over the last seven years. In other words, the recent reconstitution has made the Index 26% more expensive just by reweighting the highest multiple stocks.
While the Index may have changed, our investment approach has not. We remain disciplined growth investors with a focus on risk-adjusted returns. This requires not just finding great companies with the potential for superior long-term growth but also managing risk exposure by not overpaying for them. This balanced, selective approach has worked for us long term, and it has
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
helped us identify a cohort of reasonably valued, dynamic growth companies we believe are ideal for the Portfolio. As a result, while our more cautious approach to high value stocks dampened performance relative to the Russell Midcap Growth Index, our stock picking helped us outperform the broader mid-cap market, as reflected by the Russell Midcap® Index.
DERIVATIVES USE
Please see the Derivative Instruments section in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for a discussion of derivatives used by the Portfolio.
OUTLOOK
Looking ahead, we recognize that heighted uncertainty around COVID-19 may persist in the near term, contributing to some unusual market dynamics. At the same time, we believe a rally fueled by multiple expansion is not sustainable long term. Rather than trying to predict the timing of market shifts, we remain committed to our long-term investment approach that focuses on a three- to five-year time horizon. We would also note that while we will not pay any price for growth, we recognize the pitfalls of value investing in a period of tremendous business disruption. We have no interest in buying stocks that appear undervalued but face considerable structural headwinds. Instead, we have tried to find a middle way, focusing on well-managed, fundamentally strong growth companies with durable competitive advantages and strong earnings trajectories that we believe fully support their valuations. This philosophy has worked to our advantage over the long term, and we believe it is the best way to manage near-term uncertainty and ultimately deliver strong risk-adjusted returns.
Thank you for your investment in Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Contributors - Holdings | 5 Top Detractors - Holdings | |||||||
|
| Average
|
| Relative
|
|
| Average |
| Relative
|
| Wayfair Inc | 0.69% |
| 0.66% |
| Sensata Technologies Holding PLC | 1.60% |
| -0.65% |
| Nice Ltd (ADR) | 2.71% |
| 0.42% |
| Magellan Midstream Partners LP | 1.60% |
| -0.58% |
| Catalent Inc | 1.28% |
| 0.28% |
| Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd | 0.29% |
| -0.56% |
| Crown Castle International Corp | 2.16% |
| 0.28% |
| Boston Scientific Corp | 1.94% |
| -0.56% |
| Royalty Pharma PLC - Class A | 0.06% |
| 0.26% |
| Cimpress PLC | 0.90% |
| -0.52% |
| 5 Top Contributors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Communication Services |
| 0.11% |
| 0.50% | 4.50% |
| Materials |
| 0.07% |
| 0.99% | 2.63% |
| Other** |
| 0.00% |
| 5.81% | 0.00% |
| Consumer Staples |
| -0.04% |
| 0.00% | 3.35% |
| Energy |
| -0.10% |
| 1.60% | 0.92% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Detractors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Information Technology |
| -4.19% |
| 33.87% | 35.21% |
| Health Care |
| -3.40% |
| 17.96% | 16.34% |
| Financials |
| -1.78% |
| 11.81% | 4.31% |
| Industrials |
| -1.17% |
| 16.59% | 16.11% |
| Consumer Discretionary |
| -0.46% |
| 6.85% | 13.83% |
| Relative contribution reflects
how the portolio's holdings impacted return relative to the benchmark. Cash and securities not held in
the portfolio are not shown. For equity portfolios, relative contribution compares the performance of
a security in the portfolio to the benchmark's total return, factoring in the difference in weight of
that security in the benchmark. Returns are calculated using daily returns and previous day ending weights
rolled up by ticker, excluding fixed income securities, gross of advisory fees, may exclude certain derivatives
and will differ from actual performance. | |||||
* | Based on sector classification according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) codes, which are the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. | |||||
** | Not a GICS classified sector. |
Janus Aspen Series | 3 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
5 Largest Equity Holdings - (% of Net Assets) | |
Constellation Software Inc/Canada | |
Software | 2.9% |
Nice Ltd (ADR) | |
Software | 2.6% |
Microchip Technology Inc | |
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment | 2.5% |
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc | |
Software | 2.4% |
Aon PLC | |
Insurance | 2.2% |
12.6% |
Asset Allocation - (% of Net Assets) | |||||
Common Stocks | 94.5% | ||||
Investment Companies | 5.0% | ||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | 1.0% | ||||
Limited Partnership Interests | 0.4% | ||||
Other | (0.9)% | ||||
100.0% |
Top Country Allocations - Long Positions - (% of Investment Securities) | |
As of June 30, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 |
4 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
Performance
See important disclosures on the next page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return - for the periods ended June 30, 2020 |
|
| Expense Ratios | |||||||
|
| Fiscal
| One
| Five
| Ten | Since
|
|
| Total Annual Fund | |
Institutional Shares(1) |
| -6.92% | -0.35% | 12.01% | 15.49% | 10.93% |
|
| 0.72% | |
Service Shares(1) |
| -7.02% | -0.59% | 11.73% | 15.20% | 10.65% |
|
| 0.97% | |
Russell Midcap Growth Index |
| 4.16% | 11.91% | 11.60% | 15.09% | 10.09% |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Quartile - Institutional Shares |
| - | 4th | 1st | 1st | 2nd |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Ranking - based on total returns for Mid-Cap Growth Funds |
| - | 553/608 | 163/564 | 96/509 | 47/150 |
|
|
|
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold. For the most recent month-end performance call 800.668.0434 or visit janushenderson.com/VITperformance.
Performance may be affected by risks that include those associated with non-diversification, portfolio turnover, short sales, potential conflicts of interest, foreign and emerging markets, initial public offerings (IPOs), high-yield and high-risk securities, undervalued, overlooked and smaller capitalization companies, real estate related securities including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), derivatives, and commodity-linked investments. Each product has different risks. Please see the prospectus for more information about risks, holdings and other details.
Returns do not reflect the deduction of fees, charges or expenses of any insurance product or qualified plan. If applied, returns would have been lower.
Returns include reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares. The returns do not include adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes.
Performance for Service Shares prior to December 31, 1999 reflects the performance of Institutional Shares, adjusted to reflect the expenses of Service Shares.
Ranking is for the share class shown only; other classes may have different performance characteristics.
© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information for index definitions.
Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
See “Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report.”
Janus Aspen Series | 5 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
Performance
*The Portfolio’s inception date – September 13, 1993
‡ As stated in the prospectus. See Financial Highlights for actual expense ratios during the reporting period.
(1) Closed to certain new investors.
6 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (unaudited)(closed to certain new investors)
Expense Examples
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares only); transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement; and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The example is based upon an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the six-months indicated, unless noted otherwise in the table and footnotes below.
Actual Expenses
The information in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based upon the Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Additionally, for an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in either share class or other similar funds, please visit www.finra.org/fundanalyzer.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as any charges at the separate account level or contract level. These fees are fully described in the Portfolio’s prospectuses. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Actual |
| Hypothetical
|
| ||||
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Net Annualized | ||
Institutional Shares | $1,000.00 | $930.80 | $3.41 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,021.33 | $3.57 | 0.71% | ||
Service Shares | $1,000.00 | $929.80 | $4.61 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,020.09 | $4.82 | 0.96% | ||
† | Expenses Paid During Period are equal to the Net Annualized Expense Ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses in the examples include the effect of applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, if any. Had such waivers and/or reimbursements not been in effect, your expenses would have been higher. Please refer to the Notes to Financial Statements or the Portfolio’s prospectuses for more information regarding waivers and/or reimbursements. |
Janus Aspen Series | 7 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 94.5% | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.9% | |||||||
HEICO Corp | 66,397 | $5,394,092 | |||||
L3Harris Technologies Inc | 105,294 | 17,865,233 | |||||
Teledyne Technologies Inc* | 58,119 | 18,072,103 | |||||
41,331,428 | |||||||
Airlines – 0.6% | |||||||
Ryanair Holdings PLC (ADR)* | 135,999 | 9,022,174 | |||||
Auto Components – 0.4% | |||||||
Visteon Corp* | 80,376 | 5,505,756 | |||||
Banks – 0.6% | |||||||
SVB Financial Group* | 37,050 | 7,985,387 | |||||
Biotechnology – 1.4% | |||||||
Ascendis Pharma A/S (ADR)* | 24,707 | 3,654,165 | |||||
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc* | 66,089 | 8,062,858 | |||||
Sarepta Therapeutics Inc* | 53,767 | 8,621,001 | |||||
20,338,024 | |||||||
Capital Markets – 3.5% | |||||||
Cboe Global Markets Inc | 105,467 | 9,837,962 | |||||
LPL Financial Holdings Inc | 319,066 | 25,014,774 | |||||
MSCI Inc | 23,957 | 7,997,326 | |||||
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp | 208,925 | 7,600,692 | |||||
50,450,754 | |||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 2.7% | |||||||
Cimpress PLC* | 150,495 | 11,488,788 | |||||
Edenred | 251,829 | 11,000,699 | |||||
Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc | 377,759 | 15,431,455 | |||||
37,920,942 | |||||||
Containers & Packaging – 1.0% | |||||||
Sealed Air Corp | 451,026 | 14,816,204 | |||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 1.5% | |||||||
frontdoor Inc* | 181,704 | 8,054,938 | |||||
ServiceMaster Global Holdings Inc* | 382,086 | 13,636,649 | |||||
21,691,587 | |||||||
Electric Utilities – 0.7% | |||||||
Alliant Energy Corp | 196,004 | 9,376,831 | |||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.5% | |||||||
Sensata Technologies Holding PLC* | 581,594 | 21,652,745 | |||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 5.0% | |||||||
Dolby Laboratories Inc | 240,399 | 15,835,082 | |||||
Flex Ltd* | 1,352,370 | 13,861,793 | |||||
National Instruments Corp | 424,583 | 16,435,608 | |||||
TE Connectivity Ltd | 313,876 | 25,596,588 | |||||
71,729,071 | |||||||
Entertainment – 0.4% | |||||||
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One* | 188,106 | 5,964,841 | |||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 3.4% | |||||||
Crown Castle International Corp | 163,409 | 27,346,496 | |||||
Lamar Advertising Co | 314,915 | 21,023,725 | |||||
48,370,221 | |||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 8.3% | |||||||
Boston Scientific Corp* | 733,376 | 25,748,831 | |||||
Cooper Cos Inc | 88,909 | 25,218,149 | |||||
Dentsply Sirona Inc | 240,712 | 10,605,771 | |||||
ICU Medical Inc* | 55,143 | 10,163,406 | |||||
STERIS PLC | 156,627 | 24,032,847 | |||||
Teleflex Inc | 39,161 | 14,253,821 | |||||
Varian Medical Systems Inc* | 72,022 | 8,824,135 | |||||
118,846,960 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
8 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.7% | |||||||
Aramark | 333,527 | $7,527,704 | |||||
Dunkin' Brands Group Inc | 253,335 | 16,525,042 | |||||
24,052,746 | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.5% | |||||||
Carlisle Cos Inc | 60,476 | 7,237,163 | |||||
Information Technology Services – 11.5% | |||||||
Amdocs Ltd | 369,156 | 22,474,217 | |||||
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc | 230,043 | 29,029,126 | |||||
Euronet Worldwide Inc* | 55,068 | 5,276,616 | |||||
Fidelity National Information Services Inc | 188,370 | 25,258,533 | |||||
Global Payments Inc | 181,579 | 30,799,430 | |||||
GoDaddy Inc* | 382,310 | 28,034,792 | |||||
WEX Inc* | 138,445 | 22,844,809 | |||||
163,717,523 | |||||||
Insurance – 6.5% | |||||||
Aon PLC | 163,736 | 31,535,554 | |||||
Intact Financial Corp | 252,478 | 24,033,212 | |||||
Willis Towers Watson PLC | 85,231 | 16,786,245 | |||||
WR Berkley Corp | 368,251 | 21,097,100 | |||||
93,452,111 | |||||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail – 1.4% | |||||||
Wayfair Inc*,# | 98,436 | 19,451,938 | |||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 5.2% | |||||||
IQVIA Holdings Inc* | 142,379 | 20,200,733 | |||||
PerkinElmer Inc | 304,273 | 29,846,139 | |||||
PRA Health Sciences Inc* | 103,949 | 10,113,198 | |||||
Waters Corp* | 79,450 | 14,332,780 | |||||
74,492,850 | |||||||
Machinery – 3.0% | |||||||
Ingersoll Rand Inc* | 354,303 | 9,963,000 | |||||
Middleby Corp* | 86,192 | 6,803,997 | |||||
Rexnord Corp | 451,039 | 13,147,787 | |||||
Wabtec Corp | 230,728 | 13,283,011 | |||||
43,197,795 | |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 1.5% | |||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners LP | 506,502 | 21,865,691 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.5% | |||||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 157,065 | 9,235,422 | |||||
Catalent Inc* | 289,724 | 21,236,769 | |||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc* | 427,846 | 9,177,297 | |||||
Royalty Pharma PLC - Class A* | 203,963 | 9,902,404 | |||||
49,551,892 | |||||||
Professional Services – 4.0% | |||||||
CoStar Group Inc* | 26,849 | 19,080,779 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd | 164,698 | 12,434,699 | |||||
Verisk Analytics Inc | 149,139 | 25,383,458 | |||||
56,898,936 | |||||||
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment – 8.6% | |||||||
KLA Corp | 152,971 | 29,749,800 | |||||
Lam Research Corp | 71,717 | 23,197,581 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc | 341,587 | 35,972,527 | |||||
ON Semiconductor Corp* | 993,366 | 19,688,514 | |||||
Xilinx Inc | 143,235 | 14,092,892 | |||||
122,701,314 | |||||||
Software – 10.5% | |||||||
Atlassian Corp PLC* | 118,781 | 21,412,651 | |||||
Ceridian HCM Holding Inc* | 138,634 | 10,989,517 | |||||
Constellation Software Inc/Canada | 36,314 | 41,008,816 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 9 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Software – (continued) | |||||||
Dynatrace Inc* | 148,136 | $6,014,322 | |||||
Nice Ltd (ADR)* | 197,967 | 37,463,275 | |||||
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc | 596,849 | 33,710,032 | |||||
150,598,613 | |||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.5% | |||||||
CarMax Inc* | 232,130 | 20,787,242 | |||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.5% | |||||||
Gildan Activewear Inc | 503,751 | 7,803,103 | |||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 0.7% | |||||||
Ferguson PLC | 124,438 | 10,177,968 | |||||
Total Common Stocks (cost $825,920,389) | 1,350,989,810 | ||||||
Limited Partnership Interests – 0.4% | |||||||
Biotechnology – 0.4% | |||||||
RPI International Holdings LP§ (cost $2,783,572) | 135,120 | 5,904,068 | |||||
Investment Companies – 5.0% | |||||||
Money Markets – 5.0% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº,£ (cost $70,874,908) | 70,873,303 | 70,880,390 | |||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending – 1.0% | |||||||
Investment Companies – 0.8% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº,£ | 11,899,932 | 11,899,932 | |||||
Time Deposits – 0.2% | |||||||
Royal Bank of Canada, 0.0900%, 7/1/20 | $2,974,983 | 2,974,983 | |||||
Total Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending (cost $14,874,915) | 14,874,915 | ||||||
Total Investments (total cost $914,453,784) – 100.9% | 1,442,649,183 | ||||||
Liabilities, net of Cash, Receivables and Other Assets – (0.9)% | (13,211,527) | ||||||
Net Assets – 100% | $1,429,437,656 |
Summary of Investments by Country - (Long Positions) (unaudited) | |||||
% of | |||||
Investment | |||||
Country | Value | Securities | |||
United States | $1,271,819,633 | 88.2 | % | ||
Canada | 88,276,586 | 6.1 | |||
Israel | 37,463,275 | 2.6 | |||
Australia | 21,412,651 | 1.5 | |||
France | 11,000,699 | 0.8 | |||
Ireland | 9,022,174 | 0.6 | |||
Denmark | 3,654,165 | 0.2 |
Total | $1,442,649,183 | 100.0 | % |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
10 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Schedules of Affiliated Investments – (% of Net Assets)
Dividend Income | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 5.0% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 5.0% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | $ | 406,580 | $ | 5,632 | $ | 7,044 | $ | 70,880,390 | ||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | 8,655∆ | - | - | 11,899,932 | ||||||
Total Affiliated Investments - 5.8% | $ | 415,235 | $ | 5,632 | $ | 7,044 | $ | 82,780,322 |
Value at 12/31/19 | Purchases | Sales Proceeds | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 5.0% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 5.0% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | 106,440,118 | 88,005,359 | (123,577,763) | 70,880,390 | ||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | 3,921,920 | 103,041,817 | (95,063,805) | 11,899,932 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 11 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Schedule of Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts, Open |
Counterparty/ Foreign Currency | Settlement Date | Foreign Currency Amount (Sold)/ Purchased | USD Currency Amount (Sold)/ Purchased | Market Value and Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | ||||
Barclays Capital, Inc.: | ||||||||
Canadian Dollar | 7/16/20 | (2,572,000) | $ | 1,832,868 | (62,018) | |||
Citibank, National Association: | ||||||||
Canadian Dollar | 9/24/20 | (5,865,000) | 4,300,500 | (21,100) | ||||
Euro | 9/24/20 | (4,748,000) | 5,340,112 | (3,354) | ||||
(24,454) | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International: | ||||||||
Canadian Dollar | 9/10/20 | (11,974,000) | 8,872,522 | 49,772 | ||||
HSBC Securities (USA), Inc.: | ||||||||
Canadian Dollar | 9/24/20 | (10,802,000) | 7,910,007 | (49,402) | ||||
Euro | 9/24/20 | (3,692,800) | 4,149,551 | (6,377) | ||||
(55,779) | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association: | ||||||||
Euro | 7/16/20 | (8,843,000) | 9,556,354 | (381,275) | ||||
Total | $ | (473,754) |
The following table, grouped by derivative type, provides information about the fair value and location of derivatives within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2020.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (not accounted for as hedging instruments) as of June 30, 2020 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Currency
|
Asset Derivatives: |
|
|
| ||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
| $ 49,772 | ||
Liability Derivatives: |
|
|
| ||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
| $523,526 | ||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
12 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
The following tables provide information about the effect of derivatives and hedging activities on the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations for the period ended June 30, 2020.
The effect of Derivative Instruments (not accounted for as hedging instruments) on the Statement of Operations for the period ended June 30, 2020 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Realized Gain/(Loss) Recognized on Derivatives | ||||
Derivative |
| Currency | ||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| $1,396,271 | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
Amount of Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation Recognized on Derivatives | ||||
Derivative |
| Currency
| ||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| $ 55,089 | ||
Please see the "Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments" and "Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation" sections of the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations.
Average Ending Monthly Market Value of Derivative Instruments During the Period Ended June 30, 2020 | |
|
|
| Market Value(a) |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts, sold | $ 44,409,861 |
(a) Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are reported as the average ending monthly currency amount sold. |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 13 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
Russell Midcap® Growth Index | Russell Midcap® Growth Index reflects the performance of U.S. mid-cap equities with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt |
LLC | Limited Liability Company |
LP | Limited Partnership |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
* | Non-income producing security. |
ºº | Rate shown is the 7-day yield as of June 30, 2020. |
# | Loaned security; a portion of the security is on loan at June 30, 2020. |
£ | The Portfolio may invest in certain securities that are considered affiliated companies. As defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, an affiliated company is one in which the Portfolio owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control. |
∆ | Net of income paid to the securities lending agent and rebates paid to the borrowing counterparties. |
§ | Schedule of Restricted Securities (as of June 30, 2020) | |||||||||
Value as a | ||||||||||
Acquisition | % of Net | |||||||||
Date | Cost | Value | Assets | |||||||
RPI International Holdings LP | 2/4/20 | $ | 2,783,572 | $ | 5,904,068 | 0.4 | % | |||
The Portfolio has registration rights for certain restricted securities held as of June 30, 2020. The issuer incurs all registration costs. |
14 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
The following is a summary of the inputs that were used to value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments as of June 30, 2020. See Notes to Financial Statements for more information. | |||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs Summary | |||||||||||||
Level 2 - | Level 3 - | ||||||||||||
Level 1 - | Other Significant | Significant | |||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | |||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments In Securities: | |||||||||||||
Common Stocks | |||||||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies | $ | 26,920,243 | $ | 11,000,699 | $ | - | |||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors | - | 10,177,968 | - | ||||||||||
All Other | 1,302,890,900 | - | - | ||||||||||
Limited Partnership Interests | - | 5,904,068 | - | ||||||||||
Investment Companies | - | 70,880,390 | - | ||||||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | - | 14,874,915 | - | ||||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 1,329,811,143 | $ | 112,838,040 | $ | - | |||||||
Other Financial Instruments(a): | |||||||||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | - | 49,772 | - | ||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,329,811,143 | $ | 112,887,812 | $ | - | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments(a): | |||||||||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | $ | - | $ | 523,526 | $ | - | |||||||
(a) | Other financial instruments include forward foreign currency exchange, futures, written options, written swaptions, and swap contracts. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are reported at their unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract's value from trade date. Futures, certain written options on futures, and centrally cleared swap contracts are reported at their variation margin at measurement date, which represents the amount due to/from the Portfolio at that date. Written options, written swaptions, and other swap contracts are reported at their market value at measurement date. |
Janus Aspen Series | 15 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Unaffiliated investments, at value(1)(2) |
| $ | 1,359,868,861 |
| |
| Affiliated investments, at value(3) |
|
| 82,780,322 |
| |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
| 49,772 |
| |
| Closed foreign currency contracts |
|
| 22,233 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation |
|
| 29,375 |
| |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Investments sold |
|
| 3,763,658 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares sold |
|
| 705,382 |
|
|
| Dividends |
|
| 431,314 |
|
|
| Dividends from affiliates |
|
| 11,686 |
|
| Other assets |
|
| 6,832 |
| |
Total Assets |
|
| 1,447,669,435 |
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Due to custodian |
|
| 541 |
| |
| Foreign cash due to custodian |
|
| 51 |
| |
| Collateral for securities loaned (Note 3) |
|
| 14,874,915 |
| |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
| 523,526 |
| |
| Closed foreign currency contracts |
|
| 740,028 |
| |
| Payables: |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Advisory fees |
|
| 754,291 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares repurchased |
|
| 683,218 |
|
|
| Investments purchased |
|
| 288,434 |
|
|
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees |
|
| 153,394 |
|
|
| Transfer agent fees and expenses |
|
| 63,103 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation fees |
|
| 29,375 |
|
|
| Professional fees |
|
| 18,489 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' fees and expenses |
|
| 7,487 |
|
|
| Custodian fees |
|
| 3,348 |
|
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 2,946 |
|
|
| Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
| 88,633 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 18,231,779 |
| ||
Net Assets |
| $ | 1,429,437,656 |
| ||
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) |
| $ | 873,665,691 |
| |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) |
|
| 555,771,965 |
| |
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 1,429,437,656 |
| ||
Net Assets - Institutional Shares |
| $ | 684,352,728 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 9,323,593 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 73.40 |
| ||
Net Assets - Service Shares |
| $ | 745,084,928 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 10,920,425 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 68.23 |
|
(1) Includes cost of $831,678,944. (2) Includes $14,582,150 of securities on loan. See Note 3 in Notes to Financial Statements. (3) Includes cost of $82,774,840. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
16 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Statement of Operations (unaudited)
For the period ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
| ||
| Dividends | $ | 7,220,594 |
| |
| Dividends from affiliates |
| 406,580 |
| |
| Affiliated securities lending income, net |
| 8,655 |
| |
| Unaffiliated securities lending income, net |
| 862 |
| |
| Other income |
| 13 |
| |
| Foreign tax withheld |
| (123,372) |
| |
Total Investment Income |
| 7,513,332 |
| ||
Expenses: |
|
|
| ||
| Advisory fees |
| 4,506,406 |
| |
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees: |
|
|
| |
|
| Service Shares |
| 900,975 |
|
| Transfer agent administrative fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 171,868 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 180,195 |
|
| Other transfer agent fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 18,773 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 10,074 |
|
| Shareholder reports expense |
| 32,464 |
| |
| Professional fees |
| 21,977 |
| |
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees |
| 17,603 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses |
| 13,147 |
| |
| Registration fees |
| 12,431 |
| |
| Custodian fees |
| 8,627 |
| |
| Other expenses |
| 61,436 |
| |
Total Expenses |
| 5,955,976 |
| ||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 1,557,356 |
| ||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and foreign currency transactions |
| 22,695,331 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 5,632 |
| |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| 1,396,271 |
| |
Total Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments |
| 24,097,234 |
| ||
Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments, foreign currency translations and non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation |
| (137,312,752) |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 7,044 |
| |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| 55,089 |
| |
Total Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation |
| (137,250,619) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | (111,596,029) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 17 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 1,557,356 |
| $ | 3,462,396 |
| |
| Net realized gain/(loss) on investments |
| 24,097,234 |
|
| 111,811,975 |
| |
| Change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation |
| (137,250,619) |
|
| 298,949,675 |
| |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| (111,596,029) |
|
| 414,224,046 |
| ||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (51,851,531) |
|
| (41,927,038) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| (59,611,141) |
|
| (45,398,321) |
|
Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
| (111,462,672) |
|
| (87,325,359) |
| ||
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 1,653,833 |
|
| 50,633,453 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 38,390,896 |
|
| 68,470,182 |
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions |
| 40,044,729 |
|
| 119,103,635 |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
| (183,013,972) |
|
| 446,002,322 |
| ||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Beginning of period |
| 1,612,451,628 |
|
| 1,166,449,306 |
| |
| End of period | $ | 1,429,437,656 |
| $ | 1,612,451,628 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
18 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Financial Highlights
Institutional Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $85.46 |
|
| $67.02 |
|
| $70.65 |
|
| $59.27 |
|
| $57.33 |
|
| $61.75 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.13 |
|
| 0.29 |
|
| 0.21 |
|
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.28 |
|
| 0.27 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (6.21) |
|
| 23.06 |
|
| (0.16) |
|
| 15.67 |
|
| 6.50 |
|
| 2.55 |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (6.08) |
|
| 23.35 |
|
| 0.05 |
|
| 15.78 |
|
| 6.78 |
|
| 2.82 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.06) |
|
| (0.16) |
|
| (0.18) |
|
| (0.17) |
|
| (0.09) |
|
| (0.40) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (5.92) |
|
| (4.75) |
|
| (3.50) |
|
| (4.23) |
|
| (4.75) |
|
| (6.84) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (5.98) |
|
| (4.91) |
|
| (3.68) |
|
| (4.40) |
|
| (4.84) |
|
| (7.24) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $73.40 |
|
| $85.46 |
|
| $67.02 |
|
| $70.65 |
|
| $59.27 |
|
| $57.33 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (6.92)% |
|
| 35.48% |
|
| (0.41)% |
|
| 27.42% |
|
| 12.36% |
|
| 4.05% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $684,353 |
|
| $791,044 |
|
| $577,477 |
|
| $618,750 |
|
| $459,250 |
|
| $418,158 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $695,586 |
|
| $707,052 |
|
| $641,390 |
|
| $556,940 |
|
| $435,190 |
|
| $427,941 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.71% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.73% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.68% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.71% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.73% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.68% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 0.35% |
|
| 0.37% |
|
| 0.29% |
|
| 0.17% |
|
| 0.48% |
|
| 0.44% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 7% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 20% |
|
| 22% |
| ||
Service Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $79.93 |
|
| $63.00 |
|
| $66.67 |
|
| $56.22 |
|
| $54.67 |
|
| $59.26 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.04 |
|
| 0.09 |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| (0.05) |
|
| 0.12 |
|
| 0.11 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (5.82) |
|
| 21.63 |
|
| (0.12) |
|
| 14.82 |
|
| 6.19 |
|
| 2.45 |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (5.78) |
|
| 21.72 |
|
| (0.09) |
|
| 14.77 |
|
| 6.31 |
|
| 2.56 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| — |
|
| (0.04) |
|
| (0.08) |
|
| (0.09) |
|
| (0.01) |
|
| (0.31) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (5.92) |
|
| (4.75) |
|
| (3.50) |
|
| (4.23) |
|
| (4.75) |
|
| (6.84) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (5.92) |
|
| (4.79) |
|
| (3.58) |
|
| (4.32) |
|
| (4.76) |
|
| (7.15) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $68.23 |
|
| $79.93 |
|
| $63.00 |
|
| $66.67 |
|
| $56.22 |
|
| $54.67 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (7.02)% |
|
| 35.14% |
|
| (0.65)% |
|
| 27.09% |
|
| 12.10% |
|
| 3.77% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $745,085 |
|
| $821,408 |
|
| $588,973 |
|
| $555,550 |
|
| $419,251 |
|
| $321,482 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $729,242 |
|
| $734,274 |
|
| $612,433 |
|
| $489,237 |
|
| $373,400 |
|
| $299,393 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.96% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.98% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.94% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.96% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.98% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.94% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 0.10% |
|
| 0.12% |
|
| 0.04% |
|
| (0.08)% |
|
| 0.22% |
|
| 0.19% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 7% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 14% |
|
| 20% |
|
| 22% |
| ||
* Total return includes adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the year or period end and are not annualized for periods of less than one full year. Total return does not include fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and life insurance contracts for which Janus Aspen Series serves as an underlying investment vehicle. ** Annualized for periods of less than one full year. (1) Per share amounts are calculated based on average shares outstanding during the year or period. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 19 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a series of Janus Aspen Series (the “Trust”), which is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and therefore has applied the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946. The Trust offers 11 portfolios, each of which offers multiple share classes, with differing investment objectives and policies. The Portfolio seeks long-term growth of capital. The Portfolio is classified as diversified, as defined in the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio currently offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Service Shares. Each class represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Institutional Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans. Service Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans that require a fee from Portfolio assets to procure distribution and administrative services to contract owners and plan participants.
Shareholders, including other portfolios, participating insurance companies, as well as accounts, may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) a significant percentage of the Portfolio’s Shares and can be considered to “control” the Portfolio when that ownership exceeds 25% of the Portfolio’s assets (and which may differ from control as determined in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting priciples ("US GAAP")).
The following accounting policies have been followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with US GAAP.
Investment Valuation
Securities held by the Portfolio are valued in accordance with policies and procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees (the “Valuation Procedures”). Equity securities traded on a domestic securities exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If such price is lacking for the trading period immediately preceding the time of determination, such securities are valued at their current bid price. Equity securities that are traded on a foreign exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on such markets. In the event that there is no current trading volume on a particular security in such foreign exchange, the bid price from the primary exchange is generally used to value the security. Securities that are traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets are generally valued at their closing or latest bid prices as available. Foreign securities and currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Portfolio will determine the market value of individual securities held by it by using prices provided by one or more approved professional pricing services or, as needed, by obtaining market quotations from independent broker-dealers. Most debt securities are valued in accordance with the evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service that is intended to reflect market value. The evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service is an evaluation that may consider factors such as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Certain short-term securities maturing within 60 days or less may be evaluated and valued on an amortized cost basis provided that the amortized cost determined approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations or evaluated prices are not readily available or deemed unreliable are valued at fair value determined in good faith under the Valuation Procedures. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant event that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy, or significant issuer-specific development; (ii) an event that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; (iii) a nonsignificant event such as a market closing early or not opening, or a security trading halt; and (iv) pricing of a nonvalued security and a restricted or nonpublic security. Special valuation considerations may apply with respect to “odd-lot” fixed-income transactions which, due to their small size, may receive evaluated prices by pricing services which reflect a large block trade and not what actually could be obtained for the odd-lot position. The Portfolio uses systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties to value international equity securities in order to adjust for stale pricing, which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE.
Valuation Inputs Summary
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This standard emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that
20 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets the Portfolio has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Assets or liabilities categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy generally include: debt securities fair valued in accordance with the evaluated bid or ask prices supplied by a pricing service; securities traded on OTC markets and listed securities for which no sales are reported that are fair valued at the latest bid price (or yield equivalent thereof) obtained from one or more dealers transacting in a market for such securities or by a pricing service approved by the Portfolio’s Trustees; certain short-term debt securities with maturities of 60 days or less that are fair valued at amortized cost; and equity securities of foreign issuers whose fair value is determined by using systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties in order to adjust for stale pricing which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE. Other securities that may be categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy include, but are not limited to, preferred stocks, bank loans, swaps, investments in unregistered investment companies, options, and forward contracts.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.
There have been no significant changes in valuation techniques used in valuing any such positions held by the Portfolio since the beginning of the fiscal year.
The inputs or methodology used for fair valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of inputs used as of June 30, 2020 to fair value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments is included in the “Valuation Inputs Summary” in the Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for as of the date purchased or sold (trade date). Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend, if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividends from foreign securities may be subject to withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. The Portfolio classifies gains and losses on prepayments received as an adjustment to interest income. Debt securities may be placed in non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivables when collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Income, as well as gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets.
Expenses
The Portfolio bears expenses incurred specifically on its behalf. Each class of shares bears a portion of general expenses, which are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets. Expenses directly attributable to a specific class of shares are charged against the operations of such class.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Janus Aspen Series | 21 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts that contain provisions for indemnification of other parties against certain potential liabilities. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, and would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred. Currently, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Foreign Currency Translations
The Portfolio does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held at the date of the financial statements. Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency translations arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities held at the date of the financial statements, resulting from changes in the exchange rates and changes in market prices of securities held.
Currency gains and losses are also calculated on payables and receivables that are denominated in foreign currencies. The payables and receivables are generally related to foreign security transactions and income translations.
Foreign currency-denominated assets and forward currency contracts may involve more risks than domestic transactions, including currency risk, counterparty risk, political and economic risk, regulatory risk and equity risk. Risks may arise from unanticipated movements in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Dividends and Distributions
The Portfolio may make semiannual distributions of substantially all of its investment income and an annual distribution of its net realized capital gains (if any).
The Portfolio may make certain investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which pay dividends to their shareholders based upon funds available from operations. It is quite common for these dividends to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits, resulting in the excess portion of such dividends being designated as a return of capital. If the Portfolio distributes such amounts, such distributions could constitute a return of capital to shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years, generally a three-year period, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
2. Derivative Instruments
The Portfolio may invest in various types of derivatives, which may at times result in significant derivative exposure. A derivative is a financial instrument whose performance is derived from the performance of another asset. The Portfolio may invest in derivative instruments including, but not limited to: futures contracts, put options, call options, options on futures contracts, options on foreign currencies, options on recovery locks, options on security and commodity indices, swaps, forward contracts, structured investments, and other equity-linked derivatives. Each derivative instrument that was held by the Portfolio during the period ended June 30, 2020 is discussed in further detail below. A summary of derivative activity by the Portfolio is reflected in the tables at the end of the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio may use derivative instruments for hedging purposes (to offset risks associated with an investment, currency exposure, or market conditions), to adjust currency exposure relative to a benchmark index, or for speculative purposes (to earn income and seek to enhance returns). When the Portfolio invests in a derivative for speculative purposes, the Portfolio will be fully exposed to the risks of loss of that derivative, which may sometimes be greater than the derivative’s cost. The Portfolio may not use any derivative to gain exposure to an asset or class of assets that it would be prohibited by its investment restrictions from purchasing directly. The Portfolio’s ability to use derivative instruments may also be limited by tax considerations.
Investments in derivatives in general are subject to market risks that may cause their prices to fluctuate over time. Investments in derivatives may not directly correlate with the price movements of the underlying instrument. As a result,
22 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
the use of derivatives may expose the Portfolio to additional risks that it would not be subject to if it invested directly in the securities underlying those derivatives. The use of derivatives may result in larger losses or smaller gains than otherwise would be the case. Derivatives can be volatile and may involve significant risks.
In pursuit of its investment objective, the Portfolio may seek to use derivatives to increase or decrease exposure to the following market risk factors:
· Commodity Risk – the risk related to the change in value of commodities or commodity-linked investments due to changes in the overall market movements, volatility of the underlying benchmark, changes in interest rates, or other factors affecting a particular industry or commodity such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs, and international economic, political, and regulatory developments.
· Counterparty Risk – the risk that the counterparty (the party on the other side of the transaction) on a derivative transaction will be unable to honor its financial obligation to the Portfolio.
· Credit Risk – the risk an issuer will be unable to make principal and interest payments when due, or will default on its obligations.
· Currency Risk – the risk that changes in the exchange rate between currencies will adversely affect the value (in U.S. dollar terms) of an investment.
· Equity Risk – the risk related to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
· Index Risk – if the derivative is linked to the performance of an index, it will be subject to the risks associated with changes in that index. If the index changes, the Portfolio could receive lower interest payments or experience a reduction in the value of the derivative to below what the Portfolio paid. Certain indexed securities, including inverse securities (which move in an opposite direction to the index), may create leverage, to the extent that they increase or decrease in value at a rate that is a multiple of the changes in the applicable index.
· Interest Rate Risk – the risk that the value of fixed-income securities will generally decline as prevailing interest rates rise, which may cause the Portfolio’s NAV to likewise decrease.
· Leverage Risk – the risk associated with certain types of leveraged investments or trading strategies pursuant to which relatively small market movements may result in large changes in the value of an investment. The Portfolio creates leverage by investing in instruments, including derivatives, where the investment loss can exceed the original amount invested. Certain investments or trading strategies, such as short sales, that involve leverage can result in losses that greatly exceed the amount originally invested.
· Liquidity Risk – the risk that certain securities may be difficult or impossible to sell at the time that the seller would like or at the price that the seller believes the security is currently worth.
Derivatives may generally be traded OTC or on an exchange. Derivatives traded OTC are agreements that are individually negotiated between parties and can be tailored to meet a purchaser’s needs. OTC derivatives are not guaranteed by a clearing agency and may be subject to increased credit risk.
In an effort to mitigate credit risk associated with derivatives traded OTC, the Portfolio may enter into collateral agreements with certain counterparties whereby, subject to certain minimum exposure requirements, the Portfolio may require the counterparty to post collateral if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized gain on all OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. Additionally, the Portfolio may deposit cash and/or treasuries as collateral with the counterparty and/or custodian daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized loss on OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. All liquid securities and restricted cash are considered to cover in an amount at all times equal to or greater than the Portfolio’s commitment with respect to certain exchange-traded derivatives, centrally cleared derivatives, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, short sales, and/or securities with extended settlement dates. There is no guarantee that counterparty exposure is reduced and these arrangements are dependent on Janus Capital Management LLC's ("Janus Capital") ability to establish and maintain appropriate systems and trading.
Janus Aspen Series | 23 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
A forward foreign currency exchange contract (“forward currency contract”) is an obligation to buy or sell a specified currency at a future date at a negotiated rate (which may be U.S. dollars or a foreign currency). The Portfolio may enter into forward currency contracts for hedging purposes, including, but not limited to, reducing exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on foreign portfolio holdings and locking in the U.S. dollar cost of firm purchase and sale commitments for securities denominated in or exposed to foreign currencies. The Portfolio may also invest in forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes such as seeking to enhance returns. The Portfolio is subject to currency risk and counterparty risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective through its investments in forward currency contracts.
Forward currency contracts are valued by converting the foreign value to U.S. dollars by using the current spot U.S. dollar exchange rate and/or forward rate for that currency. Exchange and forward rates as of the close of the NYSE shall be used to value the forward currency contracts. The unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) for forward currency contracts is reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a receivable or payable and in the Statement of Operations for the change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation (if applicable). The gain or loss arising from the difference between the U.S. dollar cost of the original contract and the value of the foreign currency in U.S. dollars upon closing a forward currency contract is reported on the Statement of Operations (if applicable).
During the period, the Portfolio entered into forward currency contracts with the obligation to sell foreign currencies in the future at an agreed upon rate in order to decrease exposure to currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated securities held by the Portfolio.
3. Other Investments and Strategies
Additional Investment Risk
In the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the financial sector experienced reduced liquidity in credit and other fixed-income markets, and an unusually high degree of volatility, both domestically and internationally. In response to the crisis, the United States and certain foreign governments, along with the U.S. Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks, took a number of unprecedented steps designed to support the financial markets. For example, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 provided for widespread regulation of financial institutions, consumer financial products and services, broker-dealers, over-the-counter derivatives, investment advisers, credit rating agencies, and mortgage lending, which expanded federal oversight in the financial sector, including the investment management industry. More recently, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have taken extraordinary actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets, including reducing interest rates to record low levels. The withdrawal of this support, a failure of measures put in place in response to such economic uncertainty, or investor perception that such efforts were not sufficient could each negatively affect financial markets generally, and the value and liquidity of specific securities. In addition, policy and legislative changes in the United States and in other countries continue to impact many aspects of financial regulation.
Widespread disease, including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and weather-related phenomena generally, have been and can be highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States. These disruptions could prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective(s). Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value of a Fund. In addition, these disruptions could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Fund’s service providers, including Janus Capital or the subadviser (as applicable), rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of the Fund.
A number of countries in the European Union (“EU”) have experienced, and may continue to experience, severe economic and financial difficulties. In particular, many EU nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations.
24 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit. As a result, financial markets in the EU have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. The risk of investing in securities in the European markets may also be heightened due to the referendum in which the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”). The United Kingdom formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into an eleven-month transition period, during which the United Kingdom will remain subject to EU laws and regulations. There is considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the United Kingdom’s exit and how negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted or concluded.
Certain areas of the world have historically been prone to and economically sensitive to environmental events such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, tornadoes, mudslides, or other weather-related phenomena. Such disasters, and the resulting physical or economic damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Portfolio’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Portfolio invests to conduct their businesses as they would under normal conditions. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance and reinsurance companies that insure or reinsure against the impact of natural disasters.
Counterparties
Portfolio transactions involving a counterparty are subject to the risk that the counterparty or a third party will not fulfill its obligation to the Portfolio (“counterparty risk”). Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty’s financial condition (i.e., financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or insolvency), market activities and developments, or other reasons, whether foreseen or not. A counterparty’s inability to fulfill its obligation may result in significant financial loss to the Portfolio. The Portfolio may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited recovery, and/or recovery may be delayed. The extent of the Portfolio’s exposure to counterparty risk with respect to financial assets and liabilities approximates its carrying value. See the "Offsetting Assets and Liabilities" section of this Note for further details.
The Portfolio may be exposed to counterparty risk through participation in various programs, including, but not limited to, lending its securities to third parties, cash sweep arrangements whereby the Portfolio’s cash balance is invested in one or more types of cash management vehicles, as well as investments in, but not limited to, repurchase agreements, debt securities, and derivatives, including various types of swaps, futures and options. The Portfolio intends to enter into financial transactions with counterparties that Janus Capital believes to be creditworthy at the time of the transaction. There is always the risk that Janus Capital’s analysis of a counterparty’s creditworthiness is incorrect or may change due to market conditions. To the extent that the Portfolio focuses its transactions with a limited number of counterparties, it will have greater exposure to the risks associated with one or more counterparties.
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
The Portfolio presents gross and net information about transactions that are either offset in the financial statements or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement with a designated counterparty, regardless of whether the transactions are actually offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
In order to better define its contractual rights and to secure rights that will help the Portfolio mitigate its counterparty risk, the Portfolio has entered into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreement (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar agreement with its derivative contract counterparties. An ISDA Master Agreement is a bilateral agreement between the Portfolio and a counterparty that governs OTC derivatives and forward foreign currency exchange contracts and typically contains, among other things, collateral posting terms and netting provisions in the event of a default and/or termination event. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, in the event of a default and/or termination event, the Portfolio may offset with each counterparty certain derivative financial instruments’ payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment.
The following tables present gross amounts of recognized assets and/or liabilities and the net amounts after deducting collateral that has been pledged by counterparties or has been pledged to counterparties (if applicable). For corresponding information grouped by type of instrument, see the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (not accounted for as hedging instruments) as of June 30, 2020” table located in the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments.
Janus Aspen Series | 25 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets | |||||||||
Gross Amounts | |||||||||
of Recognized | Offsetting Asset | Collateral | |||||||
Counterparty | Assets | or Liability(a) | Pledged(b) | Net Amount | |||||
Credit Suisse International | $ | 49,772 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 49,772 | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | 14,582,150 | (381,275) | (14,200,875) | — | |||||
Total | $ | 14,631,922 | $ | (381,275) | $ | (14,200,875) | $ | 49,772 | |
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities | |||||||||
Gross Amounts | |||||||||
of Recognized | Offsetting Asset | Collateral | |||||||
Counterparty | Liabilities | or Liability(a) | Pledged(b) | Net Amount | |||||
Barclays Capital, Inc. | $ | 62,018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 62,018 | |
Citibank, National Association | 24,454 | — | — | 24,454 | |||||
HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. | 55,779 | — | — | 55,779 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | 381,275 | (381,275) | — | — | |||||
Total | $ | 523,526 | $ | (381,275) | $ | — | $ | 142,251 | |
(a) | Represents the amount of assets or liabilities that could be offset with the same counterparty under master netting or similar agreements that management elects not to offset on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. | ||||||||
(b) | Collateral pledged is limited to the net outstanding amount due to/from an individual counterparty. The actual collateral amounts pledged may exceed these amounts and may fluctuate in value. |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset financial instruments' payables and receivables and related collateral on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Securities on loan will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). See “Securities Lending” in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for additional information.
The Portfolio generally does not exchange collateral on its forward foreign currency contracts with its counterparties; however, all liquid securities and restricted cash are considered to cover in an amount at all times equal to or greater than the Portfolio’s commitment with respect to these contracts. Certain securities may be segregated at the Portfolio’s custodian. These segregated securities are denoted on the accompanying Schedule of Investments and are evaluated daily to ensure their cover and/or market value equals or exceeds the Portfolio’s corresponding forward foreign currency exchange contract's obligation value.
The Portfolio may require the counterparty to pledge securities as collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized gain on OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. The Portfolio may deposit cash as collateral with the counterparty and/or custodian daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized loss on OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. The collateral amounts are subject to minimum exposure requirements and initial margin
26 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
requirements. Collateral amounts are monitored and subsequently adjusted up or down as valuations fluctuate by at least the minimum exposure requirement. Collateral may reduce the risk of loss.
Real Estate Investing
The Portfolio may invest in equity and debt securities of real estate-related companies. Such companies may include those in the real estate industry or real estate-related industries. These securities may include common stocks, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, and other equity securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed securities, real estate-backed securities, securities of REITs and similar REIT-like entities. A REIT is a trust that invests in real estate-related projects, such as properties, mortgage loans, and construction loans. REITs are generally categorized as equity, mortgage, or hybrid REITs. A REIT may be listed on an exchange or traded OTC.
Restricted Security Transactions
Restricted securities held by the Portfolio may not be sold except in exempt transactions or in a public offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The risk of investing in such securities is generally greater than the risk of investing in the securities of widely held, publicly traded companies. Lack of a secondary market and resale restrictions may result in the inability of the Portfolio to sell a security at a fair price and may substantially delay the sale of the security. In addition, these securities may exhibit greater price volatility than securities for which secondary markets exist.
Securities Lending
Under procedures adopted by the Trustees, the Portfolio may seek to earn additional income by lending securities to certain qualified broker-dealers and institutions. Effective December 16, 2019, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association replaced Deutsche Bank AG as securities lending agent for the Portfolio. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. The Portfolio may lend portfolio securities in an amount equal to up to 1/3 of its total assets as determined at the time of the loan origination. There is the risk of delay in recovering a loaned security or the risk of loss in collateral rights if the borrower fails financially. In addition, Janus Capital makes efforts to balance the benefits and risks from granting such loans. All loans will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the SEC. If the Portfolio is unable to recover a security on loan, the Portfolio may use the collateral to purchase replacement securities in the market. There is a risk that the value of the collateral could decrease below the cost of the replacement security by the time the replacement investment is made, resulting in a loss to the Portfolio. In certain circumstances individual loan transactions could yield negative returns.
Upon receipt of cash collateral, Janus Capital may invest it in affiliated or non-affiliated cash management vehicles, whether registered or unregistered entities, as permitted by the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. Janus Capital currently intends to primarily invest the cash collateral in a cash management vehicle for which Janus Capital serves as investment adviser, Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. An investment in Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC is generally subject to the same risks that shareholders experience when investing in similarly structured vehicles, such as the potential for significant fluctuations in assets as a result of the purchase and redemption activity of the securities lending program, a decline in the value of the collateral, and possible liquidity issues. Such risks may delay the return of the cash collateral and cause the Portfolio to violate its agreement to return the cash collateral to a borrower in a timely manner. As adviser to the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest as a result of its fiduciary duties to both the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. Additionally, Janus Capital receives an investment advisory fee of 0.05% for managing Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, but it may not receive a fee for managing certain other affiliated cash management vehicles in which the Portfolio may invest, and therefore may have an incentive to allocate preferred investment opportunities to investment vehicles for which it is receiving a fee.
The value of the collateral must be at least 102% of the market value of the loaned securities that are denominated in U.S. dollars and 105% of the market value of the loaned securities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars. Loaned securities and related collateral are marked-to-market each business day based upon the market value of the loaned securities at the close of business, employing the most recent available pricing information. Collateral levels are then adjusted based on this mark-to-market evaluation.
Janus Aspen Series | 27 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
The cash collateral invested by Janus Capital is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments (if applicable). Income earned from the investment of the cash collateral, net of rebates paid to, or fees paid by, borrowers and less the fees paid to the lending agent are included as “Affiliated securities lending income, net” on the Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2020, securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings with an overnight and continuous contractual maturity are $14,582,150. Gross amounts of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) as of June 30, 2020 is $14,874,915, resulting in the net amount due to the counterparty of $292,765.
Income earned from the investment of the cash collateral, net of rebates paid to, or fees paid by, borrowers and less the fees paid to the lending agent are included as “Affiliated securities lending income, net” on the Statement of Operations.
4. Investment Advisory Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Portfolio pays Janus Capital an investment advisory fee which is calculated daily and paid monthly. The Portfolio’s contractual investment advisory fee rate (expressed as an annual rate) is 0.64% of its average daily net assets.
Janus Services LLC (“Janus Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, is the Portfolio’s transfer agent. Janus Services receives an administrative services fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets of the Portfolio for arranging for the provision by participating insurance companies and qualified plan service providers of administrative services, including recordkeeping, subaccounting, order processing, or other shareholder services provided on behalf of contract holders or plan participants investing in the Portfolio. Other shareholder services may include the provision of order confirmations, periodic account statements, forwarding prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other materials to existing investors, and answering inquiries regarding accounts. Janus Services expects to use this entire fee to compensate insurance companies and qualified plan service providers for providing these services to their customers who invest in the Portfolio. Any unused portion will be reimbursed to the applicable share class at least annually.
In addition, Janus Services provides or arranges for the provision of certain other internal administrative, recordkeeping, and shareholder relations services for the Portfolio. Janus Services is not compensated for these internal services related to the shares, except for out-of-pocket costs. These amounts are disclosed as “Other transfer agent fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Under a distribution and shareholder servicing plan (the “Plan”) adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Service Shares may pay the Trust’s distributor, Janus Distributors LLC (“Janus Distributors”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, a fee for the sale and distribution and/or shareholder servicing of the Service Shares at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Service Shares. Under the terms of the Plan, the Trust is authorized to make payments to Janus Distributors for remittance to insurance companies and qualified plan service providers as compensation for distribution and/or shareholder services performed by such entities. These amounts are disclosed as “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” on the Statement of Operations. Payments under the Plan are not tied exclusively to actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees, and the payments may exceed 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees actually incurred. If any of the Portfolio’s actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees incurred during a calendar year are less than the payments made during a calendar year, the Portfolio will be refunded the difference. Refunds, if any, are included in “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” in the Statement of Operations.
Janus Capital serves as administrator to the Portfolio pursuant to an administration agreement between Janus Capital and the Trust. Under the administration agreement, Janus Capital is obligated to provide or arrange for the provision of certain administration, compliance, and accounting services to the Portfolio, including providing office space for the Portfolio, and is reimbursed by the Portfolio for certain of its costs in providing these services (to the extent Janus Capital seeks reimbursement and such costs are not otherwise waived). In addition, employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates may serve as officers of the Trust. The Portfolio pays for some or all of the salaries, fees, and expenses of Janus Capital employees and Portfolio officers, with respect to certain specified administration functions they perform on behalf of the Portfolio. The Portfolio pays these costs based on out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Janus Capital, and these costs are separate and apart from advisory fees and other expenses paid in connection with the investment advisory services Janus Capital (or any subadvisor, as applicable) provides to the Portfolio. These amounts are disclosed as “Affiliated portfolio administration fees” on the Statement of Operations. In addition, some expenses related to compensation payable to the Portfolio’s Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff, all of whom are employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates, are shared with the Portfolio. Total compensation of $20,422 was paid
28 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
to the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff by the Trust during the period ended June 30, 2020. The Portfolio's portion is reported as part of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for independent Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Portfolio. All deferred fees are credited to an account established in the name of the Trustees. The amounts credited to the account then increase or decrease, as the case may be, in accordance with the performance of one or more of the Janus Henderson funds that are selected by the Trustees. The account balance continues to fluctuate in accordance with the performance of the selected fund or funds until final payment of all amounts are credited to the account. The fluctuation of the account balance is recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) and is included as of June 30, 2020 on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the asset, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation,” and liability, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation fees.” Additionally, the recorded unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is included in “Total distributable earnings (loss)” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferred compensation expenses for the period ended June 30, 2020 are included in “Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Trustees are allowed to change their designation of mutual funds from time to time. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the Deferred Plan. Deferred fees of $220,425 were paid by the Trust to the Trustees under the Deferred Plan during the period ended June 30, 2020.
Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act and related rules, the Portfolio may participate in an affiliated or non-affiliated cash sweep program. In the cash sweep program, uninvested cash balances of the Portfolio may be used to purchase shares of affiliated or non-affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles that operate as money market funds. The Portfolio is eligible to participate in the cash sweep program (the “Investing Funds”). As adviser, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest because of its fiduciary duties to the affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles and the Investing Funds. Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC (the “Sweep Vehicle”) is an affiliated unregistered cash management pooled investment vehicle that invests primarily in highly-rated short-term fixed-income securities. The Sweep Vehicle operates pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act that govern the operation of money market funds and prices its shares at NAV reflecting market-based values of its portfolio securities (i.e., a “floating” NAV) rounded to the fourth decimal place (e.g., $1.0000). The Sweep Vehicle is permitted to impose a liquidity fee (of up to 2%) on redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle or a redemption gate that temporarily suspends redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle for up to 10 business days during a 90 day period. There are no restrictions on the Portfolio's ability to withdraw investments from the Sweep Vehicle at will, and there are no unfunded capital commitments due from the Portfolio to the Sweep Vehicle. The Sweep Vehicle does not charge any management fee, sales charge or service fee.
Any purchases and sales, realized gains/losses and recorded dividends from affiliated investments during the period ended June 30, 2020 can be found in the “Schedules of Affiliated Investments” located in the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio is permitted to purchase or sell securities (“cross-trade”) between itself and other funds or accounts managed by Janus Capital in accordance with Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Rule 17a-7”), when the transaction is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio and in accordance with the Internal Cross Trade Procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any cross-trade of securities by the Portfolio from or to another fund or account that is or could be considered an affiliate of the Portfolio under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser, common Officer, or common Trustee complies with Rule 17a-7. Under these procedures, each cross-trade is effected at the current market price to save costs where allowed. During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio engaged in cross trades amounting to $37,688 in purchases.
5. Federal Income Tax
Income and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for items such as net short-term gains, deferral of wash sale losses, foreign currency transactions, net investment losses, and capital loss carryovers.
The Portfolio has elected to treat gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts as capital gains and losses, if applicable. Other foreign currency gains and losses on debt instruments are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Janus Aspen Series | 29 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
The aggregate cost of investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investment securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2020 are noted below. The primary differences between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of investments are wash sale loss deferrals and investments in partnerships.
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized
| Net Tax Appreciation/ |
$ 912,670,749 | $564,322,255 | $(34,343,821) | $ 529,978,434 |
Information on the tax components of derivatives as of June 30, 2020 is as follows:
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Net
Tax Appreciation/ |
$ - | $ 49,772 | $ (523,526) | $ (473,754) |
Tax cost of investments and unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) may also include timing differences that do not constitute adjustments to tax basis.
6. Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended June 30, 2020 |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||
|
| Shares | Amount |
| Shares | Amount |
Institutional Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 664,034 | $ 49,470,004 |
| 1,542,514 | $123,201,744 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 726,925 | 51,851,531 |
| 533,515 | 41,927,038 | |
Shares repurchased | (1,324,069) | (99,667,702) |
| (1,435,966) | (114,495,329) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 66,890 | $ 1,653,833 |
| 640,063 | $ 50,633,453 | |
Service Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 1,494,703 | $102,582,505 |
| 2,323,035 | $172,829,765 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 898,977 | 59,611,141 |
| 617,488 | 45,398,321 | |
Shares repurchased | (1,749,587) | (123,802,750) |
| (2,013,680) | (149,757,904) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 644,093 | $ 38,390,896 |
| 926,843 | $ 68,470,182 |
7. Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities
For the period ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding any short-term securities, short-term options contracts, TBAs, and in-kind transactions, as applicable) was as follows:
Purchases of | Proceeds from Sales | Purchases
of Long- | Proceeds
from Sales |
$97,448,172 | $ 134,473,562 | $ - | $ - |
8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), in August 2018. The new guidance removes, modifies and enhances the disclosures to Topic 820. For public entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted, and Management has decided, to early adopt the removed and modified disclosures in these financial statements. Management is also evaluating the implications related to the new disclosure requirements and has not yet determined the impact to the financial statements.
30 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
9. Other Matters
An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 has been, and may continue to be, highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Portfolio's investments. This may impact liquidity in the marketplace, which in turn may affect the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests. Public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, and economic risks in certain countries or globally. The duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects cannot be determined with certainty, and could prevent a Portfolio from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Portfolio's ability to achieve its investment objective.
10. Subsequent Event
Management has evaluated whether any events or transactions occurred subsequent to June 30, 2020 and through the date of issuance of the Portfolio’s financial statements and determined that there were no material events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
Janus Aspen Series | 31 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Policies and Voting Record
A description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities is available without charge: (i) upon request, by calling 1-800-525-1093; (ii) on the Portfolio’s website at janushenderson.com/proxyvoting; and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, information regarding the Portfolio’s proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is also available, free of charge, through janushenderson.com/proxyvoting and from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Full Holdings
The Portfolio is required to disclose its complete holdings as an exhibit to Form N-PORT within 60 days of the end of the first and third fiscal quarters, and in the annual report and semiannual report to Portfolio shareholders. Historically, the Portfolio filed its complete portfolio holdings (schedule of investments) with the SEC for the first and third quarters each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Form N-PORT and Form N-Q filings: (i) are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; (ii) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330); and (iii) are available without charge, upon request, by calling a Janus Henderson representative at 1-877-335-2687 (toll free) . Portfolio holdings consisting of at least the names of the holdings are generally available on a monthly basis with a 30-day lag. Holdings are generally posted approximately two business days thereafter under Full Holdings for the Portfolio at janushenderson.com/vit.
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD
The Trustees of Janus Aspen Series, each of whom serves as an “independent” Trustee (the “Trustees”), oversee the management of each Portfolio of Janus Aspen Series (each, a “VIT Portfolio,” and collectively, the “VIT Portfolios”), as well as each Fund of Janus Investment Fund (together with the VIT Portfolios, the “Janus Henderson Funds,” and each, a “Janus Henderson Fund”). As required by law, the Trustees determine annually whether to continue the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund and the subadvisory agreements for the Janus Henderson Funds that utilize subadvisers.
In connection with their most recent consideration of those agreements for each Janus Henderson Fund, the Trustees received and reviewed information provided by Janus Capital and the respective subadvisers in response to requests of the Trustees and their independent legal counsel. They also received and reviewed information and analysis provided by, and in response to requests of, their independent fee consultant. Throughout their consideration of the agreements, the Trustees were advised by their independent legal counsel. The Trustees met with management to consider the agreements, and also met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and their independent fee consultant.
At a meeting held on December 5, 2019, based on the Trustees’ evaluation of the information provided by Janus Capital, the subadvisers, and the independent fee consultant, as well as other information, the Trustees determined that the overall arrangements between each Janus Henderson Fund and Janus Capital and each subadviser, as applicable, were fair and reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital, its affiliates and the subadvisers, the fees charged for those services, and other matters that the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. At that meeting, the Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund, and the subadvisory agreement for each subadvised Janus Henderson Fund, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 1, 2021, subject to earlier termination as provided for in each agreement.
In considering the continuation of those agreements, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. However, the material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the agreements are discussed separately below. Also included is a summary of the independent fee consultant’s conclusions and opinions that arose during, and were included as part of, the Trustees’ consideration of the agreements. “Management fees,” as used herein, reflect actual annual advisory fees and, for the purpose of peer comparisons, any administration fees (excluding out of pocket costs), net of any waivers, paid by a fund as a percentage of average net assets.
32 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees reviewed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital and the subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds, taking into account the investment objective, strategies and policies of each Janus Henderson Fund, and the knowledge the Trustees gained from their regular meetings with management on at least a quarterly basis and their ongoing review of information related to the Janus Henderson Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the resources and key personnel of Janus Capital and each subadviser, particularly noting those employees who provide investment and risk management services to the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Janus Henderson Funds by Janus Capital or the subadvisers, such as managing the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of broker-dealers for those transactions. The Trustees considered Janus Capital’s role as administrator to the Janus Henderson Funds, noting that Janus Capital generally does not receive a fee for its services but is reimbursed for its out-of-pocket costs. The Trustees considered the role of Janus Capital in monitoring adherence to the Janus Henderson Funds’ investment restrictions, providing support services for the Trustees and Trustee committees, and overseeing communications with shareholders and the activities of other service providers, including monitoring compliance with various policies and procedures of the Janus Henderson Funds and with applicable securities laws and regulations.
In this regard, the independent fee consultant noted that Janus Capital provides a number of different services for the Janus Henderson Funds and fund shareholders, ranging from investment management services to various other servicing functions, and that, in its view, Janus Capital is a capable provider of those services. The independent fee consultant also provided its belief that Janus Capital has developed a number of institutional competitive advantages that should enable it to provide superior investment and service performance over the long term.
The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital or the subadviser to each Janus Henderson Fund were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective advisory and subadvisory agreements, and that, taking into account steps taken to address those Janus Henderson Funds whose performance lagged that of their peers for certain periods, the Janus Henderson Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services. They also concluded that Janus Capital and each subadviser had sufficient personnel, with the appropriate education and experience, to serve the Janus Henderson Funds effectively and had demonstrated its ability to attract well-qualified personnel.
Performance of the Funds
The Trustees considered the performance results of each Janus Henderson Fund over various time periods. They noted that they considered Janus Henderson Fund performance data throughout the year, including periodic meetings with each Janus Henderson Fund’s portfolio manager(s), and also reviewed information comparing each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups identified by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent data provider, and with the Janus Henderson Fund’s benchmark index. In this regard, the independent fee consultant found that the overall Janus Henderson Funds’ performance has been reasonable: for the 36 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 71% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar.
The Trustees considered the performance of each Janus Henderson Fund, noting that performance may vary by share class, and noted the following with respect to the VIT Portfolios:
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance.
Janus Aspen Series | 33 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the third Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital and Intech had taken or were taking to improve performance, and the performance trend was improving.
In consideration of each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance, the Trustees concluded that, taking into account the factors relevant to performance, as well as other considerations, including steps taken to improve performance, the Janus Henderson Fund’s performance warranted continuation of such Janus Henderson Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory agreement(s).
Costs of Services Provided
The Trustees examined information regarding the fees and expenses of each Janus Henderson Fund in comparison to similar information for other comparable funds as provided by Broadridge, an independent data provider. They also reviewed an analysis of that information provided by their independent fee consultant and noted that the rate of management fees (investment advisory and any administration, but excluding out-of-pocket costs) for many of the Janus Henderson Funds, after applicable waivers, was below the average management fee rate of the respective peer group of funds selected by an independent data provider. The Trustees also examined information regarding the subadvisory fees charged for subadvisory services, as applicable, noting that all such fees were paid by Janus Capital out of its management fees collected from such Janus Henderson Fund.
The independent fee consultant provided its belief that the management fees charged by Janus Capital to each of the Janus Henderson Funds under the current investment advisory and administration agreements are reasonable in relation to the services provided by Janus Capital. The independent fee consultant found: (1) the total expenses and management fees of the Janus Henderson Funds to be reasonable relative to other mutual funds; (2) the total expenses, on average, were 10% under the average total expenses of their respective Broadridge Expense Group peers; and (3) and the management fees for the Janus Henderson Funds, on average, were 7% under the average management fees for their Expense Groups. The Trustees also considered the total expenses for each share class of
34 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
each Janus Henderson Fund compared to the average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Group peers and to average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Universe.
For certain Janus Henderson Funds, the independent fee consultant also performed a systematic “focus list” analysis of expenses which assessed fund fees in the context of fund performance being delivered. Based on this analysis, the independent fee consultant found that the combination of service quality/performance and expenses on these individual Janus Henderson Funds was reasonable in light of performance trends, performance histories, and existence of performance fees, breakpoints, and/or expense waivers on such Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees considered the methodology used by Janus Capital and each subadviser in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers, the competitive environment for investment management talent, and the competitive market for mutual funds in different distribution channels.
The Trustees also reviewed management fees charged by Janus Capital and each subadviser to comparable separate account clients and to comparable non-affiliated funds subadvised by Janus Capital or by a subadviser (for which Janus Capital or the subadviser provides only or primarily portfolio management services). Although in most instances subadvisory and separate account fee rates for various investment strategies were lower than management fee rates for Janus Henderson Funds having a similar strategy, the Trustees considered that Janus Capital noted that, under the terms of the management agreements with the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital performs significant additional services for the Janus Henderson Funds that it does not provide to those other clients, including administration services, oversight of the Janus Henderson Funds’ other service providers, trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in serving the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital assumes many legal risks and other costs that it does not assume in servicing its other clients. Moreover, they noted that the independent fee consultant found that: (1) the management fees Janus Capital charges to the Janus Henderson Funds are reasonable in relation to the management fees Janus Capital charges to funds subadvised by Janus Capital and to the fees Janus Capital charges to its institutional separate account clients; (2) these subadvised and institutional separate accounts have different service and infrastructure needs; and (3) Janus Henderson mutual fund investors enjoy reasonable fees relative to the fees charged to Janus Henderson subadvised fund and separate account investors; (4) 11 of 12 Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar funds subadvised by Janus Capital; and (5) six of nine Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar separate accounts managed by Janus Capital.
The Trustees considered the fees for each Janus Henderson Fund for its fiscal year ended in 2018, including the VIT Portfolios, and noted the following with regard to each VIT Portfolio’s total expenses, net of applicable fee waivers (the VIT Portfolio’s “total expenses”):
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
Janus Aspen Series | 35 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for its sole share class.
The Trustees reviewed information on the overall profitability to Janus Capital and its affiliates of their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds, and considered profitability data of other publicly traded mutual fund advisers. The Trustees recognized that profitability comparisons among fund managers are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund manager is affected by numerous factors, including the organizational structure of the particular fund manager, differences in complex size, difference in product mix, difference in types of business (mutual fund, institutional and other), differences in the types of funds and other accounts it manages, possible other lines of business, the methodology for allocating expenses, and the fund manager’s capital structure and cost of capital.
Additionally, the Trustees considered the estimated profitability to Janus Capital from the investment management services it provided to each Janus Henderson Fund. In their review, the Trustees considered whether Janus Capital and each subadviser receive adequate incentives and resources to manage the Janus Henderson Funds effectively. In reviewing profitability, the Trustees noted that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund is necessarily a product of the allocation methodology utilized by Janus Capital to allocate its expenses as part of the estimated profitability calculation. In this regard, the Trustees noted that the independent fee consultant found that (1) the expense allocation methodology and rationales utilized by Janus Capital were reasonable and (2) no clear correlation between expense allocations and operating margins. The Trustees also considered that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund was influenced by a number of factors, including not only the allocation methodology selected, but also the presence of fee waivers and expense caps, and whether the Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management agreement contained breakpoints or a performance fee component. The Trustees determined, after taking into account these factors, among others, that Janus Capital’s estimated profitability with respect to each Janus Henderson Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the variation in the range of such estimated profitability among the Janus Henderson Funds was not a material factor in the Board’s approval of the reasonableness of any Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management fees.
The Trustees concluded that the management fees payable by each Janus Henderson Fund to Janus Capital and its affiliates, as well as the fees paid by Janus Capital to the subadvisers of subadvised Janus Henderson Funds, were reasonable in relation to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, taking into account the fees charged by other advisers for managing comparable mutual funds with similar strategies, the fees Janus Capital and the subadvisers charge to other clients, and, as applicable, the impact of fund performance on management fees payable by the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also concluded that each Janus Henderson Fund’s total expenses were reasonable, taking into account the size of the Janus Henderson Fund, the quality of services provided by Janus Capital and any subadviser, the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund, and any expense limitations agreed to or provided by Janus Capital.
Economies of Scale
The Trustees considered information about the potential for Janus Capital to realize economies of scale as the assets of the Janus Henderson Funds increase. They noted that their independent fee consultant published a report to the Trustees in November 2019 which provided its research and analysis into economies of scale. They also noted that, although many Janus Henderson Funds pay advisory fees at a base fixed rate as a percentage of net assets, without any breakpoints or performance fees, their independent fee consultant concluded that 64% of these Janus Henderson Funds’ share classes have contractual management fees (gross of waivers) below their Broadridge expense group averages. They also noted the following: (1) that for those Janus Henderson Funds whose expenses are being reduced by the contractual expense limitations of Janus Capital, Janus Capital is subsidizing certain of these Janus Henderson Funds because they have not reached adequate scale; (2) as the assets of some of the Janus Henderson Funds have declined in the past few years, certain Janus Henderson Funds have benefited from having advisory fee rates that have remained constant rather than increasing as assets declined; (3) performance fee structures have been implemented for various Janus Henderson Funds that have caused the effective rate of advisory fees payable by such a
36 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Janus Henderson Fund to vary depending on the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund relative to its benchmark index over the measurement period; and (4) a few Janus Henderson Funds have fee schedules with breakpoints and reduced fee rates above certain asset levels. The Trustees also noted that the Janus Henderson Funds share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of all of the Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees also considered the independent fee consultant’s conclusion that, given the limitations of various analytical approaches to economies of scale and their conflicting results, it is difficult to analytically confirm or deny the existence of economies of scale in the Janus Henderson complex. In this regard, the independent consultant concluded that (1) to the extent there were economies of scale at Janus Capital, Janus Capital’s general strategy of setting fixed management fees below peers appeared to share any such economies with investors even on smaller Janus Henderson Funds which have not yet achieved those economies and (2) by setting lower fixed fees from the start on these Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital appeared to be investing to increase the likelihood that these Janus Henderson Funds will grow to a level to achieve any scale economies that may exist. Further, the independent fee consultant provided its belief that Janus Henderson Fund investors are well-served by the fee levels and performance fee structures in place on the Janus Henderson Funds in light of any economies of scale that may be present at Janus Capital.
Based on all of the information reviewed, including the recent and past research and analysis conducted by the Trustees’ independent fee consultant, the Trustees concluded that the current fee structure of each Janus Henderson Fund was reasonable and that the current rates of fees do reflect a sharing between Janus Capital and the Janus Henderson Fund of any economies of scale that may be present at the current asset level of the Janus Henderson Fund.
Other Benefits to Janus Capital
The Trustees also considered benefits that accrue to Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds from their relationships with the Janus Henderson Funds. They recognized that two affiliates of Janus Capital separately serve the Janus Henderson Funds as transfer agent and distributor, respectively, and the transfer agent receives compensation directly from the non-money market funds for services provided, and that such compensation contributes to the overall profitability of Janus Capital and its affiliates that results from their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered Janus Capital’s past and proposed use of commissions paid by the Janus Henderson Funds on portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services benefiting the Janus Henderson Fund and/or other clients of Janus Capital and/or Janus Capital, and/or a subadviser to a Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees concluded that Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ use of these types of client commission arrangements to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidelines and was likely to benefit each Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees also concluded that, other than the services provided by Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers pursuant to the agreements and the fees to be paid by each Janus Henderson Fund therefor, the Janus Henderson Funds and Janus Capital and the subadvisers may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other in other ways. They concluded that Janus Capital and its affiliates share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of the Janus Henderson Funds and other clients serviced by Janus Capital and its affiliates. They also concluded that Janus Capital and/or the subadvisers benefit from the receipt of research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Janus Henderson Funds and that the Janus Henderson Funds benefit from Janus Capital’s and/or the subadvisers’ receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of Janus Capital and/or other clients of the subadvisers. They further concluded that the success of any Janus Henderson Fund could attract other business to Janus Capital, the subadvisers or other Janus Henderson funds, and that the success of Janus Capital and the subadvisers could enhance Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ ability to serve the Janus Henderson Funds.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Janus Henderson Funds (other than the money market funds) have adopted and implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “LRMP”) as required by Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”). Rule 22e-4, requires open-end funds to adopt and implement a written liquidity risk management program that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk, which is the risk that a fund could not meet redemption requests without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interest in the fund. The LRMP
Janus Aspen Series | 37 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
incorporates the following elements: (i) assessment, management, and periodic review of liquidity risk; (ii) classification of portfolio investments; (iii) the establishment and monitoring of a highly liquid investment minimum, as applicable; (iv) a 15% limitation on a Portfolio’s illiquid investments; (v) redemptions in-kind; and (vi) board oversight.
The Trustees have designated Janus Capital Management LLC, the Portfolio’s investment adviser (“Janus Capital”), as the Program Administrator for the LRMP responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of the LRMP. A working group comprised of various groups within Janus Capital’s business is responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of different aspects of the LRMP.
The Liquidity Rule requires the Trustees to review at least annually a written report provided by the Program Administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and the effectiveness of its implementation, including, if applicable, the operation of the highly liquid investment minimum, and any material changes to the LRMP (the “Program Administrator Report”). During the semi-annual period ended June 30, 2020, the Program Administrator provided the Program Administrator Report to the Trustees which covered the operation of the LRMP from December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”). No significant liquidity events impacting the Portfolio were noted in the Program Administrator Report, and the Portfolio was able to process redemptions during the normal course of business during the Reporting Period. In addition, the Program Administrator expressed its belief in the Program Administrator Report that:
· the LRMP is reasonably designed and adequate to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, taking into account the Portfolio’s particular risks and circumstances, and includes policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement each required component of the Liquidity Rule; and
· the LRMP, including the Highly Liquid Investment Minimum where applicable, was implemented and operated effectively to achieve the goal of assessing and managing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk.
There can be no assurance that the LRMP will achieve its objectives in the future. Please refer to your Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.
38 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Management Commentary in this report includes valuable insight as well as statistical information to help you understand how your Portfolio’s performance and characteristics stack up against those of comparable indices.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, this report may include information about country exposure. Country exposure is based primarily on the country of risk. A company may be allocated to a country based on other factors such as location of the company’s principal office, the location of the principal trading market for the company’s securities, or the country where a majority of the company’s revenues are derived.
Please keep in mind that the opinions expressed in the Management Commentary are just that: opinions. They are a reflection based on best judgment at the time this report was compiled, which was June 30, 2020. As the investing environment changes, so could opinions. These views are unique and are not necessarily shared by fellow employees or by Janus Henderson in general.
Performance Overviews
Performance overview graphs compare the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Portfolio with one or more widely used market indices. When comparing the performance of the Portfolio with an index, keep in mind that market indices are not available for investment and do not reflect deduction of expenses.
Average annual total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with more than one year of performance history. Average annual total return is calculated by taking the growth or decline in value of an investment over a period of time, including reinvestment of dividends and distributions, then calculating the annual compounded percentage rate that would have produced the same result had the rate of growth been constant throughout the period. Average annual total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Cumulative total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with less than one year of performance history. Cumulative total return is the growth or decline in value of an investment over time, independent of the period of time involved. Cumulative total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Pursuant to federal securities rules, expense ratios shown in the performance chart reflect subsidized (if applicable) and unsubsidized ratios. The total annual fund operating expenses ratio is gross of any fee waivers, reflecting the Portfolio’s unsubsidized expense ratio. The net annual fund operating expenses ratio (if applicable) includes contractual waivers of Janus Capital and reflects the Portfolio’s subsidized expense ratio. Ratios may be higher or lower than those shown in the “Financial Highlights” in this report.
Schedule of Investments
Following the performance overview section is the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments. This schedule reports the types of securities held in the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period. Securities are usually listed by type (common stock, corporate bonds, U.S. Government obligations, etc.) and by industry classification (banking, communications, insurance, etc.). Holdings are subject to change without notice.
The value of each security is quoted as of the last day of the reporting period. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies is converted into U.S. dollars.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, it will also provide a summary of investments by country. This summary reports the Portfolio exposure to different countries by providing the percentage of securities invested in each country. The country of each security represents the country of risk. The Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments relies upon the industry group and country classifications published by Barclays and/or MSCI Inc.
Tables listing details of individual forward currency contracts, futures, written options, swaptions, and swaps follow the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments (if applicable).
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
This statement is often referred to as the “balance sheet.” It lists the assets and liabilities of the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period.
Janus Aspen Series | 39 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Portfolio’s assets are calculated by adding the value of the securities owned, the receivable for securities sold but not yet settled, the receivable for dividends declared but not yet received on securities owned, and the receivable for Portfolio shares sold to investors but not yet settled. The Portfolio’s liabilities include payables for securities purchased but not yet settled, Portfolio shares redeemed but not yet paid, and expenses owed but not yet paid. Additionally, there may be other assets and liabilities such as unrealized gain or loss on forward currency contracts.
The section entitled “Net Assets Consist of” breaks down the components of the Portfolio’s net assets. Because the Portfolio must distribute substantially all earnings, you will notice that a significant portion of net assets is shareholder capital.
The last section of this statement reports the net asset value (“NAV”) per share on the last day of the reporting period. The NAV is calculated by dividing the Portfolio’s net assets for each share class (assets minus liabilities) by the number of shares outstanding.
Statement of Operations
This statement details the Portfolio’s income, expenses, realized gains and losses on securities and currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of Portfolio holdings.
The first section in this statement, entitled “Investment Income,” reports the dividends earned from securities and interest earned from interest-bearing securities in the Portfolio.
The next section reports the expenses incurred by the Portfolio, including the advisory fee paid to the investment adviser, transfer agent fees and expenses, and printing and postage for mailing statements, financial reports and prospectuses. Expense offsets and expense reimbursements, if any, are also shown.
The last section lists the amounts of realized gains or losses from investment and foreign currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Portfolio will realize a gain (or loss) when it sells its position in a particular security. A change in unrealized gain (or loss) refers to the change in net appreciation or depreciation of the Portfolio during the reporting period. “Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” is affected both by changes in the market value of Portfolio holdings and by gains (or losses) realized during the reporting period.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
These statements report the increase or decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets during the reporting period. Changes in the Portfolio’s net assets are attributable to investment operations, dividends and distributions to investors, and capital share transactions. This is important to investors because it shows exactly what caused the Portfolio’s net asset size to change during the period.
The first section summarizes the information from the Statement of Operations regarding changes in net assets due to the Portfolio’s investment operations. The Portfolio’s net assets may also change as a result of dividend and capital gains distributions to investors. If investors receive their dividends and/or distributions in cash, money is taken out of the Portfolio to pay the dividend and/or distribution. If investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions, the Portfolio’s net assets will not be affected. If you compare the Portfolio’s “Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions” to “Reinvested Dividends and Distributions,” you will notice that dividends and distributions have little effect on the Portfolio’s net assets. This is because the majority of the Portfolio’s investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions.
The reinvestment of dividends and distributions is included under “Capital Share Transactions.” “Capital Shares” refers to the money investors contribute to the Portfolio through purchases or withdrawals via redemptions. The Portfolio’s net assets will increase and decrease in value as investors purchase and redeem shares from the Portfolio.
Financial Highlights
This schedule provides a per-share breakdown of the components that affect the Portfolio’s NAV for current and past reporting periods as well as total return, asset size, ratios, and portfolio turnover rate.
The first line in the table reflects the NAV per share at the beginning of the reporting period. The next line reports the net investment income/(loss) per share. Following is the per share total of net gains/(losses), realized and unrealized. Per share dividends and distributions to investors are then subtracted to arrive at the NAV per share at the end of the period. The next line reflects the total return for the period. The total return may include adjustments in accordance with
40 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the total return may differ from the total return reflected for individual shareholder transactions. Also included are ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets.
The Portfolio’s expenses may be reduced through expense offsets and expense reimbursements. The ratios shown reflect expenses before and after any such offsets and reimbursements.
The ratio of net investment income/(loss) summarizes the income earned less expenses, divided by the average net assets of the Portfolio during the reporting period. Do not confuse this ratio with the Portfolio’s yield. The net investment income ratio is not a true measure of the Portfolio’s yield because it does not take into account the dividends distributed to the Portfolio’s investors.
The next figure is the portfolio turnover rate, which measures the buying and selling activity in the Portfolio. Portfolio turnover is affected by market conditions, changes in the asset size of the Portfolio, fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, the nature of the Portfolio’s investments, and the investment style and/or outlook of the portfolio manager(s) and/or investment personnel. A 100% rate implies that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio was replaced once during the fiscal year; a 50% rate means that an amount equal to the value of half the portfolio is traded in a year; and a 200% rate means that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio is traded every six months.
Janus Aspen Series | 41 |
Knowledge Shared
At Janus Henderson, we believe in the sharing of expert insight for better investment and business decisions. We call this ethos Knowledge Shared.
Learn more by visiting janushenderson.com.
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Portfolio. It is not an offer or solicitation for the Portfolio and is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus. | ||||||||
Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc Janus Henderson Distributors | ||||||||
109-24-81116 08-20 |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | |||||
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | |||||
Janus Aspen Series | |||||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
| |||||
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2020, Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned 6.72% and 6.62%, respectively, compared with a 6.14% return for the Portfolio’s benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
During the first half of the period, the exogenous shock of the COVID-19 coronavirus ushered in a period of severe economic uncertainty and market volatility as governments around the world restricted travel and social activity to help contain the virus. Contributing to the malaise was a collapse in oil prices when the virus-related drop in demand was met by a flood of supply after OPEC and Russia failed to agree on production cutbacks. Across the globe, central bank and government stimulus action was swift and aggressive. The Federal Reserve (Fed) cut policy rates to zero, committed to open-ended quantitative easing and introduced programs to support bond market liquidity while Congress approved trillions of dollars in crisis support to consumers and small and large businesses.
The Fed’s aggressive actions supported financial markets and corporations and contributed to a rapid improvement in liquidity conditions. An opening of capital markets for corporations resulted in a record $1.4 trillion of debt issued by investment-grade companies over the period. The staggering levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus coupled with optimism on reopening the U.S. economy bolstered investor confidence in the second half of the period, although volatility remained high.
Investors sought relative safety in U.S. Treasuries, particularly early in the period, and rates fell across the yield curve. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield closed June at 0.66%, down from 1.92% in December. Corporate and securitized credit were volatile, with heightened risk of downgrades and defaults causing spreads over Treasuries to widen dramatically in the first half of the period. Fed support helped credit retrace some of its losses. Investment-grade corporate bonds ultimately generated positive returns versus negative returns for their high-yield counterparts.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Portfolio outperformed its benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Considering the strong returns and heightened valuations in many fixed income markets toward the end of 2019, we had reduced risk coming into 2020. As the COVID-19 health care crisis accelerated through mid-March, we sought to preserve capital and increase liquidity by lowering the credit allocations further, while increasing Fund duration (a measure of interest rate risk) with the purchase of 30-year Treasuries to provide a hedge against spread widening in our credit positions. As we gained confidence in the backstop from monetary and fiscal stimulus and the increased potential for an economic recovery, we added approximately 20% to the portfolio’s corporate credit allocation from its March low. These additions were primarily in the investment-grade space but also, and more selectively, in the high-yield market. To accommodate that increase, we moved further underweight in agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and U.S. Treasuries.
Investment-grade corporate bonds performed well during the period, driven in large part by the Fed’s bond-buying programs. Our overweight coupled with strong security selection contributed positively to relative outperformance. While agency MBS and government-related securities generated positive returns for the period, the asset classes did not keep pace with Treasuries and
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
investment-grade corporate bonds, and our underweights to these asset classes also aided relative results.
At the sector level, positioning in food and beverage contributed to relative performance. Food services company Sysco was the top contributor at the issuer level, performing well after an attractive new issue was launched in March. However, our overweight in midstream energy weighed on results amid highly volatile oil prices. A position in exploration and production company Continental Resources also detracted as its credit ratings were downgraded, reflecting reduced profitability and cash flows.
At the asset class level, an out-of-index allocation to high-yield corporate credit lagged the returns of the Index constituents and detracted from relative performance. The Portfolio’s underweight to Treasuries, the strongest-performing asset class in the Index, also held back returns.
DERIVATIVES USAGE
Please see the Derivative Instruments section in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for a discussion of derivatives used by the Fund.
OUTLOOK
We believe the continued support from both the Fed and fiscal authorities will benefit consumers, corporations and market conditions. With this support, we expect the U.S. economy to bounce back from lockdown levels over the next few quarters but know it will take years before the economy fully recovers.
While there has been a rapid deterioration in corporate fundamentals, we believe we are entering a new phase of the credit cycle where balance sheet repair will be a top priority for management teams and ultimately lead to lower credit risk premiums. We expect corporate bonds and structured securities, including asset-backed securities (ABS) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), to remain in demand, driven by the additional yield available over very low policy rates – which will likely persist for the foreseeable future – and thus more attractive hedging costs for non-U.S. investors.
We continue to favor investment-grade over high-yield companies but remain focused on valuations and diligent in identifying attractive risk-adjusted opportunities across the ratings spectrum. In structured securities, we believe the Fed’s aggressive actions should support liquidity and underlying fundamentals but are biased to higher-quality credits within ABS, CMBS and collateralized mortgage obligations. We will continue to favor sectors and securities where we believe the structures can withstand the elevated economic uncertainty.
Although market sentiment and credit spreads have improved markedly, valuations ended the period closer to longer-term averages and thus still have room to tighten before reaching pre-COVID-19 levels. In our view, this creates an opportunity for attractive returns in fixed income in the year ahead. But we do not expect volatility to fade. COVID-19 and its economic impact remain the most pressing concern, and other risks to market sentiment are also on our radar: a resumption of trade tensions with China and the upcoming U.S. elections to name two. As we navigate these uncertainties, we will continue to adhere to our research-driven investment process with a focus on taking the right amount of risk throughout the cycle.
Thank you for your investment in the Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
Fund Profile |
|
|
30-day Current Yield* | Without
| With
|
Institutional Shares | 1.80% | 1.81% |
Service Shares | 1.56% | 1.57% |
Weighted Average Maturity | 8.6 Years | |
Average Effective Duration** | 6.4 Years | |
* Yield will fluctuate. |
|
|
** A theoretical measure of price volatility. |
|
Ratings† Summary - (% of Total Investments) |
|
AAA | 1.9% |
AA | 29.8% |
A | 12.2% |
BBB | 39.9% |
BB | 5.9% |
B | 1.4% |
Not Rated | 7.9% |
Other | 1.0% |
† Credit ratings provided by Standard & Poor's (S&P), an independent credit rating agency. Credit ratings range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest) based on S&P's measures. Further information on S&P's rating methodology may be found at www.standardandpoors.com. Other rating agencies may rate the same securities differently. Ratings are relative and subjective and are not absolute standards of quality. Credit quality does not remove market risk and is subject to change. "Not Rated" securities are not rated by S&P, but may be rated by other rating agencies and do not necessarily indicate low quality. "Other" includes cash equivalents, equity securities, and certain derivative instruments. |
Asset Allocation - (% of Net Assets) | |||||
Corporate Bonds | 55.2% | ||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 19.2% | ||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 13.6% | ||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds | 10.1% | ||||
Investment Companies | 6.4% | ||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans | 0.4% | ||||
Other | (4.9)% | ||||
100.0% |
Janus Aspen Series | 3 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
See important disclosures on the next page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Average Annual Total Return - for the periods ended June 30, 2020 |
|
| Expense Ratios | ||||||||
|
| Fiscal
| One
| Five | Ten
| Since |
|
| Total
Annual Fund | Net Annual Fund
| |
Institutional Shares |
| 6.72% | 10.10% | 4.15% | 4.35% | 6.31% |
|
| 0.60% | 0.57% | |
Service Shares |
| 6.62% | 9.77% | 3.88% | 4.08% | 6.07% |
|
| 0.85% | 0.82% | |
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
| 6.14% | 8.74% | 4.30% | 3.82% | 5.28% |
|
|
|
| |
Morningstar Quartile - Institutional Shares |
| - | 1st | 2nd | 2nd | 1st |
|
|
|
| |
Morningstar Ranking - based on total returns for Intermediate Core - Plus Bond Funds |
| - | 34/616 | 246/530 | 181/468 | 7/187 |
|
|
|
|
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold. For the most recent month-end performance call 800.668.0434 or visit janushenderson.com/VITperformance.
Net expense ratios reflect the expense waiver, if any, contractually agreed to for at least a one-year period commencing on April 29, 2020.
Performance may be affected by risks that include those associated with non-diversification, portfolio turnover, short sales, potential conflicts of interest, foreign and emerging markets, initial public offerings (IPOs), high-yield and high-risk securities, undervalued, overlooked and smaller capitalization companies, real estate related securities including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), derivatives, and commodity-linked investments. Each product has different risks. Please see the prospectus for more information about risks, holdings and other details.
The Portfolio will normally invest at least 80% of its net assets, measured at the time of purchase, in the type of securities described by its name.
Returns do not reflect the deduction of fees, charges or expenses of any insurance product or qualified plan. If applied, returns would have been lower.
Returns include reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares. The returns do not include adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes.
Performance for Service Shares prior to December 31, 1999 reflects the performance of Institutional Shares, adjusted to reflect the expenses of Service Shares.
Ranking is for the share class shown only; other classes may have different performance characteristics. When an expense waiver is in effect, it may have a material effect on the total return, and therefore the ranking for the period.
4 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information for indexfor index definitions.
Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
See “Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report.”
Effective February 1, 2020, Michael Keough and Greg Wilensky are Co-Portfolio Managers of the Portfolio.
*The Portfolio’s inception date – September 13, 1993
‡ As stated in the prospectus. See Financial Highlights for actual expense ratios during the reporting period.
Janus Aspen Series | 5 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (unaudited)
Expense Examples
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares only); transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement; and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The example is based upon an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the six-months indicated, unless noted otherwise in the table and footnotes below.
Actual Expenses
The information in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based upon the Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Additionally, for an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in either share class or other similar funds, please visit www.finra.org/fundanalyzer.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as any charges at the separate account level or contract level. These fees are fully described in the Portfolio’s prospectuses. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Actual |
| Hypothetical
|
| ||||
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Net Annualized | ||
Institutional Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,067.20 | $3.03 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,021.93 | $2.97 | 0.59% | ||
Service Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,066.20 | $4.32 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,020.69 | $4.22 | 0.84% | ||
† | Expenses Paid During Period are equal to the Net Annualized Expense Ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses in the examples include the effect of applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, if any. Had such waivers and/or reimbursements not been in effect, your expenses would have been higher. Please refer to the Notes to Financial Statements or the Portfolio’s prospectuses for more information regarding waivers and/or reimbursements. |
6 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – 13.6% | |||||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2018-2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.7600%, 3.6740%, 7/27/48 (144A)‡ | $175,725 | $178,847 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2019-5, 2.5930%, 10/25/49 (144A)‡ | 544,807 | 550,768 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2019-6, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.9500%, 2.6200%, 11/25/59 (144A)‡ | 526,630 | 533,225 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC 2020-3, 2.4100%, 4/25/65 (144A)‡ | 781,000 | 780,992 | |||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust I LLC2020-2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 2.2000%, 2.5310%, 1/26/65 (144A)‡ | 836,836 | 842,178 | |||||
Applebee's Funding LLC / IHOP Funding LLC, 4.1940%, 6/7/49 (144A) | 1,230,000 | 1,079,589 | |||||
Arroyo Mortgage Trust 2018-1, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.8500%, 3.7630%, 4/25/48 (144A)‡ | 361,153 | 370,706 | |||||
Bank 2018-BN12 A4, 4.2550%, 5/15/61‡ | 260,123 | 305,692 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN17, 3.7140%, 4/15/52 | 569,676 | 658,831 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN18, 3.5840%, 5/15/62 | 978,130 | 1,127,639 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN20, 3.0110%, 9/15/62 | 466,163 | 515,598 | |||||
Bank 2019-BN23, 2.9200%, 12/15/52 | 838,600 | 924,498 | |||||
Bank 2019-BNK24, 2.9600%, 11/15/62 | 236,800 | 261,949 | |||||
Barclays Comercial Mortgage Securities LLC 2017-DELC, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8500%, 1.0348%, 8/15/36 (144A)‡ | 443,000 | 422,771 | |||||
BBCMS Trust 2015-SRCH, 4.1970%, 8/10/35 (144A) | 1,447,000 | 1,591,242 | |||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust 2020-B16, 2.7320%, 2/15/53 | 565,000 | 611,621 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-IND, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7500%, 0.9348%, 11/15/35 (144A)‡ | 1,232,355 | 1,219,563 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-XL, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9200%, 1.1048%, 10/15/36 (144A)‡ | 1,321,319 | 1,309,930 | |||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-XL, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.0800%, 1.2648%, 10/15/36 (144A)‡ | 219,742 | 215,900 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.2020%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 1,227,000 | 1,279,876 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.6050%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 614,000 | 613,196 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 3.8560%, 12/9/41 (144A) | 614,000 | 585,609 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 4.0755%, 12/9/41 (144A)‡ | 920,000 | 851,277 | |||||
BX Trust 2019-OC11, 4.0755%, 12/9/41 (144A)‡ | 234,000 | 207,674 | |||||
BXP Trust 2017-GM, 3.3790%, 6/13/39 (144A) | 696,000 | 762,109 | |||||
Chase Home Lending Mortgage Trust 2019-ATR2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 7/25/49 (144A)‡ | 167,890 | 167,520 | |||||
COLT Funding LLC 2020-2, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.5000%, 1.8530%, 3/25/65 (144A)‡ | 465,714 | 468,166 | |||||
COLT Funding LLC 2020-3, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.2000%, 1.5060%, 4/27/65 (144A)‡ | 451,000 | 448,022 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2014-C04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 4.9000%, 5.0845%, 11/25/24‡ | 108,809 | 112,753 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2016-C03, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.9000%, 6.0845%, 10/25/28‡ | 189,672 | 197,184 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2016-C04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 4.2500%, 4.4345%, 1/25/29‡ | 444,537 | 455,842 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2017-C01, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 3.5500%, 3.7345%, 7/25/29‡ | 786,183 | 799,046 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2018-C05, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.3500%, 2.5345%, 1/25/31‡ | 401,667 | 393,058 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R02, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.3000%, 2.4845%, 8/25/31 (144A)‡ | 461,240 | 454,440 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R03, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1500%, 2.3345%, 9/25/31 (144A)‡ | 1,186,995 | 1,170,192 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R04, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1000%, 2.2845%, 6/25/39 (144A)‡ | 747,844 | 722,584 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R05, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 7/25/39 (144A)‡ | 1,461,049 | 1,428,901 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2019-R07, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.1000%, 2.2845%, 10/25/39 (144A)‡ | 1,463,902 | 1,418,942 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 7 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2020-R01, ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8000%, 0.9845%, 1/25/40 (144A)‡ | $348,335 | $346,166 | |||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2020-R02, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 1/25/40 (144A)‡ | 1,522,717 | 1,438,032 | |||||
Cosmopolitan Hotel Trust 2017, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9300%, 1.1148%, 11/15/36 (144A)‡ | 552,036 | 528,368 | |||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2018-2, 3.9400%, 7/15/27 (144A) | 563,000 | 580,882 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 3.7870%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 576,643 | 591,499 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 4.0210%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 233,238 | 244,453 | |||||
DB Master Finance LLC, 4.3520%, 5/20/49 (144A) | 461,513 | 488,994 | |||||
Dell Equipment Finance Trust 2020-1, 2.2600%, 6/22/22 (144A) | 628,000 | 638,502 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 3.0820%, 7/25/47 (144A) | 231,075 | 233,488 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.1180%, 7/25/47 (144A) | 362,700 | 389,319 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.1160%, 7/25/48 (144A) | 1,073,873 | 1,139,385 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 4.3280%, 7/25/48 (144A) | 558,060 | 605,374 | |||||
Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, 3.6680%, 10/25/49 (144A) | 1,995,970 | 2,094,432 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1, 5.1700%, 9/16/24 | 1,590,000 | 1,620,931 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2, 5.2700%, 11/15/24 | 1,400,000 | 1,432,138 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3, 3.5300%, 12/15/23 (144A) | 164,992 | 167,323 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A, 4.1600%, 5/15/24 (144A) | 387,710 | 393,802 | |||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2, 3.0400%, 3/15/23 | 367,157 | 368,407 | |||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1A C, 3.0300%, 1/17/23 (144A) | 551,882 | 554,617 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.0000%, 5.1845%, 7/25/25‡ | 713,662 | 730,766 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 5.7000%, 5.8845%, 4/25/28‡ | 371,929 | 387,750 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9500%, 1.1345%, 10/25/29‡ | 20,333 | 20,314 | |||||
Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 2.0000%, 2.1845%, 3/25/31‡ | 1,239,435 | 1,194,478 | |||||
Fannie Mae REMICS, 3.0000%, 5/25/48 | 1,834,756 | 1,969,237 | |||||
Fannie Mae REMICS, 3.0000%, 11/25/49 | 2,120,263 | 2,192,435 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7700%, 0.9545%, 11/25/49 (144A)‡ | 22,310 | 22,290 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.7000%, 1.8845%, 1/25/50 (144A)‡ | 1,014,000 | 938,027 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.7500%, 0.9345%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 129,344 | 128,539 | |||||
Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 3.0000%, 0%, 6/25/50‡ | 418,000 | 418,000 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.0340%, 1.2188%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 293,000 | 280,619 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.3340%, 1.5188%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 328,000 | 309,210 | |||||
Great Wolf Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.6330%, 1.8178%, 12/15/36 (144A)‡ | 365,000 | 337,211 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS10, 4.1550%, 7/10/51‡ | 371,605 | 434,112 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS9, 3.9920%, 3/10/51‡ | 618,450 | 715,365 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2020-GC45, 2.9106%, 2/13/53 | 580,000 | 633,097 | |||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2020-GC47, 2.3772%, 5/12/53 | 663,000 | 703,545 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A23, 4.9700%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 1,185,045 | 1,212,579 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A2I, 3.9820%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 1,185,045 | 1,219,036 | |||||
Jack in the Box Funding LLC 2019-1A A2II, 4.4760%, 8/25/49 (144A) | 1,185,045 | 1,229,421 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 11/25/49 (144A)‡ | 96,131 | 96,130 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-7, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 618,098 | 616,713 | |||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-INV1, | |||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9500%, 1.1345%, 10/25/49 (144A)‡ | 266,225 | 266,219 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
8 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares or | Value | |||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | ||||||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2019-LTV2, ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 12/25/49 (144A)‡ | $442,765 | $441,866 | ||||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust 2020-4, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.2500%, 1.4401%, 11/25/50 (144A)‡ | 416,000 | 415,986 | ||||||
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust 2018-1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.8500%, 1.0345%, 11/25/51 (144A)‡ | 1,772,000 | 1,768,111 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UB11, 2.7820%, 8/15/49 | 594,000 | 629,618 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2019-H6, 3.4170%, 6/15/52 | 324,754 | 365,210 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2015-UBS8, 3.8090%, 12/15/48 | 447,000 | 490,172 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2018-H3, 4.1770%, 7/15/51 | 590,372 | 690,871 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2018-H4, 4.3100%, 12/15/51 | 883,008 | 1,046,406 | ||||||
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2018-2, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 6 Month + 0.6800%, 4.5000%, 2/25/58 (144A)‡ | 476,760 | 506,953 | ||||||
OneMain Direct Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2A, 2.8200%, 7/15/24 (144A) | 520,000 | 521,547 | ||||||
OneMain Direct Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, 3.8500%, 10/14/25 (144A) | 254,000 | 255,660 | ||||||
OneMain Direct Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, 4.4000%, 1/14/28 (144A) | 252,000 | 260,054 | ||||||
Planet Fitness Master Issuer LLC, 3.8580%, 12/5/49 (144A) | 954,205 | 817,602 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-1A, 4.5000%, 1/25/24 (144A)Ç | 294,936 | 297,387 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-2A, 3.9670%, 4/25/24 (144A)Ç | 603,676 | 606,891 | ||||||
Preston Ridge Partners Mortgage Trust 2019-3A, 3.3510%, 7/25/24 (144A)Ç | 407,240 | 406,920 | ||||||
Provident Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-1, 3.0000%, 2/25/50 (144A)‡ | 307,797 | 315,135 | ||||||
PRPM 2020-1A LLC, 2.9810%, 2/25/25 (144A)Ç | 274,403 | 271,802 | ||||||
PRPM LLC, 3.3510%, 11/25/24 (144A)Ç | 686,891 | 682,708 | ||||||
Santander Consumer Auto Receivables Trust 2020-AA, 1.3700%, 10/15/24 (144A) | 707,318 | 711,478 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-3, 4.2900%, 2/15/24 | 1,868,000 | 1,896,627 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-5, 2.5000%, 5/25/43 (144A)‡ | 345,708 | 352,513 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7, 3.0000%, 6/25/43‡ | 144,021 | 148,350 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-9, 3.5000%, 7/25/43 (144A) | 69,872 | 71,861 | ||||||
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2019-3, 3.5000%, 9/25/49 (144A)‡ | 199,954 | 204,371 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH1 A1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 0.9500%, 2.5210%, 1/28/50 (144A)‡ | 227,487 | 227,590 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH1 A2, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 12 Month + 1.0500%, 2.6240%, 1/28/50 (144A)‡ | 448,429 | 444,411 | ||||||
Spruce Hill Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-SH2, 3.4070%, 6/25/55 (144A)‡ | 1,647,000 | 1,646,978 | ||||||
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust 2020-2, 2.7180%, 4/25/60 (144A)‡ | 424,971 | 431,991 | ||||||
Station Place Securitization Trust Series 2019-10, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0848%, 10/24/20 (144A)‡ | 2,436,000 | 2,435,903 | ||||||
Taco Bell Funding LLC, 4.9400%, 11/25/48 (144A) | 215,715 | 228,390 | ||||||
Towd Point Asset Funding LLC 2019-HE1 A1, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 0.9000%, 1.0845%, 4/25/48 (144A)‡ | 705,625 | 695,252 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust 2019-4, | ||||||||
3.5000%, 9/25/49 (144A)‡ | 369,775 | 377,299 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.5730%, 3/15/48 (144A) | 387,075 | 400,247 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.8840%, 3/15/48 (144A) | 105,300 | 111,125 | ||||||
Wendy's Funding LLC, 3.7830%, 6/15/49 (144A) | 567,420 | 596,885 | ||||||
WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C25, 3.6310%, 11/15/47 | 501,000 | 543,940 | ||||||
Total Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $77,393,710) | 78,265,245 | |||||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans – 0.4% | ||||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – 0.4% | ||||||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc, | ||||||||
ICE LIBOR USD 1 Month + 1.7500%, 3.4044%, 2/4/27ƒ,‡ (cost $2,557,770) | 2,557,770 | 2,434,153 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – 55.2% | ||||||||
Banking – 9.7% | ||||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.0600%, 3.5590%, 4/23/27‡ | 2,421,000 | 2,702,032 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.5120%, 3.7050%, 4/24/28‡ | 2,482,000 | 2,805,077 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, SOFR + 2.1500%, 2.5920%, 4/29/31‡ | 1,455,000 | 1,539,029 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.7050%, 6.2500%‡,µ | 1,230,000 | 1,273,136 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.8980%, 6.1000%‡,µ | 538,000 | 567,590 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 9 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Banking – (continued) | |||||||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp, US Treasury Yield Curve Rate + 4.3580%, 4.7000%‡,µ | $1,804,000 | $1,876,160 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 2.2350%, 4.7050%, 1/10/25 (144A)‡ | 835,000 | 924,184 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.1110%, 2.8190%, 11/19/25 (144A)‡ | 567,000 | 593,812 | |||||
BNP Paribas SA, SOFR + 1.5070%, 3.0520%, 1/13/31 (144A)‡ | 1,564,000 | 1,645,240 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.5630%, 3.8870%, 1/10/28‡ | 1,461,000 | 1,646,568 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, SOFR + 1.4220%, 2.9760%, 11/5/30‡ | 535,000 | 569,219 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 4.0680%, 5.9500%‡,µ | 936,000 | 926,598 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, 5.9000%µ | 118,000 | 117,337 | |||||
Citigroup Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9050%, 5.9500%‡,µ | 614,000 | 609,702 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 3.7500%, 7/1/24 | 613,000 | 658,989 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 4.3500%, 8/1/25 | 427,000 | 472,625 | |||||
Citizens Financial Group Inc, 4.3000%, 12/3/25 | 1,435,000 | 1,605,645 | |||||
Credit Agricole SA, 4.3750%, 3/17/25 (144A) | 771,000 | 851,965 | |||||
Credit Agricole SA, 3.2500%, 1/14/30 (144A) | 1,673,000 | 1,794,656 | |||||
Credit Agricole SA/London, SOFR + 1.6760%, 1.9070%, 6/16/26 (144A)‡ | 261,000 | 264,589 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group Inc, 3.5000%, 4/1/25 | 2,530,000 | 2,774,164 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group Inc, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9220%, 4.3696%‡,µ | 1,846,000 | 1,692,228 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, SOFR + 1.8500%, 2.0830%, 4/22/26‡ | 1,682,000 | 1,745,128 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.2450%, 3.9600%, 1/29/27‡ | 2,660,000 | 3,029,866 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 1.3300%, 4.4520%, 12/5/29‡ | 3,362,000 | 4,030,458 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co, SOFR + 2.5150%, 2.9560%, 5/13/31‡ | 2,769,000 | 2,944,496 | |||||
Morgan Stanley, SOFR + 1.9900%, 2.1880%, 4/28/26‡ | 2,671,000 | 2,777,869 | |||||
Morgan Stanley, 3.9500%, 4/23/27 | 1,526,000 | 1,717,578 | |||||
Societe Generale SA, 2.6250%, 1/22/25 (144A) | 1,743,000 | 1,779,651 | |||||
SVB Financial Group, 3.1250%, 6/5/30 | 2,797,000 | 2,995,220 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, SOFR + 1.6000%, 1.6540%, 6/2/24‡ | 1,231,000 | 1,250,935 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 0.7500%, 2.1640%, 2/11/26‡ | 2,842,000 | 2,933,201 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, SOFR + 2.0000%, 2.1880%, 4/30/26‡ | 1,381,000 | 1,427,909 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.9900%, 5.8750%‡,µ | 1,259,000 | 1,308,567 | |||||
55,851,423 | |||||||
Basic Industry – 1.0% | |||||||
Constellium NV, 5.7500%, 5/15/24 (144A) | 847,000 | 847,000 | |||||
Ecolab Inc, 4.8000%, 3/24/30 | 552,000 | 699,838 | |||||
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 3.1630%, 11/15/21 (144A) | 2,043,000 | 2,100,213 | |||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co, 4.5000%, 4/15/23 | 1,564,000 | 1,679,863 | |||||
Steel Dynamics Inc, 5.5000%, 10/1/24 | 403,000 | 414,083 | |||||
5,740,997 | |||||||
Beverages – 0.3% | |||||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 2.3750%, 10/24/29 | 1,434,000 | 1,530,533 | |||||
Brokerage – 1.3% | |||||||
Cboe Global Markets Inc, 3.6500%, 1/12/27 | 1,546,000 | 1,736,983 | |||||
Charles Schwab Corp, 4.2000%, 3/24/25 | 1,023,000 | 1,173,456 | |||||
Charles Schwab Corp, US Treasury Yield Curve Rate + 4.9710%, 5.3750%‡,µ | 2,470,000 | 2,638,750 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 5.6250%, 4/1/24 | 516,000 | 587,993 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 4.6500%, 4/1/30 | 185,000 | 221,166 | |||||
Raymond James Financial Inc, 4.9500%, 7/15/46 | 1,132,000 | 1,368,857 | |||||
7,727,205 | |||||||
Capital Goods – 4.5% | |||||||
Avery Dennison Co, 2.6500%, 4/30/30 | 1,406,000 | 1,440,718 | |||||
BAE Systems PLC, 3.4000%, 4/15/30 (144A) | 501,000 | 546,382 | |||||
Bemis Co Inc, 2.6300%, 6/19/30 | 1,599,000 | 1,639,030 | |||||
Boeing Co, 4.5080%, 5/1/23 | 1,379,000 | 1,456,100 | |||||
Boeing Co, 4.8750%, 5/1/25 | 1,023,000 | 1,113,896 | |||||
Boeing Co, 2.2500%, 6/15/26 | 291,000 | 281,295 | |||||
Boeing Co, 3.6000%, 5/1/34 | 1,447,000 | 1,367,357 | |||||
Boeing Co, 5.7050%, 5/1/40 | 549,000 | 620,880 | |||||
Boeing Co, 5.8050%, 5/1/50 | 549,000 | 647,767 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
10 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Capital Goods – (continued) | |||||||
Boeing Co, 5.9300%, 5/1/60 | $549,000 | $648,717 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp, 3.2500%, 4/1/25 | 613,000 | 679,831 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp, 3.5000%, 4/1/27 | 887,000 | 1,015,833 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp, 4.2500%, 4/1/50 | 244,000 | 316,941 | |||||
General Electric Co, 3.4500%, 5/1/27 | 406,000 | 416,462 | |||||
General Electric Co, 6.7500%, 3/15/32 | 661,000 | 809,264 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 3.8440%, 5/1/25 (144A) | 575,000 | 624,349 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 5.0000%, 11/15/25 (144A) | 2,760,000 | 2,857,566 | |||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, 4.2000%, 5/1/30 (144A) | 1,276,000 | 1,421,503 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 4.4000%, 5/1/30 | 634,000 | 768,409 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 5.1500%, 5/1/40 | 459,000 | 610,813 | |||||
Northrop Grumman Corp, 5.2500%, 5/1/50 | 236,000 | 339,364 | |||||
Otis Worldwide Corp, 2.0560%, 4/5/25 (144A) | 729,000 | 763,977 | |||||
Vulcan Materials Co, 3.5000%, 6/1/30 | 608,000 | 660,240 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 4.4000%, 3/15/24 | 558,000 | 591,560 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 3.4500%, 11/15/26 | 861,000 | 886,297 | |||||
Wabtec Corp, 4.9500%, 9/15/28 | 1,971,000 | 2,193,069 | |||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp, 3.2000%, 6/15/25 | 1,183,000 | 1,207,688 | |||||
25,925,308 | |||||||
Communications – 5.5% | |||||||
AT&T Inc, 3.6000%, 7/15/25 | 150,000 | 166,595 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 4.8500%, 3/1/39 | 1,058,000 | 1,275,693 | |||||
AT&T Inc, 4.7500%, 5/15/46 | 481,000 | 569,602 | |||||
CenturyLink Inc, 6.4500%, 6/15/21 | 928,000 | 949,066 | |||||
CenturyLink Inc, 5.8000%, 3/15/22 | 516,000 | 530,190 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 2.8000%, 4/1/31 | 980,000 | 992,965 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 6.4840%, 10/23/45 | 302,000 | 401,250 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 5.3750%, 5/1/47 | 242,000 | 285,656 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 4.8000%, 3/1/50 | 1,369,000 | 1,551,632 | |||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital, 3.7000%, 4/1/51 | 1,070,000 | 1,040,852 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.1000%, 4/1/25 | 169,000 | 185,639 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.1500%, 3/1/26 | 165,000 | 184,626 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.3000%, 4/1/27 | 461,000 | 518,206 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 4.6000%, 10/15/38 | 800,000 | 1,018,790 | |||||
Comcast Corp, 3.7500%, 4/1/40 | 184,000 | 216,432 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 3.6500%, 9/1/27 | 653,000 | 727,306 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 4.3000%, 2/15/29 | 807,000 | 936,307 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp, 3.1000%, 11/15/29 | 1,372,000 | 1,470,432 | |||||
CSC Holdings LLC, 4.1250%, 12/1/30 (144A) | 1,320,000 | 1,308,529 | |||||
Level 3 Financing Inc, 3.8750%, 11/15/29 (144A) | 1,300,000 | 1,370,616 | |||||
Netflix Inc, 3.6250%, 6/15/25 (144A) | 2,763,000 | 2,783,723 | |||||
RELX Capital Inc, 3.0000%, 5/22/30 | 778,000 | 842,468 | |||||
Sirius XM Radio Inc, 4.1250%, 7/1/30 (144A) | 1,837,000 | 1,812,127 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 6.3750%, 3/1/25 | 1,562,000 | 1,604,955 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.5000%, 4/15/25 (144A) | 727,000 | 792,445 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 1.5000%, 2/15/26 (144A) | 787,000 | 786,945 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.7500%, 4/15/27 (144A) | 1,853,000 | 2,055,904 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 2.0500%, 2/15/28 (144A) | 604,000 | 604,284 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 3.8750%, 4/15/30 (144A) | 356,000 | 396,787 | |||||
T-Mobile USA Inc, 2.5500%, 2/15/31 (144A) | 983,000 | 986,460 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 2.6250%, 8/15/26 | 982,000 | 1,068,464 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 3.0000%, 3/22/27 | 471,000 | 522,410 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.8620%, 8/21/46 | 479,000 | 651,153 | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.5220%, 9/15/48 | 353,000 | 466,477 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 11 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Communications – (continued) | |||||||
Verizon Communications Inc, 4.0000%, 3/22/50 | $407,000 | $512,373 | |||||
31,587,359 | |||||||
Consumer Cyclical – 5.9% | |||||||
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc, 2.9500%, 1/25/30 (144A) | 330,000 | 342,081 | |||||
AutoZone Inc, 3.7500%, 4/18/29 | 1,214,000 | 1,379,320 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.1000%, 4/13/25 | 2,604,000 | 2,925,807 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.5000%, 4/13/27 | 794,000 | 911,481 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc, 4.6250%, 4/13/30 | 554,000 | 647,911 | |||||
Choice Hotels International Inc, 3.7000%, 12/1/29 | 1,179,000 | 1,181,087 | |||||
Experian Finance PLC, 2.7500%, 3/8/30 (144A) | 2,862,000 | 3,049,515 | |||||
General Motors Co, 4.2000%, 10/1/27 | 438,000 | 446,224 | |||||
General Motors Co, 5.0000%, 10/1/28 | 1,113,000 | 1,181,968 | |||||
General Motors Co, 5.4000%, 4/1/48 | 464,000 | 458,590 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3500%, 4/9/25 | 319,000 | 336,678 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3000%, 7/13/25 | 276,000 | 287,589 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co Inc, 4.3500%, 1/17/27 | 748,000 | 773,836 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 3.3500%, 9/1/24 | 228,000 | 227,818 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.2500%, 6/1/25 | 440,000 | 478,460 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.3750%, 4/15/26 | 802,000 | 876,490 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 5.3000%, 1/15/29 | 90,000 | 97,387 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 4.0000%, 1/15/30 | 1,539,000 | 1,530,305 | |||||
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II Inc, 4.0000%, 1/15/31 | 331,000 | 327,058 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd, 5.0000%, 11/1/22 (144A) | 1,034,000 | 1,108,776 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd, 4.7500%, 2/15/25 (144A) | 1,793,000 | 2,008,160 | |||||
IHS Markit Ltd, 4.0000%, 3/1/26 (144A) | 559,000 | 618,260 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 4.0000%, 4/15/25 | 650,000 | 741,695 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 4.5000%, 4/15/30 | 673,000 | 825,443 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 5.0000%, 4/15/40 | 477,000 | 619,679 | |||||
Lowe's Cos Inc, 5.1250%, 4/15/50 | 652,000 | 900,003 | |||||
Marriott International Inc, 5.7500%, 5/1/25 | 1,360,000 | 1,482,156 | |||||
Mastercard Inc, 3.3000%, 3/26/27 | 540,000 | 611,496 | |||||
Mastercard Inc, 3.3500%, 3/26/30 | 686,000 | 793,586 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.3000%, 7/1/25 | 245,000 | 272,179 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.5000%, 7/1/27 | 772,000 | 876,444 | |||||
McDonald's Corp, 3.6250%, 9/1/49 | 732,000 | 811,229 | |||||
MDC Holdings Inc, 5.5000%, 1/15/24 | 1,101,000 | 1,178,070 | |||||
MGM Resorts International, 7.7500%, 3/15/22 | 281,000 | 285,833 | |||||
Nordstrom Inc, 4.3750%, 4/1/30 | 1,408,000 | 1,104,443 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 3.6000%, 9/1/27 | 31,000 | 34,833 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 4.3500%, 6/1/28 | 237,000 | 276,267 | |||||
O'Reilly Automotive Inc, 3.9000%, 6/1/29 | 1,384,000 | 1,593,548 | |||||
33,601,705 | |||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – 8.2% | |||||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.4500%, 3/15/22 (144A) | 1,316,000 | 1,367,208 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.2500%, 10/1/22 (144A) | 958,000 | 1,002,214 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 2.8000%, 3/15/23 (144A) | 75,000 | 77,826 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 2.6000%, 11/21/24 (144A) | 854,000 | 909,407 | |||||
AbbVie Inc, 3.8000%, 3/15/25 (144A) | 1,089,000 | 1,214,275 | |||||
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc, | |||||||
4.9000%, 2/1/46 | 1,197,000 | 1,464,088 | |||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc, 4.3500%, 6/1/40 | 735,000 | 837,001 | |||||
Aramark Services Inc, 6.3750%, 5/1/25 (144A) | 1,934,000 | 1,997,106 | |||||
Baxter International Inc, 3.7500%, 10/1/25 (144A) | 580,000 | 660,812 | |||||
Baxter International Inc, 3.9500%, 4/1/30 (144A) | 507,000 | 601,108 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 3.7500%, 3/1/26 | 704,000 | 799,409 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 4.0000%, 3/1/29 | 366,000 | 418,701 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp, 4.7000%, 3/1/49 | 587,000 | 748,577 | |||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, 3.4000%, 7/26/29 (144A) | 634,000 | 738,914 | |||||
Campbell Soup Co, 3.9500%, 3/15/25 | 227,000 | 255,193 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
12 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Consumer Non-Cyclical – (continued) | |||||||
Cargill Inc, 1.3750%, 7/23/23 (144A) | $299,000 | $304,160 | |||||
Cargill Inc, 2.1250%, 4/23/30 (144A) | 439,000 | 460,076 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 2.4000%, 3/15/30 | 538,000 | 558,169 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 3.2000%, 3/15/40 | 245,000 | 259,444 | |||||
Cigna Corp, 3.4000%, 3/15/50 | 369,000 | 397,520 | |||||
Coca-Cola Co, 3.3750%, 3/25/27 | 1,072,000 | 1,229,151 | |||||
Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV, 2.7500%, 1/22/30 | 691,000 | 730,782 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.1000%, 3/25/25 | 2,020,000 | 2,283,449 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 3.0000%, 8/15/26 | 169,000 | 184,779 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.3000%, 3/25/28 | 903,000 | 1,055,690 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.1250%, 4/1/40 | 342,000 | 403,362 | |||||
CVS Health Corp, 4.2500%, 4/1/50 | 169,000 | 203,278 | |||||
DaVita Inc, 4.6250%, 6/1/30 (144A) | 1,081,000 | 1,075,055 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 2.2000%, 11/15/24 | 606,000 | 636,912 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 2.6000%, 11/15/29 | 332,000 | 353,235 | |||||
DH Europe Finance II Sarl, 3.4000%, 11/15/49 | 428,000 | 480,612 | |||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc, 5.0220%, 8/28/23Ç | 621,000 | 652,050 | |||||
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV, 3.5000%, 1/16/50 | 1,012,000 | 1,044,090 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.0000%, 11/19/24 | 670,000 | 701,590 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.5500%, 11/19/26 | 890,000 | 940,494 | |||||
Hasbro Inc, 3.9000%, 11/19/29 | 2,398,000 | 2,496,606 | |||||
HCA Inc, 5.3750%, 2/1/25 | 573,000 | 613,826 | |||||
JBS USA LUX SA / JBS USA Finance Inc, 6.7500%, 2/15/28 (144A) | 321,000 | 339,059 | |||||
JM Smucker Co, 2.3750%, 3/15/30 | 773,000 | 789,050 | |||||
JM Smucker Co, 3.5500%, 3/15/50 | 363,000 | 374,365 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 4.5970%, 5/25/28 | 1,404,000 | 1,683,698 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 3.2000%, 5/1/30 | 156,000 | 172,577 | |||||
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc, 3.8000%, 5/1/50 | 357,000 | 407,253 | |||||
Mars Inc, 2.7000%, 4/1/25 (144A) | 710,000 | 759,952 | |||||
Mars Inc, 4.2000%, 4/1/59 (144A) | 561,000 | 719,284 | |||||
McCormick & Co Inc/MD, 2.5000%, 4/15/30 | 528,000 | 550,657 | |||||
Mondelez International Holdings Netherlands BV, 2.2500%, 9/19/24 (144A) | 1,216,000 | 1,279,243 | |||||
Mondelez International Inc, 2.1250%, 4/13/23 | 227,000 | 235,111 | |||||
PepsiCo Inc, 2.2500%, 3/19/25 | 703,000 | 751,977 | |||||
PepsiCo Inc, 2.6250%, 3/19/27 | 217,000 | 237,177 | |||||
Pfizer Inc, 2.6250%, 4/1/30 | 325,000 | 357,535 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 5.6500%, 4/1/25 | 1,009,000 | 1,180,384 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 2.4000%, 2/15/30 | 307,000 | 303,396 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 5.9500%, 4/1/30 | 1,315,000 | 1,647,788 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 6.6000%, 4/1/40 | 544,000 | 736,297 | |||||
Sysco Corp, 6.6000%, 4/1/50 | 898,000 | 1,233,604 | |||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 3.0250%, 7/9/40 | 409,000 | 412,119 | |||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 3.3750%, 7/9/60 | 409,000 | 409,031 | |||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, 4.1330%, 3/25/25 | 438,000 | 500,271 | |||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, 4.4970%, 3/25/30 | 1,028,000 | 1,271,587 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 1.6500%, 6/22/25 (144A) | 223,000 | 227,338 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 2.3000%, 6/22/27 (144A) | 259,000 | 267,384 | |||||
Upjohn Inc, 3.8500%, 6/22/40 (144A) | 258,000 | 276,700 | |||||
47,279,006 | |||||||
Electric – 3.7% | |||||||
AEP Transmission Co LLC, 3.6500%, 4/1/50 | 376,000 | 433,964 | |||||
Ameren Corp, 3.5000%, 1/15/31 | 1,766,000 | 1,974,117 | |||||
Berkshire Hathaway Energy, 4.2500%, 10/15/50 (144A) | 1,131,000 | 1,416,523 | |||||
Black Hills Corp, 2.5000%, 6/15/30 | 2,209,305 | 2,256,866 | |||||
CMS Energy Corp, US Treasury Yield Curve Rate + 4.1160%, 4.7500%, 6/1/50‡ | 1,249,000 | 1,273,478 | |||||
Dominion Energy Inc, 3.3750%, 4/1/30 | 898,000 | 993,396 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 1.3000%, 6/15/25 (144A) | 161,000 | 161,883 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 2.0000%, 6/15/30 (144A) | 148,000 | 147,688 | |||||
East Ohio Gas Co/The, 3.0000%, 6/15/50 (144A) | 215,000 | 214,644 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 13 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Electric – (continued) | |||||||
IPALCO Enterprises Inc, 4.2500%, 5/1/30 (144A) | $2,385,000 | $2,583,444 | |||||
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings Inc, 2.7500%, 5/1/25 | 596,000 | 643,550 | |||||
NRG Energy Inc, 7.2500%, 5/15/26 | 2,024,000 | 2,135,320 | |||||
NRG Energy Inc, 6.6250%, 1/15/27 | 758,000 | 792,110 | |||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC, 3.8000%, 6/1/49 | 1,370,000 | 1,657,883 | |||||
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, 2.1000%, 8/1/27 | 532,000 | 525,387 | |||||
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, 2.5000%, 2/1/31 | 1,093,000 | 1,068,517 | |||||
PPL WEM Ltd / Western Power Distribution Ltd, 5.3750%, 5/1/21 (144A) | 1,336,000 | 1,368,457 | |||||
Southern Co, 3.7000%, 4/30/30 | 1,356,000 | 1,547,633 | |||||
21,194,860 | |||||||
Energy – 3.2% | |||||||
Cheniere Corpus Christi Holdings LLC, 3.7000%, 11/15/29 (144A) | 2,230,000 | 2,283,412 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 5.8750%, 1/15/24 | 763,000 | 853,352 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 5.5000%, 6/1/27 | 106,000 | 118,220 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 4.9500%, 6/15/28 | 172,000 | 184,676 | |||||
Energy Transfer Operating LP, 6.0000%, 6/15/48 | 355,000 | 368,247 | |||||
EOG Resources Inc, 4.3750%, 4/15/30 | 1,471,000 | 1,751,048 | |||||
EOG Resources Inc, 4.9500%, 4/15/50 | 1,209,000 | 1,572,764 | |||||
Hess Midstream Operations LP, 5.1250%, 6/15/28 (144A) | 1,974,000 | 1,899,817 | |||||
Kinder Morgan Inc/DE, 6.5000%, 9/15/20 | 84,000 | 84,927 | |||||
Kinder Morgan Inc/DE, 4.3000%, 3/1/28 | 378,000 | 428,313 | |||||
NGPL PipeCo LLC, 4.3750%, 8/15/22 (144A) | 2,001,000 | 2,063,871 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 5.8500%, 1/15/26 | 344,000 | 392,817 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 6.3500%, 1/15/31 | 736,000 | 861,371 | |||||
ONEOK Inc, 7.1500%, 1/15/51 | 192,000 | 233,164 | |||||
Phillips 66, 3.7000%, 4/6/23 | 286,000 | 305,732 | |||||
Phillips 66, 3.8500%, 4/9/25 | 286,000 | 317,006 | |||||
Plains All American Pipeline LP / PAA Finance Corp, 4.6500%, 10/15/25 | 604,000 | 645,010 | |||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd, 4.1000%, 4/15/30 | 813,000 | 925,666 | |||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co LLC, 3.2500%, 5/15/30 (144A) | 1,065,000 | 1,137,327 | |||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co LLC, 3.9500%, 5/15/50 (144A) | 665,000 | 711,678 | |||||
WPX Energy Inc, 4.5000%, 1/15/30 | 1,284,000 | 1,134,555 | |||||
18,272,973 | |||||||
Finance Companies – 0% | |||||||
USAA Capital Corp, 2.1250%, 5/1/30 (144A) | 150,000 | 154,435 | |||||
Financial Institutions – 0.6% | |||||||
Equifax Inc, 2.6000%, 12/15/25 | 1,041,000 | 1,108,898 | |||||
Equifax Inc, 3.1000%, 5/15/30 | 949,000 | 1,008,779 | |||||
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc, 4.4000%, 11/15/22 | 1,319,000 | 1,382,558 | |||||
3,500,235 | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.2% | |||||||
General Electric Co, ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month + 3.3300%, 5.0000%‡,µ | 1,723,000 | 1,352,727 | |||||
Insurance – 1.5% | |||||||
Brown & Brown Inc, 4.5000%, 3/15/29 | 837,000 | 901,786 | |||||
Centene Corp, 4.2500%, 12/15/27 | 1,501,000 | 1,548,897 | |||||
Centene Corp, 4.6250%, 12/15/29 | 2,256,000 | 2,388,585 | |||||
Centene Corp, 3.3750%, 2/15/30 | 910,000 | 918,836 | |||||
Molina Healthcare Inc, 4.3750%, 6/15/28 (144A) | 2,726,000 | 2,732,815 | |||||
8,490,919 | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 0.6% | |||||||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc, 4.9000%, 12/15/30 | 576,000 | 717,244 | |||||
Camden Property Trust, 2.8000%, 5/15/30 | 1,349,000 | 1,457,306 | |||||
Realty Income Corp, 3.2500%, 1/15/31 | 1,099,000 | 1,188,715 | |||||
3,363,265 | |||||||
Technology – 8.5% | |||||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.7000%, 4/15/25 (144A) | 804,000 | 905,206 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 3.1500%, 11/15/25 (144A) | 1,396,000 | 1,482,140 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.1500%, 11/15/30 (144A) | 1,151,000 | 1,252,339 | |||||
Broadcom Inc, 4.3000%, 11/15/32 (144A) | 921,000 | 1,016,714 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
14 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds – (continued) | |||||||
Technology – (continued) | |||||||
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc, 2.9000%, 12/1/29 | $2,259,000 | $2,414,092 | |||||
Cadence Design Systems Inc, 4.3750%, 10/15/24 | 2,887,000 | 3,216,225 | |||||
CoStar Group Inc, 2.8000%, 7/15/30 (144A) | 1,475,000 | 1,509,096 | |||||
Equifax Inc, 2.6000%, 12/1/24 | 1,954,000 | 2,066,526 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 2.6250%, 11/18/24 | 631,000 | 671,775 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 2.9000%, 11/18/26 | 528,000 | 569,142 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 1.8000%, 7/15/27 | 1,400,000 | 1,401,442 | |||||
Equinix Inc, 3.2000%, 11/18/29 | 1,188,000 | 1,289,550 | |||||
Global Payments Inc, 3.2000%, 8/15/29 | 389,000 | 416,619 | |||||
Global Payments Inc, 2.9000%, 5/15/30 | 954,000 | 997,752 | |||||
Intuit Inc, 0.9500%, 7/15/25 | 240,000 | 240,206 | |||||
Intuit Inc, 1.3500%, 7/15/27 | 250,000 | 251,104 | |||||
Keysight Technologies Inc, 3.0000%, 10/30/29 | 1,424,000 | 1,540,277 | |||||
Lam Research Corp, 4.0000%, 3/15/29 | 255,000 | 302,972 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 2.9500%, 5/15/23 (144A) | 173,000 | 180,214 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 3.6250%, 5/15/25 (144A) | 672,000 | 732,312 | |||||
Leidos Inc, 4.3750%, 5/15/30 (144A) | 948,000 | 1,067,875 | |||||
Marvell Technology Group Ltd, 4.2000%, 6/22/23 | 619,000 | 665,148 | |||||
Marvell Technology Group Ltd, 4.8750%, 6/22/28 | 2,055,000 | 2,471,490 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc, 2.6700%, 9/1/23 (144A) | 1,428,000 | 1,469,494 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc, 4.2500%, 9/1/25 (144A) | 1,119,000 | 1,128,220 | |||||
Micron Technology Inc, 2.4970%, 4/24/23 | 1,394,000 | 1,447,585 | |||||
MSCI Inc, 3.8750%, 2/15/31 (144A) | 1,738,000 | 1,772,760 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 1.3500%, 6/1/23 | 267,000 | 272,554 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.4000%, 10/1/24 | 670,000 | 711,116 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.6500%, 10/1/26 | 1,453,000 | 1,579,021 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 2.3000%, 6/1/30 | 574,000 | 596,499 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc, 3.2500%, 6/1/50 | 791,000 | 861,320 | |||||
Total System Services Inc, 4.8000%, 4/1/26 | 2,691,000 | 3,155,307 | |||||
Trimble Inc, 4.7500%, 12/1/24 | 2,757,000 | 2,999,367 | |||||
Trimble Inc, 4.9000%, 6/15/28 | 2,747,000 | 3,152,617 | |||||
Verisk Analytics Inc, 5.5000%, 6/15/45 | 969,000 | 1,328,465 | |||||
Verisk Analytics Inc, 3.6250%, 5/15/50 | 106,000 | 120,078 | |||||
VMware Inc, 4.5000%, 5/15/25 | 730,000 | 798,687 | |||||
VMware Inc, 4.6500%, 5/15/27 | 819,000 | 905,777 | |||||
48,959,083 | |||||||
Transportation – 0.3% | |||||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 3.9000%, 4/1/25 | 445,000 | 505,161 | |||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 5.2000%, 4/1/40 | 203,000 | 280,183 | |||||
United Parcel Service Inc, 5.3000%, 4/1/50 | 440,000 | 628,633 | |||||
1,413,977 | |||||||
Water Utilities – 0.2% | |||||||
American Water Capital Corp, 2.8000%, 5/1/30 | 417,000 | 453,392 | |||||
American Water Capital Corp, 3.4500%, 5/1/50 | 496,000 | 557,262 | |||||
1,010,654 | |||||||
Total Corporate Bonds (cost $294,870,305) | 316,956,664 | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – 19.2% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
2.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 625,900 | 645,923 | |||||
2.5000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 1,232,300 | 1,287,803 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 50,500 | 53,059 | |||||
3.5000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 1,412,762 | 1,483,414 | |||||
4.0000%, TBA, 15 Year Maturity | 403,662 | 426,873 | |||||
2.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 87,200 | 88,979 | |||||
2.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 3,257,000 | 3,387,150 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 660,400 | 693,929 | |||||
3.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 1,640,870 | 1,725,375 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 15 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Fannie Mae – (continued) | |||||||
4.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | $3,300,000 | $3,496,119 | |||||
13,288,624 | |||||||
Fannie Mae Pool: | |||||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | 233,591 | 246,840 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 296,921 | 313,734 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/34 | 47,742 | 50,911 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/34 | 46,524 | 49,566 | |||||
6.0000%, 2/1/37 | 111,086 | 133,419 | |||||
4.5000%, 11/1/42 | 89,042 | 99,416 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/42 | 1,175,945 | 1,273,919 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/43 | 34,474 | 36,853 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/43 | 44,172 | 47,167 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/43 | 4,131,836 | 4,476,078 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/43 | 426,375 | 461,135 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/43 | 1,280,551 | 1,384,948 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/43 | 606,972 | 656,456 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/43 | 631,628 | 667,933 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/43 | 229,380 | 244,887 | |||||
3.5000%, 11/1/43 | 1,364 | 1,478 | |||||
3.5000%, 4/1/44 | 629,530 | 694,314 | |||||
5.0000%, 7/1/44 | 752,311 | 839,562 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/44 | 187,686 | 213,720 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/45 | 2,219,413 | 2,400,351 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/45 | 292,856 | 333,479 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/45 | 170,798 | 190,394 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/45 | 551,889 | 607,906 | |||||
4.5000%, 2/1/46 | 342,486 | 382,390 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 1,073,249 | 1,169,335 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/46 | 884,707 | 945,686 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/47 | 11,872,101 | 12,694,422 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 59,060 | 65,585 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 53,219 | 58,293 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 52,521 | 57,776 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 37,556 | 41,137 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 35,924 | 39,893 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 27,913 | 30,706 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 17,726 | 19,499 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 12,537 | 13,922 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/47 | 11,402 | 12,662 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 178,507 | 190,246 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 97,214 | 104,238 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 83,478 | 88,967 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/1/47 | 43,151 | 46,269 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/47 | 237,233 | 255,811 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/47 | 20,040 | 22,255 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 146,580 | 156,219 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 141,877 | 151,207 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 46,385 | 49,435 | |||||
4.0000%, 7/1/47 | 29,449 | 31,385 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | 173,584 | 187,177 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | 119,788 | 129,169 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/47 | 108,143 | 116,612 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/47 | 444,925 | 469,496 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/1/47 | 291,613 | 310,789 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/1/47 | 168,224 | 179,286 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/1/47 | 177,517 | 191,418 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/1/47 | 24,833 | 26,857 | |||||
4.0000%, 9/1/47 | 77,067 | 83,102 | |||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | 148,411 | 160,033 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
16 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Fannie Mae Pool – (continued) | |||||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | $94,364 | $101,753 | |||||
4.5000%, 9/1/47 | 93,494 | 100,815 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 349,422 | 372,401 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 336,543 | 362,896 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 321,141 | 346,288 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 211,596 | 228,166 | |||||
4.0000%, 10/1/47 | 188,482 | 200,877 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/47 | 19,034 | 20,524 | |||||
4.5000%, 10/1/47 | 13,703 | 14,776 | |||||
4.0000%, 11/1/47 | 136,602 | 145,585 | |||||
4.5000%, 11/1/47 | 109,541 | 118,119 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 813,561 | 868,483 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 168,807 | 178,999 | |||||
4.0000%, 12/1/47 | 130,304 | 138,873 | |||||
3.5000%, 1/1/48 | 584,444 | 623,898 | |||||
3.5000%, 1/1/48 | 279,246 | 298,684 | |||||
4.0000%, 1/1/48 | 1,977,396 | 2,135,821 | |||||
4.0000%, 1/1/48 | 160,708 | 171,277 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/48 | 152,157 | 163,914 | |||||
3.5000%, 3/1/48 | 381,400 | 406,443 | |||||
4.0000%, 3/1/48 | 770,175 | 829,416 | |||||
4.5000%, 3/1/48 | 128,585 | 138,486 | |||||
4.5000%, 4/1/48 | 141,956 | 152,886 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/48 | 83,065 | 88,079 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/48 | 86,921 | 93,614 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/48 | 80,386 | 86,575 | |||||
5.0000%, 5/1/48 | 237,523 | 259,335 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/48 | 164,429 | 177,089 | |||||
4.5000%, 6/1/48 | 88,626 | 95,450 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/48 | 2,147,994 | 2,266,226 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/49 | 302,449 | 324,153 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/49 | 75,984 | 80,774 | |||||
2.5000%, 1/1/50 | 164,169 | 172,400 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 366,634 | 386,262 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | 3,089,747 | 3,259,022 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/56 | 2,585,311 | 2,810,765 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/57 | 1,680,504 | 1,801,163 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/57 | 2,947,314 | 3,226,469 | |||||
3.0000%, 6/1/57 | 8,122 | 8,701 | |||||
57,161,200 | |||||||
Freddie Mac Gold Pool: | |||||||
6.0000%, 4/1/40 | 179,628 | 216,401 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/42 | 12,694 | 13,755 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/42 | 15,525 | 16,822 | |||||
3.5000%, 8/1/42 | 13,587 | 14,722 | |||||
3.0000%, 6/1/43 | 73,747 | 77,614 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/1/44 | 165,770 | 184,860 | |||||
4.0000%, 2/1/46 | 511,051 | 555,523 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 2,078,081 | 2,289,528 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/46 | 299,776 | 316,330 | |||||
3.5000%, 9/1/47 | 537,209 | 567,007 | |||||
5.0000%, 9/1/48 | 121,716 | 133,668 | |||||
4,386,230 | |||||||
Freddie Mac Pool: | |||||||
3.0000%, 5/1/31 | 1,802,229 | 1,908,314 | |||||
3.0000%, 9/1/32 | 364,461 | 386,130 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/32 | 120,881 | 127,183 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/33 | 205,728 | 217,960 | |||||
2.5000%, 12/1/33 | 2,328,366 | 2,441,423 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 17 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Freddie Mac Pool – (continued) | |||||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | $422,383 | $448,063 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/34 | 175,855 | 185,829 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 241,220 | 254,879 | |||||
2.5000%, 11/1/34 | 232,958 | 246,149 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/43 | 492,840 | 532,942 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/43 | 415,323 | 443,928 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/44 | 686,032 | 741,855 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/45 | 867,341 | 919,699 | |||||
3.5000%, 7/1/46 | 505,387 | 548,808 | |||||
4.0000%, 3/1/47 | 146,893 | 159,626 | |||||
3.0000%, 4/1/47 | 465,617 | 491,246 | |||||
3.5000%, 11/1/47 | 724,562 | 773,399 | |||||
3.5000%, 12/1/47 | 541,022 | 577,488 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/48 | 265,730 | 283,168 | |||||
3.5000%, 2/1/48 | 238,787 | 253,807 | |||||
4.0000%, 4/1/48 | 674,177 | 723,056 | |||||
4.5000%, 7/1/48 | 221,938 | 239,264 | |||||
3.0000%, 8/1/49 | 96,948 | 103,905 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 239,677 | 252,246 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 166,162 | 175,243 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 161,552 | 170,024 | |||||
3.0000%, 10/1/49 | 55,227 | 58,246 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 633,436 | 666,655 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 252,595 | 265,842 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 158,423 | 166,731 | |||||
3.0000%, 11/1/49 | 68,265 | 71,996 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 401,018 | 422,048 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 338,746 | 356,511 | |||||
3.0000%, 12/1/49 | 246,249 | 259,163 | |||||
2.5000%, 1/1/50 | 76,525 | 80,362 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 677,820 | 714,864 | |||||
3.0000%, 1/1/50 | 68,820 | 72,645 | |||||
3.0000%, 2/1/50 | 121,962 | 128,741 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | 109,264 | 115,314 | |||||
3.0000%, 3/1/50 | 107,350 | 113,231 | |||||
3.0000%, 5/1/50 | 869,631 | 918,285 | |||||
18,016,268 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae: | |||||||
2.5000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 2,001,700 | 2,101,305 | |||||
3.0000%, TBA, 30 Year Maturity | 580,100 | 612,992 | |||||
2,714,297 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae I Pool: | |||||||
4.0000%, 1/15/45 | 2,332,799 | 2,540,622 | |||||
4.5000%, 8/15/46 | 2,820,584 | 3,128,266 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/15/47 | 238,899 | 259,906 | |||||
4.0000%, 11/15/47 | 344,963 | 375,297 | |||||
4.0000%, 12/15/47 | 458,185 | 498,476 | |||||
6,802,567 | |||||||
Ginnie Mae II Pool: | |||||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 240,610 | 259,072 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 58,528 | 63,019 | |||||
4.0000%, 8/20/47 | 39,301 | 42,944 | |||||
4.5000%, 2/20/48 | 614,312 | 662,780 | |||||
4.0000%, 5/20/48 | 851,276 | 908,564 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/20/48 | 1,177,767 | 1,266,514 | |||||
4.5000%, 5/20/48 | 224,349 | 241,254 | |||||
5.0000%, 5/20/48 | 1,175,725 | 1,281,816 | |||||
4.0000%, 6/20/48 | 1,248,452 | 1,332,469 | |||||
5.0000%, 6/20/48 | 693,771 | 756,373 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
18 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities – (continued) | |||||||
Ginnie Mae II Pool – (continued) | |||||||
5.0000%, 8/20/48 | $1,183,702 | $1,283,511 | |||||
8,098,316 | |||||||
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $106,986,036) | 110,467,502 | ||||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds – 10.1% | |||||||
1.1250%, 2/28/22 | 8,999,000 | 9,142,070 | |||||
0.5000%, 3/31/25 | 900 | 910 | |||||
0.2500%, 6/30/25 | 3,447,700 | 3,440,966 | |||||
1.5000%, 2/15/30 | 1,197,300 | 1,294,160 | |||||
0.6250%, 5/15/30 | 2,053,400 | 2,047,144 | |||||
1.1250%, 5/15/40 | 6,363,000 | 6,302,850 | |||||
2.7500%, 8/15/42 | 11,403,000 | 14,615,884 | |||||
2.3750%, 11/15/49 | 6,004,300 | 7,412,261 | |||||
2.0000%, 2/15/50 | 11,810,000 | 13,517,837 | |||||
Total United States Treasury Notes/Bonds (cost $54,964,739) | 57,774,082 | ||||||
Investment Companies – 6.4% | |||||||
Money Markets – 6.4% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº,£ (cost $36,943,564) | 36,941,190 | 36,944,885 | |||||
Total Investments (total cost $573,716,124) – 104.9% | 602,842,531 | ||||||
Liabilities, net of Cash, Receivables and Other Assets – (4.9)% | (28,344,307) | ||||||
Net Assets – 100% | $574,498,224 |
Summary of Investments by Country - (Long Positions) (unaudited) | |||||
% of | |||||
Investment | |||||
Country | Value | Securities | |||
United States | $581,486,221 | 96.5 | % | ||
France | 7,854,097 | 1.3 | |||
United Kingdom | 7,337,355 | 1.2 | |||
Belgium | 2,301,089 | 0.4 | |||
Mexico | 1,774,872 | 0.3 | |||
Canada | 1,267,747 | 0.2 | |||
Japan | 821,150 | 0.1 |
Total | $602,842,531 | 100.0 | % |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 19 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Schedules of Affiliated Investments – (% of Net Assets)
Dividend Income | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 6.4% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 6.4% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | $ | 113,988 | $ | (96) | $ | 1,687 | $ | 36,944,885 | ||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - N/A | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - N/A | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | 7,842∆ | - | - | - | ||||||
Total Affiliated Investments - 6.4% | $ | 121,830 | $ | (96) | $ | 1,687 | $ | 36,944,885 |
Value at 12/31/19 | Purchases | Sales Proceeds | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 6.4% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 6.4% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | 24,916,418 | 190,645,540 | (178,618,664) | 36,944,885 | ||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - N/A | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - N/A | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | - | 12,543,406 | (12,543,406) | - |
Schedule of Futures
Description | Number of Contracts | Expiration Date | Value and Notional Amount | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | Variation Margin Asset/(Liability) | ||||||||
Futures Purchased: | |||||||||||||
10-Year US Treasury Note | 7 | 9/30/20 | $ | 974,203 | $ | 3,445 | $ | (1,094) |
The following table, grouped by derivative type, provides information about the fair value and location of derivatives within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2020.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (not accounted for as hedging instruments) as of June 30, 2020 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest
Rate |
|
|
|
| ||
Variation margin payable |
|
| $ 1,094 | ||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
20 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
The following tables provide information about the effect of derivatives and hedging activities on the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations for the period ended June 30, 2020.
The effect of Derivative Instruments (not accounted for as hedging instruments) on the Statement of Operations for the period ended June 30, 2020 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Realized Gain/(Loss) Recognized on Derivatives | ||||
Derivative |
| Interest Rate | ||
Futures contracts |
| $ (1,336) | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
Amount of Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation Recognized on Derivatives | ||||
Derivative |
| Interest Rate
| ||
Futures contracts |
| $ 3,445 | ||
Please see the "Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments" and "Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation" sections of the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations.
Average Ending Monthly Market Value of Derivative Instruments During the Period Ended June 30, 2020 | |
|
|
| Market Value |
Futures contracts, purchased | $ 555,984 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 21 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based measure of the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. |
ICE | Intercontinental Exchange |
LIBOR | London Interbank Offered Rate |
LLC | Limited Liability Company |
LP | Limited Partnership |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
SOFR | Secured Overnight Financing Rate |
TBA | (To Be Announced) Securities are purchased/sold on a forward commitment basis with an approximate principal amount and no defined maturity date. The actual principal and maturity date will be determined upon settlement when specific mortgage pools are assigned. |
144A | Securities sold under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are subject to legal and/or contractual restrictions on resale and may not be publicly sold without registration under the 1933 Act. Unless otherwise noted, these securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total value of 144A securities as of the period ended June 30, 2020 is $133,978,949, which represents 23.3% of net assets. |
ƒ | All or a portion of this position is not funded, or has been purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. If applicable, interest rates will be determined and interest will begin to accrue at a future date. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
‡ | Variable or floating rate security. Rate shown is the current rate as of June 30, 2020. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread; they are determined by the issuer or agent and current market conditions. Reference rate is as of reset date and may vary by security, which may not indicate a reference rate and/or spread in their description. |
ºº | Rate shown is the 7-day yield as of June 30, 2020. |
µ | Perpetual security. Perpetual securities have no stated maturity date, but they may be called/redeemed by the issuer. The date indicated, if any, represents the next call date. |
Ç | Step bond. The coupon rate will increase or decrease periodically based upon a predetermined schedule. The rate shown reflects the current rate. |
£ | The Portfolio may invest in certain securities that are considered affiliated companies. As defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, an affiliated company is one in which the Portfolio owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control. |
∆ | Net of income paid to the securities lending agent and rebates paid to the borrowing counterparties. |
22 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
The following is a summary of the inputs that were used to value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments as of June 30, 2020. See Notes to Financial Statements for more information. | |||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs Summary | |||||||||||||
Level 2 - | Level 3 - | ||||||||||||
Level 1 - | Other Significant | Significant | |||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | |||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments In Securities: | |||||||||||||
Asset-Backed/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | $ | - | $ | 78,265,245 | $ | - | |||||||
Bank Loans and Mezzanine Loans | - | 2,434,153 | - | ||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | - | 316,956,664 | - | ||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | - | 110,467,502 | - | ||||||||||
United States Treasury Notes/Bonds | - | 57,774,082 | - | ||||||||||
Investment Companies | - | 36,944,885 | - | ||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | - | $ | 602,842,531 | $ | - | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments(a): | |||||||||||||
Variation Margin Payable | $ | 1,094 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
(a) | Other financial instruments include forward foreign currency exchange, futures, written options, written swaptions, and swap contracts. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are reported at their unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract's value from trade date. Futures, certain written options on futures, and centrally cleared swap contracts are reported at their variation margin at measurement date, which represents the amount due to/from the Portfolio at that date. Written options, written swaptions, and other swap contracts are reported at their market value at measurement date. |
Janus Aspen Series | 23 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Unaffiliated investments, at value(1) |
| $ | 565,897,646 |
| |
| Affiliated investments, at value(2) |
|
| 36,944,885 |
| |
| Cash |
|
| 1,139,967 |
| |
| Deposits with brokers for futures |
|
| 20,000 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation |
|
| 11,816 |
| |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Interest |
|
| 3,066,902 |
|
|
| Investments sold |
|
| 2,865,798 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares sold |
|
| 762,502 |
|
|
| Dividends from affiliates |
|
| 3,809 |
|
| Other assets |
|
| 2,053 |
| |
Total Assets |
|
| 610,715,378 |
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Variation margin payable |
|
| 1,094 |
| |
| Payables: |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Investments purchased |
|
| 34,514,357 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares repurchased |
|
| 1,245,091 |
|
|
| Advisory fees |
|
| 227,397 |
|
|
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees |
|
| 83,942 |
|
|
| Transfer agent fees and expenses |
|
| 24,766 |
|
|
| Professional fees |
|
| 20,125 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation fees |
|
| 11,816 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' fees and expenses |
|
| 2,895 |
|
|
| Custodian fees |
|
| 2,877 |
|
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 1,159 |
|
|
| Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
| 81,635 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 36,217,154 |
| ||
Net Assets |
| $ | 574,498,224 |
| ||
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) |
| $ | 540,126,372 |
| |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) |
|
| 34,371,852 |
| |
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 574,498,224 |
| ||
Net Assets - Institutional Shares |
| $ | 155,983,579 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 12,518,899 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 12.46 |
| ||
Net Assets - Service Shares |
| $ | 418,514,645 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 30,649,647 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 13.65 |
|
(1) Includes cost of $536,772,560. (2) Includes cost of $36,943,564. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
24 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Statement of Operations (unaudited)
For the period ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
| ||
| Interest | $ | 8,308,382 |
| |
| Dividends from affiliates |
| 113,988 |
| |
| Dividends |
| 23,986 |
| |
| Affiliated securities lending income, net |
| 7,842 |
| |
| Unaffiliated securities lending income, net |
| 827 |
| |
| Other income |
| 3,438 |
| |
Total Investment Income |
| 8,458,463 |
| ||
Expenses: |
|
|
| ||
| Advisory fees |
| 1,391,705 |
| |
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees: |
|
|
| |
|
| Service Shares |
| 496,060 |
|
| Transfer agent administrative fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 38,937 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 99,212 |
|
| Other transfer agent fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 4,742 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 6,608 |
|
| Professional fees |
| 24,787 |
| |
| Shareholder reports expense |
| 20,524 |
| |
| Custodian fees |
| 7,611 |
| |
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees |
| 6,908 |
| |
| Registration fees |
| 5,220 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses |
| 5,081 |
| |
| Other expenses |
| 42,140 |
| |
Total Expenses |
| 2,149,535 |
| ||
Less: Excess Expense Reimbursement and Waivers |
| (13,717) |
| ||
Net Expenses |
| 2,135,818 |
| ||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 6,322,645 |
| ||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments |
| 18,061,363 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| (96) |
| |
| Futures contracts |
| (1,336) |
| |
Total Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments |
| 18,059,931 |
| ||
Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation |
| 11,371,794 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 1,687 |
| |
| Futures contracts |
| 3,445 |
| |
Total Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation |
| 11,376,926 |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 35,759,502 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 25 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 6,322,645 |
| $ | 16,145,287 |
| |
| Net realized gain/(loss) on investments |
| 18,059,931 |
|
| 16,000,005 |
| |
| Change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation |
| 11,376,926 |
|
| 21,514,428 |
| |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| 35,759,502 |
|
| 53,659,720 |
| ||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (2,705,722) |
|
| (6,558,390) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| (5,927,120) |
|
| (10,929,187) |
|
Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
| (8,632,842) |
|
| (17,487,577) |
| ||
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (14,128,323) |
|
| (90,843,813) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 2,108,544 |
|
| (11,187,982) |
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions |
| (12,019,779) |
|
| (102,031,795) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
| 15,106,881 |
|
| (65,859,652) |
| ||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Beginning of period |
| 559,391,343 |
|
| 625,250,995 |
| |
| End of period | $ | 574,498,224 |
| $ | 559,391,343 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
26 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Financial Highlights
Institutional Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $11.88 |
|
| $11.21 |
|
| $11.69 |
|
| $11.62 |
|
| $11.67 |
|
| $11.98 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.15 |
|
| 0.34 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 0.30 |
|
| 0.28 |
|
| 0.28 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| 0.65 |
|
| 0.72 |
|
| (0.45) |
|
| 0.12 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
| (0.25) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| 0.80 |
|
| 1.06 |
|
| (0.12) |
|
| 0.42 |
|
| 0.29 |
|
| 0.03 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.22) |
|
| (0.39) |
|
| (0.36) |
|
| (0.35) |
|
| (0.34) |
|
| (0.28) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (0.06) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (0.22) |
|
| (0.39) |
|
| (0.36) |
|
| (0.35) |
|
| (0.34) |
|
| (0.34) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $12.46 |
|
| $11.88 |
|
| $11.21 |
|
| $11.69 |
|
| $11.62 |
|
| $11.67 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| 6.72% |
|
| 9.57% |
|
| (1.00)% |
|
| 3.62% |
|
| 2.46% |
|
| 0.22% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $155,984 |
|
| $162,620 |
|
| $240,427 |
|
| $292,251 |
|
| $335,208 |
|
| $355,569 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $157,500 |
|
| $208,624 |
|
| $266,429 |
|
| $319,492 |
|
| $350,120 |
|
| $347,338 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.61% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.58% |
|
| 0.57% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.59% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.61% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.58% |
|
| 0.57% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 2.45% |
|
| 2.89% |
|
| 2.88% |
|
| 2.51% |
|
| 2.31% |
|
| 2.33% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 90%(2) |
|
| 177%(2) |
|
| 238%(2) |
|
| 130%(2) |
|
| 112% |
|
| 111% |
| ||
Service Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $12.99 |
|
| $12.23 |
|
| $12.73 |
|
| $12.63 |
|
| $12.66 |
|
| $12.98 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.15 |
|
| 0.34 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 0.29 |
|
| 0.27 |
|
| 0.27 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| 0.71 |
|
| 0.79 |
|
| (0.50) |
|
| 0.13 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
| (0.27) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| 0.86 |
|
| 1.13 |
|
| (0.17) |
|
| 0.42 |
|
| 0.28 |
|
| — |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.20) |
|
| (0.37) |
|
| (0.33) |
|
| (0.32) |
|
| (0.31) |
|
| (0.26) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (0.06) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (0.20) |
|
| (0.37) |
|
| (0.33) |
|
| (0.32) |
|
| (0.31) |
|
| (0.32) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $13.65 |
|
| $12.99 |
|
| $12.23 |
|
| $12.73 |
|
| $12.63 |
|
| $12.66 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| 6.62% |
|
| 9.28% |
|
| (1.29)% |
|
| 3.35% |
|
| 2.22% |
|
| (0.06)% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $418,515 |
|
| $396,771 |
|
| $384,824 |
|
| $403,243 |
|
| $401,186 |
|
| $303,873 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $401,209 |
|
| $384,358 |
|
| $389,260 |
|
| $402,544 |
|
| $383,710 |
|
| $250,537 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.84% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.86% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.83% |
|
| 0.82% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.84% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.86% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.83% |
|
| 0.82% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 2.21% |
|
| 2.63% |
|
| 2.64% |
|
| 2.27% |
|
| 2.06% |
|
| 2.09% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 90%(2) |
|
| 177%(2) |
|
| 238%(2) |
|
| 130%(2) |
|
| 112% |
|
| 111% |
| ||
* Total return includes adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the year or period end and are not annualized for periods of less than one full year. Total return does not include fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and life insurance contracts for which Janus Aspen Series serves as an underlying investment vehicle. ** Annualized for periods of less than one full year. (1) Per share amounts are calculated based on average shares outstanding during the year or period. (2) Portfolio Turnover Rate excludes TBA (to be announced) purchase and sales commitments. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 27 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a series of Janus Aspen Series (the “Trust”), which is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and therefore has applied the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946. The Trust offers 11 portfolios, each of which offers multiple share classes, with differing investment objectives and policies. The Portfolio seeks to obtain maximum total return, consistent with preservation of capital. The Portfolio is classified as diversified, as defined in the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio currently offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Service Shares. Each class represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Institutional Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans. Service Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans that require a fee from Portfolio assets to procure distribution and administrative services to contract owners and plan participants.
Shareholders, including other portfolios, participating insurance companies, as well as accounts, may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) a significant percentage of the Portfolio’s Shares and can be considered to “control” the Portfolio when that ownership exceeds 25% of the Portfolio’s assets (and which may differ from control as determined in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting priciples ("US GAAP")).
The following accounting policies have been followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with US GAAP.
Investment Valuation
Securities held by the Portfolio are valued in accordance with policies and procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees (the “Valuation Procedures”). Equity securities traded on a domestic securities exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If such price is lacking for the trading period immediately preceding the time of determination, such securities are valued at their current bid price. Equity securities that are traded on a foreign exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on such markets. In the event that there is no current trading volume on a particular security in such foreign exchange, the bid price from the primary exchange is generally used to value the security. Securities that are traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets are generally valued at their closing or latest bid prices as available. Foreign securities and currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Portfolio will determine the market value of individual securities held by it by using prices provided by one or more approved professional pricing services or, as needed, by obtaining market quotations from independent broker-dealers. Most debt securities are valued in accordance with the evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service that is intended to reflect market value. The evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service is an evaluation that may consider factors such as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Certain short-term securities maturing within 60 days or less may be evaluated and valued on an amortized cost basis provided that the amortized cost determined approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations or evaluated prices are not readily available or deemed unreliable are valued at fair value determined in good faith under the Valuation Procedures. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant event that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy, or significant issuer-specific development; (ii) an event that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; (iii) a nonsignificant event such as a market closing early or not opening, or a security trading halt; and (iv) pricing of a nonvalued security and a restricted or nonpublic security. Special valuation considerations may apply with respect to “odd-lot” fixed-income transactions which, due to their small size, may receive evaluated prices by pricing services which reflect a large block trade and not what actually could be obtained for the odd-lot position. The Portfolio uses systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties to value international equity securities in order to adjust for stale pricing, which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE.
Valuation Inputs Summary
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This standard emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that
28 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets the Portfolio has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Assets or liabilities categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy generally include: debt securities fair valued in accordance with the evaluated bid or ask prices supplied by a pricing service; securities traded on OTC markets and listed securities for which no sales are reported that are fair valued at the latest bid price (or yield equivalent thereof) obtained from one or more dealers transacting in a market for such securities or by a pricing service approved by the Portfolio’s Trustees; certain short-term debt securities with maturities of 60 days or less that are fair valued at amortized cost; and equity securities of foreign issuers whose fair value is determined by using systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties in order to adjust for stale pricing which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE. Other securities that may be categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy include, but are not limited to, preferred stocks, bank loans, swaps, investments in unregistered investment companies, options, and forward contracts.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.
There have been no significant changes in valuation techniques used in valuing any such positions held by the Portfolio since the beginning of the fiscal year.
The inputs or methodology used for fair valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of inputs used as of June 30, 2020 to fair value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments is included in the “Valuation Inputs Summary” in the Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for as of the date purchased or sold (trade date). Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend, if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividends from foreign securities may be subject to withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. The Portfolio classifies gains and losses on prepayments received as an adjustment to interest income. Debt securities may be placed in non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivables when collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Income, as well as gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets.
Expenses
The Portfolio bears expenses incurred specifically on its behalf. Each class of shares bears a portion of general expenses, which are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets. Expenses directly attributable to a specific class of shares are charged against the operations of such class.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Janus Aspen Series | 29 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts that contain provisions for indemnification of other parties against certain potential liabilities. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, and would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred. Currently, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Dividends and Distributions
The Portfolio may make semiannual distributions of substantially all of its investment income and an annual distribution of its net realized capital gains (if any).
The Portfolio may make certain investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which pay dividends to their shareholders based upon funds available from operations. It is quite common for these dividends to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits, resulting in the excess portion of such dividends being designated as a return of capital. If the Portfolio distributes such amounts, such distributions could constitute a return of capital to shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years, generally a three-year period, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
2. Derivative Instruments
The Portfolio may invest in various types of derivatives, which may at times result in significant derivative exposure. A derivative is a financial instrument whose performance is derived from the performance of another asset. The Portfolio may invest in derivative instruments including, but not limited to: futures contracts, put options, call options, options on futures contracts, options on foreign currencies, options on recovery locks, options on security and commodity indices, swaps, forward contracts, structured investments, and other equity-linked derivatives. Each derivative instrument that was held by the Portfolio during the period ended June 30, 2020 is discussed in further detail below. A summary of derivative activity by the Portfolio is reflected in the tables at the end of the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio may use derivative instruments for hedging purposes (to offset risks associated with an investment, currency exposure, or market conditions), to adjust currency exposure relative to a benchmark index, or for speculative purposes (to earn income and seek to enhance returns). When the Portfolio invests in a derivative for speculative purposes, the Portfolio will be fully exposed to the risks of loss of that derivative, which may sometimes be greater than the derivative’s cost. The Portfolio may not use any derivative to gain exposure to an asset or class of assets that it would be prohibited by its investment restrictions from purchasing directly. The Portfolio’s ability to use derivative instruments may also be limited by tax considerations.
Investments in derivatives in general are subject to market risks that may cause their prices to fluctuate over time. Investments in derivatives may not directly correlate with the price movements of the underlying instrument. As a result, the use of derivatives may expose the Portfolio to additional risks that it would not be subject to if it invested directly in the securities underlying those derivatives. The use of derivatives may result in larger losses or smaller gains than otherwise would be the case. Derivatives can be volatile and may involve significant risks.
In pursuit of its investment objective, the Portfolio may seek to use derivatives to increase or decrease exposure to the following market risk factors:
· Commodity Risk – the risk related to the change in value of commodities or commodity-linked investments due to changes in the overall market movements, volatility of the underlying benchmark, changes in interest rates, or other factors affecting a particular industry or commodity such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs, and international economic, political, and regulatory developments.
· Counterparty Risk – the risk that the counterparty (the party on the other side of the transaction) on a derivative transaction will be unable to honor its financial obligation to the Portfolio.
30 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
· Credit Risk – the risk an issuer will be unable to make principal and interest payments when due, or will default on its obligations.
· Currency Risk – the risk that changes in the exchange rate between currencies will adversely affect the value (in U.S. dollar terms) of an investment.
· Equity Risk – the risk related to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
· Index Risk – if the derivative is linked to the performance of an index, it will be subject to the risks associated with changes in that index. If the index changes, the Portfolio could receive lower interest payments or experience a reduction in the value of the derivative to below what the Portfolio paid. Certain indexed securities, including inverse securities (which move in an opposite direction to the index), may create leverage, to the extent that they increase or decrease in value at a rate that is a multiple of the changes in the applicable index.
· Interest Rate Risk – the risk that the value of fixed-income securities will generally decline as prevailing interest rates rise, which may cause the Portfolio’s NAV to likewise decrease.
· Leverage Risk – the risk associated with certain types of leveraged investments or trading strategies pursuant to which relatively small market movements may result in large changes in the value of an investment. The Portfolio creates leverage by investing in instruments, including derivatives, where the investment loss can exceed the original amount invested. Certain investments or trading strategies, such as short sales, that involve leverage can result in losses that greatly exceed the amount originally invested.
· Liquidity Risk – the risk that certain securities may be difficult or impossible to sell at the time that the seller would like or at the price that the seller believes the security is currently worth.
Derivatives may generally be traded OTC or on an exchange. Derivatives traded OTC are agreements that are individually negotiated between parties and can be tailored to meet a purchaser’s needs. OTC derivatives are not guaranteed by a clearing agency and may be subject to increased credit risk.
In an effort to mitigate credit risk associated with derivatives traded OTC, the Portfolio may enter into collateral agreements with certain counterparties whereby, subject to certain minimum exposure requirements, the Portfolio may require the counterparty to post collateral if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized gain on all OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. Additionally, the Portfolio may deposit cash and/or treasuries as collateral with the counterparty and/or custodian daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) if the Portfolio has a net aggregate unrealized loss on OTC derivative contracts with a particular counterparty. All liquid securities and restricted cash are considered to cover in an amount at all times equal to or greater than the Portfolio’s commitment with respect to certain exchange-traded derivatives, centrally cleared derivatives, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, short sales, and/or securities with extended settlement dates. There is no guarantee that counterparty exposure is reduced and these arrangements are dependent on Janus Capital's ability to establish and maintain appropriate systems and trading.
Futures Contracts
A futures contract is an exchange-traded agreement to take or make delivery of an underlying asset at a specific time in the future for a specific predetermined negotiated price. The Portfolio may enter into futures contracts to gain exposure to the stock market or other markets pending investment of cash balances or to meet liquidity needs. The Portfolio is subject to interest rate risk, equity risk, and currency risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective through its investments in futures contracts. The Portfolio may also use such derivative instruments to hedge or protect from adverse movements in securities prices, currency rates or interest rates. The use of futures contracts may involve risks such as the possibility of illiquid markets or imperfect correlation between the values of the contracts and the underlying securities, or that the counterparty will fail to perform its obligations.
Futures contracts on commodities are valued at the settlement price on valuation date on the commodities exchange as reported by an approved vendor. Mini contracts, as defined in the description of the contract, shall be valued using the Actual Settlement Price or “ASET” price type as reported by an approved vendor. In the event that foreign futures trade when the foreign equity markets are closed, the last foreign futures trade price shall be used.
Futures contracts are marked-to-market daily, and the daily variation margin is recorded as a receivable or payable on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities (if applicable). The change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation is
Janus Aspen Series | 31 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
reported on the Statement of Operations (if applicable). When a contract is closed, a realized gain or loss is reported on the Statement of Operations (if applicable), equal to the difference between the opening and closing value of the contract.
Securities held by the Portfolio that are designated as collateral for market value on futures contracts are noted on the Schedule of Investments (if applicable). Such collateral is in the possession of the Portfolio’s futures commission merchant.
With futures, there is minimal counterparty credit risk to the Portfolio since futures are exchange-traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange-traded futures, guarantees the futures against default.
During the period, the Portfolio purchased interest rate futures to increase exposure to interest rate risk.
During the period, the Portfolio sold interest rate futures to decrease exposure to interest rate risk.
3. Other Investments and Strategies
Additional Investment Risk
The Portfolio may be invested in lower-rated debt securities that have a higher risk of default or loss of value since these securities may be sensitive to economic changes, political changes, or adverse developments specific to the issuer.
In the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the financial sector experienced reduced liquidity in credit and other fixed-income markets, and an unusually high degree of volatility, both domestically and internationally. In response to the crisis, the United States and certain foreign governments, along with the U.S. Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks, took a number of unprecedented steps designed to support the financial markets. For example, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 provided for widespread regulation of financial institutions, consumer financial products and services, broker-dealers, over-the-counter derivatives, investment advisers, credit rating agencies, and mortgage lending, which expanded federal oversight in the financial sector, including the investment management industry. More recently, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have taken extraordinary actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets, including reducing interest rates to record low levels. The withdrawal of this support, a failure of measures put in place in response to such economic uncertainty, or investor perception that such efforts were not sufficient could each negatively affect financial markets generally, and the value and liquidity of specific securities. In addition, policy and legislative changes in the United States and in other countries continue to impact many aspects of financial regulation.
Widespread disease, including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and weather-related phenomena generally, have been and can be highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States. These disruptions could prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective(s). Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value of a Fund. In addition, these disruptions could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Fund’s service providers, including Janus Capital or the subadviser (as applicable), rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of the Fund.
A number of countries in the European Union (“EU”) have experienced, and may continue to experience, severe economic and financial difficulties. In particular, many EU nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. Financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit. As a result, financial markets in the EU have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. The risk of
32 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
investing in securities in the European markets may also be heightened due to the referendum in which the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”). The United Kingdom formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into an eleven-month transition period, during which the United Kingdom will remain subject to EU laws and regulations. There is considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the United Kingdom’s exit and how negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted or concluded.
Certain areas of the world have historically been prone to and economically sensitive to environmental events such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, tornadoes, mudslides, or other weather-related phenomena. Such disasters, and the resulting physical or economic damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Portfolio’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Portfolio invests to conduct their businesses as they would under normal conditions. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance and reinsurance companies that insure or reinsure against the impact of natural disasters.
LIBOR Replacement Risk
The Portfolio may invest in certain debt securities, derivatives or other financial instruments that utilize the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as a reference rate for various rate calculations. On July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to stop compelling or inducing banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. However, it remains unclear if LIBOR will continue to exist in its current, or a modified, form. Actions by regulators have resulted in the establishment of alternative reference rates to LIBOR in most major currencies. The U.S. Federal Reserve, based on the recommendations of the New York Federal Reserve’s Alternative Reference Rate Committee (comprised of major derivative market participants and their regulators), has begun publishing a Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), that is intended to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR. Proposals for alternative reference rates for other currencies have also been announced or have already begun publication. However, global consensus on alternative rates is lacking. The elimination of LIBOR or changes to other reference rates or any other changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of reference rates could adversely impact (i) volatility and liquidity in markets that are tied to LIBOR, (ii) the market for, or value of, specific securities or payments linked to those reference rates, (iii) availability or terms of borrowing or refinancing, or (iv) the effectiveness of hedging strategies. For these and other reasons, the elimination of LIBOR or changes to other interest rates may adversely affect the Portfolio’s performance and/or net asset value. Since the usefulness of LIBOR as a benchmark could deteriorate during the transition period, these effects could occur prior to the end of 2021. Markets are slowly developing in response to these new rates. Uncertainty regarding the process for amending existing contracts or instruments to transition away from LIBOR remains a concern for the Portfolio. The effect of any changes to, or discontinuation of, LIBOR on the Portfolio will vary depending, among other things, on (1) existing fallback or termination provisions in individual contracts and (2) whether, how, and when industry participants develop and adopt new reference rates and fallbacks for both legacy and new products and instruments. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the transition away from LIBOR on the Portfolio until new reference rates and fallbacks for both legacy and new products, instruments and contracts are commercially accepted.
Counterparties
Portfolio transactions involving a counterparty are subject to the risk that the counterparty or a third party will not fulfill its obligation to the Portfolio (“counterparty risk”). Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty’s financial condition (i.e., financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or insolvency), market activities and developments, or other reasons, whether foreseen or not. A counterparty’s inability to fulfill its obligation may result in significant financial loss to the Portfolio. The Portfolio may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited recovery, and/or recovery may be delayed. The extent of the Portfolio’s exposure to counterparty risk with respect to financial assets and liabilities approximates its carrying value.
The Portfolio may be exposed to counterparty risk through participation in various programs, including, but not limited to, lending its securities to third parties, cash sweep arrangements whereby the Portfolio’s cash balance is invested in one or more types of cash management vehicles, as well as investments in, but not limited to, repurchase agreements, debt securities, and derivatives, including various types of swaps, futures and options. The Portfolio intends to enter into financial transactions with counterparties that Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus Capital”) believes to be creditworthy at the time of the transaction. There is always the risk that Janus Capital’s analysis of a counterparty’s creditworthiness is incorrect or may change due to market conditions. To the extent that the Portfolio focuses its
Janus Aspen Series | 33 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
transactions with a limited number of counterparties, it will have greater exposure to the risks associated with one or more counterparties.
Loans
The Portfolio may invest in various commercial loans, including bank loans, bridge loans, debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) loans, mezzanine loans, and other fixed and floating rate loans. These loans may be acquired through loan participations and assignments or on a when-issued basis. Commercial loans will comprise no more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total assets. Below are descriptions of the types of loans held by the Portfolio as of June 30, 2020.
· Bank Loans - Bank loans are obligations of companies or other entities entered into in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, and refinancings. The Portfolio’s investments in bank loans are generally acquired as a participation interest in, or assignment of, loans originated by a lender or other financial institution. These investments may include institutionally-traded floating and fixed-rate debt securities.
· Floating Rate Loans – Floating rate loans are debt securities that have floating interest rates, that adjust periodically, and are tied to a benchmark lending rate, such as London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In other cases, the lending rate could be tied to the prime rate offered by one or more major U.S. banks or the rate paid on large certificates of deposit traded in the secondary markets. If the benchmark lending rate changes, the rate payable to lenders under the loan will change at the next scheduled adjustment date specified in the loan agreement. Floating rate loans are typically issued to companies (‘‘borrowers’’) in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, and refinancings. Floating rate loan investments are generally below investment grade. Senior floating rate loans are secured by specific collateral of a borrower and are senior in the borrower’s capital structure. The senior position in the borrower’s capital structure generally gives holders of senior loans a claim on certain of the borrower’s assets that is senior to subordinated debt and preferred and common stock in the case of a borrower’s default. Floating rate loan investments may involve foreign borrowers, and investments may be denominated in foreign currencies. Floating rate loans often involve borrowers whose financial condition is troubled or uncertain and companies that are highly leveraged. The Portfolio may invest in obligations of borrowers who are in bankruptcy proceedings. While the Portfolio generally expects to invest in fully funded term loans, certain of the loans in which the Portfolio may invest include revolving loans, bridge loans, and delayed draw term loans.
Purchasers of floating rate loans may pay and/or receive certain fees. The Portfolio may receive fees such as covenant waiver fees or prepayment penalty fees. The Portfolio may pay fees such as facility fees. Such fees may affect the Portfolio’s return.
· Mezzanine Loans - Mezzanine loans are secured by the stock of the company that owns the assets. Mezzanine loans are a hybrid of debt and equity financing that is typically used to fund the expansion of existing companies. A mezzanine loan is composed of debt capital that gives the lender the right to convert to an ownership or equity interest in the company if the loan is not paid back in time and in full. Mezzanine loans typically are the most subordinated debt obligation in an issuer’s capital structure.
Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities represent interests in “pools” of commercial or residential mortgages or other assets, including consumer loans or receivables. The Portfolio may purchase fixed or variable rate commercial or residential mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), or other governmental or government-related entities. Ginnie Mae’s guarantees are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, which means that the U.S. Government guarantees that the interest and principal will be paid when due. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), an agency of the U.S. Government, placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship. Since that time, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received capital support through U.S. Treasury preferred stock purchases, and Treasury and Federal Reserve purchases of their mortgage-backed securities. The FHFA and the U.S. Treasury have imposed strict limits on the size of these entities’ mortgage portfolios. The FHFA has the power to cancel any contract entered into by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac prior to FHFA’s appointment as conservator or receiver, including the guarantee obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The Portfolio may also purchase other mortgage- and asset-backed securities through single- and multi-seller conduits, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles, and other similar securities. Asset-backed securities may
34 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
be backed by various consumer obligations, including automobile loans, equipment leases, credit card receivables, or other collateral. In the event the underlying loans are not paid, the securities’ issuer could be forced to sell the assets and recognize losses on such assets, which could impact your return. Unlike traditional debt instruments, payments on these securities include both interest and a partial payment of principal. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are subject to both extension risk, where borrowers pay off their debt obligations more slowly in times of rising interest rates, and prepayment risk, where borrowers pay off their debt obligations sooner than expected in times of declining interest rates. These risks may reduce the Portfolio’s returns. In addition, investments in mortgage- and asset-backed securities, including those comprised of subprime mortgages, may be subject to a higher degree of credit risk, valuation risk, and liquidity risk than various other types of fixed-income securities. Additionally, although mortgage-backed securities are generally supported by some form of government or private guarantee and/or insurance, there is no assurance that guarantors or insurers will meet their obligations.
Real Estate Investing
The Portfolio may invest in equity and debt securities of real estate-related companies. Such companies may include those in the real estate industry or real estate-related industries. These securities may include common stocks, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, and other equity securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed securities, real estate-backed securities, securities of REITs and similar REIT-like entities. A REIT is a trust that invests in real estate-related projects, such as properties, mortgage loans, and construction loans. REITs are generally categorized as equity, mortgage, or hybrid REITs. A REIT may be listed on an exchange or traded OTC.
Securities Lending
Under procedures adopted by the Trustees, the Portfolio may seek to earn additional income by lending securities to certain qualified broker-dealers and institutions. Effective December 16, 2019, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association replaced Deutsche Bank AG as securities lending agent for the Portfolio. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. The Portfolio may lend portfolio securities in an amount equal to up to 1/3 of its total assets as determined at the time of the loan origination. There is the risk of delay in recovering a loaned security or the risk of loss in collateral rights if the borrower fails financially. In addition, Janus Capital makes efforts to balance the benefits and risks from granting such loans. All loans will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). If the Portfolio is unable to recover a security on loan, the Portfolio may use the collateral to purchase replacement securities in the market. There is a risk that the value of the collateral could decrease below the cost of the replacement security by the time the replacement investment is made, resulting in a loss to the Portfolio. In certain circumstances individual loan transactions could yield negative returns.
Upon receipt of cash collateral, Janus Capital may invest it in affiliated or non-affiliated cash management vehicles, whether registered or unregistered entities, as permitted by the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. Janus Capital currently intends to primarily invest the cash collateral in a cash management vehicle for which Janus Capital serves as investment adviser, Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. An investment in Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC is generally subject to the same risks that shareholders experience when investing in similarly structured vehicles, such as the potential for significant fluctuations in assets as a result of the purchase and redemption activity of the securities lending program, a decline in the value of the collateral, and possible liquidity issues. Such risks may delay the return of the cash collateral and cause the Portfolio to violate its agreement to return the cash collateral to a borrower in a timely manner. As adviser to the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest as a result of its fiduciary duties to both the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. Additionally, Janus Capital receives an investment advisory fee of 0.05% for managing Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, but it may not receive a fee for managing certain other affiliated cash management vehicles in which the Portfolio may invest, and therefore may have an incentive to allocate preferred investment opportunities to investment vehicles for which it is receiving a fee.
The value of the collateral must be at least 102% of the market value of the loaned securities that are denominated in U.S. dollars and 105% of the market value of the loaned securities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars. Loaned securities and related collateral are marked-to-market each business day based upon the market value of the loaned
Janus Aspen Series | 35 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
securities at the close of business, employing the most recent available pricing information. Collateral levels are then adjusted based on this mark-to-market evaluation.
The cash collateral invested by Janus Capital is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments (if applicable). Income earned from the investment of the cash collateral, net of rebates paid to, or fees paid by, borrowers and less the fees paid to the lending agent are included as “Affiliated securities lending income, net” on the Statement of Operations.
There were no securities on loan as of June 30, 2020.
Sovereign Debt
The Portfolio may invest in U.S. and non-U.S. government debt securities (“sovereign debt”). Some investments in sovereign debt, such as U.S. sovereign debt, are considered low risk. However, investments in sovereign debt, especially the debt of less developed countries, can involve a high degree of risk, including the risk that the governmental entity that controls the repayment of sovereign debt may not be willing or able to repay the principal and/or to pay the interest on its sovereign debt in a timely manner. A sovereign debtor’s willingness or ability to satisfy its debt obligation may be affected by various factors including, but not limited to, its cash flow situation, the extent of its foreign currency reserves, the availability of foreign exchange when a payment is due, the relative size of its debt position in relation to its economy as a whole, the sovereign debtor’s policy toward international lenders, and local political constraints to which the governmental entity may be subject. Sovereign debtors may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies, and other entities. The failure of a sovereign debtor to implement economic reforms, achieve specified levels of economic performance, or repay principal or interest when due may result in the cancellation of third party commitments to lend funds to the sovereign debtor, which may further impair such debtor’s ability or willingness to timely service its debts. The Portfolio may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such sovereign debt and to extend further loans to governmental entities, which may adversely affect the Portfolio’s holdings. In the event of default, there may be limited or no legal remedies for collecting sovereign debt and there may be no bankruptcy proceedings through which the Portfolio may collect all or part of the sovereign debt that a governmental entity has not repaid. In addition, to the extent the Portfolio invests in non-U.S. sovereign debt, it may be subject to currency risk.
TBA Commitments
The Portfolio may enter into “to be announced” or “TBA” commitments. TBAs are forward agreements for the purchase or sale of securities, including mortgage-backed securities, for a fixed price, with payment and delivery on an agreed upon future settlement date. The specific securities to be delivered are not identified at the trade date. However, delivered securities must meet specified terms, including issuer, rate, and mortgage terms. Although the particular TBA securities must meet industry-accepted “good delivery” standards, there can be no assurance that a security purchased on forward commitment basis will ultimately be issued or delivered by the counterparty. During the settlement period, the Portfolio will still bear the risk of any decline in the value of the security to be delivered. Because TBA commitments do not require the purchase and sale of identical securities, the characteristics of the security delivered to the Portfolio may be less favorable than the security delivered to the dealer. If the counterparty to a transaction fails to deliver the security, the Portfolio could suffer a loss.
When-Issued, Delayed Delivery and Forward Commitment Transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell securities on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis. When purchasing a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Portfolio assumes the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations, and takes such fluctuations into account when determining its net asset value. Typically, no income accrues on securities the Portfolio has committed to purchase prior to the time delivery of the securities is made. Because the Portfolio is not required to pay for the security until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with the Portfolio’s other investments. If the other party to a transaction fails to deliver the securities, the Portfolio could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity. If the Portfolio remains substantially fully invested at a time when when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment purchases are outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage.
When the Portfolio has sold a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Portfolio does not participate in future gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a transaction fails to pay for the securities, the Portfolio could suffer a loss. Additionally, when selling a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis without owning the security, the Portfolio will incur a loss if the security’s price appreciates in value such that the security’s price is above the agreed upon price on the settlement date. The Portfolio
36 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
may dispose of or renegotiate a transaction after it is entered into, and may purchase or sell when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment securities before the settlement date, which may result in a gain or loss.
4. Investment Advisory Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Portfolio pays Janus Capital an investment advisory fee which is calculated daily and paid monthly. The following table reflects the Portfolio’s contractual investment advisory fee rate (expressed as an annual rate).
Average Daily Net Assets of the Portfolio | Contractual Investment Advisory Fee (%) |
First $300 Million | 0.55 |
Over $300 Million | 0.45 |
The Fund’s actual investment advisory fee rate for the reporting period was 0.50% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Janus Capital has contractually agreed to waive the advisory fee payable by the Portfolio or reimburse expenses in an amount equal to the amount, if any, that the Portfolio’s total annual fund operating expenses, including the investment advisory fee, but excluding the 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares), transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement, brokerage commissions, interest, dividends, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses, and extraordinary expenses, exceed the annual rate of 0.52% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets. Janus Capital has agreed to continue the waivers for at least a one-year period commencing April 29, 2020. The previous expense limit (until at least May 1, 2020) was 0.57%. If applicable, amounts waived and/or reimbursed to the Portfolio by Janus Capital are disclosed as “Excess Expense Reimbursement and Waivers” on the Statement of Operations.
Janus Services LLC (“Janus Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, is the Portfolio’s transfer agent. Janus Services receives an administrative services fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets of the Portfolio for arranging for the provision by participating insurance companies and qualified plan service providers of administrative services, including recordkeeping, subaccounting, order processing, or other shareholder services provided on behalf of contract holders or plan participants investing in the Portfolio. Other shareholder services may include the provision of order confirmations, periodic account statements, forwarding prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other materials to existing investors, and answering inquiries regarding accounts. Janus Services expects to use this entire fee to compensate insurance companies and qualified plan service providers for providing these services to their customers who invest in the Portfolio. Any unused portion will be reimbursed to the applicable share class at least annually.
In addition, Janus Services provides or arranges for the provision of certain other internal administrative, recordkeeping, and shareholder relations services for the Portfolio. Janus Services is not compensated for these internal services related to the shares, except for out-of-pocket costs. These amounts are disclosed as “Other transfer agent fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Under a distribution and shareholder servicing plan (the “Plan”) adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Service Shares may pay the Trust’s distributor, Janus Distributors LLC (“Janus Distributors”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, a fee for the sale and distribution and/or shareholder servicing of the Service Shares at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Service Shares. Under the terms of the Plan, the Trust is authorized to make payments to Janus Distributors for remittance to insurance companies and qualified plan service providers as compensation for distribution and/or shareholder services performed by such entities. These amounts are disclosed as “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” on the Statement of Operations. Payments under the Plan are not tied exclusively to actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees, and the payments may exceed 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees actually incurred. If any of the Portfolio’s actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees incurred during a calendar year are less than the payments made during a calendar year, the Portfolio will be refunded the difference. Refunds, if any, are included in “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” in the Statement of Operations.
Janus Capital serves as administrator to the Portfolio pursuant to an administration agreement between Janus Capital and the Trust. Under the administration agreement, Janus Capital is obligated to provide or arrange for the provision of certain administration, compliance, and accounting services to the Portfolio, including providing office space for the
Janus Aspen Series | 37 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Portfolio, and is reimbursed by the Portfolio for certain of its costs in providing these services (to the extent Janus Capital seeks reimbursement and such costs are not otherwise waived). In addition, employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates may serve as officers of the Trust. The Portfolio pays for some or all of the salaries, fees, and expenses of Janus Capital employees and Portfolio officers, with respect to certain specified administration functions they perform on behalf of the Portfolio. The Portfolio pays these costs based on out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Janus Capital, and these costs are separate and apart from advisory fees and other expenses paid in connection with the investment advisory services Janus Capital (or any subadvisor, as applicable) provides to the Portfolio. These amounts are disclosed as “Affiliated portfolio administration fees” on the Statement of Operations. In addition, some expenses related to compensation payable to the Portfolio’s Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff, all of whom are employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates, are shared with the Portfolio. Total compensation of $20,422 was paid to the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff by the Trust during the period ended June 30, 2020. The Portfolio's portion is reported as part of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for independent Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Portfolio. All deferred fees are credited to an account established in the name of the Trustees. The amounts credited to the account then increase or decrease, as the case may be, in accordance with the performance of one or more of the Janus Henderson funds that are selected by the Trustees. The account balance continues to fluctuate in accordance with the performance of the selected fund or funds until final payment of all amounts are credited to the account. The fluctuation of the account balance is recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) and is included as of June 30, 2020 on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the asset, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation,” and liability, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation fees.” Additionally, the recorded unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is included in “Total distributable earnings (loss)” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferred compensation expenses for the period ended June 30, 2020 are included in “Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Trustees are allowed to change their designation of mutual funds from time to time. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the Deferred Plan. Deferred fees of $220,425 were paid by the Trust to the Trustees under the Deferred Plan during the period ended June 30, 2020.
Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act and related rules, the Portfolio may participate in an affiliated or non-affiliated cash sweep program. In the cash sweep program, uninvested cash balances of the Portfolio may be used to purchase shares of affiliated or non-affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles that operate as money market funds. The Portfolio is eligible to participate in the cash sweep program (the “Investing Funds”). As adviser, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest because of its fiduciary duties to the affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles and the Investing Funds. Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC (the “Sweep Vehicle”) is an affiliated unregistered cash management pooled investment vehicle that invests primarily in highly-rated short-term fixed-income securities. The Sweep Vehicle operates pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act that govern the operation of money market funds and prices its shares at NAV reflecting market-based values of its portfolio securities (i.e., a “floating” NAV) rounded to the fourth decimal place (e.g., $1.0000). The Sweep Vehicle is permitted to impose a liquidity fee (of up to 2%) on redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle or a redemption gate that temporarily suspends redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle for up to 10 business days during a 90 day period. There are no restrictions on the Portfolio's ability to withdraw investments from the Sweep Vehicle at will, and there are no unfunded capital commitments due from the Portfolio to the Sweep Vehicle. The Sweep Vehicle does not charge any management fee, sales charge or service fee.
Any purchases and sales, realized gains/losses and recorded dividends from affiliated investments during the period ended June 30, 2020 can be found in the “Schedules of Affiliated Investments” located in the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio is permitted to purchase or sell securities (“cross-trade”) between itself and other funds or accounts managed by Janus Capital in accordance with Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Rule 17a-7”), when the transaction is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio and in accordance with the Internal Cross Trade Procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any cross-trade of securities by the Portfolio from or to another fund or account that is or could be considered an affiliate of the Portfolio under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser, common Officer, or common Trustee complies with Rule 17a-7. Under these procedures, each cross-trade is effected at the current market price to save costs where allowed. During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio engaged in cross trades amounting to $2,833,951 in purchases and $6,480,238 in sales, resulting in a net realized
38 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
gain of $377,704. The net realized gain is included within the “Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” section of the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations.
5. Federal Income Tax
Income and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for items such as net short-term gains, deferral of wash sale losses, foreign currency transactions, net investment losses, and capital loss carryovers.
The Portfolio has elected to treat gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts as capital gains and losses, if applicable. Other foreign currency gains and losses on debt instruments are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accumulated capital losses noted below represent net capital loss carryovers, as of December 31, 2019, that may be available to offset future realized capital gains and thereby reduce future taxable gains distributions. The following table shows these capital loss carryovers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Loss Carryover Schedule |
|
| |||
For the year ended December 31, 2019 |
|
| |||
| No Expiration |
|
|
| |
| Short-Term | Long-Term | Accumulated |
|
|
| $(11,564,717) | $ - | $ (11,564,717) |
|
|
The aggregate cost of investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investment securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2020 are noted below. The primary differences between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of investments are wash sale loss deferrals and investments in partnerships.
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Net
Tax Appreciation/ |
$ 575,213,779 | $30,903,893 | $ (3,275,141) | $ 27,628,752 |
Information on the tax components of derivatives as of June 30, 2020 is as follows:
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Net
Tax Appreciation/ |
$ - | $ 3,445 | $ - | $ 3,445 |
Tax cost of investments and unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) may also include timing differences that do not constitute adjustments to tax basis.
Janus Aspen Series | 39 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
6. Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended June 30, 2020 |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||
|
| Shares | Amount |
| Shares | Amount |
Institutional Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 1,100,560 | $ 13,318,197 |
| 1,563,012 | $ 18,348,907 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 218,380 | 2,705,722 |
| 562,738 | 6,558,390 | |
Shares repurchased | (2,492,758) | (30,152,242) |
| (9,884,146) | (115,751,110) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | (1,173,818) | $(14,128,323) |
| (7,758,396) | $(90,843,813) | |
Service Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 4,832,165 | $ 64,171,455 |
| 5,747,545 | $ 73,366,642 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 436,460 | 5,927,120 |
| 856,061 | 10,929,187 | |
Shares repurchased | (5,154,954) | (67,990,031) |
| (7,526,222) | (95,483,811) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 113,671 | $ 2,108,544 |
| (922,616) | $(11,187,982) |
7. Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities
For the period ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding any short-term securities, short-term options contracts, TBAs, and in-kind transactions, as applicable) was as follows:
Purchases of | Proceeds from Sales | Purchases
of Long- | Proceeds
from Sales |
$305,388,744 | $ 294,214,973 | $ 179,227,422 | $ 204,503,450 |
8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-08, Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities ("ASU 2017-08") to amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The guidance requires certain premiums on callable debt securities to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amortization period for callable debt securities purchased at a discount will not be impacted. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management has adopted the amendments as of the beginning of this fiscal period and concluded these changes do not have a material impact on the Portfolio’s financial statements.
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), in August 2018. The new guidance removes, modifies and enhances the disclosures to Topic 820. For public entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted, and Management has decided, to early adopt the removed and modified disclosures in these financial statements. Management is also evaluating the implications related to the new disclosure requirements and has not yet determined the impact to the financial statements.
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform: Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”) in March 2020. The new guidance in the ASU provide optional temporary financial reporting relief from the effect of certain types of contract modifications due to the planned discontinuation of the LIBOR or other interbank-offered based reference rates as of the end of 2021. For new and existing contracts, Portfolios may elect to apply the guidance as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the ASU’s adoption to the Portfolio’s financial statements.
9. Other Matters
An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 has been, and may continue to be, highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting
40 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Portfolio's investments. This may impact liquidity in the marketplace, which in turn may affect the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests. Public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, and economic risks in certain countries or globally. The duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects cannot be determined with certainty, and could prevent a Portfolio from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Portfolio's ability to achieve its investment objective.
10. Subsequent Event
Management has evaluated whether any events or transactions occurred subsequent to June 30, 2020 and through the date of issuance of the Portfolio’s financial statements and determined that there were no material events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
Janus Aspen Series | 41 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Policies and Voting Record
A description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities is available without charge: (i) upon request, by calling 1-800-525-1093; (ii) on the Portfolio’s website at janushenderson.com/proxyvoting; and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, information regarding the Portfolio’s proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is also available, free of charge, through janushenderson.com/proxyvoting and from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Full Holdings
The Portfolio is required to disclose its complete holdings as an exhibit to Form N-PORT within 60 days of the end of the first and third fiscal quarters, and in the annual report and semiannual report to Portfolio shareholders. Historically, the Portfolio filed its complete portfolio holdings (schedule of investments) with the SEC for the first and third quarters each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Form N-PORT and Form N-Q filings: (i) are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; (ii) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330); and (iii) are available without charge, upon request, by calling a Janus Henderson representative at 1-877-335-2687 (toll free) . Portfolio holdings consisting of at least the names of the holdings are generally available on a monthly basis with a 30-day lag. Holdings are generally posted approximately two business days thereafter under Full Holdings for the Portfolio at janushenderson.com/vit.
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD
The Trustees of Janus Aspen Series, each of whom serves as an “independent” Trustee (the “Trustees”), oversee the management of each Portfolio of Janus Aspen Series (each, a “VIT Portfolio,” and collectively, the “VIT Portfolios”), as well as each Fund of Janus Investment Fund (together with the VIT Portfolios, the “Janus Henderson Funds,” and each, a “Janus Henderson Fund”). As required by law, the Trustees determine annually whether to continue the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund and the subadvisory agreements for the Janus Henderson Funds that utilize subadvisers.
In connection with their most recent consideration of those agreements for each Janus Henderson Fund, the Trustees received and reviewed information provided by Janus Capital and the respective subadvisers in response to requests of the Trustees and their independent legal counsel. They also received and reviewed information and analysis provided by, and in response to requests of, their independent fee consultant. Throughout their consideration of the agreements, the Trustees were advised by their independent legal counsel. The Trustees met with management to consider the agreements, and also met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and their independent fee consultant.
At a meeting held on December 5, 2019, based on the Trustees’ evaluation of the information provided by Janus Capital, the subadvisers, and the independent fee consultant, as well as other information, the Trustees determined that the overall arrangements between each Janus Henderson Fund and Janus Capital and each subadviser, as applicable, were fair and reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital, its affiliates and the subadvisers, the fees charged for those services, and other matters that the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. At that meeting, the Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund, and the subadvisory agreement for each subadvised Janus Henderson Fund, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 1, 2021, subject to earlier termination as provided for in each agreement.
In considering the continuation of those agreements, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. However, the material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the agreements are discussed separately below. Also included is a summary of the independent fee consultant’s conclusions and opinions that arose during, and were included as part of, the Trustees’ consideration of the agreements. “Management fees,” as used herein, reflect actual annual advisory fees and, for the purpose of peer comparisons, any administration fees (excluding out of pocket costs), net of any waivers, paid by a fund as a percentage of average net assets.
42 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees reviewed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital and the subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds, taking into account the investment objective, strategies and policies of each Janus Henderson Fund, and the knowledge the Trustees gained from their regular meetings with management on at least a quarterly basis and their ongoing review of information related to the Janus Henderson Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the resources and key personnel of Janus Capital and each subadviser, particularly noting those employees who provide investment and risk management services to the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Janus Henderson Funds by Janus Capital or the subadvisers, such as managing the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of broker-dealers for those transactions. The Trustees considered Janus Capital’s role as administrator to the Janus Henderson Funds, noting that Janus Capital generally does not receive a fee for its services but is reimbursed for its out-of-pocket costs. The Trustees considered the role of Janus Capital in monitoring adherence to the Janus Henderson Funds’ investment restrictions, providing support services for the Trustees and Trustee committees, and overseeing communications with shareholders and the activities of other service providers, including monitoring compliance with various policies and procedures of the Janus Henderson Funds and with applicable securities laws and regulations.
In this regard, the independent fee consultant noted that Janus Capital provides a number of different services for the Janus Henderson Funds and fund shareholders, ranging from investment management services to various other servicing functions, and that, in its view, Janus Capital is a capable provider of those services. The independent fee consultant also provided its belief that Janus Capital has developed a number of institutional competitive advantages that should enable it to provide superior investment and service performance over the long term.
The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital or the subadviser to each Janus Henderson Fund were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective advisory and subadvisory agreements, and that, taking into account steps taken to address those Janus Henderson Funds whose performance lagged that of their peers for certain periods, the Janus Henderson Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services. They also concluded that Janus Capital and each subadviser had sufficient personnel, with the appropriate education and experience, to serve the Janus Henderson Funds effectively and had demonstrated its ability to attract well-qualified personnel.
Performance of the Funds
The Trustees considered the performance results of each Janus Henderson Fund over various time periods. They noted that they considered Janus Henderson Fund performance data throughout the year, including periodic meetings with each Janus Henderson Fund’s portfolio manager(s), and also reviewed information comparing each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups identified by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent data provider, and with the Janus Henderson Fund’s benchmark index. In this regard, the independent fee consultant found that the overall Janus Henderson Funds’ performance has been reasonable: for the 36 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 71% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar.
The Trustees considered the performance of each Janus Henderson Fund, noting that performance may vary by share class, and noted the following with respect to the VIT Portfolios:
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance.
Janus Aspen Series | 43 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the third Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital and Intech had taken or were taking to improve performance, and the performance trend was improving.
In consideration of each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance, the Trustees concluded that, taking into account the factors relevant to performance, as well as other considerations, including steps taken to improve performance, the Janus Henderson Fund’s performance warranted continuation of such Janus Henderson Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory agreement(s).
Costs of Services Provided
The Trustees examined information regarding the fees and expenses of each Janus Henderson Fund in comparison to similar information for other comparable funds as provided by Broadridge, an independent data provider. They also reviewed an analysis of that information provided by their independent fee consultant and noted that the rate of management fees (investment advisory and any administration, but excluding out-of-pocket costs) for many of the Janus Henderson Funds, after applicable waivers, was below the average management fee rate of the respective peer group of funds selected by an independent data provider. The Trustees also examined information regarding the subadvisory fees charged for subadvisory services, as applicable, noting that all such fees were paid by Janus Capital out of its management fees collected from such Janus Henderson Fund.
The independent fee consultant provided its belief that the management fees charged by Janus Capital to each of the Janus Henderson Funds under the current investment advisory and administration agreements are reasonable in relation to the services provided by Janus Capital. The independent fee consultant found: (1) the total expenses and management fees of the Janus Henderson Funds to be reasonable relative to other mutual funds; (2) the total expenses, on average, were 10% under the average total expenses of their respective Broadridge Expense Group peers; and (3) and the management fees for the Janus Henderson Funds, on average, were 7% under the average management fees for their Expense Groups. The Trustees also considered the total expenses for each share class of
44 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
each Janus Henderson Fund compared to the average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Group peers and to average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Universe.
For certain Janus Henderson Funds, the independent fee consultant also performed a systematic “focus list” analysis of expenses which assessed fund fees in the context of fund performance being delivered. Based on this analysis, the independent fee consultant found that the combination of service quality/performance and expenses on these individual Janus Henderson Funds was reasonable in light of performance trends, performance histories, and existence of performance fees, breakpoints, and/or expense waivers on such Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees considered the methodology used by Janus Capital and each subadviser in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers, the competitive environment for investment management talent, and the competitive market for mutual funds in different distribution channels.
The Trustees also reviewed management fees charged by Janus Capital and each subadviser to comparable separate account clients and to comparable non-affiliated funds subadvised by Janus Capital or by a subadviser (for which Janus Capital or the subadviser provides only or primarily portfolio management services). Although in most instances subadvisory and separate account fee rates for various investment strategies were lower than management fee rates for Janus Henderson Funds having a similar strategy, the Trustees considered that Janus Capital noted that, under the terms of the management agreements with the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital performs significant additional services for the Janus Henderson Funds that it does not provide to those other clients, including administration services, oversight of the Janus Henderson Funds’ other service providers, trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in serving the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital assumes many legal risks and other costs that it does not assume in servicing its other clients. Moreover, they noted that the independent fee consultant found that: (1) the management fees Janus Capital charges to the Janus Henderson Funds are reasonable in relation to the management fees Janus Capital charges to funds subadvised by Janus Capital and to the fees Janus Capital charges to its institutional separate account clients; (2) these subadvised and institutional separate accounts have different service and infrastructure needs; and (3) Janus Henderson mutual fund investors enjoy reasonable fees relative to the fees charged to Janus Henderson subadvised fund and separate account investors; (4) 11 of 12 Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar funds subadvised by Janus Capital; and (5) six of nine Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar separate accounts managed by Janus Capital.
The Trustees considered the fees for each Janus Henderson Fund for its fiscal year ended in 2018, including the VIT Portfolios, and noted the following with regard to each VIT Portfolio’s total expenses, net of applicable fee waivers (the VIT Portfolio’s “total expenses”):
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
Janus Aspen Series | 45 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for its sole share class.
The Trustees reviewed information on the overall profitability to Janus Capital and its affiliates of their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds, and considered profitability data of other publicly traded mutual fund advisers. The Trustees recognized that profitability comparisons among fund managers are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund manager is affected by numerous factors, including the organizational structure of the particular fund manager, differences in complex size, difference in product mix, difference in types of business (mutual fund, institutional and other), differences in the types of funds and other accounts it manages, possible other lines of business, the methodology for allocating expenses, and the fund manager’s capital structure and cost of capital.
Additionally, the Trustees considered the estimated profitability to Janus Capital from the investment management services it provided to each Janus Henderson Fund. In their review, the Trustees considered whether Janus Capital and each subadviser receive adequate incentives and resources to manage the Janus Henderson Funds effectively. In reviewing profitability, the Trustees noted that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund is necessarily a product of the allocation methodology utilized by Janus Capital to allocate its expenses as part of the estimated profitability calculation. In this regard, the Trustees noted that the independent fee consultant found that (1) the expense allocation methodology and rationales utilized by Janus Capital were reasonable and (2) no clear correlation between expense allocations and operating margins. The Trustees also considered that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund was influenced by a number of factors, including not only the allocation methodology selected, but also the presence of fee waivers and expense caps, and whether the Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management agreement contained breakpoints or a performance fee component. The Trustees determined, after taking into account these factors, among others, that Janus Capital’s estimated profitability with respect to each Janus Henderson Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the variation in the range of such estimated profitability among the Janus Henderson Funds was not a material factor in the Board’s approval of the reasonableness of any Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management fees.
The Trustees concluded that the management fees payable by each Janus Henderson Fund to Janus Capital and its affiliates, as well as the fees paid by Janus Capital to the subadvisers of subadvised Janus Henderson Funds, were reasonable in relation to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, taking into account the fees charged by other advisers for managing comparable mutual funds with similar strategies, the fees Janus Capital and the subadvisers charge to other clients, and, as applicable, the impact of fund performance on management fees payable by the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also concluded that each Janus Henderson Fund’s total expenses were reasonable, taking into account the size of the Janus Henderson Fund, the quality of services provided by Janus Capital and any subadviser, the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund, and any expense limitations agreed to or provided by Janus Capital.
Economies of Scale
The Trustees considered information about the potential for Janus Capital to realize economies of scale as the assets of the Janus Henderson Funds increase. They noted that their independent fee consultant published a report to the Trustees in November 2019 which provided its research and analysis into economies of scale. They also noted that, although many Janus Henderson Funds pay advisory fees at a base fixed rate as a percentage of net assets, without any breakpoints or performance fees, their independent fee consultant concluded that 64% of these Janus Henderson Funds’ share classes have contractual management fees (gross of waivers) below their Broadridge expense group averages. They also noted the following: (1) that for those Janus Henderson Funds whose expenses are being reduced by the contractual expense limitations of Janus Capital, Janus Capital is subsidizing certain of these Janus Henderson Funds because they have not reached adequate scale; (2) as the assets of some of the Janus Henderson Funds have declined in the past few years, certain Janus Henderson Funds have benefited from having advisory fee rates that have remained constant rather than increasing as assets declined; (3) performance fee structures have been implemented for various Janus Henderson Funds that have caused the effective rate of advisory fees payable by such a
46 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Janus Henderson Fund to vary depending on the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund relative to its benchmark index over the measurement period; and (4) a few Janus Henderson Funds have fee schedules with breakpoints and reduced fee rates above certain asset levels. The Trustees also noted that the Janus Henderson Funds share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of all of the Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees also considered the independent fee consultant’s conclusion that, given the limitations of various analytical approaches to economies of scale and their conflicting results, it is difficult to analytically confirm or deny the existence of economies of scale in the Janus Henderson complex. In this regard, the independent consultant concluded that (1) to the extent there were economies of scale at Janus Capital, Janus Capital’s general strategy of setting fixed management fees below peers appeared to share any such economies with investors even on smaller Janus Henderson Funds which have not yet achieved those economies and (2) by setting lower fixed fees from the start on these Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital appeared to be investing to increase the likelihood that these Janus Henderson Funds will grow to a level to achieve any scale economies that may exist. Further, the independent fee consultant provided its belief that Janus Henderson Fund investors are well-served by the fee levels and performance fee structures in place on the Janus Henderson Funds in light of any economies of scale that may be present at Janus Capital.
Based on all of the information reviewed, including the recent and past research and analysis conducted by the Trustees’ independent fee consultant, the Trustees concluded that the current fee structure of each Janus Henderson Fund was reasonable and that the current rates of fees do reflect a sharing between Janus Capital and the Janus Henderson Fund of any economies of scale that may be present at the current asset level of the Janus Henderson Fund.
Other Benefits to Janus Capital
The Trustees also considered benefits that accrue to Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds from their relationships with the Janus Henderson Funds. They recognized that two affiliates of Janus Capital separately serve the Janus Henderson Funds as transfer agent and distributor, respectively, and the transfer agent receives compensation directly from the non-money market funds for services provided, and that such compensation contributes to the overall profitability of Janus Capital and its affiliates that results from their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered Janus Capital’s past and proposed use of commissions paid by the Janus Henderson Funds on portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services benefiting the Janus Henderson Fund and/or other clients of Janus Capital and/or Janus Capital, and/or a subadviser to a Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees concluded that Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ use of these types of client commission arrangements to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidelines and was likely to benefit each Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees also concluded that, other than the services provided by Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers pursuant to the agreements and the fees to be paid by each Janus Henderson Fund therefor, the Janus Henderson Funds and Janus Capital and the subadvisers may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other in other ways. They concluded that Janus Capital and its affiliates share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of the Janus Henderson Funds and other clients serviced by Janus Capital and its affiliates. They also concluded that Janus Capital and/or the subadvisers benefit from the receipt of research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Janus Henderson Funds and that the Janus Henderson Funds benefit from Janus Capital’s and/or the subadvisers’ receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of Janus Capital and/or other clients of the subadvisers. They further concluded that the success of any Janus Henderson Fund could attract other business to Janus Capital, the subadvisers or other Janus Henderson funds, and that the success of Janus Capital and the subadvisers could enhance Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ ability to serve the Janus Henderson Funds.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Janus Henderson Funds (other than the money market funds) have adopted and implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “LRMP”) as required by Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”). Rule 22e-4, requires open-end funds to adopt and implement a written liquidity risk management program that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk, which is the risk that a fund could not meet redemption requests without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interest in the fund. The LRMP
Janus Aspen Series | 47 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
incorporates the following elements: (i) assessment, management, and periodic review of liquidity risk; (ii) classification of portfolio investments; (iii) the establishment and monitoring of a highly liquid investment minimum, as applicable; (iv) a 15% limitation on a Portfolio’s illiquid investments; (v) redemptions in-kind; and (vi) board oversight.
The Trustees have designated Janus Capital Management LLC, the Portfolio’s investment adviser (“Janus Capital”), as the Program Administrator for the LRMP responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of the LRMP. A working group comprised of various groups within Janus Capital’s business is responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of different aspects of the LRMP.
The Liquidity Rule requires the Trustees to review at least annually a written report provided by the Program Administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and the effectiveness of its implementation, including, if applicable, the operation of the highly liquid investment minimum, and any material changes to the LRMP (the “Program Administrator Report”). During the semi-annual period ended June 30, 2020, the Program Administrator provided the Program Administrator Report to the Trustees which covered the operation of the LRMP from December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”). No significant liquidity events impacting the Portfolio were noted in the Program Administrator Report, and the Portfolio was able to process redemptions during the normal course of business during the Reporting Period. In addition, the Program Administrator expressed its belief in the Program Administrator Report that:
· the LRMP is reasonably designed and adequate to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, taking into account the Portfolio’s particular risks and circumstances, and includes policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement each required component of the Liquidity Rule; and
· the LRMP, including the Highly Liquid Investment Minimum where applicable, was implemented and operated effectively to achieve the goal of assessing and managing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk.
There can be no assurance that the LRMP will achieve its objectives in the future. Please refer to your Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.
48 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Management Commentary in this report includes valuable insight as well as statistical information to help you understand how your Portfolio’s performance and characteristics stack up against those of comparable indices.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, this report may include information about country exposure. Country exposure is based primarily on the country of risk. A company may be allocated to a country based on other factors such as location of the company’s principal office, the location of the principal trading market for the company’s securities, or the country where a majority of the company’s revenues are derived.
Please keep in mind that the opinions expressed in the Management Commentary are just that: opinions. They are a reflection based on best judgment at the time this report was compiled, which was June 30, 2020. As the investing environment changes, so could opinions. These views are unique and are not necessarily shared by fellow employees or by Janus Henderson in general.
Performance Overviews
Performance overview graphs compare the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Portfolio with one or more widely used market indices. When comparing the performance of the Portfolio with an index, keep in mind that market indices are not available for investment and do not reflect deduction of expenses.
Average annual total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with more than one year of performance history. Average annual total return is calculated by taking the growth or decline in value of an investment over a period of time, including reinvestment of dividends and distributions, then calculating the annual compounded percentage rate that would have produced the same result had the rate of growth been constant throughout the period. Average annual total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Cumulative total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with less than one year of performance history. Cumulative total return is the growth or decline in value of an investment over time, independent of the period of time involved. Cumulative total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Pursuant to federal securities rules, expense ratios shown in the performance chart reflect subsidized (if applicable) and unsubsidized ratios. The total annual fund operating expenses ratio is gross of any fee waivers, reflecting the Portfolio’s unsubsidized expense ratio. The net annual fund operating expenses ratio (if applicable) includes contractual waivers of Janus Capital and reflects the Portfolio’s subsidized expense ratio. Ratios may be higher or lower than those shown in the “Financial Highlights” in this report.
Schedule of Investments
Following the performance overview section is the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments. This schedule reports the types of securities held in the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period. Securities are usually listed by type (common stock, corporate bonds, U.S. Government obligations, etc.) and by industry classification (banking, communications, insurance, etc.). Holdings are subject to change without notice.
The value of each security is quoted as of the last day of the reporting period. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies is converted into U.S. dollars.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, it will also provide a summary of investments by country. This summary reports the Portfolio exposure to different countries by providing the percentage of securities invested in each country. The country of each security represents the country of risk. The Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments relies upon the industry group and country classifications published by Barclays and/or MSCI Inc.
Tables listing details of individual forward currency contracts, futures, written options, swaptions, and swaps follow the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments (if applicable).
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
This statement is often referred to as the “balance sheet.” It lists the assets and liabilities of the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period.
Janus Aspen Series | 49 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Portfolio’s assets are calculated by adding the value of the securities owned, the receivable for securities sold but not yet settled, the receivable for dividends declared but not yet received on securities owned, and the receivable for Portfolio shares sold to investors but not yet settled. The Portfolio’s liabilities include payables for securities purchased but not yet settled, Portfolio shares redeemed but not yet paid, and expenses owed but not yet paid. Additionally, there may be other assets and liabilities such as unrealized gain or loss on forward currency contracts.
The section entitled “Net Assets Consist of” breaks down the components of the Portfolio’s net assets. Because the Portfolio must distribute substantially all earnings, you will notice that a significant portion of net assets is shareholder capital.
The last section of this statement reports the net asset value (“NAV”) per share on the last day of the reporting period. The NAV is calculated by dividing the Portfolio’s net assets for each share class (assets minus liabilities) by the number of shares outstanding.
Statement of Operations
This statement details the Portfolio’s income, expenses, realized gains and losses on securities and currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of Portfolio holdings.
The first section in this statement, entitled “Investment Income,” reports the dividends earned from securities and interest earned from interest-bearing securities in the Portfolio.
The next section reports the expenses incurred by the Portfolio, including the advisory fee paid to the investment adviser, transfer agent fees and expenses, and printing and postage for mailing statements, financial reports and prospectuses. Expense offsets and expense reimbursements, if any, are also shown.
The last section lists the amounts of realized gains or losses from investment and foreign currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Portfolio will realize a gain (or loss) when it sells its position in a particular security. A change in unrealized gain (or loss) refers to the change in net appreciation or depreciation of the Portfolio during the reporting period. “Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” is affected both by changes in the market value of Portfolio holdings and by gains (or losses) realized during the reporting period.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
These statements report the increase or decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets during the reporting period. Changes in the Portfolio’s net assets are attributable to investment operations, dividends and distributions to investors, and capital share transactions. This is important to investors because it shows exactly what caused the Portfolio’s net asset size to change during the period.
The first section summarizes the information from the Statement of Operations regarding changes in net assets due to the Portfolio’s investment operations. The Portfolio’s net assets may also change as a result of dividend and capital gains distributions to investors. If investors receive their dividends and/or distributions in cash, money is taken out of the Portfolio to pay the dividend and/or distribution. If investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions, the Portfolio’s net assets will not be affected. If you compare the Portfolio’s “Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions” to “Reinvested Dividends and Distributions,” you will notice that dividends and distributions have little effect on the Portfolio’s net assets. This is because the majority of the Portfolio’s investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions.
The reinvestment of dividends and distributions is included under “Capital Share Transactions.” “Capital Shares” refers to the money investors contribute to the Portfolio through purchases or withdrawals via redemptions. The Portfolio’s net assets will increase and decrease in value as investors purchase and redeem shares from the Portfolio.
Financial Highlights
This schedule provides a per-share breakdown of the components that affect the Portfolio’s NAV for current and past reporting periods as well as total return, asset size, ratios, and portfolio turnover rate.
The first line in the table reflects the NAV per share at the beginning of the reporting period. The next line reports the net investment income/(loss) per share. Following is the per share total of net gains/(losses), realized and unrealized. Per share dividends and distributions to investors are then subtracted to arrive at the NAV per share at the end of the period. The next line reflects the total return for the period. The total return may include adjustments in accordance with
50 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the total return may differ from the total return reflected for individual shareholder transactions. Also included are ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets.
The Portfolio’s expenses may be reduced through expense offsets and expense reimbursements. The ratios shown reflect expenses before and after any such offsets and reimbursements.
The ratio of net investment income/(loss) summarizes the income earned less expenses, divided by the average net assets of the Portfolio during the reporting period. Do not confuse this ratio with the Portfolio’s yield. The net investment income ratio is not a true measure of the Portfolio’s yield because it does not take into account the dividends distributed to the Portfolio’s investors.
The next figure is the portfolio turnover rate, which measures the buying and selling activity in the Portfolio. Portfolio turnover is affected by market conditions, changes in the asset size of the Portfolio, fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, the nature of the Portfolio’s investments, and the investment style and/or outlook of the portfolio manager(s) and/or investment personnel. A 100% rate implies that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio was replaced once during the fiscal year; a 50% rate means that an amount equal to the value of half the portfolio is traded in a year; and a 200% rate means that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio is traded every six months.
Janus Aspen Series | 51 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage1
52 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage2
Janus Aspen Series | 53 |
Knowledge Shared
At Janus Henderson, we believe in the sharing of expert insight for better investment and business decisions. We call this ethos Knowledge Shared.
Learn more by visiting janushenderson.com.
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Portfolio. It is not an offer or solicitation for the Portfolio and is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus. | ||||||||
Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc Janus Henderson Distributors | ||||||||
109-24-81114 08-20 |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | ||
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio | ||
Janus Aspen Series | ||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
|
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio
performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned 10.84% and 10.68%, respectively, versus a return of 9.81% for the Portfolio’s primary benchmark, the Russell 1000® Growth Index. The Portfolio’s secondary benchmark, the S&P 500® Index, returned -3.08% for the period.
INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
The Russell 1000 Growth Index staged an impressive rebound on the heels of a near-total shutdown of the economy as the U.S. government and Federal Reserve (Fed) implemented massive stimulus and liquidity measures to backstop markets. Growth stocks, driven primarily by large-cap technology firms, significantly outperformed value stocks and the broader market. The unemployment rate, which had previously risen to an extremely high level, eventually showed signs of recovery but remained elevated. Relatively positive economic data toward the end of the period, including an uptick in consumer spending, pointed to a nascent recovery; however, the development of virus hot spots, particularly in the Southern and Western regions of the country, underscored the challenges that remain as the economy reopens amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Portfolio outperformed its primary benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, and its secondary benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, during the period. As part of our investment strategy, we seek companies that have built clear, sustainable competitive moats around their businesses, which should help them grow market share within their respective industries over time. Important competitive advantages could include a strong brand, network effects from a product or service that would be hard for a competitor to replicate, a lower cost structure than competitors in the industry, a distribution advantage or patent protection over valuable intellectual property. We think emphasizing these sustainable competitive advantages can be a meaningful driver of outperformance over longer time horizons because the market often underestimates the duration of growth for these companies and the long-term potential return to shareholders.
Avalara was a top contributor for the period relative to the benchmark. The Software as a Service company is a provider of tax calculation solutions for medium-size e-commerce businesses. Companies that sell goods online are now required to collect the appropriate sales tax for each state they sell into, even if they do not have a physical presence in that state. This requirement, combined with the complexity of the U.S. tax code, makes Avalara’s software an essential service for many online businesses. The stock was up during the period after reporting strong earnings and a growing customer base through a challenging economic environment.
Netflix, Inc., another top contributor, has been a clear beneficiary of shelter-in-place orders, with a fairly low-priced product that has seen a spike in demand amid social distancing. As business activity slowed and advertising decreased, Netflix’s business model also benefited due to its ad-free structure, while competitors more reliant on advertising revenue were negatively impacted.
Amazon was another top contributor, as almost every business line has continued to benefit from the disrupted environment. E-commerce (traditional and Whole Foods) benefited from increased deliveries. Amazon’s extensive and sophisticated direct-to-consumer distribution network and Prime Video streaming were welcomed by consumers in this environment. Amazon Web Services (AWS) also benefited from an accelerated transition to the cloud, driven by the need to provide knowledge workers remote access to corporate information technology (IT) applications.
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Boston Scientific, a cardiovascular-focused medical device company, was among the top detractors. The company has suffered as some surgeries have been pushed back until the COVID-19 pandemic slows down. Procedures like heart surgery are not seen as elective, but many operations have been delayed in the near term.
Another detractor relative to the benchmark was defense contractor L3Harris Technologies. Defense stocks in general held up better during the initial market sell-off but have struggled more recently. Huge levels of fiscal stimulus will likely lead to strained government budgets for the foreseeable future. As a result, fears that defense spending will be negatively impacted weighed on the stock during the period.
Elanco Animal Health also detracted from relative performance. The stock declined after the company reported lower-than-expected quarterly revenues and withdrew fiscal year guidance because of COVID-19. Elanco is a top participant in the expanding animal food and health market. The firm’s planned acquisition of Bayer Animal Health remains targeted for a midyear close and should help diversify Elanco’s portfolio and distribution channels.
OUTLOOK
Massive fiscal and monetary stimulus measures have thus far helped cushion the blow from shelter-in-place orders and provided much-needed liquidity for markets, Main Street businesses and consumers. As a result, the individual savings rate has gone up dramatically, and many companies with impaired balance sheets have likewise been able to raise inexpensive capital and deleverage. Interest rates (and therefore company cost of capital) are likely to remain at or near zero for the foreseeable future. This could eventually lead to price extremes for both equities and fixed income and will present investors with significant challenges in assessing corporate valuations.
The economy has shown signs of a budding recovery as it reopens, but it is clear that COVID-19 infection rates will need to be kept in check, as large spikes could necessitate renewed shutdowns and create risks to the developing recovery. Thus, the path back to normalcy will likely be extended and volatile until there is an effective and widely implemented vaccine. Adding to short-term market volatility is a recent spike in retail trading volume and accounts, spurred by zero-cost commissions across the retail brokerage industry and an increase in hours spent at home for individual investors.
While we can’t predict macroeconomic outlooks, nor the trajectory of COVID-19, we believe many of the themes we have discussed in the past, specifically the widespread digitization of sectors across the economy, will not only persist but also get stronger over the coming months and years. Now more than ever, we think it is important to own companies that can benefit from long-term secular trends and that can continue to invest and grow. These are firms that have durable business models with deeply rooted competitive advantages, including strong balance sheets. Such qualities should allow these companies to allocate capital to growth opportunities despite a recessionary environment.
Thank you for your investment in Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Contributors - Holdings | 5 Top Detractors - Holdings | |||||||
|
| Average
|
| Relative
|
|
| Average |
| Relative
|
| Avalara Inc | 1.09% |
| 0.62% |
| Boston Scientific Corp | 3.28% |
| -1.11% |
| Netflix Inc | 2.84% |
| 0.55% |
| Walt Disney Co | 1.71% |
| -0.68% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 7.24% |
| 0.51% |
| L3Harris Technologies Inc | 2.99% |
| -0.61% |
| Adobe Inc | 3.43% |
| 0.46% |
| Elanco Animal Health Inc | 1.05% |
| -0.61% |
| ASML Holding NV | 2.13% |
| 0.31% |
| Mastercard Inc | 5.81% |
| -0.43% |
| 5 Top Contributors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Information Technology |
| 1.21% |
| 38.10% | 39.94% |
| Consumer Discretionary |
| 1.02% |
| 13.43% | 14.35% |
| Industrials |
| 0.54% |
| 6.97% | 8.18% |
| Consumer Staples |
| 0.49% |
| 1.21% | 4.48% |
| Real Estate |
| 0.25% |
| 3.01% | 2.37% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Detractors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Health Care |
| -1.93% |
| 13.07% | 14.54% |
| Materials |
| -0.47% |
| 3.49% | 1.25% |
| Financials |
| -0.34% |
| 3.85% | 2.96% |
| Other** |
| 0.04% |
| 2.42% | 0.00% |
| Energy |
| 0.12% |
| 0.00% | 0.18% |
| Relative contribution reflects
how the portolio's holdings impacted return relative to the benchmark. Cash and securities not held in
the portfolio are not shown. For equity portfolios, relative contribution compares the performance of
a security in the portfolio to the benchmark's total return, factoring in the difference in weight of
that security in the benchmark. Returns are calculated using daily returns and previous day ending weights
rolled up by ticker, excluding fixed income securities, gross of advisory fees, may exclude certain derivatives
and will differ from actual performance. | |||||
* | Based on sector classification according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) codes, which are the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. | |||||
** | Not a GICS classified sector. |
Janus Aspen Series | 3 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
5 Largest Equity Holdings - (% of Net Assets) | |
Microsoft Corp | |
Software | 9.0% |
Amazon.com Inc | |
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail | 8.7% |
Apple Inc | |
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 5.9% |
Mastercard Inc | |
Information Technology Services | 5.8% |
Alphabet Inc - Class C | |
Interactive Media & Services | 3.9% |
33.3% |
Asset Allocation - (% of Net Assets) | |||||
Common Stocks | 99.5% | ||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | 0.9% | ||||
Investment Companies | 0.8% | ||||
Other | (1.2)% | ||||
100.0% |
Top Country Allocations - Long Positions - (% of Investment Securities) | |
As of June 30, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 |
4 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
See important disclosures on the next page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return - for the periods ended June 30, 2020 |
|
| Expense Ratios | |||||||
|
| Fiscal
| One
| Five
| Ten | Since
|
|
| Total Annual Fund | |
Institutional Shares |
| 10.84% | 23.10% | 16.48% | 16.54% | 12.25% |
|
| 0.77% | |
Service Shares |
| 10.68% | 22.79% | 16.19% | 16.24% | 11.94% |
|
| 1.02% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| 9.81% | 23.28% | 15.89% | 17.23% | 8.62% |
|
|
| |
S&P 500 Index |
| -3.08% | 7.51% | 10.73% | 13.99% | 8.05% |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Quartile - Institutional Shares |
| - | 1st | 1st | 2nd | 1st |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Ranking - based on total returns for Large Growth Funds |
| - | 319/1,366 | 161/1,251 | 305/1,100 | 14/587 |
|
|
|
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold. For the most recent month-end performance call 800.668.0434 or visit janushenderson.com/VITperformance.
This Portfolio has a performance-based management fee that may adjust up or down based on the Portfolio’s performance.
Performance may be affected by risks that include those associated with non-diversification, portfolio turnover, short sales, potential conflicts of interest, foreign and emerging markets, initial public offerings (IPOs), high-yield and high-risk securities, undervalued, overlooked and smaller capitalization companies, real estate related securities including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), derivatives, and commodity-linked investments. Each product has different risks. Please see the prospectus for more information about risks, holdings and other details.
Returns do not reflect the deduction of fees, charges or expenses of any insurance product or qualified plan. If applied, returns would have been lower.
Returns include reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares. The returns do not include adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes.
Performance for Service Shares prior to December 31, 1999 reflects the performance of Institutional Shares, adjusted to reflect the expenses of Service Shares.
Ranking is for the share class shown only; other classes may have different performance characteristics.
© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information for index definitions.
Janus Aspen Series | 5 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
See “Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report.”
*The Portfolio’s inception date – May 1 ,1997
‡ As stated in the prospectus. See Financial Highlights for actual expense ratios during the reporting period.
6 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (unaudited)
Expense Examples
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares only); transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement; and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The example is based upon an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the six-months indicated, unless noted otherwise in the table and footnotes below.
Actual Expenses
The information in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based upon the Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Additionally, for an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in either share class or other similar funds, please visit www.finra.org/fundanalyzer.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as any charges at the separate account level or contract level. These fees are fully described in the Portfolio’s prospectuses. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Actual |
| Hypothetical
|
| ||||
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Net Annualized | ||
Institutional Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,108.40 | $4.09 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,020.98 | $3.92 | 0.78% | ||
Service Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,106.80 | $5.34 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,019.79 | $5.12 | 1.02% | ||
† | Expenses Paid During Period are equal to the Net Annualized Expense Ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses in the examples include the effect of applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, if any. Had such waivers and/or reimbursements not been in effect, your expenses would have been higher. Please refer to the Notes to Financial Statements or the Portfolio’s prospectuses for more information regarding waivers and/or reimbursements. |
Janus Aspen Series | 7 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.5% | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.2% | |||||||
L3Harris Technologies Inc | 118,258 | $20,064,835 | |||||
Capital Markets – 2.3% | |||||||
Blackstone Group Inc | 377,230 | 21,373,852 | |||||
Chemicals – 2.0% | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co | 32,071 | 18,532,227 | |||||
Construction Materials – 0.8% | |||||||
Vulcan Materials Co | 60,230 | 6,977,646 | |||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.6% | |||||||
Cognex Corp | 97,030 | 5,794,632 | |||||
Entertainment – 4.0% | |||||||
Netflix Inc* | 56,422 | 25,674,267 | |||||
Walt Disney Co | 101,830 | 11,355,063 | |||||
37,029,330 | |||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 3.0% | |||||||
American Tower Corp | 107,415 | 27,771,074 | |||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 8.6% | |||||||
Boston Scientific Corp* | 894,478 | 31,405,123 | |||||
Danaher Corp | 143,461 | 25,368,209 | |||||
Edwards Lifesciences Corp* | 92,124 | 6,366,690 | |||||
Intuitive Surgical Inc* | 28,895 | 16,465,238 | |||||
79,605,260 | |||||||
Household Products – 1.9% | |||||||
Procter & Gamble Co | 149,413 | 17,865,312 | |||||
Information Technology Services – 7.3% | |||||||
Mastercard Inc | 181,878 | 53,781,325 | |||||
PayPal Holdings Inc* | 77,802 | 13,555,442 | |||||
67,336,767 | |||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 9.2% | |||||||
Alphabet Inc - Class C* | 25,682 | 36,304,332 | |||||
Facebook Inc* | 105,041 | 23,851,660 | |||||
Match Group Inc*,# | 104,099 | 11,143,798 | |||||
Snap Inc* | 581,763 | 13,665,613 | |||||
84,965,403 | |||||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail – 9.9% | |||||||
Amazon.com Inc* | 29,018 | 80,055,439 | |||||
Booking Holdings Inc* | 7,125 | 11,345,422 | |||||
91,400,861 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 4.4% | |||||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc* | 453,220 | 9,721,569 | |||||
Merck & Co Inc | 207,128 | 16,017,208 | |||||
Zoetis Inc | 107,998 | 14,800,046 | |||||
40,538,823 | |||||||
Professional Services – 2.1% | |||||||
CoStar Group Inc* | 27,655 | 19,653,579 | |||||
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment – 8.5% | |||||||
ASML Holding NV | 56,609 | 20,833,810 | |||||
Lam Research Corp | 29,219 | 9,451,178 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc | 74,542 | 7,850,018 | |||||
NVIDIA Corp | 50,564 | 19,209,769 | |||||
Texas Instruments Inc | 165,868 | 21,060,260 | |||||
78,405,035 | |||||||
Software – 17.4% | |||||||
Adobe Inc* | 74,698 | 32,516,786 | |||||
Avalara Inc* | 89,312 | 11,886,534 | |||||
Microsoft Corp | 407,075 | 82,843,833 | |||||
salesforce.com Inc* | 180,945 | 33,896,427 | |||||
161,143,580 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
8 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Specialty Retail – 2.6% | |||||||
Home Depot Inc | 96,149 | $24,086,286 | |||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 5.9% | |||||||
Apple Inc | 148,379 | 54,128,659 | |||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 4.4% | |||||||
Lululemon Athletica Inc* | 21,321 | 6,652,365 | |||||
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE | 44,143 | 19,332,971 | |||||
NIKE Inc | 147,294 | 14,442,177 | |||||
40,427,513 | |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 2.4% | |||||||
T-Mobile US Inc* | 214,575 | 22,347,986 | |||||
Total Common Stocks (cost $525,472,235) | 919,448,660 | ||||||
Investment Companies – 0.8% | |||||||
Money Markets – 0.8% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº,£ (cost $7,687,698) | 7,687,556 | 7,688,325 | |||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending – 0.9% | |||||||
Investment Companies – 0.7% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº,£ | 6,398,181 | 6,398,181 | |||||
Time Deposits – 0.2% | |||||||
Royal Bank of Canada, 0.0900%, 7/1/20 | $1,599,545 | 1,599,545 | |||||
Total Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending (cost $7,997,726) | 7,997,726 | ||||||
Total Investments (total cost $541,157,659) – 101.2% | 935,134,711 | ||||||
Liabilities, net of Cash, Receivables and Other Assets – (1.2)% | (10,901,244) | ||||||
Net Assets – 100% | $924,233,467 |
Summary of Investments by Country - (Long Positions) (unaudited) | |||||
% of | |||||
Investment | |||||
Country | Value | Securities | |||
United States | $894,967,930 | 95.7 | % | ||
Netherlands | 20,833,810 | 2.2 | |||
France | 19,332,971 | 2.1 |
Total | $935,134,711 | 100.0 | % |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 9 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Schedules of Affiliated Investments – (% of Net Assets)
Dividend Income | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | $ | 97,840 | $ | 5,174 | $ | 850 | $ | 7,688,325 | ||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.7% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.7% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | 278,585∆ | - | - | 6,398,181 | ||||||
Total Affiliated Investments - 1.5% | $ | 376,425 | $ | 5,174- | $ | 850 | $ | 14,086,506 |
Value at 12/31/19 | Purchases | Sales Proceeds | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Money Markets - 0.8% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | 17,377,343 | 157,584,891 | (167,279,933) | 7,688,325 | ||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.7% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.7% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | - | 19,515,652 | (13,117,471) | 6,398,181 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
10 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
Russell 1000® Growth Index | Russell 1000® Growth Index reflects the performance of U.S. large-cap equities with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. |
S&P 500® Index | S&P 500® Index reflects U.S. large-cap equity performance and represents broad U.S. equity market performance. |
LLC | Limited Liability Company |
* | Non-income producing security. |
ºº | Rate shown is the 7-day yield as of June 30, 2020. |
# | Loaned security; a portion of the security is on loan at June 30, 2020. |
£ | The Portfolio may invest in certain securities that are considered affiliated companies. As defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, an affiliated company is one in which the Portfolio owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control. |
∆ | Net of income paid to the securities lending agent and rebates paid to the borrowing counterparties. |
The following is a summary of the inputs that were used to value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments as of June 30, 2020. See Notes to Financial Statements for more information. | ||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs Summary | ||||||||||||
Level 2 - | Level 3 - | |||||||||||
Level 1 - | Other Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Investments In Securities: | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | $ | 21,094,542 | $ | 19,332,971 | $ | - | ||||||
All Other | 879,021,147 | - | - | |||||||||
Investment Companies | - | 7,688,325 | - | |||||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | - | 7,997,726 | - | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 900,115,689 | $ | 35,019,022 | $ | - | ||||||
Janus Aspen Series | 11 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Unaffiliated investments, at value(1)(2) |
| $ | 921,048,205 |
| |
| Affiliated investments, at value(3) |
|
| 14,086,506 |
| |
| Cash |
|
| 347 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation |
|
| 19,045 |
| |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Dividends |
|
| 340,016 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares sold |
|
| 176,377 |
|
|
| Foreign tax reclaims |
|
| 7,160 |
|
|
| Dividends from affiliates |
|
| 2,159 |
|
| Other assets |
|
| 93,149 |
| |
Total Assets |
|
| 935,772,964 |
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Collateral for securities loaned (Note 2) |
|
| 7,997,726 |
| |
| Payables: |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Portfolio shares repurchased |
|
| 2,791,461 |
|
|
| Advisory fees |
|
| 475,478 |
|
|
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees |
|
| 109,260 |
|
|
| Transfer agent fees and expenses |
|
| 39,604 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation fees |
|
| 19,045 |
|
|
| Non-affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 18,898 |
|
|
| Professional fees |
|
| 17,335 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' fees and expenses |
|
| 4,277 |
|
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 1,857 |
|
|
| Custodian fees |
|
| 1,693 |
|
|
| Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
| 62,863 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 11,539,497 |
| ||
Net Assets |
| $ | 924,233,467 |
| ||
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) |
| $ | 479,180,586 |
| |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) |
|
| 445,052,881 |
| |
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 924,233,467 |
| ||
Net Assets - Institutional Shares |
| $ | 381,570,831 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 8,418,855 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 45.32 |
| ||
Net Assets - Service Shares |
| $ | 542,662,636 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 12,869,814 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 42.17 |
|
(1) Includes cost of $527,071,780. (2) Includes $7,831,492 of securities on loan. See Note 2 in Notes to Financial Statements. (3) Includes cost of $14,085,879. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
12 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Statement of Operations (unaudited)
For the period ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
| ||
| Dividends | $ | 3,383,310 |
| |
| Affiliated securities lending income, net |
| 278,585 |
| |
| Dividends from affiliates |
| 97,840 |
| |
| Unaffiliated securities lending income, net |
| 3,142 |
| |
| Foreign tax withheld |
| (13,670) |
| |
Total Investment Income |
| 3,749,207 |
| ||
Expenses: |
|
|
| ||
| Advisory fees |
| 2,964,550 |
| |
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees: |
|
|
| |
|
| Service Shares |
| 626,658 |
|
| Transfer agent administrative fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 87,260 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 125,332 |
|
| Other transfer agent fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 8,511 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 5,762 |
|
| Shareholder reports expense |
| 20,346 |
| |
| Professional fees |
| 19,834 |
| |
| Registration fees |
| 11,740 |
| |
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees |
| 10,630 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses |
| 7,710 |
| |
| Custodian fees |
| 5,539 |
| |
| Other expenses |
| 45,664 |
| |
Total Expenses |
| 3,939,536 |
| ||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| (190,329) |
| ||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and foreign currency transactions |
| 51,282,171 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 5,174 |
| |
Total Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments |
| 51,287,345 |
| ||
Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments, foreign currency translations and non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation |
| 37,904,505 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 850 |
| |
Total Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation |
| 37,905,355 |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 89,002,371 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 13 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net investment income/(loss) | $ | (190,329) |
| $ | 678,107 |
| |
| Net realized gain/(loss) on investments |
| 51,287,345 |
|
| 71,678,445 |
| |
| Change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation |
| 37,905,355 |
|
| 183,133,171 |
| |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| 89,002,371 |
|
| 255,489,723 |
| ||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (28,629,140) |
|
| (27,749,524) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| (43,209,494) |
|
| (42,198,627) |
|
Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
| (71,838,634) |
|
| (69,948,151) |
| ||
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 11,410,846 |
|
| (6,219,350) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 8,545,667 |
|
| (11,662,110) |
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions |
| 19,956,513 |
|
| (17,881,460) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
| 37,120,250 |
|
| 167,660,112 |
| ||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Beginning of period |
| 887,113,217 |
|
| 719,453,105 |
| |
| End of period | $ | 924,233,467 |
| $ | 887,113,217 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
14 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Financial Highlights
Institutional Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $44.38 |
|
| $35.20 |
|
| $39.76 |
|
| $32.19 |
|
| $36.37 |
|
| $40.27 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.02 |
|
| 0.09 |
|
| 0.07 |
|
| 0.02 |
|
| 0.05 |
|
| 0.03 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| 4.58 |
|
| 12.55 |
|
| 1.31 |
|
| 9.58 |
|
| 0.58 |
|
| 4.77 |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| 4.60 |
|
| 12.64 |
|
| 1.38 |
|
| 9.60 |
|
| 0.63 |
|
| 4.80 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.14) |
|
| (0.06) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (3.52) |
|
| (3.40) |
|
| (5.94) |
|
| (2.03) |
|
| (4.81) |
|
| (8.70) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (3.66) |
|
| (3.46) |
|
| (5.94) |
|
| (2.03) |
|
| (4.81) |
|
| (8.70) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $45.32 |
|
| $44.38 |
|
| $35.20 |
|
| $39.76 |
|
| $32.19 |
|
| $36.37 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| 10.84% |
|
| 37.16% |
|
| 1.98% |
|
| 30.31% |
|
| 2.20% |
|
| 12.22% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $381,571 |
|
| $362,001 |
|
| $292,132 |
|
| $309,258 |
|
| $257,009 |
|
| $295,725 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $352,946 |
|
| $337,416 |
|
| $327,962 |
|
| $297,125 |
|
| $273,374 |
|
| $298,904 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.78% |
|
| 0.77% |
|
| 0.71% |
|
| 0.82% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.69% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.78% |
|
| 0.77% |
|
| 0.71% |
|
| 0.82% |
|
| 0.72% |
|
| 0.69% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 0.10% |
|
| 0.23% |
|
| 0.17% |
|
| 0.05% |
|
| 0.15% |
|
| 0.08% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 26% |
|
| 35% |
|
| 41% |
|
| 39% |
|
| 53% |
|
| 55% |
| ||
Service Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $41.53 |
|
| $33.15 |
|
| $37.84 |
|
| $30.79 |
|
| $35.08 |
|
| $39.21 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| (0.03) |
|
| (0.01) |
|
| (0.03) |
|
| (0.07) |
|
| (0.03) |
|
| (0.06) |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| 4.27 |
|
| 11.80 |
|
| 1.28 |
|
| 9.15 |
|
| 0.55 |
|
| 4.63 |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| 4.24 |
|
| 11.79 |
|
| 1.25 |
|
| 9.08 |
|
| 0.52 |
|
| 4.57 |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.08) |
|
| (0.01) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (3.52) |
|
| (3.40) |
|
| (5.94) |
|
| (2.03) |
|
| (4.81) |
|
| (8.70) |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (3.60) |
|
| (3.41) |
|
| (5.94) |
|
| (2.03) |
|
| (4.81) |
|
| (8.70) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $42.17 |
|
| $41.53 |
|
| $33.15 |
|
| $37.84 |
|
| $30.79 |
|
| $35.08 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| 10.71% |
|
| 36.85% |
|
| 1.72% |
|
| 29.99% |
|
| 1.94% |
|
| 11.94% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $542,663 |
|
| $525,112 |
|
| $427,321 |
|
| $466,969 |
|
| $430,510 |
|
| $501,003 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $506,966 |
|
| $495,465 |
|
| $487,559 |
|
| $457,168 |
|
| $464,943 |
|
| $501,868 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 1.02% |
|
| 1.02% |
|
| 0.96% |
|
| 1.06% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.94% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 1.02% |
|
| 1.02% |
|
| 0.96% |
|
| 1.06% |
|
| 0.97% |
|
| 0.94% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| (0.15)% |
|
| (0.02)% |
|
| (0.08)% |
|
| (0.19)% |
|
| (0.09)% |
|
| (0.17)% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 26% |
|
| 35% |
|
| 41% |
|
| 39% |
|
| 53% |
|
| 55% |
| ||
* Total return includes adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the year or period end and are not annualized for periods of less than one full year. Total return does not include fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and life insurance contracts for which Janus Aspen Series serves as an underlying investment vehicle. ** Annualized for periods of less than one full year. (1) Per share amounts are calculated based on average shares outstanding during the year or period. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 15 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a series of Janus Aspen Series (the “Trust”), which is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and therefore has applied the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946. The Trust offers 11 portfolios, each of which offers multiple share classes, with differing investment objectives and policies. The Portfolio seeks long-term growth of capital. The Portfolio is classified as nondiversified, as defined in the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio currently offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Service Shares. Each class represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Institutional Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans. Service Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans that require a fee from Portfolio assets to procure distribution and administrative services to contract owners and plan participants.
Shareholders, including other portfolios, participating insurance companies, as well as accounts, may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) a significant percentage of the Portfolio’s Shares and can be considered to “control” the Portfolio when that ownership exceeds 25% of the Portfolio’s assets (and which may differ from control as determined in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting priciples ("US GAAP")).
The following accounting policies have been followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with US GAAP.
Investment Valuation
Securities held by the Portfolio are valued in accordance with policies and procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees (the “Valuation Procedures”). Equity securities traded on a domestic securities exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If such price is lacking for the trading period immediately preceding the time of determination, such securities are valued at their current bid price. Equity securities that are traded on a foreign exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on such markets. In the event that there is no current trading volume on a particular security in such foreign exchange, the bid price from the primary exchange is generally used to value the security. Securities that are traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets are generally valued at their closing or latest bid prices as available. Foreign securities and currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Portfolio will determine the market value of individual securities held by it by using prices provided by one or more approved professional pricing services or, as needed, by obtaining market quotations from independent broker-dealers. Most debt securities are valued in accordance with the evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service that is intended to reflect market value. The evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service is an evaluation that may consider factors such as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Certain short-term securities maturing within 60 days or less may be evaluated and valued on an amortized cost basis provided that the amortized cost determined approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations or evaluated prices are not readily available or deemed unreliable are valued at fair value determined in good faith under the Valuation Procedures. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant event that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy, or significant issuer-specific development; (ii) an event that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; (iii) a nonsignificant event such as a market closing early or not opening, or a security trading halt; and (iv) pricing of a nonvalued security and a restricted or nonpublic security. Special valuation considerations may apply with respect to “odd-lot” fixed-income transactions which, due to their small size, may receive evaluated prices by pricing services which reflect a large block trade and not what actually could be obtained for the odd-lot position. The Portfolio uses systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties to value international equity securities in order to adjust for stale pricing, which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE.
Valuation Inputs Summary
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This standard emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that
16 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets the Portfolio has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Assets or liabilities categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy generally include: debt securities fair valued in accordance with the evaluated bid or ask prices supplied by a pricing service; securities traded on OTC markets and listed securities for which no sales are reported that are fair valued at the latest bid price (or yield equivalent thereof) obtained from one or more dealers transacting in a market for such securities or by a pricing service approved by the Portfolio’s Trustees; certain short-term debt securities with maturities of 60 days or less that are fair valued at amortized cost; and equity securities of foreign issuers whose fair value is determined by using systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties in order to adjust for stale pricing which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE. Other securities that may be categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy include, but are not limited to, preferred stocks, bank loans, swaps, investments in unregistered investment companies, options, and forward contracts.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.
There have been no significant changes in valuation techniques used in valuing any such positions held by the Portfolio since the beginning of the fiscal year.
The inputs or methodology used for fair valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of inputs used as of June 30, 2020 to fair value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments is included in the “Valuation Inputs Summary” in the Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for as of the date purchased or sold (trade date). Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend, if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividends from foreign securities may be subject to withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. The Portfolio classifies gains and losses on prepayments received as an adjustment to interest income. Debt securities may be placed in non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivables when collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes.
Expenses
The Portfolio bears expenses incurred specifically on its behalf. Each class of shares bears a portion of general expenses, which are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets. Expenses directly attributable to a specific class of shares are charged against the operations of such class.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Janus Aspen Series | 17 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts that contain provisions for indemnification of other parties against certain potential liabilities. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, and would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred. Currently, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Foreign Currency Translations
The Portfolio does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held at the date of the financial statements. Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency translations arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities held at the date of the financial statements, resulting from changes in the exchange rates and changes in market prices of securities held.
Currency gains and losses are also calculated on payables and receivables that are denominated in foreign currencies. The payables and receivables are generally related to foreign security transactions and income translations.
Foreign currency-denominated assets and forward currency contracts may involve more risks than domestic transactions, including currency risk, counterparty risk, political and economic risk, regulatory risk and equity risk. Risks may arise from unanticipated movements in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Dividends and Distributions
The Portfolio may make semiannual distributions of substantially all of its investment income and an annual distribution of its net realized capital gains (if any).
The Portfolio may make certain investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which pay dividends to their shareholders based upon funds available from operations. It is quite common for these dividends to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits, resulting in the excess portion of such dividends being designated as a return of capital. If the Portfolio distributes such amounts, such distributions could constitute a return of capital to shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years, generally a three-year period, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
2. Other Investments and Strategies
Additional Investment Risk
In the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the financial sector experienced reduced liquidity in credit and other fixed-income markets, and an unusually high degree of volatility, both domestically and internationally. In response to the crisis, the United States and certain foreign governments, along with the U.S. Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks, took a number of unprecedented steps designed to support the financial markets. For example, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 provided for widespread regulation of financial institutions, consumer financial products and services, broker-dealers, over-the-counter derivatives, investment advisers, credit rating agencies, and mortgage lending, which expanded federal oversight in the financial sector, including the investment management industry. More recently, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have taken extraordinary actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets, including reducing interest rates to record low levels. The withdrawal of this support, a failure of measures put in place in response to such economic uncertainty, or investor perception that such efforts were not sufficient could each negatively affect financial markets generally, and the value and liquidity of specific securities. In addition, policy and legislative changes in the United States and in other countries continue to impact many aspects of financial regulation.
Widespread disease, including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and weather-related phenomena generally, have been and can be highly disruptive to
18 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States. These disruptions could prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective(s). Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value of a Fund. In addition, these disruptions could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Fund’s service providers, including Janus Capital or the subadviser (as applicable), rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of the Fund.
A number of countries in the European Union (“EU”) have experienced, and may continue to experience, severe economic and financial difficulties. In particular, many EU nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. Financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit. As a result, financial markets in the EU have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. The risk of investing in securities in the European markets may also be heightened due to the referendum in which the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”). The United Kingdom formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into an eleven-month transition period, during which the United Kingdom will remain subject to EU laws and regulations. There is considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the United Kingdom’s exit and how negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted or concluded.
Certain areas of the world have historically been prone to and economically sensitive to environmental events such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, tornadoes, mudslides, or other weather-related phenomena. Such disasters, and the resulting physical or economic damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Portfolio’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Portfolio invests to conduct their businesses as they would under normal conditions. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance and reinsurance companies that insure or reinsure against the impact of natural disasters.
Counterparties
Portfolio transactions involving a counterparty are subject to the risk that the counterparty or a third party will not fulfill its obligation to the Portfolio (“counterparty risk”). Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty’s financial condition (i.e., financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or insolvency), market activities and developments, or other reasons, whether foreseen or not. A counterparty’s inability to fulfill its obligation may result in significant financial loss to the Portfolio. The Portfolio may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited recovery, and/or recovery may be delayed. The extent of the Portfolio’s exposure to counterparty risk with respect to financial assets and liabilities approximates its carrying value.
The Portfolio may be exposed to counterparty risk through participation in various programs, including, but not limited to, lending its securities to third parties, cash sweep arrangements whereby the Portfolio’s cash balance is invested in one or more types of cash management vehicles, as well as investments in, but not limited to, repurchase agreements, debt securities, and derivatives, including various types of swaps, futures and options. The Portfolio intends to enter into financial transactions with counterparties that Janus Capital believes to be creditworthy at the time of the transaction. There is always the risk that Janus Capital’s analysis of a counterparty’s creditworthiness is incorrect or may change due to market conditions. To the extent that the Portfolio focuses its transactions with a limited number of counterparties, it will have greater exposure to the risks associated with one or more counterparties.
Real Estate Investing
The Portfolio may invest in equity and debt securities of real estate-related companies. Such companies may include those in the real estate industry or real estate-related industries. These securities may include common stocks, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, and other equity securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed securities,
Janus Aspen Series | 19 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
real estate-backed securities, securities of REITs and similar REIT-like entities. A REIT is a trust that invests in real estate-related projects, such as properties, mortgage loans, and construction loans. REITs are generally categorized as equity, mortgage, or hybrid REITs. A REIT may be listed on an exchange or traded OTC.
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
The Portfolio presents gross and net information about transactions that are either offset in the financial statements or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement with a designated counterparty, regardless of whether the transactions are actually offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The following table presents gross amounts of recognized assets and/or liabilities and the net amounts after deducting collateral that has been pledged by counterparties or has been pledged to counterparties (if applicable). For corresponding information grouped by type of instrument, see the Portfolio's Schedule of Investments.
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets | |||||||||
Gross Amounts | |||||||||
of Recognized | Offsetting Asset | Collateral | |||||||
Counterparty | Assets | or Liability(a) | Pledged(b) | Net Amount | |||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | $ | 7,831,492 | $ | — | $ | (7,831,492) | $ | — | |
(a) | Represents the amount of assets or liabilities that could be offset with the same counterparty under master netting or similar agreements that management elects not to offset on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. | ||||||||
(b) | Collateral pledged is limited to the net outstanding amount due to/from an individual counterparty. The actual collateral amounts pledged may exceed these amounts and may fluctuate in value. |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset financial instruments' payables and receivables and related collateral on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Securities on loan will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). See “Securities Lending” in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for additional information.
Securities Lending
Under procedures adopted by the Trustees, the Portfolio may seek to earn additional income by lending securities to certain qualified broker-dealers and institutions. Effective December 16, 2019, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association replaced Deutsche Bank AG as securities lending agent for the Portfolio. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. The Portfolio may lend portfolio securities in an amount equal to up to 1/3 of its total assets as determined at the time of the loan origination. There is the risk of delay in recovering a loaned security or the risk of loss in collateral rights if the borrower fails financially. In addition, Janus Capital makes efforts to balance the benefits and risks from granting such loans. All loans will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the SEC. If the Portfolio is unable to recover a security on loan, the Portfolio may use the collateral to purchase replacement securities in the market. There is a risk that the value of the collateral could decrease below the cost of the replacement security by the time the replacement investment is made, resulting in a loss to the Portfolio. In certain circumstances individual loan transactions could yield negative returns.
Upon receipt of cash collateral, Janus Capital may invest it in affiliated or non-affiliated cash management vehicles, whether registered or unregistered entities, as permitted by the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. Janus Capital currently intends to primarily invest the cash collateral in a cash management vehicle for which Janus Capital serves as investment adviser, Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. An investment in Janus Henderson Cash
20 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Collateral Fund LLC is generally subject to the same risks that shareholders experience when investing in similarly structured vehicles, such as the potential for significant fluctuations in assets as a result of the purchase and redemption activity of the securities lending program, a decline in the value of the collateral, and possible liquidity issues. Such risks may delay the return of the cash collateral and cause the Portfolio to violate its agreement to return the cash collateral to a borrower in a timely manner. As adviser to the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest as a result of its fiduciary duties to both the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. Additionally, Janus Capital receives an investment advisory fee of 0.05% for managing Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, but it may not receive a fee for managing certain other affiliated cash management vehicles in which the Portfolio may invest, and therefore may have an incentive to allocate preferred investment opportunities to investment vehicles for which it is receiving a fee.
The value of the collateral must be at least 102% of the market value of the loaned securities that are denominated in U.S. dollars and 105% of the market value of the loaned securities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars. Loaned securities and related collateral are marked-to-market each business day based upon the market value of the loaned securities at the close of business, employing the most recent available pricing information. Collateral levels are then adjusted based on this mark-to-market evaluation.
The cash collateral invested by Janus Capital is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments (if applicable). Income earned from the investment of the cash collateral, net of rebates paid to, or fees paid by, borrowers and less the fees paid to the lending agent are included as “Affiliated securities lending income, net” on the Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2020, securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings with an overnight and continuous contractual maturity are $7,831,492. Gross amounts of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) as of June 30, 2020 is $7,997,726, resulting in the net amount due to the counterparty of $166,234.
3. Investment Advisory Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Portfolio pays Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus Capital”) an investment advisory fee which is calculated daily and paid monthly. The Portfolio’s "base" fee rate prior to any performance adjustment (expressed as an annual rate) is 0.64%.
The investment advisory fee rate is determined by calculating a base fee and applying a performance adjustment. The base fee rate is the same as the contractual investment advisory fee rate. The performance adjustment either increases or decreases the base fee depending on how well the Portfolio has performed relative to its benchmark index. The Portfolio's benchmark index used in the calculation is the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
The calculation of the performance adjustment applies as follows:
Investment Advisory Fee = Base Fee Rate +/- Performance Adjustment
The investment advisory fee rate paid to Janus Capital by the Portfolio consists of two components: (1) a base fee calculated by applying the contractual fixed rate of the advisory fee to the Portfolio’s average daily net assets during the previous month (“Base Fee Rate”), plus or minus (2) a performance-fee adjustment (“Performance Adjustment”) calculated by applying a variable rate of up to 0.15% (positive or negative) to the Portfolio’s average daily net assets based on the Portfolio’s relative performance compared to the cumulative investment record of its benchmark index over a 36-month performance measurement period or shorter time period, as applicable. The investment performance of a Portfolio’s Service Shares, for the performance measurement period is used to calculate the Performance Adjustment. No Performance Adjustment is applied unless the difference between the Portfolio’s investment performance and the cumulative investment record of the Portfolio’s benchmark index is 0.50% or greater (positive or negative) during the applicable performance measurement period.
The Portfolio’s prospectuses and statement(s) of additional information contain additional information about performance-based fees. The amount shown as advisory fees on the Statement of Operations reflects the Base Fee Rate plus/minus any Performance Adjustment. For the period ended June 30, 2020, the performance adjusted investment advisory fee rate before any waivers and/or reimbursements of expenses is 0.70%.
Janus Services LLC (“Janus Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, is the Portfolio’s transfer agent. Janus Services receives an administrative services fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets of the Portfolio for arranging for the provision by participating insurance companies and qualified plan service providers of administrative services, including recordkeeping, subaccounting, order processing, or other shareholder services
Janus Aspen Series | 21 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
provided on behalf of contract holders or plan participants investing in the Portfolio. Other shareholder services may include the provision of order confirmations, periodic account statements, forwarding prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other materials to existing investors, and answering inquiries regarding accounts. Janus Services expects to use this entire fee to compensate insurance companies and qualified plan service providers for providing these services to their customers who invest in the Portfolio. Any unused portion will be reimbursed to the applicable share class at least annually.
In addition, Janus Services provides or arranges for the provision of certain other internal administrative, recordkeeping, and shareholder relations services for the Portfolio. Janus Services is not compensated for these internal services related to the shares, except for out-of-pocket costs. These amounts are disclosed as “Other transfer agent fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Under a distribution and shareholder servicing plan (the “Plan”) adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Service Shares may pay the Trust’s distributor, Janus Distributors LLC (“Janus Distributors”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, a fee for the sale and distribution and/or shareholder servicing of the Service Shares at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Service Shares. Under the terms of the Plan, the Trust is authorized to make payments to Janus Distributors for remittance to insurance companies and qualified plan service providers as compensation for distribution and/or shareholder services performed by such entities. These amounts are disclosed as “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” on the Statement of Operations. Payments under the Plan are not tied exclusively to actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees, and the payments may exceed 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees actually incurred. If any of the Portfolio’s actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees incurred during a calendar year are less than the payments made during a calendar year, the Portfolio will be refunded the difference. Refunds, if any, are included in “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” in the Statement of Operations.
Janus Capital serves as administrator to the Portfolio pursuant to an administration agreement between Janus Capital and the Trust. Under the administration agreement, Janus Capital is obligated to provide or arrange for the provision of certain administration, compliance, and accounting services to the Portfolio, including providing office space for the Portfolio, and is reimbursed by the Portfolio for certain of its costs in providing these services (to the extent Janus Capital seeks reimbursement and such costs are not otherwise waived). In addition, employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates may serve as officers of the Trust. The Portfolio pays for some or all of the salaries, fees, and expenses of Janus Capital employees and Portfolio officers, with respect to certain specified administration functions they perform on behalf of the Portfolio. The Portfolio pays these costs based on out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Janus Capital, and these costs are separate and apart from advisory fees and other expenses paid in connection with the investment advisory services Janus Capital (or any subadvisor, as applicable) provides to the Portfolio. These amounts are disclosed as “Affiliated portfolio administration fees” on the Statement of Operations. In addition, some expenses related to compensation payable to the Portfolio’s Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff, all of whom are employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates, are shared with the Portfolio. Total compensation of $20,422 was paid to the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff by the Trust during the period ended June 30, 2020. The Portfolio's portion is reported as part of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for independent Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Portfolio. All deferred fees are credited to an account established in the name of the Trustees. The amounts credited to the account then increase or decrease, as the case may be, in accordance with the performance of one or more of the Janus Henderson funds that are selected by the Trustees. The account balance continues to fluctuate in accordance with the performance of the selected fund or funds until final payment of all amounts are credited to the account. The fluctuation of the account balance is recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) and is included as of June 30, 2020 on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the asset, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation,” and liability, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation fees.” Additionally, the recorded unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is included in “Total distributable earnings (loss)” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferred compensation expenses for the period ended June 30, 2020 are included in “Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Trustees are allowed to change their designation of mutual funds from time to time. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the Deferred Plan. Deferred fees of $220,425 were paid by the Trust to the Trustees under the Deferred Plan during the period ended June 30, 2020.
22 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act and related rules, the Portfolio may participate in an affiliated or non-affiliated cash sweep program. In the cash sweep program, uninvested cash balances of the Portfolio may be used to purchase shares of affiliated or non-affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles that operate as money market funds. The Portfolio is eligible to participate in the cash sweep program (the “Investing Funds”). As adviser, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest because of its fiduciary duties to the affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles and the Investing Funds. Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC (the “Sweep Vehicle”) is an affiliated unregistered cash management pooled investment vehicle that invests primarily in highly-rated short-term fixed-income securities. The Sweep Vehicle operates pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act that govern the operation of money market funds and prices its shares at NAV reflecting market-based values of its portfolio securities (i.e., a “floating” NAV) rounded to the fourth decimal place (e.g., $1.0000). The Sweep Vehicle is permitted to impose a liquidity fee (of up to 2%) on redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle or a redemption gate that temporarily suspends redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle for up to 10 business days during a 90 day period. There are no restrictions on the Portfolio's ability to withdraw investments from the Sweep Vehicle at will, and there are no unfunded capital commitments due from the Portfolio to the Sweep Vehicle. The Sweep Vehicle does not charge any management fee, sales charge or service fee.
Any purchases and sales, realized gains/losses and recorded dividends from affiliated investments during the period ended June 30, 2020 can be found in the “Schedules of Affiliated Investments” located in the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio is permitted to purchase or sell securities (“cross-trade”) between itself and other funds or accounts managed by Janus Capital in accordance with Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Rule 17a-7”), when the transaction is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio and in accordance with the Internal Cross Trade Procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any cross-trade of securities by the Portfolio from or to another fund or account that is or could be considered an affiliate of the Portfolio under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser, common Officer, or common Trustee complies with Rule 17a-7. Under these procedures, each cross-trade is effected at the current market price to save costs where allowed. During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio engaged in cross trades amounting to $1,075,151 in sales, resulting in a net realized loss of $565,414. The net realized loss is included within the “Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” section of the Portfolio’s Statement of Operations.
4. Federal Income Tax
Income and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for items such as net short-term gains, deferral of wash sale losses, foreign currency transactions, net investment losses, and capital loss carryovers.
The Portfolio has elected to treat gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts as capital gains and losses, if applicable. Other foreign currency gains and losses on debt instruments are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The aggregate cost of investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investment securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2020 are noted below. The primary differences between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of investments are wash sale loss deferrals and investments in partnerships.
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized
| Net Tax Appreciation/ |
$ 543,831,297 | $398,248,584 | $ (6,945,170) | $ 391,303,414 |
Janus Aspen Series | 23 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
5. Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended June 30, 2020 |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||
|
| Shares | Amount |
| Shares | Amount |
Institutional Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 671,671 | $29,694,016 |
| 1,174,768 | $ 48,016,950 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 667,502 | 28,629,140 |
| 703,924 | 27,749,524 | |
Shares repurchased | (1,076,765) | (46,912,310) |
| (2,021,587) | (81,985,824) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 262,408 | $11,410,846 |
| (142,895) | $ (6,219,350) | |
Service Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 570,659 | $23,537,173 |
| 919,315 | $ 34,835,599 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 1,082,945 | 43,209,494 |
| 1,143,734 | 42,198,627 | |
Shares repurchased | (1,428,767) | (58,201,000) |
| (2,307,562) | (88,696,336) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 224,837 | $ 8,545,667 |
| (244,513) | $(11,662,110) |
6. Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities
For the period ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding any short-term securities, short-term options contracts, TBAs, and in-kind transactions, as applicable) was as follows:
Purchases of | Proceeds from Sales | Purchases
of Long- | Proceeds
from Sales |
$218,319,160 | $ 258,876,098 | $ - | $ - |
7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), in August 2018. The new guidance removes, modifies and enhances the disclosures to Topic 820. For public entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted, and Management has decided, to early adopt the removed and modified disclosures in these financial statements. Management is also evaluating the implications related to the new disclosure requirements and has not yet determined the impact to the financial statements.
8. Other Matters
An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 has been, and may continue to be, highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Portfolio's investments. This may impact liquidity in the marketplace, which in turn may affect the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests. Public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, and economic risks in certain countries or globally. The duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects cannot be determined with certainty, and could prevent a Portfolio from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Portfolio's ability to achieve its investment objective.
9. Subsequent Event
Management has evaluated whether any events or transactions occurred subsequent to June 30, 2020 and through the date of issuance of the Portfolio’s financial statements and determined that there were no material events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
24 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Policies and Voting Record
A description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities is available without charge: (i) upon request, by calling 1-800-525-1093; (ii) on the Portfolio’s website at janushenderson.com/proxyvoting; and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, information regarding the Portfolio’s proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is also available, free of charge, through janushenderson.com/proxyvoting and from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Full Holdings
The Portfolio is required to disclose its complete holdings as an exhibit to Form N-PORT within 60 days of the end of the first and third fiscal quarters, and in the annual report and semiannual report to Portfolio shareholders. Historically, the Portfolio filed its complete portfolio holdings (schedule of investments) with the SEC for the first and third quarters each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Form N-PORT and Form N-Q filings: (i) are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; (ii) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330); and (iii) are available without charge, upon request, by calling a Janus Henderson representative at 1-877-335-2687 (toll free) . Portfolio holdings consisting of at least the names of the holdings are generally available on a monthly basis with a 30-day lag. Holdings are generally posted approximately two business days thereafter under Full Holdings for the Portfolio at janushenderson.com/vit.
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD
The Trustees of Janus Aspen Series, each of whom serves as an “independent” Trustee (the “Trustees”), oversee the management of each Portfolio of Janus Aspen Series (each, a “VIT Portfolio,” and collectively, the “VIT Portfolios”), as well as each Fund of Janus Investment Fund (together with the VIT Portfolios, the “Janus Henderson Funds,” and each, a “Janus Henderson Fund”). As required by law, the Trustees determine annually whether to continue the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund and the subadvisory agreements for the Janus Henderson Funds that utilize subadvisers.
In connection with their most recent consideration of those agreements for each Janus Henderson Fund, the Trustees received and reviewed information provided by Janus Capital and the respective subadvisers in response to requests of the Trustees and their independent legal counsel. They also received and reviewed information and analysis provided by, and in response to requests of, their independent fee consultant. Throughout their consideration of the agreements, the Trustees were advised by their independent legal counsel. The Trustees met with management to consider the agreements, and also met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and their independent fee consultant.
At a meeting held on December 5, 2019, based on the Trustees’ evaluation of the information provided by Janus Capital, the subadvisers, and the independent fee consultant, as well as other information, the Trustees determined that the overall arrangements between each Janus Henderson Fund and Janus Capital and each subadviser, as applicable, were fair and reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital, its affiliates and the subadvisers, the fees charged for those services, and other matters that the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. At that meeting, the Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund, and the subadvisory agreement for each subadvised Janus Henderson Fund, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 1, 2021, subject to earlier termination as provided for in each agreement.
In considering the continuation of those agreements, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. However, the material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the agreements are discussed separately below. Also included is a summary of the independent fee consultant’s conclusions and opinions that arose during, and were included as part of, the Trustees’ consideration of the agreements. “Management fees,” as used herein, reflect actual annual advisory fees and, for the purpose of peer comparisons, any administration fees (excluding out of pocket costs), net of any waivers, paid by a fund as a percentage of average net assets.
Janus Aspen Series | 25 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees reviewed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital and the subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds, taking into account the investment objective, strategies and policies of each Janus Henderson Fund, and the knowledge the Trustees gained from their regular meetings with management on at least a quarterly basis and their ongoing review of information related to the Janus Henderson Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the resources and key personnel of Janus Capital and each subadviser, particularly noting those employees who provide investment and risk management services to the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Janus Henderson Funds by Janus Capital or the subadvisers, such as managing the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of broker-dealers for those transactions. The Trustees considered Janus Capital’s role as administrator to the Janus Henderson Funds, noting that Janus Capital generally does not receive a fee for its services but is reimbursed for its out-of-pocket costs. The Trustees considered the role of Janus Capital in monitoring adherence to the Janus Henderson Funds’ investment restrictions, providing support services for the Trustees and Trustee committees, and overseeing communications with shareholders and the activities of other service providers, including monitoring compliance with various policies and procedures of the Janus Henderson Funds and with applicable securities laws and regulations.
In this regard, the independent fee consultant noted that Janus Capital provides a number of different services for the Janus Henderson Funds and fund shareholders, ranging from investment management services to various other servicing functions, and that, in its view, Janus Capital is a capable provider of those services. The independent fee consultant also provided its belief that Janus Capital has developed a number of institutional competitive advantages that should enable it to provide superior investment and service performance over the long term.
The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital or the subadviser to each Janus Henderson Fund were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective advisory and subadvisory agreements, and that, taking into account steps taken to address those Janus Henderson Funds whose performance lagged that of their peers for certain periods, the Janus Henderson Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services. They also concluded that Janus Capital and each subadviser had sufficient personnel, with the appropriate education and experience, to serve the Janus Henderson Funds effectively and had demonstrated its ability to attract well-qualified personnel.
Performance of the Funds
The Trustees considered the performance results of each Janus Henderson Fund over various time periods. They noted that they considered Janus Henderson Fund performance data throughout the year, including periodic meetings with each Janus Henderson Fund’s portfolio manager(s), and also reviewed information comparing each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups identified by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent data provider, and with the Janus Henderson Fund’s benchmark index. In this regard, the independent fee consultant found that the overall Janus Henderson Funds’ performance has been reasonable: for the 36 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 71% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar.
The Trustees considered the performance of each Janus Henderson Fund, noting that performance may vary by share class, and noted the following with respect to the VIT Portfolios:
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance.
26 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the third Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital and Intech had taken or were taking to improve performance, and the performance trend was improving.
In consideration of each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance, the Trustees concluded that, taking into account the factors relevant to performance, as well as other considerations, including steps taken to improve performance, the Janus Henderson Fund’s performance warranted continuation of such Janus Henderson Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory agreement(s).
Costs of Services Provided
The Trustees examined information regarding the fees and expenses of each Janus Henderson Fund in comparison to similar information for other comparable funds as provided by Broadridge, an independent data provider. They also reviewed an analysis of that information provided by their independent fee consultant and noted that the rate of management fees (investment advisory and any administration, but excluding out-of-pocket costs) for many of the Janus Henderson Funds, after applicable waivers, was below the average management fee rate of the respective peer group of funds selected by an independent data provider. The Trustees also examined information regarding the subadvisory fees charged for subadvisory services, as applicable, noting that all such fees were paid by Janus Capital out of its management fees collected from such Janus Henderson Fund.
The independent fee consultant provided its belief that the management fees charged by Janus Capital to each of the Janus Henderson Funds under the current investment advisory and administration agreements are reasonable in relation to the services provided by Janus Capital. The independent fee consultant found: (1) the total expenses and management fees of the Janus Henderson Funds to be reasonable relative to other mutual funds; (2) the total expenses, on average, were 10% under the average total expenses of their respective Broadridge Expense Group peers; and (3) and the management fees for the Janus Henderson Funds, on average, were 7% under the average management fees for their Expense Groups. The Trustees also considered the total expenses for each share class of
Janus Aspen Series | 27 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
each Janus Henderson Fund compared to the average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Group peers and to average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Universe.
For certain Janus Henderson Funds, the independent fee consultant also performed a systematic “focus list” analysis of expenses which assessed fund fees in the context of fund performance being delivered. Based on this analysis, the independent fee consultant found that the combination of service quality/performance and expenses on these individual Janus Henderson Funds was reasonable in light of performance trends, performance histories, and existence of performance fees, breakpoints, and/or expense waivers on such Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees considered the methodology used by Janus Capital and each subadviser in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers, the competitive environment for investment management talent, and the competitive market for mutual funds in different distribution channels.
The Trustees also reviewed management fees charged by Janus Capital and each subadviser to comparable separate account clients and to comparable non-affiliated funds subadvised by Janus Capital or by a subadviser (for which Janus Capital or the subadviser provides only or primarily portfolio management services). Although in most instances subadvisory and separate account fee rates for various investment strategies were lower than management fee rates for Janus Henderson Funds having a similar strategy, the Trustees considered that Janus Capital noted that, under the terms of the management agreements with the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital performs significant additional services for the Janus Henderson Funds that it does not provide to those other clients, including administration services, oversight of the Janus Henderson Funds’ other service providers, trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in serving the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital assumes many legal risks and other costs that it does not assume in servicing its other clients. Moreover, they noted that the independent fee consultant found that: (1) the management fees Janus Capital charges to the Janus Henderson Funds are reasonable in relation to the management fees Janus Capital charges to funds subadvised by Janus Capital and to the fees Janus Capital charges to its institutional separate account clients; (2) these subadvised and institutional separate accounts have different service and infrastructure needs; and (3) Janus Henderson mutual fund investors enjoy reasonable fees relative to the fees charged to Janus Henderson subadvised fund and separate account investors; (4) 11 of 12 Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar funds subadvised by Janus Capital; and (5) six of nine Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar separate accounts managed by Janus Capital.
The Trustees considered the fees for each Janus Henderson Fund for its fiscal year ended in 2018, including the VIT Portfolios, and noted the following with regard to each VIT Portfolio’s total expenses, net of applicable fee waivers (the VIT Portfolio’s “total expenses”):
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
28 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for its sole share class.
The Trustees reviewed information on the overall profitability to Janus Capital and its affiliates of their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds, and considered profitability data of other publicly traded mutual fund advisers. The Trustees recognized that profitability comparisons among fund managers are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund manager is affected by numerous factors, including the organizational structure of the particular fund manager, differences in complex size, difference in product mix, difference in types of business (mutual fund, institutional and other), differences in the types of funds and other accounts it manages, possible other lines of business, the methodology for allocating expenses, and the fund manager’s capital structure and cost of capital.
Additionally, the Trustees considered the estimated profitability to Janus Capital from the investment management services it provided to each Janus Henderson Fund. In their review, the Trustees considered whether Janus Capital and each subadviser receive adequate incentives and resources to manage the Janus Henderson Funds effectively. In reviewing profitability, the Trustees noted that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund is necessarily a product of the allocation methodology utilized by Janus Capital to allocate its expenses as part of the estimated profitability calculation. In this regard, the Trustees noted that the independent fee consultant found that (1) the expense allocation methodology and rationales utilized by Janus Capital were reasonable and (2) no clear correlation between expense allocations and operating margins. The Trustees also considered that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund was influenced by a number of factors, including not only the allocation methodology selected, but also the presence of fee waivers and expense caps, and whether the Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management agreement contained breakpoints or a performance fee component. The Trustees determined, after taking into account these factors, among others, that Janus Capital’s estimated profitability with respect to each Janus Henderson Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the variation in the range of such estimated profitability among the Janus Henderson Funds was not a material factor in the Board’s approval of the reasonableness of any Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management fees.
The Trustees concluded that the management fees payable by each Janus Henderson Fund to Janus Capital and its affiliates, as well as the fees paid by Janus Capital to the subadvisers of subadvised Janus Henderson Funds, were reasonable in relation to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, taking into account the fees charged by other advisers for managing comparable mutual funds with similar strategies, the fees Janus Capital and the subadvisers charge to other clients, and, as applicable, the impact of fund performance on management fees payable by the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also concluded that each Janus Henderson Fund’s total expenses were reasonable, taking into account the size of the Janus Henderson Fund, the quality of services provided by Janus Capital and any subadviser, the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund, and any expense limitations agreed to or provided by Janus Capital.
Economies of Scale
The Trustees considered information about the potential for Janus Capital to realize economies of scale as the assets of the Janus Henderson Funds increase. They noted that their independent fee consultant published a report to the Trustees in November 2019 which provided its research and analysis into economies of scale. They also noted that, although many Janus Henderson Funds pay advisory fees at a base fixed rate as a percentage of net assets, without any breakpoints or performance fees, their independent fee consultant concluded that 64% of these Janus Henderson Funds’ share classes have contractual management fees (gross of waivers) below their Broadridge expense group averages. They also noted the following: (1) that for those Janus Henderson Funds whose expenses are being reduced by the contractual expense limitations of Janus Capital, Janus Capital is subsidizing certain of these Janus Henderson Funds because they have not reached adequate scale; (2) as the assets of some of the Janus Henderson Funds have declined in the past few years, certain Janus Henderson Funds have benefited from having advisory fee rates that have remained constant rather than increasing as assets declined; (3) performance fee structures have been implemented for various Janus Henderson Funds that have caused the effective rate of advisory fees payable by such a
Janus Aspen Series | 29 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Janus Henderson Fund to vary depending on the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund relative to its benchmark index over the measurement period; and (4) a few Janus Henderson Funds have fee schedules with breakpoints and reduced fee rates above certain asset levels. The Trustees also noted that the Janus Henderson Funds share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of all of the Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees also considered the independent fee consultant’s conclusion that, given the limitations of various analytical approaches to economies of scale and their conflicting results, it is difficult to analytically confirm or deny the existence of economies of scale in the Janus Henderson complex. In this regard, the independent consultant concluded that (1) to the extent there were economies of scale at Janus Capital, Janus Capital’s general strategy of setting fixed management fees below peers appeared to share any such economies with investors even on smaller Janus Henderson Funds which have not yet achieved those economies and (2) by setting lower fixed fees from the start on these Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital appeared to be investing to increase the likelihood that these Janus Henderson Funds will grow to a level to achieve any scale economies that may exist. Further, the independent fee consultant provided its belief that Janus Henderson Fund investors are well-served by the fee levels and performance fee structures in place on the Janus Henderson Funds in light of any economies of scale that may be present at Janus Capital.
Based on all of the information reviewed, including the recent and past research and analysis conducted by the Trustees’ independent fee consultant, the Trustees concluded that the current fee structure of each Janus Henderson Fund was reasonable and that the current rates of fees do reflect a sharing between Janus Capital and the Janus Henderson Fund of any economies of scale that may be present at the current asset level of the Janus Henderson Fund.
Other Benefits to Janus Capital
The Trustees also considered benefits that accrue to Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds from their relationships with the Janus Henderson Funds. They recognized that two affiliates of Janus Capital separately serve the Janus Henderson Funds as transfer agent and distributor, respectively, and the transfer agent receives compensation directly from the non-money market funds for services provided, and that such compensation contributes to the overall profitability of Janus Capital and its affiliates that results from their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered Janus Capital’s past and proposed use of commissions paid by the Janus Henderson Funds on portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services benefiting the Janus Henderson Fund and/or other clients of Janus Capital and/or Janus Capital, and/or a subadviser to a Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees concluded that Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ use of these types of client commission arrangements to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidelines and was likely to benefit each Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees also concluded that, other than the services provided by Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers pursuant to the agreements and the fees to be paid by each Janus Henderson Fund therefor, the Janus Henderson Funds and Janus Capital and the subadvisers may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other in other ways. They concluded that Janus Capital and its affiliates share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of the Janus Henderson Funds and other clients serviced by Janus Capital and its affiliates. They also concluded that Janus Capital and/or the subadvisers benefit from the receipt of research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Janus Henderson Funds and that the Janus Henderson Funds benefit from Janus Capital’s and/or the subadvisers’ receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of Janus Capital and/or other clients of the subadvisers. They further concluded that the success of any Janus Henderson Fund could attract other business to Janus Capital, the subadvisers or other Janus Henderson funds, and that the success of Janus Capital and the subadvisers could enhance Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ ability to serve the Janus Henderson Funds.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Janus Henderson Funds (other than the money market funds) have adopted and implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “LRMP”) as required by Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”). Rule 22e-4, requires open-end funds to adopt and implement a written liquidity risk management program that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk, which is the risk that a fund could not meet redemption requests without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interest in the fund. The LRMP
30 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
incorporates the following elements: (i) assessment, management, and periodic review of liquidity risk; (ii) classification of portfolio investments; (iii) the establishment and monitoring of a highly liquid investment minimum, as applicable; (iv) a 15% limitation on a Portfolio’s illiquid investments; (v) redemptions in-kind; and (vi) board oversight.
The Trustees have designated Janus Capital Management LLC, the Portfolio’s investment adviser (“Janus Capital”), as the Program Administrator for the LRMP responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of the LRMP. A working group comprised of various groups within Janus Capital’s business is responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of different aspects of the LRMP.
The Liquidity Rule requires the Trustees to review at least annually a written report provided by the Program Administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and the effectiveness of its implementation, including, if applicable, the operation of the highly liquid investment minimum, and any material changes to the LRMP (the “Program Administrator Report”). During the semi-annual period ended June 30, 2020, the Program Administrator provided the Program Administrator Report to the Trustees which covered the operation of the LRMP from December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”). No significant liquidity events impacting the Portfolio were noted in the Program Administrator Report, and the Portfolio was able to process redemptions during the normal course of business during the Reporting Period. In addition, the Program Administrator expressed its belief in the Program Administrator Report that:
· the LRMP is reasonably designed and adequate to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, taking into account the Portfolio’s particular risks and circumstances, and includes policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement each required component of the Liquidity Rule; and
· the LRMP, including the Highly Liquid Investment Minimum where applicable, was implemented and operated effectively to achieve the goal of assessing and managing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk.
There can be no assurance that the LRMP will achieve its objectives in the future. Please refer to your Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.
Janus Aspen Series | 31 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Management Commentary in this report includes valuable insight as well as statistical information to help you understand how your Portfolio’s performance and characteristics stack up against those of comparable indices.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, this report may include information about country exposure. Country exposure is based primarily on the country of risk. A company may be allocated to a country based on other factors such as location of the company’s principal office, the location of the principal trading market for the company’s securities, or the country where a majority of the company’s revenues are derived.
Please keep in mind that the opinions expressed in the Management Commentary are just that: opinions. They are a reflection based on best judgment at the time this report was compiled, which was June 30, 2020. As the investing environment changes, so could opinions. These views are unique and are not necessarily shared by fellow employees or by Janus Henderson in general.
Performance Overviews
Performance overview graphs compare the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Portfolio with one or more widely used market indices. When comparing the performance of the Portfolio with an index, keep in mind that market indices are not available for investment and do not reflect deduction of expenses.
Average annual total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with more than one year of performance history. Average annual total return is calculated by taking the growth or decline in value of an investment over a period of time, including reinvestment of dividends and distributions, then calculating the annual compounded percentage rate that would have produced the same result had the rate of growth been constant throughout the period. Average annual total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Cumulative total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with less than one year of performance history. Cumulative total return is the growth or decline in value of an investment over time, independent of the period of time involved. Cumulative total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Pursuant to federal securities rules, expense ratios shown in the performance chart reflect subsidized (if applicable) and unsubsidized ratios. The total annual fund operating expenses ratio is gross of any fee waivers, reflecting the Portfolio’s unsubsidized expense ratio. The net annual fund operating expenses ratio (if applicable) includes contractual waivers of Janus Capital and reflects the Portfolio’s subsidized expense ratio. Ratios may be higher or lower than those shown in the “Financial Highlights” in this report.
Schedule of Investments
Following the performance overview section is the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments. This schedule reports the types of securities held in the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period. Securities are usually listed by type (common stock, corporate bonds, U.S. Government obligations, etc.) and by industry classification (banking, communications, insurance, etc.). Holdings are subject to change without notice.
The value of each security is quoted as of the last day of the reporting period. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies is converted into U.S. dollars.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, it will also provide a summary of investments by country. This summary reports the Portfolio exposure to different countries by providing the percentage of securities invested in each country. The country of each security represents the country of risk. The Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments relies upon the industry group and country classifications published by Barclays and/or MSCI Inc.
Tables listing details of individual forward currency contracts, futures, written options, swaptions, and swaps follow the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments (if applicable).
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
This statement is often referred to as the “balance sheet.” It lists the assets and liabilities of the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period.
32 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Portfolio’s assets are calculated by adding the value of the securities owned, the receivable for securities sold but not yet settled, the receivable for dividends declared but not yet received on securities owned, and the receivable for Portfolio shares sold to investors but not yet settled. The Portfolio’s liabilities include payables for securities purchased but not yet settled, Portfolio shares redeemed but not yet paid, and expenses owed but not yet paid. Additionally, there may be other assets and liabilities such as unrealized gain or loss on forward currency contracts.
The section entitled “Net Assets Consist of” breaks down the components of the Portfolio’s net assets. Because the Portfolio must distribute substantially all earnings, you will notice that a significant portion of net assets is shareholder capital.
The last section of this statement reports the net asset value (“NAV”) per share on the last day of the reporting period. The NAV is calculated by dividing the Portfolio’s net assets for each share class (assets minus liabilities) by the number of shares outstanding.
Statement of Operations
This statement details the Portfolio’s income, expenses, realized gains and losses on securities and currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of Portfolio holdings.
The first section in this statement, entitled “Investment Income,” reports the dividends earned from securities and interest earned from interest-bearing securities in the Portfolio.
The next section reports the expenses incurred by the Portfolio, including the advisory fee paid to the investment adviser, transfer agent fees and expenses, and printing and postage for mailing statements, financial reports and prospectuses. Expense offsets and expense reimbursements, if any, are also shown.
The last section lists the amounts of realized gains or losses from investment and foreign currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Portfolio will realize a gain (or loss) when it sells its position in a particular security. A change in unrealized gain (or loss) refers to the change in net appreciation or depreciation of the Portfolio during the reporting period. “Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” is affected both by changes in the market value of Portfolio holdings and by gains (or losses) realized during the reporting period.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
These statements report the increase or decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets during the reporting period. Changes in the Portfolio’s net assets are attributable to investment operations, dividends and distributions to investors, and capital share transactions. This is important to investors because it shows exactly what caused the Portfolio’s net asset size to change during the period.
The first section summarizes the information from the Statement of Operations regarding changes in net assets due to the Portfolio’s investment operations. The Portfolio’s net assets may also change as a result of dividend and capital gains distributions to investors. If investors receive their dividends and/or distributions in cash, money is taken out of the Portfolio to pay the dividend and/or distribution. If investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions, the Portfolio’s net assets will not be affected. If you compare the Portfolio’s “Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions” to “Reinvested Dividends and Distributions,” you will notice that dividends and distributions have little effect on the Portfolio’s net assets. This is because the majority of the Portfolio’s investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions.
The reinvestment of dividends and distributions is included under “Capital Share Transactions.” “Capital Shares” refers to the money investors contribute to the Portfolio through purchases or withdrawals via redemptions. The Portfolio’s net assets will increase and decrease in value as investors purchase and redeem shares from the Portfolio.
Financial Highlights
This schedule provides a per-share breakdown of the components that affect the Portfolio’s NAV for current and past reporting periods as well as total return, asset size, ratios, and portfolio turnover rate.
The first line in the table reflects the NAV per share at the beginning of the reporting period. The next line reports the net investment income/(loss) per share. Following is the per share total of net gains/(losses), realized and unrealized. Per share dividends and distributions to investors are then subtracted to arrive at the NAV per share at the end of the period. The next line reflects the total return for the period. The total return may include adjustments in accordance with
Janus Aspen Series | 33 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the total return may differ from the total return reflected for individual shareholder transactions. Also included are ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets.
The Portfolio’s expenses may be reduced through expense offsets and expense reimbursements. The ratios shown reflect expenses before and after any such offsets and reimbursements.
The ratio of net investment income/(loss) summarizes the income earned less expenses, divided by the average net assets of the Portfolio during the reporting period. Do not confuse this ratio with the Portfolio’s yield. The net investment income ratio is not a true measure of the Portfolio’s yield because it does not take into account the dividends distributed to the Portfolio’s investors.
The next figure is the portfolio turnover rate, which measures the buying and selling activity in the Portfolio. Portfolio turnover is affected by market conditions, changes in the asset size of the Portfolio, fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, the nature of the Portfolio’s investments, and the investment style and/or outlook of the portfolio manager(s) and/or investment personnel. A 100% rate implies that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio was replaced once during the fiscal year; a 50% rate means that an amount equal to the value of half the portfolio is traded in a year; and a 200% rate means that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio is traded every six months.
34 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage1
Janus Aspen Series | 35 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage2
36 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage3
Janus Aspen Series | 37 |
Knowledge Shared
At Janus Henderson, we believe in the sharing of expert insight for better investment and business decisions. We call this ethos Knowledge Shared.
Learn more by visiting janushenderson.com.
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Portfolio. It is not an offer or solicitation for the Portfolio and is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus. | ||||||||
Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc Janus Henderson Distributors | ||||||||
109-24-81115 08-20 |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | ||
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio | ||
Janus Aspen Series | ||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
|
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio
performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance Overview
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned -3.70% and -3.82%, respectively, over the six-month period ended June 30, 2020, outperforming its primary benchmark, the MSCI World Index®, and its secondary benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index®, which returned -5.77% and -6.25%, respectively.
Market Environment
After falling precipitously in the first quarter due to severe economic uncertainty triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, global markets recouped much of their losses in the second quarter as the rate of infections leveled off and several countries reopened their economies. Unprecedented monetary and fiscal stimulus, as well as progress toward developing a vaccine, contributed to the rebound. Despite signs of economic improvement late in the period, however, the pace of a global economic recovery lagged that of the market recovery.
Performance Discussion
While we aim to outperform over shorter periods, our goal is to provide consistent outperformance long term by focusing on what we consider our strength: picking stocks and avoiding macroeconomic risks. Stocks are selected by our seven global sector teams, which employ a bottom-up, fundamental approach to identify what we believe are the best global opportunities.
Positive stock selection within the financials and communications sectors drove outperformance for the period. Conversely, our energy and technology holdings detracted from the Portfolio’s relative results.
Top relative contributors included technology holdings ASML and Adobe. As a leading manufacturer of chip-making equipment, ASML benefited from continued robust demand for semiconductors in multiple end markets, notably servers. Strong growth in digital media – across both creative and document clouds – drove gains for software maker Adobe, which reported record revenue for its most recent quarter. Work from home accelerated demand for certain of these products. Additionally, Adobe showed strong operating margin leverage.
Amazon also contributed to relative gains. Nearly all its business lines continued to benefit from the disrupted environment caused by the pandemic. E-commerce, both traditional and Whole Foods grocers, saw increased demand for deliveries. Amazon’s extensive direct-to-consumer distribution network proved to be a significant area of strength. Its Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform has seen continued strength, driven in part by an increase in the number of people working from home.
While pleased to outperform the benchmark this period, we were disappointed by the weak relative results of select holdings, including Apple. The technology hardware and services company was part of a cohort of mega cap technology stocks that drove equity markets during the period. We are positive on the stock, but our weighting, while material, was underweight the Portfolio’ primary benchmark. As a result, we were unable to benefit from the rally in Apple’s stock to the same degree as our primary benchmark.
Relative detractors also included companies that experienced the greatest disruption to their businesses due to the pandemic. For example, Norwegian Cruise Line saw a significant increase in cancellations and decrease in new bookings as a result of travel bans. Given the severity of the stock’s decline and looming uncertainty about when the virus will be contained, we sold our position.
Air travel also declined sharply. Our exposure to jet engine manufacturer Safran consequently detracted from relative returns. As major airlines grounded planes, investors became concerned that Safran’s aftermarket revenues (engine service and spare parts) would decrease. We believe company fundamentals remain strong and that
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
aerospace will be one of the first industries to recover from the downturn.
Outlook
While we were encouraged by the stock market’s rebound during the second quarter, in our view, recent gains do not reflect economic reality. Notably, while several key economies enjoyed stronger-than-expected increases in manufacturing output in June, global manufacturing activity remains in a contractionary mode, suggesting the road to a broad recovery will be uneven and gradual.
What market gains did reflect was that the same mega cap technology and communications stocks that drove indices to record highs in February remained the leaders during the second quarter. Although we expect these stocks to stay in favor, we anticipate the recovery will eventually broaden and include companies whose prospects are underappreciated, including those with business models that could add value in a post-COVID-19 world or experience rebounding demand as pandemic-related lockdowns ease. Conversely, other businesses could see end markets wither away as consumer and enterprise behaviors permanently change.
In each of these scenarios, we believe long-term stock performance will be determined by a company’s underlying merits rather than by the sector in which it is categorized. With this in mind, we continue to rely on the rigorous fundamental research of our equity analysts and the capital structure expertise of our fixed income team to scrutinize the long-term viability of a company’s growth prospects and financial strength.
To that end, we have identified a number of companies with stock prices that, in our opinion, do not fully reflect their exposure to secular growth themes or ability to participate in an economic recovery. At the same time, we reduced our exposure to business models that we believe may be fundamentally challenged as the economy struggles to regain its footing. While it is too early to identify a clear path out of the COVID-19-impacted downturn, we believe our fine-tuning of the Portfolio has positioned it for a variety of economic outcomes.
Thank you for your investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Contributors - Holdings | 5 Top Detractors - Holdings | |||||||
|
| Average |
| Relative |
|
| Average |
| Relative |
| Adobe Inc | 2.12% |
| 0.54% |
| Apple Inc | 0.02% |
| -0.91% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.46% |
| 0.50% |
| Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd | 0.26% |
| -0.48% |
| ASML Holding NV | 1.88% |
| 0.43% |
| Safran SA | 1.30% |
| -0.45% |
| Netflix Inc | 1.45% |
| 0.39% |
| Microsoft Corp | 1.79% |
| -0.43% |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd | 0.98% |
| 0.34% |
| Suncor Energy Inc | 0.77% |
| -0.41% |
| 3 Top Contributors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | MSCI World Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Financials |
| 2.60% |
| 19.59% | 19.34% |
| Communications |
| 1.63% |
| 10.67% | 10.43% |
| Other** |
| -0.19% |
| 0.49% | 0.02% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Detractors - Sectors* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative |
| Portfolio | MSCI World Index |
|
|
| Contribution |
| Average Weight | Average Weight |
| Energy |
| -0.66% |
| 7.32% | 7.39% |
| Technology |
| -0.43% |
| 15.15% | 15.59% |
| Industrials |
| -0.34% |
| 16.01% | 16.08% |
| Healthcare |
| -0.27% |
| 13.84% | 14.04% |
| Consumer |
| -0.23% |
| 16.93% | 17.11% |
| Relative contribution reflects
how the portolio's holdings impacted return relative to the benchmark. Cash and securities not held in
the portfolio are not shown. For equity portfolios, relative contribution compares the performance of
a security in the portfolio to the benchmark's total return, factoring in the difference in weight of
that security in the benchmark. Returns are calculated using daily returns and previous day ending weights
rolled up by ticker, excluding fixed income securities, gross of advisory fees, may exclude certain derivatives
and will differ from actual performance. | |||||
* | The sectors listed above reflect those covered by the six analyst teams who comprise the Janus Henderson Research Team. | |||||
** | Not a GICS classified sector. |
Janus Aspen Series | 3 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
5 Largest Equity Holdings - (% of Net Assets) | |
Amazon.com Inc | |
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail | 4.0% |
Microsoft Corp | |
Software | 3.4% |
Apple Inc | |
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 2.7% |
Alphabet Inc - Class C | |
Interactive Media & Services | 2.5% |
Adobe Inc | |
Software | 2.3% |
14.9% |
Asset Allocation - (% of Net Assets) | |||||
Common Stocks | 99.6% | ||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | 0.5% | ||||
Rights | 0.0% | ||||
Other | (0.1)% | ||||
100.0% |
Top Country Allocations - Long Positions - (% of Investment Securities) | |
As of June 30, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 |
4 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
See important disclosures on the next page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return - for the periods ended June 30, 2020 |
|
| Expense Ratios | |||||||
|
| Fiscal
| One
| Five
| Ten | Since
|
|
| Total Annual Fund | |
Institutional Shares |
| -3.70% | 5.05% | 6.96% | 9.86% | 8.20% |
|
| 0.79% | |
Service Shares |
| -3.82% | 4.78% | 6.70% | 9.58% | 7.92% |
|
| 1.04% | |
MSCI World Index |
| -5.77% | 2.84% | 6.90% | 9.95% | 6.86% |
|
|
| |
MSCI All Country World Index |
| -6.25% | 2.11% | 6.46% | 9.16% | N/A** |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Quartile - Institutional Shares |
| - | 2nd | 2nd | 2nd | 2nd |
|
|
| |
Morningstar Ranking - based on total returns for World Large Stock Funds |
| - | 316/890 | 273/730 | 191/515 | 65/144 |
|
|
|
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold. For the most recent month-end performance call 800.668.0434 or visit janushenderson.com/VITperformance.
This Portfolio has a performance-based management fee that may adjust up or down based on the Portfolio’s performance.
Performance may be affected by risks that include those associated with non-diversification, portfolio turnover, short sales, potential conflicts of interest, foreign and emerging markets, initial public offerings (IPOs), high-yield and high-risk securities, undervalued, overlooked and smaller capitalization companies, real estate related securities including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), derivatives, and commodity-linked investments. Each product has different risks. Please see the prospectus for more information about risks, holdings and other details.
Returns do not reflect the deduction of fees, charges or expenses of any insurance product or qualified plan. If applied, returns would have been lower.
Returns include reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares. The returns do not include adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes.
Performance for Service Shares prior to December 31, 1999 reflects the performance of Institutional Shares adjusted to reflect the expenses of Service Shares.
Ranking is for the share class shown only; other classes may have different performance characteristics.
© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information for index definitions.
Janus Aspen Series | 5 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Performance
Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
See “Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report.”
Effective April 13, 2020, Matthew Peron is the Portfolio Manager of the Portfolio and provides general oversight of the Research Team.
*The Portfolio’s inception date – September 13, 1993
‡ As stated in the prospectus. See Financial Highlights for actual expense ratios during the reporting period.
**Since inception return is not shown for the index because the index’s inception date differs significantly from the Portfolio’s inception date.
6 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (unaudited)
Expense Examples
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; 12b-1 distribution and shareholder servicing fees (applicable to Service Shares only); transfer agent fees and expenses payable pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement; and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The example is based upon an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the six-months indicated, unless noted otherwise in the table and footnotes below.
Actual Expenses
The information in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based upon the Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Additionally, for an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in either share class or other similar funds, please visit www.finra.org/fundanalyzer.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as any charges at the separate account level or contract level. These fees are fully described in the Portfolio’s prospectuses. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Actual |
| Hypothetical
|
| ||||
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Net Annualized | ||
Institutional Shares | $1,000.00 | $963.00 | $4.10 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,020.69 | $4.22 | 0.84% | ||
Service Shares | $1,000.00 | $961.80 | $5.32 |
| $1,000.00 | $1,019.44 | $5.47 | 1.09% | ||
† | Expenses Paid During Period are equal to the Net Annualized Expense Ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses in the examples include the effect of applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, if any. Had such waivers and/or reimbursements not been in effect, your expenses would have been higher. Please refer to the Notes to Financial Statements or the Portfolio’s prospectuses for more information regarding waivers and/or reimbursements. |
Janus Aspen Series | 7 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.6% | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.8% | |||||||
CAE Inc | 274,798 | $4,457,825 | |||||
L3Harris Technologies Inc | 44,207 | 7,500,602 | |||||
Safran SA* | 78,016 | 7,803,466 | |||||
19,761,893 | |||||||
Airlines – 0.6% | |||||||
Ryanair Holdings PLC (ADR)* | 60,328 | 4,002,160 | |||||
Auto Components – 0.7% | |||||||
Aptiv PLC | 65,187 | 5,079,371 | |||||
Automobiles – 0.3% | |||||||
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd | 27,689 | 2,152,353 | |||||
Banks – 3.3% | |||||||
BNP Paribas SA* | 74,830 | 2,966,246 | |||||
Citigroup Inc | 93,258 | 4,765,484 | |||||
HDFC Bank Ltd | 272,691 | 3,887,363 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co | 122,431 | 11,515,860 | |||||
23,134,953 | |||||||
Beverages – 3.3% | |||||||
Constellation Brands Inc | 74,476 | 13,029,576 | |||||
Pernod Ricard SA | 65,396 | 10,277,386 | |||||
23,306,962 | |||||||
Biotechnology – 3.6% | |||||||
AbbVie Inc | 79,898 | 7,844,386 | |||||
Ascendis Pharma A/S (ADR)* | 16,916 | 2,501,876 | |||||
Global Blood Therapeutics Inc* | 29,778 | 1,879,885 | |||||
Mirati Therapeutics Inc* | 21,079 | 2,406,589 | |||||
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc* | 33,321 | 4,065,162 | |||||
Sarepta Therapeutics Inc* | 20,137 | 3,228,767 | |||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc* | 11,513 | 3,342,339 | |||||
25,269,004 | |||||||
Building Products – 1.2% | |||||||
Daikin Industries Ltd | 51,800 | 8,330,918 | |||||
Capital Markets – 3.0% | |||||||
Blackstone Group Inc | 121,011 | 6,856,483 | |||||
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd | 87,300 | 3,720,707 | |||||
London Stock Exchange Group PLC | 64,075 | 6,627,075 | |||||
Morgan Stanley | 81,917 | 3,956,591 | |||||
21,160,856 | |||||||
Chemicals – 2.0% | |||||||
Air Products & Chemicals Inc | 30,174 | 7,285,814 | |||||
Sherwin-Williams Co | 11,055 | 6,388,132 | |||||
13,673,946 | |||||||
Construction Materials – 0.2% | |||||||
Vulcan Materials Co | 14,207 | 1,645,881 | |||||
Consumer Finance – 1.5% | |||||||
Nexi SpA (144A)* | 391,752 | 6,766,759 | |||||
Synchrony Financial | 172,231 | 3,816,639 | |||||
10,583,398 | |||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 2.3% | |||||||
Hexagon AB* | 160,868 | 9,379,553 | |||||
Keyence Corp | 15,500 | 6,472,494 | |||||
15,852,047 | |||||||
Entertainment – 2.3% | |||||||
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One* | 171,583 | 5,440,897 | |||||
Netflix Inc* | 23,704 | 10,786,268 | |||||
16,227,165 | |||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 2.0% | |||||||
American Tower Corp | 19,667 | 5,084,706 | |||||
Crown Castle International Corp | 28,825 | 4,823,864 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
8 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – (continued) | |||||||
Equinix Inc | 5,786 | $4,063,508 | |||||
13,972,078 | |||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.5% | |||||||
Abbott Laboratories | 91,045 | 8,324,244 | |||||
Boston Scientific Corp* | 182,410 | 6,404,415 | |||||
Dentsply Sirona Inc | 53,536 | 2,358,796 | |||||
17,087,455 | |||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 1.4% | |||||||
Centene Corp* | 63,097 | 4,009,814 | |||||
Humana Inc | 14,419 | 5,590,967 | |||||
9,600,781 | |||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.5% | |||||||
GVC Holdings PLC | 633,168 | 5,800,405 | |||||
McDonald's Corp | 35,887 | 6,620,075 | |||||
Sands China Ltd | 1,328,400 | 5,198,461 | |||||
17,618,941 | |||||||
Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers – 2.1% | |||||||
NRG Energy Inc | 261,378 | 8,510,468 | |||||
Vistra Energy Corp | 345,495 | 6,433,117 | |||||
14,943,585 | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.9% | |||||||
Honeywell International Inc | 45,449 | 6,571,471 | |||||
Information Technology Services – 4.6% | |||||||
Fidelity National Information Services Inc | 56,610 | 7,590,835 | |||||
Mastercard Inc | 39,838 | 11,780,097 | |||||
Visa Inc | 65,027 | 12,561,266 | |||||
31,932,198 | |||||||
Insurance – 4.9% | |||||||
AIA Group Ltd | 944,000 | 8,786,099 | |||||
Aon PLC | 35,131 | 6,766,231 | |||||
Beazley PLC | 355,692 | 1,804,940 | |||||
Intact Financial Corp | 52,026 | 4,952,320 | |||||
Progressive Corp | 104,869 | 8,401,056 | |||||
Prudential PLC | 207,786 | 3,128,672 | |||||
33,839,318 | |||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 5.3% | |||||||
Alphabet Inc - Class C* | 12,219 | 17,272,901 | |||||
Facebook Inc* | 54,837 | 12,451,838 | |||||
Tencent Holdings Ltd | 108,500 | 6,969,548 | |||||
36,694,287 | |||||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail – 4.8% | |||||||
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (ADR)* | 27,494 | 5,930,456 | |||||
Amazon.com Inc* | 10,088 | 27,830,976 | |||||
33,761,432 | |||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.9% | |||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 16,913 | 6,128,256 | |||||
Machinery – 1.1% | |||||||
Parker-Hannifin Corp | 40,914 | 7,498,309 | |||||
Metals & Mining – 1.4% | |||||||
Rio Tinto PLC | 113,673 | 6,395,321 | |||||
Teck Resources Ltd | 305,446 | 3,199,825 | |||||
9,595,146 | |||||||
Multi-Utilities – 1.9% | |||||||
National Grid PLC | 394,709 | 4,832,502 | |||||
RWE AG | 242,994 | 8,500,157 | |||||
13,332,659 | |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 2.7% | |||||||
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd | 85,908 | 1,490,447 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 9 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – (continued) | |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – (continued) | |||||||
Cheniere Energy Inc* | 59,686 | $2,884,028 | |||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP | 127,260 | 2,312,314 | |||||
Marathon Petroleum Corp | 98,101 | 3,667,015 | |||||
Suncor Energy Inc | 230,665 | 3,889,732 | |||||
TOTAL SA# | 120,023 | 4,571,247 | |||||
18,814,783 | |||||||
Personal Products – 1.8% | |||||||
Unilever NV | 242,098 | 12,838,684 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals – 5.7% | |||||||
AstraZeneca PLC | 65,678 | 6,845,585 | |||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 77,772 | 4,572,994 | |||||
Catalent Inc* | 81,255 | 5,955,991 | |||||
Elanco Animal Health Inc* | 168,004 | 3,603,686 | |||||
Merck & Co Inc | 112,954 | 8,734,733 | |||||
Novartis AG | 88,388 | 7,682,119 | |||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd | 71,550 | 2,554,021 | |||||
39,949,129 | |||||||
Road & Rail – 1.7% | |||||||
CSX Corp | 98,796 | 6,890,033 | |||||
Uber Technologies Inc* | 156,144 | 4,852,956 | |||||
11,742,989 | |||||||
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment – 5.8% | |||||||
ASML Holding NV | 40,885 | 14,986,305 | |||||
Microchip Technology Inc | 61,092 | 6,433,599 | |||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 822,000 | 8,701,239 | |||||
Texas Instruments Inc | 78,718 | 9,994,824 | |||||
40,115,967 | |||||||
Software – 9.7% | |||||||
Adobe Inc* | 37,567 | 16,353,291 | |||||
Autodesk Inc* | 29,960 | 7,166,132 | |||||
Constellation Software Inc/Canada | 5,110 | 5,770,641 | |||||
Microsoft Corp | 116,691 | 23,747,785 | |||||
salesforce.com Inc* | 47,671 | 8,930,208 | |||||
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc | 99,183 | 5,601,856 | |||||
67,569,913 | |||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 2.7% | |||||||
Apple Inc | 52,299 | 19,078,675 | |||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 1.8% | |||||||
adidas AG* | 23,682 | 6,195,161 | |||||
NIKE Inc | 67,239 | 6,592,784 | |||||
12,787,945 | |||||||
Tobacco – 1.8% | |||||||
British American Tobacco PLC | 331,051 | 12,717,362 | |||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 1.4% | |||||||
Ferguson PLC | 122,926 | 10,054,300 | |||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 1.1% | |||||||
T-Mobile US Inc* | 72,317 | 7,531,816 | |||||
Total Common Stocks (cost $516,871,166) | 695,958,386 | ||||||
Rights – 0% | |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0% | |||||||
T-Mobile US Inc* (cost $0) | 81,648 | 13,717 | |||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending – 0.5% | |||||||
Investment Companies – 0.4% | |||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº,£ | 2,643,840 | 2,643,840 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
10 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Shares
or | Value | ||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending – (continued) | |||||||
Time Deposits – 0.1% | |||||||
Royal Bank of Canada, 0.0900%, 7/1/20 | $660,960 | $660,960 | |||||
Total Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending (cost $3,304,800) | 3,304,800 | ||||||
Total Investments (total cost $520,175,966) – 100.1% | 699,276,903 | ||||||
Liabilities, net of Cash, Receivables and Other Assets – (0.1)% | (867,505) | ||||||
Net Assets – 100% | $698,409,398 |
Summary of Investments by Country - (Long Positions) (unaudited) | |||||
% of | |||||
Investment | |||||
Country | Value | Securities | |||
United States | $466,189,473 | 66.7 | % | ||
United Kingdom | 48,151,862 | 6.9 | |||
Netherlands | 27,824,989 | 4.0 | |||
France | 25,618,345 | 3.7 | |||
Canada | 23,760,790 | 3.4 | |||
Hong Kong | 17,705,267 | 2.5 | |||
Japan | 17,357,433 | 2.5 | |||
Germany | 14,695,318 | 2.1 | |||
China | 12,900,004 | 1.8 | |||
Sweden | 9,379,553 | 1.3 | |||
Taiwan | 8,701,239 | 1.2 | |||
Switzerland | 7,682,119 | 1.1 | |||
Italy | 6,766,759 | 1.0 | |||
India | 6,039,716 | 0.9 | |||
Ireland | 4,002,160 | 0.6 | |||
Denmark | 2,501,876 | 0.3 |
Total | $699,276,903 | 100.0 | % |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 11 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
Schedules of Affiliated Investments – (% of Net Assets)
Dividend Income | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - N/A | ||||||||||
Money Markets - N/A | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | $ | 8,869 | $ | 373 | $ | - | $ | - | ||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.4% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.4% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | 176∆ | - | - | 2,643,840 | ||||||
Total Affiliated Investments - 0.4% | $ | 9,045 | $ | 373 | $ | - | $ | 2,643,840 |
Value at 12/31/19 | Purchases | Sales Proceeds | Value at 6/30/20 | |||||||
Investment Companies - N/A | ||||||||||
Money Markets - N/A | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC, 0.1535%ºº | - | 36,716,322 | (36,716,695) | - | ||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending - 0.4% | ||||||||||
Investment Companies - 0.4% | ||||||||||
Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, 0.0368%ºº | - | 2,715,120 | (71,280) | 2,643,840 |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information and Notes to Financial Statements. | |
12 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
MSCI All Country World IndexSM | MSCI All Country World IndexSM reflects the equity market performance of global developed and emerging markets. |
MSCI World IndexSM | MSCI World IndexSM reflects the equity market performance of global developed markets. |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt |
LLC | Limited Liability Company |
LP | Limited Partnership |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
144A | Securities sold under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are subject to legal and/or contractual restrictions on resale and may not be publicly sold without registration under the 1933 Act. Unless otherwise noted, these securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total value of 144A securities as of the period ended June 30, 2020 is $6,766,759, which represents 1.0% of net assets. |
* | Non-income producing security. |
ºº | Rate shown is the 7-day yield as of June 30, 2020. |
# | Loaned security; a portion of the security is on loan at June 30, 2020. |
£ | The Portfolio may invest in certain securities that are considered affiliated companies. As defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, an affiliated company is one in which the Portfolio owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control. |
∆ | Net of income paid to the securities lending agent and rebates paid to the borrowing counterparties. |
Janus Aspen Series | 13 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information (unaudited)
The following is a summary of the inputs that were used to value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments as of June 30, 2020. See Notes to Financial Statements for more information. | ||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs Summary | ||||||||||||
Level 2 - | Level 3 - | |||||||||||
Level 1 - | Other Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Investments In Securities: | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
Aerospace & Defense | $ | 11,958,427 | $ | 7,803,466 | $ | - | ||||||
Automobiles | - | 2,152,353 | - | |||||||||
Banks | 16,281,344 | 6,853,609 | - | |||||||||
Beverages | 13,029,576 | 10,277,386 | - | |||||||||
Building Products | - | 8,330,918 | - | |||||||||
Capital Markets | 10,813,074 | 10,347,782 | - | |||||||||
Consumer Finance | 3,816,639 | 6,766,759 | - | |||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | - | 15,852,047 | - | |||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | 6,620,075 | 10,998,866 | - | |||||||||
Insurance | 20,119,607 | 13,719,711 | - | |||||||||
Interactive Media & Services | 29,724,739 | 6,969,548 | - | |||||||||
Metals & Mining | 3,199,825 | 6,395,321 | - | |||||||||
Multi-Utilities | - | 13,332,659 | - | |||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 14,243,536 | 4,571,247 | - | |||||||||
Personal Products | - | 12,838,684 | - | |||||||||
Pharmaceuticals | 22,867,404 | 17,081,725 | - | |||||||||
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment | 16,428,423 | 23,687,544 | - | |||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | 6,592,784 | 6,195,161 | - | |||||||||
Tobacco | - | 12,717,362 | - | |||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors | - | 10,054,300 | - | |||||||||
All Other | 313,316,485 | - | - | |||||||||
Rights | 13,717 | - | - | |||||||||
Investments Purchased with Cash Collateral from Securities Lending | - | 3,304,800 | - | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 489,025,655 | $ | 210,251,248 | $ | - | ||||||
14 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited)
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Unaffiliated investments, at value(1)(2) |
| $ | 696,633,063 |
| |
| Affiliated investments, at value(3) |
|
| 2,643,840 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation |
|
| 14,355 |
| |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Investments sold |
|
| 29,725,643 |
|
|
| Dividends |
|
| 527,205 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares sold |
|
| 285,771 |
|
|
| Foreign tax reclaims |
|
| 229,239 |
|
| Other assets |
|
| 2,982 |
| |
Total Assets |
|
| 730,062,098 |
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Due to custodian |
|
| 65,919 |
| |
| Collateral for securities loaned (Note 2) |
|
| 3,304,800 |
| |
| Payables: |
|
| — |
| |
|
| Investments purchased |
|
| 27,237,722 |
|
|
| Advisory fees |
|
| 425,051 |
|
|
| Portfolio shares repurchased |
|
| 407,635 |
|
|
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees |
|
| 41,193 |
|
|
| Transfer agent fees and expenses |
|
| 30,946 |
|
|
| Professional fees |
|
| 17,143 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' deferred compensation fees |
|
| 14,355 |
|
|
| Custodian fees |
|
| 7,180 |
|
|
| Non-interested Trustees' fees and expenses |
|
| 3,521 |
|
|
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees payable |
|
| 1,428 |
|
|
| Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
| 95,807 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 31,652,700 |
| ||
Net Assets |
| $ | 698,409,398 |
| ||
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
| ||
| Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) |
| $ | 509,361,345 |
| |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) |
|
| 189,048,053 |
| |
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 698,409,398 |
| ||
Net Assets - Institutional Shares |
| $ | 497,079,620 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 9,710,517 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 51.19 |
| ||
Net Assets - Service Shares |
| $ | 201,329,778 |
| ||
| Shares Outstanding, $0.01 Par Value (unlimited shares authorized) |
|
| 4,034,018 |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $ | 49.91 |
|
(1) Includes cost of $517,532,126. (2) Includes $3,147,182 of securities on loan. See Note 2 in Notes to Financial Statements. (3) Includes cost of $2,643,840. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 15 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Statement of Operations (unaudited)
For the period ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
| ||
| Dividends | $ | 5,969,489 |
| |
| Dividends from affiliates |
| 8,869 |
| |
| Affiliated securities lending income, net |
| 176 |
| |
| Unaffiliated securities lending income, net |
| 48 |
| |
| Foreign tax withheld |
| (299,615) |
| |
Total Investment Income |
| 5,678,967 |
| ||
Expenses: |
|
|
| ||
| Advisory fees |
| 2,540,738 |
| |
| 12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees: |
|
|
| |
|
| Service Shares |
| 240,729 |
|
| Transfer agent administrative fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 120,387 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 48,146 |
|
| Other transfer agent fees and expenses: |
|
|
| |
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 12,978 |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 2,663 |
|
| Professional fees |
| 23,121 |
| |
| Shareholder reports expense |
| 21,393 |
| |
| Custodian fees |
| 18,215 |
| |
| Registration fees |
| 11,586 |
| |
| Affiliated portfolio administration fees |
| 8,426 |
| |
| Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses |
| 6,231 |
| |
| Other expenses |
| 40,700 |
| |
Total Expenses |
| 3,095,313 |
| ||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 2,583,654 |
| ||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments and foreign currency transactions |
| 6,359,784 |
| |
| Investments in affiliates |
| 373 |
| |
Total Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments |
| 6,360,157 |
| ||
Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation: |
|
|
| ||
| Investments, foreign currency translations and non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation(1) |
| (38,360,397) |
| |
Total Change in Unrealized Net Appreciation/Depreciation |
| (38,360,397) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | (29,416,586) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of $577 due to foreign capital gains tax on investments. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
16 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 2,583,654 |
| $ | 7,549,236 |
| |
| Net realized gain/(loss) on investments |
| 6,360,157 |
|
| 39,064,185 |
| |
| Change in unrealized net appreciation/depreciation |
| (38,360,397) |
|
| 132,017,612 |
| |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| (29,416,586) |
|
| 178,631,033 |
| ||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| (29,357,266) |
|
| (35,853,466) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| (12,003,638) |
|
| (13,833,812) |
|
Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders |
| (41,360,904) |
|
| (49,687,278) |
| ||
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Institutional Shares |
| 7,634,515 |
|
| (16,577,616) |
|
|
| Service Shares |
| 7,213,176 |
|
| (1,596,518) |
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions |
| 14,847,691 |
|
| (18,174,134) |
| ||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
| (55,929,799) |
|
| 110,769,621 |
| ||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Beginning of period |
| 754,339,197 |
|
| 643,569,576 |
| |
| End of period | $ | 698,409,398 |
| $ | 754,339,197 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
Janus Aspen Series | 17 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Financial Highlights
Institutional Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $56.59 |
|
| $47.13 |
|
| $51.20 |
|
| $40.63 |
|
| $40.24 |
|
| $41.45 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.22 |
|
| 0.60 |
|
| 0.62 |
|
| 0.51 |
|
| 0.45 |
|
| 0.35 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (2.42) |
|
| 12.67 |
|
| (4.09) |
|
| 10.45 |
|
| 0.37 |
|
| (1.28) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (2.20) |
|
| 13.27 |
|
| (3.47) |
|
| 10.96 |
|
| 0.82 |
|
| (0.93) |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.21) |
|
| (0.54) |
|
| (0.60) |
|
| (0.39) |
|
| (0.43) |
|
| (0.28) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (2.99) |
|
| (3.27) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (3.20) |
|
| (3.81) |
|
| (0.60) |
|
| (0.39) |
|
| (0.43) |
|
| (0.28) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $51.19 |
|
| $56.59 |
|
| $47.13 |
|
| $51.20 |
|
| $40.63 |
|
| $40.24 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (3.70)% |
|
| 29.04% |
|
| (6.87)% |
|
| 27.03% |
|
| 2.07% |
|
| (2.29)% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $497,080 |
|
| $539,915 |
|
| $463,402 |
|
| $540,594 |
|
| $469,321 |
|
| $509,494 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $487,159 |
|
| $511,859 |
|
| $533,418 |
|
| $512,287 |
|
| $478,402 |
|
| $560,660 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 0.84% |
|
| 0.79% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.64% |
|
| 0.65% |
|
| 0.80% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 0.84% |
|
| 0.79% |
|
| 0.60% |
|
| 0.64% |
|
| 0.65% |
|
| 0.80% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 0.83% |
|
| 1.13% |
|
| 1.19% |
|
| 1.05% |
|
| 1.15% |
|
| 0.83% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 21% |
|
| 36% |
|
| 36% |
|
| 41% |
|
| 45% |
|
| 50% |
| ||
Service Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For a share outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31 | 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2015 |
| ||||
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
| $55.27 |
|
| $46.15 |
|
| $50.17 |
|
| $39.87 |
|
| $39.53 |
|
| $40.77 |
| ||
| Income/(Loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Net investment income/(loss)(1) |
| 0.15 |
|
| 0.45 |
|
| 0.48 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 0.35 |
|
| 0.24 |
| |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
| (2.36) |
|
| 12.39 |
|
| (4.00) |
|
| 10.24 |
|
| 0.36 |
|
| (1.26) |
| |
| Total from Investment Operations |
| (2.21) |
|
| 12.84 |
|
| (3.52) |
|
| 10.62 |
|
| 0.71 |
|
| (1.02) |
| ||
| Less Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Dividends (from net investment income) |
| (0.16) |
|
| (0.45) |
|
| (0.50) |
|
| (0.32) |
|
| (0.37) |
|
| (0.22) |
| |
|
| Distributions (from capital gains) |
| (2.99) |
|
| (3.27) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
| Total Dividends and Distributions |
| (3.15) |
|
| (3.72) |
|
| (0.50) |
|
| (0.32) |
|
| (0.37) |
|
| (0.22) |
| ||
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
| $49.91 |
|
| $55.27 |
|
| $46.15 |
|
| $50.17 |
|
| $39.87 |
|
| $39.53 |
| ||
| Total Return* |
| (3.82)% |
|
| 28.71% |
|
| (7.08)% |
|
| 26.68% |
|
| 1.82% |
|
| (2.53)% |
| ||
| Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
| $201,330 |
|
| $214,425 |
|
| $180,168 |
|
| $210,318 |
|
| $179,125 |
|
| $202,896 |
| ||
| Average Net Assets for the Period (in thousands) |
| $194,818 |
|
| $198,883 |
|
| $206,497 |
|
| $197,483 |
|
| $186,563 |
|
| $218,006 |
| ||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets**: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ratio of Gross Expenses |
| 1.09% |
|
| 1.04% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.89% |
|
| 0.90% |
|
| 1.05% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Expenses (After Waivers and Expense Offsets) |
| 1.09% |
|
| 1.04% |
|
| 0.85% |
|
| 0.89% |
|
| 0.90% |
|
| 1.05% |
| |
|
| Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
| 0.58% |
|
| 0.88% |
|
| 0.94% |
|
| 0.81% |
|
| 0.91% |
|
| 0.57% |
| |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
| 21% |
|
| 36% |
|
| 36% |
|
| 41% |
|
| 45% |
|
| 50% |
| ||
* Total return includes adjustments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles required at the year or period end and are not annualized for periods of less than one full year. Total return does not include fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and life insurance contracts for which Janus Aspen Series serves as an underlying investment vehicle. ** Annualized for periods of less than one full year. (1) Per share amounts are calculated based on average shares outstanding during the year or period. |
See Notes to Financial Statements. | |
18 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a series of Janus Aspen Series (the “Trust”), which is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and therefore has applied the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946. The Trust offers 11 portfolios, each of which offers multiple share classes, with differing investment objectives and policies. The Portfolio seeks long-term growth of capital. The Portfolio is classified as diversified, as defined in the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio currently offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Service Shares. Each class represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Institutional Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans. Service Shares are offered only in connection with investment in and payments under variable insurance contracts as well as certain qualified retirement plans that require a fee from Portfolio assets to procure distribution and administrative services to contract owners and plan participants.
Shareholders, including other portfolios, participating insurance companies, as well as accounts, may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) a significant percentage of the Portfolio’s Shares and can be considered to “control” the Portfolio when that ownership exceeds 25% of the Portfolio’s assets (and which may differ from control as determined in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting priciples ("US GAAP")).
The following accounting policies have been followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with US GAAP.
Investment Valuation
Securities held by the Portfolio are valued in accordance with policies and procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees (the “Valuation Procedures”). Equity securities traded on a domestic securities exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If such price is lacking for the trading period immediately preceding the time of determination, such securities are valued at their current bid price. Equity securities that are traded on a foreign exchange are generally valued at the closing prices on such markets. In the event that there is no current trading volume on a particular security in such foreign exchange, the bid price from the primary exchange is generally used to value the security. Securities that are traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets are generally valued at their closing or latest bid prices as available. Foreign securities and currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Portfolio will determine the market value of individual securities held by it by using prices provided by one or more approved professional pricing services or, as needed, by obtaining market quotations from independent broker-dealers. Most debt securities are valued in accordance with the evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service that is intended to reflect market value. The evaluated bid price supplied by the pricing service is an evaluation that may consider factors such as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Certain short-term securities maturing within 60 days or less may be evaluated and valued on an amortized cost basis provided that the amortized cost determined approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations or evaluated prices are not readily available or deemed unreliable are valued at fair value determined in good faith under the Valuation Procedures. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant event that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy, or significant issuer-specific development; (ii) an event that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; (iii) a nonsignificant event such as a market closing early or not opening, or a security trading halt; and (iv) pricing of a nonvalued security and a restricted or nonpublic security. Special valuation considerations may apply with respect to “odd-lot” fixed-income transactions which, due to their small size, may receive evaluated prices by pricing services which reflect a large block trade and not what actually could be obtained for the odd-lot position. The Portfolio uses systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties to value international equity securities in order to adjust for stale pricing, which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE.
Valuation Inputs Summary
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This standard emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that
Janus Aspen Series | 19 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets the Portfolio has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Assets or liabilities categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy generally include: debt securities fair valued in accordance with the evaluated bid or ask prices supplied by a pricing service; securities traded on OTC markets and listed securities for which no sales are reported that are fair valued at the latest bid price (or yield equivalent thereof) obtained from one or more dealers transacting in a market for such securities or by a pricing service approved by the Portfolio’s Trustees; certain short-term debt securities with maturities of 60 days or less that are fair valued at amortized cost; and equity securities of foreign issuers whose fair value is determined by using systematic fair valuation models provided by independent third parties in order to adjust for stale pricing which may occur between the close of certain foreign exchanges and the close of the NYSE. Other securities that may be categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy include, but are not limited to, preferred stocks, bank loans, swaps, investments in unregistered investment companies, options, and forward contracts.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.
There have been no significant changes in valuation techniques used in valuing any such positions held by the Portfolio since the beginning of the fiscal year.
The inputs or methodology used for fair valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of inputs used as of June 30, 2020 to fair value the Portfolio’s investments in securities and other financial instruments is included in the “Valuation Inputs Summary” in the Notes to Schedule of Investments and Other Information.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for as of the date purchased or sold (trade date). Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend, if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividends from foreign securities may be subject to withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. The Portfolio classifies gains and losses on prepayments received as an adjustment to interest income. Debt securities may be placed in non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivables when collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Income, as well as gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets.
Expenses
The Portfolio bears expenses incurred specifically on its behalf. Each class of shares bears a portion of general expenses, which are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of net assets represented by each class as a percentage of total net assets. Expenses directly attributable to a specific class of shares are charged against the operations of such class.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
20 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts that contain provisions for indemnification of other parties against certain potential liabilities. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, and would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred. Currently, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Foreign Currency Translations
The Portfolio does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held at the date of the financial statements. Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency translations arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities held at the date of the financial statements, resulting from changes in the exchange rates and changes in market prices of securities held.
Currency gains and losses are also calculated on payables and receivables that are denominated in foreign currencies. The payables and receivables are generally related to foreign security transactions and income translations.
Foreign currency-denominated assets and forward currency contracts may involve more risks than domestic transactions, including currency risk, counterparty risk, political and economic risk, regulatory risk and equity risk. Risks may arise from unanticipated movements in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Dividends and Distributions
The Portfolio may make semiannual distributions of substantially all of its investment income and an annual distribution of its net realized capital gains (if any).
The Portfolio may make certain investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which pay dividends to their shareholders based upon funds available from operations. It is quite common for these dividends to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits, resulting in the excess portion of such dividends being designated as a return of capital. If the Portfolio distributes such amounts, such distributions could constitute a return of capital to shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years, generally a three-year period, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
2. Other Investments and Strategies
Additional Investment Risk
In the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the financial sector experienced reduced liquidity in credit and other fixed-income markets, and an unusually high degree of volatility, both domestically and internationally. In response to the crisis, the United States and certain foreign governments, along with the U.S. Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks, took a number of unprecedented steps designed to support the financial markets. For example, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 provided for widespread regulation of financial institutions, consumer financial products and services, broker-dealers, over-the-counter derivatives, investment advisers, credit rating agencies, and mortgage lending, which expanded federal oversight in the financial sector, including the investment management industry. More recently, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have taken extraordinary actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets, including reducing interest rates to record low levels. The withdrawal of this support, a failure of measures put in place in response to such economic uncertainty, or investor perception that such efforts were not sufficient could each negatively affect financial markets generally, and the value and liquidity of specific securities. In addition, policy and legislative changes in the United States and in other countries continue to impact many aspects of financial regulation.
Widespread disease, including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and weather-related phenomena generally, have been and can be highly disruptive to
Janus Aspen Series | 21 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States. These disruptions could prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective(s). Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value of a Fund. In addition, these disruptions could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Fund’s service providers, including Janus Capital or the subadviser (as applicable), rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of the Fund.
A number of countries in the European Union (“EU”) have experienced, and may continue to experience, severe economic and financial difficulties. In particular, many EU nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. Financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit. As a result, financial markets in the EU have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. The risk of investing in securities in the European markets may also be heightened due to the referendum in which the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”). The United Kingdom formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into an eleven-month transition period, during which the United Kingdom will remain subject to EU laws and regulations. There is considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the United Kingdom’s exit and how negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted or concluded.
Certain areas of the world have historically been prone to and economically sensitive to environmental events such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, tornadoes, mudslides, or other weather-related phenomena. Such disasters, and the resulting physical or economic damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Portfolio’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Portfolio invests to conduct their businesses as they would under normal conditions. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance and reinsurance companies that insure or reinsure against the impact of natural disasters.
Counterparties
Portfolio transactions involving a counterparty are subject to the risk that the counterparty or a third party will not fulfill its obligation to the Portfolio (“counterparty risk”). Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty’s financial condition (i.e., financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or insolvency), market activities and developments, or other reasons, whether foreseen or not. A counterparty’s inability to fulfill its obligation may result in significant financial loss to the Portfolio. The Portfolio may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited recovery, and/or recovery may be delayed. The extent of the Portfolio’s exposure to counterparty risk with respect to financial assets and liabilities approximates its carrying value.
The Portfolio may be exposed to counterparty risk through participation in various programs, including, but not limited to, lending its securities to third parties, cash sweep arrangements whereby the Portfolio’s cash balance is invested in one or more types of cash management vehicles, as well as investments in, but not limited to, repurchase agreements, debt securities, and derivatives, including various types of swaps, futures and options. The Portfolio intends to enter into financial transactions with counterparties that Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus Capital”) believes to be creditworthy at the time of the transaction. There is always the risk that Janus Capital’s analysis of a counterparty’s creditworthiness is incorrect or may change due to market conditions. To the extent that the Portfolio focuses its transactions with a limited number of counterparties, it will have greater exposure to the risks associated with one or more counterparties.
Emerging Market Investing
Within the parameters of its specific investment policies, the Portfolio may invest in securities of issuers or companies from or with exposure to one or more “developing countries” or “emerging market countries.” To the extent that the
22 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Portfolio invests a significant amount of its assets in one or more of these countries, its returns and net asset value may be affected to a large degree by events and economic conditions in such countries. The risks of foreign investing are heightened when investing in emerging markets, which may result in the price of investments in emerging markets experiencing sudden and sharp price swings. In many developing markets, there is less government supervision and regulation of business and industry practices (including the potential lack of strict finance and accounting controls and standards), stock exchanges, brokers, and listed companies, making these investments potentially more volatile in price and less liquid than investments in developed securities markets, resulting in greater risk to investors. There is a risk in developing countries that a future economic or political crisis could lead to price controls, forced mergers of companies, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, imposition or enforcement of foreign ownership limits, seizure, nationalization, sanctions or imposition of restrictions by various governmental entities on investment and trading, or creation of government monopolies, any of which may have a detrimental effect on the Portfolio’s investments. In addition, the Portfolio’s investments may be denominated in foreign currencies and therefore, changes in the value of a country’s currency compared to the U.S. dollar may affect the value of the Portfolio’s investments. To the extent that the Portfolio invests a significant portion of its assets in the securities of issuers in or companies of a single country or region, it is more likely to be impacted by events or conditions affecting that country or region, which could have a negative impact on the Portfolio’s performance.
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
The Portfolio presents gross and net information about transactions that are either offset in the financial statements or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement with a designated counterparty, regardless of whether the transactions are actually offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The following table presents gross amounts of recognized assets and/or liabilities and the net amounts after deducting collateral that has been pledged by counterparties or has been pledged to counterparties (if applicable). For corresponding information grouped by type of instrument, see the Portfolio's Schedule of Investments.
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets | |||||||||
Gross Amounts | |||||||||
of Recognized | Offsetting Asset | Collateral | |||||||
Counterparty | Assets | or Liability(a) | Pledged(b) | Net Amount | |||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | $ | 3,147,182 | $ | — | $ | (3,147,182) | $ | — | |
(a) | Represents the amount of assets or liabilities that could be offset with the same counterparty under master netting or similar agreements that management elects not to offset on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. | ||||||||
(b) | Collateral pledged is limited to the net outstanding amount due to/from an individual counterparty. The actual collateral amounts pledged may exceed these amounts and may fluctuate in value. |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset financial instruments' payables and receivables and related collateral on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Securities on loan will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). See “Securities Lending” in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for additional information.
Real Estate Investing
The Portfolio may invest in equity and debt securities of real estate-related companies. Such companies may include those in the real estate industry or real estate-related industries. These securities may include common stocks, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, and other equity securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed securities, real estate-backed securities, securities of REITs and similar REIT-like entities. A REIT is a trust that invests in real estate-related projects, such as properties, mortgage loans, and construction loans. REITs are generally categorized as equity, mortgage, or hybrid REITs. A REIT may be listed on an exchange or traded OTC.
Janus Aspen Series | 23 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Securities Lending
Under procedures adopted by the Trustees, the Portfolio may seek to earn additional income by lending securities to certain qualified broker-dealers and institutions. Effective December 16, 2019, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association replaced Deutsche Bank AG as securities lending agent for the Portfolio. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association acts as securities lending agent and a limited purpose custodian or subcustodian to receive and disburse cash balances and cash collateral, hold short-term investments, hold collateral, and perform other custodial functions in accordance with the Non-Custodial Securities Lending Agreement. The Portfolio may lend portfolio securities in an amount equal to up to 1/3 of its total assets as determined at the time of the loan origination. There is the risk of delay in recovering a loaned security or the risk of loss in collateral rights if the borrower fails financially. In addition, Janus Capital makes efforts to balance the benefits and risks from granting such loans. All loans will be continuously secured by collateral which may consist of cash, U.S. Government securities, domestic and foreign short-term debt instruments, letters of credit, time deposits, repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds or other money market accounts, or such other collateral as permitted by the SEC. If the Portfolio is unable to recover a security on loan, the Portfolio may use the collateral to purchase replacement securities in the market. There is a risk that the value of the collateral could decrease below the cost of the replacement security by the time the replacement investment is made, resulting in a loss to the Portfolio. In certain circumstances individual loan transactions could yield negative returns.
Upon receipt of cash collateral, Janus Capital may invest it in affiliated or non-affiliated cash management vehicles, whether registered or unregistered entities, as permitted by the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. Janus Capital currently intends to primarily invest the cash collateral in a cash management vehicle for which Janus Capital serves as investment adviser, Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. An investment in Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC is generally subject to the same risks that shareholders experience when investing in similarly structured vehicles, such as the potential for significant fluctuations in assets as a result of the purchase and redemption activity of the securities lending program, a decline in the value of the collateral, and possible liquidity issues. Such risks may delay the return of the cash collateral and cause the Portfolio to violate its agreement to return the cash collateral to a borrower in a timely manner. As adviser to the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest as a result of its fiduciary duties to both the Portfolio and Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC. Additionally, Janus Capital receives an investment advisory fee of 0.05% for managing Janus Henderson Cash Collateral Fund LLC, but it may not receive a fee for managing certain other affiliated cash management vehicles in which the Portfolio may invest, and therefore may have an incentive to allocate preferred investment opportunities to investment vehicles for which it is receiving a fee.
The value of the collateral must be at least 102% of the market value of the loaned securities that are denominated in U.S. dollars and 105% of the market value of the loaned securities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars. Loaned securities and related collateral are marked-to-market each business day based upon the market value of the loaned securities at the close of business, employing the most recent available pricing information. Collateral levels are then adjusted based on this mark-to-market evaluation.
The cash collateral invested by Janus Capital is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments (if applicable). Income earned from the investment of the cash collateral, net of rebates paid to, or fees paid by, borrowers and less the fees paid to the lending agent are included as “Affiliated securities lending income, net” on the Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2020, securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings with an overnight and continuous contractual maturity are $3,147,182. Gross amounts of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) as of June 30, 2020 is $3,304,800, resulting in the net amount due to the counterparty of $157,618.
3. Investment Advisory Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Portfolio pays Janus Capital an investment advisory fee which is calculated daily and paid monthly. The Portfolio’s "base" fee rate prior to any performance adjustment (expressed as an annual rate) is 0.60%.
The investment advisory fee rate is determined by calculating a base fee and applying a performance adjustment. The base fee rate is the same as the contractual investment advisory fee rate. The performance adjustment either increases or decreases the base fee depending on how well the Portfolio has performed relative to its benchmark index. The Portfolio's benchmark index used in the calculation is the MSCI World IndexSM.
The calculation of the performance adjustment applies as follows:
Investment Advisory Fee = Base Fee Rate +/- Performance Adjustment
24 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
The investment advisory fee rate paid to Janus Capital by the Portfolio consists of two components: (1) a base fee calculated by applying the contractual fixed rate of the advisory fee to the Portfolio’s average daily net assets during the previous month (“Base Fee Rate”), plus or minus (2) a performance-fee adjustment (“Performance Adjustment”) calculated by applying a variable rate of up to 0.15% (positive or negative) to the Portfolio’s average daily net assets based on the Portfolio’s relative performance compared to the cumulative investment record of its benchmark index over a 36-month performance measurement period or shorter time period, as applicable. The investment performance of a Portfolio’s Service Shares, for the performance measurement period is used to calculate the Performance Adjustment. No Performance Adjustment is applied unless the difference between the Portfolio’s investment performance and the cumulative investment record of the Portfolio’s benchmark index is 0.50% or greater (positive or negative) during the applicable performance measurement period.
The Portfolio’s prospectuses and statement(s) of additional information contain additional information about performance-based fees. The amount shown as advisory fees on the Statement of Operations reflects the Base Fee Rate plus/minus any Performance Adjustment. For the period ended June 30, 2020, the performance adjusted investment advisory fee rate before any waivers and/or reimbursements of expenses is 0.75%.
Janus Services LLC (“Janus Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, is the Portfolio’s transfer agent. Janus Services receives an administrative services fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets of the Portfolio for arranging for the provision by participating insurance companies and qualified plan service providers of administrative services, including recordkeeping, subaccounting, order processing, or other shareholder services provided on behalf of contract holders or plan participants investing in the Portfolio. Other shareholder services may include the provision of order confirmations, periodic account statements, forwarding prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other materials to existing investors, and answering inquiries regarding accounts. Janus Services expects to use this entire fee to compensate insurance companies and qualified plan service providers for providing these services to their customers who invest in the Portfolio. Any unused portion will be reimbursed to the applicable share class at least annually.
In addition, Janus Services provides or arranges for the provision of certain other internal administrative, recordkeeping, and shareholder relations services for the Portfolio. Janus Services is not compensated for these internal services related to the shares, except for out-of-pocket costs. These amounts are disclosed as “Other transfer agent fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Under a distribution and shareholder servicing plan (the “Plan”) adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Service Shares may pay the Trust’s distributor, Janus Distributors LLC (“Janus Distributors”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus Capital, a fee for the sale and distribution and/or shareholder servicing of the Service Shares at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Service Shares. Under the terms of the Plan, the Trust is authorized to make payments to Janus Distributors for remittance to insurance companies and qualified plan service providers as compensation for distribution and/or shareholder services performed by such entities. These amounts are disclosed as “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” on the Statement of Operations. Payments under the Plan are not tied exclusively to actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees, and the payments may exceed 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees actually incurred. If any of the Portfolio’s actual 12b-1 distribution and servicing fees incurred during a calendar year are less than the payments made during a calendar year, the Portfolio will be refunded the difference. Refunds, if any, are included in “12b-1 Distribution and shareholder servicing fees” in the Statement of Operations.
Janus Capital serves as administrator to the Portfolio pursuant to an administration agreement between Janus Capital and the Trust. Under the administration agreement, Janus Capital is obligated to provide or arrange for the provision of certain administration, compliance, and accounting services to the Portfolio, including providing office space for the Portfolio, and is reimbursed by the Portfolio for certain of its costs in providing these services (to the extent Janus Capital seeks reimbursement and such costs are not otherwise waived). In addition, employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates may serve as officers of the Trust. The Portfolio pays for some or all of the salaries, fees, and expenses of Janus Capital employees and Portfolio officers, with respect to certain specified administration functions they perform on behalf of the Portfolio. The Portfolio pays these costs based on out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Janus Capital, and these costs are separate and apart from advisory fees and other expenses paid in connection with the investment advisory services Janus Capital (or any subadvisor, as applicable) provides to the Portfolio. These amounts are disclosed as “Affiliated portfolio administration fees” on the Statement of Operations. In addition, some expenses related to compensation payable to the Portfolio’s Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff, all of whom are
Janus Aspen Series | 25 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
employees of Janus Capital and/or its affiliates, are shared with the Portfolio. Total compensation of $20,422 was paid to the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance staff by the Trust during the period ended June 30, 2020. The Portfolio's portion is reported as part of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for independent Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Portfolio. All deferred fees are credited to an account established in the name of the Trustees. The amounts credited to the account then increase or decrease, as the case may be, in accordance with the performance of one or more of the Janus Henderson funds that are selected by the Trustees. The account balance continues to fluctuate in accordance with the performance of the selected fund or funds until final payment of all amounts are credited to the account. The fluctuation of the account balance is recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) and is included as of June 30, 2020 on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the asset, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation,” and liability, “Non-interested Trustees’ deferred compensation fees.” Additionally, the recorded unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is included in “Total distributable earnings (loss)” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferred compensation expenses for the period ended June 30, 2020 are included in “Non-interested Trustees’ fees and expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Trustees are allowed to change their designation of mutual funds from time to time. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the Deferred Plan. Deferred fees of $220,425 were paid by the Trust to the Trustees under the Deferred Plan during the period ended June 30, 2020.
Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act and related rules, the Portfolio may participate in an affiliated or non-affiliated cash sweep program. In the cash sweep program, uninvested cash balances of the Portfolio may be used to purchase shares of affiliated or non-affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles that operate as money market funds. The Portfolio is eligible to participate in the cash sweep program (the “Investing Funds”). As adviser, Janus Capital has an inherent conflict of interest because of its fiduciary duties to the affiliated money market funds or cash management pooled investment vehicles and the Investing Funds. Janus Henderson Cash Liquidity Fund LLC (the “Sweep Vehicle”) is an affiliated unregistered cash management pooled investment vehicle that invests primarily in highly-rated short-term fixed-income securities. The Sweep Vehicle operates pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act that govern the operation of money market funds and prices its shares at NAV reflecting market-based values of its portfolio securities (i.e., a “floating” NAV) rounded to the fourth decimal place (e.g., $1.0000). The Sweep Vehicle is permitted to impose a liquidity fee (of up to 2%) on redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle or a redemption gate that temporarily suspends redemptions from the Sweep Vehicle for up to 10 business days during a 90 day period. There are no restrictions on the Portfolio's ability to withdraw investments from the Sweep Vehicle at will, and there are no unfunded capital commitments due from the Portfolio to the Sweep Vehicle. The Sweep Vehicle does not charge any management fee, sales charge or service fee.
Any purchases and sales, realized gains/losses and recorded dividends from affiliated investments during the period ended June 30, 2020 can be found in the “Schedules of Affiliated Investments” located in the Schedule of Investments.
The Portfolio is permitted to purchase or sell securities (“cross-trade”) between itself and other funds or accounts managed by Janus Capital in accordance with Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Rule 17a-7”), when the transaction is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio and in accordance with the Internal Cross Trade Procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any cross-trade of securities by the Portfolio from or to another fund or account that is or could be considered an affiliate of the Portfolio under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser, common Officer, or common Trustee complies with Rule 17a-7. Under these procedures, each cross-trade is effected at the current market price to save costs where allowed. During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Portfolio engaged in cross trades amounting to $1,321,672 in purchases.
4. Federal Income Tax
Income and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for items such as net short-term gains, deferral of wash sale losses, foreign currency transactions, net investment losses, and capital loss carryovers.
The Portfolio has elected to treat gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts as capital gains and losses, if applicable. Other foreign currency gains and losses on debt instruments are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code.
26 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
The aggregate cost of investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investment securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2020 are noted below. The primary differences between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of investments are wash sale loss deferrals and investments in partnerships.
Federal Tax Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized
| Net Tax Appreciation/ |
$ 518,507,338 | $207,575,776 | $(26,806,211) | $ 180,769,565 |
5. Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period ended June 30, 2020 |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||
|
| Shares | Amount |
| Shares | Amount |
Institutional Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 142,679 | $ 7,419,828 |
| 211,898 | $ 11,104,330 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 592,119 | 29,357,266 |
| 700,470 | 35,853,466 | |
Shares repurchased | (564,449) | (29,142,579) |
| (1,204,072) | (63,535,412) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 170,349 | $ 7,634,515 |
| (291,704) | $(16,577,616) | |
Service Shares: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares sold | 154,225 | $ 7,610,131 |
| 230,603 | $ 11,845,436 | |
Reinvested dividends and distributions | 248,317 | 12,003,638 |
| 276,671 | 13,833,812 | |
Shares repurchased | (248,031) | (12,400,593) |
| (531,967) | (27,275,766) | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) | 154,511 | $ 7,213,176 |
| (24,693) | $ (1,596,518) |
6. Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities
For the period ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding any short-term securities, short-term options contracts, TBAs, and in-kind transactions, as applicable) was as follows:
Purchases of | Proceeds from Sales | Purchases
of Long- | Proceeds
from Sales |
$142,494,168 | $ 168,069,513 | $ - | $ - |
7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), in August 2018. The new guidance removes, modifies and enhances the disclosures to Topic 820. For public entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted, and Management has decided, to early adopt the removed and modified disclosures in these financial statements. Management is also evaluating the implications related to the new disclosure requirements and has not yet determined the impact to the financial statements.
8. Other Matters
An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 has been, and may continue to be, highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Portfolio's investments. This may impact liquidity in the marketplace, which in turn may affect the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests. Public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, and economic risks in certain countries or globally. The duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects cannot be determined with certainty, and could prevent
Janus Aspen Series | 27 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
a Portfolio from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact a Portfolio's ability to achieve its investment objective.
9. Subsequent Event
Management has evaluated whether any events or transactions occurred subsequent to June 30, 2020 and through the date of issuance of the Portfolio’s financial statements and determined that there were no material events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
28 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Policies and Voting Record
A description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities is available without charge: (i) upon request, by calling 1-800-525-1093; (ii) on the Portfolio’s website at janushenderson.com/proxyvoting; and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, information regarding the Portfolio’s proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is also available, free of charge, through janushenderson.com/proxyvoting and from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Full Holdings
The Portfolio is required to disclose its complete holdings as an exhibit to Form N-PORT within 60 days of the end of the first and third fiscal quarters, and in the annual report and semiannual report to Portfolio shareholders. Historically, the Portfolio filed its complete portfolio holdings (schedule of investments) with the SEC for the first and third quarters each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Form N-PORT and Form N-Q filings: (i) are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; (ii) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330); and (iii) are available without charge, upon request, by calling a Janus Henderson representative at 1-877-335-2687 (toll free) . Portfolio holdings consisting of at least the names of the holdings are generally available on a monthly basis with a 30-day lag. Holdings are generally posted approximately two business days thereafter under Full Holdings for the Portfolio at janushenderson.com/vit.
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD
The Trustees of Janus Aspen Series, each of whom serves as an “independent” Trustee (the “Trustees”), oversee the management of each Portfolio of Janus Aspen Series (each, a “VIT Portfolio,” and collectively, the “VIT Portfolios”), as well as each Fund of Janus Investment Fund (together with the VIT Portfolios, the “Janus Henderson Funds,” and each, a “Janus Henderson Fund”). As required by law, the Trustees determine annually whether to continue the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund and the subadvisory agreements for the Janus Henderson Funds that utilize subadvisers.
In connection with their most recent consideration of those agreements for each Janus Henderson Fund, the Trustees received and reviewed information provided by Janus Capital and the respective subadvisers in response to requests of the Trustees and their independent legal counsel. They also received and reviewed information and analysis provided by, and in response to requests of, their independent fee consultant. Throughout their consideration of the agreements, the Trustees were advised by their independent legal counsel. The Trustees met with management to consider the agreements, and also met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and their independent fee consultant.
At a meeting held on December 5, 2019, based on the Trustees’ evaluation of the information provided by Janus Capital, the subadvisers, and the independent fee consultant, as well as other information, the Trustees determined that the overall arrangements between each Janus Henderson Fund and Janus Capital and each subadviser, as applicable, were fair and reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital, its affiliates and the subadvisers, the fees charged for those services, and other matters that the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. At that meeting, the Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Janus Henderson Fund, and the subadvisory agreement for each subadvised Janus Henderson Fund, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 1, 2021, subject to earlier termination as provided for in each agreement.
In considering the continuation of those agreements, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. However, the material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the agreements are discussed separately below. Also included is a summary of the independent fee consultant’s conclusions and opinions that arose during, and were included as part of, the Trustees’ consideration of the agreements. “Management fees,” as used herein, reflect actual annual advisory fees and, for the purpose of peer comparisons, any administration fees (excluding out of pocket costs), net of any waivers, paid by a fund as a percentage of average net assets.
Janus Aspen Series | 29 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees reviewed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital and the subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds, taking into account the investment objective, strategies and policies of each Janus Henderson Fund, and the knowledge the Trustees gained from their regular meetings with management on at least a quarterly basis and their ongoing review of information related to the Janus Henderson Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the resources and key personnel of Janus Capital and each subadviser, particularly noting those employees who provide investment and risk management services to the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Janus Henderson Funds by Janus Capital or the subadvisers, such as managing the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of broker-dealers for those transactions. The Trustees considered Janus Capital’s role as administrator to the Janus Henderson Funds, noting that Janus Capital generally does not receive a fee for its services but is reimbursed for its out-of-pocket costs. The Trustees considered the role of Janus Capital in monitoring adherence to the Janus Henderson Funds’ investment restrictions, providing support services for the Trustees and Trustee committees, and overseeing communications with shareholders and the activities of other service providers, including monitoring compliance with various policies and procedures of the Janus Henderson Funds and with applicable securities laws and regulations.
In this regard, the independent fee consultant noted that Janus Capital provides a number of different services for the Janus Henderson Funds and fund shareholders, ranging from investment management services to various other servicing functions, and that, in its view, Janus Capital is a capable provider of those services. The independent fee consultant also provided its belief that Janus Capital has developed a number of institutional competitive advantages that should enable it to provide superior investment and service performance over the long term.
The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Janus Capital or the subadviser to each Janus Henderson Fund were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective advisory and subadvisory agreements, and that, taking into account steps taken to address those Janus Henderson Funds whose performance lagged that of their peers for certain periods, the Janus Henderson Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services. They also concluded that Janus Capital and each subadviser had sufficient personnel, with the appropriate education and experience, to serve the Janus Henderson Funds effectively and had demonstrated its ability to attract well-qualified personnel.
Performance of the Funds
The Trustees considered the performance results of each Janus Henderson Fund over various time periods. They noted that they considered Janus Henderson Fund performance data throughout the year, including periodic meetings with each Janus Henderson Fund’s portfolio manager(s), and also reviewed information comparing each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups identified by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent data provider, and with the Janus Henderson Fund’s benchmark index. In this regard, the independent fee consultant found that the overall Janus Henderson Funds’ performance has been reasonable: for the 36 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2019, approximately 71% of the Janus Henderson Funds were in the top two quartiles of performance, as reported by Morningstar.
The Trustees considered the performance of each Janus Henderson Fund, noting that performance may vary by share class, and noted the following with respect to the VIT Portfolios:
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance.
30 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the first Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the third Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the bottom Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the second Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance, while also noting that the Fund has a performance fee structure that results in lower management fees during periods of underperformance, and the steps Janus Capital had taken or was taking to improve performance, and that the performance trend was improving
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s performance was in the third Broadridge quartile for the 36 months ended May 31, 2019 and the first Broadridge quartile for the 12 months ended May 31, 2019. The Trustees noted the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance and the steps Janus Capital and Intech had taken or were taking to improve performance, and the performance trend was improving.
In consideration of each Janus Henderson Fund’s performance, the Trustees concluded that, taking into account the factors relevant to performance, as well as other considerations, including steps taken to improve performance, the Janus Henderson Fund’s performance warranted continuation of such Janus Henderson Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory agreement(s).
Costs of Services Provided
The Trustees examined information regarding the fees and expenses of each Janus Henderson Fund in comparison to similar information for other comparable funds as provided by Broadridge, an independent data provider. They also reviewed an analysis of that information provided by their independent fee consultant and noted that the rate of management fees (investment advisory and any administration, but excluding out-of-pocket costs) for many of the Janus Henderson Funds, after applicable waivers, was below the average management fee rate of the respective peer group of funds selected by an independent data provider. The Trustees also examined information regarding the subadvisory fees charged for subadvisory services, as applicable, noting that all such fees were paid by Janus Capital out of its management fees collected from such Janus Henderson Fund.
The independent fee consultant provided its belief that the management fees charged by Janus Capital to each of the Janus Henderson Funds under the current investment advisory and administration agreements are reasonable in relation to the services provided by Janus Capital. The independent fee consultant found: (1) the total expenses and management fees of the Janus Henderson Funds to be reasonable relative to other mutual funds; (2) the total expenses, on average, were 10% under the average total expenses of their respective Broadridge Expense Group peers; and (3) and the management fees for the Janus Henderson Funds, on average, were 7% under the average management fees for their Expense Groups. The Trustees also considered the total expenses for each share class of
Janus Aspen Series | 31 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
each Janus Henderson Fund compared to the average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Group peers and to average total expenses for its Broadridge Expense Universe.
For certain Janus Henderson Funds, the independent fee consultant also performed a systematic “focus list” analysis of expenses which assessed fund fees in the context of fund performance being delivered. Based on this analysis, the independent fee consultant found that the combination of service quality/performance and expenses on these individual Janus Henderson Funds was reasonable in light of performance trends, performance histories, and existence of performance fees, breakpoints, and/or expense waivers on such Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees considered the methodology used by Janus Capital and each subadviser in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers, the competitive environment for investment management talent, and the competitive market for mutual funds in different distribution channels.
The Trustees also reviewed management fees charged by Janus Capital and each subadviser to comparable separate account clients and to comparable non-affiliated funds subadvised by Janus Capital or by a subadviser (for which Janus Capital or the subadviser provides only or primarily portfolio management services). Although in most instances subadvisory and separate account fee rates for various investment strategies were lower than management fee rates for Janus Henderson Funds having a similar strategy, the Trustees considered that Janus Capital noted that, under the terms of the management agreements with the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital performs significant additional services for the Janus Henderson Funds that it does not provide to those other clients, including administration services, oversight of the Janus Henderson Funds’ other service providers, trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in serving the Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital assumes many legal risks and other costs that it does not assume in servicing its other clients. Moreover, they noted that the independent fee consultant found that: (1) the management fees Janus Capital charges to the Janus Henderson Funds are reasonable in relation to the management fees Janus Capital charges to funds subadvised by Janus Capital and to the fees Janus Capital charges to its institutional separate account clients; (2) these subadvised and institutional separate accounts have different service and infrastructure needs; and (3) Janus Henderson mutual fund investors enjoy reasonable fees relative to the fees charged to Janus Henderson subadvised fund and separate account investors; (4) 11 of 12 Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar funds subadvised by Janus Capital; and (5) six of nine Janus Henderson Funds have lower management fees than similar separate accounts managed by Janus Capital.
The Trustees considered the fees for each Janus Henderson Fund for its fiscal year ended in 2018, including the VIT Portfolios, and noted the following with regard to each VIT Portfolio’s total expenses, net of applicable fee waivers (the VIT Portfolio’s “total expenses”):
· For Janus Henderson Balanced Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Enterprise Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
· For Janus Henderson Forty Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable.
· For Janus Henderson Global Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Global Technology Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Portfolio, the Trustees noted that, although the Fund’s total expenses exceeded the peer group average for one share class, overall the Fund’s total expenses were reasonable. The Trustees also noted that Janus Capital has contractually agreed to limit the Fund’s expenses, although this limit did not apply because the Fund’s total expenses were already below the applicable fee limit.
32 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
· For Janus Henderson Overseas Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson Research Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for both share classes.
· For Janus Henderson U.S. Low Volatility Portfolio, the Trustees noted that the Fund’s total expenses were below the peer group average for its sole share class.
The Trustees reviewed information on the overall profitability to Janus Capital and its affiliates of their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds, and considered profitability data of other publicly traded mutual fund advisers. The Trustees recognized that profitability comparisons among fund managers are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund manager is affected by numerous factors, including the organizational structure of the particular fund manager, differences in complex size, difference in product mix, difference in types of business (mutual fund, institutional and other), differences in the types of funds and other accounts it manages, possible other lines of business, the methodology for allocating expenses, and the fund manager’s capital structure and cost of capital.
Additionally, the Trustees considered the estimated profitability to Janus Capital from the investment management services it provided to each Janus Henderson Fund. In their review, the Trustees considered whether Janus Capital and each subadviser receive adequate incentives and resources to manage the Janus Henderson Funds effectively. In reviewing profitability, the Trustees noted that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund is necessarily a product of the allocation methodology utilized by Janus Capital to allocate its expenses as part of the estimated profitability calculation. In this regard, the Trustees noted that the independent fee consultant found that (1) the expense allocation methodology and rationales utilized by Janus Capital were reasonable and (2) no clear correlation between expense allocations and operating margins. The Trustees also considered that the estimated profitability for an individual Janus Henderson Fund was influenced by a number of factors, including not only the allocation methodology selected, but also the presence of fee waivers and expense caps, and whether the Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management agreement contained breakpoints or a performance fee component. The Trustees determined, after taking into account these factors, among others, that Janus Capital’s estimated profitability with respect to each Janus Henderson Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the variation in the range of such estimated profitability among the Janus Henderson Funds was not a material factor in the Board’s approval of the reasonableness of any Janus Henderson Fund’s investment management fees.
The Trustees concluded that the management fees payable by each Janus Henderson Fund to Janus Capital and its affiliates, as well as the fees paid by Janus Capital to the subadvisers of subadvised Janus Henderson Funds, were reasonable in relation to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, taking into account the fees charged by other advisers for managing comparable mutual funds with similar strategies, the fees Janus Capital and the subadvisers charge to other clients, and, as applicable, the impact of fund performance on management fees payable by the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also concluded that each Janus Henderson Fund’s total expenses were reasonable, taking into account the size of the Janus Henderson Fund, the quality of services provided by Janus Capital and any subadviser, the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund, and any expense limitations agreed to or provided by Janus Capital.
Economies of Scale
The Trustees considered information about the potential for Janus Capital to realize economies of scale as the assets of the Janus Henderson Funds increase. They noted that their independent fee consultant published a report to the Trustees in November 2019 which provided its research and analysis into economies of scale. They also noted that, although many Janus Henderson Funds pay advisory fees at a base fixed rate as a percentage of net assets, without any breakpoints or performance fees, their independent fee consultant concluded that 64% of these Janus Henderson Funds’ share classes have contractual management fees (gross of waivers) below their Broadridge expense group averages. They also noted the following: (1) that for those Janus Henderson Funds whose expenses are being reduced by the contractual expense limitations of Janus Capital, Janus Capital is subsidizing certain of these Janus Henderson Funds because they have not reached adequate scale; (2) as the assets of some of the Janus Henderson Funds have declined in the past few years, certain Janus Henderson Funds have benefited from having advisory fee rates that have remained constant rather than increasing as assets declined; (3) performance fee structures have been implemented for various Janus Henderson Funds that have caused the effective rate of advisory fees payable by such a
Janus Aspen Series | 33 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
Janus Henderson Fund to vary depending on the investment performance of the Janus Henderson Fund relative to its benchmark index over the measurement period; and (4) a few Janus Henderson Funds have fee schedules with breakpoints and reduced fee rates above certain asset levels. The Trustees also noted that the Janus Henderson Funds share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of all of the Janus Henderson Funds.
The Trustees also considered the independent fee consultant’s conclusion that, given the limitations of various analytical approaches to economies of scale and their conflicting results, it is difficult to analytically confirm or deny the existence of economies of scale in the Janus Henderson complex. In this regard, the independent consultant concluded that (1) to the extent there were economies of scale at Janus Capital, Janus Capital’s general strategy of setting fixed management fees below peers appeared to share any such economies with investors even on smaller Janus Henderson Funds which have not yet achieved those economies and (2) by setting lower fixed fees from the start on these Janus Henderson Funds, Janus Capital appeared to be investing to increase the likelihood that these Janus Henderson Funds will grow to a level to achieve any scale economies that may exist. Further, the independent fee consultant provided its belief that Janus Henderson Fund investors are well-served by the fee levels and performance fee structures in place on the Janus Henderson Funds in light of any economies of scale that may be present at Janus Capital.
Based on all of the information reviewed, including the recent and past research and analysis conducted by the Trustees’ independent fee consultant, the Trustees concluded that the current fee structure of each Janus Henderson Fund was reasonable and that the current rates of fees do reflect a sharing between Janus Capital and the Janus Henderson Fund of any economies of scale that may be present at the current asset level of the Janus Henderson Fund.
Other Benefits to Janus Capital
The Trustees also considered benefits that accrue to Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers to the Janus Henderson Funds from their relationships with the Janus Henderson Funds. They recognized that two affiliates of Janus Capital separately serve the Janus Henderson Funds as transfer agent and distributor, respectively, and the transfer agent receives compensation directly from the non-money market funds for services provided, and that such compensation contributes to the overall profitability of Janus Capital and its affiliates that results from their relationship with the Janus Henderson Funds. The Trustees also considered Janus Capital’s past and proposed use of commissions paid by the Janus Henderson Funds on portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services benefiting the Janus Henderson Fund and/or other clients of Janus Capital and/or Janus Capital, and/or a subadviser to a Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees concluded that Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ use of these types of client commission arrangements to obtain proprietary and third-party research products and services was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidelines and was likely to benefit each Janus Henderson Fund. The Trustees also concluded that, other than the services provided by Janus Capital and its affiliates and subadvisers pursuant to the agreements and the fees to be paid by each Janus Henderson Fund therefor, the Janus Henderson Funds and Janus Capital and the subadvisers may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other in other ways. They concluded that Janus Capital and its affiliates share directly in economies of scale through the lower charges of third-party service providers that are based in part on the combined scale of the Janus Henderson Funds and other clients serviced by Janus Capital and its affiliates. They also concluded that Janus Capital and/or the subadvisers benefit from the receipt of research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Janus Henderson Funds and that the Janus Henderson Funds benefit from Janus Capital’s and/or the subadvisers’ receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of Janus Capital and/or other clients of the subadvisers. They further concluded that the success of any Janus Henderson Fund could attract other business to Janus Capital, the subadvisers or other Janus Henderson funds, and that the success of Janus Capital and the subadvisers could enhance Janus Capital’s and the subadvisers’ ability to serve the Janus Henderson Funds.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Janus Henderson Funds (other than the money market funds) have adopted and implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “LRMP”) as required by Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”). Rule 22e-4, requires open-end funds to adopt and implement a written liquidity risk management program that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk, which is the risk that a fund could not meet redemption requests without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interest in the fund. The LRMP
34 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Additional Information (unaudited)
incorporates the following elements: (i) assessment, management, and periodic review of liquidity risk; (ii) classification of portfolio investments; (iii) the establishment and monitoring of a highly liquid investment minimum, as applicable; (iv) a 15% limitation on a Portfolio’s illiquid investments; (v) redemptions in-kind; and (vi) board oversight.
The Trustees have designated Janus Capital Management LLC, the Portfolio’s investment adviser (“Janus Capital”), as the Program Administrator for the LRMP responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of the LRMP. A working group comprised of various groups within Janus Capital’s business is responsible for administering the LRMP and carrying out the specific responsibilities of different aspects of the LRMP.
The Liquidity Rule requires the Trustees to review at least annually a written report provided by the Program Administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and the effectiveness of its implementation, including, if applicable, the operation of the highly liquid investment minimum, and any material changes to the LRMP (the “Program Administrator Report”). During the semi-annual period ended June 30, 2020, the Program Administrator provided the Program Administrator Report to the Trustees which covered the operation of the LRMP from December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”). No significant liquidity events impacting the Portfolio were noted in the Program Administrator Report, and the Portfolio was able to process redemptions during the normal course of business during the Reporting Period. In addition, the Program Administrator expressed its belief in the Program Administrator Report that:
· the LRMP is reasonably designed and adequate to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, taking into account the Portfolio’s particular risks and circumstances, and includes policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement each required component of the Liquidity Rule; and
· the LRMP, including the Highly Liquid Investment Minimum where applicable, was implemented and operated effectively to achieve the goal of assessing and managing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk.
There can be no assurance that the LRMP will achieve its objectives in the future. Please refer to your Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.
Janus Aspen Series | 35 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Management Commentary in this report includes valuable insight as well as statistical information to help you understand how your Portfolio’s performance and characteristics stack up against those of comparable indices.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, this report may include information about country exposure. Country exposure is based primarily on the country of risk. A company may be allocated to a country based on other factors such as location of the company’s principal office, the location of the principal trading market for the company’s securities, or the country where a majority of the company’s revenues are derived.
Please keep in mind that the opinions expressed in the Management Commentary are just that: opinions. They are a reflection based on best judgment at the time this report was compiled, which was June 30, 2020. As the investing environment changes, so could opinions. These views are unique and are not necessarily shared by fellow employees or by Janus Henderson in general.
Performance Overviews
Performance overview graphs compare the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Portfolio with one or more widely used market indices. When comparing the performance of the Portfolio with an index, keep in mind that market indices are not available for investment and do not reflect deduction of expenses.
Average annual total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with more than one year of performance history. Average annual total return is calculated by taking the growth or decline in value of an investment over a period of time, including reinvestment of dividends and distributions, then calculating the annual compounded percentage rate that would have produced the same result had the rate of growth been constant throughout the period. Average annual total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Cumulative total returns are quoted for a Portfolio with less than one year of performance history. Cumulative total return is the growth or decline in value of an investment over time, independent of the period of time involved. Cumulative total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Portfolio distributions or redemptions of Portfolio shares.
Pursuant to federal securities rules, expense ratios shown in the performance chart reflect subsidized (if applicable) and unsubsidized ratios. The total annual fund operating expenses ratio is gross of any fee waivers, reflecting the Portfolio’s unsubsidized expense ratio. The net annual fund operating expenses ratio (if applicable) includes contractual waivers of Janus Capital and reflects the Portfolio’s subsidized expense ratio. Ratios may be higher or lower than those shown in the “Financial Highlights” in this report.
Schedule of Investments
Following the performance overview section is the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments. This schedule reports the types of securities held in the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period. Securities are usually listed by type (common stock, corporate bonds, U.S. Government obligations, etc.) and by industry classification (banking, communications, insurance, etc.). Holdings are subject to change without notice.
The value of each security is quoted as of the last day of the reporting period. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies is converted into U.S. dollars.
If the Portfolio invests in foreign securities, it will also provide a summary of investments by country. This summary reports the Portfolio exposure to different countries by providing the percentage of securities invested in each country. The country of each security represents the country of risk. The Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments relies upon the industry group and country classifications published by Barclays and/or MSCI Inc.
Tables listing details of individual forward currency contracts, futures, written options, swaptions, and swaps follow the Portfolio’s Schedule of Investments (if applicable).
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
This statement is often referred to as the “balance sheet.” It lists the assets and liabilities of the Portfolio on the last day of the reporting period.
36 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
The Portfolio’s assets are calculated by adding the value of the securities owned, the receivable for securities sold but not yet settled, the receivable for dividends declared but not yet received on securities owned, and the receivable for Portfolio shares sold to investors but not yet settled. The Portfolio’s liabilities include payables for securities purchased but not yet settled, Portfolio shares redeemed but not yet paid, and expenses owed but not yet paid. Additionally, there may be other assets and liabilities such as unrealized gain or loss on forward currency contracts.
The section entitled “Net Assets Consist of” breaks down the components of the Portfolio’s net assets. Because the Portfolio must distribute substantially all earnings, you will notice that a significant portion of net assets is shareholder capital.
The last section of this statement reports the net asset value (“NAV”) per share on the last day of the reporting period. The NAV is calculated by dividing the Portfolio’s net assets for each share class (assets minus liabilities) by the number of shares outstanding.
Statement of Operations
This statement details the Portfolio’s income, expenses, realized gains and losses on securities and currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of Portfolio holdings.
The first section in this statement, entitled “Investment Income,” reports the dividends earned from securities and interest earned from interest-bearing securities in the Portfolio.
The next section reports the expenses incurred by the Portfolio, including the advisory fee paid to the investment adviser, transfer agent fees and expenses, and printing and postage for mailing statements, financial reports and prospectuses. Expense offsets and expense reimbursements, if any, are also shown.
The last section lists the amounts of realized gains or losses from investment and foreign currency transactions, and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Portfolio will realize a gain (or loss) when it sells its position in a particular security. A change in unrealized gain (or loss) refers to the change in net appreciation or depreciation of the Portfolio during the reporting period. “Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments” is affected both by changes in the market value of Portfolio holdings and by gains (or losses) realized during the reporting period.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
These statements report the increase or decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets during the reporting period. Changes in the Portfolio’s net assets are attributable to investment operations, dividends and distributions to investors, and capital share transactions. This is important to investors because it shows exactly what caused the Portfolio’s net asset size to change during the period.
The first section summarizes the information from the Statement of Operations regarding changes in net assets due to the Portfolio’s investment operations. The Portfolio’s net assets may also change as a result of dividend and capital gains distributions to investors. If investors receive their dividends and/or distributions in cash, money is taken out of the Portfolio to pay the dividend and/or distribution. If investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions, the Portfolio’s net assets will not be affected. If you compare the Portfolio’s “Net Decrease from Dividends and Distributions” to “Reinvested Dividends and Distributions,” you will notice that dividends and distributions have little effect on the Portfolio’s net assets. This is because the majority of the Portfolio’s investors reinvest their dividends and/or distributions.
The reinvestment of dividends and distributions is included under “Capital Share Transactions.” “Capital Shares” refers to the money investors contribute to the Portfolio through purchases or withdrawals via redemptions. The Portfolio’s net assets will increase and decrease in value as investors purchase and redeem shares from the Portfolio.
Financial Highlights
This schedule provides a per-share breakdown of the components that affect the Portfolio’s NAV for current and past reporting periods as well as total return, asset size, ratios, and portfolio turnover rate.
The first line in the table reflects the NAV per share at the beginning of the reporting period. The next line reports the net investment income/(loss) per share. Following is the per share total of net gains/(losses), realized and unrealized. Per share dividends and distributions to investors are then subtracted to arrive at the NAV per share at the end of the period. The next line reflects the total return for the period. The total return may include adjustments in accordance with
Janus Aspen Series | 37 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Useful Information About Your Portfolio Report (unaudited)
generally accepted accounting principles required at the period end for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the total return may differ from the total return reflected for individual shareholder transactions. Also included are ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets.
The Portfolio’s expenses may be reduced through expense offsets and expense reimbursements. The ratios shown reflect expenses before and after any such offsets and reimbursements.
The ratio of net investment income/(loss) summarizes the income earned less expenses, divided by the average net assets of the Portfolio during the reporting period. Do not confuse this ratio with the Portfolio’s yield. The net investment income ratio is not a true measure of the Portfolio’s yield because it does not take into account the dividends distributed to the Portfolio’s investors.
The next figure is the portfolio turnover rate, which measures the buying and selling activity in the Portfolio. Portfolio turnover is affected by market conditions, changes in the asset size of the Portfolio, fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, the nature of the Portfolio’s investments, and the investment style and/or outlook of the portfolio manager(s) and/or investment personnel. A 100% rate implies that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio was replaced once during the fiscal year; a 50% rate means that an amount equal to the value of half the portfolio is traded in a year; and a 200% rate means that an amount equal to the value of the entire portfolio is traded every six months.
38 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage1
Janus Aspen Series | 39 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage2
40 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Research Portfolio
Notes
NotesPage3
Janus Aspen Series | 41 |
Knowledge Shared
At Janus Henderson, we believe in the sharing of expert insight for better investment and business decisions. We call this ethos Knowledge Shared.
Learn more by visiting janushenderson.com.
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Portfolio. It is not an offer or solicitation for the Portfolio and is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus. | ||||||||
Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech and Knowledge Shared are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc Janus Henderson Distributors | ||||||||
109-24-81112 08-20 |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT June 30, 2020 | |||||
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (formerly Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology Portfolio) | |||||
Janus Aspen Series | |||||
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the insurance company that offers your variable life insurance contract or variable annuity contract, may determine that it will no longer send you paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, for shareholders who are not insurance contract holders, paper copies of the Portfolio’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary will notify you by mail each time a report is posted and provide you with a website link to access the report. Instructions for requesting paper copies will be provided by your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or financial intermediary. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Portfolio electronically by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker-dealer, or other financial intermediary. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by contacting your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your insurance company or plan sponsor, broker dealer or other financial intermediary.
| |||||
HIGHLIGHTS · Portfolio management perspective · Investment strategy behind your portfolio · Portfolio
performance, characteristics |
Table of Contents
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (unaudited)
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
During the six months ended June 30, 2020, Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology Portfolio’s Institutional Shares and Service Shares returned 17.75% and 17.49%, respectively. By comparison, the Portfolio’s benchmarks, the S&P 500® Index and the MSCI All Country World Information Technology IndexSM, returned -3.08% and 12.21%, respectively.
INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
Global equity markets endured a tumultuous period as economic activity across much of the world contracted as countries dealt with the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, stocks surged on large-scale policy responses. Throughout both the sell-off and recovery, tech stocks outperformed broader equities as many of the sector’s products were relied upon to help consumers and businesses navigate social distancing measures.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
Since we believe technology markets are complex, we construct a Portfolio with special attention to downside risk that seeks to balance resilience and optionality. Resilience positions tend to be larger, established companies with more stable, long duration growth profiles. Positions that exhibit optionality tend to be companies earlier in their growth cycle with potential for higher sustainable growth. We believe our focus on stocks that are less volatile on a risk-adjusted basis than those in the MSCI benchmark and that are well positioned to benefit from the rapid rate of change in technology will provide better performance for our shareholders over the long term.
Perhaps no other company registered an increase in demand for its products more than Amazon. E-commerce went mainstream as households sheltered in place and slow adopters of online shopping became reliant on digital purchases. Similarly, the company’s cloud business proved to be a valuable tool for companies seeking to increase their capabilities as customers and employees adapted to working remotely.
The increased usage of e-commerce also aided Brazil’s MercadoLibre. The company registered a marked increase in transactions on its digital payments platform as well. This payments platform and e-commerce activity are primed to grow in coming years as the penetration of these services in Latin America rises toward the levels registered in the U.S. and China.
Given the large share of the Index that Apple commands, we maintain an underweight in the stock. This can detract from Fund results when the stock outperforms, as was the case this quarter. We have increased our exposure to Apple given our favorable view of the company’s transition to a model geared more to services and wearables.
Another detractor was Alibaba. The company is undergoing a significant investment cycle, but so far, few of its potential new endeavors have convinced shareholders that these investments will result in lucrative new products or markets. On a positive note, Alibaba could be one of the key beneficiaries of a move to Hong Kong listing whereby Chinese investors will have the ability to directly invest in it.
Please see the Derivative Instruments section in the “Notes to Financial Statements” for a discussion of derivatives used by the Portfolio.
OUTLOOK
The technology sector finds itself in a unique position as the global economy continues to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic. The recent broad equities rally indicates that investors believe economic growth is close to finding sound footing. Should that be the case, we’d expect more economically sensitive segments of tech to perform well.
Janus Aspen Series | 1 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (unaudited)
Among these are semiconductors, digital advertising and payments. The latter category is of note, as we’d expect it to behave more like software than semis. But while we believe digital payments are a durable, secular theme, these businesses weren’t constructed to withstand a shutdown of the global economy. While this has resulted in payment stocks lagging, we believe these business models are well positioned to participate in an increasingly digital economy.
Should an economic recovery remain elusive, however, we’d expect other secular growth themes to remain favored investment destinations. Among these are e-commerce, the cloud, the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence.
Thank you for your investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology Portfolio.
2 | JUNE 30, 2020 |
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (unaudited)
Portfolio At A Glance
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 Top Contributors - Holdings | 5 Top Detractors - Holdings | |||||||
|
| Average |