XML 26 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
14.   Commitments and Contingencies
     The Company, as an owner of real estate, is subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws. Compliance by the Company with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Company. However, the Company cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations on its current properties or on properties that it may acquire in the future.
     The Company is party to a housing discrimination lawsuit brought by a non-profit civil rights organization in April 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The suit alleges that the Company designed and built approximately 300 of its properties in violation of the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act and Americans With Disabilities Act. The suit seeks actual and punitive damages, injunctive relief (including modification of non-compliant properties), costs and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes it has a number of viable defenses, including that a majority of the named properties were completed before the operative dates of the statutes in question and/or were not designed or built by the Company. Accordingly, the Company is defending the suit vigorously. Due to the pendency of the Company’s defenses and the uncertainty of many other critical factual and legal issues, it is not possible to determine or predict the outcome of the suit or a possible loss or a range of loss, and no amounts have been accrued at June 30, 2011. While no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that the suit, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
     The Company does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against it that, individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
     The Company has established a reserve and recorded a corresponding reduction to its net gain on sales of discontinued operations related to potential liabilities associated with its condominium conversion activities. The reserve covers potential product liability related to each conversion. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserve and makes adjustments as necessary. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded additional reserves of approximately $0.1 million, paid approximately $0.6 million in settlements and legal fees and released approximately $0.3 million of remaining reserves for settled claims. As a result, the Company had total reserves of approximately $2.5 million at June 30, 2011. While no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these potential liabilities, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
     As of June 30, 2011, the Company has four consolidated projects totaling 747 apartment units in various stages of development with commitments to fund of approximately $133.5 million and estimated completion dates ranging through September 30, 2013, as well as other completed development projects that are in various stages of lease up or are stabilized. The projects under development are being developed solely by the Company, while the completed development projects were either developed solely by the Company or co-developed with various third party development partners. The development venture agreements with partners are primarily deal-specific, with differing terms regarding profit-sharing, equity contributions, returns on investment, buy-sell agreements and other customary provisions. The partner is most often the “general” or “managing” partner of the development venture. The typical buy-sell arrangements contain appraisal rights and provisions that provide the right, but not the obligation, for the Company to acquire the partner’s interest in the project at fair market value upon the expiration of a negotiated time period (typically two to five years after substantial completion of the project).
     As of June 30, 2011, the Company has one unconsolidated project totaling 501 apartment units under development with commitments to fund of approximately $2.4 million and an estimated completion date in the second quarter of 2013. The Company is the managing member of the joint venture, is responsible for constructing the project and has given certain construction cost overrun guarantees. The buy-sell arrangements contain provisions that provide the right, but not the obligation, for the Company to acquire the partner’s interest or sell its interest at any time following the occurrence of certain pre-defined events (including at stabilization) described in the development venture agreement.