XML 28 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Basis Of Presentation And New Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

In June, 2017, the Company changed its classification of prepayments made during the construction of plant assets from prepaid expenses and other assets to other non-current assets on the consolidated condensed balance sheet. The Company reclassified $4,390 from prepaid expenses and other assets to other non-current assets on the December 31, 2016 consolidated condensed balance sheet in order to conform with the current year’s presentation.

Derivatives and Hedging

In August, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” ASU 2017-12 expands the number and type of nonfinancial and interest rate risk components an entity has the ability to designate as the hedged risk in a qualifying hedging relationship. ASU 2017-12 requires entities to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item in which the earnings effect of the hedge item is reported. This approach simplifies the financial statement reporting for qualifying hedging relationships by eliminating the requirement to separately report the portion of the hedge deemed to be ineffective. For cash flow hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Furthermore, income statement effects from fair value and cash flow hedges are to be presented in tabular disclosure.

ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual and any interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption of the amendments in this update are permitted. For cash flow hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative catch-up adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulative other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this update. We are currently in the process of determining the impact the implementation of ASU 2017-12 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Share-Based Payment Awards

In May, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting, in accordance with Topic 718. An entity should account for the effect of a modification unless all of the following are met:

The fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not affect any of the inputs of the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification.

The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.

The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.

ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual and any interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption of the amendments in this update is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 should be applied on a prospective basis and in the initial period of adoption, entities must disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle. The Company has not historically made changes to the terms or conditions of shared-based payment awards and does not expect adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material impact the consolidated financial statements when it is adopted in the first quarter of 2018.

Goodwill Impairment

In January, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04 modified the concept of impairment of goodwill to be a condition that exists when the carrying value of a reporting unit that includes goodwill exceeds its fair value. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Entities no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination.

ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption of the amendments in this update is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-04 must be applied on a prospective basis and in the initial period of adoption, entities must disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle. The Company expects adoption of ASU 2017-04 will reduce the complexity of evaluating goodwill for impairment.

Business Combinations

In January, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. To be considered a business, the integrated set of activities and assets to be evaluated must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the integrated set or activities and assets is not considered a business. ASU 2017-01 provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether an integrated set of activities and assets include both an input and a substantive process when the assets’ fair value is not concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets.

ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 should be applied on or after the effective date. No disclosure is required at adoption. The Company expects the impact from adopting this update to be immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

In October, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” ASU 2016-16 modifies the current prohibition to recognize deferred income taxes from differences between the tax basis of assets in the buyer’s tax jurisdiction and their cost resulting from an intra-entity transfer from one tax-paying component to another tax-paying component of the same consolidated group. Under current GAAP, deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers are not recognized until the asset is sold to an outside party. ASU 2016-16 allows entities to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.

ASU 2016-16 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. For entities that issue interim financial statements and whose current fiscal year end date is December 31, 2016, early adoption was permitted during the three month period ending March 31, 2017. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulate-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We did not early adopt ASU 2016-16 during the three month period ending March 31, 2017. The update will be adopted during the first quarter of 2018 and is expected to increase the Company’s 2018 effective tax rate by approximately 3% to 5%.

Leases

In February, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on their balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. Payments to be made in optional periods should be included in the measurement of lease assets and liabilities if the lessee is reasonably certain it will exercise an option to extend the lease or not exercise an option to terminate the lease. While ASU 2016-02 continues to differentiate between finance or capital leases and operating leases, the principal change from current lease accounting guidance is that lease assets and liabilities arising from operating leases will be recognized on the balance sheet.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements – Continued

ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption of the amendments in this update are permitted. Lessees are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach which includes a number of practical expedients, including the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease. An entity that elects to apply the practical expedients will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all operating leases at each reporting date based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payment that were tracked and disclosed under previous GAAP. We are currently in the process of determining the impact the implementation of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Statement of Cash Flows

In August, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on the classification of eight specific cash receipt and cash payment transactions in the statement of cash flows. The Company is currently evaluating the following transactions to determine the effect ASU 2016-15 will have on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows:

Debt extinguishment payments and debt prepayments are to be shown as cash outflows for financing activities. Presently, Gentherm classifies debt extinguishment payments within operating activities.

Payments made to settle contingent consideration liabilities not made soon after the acquisition date of a business combination should be recognized as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the liability recognized at the acquisition date. Payments, or the portion of a payment, to settle contingent consideration liabilities that exceed the amount of the liability recognized at the acquisition date will be recognized as cash outflows for operating activities.

Cash receipts from the settlement of insurance claims, excluding those related to corporate-owned life insurance policies, shall be classified on the basis of the related insurance coverage. For example, proceeds received to cover claims issued under product recall liability insurance would be classified as cash inflows from operating activities.

Cash receipts from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies shall be classified as cash inflows from investing activities.

The other cash receipt and cash payment transactions addressed by this update are not expected to impact the Company. For public companies, ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company will adopt the amendments in this update during the first quarter of 2018.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2014-09 was developed to enable financial statement users to better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This update’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies are to use a five-step contract review model to ensure revenue is recognized, measured and disclosed in accordance with this principle. The FASB has issued several amendments to the new standard, including a one-year deferral of the original effective date, and new methods for identifying performance obligations intended to reduce the cost and complexity of compliance.

This update permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). We have chosen to use the cumulative catch-up transition method. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is not permitted.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements – Continued

Gentherm is executing a plan to complete the five-step contract review process for all existing contracts with customers, across all business units. While we continue to assess all potential impacts from this update, we currently believe the most significant impact will be to our automotive business unit and relates to our accounting for options that give customers the right to purchase additional goods under long-term supply agreements in the future. Due to the complexity of certain of our automotive supply contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment for customer purchase options will depend on contract-specific terms and could vary from other contracts that are similar in nature. Based on our progress executing the five-step contract review process, we believe the implementation of ASU 2014-09 and any corresponding amendments will have an immaterial impact on the financial results of the Company.