0001193125-13-184848.txt : 20130430 0001193125-13-184848.hdr.sgml : 20130430 20130430094010 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-13-184848 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20130429 ITEM INFORMATION: Results of Operations and Financial Condition ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20130430 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20130430 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: POST PROPERTIES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000903127 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS [6798] IRS NUMBER: 581550675 STATE OF INCORPORATION: GA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12080 FILM NUMBER: 13794769 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4401 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY STREET 2: SUITE 800 CITY: ATLANTA STATE: GA ZIP: 30327 BUSINESS PHONE: 4048465000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4401 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY STREET 2: SUITE 800 CITY: ATLANTA STATE: GA ZIP: 30327 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: POST APARTMENT HOMES LP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001012271 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: OPERATORS OF APARTMENT BUILDINGS [6513] IRS NUMBER: 582053632 STATE OF INCORPORATION: GA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-28226 FILM NUMBER: 13794770 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4401 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY STREET 2: SUITE 800 CITY: ATLANTA STATE: GA ZIP: 30327 BUSINESS PHONE: 404-846-5000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4401 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY STREET 2: SUITE 800 CITY: ATLANTA STATE: GA ZIP: 30327 8-K 1 d529404d8k.htm 8-K 8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 29, 2013

Post Properties, Inc.

Post Apartment Homes, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Georgia

Georgia

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

1-12080

0-28226

(Commission File Number)

58-1550675

58-2053632

(IRS Employer Identification Number)

4401 Northside Parkway, Suite 800, Atlanta, Georgia 30327

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (404) 846-5000

Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

  ¨

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

  ¨

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

  ¨

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

  ¨

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

On April 29, 2013, Post Properties, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. (collectively referred to as the “Registrants”), issued an Earnings Release and Supplemental Financial Data announcing their financial results for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013. The Earnings Release and Supplemental Financial Data contain information about the Registrants’ financial condition and results of operations for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013. A copy of the Earnings Release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. A copy of the Supplemental Financial Data is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

99.1            Earnings Release
99.2            Supplemental Financial Data


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 30, 2013

 

POST PROPERTIES, INC.
By:     /s/ David P. Stockert            
         David P. Stockert
         President and
         Chief Executive Officer


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 30, 2013

 

POST APARTMENT HOMES, L.P.
By:    POST GP HOLDINGS, INC.,
  as General Partner
By:      /s/ David P. Stockert            
           David P. Stockert
           President and
           Chief Executive Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

  Exhibit
  Number    

  

  Description                                         

99.1

     Earnings Release

99.2

     Supplemental Financial Data
EX-99.1 2 d529404dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

 

Contact:

 

Chris Papa

Post Properties, Inc.

(404) 846-5028

   LOGO    
      
      

Post Properties Announces First Quarter 2013 Earnings

Investor/Analyst Conference Call Scheduled for Tuesday, April 30 at 10:00 a.m. ET

ATLANTA, Monday, April 29, 2013 – Post Properties, Inc. (NYSE: PPS) announced today net income available to common shareholders of $19.4 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2013, compared to $20.9 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2012.

The Company’s net income available to common shareholders for the first quarter of 2012 included a gain of $6.1 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, on the sale of an asset.

Funds From Operations

The Company uses the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as an operating measure of the Company’s financial performance. A reconciliation of FFO to GAAP net income is included in the financial data (Table 1) accompanying this press release.

FFO for the first quarter of 2013 was $40.5 million, or $0.74 per diluted share, compared to $34.2 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2012.

Said Dave Stockert, Post’s CEO, “We are pleased to produce growth in core funds from operations for the quarter of more than 15 percent. These results point to the ongoing momentum in apartment market fundamentals, the strength of our capital position and the attractive return potential of our new projects in development.”

Same Store Community Data

Average economic occupancy at the Company’s 51 same store communities, containing 18,341 apartment units, was 95.3% and 95.8% for the first quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Total revenues for the same store communities increased 5.1% and total operating expenses increased 5.1% during the first quarter of 2013, compared to the first quarter of 2012, resulting in a 5.2% increase in same store net operating income (“NOI”). The average monthly rental rate per unit increased 5.3% during the first quarter of 2013, compared to the first quarter of 2012.

On a sequential basis, total revenues for the same store communities increased 0.8% and total operating expenses increased 3.8%, producing a 1.1% decrease in same store NOI for the first quarter of 2013, compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. On a sequential basis, the average monthly rental rate per unit increased 0.5%. For the first quarter of 2013, average economic occupancy at the same store communities was 95.3%, compared to 95.6% for the fourth quarter of 2012.

Same store NOI is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of same store NOI to the comparable GAAP financial measure is included in the financial data (Table 2) accompanying this press release. Information on same store NOI and average rental rate per unit by geographic market is also included in the financial data (Table 3) accompanying this press release.

Development Activity

In the aggregate, the Company has 2,046 units in seven apartment communities, and approximately 45,085 square feet of retail space, under development or in lease-up with a total estimated cost of $335.5 million. The Company currently expects to utilize available cash, available borrowings under its unsecured bank credit facilities, or other indebtedness, as well as net proceeds from its on-going condominium sales and, from time to time, its at-the-market common equity sales program to fund future estimated construction expenditures.

 

-1-


During the first quarter of 2013, the Company substantially completed the development of three of its communities: the second phase of its Post Carlyle Square™ apartment community in Washington D.C., its Post South Lamar™ apartment community in Austin, Texas, and the third phase of its Post Midtown Square® apartment community in Houston, Texas. During the first quarter of 2013, the Company also began leasing the third phase of its Post Lake® at Baldwin Park apartment community in Orlando, Florida and its Post Parkside™ at Wade apartment community in Raleigh, North Carolina. As of April 26, 2013, Post Carlyle Square™ – Phase II, Post South Lamar™, Post Midtown Square®—Phase III, Post Lake® at Baldwin Park – Phase III and Post Parkside™ at Wade were 73.6%, 82.8%, 84.8%, 10.6% and 4.2% leased, respectively.

Financing Activity

Leverage, Line and Term Loan Capacity

Total debt and preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of real estate assets and debt) was 38.1% at March 31, 2013.

As of April 26, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $113.4 million. Additionally, the Company had no outstanding borrowings, and letters of credit totaling $0.6 million under its combined $330 million unsecured lines of credit. The Company has no principal debt maturities in either 2013 or 2014.

Computations of debt ratios and reconciliations of the ratios to the appropriate GAAP measures in the Company’s financial statements are included in the financial data (Table 4) accompanying this press release.

At-the-Market Common Equity Activity

The Company has available an at-the-market (“ATM”) common equity program that provides for the sale of up to 4 million shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2013 and through April 26, 2013, no shares have been issued under that program. The Company expects to use its ATM program, from time to time, as an additional source of capital and liquidity, to maintain the strength of its balance sheet and to fund its future investment activities. Sales under this program are dependent upon a variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of the Company’s common stock, the Company’s liquidity position and the potential use of proceeds.

Condominium Activity

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company closed 20 condominium units at its Austin and Atlanta condominium projects for aggregate gross revenue of $17.5 million. As of April 26, 2013, the Company has, in the aggregate, closed 244 units at the Austin and Atlanta condominium projects and has 12 units under contract. There can be no assurance that condominium units under contract will close.

The Company recognized net gains in FFO of $8.2 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, from condominium sales activities during the first quarter of 2013, compared to $6.9 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, during the first quarter of 2012.

Recent Technology Initiatives

In a move to offer residents a better online experience, the Company recently announced the launch of MyPost™, its first mobile app, for residents. MyPost™ is available in the iTunes App Store and is a way to enhance the resident experience by allowing a resident to pay rent, submit maintenance requests, view service history and more. While the Company deployed the mobile app for iPhones initially, there are plans underway for an Android version.

As part of its ongoing technology and social media initiatives, the Company also recently launched a refreshed website. With its clean look and simpler navigation, www.postproperties.com makes it easier for apartment hunters to search for and compare units across multiple properties within a market or submarket.

2013 Outlook

The Company reaffirms its outlook for FFO per diluted share for the full year 2013 previously included in its February 4, 2013 earnings release. The estimates and assumptions presented in its February 4, 2013 release and its current outlook are forward looking and are based on the Company’s future view of the apartment and condominium markets and of general

 

-2-


economic conditions, as well as other risks outlined below under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.” There can be no assurance that the Company’s actual results will not differ materially from the estimates set forth. The Company assumes no obligation to update this guidance in the future.

Supplemental Financial Data

The Company also produces Supplemental Financial Data that includes detailed information regarding the Company’s operating results, investment activity, financing activity, balance sheet and properties. This Supplemental Financial Data is considered an integral part of this earnings release and is available on the Company’s website. The Company’s Earnings Release and the Supplemental Financial Data are available through the Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly and Other Reports section of the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.

The ability to access the attachments on the Company’s website requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded at http://get.adobe.com/reader/.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms

The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and other defined terms in this press release and in its Supplemental Financial Data available on the Company’s website. The non-GAAP financial measures include FFO, Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”), net operating income, same store capital expenditures, and certain debt statistics and ratios. The definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures are listed below and on page 19 of the Supplemental Financial Data. The Company believes that these measures are helpful to investors in measuring financial performance and/or liquidity and comparing such performance and/or liquidity to other REITs.

Funds from Operations - The Company uses FFO as an operating measure. The Company uses the NAREIT definition of FFO. FFO is defined by NAREIT to mean net income (loss) available to common shareholders determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciable operating property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures all determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. FFO presented in the Company’s press release and Supplemental Financial Data is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies because not all real estate companies use the same definition. The Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the current NAREIT definition.

Accounting for real estate assets using historical cost accounting under GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its April 2002 White Paper on Funds from Operations that “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” As a result, the concept of FFO was created by NAREIT for the REIT industry to provide an alternate measure. Since the Company agrees with the concept of FFO and appreciates the reasons surrounding its creation, the Company believes that FFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that FFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company’s results to those of other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.

Adjusted Funds From Operations - The Company also uses AFFO as an operating measure. AFFO is defined as FFO less operating capital expenditures and after adjusting for the impact of non-cash straight-line, long-term ground lease expense, non-cash impairment charges, debt extinguishment gains (losses) and preferred stock redemption costs. The Company believes that AFFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for an equity REIT because it provides investors with an indication of the REIT’s ability to fund its operating capital expenditures through earnings. In addition, since most equity REITs provide AFFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that AFFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company to other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to AFFO.

Property Net Operating Income (“NOI”) - The Company uses property NOI, including same store NOI and same store NOI by market, as an operating measure. NOI is defined as rental and other revenues from real estate operations less total property

 

-3-


and maintenance expenses from real estate operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). The Company believes that NOI is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT’s operating real estate because it provides a measure of the core operations, rather than factoring in depreciation and amortization, financing costs and general and administrative expenses generally incurred at the corporate level. This measure is particularly useful, in the opinion of the Company, in evaluating the performance of geographic operations, same store groupings and individual properties. Additionally, the Company believes that NOI, as defined, is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate investment community. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI.

Same Store Capital Expenditures - The Company uses same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures as cash flow measures. Same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes that same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are important indicators of the costs incurred by the Company in maintaining its same store communities on an ongoing basis. The corresponding GAAP measures include information with respect to the Company’s other operating segments consisting of communities stabilized in the prior year, lease-up communities, rehabilitation properties, sold properties and commercial properties in addition to same store information. Therefore, the Company believes that the Company’s presentation of same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is necessary to demonstrate same store replacement costs over time. The Company believes that the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is the line on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows entitled “property capital expenditures,” which also includes revenue generating capital expenditures.

Debt Statistics and Debt Ratios - The Company uses a number of debt statistics and ratios as supplemental measures of liquidity. The numerator and/or the denominator of certain of these statistics and/or ratios include non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. These debt statistics and ratios include: (1) interest coverage ratios; (2) fixed charge coverage ratios; (3) total debt as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (4) total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (5) a ratio of consolidated debt to total assets; (6) a ratio of secured debt to total assets; (7) a ratio of total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt; (8) a ratio of consolidated income available for debt service to annual debt service charge; and (9) a debt to annualized income available for debt service ratio. A number of these debt statistics and ratios are derived from covenants found in the Company’s debt agreements, including, among others, the Company’s senior unsecured notes. In addition, the Company presents these measures because the degree of leverage could affect the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. The Company uses these measures internally as an indicator of liquidity, and the Company believes that these measures are also utilized by the investment and analyst communities to better understand the Company’s liquidity.

The Company uses income available for debt service to calculate certain debt ratios and statistics. Income available for debt service is defined as net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, gains on sales of real estate assets, non-cash impairment charges and other non-cash income and expenses. Income available for debt service is a supplemental measure of operating performance that does not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operating activities as determined under GAAP, and the Company’s calculation thereof may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies, including EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA.

Property Operating Statistics - The Company uses average economic occupancy, gross turnover, net turnover and percentage increases in rent for new and renewed leases as statistical measures of property operating performance. The Company defines average economic occupancy as gross potential rent less vacancy losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential rent for the period, expressed as a percentage. Gross turnover is defined as the percentage of leases expiring during the period that are not renewed by the existing residents. Net turnover is defined as gross turnover decreased by the percentage of expiring leases where the residents transfer to a new apartment unit in the same community or in another Post® community. The percentage increases in rent for new and renewed leases are calculated using the respective new or renewed rental rate as of the date of a new lease, as compared with the previous rental rate on that same unit.

Conference Call Information

The Company will hold its quarterly conference call on Tuesday, April 30, at 10:00 a.m. ET. The telephone numbers are 888-427-9376 for US and Canada callers and 719-325-2361 for international callers. The access code is 3400336. The

 

-4-


conference call will be open to the public and can be listened to live on Post’s website at www.postproperties.com. Click Investors in the top menu, then select either Investor’s Overview or Events Calendar. The replay will begin at 1:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, April 30, and will be available until Monday, May 6, at 11:59 p.m. ET. The telephone numbers for the replay are 888-203-1112 for US and Canada callers and 719-457-0820 for international callers. The access code for the replay is 3400336. A replay of the call also will be archived on Post’s website under Investors/Audio Archive.

About Post

Post Properties, founded more than 40 years ago, is a leading developer and operator of upscale multifamily communities. The Company’s mission is delivering superior satisfaction and value to its residents, associates, and investors, with a vision of being the first choice in quality multifamily living. Operating as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), the Company focuses on developing and managing Post® branded high density urban and resort-style garden apartments. Post Properties is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, and has operations in ten markets across the country.

Post Properties has interests in 22,218 apartment units in 60 communities, including 1,471 apartment units in four communities held in unconsolidated entities and 2,046 apartment units in seven communities currently under development or in lease-up. The Company is also selling luxury for-sale condominium homes in two communities through a taxable REIT subsidiary.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this press release and other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements regarding future events and developments and the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. Examples of such statements in this press release include, expectations regarding apartment market conditions, expectations regarding use of proceeds from unsecured bank credit facilities, expectations regarding future operating conditions, including the Company’s current outlook as to expected funds from operations, revenue, operating expenses and net operating income, anticipated development activities (including projected construction expenditures and timing), expectations regarding the for-sale condominium business, and expectations regarding offerings of the Company’s common stock and the use of proceeds thereof. All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements. These statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company’s actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Company’s forward-looking statements: the success of the Company’s business strategies discussed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and in subsequent filings with the SEC; conditions affecting ownership of residential real estate and general conditions in the multi-family residential real estate market; uncertainties associated with the Company’s real estate development and construction; uncertainties associated with the timing and amount of apartment community sales; exposure to economic and other competitive factors due to market concentration; future local and national economic conditions, including changes in job growth, interest rates, the availability of mortgage and other financing and related factors; the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to make required payments associated with its debt financing; the effects of the Company’s leverage on its risk of default and debt service requirements; the impact of a downgrade in the credit rating of the Company’s securities; the effects of a default by the Company or its subsidiaries on an obligation to repay outstanding indebtedness, including cross-defaults and cross-acceleration under other indebtedness; the effects of covenants of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ mortgage indebtedness on operational flexibility and default risks; the Company’s ability to maintain its current dividend level; uncertainties associated with the Company’s condominium for-sale housing business, including the timing and volume of condominium sales; the impact of any additional charges the Company may be required to record in the future related to any impairment in the carrying value of its assets; the impact of competition on the Company’s business, including competition for residents in the Company’s apartment communities and buyers of the Company’s for-sale condominium homes and development locations; the Company’s ability to compete for limited investment opportunities; the effects of any decision by the government to eliminate Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or reduce government support for apartment mortgage loans; the effects of changing interest rates and effectiveness of interest rate hedging contracts; the success of the Company’s acquired apartment communities; the Company’s ability to succeed in new markets; the costs associated with compliance with laws

 

-5-


requiring access to the Company’s properties by persons with disabilities; the impact of the Company’s ongoing litigation with the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act as well as the impact of other litigation; the effects of losses from natural catastrophes in excess of insurance coverage; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; the costs associated with moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation; the Company’s ability to control joint ventures, properties in which it has joint ownership and corporations and limited partnership in which it has partial interests; the Company’s ability to renew leases or relet units as leases expire; the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; the effects of changes in accounting policies and other regulatory matters detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; increased costs arising from health care reform; and any breach of the Company’s privacy or information security systems. Other important risk factors regarding the Company are included under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and may be discussed in subsequent filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors” are specifically incorporated by reference into this press release.

Financial Highlights

(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)

 

     Three months ended  
     March 31,  
     2013      2012  

OPERATING DATA

     

Total revenues

   $ 87,529       $ 80,276   

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 19,420       $ 20,878   

Funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders (Table 1)

   $ 40,537       $ 34,223   

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted

     54,639         53,493   

Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted

     54,782         53,645   

PER COMMON SHARE DATA - DILUTED

     

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 0.35       $ 0.39   

Funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders (Table 1) (1)

   $ 0.74       $ 0.64   

Dividends declared

   $ 0.25       $ 0.22   

 

1)

Funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders per share was computed using weighted average shares and units outstanding, including the impact of dilutive securities totaling 202 and 406 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, diluted weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 111 and 119 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the computation of FFO per share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the income per share computations under GAAP using the “two-class method.”

 

-6-


Table 1

Reconciliation of Net Income Available to Common Shareholders to

Funds From Operations Available to Common Shareholders and Unitholders

(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
 
     2013      2012  

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 19,420       $ 20,878   

Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership

     51         59   

Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets, net

     20,777         19,003   

Depreciation on real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities

     289         338   

Gains on sales of depreciable real estate assets - unconsolidated entities

     -         (6,055
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders

   $ 40,537       $ 34,223   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funds from operations - per share and unit - diluted (1)

   $ 0.74       $ 0.64   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted (1)

     54,893         53,764   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1)

Diluted weighted average shares and units include the impact of dilutive securities totaling 202 and 406 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, diluted weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 111 and 119 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the computation of FFO per share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the income per share computations under GAAP using the “two-class method.”

 

-7-


Table 2

Reconciliation of Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) to GAAP Net Income

(Unaudited; In thousands)

 

     Three months ended  
     March 31,
2013
    March 31,
2012
    December 31,
2012
 

Total same store NOI

   $ 48,008      $ 45,650      $ 48,525   

Property NOI from other operating segments

     1,552        (233     894   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated property NOI

     49,560        45,417        49,419   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Add (subtract):

      

Interest income

     36        51        34   

Other revenues

     214        222        213   

Depreciation

     (21,121     (19,341     (20,973

Interest expense

     (11,142     (11,645     (11,855

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     (624     (661     (669

General and administrative

     (4,245     (4,285     (4,411

Investment and development

     (489     (480     (312

Other investment costs

     (305     (306     (242

Gains on condominium sales activities, net

     8,194        6,904        10,578   

Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities, net

     478        6,446        579   

Other income (expense), net

     (166     (156     590   

Net loss on extinguishment of indebtedness

     -        (301     (4,017
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $     20,390      $     21,865      $ 18,934   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

-8-


Table 3

Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per Unit by Market

(In thousands)

 

     Three months ended      Q1 ‘13
vs. Q1 ‘12
% Change
     Q1 ‘13
vs. Q4 ‘12
% Change
     Q1 ‘13
%  Same
Store NOI
 
     March 31,
2013
     March 31,
2012
     December 31,
2012
          

Rental and other revenues

                 

Atlanta

   $ 20,989       $ 19,970       $ 20,807         5.1%           0.9%        

Dallas

     17,263         16,180         17,083         6.7%           1.1%        

Houston

     3,593         3,245         3,453         10.7%           4.1%        

Austin

     2,884         2,692         2,823         7.1%           2.2%        

Washington, D.C.

     13,040         12,854         13,180         1.4%           (1.1)%        

New York

     3,611         3,602         3,704         0.2%           (2.5)%        

Tampa

     9,015         8,509         8,851         5.9%           1.9%        

Orlando

     2,785         2,662         2,778         4.6%           0.3%        

Charlotte

     5,019         4,663         4,930         7.6%           1.8%        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Total rental and other revenues

     78,199         74,377         77,609         5.1%           0.8%        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

                 

Atlanta

     8,297         7,816         8,280         6.2%           0.2%        

Dallas

     7,174         7,000         6,755         2.5%           6.2%        

Houston

     1,385         1,205         1,341         14.9%           3.3%        

Austin

     1,223         1,203         1,175         1.7%           4.1%        

Washington, D.C.

     4,291         4,024         4,147         6.6%           3.5%        

New York

     1,768         1,686         1,662         4.9%           6.4%        

Tampa

     3,310         3,170         3,169         4.4%           4.4%        

Orlando

     1,104         1,003         967         10.1%           14.2%        

Charlotte

     1,639         1,620         1,588         1.2%           3.2%        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Total

     30,191         28,727         29,084         5.1%           3.8%        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Net operating income

                 

Atlanta

     12,692         12,154         12,527         4.4%           1.3%           26.4%     

Dallas

     10,089         9,180         10,328         9.9%           (2.3)%           21.0%     

Houston

     2,208         2,040         2,112         8.2%           4.5%           4.6%     

Austin

     1,661         1,489         1,648         11.6%           0.8%           3.5%     

Washington, D.C.

     8,749         8,830         9,033         (0.9)%           (3.1)%           18.2%     

New York

     1,843         1,916         2,042         (3.8)%           (9.7)%           3.8%     

Tampa

     5,705         5,339         5,682         6.9%           0.4%           11.9%     

Orlando

     1,681         1,659         1,811         1.3%           (7.2)%           3.5%     

Charlotte

     3,380         3,043         3,342         11.1%           1.1%           7.1%     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

 

 

 

Total same store NOI

   $ 48,008       $ 45,650       $ 48,525         5.2%           (1.1)%           100.0%     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

 

 

 

Average rental rate per unit

                 

Atlanta

   $ 1,236       $ 1,168       $ 1,227         5.8%           0.7%        

Dallas

     1,199         1,139         1,192         5.3%           0.6%        

Houston

     1,381         1,264         1,366         9.3%           1.1%        

Austin

     1,490         1,399         1,475         6.5%           1.0%        

Washington, D.C.

     1,889         1,843         1,889         2.5%           -        

New York

     3,874         3,744         3,856         3.5%           0.5%        

Tampa

     1,371         1,297         1,361         5.7%           0.7%        

Orlando

     1,512         1,424         1,502         6.2%           0.7%        

Charlotte

     1,180         1,105         1,182         6.8%           (0.2)%        

Total average rental rate per unit

     1,393         1,323         1,385         5.3%           0.5%        

 

-9-


Table 4

Computation of Debt Ratios

(In thousands)

 

     As of March 31,  
     2013     2012  

Total real estate assets per balance sheet

   $ 2,203,873      $ 2,083,008   

Plus:

    

Company share of real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities

     58,448        59,748   

Company share of accumulated depreciation - assets held in unconsolidated entities

     11,526        9,896   

Accumulated depreciation per balance sheet

     863,594        785,996   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total undepreciated real estate assets (A)

   $ 3,137,441      $ 2,938,648   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt per balance sheet

   $ 1,101,495      $ 939,263   

Plus:

    

Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities

     49,531        49,531   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (B)

   $ 1,151,026      $ 988,794   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (B÷A)

     36.7     33.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt per balance sheet

   $ 1,101,495      $ 939,263   

Plus:

    

Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities

     49,531        49,531   

Preferred shares at liquidation value

     43,392        43,392   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt and preferred equity (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (C)

   $ 1,194,418      $ 1,032,186   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (C÷A)

     38.1     35.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

-10-

EX-99.2 3 d529404dex992.htm EX-99.2 EX-99.2

Exhibit 99.2

 

1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

First Quarter 2013

Supplemental Financial Data

Table of Contents

 

     Page  

Consolidated Statements of Operations

     3   

Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations

     4   

Consolidated Balance Sheets

     5   

Same Store Results

     7   

Debt Summary

     10   

Summary of Apartment Communities Under Development, Land Held for Future Investment and Acquisition/Disposition Activity

     13   

Summary of Condominium Projects

     14   

Capitalized Costs Summary

     15   

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

     16   

Net Asset Value Supplemental Information

     17   

Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms and Property Tables

     19   

The projections and estimates given in this document and other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements. These statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise. The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company’s actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Company’s forward-looking statements: the success of the Company’s business strategies discussed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and in subsequent filings with the SEC; conditions affecting ownership of residential real estate and general conditions in the multi-family residential real estate market; uncertainties associated with the Company’s real estate development and construction; uncertainties associated with the timing and amount of apartment community sales; exposure to economic and other competitive factors due to market concentration; future local and national economic conditions, including changes in job growth, interest rates, the availability of mortgage and other financing and related factors; the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to make required payments associated with its debt financing; the effects of the Company’s leverage on its risk of default and debt service requirements; the impact of a downgrade in the credit rating of the Company’s securities; the effects of a default by the Company or its subsidiaries on an obligation to repay outstanding indebtedness, including cross-defaults and cross-acceleration under other indebtedness; the effects of covenants of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ mortgage indebtedness on operational flexibility and default risks; the Company’s ability to maintain its current dividend level; uncertainties associated with the Company’s condominium for-sale housing business, including the timing and volume of condominium sales; the impact of any additional charges the Company may be required to record in the future related to any impairment in the carrying value of its assets; the impact of competition on the Company’s business, including competition for residents in the Company’s apartment communities and buyers of the Company’s for-sale condominium homes and development locations; the Company’s ability to compete for limited investment opportunities; the effects of any decision by the government to eliminate Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or reduce government support for apartment mortgage loans; the effects of changing interest rates and effectiveness of interest rate hedging contracts; the success of the Company’s acquired apartment communities; the Company’s ability to succeed in new markets; the costs associated with compliance with laws requiring access to the Company’s properties by persons with disabilities; the impact of the Company’s ongoing litigation with the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act as well as the impact of other litigation; the effects of losses from natural catastrophes in excess of insurance coverage; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; the costs associated with moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation; the Company’s ability to control joint ventures, properties in which it has joint ownership and corporations and limited partnership in which it has partial interests; the Company’s ability to renew leases or relet units as leases expire; the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; and the effects of changes in accounting policies and other regulatory matters detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; increased costs arising from health care reform; any breach of the Company’s privacy or information security systems. Other important risk factors regarding the Company are included under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and may be discussed in subsequent filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors” are specifically incorporated by reference into this document.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   2 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data) - (Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
 
             2013                      2012          

Revenues

     

Rental

     $       82,396           $         75,655     

Other property revenues

     4,919           4,399     

Other

     214           222     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

     87,529           80,276     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses

     

Property operating and maintenance (exclusive of items shown separately below)

     37,755           34,637     

Depreciation

     21,121           19,341     

General and administrative

     4,245           4,285     

Investment and development (1)

     489           480     

Other investment costs (1)

     305           306     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

     63,915           59,049     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operating income

     23,614           21,227     

Interest income

     36           51     

Interest expense

     (11,142)          (11,645)    

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     (624)          (661)    

Net gains on condominium sales activities (2)

     8,194           6,904     

Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities, net (3)

     478           6,446     

Other income (expense), net

     (166)          (156)    

Net loss on extinguishment of indebtedness (4)

     -           (301)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

     20,390           21,865     

Noncontrolling interests - consolidated real estate entities

     3           (6)    

Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership

     (51)          (59)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to the Company

     20,342           21,800     

Dividends to preferred shareholders

     (922)          (922)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

     $        19,420           $        20,878     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Basic (5)

     

Net income available to common shareholders

     $           0.36           $           0.39     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

     54,437           53,087     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Diluted (5)

     

Net income available to common shareholders

     $           0.35           $           0.39     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted

     54,639           53,493     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 6

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   3 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AND ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data) - (Unaudited)

A reconciliation of net income available to common shareholders to funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders, and adjusted funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders is provided below.

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
 
             2013                      2012          

Funds From Operations

             

Net income available to common shareholders

     $         19,420           $ 20,878     

Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership

     51           59     

Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets, net (6)

     20,777           19,003     

Depreciation on real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities

     289           338     

Gains on sales of depreciable real estate assets - unconsolidated entities

     -           (6,055)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders (A)

     $ 40,537           $ 34,223     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders - core operations (B)

     $ 32,343           $ 27,319     

Funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders - condominiums

     8,194           6,904     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders (A)

     $ 40,537           $      34,223     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted Funds From Operations

             

Funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders (A)

     $ 40,537           $ 34,223     

Annually recurring capital expenditures

     (3,474)          (2,941)    

Periodically recurring capital expenditures

     (4,694)          (1,377)    

Non-cash straight-line adjustment for ground lease expenses

     121           128     

Net loss on early extinguishment of indebtedness

     -           301     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders (7) (C)

     $ 32,490           $ 30,334     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders - core operations (7) (D)

     $ 24,296           $ 23,430     

Adjusted funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders - condominiums (7)

     8,194           6,904     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted funds from operations available to common
shareholders and unitholders
(7) (C)

     $ 32,490           $ 30,334     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per Common Share Data - Diluted

             

Funds from operations per share or unit, as defined (A÷E)

     $ 0.74           $ 0.64     

Funds from operations per share or unit - core operations (B÷E)

     $ 0.59           $ 0.51     

Adjusted funds from operations per share or unit, as defined (7) (C÷E)

     $ 0.59           $ 0.56     

Adjusted funds from operations per share or unit - core operations (7) (D÷E)

     $ 0.44           $ 0.44     

Dividends declared

     $ 0.25           $ 0.22     

Weighted average shares outstanding (8)

     54,750           53,612     

Weighted average shares and units outstanding (8) (E)

     54,893           53,764     

See Notes to Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations on page 6

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   4 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

               March 31,           
2013
             December 31,         
2012
 
     (Unaudited)         

Assets

     

Real estate assets

     

Land

     $ 320,411           $ 318,416     

Building and improvements

     2,304,900           2,278,213     

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

     274,615           270,180     

Construction in progress

     93,931           90,075     

Land held for future development

     54,531           54,468     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     3,048,388           3,011,352     

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (863,594)          (842,925)    

For-sale condominiums

     19,079           23,281     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate assets

     2,203,873           2,191,708     

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities

     4,487           4,533     

Cash and cash equivalents

     114,854           118,698     

Restricted cash

     6,252           5,388     

Deferred financing costs, net

     10,366           10,855     

Other assets

     30,745           32,182     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

     $ 2,370,577           $ 2,363,364     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and equity

     

Indebtedness

     $ 1,101,495           $ 1,102,464     

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other

     82,864           88,926     

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities

     16,470           16,297     

Dividends and distributions payable

     13,682           13,653     

Accrued interest payable

     9,479           5,721     

Security deposits and prepaid rents

     10,537           9,524     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,234,527           1,236,585     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Redeemable common units

     6,751           7,159     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

     

Equity

     

Company shareholders’ equity

     

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000 authorized:

     

8 1/2% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Shares, liquidation preference
$50 per share, 868 shares issued and outstanding

     9           9     

Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000 authorized:

     

54,587 and 54,483 shares issued and 54,587 and 54,470 shares outstanding
at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

     546           545     

Additional paid-in-capital

     1,109,383           1,107,354     

Accumulated earnings

     33,471           27,266     

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (10,756)          (11,679)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,132,653           1,123,495     

Less common stock in treasury, at cost, 95 and 107 shares
at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

     (3,200)          (3,781)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Company shareholders’ equity

     1,129,453           1,119,714     

Noncontrolling interests - consolidated property partnerships

     (154)          (94)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total equity

     1,129,299           1,119,620     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

     $ 2,370,577           $ 2,363,364     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 6

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   5 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AND RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AND ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

(In thousands)

 

1)

Investment and development expenses include investment group expenses, development personnel and associated costs not allocable to development projects. Other investment costs primarily includes land carry costs, principally property taxes and assessments.

 

2)

A summary of revenues and costs and expenses of condominium activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

 

                   Three months  ended              
March 31,
 
     2013      2012  

Condominium revenues

     $   17,475           $ 17,581     

Condominium costs and expenses

     (9,281)          (11,289)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net gains on sales of residential condominiums, before income tax

     8,194           6,292     

Income tax benefit

     -           612     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net gains on sales of condominiums

     $ 8,194           $ 6,904     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

3)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 includes the Company’s $6,055 share of the gain on the sale of Post Biltmore™, previously owned by a 35% owned unconsolidated entity.

 

4)

The net loss on early extinguishment of indebtedness of $301 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, represents the write-off of a portion of unamortized deferred loan costs associated with the refinancing of the Company’s line of credit.

 

5)

Post Properties, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is the sole general partner, a limited partner and owns a majority interest in Post Apartment Homes, L.P., the Operating Partnership, through which the Company conducts its operations. As of March 31, 2013, there were 54,730 Operating Partnership units outstanding, of which 54,587, or 99.7%, were owned by the Company.

 

6)

Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets is net of the minority interest portion of depreciation on consolidated entities.

 

7)

Since the Company does not add back the depreciation of non-real estate assets in its calculation of FFO, non-real estate related capital expenditures of $340 and $79 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are excluded from the calculation of adjusted funds from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders.

 

8)

Diluted weighted average shares and units include the impact of dilutive securities totaling 202 and 406 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, basic and diluted weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 111 and 119 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the computation of FFO per share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the income per share computations under GAAP using the “two-class method.”

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   6 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

SAME STORE RESULTS

(In thousands, except per unit data) - (Unaudited)

Same Store Operating Results

The Company defines same store communities as those which have reached stabilization prior to the beginning of the previous calendar year. Same store net operating income is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. See Table 1 on page 21 for a reconciliation of same store net operating income to GAAP net income and Table 4 on page 25 for a year-to-date margin analysis. The operating performance and capital expenditures of the 51 communities containing 18,341 apartment units which were fully stabilized as of January 1, 2012, are summarized in the table below.

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
    

 

 
             2013                      2012                % Change    

Revenues:

        

Rental and other revenue

     $       75,778           $       72,154           5.0%       

Utility reimbursements

     2,421           2,223           8.9%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total rental and other revenues

     $       78,199           $       74,377           5.1%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Property operating and maintenance expenses:

        

Personnel expenses

     6,742           6,902           (2.3)%       

Utility expense

     4,196           3,900           7.6%       

Real estate taxes and fees

     11,895           10,659           11.6%       

Insurance expenses

     1,260           1,136           10.9%       

Building and grounds repairs and maintenance

     3,964           4,038           (1.8)%       

Ground lease expense

     230           234           (1.7)%       

Other expenses

     1,904           1,858           2.5%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total property operating and maintenance expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization)

     30,191           28,727           5.1%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Same store net operating income

     $         48,008           $       45,650           5.2%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Same store net operating income margin

     61.4%          61.4%          -       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Capital expenditures (1)

        

Annually recurring:

        

Carpet

     $ 791           $ 695           13.8%       

Other

     2,573           2,135           20.5%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total annually recurring

     3,364           2,830           18.9%       

Periodically recurring (1)

     4,260           531           702.3%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total capital expenditures (A)

     $ 7,624           $ 3,361           126.8%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total capital expenditures per unit (A ÷ 18,341 units)

     $ 416           $ 183           127.3%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Average monthly rental rate per unit (2)

     $           1,393           $           1,323           5.3%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Gross turnover (3)

     51.2%          49.3%          1.9%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Net turnover (4)

     44.2%          43.2%          1.0%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Percentage rent increase - new leases (5)

     5.0%          5.2%          (0.2)%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Percentage rent increase - renewed leases (5)

     5.2%          7.0%          (1.8)%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

1)

See Table 5 on page 26 for a reconciliation of these segment components of property capital expenditures to total annually recurring capital expenditures and total periodically recurring capital expenditures as presented in the consolidated cash flow statements prepared under GAAP. Periodically recurring capital expenditures includes $179 and $124 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the Company’s “resident design center” program.

2)

Average monthly rental rate is defined as the average of the gross actual rates for occupied units and the anticipated rental rates for unoccupied units divided by total units. See Table 2 on page 22 and Table 3 on page 23 for further information.

3)

Gross turnover represents the percentage of leases expiring during the period that are not renewed by the existing resident(s).

4)

Net turnover is gross turnover decreased by the percentage of expiring leases where the resident(s) transfer to a new apartment unit in the same community or in another Post® community.

5)

Percentage change is calculated using the respective new or renewed rental rate as of the date of a new lease, as compared with the previous rental rate on that same unit. Accordingly, these percentage changes may differ from the change in the average monthly rental rate per unit due to the timing of move-ins and/or the term of the respective leases.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   7 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

SAME STORE RESULTS (CONT)

(In thousands, except per unit data) - (Unaudited)

 

Same Store Operating Results by Market - Comparison of First Quarter 2013 to First Quarter 2012

(Increase (decrease) between periods)

 

     Three months ended
March 31, 2013
 

Market

     Revenues       (1)      Expenses       (1)          NOI         (1)    Average
Economic

   Occupancy  
 

Atlanta

     5.1%               6.2%              4.4%              (0.9)%       

Dallas

     6.7%               2.5%              9.9%              0.7%       

Houston

     10.7%               14.9%              8.2%              1.1%       

Austin

     7.1%               1.7%              11.6%              (0.1)%       

Washington, D.C.

     1.4%               6.6%              (0.9)%              (1.7)%       

New York

     0.2%               4.9%              (3.8)%              (3.4)%       

Tampa

     5.9%               4.4%              6.9%              0.1%       

Orlando

     4.6%               10.1%              1.3%              (1.2)%       

Charlotte

     7.6%               1.2%              11.1%              (0.3)%       
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

     5.1%               5.1%              5.2%              (0.5)%       
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

1)

See Table 2 on page 22 for a reconciliation of these components of same store net operating income and Table 1 on page 21 for a reconciliation of same store net operating income to GAAP net income.

Same Store Occupancy by Market

 

                                          Average Rental    
                   Average Economic             Rate Per Unit  
                   Occupancy (1)      Physical      Three Months  
            % of NOI          Three months ended             Occupancy      Ended  
       Apartment          Three months ended        March 31,          at March 31,          March 31,  

Market

   Units      March 31, 2013      2013      2012      2013 (2)      2013 (3)  

Atlanta

     5,407           26.4%                 95.7%            96.6%            94.7%               $ 1,236     

Dallas

     4,725           21.0%                 95.3%            94.6%            94.2%               1,199     

Houston

     837           4.6%                 97.8%            96.7%            96.3%               1,381     

Austin

     637           3.5%                 95.9%            96.0%            93.9%               1,490     

Washington, D.C.

     2,301           18.2%                 93.1%            94.8%            93.9%               1,889     

New York

     337           3.8%                 92.3%            95.7%            93.8%               3,874     

Tampa

     2,111           11.9%                 97.1%            97.0%            96.4%               1,371     

Orlando

     598           3.5%                 96.4%            97.6%            96.0%               1,512     

Charlotte

     1,388           7.1%                 95.5%            95.8%            96.0%               1,180     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     18,341           100.0%                 95.3%            95.8%            94.9%               $ 1,393     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
1)

Average economic occupancy is defined as gross potential rent less vacancy losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential rent for the period, expressed as a percentage. Gross potential rent is defined as the sum of the gross actual rates for leased units and the anticipated rental rates for unoccupied units. The calculation of average economic occupancy does not include a deduction for net concessions and employee discounts. Average economic occupancy, including these amounts, would have been 94.7% and 95.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, net concessions were $255 and $337, respectively, and employee discounts were $213 and $209, respectively.

2)

Physical occupancy is defined as the number of units occupied divided by total apartment units, expressed as a percentage.

3)

Average monthly rental rate is defined as the average of the gross actual rates for occupied units and the anticipated rental rates for unoccupied units divided by total units. See Table 2 on page 22 and Table 3 on page 23 for further information.

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   8 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

SAME STORE RESULTS (CONT)

(In thousands, except per unit data) - (Unaudited)

 

Sequential Same Store Operating Results - Comparison of First Quarter of 2013 to Fourth Quarter of 2012

 

     Three months ended         
         March 31,    
2013
         December 31,    
2012
         % Change      

Rental and other revenue

     $ 75,778           $ 75,296           0.6%       

Utility reimbursements

     2,421           2,313           4.7%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total rental and other revenues

     $ 78,199           $ 77,609           0.8%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Personnel expenses

     6,742           6,740           -       

Utility expense

     4,196           4,038           3.9%       

Real estate taxes and fees

     11,895           10,866           9.5%       

Insurance expenses

     1,260           1,253           0.6%       

Building and grounds repairs and maintenance

     3,964           4,109           (3.5)%       

Ground lease expense

     230           230           -       

Other expenses

     1,904           1,848           3.0%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total property operating and maintenance expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization)

     30,191           29,084           3.8%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Same store net operating income (1)

     $ 48,008           $ 48,525           (1.1)%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Average economic occupancy

     95.3%           95.6%           (0.3)%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Average monthly rental rate per unit

     $ 1,393           $ 1,385           0.5%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

1)

See Table 2 on page 22 for a reconciliation of these components of same store net operating income and Table 1 on page 21 for a reconciliation of same store net operating income to GAAP net income.

Sequential Same Store Operating Results by Market - Comparison of First Quarter of 2013 to Fourth Quarter of 2012

(Increase (decrease) between periods)

 

                                      Average  
                                      Economic  

Market

        Revenues          (1)         Expenses          (1)                NOI                  (1)         Occupancy       

Atlanta

     0.9%               0.2%               1.3%               (0.5)%       

Dallas

     1.1%               6.2%               (2.3)%               (0.4)%       

Houston

     4.1%               3.3%               4.5%               3.1%       

Austin

     2.2%               4.1%               0.8%               0.4%       

Washington, D.C.

     (1.1)%               3.5%               (3.1)%               (1.5)%       

New York

     (2.5)%               6.4%               (9.7)%               (2.8)%       

Tampa

     1.9%               4.4%               0.4%               1.0%       

Orlando

     0.3%               14.2%               (7.2)%               (0.9)%       

Charlotte

     1.8%               3.2%               1.1%               1.0%       
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

     0.8%               3.8%               (1.1)%               (0.3)%       
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

1)

See Table 2 on page 22 for a reconciliation of these components of same store net operating income and Table 1 on page 21 for a reconciliation of same store net operating income to GAAP net income.

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   9 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

DEBT SUMMARY

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

Summary of Outstanding Debt at March 31, 2013 - Consolidated

 

                     Weighted Average Rate (1)  
        Percentage    March 31,  

Type of Indebtedness

           Balance              of Total Debt                2013                      2012          

Unsecured fixed rate senior notes

       $ 400,000         36.3%      3.9%                5.5%          

Unsecured bank term loan

       300,000         27.2%      3.2%                3.5%          

Secured fixed rate notes

       401,495         36.5%      5.6%                5.6%          

Unsecured revolving lines of credit

       -         0.0%      -                1.6%          
    

 

 

    

 

     
       $     1,101,495         100.0%       4.3%                5.3%          
    

 

 

    

 

     
                Percentage    Weighted Average Maturity  
         Balance      of Total Debt    of Total Debt (2)  

Total fixed rate debt

     $ 1,101,495         100.0%      5.9   

Total variable rate debt - unhedged

       -            0.0%      0.0   
    

 

 

    

 

     

Total debt

     $ 1,101,495         100.0%      5.9   
    

 

 

    

 

     

Debt Maturities – Consolidated and Unconsolidated

 

         Consolidated    Unconsolidated Entities

Aggregate debt maturities by year

           Amount          Weighted Avg. 
Rate on Debt
Maturities (1)
       Amount              Company    
Share
      Weighted Avg. 
Rate on Debt
Maturities (1)

Remainder of 2013

       $ 2,762        5.9%      $ -           $ -         -

2014

       3,961        5.9%      -           -         -

2015

       124,205   (9)    4.9%      -           -         -

2016

       4,419   (3)    5.9%      -           -         -

2017

       154,736        4.8%      85,723           21,431         5.6%

Thereafter

       811,412        4.1%      92,000           28,100         4.5%
    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    
       $     1,101,495        4.3%      $       177,723           $  49,531         5.0%
    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Debt Statistics

 

                 Three months ended             
March 31,
     2013    2012

Interest coverage ratio (4)(5)

   4.0x    3.5x

Interest coverage ratio (including capitalized interest) (4)(5)

   3.7x    3.1x

Fixed charge coverage ratio (4)(6)

   3.7x    3.2x

Fixed charge coverage ratio (including capitalized interest) (4)(6)

   3.4x    2.9x

Total debt to annualized income available for debt service ratio (7)

   6.1x    5.7x

Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt) (8)

     36.7%      33.6%

Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt) (8)

     38.1%      35.1%

 

1)

Weighted average rate includes credit enhancements and other fees, where applicable. The weighted average rates at March 31, 2013 and 2012 are based on the debt outstanding at that date. Weighted average interest rate of the unsecured bank term loan represents the effective fixed interest rate based on outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, after considering the impact of interest rate swap arrangements that hedge this debt.

2)

Weighted average maturity of total debt represents number of years to maturity based on the debt maturities schedule above.

3)

Includes $0 outstanding on unsecured revolving lines of credit maturing in 2016. At March 31, 2013, the Company’s lines of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.225%.

4)

Calculated for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

5)

Interest coverage ratio is defined as net income available for debt service divided by interest expense. The calculation of the interest coverage ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of net income available for debt service to net income and interest expense to consolidated interest expense is included in Table 7 on page 27.

6)

Fixed charge coverage ratio is defined as net income available for debt service divided by interest expense plus dividends to preferred shareholders. The calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of net income available for debt service to net income and fixed charges to consolidated interest expense plus dividends to preferred shareholders is included in Table 7 on page 27.

7)

A computation of this ratio is included in Table 7 on page 27.

8)

A computation of these debt ratios is included in Table 6 on page 26.

9)

Includes a mortgage note payable of $120,000 that matures in February 2015 at which time it will automatically be extended for a one-year term at a variable interest rate.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   10 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

DEBT SUMMARY (CONT)

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

 

Financial Debt Covenants - Senior Unsecured Public Notes

 

     As of

Covenant requirement (1)

       March 31, 2013    

Consolidated Debt to Total Assets cannot exceed 60%

   34%

Secured Debt to Total Assets cannot exceed 40%

   12%

Total Unencumbered Assets to Unsecured Debt must be at least 1.5/1

   3.8x

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service Charge must be at least 1.5/1

   4.0x

 

1)

A summary of the public debt covenant calculations and reconciliations of the financial components used in the public debt covenant calculations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is detailed below.

 

Ratio of Consolidated Debt to Total Assets

        
     As of  
         March 31, 2013      

Consolidated debt, per balance sheet (A)

     $ 1,101,495      
  

 

 

 

Total assets, as defined (B) (Table A)

     $ 3,217,079      
  

 

 

 

Computed ratio (A÷B)

     34%      
  

 

 

 

Required ratio (cannot exceed)

     60%      
  

 

 

 

Ratio of Secured Debt to Total Assets

        

Total secured debt (C)

     $ 401,495      
  

 

 

 

Computed ratio (C÷B)

     12%      
  

 

 

 

Required ratio (cannot exceed)

     40%      
  

 

 

 

Ratio of Total Unencumbered Assets to Unsecured Debt

        

Consolidated debt, per balance sheet (A)

     $ 1,101,495      

Total secured debt (C)

     (401,495)     
  

 

 

 

Total unsecured debt (D)

     $ 700,000      
  

 

 

 

Total unencumbered assets, as defined (E) (Table A)

     $ 2,683,477      
  

 

 

 

Computed ratio (E÷D)

     3.8x      
  

 

 

 

Required minimum ratio

     1.5x      
  

 

 

 

Ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to Annual Debt Service Charge (Annualized)

        

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service, as defined (F) (Table B)

     $ 188,412      
  

 

 

 

Annual Debt Service Charge, as defined (G) (Table B)

     $ 46,984      
  

 

 

 

Computed ratio (F÷G)

     4.0x      
  

 

 

 

Required minimum ratio

     1.5x      
  

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   11 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

DEBT SUMMARY (CONT)

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

 

Table A

Calculation of Total Assets and Total Unencumbered Assets for Public Debt Covenant Computations

 

     As of  
                March 31,            
2013
 

Total real estate assets

     $ 2,203,873     

Add:

  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities

     4,487     

Accumulated depreciation

     863,594     

Other tangible assets

     145,125     
  

 

 

 

Total assets for public debt covenant computations

     3,217,079     

Less:

  

Encumbered real estate assets

     (529,115)    

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities

     (4,487)    
  

 

 

 

Total unencumbered assets for public debt covenant computations

     $ 2,683,477     
  

 

 

 

Table B

Calculation of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service and Annual Debt Service Charge - Annualized (1)

 

     Three months ended  

Consolidated income available for debt service

           March 31, 2013           

Net income

     $ 20,390     

Add:

  

Depreciation

     21,121     

Depreciation and amort. (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     297     

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     624     

Interest expense

     11,142     

Interest expense (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     604     

Income tax expense, net

     166     

Other non-cash (income) expense, net

     953     

Less:

  

Gains on sales of real estate assets, net

     (8,194)    
  

 

 

 

Consolidated income available for debt service

     $ 47,103     
  

 

 

 

Consolidated income available for debt service (annualized)

     $ 188,412     
  

 

 

 

Annual debt service charge

  

Consolidated interest expense

     $ 11,142     

Interest expense (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     604     
  

 

 

 

Debt service charge

     $ 11,746     
  

 

 

 

Debt service charge (annualized)

     $ 46,984     
  

 

 

 

 

1)

The actual calculation of these ratios requires the use of annual trailing financial data. These computations reflect annualized 2013 results for comparison and presentation purposes. The computations using annual trailing financial data also reflect compliance with the debt covenants.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   12 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

SUMMARY OF APARTMENT COMMUNITIES UNDER DEVELOPMENT,

LAND HELD FOR FUTURE INVESTMENT AND ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION ACTIVITY

(In millions, except units, square footage and acreage) - (Unaudited)

Communities Under Development

 

Community

   Location    Number
of Units
     Estimated
Average
Unit Size

Sq. Ft. (1)
     Estimated
Retail

Sq. Ft.  (1)
     Estimated
Total
Cost  (2)
     Estimated
Total

Cost Per
Sq. Ft. (3)
     Costs
Incurred

as of
3/31/2013
     Quarter
of First Units
Available
   Estimated
Quarter of
Stabilized
Occupancy (4)
   Percent
Leased (5)

Substainially complete, in lease-up

                             

Post Carlyle Square™, II

   Wash. DC      344         906         -       $ 85.0         $ 273       $ 83.5         2Q 2012    4Q 2013    73.6%

Post South Lamar™

   Austin, TX      298         852         9,263         41.0           156         39.1         3Q 2012    4Q 2013    82.8%

Post Midtown Square®, III

   Houston, TX      124         889         10,358         21.8           181         20.0         4Q 2012    4Q 2013    84.8%

Under development

                             

Post Lake® at Baldwin Park, III

   Orlando, FL      410         960         -         58.6           149         38.9         1Q 2013    3Q 2014    10.6%

Post Parkside™ at Wade

   Raleigh, NC      397         882         14,908         55.0           151         38.4         1Q 2013    3Q 2014    4.2%

Post Richmond Avenue™

   Houston, TX      242         857         -         34.3           165         15.9         4Q 2013    4Q 2014    N/A

Post Soho Square™

   Tampa, FL      231         880         10,556         39.8           186         11.5         1Q 2014    2Q 2015    N/A
     

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

          

Total

        2,046            45,085         $ 335.5              $ 247.3              
     

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

          

 

1)

Square footage amounts are approximate. Actual square footage may vary.

2)

To the extent that developments contain a retail component, total estimated cost includes estimated first generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

3)

The estimated total cost per square foot is calculated using net rentable residential and retail square feet, where applicable. Square footage amounts used are approximate. Actual amounts may vary.

4)

The Company defines stabilized occupancy as the earlier to occur of (i) the attainment of 95% physical occupancy on the first day of any month or (ii) one year after completion of construction.

5)

Represents unit status as of April 26, 2013.

Land Held for Future Investment

The following are land positions (including pre-development costs incurred to date) that the Company currently holds. There can be no assurance that projects held for future investment will be developed in the future or at all.

 

          Carrying Value         
                  At March 31, 2013                    Estimated Usable        

Project

           Metro Area            (in thousands)      Acreage  

Alexander

     Atlanta, GA      $ 6,652           2.5     

Centennial Park

     Atlanta, GA      18,858           5.6     

Millennium

     Atlanta, GA      2,775           1.0     

Spring Hill

     Atlanta, GA      2,023           9.1     

South Lamar II

     Austin, TX      8,492           3.0     

Frisco Bridges II

     Dallas, TX      5,480           5.4     

Wade

     Raleigh, NC      10,251           26.6     
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Land Held for Future Investment

        $ 54,531           53.2     
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Acquisition/Disposition Activity

 

Property Name

        Location         Quarter
 Acquired / 

Disposed
    Units     Est. Avg.
Unit Size
  Sq. Ft. (1)  
  Retail
  Sq. Ft.  
  Year
 Completed 
  Gross Price
 (thousands) 
    Est. Total
Price Per
  Sq. Ft. (2)  
    Cap
    Rate    
  Company’s
 Ownership 
%

Acquisitions

                   

Post South End™

   Charlotte, NC     Q3 2012   360   847   7,612   2009     $ 74,000          $ 237        5.0%(3)    100%

Dispositions

                   

Post Biltmore™

   Atlanta, GA     Q1 2012   276   766   -   2002     $ 51,075          $ 242        4.8%(4)    35%

 

1)

Square footage amounts are approximate. Actual square footage may vary.

2)

The estimated total price per square foot is calculated using net rentable residential and retail square feet, where applicable. Square footage amounts used are approximate. Actual amounts may vary.

3)

Based on projected first twelve-month net operating income after adjustments for management fee (3.0%) and capital reserves ($300/unit). Also assumes the Company will initially spend approximately $0.5 million relating to closing costs and other amounts it plans to spend to improve the community.

4)

Based on trailing twelve-month net operating income after adjustments for management fee (3%) and capital reserves ($300/unit).

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   13 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

SUMMARY OF CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS

(In thousands, except unit and square foot data) - (Unaudited)

 

     The Ritz-Carlton             Four Seasons         
     Residences,                  Private Residences,              
          Atlanta Buckhead                  Austin         

Project Data

           

Location

     Atlanta, GA              Austin, TX        

Residential square footage

     245,539              292,741        

Average unit square footage (1)

     1,903              1,978        

Quarter of first units available

     3Q10              2Q10        

Units as of 4/26/13 (2)

           

Closed

     106              138        

Under contract

     8              4        

Available for sale (4)

     12              6        
  

 

 

       

 

 

    

Total (4)

     126              148        
  

 

 

       

 

 

    
Quarterly Data               Per Sq. Ft.                     Per Sq. Ft.      

Balance Sheet/Cost Data as of 3/31/13

           

Condominium book value

     $ 6,020              $ 13,059        

Condominium estimated cost to complete

     $ 959              $ 764        

Estimated book value at completion

     $ 6,979           $ 126           $ 13,823           $ 330     

Projected total cost (before impairment losses)

     $ 112,700           $ 459           $ 138,500           $ 473     

Units Closed as of 3/31/13

           

Quarter

     16              4        

Year to date

     16              4        

Project to date

     99              132        

Square Footage of Units Closed as of 3/31/13 (1)

           

Quarter

     29,646              8,837        

Year to date

     29,646              8,837        

Project to date

     190,113              250,902        

Gross Revenue as of 3/31/13

           

Quarter

     $ 11,567           $ 390           $ 5,908           $ 669     

Year to date

     $ 11,567           $ 390           $ 5,908           $ 669     

Project to date

     $ 74,410           $ 391           $ 156,954           $ 626     

Cash flow from sales as of 3/31/13 (3)

           

Quarter

     $ 8,669           $ 292           $ 4,418           $ 500     

Year to date

     $ 8,669           $ 292           $ 4,418           $ 500     

Project to date

     $ 48,726           $ 256           $ 126,758           $ 505     

 

1)

Average square footage information is based on approximate amounts, and individual unit sizes may vary.

2)

Units “under contract” includes all units currently under contract. However, the Company has experienced contract terminations in these and other condominium projects when units become available for delivery and may experience additional terminations in connection with existing projects. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that condominium units under contract will close.

3)

Amounts represent approximate cash flows from condominium activities beginning in the period of initial closings for each community.

4)

The total unit count for the Ritz Carlton Residences, Atlanta Buckhead community was reduced by 3 units due to the combination of certain units into larger residential suites.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   14 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

CAPITALIZED COSTS SUMMARY

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

The Company has a policy of capitalizing those expenditures relating to the acquisition of new assets and the development, construction and rehabilitation of apartment and condominium communities. In addition, the Company capitalizes expenditures that enhance the value of existing assets and expenditures that substantially extend the life of existing assets. All other expenditures necessary to maintain a community in ordinary operating condition are expensed as incurred.

The Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes, and certain internal personnel and associated costs related to apartment and condominium communities under development, construction, and major rehabilitation. The internal personnel and associated costs are capitalized to the projects under development based upon the effort identifiable with such projects. The Company treats each unit in an apartment or condominium community separately for cost accumulation, capitalization and expense recognition purposes. Prior to the commencement of leasing and sales activities, interest and other construction costs are capitalized and are reflected on the balance sheet as construction in progress. The Company ceases the capitalization of such costs as the residential units in a community become substantially complete and available for occupancy. This results in a proration of these costs between amounts that are capitalized and expensed as the residential units in a development community become available for occupancy. In addition, prior to the completion of units, the Company expenses as incurred substantially all operating expenses (including pre-opening marketing and property management and leasing personnel expenses) of such communities.

A summary of community acquisition and development improvements and other capitalized expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is provided below.

 

     Three months ended March 31,  
     2013      2012  

New community development and acquisition activity (1)

     $            33,932           $            31,231     

Periodically recurring capital expenditures

     

Community rehabilitation and other revenue generating
improvements (2)

     918           711     

Other community additions and improvements (3) (6)

     4,694           1,377     

Annually recurring capital expenditures

     

Carpet replacements and other community additions and
improvements (4)

     3,474           2,941     

Corporate additions and improvements

     340           79     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     $ 43,358           $ 36,339     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other Data

     

Capitalized interest

     $ 1,004           $ 1,321     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capitalized development and associated costs (5)

     $ 756           $ 806     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1)

Reflects aggregate community acquisition and development costs, exclusive of the change in construction payables and assumed debt, if any, between years.

2)

Represents expenditures for community rehabilitations and other unit upgrade costs that enhance the rental value of such units.

3)

Represents community improvement expenditures (e.g. property upgrades) that generally occur less frequently than on an annual basis.

4)

Represents community improvement expenditures (e.g. carpets, appliances) of a type that are expected to be incurred on an annual basis.

5)

Reflects internal personnel and associated costs capitalized to construction and development activities.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   15 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE ENTITIES

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

The Company holds investments in limited liability companies (the “Property LLCs”) with institutional investors and accounts for its investments in these Property LLCs using the equity method of accounting. A summary of non-financial and financial information for the Property LLCs is provided below.

 

Non-Financial Data

Joint Venture Property

   Location        Property    
Type
     # of Units          Ownership    
Interest

Post Collier Hills® (1)

   Atlanta, GA    Apartments    396    25%

Post Crest® (1)

   Atlanta, GA    Apartments    410    25%

Post Lindbergh® (1)

   Atlanta, GA    Apartments    396    25%

Post Massachusetts Avenue™

   Washington, D.C.    Apartments    269    35%

 

Financial Data

 
     As of
March 31, 2013
    Three months ended
March 31, 2013
 

Joint Venture Property

   Gross
Investment in

   Real Estate (6)  
     Mortgage
  Notes  Payable  
    Entity
     Equity    
         Company’s    
Equity
Investment
    Entity
NOI
     Company’s
Equity in
 Income (Loss) 
     Mgmt.
  Fees &   
Other
 

Post Collier Hills® (1)

     $ 55,149           $ 39,565     (2)      $ 8,711           $ (4,736)    (1)    $ 674           $ (3)       

Post Crest® (1)

     64,584           46,158     (2)      10,052           (7,097)    (1)      808           5        

Post Lindbergh® (1)

     60,881           41,000     (3)      13,083           (4,637)    (1)      719           (4)       

Post Massachusetts Avenue™

     70,916           51,000     (4)      4,755           4,487          1,880           480        
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     $ 251,530           $ 177,723        $ 36,601           $ (11,983)         $   4,081           $   478           $ 208     (5) 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

1)

The Company’s investment in the 25% owned Property LLC resulted from the transfer of three previously owned apartment communities to the Property LLC co-owned with an institutional investor. The assets, liabilities and members’ equity of the Property LLC were recorded at fair value based on agreed-upon amounts contributed to the venture. The credit investments in the Company’s 25% owned Property LLC resulted from financing proceeds distributed in excess of the Company’s historical cost-basis investment. These credit investments are reflected in consolidated liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

2)

These notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.63% and mature in June 2017.

3)

This note bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.71% and matures in January 2018, at which time it will be automatically extended for a one-year term at a variable interest rate.

4)

This note bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.5% and matures in February 2019. The note is prepayable without penalty beginning in February 2017.

5)

Amounts include net property and asset management fees to the Company included in “Other Revenues” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

6)

Represents GAAP basis net book value plus accumulated depreciation.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   16 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

NET ASSET VALUE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1)

(In thousands, except unit data, commercial square feet and stock price) - (Unaudited)

Financial Data

 

Income Statement Data

       Three months ended    
March 31, 2013
         Adjustments         As
    Adjusted  (3)    
 

Rental revenues

     $ 82,396           $ (2,138)    (2)      $ 80,258     

Other property revenues

     4,919           (45)    (2)      4,874     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total rental and other revenues (A)

     87,315           (2,183)        85,132     

Property operating & maintenance expenses

       

(excluding depreciation and amortization) (B)

     37,755           (5,495)    (2)      32,260     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property net operating income (Table 1) (A-B)

     $ 49,560           $ 3,312         $ 52,872     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assumed property management fee

       

(calculated at 3% of revenues) (A x 3%)

          (2,554)    

Assumed property capital expenditure reserve

       

($300 per unit per year based on 19,051 units)

          (1,429)    
       

 

 

 

Adjusted property net operating income

          $ 48,889     
       

 

 

 

Annualized property net operating income (C)

          $ 195,556     
       

 

 

 

Apartment units represented (D)

     22,218           (3,167)    (2)      19,051     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Asset Data

   As of
March 31, 2013
     Adjustments     As
Adjusted
 

Cash & equivalents

     $ 114,854           $ -          $ 114,854     

Real estate assets under construction, at cost (4)

     93,931           153,406          247,337     

Land held for future investment

     54,531           -          54,531     

For-sale condominiums

     19,079           -          19,079     

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities (5)

     4,487           (4,487)    (5)      -     

Restricted cash and other assets

     36,997           -          36,997     

Cash & other assets of unconsolidated apartment entities (6)

     5,297           (3,809)    (6)      1,488     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total (E)

     $ 329,176           $ 145,110          $ 474,286     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Liability Data

                   

Indebtedness (7)

     $ 1,101,495           $ (10,865)    (7)      $ 1,090,630     

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities (5)

     16,470           (16,470)    (5)      -     

Other liabilities (including noncontrolling interests) (8)

     116,562           (7,895)    (8)      108,667     

Total liabilities of unconsolidated apartment entities (9)

     180,579           (130,269)    (9)      50,310     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total (F)

     $ 1,415,106           $ (165,499)        $ 1,249,607     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Data

     As of March 31, 2013  
     # Shares/Units      Stock Price          Implied Value      

Liquidation value of preferred shares (G)

           $ 43,392     
        

 

 

 

Common shares outstanding

     54,587           

Common units outstanding

     143           
  

 

 

       

Total (H)

     54,730           $ 47.10           $ 2,577,783     
  

 

 

       

 

 

 

Implied market value of Company gross real estate assets (I) = (F+G+H-E)

           $ 3,396,496     
        

 

 

 

Implied Portfolio Capitalization Rate (C÷I)

           5.8%   
        

 

 

 

 

1)

This supplemental financial and other data provides adjustments to certain GAAP financial measures and Net Operating Income (“NOI”), which is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses internally to calculate Net Asset Value (“NAV”). These measures, as adjusted, are also non-GAAP financial measures. With the exception of NOI, the most comparable GAAP measure for each of the non-GAAP measures presented below in the “As Adjusted” column is the corresponding number presented in the first column listed below.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   17 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

The Company presents NOI for the first quarter ended March 31, 2013, for properties stabilized as of January 1, 2013, so that a capitalization rate may be applied and an approximate value for the assets determined. Properties not stabilized as of January 1, 2013, are presented at full undepreciated cost. Other tangible assets, total liabilities and the liquidation value of preferred shares are also presented.

 

2)

The following table summarizes the adjustments made to the components of property net operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2013, to adjust property net operating income to the Company’s share for fully stabilized communities:

 

 

       Rental Revenue            Other Revenue            Expenses              Units      

Communities in lease-up

      $ (2,084)          $ (111)          $ (1,550)          (2,046)    

Company share of unconsolidated entities

     1,820           125           660           (1,077)    

Minority share of consolidated real estate entity

     (528)          (2)          (257)          (44)    

Corporate property management expenses

     -           -           (3,004)          -     

Corporate apartments and other

     (1,346)          (57)          (1,344)          -     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     $ (2,138)          $ (45)          $ (5,495)          (3,167)               
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

3)

The following table summarizes the Company’s share of the “As Adjusted” components of property net operating income, apartment units and commercial square feet by market for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

    Rental and
Other Revenues
     Property Operating &
Maintenace Expenses
(ex. Deprec. and Amort.)
     Property Net
    Operating Income (NOI)    
         Percentage of    
Total NOI
     Apartment Units /
    Commercial Sq. Ft.    
 

Atlanta

    $ 22,014           $ 8,603           $ 13,411           25.4%         5,707     

Dallas

    17,263           7,174           10,089           19.1%         4,725     

Houston

    3,593           1,385           2,208           4.2%         837     

Austin

    2,884           1,223           1,661           3.1%         637     

Washington, D.C.

    13,960           4,524           9,436           17.8%         2,395     

New York

    3,081           1,511           1,570           3.0%         293     

Tampa

    9,015           3,310           5,705           10.8%         2,111     

Orlando

    2,785           1,104           1,681           3.2%         598     

Charlotte

    6,548           2,091           4,457           8.4%         1,748     

Commercial

    3,989           1,335           2,654           5.0%         -     
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

    $ 85,132           $ 32,260           $ 52,872           100.0%         19,051     
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Approximate commercial Sq. Ft.

  

           719,000   
             

 

 

 

 

4)

The “As Adjusted” amount represents the CIP balance per the Company’s balance sheet consisting of the following:

 

    Post Carlyle Square™ - Phase II      $                83,491    
 

Post South Lamar™

     39,112     
 

Post Midtown Square® - Phase III

     20,045     
 

Post Parkside™ at Wade

     38,400     
 

Post Lake® at Baldwin Park - Phase III

     38,860     
 

Post Richmond Avenue™

     15,905     
 

Post Soho Square™

     11,524     
    

 

 

 
       $                 247,337     
    

 

 

 

 

5)

The adjustment reflects a reduction for the investments in unconsolidated entities, as the Company’s respective share of net operating income of such investments is included in the adjusted net operating income reflected above.

6)

The “As of March 31, 2013” amount represents cash and other assets of unconsolidated apartment entities. The adjustment includes a reduction for the venture partners’ respective share of cash and other assets. The “As Adjusted” amount represents the Company’s respective share of the cash and other assets of unconsolidated apartment entities.

7)

The adjustment reflects a reduction for the minority interest portion of the consolidated mortgage debt of a consolidated joint venture community. Likewise, only the Company’s majority share of that community is included in the adjusted net operating income reflected above.

8)

The “As of March 31, 2013” amount consists of the sum of accrued interest payable, dividends and distributions payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and security deposits and prepaid rents as reflected on the Company’s balance sheet. The adjustment represents a reduction for the non-cash liability associated with straight-line, long-term ground lease expense of $7,946, offset by the addition of noncontrolling interests of consolidated real estate entities of $205.

9)

The “As of March 31, 2013” amount represents total liabilities of unconsolidated apartment entities. The adjustment represents a reduction for the venture partners’ respective share of liabilities. The “As Adjusted” amount represents the Company’s respective share of liabilities of unconsolidated apartment entities.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   18 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER DEFINED TERMS

Definitions of Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms

The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and other defined terms in this Supplemental Financial Data. These non-GAAP financial measures include FFO, AFFO, net operating income, same store capital expenditures and certain debt statistics and ratios. The definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures are summarized below. The Company believes that these measures are helpful to investors in measuring financial performance and/or liquidity and comparing such performance and/or liquidity to other REITs.

Funds from Operations - The Company uses FFO as an operating measure. The Company uses the NAREIT definition of FFO. FFO is defined by NAREIT to mean net income (loss) available to common shareholders determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciable operating property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures all determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. FFO presented in the Company’s press release and Supplemental Financial Data is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies because not all real estate companies use the same definition. The Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the current NAREIT definition.

Accounting for real estate assets using historical cost accounting under GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its April 2002 White Paper on Funds from Operations that “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” As a result, the concept of FFO was created by NAREIT for the REIT industry to provide an alternate measure. Since the Company agrees with the concept of FFO and appreciates the reasons surrounding its creation, the Company believes that FFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that FFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company’s results to those of other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.

Adjusted Funds From Operations - The Company also uses adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”) as an operating measure. AFFO is defined as FFO less operating capital expenditures after adjusting for the impact of non-cash straight-line long-term ground lease expense, non-cash impairment charges, debt extinguishment gains (losses) and preferred stock redemption costs. The Company believes that AFFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for an equity REIT because it provides investors with an indication of the REIT’s ability to fund operating capital expenditures through earnings. In addition, since most equity REITs provide AFFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that AFFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company to other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to AFFO.

Property Net Operating Income - The Company uses property NOI, including same store NOI and same store NOI by market, as an operating measure. NOI is defined as rental and other revenues from real estate operations less total property and maintenance expenses from real estate operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). The Company believes that NOI is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT’s operating real estate because it provides a measure of the core operations, rather than factoring in depreciation and amortization, financing costs and general and administrative expenses generally incurred at the corporate level. This measure is particularly useful, in the opinion of the Company, in evaluating the performance of geographic operations, same store groupings and individual properties. Additionally, the Company believes that NOI, as defined, is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate investment community. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   19 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Same Store Capital Expenditures - The Company uses same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures as cash flow measures. Same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes that same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are important indicators of the costs incurred by the Company in maintaining its same store communities on an ongoing basis. The corresponding GAAP measures include information with respect to the Company’s other operating segments consisting of communities stabilized in the prior year, lease-up communities, rehabilitation communities, sold properties and commercial properties in addition to same store information. Therefore, the Company believes that the Company’s presentation of same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is necessary to demonstrate same store replacement costs over time. The Company believes that the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is the line on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows entitled “property capital expenditures,” which also includes revenue generating capital expenditures.

Debt Statistics and Debt Ratios - The Company uses a number of debt statistics and ratios as supplemental measures of liquidity. The numerator and/or the denominator of certain of these statistics and/or ratios include non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. These debt statistics and ratios include: (1) interest coverage ratios; (2) fixed charge coverage ratios; (3) total debt as a percentage of undepreciated real estate (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (4) total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real estate (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (5) a ratio of consolidated debt to total assets; (6) a ratio of secured debt to total assets; (7) a ratio of total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt; (8) a ratio of consolidated income available for debt service to annual debt service charge; and (9) a debt to annualized income available for debt service ratio. A number of these debt statistics and ratios are derived from covenants found in the Company’s debt agreements, including, among others, the Company’s senior unsecured notes. In addition, the Company presents these measures because the degree of leverage could affect the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. The Company uses these measures internally as an indicator of liquidity, and the Company believes that these measures are also utilized by the investment and analyst communities to better understand the Company’s liquidity.

The Company uses income available for debt service to calculate certain debt ratios and statistics. Income available for debt service is defined as net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, gains on sales of real estate assets, non-cash impairment charges and other non-cash income and expenses. Income available for debt service is a supplemental measure of operating performance that does not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operating activities as determined under GAAP, and the Company’s calculation thereof may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies, including EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA.

Property Operating Statistics - The Company uses average economic occupancy, gross turnover, net turnover and percentage increases in rent for new and renewed leases as statistical measures of property operating performance. The Company defines average economic occupancy as gross potential rent less vacancy losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential rent for the period, expressed as a percentage. Gross turnover is defined as the percentage of leases expiring during the period that are not renewed by the existing residents. Net turnover is defined as gross turnover decreased by the percentage of expiring leases where the residents transfer to a new apartment unit in the same community or in another Post® community. The percentage increases in rent for new and renewed leases are calculated using the respective new or renewed rental rate as of the date of a new lease, as compared with the previous rental rate on that same unit.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   20 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

RECONCILIATIONS OF SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Table 1 - Reconciliation of Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) to GAAP Net Income

(In thousands) - (Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended  
           March 31,      
2013
           March 31,      
2012
         December 31,    
2012
 

Total same store NOI

     $ 48,008          $ 45,650          $ 48,525    

Property NOI from other operating segments

     1,552          (233)         894    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated property NOI

     49,560          45,417          49,419    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Add (subtract):

        

Interest income

     36          51          34    

Other revenues

     214          222          213    

Depreciation

     (21,121)         (19,341)         (20,973)   

Interest expense

     (11,142)         (11,645)         (11,855)   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     (624)         (661)         (669)   

General and administrative

     (4,245)         (4,285)         (4,411)   

Investment and development

     (489)         (480)         (312)   

Other investment costs

     (305)         (306)         (242)   

Gains on condominium sales activities, net

     8,194          6,904          10,578    

Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities, net

     478          6,446          579    

Other income (expense), net

     (166)         (156)         590    

Net loss on extinguishment of indebtedness

             (301)         (4,017)   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

     $ 20,390          $ 21,865          $ 18,934    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   21 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 2 - Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per Unit by Market

(In thousands, except average rental rates)

 

     Three months ended      Q1 ‘13
vs. Q1 ‘12
  % Change  
     Q1 ‘13
vs. Q4 ‘12
  % Change  
     Q1 ‘13
%  Same
  Store NOI  
 
             March 31,         
2013
             March 31,         
2012
           December 31,      
2012
          

Rental and other revenues

                 

Atlanta

     $ 20,989          $ 19,970          $ 20,807          5.1%             0.9%          

Dallas

     17,263          16,180          17,083          6.7%             1.1%          

Houston

     3,593          3,245          3,453          10.7%             4.1%          

Austin

     2,884          2,692          2,823          7.1%             2.2%          

Washington, D.C.

     13,040          12,854          13,180          1.4%             (1.1)%          

New York

     3,611          3,602          3,704          0.2%             (2.5)%          

Tampa

     9,015          8,509          8,851          5.9%             1.9%          

Orlando

     2,785          2,662          2,778          4.6%             0.3%          

Charlotte

     5,019          4,663          4,930          7.6%             1.8%          
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Total rental and other revenues

     78,199          74,377          77,609          5.1%             0.8%          
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Property operating and maintenance

  expenses (exclusive of depreciation

  and amortization)

                 

Atlanta

     8,297          7,816          8,280          6.2%             0.2%          

Dallas

     7,174          7,000          6,755          2.5%             6.2%          

Houston

     1,385          1,205          1,341          14.9%             3.3%          

Austin

     1,223          1,203          1,175          1.7%             4.1%          

Washington, D.C.

     4,291          4,024          4,147          6.6%             3.5%          

New York

     1,768          1,686          1,662          4.9%             6.4%          

Tampa

     3,310          3,170          3,169          4.4%             4.4%          

Orlando

     1,104          1,003          967          10.1%             14.2%          

Charlotte

     1,639          1,620          1,588          1.2%             3.2%          
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Total

     30,191          28,727          29,084          5.1%             3.8%          
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

Net operating income

                 

Atlanta

     12,692          12,154          12,527          4.4%             1.3%             26.4%       

Dallas

     10,089          9,180          10,328          9.9%             (2.3)%             21.0%       

Houston

     2,208          2,040          2,112          8.2%             4.5%             4.6%       

Austin

     1,661          1,489          1,648          11.6%             0.8%             3.5%       

Washington, D.C.

     8,749          8,830          9,033          (0.9)%             (3.1)%             18.2%       

New York

     1,843          1,916          2,042          (3.8)%             (9.7)%             3.8%       

Tampa

     5,705          5,339          5,682          6.9%             0.4%             11.9%       

Orlando

     1,681          1,659          1,811          1.3%             (7.2)%             3.5%       

Charlotte

     3,380          3,043          3,342          11.1%             1.1%             7.1%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

 

 

 

Total same store NOI

     $ 48,008          $ 45,650          $ 48,525          5.2%             (1.1)%             100.0%       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

          

 

 

 

Average rental rate per unit

                 

Atlanta

     $ 1,236          $ 1,168          $ 1,227          5.8%             0.7%          

Dallas

     1,199          1,139          1,192          5.3%             0.6%          

Houston

     1,381          1,264          1,366          9.3%             1.1%          

Austin

     1,490          1,399          1,475          6.5%             1.0%          

Washington, D.C.

     1,889          1,843          1,889          2.5%             -          

New York

     3,874          3,744          3,856          3.5%             0.5%          

Tampa

     1,371          1,297          1,361          5.7%             0.7%          

Orlando

     1,512          1,424          1,502          6.2%             0.7%          

Charlotte

     1,180          1,105          1,182          6.8%             (0.2)%          

Total average rental rate per unit

     1,393          1,323          1,385          5.3%             0.5%          

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   22 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 3 - Operating Community Table

 

Market /

Submarket /

Community

   Year
Completed/
Year of
Substantial
          Renovations          
   No. of
          Units          
     Avg.
Unit Size
    (Sq. Ft.)    
     Q1 2013
Avg. Monthly Rent
     Q1 2013
Average
Economic
    Occ.    
 
            Per
    Unit    
     Per
    Sq. Ft.    
    

 Atlanta

                 

 Buckhead / Brookhaven

                 

 Post Alexander™

   2008      307         1,015       $ 1,653       $ 1.63         95.3

 Post Brookhaven®

   1990-1992      735         933         1,065         1.14         97.1

 Post Chastain®

   1990/2008      558         866         1,191         1.38         95.9

 Post Collier Hills® (1)(2)

   1997      396         948         1,063         1.12         98.0

 Post Gardens®

   1998      397         1,039         1,238         1.19         96.4

 Post Glen® (2)

   1997      314         1,076         1,250         1.16         96.4

 Post Lindbergh® (1)(2)

   1998      396         909         1,120         1.23         96.4

 Post Peachtree Hills®

   1992-1994/2009      300         978         1,332         1.36         96.3

 Post StratfordTM

   2000      250         1,000         1,303         1.30         94.4

 Dunwoody

                 

 Post Crossing® (2)

   1995      354         1,036         1,135         1.10         96.1

 Emory Area

                 

 Post BriarcliffTM (2)

   1999      688         1,006         1,204         1.20         95.9

 Midtown

                 

 Post ParksideTM

   2000      188         886         1,460         1.65         97.4

 Post Renaissance®

   1992-1994      342         914         1,073         1.17         96.8

 Northwest Atlanta

                 

 Post Crest® (1)(2)

   1996      410         1,033         1,053         1.02         97.7

 Post Riverside®

   1998      522         1,059         1,499         1.42         93.0

 Post SpringTM

   2000      452         977         1,033         1.06         94.7

 Dallas

                 

 North Dallas

                 

 Post Addison CircleTM (2)

   1998-2000      1,334         846         1,068         1.26         95.5

 Post EastsideTM

   2008      435         912         1,155         1.27         94.8

 Post Legacy

   2000      384         810         1,032         1.27         93.8

 Post Sierra at Frisco Bridges™

   2009      268         896         1,114         1.24         92.2

 Uptown Dallas

                 

 Post AbbeyTM

   1996      34         1,223         1,941         1.59         97.1

 Post Cole’s CornerTM

   1998      186         800         1,173         1.47         95.8

 Post GalleryTM

   1999      34         2,307         2,847         1.23         97.3

 Post HeightsTM

   1998-1999/2009      368         845         1,331         1.58         95.2

 Post Katy Trail™

   2010      227         898         1,619         1.80         95.9

 Post MeridianTM

   1991      133         780         1,322         1.69         94.9

 Post SquareTM

   1996      216         856         1,294         1.51         96.4

 Post Uptown VillageTM

   1995-2000      496         736         1,107         1.50         96.5

 Post VineyardTM

   1996      116         733         1,150         1.57         93.9

 Post VintageTM

   1993      160         750         1,192         1.59         98.4

 Post WorthingtonTM

   1993/2008      334         820         1,431         1.75         94.6

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   23 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 3 (con’t) - Operating Community Table

 

Market /

Submarket /

Community

   Year
Completed/
Year of
Substantial
          Renovations          
   No. of
          Units           
     Avg.
Unit Size
    (Sq. Ft.)    
     Q1 2013
Avg. Monthly Rent
     Q1 2013
Average

Economic
    Occ.    
 
            Per
    Unit    
     Per
    Sq. Ft.    
    

 Houston

                 

 Post Midtown Square® - Phases I & II

   1999-2000      529         759         1,306         1.72         98.2

 Post Midtown Square® - Phase III (4)

   2012      124         889         1,716         1.93         45.6

 Post Rice LoftsTM

   1998      308         904         1,510         1.67         97.2

 Austin

                 

 Post Barton Creek™

   1998      160         1,162       $ 1,694       $ 1.46         98.7

 Post Park Mesa™

   1992      148         1,091         1,416         1.30         95.6

 Post South Lamar™ (4)

   2012      298         892         1,615         1.81         37.5

 Post West Austin™

   2009      329         889         1,425         1.60         94.4

 Washington D.C.

                 

 Maryland

                 

 Post Fallsgrove

   2003      361         983         1,738         1.77         94.2

 Post Park®

   2010      396         975         1,614         1.66         96.3

 Virginia

                 

 Post Carlyle Square™ - Phase I

   2006      205         861         2,415         2.80         92.2

 Post Carlyle Square™ - Phase II (4)

   2012      344         906         2,564         2.83         49.2

 Post Corners at Trinity Centre (2)

   1996      336         994         1,600         1.61         96.9

 Post Pentagon Row TM

   2001      504         853         2,338         2.74         90.3

 Post Tysons Corner TM

   1990      499         807         1,743         2.16         92.2

 Washington D.C.

                 

 Post Massachusetts Avenue TM (1)(2)

   2002      269         883         3,139         3.55         94.9

 New York City

                 

 Post Luminaria TM (2)(3)

   2002      138         721         3,836         5.32         93.5

 Post Toscana TM (2)

   2003      199         817         3,900         4.77         91.4

 Tampa

                 

 Post Bay at Rocky Point™

   1997      150         1,012         1,410         1.39         96.1

 Post Harbour PlaceTM

   1999-2002      578         920         1,485         1.61         98.6

 Post Hyde Park® (2)

   1996-2008      467         1,011         1,448         1.43         98.3

 Post Rocky Point®

   1996-1998      916         1,031         1,253         1.22         95.4

 Orlando

                 

 Post Lake® at Baldwin Park

   2004-2007      350         1,013         1,537         1.52         96.4

 Post ParksideTM

   1999      248         867         1,476         1.70         96.2

 Charlotte

                 

 Post Ballantyne

   2004      323         1,252         1,145         0.91         95.9

 Post Gateway PlaceTM

   2000      436         804         1,087         1.35         94.3

 Post Park at Phillips Place®

   1998      402         1,101         1,337         1.21         95.8

 Post South End™

   2009      360         847         1,338         1.58         97.5

 Post Uptown PlaceTM

   2000      227         800         1,132         1.42         96.4

 

1)

Communities held in unconsolidated entities.

2)

Communities encumbered by secured mortgage indebtedness.

3)

The Company owns a 68% interest in this community.

4)

These communities, or portions thereof, are currently in lease-up.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   24 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 4 - Year-to-Date Margin Analysis

(In thousands)

 

     Three months ended March 31, 2013  
     Rental and

 

Other Property

 

Revenues

     Property

 

Operating &

 

    Maintenance    

 

Expenses

     Net

 

    Operating    

 

Income

 

(“NOI”)

     NOI

 

    Margin    

       Expense    

 

Margin

 

Same store communities

     $ 78,199           $ 30,191           $ 48,008         61.4%          38.6%       

Development and lease-up communities

     2,195           1,550           645         N/A          N/A       

Acquired communities

     1,529           452           1,077         70.4%          29.6%       

Other property segments:

              

Corporate apartments

     1,403           1,223           180         12.8%          87.2%       

Commercial

     3,989           1,335           2,654         66.5%          33.5%       

Corporate property management expenses (1)

     —           3,004           (3,004)           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       
     $ 87,315           $ 37,755              
  

 

 

    

 

 

          

Consolidated property NOI (2)

           $ 49,560           
        

 

 

       

Third-party management fees

           $ 208           
        

 

 

       

 

1)

The following table summarizes the Company’s net property management expense as a percentage of adjusted property revenues:

 

    Numerator:       
 

Corporate property management expenses

     $ 3,004     
 

Less: Third-party management fees

     (208)     
    

 

 

 
 

Net property management expenses

     $ 2,796     
    

 

 

 
 

 

Denominator:

  
 

Total rental and other property revenues

     $ 87,315     
 

   Less: Corporate apartment revenues

     (1,403)     
    

 

 

 
 

Adjusted property revenues

     $             85,912     
    

 

 

 
 

Net property management expenses as a

    percentage of adjusted property revenues

     3.3%    
    

 

 

 

 

2)

Consolidated property NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Table 1 on page 21 for a reconciliation of consolidated property NOI to GAAP net income.

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   25 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 5 - Reconciliation of Segment Cash Flow Data to Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

     Three months ended
March 31,
 
     2013      2012  

Annually recurring capital expenditures by operating segment

     

Same store communities

     $     3,364           $   2,830     

Development and lease-up

     18           -     

Acquired communities

     43           -     

Commercial and other segments

     49           111     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total annually recurring capital expenditures

     $ 3,474           $ 2,941     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Periodically recurring capital expenditures by operating segment

     

Same store communities

     $ 4,260           $ 531     

Development and lease-up

     2           -     

Acquired communities

     171           -     

Commercial and other segments

     261           846     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total periodically recurring capital expenditures

     $ 4,694           $ 1,377     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenue generating capital expenditures

     $ 918           $ 711     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Increase in capital expenditure accruals

     $ (1,285)          $ -     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total property capital expenditures per statements of cash flows

     $ 7,801           $ 5,029     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 6 - Computation of Debt Ratios

(In thousands)

 

     As of March 31,  
     2013      2012  

Total real estate assets per balance sheet

     $ 2,203,873           $   2,083,008     

Plus:

     

Company share of real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities

     58,448           59,748     

Company share of accumulated depreciation - assets held in unconsolidated entities

     11,526           9,896     

Accumulated depreciation per balance sheet

     863,594           785,996     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total undepreciated real estate assets (A)

     $ 3,137,441           $ 2,938,648     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt per balance sheet

     $ 1,101,495           $ 939,263     

Plus:

     

Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities

     49,531           49,531     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (B)

     $   1,151,026           $ 988,794     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (B÷A)

     36.7%          33.6%    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt per balance sheet

     $ 1,101,495           $ 939,263     

Plus:

     

Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities

     49,531           49,531     

Preferred shares at liquidation value

     43,392           43,392     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt and preferred equity (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (C)

     $ 1,194,418           $ 1,032,186     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (C÷A)

     38.1%          35.1%    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   26 | P a g e  


1st Quarter 2013   LOGO

 

LOGO

 

Table 7 - Computation of Coverage Ratios

(In thousands)

 

     Three months ended
March 31,
 
     2013      2012  

Net income

     $ 20,390            $ 21,865      

Other non-cash (income) expense, net

     953            1,067      

Income tax expense, net

     166            145      

Gains on sales of real estate assets, net

     (8,194)           (6,904)     

Gain on sale of real estate assets - unconsolidated entity, net

     -            (6,055)     

Net loss on early extinguishment of indebtedness

     -            301      

Depreciation expense

     21,121            19,341      

Depreciation and amort. (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     297            338      

Interest expense

     11,142            11,645      

Interest expense (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     604            747      

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     624            661      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income available for debt service (A)

     $ 47,103            $ 43,151      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Annualized income available for debt service (B)

     $ 188,412            $   172,604      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest expense

     $ 11,142            $ 11,645      

Interest expense (company share) of assets held in unconsolidated entities

     604            747      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted interest expense (C)

     11,746            12,392      

Capitalized interest

     1,004            1,321      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted interest expense (including capitalized interest) (D)

     $ 12,750            $ 13,713      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted interest expense

     $ 11,746            $ 12,392      

Dividends to preferred shareholders

     922            922      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fixed charges (E)

     12,668            13,314      

Capitalized interest

     1,004            1,321      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fixed charges (including capitalized interest) (F)

     $ 13,672            $ 14,635      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) (see Table 6) (G)

     $     1,151,026            $ 988,794      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest coverage ratio (A÷C)

     4.0x          3.5x    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest coverage ratio (including capitalized interest) (A÷D)

     3.7x          3.1x    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fixed charge coverage ratio (A÷E)

     3.7x          3.2x    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fixed charge coverage ratio (including capitalized interest) (A÷F)

     3.4x          2.9x    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt to annualized income available for debt service ratio (G÷B)

     6.1x          5.7x    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 8 - Calculation of Company Undepreciated Book Value Per Share

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

           March 31, 2013        

Total Company shareholders’ equity per balance sheet

     $ 1,129,453      

Plus:

  

Accumulated depreciation, per balance sheet

     863,594      

Noncontrolling interest of common unitholders in Operating Partnership, per balance sheet

     6,751      

Less:

  

Deferred financing costs, net, per balance sheet

     (10,366)     

Preferred shares at liquidation value

     (43,392)     
  

 

 

 

Total undepreciated book value (A)

     $ 1,946,040      
  

 

 

 

Total common shares and units (B)

     54,730      
  

 

 

 

Company undepreciated book value per share (A÷B)

     $ 35.56      
  

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Supplemental Financial Data

   27 | P a g e  
GRAPHIC 4 g529404bottomline.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g529404bottomline.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````9```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$" M`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#_\``$0@``@+&`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`&H``0`#```````````` M```````$!@>^GOX)8Z9?_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 5 g529404ex99_1p1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g529404ex99_1p1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````9```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$" M`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#_\``$0@`;0"'`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`,@```("`@,!`0$````` M```````)"`H'"P,%!@0!`@$``@,``@,!``````````````,!`@0%!P8("0H0 M```&`0$&!`,%!00$#P````$"`P0%!@<(`!$2$Q4)%!87"B$Q&"(C)"4905$R M)CEA,[9W@<%2-9&Q\9*R0]25M396=B!$``0,"`P0'`@D*`PD``````0`" M`Q$$(1(%,4$&!U%A@2(R$S-QT9%28I+2(Q06"/"AP4)R4R1D%1>Q@G3Q8S1$ MA)0F1E;_V@`,`P$``A$#$0`_`+_&PA&PA&PA&PA&PA&PA&PA13U#ZM\>:?P- M".$7-XR0K!+V5#'T!(P<4I"UA!46REYR3<++(15.Q/CE%[N1--3KMJBX6WH, MR.W(`@,XEV5@)]P8UHZ27?[5AG'$UK+U'P/G=O ME/'^GBG/SE6K<=4<,35_FYB,<%YJ#YO=,ORM3)+,Q2.7ENR4MBU=`/&@95(2 MJ&A['MVG'>!CV)&E:M::O`;NS9*;0GN/D:8P]NYS&NH[*>EP%=H!!JN_M-/U MJ8P@W]LKNI2&S(:+)SG%-NVFJ'<.'S<-_.,S%L9;AAG(MKCR\+^GUB]K1E>EZIDUN=,YE:9;8FOV=, MO]RU=%*90+N#F'*\4Z]R1I>J:;K=H+_2)XY[:M#E-',<-K'L(#V/&]K@"-X" MGIM"WHV$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$(V$+`6I3,KG".+WEB@HMG8<@6 M29AQ2CG(NG#`.16J45,V!KRU]6 MVJ=%H5Q,:B,E,1`[5[4Z#%F30H55.)HNK1;EF5%+GI*'/R$C/L<08WUGBI/^ M(ZNCIX%T:X\NT@)[D]R!4W$K=CL@HYC35K<[<`0ZOS M:O\`7+J"JG<1R7I9QK8[%/XQO](IM$G82NR45#67&,O*TTTK:5/)#@+5/P]V7-#B.WBMN)[&_GN(I)VOD@O8V2M;!:3V[7!T M[)WCRXO*^LSN&#VU88^8`[DEZJ&<=+^D6FYWL>4<+U_-T97;WGZ[,DB6C*<7 M+32L=%UV%&04D'\)C&-76;IHJN5UY20`3',JD@*:(<9I?&,\.HV>AVT[YM.; M/DDG>!FDQI1HVB.IP))<[;4"E?/>.OPXZ-JG`?$O-_7-$MM)XLGT=T]KI=JX M^19F.+.9)`P,:^Z>`7.8UK8H309'/S.3`N['CAG@"O/];E*IC2TU!=_6*-K8 MPHIM36Q]+71UD5Y6:A2,AXOR?*&1":S'IVR0U?J8SO=B*D5(IL@P#V%D: MS;`*F4!G8=1T)4RO4TRXRUT;C&_Q-*[DTG5;#7M*M];TMV?3[J)LC#U.`-.H MBM"-Q!&Y3YV%O1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(1L(2.>\OD&7J])F58AXX M9.\3H=9!0Q/#W"WS6(=-\)+I\/\#V&J^:;`*"GS3.XX@W"&S;09[N, M.Q;4DCV+KGF]J^N-TQ*"Z75:_3GD4NL4!XP(LQ+P)B/P$$AW?+;9J+'-N.HA=8?A M;9HE+0:@2O+O$T46'%R3^&E(J8BE%$92'DXZ4BU4=X*I2,:]0>,#IHU[2/:#A[E[2:C!;76FW-K>4-K+;RL?7$97L<'5 MK[:E7B.Z5:VR?:IU%SUO32:/;'A"":JM%RE3,%IM3RLMB1@#\0C.OR"4H M!O`2;_V;>X^E.DE\F5[:2%H*-Q_7` MG#8R/:*."4]V.;[,O<;Z1I!R]6.-=S+JOTM*";[1G%(MN,J[J5KL8JH/VU&T M!<*$_.U*(\*`/UN'=S#;]FJL#;H/I0EHJNMOPN:K/?\`+1UG/4BSOI(V&M>X MYK):=7?D>>U6J]L"]C4;"$;"$;"$;"$B[N`:Y>[1I]U'JX_T>]LQOJPP86A5 M6=2RH6XK0+M2WR;B:3L5:%N$LBB4D*BS:F`>1O-XC^(?V+^]JSQ;4LX:?N MU#@67Q/?6"LM3+;9]1#6"0L,6D\E[T.D2+=6_5)V9VR>/(H`6F[KB;*DO;Z]%-0$1 M.YD9FJ1F1&\.@4A1$57J:"10#>8P;#I)&BI:I$,;O"[%9AT4^Z9T!ZG;)$4+ M,T5;M(=TG73=C#R&3'\58\42#YR8J3=J?)T"1LW@5'"Y@*12681[4-_VEPVE ML[3XL"H?;2,V8JRZR?,Y-FTD8YVV?Q[]LW>L'[)=)TR?,W:15VKMFZ0.H@Y: MN4#E.FH0PE.0P"`B`[.6=)Q[N6)Y._U)HSBF@N%LN8'U#Z=(\XB`)CD"49TG M/F*(T?W+62QX!42N3J;O#EM,<]=1F\1#B>"T*.[;F=1A,L8D9NQKO7I3^&CCR/AGBF3AC4 M7Y=.U.C6DX!MRTG)U!KZN8>EQ;N"LN:O^U[@/4W6;NN>2G<8VV>N1LJC9X!N MA*L&%T"O(5^S2PUIV9!-=*XPT8T"31270Y[EDDX*)5N893K/7N"].UV%["71 M7#Y?,#FX@/H&DY:@',T"N.)Q7V9Y4?B;XVY4ZE;W.2'4M*M;#[(Z&0%CGVS7 MF6.,3-!(,+W.\JK796O0>!TOEA8Z9?"YO[AUQD= M4,R!K>VA=6A79?&'X_.)N9/!OV?@?38]&LM2MN]<&1TL_E/%#Y561B%Q%07= MXT/=RG%1R]Q_K&BPAJ!HFITHFYF%I*+RKF3PBP&+%,&2+DE`J;P$_P"%Y).E MU)95$VX4T4&AQ#:EY'1EZE[_LEXJEX3'^C^%=-^4XO,(\P/0X*S_MC7?J-A"-A"-A"-A"-A"UE_NMD`2[L+Q7<&]SILPR M<1_?RWMV1W_\!-VV.?QK?;^FKJG8._H^:$/\H7O^.[?MHB],+)-ZA]J;PJDF MLFHBLFFJBJ0Z:J2I"J)JIJ%$ATU$S`)3D.4=P@("`A\-F):U^_NB^TQBO3FK M3M>&G"FQ=#I.3;L./\^8_KC)O'5*+OT\T?RM5R%785J0C.%2MHQSQG+-D")- M?&E;K$("CA839)V93G"V6\N8Y'J2WM/>Y3>[D\NW;FS!9Y"S1]/ICC)NFN3F MWBSV2@ZS"R#./OF+4G3@QUUH.)ZNTDXA$QA!HB+Q(NY(J)"6@?7N':JW,8!S MC8KC>=PO0KE+$^6;MD.ITM:`L$<[5O&6<<4EN_(- M#E32'.=9IP\@@7J,]ION4R/4(Y^TYKBFO5S0\N5LLW047YNQO&S-\B;U-@'5 MTKY^<\N2FJ\*:M+Q?PG&^;AJ23S'".I=:R.-75:,0P'%CAW6C`TH";&O:0[J M4%K)Q`OA#+L\T9ZH:#37[=51XLFCZS5F*BE4B72#'[)'-G:-DR];9D^\!3>[ M3+R5#`CDNK1T,N=OID_I7>_);G!;\+K6$@@T!N&-:0)&_+_>`; M^]3$@?S.]Q/&W;_[7FFBPR2T?9,T6_",`SQ#C(7(`\FI4K$R0V6>33-XB.I% M?6."CMR/"+@X`W1$53[R49;/GN2!A&-JK=\T-*Y;\I-+N9RV37I[%HM[?>YV M/?<-HB8=KOUB`UN)PJZX#TZ96UN9;?:@M0KN[N\=WK(*[RWW)E&K/,@YZO3U M8'88;T^P"G*-;KY.HD*T(9ONAZO&E%T_7;-6_P`>3N+F&TB\MOC_`"V+UAY> M*^2ZR`M%)^HW+'%C M4L=5>G1$$UA17(@\1^Y0,DT2,)CG14$QMX;ZZ/=!8UM-P66WY*1M<&Y>DJ9&%9OMUX)N(>\/.[_#PH*@ M(TNE4^(E8&L8MJ8+E+OA*U#Q+)4Q"&6254*"FV7,W-0NJ]=IP6T5I`VUM8FP MVK!1L;!E8T;.ZT8#L3$6]QJ3N0AXEK::XYE+%%/9VO1K>;C%Y"=@XU5DC(S, M.R2OYYQH;)># M[B-#R?1I:T1M?LU8LG3&$L5NI$SJ\<[D&*K.23`CQJ5=H98JB0*51"Q1"Q#!^\#)O#%$-IJ%&4]!7`\R-CV. M3%60O=-8I%WB91Y:(1JF4`^8B==\0H;MBH1E=T%1R;:]]($IDC(6(:UGJ@W7 M(^*L;GROD&K4.6)=7=7J'7H^L-C2;JM%DHY*P2,]*MFS:)YPR:QUR"5#A.41 MC,",M<^%\J0.19R";W!B;&U1LEYE(B4B&!966KE3CVTE.J00,) M=_'.96+0D617+%9P@Z;J/VW,*4BQ3[`>#6FY26D*9>UE5:S_`-V%_54;?_F/ M$?\`XW?ML4_C[%OM_35P;L%Y6Q(+(C(1KL$EB&Y:R9#\)@'=N$-M$1'EA9IFN\PFAVIB^?-;6D?2]59" MYY]U%XCQC"1R!G"@6&Z0W6GA2_$$8:L,7+NRSSQ3Y$09-'"QA^11VN7L&TA+ M#'$T`6N\[UW=ON'>*S;C73AI1Q_D"5P50;2Z7QG36$#)2.2LZY)DT3PR=X>T MR*3=O(Z+C(Q=5M#,5"G7;I.7#ER9,RP)(9)7F0T&P+;''Y(J_>F?Z=L;$]L] MVZL@:N\]0U^NZN=0.HF. M2O&/L;YB?R,ACS$N,9W>^J7AZ`1=K`(2\_%+)O$&((!'1+!9!%)`%P55&S(\ MW?DQ<5227*_3/5HR08?5KA6OM9=>PI-T8LN:\:IN&\2%W&+1(DV97.NR+A%I M/((%(DJ9=%VFF0%54TK129\'>(*)XLAJWPE*U[MFM3,O<1[MV-.S7C7+%FPI MIE;9:IV)\V2M*>KQ%BR39WD.E;\@$EWR"R*KV"K,$!HV,BS'!FXE"G<.2K!R MB)KD<7R>6-B;$P-A,QVA6*XKL+=HJ,QFWQ8.AO#4E#HQ18Q6RRT8_>Y(>K`W M!%2;=Y'-($N'7EE-ZHN$W:8D5'[!2%`"@XQLK0C%9_.D)K5(6TD:%);M!]_S M&%%/=[79=*.<-,VIEUIYL-TFGTLYJ-9JL&QR5=L7O5G*IF996CK5,KDRK9-` M'[%PWT==OBG:/WNDC%;K%#S)EIRW&W=PA?,@649ME6 M8.F.X-$Y+99YPC063B5<&XD`3$_,W&W@`;5F:U@H-A3+=[I'',=B;9VM>Q5V MR=6/;6TEYJS7@.4L.5,HXE:V"ZW-AEC+,&_E9I:8F6IWY6,7(L9&QS!5*DFD8\M!PJL*Z:^U=6^V+WPJQ@NIO[5(Z0]>FE_.- MVF8=X9(RJC95+F`HH@L)@1ALF M`[I"ETOF15/B!5F;%6@O&6**YD:"A[):W:V0Z1<:*9^H:,:(UQG?F3-K<;%" M0[=ETHMRMKB)CW,J^43.5XM&M_NDRE.51@8!7K6T5;+N0ZOUF61M5CBBNS1<;.%BFA@9QZ1.!%%,GV=^[>(B+&0LM3E`0'EJ>"G8]R=(?D M(F+3CBO#JSM$&[^;JU9:A;)1$"\/*E; ME(^/M*;(@?(-LTSBYX;N6RW;EB M+MZV*L'"QE;A8BNPC-&/AH&+CX6(8-R@1NQC(MHBQ8,T"!N`B+9J@0A0#X`! M=M>Q8:U*[0?D/[?[-A"UG#0/TT?0R+BG5@VC^;7 MRHDX4S1L:3)9.0F(<)#LTA`-Y`VQ#N38;*K>29+?'H7G.^_B3/\`V^.\E9=6 ME+)+5QODO)-4U-X`R=TTZ\`O<8ME"^:JPHNTZ:LCB1JSEKK6(N2R' MA24=CO(O*I+11'-ZJ#50VXWAG+!^1$!'>[.`;Q8R=I\6!6=]NYN+<0K+>*LE M::M5]7IV<,16G$V=:TQ3EBTK(M95KEQZ`>?CR1]B91^>?\-X]VRW M.[M6NUVGL3_NQ)_2%T$_Y&L/\0V#9T7IA(E]0^U-2?5Z`E)*%F9.$B)&8K2S MQS7)5_&LG= M"8_[.*)4G_,R%="_\0;:8?3"R3>H?:G![,2T;"%K$N]<+K`/N%+%DBP\:,4U MS)I*S6V=*[P2/6VD=CE5TX3.;X"DT7K;M,V[X%,B8/V;8IL),5OAH85LYFSI MN];-WC19-RU=(HN6SA$X*(KMW"954%DE"[RG353.!BB'P$!VV[5@7/L(6M6[ MFL>IGKW/$/2Z.4'LB;5%HSIJHM_M"21I41BN2LQS"3?PFC&L>X%01_@Y(B.[ M=MB?C+ATKE;"C/&!-.6KW']LP?GJ@T#-%(450;V2G6)%E++P$FLV*Z M8/45FRQ9JHV)-JL"K5VV5:/4TS\29P*;XZR&NP.-%B:7,-0:*H-K>]H;"+MY M^ZZ`W=O;,=LW.8JUA'55A&7<&")F82 MR3C&O*2SJ-366B'DY6AED9:%F&XGYJ!0!-4[9P7C_)&@0/G_.N>QW;_`-U;QX'^O;+<[`M=KB2%8![$G](703_D:P_Q M#8-G1>F$B7U#[4VK9B6C80NCE+/6H-9-O-V&#AUUD^4JS0ELC:OBK#%,D9.O23.7 MCFT_&5MU)RL1X]@LNU,]C331".$RG$R*O$0X`D%=']O'F3%\ MUVA](L.VR#3AF:/7;G3K7$*V*);R=>GHW)-Q7/&2S!=TFZ8N3L7:#A,#D+S$ M%B*%WD,41T1.:&"I"RS`^8:#>GH,7[&3:I/HUZTD&2X"9!XQ<(NVJQ2F,0PI M.$#J(J`4Y1`=PCN$-VSMN(V)*^O80J;WNO>VM;V.P81K3W'V M?(.$:*.I=SB%>07F:[?D&C1$SEZGCZ:?O$Y$Q>8JG'2!5@`$FJA@SSLKWPM5 MN\`Y#O3(_;Z=T.CZ[]'-#Q?:K9&)ZI-.U2A,?Y+JCQ\BG.6ZKUQHC#4_+,(T M4$JLM$6&&;()R2J/-%I+)JE6X"JH"I>%^9M#X@J7$1C?AX2F\ZI]3^'M'&", MA:B,YVEA5*!CR"=RKM5TX22?STH5!48:I5MHH8%9:T69^4C5BU2`QU%E`$=Q M"G,6[G!H+CN2FM+G!HZ53E]O)HQRGK1UQ9H[TVHRM.8.KS.1S:@G`$WA MO$B4+C!(YP#YB!3+E#?\MY@_?MEN=@6RTVGL5@/L,/&S[M`Z#5FJQ%TT\+E9 M',F8#`1S'6VSL'B!A#Y*-W;8Z9@^8&*(#LZ+TPL\OJ'VINFS$M&PA)G[B_9G MT3=QW,=*R]J7O.7*[;:-CU+'D3$X_P`HPE(B'->+89>QI.G\?(U^6=K2`R$N MN7G$5(4R8%+P[R[]DO$1=WS0^T!;+>*[>W-!$][>EK2?S@*":/M9NSRD7A-9 ML]+#O$1.KJ'B0,)C"(F./)K"11,81WB.[XCM3)!\8?"$_P"SZGN@EI^P[W+@ M<>UE[0YBJ`QO6H>*.IN$QV6H>!^)@#<4QB+U)8IS%`-WQW_#:,D'QA\(4BWU M/]Q+\QWN3R-&6G;!&AG3EC[3!AZ[/Y3'N-B3Y(%_?;G"V"U./,=DEK2_-)RK M5O%-W/!(S*I4@(W3`B(%+\1#>+6OC:*!P^%)=8:@YQ<8)L?D.]RE%YMJG_J: MO?\`?4;_`-IVMYD?QF_"%7^GW_[B;YCOST]RBJW<6"M.&ZZ2B"Z"TM%J MHK(JE$BJ2J1W!B*)*$$0,40$!`=P['F1G:YOPH_IU_\`N)OF.]R0]J([!';A MR]E0,^87N%^T29T3DUII/(.DK*$9CE`)ARH=5U)HU)="4KL.Z=*&WK=*2C2+ M?'F%.(B.RBV`FN8#M3F6NI-%#!*1UL=[ETD3V%=)]ZNU9O.MG6/JK[@B],5BFZE<]LWF-H]RF(""BU0JJ$%XTJ@!N434<\E<@B54BA!$NP&P[2X5]JDVN MH;&6\K1U,=[D^6LKXRI==A:C3W%&J]6K46RA*[6Z^X@H>#@X>.0(UCXN)BF" MC=E'Q[)LF4B2*1"D(0H```&S?,B&QS?A"1_3]0)Q@F^8[W);VH+M-]KG4Q0K MA1,E81QF4]UR1<VS4IBNZ9X&$CK!:DVR=YRE<;8QM>4KP#10RR"$[:79T1;Q23@Y ME21[!%G'E5'F4P?PF`!VMYD?QF_"J_T_4/W$WS'>Y5\ MLE>W6[<^:W\=*YNU%:R+?PAN46P.VN'PA/;;:FP=V"7YCOTOI&T%7ZK7/`NHC4\$ M#4&5L:16';KJ>=6C!YCW%FX:RL@YQF9FP@SR2:SD[I%8H$%-X/.'>?X[2#"T MUS"@ZPEOM-1<.]!+0GXCO5E;/F7DHEO+>*64BE7`$T&[\Z\ST#F!QUPS9'3^'-7O[*P M#B_RX9GQLS.IF=E::5-!4TQHO"8IF>V_EZ^Z@\)PFC:.KNI'31"QMDR-ITO& M)J-6LE/*W.M`=URTTEXK/.*#G*8B#A10HEVK]WM!!HZS@'^4 M*?[S8=/&%+OH8;V:SZJ+HIC?"DK2<;XJ>UJP M7UNP/*O:Y+/YVXP#VM&9QH%6,Z=MB-#`;<10Q@,`2[AW06D#[';X_)"EO.;F MVYI<.)-8P_FI?I+DQ'+=N#-%PU"8?J^C>,AM1^F5I&2.3M-EVQ11:ME3H\^T M![6+)5%7D\I0K;4K4@.]C*,IM1F8QBE5.BLY>G[5+])8`QMJ,[>&9-,$_K"Q/VR,JY"P=5W]UCYZ1K.#L,O[FR5QU) MN8F[+(X[+E`+=*-X!RS6,IX-LNHHDD8Z9#@&T?=[0:5%E!3]D*QYR\VP[*>) M-8KA_P`U-O\`\RS%GNY=M[`=GTF5F0T5,\@_6U,1%9T^SV.\98P?5^Q6BIO&\SI0K^+,V:2:&XR?F#"N4,25:%NS?'G17,U%7 MNINH)_9:K=:=/(MA2:OHR0<@#@Y$EB)*&*03[O:!4C['!4?('N0>D.890&9MX\`E*H!B%C[OZ#A_!08_('N4_WEYM5(^\FL4'\U M-])>T?Y(T,57$NJ[+N2>VA:<=L-'5@2;9:IE M:Y8::K&N5$4082KMXLLW4`$>(BA23]WM!H2;.#`_$'N1_>7FU4!O$FL&O\U- M])=E:BI&C M)%.0;[FB+M632!4#*-BE*<2Q]WM!R9_L<%/V0H_O-S;SY/O)K-?]5+])=^G. M:%FA].DI:>W%::CCS4]/4:N8^RS(8DQ#,T&$DLFPZZ$'G+S;(!=Q)K'5_%2^SXV_8F9Z>#8 MO=X2QC/87JC.DXPN=-@;[3ZRRAD*^6+B;U'-[6BD[A6PF1C9,W5A,[1`1$CD M3@(B(".W+6]O!:Q"&V8V.$;`T`#\R\$UK6]9XBU%^K:]=3WFJ2!H?+,]SY'9 M6AK:N<231H`%3@``LS;/7%*O/WN^O#J=[(!*L:')93=QZ'&"/8$WJL&62"DO MO#C*IQJB,@=EQ#]L$3%/N^0[*DVM]J='X7>Q3;P7H%E\DN$S-*3-=:82L60XANC/R,:Q1E&;;DID.!E!%1+16,!WA)3Z M#S3D\5$ZWN72<3A[N==C++%N48M=&U9M>7,6P\X9VFKCZF9CR)CAI6,+S M,YDO)=NPW1M/E;8(BZM-@SM+93JJM)84MFD!GR]B31:NU@%N',3:I+&$0(!A MVM+0L(WJL!I("5&ONCQV2X7/?MWX24?0SO+\9JG;QLU(V'QKR#=WJ/PE$-;` M[DQC%4G[EJYEDUSB9$X&$1`=^[?M#_&SM5F'!Y_53+]-V@25Q;JWU-Z],QY- M99)U%:CJ14\6],IM66IF,\98EH945(&FUF+?S-BG[%+/7;%NX?RS]T0ZZJ>Y M)NB01`;",9BX^(I9?5H8/"$H#L"XWU!V;1;IVO%+SI$UK"F.=:VJJ?RMB-2J M!$OK96PE,MU\$W&1&TPYL=:88-!39G-+ MS48D#LHLZ]URWPN2=0G8=MV#+)39B'L.N:7>XWLPMG4I0WZ3?%DTC&/$T(=U M%.)"OJF;;DC-%TBJI<)TCB00$23Q-(Z56/POKT+MNUU`"`_OX<11.\`'Y"(;PW_NW[0\? M6-4Q^F[#G6#KU4DZLG0XO' MER.%8D&$D[:$E;`QN,I/M)./CVKPQD'OC&Z2#=L(K[,96@)V45'4S$-&-2H= MZH-*6>F&>=8.O'M,:S6&*@]2<+H(U"R6K'1AIFU M)3%,0Q[+9HP]3;[)TQF"I8Z!?S46DJ[;1`+E*OT19)AWB+& MDEH)VI;@`X@8A2YVLJI6NNS],7U;P1]HO'Q?[N_.^3P;_NN#9;_+J,^U,9YE#DV;]BGS?_3[TAL7G7K'IEY,5Z_X M+SKUORIT\G/X?+?\^^+\!_'X?\?\]_VN+:^&7JHJ"M<-J5YB#]&3Z!\]^EWH M[^G9X>8]<.H^H'H/R^J*=?Y/G3\O\5YEW^+Z)]]UCAX_QG#M1OET[OA5_K/, M_P!XLX0_Z9WT$AU+TC_3YZ"3POK3UOTF\M[T.C]']:OQG2>+E=#\)]WQ7N4NS_K?H_0NWUO_IB>MV!_K8Z5ZX=2)]-G6O6S MKGF?F*<7I'Y"_+O/>[^_Z7^<.O>7?#)<7AO*'\^^,\/P\7A/QWSW_'BVLECJ24L;?H1_3_ M`)"]'.G?3)XZU^IOI=]6?H[U'D_SSYK\H_RMXSD?[V\1]OAW^(_;LKZNAZ*X M[4UWFYAF\5.I9QSU^CY_])O6GR/R/*5(^@GI?K)TWH?16GD?T(]/OR_S)Y9DP\"\?K*_2Q^I## M?UB]-^I/QZ/T^=:]=_,G7?"H<[T:\E?E/F;P?*\=T/\`'\O@\3\.':'9*][: MAGF93D\.]2CUI_29]-UF^L[P_P!-7AD//77O4+ROT;ISWC\]^2OS/RIT_F^- MZI^6[MWB?M<&TORT[VQ59FS#+XE#>Q_I%_I]0GF?H7Z='&7I74O7OT=OJ?]'_/?4X_T8\D^>?_`(QYO5/"]"X_PW'R^1\.'8^K4=ZA7M<_?I+^ MH>9O53H'G3<7ZI?3#UNZ3X3M6'F M;NCJV)K%.\I>4:OY!\O^1?+L)Y+\I]/\J^5.FMO+OEGI/Y5Y?Z1R?!^%_#^' -X.7]C=LQ+7I-A"__V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 6 g529404ex99_2logo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g529404ex99_2logo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````9```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$" M`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#_\``$0@`'`#=`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`+T```(#``,``P`````` M``````D*``<(!`4&`0(#`0`"`P`#`0$!`````````````P$"!`4&!P@)"A`` M``0$!`8!`08#`@<1`````P0%!@$"!P@4%187`!$2$Q@)&20A(B,E)B7MR@X>!$``0,"`P0'!08$!P```````0`1 M`A(#(3$$02(3!5%A<8&A,@9"(S,4%;'14F('"/"1P>&"0S1$)A<)_]H`#`,! M``(1`Q$`/P!X2MM>&[1D@F%QBDSC>CD%D+-1FE3LA$PI""'R*5*>4C\2YV9) M1)555*E.](7-&C)PT`4)EC9P<$N)(!D:8XE9M7K-+H-.=5K)B%@$!\R92(C& M,0,93E(@1B'))5#JE9U0DOI;:?%UE&:9OM579VQ"GB.R"RG,A.61JSON"`XU M1QO$T=D.09T,?WS`2,&.7A&8.26/V<<==YIRZS?&FNW[<;YG32^(E36QZ-W> MQ;!=VY;Z$]9\UY3+GFAY5KI\KCIQ?X@MFDVC?&F$X$?$''(M$6ZS&>!9>L2K MC3S.0ZE-9=3SL$Z!$RL-]14G!(033$5,MU*A! M64"@,38,YL(B7%#&GW0D+EL7H$2M2`((Q#'(]AV')=/U4_D>:RY)KHSL8#0E-<0B*HAG5I((*-\=]7LM]6B"D7`UXII;O>99P5<2,@U5>%! M&R_:$5SI&`OGRJ2E.%19KQJ!5ME.9OFU0X&5#%"/D_K!`@1YBTHT@_$RG.WB M6,56$+=S")(GU[4;"AM:J=7&T>IK7>D:\&YJ:599R&^66MAAS`3G4->)!G"L M#143\4BHE(SQ!-%Y^0A MM236M:8)XA;\]:=T_J7.?21$URU28*[4IGETT$^"(ME3C4;CZIRJFC9Y-A.& M7%D5`I2XLT)YI!(0C)&"[89J8TOO9)>^P:_CV=7O777[6MJ52[.Z5'+%ZA`T M\//-(MJJF]`*F'1G<_VK*JED52N7;D[7)0T+$?M3#G!/JH2=7X<9IE1E.1,7 M&"=.-N,00#B.E6!6[VO7:^M"Y"C=+_9I2RBCFMAN!<6CZ=WHVT2O5J)C3LBAP3NZ:+P-1+&0`I,Y0($V8[5`MQG$FV]0 MV%,2AB!C!ABA"2"A"R2B!"AS2SAB!SRPFD$#GEC&6>2>6,(PC"/*,.&I*^_` MA3@0IP(4X$*<"%.!"G`A3@0IP(4X$*<"%.!"G`A+_/NN@*K[GK:Z6N\W*`VS M\:T+*.5.S2Q)&G@R64YZ?4R3X]V$83P0S)5VJ1(/^$JFXYA(0[D@4TNNS:)T MEV\,W;K8-]^*\2]6>H8#]9?3?I;5R;0C37]3&)\L]1.%^W;,AM-N,)"WT2N$ MYLP5_8\_GBD7!W#A*,ZBWW)6^HKVW`FB(8(3BTRIF\E2FU,J?R0Z@I14D=,9 MLJVHS\HP/8TG+S[(<8"_,/J_5:BUS35QE5"[JKL^(<0]NW(V[<.L-"N735$9 M+^B3]MW(N3\Q]!\@O6A;U'+N0Z#3C2!HSIUNML0UFMU9S:X)Z@Z:R,.'PKQ; MB2>)0+CZ\*;$]*EEU7GD3@6J(WGK00@S$]2#F`'<28@JR\V%5.&+"0D%,(K_ M`*#)ZH5/!\NV83E&>$81EGAQ[[Z#.HUGI_1_,`B9TP!?\(W8GOB`0OQ(_P#0 M#6\J]!?J'S[F'(KL3=TWJFW>TYA+*_,F_J+0(S`$M19N#(BJ)Z$?>VU;4UVB MS,&6#HZFH).HF@*IFYIYSJH$Q'8NLDHJ*`@DTTXJDHDV^&.8GC'G..)/-_/C ME0"`QS&'\E$9QNPC=B&C.(D!T"0!;N=*MUXJY2VAO]6,QZAUB?[3IBQ2=CX2 M4>=[W6R+=;A-26&B]RB43-JZD*`2*C'QX=`7Z;V!TCNQM-J1Z^+"RRO>_DLZ_V/3)MA.YON%9>51Z MF)14>GS:`D)HTP!<(=2D$!%%@9,=DN#,)&;DQ*-$,2>A5M0,95SPB.E6QZVG MC7:C--&/ZJ;6DBE+V?M@E)&:CWC7'514W,=H\RJX52$6:A[$4S:[+F(N2I3J M2IULR*HG!5%&3T4@"#)/$,B94R\RK*`$1..,53%-?8#=Y7^A2'>K02B-&';:\Z:U3LA M!IZ<<+_&N*$HTBUQGHH[:VFQT5-.LP-=2\K4'!!FRE)A0D8&6$ZM$U"8OQ47 M)&-<1NOWYJ3",942.\W*^2E;"XUD$1R*AL15(\YY<4BQ`&B$%.-+":#.8B9,&!1 M&$)$1*"X: MVH#1K8!4RX&ZQ*:ZX7MRI(@E6ZM-")0M5,^0*MYVJY=.D0AB'Q1:]R\YX%L`C"/F\BZ6F7L0IWZS*4TZH`IIC@M*/U^IW M56H3NJ2&>`;-/U4O3D5J/-O(#='DG7E%>(S#RGBAN8"0G/",P4PL(R37,I"8 M@&R2A&)A67=UW=N/MWIV\J.7TO6Z1FAVY/[UK/5RL:[!O)CBC4%G!"(I$^H( M#HI8ZHI+;/.Q'J"`FB2)1(P1)J.,FD+SR1B('//(N8$RS"F5H@QIQ$A@OB>[ M'V6+-LY2]!G6FT1-,8\T0ZNIUHB[4%Z$KI5:CHJ=!P%>3^)(QNEB76E3:D93 MX;4F3#)0(Q/*GS*TQGG'@JN$5,&Z-J*;8E227Z=BINZ3W+G6C8_:S[`+2F93 MJK]%;CJGTQH^.@5+6W2S'TS7E5!U&&?`%2+MY,<">":IXO)1XHMD!(RB"#@P MPPTP<99YXE1A)P1_1:#;WL*J@P[_FOZZ;G*7,)M5(K;1]T5>ME MK)2YUKZ]32HP3,#59W2R7HUG*B)3H8#K0P48P:E[1M6*'2LD.@4(6>4.,UFJ M@Y[%!@#"N.0.*INU*_N_.[:H5\U*&92"TIL/6Q^NAN@BP*Y:@5A$;E3'$72C M:F77$@\FLH90::,<@6EDC(.5/C`]SGRGZ>4T"5^]AE MS%"O5>\+\G-;BSFE6ZB1%R&J\6YOIU.@BFIYQC/Y6IRYTQB/A,;YH19+*2B5 M+*B&ISDYB"DD&)!99H0%DFA)E*BH#'K1&$97*'P*Z$Q[-*X42JC8*@7449I@ M%2/V)FVLRZ6U1HD]76IJE,*P/)J)3J:['J8RGHVDZ*BWW#(K0*@+:8HZ87W73%*#V]&+9+5UAX[;)%07)55 MH5JJVVJ:H#>)/!?!+)K<7&F10E6H45F MDA.1G.4!(`(E"$9F!)6QZM7G/]7NHI/9?;*A4^W:?EN*S=H['G7.5U%&FRJ/ MDG2CL1NI)!E-H5)=3I?[N=RQ-*(7F.IP"*0(CCCQ&$G!+S6,BX$%"8Y*2+'.2T-^W;E*S>^%/IR!R7SO M^O'H+GO/;&@]:^CQ.7JCDTZA"&,[EH2X@,`V].U-Y"&9?+\VTUK4STX$8Z35W)"X!*/NC.W5"Y@0TH&0D)A8*N M(J`^?;Q>;2M(I2U%@>QBWEV03V"/,GCHB57EZ(YDN,LRM4(<`"4X179$T`A. M9EEB5:[4#,J1R)>:$'N3I,I1+95*6-"FU/&JRYSV:'49.C M%95NF8."NXE,R85W*L2!31C$`-6,::.\]TS!B2S230Z1.?VPX1_N M.Y/'^F[TVZ4(D4\*()`F5(@QFC-$(H7!+!1FC_&:(8,DDG5'^WEQH6=+?>A) M6,LNX#W-V[U(&@5KXU?8I4*KKG)J<\`UQQ4\JP6#'I^[RP8\93:@WSI%&FF` M'EA,%(&9!^V'=DYIM8&0.;I][RPD,C'[%Z*Z!(./[^H\]<,E.@IS2S0BS>Y! M^7`*R;+WPFU2]]9ZSJ>)KI&`ZI24'`]AQX$0!XRS"33S"R2QEEC-`E\8-L"( MX6)/MD%@"O-O5;/5;3PS[6_4Y=2NKUB#T>+(KE5NQ:I$HRW3=59]9GHW4U=4 MJ4CG9A1T(=0A6B17H'`B/7"EPG9&D_NC!]73-#^48<7O?"*78^*` MB]T-_P"Y2C__`)6T_P#^R:1PP9)9S5I<2H2COHBD3UGVU>_T,Z3*G@1+DBPT MH9PJ"8DA$*L=P($8]`\D\LLW5+_CY?X.$6O/+M6F]A;AV)MT```L%(`6!"+@ M!2](8(`<@00F0,.$LDDO./\`"$.'K,EG[T4^O:G[^:2A6Q.BG+4KD5]0 M-:S=/SM5F@K/1C'UZ2N"M!,1UI.1'":@6J'V(2]4$1FU:_IX[Z*J4F0WY&[@Y=.WZD>U)NOM<+.&J8] M:*7UC;YBK2>L$TE)0":=39*3P)59"(%4\`F1191I)HBC`&A8T+&T2,WQ3(EK MX!\K8=AR3M-&:LTZJ;0.F=;&8OHQBESRI:UZ@H3A!-EI$4%HJ39*+0)L8UUP M+E"Z,N'B'/+/"6,DT(:8D$`C)92"#3M2&QML.5*]![-=Y0K.AL:M M'O50*K6[AJI$>=."I*XJT&4QF+)9/E&)#&&VHK3?.FP0PQ`(&"\_6&)+`66? MC,`>%AD9+9@;_9!O!-XLWUX*Z]?>@^PNYVL9"KU8*84P5J16^,5B4[GI=2:C M#9<\RCK)SZGSA7&F51V@(U*EI;674)YJK;=;D.--9J M`W2:^BMPPG3"(9\E&,@W(646282694`92D';>3ID",''LHHGO??#.=WIU]EA M)L.-(<1ABTW,,IY`(Y\`[,W7:76:>KAIM*@@$10RBT527`2&%`FYB`P,R0GA M";G+!DR\"R79'O8NAS,296&]DWJRIE[$U=(=]*BUL;.JEZN7$PDLW32E0=R" M)3MLD7RV:UMQ5677_QJ?4/]($M+#_+'AE[X4NQ4L?&CVK3WK[_`/H7 M9+_^1[TH&OHBGD$]/%YL9.73&XOV'1_MA&$XZE/+_J3 MPX5;^&>].O?$'8%^'H,H!5YPV&>IFX0O<.OC4:I0S[CA710-;2F:D-%.U6H5 M=9R4Z$%PH#53W>><,R7-P!$M.(F7B6D%2$S`-(/;)Q'8A^2^PSVH MS>NT:B.=TZA[&P?::5]37D'%'3=$B*1E&-NS>J0EDFG(J8*`4R^^YSY?SY<:%G#OAF@X5>^-+6,-5X_-<.%_P!(M"8K`X<;IPGD+^NL MGPO=[6%^B[/5V/PN'0^:I]UQ*.JIET;U!_UG]0_Y1]"^K;?F/EN+_BKWLOQ; M'ZT0FVOQE[4^R>"U%IXIB\]S?7ND^^!AL+JC\UT-F'3VUW?Q7<=)\G\I;^G<'Z?3[O@T\)OR4;C=BT#4+":!?&/U;@=(.7&:!S77>$ MR8[B-%9%^>:M[//+<']7C.WV?Q.G@.2>E`?]B=YF)V*^8#Y%-/!8#'>?_EKI MK1P_1V^?ZNR/1'=ZN7T>!Z^?W>KC-[JKVJ_%:_>T>SP^YDV9;[E.Q]*LBWRS?S5F]6"R\'L;HZZ_66M^WRS#,_K<1U=W[W/A\6I#.W6LLG?%G0K+U? MC[\RV3AM]/DLV_C@?`W4GDKLKW0^K>S(/VUVKQ'8PFX7TW=[.`^_T<4G16,Z M^I7C73^1]N7\=BO:P?PMQ=QFR^Y/D7G2)YA^1VMO+[-<@'T-NGKC]1:0TKUZ M5R+](X3N91]O?XM"EBSOMZ43JP?+8V2'>QOBHRBD.E_,'X^MYFAM7G^[WQI; MR:U*Z%Z]8?G^C=Y^U@%^[PSI?N5CQ,7:IN];C]Q_AMXK*7G M]Y$>)^("W5V4W$TCA=1-+3>\&VGY[DFLLNROJ_"S#^/%[M%/O'I46JJMQJNM M;7M"TCX[4ST#O3H;))='>0.?;H:8[PF19SJC]09?E?:R_%_CX#M=?V\^+19L M,E2;U%V?J7&O%TWX^O35ODMD.*:V,\0]RM_>K52-AM&[1_K[#8GHS/!?9E>( M[OX/7P3:G%VZD0\P9N_)+`6L_"EOG5_PV^6_R'U(!Y'[,^>FX.>:V.XG??"_ MC]>M,;B\Y^]W\5U?[]PD<-]VJK:S^*?/BT[]-/=X)QSC0LR!C4+P5^8%@:B\ MS?D*V]*[?Y'NQMCXY:A*:@P.#_;/8[6'_&`%^0C*-P?#3GMZLXK?G/OV'SK*-[W_#. M)%%9;/;T(/$H#Y;.E98:/Q5[+OG9?Y#?C'SERZ_V?W]^/W)\P-[D9+@_W4V) MQ^+U#H_]#=O%=[Z?$<5W&+/1X?>K'B58MQ/%:D]H7QA^-UJOE!O)XB:CIMX[ M>*>NMF-9=I)V%PVRGTV/PW3I'E]#V^[V_P"[Q:5##.GJ46^)4:6J8N_BC"TZ M[.RK<[6[G8T/+T;BXW>KMY>+RU'C/S#7'+^/<_$Q'3S^WA@R2CFEY[7/CPW: MO"\4/E8WLW"`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`FGOE_P`Z8[_DO@]WP_R^ ..+_>H]YQ/S-U,WV,O_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 7 g529404topline.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g529404topline.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````9```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$" M`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#_\``$0@`!0+&`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`'D``0`#```````````` M```````'"`H!`0`"`P`````````````````#!@0%!Q```00"`@,!`0$````` M````!P`45@F6UP$$`@,&!0@5$0```PD!`0`!`P,%````````!`8149'1`@,3 M4Y/3`1(A,05!@10B,G(S%O_:``P#`0`"$0,1`#\`TO\`])=,N^PX$'S^=^AM M"Z?XOE^E^=S^?U@7\<./TA-ZO7_@?D\>SCXSN_L_=?E?I]CH<^_CRY]_/NZ_ MJ\N.WS[N...?'CCRYX&K:/YWZHC7TK=6-)?\Z6?"=JQ46_V4_P#3]KO4U??C M?W;3\_U_E\_;]1J3/R]F^_C],_/^/SY]^?V;]^"$V!XE5S6`"/92KV-1[E_Q M+^X@9?>RDQJ/Y?\`$O[@R^\Y"F8,#Q*KFL`$>RDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7 MWG(4S!@>)5)5RDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_P")?W!E]YR%,P8' MB57-8`(]E)C4>Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7WG(4S!@>)5 M)5< MU@`CV4F-1[E_Q+^X,OO.0IF#`\2JYK`!'LI,:CW+_B7]P9?>RDQJ/RDQJ/Y?\`$O[@R^\Y"F8,#Q*KFL`$>RDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7WG(4S!@>)5)5RDQJ/Y?\2_N M#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_P")?W!E]YR%,P8'B57-8`(]E)C4>Y?\2_N# M+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7WG(4S!@>)5)5RDQJ/RDQJ/Y?\`$O[@R^\Y"F8, M#Q*KFL`$>RDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$ MJN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7WG(4S!@>)5)5 MRDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3 M&H]R_P")?W!E]YR%,P8'B57-8`(]E)C4>Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3& MH]R_XE_<&7WG(4S!@>)5)5RDQJ/RDQJ/Y?\`$O[@R^\Y"F8,#Q*KFL`$>RDQJ/Y?\2_N#+[SD*9@P/$JN:P`1[*3&H]R_XE_<&7 MWG(4S!@>)5)5RDQJ/